levocetirizine and Long-QT-Syndrome

Allergic rhinitis (AR) is now recognised as a global health problem that affects 10-30% of adults and up to 40% of children. Each year, millions of patients seek treatment from their healthcare provider. However, the prevalence of AR maybe significantly underestimated because of misdiagnosis, under diagnosis and failure of patients to seek medical attention. In addition to the classical symptoms such as sneezing, nasal pruritus, congestion and rhinorrhoea, it is now recognised that AR has a significant impact on quality of life (QOL). This condition can lead to sleep disturbance as a result of nasal congestion, which leads to significant impairment in daily activities such as work and school. Traditionally, AR has been subdivided into seasonal AR (SAR) or perennial AR (PAR). SAR symptoms usually appear during a specific season in which aeroallergens are present in the outdoor air such as tree and grass pollen in the spring and summer and weed pollens in the autumn (fall); and PAR symptoms are present year-round and are triggered by dust mite, animal dander, indoor molds and cockroaches. Oral histamine H(1)-receptor antagonists (H(1) antihistamines) are one of the most commonly prescribed medications for the treatment of AR. There are several oral H(1) antihistamines available and it is important to know the pharmacology, such as administration interval, onset of action, metabolism and conditions that require administration adjustments. When prescribing oral H(1) antihistamines, the healthcare provider must take into account the clinical efficacy and weigh this against the risk of adverse effects from the agent. In addition to the clinical efficacy, potential for improvement in QOL with a particular treatment should also be considered.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Cardiovascular System; Central Nervous System; Cetirizine; Drug Interactions; Histamine H1 Antagonists; Histamine H1 Antagonists, Non-Sedating; Humans; Long QT Syndrome; Loratadine; Piperazines; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Quality of Life; Rhinitis, Allergic, Perennial; Rhinitis, Allergic, Seasonal; Terfenadine; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Arrhythmias, Cardiac; Biomarkers; Cetirizine; Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions; Electrocardiography; Female; Fluoroquinolones; Healthy Volunteers; Heart Conduction System; Heart Rate; Humans; Indoles; Ion Channels; Long QT Syndrome; Male; Moxifloxacin; Ondansetron; Phenethylamines; Quinine; Quinolizines; Risk Assessment; Sulfonamides

To conduct a thorough QT study of levocetirizine, a non-sedating antihistamine, in accordance with International Conference on Harmonisation (ICH) E14 guidance.. The study was designed as a single-dose, placebo and positive-controlled, four-way crossover, randomised trial in which 52 healthy male and female subjects participated. Levocetirizine (5 and 30 mg) and placebo were administered double-blind, and the positive control, moxifloxacin (400 mg), was open-label. Electrocardiograms (ECGs) were obtained by continuous Holter monitoring at various time points (three per time point) during a 24-h period at baseline and after each treatment. The ECGs were read centrally in a blinded manner. QT intervals were corrected for heart rate using a gender- and study-specific correction (QTcSS) and Fridericia's correction (QTcF). The largest QTc time-matched and baseline-subtracted difference between each active drug and the placebo (largest delta delta QTcSS) was derived from a mixed-effect analysis of variance.. The one-sided 95% upper limits of the largest delta delta QTcSS for levocetirizine were 5.7 ms (5 mg) and 3.9 ms (30 mg), with mean estimates of 2.9 and 1.1 ms, respectively. Similar results were obtained for the delta delta QTcF data. Statistically, moxifloxacin significantly lengthened the QTcSS, with a one-sided 95% lower limit of the largest delta delta QTcSS of 10.5 ms and a mean estimate of 13.4 ms. There was no relationship between the measured delta QTcSS and the plasma concentration of levocetirizine, whereas a statistically significant linear relationship was observed with the plasma concentration of moxifloxacin [slope estimate 0.004 ms/(ng/mL); 95% confidence interval: 0.003-0.005].. Overall, the results of this thorough QT study indicate that the methodology of the trial was valid and sensitive enough to demonstrate the absence of effect of levocetirizine at both therapeutic (5 mg) and supra-therapeutic (30 mg) doses on cardiac repolarisation.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aza Compounds; Cetirizine; Cross-Over Studies; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Double-Blind Method; Electrocardiography, Ambulatory; Female; Fluoroquinolones; Heart Rate; Histamine H1 Antagonists, Non-Sedating; Humans; Long QT Syndrome; Male; Middle Aged; Moxifloxacin; Piperazines; Quinolines

In prior clinical studies, levocetirizine (LEVO) has demonstrated no effect on ventricular repolarization (QTc intervals), therefore it is a relevant negative control to assess in nonclinical assays to define low proarrhythmic risk. LEVO was tested in beagle dog and cynomolgus monkey (nonhuman primate [NHP]) telemetry models to understand the nonclinical-clinical translation of this negative control. One oral dose of vehicle, LEVO (10 mg/kg/species) or moxifloxacin (MOXI; 30 mg/kg/dog; 80 mg/kg/NHP) was administered to instrumented animals (N = 8/species) using a cross-over dosing design; MOXI was the in-study positive control. Corrected QT interval values (QTcI) were calculated using an individual animal correction factor. Blood samples were taken for drug exposure during telemetry and for pharmacokinetic (PK) analysis (same animals; different day) for exposure-response (C-QTc) modeling. Statistical analysis of QTc-by-timepoint data showed that LEVO treatment was consistent with vehicle, thus no effect on ventricular repolarization was observed over 24 h in both species. PK analysis indicated that LEVO-maximum concentration levels in dogs (range: 12,300-20,100 ng/ml) and NHPs (range: 4090-12,700 ng/ml) were ≥4-fold higher than supratherapeutic drug levels in clinical QTc studies. Slope analysis values in dogs (0.00019 ms/ng/ml) and NHPs (0.00016 ms/ng/ml) were similar to the human C-QTc relationship and indicated no relationship between QTc intervals and plasma levels of LEVO. MOXI treatment caused QTc interval prolongation (dog: 18 ms; NHP: 29 ms). The characterization of LEVO in these non-rodent telemetry studies further demonstrates the value and impact of the in vivo QTc assay to define a "no QTc effect" profile and support clinical safety assessment.

Topics: Animals; Dogs; Fluoroquinolones; Humans; Long QT Syndrome; Macaca fascicularis; Moxifloxacin; Telemetry

The long QT syndrome is a rare disease. The prevalence is estimated at 1/5 000 to 1/20,000. Numerous drugs are contra-indicated because they can lengthen the QT interval. A case of pollen allergy in an adolescent with LQTS is described. The possibility to prescribe anti-H1 drugs is reviewed since cases of torsades de pointe and even deaths have been reported for terfenadine and astemizole. Diphenhydramine, orphenadrine and hydroxyzine are contra-indicated. No accidents and no effects on the QT interval have been published for ebastine, fexofenadine, desloratadine and levocetirizine. These anti-H1 drugs could be used with great care, without any association with drugs resulting in low serum potassium level. Azelastine eye drops have been authorized and a routine protection by inhaled corticosteroids during the pollinic period has been advised in this adolescent treated by betablockers.

Topics: Adolescent; Adrenergic beta-Antagonists; Anti-Asthmatic Agents; Butyrophenones; Cetirizine; Conjunctivitis, Allergic; Cromolyn Sodium; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1; Heart; Histamine H1 Antagonists; Humans; Long QT Syndrome; Male; Piperazines; Piperidines; Rhinitis, Allergic, Seasonal; Terfenadine