lewis-x-antigen and Bacterial-Infections

lewis-x-antigen has been researched along with Bacterial-Infections* in 4 studies

Other Studies

4 other study(ies) available for lewis-x-antigen and Bacterial-Infections

ArticleYear
Leucocyte adhesion deficiency-A multicentre national experience.
    European journal of clinical investigation, 2019, Volume: 49, Issue:2

    Leucocyte adhesion deficiency (LAD) is a rare, innate autosomal recessive immunodeficiency with three subtypes. Twenty-nine patients with LADs were diagnosed and treated in Israeli Medical Centers and in the Palestinian Authority. We discuss the phenotypic, genotypic and biochemical features of LAD-I, LAD-II and LAD-III diagnosed during the neonatal period and early infancy in 18, 6 and 5 patients, respectively. Consanguinity was frequent. Common features were severe infections of variable aetiology, excessive leukocytosis and delayed umbilical cord detachment. In LAD-I, the integrin CD18 expression varied from negligible to normal. However, CD11a expression was negligible in all tested patients, suggesting both CD11a and CD18 should be used to assess this subtype. LAD-II patients showed distinctive facial features, physical malformations, short stature and developmental delay. These patients show defective expression of SLeX (CD15a) on cell surface glycoproteins and lack of H antigen on erythroid cell surfaces resulting in Bombay blood group (hh). LAD-III showed intact but inactive β

    Topics: Antigens, Bacterial; Bacterial Infections; CD11 Antigens; CD18 Antigens; Cell Adhesion; Chemotaxis; Consanguinity; Erythroid Cells; Female; Humans; Infant; Infant, Newborn; Leukocyte-Adhesion Deficiency Syndrome; Leukocytosis; Lewis X Antigen; Male; Membrane Glycoproteins; Mutation; Mycoses; Neutrophils; Retrospective Studies; Treatment Outcome

2019
CD15 focus score: Infection diagnosis and stratification into low-virulence and high-virulence microbial pathogens in periprosthetic joint infection.
    Pathology, research and practice, 2017, Volume: 213, Issue:5

    The aim of the work was to validate the CD15 focus score for the infection pathology of periprosthetic joint infection in a large group and to clarify whether a stratification into low-virulence and high-virulence microbial pathogens is possible by means of the CD15 focus score (quantification of CD15 positive granulocytes).. The histopathology of 275 synovial tissue samples taken intraoperatively during revision operations (n=127 hip, n=141 knee, n=2 shoulder, n=5 ankle) was evaluated according to the SLIM consensus classification (SLIM=synovial-like interface membrane). Neutrophilic granulocytes (NG) were quantified by the CD15 focus score on the basis of the principle of focal maximum infiltration (focus) with evaluation of one field of vision (about 0.3mm. The patients with positive microbiological findings (n=160) had significantly (p<0.001, Mann-Whitney U test) higher CD15 focus score values than patients with negative microbiological findings (n=115), the cut-off value being 39 cells per high power field (HPF). The CD15 focus score values of low-virulence microbial pathogens (n=94) were significantly lower (p<0.001, Mann-Whitney U test) than the values of high-virulence microbial pathogens (n=55), the cut-off value being 106 cells per HPF. Based on the microbiological diagnosis the sensitivity with respect to a microbial infection is 0.91, the specificity 0.92 (PPV=0.94; NPV=0.88; accuracy: 0.92; AUC=0.95). Based on the differentiation of the CD15 focus score values between low-virulence and high-virulence microbes the sensitivity is 0.70 and the specificity 0.77 (PPV=0.63; NPV=0.81; accuracy=0.74; AUC=0.74).. As a result of the high sensitivity and specificity, the easy to use CD15 focus score is a diagnostically valid score for microbial periprosthetic infection. A differentiation between low-virulence and high-virulence microorganism of sufficiently high diagnostic quality is additionally possible as a result of the defined quantification of CD15 positive granulocytes (the CD15 focus score) histopathological diagnosis of microbial infections is possible, which on the one hand supports the microbiological diagnosis and on the other hand by the stratification into low-virulence and high-virulence microbial pathogens could represent an additional basis for a pathogen-specific antibiotic treatment in the event of unclear constellations of findings.

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Animals; Bacteria; Bacterial Infections; Female; Fucosyltransferases; Granulocytes; Humans; Joint Prosthesis; Lewis X Antigen; Male; Middle Aged; Neutrophils; Prosthesis-Related Infections; Sensitivity and Specificity; Virulence; Young Adult

2017
[CD15 focus score for diagnostics of periprosthetic joint infections : Neutrophilic granulocytes quantification mode and the development of morphometric software (CD15 quantifier)].
    Zeitschrift fur Rheumatologie, 2015, Volume: 74, Issue:7

    The aim of this project was to devise a quantification method for neutrophils within a single focal point through the development of a CD15 focus score which enables bacterial infections in synovial-like interface membranes (SLIM) to be diagnosed.. In this study a histopathological classification of 91 SLIM removed during revision surgery from the hips (n = 59) and knees (n = 32) was performed. Neutrophils were identified immunohistochemically by means of a CD15-specific monoclonal antibody. The quantitative evaluation of CD15-positive neutrophils (CD15Ne) used the principle of maximum focal infiltration (focus) together with an assessment of a single focal point (0.3 mm(2)). This immunohistochemical approach made it possible to develop the CD15 quantifier software, which automatically quantifies CD15Ne.. The SLIM cases with positive microbiological findings (n = 47) had significantly (p < 0.001, Mann-Whitney U-test) more CD15Ne/focal point than cases with negative microbiological findings (n = 44). A count of 50 CD15Ne/focal point was identified as the optimum threshold when diagnosing periprosthetic joint infections (PJI) using the CD15 focus score. If the microbiological findings are used as a gold standard, the diagnostic sensitivity is 0.83, and the specificity is 0.864 with a positive predictive value (PPV) of 0.87, a negative predictive value (NPV) of 0.83, an accuracy of 0.846 and an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.878. The evaluation of findings for the preparations using the CD15 quantifier software (n = 31) deviated by an average of 12 cells from the histopathological evaluation findings (CD15 focus score). Above a cell count of 62, the CD15-quantifier needs on average 32 s less than the pathologist.. The immunohistochemical CD15 focus score has a high diagnostic value and allowed the development of the CD15 quantifier software. This provides an automated procedure, which shortens the mentally tiring and time-consuming process of microscopic cell counting and thus makes a contribution towards the standardization of tools for diagnosing PJI.

    Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Bacterial Infections; Biomarkers; Diagnosis, Computer-Assisted; Fucosyltransferases; Humans; Lewis X Antigen; Male; Middle Aged; Neutrophils; Prosthesis-Related Infections; Reproducibility of Results; Sensitivity and Specificity; Software

2015
CD15s is a potential biomarker of serious bacterial infection in infants admitted to hospital.
    European journal of pediatrics, 2013, Volume: 172, Issue:10

    Early recognition of serious bacterial infection (SBI) in children is essential for better treatment outcome. Flow cytometry analysis of neutrophil surface molecules has been more frequently utilized as a tool for diagnosis of infection. The infants (n = 105) under 6 months of age presenting to the pediatric emergency department with fever without apparent source who were hospitalized with suspicion of having SBI were enrolled in this prospective study. Sixty-nine infants were included into the training pool and were classified into bacterial or viral infection group. Validation pool consisted of 36 infants. The values of white blood cells counts, absolute neutrophil count (ANC), C-reactive protein (CRP), procalcitonin (PCT), neutrophil CD11b, CD15s and CD64 expression, and the percentage (%CD15s+) and absolute count (AC-CD15s+) of CD15s+ neutrophils were determined. In infants with SBI, %CD15s+ was 10.5 times more likely to be higher than the cut-off value. ANC, CRP, PCT, CD64, and AC-CD15s+ were also found as useful biomarkers for differentiation between bacterial and viral infection. The best fit multivariate logistic regression model included CRP, PCT, and %CD15s+ as strong predictors of SBI. The model's sensitivity (87 %) and specificity (83 %) indicated high model's accuracy. After validation on independent dataset, model's accuracy maintained high: 86 % sensitivity and 93 % specificity, confirming its reliability and supporting CRP, PCT, and %CD15s+ as real predictors. The findings of this study support assumption made in the literature on significance of CD15s in inflammation processes. Also, this study demonstrated for the first time that CD15s is potentially valuable biomarker of SBI in infants.

    Topics: Area Under Curve; Bacterial Infections; Biomarkers; C-Reactive Protein; CD11b Antigen; Emergency Service, Hospital; Female; Fucosyltransferases; Hospitalization; Humans; Infant; Lewis X Antigen; Logistic Models; Male; Prospective Studies; Receptors, IgG; Sensitivity and Specificity

2013