levetiracetam and Drug-Related-Side-Effects-and-Adverse-Reactions

Levetiracetam (LVT), while an effective treatment for multiple seizure types, is associated with a high incidence of neuropsychiatric adverse events (NPAEs). In predominantly retrospective studies, supplementation with pyridoxine/vitamin B. An updated systematic review of the published literature was performed in line with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar were searched to identify studies published between June 2019 and 2nd November 2022 in which supplementary PN was initiated for the treatment of LVT-associated NPAEs. All study types were eligible. The risk of bias in randomized trials was assessed using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool.. Seven additional studies were identified: two double-blind, randomized controlled trials (RCTs), four retrospective studies, and one retrospective case series. One RCT reported significant improvements from baseline in behavioral adverse events (BAEs) in both the intervention (PN) group and the low-dose control group (both p < 0.05), with a significantly greater improvement in the intervention group (p < 0.001). In the second RCT, differences in BAE severity between PN and placebo groups at the endpoint were not statistically significant. In one retrospective study, subjective irritability was reported to have improved from baseline in 9/20 individuals (45%) treated with supplementary PN. Data for systematic assessments (PHQ-9 and GAD-7) were available for 10 individuals. Assessment by PHQ-9 showed that six individuals improved, two worsened and two had no change. Based on the GAD-7, three people improved, two worsened and five had no change. In the second retrospective study, 18/41 individuals (44%) who commenced PN following the emergence of BAEs showed "significant" improvement. In a separate group of individuals with pre-existing behavioral problems in whom PN treatment was initiated at the same time as commencing LVT, 3/18 (16.7%) developed BAEs. This compared with 79/458 people (17.2%) who were initially treated only with LVT. The third retrospective study compared treatment-related irritability in individuals who had been treated with both LVT and perampanel, either sequentially or concomitantly. Two people who developed irritability while receiving LVT monotherapy were able to continue treatment with the addition of PN. The fourth study reported a significantly lower LVT discontinuation rate in individuals taking PN and a higher rate of improved behavior in those who were able to continue LVT. The case series reported improvements in behavioral symptoms in six people within two to three weeks of commencing supplementary PN.. Data published within the last three years add to earlier evidence suggesting that PN might be effective in the treatment of NPAEs associated with LVT. However, the quality of evidence remains poor and only a few prospective trials have been published. Data from placebo-controlled trials are still largely lacking. Currently, there is insufficient evidence to justify any firm recommendation for PN supplementation to treat NPAEs associated with LVT. Further well-designed, prospective trials are warranted.

Topics: Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions; Humans; Levetiracetam; Pyridoxine; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Treatment Outcome; Vitamin B 6

The ability to administer medications via rapid intravenous bolus has the potential to allow for the rapid attainment of therapeutic drug levels and to limit the amount of unnecessary fluid volumes infused. The purpose of this review was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of undiluted or minimally diluted levetiracetam bolus doses.. A total of six pieces of the literature were evaluated in this review. Doses of up to 4,500 mg of intravenous levetiracetam were found to be both efficacious and safe when administered undiluted or minimally diluted in either a peripheral or central line. Product concentrations of levetiracetam ranged from 50 mg/mL to 100 mg/mL, with volumes ranging from 10 to 30 mL. Maintenance doses of up to 1,500 mg twice daily were demonstrated to be both efficacious and safe when administered undiluted or minimally diluted. Injection site pain and agitation were the most commonly reported adverse drug effects.. Although hospitals and clinicians must be judicious with regard to training and the safety concerns of bolus intravenous push doses, and will need to address numerous logistical concerns, this practice is supported by practice guidelines and should be readily employed.

Topics: Administration, Intravenous; Anticonvulsants; Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions; Humans; Infusions, Intravenous; Levetiracetam; Piracetam; Status Epilepticus

A generalized tonic-clonic seizure (GTCS) is the most severe form of common epileptic seizure and carries the greatest risk of harm. The aim of this review is to provide an evidence-based guide for the selection of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) for patients with GTCSs. Eight AEDs are approved in Europe and the USA for the treatment of both primarily GTCSs (PGTCSs) and secondarily GTCSs (SGTCSs) and are considered in this paper.. Each AED is evaluated using five criteria: (1) efficacy, by seizure type (a: PGTCSs and b: SGTCSs); (2) adverse effects; (3) interactions; (4) adherence and dosing; and (5) mechanism of action (MOA). To ensure the inclusions of robust data, only efficacy data accepted by regulatory authorities were considered, and data related to adverse effects, interactions, adherence, and MOA were all extracted from UK Summaries of Product Characteristics (SPCs).. (1a) There is class 1 evidence of the efficacy of only four AEDs in controlling PGTCSs (lamotrigine, levetiracetam, perampanel, and topiramate). (1b) There is no class 1 evidence of the efficacy of any AED in SGTCSs although some evidence from pooled/subgroup analyses or meta-analyses supports the use of the four AEDs (levetiracetam, perampanel, topiramate, and with less robust data for lamotrigine). (2) AEDs are associated with different, but to some extent overlapping, common adverse effect profiles but have differing idiosyncratic adverse effects. (3) Pharmacokinetic interactions are seen with most, but not all, AEDs and are most common with carbamazepine and phenytoin. (4) Good adherence is important for seizure control and is influenced by frequency of dosing, among other factors. (5) Mechanism of action is also a consideration in rationalising AED selection when switching or combining AEDs.. Ultimately, the choice of AED depends on all these factors but particularly on efficacy and adverse effects. Different patients will weigh the various factors differently, and the role of the treating physician is to provide accurate information to allow patients to make informed choices.

Topics: Anticonvulsants; Benzodiazepines; Carbamazepine; Drug and Narcotic Control; Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions; Humans; Lamotrigine; Levetiracetam; Nitriles; Phenytoin; Pyridones; Seizures; Topiramate; Treatment Outcome

Levetiracetam is a new anticonvulsant, which works to block high-voltage-activated Ca(++) channels in children, for partial-onset seizures. Reports of clinical experience with pediatric ingestions are minimal. The purpose of this study was to characterize the toxicity of accidental levetiracetam exposures in children less than 6 years of age.. This was an 11-year retrospective observational case series of pediatric (< 6 years old) levetiracetam ingestions reported to a Poison Control System from 2002 to 2013. Case narratives were individually reviewed to collect desired information on exposure and clinical course. Inclusion criteria were levetiracetam as a single ingested medication, age less than 6 years, treatment in a health care facility, and followed to a known outcome.. Eighty-two cases met inclusion criteria with 55% female patients and overall median age of 2.0 years (range: 1-60 months). The levetiracetam dose ingested was reported in 69 (84.1%) cases, with exact dose (median dose, 45.0 mg/kg; range, 10.5-1429 mg/kg) reported in 33 cases (40.2%). Of these, twenty-nine cases (88%) involved the oral solution formulation and 28 cases (85%) had unintentional therapeutic error as the cause of the exposure. No dose-response relationship was demonstrated; however, the odds of a levetiracetam-naive patient, (median dose, 26.9 mg/kg; N = 15) with an unintentional exposure, developing drowsiness or ataxia was 6 times that of a patient who was not naïve to levetiracetam (median dose, 70.1 mg/kg; N = 20) (Odds ratio [OR], 6.0; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.03-35.91).Of the 82 cases, 17 (20.7%) developed untoward clinical effects of drowsiness and/or ataxia. Eighty patients (97.6%) were treated and discharged from the emergency department, and two patients (2.4%) were admitted. The two patients admitted included a two-month old who was accidentally given a dose 10 times that of her usual dose and a 3-year old who was lethargic on arrival to the hospital after ingestion of an unknown dose. Of all patients, 66 patients (80.5%) had no effect from the drug exposure. The medical outcome was considered to be minor in 15 cases (18.3%), and moderate in 1 case (1.2%). There were no cases with major outcomes and no deaths.. Pediatric levetiracetam exposures were associated with few transient clinical effects. Poison Control Centers may wish to consider acuity of ingestion when developing send-in protocols.

Topics: Anticonvulsants; California; Child, Preschool; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions; Female; Humans; Infant; Levetiracetam; Male; Piracetam; Poison Control Centers

Levetiracetam is an antiepileptic drug that has been shown to be effective in various types of seizures, both partial and generalized. Although it is not yet well established because of the small number of studies, levetiracetam as both add-on therapy and monotherapy can be considered as an alternative to valproic acid in some pediatric patients. We have reviewed the available data on the efficacy, tolerability, and safety of levetiracetam in children with epilepsy. The efficacy of levetiracetam as an adjunctive therapy and as monotherapy for generalized and partial childhood epilepsies and for some types of specific epileptic syndromes of infancy and childhood (such as juvenile myoclonic epilepsy, benign rolandic epilepsy, and Jeavon syndrome) has been demonstrated in some studies. Moreover, levetiracetam may be a valuable option for children with refractory epilepsy. The reported tolerability of levetiracetam and its safety profile are favorable. Among the side effects reported, behavioral changes and even psychotic reactions seem to occur more frequently in younger patients (under 4 years of age). The onset of signs/symptoms usually occurs early, even during the titration phase, and, in many cases, at a low dosage (<20 mg/kg/day). These side effects were always observed to be reversible after discontinuation of levetiracetam. In conclusion, results from clinical trials to date suggest that levetiracetam has a full spectrum of efficacy as well as a favorable safety profile, and this drug can be considered a valuable option in the treatment of epilepsy in pediatric patients.

Topics: Animals; Child; Drug Prescriptions; Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions; Epilepsy; Humans; Levetiracetam; Piracetam

Levetiracetam is a broad-spectrum antiseizure medication with known behavioral side effects. The possible beneficial effect of pyridoxine on improvement of these psychiatric problems has been suggested in few previous studies. This clinical trial aimed to investigate the effect of pyridoxine on behavioral side effects of levetiracetam in adult patients with epilepsy.. This study was a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled clinical trial on 53 adult patients with epilepsy with behavioral side effects after treatment by levetiracetam. Patients who met the study criteria were randomized to receive 40 mg/day pyridoxine or placebo. Their psychiatric state was surveyed by SCL-90-R questionnaire before and three weeks after initiation of treatment.. There were no statistically significant differences in the behavioral adverse effects between the pyridoxine-treated group and the placebo group.. Although this study showed no statistically significant beneficial effects of pyridoxine on the behavioral adverse effects of levetiracetam, placebo-controlled trials with a larger size and higher doses are needed to determine whether it is effective or not.

Topics: Adult; Anticonvulsants; Double-Blind Method; Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions; Epilepsy; Humans; Levetiracetam; Piracetam; Pyridoxine; Treatment Outcome

This study was undertaken to compare the efficacy of modified Atkins diet (MAD) among children with non-surgical drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE) to levetiracetam, when added to on-going anti-seizure medications.. An open-label, randomized controlled trial among children aged 2-12 years with non-surgical DRE was conducted. Eligible children were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive add-on MAD or levetiracetam. Baseline and post-intervention seizure frequency at 12 weeks was determined from seizure logs maintained by parents. The primary outcome was the proportion of responders, i.e., patients who achieved > 50% seizure reduction from baseline. Adverse events were compared. Analysis was intention-to-treat. (NCT04172311) RESULTS: One hundred and one children were enrolled (MAD-51, levetiracetam-50). The majority of the enrolled children had generalized seizures of mixed types secondary to structural brain lesions and Lennox-Gastaut syndrome was the most common electroclinical syndrome (46%). The proportion of children with >50% seizure reduction at 12 weeks was significantly higher in the MAD arm compared to the levetiracetam arm (27/51(52.9%) vs 11/50(22%); p < 0.001). At 12-weeks post-intervention, the change in mean seizure frequency compared to baseline was -47.33 ± 39.57% in the MAD arm and -31.15 ± 32.18% in the levetiracetam arm (p = 0.03). Constipation (41.1%) was the most frequent adverse effect with MAD. Sedation/lethargy (18%) and anxiety and irritability (14%) were the most frequent adverse effects in the levetiracetam group.. Addition of MAD was found to be superior to levetiracetam among children with non-surgical DRE with predominant generalized seizures in achieving seizure reduction at 12 weeks. Both treatments were well tolerated. Adverse effects, although higher with MAD, were expected side effects.

Topics: Child; Diet, High-Protein Low-Carbohydrate; Diet, Ketogenic; Drug Resistant Epilepsy; Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions; Humans; Levetiracetam; Seizures; Treatment Outcome

Levetiracetam is a relatively new-generation antiseizure drug approved for the treatment of focal and generalized seizures. Despite its favorable side effect profile and minimal drug-drug interactions, neuropsychiatric side effects are reported in up to 13% of children. A few case series have suggested that supplementation of pyridoxine may mitigate these side effects, but controlled trials are lacking. To address this issue, a randomized interventional study was carried out in a pediatric tertiary hospital to qualify and quantify the potential beneficial effect of pyridoxine in attenuating the neuropsychiatric side effects of levetiracetam in children.. A total of 105 children with epilepsy who were taking levetiracetam (as a monotherapy or an adjunct) who showed behavioral symptoms coinciding with the start of levetiracetam, were included. Patients randomly and blindly received either a therapeutic (pyridoxine group, 46 of 105, 44%) or a homeopathic dose of pyridoxine (placebo, 59 of 105, 56%). A 30-item behavioral checklist was used to qualify and quantify the behavioral side effects at baseline and at different time points following initiation of treatment.. Both placebo and pyridoxine groups experienced a statistical reduction in behavioral scores when compared with baseline. Our study indicated that although there was a placebo effect, the improvement in neuropsychiatric symptoms was more prominent in children who received therapeutic doses of pyridoxine.. These data provide clinicians with pertinent evidence-based information that suggests that a trial of pyridoxine in patients who experience behavioral side effects due to the use of levetiracetam may avoid unnecessary change of antiseizure medications.

Topics: Anticonvulsants; Behavioral Symptoms; Child; Child, Preschool; Double-Blind Method; Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions; Female; Humans; Levetiracetam; Male; Outcome Assessment, Health Care; Pyridoxine; Vitamin B Complex

Brivaracetam is a new antiepileptic drug indicated for adjunctive treatment of focal seizures in adults at a dose of 50-200mg/day taken in two equal doses. The objective of this study was to evaluate the abuse potential of brivaracetam compared with alprazolam (positive control), placebo, and levetiracetam.. This study in healthy recreational CNS depressant users showed that single doses of brivaracetam 50mg (therapeutic single dose) had lower sedative, positive, and negative drug effects than alprazolam, while brivaracetam 200 and 1000mg (supratherapeutic single doses) were more similar to alprazolam. The subjective profile of brivaracetam appeared to be similar to that of levetiracetam, but further evaluation using a range of levetiracetam doses would be needed to confirm similar abuse potential.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Alprazolam; Anticonvulsants; Central Nervous System Depressants; Cross-Over Studies; Double-Blind Method; Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions; Euphoria; Female; Humans; Hypnotics and Sedatives; Illicit Drugs; Levetiracetam; Male; Middle Aged; Pyrrolidinones; Young Adult

To evaluate the feasibility and safety of intravenous (iv) levetiracetam (LEV) added to the standard therapeutic regimen in adults with status epilepticus (SE), and as secondary objective to assess a population pharmacokinetic (PK) model for ivLEV in patients with SE.. In 12 adults presenting with SE, 2,500 mg ivLEV was added as soon as possible to standardized protocol, consisting of iv clonazepam and/or rectal diazepam, as needed followed by phenytoin or valproic acid. ivLEV was administered over approximately 5 min, in general after administration of clonazepam, regardless the need for further treatment. During 24-h follow-up, patients were observed for any clinically relevant side-effects. Blood samples for PK analysis were available in 10 patients. A population PK model was developed by iterative two-stage Bayesian analysis and compared to PK data of healthy volunteers.. Eleven patients with a median age of 60 years were included in the per protocol analysis. Five were diagnosed as generalized-convulsive SE, five as partial-convulsive SE, and one as a nonconvulsive SE. The median time from hospital admission to ivLEV was 36 min. No serious side effects could be related directly to the administration of ivLEV. During PK analysis, four patients showed a clear distribution phase, lacking in the others. The PK of the population was best described by a two-compartment population model. Mean (standard deviation, SD) population parameters included volume of distribution of central compartment: 0.45 (0.084) L/kg; total body clearance: 0.0476 (0.0147) L/h/kg; distribution rate constants, central to peripheral compartment (k(12)): 0.24 (0.12)/h, and peripheral to central (k(21)): 0.70 (0.22)/h. Mean maximal plasma concentration was 85 (19) mg/L.. The addition of ivLEV to the standard regimen for controlling SE seems feasible and safe. PK data of ivLEV in patients with SE correspond to earlier values derived from healthy volunteers, confirming a two-compartment population model.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Anticonvulsants; Bayes Theorem; Biological Availability; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Therapy, Combination; Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions; Female; Humans; Infusions, Intravenous; Levetiracetam; Male; Metabolic Clearance Rate; Middle Aged; Piracetam; Prospective Studies; Status Epilepticus

The objective of this study was to determine whether levetiracetam (LEV) is an effective drug for treatment of trigeminal neuralgia (TN).. Ten patients with TN were enrolled in a 10-week, prospective, open-label pilot study. The primary outcome measure was the visual analogue scale on daily pain diary and side effects. Serum levels of LEV were measured to assess correlation between drug levels and pain control.. There was a significant tendency towards improvement in pain severity compared with baseline in four patients with higher doses of 4,000 mg/day. The four treatment responders had less pain compared with baseline (50-90% improvement) and three subjects continued the drug after study completion. All patients rated themselves on the global evaluation scale as much improved (n = 2), minimally improved (n = 3), no change (n = 1), minimally worse (n = 2), much worse (n = 1) and very much worse (n = 1). LEV was very well tolerated and there was no difference in side effects between the low and high doses of LEV evaluations.. Given its established safety profile, a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial of LEV using enhancement enrollment design is needed to confirm these open-labelled findings using a wide variety of outcome measures.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticonvulsants; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Resistance; Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions; Female; Humans; Levetiracetam; Male; Middle Aged; Pain Measurement; Patient Satisfaction; Pilot Projects; Piracetam; Prospective Studies; Treatment Outcome; Trigeminal Neuralgia

The aim of this study was to assess the relationship between levetiracetam dose and both efficacy and safety in adult patients with refractory partial epilepsy. Dose-response relationships for levetiracetam efficacy were evaluated using pooled data from three trials including adults with refractory partial epilepsy. Two were randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group trials in which doses of 1000-3000 mg/day of levetiracetam were administered as adjunctive therapy. The third consisted of the two parts of a crossover randomized, double-blind study in which levetiracetam (1000 or 2000 mg/day) or placebo was added to ongoing therapy. Data from each part of the crossover trial were included as if it was an independent parallel-group study. A fourth randomized double-blind trial was added for the safety evaluation. It included data from adults receiving placebo or 2000 mg/day of levetiracetam as adjunctive therapy for refractory partial seizures. The combined analysis showed an increasing effect with increasing dose. The responder rates (> or = 50% reduction in seizures) for placebo and levetiracetam 1000, 2000, and 3000 mg/day were 13.1%, 28.5%, 34.3%, and 41.3%, respectively. The respective values for seizure freedom were 0.8%, 4.7%, 6.3%, and 8.6%. There was no evidence of a dose-response relationship with regard to adverse events, including those (asthenia, dizziness, somnolence) most commonly associated with this antiepileptic drug. Patients who do not become seizure-free at the lowest recommended levetiracetam dose (1000 mg/day) should be titrated to 2000 or 3000 mg/day to provide the greatest opportunity for efficacy with little or no increased risk for adverse events.

Topics: Anticonvulsants; Cross-Over Studies; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Double-Blind Method; Drug Evaluation; Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions; Epilepsy; Humans; Levetiracetam; Outcome Assessment, Health Care; Piracetam

Topics: Anticonvulsants; Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions; Humans; Levetiracetam; Topiramate

Data on drug-induced liver injury (DILI) caused by newer antiseizure medications (ASMs) in the elderly are scarce and mainly come from literature case reports. We analyzed Individual Case Safety Reports (ICSRs) of DILI in elderly patients treated with newer ASMs reported to VigiBase.. Empirica™ Signal software was used to retrieve ICSRs reported to VigiBase up to 31 December 2021 and to calculate Empirical Bayesian Geometric Mean and corresponding 90% confidence intervals (EB05, EB95) for each drug-event pair. EB05 > 2,. There were 1399 ICSRs reporting 1947 events of hepatotoxicity. 56.97% of the reports were reported in females, 67.05% were serious, and 3.36% resulted in death. For one or more events of hepatotoxicity, signals were detected for lamotrigine, levetiracetam, oxcarbazepine, topiramate, and zonisamide. Age- and gender-biased reporting frequency was identified for topiramate-induced hyperammonemia, with disproportionally higher reporting frequency in ≥75-year-old male patients.. The results of our study indicate differences among newer ASMs in their potential to cause DILI in the elderly. Further studies are needed to confirm the associations identified in this study.

Topics: Aged; Anticonvulsants; Bayes Theorem; Chemical and Drug Induced Liver Injury; Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions; Female; Humans; Levetiracetam; Male; Topiramate

Approximately one quarter of people with an intellectual disability (PwID) have epilepsy of whom nearly three-quarters are pharmaco-resistant. There are higher reported neuropsychiatric side-effects to anti-seizure medication (ASM) in this group. Levetiracetam (LEV) is a first-line ASM with a stronger association with neuropsychiatric symptoms for PwID than other ASMs. Brivaracetam (BRV) is a newer ASM. Recent studies suggest a beneficial effect of swapping people who experience neuropsychiatric events with LEV to BRV. However, there is limited evidence of this for PwID. This evaluation analyses real world outcomes of LEV to BRV swap for PwID compared to those without ID.. We performed a multicentre, retrospective review of clinical records. Demographic, clinical characteristics and reported adverse events of patients switched from LEV to BRV (2016-2020) were recorded at 3 months pre and 6- and 12-month post-BRV initiation. Outcomes were compared between PwID and those without and summarised using cross-tabulations and logistic regression models. A Bonferroni correction was applied.. Of 77 participants, 46 had ID and 52% had a past psychiatric illness. 71% participants switched overnight from LEV to BRV. Seizure reduction of > 50% was seen in 40% patients. Psychiatric illness history was predictive of having neuropsychiatric side-effects with LEV but not BRV (p = 0.001). There was no significant difference for any primary outcomes between PwID versus without ID.. Switching from LEV to BRV appears as well tolerated and efficacious in PwID as those without ID with over 90% still on BRV after 12 months.

Topics: Anticonvulsants; Case-Control Studies; Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions; Epilepsy; Humans; Intellectual Disability; Levetiracetam; Substance Abuse, Intravenous; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Anticonvulsants; Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions; Humans; Levetiracetam; Piracetam; Pyridoxine

Levetiracetam (LEV) is an effective antiseizure medicine, but 10%-20% of people treated with LEV report psychiatric side-effects, and up to 1% may have psychotic episodes. Pharmacogenomic predictors of these adverse drug reactions (ADRs) have yet to be identified. We sought to determine the contribution of both common and rare genetic variation to psychiatric and behavioral ADRs associated with LEV.. This case-control study compared cases of LEV-associated behavioral disorder (n = 149) or psychotic reaction (n = 37) to LEV-exposed people with no history of psychiatric ADRs (n = 920). All samples were of European ancestry. We performed genome-wide association study (GWAS) analysis comparing those with LEV ADRs to controls. We estimated the polygenic risk scores (PRS) for schizophrenia and compared cases with LEV-associated psychotic reaction to controls. Rare variant burden analysis was performed using exome sequence data of cases with psychotic reactions (n = 18) and controls (n = 122).. Univariate GWAS found no significant associations with either LEV-associated behavioural disorder or LEV-psychotic reaction. PRS analysis showed that cases of LEV-associated psychotic reaction had an increased PRS for schizophrenia relative to contr ols (p = .0097, estimate = .4886). The rare-variant analysis found no evidence of an increased burden of rare genetic variants in people who had experienced LEV-associated psychotic reaction relative to controls.. The polygenic burden for schizophrenia is a risk factor for LEV-associated psychotic reaction. To assess the clinical utility of PRS as a predictor, it should be tested in an independent and ideally prospective cohort. Larger sample sizes are required for the identification of significant univariate common genetic signals or rare genetic signals associated with psychiatric LEV ADRs.

Topics: Anticonvulsants; Case-Control Studies; Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions; Genetic Predisposition to Disease; Genome-Wide Association Study; Humans; Levetiracetam; Pharmacogenetics; Prospective Studies

Brivaracetam (BRV) is one of our latest antiseizure medications (ASMs). It is an analogue of levetiracetam with limited real-life experience. The purpose of this study was to evaluate clinical experience with BRV with focus on efficacy, tolerability and pharmacokinetic variability among adult patients with difficult-to-treat epilepsy.. We retrospectively collected clinical and laboratory data from patients aged > 18 years who initiated treatment with BRV during 2016-2019 and were followed for > one year or cessation of BRV.. The study cohort consisted of 120 adults with drug-resistant epilepsy. Serum concentrations of BRV were available in 72 patients. After one-year follow-up, the retention rate of BRV was 52%. Fifty-seven patients (48%) were responders (>50 reduction of seizure frequency), of whom six became seizure free. Adverse effects were reported in 78 patients (65%); 37 (31%) experienced psychiatric problems like increased irritability, anxiety and depressive symptoms. The mean daily BRV dose was 159 mg (SD 80 mg) and the mean serum concentration 5.4 μmol/L (SD 4.1 μmol/L). In 24 patients, BRV replaced levetiracetam. Pharmacokinetic variability between patients was considerable; 14-fold variation in concentration/dose (C/D)-ratios. Concomitant use of enzyme-inducing ASMs decreased the C/D-ratio by 48%. There were no significant differences in serum concentrations between responders vs. non-responders, or those who experienced adverse effects or not.. After > 1 year of treatment with BRV, we found a responder rate of 48% in adult patients with difficult-to-treat epilepsy. The drug was largely well tolerated, but one third experienced psychiatric adverse effects. The combination of clinical and pharmacokinetic data provides insight into factors contributing to efficacy and tolerability of new ASMs.

Topics: Adult; Anticonvulsants; Drug Therapy, Combination; Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions; Epilepsy; Humans; Levetiracetam; Pyrrolidinones; Retrospective Studies; Treatment Outcome

Aggression is the most common adverse effect of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs). This study aimed to investigate the association of aggression with AED use. The reporting odds ratio (ROR) from adverse event reports, submitted to the Japanese Adverse Drug Event Report database between 2004 and 2020, was used to calculate and investigate the association between AEDs and aggression. We also analyzed the association of aggression with the combined use of AEDs and the relationship between AED-associated aggression and patient characteristics. A total of 433 patients developed aggression. Significant aggression signals were detected for perampanel (crude ROR: 325.04, 95% confidence interval (CI): 118.48-752.58, p < 0.01), levetiracetam (crude ROR: 17.14, 95% CI: 10.33-26.90, p < 0.01), lacosamide (crude ROR: 16.90, 95% CI: 2.02-62.51, p < 0.01), lamotrigine (crude ROR: 15.98, 95% CI: 9.99-24.39, p < 0.01), valproate (crude ROR: 6.68, 95% CI: 4.27-10.02, p < 0.01), and carbamazepine (crude ROR: 2.47, 95% CI: 1.17-4.59, p < 0.01). The combined therapy with perampanel and levetiracetam had a significant aggression signal (adjusted ROR: 25.90, 95% CI: 1.14-59.10, p < 0.01). In addition, we found that aggression frequently occurred in patients <60 year (adjusted ROR: 2.88, 95% CI: 1.49-5.56, p < 0.01) treated with levetiracetam. These results may be useful for minimizing the risk of aggression during the treatment of AEDs.

Topics: Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting Systems; Aggression; Anticonvulsants; Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions; Humans; Japan; Levetiracetam

Levetiracetam (LEV) is an anti-seizure medication (ASM) known to have significant behavioral side effects in children with epilepsy. These side effects may be improved by supplemental vitamin B6 (pyridoxine) use. Our research aimed to study risk factors for LEV side effects and the role of vitamin B6 in altering this risk.. We retrospectively analyzed the demographic and clinical profile of all pediatric patients on LEV treatment between July 2019 and December 2020. T-tests, Chi-square and Fisher exact tests were used to assess predictors of LEV discontinuation. A p-value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant.. 150/240 (62%) children were on additional medications besides LEV for epilepsy management. Thirty-five percent children reported side effects, especially behavioral and mood concerns. Of the patients who reported side effects on LEV, 71% were taking vitamin B6 (n = 59). The rate of LEV discontinuation was significantly lower for children on vitamin B6 than children not taking B6, regardless of monotherapy or polypharmacy (49% v 88% respectively, p = 0.001). Over half of the patients who were able to remain on LEV reported improved behavior with B6 supplementation as compared to those who were unable to continue LEV (17/30, 57% versus 0/26, 0%; p < 0.001).. Levetiracetam side effects significantly impact the tolerability of this ASM in children with epilepsy. Our results suggest that vitamin B6 supplementation can significantly reduce the odds of discontinuing LEV due to its behavioral side effects.

Topics: Anticonvulsants; Child; Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions; Epilepsy; Humans; Levetiracetam; Piracetam; Pyridoxine; Retrospective Studies; Vitamin B 6

Brivaracetam (BRV) is licensed as an adjunctive treatment for focal epilepsy. We describe our clinical experience with BRV at a large UK tertiary center.. Adults initiated on BRV between July 2015 and July 2020 were followed up until they discontinued BRV or September 2021. Data on epilepsy syndrome, duration, seizure types, concomitant and previous antiseizure medication (ASM) use, BRV dosing, efficacy, and side effects were recorded. Efficacy was categorized as temporary (minimum three months) or ongoing (at last follow-up) seizure freedom, ≥50% seizure reduction, or other benefits (e.g., no convulsions or daytime seizures). Brivaracetam retention was estimated using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis.. Two-hundred people were treated with BRV, of whom 81% had focal epilepsy. The mean (interquartile range [IQR]) follow-up time was 707 (688) days, and the dose range was 50-600 mg daily. The mean (IQR) of the previous number of used ASMs was 6.9 (6.0), and concomitant use was 2.2 (1.0). One-hundred and eighty-eight people (94%) had previously discontinued levetiracetam (LEV), mainly due to side effects. 13/200 (6.5%) were seizure free for a minimum of six months during treatment, and 46/200 (23%) had a ≥50% reduction in seizure frequency for six months or more. Retention rates were 83% at six months, 71% at 12 months, and 57% at 36 months. Brivaracetam was mostly discontinued due to side effects (38/75, 51%) or lack of efficacy (28/75, 37%). Concomitant use of carbamazepine significantly increased the hazard ratio of discontinuing BRV due to side effects (p = 0.006). The most commonly reported side effects were low mood (20.5%), fatigue (18%) and aggressive behavior (8.5%). These side effects were less prevalent than when the same individuals took LEV (low mood, 59%; aggressive behavior, 43%). Intellectual disability was a risk factor for behavioral side effects (p = 0.004), and a pre-existing mood disorder significantly increased the likelihood of further episodes of low mood (p = 0.019).. Brivaracetam was effective at a broad range of doses in managing drug-resistant epilepsy across various phenotypes, but less effective than LEV in those who switched due to poor tolerability on LEV. There were no new tolerability issues, but 77% of the individuals experiencing side effects on BRV also experienced similar side effects on LEV.

Topics: Anticonvulsants; Carbamazepine; Drug Resistant Epilepsy; Drug Therapy, Combination; Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions; Epilepsies, Partial; Humans; Levetiracetam; Pyrrolidinones; Seizures; Tertiary Care Centers; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Accidental Falls; Aged; Anticonvulsants; Clinical Pharmacy Information Systems; Deprescriptions; Drug Prescriptions; Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions; Electronic Health Records; Electronic Prescribing; Epilepsy; Female; Humans; Levetiracetam; Medical Record Linkage; Medication Therapy Management; Phenytoin; Practice Patterns, Physicians'

Operational delays have the potential to lead to suboptimal time to seizure control during status epilepticus. Levetiracetam (LEV) is an urgent control antiepileptic medication that offers relative lack of adverse effects and ease of monitoring. There are limited data published demonstrating safety and tolerability of undiluted rapid intravenous (IV) push of LEV in doses of 1000 mg or less. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety of IV push administration of LEV doses up to 4500 mg.. This is a retrospective, observational, cohort analysis of adult patients who received at least one dose of undiluted IV push LEV from October 15, 2019 to August 31, 2020 at a large academic medical center in Phoenix, Arizona. Outcomes of interest include safety and tolerability of rapid administration of undiluted LEV.. There were 953 unique patients included during the study period. LEV was a new medication for witnessed or suspected seizure in 51.9% of patients, and 40.7% of patients had a documented history of epilepsy or seizure disorder. There were 8561 undiluted IV push LEV doses administered, 3674 (42.9%) of which were greater than 1000 mg. LEV was administered most often through a peripheral IV (79.1%). There were 12 patients with documented adverse drug events during the study period, with four potentially directly related to IV push LEV administration. These events were limited to local injection site reactions and included redness, burning, and loss of a peripheral IV line.. Rapid IV administration of undiluted LEV is both safe and tolerable in doses of up to 4500 mg, allowing for rapid drug administration, which is paramount during neurologic emergencies.

Topics: Adult; Anticonvulsants; Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions; Epilepsy; Humans; Levetiracetam; Piracetam; Seizures; Status Epilepticus; Treatment Outcome

Newer antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) are preferred over conventional AEDs with the perception of better safety profile and efficacy though there is a lack of confirmatory evidence. The present study assessed the adverse drug reactions' (ADRs) profile of AEDs prescribed in persons with epilepsy (PWE) as per the System Organ Class (SOC) and compared them on the basis of demographics and treatment pattern.. This prospective, cross-sectional, and observational study was conducted in PWE attending Neurology Outpatient-Department from February 2016 to April 2019 who were presented with any ADR. World Health Organization-Uppsala Monitoring Centre (WHO-UMC) scale was used for the causality assessment of suspected ADRs.. Among the 1011 PWE on AEDs, male:female ratio was 622:389, adult:pediatric ratio 736:275, and conventional:newer AEDs ratio 624:387. Among monotherapy PWE (47.1%), commonly used AEDs were levetiracetam (34.4%), valproic acid (22.9%), carbamazepine (18.3%), phenytoin (11.9%), and other AEDs (12.5%). A total of 1990 ADRs (1.96 ADRs per PWE) were reported as per SOC; among them, newer vs. conventional AEDs did not reveal any significant difference; however, monotherapy vs. polytherapy showed differences in nervous system disorders (p = 0.01) and skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders (p = 0.005). Causality assessment revealed 0.3% certain, 27.3% probable, 61.3% possible, and 11.1% unlikely association of ADRs with AEDs. Depending on the ADRs, there was either withdrawal of AED (0.9%), reduction in dose (48.4%), or continuation in the same dose as before (50.7%).. The ADR analysis showed that newer AEDs were associated with a similar trend of ADRs as that of conventional AEDs. Thus, the choice among newer and conventional AEDs should preferably focus on the experience of better efficacy in addition to safety data.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Anticonvulsants; Benzodiazepines; Child; Cross-Sectional Studies; Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions; Epilepsy; Female; Humans; Levetiracetam; Male; Middle Aged; Prospective Studies; Valproic Acid; Young Adult

Antiseizure drugs (ASDs) are known to cause a wide range of adverse drug reactions (ADRs). Recently, electronic health care data using the common data model (CDM) have been introduced and commonly adopted in pharmacovigilance research. We aimed to analyze ASD-related ADRs using CDM and to assess the feasibility of CDM analysis in monitoring ADR in a single tertiary hospital.. We selected five ASDs: oxcarbazepine (OXC), lamotrigine (LTG), levetiracetam (LEV), valproic acid (VPA), and topiramate (TPM). Patients diagnosed with epilepsy and exposed to monotherapy with one of the ASDs before age 18 years were included. We measured four ADR outcomes: (1) hematologic abnormality, (2) hyponatremia, (3) elevation of liver enzymes, and (4) subclinical hypothyroidism. We performed a subgroup analysis to exclude the effects of concomitant medications.. From the database, 1344 patients were included for the study. Of the 1344 patients, 436 were receiving OXC, 293 were receiving LTG, 275 were receiving LEV, 180 were receiving VPA, and 160 were receiving TPM. Thrombocytopenia developed in 14.1% of patients taking VPA. Hyponatremia occurred in 10.5% of patients taking OXC. Variable ranges of liver enzyme elevation were detected in 19.3% of patients taking VPA. Subclinical hypothyroidism occurred in approximately 21.5% to 28% of patients with ASD monotherapy, which did not significantly differ according to the type of ASD. In a subgroup analysis, we observed similar ADR tendencies, but with less thrombocytopenia in the TPM group.. The incidence and trends of ADRs that were evaluated by CDM were similar to the previous literature. CDM can be a useful tool for analyzing ASD-related ADRs in a multicenter study. The strengths and limitations of CDM should be carefully addressed.

Topics: Anticonvulsants; Common Data Elements; Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions; Electronic Health Records; Epilepsy; Humans; Lamotrigine; Levetiracetam; Oxcarbazepine; Topiramate; Valproic Acid

A 62-year-old previously healthy male was admitted with new onset generalised tonic-clonic seizures. Treatment was initiated with the antiepileptic levetiracetam and he had no further episodes of seizures. Creatine kinase (CPK) level was 1812 IU/L 12-hour postadmission. Despite good hydration, his CPK levels continued to rise dramatically and reached a level of 19 000 IU/L on day 5. This rise was unexplained as he did not have any further seizures and had a normal renal function. In the absence of other risk factors, the rare possibility of levetiracetam being responsible for the disproportionately high CPK was considered. Within 12 hours of withdrawal of levetiracetam, there was a downward trend in the CPK levels, with a 10-fold decrease in CPK levels over the next 4 days. This is only the ninth case reported in literature regarding this rare and potentially serious adverse effect of levetiracetam.

Topics: Anticonvulsants; Creatine Kinase; Drug Substitution; Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions; Humans; Levetiracetam; Male; Middle Aged; Neurologic Examination; Phenytoin; Rhabdomyolysis; Seizures; Treatment Outcome

The aim was to study the impact of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) on paediatric patients on lamotrigine therapy and the evaluation of possible drug interactions, especially in triple antiepileptic drug combinations. During the period of 2001-2015, 1308 pre-dose samples were taken from 430 patients <15 years of age as part of routine TDM. Drug interactions were evaluated using calculation of lamotrigine clearance. Valproic acid decreased lamotrigine clearance by 54% in bitherapy, and by 21% in triple therapy with carbamazepine. Carbamazepine increased lamotrigine clearance by 191% in bitherapy. Levetiracetam and topiramate had no effect. The upper limit of lamotrigine therapeutic range (TR) was exceeded in 2% of cases in monotherapy, and in 6%-7% of cases in bi- or triple therapy. About 61% of plasma levels were found within the TR during 2001-2005, compared to 75% and 74% during 2006-2010 and 2011-2015, respectively. Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) were reported in 22 cases. Higher number of supratherapeutic levels in combination therapy led to a 3-fold increase in incidence of ADRs. Seizures occurred more often daily and monthly during 2001-2005 and in patients with three or four antiepileptic drugs in combination. Carbamazepine only partially compensated for the inhibitory effect of valproic acid. Lamotrigine clearance in monotherapy in children is similar to adults, but in polytherapy was found higher susceptibility to induction. A significantly higher number of supratherapeutic lamotrigine levels were found in combinations with valproate. Despite poor correlation with TR, both seizure frequency and ADRs declined after the implementation of TDM.

Topics: Adolescent; Anticonvulsants; Carbamazepine; Child; Child, Preschool; Czech Republic; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Interactions; Drug Monitoring; Drug Therapy, Combination; Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions; Epilepsy; Female; Humans; Incidence; Lamotrigine; Levetiracetam; Male; Metabolic Clearance Rate; Severity of Illness Index; Topiramate; Valproic Acid

Levetiracetam (LEV), and its newer selective analog brivaracetam (BRV), are two seizure medications that share an innovative mechanism of action targeting the Synaptic Vesicle Protein 2A (SV2A), altering neurotransmitter release and decreasing seizure frequency. Behavioral changes are the most significant adverse effects reported by patients taking LEV. We hypothesize that BRV, the more potent SV2A analog, could exert less behavioral side effects, as it requires lower doses than LEV. Using Kainic Acid (KA)-treated and control rats, we measured adverse behavioral effect profiles of LEV, BRV, or Saline, on social and nonsocial behaviors. Our data indicate that both tested drugs had no effect on locomotion, anxiety levels, fear learning, depression-like behavior, and memory retention in rats. However, when considering social interactions, we first confirmed the epilepsy-induced strong increase in aggressive behaviors and specific hippocampal neuronal loss. We furthermore observed, in Sham rats, that LEV-treated animals were 2 times faster to attack at first encounter, had 5 times more aggressive behaviors, and had significantly less social behaviors than control rats. In all circumstances, BRV rats behaved like Saline rats, suggesting that BRV treatment in rats leads to significantly less aggressive behaviors than LEV treatment at the doses used, while there are limited differential effects between these two drugs on other types of behaviors. Since increased aggressiveness has been reported in patients well controlled on LEV, this study indicates based on our findings, that BRV could represent an effective alternative to LEV to limit aggressiveness problems due to this antiepileptic drug (AED) therapy.

Topics: Animals; Anticonvulsants; Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions; Epilepsy; Hippocampus; Humans; Kainic Acid; Levetiracetam; Male; Pyrrolidinones; Rats; Seizures; Synaptic Transmission

Perampanel (PER) is a third generation antiepileptic drug (AED), recently approved as add-on therapy in both focal and generalized seizures. Levetiracetam (LEV) is a second generation AED, widely used in patients with epilepsy because of its favorable safety and efficacy profiles. Perampanel and LEV treatments have been associated with the occurrence of similar adverse events (AEs) (sleepiness, irritability, depression, anxiety, aggressiveness). The aim of the present retrospective single center study was to verify the efficacy and tolerability of PER and LEV used as first add-on therapy in patients with epilepsy affected by secondarily generalized seizures. We collected data from 15 patients treated with PER and 26 patients treated with LEV and followed at our site with follow-up visits at 3, 6, and 12months. This retrospective study documented the comparable efficacy of PER and LEV as first add-on treatments in patients affected by uncontrolled secondarily generalized seizures. However, more patients withdrawn LEV because of AEs compared with PER at the 3- and 12-month follow-up visits. The better tolerability of PER observed in this study could be related to the low therapeutic dose of PER prescribed when it is used as first adjunctive treatment for better controlling secondarily generalized seizures.

Topics: Adult; Aggression; Anticonvulsants; Anxiety; Depression; Dizziness; Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions; Epilepsy; Female; Humans; Irritable Mood; Levetiracetam; Male; Middle Aged; Nitriles; Pyridones; Retrospective Studies; Seizures; Treatment Outcome; Wakefulness

Psychiatric and behavioral side effects (PBSEs) are a major cause of antiepileptic drug (AED) withdrawal. Levetiracetam (LEV) is a recognized first-line AED with good seizure outcomes but recognized with PBSEs. Eslicarbazepine (ESL) is considered to function similarly to an active metabolite of the commonly used carbamazepine (CBZ). Carbamazepine is used as psychotropic medication to assist in various psychiatric illnesses such as mood disorders, aggression, and anxiety.. The aim was to evaluate the psychiatric profile of ESL in people who had LEV withdrawn due to PBSEs in routine clinical practice to see if ESL can be used as a possible alternative to LEV.. A retrospective observational review was conducted in two UK epilepsy centers looking at all cases exposed to ESL since its licensing in 2010. The ESL group was all patients with treatment-resistant epilepsy who developed intolerable PBSEs to LEV, subsequently trialed on ESL. The ESL group was matched to a group who tolerated LEV without intolerable PBSEs. Psychiatric disorders were identified from case notes. The Hamilton Depression Scale (HAM-D) was used to outcome change in mood. Clinical diagnoses of a mental disorder were compared between groups using the Fisher's exact test. Group differences in HAM-D scores were assessed using the independent samples t-test (alpha=0.05).. The total number of people with active epilepsy in the two centers was 2142 of whom 46 had been exposed to ESL. Twenty-six had previous exposure to LEV and had intolerable PBSEs who were matched to a person tolerating LEV. There was no statistical differences in the two groups for mental disorders including mood as measured by HAM-D (Chi-square test: p=0.28).. The ESL was well tolerated and did not produce significant PBSEs in those who had PBSEs with LEV leading to withdrawal of the drug. Though numbers were small, the findings suggest that ESL could be a treatment option in those who develop PBSEs with LEV and possibly other AEDs.

Topics: Adult; Anticonvulsants; Dibenzazepines; Drug Substitution; Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions; Epilepsy; Female; Humans; Levetiracetam; Male; Mental Disorders; Middle Aged; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Retrospective Studies; Seizures; Substance Withdrawal Syndrome; Treatment Outcome; Voltage-Gated Sodium Channel Blockers

The present study aims to determine qualitative outcomes of presentations with acute recurrent seizures or status epilepticus to the emergency department of our institution after the introduction of a new seizure management protocol.. We performed a retrospective analysis on two cohorts of patients for all presentations to the emergency department of our institution. Presentations were reviewed from January to July pre-protocol introduction and the same period post-protocol. Patients were included if they were treated for acute recurrent seizures or status epilepticus. The protocol applied a strict treatment regimen and used levetiracetam, valproate and phenobarbitone in place of phenytoin.. A total of 77 patients was included from the pre-protocol cohort and 72 from the post-protocol group. There was a significant reduction in intensive care unit (ICU) admission (seven patients in cohort 1 and 0 patients in cohort 2) and adverse drug reactions (18 patients in cohort 1 and four patients in cohort 2). There was a trend towards fewer deaths.. The introduction of the new seizure management protocol assessed in this study has resulted in fewer ICU admissions, adverse drug reactions and most importantly fewer patient deaths. This is likely attributable to a combination of improved efficacy of the newer antiepileptic agents and a clearly defined protocol directed therapy.

Topics: Adult; Anticonvulsants; Clinical Protocols; Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions; Emergency Service, Hospital; Female; Humans; Levetiracetam; Male; Middle Aged; Phenobarbital; Phenytoin; Piracetam; Retrospective Studies; Status Epilepticus; Treatment Outcome; Valproic Acid

Psychiatric comorbidities are common in people with epilepsy. A retrospective study of characteristics associated with withdrawal due to psychiatric side effects was undertaken in patients with treated epilepsy participating in prospective audits with new antiepileptic drugs (AEDs). A total of 1058 treated patients with uncontrolled seizures (942 focal-onset seizures, 116 generalized genetic epilepsies [GGEs]) participated in eight prospective, observational audits from 1996 to 2014. These patients were prescribed adjunctive topiramate (n=170), levetiracetam (n=220), pregabalin (n=135), zonisamide (n=203), lacosamide (n=160), eslicarbazepine acetate (n=52), retigabine (n=64), or perampanel (n=54). Doses were titrated according to efficacy and tolerability to optimize zeizure outcomes and reduce side effects. Psychiatric comorbidities were recorded prior to and after the addition of each AED. At baseline, patients with focal-onset seizures (189 of 942; 20.1%) were statistically more likely to have psychiatric diagnoses compared to patients with GGEs (14 of 116, 12.1%; p=0.039). Following adjunctive AED treatment, neuropsychiatric adverse effects led to AED withdrawal in 1.9-16.7% of patients. Patients with a pre-treatment psychiatric history (22 of 209; 10.5%) were statistically more likely to discontinue their new AED due to psychiatric issues compared to patients with no previous psychiatric diagnosis (50 of 849; 5.9%; p=0.017). Patients receiving sodium channel blocking AEDs (4 of 212, 1.9%) were statistically less likely to develop intolerable psychiatric problems, compared to those on AEDs possessing other mechanisms of action (68 of 846, 8.0%; p=0.012). Depression was the commonest problem, leading to discontinuation of AEDs in 2.8% (n=30) patients. Aggression was statistically more common in men (11 of 527, 2.1%) compared to women (1 of 531, 0.2%; p=0.004). Patients with learning disability (12 of 122, 9.8%; p=0.0015) were statistically less likely to have psychiatric issues prior to adjunctive AED treatment compared to other patients (208 of 936, 22.2%), but there were no statistically significant differences once the new AEDs were added (8 of 122 patients with learning disability, 6.6%; 64 of 936 other patients, 6.8%). Awareness of these issues may assist clinicians in avoiding, identifying and treating psychiatric comorbidities in people with epilepsy.

Topics: Acetamides; Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticonvulsants; Dibenzazepines; Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions; Epilepsy; Female; Fructose; Humans; Lacosamide; Levetiracetam; Male; Medical Audit; Mental Disorders; Middle Aged; Nitriles; Piracetam; Pregabalin; Prospective Studies; Pyridones; Retrospective Studies; Seizures; Sodium Channel Blockers; Topiramate; Young Adult

In patients taking antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) for epilepsy, adverse effects (AEs) often lead to unfavorable quality of life, impaired adherence, and, eventually, discontinuation of pharmacological treatment. In a true-to-life sample of subjects from our academic epilepsy outpatient clinic, we aimed to identify predictors for overall high AE burden and for specific AEs focusing on patients on monotherapy.. All patients ≥16years of age with epilepsy for ≥12months were routinely asked to complete the Liverpool Adverse Event Profile (LAEP) just before their appointment. Demographic, epilepsy, and treatment variables were derived from our comprehensive outpatient database.. Out of 841 patients, 438 (61% female, mean age: 44.7±17.1years) on monotherapy were included in this study. Levetiracetam (n=151), lamotrigine (n=167), valproic acid (n=73), or controlled-release carbamazepine (n=47) were the most commonly used antiepileptic drugs (AEDs). Independent predictors for general high AE burden (LAEP score≥45) were duration of epilepsy, lack of 12-month seizure freedom, and partial epilepsy, but none of the four individual AEDs. The most frequent LAEP-defined specific AEs were sleepiness, difficulty concentrating, tiredness, and memory problems. The three most frequent independent predictors for each of the 19 AEs were lack of 12-month seizure freedom (13/19 AEs), individual AED (7/19 AEs), and partial epilepsy (6/19 AEs). Levetiracetam was independently associated with anger/aggression, nervousness/agitation, upset stomach, depression, and sleep disturbance; lamotrigine with nervousness/agitation, upset stomach, and difficulty concentrating; and valproic acid with upset stomach and shaky hands.. Individual AEDs independently predicted some specific AEs, but not overall high AE burden. Our findings may help to characterize patients with epilepsy who are at high risk for specific AEs. Dose reduction or change to another AED may reduce LAEP score and potential nonadherence.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Anticonvulsants; Anxiety; Carbamazepine; Depression; Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions; Epilepsy; Fatigue; Female; Humans; Lamotrigine; Levetiracetam; Male; Middle Aged; Piracetam; Quality of Life; Triazines; Valproic Acid; Young Adult

There are limited data on the use of the antiepileptic drug (AED) levetiracetam for the treatment of infants.. To prospectively evaluate the safety of levetiracetam oral solution and its impact on epilepsy severity in infants with different seizure types.. This noninterventional post-authorization safety study included patients 1-11 months of age. Patients' treatment - levetiracetam dose, and addition, withdrawal or changes in the doses of concomitant medications and AEDs - was at the discretion of the physician. The primary variable was treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs).. Of 101 infants, 75 completed and 26 discontinued the study. Mean age was 6.0 months, 50 were male, most (80%) took 1 ≥ concomitant AED and had cryptogenic or symptomatic epilepsy that was focal (38.6%) or generalized (20.8%), particularly frontal lobe epilepsy (20.0%) or West syndrome/infantile spasms (20.0%). Among known aetiologies, congenital factors (22.8%) such as dysplastic lesions or perinatal events (17.8%) were predominant. Overall, 54.5% of patients had ≥ 1 TEAE. Five patients experienced drug-related TEAEs - convulsion, irritability, somnolence and hypotonia, all listed in the product label, with the exception of hypotonia, which was reported for one patient and resolved without any change in study medication. Seven patients discontinued due to TEAEs, mainly due to infantile spasms and respiratory disorders. At study end, 71.8% of patients showed improvement in epilepsy severity, 18.8% remained stable and 9.4% showed worsening. Levetiracetam did not appear to have a negative effect on growth parameters.. In this prospective study, which included the largest number of patients in this age range so far, levetiracetam was found to be well tolerated and efficacious for the treatment of infants with epilepsy.

Topics: Anticonvulsants; Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions; Epilepsy; Europe; Female; Humans; Infant; Levetiracetam; Male; Piracetam; Prospective Studies; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Agranulocytosis; Anticonvulsants; Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions; Epilepsy; Fever; Humans; Levetiracetam; Male; Piracetam

Levetiracetam is one of the new anticonvulsant drugs that has a high therapeutic index and potential antiepileptogenic effects. Herein, we report a patient with multidrug refractory epilepsy and Ohtahara syndrome who was accidentally administered 300 mg/kg/d for 35 days by her mother. To our knowledge, there are only a few cases of accidental overdose of levetiracetam in pediatric patients reported in the literature, and this case study is the first to report such a high and long-term dose in an infant who showed no adverse effects.

Topics: Anticonvulsants; Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions; Epilepsy; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Infant; Levetiracetam; Piracetam

The bile salt export pump (BSEP) is expressed at the canalicular domain of hepatocytes, where it serves as the primary route of elimination for monovalent bile acids (BAs) into the bile canaliculi. The most compelling evidence linking dysfunction in BA transport with liver injury in humans is found with carriers of mutations that render BSEP nonfunctional. Based on mounting evidence, there appears to be a strong association between drug-induced BSEP interference and liver injury in humans; however, causality has not been established. For this reason, drug-induced BSEP interference is best considered a susceptibility factor for liver injury as other host- or drug-related properties may contribute to the development of hepatotoxicity. To better understand the association between BSEP interference and liver injury in humans, over 600 marketed or withdrawn drugs were evaluated in BSEP expressing membrane vesicles. The example of a compound that failed during phase 1 human trials is also described, AMG 009. AMG 009 showed evidence of liver injury in humans that was not predicted by preclinical safety studies, and BSEP inhibition was implicated. For 109 of the drugs with some effect on in vitro BSEP function, clinical use, associations with hepatotoxicity, pharmacokinetic data, and other information were annotated. A steady state concentration (C(ss)) for each of these annotated drugs was estimated, and a ratio between this value and measured IC₅₀ potency values were calculated in an attempt to relate exposure to in vitro potencies. When factoring for exposure, 95% of the annotated compounds with a C(ss)/BSEP IC₅₀ ratio ≥ 0.1 were associated with some form of liver injury. We then investigated the relationship between clinical evidence of liver injury and effects to multidrug resistance-associated proteins (MRPs) believed to play a role in BA homeostasis. The effect of 600+ drugs on MRP2, MRP3, and MRP4 function was also evaluated in membrane vesicle assays. Drugs with a C(ss)/BSEP IC₅₀ ratio ≥ 0.1 and a C(ss)/MRP IC₅₀ ratio ≥ 0.1 had almost a 100% correlation with some evidence of liver injury in humans. These data suggest that integration of exposure data, and knowledge of an effect to not only BSEP but also one or more of the MRPs, is a useful tool for informing the potential for liver injury due to altered BA transport.

Topics: Animals; ATP Binding Cassette Transporter, Subfamily B; ATP Binding Cassette Transporter, Subfamily B, Member 11; ATP-Binding Cassette Transporters; Biological Transport; Chemical and Drug Induced Liver Injury; Cluster Analysis; Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions; Humans; Liver; Male; Multidrug Resistance-Associated Proteins; Pharmacokinetics; Rats; Rats, Sprague-Dawley; Recombinant Proteins; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Toxicity Tests

Topics: Aged; Anticonvulsants; Cognition; Disease Progression; Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions; Epilepsy; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Levetiracetam; Male; Motor Activity; Piracetam; Stroke

Drug-induced liver injury (DILI) is a significant concern in drug development due to the poor concordance between preclinical and clinical findings of liver toxicity. We hypothesized that the DILI types (hepatotoxic side effects) seen in the clinic can be translated into the development of predictive in silico models for use in the drug discovery phase. We identified 13 hepatotoxic side effects with high accuracy for classifying marketed drugs for their DILI potential. We then developed in silico predictive models for each of these 13 side effects, which were further combined to construct a DILI prediction system (DILIps). The DILIps yielded 60-70% prediction accuracy for three independent validation sets. To enhance the confidence for identification of drugs that cause severe DILI in humans, the "Rule of Three" was developed in DILIps by using a consensus strategy based on 13 models. This gave high positive predictive value (91%) when applied to an external dataset containing 206 drugs from three independent literature datasets. Using the DILIps, we screened all the drugs in DrugBank and investigated their DILI potential in terms of protein targets and therapeutic categories through network modeling. We demonstrated that two therapeutic categories, anti-infectives for systemic use and musculoskeletal system drugs, were enriched for DILI, which is consistent with current knowledge. We also identified protein targets and pathways that are related to drugs that cause DILI by using pathway analysis and co-occurrence text mining. While marketed drugs were the focus of this study, the DILIps has a potential as an evaluation tool to screen and prioritize new drug candidates or chemicals, such as environmental chemicals, to avoid those that might cause liver toxicity. We expect that the methodology can be also applied to other drug safety endpoints, such as renal or cardiovascular toxicity.

Topics: Animals; Anti-Infective Agents; Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Chemical and Drug Induced Liver Injury; Databases, Factual; Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions; Humans; Liver; Models, Biological; Predictive Value of Tests

In 2006, intravenous levetiracetam received US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval for adjunctive treatment of partial onset seizures in adults with epilepsy, 16 years or older. We have established the safety, tolerability, and dosage of intravenous levetiracetam in children. This prospective study included 30 children (6 months to <15 years of age). Patients were administered a single dose of intravenous levetiracetam (50 mg/kg, maximal dose 2500 mg) over 15 minutes. A blood level of levetiracetam was performed 10 minutes after the infusion. The treated children's average age was 6.3 years (range 0.5-14.8 years). The mean levetiracetam level was 83.3 microg/mL (range 47-128 microg/mL). There were no serious adverse reactions. Minor reactions included sleepiness, fatigue, and restlessness. An apparent decrease in seizure frequency across all seizure types was noted. The dose of 50 mg/kg was well tolerated by the patients and is a safe, appropriate loading dose.

Topics: Adolescent; Anticonvulsants; Child; Child, Preschool; Drug Therapy, Combination; Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions; Epilepsy; Female; Humans; Infant; Infusions, Intravenous; Levetiracetam; Male; Piracetam; Prospective Studies; Regression Analysis; Seizures; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

Anticonvulsant hypersensitivity syndrome (AHS) is a rare, potentially life-threatening drug reaction which usually occurs after exposure to aromatic antiepileptics. AHS secondary to non-aromatic antiepileptics is even more rare and there are only few case reports of AHS presenting as aseptic meningitis. We present the case of a 48-year-old patient who presented with meningism within 3 weeks of adding lamotrigine for control of her juvenile myoclonic epilepsy. When lamotrigine was restarted 2 weeks later she developed similar but more severe symptoms which resolved on stopping lamotrigine. Our patient was subsequently rendered seizure free on levetiracetam which has not so far been linked with this syndrome. It is important to be aware of this life-threatening complication associated with the use of antiepileptics.

Topics: Anti-Bacterial Agents; Anticonvulsants; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions; Female; Fever; Headache; Humans; Lamotrigine; Levetiracetam; Meninges; Meningitis, Aseptic; Middle Aged; Myoclonic Epilepsy, Juvenile; Nausea; Piracetam; Steroids; Triazines

Antiepileptic drugs are routinely given after craniotomy. Though phenytoin (PHT) is still the most commonly used agent, levetiracetam (LEV) is increasingly administered for this purpose. This retrospective study compared the use of LEV and PHT as monotherapy prophylaxis following supratentorial neurosurgery.. Patients receiving LEV monotherapy after supratentorial craniotomy were reviewed and compared to a control group of patients receiving PHT monotherapy.. One of 105 patients taking LEV and 9/210 patients taking PHT had seizures within 7 days of surgery (p = 0.17). Adverse drug reactions requiring change in therapy during hospitalization occurred in 1/105 patients taking LEV and 38/210 patients taking PHT (p < 0.001). Among patients followed for at least 12 months, 11/42 (26%) treated with LEV vs 42/117 (36%) treated with PHT developed epilepsy (p = 0.34); 64% remained on LEV, while 26% remained on PHT (p = 0.03).. Both levetiracetam (LEV) and phenytoin (PHT) were associated with a low risk of early postoperative seizures and a moderate risk of later epilepsy. LEV was associated with significantly fewer early adverse reactions than PHT and with a higher retention rate in patients who were followed for at least 1 year and developed epilepsy.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticonvulsants; Brain; Brain Injuries; Drug Tolerance; Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions; Epilepsy; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Levetiracetam; Male; Middle Aged; Neurosurgical Procedures; Phenytoin; Piracetam; Postoperative Complications; Retrospective Studies; Supratentorial Neoplasms; Treatment Outcome

Intravenous (IV) levetiracetam (LEV) is available for humans for bridge therapy when the oral route is unavailable. We investigated the safety and pharmacokinetics of LEV administered intramuscularly (IM), IV, and orally to dogs. Six Hound dogs received 19.5-22.6 mg/kg of LEV IM, IV and orally with a wash-out period in between. All dogs received 500 mg LEV orally and 5 mL of 100 mg/mL LEV IM. Three dogs received 500 mg of LEV IV and three dogs received 250 mg LEV IV with 250 mg given perivascularly to approximate extravasation. Safety was assessed using a pain scale at time of IM administration and histopathological examination 24 h to 5 days after injection. Intravenous LEV half-life was 180 +/- 18 min. Bioavailability of IM LEV was 100%. Mean time to T(max) after IM was 40 +/- 16 min. The mean C(max) IM was 30.3 +/- 3 mug/mL compared to the C(0) of 37 +/- 5 mug/mL for IV. Mean inflammation score (0-4 scale) for IM LEV was 0.28 and for saline 0.62. Extravasation did not cause tissue damage. Parenteral LEV is well tolerated and appears safe following IM and IV injections in dogs. Parenteral LEV should be evaluated for use in dogs with epilepsy.

Topics: Absorption; Administration, Oral; Animals; Anticonvulsants; Area Under Curve; Biological Availability; Dogs; Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions; Female; Half-Life; Injections, Intramuscular; Injections, Intravenous; Levetiracetam; Male; Metabolic Clearance Rate; Piracetam