letrozole has been researched along with Metastase in 78 studies
Excerpt | Relevance | Reference |
---|---|---|
"In the randomised phase II LEO trial, we investigated the effect of adding everolimus (EVE) to letrozole (LET) in ovarian-suppressed premenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive (HR+), HER2-negative (HER2-) recurrent/metastatic breast cancer." | 9.41 | Leuprorelin combined with letrozole with/without everolimus in ovarian-suppressed premenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer: The LEO study. ( Ahn, JH; Cheon, J; Jeong, JH; Jung, KH; Kim, GM; Kim, JE; Kim, SB; Koh, SJ; Lee, KS; Park, IH; Sim, SH; Sohn, J, 2021) |
"The cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor palbociclib has emerged as a novel therapeutic agent in metastatic breast cancer." | 9.30 | Real-World Experience of Palbociclib-Induced Adverse Events and Compliance With Complete Blood Count Monitoring in Women With Hormone Receptor-Positive/HER2-Negative Metastatic Breast Cancer. ( Aslam, R; Deac, O; Kennedy, J; O'Dwyer, R; Sukor, S; Tierney, A; Watson, GA, 2019) |
"This report assesses the efficacy and safety of palbociclib plus endocrine therapy (ET) in women with hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative advanced breast cancer (ABC) with or without visceral metastases." | 9.27 | Clinical considerations of the role of palbociclib in the management of advanced breast cancer patients with and without visceral metastases. ( Bartlett, CH; Colleoni, M; Cristofanilli, M; DeMichele, A; Diéras, V; Ettl, J; Finn, RS; Gelmon, KA; Giorgetti, C; Im, SA; Iyer, S; Lipatov, O; Lu, DR; Martin, M; Mori, A; Moulder, S; Turner, NC, 2018) |
"The phase 3 MONALEESA-2 study demonstrated that addition of ribociclib (RIB) to letrozole (LET) significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS) in patients (pts) with hormone receptor-positive (HR+), HER2-negative (HER2-) advanced breast cancer (ABC)." | 9.27 | First-line ribociclib plus letrozole in postmenopausal women with HR+ , HER2- advanced breast cancer: Tumor response and pain reduction in the phase 3 MONALEESA-2 trial. ( Alba, E; Auñón, PZ; Bachelot, T; Beck, TJ; Campone, M; Diab, S; Esteva, FJ; Gil-Gil, M; Janni, W; Kral, Z; Lopez, R; Miller, M; Pluard, TJ; Richards, P; Ryvo, L; Sutradhar, S; Tsai, M; Ward, P, 2018) |
"Adding temsirolimus to letrozole did not improve PFS as first-line therapy in patients with AI-naive advanced breast cancer." | 9.17 | Randomized phase III placebo-controlled trial of letrozole plus oral temsirolimus as first-line endocrine therapy in postmenopausal women with locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer. ( Berkenblit, A; Bondarenko, I; Brincat, S; Chan, A; Chow, L; Cincotta, M; Fumoleau, P; Garin, AM; Guimaraes, RC; Hachemi, S; Hayes, DF; Kang, LL; Krygowski, M; Lazar, AA; Moore, L; Neskovic-Konstantinovic, Z; Strahs, A; Sun, Y; Wolff, AC, 2013) |
"Goserelin and letrozole in premenopausal patients can result in clinical outcomes comparable to those obtained by letrozole alone in postmenopausal patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC)." | 9.14 | Phase II parallel group study showing comparable efficacy between premenopausal metastatic breast cancer patients treated with letrozole plus goserelin and postmenopausal patients treated with letrozole alone as first-line hormone therapy. ( Jung, SY; Kang, HS; Kim, EA; Kim, SW; Kwon, Y; Lee, KS; Lee, S; Nam, BH; Park, IH; Ro, J, 2010) |
"The letrozole study 025 is a large (n = 907), international, double-blind, randomized, phase III trial in postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer." | 9.11 | Superiority of letrozole to tamoxifen in the first-line treatment of advanced breast cancer: evidence from metastatic subgroups and a test of functional ability. ( Becquart, D; Chaudri-Ross, HA; Gershanovich, M; Lang, R; Mouridsen, H; Perez-Carrion, R; Sun, Y, 2004) |
"In this Phase I trial, 23 heavily pretreated postmenopausal patients with metastatic breast cancer received letrozole at doses ranging from 0." | 9.08 | Letrozole (CGS 20267). A phase I study of a new potent oral aromatase inhibitor of breast cancer. ( Adlercruetz, H; Brady, C; Demers, LM; Grossberg, H; Harvey, HA; Kambic, KB; Lipton, A; Santen, RJ; Trunet, PF, 1995) |
" It is indicated for the treatment of women with HR-positive, HER2-negative advanced or metastatic breast cancer, in combination with an aromatase inhibitor as initial endocrine-based therapy, and in combination with fulvestrant (with or without a luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonist) in those previously treated with endocrine therapy." | 8.95 | Palbociclib: A Review in HR-Positive, HER2-Negative, Advanced or Metastatic Breast Cancer. ( Kim, ES; Scott, LJ, 2017) |
"Third-generation aromatase inhibitors (letrozole, anastrozole) have shown superior efficacy in early and advanced breast cancer compared with tamoxifen." | 8.88 | Systematic review of lapatinib in combination with letrozole compared with other first-line treatments for hormone receptor positive(HR+) and HER2+ advanced or metastatic breast cancer(MBC). ( Amonkar, MM; Diaz, JR; Forbes, CA; Kleijnen, J; Lykopoulos, K; Rea, DW; Riemsma, R, 2012) |
" In a large phase III trial (EGF30008) in 1286 postmenopausal women with hormone receptor (HR)-positive, metastatic breast cancer who had not received previous therapy for advanced or metastatic disease, the primary endpoint of median progression-free survival in a HER2-positive population of 219 women was significantly longer with lapatinib plus letrozole than with letrozole plus placebo (8." | 8.86 | Lapatinib: in postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive, HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer. ( Curran, MP, 2010) |
"In patients with metastatic breast cancer, second-line therapy with aromatase inhibitors can improve survival in comparison with megestrol." | 8.80 | Survival in patients with metastatic breast cancer: analysis of randomized studies comparing oral aromatase inhibitors versus megestrol. ( Cattel, F; Messori, A; Trippoli, S; Vaiani, M, 2000) |
"The selective cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor palbociclib was approved in Argentina in 2015 for postmenopausal women with hormone receptor (HR)-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative advanced breast cancer (ABC) or metastatic breast cancer (MBC) based on phase III study results." | 7.91 | Real-World Treatment Patterns and Clinical Outcomes in Patients Receiving Palbociclib for Hormone Receptor-Positive, Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Negative Advanced or Metastatic Breast Cancer in Argentina: The IRIS Study. ( Iyer, S; Milligan, G; Mitra, D; Mycock, K; Taylor-Stokes, G; Waller, J; Zhan, L, 2019) |
"Among patients with HR-positive advanced breast cancer, the estimated PFS in patients treated with fulvestrant and palbociclib was comparable to a previously reported phase 3 trial." | 7.91 | Real-world clinical outcomes and toxicity in metastatic breast cancer patients treated with palbociclib and endocrine therapy. ( Abraham, J; Budd, GT; Eziokwu, AS; Jia, X; Kruse, M; Montero, AJ; Moore, HCF; Varella, L, 2019) |
"Letrozole showed efficacy and generally favorable toxicities, along with the convenience of oral administration in postmenopausal patients with hormone receptor (HR)-positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC)." | 7.85 | Efficacy of Letrozole as First-Line Treatment of Postmenopausal Women with Hormone Receptor-Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer in Korea. ( Beom, SH; Han, SW; Han, W; Im, SA; Kim, TY; Lee, KH; Moon, HG; Noh, DY; Oh, DY; Oh, J; Suh, KJ; Yang, Y, 2017) |
" When added to the aromatase inhibitor letrozole in a randomized phase II trial for first-line therapy of estrogen receptor-positive, HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer, palbociclib significantly increased progression-free survival compared with letrozole alone [palbociclib + letrozole: 20." | 7.81 | Palbociclib for the Treatment of Estrogen Receptor-Positive, HER2-Negative Metastatic Breast Cancer. ( Henry, NL; Morikawa, A, 2015) |
"Everolimus (Afinitor®) plus exemestane are indicated for hormone receptor-positive, HER2/neu-negative metastatic breast cancer (MBC), in menopausal women without symptomatic visceral disease after recurrence or progression following aromatase inhibitors." | 7.81 | Everolimus in Metastatic Breast Cancer: Clinical Experience as a Late Treatment Line. ( Abrial, C; Arbre, M; Chollet, P; Devaud, H; Dohou, J; Dubray-Longeras, P; Durando, X; Herviou, P; Kwiatkowski, F; Mahammedi, H; Mouret-Reynier, MA; Planchat, E; Pouget, M; Van Praagh, I, 2015) |
"Lapatinib, a dual epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and HER2 inhibitor, remains unproven in non-HER2-amplified metastatic breast cancer (MBC)." | 7.80 | Quantitative ER and PgR assessment as predictors of benefit from lapatinib in postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer. ( Dering, J; Ellis, C; Finn, RS; Florance, A; Johnston, S; Martin, AM; O'Rourke, L; Press, MF, 2014) |
" We evaluated the efficacy of the aromatase inhibitor letrozole in patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) as related to DNA polymorphisms of CYP19A1." | 7.77 | Single nucleotide polymorphisms of CYP19A1 predict clinical outcomes and adverse events associated with letrozole in patients with metastatic breast cancer. ( Hong, SH; Jeong, J; Kim, SY; Lee, H; Lee, KS; Lee, YS; Nam, BH; Park, IH; Ro, J, 2011) |
"The aromatase inhibitor letrozole effectively treats breast cancer by decreasing estrogen levels in postmenopausal women." | 7.76 | Effect of letrozole on plasma lipids, triglycerides, and estradiol in postmenopausal women with metastatic breast cancer. ( Chetver, L; Hussein, O; Zidan, J; Zucker, M, 2010) |
"To investigate whether there may be a role for aromatase inhibitors (AIs) in the treatment of endometrial hyperplasia (EH) and endometrial adenocarcinoma (EA) in postmenopausal women, a retrospective study on the effect of aromatase inhibitors (anastrozole or letrozole) was conducted for 16 patients who were not amenable to surgical treatment." | 7.75 | Sustained effect of the aromatase inhibitors anastrozole and letrozole on endometrial thickness in patients with endometrial hyperplasia and endometrial carcinoma. ( Barker, LC; Brand, IR; Crawford, SM, 2009) |
"To estimate the cost-effectiveness of extended adjuvant letrozole in postmenopausal women with early breast cancer and estrogen or progesterone receptor-positive tumors who had completed 5 years of adjuvant tamoxifen." | 7.73 | Cost-effectiveness of extended adjuvant letrozole therapy after 5 years of adjuvant tamoxifen therapy in postmenopausal women with early-stage breast cancer. ( Brandman, J; Delea, TE; Gross, PE; Johnston, SR; Karnon, J; Smith, RE; Sung, JC, 2006) |
"Twenty patients (pts) with metastatic breast cancer with disease progression, previously treated with chemotherapy and tamoxifen, were administered oral letrozole (2." | 7.70 | Letrozole for the treatment of pretreated advanced breast cancer patients: preliminary report. ( Cappellini, GC; Casali, A; Casali, M; Giuntini, T; Sega, FM; Terzoli, E, 2000) |
"Median PFS for patients with bone-only metastases (n = 54) was not reached (95% CI 18." | 5.62 | Real-world benefit of combination palbociclib and endocrine therapy for metastatic breast cancer and correlation with neutropenia. ( Armaghani, AJ; Costa, RLB; Czerniecki, BJ; Han, HS; Hoover, SJ; Khakpour, N; Khong, HT; Kiluk, JV; Laronga, C; Lee, MC; Loftus, LS; Ma, J; Soliman, HH; Soyano-Muller, AE; Sun, J; Sun, W; Zhong, X, 2021) |
"In the randomised phase II LEO trial, we investigated the effect of adding everolimus (EVE) to letrozole (LET) in ovarian-suppressed premenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive (HR+), HER2-negative (HER2-) recurrent/metastatic breast cancer." | 5.41 | Leuprorelin combined with letrozole with/without everolimus in ovarian-suppressed premenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer: The LEO study. ( Ahn, JH; Cheon, J; Jeong, JH; Jung, KH; Kim, GM; Kim, JE; Kim, SB; Koh, SJ; Lee, KS; Park, IH; Sim, SH; Sohn, J, 2021) |
"Therefore, advanced breast cancer with left-sided pleural effusion and metastases to the pleura and bone was diagnosed." | 5.39 | [An elderly patient with advanced breast cancer who responded to treatment with letrozole-a case report]. ( Nakamura, H; Yoneyama, K, 2013) |
"After 3 months, the metastases showed a notable response, which was subsequently maintained for 19 months." | 5.37 | [A case of secondary inflammatory breast cancer with multiple metastases in which operation was possible through letrozole monotherapy]. ( Kusama, M, 2011) |
"Letrozole is a potent nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitor that is registered for the treatment of postmenopausal women with advanced metastatic breast cancers and in the neoadjuvant, early, and extended adjuvant indications." | 5.35 | The aromatase inhibitor letrozole and inhibitors of insulin-like growth factor I receptor synergistically induce apoptosis in in vitro models of estrogen-dependent breast cancer. ( Chen, B; Chen, S; Evans, DB; Lisztwan, J; Pornon, A, 2008) |
"This exploratory study suggests that FES-PET heterogeneity may potentially identify the subset of ER positive, metastatic breast cancer patients who benefit from letrozole combined with CDK inhibition." | 5.34 | Molecular imaging to identify patients with metastatic breast cancer who benefit from endocrine treatment combined with cyclin-dependent kinase inhibition. ( Boers, J; de Vries, EFJ; Elias, SG; Glaudemans, AWJM; Hospers, GAP; Kwee, TC; Martens, JWM; Schröder, CP; Schuuring, E; Venema, CM, 2020) |
"The cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor palbociclib has emerged as a novel therapeutic agent in metastatic breast cancer." | 5.30 | Real-World Experience of Palbociclib-Induced Adverse Events and Compliance With Complete Blood Count Monitoring in Women With Hormone Receptor-Positive/HER2-Negative Metastatic Breast Cancer. ( Aslam, R; Deac, O; Kennedy, J; O'Dwyer, R; Sukor, S; Tierney, A; Watson, GA, 2019) |
"This report assesses the efficacy and safety of palbociclib plus endocrine therapy (ET) in women with hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative advanced breast cancer (ABC) with or without visceral metastases." | 5.27 | Clinical considerations of the role of palbociclib in the management of advanced breast cancer patients with and without visceral metastases. ( Bartlett, CH; Colleoni, M; Cristofanilli, M; DeMichele, A; Diéras, V; Ettl, J; Finn, RS; Gelmon, KA; Giorgetti, C; Im, SA; Iyer, S; Lipatov, O; Lu, DR; Martin, M; Mori, A; Moulder, S; Turner, NC, 2018) |
"The phase 3 MONALEESA-2 study demonstrated that addition of ribociclib (RIB) to letrozole (LET) significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS) in patients (pts) with hormone receptor-positive (HR+), HER2-negative (HER2-) advanced breast cancer (ABC)." | 5.27 | First-line ribociclib plus letrozole in postmenopausal women with HR+ , HER2- advanced breast cancer: Tumor response and pain reduction in the phase 3 MONALEESA-2 trial. ( Alba, E; Auñón, PZ; Bachelot, T; Beck, TJ; Campone, M; Diab, S; Esteva, FJ; Gil-Gil, M; Janni, W; Kral, Z; Lopez, R; Miller, M; Pluard, TJ; Richards, P; Ryvo, L; Sutradhar, S; Tsai, M; Ward, P, 2018) |
"The aim of this multicenter, prospective, longitudinal phase IV study was to establish the optimal duration of neoadjuvant letrozole that would allow breast conservation surgery (BCS) in patients with early breast cancer who were initially unsuitable." | 5.19 | Optimum duration of neoadjuvant letrozole to permit breast conserving surgery. ( Andrews, C; Carpenter, R; Cordiner, C; Doughty, JC; Ellis, G; Gandhi, A; Gui, G; Moss, N; Skene, AI; Wilson, C, 2014) |
"Adding temsirolimus to letrozole did not improve PFS as first-line therapy in patients with AI-naive advanced breast cancer." | 5.17 | Randomized phase III placebo-controlled trial of letrozole plus oral temsirolimus as first-line endocrine therapy in postmenopausal women with locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer. ( Berkenblit, A; Bondarenko, I; Brincat, S; Chan, A; Chow, L; Cincotta, M; Fumoleau, P; Garin, AM; Guimaraes, RC; Hachemi, S; Hayes, DF; Kang, LL; Krygowski, M; Lazar, AA; Moore, L; Neskovic-Konstantinovic, Z; Strahs, A; Sun, Y; Wolff, AC, 2013) |
"Goserelin and letrozole in premenopausal patients can result in clinical outcomes comparable to those obtained by letrozole alone in postmenopausal patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC)." | 5.14 | Phase II parallel group study showing comparable efficacy between premenopausal metastatic breast cancer patients treated with letrozole plus goserelin and postmenopausal patients treated with letrozole alone as first-line hormone therapy. ( Jung, SY; Kang, HS; Kim, EA; Kim, SW; Kwon, Y; Lee, KS; Lee, S; Nam, BH; Park, IH; Ro, J, 2010) |
"The letrozole study 025 is a large (n = 907), international, double-blind, randomized, phase III trial in postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer." | 5.11 | Superiority of letrozole to tamoxifen in the first-line treatment of advanced breast cancer: evidence from metastatic subgroups and a test of functional ability. ( Becquart, D; Chaudri-Ross, HA; Gershanovich, M; Lang, R; Mouridsen, H; Perez-Carrion, R; Sun, Y, 2004) |
"Five hundred sixty-two estrogen receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer patients were randomized to first-line hormone therapy with either letrozole or tamoxifen." | 5.10 | Serum HER-2/neu and response to the aromatase inhibitor letrozole versus tamoxifen. ( Ali, SM; Brady, C; Carney, W; Chaudri-Ross, HA; Demers, L; Harvey, HA; Leitzel, K; Lipton, A; Wyld, P, 2003) |
"In this Phase I trial, 23 heavily pretreated postmenopausal patients with metastatic breast cancer received letrozole at doses ranging from 0." | 5.08 | Letrozole (CGS 20267). A phase I study of a new potent oral aromatase inhibitor of breast cancer. ( Adlercruetz, H; Brady, C; Demers, LM; Grossberg, H; Harvey, HA; Kambic, KB; Lipton, A; Santen, RJ; Trunet, PF, 1995) |
" It is indicated for the treatment of women with HR-positive, HER2-negative advanced or metastatic breast cancer, in combination with an aromatase inhibitor as initial endocrine-based therapy, and in combination with fulvestrant (with or without a luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonist) in those previously treated with endocrine therapy." | 4.95 | Palbociclib: A Review in HR-Positive, HER2-Negative, Advanced or Metastatic Breast Cancer. ( Kim, ES; Scott, LJ, 2017) |
", letrozole, have proven successful in reducing the death rate for breast cancer patients whose initial tumors express ERα." | 4.95 | Identification of miRNAs as biomarkers for acquired endocrine resistance in breast cancer. ( Klinge, CM; Muluhngwi, P, 2017) |
"Third-generation aromatase inhibitors (letrozole, anastrozole) have shown superior efficacy in early and advanced breast cancer compared with tamoxifen." | 4.88 | Systematic review of lapatinib in combination with letrozole compared with other first-line treatments for hormone receptor positive(HR+) and HER2+ advanced or metastatic breast cancer(MBC). ( Amonkar, MM; Diaz, JR; Forbes, CA; Kleijnen, J; Lykopoulos, K; Rea, DW; Riemsma, R, 2012) |
"Letrozole is a well-tolerated and effective drug in metastatic breast cancer in postmenopausal women." | 4.86 | Letrozole. ( Colleoni, M; Dellapasqua, S, 2010) |
" In a large phase III trial (EGF30008) in 1286 postmenopausal women with hormone receptor (HR)-positive, metastatic breast cancer who had not received previous therapy for advanced or metastatic disease, the primary endpoint of median progression-free survival in a HER2-positive population of 219 women was significantly longer with lapatinib plus letrozole than with letrozole plus placebo (8." | 4.86 | Lapatinib: in postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive, HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer. ( Curran, MP, 2010) |
"Third-generation aromatase inhibitors (AIs), including letrozole, are now standard therapy for initial adjuvant endocrine treatment of postmenopausal women with early breast cancer." | 4.84 | Understanding the BIG results: Insights from the BIG 1-98 trial analyses. ( Wardley, AM, 2008) |
"Extended adjuvant letrozole reduced the risk of recurrence by 42% and the risk of distant metastases by 40%, it was well tolerated compared to placebo; among lymph node-positive patients, overall survival was significantly improved." | 4.84 | Never too late: reducing late breast cancer relapse risk. ( Harbeck, N, 2008) |
"Randomized clinical trials have established the role of third-generation aromatase inhibitors (AIs) (letrozole, anastrozole, and exemestane) as standard treatment for patients with hormone-sensitive metastatic breast cancer who have experienced disease progression with antiestrogen therapy." | 4.82 | A comparison of the efficacy of aromatase inhibitors in second-line treatment of metastatic breast cancer. ( Rose, C, 2003) |
" For more than 20 years, standard first-line treatment for postmenopausal women with metastatic breast cancer has been the antiestrogen tamoxifen, a selective estrogen receptor modulator (SERM) with differential effects on breast, endometrial, bone, and vascular tissues." | 4.82 | Applicability of the intratumor aromatase preclinical model to predict clinical trial results with endocrine therapy. ( Brodie, AH; Mouridsen, HT, 2003) |
" In women with hormone-sensitive breast cancer, three of these agents, letrozole, anastrozole, and exemestane, provide an important alternative endocrine therapy to the antiestrogen tamoxifen, which blocks estrogen activation of the estrogen receptor." | 4.82 | Aromatase inhibitors in advanced breast cancer. ( Mouridsen, HT, 2004) |
"During recent years the development of hormone therapy for the treatment breast neoplasms has seen, in addition to classic aspecific antiestrogens (AE) like tamoxifen (TAM) and to a lesser extent toremifen, a major development of new molecules divided into two groups: the first is the so-called selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs), the most important of which is Raloxifen, which mediate estrogen-agonist effects in some tissues and estrogen-antagonist effects in others; the second group includes the aromatase inhibitors (AI), important enzymes for peripheral estrogen conversion." | 4.81 | [Antiestrogen therapy in the treatment of breast neoplasms]. ( Alba, E; Colla, F; Farina, C; Mazzoleni, A; Ragonesi, G, 2002) |
"Three new aromatase inhibitors have recently completed phase III evaluation as treatment of metastatic breast cancer in post-menopausal women whose disease has progressed despite tamoxifen therapy: anastrozole (ARIMIDEX, Zeneca), letrozole (FEMARA, Novartis) and vorozole (RIVIZOR, Janssen)." | 4.80 | The third-generation non-steroidal aromatase inhibitors: a review of their clinical benefits in the second-line hormonal treatment of advanced breast cancer. ( Hamilton, A; Piccart, M, 1999) |
"In patients with metastatic breast cancer, second-line therapy with aromatase inhibitors can improve survival in comparison with megestrol." | 4.80 | Survival in patients with metastatic breast cancer: analysis of randomized studies comparing oral aromatase inhibitors versus megestrol. ( Cattel, F; Messori, A; Trippoli, S; Vaiani, M, 2000) |
"Among patients with HR-positive advanced breast cancer, the estimated PFS in patients treated with fulvestrant and palbociclib was comparable to a previously reported phase 3 trial." | 3.91 | Real-world clinical outcomes and toxicity in metastatic breast cancer patients treated with palbociclib and endocrine therapy. ( Abraham, J; Budd, GT; Eziokwu, AS; Jia, X; Kruse, M; Montero, AJ; Moore, HCF; Varella, L, 2019) |
"The selective cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor palbociclib was approved in Argentina in 2015 for postmenopausal women with hormone receptor (HR)-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative advanced breast cancer (ABC) or metastatic breast cancer (MBC) based on phase III study results." | 3.91 | Real-World Treatment Patterns and Clinical Outcomes in Patients Receiving Palbociclib for Hormone Receptor-Positive, Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Negative Advanced or Metastatic Breast Cancer in Argentina: The IRIS Study. ( Iyer, S; Milligan, G; Mitra, D; Mycock, K; Taylor-Stokes, G; Waller, J; Zhan, L, 2019) |
"Letrozole showed efficacy and generally favorable toxicities, along with the convenience of oral administration in postmenopausal patients with hormone receptor (HR)-positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC)." | 3.85 | Efficacy of Letrozole as First-Line Treatment of Postmenopausal Women with Hormone Receptor-Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer in Korea. ( Beom, SH; Han, SW; Han, W; Im, SA; Kim, TY; Lee, KH; Moon, HG; Noh, DY; Oh, DY; Oh, J; Suh, KJ; Yang, Y, 2017) |
"Everolimus (Afinitor®) plus exemestane are indicated for hormone receptor-positive, HER2/neu-negative metastatic breast cancer (MBC), in menopausal women without symptomatic visceral disease after recurrence or progression following aromatase inhibitors." | 3.81 | Everolimus in Metastatic Breast Cancer: Clinical Experience as a Late Treatment Line. ( Abrial, C; Arbre, M; Chollet, P; Devaud, H; Dohou, J; Dubray-Longeras, P; Durando, X; Herviou, P; Kwiatkowski, F; Mahammedi, H; Mouret-Reynier, MA; Planchat, E; Pouget, M; Van Praagh, I, 2015) |
"A total of 148 postmenopausal women (including bilateral ovariectomy) with hormone dependent metastatic breast cancer receiving aromatase inhibitors (letrozole, anastrozole or exemestane) were analyzed retrospectively." | 3.81 | [Efficacies of aromatase inhibitors in the treatment of hormone dependent metastatic breast cancer in postmenopausal women: a report of 148 cases]. ( Cui, S; Lü, H; Niu, L; Yan, M; Zeng, H; Zhang, M, 2015) |
" When added to the aromatase inhibitor letrozole in a randomized phase II trial for first-line therapy of estrogen receptor-positive, HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer, palbociclib significantly increased progression-free survival compared with letrozole alone [palbociclib + letrozole: 20." | 3.81 | Palbociclib for the Treatment of Estrogen Receptor-Positive, HER2-Negative Metastatic Breast Cancer. ( Henry, NL; Morikawa, A, 2015) |
"Lapatinib, a dual epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and HER2 inhibitor, remains unproven in non-HER2-amplified metastatic breast cancer (MBC)." | 3.80 | Quantitative ER and PgR assessment as predictors of benefit from lapatinib in postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer. ( Dering, J; Ellis, C; Finn, RS; Florance, A; Johnston, S; Martin, AM; O'Rourke, L; Press, MF, 2014) |
"There may be a relationship between the incidence of vasomotor and arthralgia/myalgia symptoms and treatment outcomes for postmenopausal breast cancer patients with endocrine-responsive disease who received adjuvant letrozole or tamoxifen." | 3.80 | Symptoms of endocrine treatment and outcome in the BIG 1-98 study. ( Bonnefoi, H; Coates, AS; Cole, BF; Colleoni, M; Ejlertsen, B; Forbes, JF; Gelber, RD; Giobbie-Hurder, A; Goldhirsch, A; Huober, J; Láng, I; Neven, P; Price, KN; Rabaglio, M; Smith, I; Thürlimann, B; Wardley, A; Wu, J, 2014) |
" We evaluated the efficacy of the aromatase inhibitor letrozole in patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) as related to DNA polymorphisms of CYP19A1." | 3.77 | Single nucleotide polymorphisms of CYP19A1 predict clinical outcomes and adverse events associated with letrozole in patients with metastatic breast cancer. ( Hong, SH; Jeong, J; Kim, SY; Lee, H; Lee, KS; Lee, YS; Nam, BH; Park, IH; Ro, J, 2011) |
"The aromatase inhibitor letrozole effectively treats breast cancer by decreasing estrogen levels in postmenopausal women." | 3.76 | Effect of letrozole on plasma lipids, triglycerides, and estradiol in postmenopausal women with metastatic breast cancer. ( Chetver, L; Hussein, O; Zidan, J; Zucker, M, 2010) |
"To investigate whether there may be a role for aromatase inhibitors (AIs) in the treatment of endometrial hyperplasia (EH) and endometrial adenocarcinoma (EA) in postmenopausal women, a retrospective study on the effect of aromatase inhibitors (anastrozole or letrozole) was conducted for 16 patients who were not amenable to surgical treatment." | 3.75 | Sustained effect of the aromatase inhibitors anastrozole and letrozole on endometrial thickness in patients with endometrial hyperplasia and endometrial carcinoma. ( Barker, LC; Brand, IR; Crawford, SM, 2009) |
"In this specifically designed, prospective study, the authors addressed the predictive value of circulating levels of the extracellular domain (ECD) of HER2 in patients with metastatic breast cancer who were treated with letrozole." | 3.74 | High circulating HER2 extracellular domain levels correlate with reduced efficacy of an aromatase inhibitor in hormone receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer: a confirmatory prospective study. ( Alba, E; Barnadas, A; Colomer, R; Constenla, M; Fernández, R; Gil, M; Gilabert, M; Llombart-Cussac, A; Lloveras, B; Mayordomo, JI; Ramos, M; Tusquets, I, 2007) |
"To estimate the cost-effectiveness of extended adjuvant letrozole in postmenopausal women with early breast cancer and estrogen or progesterone receptor-positive tumors who had completed 5 years of adjuvant tamoxifen." | 3.73 | Cost-effectiveness of extended adjuvant letrozole therapy after 5 years of adjuvant tamoxifen therapy in postmenopausal women with early-stage breast cancer. ( Brandman, J; Delea, TE; Gross, PE; Johnston, SR; Karnon, J; Smith, RE; Sung, JC, 2006) |
"Twenty patients (pts) with metastatic breast cancer with disease progression, previously treated with chemotherapy and tamoxifen, were administered oral letrozole (2." | 3.70 | Letrozole for the treatment of pretreated advanced breast cancer patients: preliminary report. ( Cappellini, GC; Casali, A; Casali, M; Giuntini, T; Sega, FM; Terzoli, E, 2000) |
"Up to 75% of breast cancers express the oestrogen receptor or progesterone receptor (hormone-receptor-positive)." | 2.94 | Cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors plus aromatase inhibitor in first-line treatment hormone-receptor-positive/HER2-negative advanced breast cancer women with or without visceral disease: time to turn page? ( Bascialla, L; De Giorgi, A; Gallerani, E; Giaquinto, A; Grigioni, E; Gueli, R; Marrazzo, C; Nigro, O; Pinotti, G; Vallini, I, 2020) |
"In patients who had metastatic breast cancer, decreased serum EGFR/normal serum HER-2 predicted shorter survival compared with patients who had normal levels of serum EGFR/HER-2." | 2.72 | Serum epidermal growth factor receptor/HER-2 predicts poor survival in patients with metastatic breast cancer. ( Ali, SM; Carney, W; Chaudri-Ross, HA; Demers, L; Evans, DB; Hackl, W; Hamer, P; Leitzel, K; Lipton, A; Souder, C, 2006) |
"Distant metastases from breast cancer are incurable." | 2.71 | Beta-interferon and interleukin-2 prolong more than three times the survival of 26 consecutive endocrine dependent breast cancer patients with distant metastases: an exploratory trial. ( Carpi, A; Nicolini, A, 2005) |
"Letrozole is a new highly selective and potent aromatase inhibitor." | 2.68 | A randomized phase II trial of two dosage levels of letrozole as third-line hormonal therapy for women with metastatic breast carcinoma. ( Camoriano, JK; Gerstner, JB; Gesme, DH; Hartmann, LC; Hatfield, AK; Ingle, JN; Johnson, PA; Loprinzi, CL; Mailliard, JA; Suman, VJ, 1997) |
"Despite the selection of Type I endometrial cancer, which is more estrogen-dependent for its growth, modest clinical activity was observed in the metastatic setting." | 2.47 | Aromatase inhibition: a potential target for the management of recurrent or metastatic endometrial cancer by letrozole: more questions than answers? ( Chu, QS; Steed, HL, 2011) |
"Patients treated surgically for early breast cancer show a peak recurrence 2 years following surgery." | 2.44 | A review of the BIG results: the Breast International Group 1-98 trial analyses. ( Doughty, JC, 2008) |
"Palbociclib was evaluated using three independent data sources: real-world data from pharmacy and medical claims, a de-identified real-world data source derived from electronic health records (EHRs), and a global safety database." | 1.72 | Real-World Data of Palbociclib in Combination With Endocrine Therapy for the Treatment of Metastatic Breast Cancer in Men. ( Carson, KR; Cotter, MJ; Decembrino, J; Gossai, A; Huang Bartlett, C; Kim, S; Kraus, AL; Lu, DR; Mardekian, J; Motyl Rockland, J; Oharu, N; Schnell, P; Snow, T; Tursi, JM; VanArsdale, T; Wang, DD; Wilner, K; Yu-Kite, M, 2022) |
"Median PFS for patients with bone-only metastases (n = 54) was not reached (95% CI 18." | 1.62 | Real-world benefit of combination palbociclib and endocrine therapy for metastatic breast cancer and correlation with neutropenia. ( Armaghani, AJ; Costa, RLB; Czerniecki, BJ; Han, HS; Hoover, SJ; Khakpour, N; Khong, HT; Kiluk, JV; Laronga, C; Lee, MC; Loftus, LS; Ma, J; Soliman, HH; Soyano-Muller, AE; Sun, J; Sun, W; Zhong, X, 2021) |
"Therefore, advanced breast cancer with left-sided pleural effusion and metastases to the pleura and bone was diagnosed." | 1.39 | [An elderly patient with advanced breast cancer who responded to treatment with letrozole-a case report]. ( Nakamura, H; Yoneyama, K, 2013) |
"After 3 months, the metastases showed a notable response, which was subsequently maintained for 19 months." | 1.37 | [A case of secondary inflammatory breast cancer with multiple metastases in which operation was possible through letrozole monotherapy]. ( Kusama, M, 2011) |
"Letrozole is a potent nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitor that is registered for the treatment of postmenopausal women with advanced metastatic breast cancers and in the neoadjuvant, early, and extended adjuvant indications." | 1.35 | The aromatase inhibitor letrozole and inhibitors of insulin-like growth factor I receptor synergistically induce apoptosis in in vitro models of estrogen-dependent breast cancer. ( Chen, B; Chen, S; Evans, DB; Lisztwan, J; Pornon, A, 2008) |
"Metastatic breast cancer (MBC) is incurable in most cases." | 1.33 | Does survival increase in metastatic breast cancer with recently available anticancer drugs? ( Abrial, C; Cabrespine, A; Chollet, P; Cure, H; Durando, X; Ferriere, JP; Kwiatkowski, F; Leheurteur, M; Mouret-Reynier, MA; Penault-Llorca, F, 2006) |
Timeframe | Studies, this research(%) | All Research% |
---|---|---|
pre-1990 | 0 (0.00) | 18.7374 |
1990's | 3 (3.85) | 18.2507 |
2000's | 28 (35.90) | 29.6817 |
2010's | 39 (50.00) | 24.3611 |
2020's | 8 (10.26) | 2.80 |
Authors | Studies |
---|---|
Sun, J | 1 |
Zhong, X | 1 |
Ma, J | 1 |
Sun, W | 1 |
Han, HS | 1 |
Soliman, HH | 1 |
Loftus, LS | 1 |
Costa, RLB | 1 |
Armaghani, AJ | 1 |
Soyano-Muller, AE | 1 |
Czerniecki, BJ | 1 |
Lee, MC | 1 |
Kiluk, JV | 1 |
Khakpour, N | 1 |
Hoover, SJ | 1 |
Laronga, C | 1 |
Khong, HT | 1 |
Kraus, AL | 1 |
Yu-Kite, M | 1 |
Mardekian, J | 1 |
Cotter, MJ | 1 |
Kim, S | 1 |
Decembrino, J | 1 |
Snow, T | 1 |
Carson, KR | 1 |
Motyl Rockland, J | 1 |
Gossai, A | 1 |
Wilner, K | 1 |
Wang, DD | 1 |
Huang Bartlett, C | 1 |
Oharu, N | 1 |
Schnell, P | 1 |
VanArsdale, T | 1 |
Lu, DR | 2 |
Tursi, JM | 1 |
Liang, Z | 1 |
Cao, J | 1 |
Tian, L | 1 |
Shen, Y | 1 |
Yang, X | 1 |
Lin, Q | 1 |
Zhang, R | 1 |
Liu, H | 1 |
Du, X | 1 |
Shi, J | 1 |
Zhang, J | 1 |
Boers, J | 1 |
Venema, CM | 1 |
de Vries, EFJ | 1 |
Glaudemans, AWJM | 1 |
Kwee, TC | 1 |
Schuuring, E | 1 |
Martens, JWM | 1 |
Elias, SG | 1 |
Hospers, GAP | 1 |
Schröder, CP | 1 |
Nigro, O | 1 |
Marrazzo, C | 1 |
Gallerani, E | 1 |
Bascialla, L | 1 |
Gueli, R | 1 |
Grigioni, E | 1 |
De Giorgi, A | 1 |
Giaquinto, A | 1 |
Vallini, I | 1 |
Pinotti, G | 1 |
Schettini, F | 1 |
Giudici, F | 1 |
Giuliano, M | 1 |
Cristofanilli, M | 2 |
Arpino, G | 1 |
Del Mastro, L | 1 |
Puglisi, F | 1 |
De Placido, S | 1 |
Paris, I | 1 |
De Placido, P | 1 |
Venturini, S | 1 |
De Laurentis, M | 1 |
Conte, P | 1 |
Juric, D | 1 |
Llombart-Cussac, A | 2 |
Pusztai, L | 1 |
Prat, A | 1 |
Jerusalem, G | 1 |
Di Leo, A | 1 |
Generali, D | 1 |
Cabel, L | 1 |
Rosenblum, D | 1 |
Lerebours, F | 1 |
Brain, E | 1 |
Loirat, D | 1 |
Bergqvist, M | 1 |
Cottu, P | 1 |
Donnadieu, A | 1 |
Bethune, A | 1 |
Kiavue, N | 1 |
Rodrigues, M | 1 |
Pierga, JY | 1 |
Tanguy, ML | 1 |
Bidard, FC | 1 |
Jeong, JH | 1 |
Kim, JE | 1 |
Ahn, JH | 1 |
Jung, KH | 1 |
Koh, SJ | 1 |
Cheon, J | 1 |
Sohn, J | 1 |
Kim, GM | 1 |
Lee, KS | 3 |
Sim, SH | 1 |
Park, IH | 3 |
Kim, SB | 1 |
Egelston, C | 1 |
Guo, W | 1 |
Yost, S | 1 |
Lee, JS | 1 |
Rose, D | 1 |
Avalos, C | 1 |
Ye, J | 1 |
Frankel, P | 1 |
Schmolze, D | 1 |
Waisman, J | 1 |
Lee, P | 1 |
Yuan, Y | 1 |
Kim, ES | 1 |
Scott, LJ | 1 |
Turner, NC | 1 |
Finn, RS | 2 |
Martin, M | 1 |
Im, SA | 2 |
DeMichele, A | 2 |
Ettl, J | 1 |
Diéras, V | 1 |
Moulder, S | 1 |
Lipatov, O | 1 |
Colleoni, M | 3 |
Mori, A | 1 |
Giorgetti, C | 1 |
Iyer, S | 2 |
Bartlett, CH | 1 |
Gelmon, KA | 1 |
Janni, W | 1 |
Alba, E | 3 |
Bachelot, T | 1 |
Diab, S | 1 |
Gil-Gil, M | 1 |
Beck, TJ | 1 |
Ryvo, L | 1 |
Lopez, R | 1 |
Tsai, M | 1 |
Esteva, FJ | 2 |
Auñón, PZ | 1 |
Kral, Z | 1 |
Ward, P | 1 |
Richards, P | 1 |
Pluard, TJ | 1 |
Sutradhar, S | 1 |
Miller, M | 1 |
Campone, M | 1 |
Watson, GA | 1 |
Deac, O | 1 |
Aslam, R | 1 |
O'Dwyer, R | 1 |
Tierney, A | 1 |
Sukor, S | 1 |
Kennedy, J | 1 |
Yam, C | 1 |
Murthy, RK | 1 |
Rauch, GM | 1 |
Murray, JL | 2 |
Walters, RS | 1 |
Valero, V | 1 |
Brewster, AM | 1 |
Bast, RC | 1 |
Booser, DJ | 1 |
Giordano, SH | 1 |
Yang, W | 1 |
Hortobagyi, GN | 1 |
Moulder, SL | 1 |
Arun, B | 1 |
Weiss, J | 1 |
Afghahi, A | 1 |
Shagisultanova, E | 1 |
Diamond, JR | 1 |
Varella, L | 1 |
Eziokwu, AS | 1 |
Jia, X | 1 |
Kruse, M | 1 |
Moore, HCF | 1 |
Budd, GT | 2 |
Abraham, J | 1 |
Montero, AJ | 1 |
Waller, J | 1 |
Mitra, D | 1 |
Mycock, K | 1 |
Taylor-Stokes, G | 1 |
Milligan, G | 1 |
Zhan, L | 1 |
Press, MF | 1 |
Dering, J | 1 |
O'Rourke, L | 1 |
Florance, A | 1 |
Ellis, C | 1 |
Martin, AM | 1 |
Johnston, S | 1 |
Huober, J | 1 |
Cole, BF | 1 |
Rabaglio, M | 1 |
Giobbie-Hurder, A | 1 |
Wu, J | 1 |
Ejlertsen, B | 1 |
Bonnefoi, H | 1 |
Forbes, JF | 1 |
Neven, P | 1 |
Láng, I | 1 |
Smith, I | 1 |
Wardley, A | 1 |
Price, KN | 1 |
Goldhirsch, A | 1 |
Coates, AS | 1 |
Gelber, RD | 1 |
Thürlimann, B | 1 |
Yoneyama, K | 1 |
Nakamura, H | 1 |
Nicolini, A | 2 |
Rossi, G | 1 |
Ferrari, P | 1 |
Carpi, A | 2 |
Carpenter, R | 1 |
Doughty, JC | 3 |
Cordiner, C | 1 |
Moss, N | 1 |
Gandhi, A | 1 |
Wilson, C | 1 |
Andrews, C | 1 |
Ellis, G | 1 |
Gui, G | 1 |
Skene, AI | 1 |
Morikawa, A | 1 |
Henry, NL | 1 |
Pouget, M | 1 |
Abrial, C | 2 |
Planchat, E | 1 |
Van Praagh, I | 1 |
Arbre, M | 1 |
Kwiatkowski, F | 2 |
Dubray-Longeras, P | 1 |
Devaud, H | 1 |
Dohou, J | 1 |
Herviou, P | 1 |
Mahammedi, H | 1 |
Durando, X | 2 |
Chollet, P | 2 |
Mouret-Reynier, MA | 2 |
Zhang, M | 1 |
Yan, M | 1 |
Lü, H | 1 |
Niu, L | 1 |
Zeng, H | 1 |
Cui, S | 1 |
Beauchemin, C | 1 |
Letarte, N | 1 |
Mathurin, K | 1 |
Yelle, L | 1 |
Lachaine, J | 1 |
Sansone, P | 1 |
Ceccarelli, C | 1 |
Berishaj, M | 1 |
Chang, Q | 1 |
Rajasekhar, VK | 1 |
Perna, F | 1 |
Bowman, RL | 1 |
Vidone, M | 1 |
Daly, L | 1 |
Nnoli, J | 1 |
Santini, D | 1 |
Taffurelli, M | 1 |
Shih, NN | 1 |
Feldman, M | 1 |
Mao, JJ | 1 |
Colameco, C | 1 |
Chen, J | 1 |
Fabbri, N | 1 |
Healey, JH | 1 |
Cricca, M | 1 |
Gasparre, G | 1 |
Lyden, D | 1 |
Bonafé, M | 1 |
Bromberg, J | 1 |
Dalenc, F | 1 |
Iuliano, L | 1 |
Filleron, T | 1 |
Zerbinati, C | 1 |
Voisin, M | 1 |
Arellano, C | 1 |
Chatelut, E | 1 |
Marquet, P | 1 |
Samadi, M | 1 |
Roché, H | 1 |
Poirot, M | 1 |
Silvente-Poirot, S | 1 |
Beom, SH | 1 |
Oh, J | 1 |
Kim, TY | 2 |
Lee, KH | 1 |
Yang, Y | 1 |
Suh, KJ | 1 |
Moon, HG | 1 |
Han, SW | 1 |
Oh, DY | 1 |
Han, W | 1 |
Noh, DY | 1 |
Ellis, MJ | 1 |
Suman, VJ | 2 |
Hoog, J | 1 |
Goncalves, R | 1 |
Sanati, S | 1 |
Creighton, CJ | 1 |
DeSchryver, K | 1 |
Crouch, E | 1 |
Brink, A | 1 |
Watson, M | 1 |
Luo, J | 1 |
Tao, Y | 1 |
Barnes, M | 1 |
Dowsett, M | 1 |
Winer, E | 1 |
Silverman, P | 1 |
Esserman, L | 1 |
Carey, L | 1 |
Ma, CX | 1 |
Unzeitig, G | 1 |
Pluard, T | 1 |
Whitworth, P | 1 |
Babiera, G | 1 |
Guenther, JM | 1 |
Dayao, Z | 1 |
Ota, D | 1 |
Leitch, M | 1 |
Olson, JA | 1 |
Allred, DC | 1 |
Hunt, K | 1 |
Muluhngwi, P | 1 |
Klinge, CM | 1 |
Lisztwan, J | 1 |
Pornon, A | 1 |
Chen, B | 1 |
Chen, S | 1 |
Evans, DB | 2 |
Metro, G | 1 |
Mottolese, M | 1 |
Fabi, A | 1 |
Harbeck, N | 1 |
Cianfrocca, M | 1 |
Wardley, AM | 1 |
Barker, LC | 1 |
Brand, IR | 1 |
Crawford, SM | 1 |
Tzakas, E | 1 |
Liu, S | 1 |
Todd, RW | 1 |
Redman, CW | 1 |
Doyen, J | 1 |
Italiano, A | 2 |
Largillier, R | 2 |
Ferrero, JM | 2 |
Fontana, X | 1 |
Thyss, A | 1 |
Dellapasqua, S | 1 |
Ro, J | 2 |
Kim, EA | 1 |
Kwon, Y | 1 |
Nam, BH | 2 |
Jung, SY | 1 |
Lee, S | 1 |
Kim, SW | 1 |
Kang, HS | 1 |
Curran, MP | 1 |
Zidan, J | 1 |
Chetver, L | 1 |
Hussein, O | 1 |
Zucker, M | 1 |
Harris, CA | 1 |
Ward, RL | 1 |
Dobbins, TA | 1 |
Drew, AK | 1 |
Pearson, S | 1 |
Kusama, M | 1 |
Steed, HL | 1 |
Chu, QS | 1 |
Lee, YS | 1 |
Kim, SY | 1 |
Hong, SH | 1 |
Jeong, J | 1 |
Lee, H | 1 |
Buttar, A | 1 |
Mittal, K | 1 |
Khan, A | 1 |
Bathini, V | 1 |
Ibrahim, NK | 1 |
Yariz, KO | 1 |
Bondarenko, I | 2 |
Manikhas, A | 1 |
Semiglazov, V | 1 |
Alyasova, A | 1 |
Komisarenko, V | 1 |
Shparyk, Y | 1 |
Jones, D | 1 |
Senderovich, S | 1 |
Chau, A | 1 |
Erlandsson, F | 1 |
Acton, G | 1 |
Pegram, M | 1 |
Cruz Jurado, J | 1 |
Richart Aznar, P | 1 |
García Mata, J | 1 |
Fernández Martínez, R | 1 |
Peláez Fernández, I | 1 |
Sampedro Gimeno, T | 1 |
Galve Calvo, E | 1 |
Murillo Jaso, L | 1 |
Polo Marqués, E | 1 |
García Palomo, A | 1 |
Alkaied, H | 1 |
Harris, K | 1 |
Brenner, A | 1 |
Awasum, M | 1 |
Varma, S | 1 |
Riemsma, R | 1 |
Forbes, CA | 1 |
Amonkar, MM | 1 |
Lykopoulos, K | 1 |
Diaz, JR | 1 |
Kleijnen, J | 1 |
Rea, DW | 1 |
Wolff, AC | 1 |
Lazar, AA | 1 |
Garin, AM | 1 |
Brincat, S | 1 |
Chow, L | 1 |
Sun, Y | 2 |
Neskovic-Konstantinovic, Z | 1 |
Guimaraes, RC | 1 |
Fumoleau, P | 1 |
Chan, A | 1 |
Hachemi, S | 1 |
Strahs, A | 1 |
Cincotta, M | 1 |
Berkenblit, A | 1 |
Krygowski, M | 1 |
Kang, LL | 1 |
Moore, L | 1 |
Hayes, DF | 1 |
Piccart, MJ | 1 |
Cardoso, F | 1 |
Atalay, G | 1 |
Lipton, A | 3 |
Ali, SM | 2 |
Leitzel, K | 2 |
Demers, L | 2 |
Harvey, HA | 2 |
Chaudri-Ross, HA | 3 |
Brady, C | 2 |
Wyld, P | 1 |
Carney, W | 2 |
Brodie, AH | 1 |
Mouridsen, HT | 2 |
Rose, C | 1 |
Mouridsen, H | 2 |
Gershanovich, M | 2 |
Marcy, PY | 1 |
Foa, C | 1 |
Hartmann, MT | 1 |
Namer, M | 1 |
Perez-Carrion, R | 1 |
Becquart, D | 1 |
Lang, R | 1 |
Chia, WK | 1 |
Lim, YL | 1 |
Greaves, MW | 1 |
Ang, P | 1 |
Bhatnagar, AS | 1 |
Leheurteur, M | 1 |
Cabrespine, A | 1 |
Ferriere, JP | 1 |
Penault-Llorca, F | 1 |
Cure, H | 1 |
Delea, TE | 1 |
Karnon, J | 1 |
Smith, RE | 1 |
Johnston, SR | 1 |
Brandman, J | 1 |
Sung, JC | 1 |
Gross, PE | 1 |
Souder, C | 1 |
Hackl, W | 1 |
Hamer, P | 1 |
Colomer, R | 1 |
Lloveras, B | 1 |
Ramos, M | 1 |
Mayordomo, JI | 1 |
Fernández, R | 1 |
Tusquets, I | 1 |
Gil, M | 1 |
Barnadas, A | 1 |
Constenla, M | 1 |
Gilabert, M | 1 |
Herold, CI | 1 |
Blackwell, KL | 1 |
Demers, LM | 1 |
Kambic, KB | 1 |
Grossberg, H | 1 |
Adlercruetz, H | 1 |
Trunet, PF | 1 |
Santen, RJ | 1 |
Ingle, JN | 1 |
Johnson, PA | 1 |
Gerstner, JB | 1 |
Mailliard, JA | 1 |
Camoriano, JK | 1 |
Gesme, DH | 1 |
Loprinzi, CL | 1 |
Hatfield, AK | 1 |
Hartmann, LC | 1 |
Hamilton, A | 1 |
Piccart, M | 1 |
Casali, A | 1 |
Sega, FM | 1 |
Casali, M | 1 |
Giuntini, T | 1 |
Cappellini, GC | 1 |
Terzoli, E | 1 |
Messori, A | 1 |
Cattel, F | 1 |
Trippoli, S | 1 |
Vaiani, M | 1 |
Mackey, JR | 1 |
Joy, AA | 1 |
Ragonesi, G | 1 |
Colla, F | 1 |
Mazzoleni, A | 1 |
Farina, C | 1 |
Trial | Phase | Enrollment | Study Type | Start Date | Status | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Early Identification of Patients Who Benefit From Palbociclib in Addition to Letrozole[NCT02806050] | Phase 2 | 30 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2016-09-16 | Completed | ||
Analysis of Circulating Tumor Markers in the Blood[NCT02866149] | 682 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2015-07-31 | Active, not recruiting | |||
Phase II Study of the Combination of Pembrolizumab, Letrozole, and Palbociclib in Postmenopausal Patients With Newly Diagnosed Metastatic Estrogen Receptor Positive Breast Cancer[NCT02778685] | Phase 2 | 40 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2016-09-30 | Active, not recruiting | ||
MULTICENTER, RANDOMIZED, DOUBLE-BLIND, PLACEBO-CONTROLLED, PHASE 3 TRIAL OF FULVESTRANT (FASLODEX (REGISTERED)). WITH OR WITHOUT PD-0332991 (PALBOCICLIB) +/- GOSERELIN IN WOMEN WITH HORMONE RECEPTOR-POSITIVE, HER2-NEGATIVE METASTATIC BREAST CANCER WHOSE D[NCT01942135] | Phase 3 | 521 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2013-09-26 | Completed | ||
A RANDOMIZED, MULTICENTER, DOUBLE-BLIND PHASE 3 STUDY OF PD-0332991 (ORAL CDK 4/6 INHIBITOR) PLUS LETROZOLE VERSUS PLACEBO PLUS LETROZOLE FOR THE TREATMENT OF POSTMENOPAUSAL WOMEN WITH ER (+), HER2 (-) BREAST CANCER WHO HAVE NOT RECEIVED ANY PRIOR SYSTEMI[NCT01740427] | Phase 3 | 666 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2013-02-22 | Completed | ||
An Open-label, Prospective Study of Tumor Response Time of Palbociclib in Combination With AI in Real-world First-line Treatment of Postmenopausal Chinese Patients With ER (+) HER2 (-) Metastatic Breast Cancer[NCT04858997] | Phase 2 | 150 participants (Anticipated) | Interventional | 2021-04-22 | Recruiting | ||
A Randomized Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Study of LEE011 in Combination With Letrozole for the Treatment of Postmenopausal Women With Hormone Receptor Positive, HER2 Negative, Advanced Breast Cancer Who Received no Prior Therapy for Advanced Disease[NCT01958021] | Phase 3 | 668 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2013-12-17 | Completed | ||
TREATMENT PATTERNS AND CLINICAL OUTCOMES AMONG PATIENTS RECEIVING PALBOCICLIB COMBINATIONS FOR HR+/HER2- ADVANCED/METASTATIC BREAST CANCER IN REAL WORLD SETTINGS[NCT03159195] | 652 participants (Actual) | Observational | 2017-06-12 | Completed | |||
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Multicenter Phase III Study Comparing GW572016 and Letrozole Versus Letrozole in Subjects With Estrogen/Progesterone Receptor- Positive Advanced or Metastatic Breast Cancer[NCT00073528] | Phase 3 | 1,286 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2003-12-09 | Completed | ||
A Phase III Study to Evaluate Letrozole as Adjuvant Endocrine Therapy for Postmenopausal Women With Receptor (ER and/or PgR) Positive Tumors[NCT00004205] | Phase 3 | 8,028 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 1998-03-31 | Completed | ||
Neoadjuvant Hormone Therapy for Postmenopausal Women With HR+ Primary Breast Cancer: A Multi-center Study to Determine the Optimum Length of Treatment With Letrozole on Tumour Regression to Permit Breast Conserving Surgery.[NCT00330317] | Phase 3 | 300 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2006-02-28 | Completed | ||
A Randomized Phase III Trial Comparing 16 to 18 Weeks of Neoadjuvant Exemestane (25 mg Daily), Letrozole (2.5 mg), or Anastrozole (1 mg) in Postmenopausal Women With Clinical Stage II and III Estrogen Receptor Positive Breast Cancer[NCT00265759] | Phase 3 | 622 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2006-01-31 | Completed | ||
Alternate Approaches for Clinical Stage II or III Estrogen Receptor Positive Breast Cancer Neoadjuvant Treatment (ALTERNATE) in Postmenopausal Women: A Phase III Study[NCT01953588] | Phase 3 | 1,473 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2013-12-13 | Active, not recruiting | ||
Phase Ib Study of Neoadjuvant DPX-Survivac, Aromatase Inhibition, and With/Without Radiotherapy or Cyclophosphamide in HR+HER2- Breast Cancer[NCT04895761] | Phase 1 | 6 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2021-09-10 | Active, not recruiting | ||
Gonadotropin-releasing Hormone Agonist Combined With Letrozole Compared With Megestrol Acetate or Medroxyprogesterone Acetate Alone as Fertility-sparing Treatment in Early Endometrial Cancer[NCT05247268] | Phase 2 | 104 participants (Anticipated) | Interventional | 2022-03-11 | Recruiting | ||
Single Arm Phase 2 Study of Metformin and Simvastatin in Addition to Fulvestrant in Metastatic Estrogen Receptor Positive Breast Cancer[NCT03192293] | Phase 2 | 28 participants (Anticipated) | Interventional | 2017-01-20 | Recruiting | ||
A Phase II, Randomised, Open-Label, Multicentre Study of AS1402 in Combination With Letrozole as First Line Treatment in Postmenopausal Women With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Breast Cancer[NCT00770354] | Phase 2 | 110 participants (Anticipated) | Interventional | 2008-09-30 | Terminated | ||
A Phase 3 Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind Study of Oral CCI-779 Administered in Combination With Letrozole vs. Letrozole Alone as First Line Hormonal Therapy in Postmenopausal Women With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Breast Cancer[NCT00083993] | Phase 3 | 1,236 participants | Interventional | 2004-05-31 | Terminated | ||
A Randomized, Open Label, Phase III Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Palbociclib + Anti-HER2 Therapy + Endocrine Therapy vs. Anti-HER2 Therapy + Endocrine Therapy After Induction Treatment for Hormone Receptor Positive (HR+)/HER2-Positive Meta[NCT02947685] | Phase 3 | 496 participants (Anticipated) | Interventional | 2017-06-21 | Active, not recruiting | ||
Aromatase Inhibitors: Skeletal Effects and the Role of CYP19 Gene Polymorphisms[NCT00603967] | 151 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2006-03-31 | Completed | |||
PHASE III RANDOMIZED CONTROL CASE STUDY OF LETROZOLE IN WOMEN WITH HEAVILY PRETREATED OVARIAN CANCER (MITO 32)[NCT04421547] | Phase 3 | 236 participants (Anticipated) | Interventional | 2020-06-01 | Not yet recruiting | ||
[information is prepared from clinicaltrials.gov, extracted Sep-2024] |
The EuroQol-5D (version 3L) is a brief self-administered, validated instrument consisting of 2 parts. The second part consists of the EQ-5D general health status as measured by a visual analog scale (EQ-5D VAS). EQ-5D VAS measures the participant's self-rated health status on a scale from 0 (worst imaginable health state) to 100 (best imaginable health state). (NCT01942135)
Timeframe: From Cycle 1 to 14, as of 05 December 2014.
Intervention | Units on a scale (Mean) |
---|---|
Palbociclib + Fulvestrant | -1.8 |
Placebo + Fulvestrant | -2.6 |
The EuroQol-5D (version 3L) is a brief self-administered, validated instrument consisting of 2 parts. The first part consists of 5 descriptors of current health state (mobility, self care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/ depression); a participant is asked to rate each state on a three level scale (1=no problem, 2=some problem, and 3=extreme problem) with higher levels indicating greater severity/ impairment Published weights are available that allow for the creation of a single summary score called the EQ-5D index, which basically ranges from 0 to 1 with low scores representing a higher level of dysfunction and 1 as perfect health. The second part consists of the EQ-5D general health status as measured by a visual analog scale (EQ-5D VAS). EQ-5D VAS measures the participant's self-rated health status on a scale from 0 (worst imaginable health state) to 100 (best imaginable health state). (NCT01942135)
Timeframe: From Cycle 1 to 14, as of 05 December 2014.
Intervention | Units on a scale (Mean) |
---|---|
Palbociclib + Fulvestrant | 0.006 |
Placebo + Fulvestrant | -0.031 |
CBR is defined as the overall complete response (CR), partial response (PR) , or stable disease (SD) ≥24 weeks according to the RECIST version 1.1. Clinical Benefit Response Rate (CBRR) is defined as the proportion of participants with CR, PR, or SD ≥24 weeks relative to all randomized participants and randomized participants with measurable disease at baseline. Participants who do not have on-study radiographic tumor re-evaluation, who received antitumor treatment other than the study medication prior to reaching a CR or PR, a best response of SD ≥24 weeks, or who died, progressed, or dropped out for any reason prior to reaching a CR or PR and a best response of SD ≥24 weeks was counted as non-responders in the assessment of CBR. Per RECIST v1.1 for target lesions and assessed by MRI: CR, disappearance of all target lesions; PR, ≥30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions; OR = CR + PR. (NCT01942135)
Timeframe: From randomization until end of treatment (assessed up to 12 months)
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
Palbociclib + Fulvestrant | 34.0 |
Placebo + Fulvestrant | 19.0 |
DR is defined as the time from the first documentation of objective tumor response (CR or PR) to the first documentation of disease progression or to death due to any cause, whichever occurs first. If tumor progression data included more than 1 date, the first date was used. DR was calculated as [the date response ended (ie, date of PD or death) - first CR or PR date + 1)]/30.4. Kaplan-Meier estimate of median of the DR is provided below. No inferential statistical analysis were done for DR. The DR was only calculated for the participants with a CR or PR. (NCT01942135)
Timeframe: From randomization until end of treatment (assessed up to 12 months)
Intervention | Months (Median) |
---|---|
Palbociclib + Fulvestrant | 9.3 |
Placebo + Fulvestrant | 5.7 |
OR is defined as the overall complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) according to the RECIST version 1.1 Objective Response Rate (ORR) is defined as the proportion of participants with CR or PR relative to all randomized participants and randomized participants with measurable disease at baseline. Participants who do not have on-study radiographic tumor re-evaluation, who received anti-tumor treatment other than the study medication prior to reaching a CR or PR, or who died, progressed, or dropped out for any reason prior to reaching a CR or PR were counted as non-responders in the assessment of ORR. Per response evaluation criteria in solid tumors criteria (RECIST v1.1) for target lesions and assessed by MRI: Complete Response (CR), Disappearance of all target lesions; Partial Response (PR), ≥30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions (longest for non-nodal and short axis for nodal target lesions); Overall Response (OR) = CR + PR. (NCT01942135)
Timeframe: From randomization until end of treatment (assessed up to 12 months)
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
Palbociclib + Fulvestrant | 10.4 |
Placebo + Fulvestrant | 6.3 |
OS is defined as the time from date of randomization to date of death due to any cause. In the absence of confirmation of death, survival time was censored to last date the participant was known to be alive. For participants lacking survival data beyond the date of their last follow-up, the OS time was censored on the last date they were known to be alive. Participants lacking survival data beyond randomization were to have their OS times be censored at randomization. The length of OS was calculated as OS time (months) = [death date (censor date) - randomization date + 1]/30.4. No inferential statistical analysis were done because of the immaturity of the OS data. (NCT01942135)
Timeframe: From randomization until death (up to approximately 36 months)
Intervention | deaths (Number) |
---|---|
Palbociclib + Fulvestrant | 19 |
Placebo + Fulvestrant | 9 |
PFS is the time from the date of randomization to the date of the first documentation of objective progression of disease (PD)or death due to any cause in absence of documented PD. Participants lacking an evaluation of tumor response after randomization had their PFS time censored on the date of randomization with the duration of a day. Participants with documentation of PD or death after a long interval (2 or more incomplete or non-evaluable assessments) since the last tumor assessment were censored at the time of last objective assessment that did not show PD. The length of PFS was calculated as PFS time (months) =[progression/death date(censor date) - randomization date + 1]/30.4. Progression is defined using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors(RECIST v1.1) a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions and the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5mm or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions or the appearance of new lesions. (NCT01942135)
Timeframe: From randomization date to date of first documentation of progression or death (assessed up to 12 months)
Intervention | Months (Median) |
---|---|
Palbociclib + Fulvestrant | 9.2 |
Placebo + Fulvestrant | 3.8 |
The EORTC-QLQ-BR23 is a 23-item breast cancer-specific companion module to the EORTC-QLQ-C30 and consists of four functional scales (body image, sexual functioning, sexual enjoyment, future perspective) and four symptom scales (systemic side effects, breast symptoms, arm symptoms, upset by hair loss). QLQ-BR23 questionnaire employs 4-point scales with responses from 'not at all' to 'very much'. All scores are converted to a 0 to 100 scale. For symptom-oriented scales, a higher score represent more severe symptoms. (NCT01942135)
Timeframe: From Cycle 1 to 14, as of 05 December 2014.
Intervention | Units on a scale (Mean) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Systemic therapy side effects | Breast symptoms | Arm symptoms | Upset by hair loss | |
Palbociclib + Fulvestrant | 3.8 | -2.2 | -2.2 | 2.9 |
Placebo + Fulvestrant | 3.4 | -1.3 | -2.0 | -6.0 |
"The EORTC-QLQ-C30 is a 30-item questionnaire composed of five multi-item functional subscales (physical, role, emotional, cognitive , and social functioning), three multi-item symptom scales (fatigue, nausea/vomiting, and pain), a global quality of life (QOL) subscale, and six single item symptom scales assessing other cancer-related symptoms (dyspnea, sleep disturbance, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea, and the financial impact of cancer). The questionnaire employs 28 4-point Likert scales with responses from not at all to very much and two 7-point Likert scales for global health and overall QOL. Responses to all items are then converted to a 0 to 100 scale. For functional and global QOL scales, higher scores represent a better level of functioning/QOL. For symptom-oriented scales, a higher score represents more severe symptoms. A 10-point or higher change in scores from baseline is considered clinically significant." (NCT01942135)
Timeframe: From Cycle 1 to 14, as of 05 December 2014.
Intervention | Units on a scale (Mean) | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Fatigue | Nausea and vomiting | Pain | Dyspnoea | Insomnia | Appetite loss | Constipation | Diarrhoea | Financial difficulties | |
Palbociclib + Fulvestrant | 1.8 | 1.7 | -3.3 | 2.8 | -2.4 | 1.1 | 3.5 | 1.9 | -3.7 |
Placebo + Fulvestrant | 3.3 | 4.2 | 2.0 | 3.3 | -0.4 | 1.7 | 2.8 | 2.4 | -4.0 |
The EORTC-QLQ-BR23 is a 23-item breast cancer-specific companion module to the EORTC-QLQ-C30 and consists of four functional scales (body image, sexual functioning, sexual enjoyment, future perspective) and four symptom scales (systemic side effects, breast symptoms, arm symptoms, upset by hair loss). QLQ-BR23 questionnaire employs 4-point scales with responses from 'not at all' to 'very much'. All scores are converted to a 0 to 100 scale. For functional scales, higher scores represent a better level of functioning. (NCT01942135)
Timeframe: From Cycle 1 to 14, as of 05 December 2014.
Intervention | Units on a scale (Mean) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Body image | Sexual functioning | Sexual enjoyment | Future perspective | |
Palbociclib + Fulvestrant | 1.9 | -1.1 | -5.2 | 8.1 |
Placebo + Fulvestrant | -0.3 | -0.4 | -6.6 | 4.5 |
"The EORTC-QLQ-C30 is a 30-item questionnaire composed of five multi-item functional subscales (physical, role, emotional, cognitive , and social functioning), three multi-item symptom scales (fatigue, nausea/vomiting, and pain), a global quality of life (QOL) subscale, and six single item symptom scales assessing other cancer-related symptoms (dyspnea, sleep disturbance, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea, and the financial impact of cancer). The questionnaire employs 28 4-point Likert scales with responses from not at all to very much and two 7-point Likert scales for global health and overall QOL. Responses to all items are then converted to a 0 to 100 scale. For functional and global QOL scales, higher scores represent a better level of functioning/QOL. For symptom-oriented scales, a higher score represents more severe symptoms. A 10-point or higher change in scores from baseline is considered clinically significant." (NCT01942135)
Timeframe: From Cycle 1 to 14, as of 05 December 2014.
Intervention | Units on a scale (Mean) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Global health status / QoL | Physical functioning | Role functioning | Emotional functioning | Cognitive functioning | Social functioning | |
Palbociclib + Fulvestrant | -0.9 | -0.7 | -1.8 | 2.7 | -1.7 | -0.5 |
Placebo + Fulvestrant | -4.0 | -1.7 | -3.7 | -1.9 | -2.9 | -0.6 |
"Ctrough for Fulvestrant (if applicable). The method of dispersion applied here is percent coefficient of variation (%CV)." (NCT01942135)
Timeframe: Cycles 2/Day 1 and Cycle 3/Day 1
Intervention | ng/mL (Geometric Mean) | |
---|---|---|
Cycle 2/Day 1 (N= 35, 19) | Cycle 3/Day 1 (N= 29, 14) | |
Palbociclib + Fulvestrant | 11.75 | 9.90 |
Placebo + Fulvestrant | 9.31 | 7.60 |
"Cmin for goserelin (if applicable). The method of dispersion applied here is percent coefficient of variation (%CV)." (NCT01942135)
Timeframe: Cycles 2/ Day 1 and Cycle 3/ Day 1
Intervention | pg/mL (Geometric Mean) | |
---|---|---|
Cycle 2/Day 1 (N= 9, 5) | Cycle 3/Day 1 (N= 7, 3) | |
Palbociclib + Fulvestrant | 295.1 | 344.8 |
Placebo + Fulvestrant | 302.5 | 288.5 |
"Ctrough for palbociclib (if applicable). The method of dispersion applied here is percent coefficient of variation (%CV)." (NCT01942135)
Timeframe: Cycle 1/Day 15 and Cycle 2/Day 15
Intervention | ng/mL (Geometric Mean) | |
---|---|---|
Cycle 1/Day 15 (N= 165) | Cycle 2/Day 15 (N= 160) | |
Palbociclib + Fulvestrant | 70.70 | 75.29 |
An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation patient administered a product or medical device; the event need not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment or usage. An SAE is any untoward medical occurrence at any dose that results in death; is life-threatening; requires hospitalization; results in persistent or significant disability or in congenital anomaly/birth defect. Severity will be graded by the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI CTCAE), Version 4.0. (NCT01942135)
Timeframe: From the signing of the informed consent until 28 days after the last dose of study medication up to 14 months
Intervention | Percentage of Participants (Number) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
With AEs | With SAEs | With Grade 3 or 4 AEs | With Grade 5 AEs | Discontinued palbociclib/placebo due to AEs | |
Palbociclib + Fulvestrant | 97.7 | 9.6 | 70.1 | 0.9 | 3.8 |
Placebo + Fulvestrant | 89.0 | 14.0 | 18.0 | 1.2 | 4.1 |
One-, Two- or Three-year Survival Probability is defined as the probability of survival 1 year, 2 or 3 years after the date of randomization based on the Kaplan-Meier estimate. Survival time was censored to last date the participant is known to be alive. (NCT01942135)
Timeframe: From randomization until death (assessed up to 36 months)
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) | ||
---|---|---|---|
Survival Probability at Month 12 | Survival Probability at Month 24 | Survival Probability at Month 36 | |
Palbociclib + Fulvestrant | 89.3 | NA | NA |
Placebo + Fulvestrant | 89.3 | NA | NA |
A time to event analysis was pre-specified for pain. An analysis of TTD in pain defined as time between baseline and first occurrence of increase of ≥10 points in pain. Deterioration will be defined increase in score of 10 points or greater from baseline. The Kaplan-Meier estimates of quartiles (time to deterioration) with 95% CI is mentioned below. (NCT01942135)
Timeframe: Baseline, Day 1 of Cycles 2 to 4, Day 1 of every alternate cycle after that until the end of treatment
Intervention | Months (Median) | |
---|---|---|
25% quartile | 50% quartile | |
Palbociclib + Fulvestrant | 1.9 | 8.0 |
Placebo + Fulvestrant | 1.0 | 2.8 |
The EuroQol EQ-5D is a 6-item instrument designed to assess health status in terms of a single index value or utility score. It contains 5 descriptors of current health state (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain or discomfort, and anxiety or depression) with each dimension having 3 levels of function (1=no problem, 2=some problem, and 3=extreme problem). The scores on the 5 descriptors are summarized to create a single summary score. An overall utility score is calculated based on these domains, with a range score from 0 (worse health scenario) to a maximum of 1.0 (best health scenario). (NCT01740427)
Timeframe: From Baseline up to 2.5 years
Intervention | Units on a scale (Mean) |
---|---|
Palbociclib Plus Letrozole | 0.014 |
Placebo Plus Letrozole | -0.010 |
FACT is a modular approach to assess participant health-related quality of life using a 'core' set of questions (FACT-G) as well as a cancer site-specific module. The FACT-G is a 27-item compilation of general questions divided into 4 domains: Physical Well-Being, Social/Family Well-Being, Emotional Well-Being, and Functional Well-Being. The FACT-B consisted of the FACT-G (27-item) and a breast-specific module: a 10-item instrument designed to assess participant concerns relating to breast cancer. For all questions, participants were asked to respond to a five-level scale where 0=not at all, 1=a little bit, 2=somewhat, 3=quite a bit, and 4=very much. FACT-B total score = Physical Well-Being + Social/Family Well-Being + Emotional Well-Being + Functional Well-Being + Breast Cancer Subscale. As each of the items ranges from 0-4, the range of possible scores is 0-144, with 0 being the worst possible score and 144 the best. (NCT01740427)
Timeframe: From Baseline up to 2.5 years
Intervention | Units on a scale (Mean) |
---|---|
Palbociclib Plus Letrozole | -0.106 |
Placebo Plus Letrozole | 0.219 |
DC is defined as the overall CR, PR, or stable disease (SD) ≥24 weeks according to the RECIST version 1.1. Disease Control Rate (DCR) is defined as the patients with CR, PR, or SD ≥24 weeks relative to all randomized participants. Participants who do not have on-study radiographic tumor reevaluation, who received anti-tumor treatment, a best response of SD≥24 weeks, or who died, progressed,or dropped out for any reason prior to achieving reaching a CR or PR and a best response of SD≥24 weeks was counted as non-responders in DCR. Per RECIST v1.1, CR: Complete disappearance of target lesions with exception of nodal disease. All target nodes must decrease to normal size (short axis <10mm). PR: ≥30% decrease under baseline of the sum of diameters of all target measurable lesions. The short diameter is used in the sum for target nodes, while the longest diameter is used in the sum for all other target lesions. SD: neither sufficient shrinkage nor increase to qualify for disease progression (NCT01740427)
Timeframe: From randomization until end of treatment (up to approximately 2.5 years)
Intervention | Percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
Palbociclib Plus Letrozole | 85.8 |
Placebo Plus Letrozole | 71.2 |
DR is defined as the time from the first documentation of objective tumor response (CR or PR) to the first documentation of disease progression or to death due to any cause, whichever occurs first. If tumor progression data included more than 1 date, the first date will be used. DR was calculated as [the date response ended (i.e. date of PD or death) - first CR or PR date + 1)]/30.4. DR would only be calculated for the subgroup of patients with an objective tumor response. Per RECIST v1.1, CR: Complete disappearance of target lesions with exception of nodal disease. All target nodes must decrease to normal size (short axis <10mm). PR: ≥30% decrease under baseline of the sum of diameters of all target measurable lesions.The short diameter is used in the sum for target nodes, while the longest diameter is used in the sum for all other target lesions. Stable Disease: neither sufficient shrinkage nor increase to qualify for disease progression. (NCT01740427)
Timeframe: From randomization until end of treatment (up to approximately 2.5 years)
Intervention | Months (Median) |
---|---|
Palbociclib Plus Letrozole | 20.1 |
Placebo Plus Letrozole | 16.7 |
Objective Response (OR) defined as the overall complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) according to the RECIST v1.1. Objective Response Rate (ORR) is defined as proportion of patients with CR or PR relative to all randomized patients with measurable disease at baseline. Patients who do not have on-study radiographic tumor re-evaluation, who received anti-tumor treatment, or who died, progressed/ dropped out for any reason prior to reaching a CR or PR were counted as non-responders in the assessment of ORR. Per RECIST v1.1, CR: Complete disappearance of target lesions with exception of nodal disease. All target nodes must decrease to normal size (short axis <10mm). PR: ≥30% decrease under baseline of the sum of diameters of all target measurable lesions. The short diameter is used in the sum for target nodes, while the longest diameter is used in the sum for all other target lesions. Stable Disease: neither sufficient shrinkage nor increase to qualify for disease progression. (NCT01740427)
Timeframe: From randomization until end of treatment (up to approximately 2.5 years)
Intervention | Percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
Palbociclib Plus Letrozole | 46.4 |
Placebo Plus Letrozole | 38.3 |
The OR is defined as the overall CR or PR according to the RECIST v1.1. ORR is defined as proportion of patients with CR or PR relative to all randomized patients with measurable disease at baseline. Patients who do not have on-study radiographic tumor re-evaluation, who received anti-tumor treatment, or who died, progressed/ dropped out for any reason prior to reaching a CR or PR were counted as non-responders in the assessment of ORR. Per RECIST v1.1, CR: Complete disappearance of target lesions with exception of nodal disease. All target nodes must decrease to normal size (short axis <10mm). PR: ≥30% decrease under baseline of the sum of diameters of all target measurable lesions. The short diameter is used in the sum for target nodes, while the longest diameter is used in the sum for all other target lesions. Stable Disease: neither sufficient shrinkage nor increase to qualify for disease progression. (NCT01740427)
Timeframe: From randomization until end of treatment (up to approximately 2.5 years)
Intervention | Percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
Palbociclib Plus Letrozole | 60.7 |
Placebo Plus Letrozole | 49.1 |
OS was defined as the time from date of randomization to date of death due to any cause. Participants without survival data beyond the date of their last follow-up were censored on the last date they were known to be alive. (NCT01740427)
Timeframe: From date of randomization until death due to any cause or censored, (assessed up to data cut-off date of 15-Nov-2021, approximately 8.7 years)
Intervention | Months (Median) |
---|---|
Palbociclib Plus Letrozole | 53.9 |
Placebo Plus Letrozole | 51.2 |
PFS is defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of the first documentation of objective tumor progression as per Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.1) or death due to any cause in the absence of documented PD, whichever occurs first. If tumor progression data include more than 1 date, the first date will be used. PFS (in months) will be calculated as (first event date - randomization date +1)/30.4. Progression is defined using RECIST v1.1, as a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target measurable lesions above the smallest sum observed (over baseline if no decrease in the sum is observed during therapy), with a minimum absolute increase of 5 mm, or unequivocal progression of pre-existing non-target lesions, or the appearance of new lesions. (NCT01740427)
Timeframe: From randomization date to date of first documentation of progression OR death (up to approximately 2.5 years)
Intervention | Months (Median) |
---|---|
Palbociclib Plus Letrozole | 24.8 |
Placebo Plus Letrozole | 14.5 |
Triplicate 12-lead ECG measurements (each recording separated by approximately 2 minutes) were performed and sent to a central laboratory for blinded manual adjudication. The average was calculated. The time corresponding to beginning of depolarization to repolarization of the ventricles (QT interval) was adjusted for RR interval using QT and RR from each ECG by Fridericia's formula (QTcF = QT divided by cube root of RR), by Bazette's formula (QTcB = QT divided by square root of RR) and corrected QT interval according to study-specific criteria (QTcS). Time-matched change from baseline values were reported for QTc analysis population. (NCT01740427)
Timeframe: Time-matched triplicate ECGs were collected at 0 (predose), 2, 4, 6 and 8 hours on Day 0 and on Cycle1 Day14
Intervention | msec (Least Squares Mean) | ||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QTcS at 0 hour | QTcS at 2 hour | QTcS at 4 hour | QTcS at 6 hour | QTcS at 8 hour | QTcF at 0 hour | QTcF at 2 hour | QTcF at 4 hour | QTcF at 6 hour | QTcF at 8 hour | QTcB at 0 hour | QTcB at 2 hour | QTcB at 4 hour | QTcB at 6 hour | QTcB at 8 hour | |
Palbociclib Plus Letrozole | 0.80 | 3.32 | 2.76 | 4.49 | 0.94 | 1.10 | 3.68 | 2.86 | 4.57 | 1.21 | -0.11 | 1.46 | 2.58 | 4.03 | -0.17 |
Placebo Plus Letrozole | 2.95 | 1.65 | 1.74 | 0.72 | 3.14 | 3.06 | 1.73 | 1.54 | 0.71 | 2.84 | 2.78 | 0.83 | 2.47 | 0.53 | 4.14 |
Laboratory abnormalities included anemia, hemoglobin increased, neutrophils (absolute), platelets, white blood cells, alanine aminotransferase (ALT), alkaline phosphatase, aspartate aminotransferase (AST), bilirubin (total), creatinine, hypercalcemia, hyperkalemia, hypermagnesemia, hypernatremia, hypoalbuminemia, hypocalcemia, hypokalemia, hypomagnesemia and hyponatremia. Laboratory abnormalities were graded by CTCAE version (v) 4.0 as Grade 1 = mild, Grade 2 = moderate, Grade 3 = severe and Grade 4 = life-threatening. Categories with at least 1 non-zero data values are reported. (NCT01740427)
Timeframe: From randomization up to 28 days after last dose of study drug (assessed up to data cut-off date of 15-Nov-2021, approximately 8.7 years)
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Anemia: Grade 1-2 | Anemia: Grade 3 | Hemoglobin Increased: Grade 1-2 | Hemoglobin Increased: Grade 3 | Neutrophils (Absolute): Grade 1-2 | Neutrophils (Absolute): Grade 3 | Neutrophils (Absolute): Grade 4 | Platelets: Grade 1-2 | Platelets: Grade 3 | Platelets: Grade 4 | White Blood Cells: Grade 1-2 | White Blood Cells: Grade 3 | White Blood Cells: Grade 4 | ALT: Grade 1-2 | ALT: Grade 3 | ALT: Grade 4 | Alkaline Phosphatase: Grade 1-2 | Alkaline Phosphatase: Grade 3 | AST: Grade 1-2 | AST: Grade 3 | Bilirubin (Total): Grade 1-2 | Bilirubin (Total): Grade 3 | Creatinine: Grade 1-2 | Creatinine: Grade 3 | Creatinine: Grade 4 | Hypercalcemia: Grade 1-2 | Hypercalcemia: Grade 3 | Hyperkalemia: Grade 1-2 | Hyperkalemia: Grade 3 | Hyperkalemia: Grade 4 | Hypermagnesemia: Grade 1-2 | Hypermagnesemia: Grade 3 | Hypermagnesemia: Grade 4 | Hypernatremia: Grade 1-2 | Hypernatremia: Grade 3 | Hypoalbuminemia: Grade 1-2 | Hypoalbuminemia: Grade 3 | Hypocalcemia: Grade 1-2 | Hypocalcemia: Grade 3 | Hypocalcemia: Grade 4 | Hypokalemia: Grade 1-2 | Hypokalemia: Grade 3 | Hypomagnesemia: Grade 1-2 | Hypomagnesemia: Grade 3 | Hypomagnesemia: Grade 4 | Hyponatremia: Grade 1-2 | Hyponatremia: Grade 3 | |
Palbociclib Plus Letrozole | 328 | 30 | 14 | 1 | 109 | 254 | 60 | 289 | 6 | 1 | 248 | 177 | 6 | 222 | 16 | 1 | 174 | 7 | 260 | 23 | 33 | 3 | 418 | 8 | 2 | 111 | 1 | 118 | 6 | 2 | 71 | 9 | 2 | 94 | 8 | 118 | 2 | 158 | 4 | 3 | 105 | 11 | 127 | 1 | 2 | 107 | 11 |
Placebo Plus Letrozole | 90 | 6 | 25 | 0 | 42 | 2 | 1 | 32 | 0 | 0 | 57 | 0 | 0 | 76 | 0 | 0 | 95 | 0 | 82 | 2 | 11 | 0 | 201 | 0 | 0 | 54 | 2 | 51 | 1 | 0 | 26 | 6 | 0 | 35 | 1 | 42 | 0 | 48 | 1 | 0 | 32 | 2 | 41 | 0 | 0 | 44 | 4 |
Summary of Plasma Palbociclib Within-Patient Mean Steady-State Trough Concentrations. (NCT01740427)
Timeframe: 0 hour (predose) on Day 14 of cycles 1 and 2
Intervention | ng/mL (Geometric Mean) | |
---|---|---|
Cycle 1 Day 14 | Cycle 2 Day 14 | |
Palbociclib Plus Letrozole | 70.1 | 64.2 |
Triplicate 12-lead ECG measurements (each recording separated by approximately 2 minutes) were performed and sent to a central laboratory for blinded manual adjudication. The average was calculated. The time corresponding to beginning of depolarization to repolarization of the ventricles (QT interval) was adjusted for RR interval using QT and RR from each ECG by Fridericia's formula (QTcF = QT divided by cube root of RR), by Bazette's formula (QTcB = QT divided by square root of RR) and corrected QT interval according to study-specific criteria (QTcS). Percentage of participants with post-baseline maximum absolute values and maximum increase from baseline were summarized for the safety analysis population. (NCT01740427)
Timeframe: For safety monitoring triplicate ECGs were obtained at 0 hour (pre-dose) on Day 1 of Cycle 1, Day 14 of Cycles 1 and Cycle 2, then on Day 1 of Cycles 4, 7, and 10. ECGs beyond Cycle 10 were performed as clinically indicated
Intervention | Percentage of participants (Number) | ||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Maximum QTcS <450 msec | Maximum QTcS 450-<480 msec | Maximum QTcS 480-<500 msec | Maximum QTcS ≥500 msec | Maximum QTcF <450 msec | Maximum QTcF 450-<480 msec | Maximum QTcF 480-<500 msec | Maximum QTcF ≥500 msec | Maximum QTcB <450 msec | Maximum QTcB 450-<480 msec | Maximum QTcB 480-<500 msec | Maximum QTcB ≥500 msec | Maximum QTcS Change <30 msec | Maximum QTcS 30≤Change <60 msec | Maximum QTcS Change≥60 msec | Maximum QTcF Change <30 msec | Maximum QTcF 30≤Change <60 msec | Maximum QTcF Change≥60 msec | Maximum QTcB Change <30 msec | Maximum QTcB 30≤Change <60 msec | Maximum QTcB Change≥60 msec | |
Palbociclib Plus Letrozole | 80.5 | 17.9 | 1.1 | 0.5 | 85.9 | 12.2 | 1.6 | 0.2 | 64.9 | 32.2 | 2.3 | 0.7 | 92.7 | 6.6 | 0.7 | 91.6 | 7.9 | 0.5 | 88.9 | 10.2 | 0.9 |
Placebo Plus Letrozole | 85.9 | 11.8 | 2.3 | 0 | 89.5 | 9.5 | 0.9 | 0 | 69.1 | 27.3 | 3.2 | 0.5 | 94.5 | 5.5 | 0 | 93.6 | 6.4 | 0 | 91.4 | 8.2 | 0.5 |
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participant administered a product or medical device; the event need not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment or usage. SAE was any untoward medical occurrence at any dose that resulted in death; was life-threatening; required hospitalization; resulted in persistent or significant disability or in congenital anomaly/birth defect. TEAE were events that occurred between first dose of study drug and up to 28 days after last dose that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pretreatment state. Severity was graded by the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI CTCAE), Version 4.0 as Grade 1 = mild, Grade 2 = moderate, Grade 3 = severe, Grade 4 = life-threatening and Grade 5 = death related to AE. (NCT01740427)
Timeframe: From date of randomization up to 28 days after last dose of study drug, (assessed up to data cut-off date of 15-Nov-2021, approximately 8.7 years)
Intervention | Percentage of Participants (Number) | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Participants with AEs | Participants with SAEs | Participants with Grade 3 or 4 AEs | Participants with Grade 5 AEs | Permanently discontinued study due to AEs | Permanently disc. palbociclib/placebo due to AEs | Permanently discontinued letrozole due to AEs | Temporarily disc. palbociclib/placebo due to AEs | Temporarily discontinued letrozole due to AEs | With palbociclib/placebo dose reduction due to AEs | |
Palbociclib Plus Letrozole | 99.1 | 27.5 | 82.7 | 3.6 | 4.1 | 14.2 | 9.0 | 79.5 | 22.7 | 40.8 |
Placebo Plus Letrozole | 96.4 | 17.1 | 30.2 | 2.3 | 2.3 | 5.9 | 5.4 | 17.1 | 11.3 | 2.3 |
"PFS by biomarker status by Investigator assessment. Progression is defined using RECIST v1.1, as a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, or a measurable increase in a non-target lesion, or the appearance of new lesions.~Positive is defined as H-Score ≥1 and negative as H-Score <1. H-Score is calculated as the sum of the % of cells at each level of staining intensity (0, 1+, 2+, and 3+) multiplied by the staining intensity value: H-Score = (% at 0)*0 + (% at 1+)*1 + (% at 2+)*2 + (% at 3+)*3. H-Score values range from 0 to 300.~ER stands for estrogen receptor and Rb stands for retinoblastoma susceptibility gene product." (NCT01740427)
Timeframe: From randomization until end of treatment (up to approximately 24 Months)
Intervention | Months (Median) | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ER Positive | ER Negative | Rb Positive | Rb Negative | Cyclin D1 Positive | Cyclin D1 Negative | p16 Positive | p16 Negative | p16 H-Score<175 | p16 H-Score≥175 | Ki67 ≤20% | Ki67 >20% | |
Palbociclib Plus Letrozole | 24.9 | 15.6 | 24.2 | NA | 24.8 | 11.1 | 24.8 | 16.8 | 23.7 | 24.2 | 27.6 | 17.5 |
Placebo Plus Letrozole | 16.3 | 5.4 | 13.7 | 18.5 | 13.8 | 8.1 | 13.8 | 13.8 | 13.8 | 5.6 | 16.8 | 8.4 |
One, two or three-year survival probability was defined as the probability of survival 1 year, 2 or 3 years after the date of randomization. The survival probability was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and 2-sided 95% confidence interval (CI) was calculated using the product limit method. (NCT01740427)
Timeframe: 1, 2 and 3 years after randomization
Intervention | Percent probability (Number) | ||
---|---|---|---|
1 year survival probability | 2 year survival probability | 3 year survival probability | |
Palbociclib Plus Letrozole | 92.7 | 78.4 | 69.8 |
Placebo Plus Letrozole | 94.9 | 82.5 | 65.0 |
Overall response rate (ORR) is defined as the proportion of patients with the best overall response of complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) according to RECIST 1.1. CR = Disappearance of all non-nodal target lesions. In addition, any pathological lymph nodes assigned as target lesions must have a reduction in short axis to < 10 mm; PR = At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameter of all target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters. (NCT01958021)
Timeframe: Up to approximately 20 months
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
LEE011 + Letrozole | 40.7 |
Placebo + Letrozole | 27.5 |
PFS, defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of the first documented progression or death due to any cause. PFS was assessed via a local radiology assessment according to RECIST 1.1 (NCT01958021)
Timeframe: Up to approximately 20 months
Intervention | months (Median) |
---|---|
LEE011 + Letrozole | NA |
Placebo + Letrozole | 14.7 |
Percentage of participants alive from date of initiation of palbociclib treatment through up to 2 or above progression-based lines of therapy were recorded and reported in this outcome measure. Percentage of participants who alive after 1 year post Palbociclib treatment initiation were based on the Kaplan-Meier estimate. (NCT03159195)
Timeframe: 1 Year (Month 12) post Palbociclib treatment initiation (data recorded during 4 years of retrospective observation period)
Intervention | Percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
Palbociclib + Aromatase Inhibitor (P+AI) | 95.1 |
Palbociclib + Fulvestrant (P+FV) | 87.9 |
Percentage of participants alive from date of initiation of palbociclib treatment through up to 2 or above progression-based lines of therapy were recorded and reported in this outcome measure. Percentage of participants who alive after 2 years post Palbociclib treatment initiation were based on the Kaplan-Meier estimate. (NCT03159195)
Timeframe: 2 years (Month 24) post Palbociclib treatment initiation (data recorded during 4 years of retrospective observation period)
Intervention | Percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
Palbociclib + Aromatase Inhibitor (P+AI) | 90.1 |
CBR was defined as the percentage of participants who achieved complete (where 'complete response' was recorded at any time on treatment) or partial response (where 'partial response' was recorded at any time on treatment), or stable disease at greater than equal to (>=) 24 weeks on palbociclib combination therapy. Stable disease was defined as no evidence of complete or partial response, and no progression on palbociclib therapy for 24 weeks or greater. Complete response - Complete resolution of all visible disease. Partial response - Partial reduction in size of visible disease in some or all areas without any areas of increase in visible disease. (NCT03159195)
Timeframe: From initiation of treatment up to disease progression (data recorded during 4 years of retrospective observation period)
Intervention | Percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
Palbociclib + Aromatase Inhibitor (P+AI) | 93.8 |
Palbociclib + Fulvestrant (P+FV) | 93.2 |
ORR was defined as the percentage of participants who achieved complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) on palbociclib combination therapy according to the RECIST version 1.1 recorded from first dose of study treatment until disease progression due to any cause. Complete response: complete resolution of all visible disease. Partial response: partial reduction in size of visible disease in some or all areas without any areas of increase in visible disease. (NCT03159195)
Timeframe: From initiation of treatment up to disease progression (data recorded during 4 years of retrospective observation period)
Intervention | Percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
Palbociclib + Aromatase Inhibitor (P+AI) | 79.5 |
Palbociclib + Fulvestrant (P+FV) | 74.0 |
PFS was defined as the time from palbociclib combination treatment initiation until 1) clinician documented disease progression (PD) while on palbociclib, 2) death, 3) start of a new therapy line after final palbociclib dose, if the reason for discontinuation of palbociclib was disease progression, or 4) last available follow-up, whichever occurred first. Participants who did not experience a progression event (items 1, 2 and 3) were censored at date of last available follow-up. PFS (in months) was calculated as (first event date - palbociclib initiation date + 1)/30.4. Progressive disease - An increase in visible disease and/or presence of any new lesions; included cases where the clinician indicated progressive disease. Percentage of participants with PFS events at 12 months based on the Kaplan-Meier estimate were reported. (NCT03159195)
Timeframe: Day 1 of palbociclib combination treatment up to Month 12 (data recorded during 4 years of retrospective observation period)
Intervention | Percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
Palbociclib + Aromatase Inhibitor (P+AI) | 84.1 |
Palbociclib + Fulvestrant (P+FV) | 79.8 |
PFS was defined as the time from palbociclib combination treatment initiation until 1) clinician documented disease progression (PD) while on palbociclib, 2) death, 3) start of a new therapy line after final palbociclib dose, if the reason for discontinuation of palbociclib was disease progression, or 4) last available follow-up, whichever occurred first. Participants who did not experience a progression event (items 1, 2 and 3) were censored at date of last available follow-up. PFS (in months) was calculated as (first event date - palbociclib initiation date + 1)/30.4. Progressive disease - An increase in visible disease and/or presence of any new lesions; included cases where the clinician indicated progressive disease. Percentage of participants with PFS events at 24 months based on the Kaplan-Meier estimate were reported. (NCT03159195)
Timeframe: Day 1 of palbociclib combination treatment up to Month 24 (data recorded during 4 years of retrospective observation period)
Intervention | Percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
Palbociclib + Aromatase Inhibitor (P+AI) | 64.3 |
Best overall response was defined as the percentage of participants who achieved complete (where 'complete response' was recorded at any time on treatment), partial response (where 'partial response' was recorded at any time on treatment) and stable disease at greater than equal to (>=) 24 weeks on palbociclib combination therapy. Stable disease was defined as no evidence of complete or partial response, and no progression on palbociclib therapy for 24 weeks or greater. (NCT03159195)
Timeframe: From initiation of treatment up to disease progression (data recorded during 4 years of retrospective observation period)
Intervention | Percentage of participants (Number) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Complete Response | Partial Response | Stable Disease >=24 Weeks | Stable Disease <24 Weeks | |
Palbociclib + Aromatase Inhibitor (P+AI) | 11.0 | 68.5 | 14.3 | 1.4 |
Palbociclib + Fulvestrant (P+FV) | 8.5 | 65.5 | 11.0 | 3.2 |
CB is defined as the percentage of participants with evidence of confirmed CR, PR, or stable disease (SD) for at least 6 months. CR: disappearance of all target lesions. PR: at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the LD of target lesions, taking as a reference the baseline sum LD. SD: neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD, taking as reference the smallest sum LD since the baseline measurement. (NCT00073528)
Timeframe: Up to 46 months
Intervention | Months (Number) |
---|---|
Placebo + Letrozole 2.5 mg | 28.7 |
Lapatinib 1500 mg + Letrozole 2.5 mg | 47.7 |
CB is defined as the percentage of participants with evidence of confirmed CR, PR, or stable disease (SD) for at least 6 months. CR: disappearance of all target lesions. PR: at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the LD of target lesions, taking as a reference the baseline sum LD. SD: neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD, taking as reference the smallest sum LD since the baseline measurement. (NCT00073528)
Timeframe: Up to 46 months
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
Placebo + Letrozole 2.5 mg | 50.6 |
Lapatinib 1500 mg + Letrozole 2.5 mg | 55.8 |
Duration of response is defined as the time from the first documented evidence of CR (disappearance of all target lesions) or PR (at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the LD of target lesions, taking as a reference the baseline sum LD) until the first documented sign of disease progression or death due to any cause. The assessments of CR or PR required confirmation using bone scans. (NCT00073528)
Timeframe: Up to 46 months
Intervention | weeks (Median) |
---|---|
Placebo + Letrozole 2.5 mg | 84.4 |
Lapatinib 1500 mg + Letrozole 2.5 mg | 47.4 |
Duration of response is defined as the time from the first documented evidence of CR (disappearance of all target lesions) or PR (at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the LD of target lesions, taking as a reference the baseline sum LD) until the first documented sign of disease progression or death due to any cause. The assessments of CR or PR required confirmation using bone scans. (NCT00073528)
Timeframe: Up to 46 months
Intervention | weeks (Median) |
---|---|
Placebo + Letrozole 2.5 mg | 72.6 |
Lapatinib 1500 mg + Letrozole 2.5 mg | 60.1 |
The confirmation criteria for the evidence of brain metastases was the incidence of lesions occurring within any part of the central nervous system (CNS) as evidenced by radiological scans. Metastases are defined as the spread of cancer from one part of the body to another. (NCT00073528)
Timeframe: Up to 46 months
Intervention | participants (Number) |
---|---|
Placebo + Letrozole 2.5 mg | 4 |
Lapatinib 1500 mg + Letrozole 2.5 mg | 6 |
The confirmation criteria for the evidence of brain metastases was the incidence of lesions occurring within any part of the central nervous system (CNS) as evidenced by radiological scans. Metastases are defined as the spread of cancer from one part of the body to another. (NCT00073528)
Timeframe: Up to 46 months
Intervention | participants (Number) |
---|---|
Placebo + Letrozole 2.5 mg | 2 |
Lapatinib 1500 mg + Letrozole 2.5 mg | 1 |
PFS is defined as the time from randomization until the earliest date of disease progression or death due to any cause, if sooner. The date of documented disease progression is defined as the date of radiological disease progression as assessed by the investigator based on imaging data and also by the clinical assessment of symptomatic progression. Per RECIST 1.0, disease progression is defined as a 20% increase in the sum of the LD of target lesions, taking as a reference the smallest sum LD recorded since the treatment started, or the appearance of 1 or more new lesions. (NCT00073528)
Timeframe: From date of randomization until the date of first documented progression or date of death from any cause, whichever came first, assessed up to 46 months
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|---|
Placebo + Letrozole 2.5 mg | 476 |
Lapatinib 1500 mg + Letrozole 2.5 mg | 413 |
PFS is defined as the time from randomization until the earliest date of disease progression (PD) or death due to any cause, if sooner. The date of documented PD is defined as the date of radiological PD as assessed by the investigator based on imaging data and also by the clinical assessment of symptomatic progression. Per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST 1.0), PD is defined as a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter (LD) of target lesions, taking as a reference the smallest sum LD recorded since the treatment started, or the appearance of 1 or more new lesions. (NCT00073528)
Timeframe: From the date of randomization until the date of the first documented progression or date of death from any cause, whichever came first, assessed for up to 46 months
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|---|
Placebo + Letrozole 2.5 mg | 89 |
Lapatinib 1500 mg + Letrozole 2.5 mg | 88 |
Overall survival was defined as the time from randomization until death due to any cause. (NCT00073528)
Timeframe: From date of randomization until date of death due to any cause, assessed up to 46 months
Intervention | Weeks (Median) |
---|---|
Placebo + Letrozole 2.5 mg | 140.3 |
Lapatinib 1500 mg + Letrozole 2.5 mg | 144.7 |
Overall survival was defined as the time from randomization until death due to any cause. (NCT00073528)
Timeframe: From date of randomization until date of death due to any cause, assessed up to 46 months
Intervention | weeks (Median) |
---|---|
Placebo + Letrozole 2.5 mg | 176.3 |
Lapatinib 1500 mg + Letrozole 2.5 mg | 170.9 |
OR is defined as the percentage of participants achieving either a confirmed complete response (CR) or partial response (PR). Response was assessed via Response Evaluation criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST). The percentage of participants with response was calculated by using the formula: 100 * (number of participants with CR + number of participants with PR)/total number of participants. CR: disappearance of all target lesions. PR: at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter (LD) of target lesions, taking as a reference the baseline sum LD. (NCT00073528)
Timeframe: Up to 46 months
Intervention | Percent response rate (Number) |
---|---|
Placebo + Letrozole 2.5 mg | 14.8 |
Lapatinib 1500 mg + Letrozole 2.5 mg | 27.9 |
OR is defined as the percentage of participants achieving either a confirmed complete response (CR) or partial response (PR). Response was assessed via Response Evaluation criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST). The percentage of participants with response was calculated by using the formula: 100 * (number of participants with CR + number of participants with PR)/total number of participants. CR: disappearance of all target lesions. PR: at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter (LD) of target lesions, taking as a reference the baseline sum LD. (NCT00073528)
Timeframe: Up to 46 months
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
Placebo + Letrozole 2.5 mg | 27.8 |
Lapatinib 1500 mg + Letrozole 2.5 mg | 30.5 |
PFS is defined as the time from randomization until the earliest date of disease progression or death due to any cause, if sooner. The date of documented disease progression is defined as the date of radiological disease progression as assessed by the investigator based on imaging data and also by the clinical assessment of symptomatic progression. Per RECIST 1.0, disease progression is defined as a 20% increase in the sum of the LD of target lesions, taking as a reference the smallest sum LD recorded since the treatment started, or the appearance of 1 or more new lesions. (NCT00073528)
Timeframe: From date of randomization until the date of first documented progression or date of death from any cause, whichever came first, assessed up to 46 months
Intervention | Weeks (Median) |
---|---|
Placebo + Letrozole 2.5 mg | 47.0 |
Lapatinib 1500 mg + Letrozole 2.5 mg | 51.7 |
PFS is defined as the time from randomization until the earliest date of disease progression or death due to any cause, if sooner. The date of documented disease progression is defined as the date of radiological disease progression as assessed by the investigator based on imaging data and also by the clinical assessment of symptomatic progression. Per RECIST 1.0, disease progression is defined as a 20% increase in the sum of the LD of target lesions, taking as a reference the smallest sum LD recorded since the treatment started, or the appearance of 1 or more new lesions. (NCT00073528)
Timeframe: From date of randomization until the date of first documented progression or date of death from any cause, whichever came first, assessed up to 46 months
Intervention | Weeks (Median) |
---|---|
Placebo + Letrozole 2.5 mg | 13.0 |
Lapatinib 1500 mg + Letrozole 2.5 mg | 35.4 |
TTP is defined as the interval between the date of randomization and the earliest date of disease progression or death due to breast cancer. Disease progression was based on the assessments by the Investigator. (NCT00073528)
Timeframe: Up to 46 months
Intervention | weeks (Median) |
---|---|
Placebo + Letrozole 2.5 mg | 13.0 |
Lapatinib 1500 mg + Letrozole 2.5 mg | 35.4 |
Time to seroconversion was defined as the time from the date of randomization until the first instance of serum HER2 (>15 ng/mL) on two consecutive occasions. (NCT00073528)
Timeframe: Up to 46 months
Intervention | Weeks (Median) |
---|---|
Placebo + Letrozole 2.5 mg | NA |
Lapatinib 1500 mg + Letrozole 2.5 mg | 36.1 |
TTP is defined as the interval between the date of randomization and the earliest date of disease progression or death due to breast cancer. Disease progression was based on the assessments by the Investigator. (NCT00073528)
Timeframe: Up to 46 months
Intervention | weeks (Median) |
---|---|
Placebo + Letrozole 2.5 mg | 47.0 |
Lapatinib 1500 mg + Letrozole 2.5 mg | 51.7 |
Quality of Life (QOL) was assessed using the FACT-B questionnaire, which is a 37-item (27 general and 10 breast cancer-specific questions) self-reporting instrument consisting of 5 dimensions: physical-, social/family-, emotional-, functional-well being, and a breast cancer subscale. Higher scores on the FACT-B scales indicate a higher QOL; each ranging from 0 (not at all) to 4 (very much). The score is transformed for FACT-B and results in a total score ranging from 0 to 144. The FACT-B is designed to measure multidimensional QOL in participants with breast cancer. (NCT00073528)
Timeframe: Week 12, 24, 36, and 48 visits; conclusion/withdrawal visit
Intervention | Adjusted mean change (Number) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Week 12 | Week 24 | Week 36 | Week 48 | Conclusion/WD | |
Lapatinib 1500 mg + Letrozole 2.5 mg | 3.3 | 1.9 | 1.4 | 0.3 | -9.0 |
Placebo + Letrozole 2.5 mg | 1.5 | 3.8 | 3.3 | 2.9 | -9.4 |
FACT-G is a subscale of the FACT-B QOL questionnaire and consists of 27 questions grouped into 4 domains that measure a participant's physical, functional, social and family, and emotional well-being. FACT-G is assessed on a five-point Likert-type scale, with scores ranging from 0 to 4 (0=not at all, 1=a little bit, 2=somewhat, 3=quite a bit, 4=very much). The total score is calculated as the sum of the item scores on the subscale; the total ranges from 0 to 108, with higher score indicating a better quality of life. (NCT00073528)
Timeframe: Week 12, 24, 36, and 48 visits; conclusion/withdrawal visit
Intervention | Adjusted mean change (Number) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Week 12 | Week 24 | Week 36 | Week 48 | Conclusion/WD | |
Lapatinib 1500 mg + Letrozole 2.5 mg | 1.5 | 0.6 | 0.9 | -0.9 | -8.5 |
Placebo + Letrozole 2.5 mg | 1.6 | 2.2 | 2.6 | 2.0 | -7.8 |
The TOI score is the sum of the physical well-being, functional well-being, and breast cancer unweighted subscale scores. The total TOI score ranges from 0 to 92, with higher scores representing a better quality of life. (NCT00073528)
Timeframe: Week 12, 24, 36, and 48 visits; conclusion/withdrawal visit
Intervention | Adjusted mean change (Number) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Week 12 | Week 24 | Week 36 | Week 48 | Conclusion/WD | |
Lapatinib 1500 mg + Letrozole 2.5 mg | 2.7 | 2.0 | 0.8 | -0.7 | -6.4 |
Placebo + Letrozole 2.5 mg | -0.3 | 3.9 | 3.3 | 2.2 | -6.2 |
"On treatment deaths were collected from FPFT up to 30 days after study drug discontinuation, for a maximum duration of 663.9 weeks (treatment duration ranged from 0.1 to 659.9 weeks).~Deaths post treatment survival follow up were collected after the on- treatment period, up to approximately 14 years. Patients who didn't die during the on-treatment period and had not stopped study participation at the time of data cut-off (end of study) were censored." (NCT00073528)
Timeframe: up to 663 weeks (on-treatment), up to approximately 14 years (study duration)
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) | |
---|---|---|
On-treatment deaths | All deaths | |
Lapatinib 1500 mg + Letrozole 2.5 mg | 18 | 488 |
Placebo + Letrozole 2.5 mg | 23 | 484 |
Participants who had a HER2-negative tumor status based on baseline tissue with baseline serum HER2 ECD values =<15 ng/mL but later had at least two consecutive serum HER2 ECD values >15 ng/mL experienced seroconversion. (NCT00073528)
Timeframe: Up to 46 months
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) | ||
---|---|---|---|
Seroconversion, No | Seroconversion, Yes | Missing | |
Lapatinib 1500 mg + Letrozole 2.5 mg | 140 | 219 | 119 |
Placebo + Letrozole 2.5 mg | 323 | 52 | 99 |
A minimally important difference (MID) is the smallest difference in a score for a measure of QOL that corresponds to a difference in function or clinical course. Responders are defined as participants with an MID => 8 for the FACT-B score, and an MID =>6 for the FACT-G and TOI scores. (NCT00073528)
Timeframe: Up to 46 months
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) | ||
---|---|---|---|
FACT-B total, =>8 (MID upper bound) | FACT-G, =>6 (MID upper bound) | TOI, =>6 (MID upper bound) | |
Lapatinib 1500 mg + Letrozole 2.5 mg | 33 | 38 | 33 |
Placebo + Letrozole 2.5 mg | 29 | 29 | 29 |
Quality of Life (QOL) was assessed using the FACT-B questionnaire, which was a 37-item (27 general and 10 breast cancer-specific questions) self-reporting instrument consisting of 5 dimensions: physical-, social/family-, emotional-, functional-well being, and a breast cancer subscale. Higher scores on the FACT-B scales (each ranging from 0 [not at all] to 4 [very much]) indicate a higher QOL. The score is transformed for FACT-B and results in a total score ranging from 0 to 144. Complete: completing at least 1 question from FACT-B. (NCT00073528)
Timeframe: Day 1 (baseline) visit; Week 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84, 96, 108, 120, 132, 144, 156, 168, 180, and 192 visits; conclusion/withdrawal visit
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) | |||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Day 1, baseline | Week 12 | Week 24 | Week 36 | Week 48 | Week 60 | Week 72 | Week 84 | Week 96 | Week 108 | Week 120 | Week 132 | Week 144 | Week 156 | Week 168 | Week 180 | Week 192 | Conclusion/withdrawal | |
Lapatinib 1500 mg + Letrozole 2.5 mg | 605 | 476 | 382 | 294 | 243 | 183 | 153 | 119 | 98 | 62 | 56 | 43 | 33 | 21 | 11 | 5 | 1 | 359 |
Placebo + Letrozole 2.5 mg | 605 | 460 | 350 | 291 | 254 | 199 | 181 | 144 | 117 | 80 | 59 | 43 | 33 | 22 | 15 | 11 | 6 | 327 |
Clinical benefit: participants with CR, PR, or SD for =>6-month period. FISH testing measures the amount of the HER2 gene in each cell. This gene is responsible for the overproduction of the HER2 protein. FISH-positive: excessive amounts of the gene are present; FISH-negative: normal levels of the gene are present. (NCT00073528)
Timeframe: Up to 46 months
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) | ||
---|---|---|---|
FISH status, Positive | FISH status, Negative | FISH status, missing | |
Lapatinib 1500 mg + Letrozole 2.5 mg | 49 | 245 | 64 |
Placebo + Letrozole 2.5 mg | 28 | 237 | 61 |
IHC is a commonly used test to assess the amount of the HER2 receptor protein on the surface of the cancer cells. The IHC test results in a score of 0 to 3+, which indicates the amount of HER2 receptor protein on the cells in a sample of breast cancer tissue. Tissue scores of 0 to 1+ indicate HER2 negativity; scores of 2+ and 3+ indicate HER2 positivity. Clinical benefit is defined as participants with CR, PR, or SD for =>6-month period. (NCT00073528)
Timeframe: Up to 46 months
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
IHC Intensity 0 | IHC Intensity 1 | IHC Intensity 2 | IHC Intensity 3 | IHC Intensity Missing | |
Lapatinib 1500 mg + Letrozole 2.5 mg | 106 | 106 | 85 | 26 | 35 |
Placebo + Letrozole 2.5 mg | 74 | 108 | 94 | 16 | 34 |
Participants were stratified based on site of disease at screening (SDS) (soft tissue or visceral or bone-only disease) and prior adjuvant endocrine therapy (PAET) (discontinuation interval [DI] =>6 months or DI <6 months). OR is defined as the number of participants achieving either a confirmed CR or PR. Response was assessed via RECIST. CR: disappearance of all target lesions. PR: at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the LD of target lesions, taking as a reference the baseline sum LD. DI is defined as the time period from stopping the PEAT to the randomization date. (NCT00073528)
Timeframe: Up to 46 months
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
SDS, Soft tissue or visceral | SDS, Bone-only disease | PAET, DI =>6 months | PAET, DI <6 months | |
Lapatinib 1500 mg + Letrozole 2.5 mg | 31 | 0 | 24 | 7 |
Placebo + Letrozole 2.5 mg | 14 | 0 | 12 | 2 |
Participants were stratified based on site of disease at screening (SDS) (soft tissue or visceral or bone-only disease) and prior adjuvant endocrine therapy (PAET) (discontinuation interval [DI] =>6 months or DI <6 months). OR is defined as the number of participants achieving either a confirmed CR or PR. Response was assessed via RECIST. CR: disappearance of all target lesions. PR: at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the LD of target lesions, taking as a reference the baseline sum LD. DI is defined as the time period from stopping the PEAT and the randomization date. (NCT00073528)
Timeframe: Up to 46 months
Intervention | participants (Number) | ||
---|---|---|---|
SDS, Soft tissue or visceral | PAET, DI =>6 months | PAET, DI <6 months | |
Lapatinib 1500 mg + Letrozole 2.5 mg | 190 | 168 | 22 |
Placebo + Letrozole 2.5 mg | 170 | 151 | 19 |
The HER2 ECD is a glycoprotein that can be shed from the cell surface into the blood of normal individuals and can be elevated in different pathologic conditions. The serum HER2 ECD level generally reflects the tissue HER2 status. The HER2 ECD is quantified in serum with an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Non-Evaluable (NE): any participant who could not be classified as CR, PR, SD, or PD. (NCT00073528)
Timeframe: Up to 46 months
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
>15 ng/mL, CR/PR | >15 ng/mL, SD | >15 ng/mL, PD/NE | =<15 ng/mL, CR/PR | =<15 ng/mL, SD | =<15 ng/mL, PD/NE | |
Lapatinib 1500 mg + Letrozole 2.5 mg | 9 | 13 | 12 | 17 | 30 | 23 |
Placebo + Letrozole 2.5 mg | 3 | 11 | 39 | 12 | 23 | 16 |
CR: disappearance of all target lesions. PR: at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the LD of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum LD. SD: neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD, taking as a reference the smallest sum LD since the baseline measurement. The best overall response is defined as the best response recorded from the start of treatment until disease progression/recurrence. PD: presence of target lesions, non-target lesions, and/or new lesions. (NCT00073528)
Timeframe: Up to 46 months
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CR | PR | SD | PD | Unknown | |
Lapatinib 1500 mg + Letrozole 2.5 mg | 5 | 26 | 44 | 30 | 6 |
Placebo + Letrozole 2.5 mg | 4 | 12 | 35 | 49 | 8 |
CR: disappearance of all target lesions. PR: at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the LD of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum LD. SD: neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD, taking as a reference the smallest sum LD since the baseline measurement. The best overall response is defined as the best response recorded from the start of treatment until disease progression/recurrence. PD: presence of target lesions, non-target lesions, and/or new lesions. (NCT00073528)
Timeframe: Up to 46 months
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CR | PR | SD | PD | Unknown | |
Lapatinib 1500 mg + Letrozole 2.5 mg | 28 | 168 | 280 | 113 | 53 |
Placebo + Letrozole 2.5 mg | 26 | 153 | 243 | 174 | 48 |
EGFR is a cell surface receptor tyrosine kinase expressed in certain types of tumors. Depending upon the staining intensity, EGFR was graded as follows: 0=absence of membrane staining above background in all tumor cells; EGFR-positive=staining is defined as any IHC staining of tumor cell membranes above background level, whether it is complete or incomplete circumferential staining (1+, 2+, 3+). (NCT00073528)
Timeframe: Baseline
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
EGFR, 0 | EGFR, 1+ | EGFR, 2+ | EGFR, 3+ | |
Lapatinib 1500 mg + Letrozole 2.5 mg | 522 | 45 | 12 | 1 |
Placebo + Letrozole 2.5 mg | 513 | 43 | 17 | 3 |
Time to response is defined as the time from randomization until the first documented evidence of CR (disappearance of all target lesions) or PR (at least a 30% decrease in the sume of the LD of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum LD) (whichever status was recorded first). The assessments of CR or PR required confirmation using bone scans. (NCT00073528)
Timeframe: Up to 46 months
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) | ||
---|---|---|---|
Week 12 | Week 16 | Week 24 or longer | |
Lapatinib 1500 mg + Letrozole 2.5 mg | 23 | 3 | 5 |
Placebo + Letrozole 2.5 mg | 11 | 1 | 4 |
Time to response is defined as the time from randomization until the first documented evidence of CR (disappearance of all target lesions) or PR (at least a 30% decrease in the sume of the LD of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum LD) (whichever status was recorded first). The assessments of CR or PR required confirmation using bone scans. (NCT00073528)
Timeframe: Up to 46 months
Intervention | participants (Number) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Week 12 | Week 16 | Week 24 | Week 28 | Week 36 or longer | |
Lapatinib 1500 mg + Letrozole 2.5 mg | 94 | 18 | 28 | 14 | 42 |
Placebo + Letrozole 2.5 mg | 76 | 21 | 28 | 17 | 37 |
The primary aim is to assess the anti-tumor effect in terms of pathologic CR rates of neo-adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with T2-T4c, any N, M0 breast cancer (by clinical staging) who are endocrine therapy resistant (that is, their Ki-67 level is >10 after 2-4 week of neo-adjuvant endocrine therapy alone). The pCR rate (percentage) for neo-adjuvant chemotherapy is defined as 100 times the number of eligible patients with no histologic evidence of invasive tumor cells in the surgical breast specimen and the axillary or sentinel lymph nodes divided by the total number of eligible patients who received neo-adjuvant chemotherapy. (NCT00265759)
Timeframe: Up to 18 weeks
Intervention | percentage of patients (Number) |
---|---|
Cohort B Arm II: Week 2 Ki67 > 10% | 5.7 |
The clinical response rate (percentage) of a given treatment is defined as 100 times the number of eligible patients randomized to that treatment whose disease meets the WHO criteria for complete or partial response prior to surgery divided by the total number of eligible patients randomized to that treatment. For each treatment arm, a 95% binomial confidence interval will be constructed for the true clinical response rate. Complete Response (CR): The disappearance of all known disease based on a comparison between the measurements at baseline and the Week 16 visit. Partial Response (PR): A 50% or greater decrease in the product of the bi-dimensional measurements of the lesion (total tumor size) based on a comparison between the measurements at baseline and the Week 16 visit. In addition there can be no appearance of new lesions or progression of any lesion. (NCT00265759)
Timeframe: Up to 18 weeks
Intervention | percentage of patients (Number) |
---|---|
Cohort A Arm I: Exemestane | 62.9 |
Cohort A Arm II: Letrozole | 74.8 |
Cohort A Arm III: Anastrozole | 69.1 |
The rate (percentage) of improved surgical outcome for patients considered marginal for breast conservation surgery prior to therapy for Cohort A is reported below for each treatment arm. Breast conservation surgery (not mastectomy) as the most extensive surgery performed for a patient is considered an improvement in surgical outcome. (NCT00265759)
Timeframe: At time of surgery up to 18 weeks
Intervention | percentage of improved surgical outcome (Number) |
---|---|
Cohort A Arm I: Exemestane | 85.2 |
Cohort A Arm II: Letrozole | 77.4 |
Cohort A Arm III: Anastrozole | 86.4 |
Rate (percentage) of Improved surgical outcome for patients designated as candidates for mastectomy prior to therapy (Cohort A). Breast conservation surgery (not mastectomy) as the most extensive surgery performed for a patient is considered an improvement in surgical outcome. (NCT00265759)
Timeframe: At time of surgery up to 18 weeks
Intervention | percentage of patients (Number) |
---|---|
Cohort A Arm I: Exemestane | 48.1 |
Cohort A Arm II: Letrozole | 42.1 |
Cohort A Arm III: Anastrozole | 60.0 |
For those patients who undergo a sentinel lymph node dissection or an axillary lymph node dissection (at least 6 nodes examined with Hematoxylin & Eosin Staining), the LNI rate (percentage) is defined as 100 times the proportion of eligible patients randomized to that treatment with at least one positive node. For each neo-adjuvant endocrine treatment, a 95% binomial confidence interval will be constructed for its true LNI rate. (NCT00265759)
Timeframe: At time of surgery up to 18 weeks
Intervention | percentage of patients (Number) |
---|---|
Cohort A Arm I: Exemestane | 41.1 |
Cohort A Arm II: Letrozole | 48.2 |
Cohort A Arm III: Anastrozole | 44.1 |
The pathologic complete response is defined as no histologic evidence of invasive tumor cells in the surgical breast specimen and axillary or sentinel lymph nodes. The pathologic complete response rate (percentage) of a given treatment is defined as 100 times the number of eligible patients randomized to that treatment whose surgical specimen is such that there is no histologic evidence of invasive tumor cells in the surgical breast specimen and axillary or sentinel lymph nodes divided by the total number of eligible patients randomized to that treatment. For each neo-adjuvant endocrine treatment pair, a 95% binomial confidence interval will be constructed for the true difference in the pCR between these 2 treatments. (NCT00265759)
Timeframe: At time of surgery up to 18 weeks
Intervention | percentage of patients (Number) |
---|---|
Cohort A Arm I: Exemestane | 1.7 |
Cohort A Arm II: Letrozole | 0.0 |
Cohort A Arm III: Anastrozole | 0.0 |
Incidence of the most common grade 3+ toxicities reported to be probably, possibly, or definitely related to treatment as assessed by National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 3.0 (Cohort A) At each treatment evaluation, the type, severity, and attribution of each adverse event reported will be assessed using the NCI-CTCAE definitions. For each treatment, the percentage of patients who developed a severe (grade 3+) toxicity considered possibly, probably or definitively related to treatment will be determined. (NCT00265759)
Timeframe: Up to 30 days after drug therapy
Intervention | percentage of patients (Number) | ||
---|---|---|---|
Fatigue | Hot flashes/flushes | Joint pain | |
Cohort A Arm I: Exemestane | 2 | 2 | 2 |
Cohort A Arm II: Letrozole | 2 | 4 | 3 |
Cohort A Arm III: Anastrozole | 3 | 2 | 2 |
25 reviews available for letrozole and Metastase
Article | Year |
---|---|
Overall Survival of CDK4/6-Inhibitor-Based Treatments in Clinically Relevant Subgroups of Metastatic Breast Cancer: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Breast Neoplasms; Clinical Trials, Phase II as Topic | 2020 |
Palbociclib: A Review in HR-Positive, HER2-Negative, Advanced or Metastatic Breast Cancer.
Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Breast Neoplasms; Clinical Tr | 2017 |
Identification of miRNAs as biomarkers for acquired endocrine resistance in breast cancer.
Topics: Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal; Aromatase Inhibitors; Biomarkers, Tumor; Breast Neoplasms; Drug Res | 2017 |
HER-2-positive metastatic breast cancer: trastuzumab and beyond.
Topics: Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Prot | 2008 |
Never too late: reducing late breast cancer relapse risk.
Topics: Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal; Aromatase Inhibitors; Breast Neoplasms; Chemotherapy, Adjuvant; Eur | 2008 |
Overcoming recurrence risk: extended adjuvant endocrine therapy.
Topics: Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal; Aromatase Inhibitors; Breast Neoplasms; Chemotherapy, Adjuvant; Dis | 2008 |
Understanding the BIG results: Insights from the BIG 1-98 trial analyses.
Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Aromatase Inhibitors; Breast Neoplasms; Chemotherapy, Adjuvant; Female; Human | 2008 |
Letrozole.
Topics: Aromatase Inhibitors; Breast Neoplasms; Chemotherapy, Adjuvant; Female; Humans; Letrozole; Neoadjuva | 2010 |
Lapatinib: in postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive, HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer.
Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Breast Neoplasms; ErbB Receptors; Female; Humans; La | 2010 |
The efficacy of HER2-targeted agents in metastatic breast cancer: a meta-analysis.
Topics: Anastrozole; Anthracyclines; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy | 2011 |
When to start an aromatase inhibitor: now or later?
Topics: Anastrozole; Androstadienes; Aromatase Inhibitors; Breast Neoplasms; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Drug Adm | 2011 |
Aromatase inhibition: a potential target for the management of recurrent or metastatic endometrial cancer by letrozole: more questions than answers?
Topics: Aromatase Inhibitors; Clinical Trials as Topic; Endometrial Neoplasms; Female; Humans; Letrozole; Ne | 2011 |
Management of patients with metastatic breast cancer.
Topics: Adult; Age Factors; Aged; Anastrozole; Androstadienes; Aromatase Inhibitors; Breast Neoplasms; Disea | 2011 |
Does hormonal therapy have a therapeutic role in metastatic primary small cell neuroendocrine breast carcinoma? Case report and literature review.
Topics: Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal; Aromatase Inhibitors; Breast Neoplasms; Carcinom | 2012 |
Systematic review of lapatinib in combination with letrozole compared with other first-line treatments for hormone receptor positive(HR+) and HER2+ advanced or metastatic breast cancer(MBC).
Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Breast Neoplasms; Carcinoma; Disease Progression; Fe | 2012 |
Applicability of the intratumor aromatase preclinical model to predict clinical trial results with endocrine therapy.
Topics: Anastrozole; Androstadienes; Animals; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Pr | 2003 |
A comparison of the efficacy of aromatase inhibitors in second-line treatment of metastatic breast cancer.
Topics: Aminoglutethimide; Anastrozole; Androstadienes; Antineoplastic Agents; Aromatase Inhibitors; Breast | 2003 |
The role of aromatase inhibitors in the treatment of metastatic breast cancer.
Topics: Anastrozole; Androstadienes; Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal; Aromatase Inhibitors; Breast Neoplasms | 2003 |
Aromatase inhibitors in advanced breast cancer.
Topics: Anastrozole; Androstadienes; Antineoplastic Agents; Aromatase Inhibitors; Breast Neoplasms; Female; | 2004 |
Review of the development of letrozole and its use in advanced breast cancer and in the neoadjuvant setting.
Topics: Aromatase Inhibitors; Breast Neoplasms; Clinical Trials as Topic; Drug Administration Schedule; Fema | 2006 |
The impact of adjuvant endocrine therapy on reducing the risk of distant metastases in hormone-responsive breast cancer.
Topics: Anastrozole; Androstadienes; Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal; Aromatase Inhibitors; Breast Neoplasms | 2008 |
A review of the BIG results: the Breast International Group 1-98 trial analyses.
Topics: Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal; Aromatase Inhibitors; Breast Neoplasms; Chemotherapy, Adjuvant; Cli | 2008 |
The third-generation non-steroidal aromatase inhibitors: a review of their clinical benefits in the second-line hormonal treatment of advanced breast cancer.
Topics: Aged; Anastrozole; Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal; Aromatase Inhibitors; Belgium; Breast Neoplasms; | 1999 |
Survival in patients with metastatic breast cancer: analysis of randomized studies comparing oral aromatase inhibitors versus megestrol.
Topics: Anastrozole; Androstadienes; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal; Aromatase Inhib | 2000 |
[Antiestrogen therapy in the treatment of breast neoplasms].
Topics: Adult; Anastrozole; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal; Aromatase Inhibitors; Br | 2002 |
18 trials available for letrozole and Metastase
Article | Year |
---|---|
Molecular imaging to identify patients with metastatic breast cancer who benefit from endocrine treatment combined with cyclin-dependent kinase inhibition.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Aromatase Inhibitors; Breast Neoplasms; | 2020 |
Cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors plus aromatase inhibitor in first-line treatment hormone-receptor-positive/HER2-negative advanced breast cancer women with or without visceral disease: time to turn page?
Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Aminopyridines; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Brea | 2020 |
Leuprorelin combined with letrozole with/without everolimus in ovarian-suppressed premenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer: The LEO study.
Topics: Adult; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Breast Neoplasms; Everolimus; Female; Follow- | 2021 |
Clinical considerations of the role of palbociclib in the management of advanced breast cancer patients with and without visceral metastases.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherap | 2018 |
Clinical considerations of the role of palbociclib in the management of advanced breast cancer patients with and without visceral metastases.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherap | 2018 |
Clinical considerations of the role of palbociclib in the management of advanced breast cancer patients with and without visceral metastases.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherap | 2018 |
Clinical considerations of the role of palbociclib in the management of advanced breast cancer patients with and without visceral metastases.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherap | 2018 |
Clinical considerations of the role of palbociclib in the management of advanced breast cancer patients with and without visceral metastases.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherap | 2018 |
Clinical considerations of the role of palbociclib in the management of advanced breast cancer patients with and without visceral metastases.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherap | 2018 |
Clinical considerations of the role of palbociclib in the management of advanced breast cancer patients with and without visceral metastases.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherap | 2018 |
Clinical considerations of the role of palbociclib in the management of advanced breast cancer patients with and without visceral metastases.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherap | 2018 |
Clinical considerations of the role of palbociclib in the management of advanced breast cancer patients with and without visceral metastases.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherap | 2018 |
First-line ribociclib plus letrozole in postmenopausal women with HR+ , HER2- advanced breast cancer: Tumor response and pain reduction in the phase 3 MONALEESA-2 trial.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Aminopyridines; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Biom | 2018 |
First-line ribociclib plus letrozole in postmenopausal women with HR+ , HER2- advanced breast cancer: Tumor response and pain reduction in the phase 3 MONALEESA-2 trial.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Aminopyridines; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Biom | 2018 |
First-line ribociclib plus letrozole in postmenopausal women with HR+ , HER2- advanced breast cancer: Tumor response and pain reduction in the phase 3 MONALEESA-2 trial.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Aminopyridines; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Biom | 2018 |
First-line ribociclib plus letrozole in postmenopausal women with HR+ , HER2- advanced breast cancer: Tumor response and pain reduction in the phase 3 MONALEESA-2 trial.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Aminopyridines; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Biom | 2018 |
Real-World Experience of Palbociclib-Induced Adverse Events and Compliance With Complete Blood Count Monitoring in Women With Hormone Receptor-Positive/HER2-Negative Metastatic Breast Cancer.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Blood Cell Count; Breast Neoplasms; Dose-Respo | 2019 |
A phase II study of imatinib mesylate and letrozole in patients with hormone receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer expressing c-kit or PDGFR-β.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Breast Neoplasms; Female; Humans; Imatinib Mesylate; Kaplan-Meier Es | 2018 |
Optimum duration of neoadjuvant letrozole to permit breast conserving surgery.
Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Agents; Aromatase Inhibitors; Breast Neoplasms; Female; Huma | 2014 |
Ki67 Proliferation Index as a Tool for Chemotherapy Decisions During and After Neoadjuvant Aromatase Inhibitor Treatment of Breast Cancer: Results From the American College of Surgeons Oncology Group Z1031 Trial (Alliance).
Topics: Aged; Anastrozole; Androstadienes; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Aromatase Inhibit | 2017 |
Ki67 Proliferation Index as a Tool for Chemotherapy Decisions During and After Neoadjuvant Aromatase Inhibitor Treatment of Breast Cancer: Results From the American College of Surgeons Oncology Group Z1031 Trial (Alliance).
Topics: Aged; Anastrozole; Androstadienes; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Aromatase Inhibit | 2017 |
Ki67 Proliferation Index as a Tool for Chemotherapy Decisions During and After Neoadjuvant Aromatase Inhibitor Treatment of Breast Cancer: Results From the American College of Surgeons Oncology Group Z1031 Trial (Alliance).
Topics: Aged; Anastrozole; Androstadienes; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Aromatase Inhibit | 2017 |
Ki67 Proliferation Index as a Tool for Chemotherapy Decisions During and After Neoadjuvant Aromatase Inhibitor Treatment of Breast Cancer: Results From the American College of Surgeons Oncology Group Z1031 Trial (Alliance).
Topics: Aged; Anastrozole; Androstadienes; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Aromatase Inhibit | 2017 |
Ki67 Proliferation Index as a Tool for Chemotherapy Decisions During and After Neoadjuvant Aromatase Inhibitor Treatment of Breast Cancer: Results From the American College of Surgeons Oncology Group Z1031 Trial (Alliance).
Topics: Aged; Anastrozole; Androstadienes; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Aromatase Inhibit | 2017 |
Ki67 Proliferation Index as a Tool for Chemotherapy Decisions During and After Neoadjuvant Aromatase Inhibitor Treatment of Breast Cancer: Results From the American College of Surgeons Oncology Group Z1031 Trial (Alliance).
Topics: Aged; Anastrozole; Androstadienes; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Aromatase Inhibit | 2017 |
Ki67 Proliferation Index as a Tool for Chemotherapy Decisions During and After Neoadjuvant Aromatase Inhibitor Treatment of Breast Cancer: Results From the American College of Surgeons Oncology Group Z1031 Trial (Alliance).
Topics: Aged; Anastrozole; Androstadienes; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Aromatase Inhibit | 2017 |
Ki67 Proliferation Index as a Tool for Chemotherapy Decisions During and After Neoadjuvant Aromatase Inhibitor Treatment of Breast Cancer: Results From the American College of Surgeons Oncology Group Z1031 Trial (Alliance).
Topics: Aged; Anastrozole; Androstadienes; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Aromatase Inhibit | 2017 |
Ki67 Proliferation Index as a Tool for Chemotherapy Decisions During and After Neoadjuvant Aromatase Inhibitor Treatment of Breast Cancer: Results From the American College of Surgeons Oncology Group Z1031 Trial (Alliance).
Topics: Aged; Anastrozole; Androstadienes; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Aromatase Inhibit | 2017 |
Phase II parallel group study showing comparable efficacy between premenopausal metastatic breast cancer patients treated with letrozole plus goserelin and postmenopausal patients treated with letrozole alone as first-line hormone therapy.
Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Aged; Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal; Antineoplastic Combined Chemothe | 2010 |
Randomized phase II trial of letrozole plus anti-MUC1 antibody AS1402 in hormone receptor-positive locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer.
Topics: Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Prot | 2011 |
Randomized phase III placebo-controlled trial of letrozole plus oral temsirolimus as first-line endocrine therapy in postmenopausal women with locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer.
Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols | 2013 |
Serum HER-2/neu and response to the aromatase inhibitor letrozole versus tamoxifen.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Agents; Aromatase Inhibitors; Breast Neoplasms; Disea | 2003 |
Superiority of letrozole to tamoxifen in the first-line treatment of advanced breast cancer: evidence from metastatic subgroups and a test of functional ability.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal; Breast Neopl | 2004 |
Beta-interferon and interleukin-2 prolong more than three times the survival of 26 consecutive endocrine dependent breast cancer patients with distant metastases: an exploratory trial.
Topics: Breast Neoplasms; Combined Modality Therapy; Disease-Free Survival; Drug Administration Schedule; Fe | 2005 |
Serum epidermal growth factor receptor/HER-2 predicts poor survival in patients with metastatic breast cancer.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Agents; Breast Neoplasms; Carcinoma; Double-Blind Met | 2006 |
Letrozole (CGS 20267). A phase I study of a new potent oral aromatase inhibitor of breast cancer.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Aromatase Inhibitors; Breast Neoplasms; Estrogen Antagonists; Fe | 1995 |
A randomized phase II trial of two dosage levels of letrozole as third-line hormonal therapy for women with metastatic breast carcinoma.
Topics: Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal; Aromatase Inhibitors; Breast Neoplasms; Drug Administration Schedul | 1997 |
35 other studies available for letrozole and Metastase
Article | Year |
---|---|
Real-world benefit of combination palbociclib and endocrine therapy for metastatic breast cancer and correlation with neutropenia.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Breast Neoplasms; Disease-Free Survival; Femal | 2021 |
Real-World Data of Palbociclib in Combination With Endocrine Therapy for the Treatment of Metastatic Breast Cancer in Men.
Topics: Administrative Claims, Healthcare; Adult; Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Agents, Hormon | 2022 |
Aromatase-induced endogenous estrogen promotes tumour metastasis through estrogen receptor-α/matrix metalloproteinase 12 axis activation in castration-resistant prostate cancer.
Topics: Aged; Anilides; Animals; Aromatase; Cell Line, Tumor; Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition; Estrogen Re | 2019 |
Plasma thymidine kinase 1 activity and outcome of ER+ HER2- metastatic breast cancer patients treated with palbociclib and endocrine therapy.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Biomarkers, Tumor; B | 2020 |
Pre-existing effector T-cell levels and augmented myeloid cell composition denote response to CDK4/6 inhibitor palbociclib and pembrolizumab in hormone receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer.
Topics: Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Aromatase Inhibit | 2021 |
Approaching Use of CDK4/6 Inhibitors in Metastatic HR+, HER2- Breast Cancer.
Topics: Aminopyridines; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Aromatase Inhibitors; Benzimidazoles | 2018 |
Real-world clinical outcomes and toxicity in metastatic breast cancer patients treated with palbociclib and endocrine therapy.
Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Breast Neoplasms; Clinical Trials as Topic; Combined Mod | 2019 |
Real-World Treatment Patterns and Clinical Outcomes in Patients Receiving Palbociclib for Hormone Receptor-Positive, Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Negative Advanced or Metastatic Breast Cancer in Argentina: The IRIS Study.
Topics: Adult; Age Factors; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Argenti | 2019 |
Quantitative ER and PgR assessment as predictors of benefit from lapatinib in postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer.
Topics: Adult; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Biomarkers, Tumor; Breast Neoplasms; Disease- | 2014 |
Symptoms of endocrine treatment and outcome in the BIG 1-98 study.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal; Breast Neoplasms; Drug-Related Side Effects and Advers | 2014 |
[An elderly patient with advanced breast cancer who responded to treatment with letrozole-a case report].
Topics: Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Agents; Breast Neoplasms; Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast; Female; Human | 2013 |
Clinical and laboratory patterns during immune stimulation in hormone responsive metastatic breast cancer.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Breast Neoplasms; Ca | 2014 |
Palbociclib for the Treatment of Estrogen Receptor-Positive, HER2-Negative Metastatic Breast Cancer.
Topics: Aromatase Inhibitors; Biomarkers, Tumor; Breast Neoplasms; Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 4; Disease-Free S | 2015 |
Everolimus in Metastatic Breast Cancer: Clinical Experience as a Late Treatment Line.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Androstadienes; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Brea | 2015 |
[Efficacies of aromatase inhibitors in the treatment of hormone dependent metastatic breast cancer in postmenopausal women: a report of 148 cases].
Topics: Anastrozole; Androstadienes; Aromatase Inhibitors; Breast Neoplasms; Disease-Free Survival; Female; | 2015 |
A global economic model to assess the cost-effectiveness of new treatments for advanced breast cancer in Canada.
Topics: Anastrozole; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Breast Neoplasms | 2016 |
Self-renewal of CD133(hi) cells by IL6/Notch3 signalling regulates endocrine resistance in metastatic breast cancer.
Topics: AC133 Antigen; Anastrozole; Androstadienes; Animals; Antigens, CD; Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal; | 2016 |
Circulating oxysterol metabolites as potential new surrogate markers in patients with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer: Results of the OXYTAM study.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Androstadienes; Aromatase; Aromatase Inhibitors; Biomarkers; Body Mass Index; Breast Ne | 2017 |
Efficacy of Letrozole as First-Line Treatment of Postmenopausal Women with Hormone Receptor-Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer in Korea.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Agents; Aromatase Inhibitors; Biomarkers, Tumor; Brea | 2017 |
The aromatase inhibitor letrozole and inhibitors of insulin-like growth factor I receptor synergistically induce apoptosis in in vitro models of estrogen-dependent breast cancer.
Topics: Apoptosis; Aromatase Inhibitors; Breast Neoplasms; Cell Line, Tumor; Cell Proliferation; Estrogens; | 2008 |
Sustained effect of the aromatase inhibitors anastrozole and letrozole on endometrial thickness in patients with endometrial hyperplasia and endometrial carcinoma.
Topics: Aged; Anastrozole; Antineoplastic Agents; Aromatase Inhibitors; Carcinoma; Disease Progression; Endo | 2009 |
Hormonal therapy with letrozole prior to surgical management of recurrent metastatic low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma (LGESS).
Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Endometrial Neoplasms; Female; Humans; Letrozole; Middle Aged; Neoplasm Metas | 2009 |
Aromatase inhibition in male breast cancer patients: biological and clinical implications.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anastrozole; Androstadienes; Antineoplastic Agents; Aromatase; Aroma | 2010 |
Effect of letrozole on plasma lipids, triglycerides, and estradiol in postmenopausal women with metastatic breast cancer.
Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Agents; Breast Neoplasms; Estradiol; Estrogens; Female; Huma | 2010 |
[A case of secondary inflammatory breast cancer with multiple metastases in which operation was possible through letrozole monotherapy].
Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Biopsy, Needle; Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast; Catheter Ablation; Combined Modali | 2011 |
Single nucleotide polymorphisms of CYP19A1 predict clinical outcomes and adverse events associated with letrozole in patients with metastatic breast cancer.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Aromatase; Breast Neoplasms; Disease Progression; Female; Humans | 2011 |
Effective role of hormonal therapy in metastatic primary neuroendocrine breast carcinoma.
Topics: Aromatase Inhibitors; Breast Neoplasms; Carcinoma, Neuroendocrine; Diagnosis, Differential; Female; | 2011 |
Letrozole's superiority over progestins and tamoxifen challenges standards of care in endocrine therapy for metastatic breast cancer.
Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal; Breast Neoplasms; Cross-Over Studies; Double | 2002 |
[Complete remission obtained with letrozole in a man with metastatic breast cancer].
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Aromatase Inhibitors; Breast Neoplasms, Male; Humans; Letrozole; Male; | 2004 |
Toxic epidermal necrolysis in patient with breast cancer receiving letrozole.
Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Breast Neoplasms; Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast; Fatal Outcome; Female; Humans; L | 2006 |
Does survival increase in metastatic breast cancer with recently available anticancer drugs?
Topics: Aged; Anastrozole; Androstadienes; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal; Breast Ne | 2006 |
Cost-effectiveness of extended adjuvant letrozole therapy after 5 years of adjuvant tamoxifen therapy in postmenopausal women with early-stage breast cancer.
Topics: Adult; Age Factors; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal; Antineoplastic Combine | 2006 |
High circulating HER2 extracellular domain levels correlate with reduced efficacy of an aromatase inhibitor in hormone receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer: a confirmatory prospective study.
Topics: Aromatase Inhibitors; Breast Neoplasms; Cohort Studies; Female; Humans; Letrozole; Neoplasm Metastas | 2007 |
Letrozole for the treatment of pretreated advanced breast cancer patients: preliminary report.
Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Antineoplastic Agents; Breast Neoplasms; Female; Humans; Letrozole; Mid | 2000 |
Letrozole in second-line therapy of advanced breast cancer: more questions than answers.
Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Aromatase Inhibitors; Breast Neoplasms; Canada; Clinical Trials, Phase III as | 2001 |