loperamide has been researched along with Fecal Incontinence in 35 studies
Loperamide: One of the long-acting synthetic ANTIDIARRHEALS; it is not significantly absorbed from the gut, and has no effect on the adrenergic system or central nervous system, but may antagonize histamine and interfere with acetylcholine release locally.
loperamide : A synthetic piperidine derivative, effective against diarrhoea resulting from gastroenteritis or inflammatory bowel disease.
Fecal Incontinence: Failure of voluntary control of the anal sphincters, with involuntary passage of feces and flatus.
Excerpt | Relevance | Reference |
---|---|---|
"The purpose of this study was to examine the effectiveness and tolerability of loperamide compared with psyllium for reducing fecal incontinence." | 9.20 | Loperamide Versus Psyllium Fiber for Treatment of Fecal Incontinence: The Fecal Incontinence Prescription (Rx) Management (FIRM) Randomized Clinical Trial. ( Beasley, TM; Burgio, KL; Goode, PS; Markland, AD; Redden, DT; Richter, HE; Whitehead, WE; Wilcox, CM, 2015) |
"To evaluate the efficacy of methylcellulose (Citrucel) and loperamide (Imodium) in managing fecal incontinence by comparing cure rates with expectant management." | 9.14 | Efficacy of methylcellulose and loperamide in managing fecal incontinence. ( Hobbs, G; Sze, EH, 2009) |
"We have investigated the effect of loperamide (4 mg tds) on the continence to a standard volume of rectally infused saline and anorectal manometry in 26 patients complaining of chronic diarrhea complicated by fecal incontinence and severe urgency." | 9.05 | Effects of loperamide on anal sphincter function in patients complaining of chronic diarrhea with fecal incontinence and urgency. ( Barber, DC; Duthie, HL; Read, M; Read, NW, 1982) |
"The purpose of this study was to examine the effectiveness and tolerability of loperamide compared with psyllium for reducing fecal incontinence." | 5.20 | Loperamide Versus Psyllium Fiber for Treatment of Fecal Incontinence: The Fecal Incontinence Prescription (Rx) Management (FIRM) Randomized Clinical Trial. ( Beasley, TM; Burgio, KL; Goode, PS; Markland, AD; Redden, DT; Richter, HE; Whitehead, WE; Wilcox, CM, 2015) |
"To evaluate the efficacy of methylcellulose (Citrucel) and loperamide (Imodium) in managing fecal incontinence by comparing cure rates with expectant management." | 5.14 | Efficacy of methylcellulose and loperamide in managing fecal incontinence. ( Hobbs, G; Sze, EH, 2009) |
"We have investigated the effect of loperamide (4 mg tds) on the continence to a standard volume of rectally infused saline and anorectal manometry in 26 patients complaining of chronic diarrhea complicated by fecal incontinence and severe urgency." | 5.05 | Effects of loperamide on anal sphincter function in patients complaining of chronic diarrhea with fecal incontinence and urgency. ( Barber, DC; Duthie, HL; Read, M; Read, NW, 1982) |
"Loperamide is an effective therapy for a variety of diarrheal syndromes, including acute, nonspecific (infectious) diarrhea; traveler's diarrhea; and chemotherapy-related and protease inhibitor?associated diarrhea." | 4.84 | The role of loperamide in gastrointestinal disorders. ( Hanauer, SB, 2008) |
"Loperamide treatment for fecal incontinence does not worsen constipation symptoms among women with normal consistency stool." | 2.94 | Impact of treatment for fecal incontinence on constipation symptoms. ( Andy, UU; Carper, B; Dyer, KY; Gantz, MG; Jelovsek, JE; Korbly, NB; Mazloomdoost, D; Meyer, I; Rogers, RG; Sassani, JC, 2020) |
"Constipation was the most common grade 3 or higher adverse event and was reported by two (2%) of 86 participants in the loperamide and biofeedback group and two (2%) of 88 in the loperamide plus education group." | 2.90 | Controlling faecal incontinence in women by performing anal exercises with biofeedback or loperamide: a randomised clinical trial. ( Barber, MD; Carper, B; Dyer, K; Gantz, MG; Jelovsek, JE; Markland, AD; Meikle, SF; Newman, DK; Rogers, RG; Sung, VW; Sutkin, G; Visco, AG; Whitehead, WE; Zyczynski, HM, 2019) |
"Loperamide has beneficial effects on stool consistency and continence in obese subjects taking orlistat." | 2.71 | The effects of loperamide on continence problems and anorectal function in obese subjects taking orlistat. ( Fox, M; Fried, M; Menne, D; Schwizer, W; Stutz, B; Thumshirn, M, 2005) |
"Conservative treatment of fecal incontinence and obstructive defecation can be treated by many conservative treatment modalities." | 2.49 | [Pelvic floor and anal incontinence. Conservative therapy]. ( Kroesen, AJ, 2013) |
"Fecal incontinence is an inability to defer release of gas or stool from the anus and rectum by mechanisms of voluntary control." | 2.41 | Recent concepts in fecal incontinence. ( Douglas, JM; Smith, LE, 2001) |
"Organic fecal incontinence is a consequence of congenital malformations affecting the anorectum, anal sphincters, or the spinal cord." | 2.41 | Fecal incontinence in anorectal malformations, neuropathy, and miscellaneous conditions. ( Rintala, RJ, 2002) |
"Recently, the number of patients with spina bifida requiring management for fecal incontinence has increased." | 1.51 | Bowel management program in patients with spina bifida. ( Bischoff, A; Edmonds, T; Hall, J; Jacobson, R; Ketzer, J; Peña, A; Schletker, J; Trecartin, A, 2019) |
"Ulcerative colitis is an illness that occurs unexpectedly in a young patient, with a generally unpredictable prognosis, and there is no medication to cure it." | 1.29 | [Functional results of ileo-anal anastomosis. The point of view of the gastroenterologist]. ( Bigard, MA, 1993) |
Timeframe | Studies, this research(%) | All Research% |
---|---|---|
pre-1990 | 8 (22.86) | 18.7374 |
1990's | 6 (17.14) | 18.2507 |
2000's | 8 (22.86) | 29.6817 |
2010's | 11 (31.43) | 24.3611 |
2020's | 2 (5.71) | 2.80 |
Authors | Studies |
---|---|
Kako, J | 1 |
Ishiki, H | 1 |
Kajiwara, K | 1 |
Jelovsek, JE | 4 |
Du, T | 1 |
Meng, Q | 1 |
McKenna, NP | 1 |
Andy, UU | 1 |
Carper, B | 2 |
Meyer, I | 2 |
Dyer, KY | 2 |
Rogers, RG | 3 |
Mazloomdoost, D | 2 |
Korbly, NB | 1 |
Sassani, JC | 1 |
Gantz, MG | 3 |
Richter, HE | 3 |
Iyer, P | 1 |
Newman, DK | 2 |
Bradley, MS | 1 |
Harm-Ernandes, I | 1 |
Wohlrab, K | 1 |
Schletker, J | 1 |
Edmonds, T | 1 |
Jacobson, R | 1 |
Ketzer, J | 1 |
Hall, J | 1 |
Trecartin, A | 1 |
Peña, A | 1 |
Bischoff, A | 1 |
Knowles, CH | 1 |
Markland, AD | 3 |
Whitehead, WE | 2 |
Barber, MD | 1 |
Dyer, K | 1 |
Visco, AG | 1 |
Sutkin, G | 1 |
Zyczynski, HM | 1 |
Meikle, SF | 1 |
Sung, VW | 1 |
Vitton, V | 1 |
Soudan, D | 1 |
Siproudhis, L | 1 |
Abramowitz, L | 1 |
Bouvier, M | 1 |
Faucheron, JL | 1 |
Leroi, AM | 1 |
Meurette, G | 1 |
Pigot, F | 1 |
Damon, H | 1 |
Sjödahl, J | 1 |
Walter, SA | 1 |
Johansson, E | 1 |
Ingemansson, A | 1 |
Ryn, AK | 1 |
Hallböök, O | 1 |
Burgio, KL | 2 |
Wilcox, CM | 1 |
Redden, DT | 2 |
Beasley, TM | 1 |
Goode, PS | 2 |
Wheeler, TL | 1 |
Sze, EH | 1 |
Hobbs, G | 1 |
Kroesen, AJ | 1 |
Douglas, JM | 1 |
Smith, LE | 1 |
Wiesel, PH | 1 |
Cuypers, P | 1 |
Meuwly, JY | 1 |
Kuntzer, T | 1 |
Givel, JC | 1 |
Fox, M | 1 |
Stutz, B | 1 |
Menne, D | 1 |
Fried, M | 1 |
Schwizer, W | 1 |
Thumshirn, M | 1 |
Lauti, M | 1 |
Scott, D | 1 |
Thompson-Fawcett, MW | 1 |
Hanauer, SB | 1 |
Robertson, HD | 1 |
Read, M | 1 |
Read, NW | 2 |
Barber, DC | 1 |
Duthie, HL | 1 |
Kekomäki, M | 1 |
Vilkki, P | 1 |
Gordin, A | 1 |
Salo, H | 1 |
Kasahara, M | 1 |
Faacks, N | 1 |
Shelton, D | 1 |
Hallgren, T | 1 |
Fasth, S | 1 |
Delbro, DS | 1 |
Nordgren, S | 1 |
Oresland, T | 1 |
Hultén, L | 1 |
Bigard, MA | 1 |
Sun, WM | 1 |
Verlinden, M | 1 |
Nessim, A | 1 |
Wexner, SD | 1 |
Agachan, F | 1 |
Alabaz, O | 1 |
Weiss, EG | 1 |
Nogueras, JJ | 1 |
Daniel, N | 1 |
Billotti, VL | 1 |
Rintala, RJ | 1 |
Nixon, HH | 1 |
Hiltunen, KM | 1 |
Matikainen, M | 1 |
Szüle, E | 1 |
Schiller, LR | 1 |
Arnbjörnsson, E | 1 |
Breland, U | 1 |
Kullendorff, CM | 1 |
Okmian, L | 1 |
Ling, L | 1 |
Trial | Phase | Enrollment | Study Type | Start Date | Status | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Refractory Overactive Bladder: Sacral NEuromodulation v. BoTulinum Toxin Assessment (ROSETTA)[NCT01502956] | Phase 3 | 386 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2012-02-29 | Completed | ||
Controlling Anal Incontinence by Performing Anal Exercises With Biofeedback or Loperamide (CAPABLe): a Randomized Placebo Controlled Trial[NCT02008565] | Phase 3 | 300 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2014-02-28 | Completed | ||
Treatment of Diarrhea-Associated Fecal Incontinence With Eluxadoline[NCT03489265] | Phase 2 | 0 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2019-04-30 | Withdrawn (stopped due to Difficult to recruit severely affected patients with fecal incontinence) | ||
The Safety and Efficacy of 5-HT3 Receptor Antagonist (Ramosetron) Versus Psyllium (Agio®) for the Treatment of Fecal Incontinence: Multicenter Randomized Trial (SERAFI)[NCT06166615] | Phase 2/Phase 3 | 148 participants (Anticipated) | Interventional | 2023-12-15 | Not yet recruiting | ||
Antimuscarinic Medication for Urgency Urinary Incontinence in Women With Dual Incontinence (Darifenacin for Treatment of Women With Dual Incontinence)[NCT03543566] | 32 participants (Actual) | Observational | 2018-05-21 | Completed | |||
[information is prepared from clinicaltrials.gov, extracted Sep-2024] |
The primary outcome is the change from baseline in mean number of UUI episodes over the first 6-month visit period (1, 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6 month assessments); and is measured using 3-day bladder diaries administered monthly for the first 6 month visit period. (NCT01502956)
Timeframe: 6 Months
Intervention | UUI episodes (Mean) |
---|---|
InterStim® Device | -3.25 |
Botox® Injection | -3.89 |
Change from baseline in quality of life measures over the first 6 month visit period (6 month assessment) as measured by the Health Utility Index, Version 3 (HUI-3). The HUI 3 scale has a range from 0 to 1 with higher scores representing better health. (NCT01502956)
Timeframe: 6 Months
Intervention | units on a scale (Mean) |
---|---|
InterStim® Device | -0.006 |
Botox® Injection | -0.011 |
Change from baseline in quality of life measures over the first 6 month visit period (6 month assessment) as measured by the change in the mean Incontinence Impact Questionnaire short form (IIQ-SF) score. The IIQ-SF scale has a range from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating a worse quality of life. (NCT01502956)
Timeframe: 6 Months
Intervention | units on a scale (Mean) |
---|---|
InterStim® Device | -10.4 |
Botox® Injection | -12.4 |
Change from baseline in quality of life measures over the first 6 month visit period (6 month assessment) as measured by the change in mean Urinary Distress Inventory Short Form (UDI-SF) score. The UDI-SF scale has a range from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating greater distress. (NCT01502956)
Timeframe: 6 Months
Intervention | units on a scale (Mean) |
---|---|
InterStim® Device | -8.6 |
Botox® Injection | -10.0 |
"Treatment preference as measured by the Overactive Bladder Satisfaction of Treatment Questionnaire (OAB-SATq) at 6 months (6 month assessment).OAB-SATq treatment preference is a binary outcome that is classified as yes if a participant answers either Slight preference for the treatment I am receiving now or Definitely prefer the treatment I am receiving now to the question Do you prefer the treatment that you received since entering this study to the treatment you received before the study?" (NCT01502956)
Timeframe: 6 Months
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|---|
InterStim® Device | 89 |
Botox® Injection | 113 |
Change in mean Overactive Bladder Questionnaire Short Form (OABq-SF) score throughout baseline to the first 6-month visit (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6-month assessments). Values range from 0 to 100 with higher scores on the symptom scale indicating greater severity of symptoms and higher scores on the quality of life scale indicating a better quality of life. (NCT01502956)
Timeframe: 6 Months
Intervention | units on a scale (Mean) | |
---|---|---|
OABq-SF Symptom Bother | OABq-SF Quality of Life | |
Botox® Injection | -46.7 | 41.6 |
InterStim® Device | -38.6 | 38.1 |
Proportion of subjects who report adequate improvement of their bladder function and urinary leakage with the Patient Global Impression of Improvement Questionnaire (PGI-I) at 6 months. Adequate improvement is defined as a rating of 1, 2, or 3 (better) on the patient-reported measure of perceived improvement with treatment on a scale of 1 (very much better) to 7 (very much worse). (NCT01502956)
Timeframe: 6 Months
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) | |
---|---|---|
Urinary leakage | Bladder function | |
Botox® Injection | 101 | 100 |
InterStim® Device | 91 | 92 |
Severity of urge incontinence symptoms at 6 month visit period as measured by the Sandvik questionnaire. The Sandvik score is a patient-reported measure of incontinence severity as assessed on a scale of slight (1-2), moderate (3-6), severe (8-9), very severe (12) to severe (10-12) using a standard scoring algorithm. (NCT01502956)
Timeframe: 6 Months
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Sandvik Slight | Sandvik Moderate | Sandvik Severe | Sandvik Very Severe | |
Botox® Injection | 29 | 33 | 28 | 36 |
InterStim® Device | 23 | 33 | 24 | 44 |
Treatment satisfaction as measured by the mean Overactive Bladder Satisfaction of Treatment Questionnaire (OAB-SATq) score at 6 months (6 month assessment). The OAB-SATq score ranges from 0 to 100 and includes 5 subscales: treatment satisfaction, side effects, treatment endorsement, convenience, and treatment preference, with higher scores reflecting better satisfaction. (NCT01502956)
Timeframe: 6 months
Intervention | units on a scale (Mean) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
OAB-SATq Treatment Satisfaction | OAB-SATq Adverse Effects | OAB-SATq Endorsement | OAB-SATq Convenience | |
Botox® Injection | 67.7 | 88.4 | 78.1 | 67.6 |
InterStim® Device | 59.8 | 85.1 | 67.6 | 70.2 |
Change in mean number of urinary incontinence episodes (any type) and nocturia episodes from baseline over the first 6-month visit period (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6-month assessments) as measured by the 3 day bladder diary. (NCT01502956)
Timeframe: 6 Months
Intervention | Number of episodes (Mean) | |
---|---|---|
Incontinence episodes (any) | Nocturia episodes | |
Botox® Injection | -4.02 | -0.40 |
InterStim® Device | -3.50 | -0.26 |
Based on data collected from participant-completed diaries at baseline and 12 and 24 weeks, the outcome variable is computed as the difference in number of accident-free days at 12 and 24 weeks and the number of accident-free days at baseline. Only valid diaries were included in the analyses (e.g. completion of all 7 days for baseline and at least 3 complete days, not necessarily consecutive, for follow-up diaries). (NCT02008565)
Timeframe: 12 and 24 weeks
Intervention | accident-free days (Mean) | |
---|---|---|
12 Weeks | 24 Weeks | |
Loperamide - Education Only | 1.7 | 1.7 |
Loperamide - Exercise Plus Biofeedback | 1.8 | 2.5 |
Placebo - Education Only | 1.4 | 2.1 |
Placebo - Exercise Plus Biofeedback | 1.9 | 1.9 |
Based on data collected from the manometry form, the outcome variable will be computed as the difference in maximum anal pressures during squeeze with the catheter at the high pressure zone (HPZ) at 12 and 24 weeks and maximum anal pressures during squeeze with the catheter at the HPZ at baseline. (NCT02008565)
Timeframe: 12 and 24 weeks
Intervention | max. anal canal pressure squeeze (mmHg) (Mean) | |
---|---|---|
12 Week Maximum Anal Canal Pressure (Squeeze) | 24 Week Maximum Anal Canal Pressure (Squeeze) | |
Loperamide - Education Only | 73.6 | 67.1 |
Loperamide - Exercise Plus Biofeedback | 83.0 | 83.0 |
Placebo - Education Only | 73.1 | 72.7 |
Placebo - Exercise Plus Biofeedback | 76.3 | 74.6 |
Based on data collected from participant-completed diaries at baseline and 12 and 24 weeks, the outcome variable is computed as the difference in number of fecal incontinence episodes per day resulting in a change in pad, clothes or underwear at 12 and 24 weeks and the number of fecal incontinence episodes resulting in a change in pad, clothes or underwear at baseline. Only valid diaries were included in the analyses (e.g. completion of all 7 days for baseline and at least 3 complete days, not necessarily consecutive, for follow-up diaries). (NCT02008565)
Timeframe: 12 and 24 weeks
Intervention | pad-change leaks per day (Mean) | |
---|---|---|
12 Weeks | 24 Weeks | |
Loperamide - Education Only | -0.3 | -0.4 |
Loperamide - Exercise Plus Biofeedback | -0.4 | -0.5 |
Placebo - Education Only | -0.2 | -0.4 |
Placebo - Exercise Plus Biofeedback | -0.2 | -0.1 |
Based on data collected from participant-completed diaries at baseline and 12 and 24 weeks, the outcome variable is computed as the difference in number of fecal incontinence episodes per week resulting in a change in pad, clothes or underwear at 12 and 24 weeks and the number of fecal incontinence episodes resulting in a change in pad, clothes or underwear at baseline. Only valid diaries were included in the analyses (e.g. completion of all 7 days for baseline and at least 3 complete days, not necessarily consecutive, for follow-up diaries). (NCT02008565)
Timeframe: 12 and 24 weeks
Intervention | pad-change leaks per week (Mean) | |
---|---|---|
12 Weeks | 24 Weeks | |
Loperamide - Education Only | -1.3 | -2.2 |
Loperamide - Exercise Plus Biofeedback | -2.7 | -3.3 |
Placebo - Education Only | -1.7 | -2.5 |
Placebo - Exercise Plus Biofeedback | -1.1 | -0.7 |
Based on data collected from the manometry form, the outcome variable is computed as the difference in resting anal canal pressures (mm Hg) at 2 cm, 1 cm, and 0 cm insertion at 12 and 24 weeks and resting anal canal pressures (mm Hg) at 2 cm, 1 cm, and 0 cm insertion at baseline (NCT02008565)
Timeframe: 12 and 24 weeks
Intervention | resting anal canal pressure (mm Hg) (Mean) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
12 Week Maximum Anal Canal Pressure (Rest) | 24 Week Maximum Anal Canal Pressure (Rest) | 12 Week Maximum Anal Canal Pressure (Squeeze) | 24 Week Maximum Anal Canal Pressure (Squeeze) | |
Loperamide - Education Only | 51.1 | 45.7 | 73.6 | 67.1 |
Loperamide - Exercise Plus Biofeedback | 52.6 | 47.7 | 83.0 | 83.0 |
Placebo - Education Only | 46.3 | 46.5 | 73.1 | 72.7 |
Placebo - Exercise Plus Biofeedback | 49.4 | 47.8 | 76.3 | 74.6 |
"The primary outcome measure for all study arms is the change from baseline in St. Mark's (Vaizey) Score 24 weeks after treatment initiation to compare the marginal outcomes of anal exercise with biofeedback to usual care and loperamide to placebo.~The St. Mark's (Vaizey) score, published in 1999, is commonly used in clinical studies and reports and was based on the Jorge-Wexner score but added two further items for assessment: the use of constipating medication and the presence of fecal urgency. Minimum score is 0 = perfect continence; maximum score is 24 = totally incontinent." (NCT02008565)
Timeframe: 12 and 24 weeks
Intervention | units on a scale (Mean) | |
---|---|---|
12 Week St. Mark's Score | 24 Week St. Mark's Score | |
Loperamide - Education Only | -4.5 | -6.2 |
Loperamide - Exercise Plus Biofeedback | -5.5 | -9.7 |
Placebo - Education Only | -3.4 | -4.5 |
Placebo - Exercise Plus Biofeedback | -4.4 | -5.9 |
Based on data collected from participant-completed diaries at baseline and 12 and 24 weeks, the outcome variable is computed as the difference in daily average FI episodes at 12 and 24 weeks and the daily average FI episodes at baseline. Only valid diaries were included in the analyses (e.g. completion of all 7 days for baseline and at 3 complete days, not necessarily consecutive, for follow-up diaries). (NCT02008565)
Timeframe: 12 and 24 weeks
Intervention | leaks per day (Mean) | |
---|---|---|
12 Weeks | 24 Weeks | |
Loperamide - Education Only | -0.9 | -1.0 |
Loperamide - Exercise Plus Biofeedback | -1.1 | -1.3 |
Placebo - Education Only | -1.0 | -1.3 |
Placebo - Exercise Plus Biofeedback | -0.7 | -0.7 |
Based on data collected from the manometry form, the outcome variable is computed as the difference in volume of air (mL) at first sensation for perception of rectal distention at 12 and 24 weeks and volume of air (mL) at first sensation for perception of rectal distention at baseline. (NCT02008565)
Timeframe: 12 and 24 weeks
Intervention | volume of air (mL) (Mean) | |
---|---|---|
12 Week Volume of Air at First Sensation | 24 Week Volume of Air at First Sensation | |
Loperamide - Education Only | 21.6 | 21.6 |
Loperamide - Exercise Plus Biofeedback | 19.0 | 20.1 |
Placebo - Education Only | 25.1 | 23.5 |
Placebo - Exercise Plus Biofeedback | 22.7 | 24.5 |
Based on data collected from the manometry form, the outcome variable is computed as the difference in maximum tolerable rectal volume of air (mL) at 12 and 24 weeks and maximum tolerable rectal volume of air (mL) at baseline. (NCT02008565)
Timeframe: 12 and 24 weeks
Intervention | volume of air (mL) (Mean) | |
---|---|---|
12 Week Volume of Air at Strong Urge | 24 Week Volume of Air at Strong Urge | |
Loperamide - Education Only | 73.0 | 77.3 |
Loperamide - Exercise Plus Biofeedback | 69.3 | 76.0 |
Placebo - Education Only | 71.8 | 73.1 |
Placebo - Exercise Plus Biofeedback | 66.9 | 78.4 |
The Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire short form (PFIQ-7) measuring the impact of bladder, bowel, and vaginal symptoms on a woman's daily activities, relationships and emotions is composed of 3 scales of 7 questions each: the Urinary Impact Questionnaire (UIQ; range 0-100), the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Impact Questionnaire (POPIQ; range 0-100), and the Colorectal-Anal Impact Questionnaire (CRAIQ; range 0-100). The range of responses on the CRAIQ is 0-3 with (0) Not at all, (1) Somewhat, (2) Moderately, and (3), Quite a bit. Scores are calculated by multiplying the mean value of all answered questions for a scale by 100 divided by 3. The range of responses is: 0-100 with 0 (least negative impact) to 100 (most negative impact). Change = (Week [12, 24] Score - Baseline Score). Lower scores indicate better function / fewer symptoms. (NCT02008565)
Timeframe: 12 and 24 weeks
Intervention | units on a scale (Mean) | |
---|---|---|
12 Weeks | 24 Weeks | |
Loperamide - Education Only | -15.8 | -41.6 |
Loperamide - Exercise Plus Biofeedback | -12.5 | -41.3 |
Placebo - Education Only | -12.3 | -17.3 |
Placebo - Exercise Plus Biofeedback | -10.8 | -32.4 |
"The Modified Manchester Health Questionnaire (MMHQ) includes the 4-item Fecal Incontinence Severity Index (FISI), which measures the severity of liquid, solid, mucus, or gas incontinence that occurs from 2 or more times per day, once per day, 2 or more times per week, once a week, to 1-3 times per month. Patient-weighted scores were used to determine severity and scores ranged from 0-61, with higher scores indicating worse fecal incontinence (FI) severity. An FISI score of 0 indicated continence." (NCT02008565)
Timeframe: 12 and 24 weeks
Intervention | units on a scale (Mean) | |
---|---|---|
12 Week MMHQ Severity Measures Score | 24 Week MMHQ Severity Measures Score | |
Loperamide - Education Only | -14.4 | -19.2 |
Loperamide - Exercise Plus Biofeedback | -12.4 | -19.1 |
Placebo - Education Only | -7.8 | -20.0 |
Placebo - Exercise Plus Biofeedback | -10.6 | -15.0 |
The Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory is a 20-question, validated, self-reported instrument used to evaluate pelvic floor symptoms. It consists of an overall scale (range: 0-300) comprised of 3 sub-scales: 1) Pelvic Organ Prolapse Distress Inventory (range: 0-100), 2) Colorectal Anal Distress Inventory (range: 0-100), and 3) Urinary Distress Inventory (range: 0-100). The range of responses on the CRADI is 1-4 with (1) Not at all, (2) Somewhat, (3) Moderately, and (4), Quite a bit. Scores are calculated by multiplying the mean value of all questions answered by 25 for the scale. The range of responses is: 0-100 with 0 (least distress) to 100 (most distress). Change = (Week [12, 24] Score - Baseline Score). Lower scores indicate better function / fewer symptoms. (NCT02008565)
Timeframe: 12 and 24 weeks
Intervention | units on a scale (Mean) | |
---|---|---|
12 Week CRADI Score | 24 Week CRADI Score | |
Loperamide - Education Only | -16.9 | -21.7 |
Loperamide - Exercise Plus Biofeedback | -16.3 | -21.5 |
Placebo - Education Only | -4.6 | -15.7 |
Placebo - Exercise Plus Biofeedback | -13.1 | -15.7 |
The Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) is a patient-reported measure of perceived improvement with treatment, as assessed on a scale of 1 (very much better) to 7 (very much worse). Included here are participants who had improvement as indicated by a rating of 1 (very much better), 2 (much better), or 3 (a little better). (NCT02008565)
Timeframe: 12 and 24 Weeks
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) | |
---|---|---|
12 Weeks | 24 Weeks | |
Loperamide - Education Only | 61 | 60 |
Loperamide - Exercise Plus Biofeedback | 68 | 67 |
Placebo - Education Only | 26 | 25 |
Placebo - Exercise Plus Biofeedback | 57 | 59 |
6 reviews available for loperamide and Fecal Incontinence
Article | Year |
---|---|
[Pelvic floor and anal incontinence. Conservative therapy].
Topics: Anal Canal; Antidiarrheals; Benzofurans; Combined Modality Therapy; Electric Stimulation Therapy; Ev | 2013 |
Recent concepts in fecal incontinence.
Topics: Aged; Biofeedback, Psychology; Defecography; Digestive System Surgical Procedures; Electric Stimulat | 2001 |
The role of loperamide in gastrointestinal disorders.
Topics: Antidiarrheals; Diarrhea; Fecal Incontinence; Humans; Irritable Bowel Syndrome; Loperamide | 2008 |
Fecal incontinence in anorectal malformations, neuropathy, and miscellaneous conditions.
Topics: Anal Canal; Antidiarrheals; Cecostomy; Child; Child, Preschool; Enema; Fecal Incontinence; Hirschspr | 2002 |
[Diagnosis and treatment of anal incontinence].
Topics: Anal Canal; Cathartics; Fecal Incontinence; Humans; Loperamide | 1990 |
Faecal incontinence.
Topics: Atropine; Biofeedback, Psychology; Diphenoxylate; Drug Combinations; Electromyography; Fecal Inconti | 1986 |
13 trials available for loperamide and Fecal Incontinence
Article | Year |
---|---|
Impact of treatment for fecal incontinence on constipation symptoms.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antidiarrheals; Biofeedback, Psychology; Combined Modality Therapy; | 2020 |
Characteristics Associated With Clinically Important Treatment Responses in Women Undergoing Nonsurgical Therapy for Fecal Incontinence.
Topics: Aged; Antidiarrheals; Biofeedback, Psychology; Combined Modality Therapy; Exercise Therapy; Fecal In | 2020 |
Controlling faecal incontinence in women by performing anal exercises with biofeedback or loperamide: a randomised clinical trial.
Topics: Aged; Anal Canal; Antidiarrheals; Biofeedback, Psychology; Constipation; Exercise Therapy; Fecal Inc | 2019 |
Combination therapy with biofeedback, loperamide, and stool-bulking agents is effective for the treatment of fecal incontinence in women - a randomized controlled trial.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Anal Canal; Antidiarrheals; Biofeedback, Psychology; Combined Modality Therapy; Defecat | 2015 |
Loperamide Versus Psyllium Fiber for Treatment of Fecal Incontinence: The Fecal Incontinence Prescription (Rx) Management (FIRM) Randomized Clinical Trial.
Topics: Aged; Antidiarrheals; Cathartics; Constipation; Double-Blind Method; Drug Administration Schedule; F | 2015 |
Loperamide Versus Psyllium Fiber for Treatment of Fecal Incontinence: The Fecal Incontinence Prescription (Rx) Management (FIRM) Randomized Clinical Trial.
Topics: Aged; Antidiarrheals; Cathartics; Constipation; Double-Blind Method; Drug Administration Schedule; F | 2015 |
Loperamide Versus Psyllium Fiber for Treatment of Fecal Incontinence: The Fecal Incontinence Prescription (Rx) Management (FIRM) Randomized Clinical Trial.
Topics: Aged; Antidiarrheals; Cathartics; Constipation; Double-Blind Method; Drug Administration Schedule; F | 2015 |
Loperamide Versus Psyllium Fiber for Treatment of Fecal Incontinence: The Fecal Incontinence Prescription (Rx) Management (FIRM) Randomized Clinical Trial.
Topics: Aged; Antidiarrheals; Cathartics; Constipation; Double-Blind Method; Drug Administration Schedule; F | 2015 |
Efficacy of methylcellulose and loperamide in managing fecal incontinence.
Topics: Administration, Oral; Analysis of Variance; Antidiarrheals; Fecal Incontinence; Female; Humans; Lope | 2009 |
The effects of loperamide on continence problems and anorectal function in obese subjects taking orlistat.
Topics: Adult; Anal Canal; Anti-Obesity Agents; Antidiarrheals; Double-Blind Method; Fecal Incontinence; Fem | 2005 |
Fibre supplementation in addition to loperamide for faecal incontinence in adults: a randomized trial.
Topics: Antidiarrheals; Cross-Over Studies; Dietary Fiber; Fecal Incontinence; Female; Humans; Individuality | 2008 |
Effects of loperamide on anal sphincter function in patients complaining of chronic diarrhea with fecal incontinence and urgency.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Anal Canal; Diarrhea; Fecal Incontinence; Female; Humans; Loperamide; Male; Manometry; | 1982 |
Loperamide as a symptomatic treatment in pediatric surgery: a double-blind cross-over study.
Topics: Adolescent; Child; Child, Preschool; Diarrhea; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Double-Blind Method | 1981 |
Loperamide improves anal sphincter function and continence after restorative proctocolectomy.
Topics: Adult; Anal Canal; Colitis, Ulcerative; Cross-Over Studies; Defecation; Double-Blind Method; Fecal I | 1994 |
Effects of loperamide oxide on gastrointestinal transit time and anorectal function in patients with chronic diarrhoea and faecal incontinence.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Anal Canal; Chronic Disease; Cross-Over Studies; Diarrhea; Double-Blind Method; Fecal I | 1997 |
Is bowel confinement necessary after anorectal reconstructive surgery? A prospective, randomized, surgeon-blinded trial.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anal Canal; Codeine; Defecation; Diet Therapy; Double-Blind Method; | 1999 |
16 other studies available for loperamide and Fecal Incontinence
Article | Year |
---|---|
Biofeedback or loperamide for faecal incontinence in women.
Topics: Anal Canal; Biofeedback, Psychology; Exercise Therapy; Fecal Incontinence; Female; Humans; Loperamid | 2019 |
Biofeedback or loperamide for faecal incontinence in women - Author's reply.
Topics: Anal Canal; Biofeedback, Psychology; Exercise Therapy; Fecal Incontinence; Female; Humans; Loperamid | 2019 |
Biofeedback or loperamide for faecal incontinence in women.
Topics: Anal Canal; Biofeedback, Psychology; Exercise Therapy; Fecal Incontinence; Female; Humans; Loperamid | 2019 |
Low Anterior Resection Syndrome.
Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Aged; Chemotherapy, Adjuvant; Fecal Incontinence; Female; Humans; Ileostomy; Loperam | 2019 |
Bowel management program in patients with spina bifida.
Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Antidiarrheals; Child; Child, Preschool; Constipation; Enema; Fecal Incontinence; | 2019 |
Quality evidence on interventions for faecal incontinence.
Topics: Anal Canal; Biofeedback, Psychology; Exercise Therapy; Fecal Incontinence; Female; Humans; Loperamid | 2019 |
Treatments of faecal incontinence: recommendations from the French national society of coloproctology.
Topics: Anal Canal; Antidiarrheals; Cholestyramine Resin; Diet Therapy; Dietary Fiber; Electric Stimulation | 2014 |
Outcomes of combination treatment of fecal incontinence in women.
Topics: Adult; Age Factors; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Behavior Therapy; Chi-Square Distribution; Cohort Studi | 2008 |
[Taking charge of adult's anal incontinence].
Topics: Adult; Anal Canal; Antidiarrheals; Biofeedback, Psychology; Fecal Incontinence; Female; Humans; Lope | 2002 |
Use of an elemental diet as a nutritionally complete "medical colostomy".
Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Catheters, Indwelling; Child; Child, Preschool; Codeine; Colostomy; Diphenoxylate | 1983 |
Occasional fecal incontinence among community-dwelling older adults.
Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Atropine; Combined Modality Therapy; Dietary Fiber; Diphenoxylate; Drug Com | 1995 |
[Functional results of ileo-anal anastomosis. The point of view of the gastroenterologist].
Topics: Adenomatous Polyposis Coli; Colectomy; Colitis, Ulcerative; Diarrhea; Fecal Incontinence; Female; Ga | 1993 |
The use of loperamide to regulate peristalsis and improve bowel control: a preliminary report.
Topics: Child; Fecal Incontinence; Female; Gastrointestinal Motility; Humans; Infant; Intestine, Small; Lope | 1978 |
Moderation of urinary and faecal incontinence with loperamide.
Topics: Aged; Fecal Incontinence; Female; Humans; Hungary; Loperamide; Male; Middle Aged; Piperidines; Urina | 1989 |
Effect of loperamide on faecal control after rectoplasty for high imperforate anus.
Topics: Adolescent; Anal Canal; Anus, Imperforate; Child; Fecal Incontinence; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Lop | 1986 |
[Fecal incontinence--a review. Simple measures can give good therapeutic results].
Topics: Adult; Aged; Anal Canal; Cathartics; Fecal Incontinence; Female; Humans; Loperamide; Male; Middle Ag | 1985 |