lenvatinib and Non-alcoholic-Fatty-Liver-Disease

Atezolizumab plus bevacizumab and lenvatinib have not been compared in a randomised controlled trial. We conducted a retrospective multi-centre study to compare the clinical efficacy and safety of lenvatinib and atezolizumab with bevacizumab as a first-line treatment for patients with unresectable HCC in the real-world scenario.. Clinical features of lenvatinib and atezolizumab plus bevacizumab patients were balanced through inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) methodology, which weights patients' characteristics and measured outcomes of each patient in both treatment arms. Overall survival (OS) was the primary end-point.. The analysis included 1341 patients who received lenvatinib, and 864 patients who received atezolizumab plus bevacizumab. After IPTW adjustment, atezolizumab plus bevacizumab did not show a survival advantage over lenvatinib HR 0.97 (p = 0.739). OS was prolonged by atezolizumab plus bevacizumab over lenvatinib in viral patients (HR: 0.76; p = 0.024). Conversely, OS was prolonged by lenvatinib in patients with non-alcoholic steatohepatitis/non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (HR: 1.88; p = 0.014). In the IPTW-adjusted population, atezolizumab plus bevacizumab provided better safety profile for most of the recorded adverse events.. Our study did not identify any meaningful difference in OS between atezolizumab plus bevacizumab and lenvatinib. Although some hints are provided suggesting that patients with non-alcoholic steatohepatitis/non-alcoholic fatty liver disease might benefit more from lenvatinib therapy and patients with viral aetiology more from atezolizumab plus bevacizumab.

Topics: Bevacizumab; Carcinoma, Hepatocellular; Humans; Liver Neoplasms; Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease

Hepatocellular (HCC) is the most common type of primary liver cancer and the fourth most common cause of cancer-related deaths globally.

Topics: Carcinoma, Hepatocellular; Humans; Liver Neoplasms; Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease

To identify predictors of severe adverse events (≥grade 3) in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma treated with lenvatinib.. Of 41 patients, 25 and 16 were stratified into the severe and non-severe adverse events groups, respectively. Of these, 19 formed a lactulose-mannitol test subgroup, which was divided into severe adverse events (n=11) and non-severe adverse events (n=8) groups. Severe adverse events were assessed by liver disease etiology and modified albumin-bilirubin grade. Intestinal permeability by lactulose-mannitol test and serum soluble CD163, soluble mannose receptor, and zonulin levels.. Severe adverse event incidence rates were higher in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma related to alcoholic liver disease and nonalcoholic fatty-liver disease than in those with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma of other etiologies (p=0.014). The rates were higher for modified albumin-bilirubin grades 2a and 2b compared to modified albumin-bilirubin grade 1 (p=0.0104). Zonulin levels were higher in the severe adverse event group (p=0.0331) and were independently associated with severe adverse events (odds ratio=140, 95% confidence interval=1.66-11800; p=0.029). Patients with high zonulin levels (≥0.518 ng/ml) experienced more severe adverse events than those with low levels (<0.518 ng/ml) (p=0.0137). In the lactulose-mannitol test subgroup, the urine lactulose:mannitol ratio was higher in the severe vs. non-severe adverse event group (p=0.0164). Moreover, it was higher in patients with alcoholic liver disease and nonalcoholic fatty-liver disease-related advanced hepatocellular carcinoma compared to those with other advanced hepatocellular carcinoma etiologies (p=0.0108).. Serum zonulin levels predict severe adverse events in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma treated with lenvatinib.

Topics: Albumins; Bilirubin; Carcinoma, Hepatocellular; Humans; Lactulose; Liver Diseases, Alcoholic; Liver Neoplasms; Mannitol; Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease; Phenylurea Compounds; Quinolines

A growing body of evidence suggests that non-viral hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) might benefit less from immunotherapy.. We carried out a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data from consecutive patients with non-viral advanced HCC, treated with atezolizumab plus bevacizumab, lenvatinib, or sorafenib, in 36 centers in 4 countries (Italy, Japan, Republic of Korea, and UK). The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS) with atezolizumab plus bevacizumab versus lenvatinib. Secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) with atezolizumab plus bevacizumab versus lenvatinib, and OS and PFS with atezolizumab plus bevacizumab versus sorafenib. For the primary and secondary endpoints, we carried out the analysis on the whole population first, and then we divided the cohort into two groups: non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD)/non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) population and non-NAFLD/NASH population.. One hundred and ninety patients received atezolizumab plus bevacizumab, 569 patients received lenvatinib, and 210 patients received sorafenib. In the whole population, multivariate analysis showed that treatment with lenvatinib was associated with a longer OS [hazard ratio (HR) 0.65; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.44-0.95; P = 0.0268] and PFS (HR 0.67; 95% CI 0.51-0.86; P = 0.002) compared to atezolizumab plus bevacizumab. In the NAFLD/NASH population, multivariate analysis confirmed that lenvatinib treatment was associated with a longer OS (HR 0.46; 95% CI 0.26-0.84; P = 0.0110) and PFS (HR 0.55; 95% CI 0.38-0.82; P = 0.031) compared to atezolizumab plus bevacizumab. In the subgroup of non-NAFLD/NASH patients, no difference in OS or PFS was observed between patients treated with lenvatinib and those treated with atezolizumab plus bevacizumab. All these results were confirmed following propensity score matching analysis. By comparing patients receiving atezolizumab plus bevacizumab versus sorafenib, no statistically significant difference in survival was observed.. The present analysis conducted on a large number of advanced non-viral HCC patients showed for the first time that treatment with lenvatinib is associated with a significant survival benefit compared to atezolizumab plus bevacizumab, in particular in patients with NAFLD/NASH-related HCC.

Topics: Bevacizumab; Carcinoma, Hepatocellular; Humans; Liver Neoplasms; Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease; Propensity Score; Retrospective Studies; Sorafenib

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) treatment remains a big challenge in the field of oncology. The liver disease (viral or not viral) underlying HCC turned out to be crucial in determining the biologic behavior of the tumor, including its response to treatment. The aim of this analysis was to investigate the role of the etiology of the underlying liver disease in survival outcomes.. We conducted a multicenter retrospective study on a large cohort of patients treated with lenvatinib as first-line therapy for advanced HCC from both Eastern and Western institutions. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed.. Among the 1232 lenvatinib-treated HCC patients, 453 (36.8%) were hepatitis C virus positive, 268 hepatitis B virus positive (21.8%), 236 nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) correlate (19.2%) and 275 had other etiologies (22.3%). The median progression-free survival (mPFS) was 6.2 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 5.9-6.7 months] and the median overall survival (mOS) was 15.8 months (95% CI 14.9-17.2 months). In the univariate analysis for OS NASH-HCC was associated with longer mOS [22.2 versus 15.1 months; hazard ratio (HR) 0.69; 95% CI 0.56-0.85; P = 0.0006]. In the univariate analysis for PFS NASH-HCC was associated with longer mPFS (7.5 versus 6.5 months; HR 0.84; 95% CI 0.71-0.99; P = 0.0436). The multivariate analysis confirmed NASH-HCC (HR 0.64; 95% CI 0.48-0.86; P = 0.0028) as an independent prognostic factor for OS, along with albumin-bilirubin (ALBI) grade, extrahepatic spread, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, portal vein thrombosis, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status and alpha-fetoprotein. An interaction test was performed between sorafenib and lenvatinib cohorts and the results highlighted the positive predictive role of NASH in favor of the lenvatinib arm (P = 0.0047).. NASH has been identified as an independent prognostic factor in a large cohort of patients with advanced HCC treated with lenvatinib, thereby suggesting the role of the etiology in the selection of patients for tyrosine kinase treatment. If validated, this result could provide new insights useful to improve the management of these patients.

Topics: Carcinoma, Hepatocellular; Humans; Liver Neoplasms; Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease; Phenylurea Compounds; Prognosis; Quinolines; Retrospective Studies