levetiracetam and Intellectual-Disability

On the basis of the relevance of adequate epilepsy treatment (antiepileptic drugs, surgery and vagus nerve stimulation) for people with intellectual disabilities, all articles, published from the beginning of 2005 to March 2006 and searched by MEDLINE, on this topic were reviewed.. On pharmacological treatment of epilepsy in people with intellectual disabilities, there were two articles on topiramate and one on levetiracetam. Two studies described the effect of surgical interventions, one of epilepsy surgery in the narrow sense and one of vagus nerve stimulation. Two papers were published on clinical conditions and therapeutic aspects of Angelman syndrome. They highlight the importance of gamma-aminobutyric acidergic mechanism in Angelman syndrome and the antiepileptic drug effects in this syndrome.. A contradiction exists between the relevance of epilepsy treatment in people with intellectual disabilities and the small number of published studies on pharmacological treatment. Some of the reasons are addressed and some alternatives are proposed.

Topics: Anticonvulsants; Brain; Electric Stimulation Therapy; Epilepsy; Fructose; Humans; Intellectual Disability; Levetiracetam; Neurosurgical Procedures; Piracetam; Postoperative Complications; Topiramate; Vagus Nerve

To investigate the efficacy and safety of levetiracetam in adults with intellectual disabilities who have uncontrolled partial or generalised epilepsy.. An open label prospective study compared seizure frequency, adverse effects, participant challenging behaviour, carers' concerns about epilepsy and perceived participant quality of life between a baseline observation prior to the use of levetiracetam and follow-up observations at 3, 6, 9 and 12 months afterwards. Challenging behaviour, carers' concerns about epilepsy and perceived quality of life were assessed using standardized measures.. Recruitment was low (n=42). Six participants did not enter the trial. Two participants withdrew at initiation of treatment, one with seizures worsening and one with a rash, and a further one later on with a rash; all were felt to be drug related. Three other participants withdrew for independent reasons. Twelve months follow-up was achieved for 26 participants (62%) and at least 6 months follow-up for 30 participants (71%). Median seizure frequency reduced from baseline levels of 4.2 per week to average post-intervention levels of 2.2 for the 30 participants (z=-2.53, p<.05). No overall change in challenging behaviour was found, although increases in behaviour problems were reported for a minority. Patient concerns about seizures and medical treatment declined and perceived quality of life relating to seizure severity improved whilst that related to behaviour deteriorated. Increased adverse effects were reported immediately after initiation of levetiracetam but declined towards baseline levels by study completion.. Conclusions must remain tentative due to methodological weaknesses. Further investigation of the possible changes found here within a controlled study is merited.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Anticonvulsants; Drug Therapy, Combination; Epilepsy; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Intellectual Disability; Levetiracetam; Male; Middle Aged; Piracetam; Prospective Studies; Quality of Life; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult

Levetiracetam (LEV) is a novel antiepileptic drug (AED) with efficacy against a wide range of seizures types. The aim of this observational study was to assess its effectiveness in patients with mental retardation and refractory epilepsy. Sixty-four patients were started on adjunctive LEV after a 3-month baseline. LEV was initially dosed at 250 mg daily and increased by 250 mg every 2 weeks thereafter according to clinical response. Caregivers rated the patient's sleep, appetite, alertness, and behavior as poor (1), reasonable (2), or good (3) at each clinic visit. Patients were reviewed until one of four endpoints was reached: seizure freedom for at least 6 months, > or = 50% reduction in seizure frequency (responder) over a 6-month period, <50% reduction in seizure frequency (marginal effect) over a 6-month period, or LEV withdrawal due to lack of efficacy, adverse effects, or both. Twenty-four (38%) patients became seizure-free, 10 of whom were controlled on LEV 250 mg twice daily. An additional 18 (28%) patients were classified as responders, and 8 (12%) reported only marginal benefit from adjunctive LEV. Fourteen (22%) patients discontinued LEV (6 worsening seizures, 1 lack of efficacy, 7 adverse effects). Caregivers rated combined sleep, appetite, alertness, and behavior scores as "improved" at the end of follow-up (P<0.001). LEV improved seizure control in the majority of patients with mental retardation and may also have enhanced their quality of life.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Anticonvulsants; Behavior; Child; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Evaluation; Epilepsy; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Intellectual Disability; Levetiracetam; Male; Middle Aged; Neurologic Examination; Piracetam; Sleep; Treatment Outcome

We aimed to analyze the genotype-phenotype correlations of STXBP1 pathogenic variants, prognostic factors and the treatment choices in a case-series of STXBP1-related disorders from China.. The clinical data and genetic results of the children diagnosed with STXBP1-related disorders at Xiangya hospital from 2011 to 2019 were collected retrospectively, and analyzed. We divided our patients into groups for comparison purposes: patients with missense variants and nonsense variants, patients who are seizure-free and not seizure-free, patients with mild to moderate intellectual disability (ID) and severe to profound global developmental delay (GDD).. Nineteen patients were enrolled: 17 (89.5%) unrelated and 2 (10.5%) familial. Twelve (63.2%) were females. Developmental epileptic encephalopathy (DEE) was observed in 18 (94.7%) patients and ID alone in 1 (5.3%) individual. Thirteen patients (68.4%) had profound ID/GDD, 4 (23.53%) severe, 1 (5.9%) moderate and 1 (5.9%) mild. Three patients (15.8%) with profound ID died. A total of 19 variants were detected: pathogenic (n = 15) and likely pathogenic (n = 4). Seven were novel variants: c.664-1G>-, M486R, H245N, H498Pfs*44, L41R, L410del, and D90H. Of the 8 previous reported variants, 2 were recurrent: R406C and R292C. Anti-seizure medications were used in combinations, and 7 patients became seizure-free, and most of them achieved seizure freedom within the first 2 years of life irrespective of the type of the mutation. Effective medications for the seizure-free individuals included adrenocorticotropic (ACTH) and/or levetiracetam and/or phenobarbital and/or sodium valproate and/or topiramate and/or vigabatrin and/or nitrazepam. There was no correlation between the types of pathogenic variants and the phenotypes.. Our case-series showed that there is no genotype-phenotype correlation in patients with STXBP1-related disorders. This study adds 7 novel variants which expand the spectrum of STXBP1-related disorders. Combinations of levetiracetam and/or sodium valproate and/or ACTH and/or phenobarbital and/or vigabatrin and/or topiramate and/or nitrazepam were more often associated with seizure freedom in our cohort within 2 years of life.

Topics: Adrenocorticotropic Hormone; China; Female; Genetic Association Studies; Humans; Intellectual Disability; Levetiracetam; Male; Munc18 Proteins; Nitrazepam; Phenobarbital; Phenotype; Retrospective Studies; Topiramate; Valproic Acid; Vigabatrin

Approximately one quarter of people with an intellectual disability (PwID) have epilepsy of whom nearly three-quarters are pharmaco-resistant. There are higher reported neuropsychiatric side-effects to anti-seizure medication (ASM) in this group. Levetiracetam (LEV) is a first-line ASM with a stronger association with neuropsychiatric symptoms for PwID than other ASMs. Brivaracetam (BRV) is a newer ASM. Recent studies suggest a beneficial effect of swapping people who experience neuropsychiatric events with LEV to BRV. However, there is limited evidence of this for PwID. This evaluation analyses real world outcomes of LEV to BRV swap for PwID compared to those without ID.. We performed a multicentre, retrospective review of clinical records. Demographic, clinical characteristics and reported adverse events of patients switched from LEV to BRV (2016-2020) were recorded at 3 months pre and 6- and 12-month post-BRV initiation. Outcomes were compared between PwID and those without and summarised using cross-tabulations and logistic regression models. A Bonferroni correction was applied.. Of 77 participants, 46 had ID and 52% had a past psychiatric illness. 71% participants switched overnight from LEV to BRV. Seizure reduction of > 50% was seen in 40% patients. Psychiatric illness history was predictive of having neuropsychiatric side-effects with LEV but not BRV (p = 0.001). There was no significant difference for any primary outcomes between PwID versus without ID.. Switching from LEV to BRV appears as well tolerated and efficacious in PwID as those without ID with over 90% still on BRV after 12 months.

Topics: Anticonvulsants; Case-Control Studies; Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions; Epilepsy; Humans; Intellectual Disability; Levetiracetam; Substance Abuse, Intravenous; Treatment Outcome

Women with epilepsy frequently need antiseizure medication (ASM) to prevent seizures in pregnancy. Risk of neurodevelopmental disorders after prenatal exposure to AMSs is uncertain.. To determine whether children exposed prenatally to ASMs in monotherapy and duotherapy have increased risk of neurodevelopmental disorders.. The Nordic register-based study of antiepileptic drugs in pregnancy (SCAN-AED) is a population-based cohort study using health register and social register data from Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Norway, and Sweden (1996-2017; analysis performed February 2022). From 4 702 774 alive-born children with available mother-child identities and maternal prescription data, this study included 4 494 926 participants. Children from a multiple pregnancy or with chromosomal disorders or uncertain pregnancy length were excluded (n = 207 848).. Prenatal exposure to ASM determined from maternal prescription fills between last menstrual period and birth.. We estimated cumulative incidence at age 8 years in exposed and unexposed children. Cox regression adjusted for potential confounders yielded adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs) with 95% CIs for autism spectrum disorder (ASD), intellectual disability (ID), or any neurodevelopmental disorder (ASD and/or ID).. A total of 4 494 926 children were included; 2 306 993 (51.3%) were male, and the median (IQR) age at end of follow-up was 8 (4.0-12.1) years. Among 21 634 unexposed children of mothers with epilepsy, 1.5% had a diagnosis of ASD and 0.8% (numerators were not available because of personal data regulations in Denmark) of ID by age 8 years. In same-aged children of mothers with epilepsy exposed to topiramate and valproate monotherapy, 4.3% and 2.7%, respectively, had ASD, and 3.1% and 2.4% had ID. The aHRs for ASD and ID after topiramate exposure were 2.8 (95% CI, 1.4-5.7) and 3.5 (95% CI, 1.4-8.6), respectively, and after valproate exposure were 2.4 (95% CI, 1.7-3.3) and 2.5 (95% CI, 1.7-3.7). The aHRs were elevated with higher ASM doses compared with children from the general population. The duotherapies levetiracetam with carbamazepine and lamotrigine with topiramate were associated with increased risks of neurodevelopmental disorders in children of women with epilepsy: levetiracetam with carbamazepine: 8-year cumulative incidence, 5.7%; aHR, 3.5; 95% CI, 1.5-8.2; lamotrigine with topiramate: 8-year cumulative incidence, 7.5%; aHR, 2.4; 95% CI, 1.1-4.9. No increased risk was associated with levetiracetam with lamotrigine (8-year cumulative incidence, 1.6%; aHR, 0.9; 95% CI, 0.3-2.5). No consistently increased risks were observed for neurodevelopmental disorders after prenatal exposure to monotherapy with lamotrigine, levetiracetam, carbamazepin, oxcarbazepine, gapapentin, pregabalin, clonazepam, or phenobarbital.. In this cohort study, prenatal exposure to topiramate, valproate, and several duotherapies were associated with increased risks of neurodevelopmental disorders.

Topics: Anticonvulsants; Autism Spectrum Disorder; Autistic Disorder; Carbamazepine; Child; Cohort Studies; Epilepsy; Female; Humans; Intellectual Disability; Lamotrigine; Levetiracetam; Male; Pregnancy; Pregnancy Complications; Prenatal Exposure Delayed Effects; Topiramate; Valproic Acid

Clinical studies suggest that the antiepileptic drug (AED) brivaracetam (BRV) is associated with fewer behavioral and psychiatric adverse events (AEs) compared with levetiracetam (LEV) in treating epilepsy. There are, however, few comparative studies of treatment-emergent AEs between patients on BRV with preexisting psychiatric or behavioral comorbidities to those without. Our study compared longer-term tolerability over a 26-month period between these patient groups and assessed the overall efficacy of BRV as add-on therapy. Patients with intellectual disabilities in whom the prevalence of epilepsy is higher, are often excluded from randomized controlled trials, and our study further assessed comparative effectiveness between this patient group and those with normal range intellect. We collected prospective data on 134 patients prescribed add-on BRV for epilepsy at a tertiary UK center over a 26-month period. All patients had previously received LEV. Sixty-three patients were on LEV at the start of the data collection period. Levetiracetam was withdrawn and switched to BRV in 39 patients because of inefficacy and 24 patients because of behavioral or psychiatric side effects. Seventy-three patients (54%) had a preexisting psychiatric or behavioral disorder compared with 64 patients (46%) without. The retention rate at last follow-up [mean: 11 months (0.5-26 months)] was 60% in the psychiatric/behavioral disorders group versus 67% in those without (p = 0.68). Forty-one patients had diagnosed intellectual disabilities. The retention rate was 66% in this group versus 62% in patients without intellectual disabilities (p = 0.36). The commonest treatment-emergent AEs were somnolence (26%), aggression (23%), and depression (9%). There were similar frequencies reported for these specific events across the groups. The proportion with a 50% responder rate was 29% in patients with focal epilepsy and 47% in patients with generalized and combined focal and generalized epilepsies. However, fifteen patients (11%) reported increased seizure activity leading to withdrawal of treatment. This study showed evidence that BRV may be an effective adjunctive therapy in patients with drug-resistant focal or generalized epilepsies whose seizures have previously not responded or tolerated LEV therapy. We demonstrated a higher incidence of treatment-emergent AEs leading to lower retention rates compared with previous studies across all patient groups. There were, however, no signifi

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Anticonvulsants; Behavioral Symptoms; Comorbidity; Drug Therapy, Combination; Epilepsies, Partial; Epilepsy, Generalized; Female; Humans; Intellectual Disability; Levetiracetam; Male; Mental Disorders; Middle Aged; Prospective Studies; Pyrrolidinones; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult

De novo heterozygous mutations in STXBP1/Munc18-1 cause early infantile epileptic encephalopathies (EIEE4, OMIM #612164) characterized by infantile epilepsy, developmental delay, intellectual disability, and can include autistic features. We characterized the cellular deficits for an allelic series of seven STXBP1 mutations and developed four mouse models that recapitulate the abnormal EEG activity and cognitive aspects of human STXBP1-encephalopathy. Disease-causing STXBP1 variants supported synaptic transmission to a variable extent on a null background, but had no effect when overexpressed on a heterozygous background. All disease variants had severely decreased protein levels. Together, these cellular studies suggest that impaired protein stability and STXBP1 haploinsufficiency explain STXBP1-encephalopathy and that, therefore, Stxbp1+/- mice provide a valid mouse model. Simultaneous video and EEG recordings revealed that Stxbp1+/- mice with different genomic backgrounds recapitulate the seizure/spasm phenotype observed in humans, characterized by myoclonic jerks and spike-wave discharges that were suppressed by the antiepileptic drug levetiracetam. Mice heterozygous for Stxbp1 in GABAergic neurons only, showed impaired viability, 50% died within 2-3 weeks, and the rest showed stronger epileptic activity. c-Fos staining implicated neocortical areas, but not other brain regions, as the seizure foci. Stxbp1+/- mice showed impaired cognitive performance, hyperactivity and anxiety-like behaviour, without altered social behaviour. Taken together, these data demonstrate the construct, face and predictive validity of Stxbp1+/- mice and point to protein instability, haploinsufficiency and imbalanced excitation in neocortex, as the underlying mechanism of STXBP1-encephalopathy. The mouse models reported here are valid models for development of therapeutic interventions targeting STXBP1-encephalopathy.

Topics: Animals; Anticonvulsants; Brain Diseases; Cells, Cultured; Cerebral Cortex; Embryo, Mammalian; Epilepsy; Exploratory Behavior; Gene Expression Regulation; Haploinsufficiency; HEK293 Cells; Humans; Intellectual Disability; Levetiracetam; Mice; Mice, Inbred C57BL; Mice, Transgenic; Munc18 Proteins; Nerve Tissue Proteins; Synapsins; Synaptic Transmission

Pervasive developmental disorder is characterized by various symptoms that often include self-injurious behavior (SIB). Episodes of SIB occur in the context of high emotional arousal, anger, or fear and may be related to epilepsy. We report the case of a 20-year-old man with pervasive developmental disorder presenting with SIB non-responsive to antipsychotic medication. Positron emission tomography showed a right temporoparietal hypometabolic focal lesion suggestive of an epileptic focus. Two weeks after initiation of levetiracetam (Keppra®), SIB disappeared, without recurrence 24 months later. Levetiracetam (Keppra®) may be beneficial for such patients.

Topics: Anticonvulsants; Child; Child Development Disorders, Pervasive; Humans; Intellectual Disability; Levetiracetam; Male; Piracetam; Seizures; Self-Injurious Behavior; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult

Topics: Anticonvulsants; Child; Humans; Intellectual Disability; Lennox Gastaut Syndrome; Levetiracetam; Male; Piracetam; Spasms, Infantile; Status Epilepticus

The Lennox-Gastaut syndrome (LGS) is one of the most severe epileptic encephalopathies of childhood, characterized by electro-clinical triad of generalized spike-wave activity, slow (POL) in the electroencephalogram (EEG), multiple types of seizures and development delay. This paper intends to describe the syndrome in a patient with a history of hypoxic-ischaemic encephalopathy and Lennox-Gastaut syndrome, and a good response to treatment with levetiracetam (LEV).. Descriptive study on the development of a 3 year old child with intrauterine asphyxia, multiorgan failure, metabolic acidosis, hypovolemic shock, and seizures with cerebral oedema, who developed a West syndrome, resistant to drug treatment. The semiology of seizures progressively changed to generalized episodes of hypertonia and myoclonus, with slow spike-wave electroencephalographic activity.. With the diagnosis of Lennox-Gastaut syndrome the patient was treated with levetiracetam, showing a substantial improvement in the cognitive sphere, in the control of seizures, and electroencephalographic findings.. Lennox-Gastaut syndrome is one of the most severe epileptic syndromes in paediatric patients. Levetiracetam can help cognitive improvement, and contribute to seizure control in these patients.

Topics: Anticonvulsants; Child, Preschool; Humans; Intellectual Disability; Lennox Gastaut Syndrome; Levetiracetam; Male; Piracetam; Spasms, Infantile

In this retrospective study of institutionalized patients with mental retardation, we present the efficacy and safety of sequential treatment with intrarectal diazepam (IRD) gel (Diastat) and intravenous levetiracetam (IVL) in comparison with either treatment alone for acute repetitive or prolonged seizures (ARPS). We defined ARPS as >or=3 seizures of any type within 1 h or a single seizure of any type lasting >or=3 min. Eighty-eight ARPS episodes were treated in 25 patients (14 female, age 21-72 years), with mainly symptomatic generalized epilepsy. There were no adverse events directly attributable to the administration of IRD or IVL. Seizure recurrence within 4 h of treatment, the primary outcome measure, was significantly lower after combined sequential IRD + IVL treatment (3 of 36) compared to IRD alone (6 of 24, p = 0.048) or IVL alone (10 of 28, p = 0.039). There was no statistically significant difference between the individual IRD and IVL treatments (p = 0.604). The estimated odds ratio (OR) indicated that the risk of seizure recurrence was higher after IRD or IVL monotherapy compared to combined IRD + IVL treatment. Subsequent emergency room (ER) transfers following seizure recurrence were least likely after IVL treatment (10%) compared to combined IRD + IVL (67%) or IRD (83%) treatment. These findings suggest that although IRD or IVL monotherapy is efficacious, the combination is superior in controlling ARPS in this special group of institutionalized patients. In addition, we speculate that a more reliable onset of action after IVL treatment results in rapid seizure control and fewer ER transfers, despite seizure recurrence.

Topics: Acute Disease; Administration, Rectal; Adult; Aged; Diazepam; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Humans; Injections, Intravenous; Intellectual Disability; Levetiracetam; Male; Middle Aged; Piracetam; Retrospective Studies; Seizures; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult

To assess the long-term usefulness of 'new anti-epileptic drugs (AEDs)' (lamotrigine, topiramate, levetiracetam, gabapentin and pregabalin) in institutionalized intellectually disabled patients. Information from RCTs is lacking in this population with severe intellectual and behavioural disabilities.. Retrospective study. Data from the medical files and the pharmacy databases of 118 institutionalized intellectually disabled patients who had ever used at least one of the new AEDs were analyzed. The main evaluation parameters were the duration of use (using Kaplan-Meier survival estimates) and the reason for discontinuation (lack of efficacy, occurrence of adverse events, or both) of the new AEDs. Drug continuation was based on the evaluation of treatment results by experienced epileptologists, and not on fixed criteria.. New AEDs were generally tried only after a substantial number of other regimens (with classic AEDs) had failed. The most frequently used new AEDs were lamotrigine (68%) and levetiracetam (58%), followed by topiramate (28%) and gabapentin (8%). The 3-year retention rates were 70% (lamotrigine), 52% (levetiracetam), 51% (topiramate) and 33% (gabapentin). Discontinuation due to "lack of efficacy" occurred in 61% (topiramate), 60% (lamotrigine) and 42% (levetiracetam) of the cases. Discontinuation due to adverse events occurred in 42% (levetiracetam), 33% (topiramate) and 28% (lamotrigine).. Treatment of epilepsy with new AEDs was quite often successful in this very therapy-resistant population.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Amines; Anticonvulsants; Child; Cyclohexanecarboxylic Acids; Drug Utilization Review; Epilepsy; Fructose; Gabapentin; gamma-Aminobutyric Acid; Humans; Institutionalization; Intellectual Disability; Lamotrigine; Levetiracetam; Middle Aged; Piracetam; Retrospective Studies; Topiramate; Triazines

The authors report a patient with Lennox-Gastaut syndrome who was a fraternal twin. The twins encountered myoclonic seizures at the age of 4 years, but the seizures in the other patient were controlled very quickly without intellectual development damage. With the disease evolving, other characteristic seizures of Lennox-Gastaut syndrome appeared and failed to be controlled by multiple antiepileptic drugs, so levetiracetam was added on. At this time, frequent partial seizures from the left occipital and posterior temporal regions occurred, which always intermixed with atypical absence seizures in a single ictal event. To control the status epilepticus, levetiracetam was withdrawn immediately, and clonazepam, midazolam, and corticotropin in turn were used. The partial seizures were gradually alleviated. The results obtained in this study suggest that there might be some correlative mechanisms between partial seizures and atypical absence seizures in a single event. There is a temporal relationship between the occurrence of partial seizures and the introduction of levetiracetam.

Topics: Adolescent; Epilepsy; Epilepsy, Absence; Humans; Intellectual Disability; Levetiracetam; Male; Piracetam

Incidental paradoxical antiepileptic effect of levetiracetam has been described. The aim of the present study was to identify the epilepsy patients at risk.. We performed a retrospective analysis in 207 patients treated with levetiracetam. This entailed evaluation of patient notes and patient interviews. A paradoxical effect was defined as an increased seizure frequency or the experience of more severe seizures including generalized tonic-clonic seizures (GTCS) within 1 month after starting levetiracetam (LEV).. Thirty patients (14%) experienced a paradoxical effect. Eight of them (4%) developed de novo GTCS. We could not demonstrate any association between the paradoxical effect of levetiracetam and type of epilepsy or the antiepileptic comedication used. However we found that the paradoxical effect developed preferentially (p < 0.001) in mentally retarded patients.. Because there is an increased risk of worsening epilepsy when starting levetiracetam treatment of mentally retarded epileptic patients, there is a need for caution and close observation during the first weeks of therapy.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Anticonvulsants; Child; Disorders of Excessive Somnolence; Dizziness; Drug Interactions; Epilepsy; Female; Humans; Intellectual Disability; Irritable Mood; Levetiracetam; Male; Middle Aged; Piracetam; Retrospective Studies; Risk Factors

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Anticonvulsants; Epilepsy; Female; Humans; Intellectual Disability; Levetiracetam; Male; Piracetam

An observational longitudinal design was employed to evaluate whether treatment with the antiepileptic drug levetiracetam (LEV) adversely impacts behavior in people with intellectual disabilities and/or acquired brain damage. Thirty-five adults were assessed once off the drug and once when on LEV therapy, with a 2-month interval between assessments. Behaviors were rated using an adaptation of the Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale and the Challenging Behaviour Scale. Challenging behaviors were rated as more frequent and severe when individuals were taking LEV. Behavioral worsening was not related to better seizure control or increased levels of engagement in activities. Families and professionals need to be aware of the potential reversible adverse effects of this drug.

Topics: Adult; Anticonvulsants; Behavior; Epilepsy; Female; Humans; Intellectual Disability; Levetiracetam; Male; Middle Aged; Piracetam; Prospective Studies; Surveys and Questionnaires

To evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of levetiracetam in children with drug resistant epilepsy from a retrospective study.. We report the result of a study of 85 pediatric patients (mean 10.5 years, range: 1-24) with refractory generalized and focal epilepsy, who received levetiracetam as add-on treatment. The average duration of epilepsy was eight years, and the patient were treated with mean of 6.0 antiepileptic drugs before levetiracetam was introduced.. Ten patients (12%) became seizure-free, three (3%) responded with seizure reduction of more than 90%, 32 (38%) responded with seizure reduction of more than 50% following introduction of levetiracetam. No response to levetiracetam was reported in 34% (n: 29). Positive psychotropic effect was observed in 26 patient (30%). Mild to moderate side effects were reported in 11 patients (13%), consisting most frequently general behavioral changes, aggression, sleep disturbances, but they ceased after decreasing the dose of levetiracetam. Mental retardation was associated with poor response and associated with more side effects.. Levetiracetam is a well tolerated new antiepileptic drug that may effectively improve seizures control as an add-on drug in resistant epilepsy in childhood with good tolerability.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Age of Onset; Anticonvulsants; Child; Child, Preschool; Epilepsy; Female; Humans; Infant; Intellectual Disability; Levetiracetam; Male; Piracetam; Retrospective Studies; Treatment Outcome

Lennox-Gastaut syndrome is an epileptic encephalopathy characterized by multiple seizure types, mental retardation, and a slow spike-and-wave pattern on electroencephalography. Medical intractability is common. We identified a case series of six patients diagnosed with Lennox-Gastaut syndrome in which levetiracetam was initiated as add-on therapy for the management of seizures. At follow-up, four patients experienced 100% reduction of their myoclonic seizures; two patients had greater than 50% reduction of their atonic seizures, and four patients experienced 100% reduction in their generalized tonic-clonic seizures. Tonic seizures were not responsive to treatment. The most common side effect was irritability; the most positive change involved alertness. In this small sample, levetiracetam appeared effective in reducing seizures in Lennox-Gastaut syndrome. This preliminary study is limited by its retrospective design and small number of patients, but positive findings warrant a larger scale, multicenter study.

Topics: Adolescent; Anticonvulsants; Child; Child, Preschool; Drug Therapy, Combination; Epilepsy, Generalized; Epilepsy, Tonic-Clonic; Female; Humans; Intellectual Disability; Levetiracetam; Male; Myoclonic Epilepsy, Juvenile; Piracetam; Retrospective Studies; Syndrome

Optimal antiepileptic drug treatment in patients with learning disability (LD) represents a particular challenge. These patients are often unable to report toxicity, and side effects may manifest as behavioral problems. The aim of this open study was to compare efficacy and tolerability of levetiracetam (LEV) in patients with LD and those without LD. One hundred eighty-four consecutive adult patients who received LEV were followed for an average of 8.1 months. Fifty-six patients (30%) had LD. Thirty-nine percent of patients with refractory epilepsy (37% with and 40% without LD) had > 50% seizure reduction. Significantly more behavioral side effects (23% vs 10%) and a tendency toward less reported somatic central nervous side effects were found in the LD group. We conclude that LEV is equally effective and well tolerated in both patients with LD and patients without LD. However, behavioral problems are more frequent in patients with LD, whereas the tendency toward seizure increase is not enhanced.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Anticonvulsants; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Resistance; Drug Therapy, Combination; Epilepsies, Partial; Epilepsy, Generalized; Female; Humans; Intellectual Disability; Levetiracetam; Male; Mental Disorders; Middle Aged; Myoclonic Epilepsy, Juvenile; Piracetam; Retrospective Studies