levetiracetam and Infant--Newborn--Diseases

Neonatal stroke is the second cause of acute symptomatic neonatal seizures after hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy. The aim of this systematic review is to determine which drug among those available represents the best therapeutic choice for treatment of secondary seizures due to neonatal stroke.. We performed a systematic review searching on PubMed the keywords "Neonatal", "Stroke", "Seizures" and "Treatment". Search was limited only to English language with no time limit. Last literature search was done on May 30, 2022.. We selected 5 articles involving a total of 52 full-term neonates. In 96.1% the first line treatment was phenobarbital and in 3.9% was used phenobarbital associated with midazolam from the seizure onset but in all of these cases it was necessary to introduce further medications for controlling the seizures. As second line treatment was used lidocaine (response rate of 53.3%), midazolam (response rate of 15.38%) bumetanide (response rate of 100%), and fosphenytoin (no response). As third line treatment was used lidocaine (response rate of 87.5%), Midazolam (response rate of 60%), levetiracetam and clonazepam (response rate of 100%).. Our review shows that the use of ASMs that act throughout a gabaergic mechanism are inadequate in controlling seizures secondary to neonatal stroke in full-term newborns. Very effective seems to be lidocaine and levetiracetam with an apparent safer profile in short and long term. Bumetanide shows promising results, but they need to be confirmed by phase 3 studies.

Topics: Anticonvulsants; Bumetanide; Epilepsy; Humans; Infant, Newborn; Infant, Newborn, Diseases; Levetiracetam; Lidocaine; Midazolam; Phenobarbital; Stroke

Topics: Anticonvulsants; Developing Countries; Epilepsy; Humans; Infant, Newborn; Infant, Newborn, Diseases; Levetiracetam; Phenobarbital; Pilot Projects; Seizures

Neonatal seizures are one of the most challenging problems for experts across the globe. Although there is no consensus on the "ideal" treatment of neonatal seizures, phenobarbitone has been the drug of choice for decades. Unfortunately, although extensively studied in adults and children, levetiracetam lacks rigorous evaluation in the neonatal population, despite its frequent use as an off-label drug. The objective of this open-label, randomized, active-control, single-center, pragmatic trial was to compare the effectiveness of levetiracetam with phenobarbitone for term asphyxiated infants as a first-line drug.. The participants included in this study were inborn term asphyxiated infants with seizures in the first 48 hours of life. Infants satisfying the inclusion criteria were randomized to receive levetiracetam (20 mg/kg) or phenobarbitone (20 mg/kg). Clinical seizure control was noted. Infants who failed to respond to the primary drug were given the other group drug.. Of 103 eligible infants, 82 were randomly assigned (44 levetiracetam group, 38 phenobarbitone group). Clinical seizure control with the primary drug and maintenance of the same for 24 hours was observed in 29 infants (65.9%) in the levetiracetam group and 13 infants (34.2%) in the phenobarbitone group (P < .05, relative risk 0.52, 95% confidence interval 0.32-0.84). Of the infants in the phenobarbitone group who did not respond to the primary drug, 57.8% were controlled after adding levetiracetam.. Levetiracetam can be used with effectiveness as a first- and second-line drug in asphyxiated term infants. A more extensive study on pharmacokinetics and optimal regimen is required.

Topics: Adult; Anticonvulsants; Child; Epilepsy; Humans; Infant; Infant, Newborn; Infant, Newborn, Diseases; Levetiracetam; Off-Label Use; Phenobarbital; Seizures

Topics: Epilepsy; Humans; Infant, Newborn; Infant, Newborn, Diseases; Levetiracetam; Seizures

Although phenobarbital (PB) is commonly used as a first-line antiseizure medication (ASM) for neonatal seizures, in 2015 we chose to replace it with levetiracetam (LEV), a third-generation ASM. Here, we compared the safety and efficacy of LEV and PB as first-line ASM, considering the years before and after modifying our treatment protocol.. We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 108 neonates with electroencephalography (EEG)-confirmed seizures treated with first-line LEV or PB in 2012 to 2020.. First-line ASM was LEV in 33 (31%) and PB in 75 (69%) neonates. The etiology included acute symptomatic seizures in 69% of cases (30% hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy, 32% structural vascular, 6% infectious, otherwise metabolic) and neonatal epilepsy in 22% (5% structural due to brain malformation, 17% genetic). Forty-two of 108 (39%) neonates reached seizure freedom following first-line therapy. Treatment response did not vary by first-line ASM among all neonates, those with acute symptomatic seizures, or those with neonatal-onset epilepsy. Treatment response was lowest for neonates with a higher seizure frequency, particularly for those with status epilepticus versus rare seizures (P < 0.001), irrespective of gestational age, etiology, or EEG findings. Adverse events were noted in 22 neonates treated with PB and in only one treated with LEV (P < 0.001).. Our study suggests a potential noninferiority and a more acceptable safety profile for LEV, which may thus be a reasonable option as first-line ASM for neonatal seizures in place of PB. Treatment should be initiated as early as possible since higher seizure frequencies predispose to less favorable responses.

Topics: Anticonvulsants; Epilepsy; Humans; Infant, Newborn; Infant, Newborn, Diseases; Levetiracetam; Phenobarbital; Retrospective Studies; Seizures

High neonatal seizure burden is associated with worsened neurodevelopmental outcomes. We compared the efficacy of initial treatment with levetiracetam vs phenobarbital for maintaining low seizure burden in a retrospective cohort of 25 neonates monitored with video electroencephalography (EEG). Video EEG tracing were reviewed and paired with medication bolus times to determine seizure burden after treatment. Initial cumulative dose of phenobarbital was 20 mg/kg in all but 1 case; initial cumulative dose of levetiracetam ranged from 50 to 100 mg/kg. Eleven of 17 (65%) patients sustained seizure burden <10% following initial treatment with levetiracetam, compared with 5 of 8 (63%) with phenobarbital. Thirteen (76%) patients treated with levetiracetam had sustained seizure burden <20% compared with 6 (75%) treated with phenobarbital. The phenobarbital group showed a larger absolute reduction in average seizure burden in the hour before and after treatment (-24.3  vs -14.2 minutes/h). Six of 17 (35%) patients treated with levetiracetam remained seizure free after initial treatment, compared with 2 of 8 (25%) patients treated with phenobarbital. Initial treatment with levetiracetam was associated with shorter average time to seizure freedom (15 vs 21 hours). None of these results were statistically significant. Cumulative doses of levetiracetam 100 mg/kg were well tolerated and associated with substantial decrease in seizure burden in several cases. Levetiracetam remains a promising first-line treatment for neonatal seizures; additional randomized controlled trials evaluating the effects of high-dose levetiracetam on seizure burden and long-term outcomes are warranted.

Topics: Anticonvulsants; Epilepsy; Humans; Infant, Newborn; Infant, Newborn, Diseases; Levetiracetam; Phenobarbital; Retrospective Studies; Seizures

Appropriate treatment of neonatal seizures with an effective therapy is important in reducing long-term neurologic disabilities. Sixty-seven neonates, who received intravenous (IV) levetiracetam (LEV) as first-line therapy for treating seizures between 2013 and 2017 were evaluated retrospectively to investigate the efficacy of LEV and its neurodevelopmental outcome at 12 months of age. Of the 67 neonates (44 preterm and 23 term babies) evaluated for seizures, 55 (82%) had a defined etiology. EEG confirmation was obtained in 36 (57.1%) of the neonates with clinical seizures. On the 7th day of the treatment (mean seizure control time 7.4 ± 15.1 days), LEV was effective as monotherapy in 43 (64%), whereas add-on therapy was required in 24 (36%) neonates. At the 1-year follow-up, 76% of infants achieved drug-free state, nine (18%) infants remained on LEV monotherapy and three (6%) needed add-on therapy. Neurodevelopmental outcome of the infants was assessed with Ankara Development Screening Inventory and results suggested favorable neurodevelopmental outcome in 69.7% of the infants with at the end of the 1-year follow-up with LEV monotherapy. In conclusion, this retrospective cross-sectional study demonstrated that IV LEV is an effective first-line therapy for treating neonatal clinical seizures and LEV monotherapy effect was sustained during the first year follow-up.

Topics: Anticonvulsants; Child Development; Cross-Sectional Studies; Electroencephalography; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Infant; Infant, Newborn; Infant, Newborn, Diseases; Infant, Premature; Levetiracetam; Retrospective Studies; Seizures; Treatment Outcome

Neonatal seizures are difficult to diagnose and, when they are, tradition dictates first line treatment is phenobarbital. There is little data on how consultants diagnose neonatal seizures, choose when to treat or how they choose aetiological investigations or drug treatments. The purpose of this study was to assess the variation across the UK in the management of neonatal seizures and explore paediatricians' views on their diagnosis and treatment.. An explanatory sequential mixed methods approach was used (QUAN→QUAL) with equal waiting between stages. We collected quantitative data from neonatology staff and paediatric neurologists using a questionnaire sent to neonatal units and via emails from the British Paediatric Neurology Association. We asked for copies of neonatal unit guidelines on the management of seizures. The data from questionnaires was used to identify16 consultants using semi-structured interviews. Thematic analysis was used to interpret qualitative data, which was triangulated with quantitative questionnaire data.. One hundred questionnaires were returned: 47.7% thought levetiracetam was as, or equally, effective as phenobarbital; 9.2% thought it was less effective. 79.6% of clinicians had seen no side effects in neonates with levetiracetam. 97.8% of unit guidelines recommended phenobarbital first line, with wide variation in subsequent drug choice, aetiological investigations, and advice on when to start treatment. Thematic analysis revealed three themes: 'Managing uncertainty with neonatal seizures', 'Moving practice forward' and 'Multidisciplinary team working'. Consultants noted collecting evidence on anti-convulsant drugs in neonates is problematic, and recommended a number of solutions, including collaboration to reach consensus guidelines, to reduce diagnostic and management uncertainty.. There is wide variation in the management of neonatal seizures and clinicians face many uncertainties. Our data has helped reveal some of the reasons for current practice and decision making. Suggestions to improve certainty include: educational initiatives to improve the ability of neonatal staff to describe suspicious events, greater use of video, closer working between neonatologists and neurologists, further research, and a national discussion to reach a consensus on a standardised approach to managing neonatal epileptic seizures.

Topics: Anticonvulsants; Attitude of Health Personnel; Diagnostic Techniques and Procedures; Electroencephalography; Humans; Infant, Newborn; Infant, Newborn, Diseases; Interviews as Topic; Levetiracetam; Neonatologists; Patient Care Team; Pediatricians; Phenobarbital; Practice Patterns, Physicians'; Seizures; Surveys and Questionnaires; United Kingdom

Compare neurodevelopment after levetiracetam (LEV) and phenobarbital (PB) for neonatal seizures.. Retrospective study of infants who received antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) for neonatal seizures. Effect of cumulative exposure to LEV and PB on outcomes of death, cerebral palsy (CP) and Bayley Scales of Infant Development (BSID) scores were evaluated at 24 months corrected age. Analyses were adjusted for number of electrographic seizures and gestational age.. In 280 infants with comparable seizure etiology and cranial imaging results, increased exposure to PB was associated with worse BSID cognitive and motor scores (8.1- and 9-point decrease per 100 mg kg(-1); P=0.01). The effect was less with LEV (2.2- and 2.6-point decrease per 300 mg kg(-1) LEV (P=0.01)). CP probability increased by 2.3-fold per 100 mg kg(-1) PB and was not associated with increasing LEV.. Increased exposure to PB is associated with worse neurodevelopmental outcomes than LEV. Prospective studies of outcomes of neonatal exposure to AEDs are essential.

Topics: Anticonvulsants; Child Development; Child, Preschool; Cohort Studies; Gestational Age; Humans; Infant; Infant, Newborn; Infant, Newborn, Diseases; Levetiracetam; Phenobarbital; Piracetam; Retrospective Studies; Seizures

In contrast to drugs established to treat neonatal seizures, levetiracetam shows little neurotoxicity in experimental animal models and has good safety records in adults and children. Here, we present results from a survey on the off-label use of levetiracetam in newborn infants among neonatologists and pediatric neurologists in German university hospitals.

Topics: Anticonvulsants; Drug Utilization; Germany; Health Surveys; Hospitals, University; Humans; Infant, Newborn; Infant, Newborn, Diseases; Levetiracetam; Off-Label Use; Piracetam; Spasms, Infantile