levetiracetam and Dizziness

This review discusses the safety and tolerability of levetiracetam, as presented by the available literature, with attention paid to special populations. In Phase II/III trials, the adverse effects occurring more commonly in the treatment groups versus the placebo group were; somnolence (14.8 versus 8.4%), asthenia (14.7 versus 9.1%), infection (primarily common cold) (13.4 versus 7.5%), and dizziness (8.8 versus 4.1%). Adverse events usually appear within the first month after treatment initiation, are not dose-dependent, are mostly mild-to-moderate, generally resolve without medication withdrawal, and are transient when the medication is stopped. No significant changes in haematology and chemistry profiles or weight occurred. Hypersensitivity reactions were rare and no idiosyncratic event has been reported. Open-label studies have added patient data with other epileptic syndromes and from a wider patient pool, such as children and patients with prior psychiatric history. These studies have supported initial safety findings, but have reported increased behavioural adverse events in children and patients with a history of prior behavioural problems. Levetiracetam is proving to be safe and well-tolerated. So far, it appears to have a favourable safety profile in special populations, such as children, the elderly, and patients with hepatic dysfunction. Preliminary data in pregnancy are promising, but more data are needed on the impact of levetiracetam on the developing fetus and pharmacokinetic alterations caused in pregnancy. Adjustments in dosing are required for decreases in renal clearance.

Topics: Abnormalities, Drug-Induced; Adolescent; Adult; Age Factors; Aged; Animals; Anticonvulsants; Asthenia; Bone Density; Child; Child Behavior Disorders; Clinical Trials as Topic; Disorders of Excessive Somnolence; Dizziness; Drug Evaluation, Preclinical; Epilepsy; Female; Headache; Humans; Infections; Kidney Diseases; Levetiracetam; Liver Diseases; Male; Mental Disorders; Mice; Middle Aged; Patient Acceptance of Health Care; Piracetam; Pregnancy; Pregnancy Complications

The objective of this trial was to compare the effectiveness of levetiracetam (LEV) and topiramate (TPM) as adjunctive treatment for patients with focal seizures in Korea.. In this Phase IV, open-label, multicenter trial (NCT01229735), adults were randomized to treatment with LEV (1000-3000 mg/day) or TPM (200-400 mg/day). Only patients achieving LEV ≥1000 mg/day or TPM ≥100 mg/day after a 4-week up-titration entered the 20-week dose-finding and subsequent 28-week maintenance periods. The primary outcome was the 52-week retention rate; others included safety and exploratory efficacy outcomes.. Of 343 randomized patients (LEV 177; TPM 166), 211 (61.5%) completed the trial. In the full analysis set (FAS), retention rate was 59.1% with LEV vs 56.6% with TPM (p = 0.7007), while in the prespecified sensitivity analysis, based on data from patients who received drug doses in the recommended range (LEV 176; TPM 113), it was 59.1% with LEV vs 42.5% with TPM (p = 0.0086). In the FAS, median percent reduction in seizure frequency from baseline was 74.47% with LEV and 67.86% with TPM (p = 0.0665); ≥50% responder rate was 69.0% vs 64.8% (p = 0.4205), and the 6-month seizure-freedom rate was 35.8% vs 22.3% (p = 0.0061). In the sensitivity analysis, differences between groups were greater, favoring LEV. Incidences of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were 70.6% with LEV vs 77.1% with TPM; most frequently somnolence (20.3%), dizziness (18.1%), and nasopharyngitis (13.6%) with LEV; and decreased appetite (15.7%), dizziness (14.5%), and headache (14.5%) with TPM. Discontinuations due to TEAEs were 7.9% with LEV and 12.7% with TPM.. In this open-label trial, the 52-week retention rate was not significantly different between LEV and TPM. However, LEV was associated with a substantially higher seizure freedom rate and a more favorable safety profile than TPM in this population of Korean patients with focal seizures.

Topics: Adult; Anticonvulsants; Dizziness; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Therapy, Combination; Epilepsies, Partial; Female; Headache; Humans; Levetiracetam; Male; Middle Aged; Republic of Korea; Seizures; Sleepiness; Topiramate

In a double-blind crossover study we evaluated the antitremor effect of a 4-week treatment with either escalating dosages of levetiracetam or placebo in orthostatic tremor.. Twelve patients with orthostatic tremor participated in the study. Primary end point was improvement in stance duration. Secondary end points were total track length of the sway path and tremor total power. The patients' impression of impairment was assessed by a visual analog scale and quality of life by the SF-36.. We found no significant effect of dosage or treatment on stance duration (P = .175), total track length (P = .690), total power (P = .280), or visual analog scale (P =.735). Neither was SF-36 differentially changed by levetiracetam or placebo (SF-36, Physical Component Summary: P = .079; SF-36, Mental Component Summary: P = .073). Side effects like dizziness, fatigue, or nausea were only mild to moderate.. Levetiracetam is ineffective in the treatment of orthostatic tremor.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticonvulsants; Cross-Over Studies; Dizziness; Double-Blind Method; Female; Humans; Levetiracetam; Male; Middle Aged; Piracetam; Placebos; Treatment Outcome; Tremor

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of 3,000 mg daily levetiracetam (LEV; Keppra) as an adjunctive therapy for Chinese patients with refractory partial seizures.. This randomized, placebo-controlled trial consisted of an 8-week baseline period followed by a 4-week titration interval and a 12-week maintenance period, and concluded with a 4-week medication withdrawal period or entered an open-label study. LEV was compared with placebo.. The 50% responder rate (the proportion of patients with a minimum of 50% reduction in partial seizure frequency) occurred in 46.4% of the LEV group, compared with 39.3% of the placebo group (p = 0.590). The median of the absolute weekly frequency reduction from baseline of partial seizures was 0.66 per week for LEV versus 0.48 per week for placebo (p = 0.187). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events, mostly mild to moderate in severity, were somnolence, dizziness and agitation.. In this study, adjunctive therapy with LEV 3,000 mg daily was well tolerated but not as effective as expected in controlling partial seizures in this study population. Considering the lower mean weight of this study population, we suggest the dosage of LEV 3,000 mg daily may contribute to the results.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Analysis of Variance; Anticonvulsants; Body Weight; Chemotherapy, Adjuvant; China; Dizziness; Epilepsies, Partial; Female; Humans; Levetiracetam; Male; Middle Aged; Piracetam; Psychomotor Agitation; Seizures; Sleep Wake Disorders; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult

The objectives of this pilot trial were to assess the potential efficacy and safety of levetiracetam for the treatment of hot flashes, a major cause of morbidity among breast cancer survivors.. Women, aged 18 years or more, with a history of breast cancer or those who wished to avoid estrogen because of a perceived increased risk of breast cancer, who were experiencing bothersome hot flashes (more than or equal to 14 times per week, for more than or equal to 1 month before study entry), were included. During the baseline week, general demographic characteristics, hot flash information, and quality of life data were obtained. At the beginning of week 2, patients were started on levetiracetam for a total of 4 weeks. Information about hot flashes, quality of life, and toxicity were collected during these 4 weeks and compared with the baseline week.. After treatment with levetiracetam for 4 weeks (N = 19), mean hot flash scores (frequency times mean severity) were reduced by 57%, and mean hot flash frequencies were reduced by 53%, compared to the baseline week; both these reductions were greater than what would be expected with a placebo (20-25% reduction). There were significant improvements in abnormal sweating (p = 0.004), hot flash distress (p = 0.0002), and satisfaction of hot flash control (p = 0.0001), when comparing data from the fourth week of treatment to the baseline week. Twenty-nine percent of the subjects did not complete the study because of treatment-related adverse events, with the most frequently reported side effects being somnolence, fatigue, and dizziness, usually with mild to moderate intensity.. The results of this pilot trial suggest that levetiracetam might be an effective therapy for the treatment of hot flashes. Further data are needed to test this hypothesis, evaluating the efficacy and toxicity of this agent.

Topics: Breast Neoplasms; Dizziness; Fatigue; Female; Hot Flashes; Humans; Levetiracetam; Middle Aged; Nootropic Agents; Patient Satisfaction; Pilot Projects; Piracetam; Quality of Life; Severity of Illness Index; Sleep Stages

Interictal depression is common in patients with epilepsy and it significantly impacts quality of life. Some studies indicate that levetiracetam (LEV) may have mood stabilizing properties.. Twenty-five adults with uncontrolled partial seizures and concomitant depressive symptoms were treated with LEV. Patients were evaluated for depression and anxiety with several psychometric measures, including: Montgomery and Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS), Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS), Zung Self-rating Scale for Depression (Z-SDS), Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HARS), Zung Self-rating Scale for Anxiety (Z-SAS).. Evaluations after 5 weeks and after 3 months of LEV treatment demonstrated significant improvement in depression and anxiety.. This uncontrolled study suggests that treatment with LEV may also improve depression and anxiety in patients with partial seizures. However, the sample of patients is limited and the possibility of a placebo effect cannot be excluded. These findings must be considered preliminary and should be replicated under placebo-controlled conditions.

Topics: Adult; Age Factors; Anticonvulsants; Anxiety Disorders; Depressive Disorder; Dizziness; Epilepsies, Partial; Female; Humans; Levetiracetam; Male; Piracetam; Placebo Effect; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Severity of Illness Index; Treatment Outcome

To assess the efficacy and safety of adjunctive levetiracetam (LEV) therapy in controlling partial-onset seizures refractory to other antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) in a multicenter study in Taiwanese adults.. Ninety-four patients aged 16-60 years with refractory partial seizures were randomized to receive LEV (n = 47) or placebo (47) for 14 weeks and composed the intention-to-treat (ITT) population. After the first 2 weeks, LEV patients had their dosage increased from 500 mg twice daily to 1,000 mg twice daily. A 12-week maintenance phase followed, after which patients switched to long-term, open-label LEV therapy or entered a 4-week phase of medication discontinuation.. All patients from the ITT population, except one LEV-treated patient with missing seizure-count data, were included in the primary efficacy analysis. The least square mean of logarithmically transformed weekly partial-seizure frequency was significantly lower in the LEV than in the placebo group (0.813 vs. 1.085; p = 0.001). LEV reduced log-transformed weekly partial-seizure frequency by 23.8% (95% confidence interval, 10.4-35.2%) relative to placebo. Significantly more LEV than placebo patients (43.5% vs. 10.6%) experienced a response of a >or=50% decrease from baseline in weekly frequency of partial seizures [odds ratio, 6.5 (95% CI, 2.2-19.3); p < 0.001]. Adverse events were reported in 34 (72.3%) of 47 LEV-treated patients and 32 (68.1%) of 47 placebo patients. The three most common adverse events in the LEV and placebo groups were somnolence (40.4% and 14.9%), dizziness (14.9% and 8.5%), and headache (10.6% and 8.5%), respectively. Only four patients (three LEV-treated patients and one placebo patient) were withdrawn from the study because of adverse events.. Adjunctive LEV therapy,

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Anticonvulsants; Asian People; Cross-Over Studies; Dizziness; Double-Blind Method; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Resistance; Drug Therapy, Combination; Epilepsies, Partial; Female; Headache; Humans; Levetiracetam; Male; Middle Aged; Pharmacogenetics; Piracetam; Placebos; Sleep Wake Disorders; Taiwan; Treatment Outcome

To prospectively assess the safety and efficacy of levetiracetam in patients with uncontrolled focal epilepsy, in a common practice-based setting.. In this phase IV, open-label, 16-week community-based study, adult patients with focal seizures initially received levetiracetam 1,000 mg/day. Throughout the study, the dose was adjusted in increments of 1,000 mg (maximum 3,000 mg/day) to achieve seizure control and maintain tolerability. The outcome parameters were the percentage reduction in partial and total seizure frequency per week from historical baseline, global evaluation scale (GES), and adverse events (AE).. Seven hundred and thirty-one patients were included in this analysis and 84.4% completed the study. The median percent reduction in all seizures was 47.8%, and 49.3% for all partial seizures. The 50% responder rate was 49%, and the seizure-free rate was 17.2% for all partial seizures. Approximately 60% of patients showed moderate to marked improvement on the GES. The majority of AE were of mild to moderate severity; the most commonly reported being asthenia, somnolence, headache, and dizziness.. Levetiracetam is both efficacious and safe as an add-on therapy in patients with refractory epilepsy treated by clinicians in their daily practice.

Topics: Adult; Anticonvulsants; Disorders of Excessive Somnolence; Dizziness; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Resistance; Epilepsy; Female; Headache; Humans; International Cooperation; Levetiracetam; Male; Middle Aged; Piracetam; Prospective Studies; Sensation Disorders; Treatment Outcome

The primary objective of this placebo-controlled study was to evaluate the safety and tolerability of levetiracetam (LEV) administered intravenously (IV) at higher doses and/or at a faster infusion rate than proposed. The secondary objective was to assess LEV pharmacokinetics.. Single ascending doses of LEV administered by IV infusion (2,000, 3,000, 4,000 mg over 15 min; 1,500, 2,000, 2,500 mg over 5 min) were evaluated in 48 healthy subjects in a randomized, single-blind, placebo-controlled study.. All randomized subjects completed the study. Adverse events reported after IV administration of LEV (

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Anticonvulsants; Area Under Curve; Blood Pressure; Disorders of Excessive Somnolence; Dizziness; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Epilepsy; Fatigue; Female; Half-Life; Headache; Heart Rate; Humans; Infusions, Intravenous; Levetiracetam; Male; Piracetam; Placebos; Single-Blind Method; Time Factors

Anti-epileptic drug (AED) prophylaxis in the first-seven days post-traumatic brain injury (TBI) is known to reduce seizure frequency acutely. AED efficacy is equivalent; therefore, choice of AED may rest with their side-effects. We hypothesise that AEDs that impair balance will prolong recovery, shown by a longer hospital stay. We compared length of hospital stay (and reported dizziness) in TBI patients receiving the commonest AEDs used in our TBI patients, Phenytoin (which may cause imbalance), and Levetiracetam (which does not affect balance).. A retrospective observational study was performed on TBI patients admitted to a Major Trauma Unit between October 2013 and June 2018. 100 of 278 patients treated with phenytoin or levetiracetam monotherapy for seizure prophylaxis were included. The inclusion criteria of admission Glasgow Coma Score of 14 or more and length of stay less than 3 weeks minimised confounding variables such as non-ambulant patients. Length of hospital stay and incidence of dizziness were assessed.. The length of hospital stay was longer for patients on Phenytoin versus Levetiracetam, i.e., 10.74 vs. 7.58 days (p = 0.015; unpaired, two-sided t test). Dizziness reported by patients on phenytoin was 24% and levetiracetam was 8% (p = 0.018; Chi-squared test).. In this cohort, using Phenytoin for acute TBI, seizure prophylaxis was associated with longer length of stay and more dizziness compared to Levetiracetam. Given their equivalent AED efficacy in acute TBI seizure prophylaxis, our data suggest that Levetiracetam is preferable to Phenytoin for early seizure prophylaxis in TBI. This requires evaluation in larger, prospective studies.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticonvulsants; Brain Injuries, Traumatic; Dizziness; Female; Glasgow Coma Scale; Humans; Length of Stay; Levetiracetam; Male; Middle Aged; Phenytoin; Postural Balance; Retrospective Studies; Seizures; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult

We performed observational cohort study to compare the long-term efficacy, tolerability, and safety of oxcarbazepine (OXC), lamotrigine (LTG), and levetiracetam (LEV) monotherapy for newly diagnosed focal epilepsy patients.. Three hundred and eighty eight newly diagnosed focal epilepsy patients aged 1-70 years were enrolled in this study between June 2009 and March 2016. Among the patients, 191 were treated with OXC, 98 were treated with LTG, and 99 were treated with LEV monotherapy. The study was performed in a real-world setting and the primary outcomes were the one-year and three-year seizure-free rates. The secondary outcomes were the one-year and three-year withdrawal rates, the time to treatment withdrawal, the time to the first seizure, and the time to achieve one-year remission.. The three-year seizure-free rates with LTG (39.8 %) and LEV (41.4 %) were significantly better than that with OXC (26.2 %) (both P < 0.05). However, no significant difference was observed among the three drugs for the one-year seizure-free rate. The three-year withdrawal rate was 50.8 %, 46.9 %, and 43.4 % for OXC, LTG, and LEV, respectively (all P > 0.05). The one-year withdrawal rate for OXC (31.7 %) was higher than those for LTG (30.6 %) and LEV (26.3 %) (all P > 0.05). LEV [Relative Risk (RR) = 0.69, 95 % CI: 0.49∼0.99] and LTG (RR = 0.63, 95 % CI: 0.44∼0.9) were significantly better than OXC in preventing first seizure. LEV appears to be the superior option with regard to the time to achieve one-year remission.. The results of the study showed that LEV and LTG are significantly more effective than OXC for the treatment of newly diagnosed focal epilepsy. LEV has milder adverse events than OXC and LTG in clinical practice.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Anticonvulsants; Child; Child, Preschool; Cohort Studies; Dizziness; Drug Administration Schedule; Epilepsies, Partial; Exanthema; Female; Humans; Infant; Lamotrigine; Levetiracetam; Male; Middle Aged; Oxcarbazepine; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult

Perampanel (PER) is a third generation antiepileptic drug (AED), recently approved as add-on therapy in both focal and generalized seizures. Levetiracetam (LEV) is a second generation AED, widely used in patients with epilepsy because of its favorable safety and efficacy profiles. Perampanel and LEV treatments have been associated with the occurrence of similar adverse events (AEs) (sleepiness, irritability, depression, anxiety, aggressiveness). The aim of the present retrospective single center study was to verify the efficacy and tolerability of PER and LEV used as first add-on therapy in patients with epilepsy affected by secondarily generalized seizures. We collected data from 15 patients treated with PER and 26 patients treated with LEV and followed at our site with follow-up visits at 3, 6, and 12months. This retrospective study documented the comparable efficacy of PER and LEV as first add-on treatments in patients affected by uncontrolled secondarily generalized seizures. However, more patients withdrawn LEV because of AEs compared with PER at the 3- and 12-month follow-up visits. The better tolerability of PER observed in this study could be related to the low therapeutic dose of PER prescribed when it is used as first adjunctive treatment for better controlling secondarily generalized seizures.

Topics: Adult; Aggression; Anticonvulsants; Anxiety; Depression; Dizziness; Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions; Epilepsy; Female; Humans; Irritable Mood; Levetiracetam; Male; Middle Aged; Nitriles; Pyridones; Retrospective Studies; Seizures; Treatment Outcome; Wakefulness

Incidental paradoxical antiepileptic effect of levetiracetam has been described. The aim of the present study was to identify the epilepsy patients at risk.. We performed a retrospective analysis in 207 patients treated with levetiracetam. This entailed evaluation of patient notes and patient interviews. A paradoxical effect was defined as an increased seizure frequency or the experience of more severe seizures including generalized tonic-clonic seizures (GTCS) within 1 month after starting levetiracetam (LEV).. Thirty patients (14%) experienced a paradoxical effect. Eight of them (4%) developed de novo GTCS. We could not demonstrate any association between the paradoxical effect of levetiracetam and type of epilepsy or the antiepileptic comedication used. However we found that the paradoxical effect developed preferentially (p < 0.001) in mentally retarded patients.. Because there is an increased risk of worsening epilepsy when starting levetiracetam treatment of mentally retarded epileptic patients, there is a need for caution and close observation during the first weeks of therapy.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Anticonvulsants; Child; Disorders of Excessive Somnolence; Dizziness; Drug Interactions; Epilepsy; Female; Humans; Intellectual Disability; Irritable Mood; Levetiracetam; Male; Middle Aged; Piracetam; Retrospective Studies; Risk Factors