letrozole has been researched along with Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors in 4 studies
Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors: An internationally recognized set of published rules used for evaluation of cancer treatment that define when tumors found in cancer patients improve, worsen, or remain stable during treatment. These criteria are based specifically on the response of the tumor(s) to treatment, and not on the overall health status of the patient resulting from treatment.
Excerpt | Relevance | Reference |
---|---|---|
"Determine the efficacy and safety of first-line ribociclib plus letrozole in patients with de novo advanced breast cancer." | 9.27 | Ribociclib plus letrozole versus letrozole alone in patients with de novo HR+, HER2- advanced breast cancer in the randomized MONALEESA-2 trial. ( Arteaga, CL; Beck, JT; Cameron, DA; Conte, P; Germa, C; Hart, LL; Hortobagyi, GN; Jakobsen, E; Lindquist, D; Mondal, S; O'Shaughnessy, J; Petrakova, K; Sonke, GS; Souami, F; Villanueva, C, 2018) |
" The present study compared clinical outcomes in women with metastatic breast cancer who received letrozole as first-line monotherapy in oncology practices across the United States versus patients in the letrozole-alone cohort of the PALOMA-2 phase 3 trial." | 5.34 | Concordance of real-world versus conventional progression-free survival from a phase 3 trial of endocrine therapy as first-line treatment for metastatic breast cancer. ( Bourla, AB; Cotter, MJ; Huang Bartlett, C; Huang, X; Mardekian, J; Parrinello, CM; Zhang, Z, 2020) |
"Determine the efficacy and safety of first-line ribociclib plus letrozole in patients with de novo advanced breast cancer." | 5.27 | Ribociclib plus letrozole versus letrozole alone in patients with de novo HR+, HER2- advanced breast cancer in the randomized MONALEESA-2 trial. ( Arteaga, CL; Beck, JT; Cameron, DA; Conte, P; Germa, C; Hart, LL; Hortobagyi, GN; Jakobsen, E; Lindquist, D; Mondal, S; O'Shaughnessy, J; Petrakova, K; Sonke, GS; Souami, F; Villanueva, C, 2018) |
"Although approximately 60 % of breast cancers in premenopausal women are HR positive, the role of neoadjuvant ET in this population is not well defined." | 1.42 | Management of Premenopausal Women with Neoadjuvant Endocrine Therapy: A Single-Institution Experience. ( Barbie, TU; Ma, C; Margenthaler, JA, 2015) |
Timeframe | Studies, this research(%) | All Research% |
---|---|---|
pre-1990 | 0 (0.00) | 18.7374 |
1990's | 0 (0.00) | 18.2507 |
2000's | 0 (0.00) | 29.6817 |
2010's | 3 (75.00) | 24.3611 |
2020's | 1 (25.00) | 2.80 |
Authors | Studies |
---|---|
Huang Bartlett, C | 1 |
Mardekian, J | 1 |
Cotter, MJ | 1 |
Huang, X | 1 |
Zhang, Z | 1 |
Parrinello, CM | 1 |
Bourla, AB | 1 |
Safra, T | 1 |
Kaufman, B | 1 |
Kadouri, L | 1 |
Efrat Ben-Baruch, N | 1 |
Ryvo, L | 1 |
Nisenbaum, B | 1 |
Evron, E | 1 |
Yerushalmi, R | 1 |
O'Shaughnessy, J | 1 |
Petrakova, K | 1 |
Sonke, GS | 1 |
Conte, P | 1 |
Arteaga, CL | 1 |
Cameron, DA | 1 |
Hart, LL | 1 |
Villanueva, C | 1 |
Jakobsen, E | 1 |
Beck, JT | 1 |
Lindquist, D | 1 |
Souami, F | 1 |
Mondal, S | 1 |
Germa, C | 1 |
Hortobagyi, GN | 1 |
Barbie, TU | 1 |
Ma, C | 1 |
Margenthaler, JA | 1 |
Trial | Phase | Enrollment | Study Type | Start Date | Status | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
A RANDOMIZED, MULTICENTER, DOUBLE-BLIND PHASE 3 STUDY OF PD-0332991 (ORAL CDK 4/6 INHIBITOR) PLUS LETROZOLE VERSUS PLACEBO PLUS LETROZOLE FOR THE TREATMENT OF POSTMENOPAUSAL WOMEN WITH ER (+), HER2 (-) BREAST CANCER WHO HAVE NOT RECEIVED ANY PRIOR SYSTEMI[NCT01740427] | Phase 3 | 666 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2013-02-22 | Completed | ||
[information is prepared from clinicaltrials.gov, extracted Sep-2024] |
The EuroQol EQ-5D is a 6-item instrument designed to assess health status in terms of a single index value or utility score. It contains 5 descriptors of current health state (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain or discomfort, and anxiety or depression) with each dimension having 3 levels of function (1=no problem, 2=some problem, and 3=extreme problem). The scores on the 5 descriptors are summarized to create a single summary score. An overall utility score is calculated based on these domains, with a range score from 0 (worse health scenario) to a maximum of 1.0 (best health scenario). (NCT01740427)
Timeframe: From Baseline up to 2.5 years
Intervention | Units on a scale (Mean) |
---|---|
Palbociclib Plus Letrozole | 0.014 |
Placebo Plus Letrozole | -0.010 |
FACT is a modular approach to assess participant health-related quality of life using a 'core' set of questions (FACT-G) as well as a cancer site-specific module. The FACT-G is a 27-item compilation of general questions divided into 4 domains: Physical Well-Being, Social/Family Well-Being, Emotional Well-Being, and Functional Well-Being. The FACT-B consisted of the FACT-G (27-item) and a breast-specific module: a 10-item instrument designed to assess participant concerns relating to breast cancer. For all questions, participants were asked to respond to a five-level scale where 0=not at all, 1=a little bit, 2=somewhat, 3=quite a bit, and 4=very much. FACT-B total score = Physical Well-Being + Social/Family Well-Being + Emotional Well-Being + Functional Well-Being + Breast Cancer Subscale. As each of the items ranges from 0-4, the range of possible scores is 0-144, with 0 being the worst possible score and 144 the best. (NCT01740427)
Timeframe: From Baseline up to 2.5 years
Intervention | Units on a scale (Mean) |
---|---|
Palbociclib Plus Letrozole | -0.106 |
Placebo Plus Letrozole | 0.219 |
DC is defined as the overall CR, PR, or stable disease (SD) ≥24 weeks according to the RECIST version 1.1. Disease Control Rate (DCR) is defined as the patients with CR, PR, or SD ≥24 weeks relative to all randomized participants. Participants who do not have on-study radiographic tumor reevaluation, who received anti-tumor treatment, a best response of SD≥24 weeks, or who died, progressed,or dropped out for any reason prior to achieving reaching a CR or PR and a best response of SD≥24 weeks was counted as non-responders in DCR. Per RECIST v1.1, CR: Complete disappearance of target lesions with exception of nodal disease. All target nodes must decrease to normal size (short axis <10mm). PR: ≥30% decrease under baseline of the sum of diameters of all target measurable lesions. The short diameter is used in the sum for target nodes, while the longest diameter is used in the sum for all other target lesions. SD: neither sufficient shrinkage nor increase to qualify for disease progression (NCT01740427)
Timeframe: From randomization until end of treatment (up to approximately 2.5 years)
Intervention | Percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
Palbociclib Plus Letrozole | 85.8 |
Placebo Plus Letrozole | 71.2 |
DR is defined as the time from the first documentation of objective tumor response (CR or PR) to the first documentation of disease progression or to death due to any cause, whichever occurs first. If tumor progression data included more than 1 date, the first date will be used. DR was calculated as [the date response ended (i.e. date of PD or death) - first CR or PR date + 1)]/30.4. DR would only be calculated for the subgroup of patients with an objective tumor response. Per RECIST v1.1, CR: Complete disappearance of target lesions with exception of nodal disease. All target nodes must decrease to normal size (short axis <10mm). PR: ≥30% decrease under baseline of the sum of diameters of all target measurable lesions.The short diameter is used in the sum for target nodes, while the longest diameter is used in the sum for all other target lesions. Stable Disease: neither sufficient shrinkage nor increase to qualify for disease progression. (NCT01740427)
Timeframe: From randomization until end of treatment (up to approximately 2.5 years)
Intervention | Months (Median) |
---|---|
Palbociclib Plus Letrozole | 20.1 |
Placebo Plus Letrozole | 16.7 |
Objective Response (OR) defined as the overall complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) according to the RECIST v1.1. Objective Response Rate (ORR) is defined as proportion of patients with CR or PR relative to all randomized patients with measurable disease at baseline. Patients who do not have on-study radiographic tumor re-evaluation, who received anti-tumor treatment, or who died, progressed/ dropped out for any reason prior to reaching a CR or PR were counted as non-responders in the assessment of ORR. Per RECIST v1.1, CR: Complete disappearance of target lesions with exception of nodal disease. All target nodes must decrease to normal size (short axis <10mm). PR: ≥30% decrease under baseline of the sum of diameters of all target measurable lesions. The short diameter is used in the sum for target nodes, while the longest diameter is used in the sum for all other target lesions. Stable Disease: neither sufficient shrinkage nor increase to qualify for disease progression. (NCT01740427)
Timeframe: From randomization until end of treatment (up to approximately 2.5 years)
Intervention | Percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
Palbociclib Plus Letrozole | 46.4 |
Placebo Plus Letrozole | 38.3 |
The OR is defined as the overall CR or PR according to the RECIST v1.1. ORR is defined as proportion of patients with CR or PR relative to all randomized patients with measurable disease at baseline. Patients who do not have on-study radiographic tumor re-evaluation, who received anti-tumor treatment, or who died, progressed/ dropped out for any reason prior to reaching a CR or PR were counted as non-responders in the assessment of ORR. Per RECIST v1.1, CR: Complete disappearance of target lesions with exception of nodal disease. All target nodes must decrease to normal size (short axis <10mm). PR: ≥30% decrease under baseline of the sum of diameters of all target measurable lesions. The short diameter is used in the sum for target nodes, while the longest diameter is used in the sum for all other target lesions. Stable Disease: neither sufficient shrinkage nor increase to qualify for disease progression. (NCT01740427)
Timeframe: From randomization until end of treatment (up to approximately 2.5 years)
Intervention | Percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
Palbociclib Plus Letrozole | 60.7 |
Placebo Plus Letrozole | 49.1 |
OS was defined as the time from date of randomization to date of death due to any cause. Participants without survival data beyond the date of their last follow-up were censored on the last date they were known to be alive. (NCT01740427)
Timeframe: From date of randomization until death due to any cause or censored, (assessed up to data cut-off date of 15-Nov-2021, approximately 8.7 years)
Intervention | Months (Median) |
---|---|
Palbociclib Plus Letrozole | 53.9 |
Placebo Plus Letrozole | 51.2 |
PFS is defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of the first documentation of objective tumor progression as per Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.1) or death due to any cause in the absence of documented PD, whichever occurs first. If tumor progression data include more than 1 date, the first date will be used. PFS (in months) will be calculated as (first event date - randomization date +1)/30.4. Progression is defined using RECIST v1.1, as a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target measurable lesions above the smallest sum observed (over baseline if no decrease in the sum is observed during therapy), with a minimum absolute increase of 5 mm, or unequivocal progression of pre-existing non-target lesions, or the appearance of new lesions. (NCT01740427)
Timeframe: From randomization date to date of first documentation of progression OR death (up to approximately 2.5 years)
Intervention | Months (Median) |
---|---|
Palbociclib Plus Letrozole | 24.8 |
Placebo Plus Letrozole | 14.5 |
Triplicate 12-lead ECG measurements (each recording separated by approximately 2 minutes) were performed and sent to a central laboratory for blinded manual adjudication. The average was calculated. The time corresponding to beginning of depolarization to repolarization of the ventricles (QT interval) was adjusted for RR interval using QT and RR from each ECG by Fridericia's formula (QTcF = QT divided by cube root of RR), by Bazette's formula (QTcB = QT divided by square root of RR) and corrected QT interval according to study-specific criteria (QTcS). Time-matched change from baseline values were reported for QTc analysis population. (NCT01740427)
Timeframe: Time-matched triplicate ECGs were collected at 0 (predose), 2, 4, 6 and 8 hours on Day 0 and on Cycle1 Day14
Intervention | msec (Least Squares Mean) | ||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QTcS at 0 hour | QTcS at 2 hour | QTcS at 4 hour | QTcS at 6 hour | QTcS at 8 hour | QTcF at 0 hour | QTcF at 2 hour | QTcF at 4 hour | QTcF at 6 hour | QTcF at 8 hour | QTcB at 0 hour | QTcB at 2 hour | QTcB at 4 hour | QTcB at 6 hour | QTcB at 8 hour | |
Palbociclib Plus Letrozole | 0.80 | 3.32 | 2.76 | 4.49 | 0.94 | 1.10 | 3.68 | 2.86 | 4.57 | 1.21 | -0.11 | 1.46 | 2.58 | 4.03 | -0.17 |
Placebo Plus Letrozole | 2.95 | 1.65 | 1.74 | 0.72 | 3.14 | 3.06 | 1.73 | 1.54 | 0.71 | 2.84 | 2.78 | 0.83 | 2.47 | 0.53 | 4.14 |
Laboratory abnormalities included anemia, hemoglobin increased, neutrophils (absolute), platelets, white blood cells, alanine aminotransferase (ALT), alkaline phosphatase, aspartate aminotransferase (AST), bilirubin (total), creatinine, hypercalcemia, hyperkalemia, hypermagnesemia, hypernatremia, hypoalbuminemia, hypocalcemia, hypokalemia, hypomagnesemia and hyponatremia. Laboratory abnormalities were graded by CTCAE version (v) 4.0 as Grade 1 = mild, Grade 2 = moderate, Grade 3 = severe and Grade 4 = life-threatening. Categories with at least 1 non-zero data values are reported. (NCT01740427)
Timeframe: From randomization up to 28 days after last dose of study drug (assessed up to data cut-off date of 15-Nov-2021, approximately 8.7 years)
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Anemia: Grade 1-2 | Anemia: Grade 3 | Hemoglobin Increased: Grade 1-2 | Hemoglobin Increased: Grade 3 | Neutrophils (Absolute): Grade 1-2 | Neutrophils (Absolute): Grade 3 | Neutrophils (Absolute): Grade 4 | Platelets: Grade 1-2 | Platelets: Grade 3 | Platelets: Grade 4 | White Blood Cells: Grade 1-2 | White Blood Cells: Grade 3 | White Blood Cells: Grade 4 | ALT: Grade 1-2 | ALT: Grade 3 | ALT: Grade 4 | Alkaline Phosphatase: Grade 1-2 | Alkaline Phosphatase: Grade 3 | AST: Grade 1-2 | AST: Grade 3 | Bilirubin (Total): Grade 1-2 | Bilirubin (Total): Grade 3 | Creatinine: Grade 1-2 | Creatinine: Grade 3 | Creatinine: Grade 4 | Hypercalcemia: Grade 1-2 | Hypercalcemia: Grade 3 | Hyperkalemia: Grade 1-2 | Hyperkalemia: Grade 3 | Hyperkalemia: Grade 4 | Hypermagnesemia: Grade 1-2 | Hypermagnesemia: Grade 3 | Hypermagnesemia: Grade 4 | Hypernatremia: Grade 1-2 | Hypernatremia: Grade 3 | Hypoalbuminemia: Grade 1-2 | Hypoalbuminemia: Grade 3 | Hypocalcemia: Grade 1-2 | Hypocalcemia: Grade 3 | Hypocalcemia: Grade 4 | Hypokalemia: Grade 1-2 | Hypokalemia: Grade 3 | Hypomagnesemia: Grade 1-2 | Hypomagnesemia: Grade 3 | Hypomagnesemia: Grade 4 | Hyponatremia: Grade 1-2 | Hyponatremia: Grade 3 | |
Palbociclib Plus Letrozole | 328 | 30 | 14 | 1 | 109 | 254 | 60 | 289 | 6 | 1 | 248 | 177 | 6 | 222 | 16 | 1 | 174 | 7 | 260 | 23 | 33 | 3 | 418 | 8 | 2 | 111 | 1 | 118 | 6 | 2 | 71 | 9 | 2 | 94 | 8 | 118 | 2 | 158 | 4 | 3 | 105 | 11 | 127 | 1 | 2 | 107 | 11 |
Placebo Plus Letrozole | 90 | 6 | 25 | 0 | 42 | 2 | 1 | 32 | 0 | 0 | 57 | 0 | 0 | 76 | 0 | 0 | 95 | 0 | 82 | 2 | 11 | 0 | 201 | 0 | 0 | 54 | 2 | 51 | 1 | 0 | 26 | 6 | 0 | 35 | 1 | 42 | 0 | 48 | 1 | 0 | 32 | 2 | 41 | 0 | 0 | 44 | 4 |
Summary of Plasma Palbociclib Within-Patient Mean Steady-State Trough Concentrations. (NCT01740427)
Timeframe: 0 hour (predose) on Day 14 of cycles 1 and 2
Intervention | ng/mL (Geometric Mean) | |
---|---|---|
Cycle 1 Day 14 | Cycle 2 Day 14 | |
Palbociclib Plus Letrozole | 70.1 | 64.2 |
Triplicate 12-lead ECG measurements (each recording separated by approximately 2 minutes) were performed and sent to a central laboratory for blinded manual adjudication. The average was calculated. The time corresponding to beginning of depolarization to repolarization of the ventricles (QT interval) was adjusted for RR interval using QT and RR from each ECG by Fridericia's formula (QTcF = QT divided by cube root of RR), by Bazette's formula (QTcB = QT divided by square root of RR) and corrected QT interval according to study-specific criteria (QTcS). Percentage of participants with post-baseline maximum absolute values and maximum increase from baseline were summarized for the safety analysis population. (NCT01740427)
Timeframe: For safety monitoring triplicate ECGs were obtained at 0 hour (pre-dose) on Day 1 of Cycle 1, Day 14 of Cycles 1 and Cycle 2, then on Day 1 of Cycles 4, 7, and 10. ECGs beyond Cycle 10 were performed as clinically indicated
Intervention | Percentage of participants (Number) | ||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Maximum QTcS <450 msec | Maximum QTcS 450-<480 msec | Maximum QTcS 480-<500 msec | Maximum QTcS ≥500 msec | Maximum QTcF <450 msec | Maximum QTcF 450-<480 msec | Maximum QTcF 480-<500 msec | Maximum QTcF ≥500 msec | Maximum QTcB <450 msec | Maximum QTcB 450-<480 msec | Maximum QTcB 480-<500 msec | Maximum QTcB ≥500 msec | Maximum QTcS Change <30 msec | Maximum QTcS 30≤Change <60 msec | Maximum QTcS Change≥60 msec | Maximum QTcF Change <30 msec | Maximum QTcF 30≤Change <60 msec | Maximum QTcF Change≥60 msec | Maximum QTcB Change <30 msec | Maximum QTcB 30≤Change <60 msec | Maximum QTcB Change≥60 msec | |
Palbociclib Plus Letrozole | 80.5 | 17.9 | 1.1 | 0.5 | 85.9 | 12.2 | 1.6 | 0.2 | 64.9 | 32.2 | 2.3 | 0.7 | 92.7 | 6.6 | 0.7 | 91.6 | 7.9 | 0.5 | 88.9 | 10.2 | 0.9 |
Placebo Plus Letrozole | 85.9 | 11.8 | 2.3 | 0 | 89.5 | 9.5 | 0.9 | 0 | 69.1 | 27.3 | 3.2 | 0.5 | 94.5 | 5.5 | 0 | 93.6 | 6.4 | 0 | 91.4 | 8.2 | 0.5 |
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participant administered a product or medical device; the event need not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment or usage. SAE was any untoward medical occurrence at any dose that resulted in death; was life-threatening; required hospitalization; resulted in persistent or significant disability or in congenital anomaly/birth defect. TEAE were events that occurred between first dose of study drug and up to 28 days after last dose that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pretreatment state. Severity was graded by the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI CTCAE), Version 4.0 as Grade 1 = mild, Grade 2 = moderate, Grade 3 = severe, Grade 4 = life-threatening and Grade 5 = death related to AE. (NCT01740427)
Timeframe: From date of randomization up to 28 days after last dose of study drug, (assessed up to data cut-off date of 15-Nov-2021, approximately 8.7 years)
Intervention | Percentage of Participants (Number) | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Participants with AEs | Participants with SAEs | Participants with Grade 3 or 4 AEs | Participants with Grade 5 AEs | Permanently discontinued study due to AEs | Permanently disc. palbociclib/placebo due to AEs | Permanently discontinued letrozole due to AEs | Temporarily disc. palbociclib/placebo due to AEs | Temporarily discontinued letrozole due to AEs | With palbociclib/placebo dose reduction due to AEs | |
Palbociclib Plus Letrozole | 99.1 | 27.5 | 82.7 | 3.6 | 4.1 | 14.2 | 9.0 | 79.5 | 22.7 | 40.8 |
Placebo Plus Letrozole | 96.4 | 17.1 | 30.2 | 2.3 | 2.3 | 5.9 | 5.4 | 17.1 | 11.3 | 2.3 |
"PFS by biomarker status by Investigator assessment. Progression is defined using RECIST v1.1, as a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, or a measurable increase in a non-target lesion, or the appearance of new lesions.~Positive is defined as H-Score ≥1 and negative as H-Score <1. H-Score is calculated as the sum of the % of cells at each level of staining intensity (0, 1+, 2+, and 3+) multiplied by the staining intensity value: H-Score = (% at 0)*0 + (% at 1+)*1 + (% at 2+)*2 + (% at 3+)*3. H-Score values range from 0 to 300.~ER stands for estrogen receptor and Rb stands for retinoblastoma susceptibility gene product." (NCT01740427)
Timeframe: From randomization until end of treatment (up to approximately 24 Months)
Intervention | Months (Median) | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ER Positive | ER Negative | Rb Positive | Rb Negative | Cyclin D1 Positive | Cyclin D1 Negative | p16 Positive | p16 Negative | p16 H-Score<175 | p16 H-Score≥175 | Ki67 ≤20% | Ki67 >20% | |
Palbociclib Plus Letrozole | 24.9 | 15.6 | 24.2 | NA | 24.8 | 11.1 | 24.8 | 16.8 | 23.7 | 24.2 | 27.6 | 17.5 |
Placebo Plus Letrozole | 16.3 | 5.4 | 13.7 | 18.5 | 13.8 | 8.1 | 13.8 | 13.8 | 13.8 | 5.6 | 16.8 | 8.4 |
One, two or three-year survival probability was defined as the probability of survival 1 year, 2 or 3 years after the date of randomization. The survival probability was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and 2-sided 95% confidence interval (CI) was calculated using the product limit method. (NCT01740427)
Timeframe: 1, 2 and 3 years after randomization
Intervention | Percent probability (Number) | ||
---|---|---|---|
1 year survival probability | 2 year survival probability | 3 year survival probability | |
Palbociclib Plus Letrozole | 92.7 | 78.4 | 69.8 |
Placebo Plus Letrozole | 94.9 | 82.5 | 65.0 |
3 trials available for letrozole and Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors
Article | Year |
---|---|
Concordance of real-world versus conventional progression-free survival from a phase 3 trial of endocrine therapy as first-line treatment for metastatic breast cancer.
Topics: Adult; Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal; Aromatase Inhibitors; Breast Neoplasms; Electronic Health Re | 2020 |
Everolimus Plus Letrozole for Treatment of Patients With HR
Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anemia; Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal; Antineoplastic Combined Che | 2018 |
Ribociclib plus letrozole versus letrozole alone in patients with de novo HR+, HER2- advanced breast cancer in the randomized MONALEESA-2 trial.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Aminopyridines; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Brea | 2018 |
1 other study available for letrozole and Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors
Article | Year |
---|---|
Management of Premenopausal Women with Neoadjuvant Endocrine Therapy: A Single-Institution Experience.
Topics: Adult; Anastrozole; Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; | 2015 |