leukotriene-c4 and Bronchial-Spasm

Recent evidence suggests that leukotrienes may have a causative role in exercise-induced asthma. Twenty-four subjects with exercise-induced asthma received either 600 mg zileuton, a 5-lipoxygenase inhibitor, or a placebo four times daily for 2 d prior to exercise challenge (a total of nine doses). The last dose was administered in the laboratory 2 h before the exercise challenge. There was no bronchodilation after nine doses of the 5-lipoxygenase inhibitor (p=0.95). The administration of zileuton inhibited bronchospasm after exercise challenge by 40.75% as compared with placebo. Five minutes after the completion of exercise, the zileuton group's FEV1 was 85.76% of the preexercise value, compared with 73.92% of the preexercise value in the placebo group (p<0.01). The maximum percent change in baseline FEV1 after zileuton was a 15.58% decrement from the preexercise level, as compared with a 28.1% decrease after placebo (p<0.001). Five minutes after exercise, the FVC after zileuton was 92.76% of the preexercise value, as compared with 86.26% after placebo (p<0.05). This is the first study in which a 5-lipoxygenase inhibitor has been shown to attenuate exercise-induced asthma. These results suggest that leukotrienes are important biochemical mediators in the development of exercise-induced bronchospasm, and that leukotriene inhibit may have a role in the treatment of this disorder.

Topics: Adult; Albuterol; Anti-Asthmatic Agents; Asthma, Exercise-Induced; Bronchial Spasm; Bronchodilator Agents; Cross-Over Studies; Double-Blind Method; Forced Expiratory Volume; Humans; Hydroxyurea; Inflammation Mediators; Leukotriene Antagonists; Leukotriene B4; Leukotriene C4; Leukotrienes; Lipoxygenase Inhibitors; Vital Capacity

Ebastine (CAS 90729-43-4), cetirizine (CAS 83881-51-0) and loratadine (CAS 79794-75-5) are second generation H1-antihistamines of proven efficacy for treating allergy. Recent clinical studies have found ebastine to be more effective than cetirizine or loratadine in alleviating the symptoms of seasonal allergic rhinitis. The objective of this study was to compare the efficacy of these compounds in three guinea-pig modeles of bronchoconstriction, elicited either by histamine, allergen or leukotriene C4 in order to shed light onto the mechanisms that might explain differences found in clinical studies. In the present experiments, ebastine and cetirizine were equipotent against aerosol histamine-induced bronchospasm in guinea pigs (ED50 115 and 100 micrograms/kg p.o., respectively), while loratadine was three-fold less potent. In the same model the effects of ebastine, loratadine and cetirizine lasted 21, 19 and 15 h, respectively. Ebastine (ED50 334 micrograms/kg p.o.) was the most potent compound in inhibiting allergen-induced bronchospasm in conscious guinea pigs. In vitro studies in tracheally perfused guinea pig lungs demonstrated that ebastine and loratadine inhibited with equal potency the bronchoconstriction induced by leukotriene C4 whilst cetirizine was significantly less potent. Finally, in another in vivo study, ebastine reverted the changes in pulmonary resistance induced by leukotriene C4 in anaesthetised guinea pigs, whereas cetirizine and loratadine were devoid of activity in this model. In accordance with the clinical data, ebastine proved to be the substance with the widest range of application in animal experiments, too.

Topics: Aerosols; Airway Resistance; Algorithms; Animals; Anti-Allergic Agents; Bronchial Spasm; Butyrophenones; Cetirizine; Guinea Pigs; Histamine; Histamine H1 Antagonists; Leukotriene C4; Loratadine; Male; Ovalbumin; Piperidines