lewis-x-antigen and Abdominal-Pain

lewis-x-antigen has been researched along with Abdominal-Pain* in 2 studies

Other Studies

2 other study(ies) available for lewis-x-antigen and Abdominal-Pain

ArticleYear
A comparison of Lewis x and Lewis y expression in Helicobacter pylori obtained from children and adults.
    The Journal of infectious diseases, 2001, Apr-01, Volume: 183, Issue:7

    There are no reports, to our knowledge, on the expression of Lewis (Le) antigens in Helicobacter pylori isolates from children. The aim of this study was to compare the expression of Le antigens by H. pylori isolates from children and from adults. Totals of 278 clones from 22 children with recurrent abdominal pain and 293 clones from 22 adults with (n=10) or without (n=12) duodenal ulcer were studied. Expression of Le(x) and Le(y) antigens was determined by ELISA, using monoclonal anti-Le antibodies. The Le phenotype of the patients was determined in gastric juice with a hemagglutination assay. Clones expressing Le(x) were more common in children than in adults (55.4% vs. 33.4%, respectively; P<.001), and Le(y) was more common in adults than in children (81.6% vs. 66%, respectively; P<.01). A trend analysis showed a significant decline in frequency of clones expressing Le(x) with age (P=.021). In this community, expression of Le antigens differs in H. pylori isolates obtained from children versus adults.

    Topics: Abdominal Pain; Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Antigens, Bacterial; Child; Child, Preschool; Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay; Female; Gastric Juice; Helicobacter pylori; Humans; Lewis Blood Group Antigens; Lewis X Antigen; Male; Middle Aged; Stomach Ulcer

2001
Scintigraphic determination of equivocal appendicitis.
    The American surgeon, 2000, Volume: 66, Issue:9

    We evaluated Tc-99m-labeled anti-CD15 immunoglobulin M monoclonal antibody (LeuTech) for scintigraphic detection of acute appendicitis in patients with an equivocal clinical presentation. LeuTech avidly binds to circulating and sequestered human polymorphonuclear neutrophils in vivo eliminating the need for in vitro cell labeling and the risks of blood handling. We studied 99 patients to evaluate the safety and efficacy of LeuTech imaging. Serial dynamic and static planar images were acquired for up to 3 hours after the intravenous administration of 10 to 20 mCi of Tc-99m LeuTech. Scans were read as positive or negative for acute appendicitis or other intra-abdominal infection. The institutional diagnosis was established by surgery and histopathology of the appendix, results of other diagnostic studies, or 2-week clinical follow-up. Scans were positive for appendicitis in 39 of 40 patients with appendicitis at surgery (sensitivity 98%) and negative for appendicitis in 49 of 58 patients without appendicitis (specificity 84%). One was lost to follow-up. Accuracy, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were 90, 81, and 98 per cent respectively. In patients with appendicitis and positive scans more than 50 per cent of the images were positive at 4 minutes, and all were positive by 1 hour. Mean time of first positive image was 15 minutes. There were no serious adverse reactions. We conclude that LeuTech imaging is a highly sensitive test for detection of appendicitis in equivocal cases. There are advantages of this agent over the other currently used radiotracers in terms of convenience and time to diagnosis particularly the rapidity with which acute appendicitis will be seen on the images.

    Topics: Abdomen; Abdominal Pain; Acute Disease; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Appendectomy; Appendicitis; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Immunoglobulin M; Injections, Intravenous; Lewis X Antigen; Neutrophils; Predictive Value of Tests; Radioimmunodetection; Radiopharmaceuticals; Safety; Sensitivity and Specificity; Technetium Tc 99m Exametazime

2000