levorphanol and Pain--Intractable

Neuropathic pain in cancer patients is often difficult to treat, requiring a combination of several different pharmacological therapies. We describe two patients with complex neuropathic pain syndromes in the form of phantom limb pain and Brown-Sequard syndrome who did not respond to conventional treatments but responded dramatically to the addition of levorphanol. Levorphanol is a synthetic strong opioid that is a potent N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor antagonist, mu, kappa, and delta opioid receptor agonist, and reuptake inhibitor of serotonin and norepinephrine. It bypasses hepatic first-pass metabolism and thereby not subjected to numerous drug interactions. Levorphanol's unique profile makes it a potentially attractive opioid in cancer pain management.

Topics: Adult; Amputation, Surgical; Analgesics, Opioid; Breast Neoplasms; Cancer Pain; Female; Humans; Humerus; Levorphanol; Neuralgia; Osteosarcoma; Pain Measurement; Pain, Intractable; Spinal Neoplasms

Levorphanol has been reported to provide analgesia at doses that suggest it does not act like other pure agonist opioids. A dual effect of action on both opioid receptors and n-methyl, d-aspartate (NMDA) receptors has been proposed to be responsible for this effect.. Case series of patients treated with levorphanol when pain did not respond adequately to other opioids, including methadone.. During a 5-year period in a single palliative medicine practice, 20 of 244 patients with chronic nonmalignant pain in a palliative care clinic and 11 of 1508 terminally ill patients enrolled in hospice care whose severe chronic pain was not relieved by treatment with other opioids were treated with oral levorphanol. Of those 31 patients, 16 (52%) reported excellent relief of pain and 7 (22%) reported fair relief for a total response rate of 74%.. These results suggest that levorphanol has a role in the treatment of pain syndromes that are refractory to other opioids. The pattern of relief seen in this case series is similar to that reported for methadone. Could it be that levorphanol may have a role like methadone for pain that is poorly controlled with other pure agonist opioids? We summarize what is known about levorphanol and provide a table for converting other opioids to levorphanol that was used for this case series.

Topics: Analgesics, Opioid; Chronic Disease; Hospice Care; Humans; Levorphanol; Louisiana; Methadone; Pain Measurement; Pain, Intractable; Palliative Care; Treatment Failure; Treatment Outcome

To assess the safety, efficacy, and use of continuous iv infusion (CI) of opioids for cancer pain, we reviewed the clinical experience of 36 patients who received 46 CIs. CI was always preceded by a period of repetitive dosing of opioids. Morphine was used in 36 CIs, methadone in four, hydromorphone in four, oxymorphone in one, and levorphanol in one. Mean doses during CI were the morphine equivalent of 17 mg/hour (range, 0.7-100) at the start, 69 mg/hour (range, 4-480) at the maximum, and 52 mg/hour (range, 1-480) at termination. Pain relief was acceptable during 28 CIs, unacceptable during 17, and unknown during one. There were few toxic effects other than sedation. Twenty-five patients died, 12 resumed im or oral opioids, six continued CI with a different opioid (yielding analgesia in two), and outcome was undetermined in three. This review suggests that (a) CI is safe, (b) analgesia may require rapid escalation of infusion rates, (c) patient response varies and lack of acceptable analgesia may occur in up to one-third, (d) ineffective CI with one drug may be followed by success with another, (e) CI should be preceded by a period of repetitive iv boluses with the same drug, and (f) guidelines can be developed which incorporate pharmacokinetic principles.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Child; Child, Preschool; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Evaluation; Humans; Hydromorphone; Infant; Infusions, Parenteral; Levorphanol; Methadone; Middle Aged; Morphine; Narcotics; Neoplasms; Oxymorphone; Pain, Intractable; Palliative Care; Retrospective Studies

Thirty-eight patients maintained on opioid analgesics for non-malignant pain were retrospectively evaluated to determine the indications, course, safety and efficacy of this therapy. Oxycodone was used by 12 patients, methadone by 7, and levorphanol by 5; others were treated with propoxyphene, meperidine, codeine, pentazocine, or some combination of these drugs. Nineteen patients were treated for four or more years at the time of evaluation, while 6 were maintained for more than 7 years. Two-thirds required less than 20 morphine equivalent mg/day and only 4 took more than 40 mg/day. Patients occasionally required escalation of dose and/or hospitalization for exacerbation of pain; doses usually returned to a stable baseline afterward. Twenty-four patients described partial but acceptable or fully adequate relief of pain, while 14 reported inadequate relief. No patient underwent a surgical procedure for pain management while receiving therapy. Few substantial gains in employment or social function could be attributed to the institution of opioid therapy. No toxicity was reported and management became a problem in only 2 patients, both with a history of prior drug abuse. A critical review of patient characteristics, including data from the 16 Personality Factor Questionnaire in 24 patients, the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory in 23, and detailed psychiatric evaluation in 6, failed to disclose psychological or social variables capable of explaining the success of long-term management. We conclude that opioid maintenance therapy can be a safe, salutary and more humane alternative to the options of surgery or no treatment in those patients with intractable non-malignant pain and no history of drug abuse.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Analgesics, Opioid; Female; Humans; Levorphanol; Male; Methadone; Middle Aged; Opioid-Related Disorders; Oxycodone; Pain, Intractable; Personality Assessment; Personality Inventory; Retrospective Studies; Risk; Time Factors

A patient with painful bilateral metastatic lumbosacral plexopathy from cervical cancer was treated with levorphanol tartrate (Levo-Dromoran), 4 mg orally every 4 hours, with poor pain relief. A lumbar subarachnoid catheter was then placed percutaneously. A bolus of 1 mg of morphine gave complete pain relief for 17 hours. Over the next week, the dose requirement increased to 10 mg/day, infused by an external pump. A permanently implantable infusion pump with a 50-cc drug chamber and flow rate of 3.4 cc/day was placed in the abdomen and attached to the lumbar subarachnoid catheter. The pump was refilled by percutaneous injection. Morphine was infused continuously at 15 mg/day, affording the patient increased mobility and no pain for 7 days. When the pain returned, the morphine dose was increased to 17.5 mg/day, and the patient was allowed to take oral Levo-Dromoran for pain. The intrathecal morphine dose was constant within 2-week periods, but was increased from 17.5 to 96 mg/day because of inadequate pain relief. Oral Levo-Dromoran intake averaged 3.4 mg/day. Levo-Dromoran intake was less during the 1st week of each 2-week cycle than the last week (mean 15.0 versus 38.0 mg/wk, p less than 0.05). No sedation or respiratory depression was seen.

Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Drug Tolerance; Humans; Infusions, Parenteral; Levorphanol; Male; Middle Aged; Morphine; Pain, Intractable; Spinal Cord Neoplasms; Subarachnoid Space