Page last updated: 2024-10-30

loperamide and Fecal Incontinence

loperamide has been researched along with Fecal Incontinence in 35 studies

Loperamide: One of the long-acting synthetic ANTIDIARRHEALS; it is not significantly absorbed from the gut, and has no effect on the adrenergic system or central nervous system, but may antagonize histamine and interfere with acetylcholine release locally.
loperamide : A synthetic piperidine derivative, effective against diarrhoea resulting from gastroenteritis or inflammatory bowel disease.

Fecal Incontinence: Failure of voluntary control of the anal sphincters, with involuntary passage of feces and flatus.

Research Excerpts

ExcerptRelevanceReference
"The purpose of this study was to examine the effectiveness and tolerability of loperamide compared with psyllium for reducing fecal incontinence."9.20Loperamide Versus Psyllium Fiber for Treatment of Fecal Incontinence: The Fecal Incontinence Prescription (Rx) Management (FIRM) Randomized Clinical Trial. ( Beasley, TM; Burgio, KL; Goode, PS; Markland, AD; Redden, DT; Richter, HE; Whitehead, WE; Wilcox, CM, 2015)
"To evaluate the efficacy of methylcellulose (Citrucel) and loperamide (Imodium) in managing fecal incontinence by comparing cure rates with expectant management."9.14Efficacy of methylcellulose and loperamide in managing fecal incontinence. ( Hobbs, G; Sze, EH, 2009)
"We have investigated the effect of loperamide (4 mg tds) on the continence to a standard volume of rectally infused saline and anorectal manometry in 26 patients complaining of chronic diarrhea complicated by fecal incontinence and severe urgency."9.05Effects of loperamide on anal sphincter function in patients complaining of chronic diarrhea with fecal incontinence and urgency. ( Barber, DC; Duthie, HL; Read, M; Read, NW, 1982)
"The purpose of this study was to examine the effectiveness and tolerability of loperamide compared with psyllium for reducing fecal incontinence."5.20Loperamide Versus Psyllium Fiber for Treatment of Fecal Incontinence: The Fecal Incontinence Prescription (Rx) Management (FIRM) Randomized Clinical Trial. ( Beasley, TM; Burgio, KL; Goode, PS; Markland, AD; Redden, DT; Richter, HE; Whitehead, WE; Wilcox, CM, 2015)
"To evaluate the efficacy of methylcellulose (Citrucel) and loperamide (Imodium) in managing fecal incontinence by comparing cure rates with expectant management."5.14Efficacy of methylcellulose and loperamide in managing fecal incontinence. ( Hobbs, G; Sze, EH, 2009)
"We have investigated the effect of loperamide (4 mg tds) on the continence to a standard volume of rectally infused saline and anorectal manometry in 26 patients complaining of chronic diarrhea complicated by fecal incontinence and severe urgency."5.05Effects of loperamide on anal sphincter function in patients complaining of chronic diarrhea with fecal incontinence and urgency. ( Barber, DC; Duthie, HL; Read, M; Read, NW, 1982)
"Loperamide is an effective therapy for a variety of diarrheal syndromes, including acute, nonspecific (infectious) diarrhea; traveler's diarrhea; and chemotherapy-related and protease inhibitor?associated diarrhea."4.84The role of loperamide in gastrointestinal disorders. ( Hanauer, SB, 2008)
"Loperamide treatment for fecal incontinence does not worsen constipation symptoms among women with normal consistency stool."2.94Impact of treatment for fecal incontinence on constipation symptoms. ( Andy, UU; Carper, B; Dyer, KY; Gantz, MG; Jelovsek, JE; Korbly, NB; Mazloomdoost, D; Meyer, I; Rogers, RG; Sassani, JC, 2020)
"Constipation was the most common grade 3 or higher adverse event and was reported by two (2%) of 86 participants in the loperamide and biofeedback group and two (2%) of 88 in the loperamide plus education group."2.90Controlling faecal incontinence in women by performing anal exercises with biofeedback or loperamide: a randomised clinical trial. ( Barber, MD; Carper, B; Dyer, K; Gantz, MG; Jelovsek, JE; Markland, AD; Meikle, SF; Newman, DK; Rogers, RG; Sung, VW; Sutkin, G; Visco, AG; Whitehead, WE; Zyczynski, HM, 2019)
"Loperamide has beneficial effects on stool consistency and continence in obese subjects taking orlistat."2.71The effects of loperamide on continence problems and anorectal function in obese subjects taking orlistat. ( Fox, M; Fried, M; Menne, D; Schwizer, W; Stutz, B; Thumshirn, M, 2005)
"Conservative treatment of fecal incontinence and obstructive defecation can be treated by many conservative treatment modalities."2.49[Pelvic floor and anal incontinence. Conservative therapy]. ( Kroesen, AJ, 2013)
"Fecal incontinence is an inability to defer release of gas or stool from the anus and rectum by mechanisms of voluntary control."2.41Recent concepts in fecal incontinence. ( Douglas, JM; Smith, LE, 2001)
"Organic fecal incontinence is a consequence of congenital malformations affecting the anorectum, anal sphincters, or the spinal cord."2.41Fecal incontinence in anorectal malformations, neuropathy, and miscellaneous conditions. ( Rintala, RJ, 2002)
"Recently, the number of patients with spina bifida requiring management for fecal incontinence has increased."1.51Bowel management program in patients with spina bifida. ( Bischoff, A; Edmonds, T; Hall, J; Jacobson, R; Ketzer, J; Peña, A; Schletker, J; Trecartin, A, 2019)
"Ulcerative colitis is an illness that occurs unexpectedly in a young patient, with a generally unpredictable prognosis, and there is no medication to cure it."1.29[Functional results of ileo-anal anastomosis. The point of view of the gastroenterologist]. ( Bigard, MA, 1993)

Research

Studies (35)

TimeframeStudies, this research(%)All Research%
pre-19908 (22.86)18.7374
1990's6 (17.14)18.2507
2000's8 (22.86)29.6817
2010's11 (31.43)24.3611
2020's2 (5.71)2.80

Authors

AuthorsStudies
Kako, J1
Ishiki, H1
Kajiwara, K1
Jelovsek, JE4
Du, T1
Meng, Q1
McKenna, NP1
Andy, UU1
Carper, B2
Meyer, I2
Dyer, KY2
Rogers, RG3
Mazloomdoost, D2
Korbly, NB1
Sassani, JC1
Gantz, MG3
Richter, HE3
Iyer, P1
Newman, DK2
Bradley, MS1
Harm-Ernandes, I1
Wohlrab, K1
Schletker, J1
Edmonds, T1
Jacobson, R1
Ketzer, J1
Hall, J1
Trecartin, A1
Peña, A1
Bischoff, A1
Knowles, CH1
Markland, AD3
Whitehead, WE2
Barber, MD1
Dyer, K1
Visco, AG1
Sutkin, G1
Zyczynski, HM1
Meikle, SF1
Sung, VW1
Vitton, V1
Soudan, D1
Siproudhis, L1
Abramowitz, L1
Bouvier, M1
Faucheron, JL1
Leroi, AM1
Meurette, G1
Pigot, F1
Damon, H1
Sjödahl, J1
Walter, SA1
Johansson, E1
Ingemansson, A1
Ryn, AK1
Hallböök, O1
Burgio, KL2
Wilcox, CM1
Redden, DT2
Beasley, TM1
Goode, PS2
Wheeler, TL1
Sze, EH1
Hobbs, G1
Kroesen, AJ1
Douglas, JM1
Smith, LE1
Wiesel, PH1
Cuypers, P1
Meuwly, JY1
Kuntzer, T1
Givel, JC1
Fox, M1
Stutz, B1
Menne, D1
Fried, M1
Schwizer, W1
Thumshirn, M1
Lauti, M1
Scott, D1
Thompson-Fawcett, MW1
Hanauer, SB1
Robertson, HD1
Read, M1
Read, NW2
Barber, DC1
Duthie, HL1
Kekomäki, M1
Vilkki, P1
Gordin, A1
Salo, H1
Kasahara, M1
Faacks, N1
Shelton, D1
Hallgren, T1
Fasth, S1
Delbro, DS1
Nordgren, S1
Oresland, T1
Hultén, L1
Bigard, MA1
Sun, WM1
Verlinden, M1
Nessim, A1
Wexner, SD1
Agachan, F1
Alabaz, O1
Weiss, EG1
Nogueras, JJ1
Daniel, N1
Billotti, VL1
Rintala, RJ1
Nixon, HH1
Hiltunen, KM1
Matikainen, M1
Szüle, E1
Schiller, LR1
Arnbjörnsson, E1
Breland, U1
Kullendorff, CM1
Okmian, L1
Ling, L1

Clinical Trials (5)

Trial Overview

TrialPhaseEnrollmentStudy TypeStart DateStatus
Refractory Overactive Bladder: Sacral NEuromodulation v. BoTulinum Toxin Assessment (ROSETTA)[NCT01502956]Phase 3386 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-02-29Completed
Controlling Anal Incontinence by Performing Anal Exercises With Biofeedback or Loperamide (CAPABLe): a Randomized Placebo Controlled Trial[NCT02008565]Phase 3300 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-02-28Completed
Treatment of Diarrhea-Associated Fecal Incontinence With Eluxadoline[NCT03489265]Phase 20 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-04-30Withdrawn (stopped due to Difficult to recruit severely affected patients with fecal incontinence)
The Safety and Efficacy of 5-HT3 Receptor Antagonist (Ramosetron) Versus Psyllium (Agio®) for the Treatment of Fecal Incontinence: Multicenter Randomized Trial (SERAFI)[NCT06166615]Phase 2/Phase 3148 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-12-15Not yet recruiting
Antimuscarinic Medication for Urgency Urinary Incontinence in Women With Dual Incontinence (Darifenacin for Treatment of Women With Dual Incontinence)[NCT03543566]32 participants (Actual)Observational2018-05-21Completed
[information is prepared from clinicaltrials.gov, extracted Sep-2024]

Trial Outcomes

Number of Urge Urinary Incontinence (UUI) Episodes

The primary outcome is the change from baseline in mean number of UUI episodes over the first 6-month visit period (1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6 month assessments); and is measured using 3-day bladder diaries administered monthly for the first 6 month visit period. (NCT01502956)
Timeframe: 6 Months

InterventionUUI episodes (Mean)
InterStim® Device-3.25
Botox® Injection-3.89

Quality of Life (HUI-3)

Change from baseline in quality of life measures over the first 6 month visit period (6 month assessment) as measured by the Health Utility Index, Version 3 (HUI-3). The HUI 3 scale has a range from 0 to 1 with higher scores representing better health. (NCT01502956)
Timeframe: 6 Months

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
InterStim® Device-0.006
Botox® Injection-0.011

Quality of Life (IIQ-SF)

Change from baseline in quality of life measures over the first 6 month visit period (6 month assessment) as measured by the change in the mean Incontinence Impact Questionnaire short form (IIQ-SF) score. The IIQ-SF scale has a range from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating a worse quality of life. (NCT01502956)
Timeframe: 6 Months

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
InterStim® Device-10.4
Botox® Injection-12.4

Quality of Life (UDI-SF)

Change from baseline in quality of life measures over the first 6 month visit period (6 month assessment) as measured by the change in mean Urinary Distress Inventory Short Form (UDI-SF) score. The UDI-SF scale has a range from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating greater distress. (NCT01502956)
Timeframe: 6 Months

Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
InterStim® Device-8.6
Botox® Injection-10.0

Treatment Satisfaction (OAB-SATq Treatment Preference)

"Treatment preference as measured by the Overactive Bladder Satisfaction of Treatment Questionnaire (OAB-SATq) at 6 months (6 month assessment).OAB-SATq treatment preference is a binary outcome that is classified as yes if a participant answers either Slight preference for the treatment I am receiving now or Definitely prefer the treatment I am receiving now to the question Do you prefer the treatment that you received since entering this study to the treatment you received before the study?" (NCT01502956)
Timeframe: 6 Months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
InterStim® Device89
Botox® Injection113

Change in Overactive Bladder

Change in mean Overactive Bladder Questionnaire Short Form (OABq-SF) score throughout baseline to the first 6-month visit (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6-month assessments). Values range from 0 to 100 with higher scores on the symptom scale indicating greater severity of symptoms and higher scores on the quality of life scale indicating a better quality of life. (NCT01502956)
Timeframe: 6 Months

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
OABq-SF Symptom BotherOABq-SF Quality of Life
Botox® Injection-46.741.6
InterStim® Device-38.638.1

Number of Participants With Improvement of Bladder Function and Urinary Leakage

Proportion of subjects who report adequate improvement of their bladder function and urinary leakage with the Patient Global Impression of Improvement Questionnaire (PGI-I) at 6 months. Adequate improvement is defined as a rating of 1, 2, or 3 (better) on the patient-reported measure of perceived improvement with treatment on a scale of 1 (very much better) to 7 (very much worse). (NCT01502956)
Timeframe: 6 Months

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Urinary leakageBladder function
Botox® Injection101100
InterStim® Device9192

Severity of Urge Incontinence Symptoms

Severity of urge incontinence symptoms at 6 month visit period as measured by the Sandvik questionnaire. The Sandvik score is a patient-reported measure of incontinence severity as assessed on a scale of slight (1-2), moderate (3-6), severe (8-9), very severe (12) to severe (10-12) using a standard scoring algorithm. (NCT01502956)
Timeframe: 6 Months

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Sandvik SlightSandvik ModerateSandvik SevereSandvik Very Severe
Botox® Injection29332836
InterStim® Device23332444

Treatment Satisfaction (OAB-SATq Treatment Satisfaction, Adverse Effects, Treatment Endorsement, and Convenience)

Treatment satisfaction as measured by the mean Overactive Bladder Satisfaction of Treatment Questionnaire (OAB-SATq) score at 6 months (6 month assessment). The OAB-SATq score ranges from 0 to 100 and includes 5 subscales: treatment satisfaction, side effects, treatment endorsement, convenience, and treatment preference, with higher scores reflecting better satisfaction. (NCT01502956)
Timeframe: 6 months

,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
OAB-SATq Treatment SatisfactionOAB-SATq Adverse EffectsOAB-SATq EndorsementOAB-SATq Convenience
Botox® Injection67.788.478.167.6
InterStim® Device59.885.167.670.2

Urinary Frequency and Nocturia

Change in mean number of urinary incontinence episodes (any type) and nocturia episodes from baseline over the first 6-month visit period (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6-month assessments) as measured by the 3 day bladder diary. (NCT01502956)
Timeframe: 6 Months

,
InterventionNumber of episodes (Mean)
Incontinence episodes (any)Nocturia episodes
Botox® Injection-4.02-0.40
InterStim® Device-3.50-0.26

Change From Baseline Accident-free Days at 12 and 24 Weeks

Based on data collected from participant-completed diaries at baseline and 12 and 24 weeks, the outcome variable is computed as the difference in number of accident-free days at 12 and 24 weeks and the number of accident-free days at baseline. Only valid diaries were included in the analyses (e.g. completion of all 7 days for baseline and at least 3 complete days, not necessarily consecutive, for follow-up diaries). (NCT02008565)
Timeframe: 12 and 24 weeks

,,,
Interventionaccident-free days (Mean)
12 Weeks24 Weeks
Loperamide - Education Only1.71.7
Loperamide - Exercise Plus Biofeedback1.82.5
Placebo - Education Only1.42.1
Placebo - Exercise Plus Biofeedback1.91.9

Change From Baseline Maximum Anal Pressures During Squeeze With the Catheter at the HPZ at 12 and 24 Weeks

Based on data collected from the manometry form, the outcome variable will be computed as the difference in maximum anal pressures during squeeze with the catheter at the high pressure zone (HPZ) at 12 and 24 weeks and maximum anal pressures during squeeze with the catheter at the HPZ at baseline. (NCT02008565)
Timeframe: 12 and 24 weeks

,,,
Interventionmax. anal canal pressure squeeze (mmHg) (Mean)
12 Week Maximum Anal Canal Pressure (Squeeze)24 Week Maximum Anal Canal Pressure (Squeeze)
Loperamide - Education Only73.667.1
Loperamide - Exercise Plus Biofeedback83.083.0
Placebo - Education Only73.172.7
Placebo - Exercise Plus Biofeedback76.374.6

Change From Baseline Pad-change Leaks Per Day at 12 and 24 Weeks

Based on data collected from participant-completed diaries at baseline and 12 and 24 weeks, the outcome variable is computed as the difference in number of fecal incontinence episodes per day resulting in a change in pad, clothes or underwear at 12 and 24 weeks and the number of fecal incontinence episodes resulting in a change in pad, clothes or underwear at baseline. Only valid diaries were included in the analyses (e.g. completion of all 7 days for baseline and at least 3 complete days, not necessarily consecutive, for follow-up diaries). (NCT02008565)
Timeframe: 12 and 24 weeks

,,,
Interventionpad-change leaks per day (Mean)
12 Weeks24 Weeks
Loperamide - Education Only-0.3-0.4
Loperamide - Exercise Plus Biofeedback-0.4-0.5
Placebo - Education Only-0.2-0.4
Placebo - Exercise Plus Biofeedback-0.2-0.1

Change From Baseline Pad-change Leaks Per Week at 12 and 24 Weeks

Based on data collected from participant-completed diaries at baseline and 12 and 24 weeks, the outcome variable is computed as the difference in number of fecal incontinence episodes per week resulting in a change in pad, clothes or underwear at 12 and 24 weeks and the number of fecal incontinence episodes resulting in a change in pad, clothes or underwear at baseline. Only valid diaries were included in the analyses (e.g. completion of all 7 days for baseline and at least 3 complete days, not necessarily consecutive, for follow-up diaries). (NCT02008565)
Timeframe: 12 and 24 weeks

,,,
Interventionpad-change leaks per week (Mean)
12 Weeks24 Weeks
Loperamide - Education Only-1.3-2.2
Loperamide - Exercise Plus Biofeedback-2.7-3.3
Placebo - Education Only-1.7-2.5
Placebo - Exercise Plus Biofeedback-1.1-0.7

Change From Baseline Resting Anal Canal Pressures (mm of Hg) at 2 cm, 1 cm, and 0 cm Insertion at 12 and 24 Weeks

Based on data collected from the manometry form, the outcome variable is computed as the difference in resting anal canal pressures (mm Hg) at 2 cm, 1 cm, and 0 cm insertion at 12 and 24 weeks and resting anal canal pressures (mm Hg) at 2 cm, 1 cm, and 0 cm insertion at baseline (NCT02008565)
Timeframe: 12 and 24 weeks

,,,
Interventionresting anal canal pressure (mm Hg) (Mean)
12 Week Maximum Anal Canal Pressure (Rest)24 Week Maximum Anal Canal Pressure (Rest)12 Week Maximum Anal Canal Pressure (Squeeze)24 Week Maximum Anal Canal Pressure (Squeeze)
Loperamide - Education Only51.145.773.667.1
Loperamide - Exercise Plus Biofeedback52.647.783.083.0
Placebo - Education Only46.346.573.172.7
Placebo - Exercise Plus Biofeedback49.447.876.374.6

Change From Baseline St. Mark's (Vaizey) Score

"The primary outcome measure for all study arms is the change from baseline in St. Mark's (Vaizey) Score 24 weeks after treatment initiation to compare the marginal outcomes of anal exercise with biofeedback to usual care and loperamide to placebo.~The St. Mark's (Vaizey) score, published in 1999, is commonly used in clinical studies and reports and was based on the Jorge-Wexner score but added two further items for assessment: the use of constipating medication and the presence of fecal urgency. Minimum score is 0 = perfect continence; maximum score is 24 = totally incontinent." (NCT02008565)
Timeframe: 12 and 24 weeks

,,,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
12 Week St. Mark's Score24 Week St. Mark's Score
Loperamide - Education Only-4.5-6.2
Loperamide - Exercise Plus Biofeedback-5.5-9.7
Placebo - Education Only-3.4-4.5
Placebo - Exercise Plus Biofeedback-4.4-5.9

Change From Baseline Total Number of Leaks Per Day at 12 and 24 Weeks

Based on data collected from participant-completed diaries at baseline and 12 and 24 weeks, the outcome variable is computed as the difference in daily average FI episodes at 12 and 24 weeks and the daily average FI episodes at baseline. Only valid diaries were included in the analyses (e.g. completion of all 7 days for baseline and at 3 complete days, not necessarily consecutive, for follow-up diaries). (NCT02008565)
Timeframe: 12 and 24 weeks

,,,
Interventionleaks per day (Mean)
12 Weeks24 Weeks
Loperamide - Education Only-0.9-1.0
Loperamide - Exercise Plus Biofeedback-1.1-1.3
Placebo - Education Only-1.0-1.3
Placebo - Exercise Plus Biofeedback-0.7-0.7

Change From Baseline Volume of Air (mL) at First Sensation for Perception of Rectal Distention at 12 and 24 Weeks

Based on data collected from the manometry form, the outcome variable is computed as the difference in volume of air (mL) at first sensation for perception of rectal distention at 12 and 24 weeks and volume of air (mL) at first sensation for perception of rectal distention at baseline. (NCT02008565)
Timeframe: 12 and 24 weeks

,,,
Interventionvolume of air (mL) (Mean)
12 Week Volume of Air at First Sensation24 Week Volume of Air at First Sensation
Loperamide - Education Only21.621.6
Loperamide - Exercise Plus Biofeedback19.020.1
Placebo - Education Only25.123.5
Placebo - Exercise Plus Biofeedback22.724.5

Change From Baseline Volume of Air (mL) at Urge to Defecate at 12 and 24 Weeks

Based on data collected from the manometry form, the outcome variable is computed as the difference in maximum tolerable rectal volume of air (mL) at 12 and 24 weeks and maximum tolerable rectal volume of air (mL) at baseline. (NCT02008565)
Timeframe: 12 and 24 weeks

,,,
Interventionvolume of air (mL) (Mean)
12 Week Volume of Air at Strong Urge24 Week Volume of Air at Strong Urge
Loperamide - Education Only73.077.3
Loperamide - Exercise Plus Biofeedback69.376.0
Placebo - Education Only71.873.1
Placebo - Exercise Plus Biofeedback66.978.4

Change in Colorectal-Anal Subscale of the Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire Short Form (CRAIQ) Score

The Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire short form (PFIQ-7) measuring the impact of bladder, bowel, and vaginal symptoms on a woman's daily activities, relationships and emotions is composed of 3 scales of 7 questions each: the Urinary Impact Questionnaire (UIQ; range 0-100), the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Impact Questionnaire (POPIQ; range 0-100), and the Colorectal-Anal Impact Questionnaire (CRAIQ; range 0-100). The range of responses on the CRAIQ is 0-3 with (0) Not at all, (1) Somewhat, (2) Moderately, and (3), Quite a bit. Scores are calculated by multiplying the mean value of all answered questions for a scale by 100 divided by 3. The range of responses is: 0-100 with 0 (least negative impact) to 100 (most negative impact). Change = (Week [12, 24] Score - Baseline Score). Lower scores indicate better function / fewer symptoms. (NCT02008565)
Timeframe: 12 and 24 weeks

,,,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
12 Weeks24 Weeks
Loperamide - Education Only-15.8-41.6
Loperamide - Exercise Plus Biofeedback-12.5-41.3
Placebo - Education Only-12.3-17.3
Placebo - Exercise Plus Biofeedback-10.8-32.4

Change in Fecal Incontinence Severity Index (FISI) Score

"The Modified Manchester Health Questionnaire (MMHQ) includes the 4-item Fecal Incontinence Severity Index (FISI), which measures the severity of liquid, solid, mucus, or gas incontinence that occurs from 2 or more times per day, once per day, 2 or more times per week, once a week, to 1-3 times per month. Patient-weighted scores were used to determine severity and scores ranged from 0-61, with higher scores indicating worse fecal incontinence (FI) severity. An FISI score of 0 indicated continence." (NCT02008565)
Timeframe: 12 and 24 weeks

,,,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
12 Week MMHQ Severity Measures Score24 Week MMHQ Severity Measures Score
Loperamide - Education Only-14.4-19.2
Loperamide - Exercise Plus Biofeedback-12.4-19.1
Placebo - Education Only-7.8-20.0
Placebo - Exercise Plus Biofeedback-10.6-15.0

Change in Quality of Life on Colorectal-Anal Distress Inventory (CRADI)

The Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory is a 20-question, validated, self-reported instrument used to evaluate pelvic floor symptoms. It consists of an overall scale (range: 0-300) comprised of 3 sub-scales: 1) Pelvic Organ Prolapse Distress Inventory (range: 0-100), 2) Colorectal Anal Distress Inventory (range: 0-100), and 3) Urinary Distress Inventory (range: 0-100). The range of responses on the CRADI is 1-4 with (1) Not at all, (2) Somewhat, (3) Moderately, and (4), Quite a bit. Scores are calculated by multiplying the mean value of all questions answered by 25 for the scale. The range of responses is: 0-100 with 0 (least distress) to 100 (most distress). Change = (Week [12, 24] Score - Baseline Score). Lower scores indicate better function / fewer symptoms. (NCT02008565)
Timeframe: 12 and 24 weeks

,,,
Interventionunits on a scale (Mean)
12 Week CRADI Score24 Week CRADI Score
Loperamide - Education Only-16.9-21.7
Loperamide - Exercise Plus Biofeedback-16.3-21.5
Placebo - Education Only-4.6-15.7
Placebo - Exercise Plus Biofeedback-13.1-15.7

Participants With Improvement in Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) Score

The Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) is a patient-reported measure of perceived improvement with treatment, as assessed on a scale of 1 (very much better) to 7 (very much worse). Included here are participants who had improvement as indicated by a rating of 1 (very much better), 2 (much better), or 3 (a little better). (NCT02008565)
Timeframe: 12 and 24 Weeks

,,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
12 Weeks24 Weeks
Loperamide - Education Only6160
Loperamide - Exercise Plus Biofeedback6867
Placebo - Education Only2625
Placebo - Exercise Plus Biofeedback5759

Reviews

6 reviews available for loperamide and Fecal Incontinence

ArticleYear
[Pelvic floor and anal incontinence. Conservative therapy].
    Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen, 2013, Volume: 84, Issue:1

    Topics: Anal Canal; Antidiarrheals; Benzofurans; Combined Modality Therapy; Electric Stimulation Therapy; Ev

2013
Recent concepts in fecal incontinence.
    Current women's health reports, 2001, Volume: 1, Issue:1

    Topics: Aged; Biofeedback, Psychology; Defecography; Digestive System Surgical Procedures; Electric Stimulat

2001
The role of loperamide in gastrointestinal disorders.
    Reviews in gastroenterological disorders, 2008,Winter, Volume: 8, Issue:1

    Topics: Antidiarrheals; Diarrhea; Fecal Incontinence; Humans; Irritable Bowel Syndrome; Loperamide

2008
Fecal incontinence in anorectal malformations, neuropathy, and miscellaneous conditions.
    Seminars in pediatric surgery, 2002, Volume: 11, Issue:2

    Topics: Anal Canal; Antidiarrheals; Cecostomy; Child; Child, Preschool; Enema; Fecal Incontinence; Hirschspr

2002
[Diagnosis and treatment of anal incontinence].
    Duodecim; laaketieteellinen aikakauskirja, 1990, Volume: 106, Issue:14

    Topics: Anal Canal; Cathartics; Fecal Incontinence; Humans; Loperamide

1990
Faecal incontinence.
    Clinics in gastroenterology, 1986, Volume: 15, Issue:3

    Topics: Atropine; Biofeedback, Psychology; Diphenoxylate; Drug Combinations; Electromyography; Fecal Inconti

1986

Trials

13 trials available for loperamide and Fecal Incontinence

ArticleYear
Impact of treatment for fecal incontinence on constipation symptoms.
    American journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 2020, Volume: 222, Issue:6

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antidiarrheals; Biofeedback, Psychology; Combined Modality Therapy;

2020
Characteristics Associated With Clinically Important Treatment Responses in Women Undergoing Nonsurgical Therapy for Fecal Incontinence.
    The American journal of gastroenterology, 2020, Volume: 115, Issue:1

    Topics: Aged; Antidiarrheals; Biofeedback, Psychology; Combined Modality Therapy; Exercise Therapy; Fecal In

2020
Controlling faecal incontinence in women by performing anal exercises with biofeedback or loperamide: a randomised clinical trial.
    The lancet. Gastroenterology & hepatology, 2019, Volume: 4, Issue:9

    Topics: Aged; Anal Canal; Antidiarrheals; Biofeedback, Psychology; Constipation; Exercise Therapy; Fecal Inc

2019
Combination therapy with biofeedback, loperamide, and stool-bulking agents is effective for the treatment of fecal incontinence in women - a randomized controlled trial.
    Scandinavian journal of gastroenterology, 2015, Volume: 50, Issue:8

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Anal Canal; Antidiarrheals; Biofeedback, Psychology; Combined Modality Therapy; Defecat

2015
Loperamide Versus Psyllium Fiber for Treatment of Fecal Incontinence: The Fecal Incontinence Prescription (Rx) Management (FIRM) Randomized Clinical Trial.
    Diseases of the colon and rectum, 2015, Volume: 58, Issue:10

    Topics: Aged; Antidiarrheals; Cathartics; Constipation; Double-Blind Method; Drug Administration Schedule; F

2015
Loperamide Versus Psyllium Fiber for Treatment of Fecal Incontinence: The Fecal Incontinence Prescription (Rx) Management (FIRM) Randomized Clinical Trial.
    Diseases of the colon and rectum, 2015, Volume: 58, Issue:10

    Topics: Aged; Antidiarrheals; Cathartics; Constipation; Double-Blind Method; Drug Administration Schedule; F

2015
Loperamide Versus Psyllium Fiber for Treatment of Fecal Incontinence: The Fecal Incontinence Prescription (Rx) Management (FIRM) Randomized Clinical Trial.
    Diseases of the colon and rectum, 2015, Volume: 58, Issue:10

    Topics: Aged; Antidiarrheals; Cathartics; Constipation; Double-Blind Method; Drug Administration Schedule; F

2015
Loperamide Versus Psyllium Fiber for Treatment of Fecal Incontinence: The Fecal Incontinence Prescription (Rx) Management (FIRM) Randomized Clinical Trial.
    Diseases of the colon and rectum, 2015, Volume: 58, Issue:10

    Topics: Aged; Antidiarrheals; Cathartics; Constipation; Double-Blind Method; Drug Administration Schedule; F

2015
Efficacy of methylcellulose and loperamide in managing fecal incontinence.
    Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica, 2009, Volume: 88, Issue:7

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Analysis of Variance; Antidiarrheals; Fecal Incontinence; Female; Humans; Lope

2009
The effects of loperamide on continence problems and anorectal function in obese subjects taking orlistat.
    Digestive diseases and sciences, 2005, Volume: 50, Issue:9

    Topics: Adult; Anal Canal; Anti-Obesity Agents; Antidiarrheals; Double-Blind Method; Fecal Incontinence; Fem

2005
Fibre supplementation in addition to loperamide for faecal incontinence in adults: a randomized trial.
    Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland, 2008, Volume: 10, Issue:6

    Topics: Antidiarrheals; Cross-Over Studies; Dietary Fiber; Fecal Incontinence; Female; Humans; Individuality

2008
Effects of loperamide on anal sphincter function in patients complaining of chronic diarrhea with fecal incontinence and urgency.
    Digestive diseases and sciences, 1982, Volume: 27, Issue:9

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Anal Canal; Diarrhea; Fecal Incontinence; Female; Humans; Loperamide; Male; Manometry;

1982
Loperamide as a symptomatic treatment in pediatric surgery: a double-blind cross-over study.
    Zeitschrift fur Kinderchirurgie : organ der Deutschen, der Schweizerischen und der Osterreichischen Gesellschaft fur Kinderchirurgie = Surgery in infancy and childhood, 1981, Volume: 32, Issue:3

    Topics: Adolescent; Child; Child, Preschool; Diarrhea; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Double-Blind Method

1981
Loperamide improves anal sphincter function and continence after restorative proctocolectomy.
    Digestive diseases and sciences, 1994, Volume: 39, Issue:12

    Topics: Adult; Anal Canal; Colitis, Ulcerative; Cross-Over Studies; Defecation; Double-Blind Method; Fecal I

1994
Effects of loperamide oxide on gastrointestinal transit time and anorectal function in patients with chronic diarrhoea and faecal incontinence.
    Scandinavian journal of gastroenterology, 1997, Volume: 32, Issue:1

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Anal Canal; Chronic Disease; Cross-Over Studies; Diarrhea; Double-Blind Method; Fecal I

1997
Is bowel confinement necessary after anorectal reconstructive surgery? A prospective, randomized, surgeon-blinded trial.
    Diseases of the colon and rectum, 1999, Volume: 42, Issue:1

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anal Canal; Codeine; Defecation; Diet Therapy; Double-Blind Method;

1999

Other Studies

16 other studies available for loperamide and Fecal Incontinence

ArticleYear
Biofeedback or loperamide for faecal incontinence in women.
    The lancet. Gastroenterology & hepatology, 2019, Volume: 4, Issue:12

    Topics: Anal Canal; Biofeedback, Psychology; Exercise Therapy; Fecal Incontinence; Female; Humans; Loperamid

2019
Biofeedback or loperamide for faecal incontinence in women - Author's reply.
    The lancet. Gastroenterology & hepatology, 2019, Volume: 4, Issue:12

    Topics: Anal Canal; Biofeedback, Psychology; Exercise Therapy; Fecal Incontinence; Female; Humans; Loperamid

2019
Biofeedback or loperamide for faecal incontinence in women.
    The lancet. Gastroenterology & hepatology, 2019, Volume: 4, Issue:12

    Topics: Anal Canal; Biofeedback, Psychology; Exercise Therapy; Fecal Incontinence; Female; Humans; Loperamid

2019
Low Anterior Resection Syndrome.
    Diseases of the colon and rectum, 2019, Volume: 62, Issue:12

    Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Aged; Chemotherapy, Adjuvant; Fecal Incontinence; Female; Humans; Ileostomy; Loperam

2019
Bowel management program in patients with spina bifida.
    Pediatric surgery international, 2019, Volume: 35, Issue:2

    Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Antidiarrheals; Child; Child, Preschool; Constipation; Enema; Fecal Incontinence;

2019
Quality evidence on interventions for faecal incontinence.
    The lancet. Gastroenterology & hepatology, 2019, Volume: 4, Issue:9

    Topics: Anal Canal; Biofeedback, Psychology; Exercise Therapy; Fecal Incontinence; Female; Humans; Loperamid

2019
Treatments of faecal incontinence: recommendations from the French national society of coloproctology.
    Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland, 2014, Volume: 16, Issue:3

    Topics: Anal Canal; Antidiarrheals; Cholestyramine Resin; Diet Therapy; Dietary Fiber; Electric Stimulation

2014
Outcomes of combination treatment of fecal incontinence in women.
    American journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 2008, Volume: 199, Issue:6

    Topics: Adult; Age Factors; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Behavior Therapy; Chi-Square Distribution; Cohort Studi

2008
[Taking charge of adult's anal incontinence].
    Revue medicale de la Suisse romande, 2002, Volume: 122, Issue:9

    Topics: Adult; Anal Canal; Antidiarrheals; Biofeedback, Psychology; Fecal Incontinence; Female; Humans; Lope

2002
Use of an elemental diet as a nutritionally complete "medical colostomy".
    Southern medical journal, 1983, Volume: 76, Issue:8

    Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Catheters, Indwelling; Child; Child, Preschool; Codeine; Colostomy; Diphenoxylate

1983
Occasional fecal incontinence among community-dwelling older adults.
    Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 1995, Volume: 43, Issue:7

    Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Atropine; Combined Modality Therapy; Dietary Fiber; Diphenoxylate; Drug Com

1995
[Functional results of ileo-anal anastomosis. The point of view of the gastroenterologist].
    Annales de chirurgie, 1993, Volume: 47, Issue:10

    Topics: Adenomatous Polyposis Coli; Colectomy; Colitis, Ulcerative; Diarrhea; Fecal Incontinence; Female; Ga

1993
The use of loperamide to regulate peristalsis and improve bowel control: a preliminary report.
    Journal of pediatric surgery, 1978, Volume: 13, Issue:1

    Topics: Child; Fecal Incontinence; Female; Gastrointestinal Motility; Humans; Infant; Intestine, Small; Lope

1978
Moderation of urinary and faecal incontinence with loperamide.
    Therapia Hungarica (English edition), 1989, Volume: 37, Issue:4

    Topics: Aged; Fecal Incontinence; Female; Humans; Hungary; Loperamide; Male; Middle Aged; Piperidines; Urina

1989
Effect of loperamide on faecal control after rectoplasty for high imperforate anus.
    Acta chirurgica Scandinavica, 1986, Volume: 152

    Topics: Adolescent; Anal Canal; Anus, Imperforate; Child; Fecal Incontinence; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Lop

1986
[Fecal incontinence--a review. Simple measures can give good therapeutic results].
    Lakartidningen, 1985, Feb-06, Volume: 82, Issue:6

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Anal Canal; Cathartics; Fecal Incontinence; Female; Humans; Loperamide; Male; Middle Ag

1985