lilial has been researched along with Dermatitis--Allergic-Contact* in 2 studies
2 other study(ies) available for lilial and Dermatitis--Allergic-Contact
Article | Year |
---|---|
Incorporating integrated testing strategy (ITSv1) defined approach into read-across (RAx) in predicting skin sensitization potency: ITSv1-based RAx.
Recently, due to regulatory and ethical demands, new approach methodologies (NAMs), defined approaches (DAs), and read-across (RAx) have been used in the risk assessment of skin sensitization. Integrated testing strategy (ITS)v1 DA, adopted in OECD Guideline No. 497, can be used for skin sensitization potency categorization. However, ITSv1 DA alone is not used for further refinement of the potency prediction based on EC3 (the estimated concentration that produces a stimulation index of 3 in murine local lymph node assay) values. Moreover, there is no explicit approach to incorporating NAM/DA data into RAx to fill the data gap of EC3 values with high confidence. This study developed a strategy incorporating ITSv1 DA into RAx to predict skin sensitization potency: ITSv1-based RAx. To examine the reliability of this novel strategy, a case study with lilial, a fragrance material, was performed. Based on ITSv1-based RAx, the skin sensitization potency of lilial was determined by extrapolating the EC3 value of 9.5% for the suitable analogue bourgeonal, which was close to the historical EC3 value of 8.6%. The result suggested that the strategy can refine the prediction of EC3 values with high confidence and be useful for the risk assessment of skin sensitization. Topics: Animals; Dermatitis, Allergic Contact; Eye Proteins; Homeodomain Proteins; Humans; Local Lymph Node Assay; Mice; Reproducibility of Results; Risk Assessment; Skin; Transcription Factors | 2023 |
Identification of Lilial as a fragrance sensitizer in a perfume by bioassay-guided chemical fractionation and structure-activity relationships.
Fragrance materials are among the most common causes of allergic contact dermatitis. The aim of this study was to identify in a perfume fragrance allergens not included in the fragrance mix, by use of bioassay-guided chemical fractionation and chemical analysis/structure-activity relationships (SARs). The basis for the investigation was a 45-year-old woman allergic to her own perfume. She had a negative patch test to the fragrance mix and agreed to participate in the study. Chemical fractionation of the perfume concentrate was used for repeated patch testing and/or repeated open application test on the pre-sensitized patient. The chemical composition of the fractions giving a positive patch-test response and repeated open application test reactions was obtained by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. From the compounds identified, those that contained a "structural alert" in their chemical structure, indicating an ability to modify skin proteins and thus behave as a skin sensitizer, were tested on the patient. The patient reacted positively to the synthetic fragrance p-t-butyl-alpha-methylhydrocinnamic aldehyde (Lilial), a widely used fragrance compound not present in the fragrance mix. The combination of bioassay-guided chemical fractionation and chemical analysis/structure-activity relationships seems to be a valuable tool for the investigation of contact allergy to fragrance materials. Topics: Aldehydes; Allergens; Biological Assay; Dermatitis, Allergic Contact; Female; Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry; Humans; Middle Aged; Patch Tests; Perfume; Structure-Activity Relationship | 2000 |