lithium-chloride and Depressive-Disorder--Major

lithium-chloride has been researched along with Depressive-Disorder--Major* in 4 studies

Trials

3 trial(s) available for lithium-chloride and Depressive-Disorder--Major

ArticleYear
Double-blind study of high-dose fluoxetine versus lithium or desipramine augmentation of fluoxetine in partial responders and nonresponders to fluoxetine.
    Journal of clinical psychopharmacology, 2002, Volume: 22, Issue:4

    In a previous study, of 41 depressed patients who had not responded to fluoxetine 20 mg/day, 53% were treated with high-dose fluoxetine (40-60 mg/ day) and responded (i.e., their 17-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression [HAM-D-17] score was <7) versus 29% and 25% of patients treated with fluoxetine plus lithium (300-600 mg/day) or fluoxetine plus desipramine (25-50 mg/day), respectively. We wanted to assess whether these findings could be replicated in a larger sample of depressed outpatients. We identified 101 outpatients with major depressive disorder (52 men and 49 women; mean age, 41.6 + 10.6 years) who were either partial responders (n = 49) or nonresponders (n = 52) to 8 weeks of treatment with fluoxetine 20 mg/ day. These patients were randomized to 4 weeks of double-blind treatment with high-dose fluoxetine (40-60 mg/day), fluoxetine plus lithium (300-600 mg/day), or fluoxetine plus desipramine (25-50 mg/day). In the overall group of patients (N = 101), there was no significant difference in response rates across the three treatment groups (high-dose fluoxetine, 42.4%; fluoxetine plus desipramine, 29.4%; fluoxetine plus lithium, 23.5%). Dropout rates were also comparable, ranging from 9.1% (high-dose fluoxetine) to 14.7% (fluoxetine plus desipramine and fluoxetine plus lithium). There were also no significant differences in response rates across the three treatment groups among partial responders (high-dose fluoxetine, 50.0%; fluoxetine plus desipramine, 33.3%; fluoxetine plus lithium, 33.3%) and nonresponders (high-dose fluoxetine, 35.3%; fluoxetine plus desipramine, 26.3%; fluoxetine plus lithium, 12.5%). At the end of the study, the mean lithium level was 0.37 + 0.15 mEq/L (n = 27; range, 0.1-0.8 mEq/L) among lithium-treated patients, and the mean desipramine level was 104.7 + 58.8 ng/mL (n = 22; range, 25-257 ng/mL). There were no significant relationships between lithium or desipramine blood levels and degree of improvement (as measured by the change in HAM-D-17 score). We found no significant differences in efficacy among these three treatment strategies among patients who had failed to respond adequately to 8 weeks of treatment with fluoxetine 20 mg/day, although the high-fluoxetine group was associated with nonsignificantly higher response rates in both partial responders and nonresponders.

    Topics: Adult; Analysis of Variance; Antidepressive Agents, Second-Generation; Antidepressive Agents, Tricyclic; Antimanic Agents; Chi-Square Distribution; Depressive Disorder, Major; Desipramine; Double-Blind Method; Drug Synergism; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Fluoxetine; Humans; Lithium Chloride; Male; Middle Aged

2002
How long should the lithium augmentation strategy be maintained? A 1-year follow-up of a placebo-controlled study in unipolar refractory major depression.
    Journal of clinical psychopharmacology, 2002, Volume: 22, Issue:4

    There is compelling evidence from placebo-controlled studies that lithium augmentation is an effective strategy in the acute and continuation treatment of refractory unipolar major depression. Authors prospectively investigated the 1-year outcome of 22 subjects diagnosed with unipolar major depression who had participated in a 4-month placebo-controlled, double-blind continuation study of lithium augmentation without relapse. At the end of the double-blind phase, the blinded medication (lithium in 14 patients, placebo in 8 patients) was tapered off over a 1-week period, while the antidepressant was continued at the same dosage for another 4 weeks. Subsequently, the antidepressant was gradually discontinued over a 4-week period. Clinical status was assessed at regular follow-up visits. During the open 6-month follow-up period, seven subjects suffered an affective recurrence, five of whom had received lithium during the placebo-controlled, double-blind phase of the study. Study data suggest that active medication should be maintained for at least 1 year after successful lithium augmentation in patients with unipolar major depressive disorder.

    Topics: Adult; Amitriptyline; Antidepressive Agents, Tricyclic; Antimanic Agents; Depressive Disorder, Major; Double-Blind Method; Drug Synergism; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Lithium Chloride; Male; Middle Aged; Prospective Studies; Recurrence; Statistics, Nonparametric

2002
Changes in quantitatively assessed tremor during treatment of major depression with lithium augmented by paroxetine or amitriptyline.
    Journal of clinical psychopharmacology, 2001, Volume: 21, Issue:2

    Tremor is a relatively frequent side effect of lithium and of antidepressants with serotonergic properties. It can be expected that combinations of lithium (which is itself serotonergic) with such antidepressants will enhance not only efficacy, but also the incidence of side effects, including tremor. To quantitatively monitor the effect of antidepressant augmentation of ongoing lithium therapy on tremor, lithium-maintained patients with a breakthrough episode of major depression were randomly assigned under double-blind conditions to receive paroxetine 20 mg/day (N = 14) or amitriptyline 75 mg/day (N = 17). The initial dosages could be increased after 2 weeks to 40 mg/day and 150 mg/day, respectively, and the patients were treated for 6 weeks. Tremor activity was assessed weekly, quantitatively by accelerometry and qualitatively with the Dosage Record and Treatment Emergent Symptom Scale. Statistical analysis detected no significant difference between the treatment groups with respect to changes in mean tremor activity relative to baseline. However, analysis of the pooled data showed that tremor increased significantly during the course of combined lithium and antidepressant therapy, with the greatest increments occurring independent of dosage approximately 3 weeks after initiation of combination treatment. Although the mean tremor activity subsided toward the end of treatment, tremor activity on the whole was still significantly greater after 6 weeks of combined lithium and antidepressant treatment than at the start of combination therapy. Increased tremor was not associated with decreased medication compliance, and no patient discontinued treatment because of increased tremor. Tremor frequency was not affected by the study treatments.

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Amitriptyline; Antidepressive Agents; Antimanic Agents; Depressive Disorder, Major; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Humans; Lithium Chloride; Male; Middle Aged; Paroxetine; Statistics, Nonparametric; Tremor

2001

Other Studies

1 other study(ies) available for lithium-chloride and Depressive-Disorder--Major

ArticleYear
Lithium augmentation in venlafaxine-refractory depression.
    Journal of clinical psychopharmacology, 2001, Volume: 21, Issue:2

    Topics: Antimanic Agents; Cyclohexanols; Depressive Disorder, Major; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Humans; Lithium Chloride; Middle Aged; Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors; Venlafaxine Hydrochloride

2001