lipofectamine and Ascites

Peritoneal carcinomatosis is a severe form of cancer in the abdomen, currently treated with cytoreductive surgery and intravenous chemotherapy. Recently, nebulization has been proposed as a less invasive strategy for the local delivery of chemotherapeutic drugs. Also, RNA interference has been considered as a potential therapeutic approach for treatment of cancer. In this study, Lipofectamine RNAiMAX/siRNA complexes and cyclodextrin/siRNA complexes are evaluated before and after nebulization. Nebulization of the siRNA complexes does not significantly lower transfection efficiency when compared to non-nebulized complexes. After incubation in ascites fluid, however, the cyclodextrin/siRNA complexes show a drastic decrease in transfection efficiency. For the Lipofectamine RNAiMAX/siRNA complexes, this decrease is less pronounced. It is concluded that nebulization is an interesting technique to distribute siRNA complexes into the peritoneal cavity, providing the complexes are stable in ascites fluid which might be present in the peritoneal cavity.

Topics: Aerosols; Ascites; Cell Line, Tumor; Cyclodextrins; Female; Humans; Lipids; Luciferases; Ovarian Neoplasms; Peritoneal Neoplasms; Plasmids; RNA, Small Interfering; Transfection

Small interfering RNA (siRNA) offers a great potential for the treatment of various diseases and disorders. Nevertheless, inefficient in vivo siRNA delivery hampers its translation into the clinic. While numerous successful in vitro siRNA delivery stories exist in reduced-protein conditions, most studies so far overlook the influence of the biological fluids present in the in vivo environment. In this study, we compared the transfection efficiency of liposomal formulations in Opti-MEM (low protein content, routinely used for in vitro screening) and human undiluted ascites fluid obtained from a peritoneal carcinomatosis patient (high protein content, representing the in vivo situation). In Opti-MEM, all formulations are biologically active. In ascites fluid, however, the biological activity of all lipoplexes is lost except for lipofectamine RNAiMAX. The drop in transfection efficiency was not correlated to the physicochemical properties of the nanoparticles, such as premature siRNA release and aggregation of the nanoparticles in the human ascites fluid. Remarkably, however, all of the formulations except for lipofectamine RNAiMAX lost their ability to be taken up by cells following incubation in ascites fluid. To take into account the possible effects of a protein corona formed around the nanoparticles, we recommend always using undiluted biological fluids for the in vitro optimization of nanosized siRNA formulations next to conventional screening in low-protein content media. This should tighten the gap between in vitro and in vivo performance of nanoparticles and ensure the optimal selection of nanoparticles for further in vivo studies.

Topics: Ascites; Cell Line, Tumor; Female; Genetic Therapy; Humans; Lipids; Liposomes; Nanoparticles; Nanotechnology; Neoplasm Metastasis; Ovarian Neoplasms; Particle Size; Proteins; RNA Interference; RNA, Small Interfering; Spectrometry, Fluorescence; Transfection