leukotriene-c4 has been researched along with Bronchitis* in 2 studies
2 other study(ies) available for leukotriene-c4 and Bronchitis
Article | Year |
---|---|
[The mechanism of airway inflammation in eosinophilic bronchitis and cough variant asthma].
To explore the characteristics of airway inflammatory cells, cytokines and inflammatory mediators in eosinophilic bronchitis (EB) and cough variant asthma (CVA) patients and to elucidate the underlying mechanism of distinct airway inflammation between EB and CVA.. This study included 15 patients with EB (EB group), 15 patients with cough variant asthma (CVA, CVA group), 14 patients with bronchial asthma (asthma group) and 14 healthy controls (healthy group). Percentage of eosinophils (EOS) in sputum induced by hypertonic saline was detected by FACS. The percentage of CD(69)(+) EOS stimulated by interleukin-5 (IL-5) and interferon γ (IFN-γ) was also detected by FACS. The expression of leukotriene C4 synthase (LTC4S) and prostaglandin-endoperoxide synthase-2 (PTGS2) mRNA in sputum was measured by real-time PCR and the concentration of leukotriene C4 (LTC4) and prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) in sputum was measured by ELISA.. The percentage of EOS in induced sputum was 15.8 ± 3.2 (EB group), 13.0 ± 2.7 (CVA group) and 11.6 ± 4.5 (asthma group), respectively, which were significantly higher than 1.0 ± 0.4 in the healthy group. The difference was significant and the t value was 16.31, 15.23 and 14.21 respectively (P < 0.05). After stimulated by IL-5 and IFN-γ, the percentage of CD(69)(+) EOS in induced sputum was 1.5 ± 0.4 and 1.5 ± 0.5 (EB group), 1.4 ± 0.4 and 1.4 ± 0.3 (CVA group) and 1.42 ± 0.72 and 1.37 ± 0.46 (asthma group) respectively. There was no statistical significance between these 3 groups, but when compared with 0.4 ± 0.2 and 0.4 ± 0.1 in healthy group, the difference was significant (P < 0.05). The expression of IL-5 mRNA and protein in induced sputum of EB group, CVA group and asthma group were higher than the healthy group and the difference was all statistically different (P < 0.05), but there was no statistical significance between EB group, CVA group and asthma group. The expression of IFN-γ mRNA and protein in induced sputum of each group was not different when compared with healthy group (P > 0.05). The concentration of PGE2 in induced sputum of EB group was(839 ± 69) ng/L, which was higher than (33 ± 8) ng/L of CVA group, (25 ± 6) ng/L of asthma group and (24 ± 8) ng/L of healthy group (all P < 0.01). There was no statistical difference between CVA group, asthma group and healthy group. The expression of PTGS2 in induced sputum of EB group increased significantly; when compared with CVA group, asthma group and healthy group, the difference was significant (all P < 0.01). The concentration of LTC4 in induced sputum of EB group, CVA group and asthma group was all higher than the healthy group (all P < 0.05). The expression of LTC4S mRNA of EB group, CVA group and asthma group was also higher than the healthy group (all P < 0.05). The expression of LTC4S mRNA and LTC4 in the EB group was higher than that in the CVA group and the asthma group (P < 0.05). The value of LTC4/PGE2 in the CVA group and the asthma group was higher than that in the EB group (t = 8.7 and 13.1, P < 0.05).. These data suggest that the difference in airway function observed in subjects with eosinophilic bronchitis and CVA (or asthma) may be due to the results of differences in PGE(2) production and an imbalance between the production of bronchoconstrictor LTC(4) and bronchoprotective PGE(2) lipid mediators. Topics: Adult; Asthma; Bronchitis; Case-Control Studies; Cough; Dinoprostone; Eosinophilia; Female; Humans; Inflammation; Interleukin-5; Leukotriene C4; Male; Middle Aged; Sputum | 2011 |
Global expression profiling of theophylline response genes in macrophages: evidence of airway anti-inflammatory regulation.
Theophylline has been used widely as a bronchodilator for the treatment of bronchial asthma and has been suggested to modulate immune response. While the importance of macrophages in asthma has been reappraised and emphasized, their significance has not been well investigated. We conducted a genome-wide profiling of the gene expressions of macrophages in response to theophylline.. Microarray technology was used to profile the gene expression patterns of macrophages modulated by theophylline. Northern blot and real-time quantitative RT-PCR were also used to validate the microarray data, while Western blot and ELISA were used to measure the levels of IL-13 and LTC4.. We identified dozens of genes in macrophages that were dose-dependently down- or up-regulated by theophylline. These included genes related to inflammation, cytokines, signaling transduction, cell adhesion and motility, cell cycle regulators, and metabolism. We observed that IL-13, a central mediator of airway inflammation, was dramatically suppressed by theophylline. Real-time quantitative RT-PCR and ELISA analyses also confirmed these results, without respect to PMA-treated THP-1 cells or isolated human alveolar macrophages. Theophylline, rolipram, etazolate, db-cAMP and forskolin suppressed both IL-13 mRNA expression (~25%, 2.73%, 8.12%, 5.28%, and 18.41%, respectively) and protein secretion (<10% production) in macrophages. These agents also effectively suppressed LTC4 expression.. Our results suggest that the suppression of IL-13 by theophylline may be through cAMP mediation and may decrease LTC4 production. This study supports the role of theophylline as a signal regulator of inflammation, and that down regulation of IL-13 by theophylline may have beneficial effects in inflammatory airway diseases. Topics: Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Bronchitis; Cell Line; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Gene Expression Profiling; Gene Expression Regulation; Humans; Immunologic Factors; Interleukin-13; Leukotriene C4; Macrophage Activation; Macrophages; Proteome; Pulmonary Alveoli; Theophylline | 2005 |