ledipasvir and Hepatitis-C--Chronic

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is an independent risk factor associated with adverse outcomes in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD). Due to the wide variety of direct-acting antiviral regimens (DAAs) and the factor of renal insufficiency, careless selection of anti-hepatitis C treatment can lead to treatment failure and safety problems. The integrated evidence for optimized therapies for these patients is lacking. This study would conduct comparisons of different DAAs and facilitate clinical decision-making.. We conducted a systematic literature search in multiple databases (PubMed, Ovid, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science) up to 7 August 2023. Study data that contained patient characteristics, study design, treatment regimens, intention-to-treat sustained virologic response (SVR), and adverse event (AE) data per regimen were extracted into a structured electronic database and analyzed. The network meta-analysis of the estimation was performed by the Bayesian Markov Chain Monte Carlo methods.. Our search identified 5,278 articles; removing the studies with duplicates and ineligible criteria, a total of 62 studies (comprising 4,554 patients) were included. Overall, the analyses contained more than 2,489 male individuals, at least 202 patients with cirrhosis, and no less than 2,377 patients under hemodialysis. Network meta-analyses of the DAAs found that receiving ombitasvir (OBV)/paritaprevir (PTV)/ritonavir (R) plus dasabuvir (DSV), glecaprevir (G)/pibrentasvir (P), and sofosbuvir (SOF)/ledipasvir (LDV) ranked as the top three efficacy factors for the HCV-infected ESRD patients. Stratified by genotype, the G/P would prioritize genotype 1 and 2 patients with 98.9%-100% SVR, the SOF/DCV regimen had the greatest SVR rates (98.7%; 95% CI, 93.0%-100.0%) in genotype 3, and the OBV/PTV/R regimen was the best choice for genotype 4, with the highest SVR of 98.1% (95% CI, 94.4%-99.9%). In the pan-genotypic DAAs comparison, the G/P regimen showed the best pooled SVR of 99.4% (95% CI, 98.6%-100%). DAA regimens without Ribavirin or SOF showed the lowest rates of AEs (49.9%; 95% CI, 38.4%-61.5%) in HCV-infected ESRD patients.. The G/P could be recommended as the best option for the treatment of pan-genotypic HCV-infected ESRD patients. The OBV/PTV/R plus DSV, SOF/Velpatasvir (VEL), SOF/Ledipasvir (LDV), and SOF/DCV would be reliable alternatives for HCV treatment with comparable efficacy and safety profiles.. https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/#searchadvanced, PROSPERO: CRD42021242359.

Topics: Antiviral Agents; Bayes Theorem; Hepacivirus; Hepatitis C; Hepatitis C, Chronic; Humans; Kidney Failure, Chronic; Male; Network Meta-Analysis; Ritonavir; Treatment Outcome

Hepatitis C treatment has changed considerably in recent years, and many interferon (IFN)-free therapies are now available. Considering the high rates of sustained virological response (SVR) presented by clinical trials for these treatments, high rates of effectiveness are also expected in real-world clinical practice. Hence, this study aimed to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational cohort studies to evaluate the clinical effectiveness and safety of IFN-free therapies for hepatitis C.. The search was performed in four electronic databases and included cohort studies that evaluated IFN-free schemes and provided data on SVR at 12 weeks after the end of treatment (SVR12) as the primary outcome. Overall and subgroup meta-analyses of patients' clinical conditions (e.g. co-infection with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), cirrhosis, liver transplant, specific genotypes, and other conditions) were performed.. Sixty-eight studies encompassing a total of 24,151 patients were included for quantitative and qualitative analyses, evaluating six treatments: sofosbuvir with ledipasvir, daclatasvir, or simeprevir; daclatasvir with asunaprevir; paritaprevir/ritonavir in combination with ombitasvir and dasabuvir; and sofosbuvir with ribavirin. The overall analysis showed SVR rates of 88-96% for all treatments except sofosbuvir combined with ribavirin, which had SVR rates of approximately 80%. The results of subgroup analyses showed that the genotype 3 virus appears to be the most difficult to treat.. In order to choose the best treatment option, it is necessary to consider the patients' conditions and characteristics. In conclusion, the use of IFN-free therapies meets the high expectations created by clinical trials, including patients in special clinical conditions.

Topics: 2-Naphthylamine; Anilides; Antiviral Agents; Benzimidazoles; Carbamates; Cohort Studies; Cyclopropanes; Drug Therapy, Combination; Fluorenes; Hepacivirus; Hepatitis C, Chronic; Humans; Interferons; Lactams, Macrocyclic; Macrocyclic Compounds; Male; Middle Aged; Proline; Ribavirin; Ritonavir; Simeprevir; Sofosbuvir; Sulfonamides; Sustained Virologic Response; Treatment Outcome; Uracil; Valine

Topics: Benzimidazoles; Carbamates; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Interactions; Fluorenes; Hepatitis C, Chronic; Humans; Imidazoles; Isoquinolines; Kidney; Protease Inhibitors; Pyrrolidines; Sofosbuvir; Sulfonamides; Valine

Ledipasvir with sofosbuvir (LED/SOF) for the treatment of patients infected with genotype 1 hepatitis C virus can be used with or without ribavirin (RBV). RBV is well known to promote significant adverse events (AE). The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of treatment with LED/SOF, with or without RBV, in patients infected with hepatitis C virus genotype 1.. We performed a systematic review followed by a pairwise meta-analysis including randomized controlled trials that reported efficacy (rapid virological response, sustained virological response at 4 and 12 weeks post-treatment (SVR4 and 12), and viral relapse) and safety outcomes (any AE, serious AE, discontinuation owing to AE, anemia, and rash). It was performed a subgroup analysis evaluating the SVR12 including only cirrhotic patients. Results were reported as risk ratios (RR) and with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI).. Seven randomized controlled trials were analyzed. LED/SOF with RBV showed a worse safety profile when compared with LED/SOF without RBV for the following outcomes: any AE (RR 0.56 [95% CI 0.46-0.69]), anemia (RR 0.08 [95% CI 0.04-0.17]), and rash (RR 0.35 [95% CI 0.19-0.65]). No significant differences were observed regarding serious AE, rapid virological response, SVR4, SVR12, or viral relapse. The subgroup analysis did not show significant differences between either treatment groups.. Administration of LED/SOF + RBV to treatment-naïve patients with or without cirrhosis, and non-cirrhotic treatment-experienced patients, did not promote significant additional benefits. Furthermore, it is still unclear whether cirrhotic treatment-experienced patients could benefit from combined therapy.

Topics: Antiviral Agents; Benzimidazoles; Databases, Bibliographic; Drug Therapy, Combination; Fluorenes; Genotype; Hepacivirus; Hepatitis C, Chronic; Humans; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Ribavirin; Sofosbuvir; Treatment Outcome

Eight weeks duration of ledipasvir/sofosbuvir (LDV/SOF) can be considered in genotype 1 hepatitis C virus-infected patients who are treatment-naive, do not have cirrhosis, and have a pretreatment viral load <6,000,000 IU/mL. The effectiveness of this regimen, however, has not been fully confirmed by real-world experience. Using data from real-world cohorts, we aimed to determine the effectiveness of 8 weeks of LDV/SOF treatment, examine variables associated with relapse after treatment with this regimen, and compare the effectiveness of 8 weeks and 12 weeks of LDV/SOF treatment. To evaluate the effectiveness of 8 weeks of therapy and characteristics associated with relapse, we used individual patient data from the IFI (Institut für Interdisziplinäre Medizin), Burman's Pharmacy, and Kaiser Permanente Southern California. All patients had fibrosis staging assessed with biopsy, transient elastography, or serum biomarkers. We also performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of six additional real-world cohorts, to compare effectiveness of 8 weeks to 12 weeks duration. In our pooled data analysis, 634 patients were treated for 8 weeks with LDV/SOF, of whom all had outcomes of cure or relapse without loss to follow-up. Per protocol rates of sustained virologic response at 12 weeks were 98.1% (622/634) in the full cohort and 97.9% (571/583) among treatment-eligible patients. Exact logistic regression revealed no specific patient characteristics associated with relapse. Our meta-analysis of six additional real-world cohorts, comprised of 5,637 patients, demonstrated similar risk for relapse between 8 weeks and 12 weeks of LDV/SOF (relative risk = 0.99, 95% confidence interval 0.98-1.00).. An 8-week duration of treatment with LDV/SOF is highly effective in properly selected patients; greater use of this regimen is recommended. (Hepatology 2017;65:1094-1103).

Topics: Adult; Benzimidazoles; Biopsy, Needle; Cohort Studies; Confidence Intervals; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Fluorenes; Follow-Up Studies; Genotype; Hepacivirus; Hepatitis C, Chronic; Humans; Immunohistochemistry; Male; Middle Aged; Patient Selection; Predictive Value of Tests; Recurrence; Risk Assessment; Severity of Illness Index; Sofosbuvir; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

The addition of ribavirin (RBV) to the combination treatment of Ledipasvir (LDV) and Sofosbuvir (SOF) remains controversial in the treatment of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. We performed a meta-analysis to assess the efficacy and safety of the LDV-SOF with and without RBV in treating HCV genotype 1 patients.. The electronical databases of PubMed Medline, EMBASE database, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) and ClinicalTrials.gov website with registered trials were searched. Eligible studies were randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and prospective cohort studies that assessed the efficacy and safety of LDV-SOF with or without RBV in patients with HCV genotype 1 (GT 1). Two reviewers independently screened studies, extracted data and assessed methodology quality. Review Manager 5.3 software was used to analyze the data.. Seven studies involving 2,626 patients with HCV GT 1 - some of whom had cirrhosis - were included in this meta-analysis. The addition of RBV to LDV- SOF regimen neither significantly improved sustained viral response at 12 weeks (SVR12) after the last dose of treatment (RR=1.00, 95%CI 0.99-1.01, p=0.99) nor decreased virologic breakthrough (RR=1.01, 95%CI 0.14-7.19, p=0.99) and relapse (RR=1.36, 95% CI 0.81-2.29, p=0.24). There was no significant difference in the incidence of discontinuation (RR=0.61, 95%CI 0.25-1.53, p=0.30) between LDV- SOF therapy and LDV- SOF plus RBV. LDV- SOF plus RBV therapy had significantly higher rate of the overall adverse events (RR=0.88, 95%CI=0.84- 0.92, p<0.00001). LDV - SOF therapy had higher incidence of serious adverse events (RR=1.60, 95%CI=1.00-2.56, p=0.05) than LDV-SOF plus RBV.. This meta-analysis suggests that LDV-SOF based therapy is a safe and effective treatment for patients with GT 1 HCV. The addition of RBV to LDV-SOF may increase toxicity without achieving improved efficacy. However, due to the relatively small sample sizes and moderate risk of bias of included studies, large-scale and high-quality clinical research is still needed to confirm the results.

Topics: Antiviral Agents; Benzimidazoles; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Fluorenes; Genotype; Hepacivirus; Hepatitis C, Chronic; Humans; Liver Cirrhosis; Male; Middle Aged; Prospective Studies; Ribavirin; Sofosbuvir; Treatment Outcome

Membranous nephropathy (MN) is the most common cause of nephrotic syndrome in adults. As many clinical cases have reported, it may be associated with hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. Antiviral therapy can be various.. We report a case of patient with chronic HCV infection and MN, who presented with was proteinuria. He was treated with ledipasvir and sofosbuvir (Harvoni; Gilead Sciences, Foster City, CA) and was found to be virus-free.. We have reported this case to provide insight into whether Ledipasvir-Sofosbuvir should be administered for HCV-related glomerulonephritis.

Topics: Aged; Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Antiviral Agents; Benzimidazoles; Drug Therapy, Combination; Fluorenes; Glomerulonephritis, Membranous; Hepacivirus; Hepatitis C, Chronic; Humans; Male; Prednisolone; Prognosis; Sofosbuvir

Current all-oral interferon-free regimens offer sustained virological response (SVR) rates above 90% as well as 12-week treatment durations for the majority of patients with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV), including treatment-naïve and -experienced patients with or without cirrhosis. There are multiple direct-acting antiviral (DAA) combinations that can be selected to optimize efficacy and safety outcomes. Each of them can be tailored according to different parameters including the use of ribarivin (RBV). For sofosbuvir (SOF)-based combinations, RBV is useful in the following situations: HCV genotype 1, treatment-experienced, cirrhotic patients, or patients with decompensated cirrhosis, and HCV genotype 3, cirrhotic patients. In these situations the addition of RBV allows to shorten the treatment to 12weeks in the majority of cases and therefore decreases the cost of the treatment. The need of RBV remains to be determined in cirrhotic patients with a SOF plus simeprevir regimen. RBV-containing regimens are recommended in all HCV genotype 1a patients who receive the 3-DAA combination: paritaprevir/r, ombitasvir, dasabuvir. Globally, the addition of RBV to the different combinations of DAA increases slightly the risk of anaemia. However severe anaemia was rare and easily manageable with RBV dose reduction without any impact on SVR. In practice, because RBV is cheap and well tolerated when combined with interferon-free regimen, it remains a useful tool to fine tune anti-HCV treatment regimens and optimize their results.

Topics: Antiviral Agents; Benzimidazoles; Carbamates; Cyclopropanes; Drug Therapy, Combination; Fluorenes; Genotype; Hepacivirus; Hepatitis C, Chronic; Humans; Imidazoles; Lactams, Macrocyclic; Macrocyclic Compounds; Proline; Pyrrolidines; Ribavirin; Simeprevir; Sofosbuvir; Sulfonamides; Valine

This review summarizes published data on sofosbuvir-based regimens for patients infected with HCV GT1 with a focus on evaluating the optimal and possible durations of treatment.. PubMed and conference abstract books published between 2011-2015 were searched.. HCV treatment has decreased from 24 week regimens to studies done as short as 4 weeks. History of prior treatment or cirrhosis have consistently shown lower SVR12 rates with shorter duration therapies. Low cure rates have been seen in patients within 4 week trials, however, select patients with low fibrosis scores, low HCV VL and HCV GT-1b have moderate cure rates.. Most patients will require 12-24 weeks of therapy. Further studies are needed to elucidate the predictors of treatment response to short duration therapies and optimal combination of DAAs.

Topics: Antiviral Agents; Benzimidazoles; Disease Management; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Therapy, Combination; Fluorenes; Genotype; Hepacivirus; Hepatitis C, Chronic; Humans; Liver Cirrhosis; Ribavirin; RNA, Viral; Sofosbuvir; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Viral Load

There has been a revolution in the treatment of chronic hepatitis C. Several oral regimens combining direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) from different families [NS5B nucleotide inhibitors, NS5B non-nucleoside inhibitors, NS5A replication complex inhibitors and NS3/4A protease inhibitors (PI)] have been developed. These regimens result in an increase in sustained virological response (SVR) rates to above 90% and reduce the duration of treatment to 12 weeks or less. As of 2016 several regimens will be approved with additive potencies, without cross-resistance and with a good safety profile. Remaining issues will include increasing screening and access to care so that HCV may become the first chronic viral infection eradicated worldwide. This review summarizes results obtained with oral DAA combinations that have been approved and/or have completed phase 3 clinical trials for HCV infection and discusses future perspectives.

Topics: 2-Naphthylamine; Amides; Anilides; Antiviral Agents; Benzimidazoles; Benzofurans; Carbamates; Cyclopropanes; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Fluorenes; Genotype; Hepacivirus; Hepatitis C, Chronic; Heterocyclic Compounds, 4 or More Rings; Humans; Imidazoles; Lactams, Macrocyclic; Macrocyclic Compounds; Proline; Protease Inhibitors; Quinoxalines; Sofosbuvir; Sulfonamides; Uracil; Valine; Viral Nonstructural Proteins

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) is a chronic infection that disproportionately impacts people living with HIV. In the past, HCV therapy was less effective in individuals with HIV co-infection. However, the advent of direct-acting antivirals has revolutionized HCV treatment with high rates of success in patients both with and without HIV.. In this paper, we review the evidence supporting the use of ledipasvir and sofosbuvir (LDV/SOF) for the treatment of HCV in patients with HIV co-infection. Articles searchable on MEDLINE/PubMed were reviewed to provide context for use of LDV/SOF in individuals with HCV and HIV co-infection.. This treatment is highly effective in achieving HCV cure or sustained virologic response, however further studies need to done to address efficacy of treatment in people with uncontrolled HIV, concerns regarding drug-interactions with antiretroviral therapy, and potential for shorter duration treatment.

Topics: Antiviral Agents; Benzimidazoles; Coinfection; Drug Interactions; Drug Resistance, Viral; Drug Therapy, Combination; Fluorenes; Hepatitis C, Chronic; HIV Infections; Humans; Sofosbuvir

During the past couple of years, the regulatory authorities have approved seven new direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) for the treatment of chronic hepatitis C (CHC). In 2014, the US FDA approved the fixed dose combination of ledipasvir (LDV) plus sofosbuvir (SOF) for the treatment of genotype (GT) 1 HCV and the European Commission Granted its marketing authorization to treat patients with GT1 and 4. This regimen showed outstanding rates of virologic response along with a favorable safety profile with a very low rate of both virologic failure and treatment discontinuation.. In this review, we sought to review the pharmacokinetics, clinical efficacy and safety profile pertaining to LDV/SOF combination in treatment of CHC with special emphasis on phase III clinical trials.. In all phase III trials, the 12-week course of this new interferon (IFN)-sparing regimen has delivered high virologic cure rates among patient with GT1 and 4 both treatment-naïve and - experienced Data about its effectiveness in patients under 18 years of age, end-stage renal disease and patients with significant other organ involvement are eagerly awaited.

Topics: Antiviral Agents; Benzimidazoles; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Drug Therapy, Combination; Fluorenes; Hepacivirus; Hepatitis C, Chronic; Humans; Safety; Sofosbuvir

The objective of this study was to compare the efficacy of sofosbuvir-based treatments in patients with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection using a model-based meta-analysis (MBMA). A bibliographic search was performed to identify clinical trials involving sofosbuvir as a unique direct-acting antiviral (DAA) agent or together with daclatasvir, ledipasvir or simeprevir for the treatment of diagnosed HCV infection. The time course of the virological response (VR) was modelled to estimate the effect of treatment and the influence of population characteristics on the longitudinal efficacy profile. The model was validated and simulations of 10 different treatment schedules were performed. Data from 19 clinical trials were included in the analysis. According to the developed model, therapy with sofosbuvir+ledipasvir is the most effective therapy in all scenarios, but it does not differ greatly in terms of sustained VR with respect to other combinations of DAA treatments. In conclusion, this MBMA generates knowledge regarding hypothetical head-to-head trials that have not been conducted previously. Therapies with sofosbuvir+ledipasvir are probably the most effective sofosbuvir-based treatments.

Topics: Antiviral Agents; Benzimidazoles; Carbamates; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Fluorenes; Hepacivirus; Hepatitis C, Chronic; Humans; Imidazoles; Male; Models, Theoretical; Pyrrolidines; Simeprevir; Sofosbuvir; Valine

Chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 1 historically has been the most difficult to treat HCV genotype, and patients infected with this genotype had been previously treated with interferon-based therapy. In recent years, however, treatment options for chronic HCV infection have rapidly changed to an all-oral regimen. Ledipasvir-sofosbuvir is an oral fixed-dose (ledipasvir 90 mg-sofosbuvir 400 mg) combination of two direct-acting antiviral drugs. Four phase 3 clinical trials (ION-1-4) evaluated ledipasvir-sofosbuvir with and without ribavirin in patients with HCV genotype 1. High rates of sustained virologic response (SVR) occurred with ledipasvir-sofosbuvir alone in treatment-naïve and treatment-experienced patients without cirrhosis as well as in treatment-naïve patients with cirrhosis when administered for 12 weeks. In treatment-experienced patients with cirrhosis, 24 weeks of ledipasvir-sofosbuvir was also highly effective. Furthermore, treatment-naïve patients without cirrhosis (particularly those with HCV RNA serum concentrations < 6 million IU/ml) can achieve a similar SVR with only 8 weeks of therapy. Similarly, in patients coinfected with human immunodeficiency virus and HCV genotype 1 who were treated with ledipasvir-sofosbuvir for 12 weeks, a high SVR was observed in those with and without cirrhosis as well as treatment-naïve and treatment-experienced patients. Ledipasvir-sofosbuvir is well tolerated, with fatigue, headache, nausea, diarrhea, and insomnia being the most common adverse effects, which are typically mild to moderate in nature. This combination antiviral can be taken with or without food. Key factors to consider when prescribing ledipasvir-sofosbuvir are drug interactions including those mediated by the P-glycoprotein transporter and increased pH, cost of the drug or insurance coverage, comorbid conditions, and patient and provider preferences. Postmarketing experience and ongoing clinical trials will further define the safety and role of ledipasvir-sofosbuvir in the treatment of HCV genotype 1.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Benzimidazoles; Drug Combinations; Fluorenes; Genotype; Hepatitis C, Chronic; Humans; Sofosbuvir

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 4 accounts for 8-13% of all chronic HCV infections worldwide. Patients with HCV genotype 4 have been reported to have poor treatment responses to PEGylated interferon and ribavirin regimens. Recently a single tablet, fixed-dose combination of sofosbuvir, an RNA-directed RNA polymerase (NS5B) inhibitor, and ledipasvir, a nonstructural protein 5A (NS5A) inhibitor, has been approved for treatment of chronic HCV infection. Two studies using the fixed-dose combination in chronic HCV genotype 4 for 12 weeks reported sustained virologic response rates at 12 weeks (SVR12) of 93-95%. Data also support the use of ledipasvir/sofosbuvir in chronic HCV genotype 4 and HIV co-infection. Administered as a single once-daily oral regimen, this ribavirin- and interferon-free regimen is well tolerated, with low potential for adverse effects and represents a significant advancement in the treatment of chronic HCV genotype 4 infection.

Topics: Antiviral Agents; Benzimidazoles; Clinical Trials as Topic; Drug Combinations; Drug Interactions; Fluorenes; Genotype; Hepacivirus; Hepatitis C, Chronic; Humans; Sofosbuvir

Chronic infection with HCV can rapidly progress to cirrhosis leading to increased mortality rates in immunosuppressed organ-transplanted patients. In liver-transplanted patients, the introduction of directly acting antivirals has modified HCV natural history by providing a safe and effective therapy for this group of patients. To date there are no data on safety and efficacy of IFN-free regimens in HCV patients who received lung transplant (LuT).. We report three patients who have received anti-HCV treatment after LuT with Sofosbuvir-based regimens.. All patients achieved a SVR, no unexpected safety signals were observed and no modifications in immunosuppressants were required.. Our report is the first to show that HCV patients who underwent LuT can be safely treated with IFN-free regimens, thus opening the door for refined clinical management of this category of patients.

Topics: Adult; Antiviral Agents; Benzimidazoles; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Fluorenes; Hepacivirus; Hepatitis C, Chronic; Humans; Lung Transplantation; Middle Aged; Ribavirin; Sofosbuvir; Treatment Outcome

Sofosbuvir and ledipasvir with or without ribavirin (RBV) regimens (SLR vs. SL) have exhibited promising results for the treatment of patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 1 infection.. To comprehensively compare the efficacy and safety of the SL and SLR regimen for the treatment of chronic HCV genotype 1 infections.. The Cochrane Library, PubMed, Web of Science, and EMBASE databases were searched. Only RCTs that compared the efficacy and safety of SL or SLR regimen for the treatment of chronic HCV genotype 1 infection were included. The primary outcome measures were the sustained virological response weeks 12 (SVR12) post-treatment and adverse events (AEs).. Seven studies comprising 2601 patients were included. Compared with the SL regimen, SLR yielded a similar probability of having an SVR12 (RR 1.002, 95 % CI 0.998, 1.017, P = 0.780). Based on subgroup analyses, the addition of RBV to the 8-week SL regimen improved the SVR12 rate. However, the SLR regimen for 12 or 24 weeks did not show a superior SVR12 rate regardless of treatment history and the presence or absence of cirrhosis. The pooled incidence of AEs was higher in patients that received the SLR treatment regimen (RR 1.140, 95 % CI 1.095, 1.187, P = 0.000).. The 12-week or 24-week SL regimen with a low incidence of AEs is as effective and well tolerated as the SLR regimen for the treatment of patients with chronic HCV genotype 1 infection.

Topics: Antiviral Agents; Benzimidazoles; Drug Therapy, Combination; Fluorenes; Genotype; Hepacivirus; Hepatitis C, Chronic; Humans; Ribavirin; Sofosbuvir; Sustained Virologic Response; Treatment Outcome

BACKGROUND Hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 4 (GT-4) is widespread in the Middle East, where it is responsible for the majority of HCV infections. It shows moderate treatment response rates when compared to other genotypes in the current era of interferon-based regimens. However, in the era of direct acting antiviral (DAA) drugs, its response is at least as good as observed for HCV genotypes 1-3. CASE REPORT We present a case of a 44-year-old patient with HCV cirrhosis. Since 2007, he has been treated for HCV infection with multiple ineffective regimens of interferon (INF) and ribavirin. A liver biopsy in 2010 revealed stage 5-6/6 indicating cirrhosis, which was later complicated by the occurrence of portal vein thrombosis and a large hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) (maximum diameter 9 cm). The patient was successfully treated with sorafenib, transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE), and radiofrequency ablation. After four TACE procedures, the patient's AFP (alpha-fetoprotein) decreased remarkably and almost normalized. The HCC disappeared radiologically as shown by triple phase CT, MRI with contrast, and PET-CT. He successfully underwent a living donor liver transplantation. Four weeks post liver transplantation he started treatment with sorafenib, and switched from tacrolimus to Rapamune (sirolimus) as immunosuppressant therapy. Ten weeks after liver transplantation, HCV treatment was introduced along with ledipasvir and sofosbuvir due to his increasing liver enzyme levels. A rapid viral response was achieved after 14 days. In total, the patient received 12 weeks of this treatment. CONCLUSIONS This case study might be of significance in informing early management and personalized treatment of patients with recurrent HCV GT-4 infections after liver transplantation, even in complex clinical surroundings.

Topics: Antiviral Agents; Benzimidazoles; Carcinoma, Hepatocellular; Drug Therapy, Combination; Fluorenes; Hepatitis C, Chronic; Humans; Liver Neoplasms; Liver Transplantation; Living Donors; Male; Middle Aged; Sofosbuvir

We used published literature from 2013-2016, to review data regarding the new all oral interferon and ribavirin free direct acting antiviral (DAA's) treatment regimens. Areas covered: Specifically, this paper will address DAA's clinical efficacy, their associated patient reported outcomes, their adherence to treatment, and their cost-effectiveness of treatment using studies from the United States. Expert commentary: The current data suggest that cure and elimination of HCV appears to be on the horizon; however, more research is needed to verify similar results from real world practices. Further, research is also needed to overcome the barriers to treatment (lack of education and awareness of HCV, inadequate diagnosis technology, and lack of access and link to care) in order for the elimination of HCV to be obtained.

Topics: Antiviral Agents; Benzimidazoles; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Fluorenes; Hepatitis C, Chronic; Humans; Medication Adherence; Sofosbuvir; Treatment Outcome; United States

To review the pharmacology, efficacy, and safety of ledipasvir-sofosbuvir for the treatment of chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV).. A literature search through clinicaltrials.gov, EMBASE, and PubMed was conducted (January 1966 to October 2014) using the terms ledipasvir, sofosbuvir, GS-5885, and GS-7977. References from retrieved articles and abstracts presented at recent meetings were reviewed for any additional material. The prescribing information was also reviewed.. Phase 1, 2, and 3 human and animal studies describing the pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, efficacy, and safety of ledipasvir and sofosbuvir for HCV were identified.. Ledipasvir-sofosbuvir, a fixed-dose combination (FDC) tablet inhibiting nonstructural (NS) 5A and 5B proteins, without peginterferon and ribavirin is indicated for adult patients with genotype 1 HCV infection who are treatment naïve or experienced, with or without cirrhosis. Pivotal trials (n = 1952) have demonstrated that once-daily administration of ledipasvir-sofosbuvir for 12 or 24 weeks is effective at achieving sustained virological response (SVR) rates (94%-99%) in treatment-naïve patients (12 weeks), treatment-experienced patients without cirrhosis (12 weeks), and treatment-experienced patients with cirrhosis (24 weeks). Treatment-naïve patients without cirrhosis and baseline viral levels of less than 6 million IU/mL may be considered for 8 weeks of treatment. The most common adverse drug events (ADEs) associated with ledipasvir-sofosbuvir include headache, fatigue, insomnia, nausea, and diarrhea.. Ledipasvir-sofosbuvir is the first interferon- and ribavirin-free FDC agent that has SVR rates much greater than 94%, with minimal ADEs, for the treatment of chronic HCV genotype 1 in naïve and treatment-experienced patients.

Topics: Adult; Animals; Antiviral Agents; Benzimidazoles; Drug Therapy, Combination; Fluorenes; Genotype; Headache; Hepacivirus; Hepatitis C, Chronic; Humans; Interferons; Liver Cirrhosis; Nausea; Ribavirin; Sofosbuvir; Uridine Monophosphate

Over the past year, interferon (IFN) free dosing regimens have become available to treat chronic hepatitis C. Offering high rates of sustained virological response (SVR), short treatment and improved tolerability, IFN-free treatment now represents the paradigm for both treatment-naïve and -experienced patients. Patients with prior treatment failure, in particular those with cirrhosis, still represent some of the most difficult to treat, but the availability of multiple agents that can interrupt several steps of the HCV lifecycle affords providers and patients with options that can be combined and individually tailored to each patient's unique needs to obtain high rates of SVR.

Topics: Antiviral Agents; Benzimidazoles; Carbamates; Drug Therapy, Combination; Fluorenes; Genotype; Hepacivirus; Hepatitis C, Chronic; Humans; Imidazoles; Precision Medicine; Pyrrolidines; Sofosbuvir; Uridine Monophosphate; Valine

The recent October 2014 approval of the fixed dose combination (FDC) of the NS5B polymerase inhibitor sofosbuvir (SOF) and the NS5A inhibitor ledipasvir (LDV) for the treatment of treatment-naive and -experienced HCV genotype 1a/1b (HCV-1) has marked a new era of IFN and ribavirin free treatment for chronic hepatitis C. SOF/LDV combination is approved for 12 weeks in treatment-naive patients with and without cirrhosis. For treatment-experienced patients, it is approved for 12 weeks in patients without cirrhosis but for 24 weeks in patients with cirrhosis. A shorter 8-week course of treatment can be considered for treatment-naive patients who have pretreatment HCV RNA of < 6 million IU/ml and do not have cirrhosis.. The purpose of this synopsis is to review the pharmacotherapy and results of pivotal clinical trials for SOF/LDV as the current standard-of-care for HCV-1 patients. We also briefly discuss emerging data with SOF/LDV for certain special populations. Preliminary data is also emerging for HCV genotypes non-1, but their discussion is beyond the scope of this synopsis. The review was done based on data from Phase I, II and III published studies as well as data presented at major national and international meetings.. The FDC of LDV (90 mg) and SOF (400 mg) has a sustained virologic response of approximately 96% when given as a once-a-day pill for 3 months to both treatment-naive and -experienced HCV-1 patients with the exception of prior null responders with cirrhosis. The latter group of patients also achieves high sustained virologic response of 95% but with therapy for 24 weeks. In addition, emerging data suggest that this FDC regimen may be effective in the treatment of HCV-1 co-infected patients with HIV, HCV-1 and -4, patients with cirrhosis and hepatic decompensation and those with post-liver transplant HCV recurrence.

Topics: Antiviral Agents; Benzimidazoles; Clinical Trials as Topic; Drug Combinations; Fluorenes; Genotype; Hepacivirus; Hepatitis C, Chronic; HIV Infections; Humans; Liver Cirrhosis; Meta-Analysis as Topic; Recurrence; Sofosbuvir; Uridine Monophosphate; Viral Nonstructural Proteins

The single-tablet regimen of the hepatitis C virus (HCV) NS5A inhibitor ledipasvir and the HCV NS5B polymerase inhibitor sofosbuvir (ledipasvir/sofosbuvir; Harvoni(®)) was recently approved in the US and the EU. The phase III ION trials included treatment-naive (ION-1 and -3) or treatment-experienced (ION-2) patients with chronic HCV genotype 1 infection (≈20 % of patients in ION-1 and -2 had cirrhosis, whereas no patient in ION-3 had cirrhosis). A sustained virological response 12 weeks' post-treatment (SVR12) was seen in 99 % of treatment-naive patients receiving ledipasvir/sofosbuvir for 12 weeks in ION-1, with no additional benefit conferred by the addition of ribavirin or extending the treatment duration to 24 weeks. Moreover, in ION-3, an 8-week regimen achieved an SVR12 rate of 94 % overall and 97 % in the subgroup of patients with a baseline HCV RNA level of <6 million IU/mL. SVR12 rates of 94 and 99 % were seen in treatment-experienced patients who received ledipasvir/sofosbuvir for 12 and 24 weeks in ION-2. Data also support the use of ledipasvir/sofosbuvir in chronic HCV genotype 4 infection, in HCV and HIV co-infection and, in combination with ribavirin, in patients with chronic HCV genotype 1 or 4 infection who have decompensated cirrhosis or are liver transplant recipients and in chronic HCV genotype 3 infection. Oral ledipasvir/sofosbuvir was generally well tolerated. In conclusion, ledipasvir/sofosbuvir is an important new single-tablet regimen that represents a significant advance in the treatment of chronic hepatitis C.

Topics: Antiviral Agents; Benzimidazoles; Fluorenes; Hepatitis C, Chronic; Humans; Sofosbuvir

Chronic hepatitis C, without treatment, can cause liver cirrhosis, liver failure and liver cancer. The availability of new oral direct acting antivirals, such as the protease inhibitors simeprevir, asunaprevir and paritaprevir, the NS5A inhibitors daclatasvir, ledipasvir, and ombitasvir, the polymerase inhibitors Sofosbuvir and dasabuvir have resulted an enormous progress in the treatment of chronic hepatitis C, leading to >90% sustained viral response rates. Even the hard-to-treat or previously treatment ineligible patients can be cured with the combination of these drugs. Furthermore the treatment duration is much shorter, and the side effects are minimal. Today, treatment of all hepatitis C virus infected patients is recommended, and the best choices are the interferon-free options. Eradication of hepatitis C virus has become realistic, however, appropriate screening programs are mandatory to achieve this goal.

Topics: 2-Naphthylamine; Administration, Oral; Anilides; Antiviral Agents; Benzimidazoles; Carbamates; Clinical Trials as Topic; Cyclopropanes; Drug Therapy, Combination; Fluorenes; Hepacivirus; Hepatitis C, Chronic; Heterocyclic Compounds, 3-Ring; Humans; Imidazoles; Interferons; Isoquinolines; Lactams, Macrocyclic; Liver Neoplasms; Macrocyclic Compounds; Nucleic Acid Synthesis Inhibitors; Proline; Protease Inhibitors; Pyrrolidines; Simeprevir; Sofosbuvir; Sulfonamides; Uracil; Uridine Monophosphate; Valine; Viral Load; Viral Nonstructural Proteins; Virus Replication

Many herbal medicines are effective anti-inflammatory agents and may therefore suppress the development of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Recently, treatment with a single-tablet regimen containing ledipasvir and sofosbuvir resulted in high rates of sustained virologic response among patients with hepatitis C virus genotype 1 infection who did not respond to prior interferon-based treatment. Patients with chronic hepatitis C are expected to receive this treatment worldwide. However, many patients have hepatitis-like fatty liver and nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. A strategy to prevent the development of HCC in this subgroup of patients is urgently required. Whether herbal medicines can suppress the development of HCC remains to be established. However, herbal medicines are effective anti-inflammatory agents and may inhibit the development of HCC. Clinical trials exploring the effectiveness of herbal medicines in the prevention and treatment of HCC are therefore warranted. The current lack of knowledge and of educational programs is a barrier to increasing the use of potentially effective herbal medicines and performing prospective clinical trials.

Topics: Animals; Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Benzimidazoles; Carcinoma, Hepatocellular; Clinical Trials as Topic; Cysteine; Drug Combinations; Drugs, Chinese Herbal; Fatty Liver; Fluorenes; Glycine; Glycyrrhetinic Acid; Glycyrrhizic Acid; Hepacivirus; Hepatitis C, Chronic; Humans; Liver Neoplasms; Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease; Phytotherapy; Plant Preparations; Sofosbuvir; Tablets

Topics: 2-Naphthylamine; Administration, Oral; Anilides; Antiviral Agents; Benzimidazoles; Carbamates; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Approval; Drug Combinations; Fluorenes; Genotype; Germany; Hepacivirus; Hepatitis C, Chronic; Humans; Interferons; Liver Cirrhosis; Proline; Ribavirin; Ritonavir; Sofosbuvir; Sulfonamides; Uracil; Uridine Monophosphate; Valine

Hepatitis C virus infection is a major health problem worldwide and no vaccine has yet been developed against this virus. In addition, currently approved pharmacotherapies achieve suboptimal cure rates and have side effects that result in non-compliance and premature treatment discontinuation. Significant research has been devoted to developing direct-acting antiviral agents that inhibit key viral functions. In particular, several novel drug candidates that inhibit the viral non-structural protein 5A (NS5A) have been demonstrated to possess high potency, pan-genotypic activity, and a high barrier to resistance. Clinical trials using combination therapies containing NS5A inhibitors have reported results that promise high cure rates and raise the possibility of developing interferon-free, all-oral regimens.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Anilides; Antiviral Agents; Benzimidazoles; Carbamates; Clinical Trials as Topic; Drug Resistance, Viral; Drug Therapy, Combination; Fluorenes; Hepacivirus; Hepatitis C, Chronic; Humans; Imidazoles; Proline; Pyrrolidines; Valine; Viral Nonstructural Proteins

Eliminating hepatitis C virus (HCV) will require effective treatment delivery to persons with substance use disorders (SUDs). We evaluated the relationship between ledipasvir/sofosbuvir treatment persistence (receiving 84 tablets), adherence, and sustained virologic response (SVR) in persons with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)/HCV coinfection.. Of the 144 participants with HIV/HCV and SUDs, 110 initiated a 12-week treatment course under 1 of 3 conditions (usual care, peer mentors, and cash incentives). We used self-report, pharmacy pill counts, and expected date of refill to examine adherence. Persistent participants were categorized as high adherence (taking ≥90% of doses) or low adherence (taking <90% of doses).. Most participants persisted on treatment after initiation (n = 105), with 95% (n = 100) achieving SVR. One third (34%) of participants had moderate/heavy alcohol use by the biomarker phosphatidylethanol ([Peth] ≥50 ng/mL), and 44% had urine toxicology positive for cocaine or heroin at enrollment. The proportion of persons with high adherence was 72% (n = 76), and the proportion of persons with low adherence was 28%. Although low adherence was associated with moderate/heavy alcohol use by PEth (relative risk = 2.77; 95% confidence interval, 1.50-5.12), SVR did not vary according to adherence (P = .702), and most participants (97%) with low adherence achieved SVR.. Treatment persistence led to high SVR rates among persons with HIV/HCV, despite imperfect adherence and SUDs.

Topics: Antiviral Agents; Benzimidazoles; Coinfection; Fluorenes; Hepacivirus; Hepatitis C; Hepatitis C, Chronic; HIV; HIV Infections; Humans; Pharmaceutical Preparations; Sofosbuvir; Substance-Related Disorders; Sustained Virologic Response; Treatment Outcome

In children with hematological malignancies, chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection has been associated with more rapid liver disease progression and higher risk of malignancy relapse due to chemotherapy interruption. We evaluated the safety and efficacy of ledipasvir-sofosbuvir for 12weeks in these patients.. In a phase 2, open-label study, at one site in Egypt, patients ages 12-<18years with chronic HCV genotype 1 or 4 infection undergoing maintenance chemotherapy for hematological malignancies received ledipasvir-sofosbuvir (90 mg/400 mg) once daily for 12weeks. The efficacy endpoint was sustained virologic response 12 weeks after treatment (SVR12). Safety was assessed by the incidence of adverse events and clinical and laboratory data, including HCV flares defined as alanine aminotransferase >3-fold increase from Day 1 and HCV RNA elevation >1 × log10 from Day 1.. Of the 19 adolescents enrolled and treated, median age was 14 years (range 12-17), 84% (16/19) were male, and all had HCV genotype 4 and were HCV treatment naive. All patients completed treatment and achieved SVR12 (19/19, 100%, 95% confidence interval, 82-100). Common adverse events were pyrexia (5/19, 26%), diarrhea (4/19, 21%), and headache (4/19, 21%). Three patients experienced serious adverse events of pneumonia (two patients), and osteoarthritis and diarrhea (one patient); none were considered related to study drug. No patient experienced HCV flares.. Ledipasvir-sofosbuvir was well-tolerated and efficacious in adolescents with chronic HCV genotype 4 and leukemia undergoing maintenance chemotherapy. These data support the use of this interferon and ribavirin-free regimen in adolescents with hematological malignancies.

Topics: Adolescent; Antiviral Agents; Benzimidazoles; Child; Diarrhea; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Fluorenes; Genotype; Hematologic Neoplasms; Hepacivirus; Hepatitis C, Chronic; Humans; Male; Sofosbuvir; Treatment Outcome

COVID-19 is a pandemic disease caused by SARS-CoV-2, which is an RNA virus similar to the hepatitis C virus (HCV) in the replication process. Sofosbuvir/ledipasvir is an approved drug to treat HCV infection. This study investigates the efficacy of Sofosbuvir/ledipasvir as a treatment for patients with moderate COVID-19 infection. This is a single-blinded parallel-randomized controlled trial. The participants were randomized equally into the intervention group that received Sofosbuvir/ledipasvir (S.L. group), and the control group received Oseltamivir, Hydroxychloroquine, and Azithromycin (OCH group). The primary outcomes were the cure rate over time and the incidence of serious adverse events. The secondary outcomes included the laboratory findings. 250 patients were divided equally into each group. Both groups were similar regarding gender, but age was higher in the S.L. group (p=0.001). In the S.L. group, 89 (71.2%) patients were cured, while only 51 (40.8%) patients were cured in the OCH group. The cure rate was significantly higher in the S.L. group (RR=1.75, p<0.001). Kaplan-Meir plot showed a considerably higher cure over time in the S.L. group (Log-rank test, p=0.032). There were no deaths in the S.L. group, but there were six deaths (4.8%) in the OCH group (RR=0.08, p=0.013). Seven patients (5.6%) in the S.L. group and six patients (4.8%) in the OCH group were admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) (RR=1.17, P=0.776). There were no significant differences between treatment groups regarding total leukocyte and neutrophils count, lymph, and urea. Sofosbuvir/ledipasvir is suggestive of being effective in treating patients with moderate COVID-19 infection. Further studies are needed to compare Sofosbuvir/ledipasvir with new treatment protocols.

Topics: Antiviral Agents; Benzimidazoles; COVID-19 Drug Treatment; Drug Therapy, Combination; Egypt; Fluorenes; Genotype; Hepacivirus; Hepatitis C; Hepatitis C, Chronic; Humans; Ribavirin; SARS-CoV-2; Sofosbuvir; Treatment Outcome; Uridine Monophosphate

The PRIORITIZE trial (clinicaltrials.gov: NCT02786537) was the first comparative effectiveness study to directly compare ledipasvir/sofosbuvir (LDV/SOF) and elbasvir/grazoprevir (EBR/GZR) for the treatment of chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV). A secondary aim of this study was to compare LDV/SOF and EBR/GZR on sustainable changes in several HCV-associated symptoms and functional well-being in patients who achieved sustained virological response (SVR). PRIORITIZE, a randomized controlled trial conducted between 2016 and 2020, evaluated change in six PROMIS® symptom scores (fatigue, sleep disturbance, cognitive disturbance, nausea, diarrhoea, abdominal pain) and functional well-being using the disease-specific HCV-PRO instrument. Survey assessments were administered at baseline, early post-treatment (median = 6 months) and late post-treatment (median = 21 months). Constrained longitudinal linear mixed-effects models were used to evaluate within-treatment change and between-treatment differences. Data from 793 participants (average 55 years old, 57% male, 44% black, 17% with cirrhosis) were analysed. From baseline to early post-treatment, 5 out of 6 symptoms and functional well-being significantly improved (all p's < .05). In the LDV/SOF arm, mean changes ranged from -3.73 for nausea to -6.41 for fatigue and in the EBR/GZR, mean changes ranged from -2.19 for cognitive impairment to -4.67 for fatigue. Change of >3 points was consider clinically meaningful. Improvements in most symptoms slightly favoured LDV/SOF, although the magnitude of differences between the regimens were small. Both regimens demonstrated significant improvements in symptoms and functional well-being that were sustained during the late post-treatment phase. EBR/GZR and LDV/SOF regimens had clinically equivalent and durable improvements in HCV symptoms and functional well-being up to two years after SVR.

Topics: Amides; Antiviral Agents; Benzimidazoles; Benzofurans; Carbamates; Cyclopropanes; Drug Therapy, Combination; Fatigue; Female; Fluorenes; Genotype; Hepacivirus; Hepatitis C; Hepatitis C, Chronic; Humans; Imidazoles; Male; Middle Aged; Nausea; Quinoxalines; Sofosbuvir; Sulfonamides

Coadministration of statins and direct acting antiviral agents is frequently used. This study explored the effects of both atorvastatin and lovastatin on pharmacokinetics of a fixed-dose combination of sofosbuvir/ledipasvir "FDCSL".. 12 healthy volunteers participated in a randomized, three-phase crossover trial and were administered a single atorvastatin dose 80 mg plus tablet containing 400/90 mg FDCSL, a single lovastatin dose 40 mg plus tablet containing 400/90 mg FDCSL, or tablets containing 400/90 mg FDCSL alone. Liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry was used to analyze plasma samples of sofosbuvir, ledipasvir and sofosbuvir metabolite "GS-331007" and their pharmacokinetic parameters were determined.. Atorvastatin caused a significant rise in sofosbuvir bioavailability as explained by increasing in AUC. Both atorvastatin and lovastatin increased AUC of sofosbuvir and its metabolite after concurrent administration with FDCSL. Statins' P-glycoprotein inhibition is the attributed mechanism of interaction. The increase in sofosbuvir bioavailability was more pronounced after atorvastatin intake. Close monitoring is needed after co-administration of atorvastatin and FDCSL.

Topics: Antiviral Agents; Atorvastatin; ATP Binding Cassette Transporter, Subfamily B; ATP Binding Cassette Transporter, Subfamily B, Member 1; Benzimidazoles; Biological Availability; Cross-Over Studies; Drug Combinations; Fluorenes; Hepatitis C, Chronic; Humans; Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors; Lovastatin; Sofosbuvir

Sofosbuvir/Ledipasvir (SOF/LDV) has been approved by the European Medicine Agency (EMA) for the treatment of children and adolescents (at least 3 years of age) with chronic hepatitis C (CHC) genotype 1, 3, and 4 infection. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of SOF/LDV in adolescents (12 to <18 years old) with CHC in the real-world setting.. Prospective, open-label, multicentre study involving 12 Italian centres. Patients received the fixed-dose combination of SOF/LDV (400/90 mg) once daily ± ribavirin as per EMA approval and recommendations. The key efficacy endpoint was sustained virological response 12 weeks after the end of treatment (SVR12) as per intention-to-treat analysis. Safety was assessed by adverse events and clinical/laboratory data.. Seventy-eight consecutive adolescents (median age 15.2 years, range 12-17.9; girls 53.8%) were enrolled and treated between June 2018 and December 2019. Genotype distribution was as follows: genotype 1 (82.1%), 3 (2.5%), and 4 (15.4%). Seventy-six (97.4%) patients completed treatment and follow-up. Overall, SVR12 was 98.7%. One patient was lost to follow-up after 4 weeks of treatment; 1 patient completed treatment and missed the follow-up visit. No virological breakthrough or relapse were observed. No patient experienced grade 3 to 4 adverse event or serious adverse event.. The results of this real-world study confirmed the high efficacy and the optimal safety profile of SOF/LDV for treatment of CHC in adolescents.

Topics: Adolescent; Antiviral Agents; Benzimidazoles; Child; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Fluorenes; Genotype; Hepacivirus; Hepatitis C, Chronic; Humans; Prospective Studies; Sofosbuvir; Treatment Outcome

Treatment of children aged 3-6 genotype 4 is still limited by the interferon side effects. We aimed in this study to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of sofosbuvir/ledipasvir in children (3-6 years) genotype 4 chronic HCV-infected patients.. In total, 22 consecutive chronic HCV-infected patients (mean age 4.8 ± 0.9years, 19 males) were included in this prospective study. All patients received sofosbuvir 200 mg/ledipasvir 45 mg in a single oral daily dose. Patients were randomly subdivided into two groups according the duration of treatment into 8 and 12 weeks. All the clinical and laboratory data were collected. All the side effects were recorded from the patients or their parents. Follow-up were made at Week 4, 8 and 12 and 12 weeks after the end of treatment (SVR12).. The overall SVR12 rate was 100%. At Week 4, 9/11 patients in the 12-week group (81.8%; 95% CI: 52.3%-94.7%) achieved virologic negativity, vs 10/11 (90.9%; 95% CI: 62.3%-98.4%) in the 8-week group. At Week 8, 10/11 (90.8%; 95% CI: 62.3%-98.4%) in the 12-week group vs 11/11 (100%; 95% CI: 74.1%-100%) in the 8-week group were virologically negative. The reported side effects were cough, abdominal pain, nausea, vomiting and diarrhoea especially early in the treatment. The main complaint was difficulty in swallowing the tablets in the youngest patient at the beginning of the course of treatment. All patients were compliant to treatment.. Sofosbuvir/ledipasvir combination is safe and tolerable in the chronic infected HCV genotype 4 infected children (3-6 years). The 8-week treatment duration is similarly effective as the 12-week duration.

Topics: Antiviral Agents; Benzimidazoles; Child; Child, Preschool; Drug Therapy, Combination; Fluorenes; Genotype; Hepacivirus; Hepatitis C, Chronic; Humans; Male; Prospective Studies; Sofosbuvir; Treatment Outcome

Direct acting antiviral (DAA) regimens of 12 weeks result in HCV clearance in vast majority of patients across genotypes. We previously demonstrated an ultra-short regimen of 4 weeks DAA cleared HCV in a subset of patients. Here, we hypothesized that individual level of antiviral immunity differentially influenced viral clearance and investigated biomarkers of a successful response. Cohorts of HCV patients treated for 4 weeks with DAA therapy who either achieved sustained virologic response (SVR) or relapsed were compared at baseline and at end of therapy (EOT) for immune cell phenotypes and HCV specific immunity. Higher levels of PD-1

Topics: Adult; Antiviral Agents; Benzimidazoles; CD8-Positive T-Lymphocytes; Cytokines; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Fluorenes; Furans; Hepacivirus; Hepatitis C, Chronic; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Pilot Projects; Programmed Cell Death 1 Receptor; Quinolines; Receptors, Immunologic; Sofosbuvir; Sustained Virologic Response; T-Lymphocytes; Thiophenes; Viral Load

The prevalence of anti-hepatitis C virus antibody in Punjab, India is 3.6%, with 728,000 people estimated to have viremic chronic hepatitis C (CHC). The Mukh-Mantri Punjab Hepatitis C Relief Fund, launched on 18th June 2016, provides no-cost generic direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) with sofosbuvir + ledipasvir ± ribavirin or sofosbuvir + daclatasvir ± ribavirin with the goal of eliminating CHC from Punjab. We assessed the safety and efficacy of decentralized treatment of CHC in a public health care setting.. Primary care providers from 3 university and 22 district hospitals were trained to provide algorithm-based DAA treatment and supervised by telehealth clinics conducted fortnightly. The diagnosis of cirrhosis was based on clinical and radiological evidence, including aspartate aminotransferase-to-platelet ratio index (APRI ≥2.0) and FIB-4 score (>3.25), or on liver stiffness measurement ≥12.5 kPa on Fibroscan®.. We enrolled 48,088 individuals with CHC (63.8% male; mean age 42.1 years; 80.5% rural; 14.8% compensated cirrhosis; 69.9% genotype [GT] 3) between 18th June 2016 to 31st July 2018. While 36,250 (75.4%) patients completed treatment, 5,497 (11.4%) had treatment interruptions and 6,341 (13.2%) patients are currently ongoing treatment. Sustained virological response at 12 weeks after treatment completion (SVR12) was achieved in 91.6% of patients per protocol, 67.6% in intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis, where all interruptions were treated as failures, and 91.2% in a modified ITT analysis where all patients with successful SVR12 in the interruptions arm were included as cured. SVR12 rates in patients with and without cirrhosis and GT3 versus non-GT3 were comparable. The SVR12 rate was 84.4% in patients who had treatment interruptions.. Decentralized care of patients with CHC using generic all-oral DAA regimens is safe and effective regardless of genotype or presence of cirrhosis. ClinicalTrials.gov number: NCT01110447.. We assessed the safety and efficacy of public health care using no-cost all-oral generic direct-acting antiviral drugs against hepatitis C in the state of Punjab, India. The goal is elimination of chronic hepatitis C (CHC) by 2030 and involves primary care providers at 25 sites in the state. We enrolled 48,088 individuals (63.8% male; mean age 42.1 years; 80.5% rural; 14.8% compensated cirrhotic; 69.9% genotype 3) between 18th June 2016 to 31st July 2018. Cure was achieved in 91.6% of patients, demonstrating that decentralized care of CHC with generic all-oral regimens is safe and effective.

Topics: Adult; Antiviral Agents; Benzimidazoles; Clinical Protocols; Delivery of Health Care; Disease Eradication; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Fluorenes; Hepatitis C, Chronic; Humans; India; Liver Cirrhosis; Male; Public Health; Ribavirin; Sofosbuvir; Sustained Virologic Response; Telemedicine

The study aimed to evaluate the effects of baseline hepatitis C virus (HCV) nonstructural protein 5A (NS5A) resistance-associated substitutions (RASs) on sustained virologic response to ledipasvir (LDV)-containing regimens in the absence of sofosbuvir (SOF) in patients with HCV genotype (GT) 1 infection across 6 phase 2 clinical studies. We analysed data from 1103 patients who received either LDV + vedroprevir (NS3 protease inhibitor) + tegobuvir (NS5B inhibitor) ± ribavirin or LDV + ribavirin + pegylated interferon. Population sequencing of HCV NS5A was performed at baseline and at virologic failure from patient plasma samples. Of 1045 patients with available baseline sequences, 747 (67.7%) had GT1a, and 298 (26.9%) had GT1b infection. The overall prevalence of NS5A RASs at baseline was 9.4%; 7.6% (57/747) and 13.8% (41/298) of patients with GT1a and GT1b infection, respectively. The majority of GT1a-infected patients with NS5A RASs at baseline had a single NS5A RAS (78.9%) at NS5A positions K24R, M28T, Q30H/L, L31M and Y93H/N/C/S. The spectrum of NS5A RASs detected in GT1b patients was much less diverse compared to GT1a patients, with all patients harbouring a single NS5A RAS either L31M or Y93H/C. For patients treated with LDV-containing regimens in the absence of SOF, the presence of baseline NS5A RASs was associated with low SVR rates. In patients with virologic failure, nearly all had either pre-existing and/or emergent NS5A RASs: 287/287 (100%) and 40/42 (95.2%) patients with GT1a and GT1b infection, respectively. Three novel NS5A substitutions were identified as emergent NS5A RASs: K26E and S38F in GT1a; and L31I in GT1b. In conclusion, the presence of NS5A RASs at baseline reduced the SVR rate in patients treated with LDV in combination vedroprevir + tegobuvir ± ribavirin or ribavirin + pegylated interferon. Virologic failure was associated with the detection of NS5A RASs in nearly all patients. These results suggest that the resistance barrier may differ depending on HCV drug combination and may be more important than that of the individual DAAs.

Topics: Antiviral Agents; Benzimidazoles; Drug Resistance, Viral; Drug Therapy, Combination; Fluorenes; Genotype; Hepacivirus; Hepatitis C, Chronic; Humans; Sequence Analysis, DNA; Sofosbuvir; Sustained Virologic Response; Viral Nonstructural Proteins

Studies evaluating the efficacy and safety of the fixed-dose combination ledipasvir (LDV)/sofosbuvir (SOF) in patients coinfected with HIV-1 and hepatitis C virus (HCV) have mainly included treatment-naïve patients without cirrhosis. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of this combination in treatment-experienced patients with and without cirrhosis.. We conducted a multicentre, open-label, double-arm, nonrandomized study in patients coinfected with HIV-1 and HCV genotype 1 with and without cirrhosis, who had good viral suppression on their antiretroviral regimens. All patients were pretreated with a first-generation NS3/4A protease inhibitor (PI) plus pegylated interferon/ribavirin. Patients received a fixed-dose combination of LDV/SOF for 12 weeks, or for 24 weeks if cirrhosis was present. The primary endpoint was a sustained virological response (SVR) 12 weeks after the end of therapy. Secondary endpoints included safety, pharmacokinetics and patient-reported outcomes.. Of the 68 patients enrolled, 39.7% had cirrhosis. Sixty-five patients [95.6%; 95% confidence interval (CI): 87.6-99.1%; P < 0.0001] achieved an SVR, with similar rates of SVR in those with and without cirrhosis. Tolerance was satisfactory, with mainly grade 1 or 2 adverse events. Among patient-reported outcomes, only fatigue significantly decreased at the end of treatment compared with baseline [odds ratio (OR): 0.36; 95% CI: 0.14-0.96; P = 0.04]. Mean tenofovir area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) at week 4 was high, with mean ± SD AUC variation between baseline and week 4 higher in cirrhotic than in noncirrhotic patients (3261.57 ± 1920.47 ng/mL vs. 1576.15 ± 911.97 ng/mL, respectively; P = 0.03). Mild proteinuria (54.4%), hypophosphataemia (50.0%), blood bicarbonate decrease (29.4%) and hypokalaemia (13.2%) were reported. The serum creatinine level was not modified.. LDV/SOF provided a high SVR rate in PI-experienced subjects coinfected with HCV genotype 1 and HIV-1, including patients with cirrhosis.

Topics: Aged; Benzimidazoles; Coinfection; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Fibrosis; Fluorenes; Genotype; Hepacivirus; Hepatitis C, Chronic; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; HIV-1; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Patient Reported Outcome Measures; Pilot Projects; Sofosbuvir; Sustained Virologic Response; Treatment Outcome

It is unclear whether multiple nonstructural (NS) 5A resistance-associated substitutions (RASs) correlate with the outcome of sofosbuvir (SOF) and ledipasvir (LDV) therapy. We investigated the effects of multiple NS5A RASs in NS5A inhibitor-naïve patients with chronic hepatitis C virus genotype 1b infection treated with SOF/LDV. In 313 patients treated with SOF/LDV, we assessed the effects of multiple NS5A RASs on the sustained virological response (SVR). RASs at L28, R30, L31, Q54, P58, Q62, A92, and Y93 in the NS5A region were examined by direct sequencing. The prevalence of RASs was as follows: 2.6% at L28, 8.7% at R30, 6.1% at L31, 48.7% at Q54, 9.9% at P58, 9.9% at Q62, 5.1% at A92, 13.8% at Y93, and 19.2% at L31 or Y93. A total of 133 patients had no RASs. SVR was achieved in 98.7% of the patients. SVR rates significantly differed between patients with and without the L31 or Y93 RAS (93.0% [53/57] vs 100% [250/250], P = .0011). In addition, among patients with the L31 or Y93 RAS, 29.8%, 45.6% and 24.6% had one, two and three or more NS5A RASs, respectively. The SVR rate was significantly lower in patients with the L31 or Y93 RAS with more than three NS5A RASs compared to those with fewer than three NS5A RASs (71.4% [10/14] vs 100% [43/43], P = .0025). Although the prevalence of multiple NS5A RASs at baseline was low in NS5A inhibitor-naïve patients, the presence of multiple NS5A RASs was associated with the effectiveness of SOF/LDV therapy.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antiviral Agents; Benzimidazoles; Drug Resistance, Viral; Female; Fluorenes; Genotype; Hepacivirus; Hepatitis C, Chronic; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Mutation, Missense; Sequence Analysis, DNA; Sofosbuvir; Sustained Virologic Response; Treatment Outcome; Viral Nonstructural Proteins

Although HCV infection is highly prevalent in East Asia, these patients have been underrepresented in HRQL studies. Here, we assess HRQL in East Asian HCV patients treated with different anti-HCV regimens. Patients completed Short Form-36 (SF-36) before, during and after treatment. A total of 989 HCV patients were enrolled in two phase 3 clinical trials [China: 60.2%, South Korea: 22.4%, Taiwan: 17.4%; genotype 1: 55.3%, treatment-naïve: 57.5%; cirrhosis: 14.0%]. Patients received pegylated interferon, sofosbuvir and ribavirin (Peg-IFN + SOF + RBV; n = 130, genotypes 1, 6) or SOF + RBV (n = 475, all genotypes) or SOF and ledipasvir (LDV/SOF; n = 384, genotype 1). The SVR-12 rates were 94.6%, 96.2% and 99.2%, respectively (P = 0.005). During treatment, Peg-IFN + SOF + RBV-treated group experienced significant declines in most HRQL scores (by the end of treatment, mean decline up to -12.0 points, all P < 0.05). Patients on SOF + RBV had milder HRQL impairment (up to -5.8 points, P < 0.05 for 5 of 8 HRQL domains). In contrast, patients receiving IFN- and RBV-free regimen with LDV/SOF had their HRQL scores improve (mean up to +4.3 points, P < 0.0001 for 3 of 8 scales). In multivariate analysis, receiving Peg-IFN + SOF + RBV was consistently independently associated with HRQL impairment during treatment (β: -10.3 to -16.4) and after achieving SVR-12 (β: -4.4 to -9.1) (all P < 0.01). The results were reproduced in a subgroup of patients enrolled in China. We conclude that in East Asian patients with HCV, HRQL improved from baseline after treatment with LDV/SOF but not with Peg-IFN + RBV-containing or Peg-IFN-free RBV-containing regimens. The HRQL impairment associated with the use of Peg-IFN persists even after achieving sustained virologic clearance.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Antiviral Agents; Benzimidazoles; China; Female; Fluorenes; Hepatitis C, Chronic; Humans; Interferon-alpha; Male; Middle Aged; Quality of Life; Republic of Korea; Ribavirin; Sofosbuvir; Surveys and Questionnaires; Sustained Virologic Response; Taiwan; Treatment Outcome

New potent direct-acting antiviral (DAA) regimens against hepatitis C virus have been approved in recent years. However, information about the rate of adverse events (AEs) across different DAA regimens is limited. We aimed to evaluate differences in AEs and treatment efficacy in patients with chronic hepatitis C (CHC), genotype (GT) 1 or 3, randomized to two different treatment arms, correspondingly.. We randomly assigned 96 patients in a 1 : 1 ratio, to treatment for 12 weeks with either paritaprevir/ombitasvir/ritonavir/dasabuvir/ribavirin (RBV) or ledipasvir/sofosbuvir (SOF)/RBV if infected with GT1 (72 patients) or to daclatasvir/SOF/RBV for 12 weeks or SOF/RBV for 24 weeks, if infected with GT3 (24 patients). Data on AEs were collected throughout the entire study period.. A total of 70 (97%) patients with CHC with GT1 and 20 (83%) patients with GT3 achieved cure. The GT3 treatment arm was prematurely terminated, owing to change in national treatment guidelines. Thus, only AEs for GT1 patients are described. AEs occurred in 70 (97%) GT1 patients, and most common AEs were anemia (n=56/78%), fatigue (n=53/74%), and headache (n=33/46%). No difference was observed in relation to treatment group (P=1.0), anemia (P=1.0), or liver cirrhosis (P=0.53). In seven (11%) patients, AEs assessed by the investigator to be possibly related to the DAA regimen were still present 12 weeks after treatment.. We found no difference in AEs possibly related to the DAA regimen in patients with CHC, but surprisingly, AEs possibly related to the DAA regimen persisted in a significant number of patients after treatment. This finding can be of importance for clinicians in relation to patient information concerning AEs possibly related to DAA treatment.

Topics: 2-Naphthylamine; Adult; Anemia; Anilides; Antiviral Agents; Benzimidazoles; Carbamates; Cyclopropanes; Drug Therapy, Combination; Fatigue; Female; Fluorenes; Genotype; Headache; Hepacivirus; Hepatitis C, Chronic; Humans; Lactams, Macrocyclic; Macrocyclic Compounds; Male; Middle Aged; Proline; Ribavirin; Ritonavir; Sofosbuvir; Sulfonamides; Treatment Outcome; Uracil; Valine; Viral Load

High sustained virologic response (SVR) rates have been observed after 6 weeks of anti-HCV treatment using sofosbuvir, ledipasvir and a non-nucleoside polymerase-inhibitor (GS-9669) or a protease-inhibitor (GS-9451) and after 12 weeks with sofosbuvir + ledipasvir. Here we analyze the viral kinetics observed during these treatments to decipher the origin of the rapid cure and to evaluate the possibility of further reducing treatment duration. We found that viral kinetics were surprisingly slow in all treatment groups and could not reproduce the high SVR rates observed. Based on experimental results suggesting that NS5A- or protease-inhibitors can generate non-infectious virus, we incorporated this effect into a mathematical model. We found that to predict observed SVR rates it was necessary to assume that ledipasvir, GS-9669 and GS-9451 rapidly reduce virus infectivity. We predicted with this model that 4 weeks of triple therapy could be sufficient to achieve SVR in patients with undetectable viremia at week 1, but would be suboptimal in general. In conclusion, the rapid cure rate achieved with these combinations is largely disconnected from viral loads measured during treatment. A model assuming that rapid cure is due to a drug effect of generating non-infectious virus could be a basis for future response guided therapy.

Topics: Antiviral Agents; Benzimidazoles; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Fluorenes; Furans; Hepacivirus; Hepatitis C, Chronic; Humans; Kinetics; Male; Models, Theoretical; Quinolines; Sofosbuvir; Sustained Virologic Response; Thiophenes; Treatment Outcome; Uridine Monophosphate; Viral Load

Almost 30 years ago, about 30% of Japanese hemophiliacs became infected with HIV-1 and hepatitis C virus (HCV) after receiving contaminated blood products. While several studies have reported the high efficacy and safety of direct acting antivirals (DAA) in HIV-1 co-infected patients, such data are limited in hemophiliacs.. We conducted a single-center, open-label study involving 27 Japanese patients (median age; 45 years) with inherited bleeding disorders who were co-infected with HCV/HIV-1. Patients with HCV genotype 1 (GT1) and GT4 received ledipasvir (90 mg) plus sofosbuvir (400 mg), those with HCV GT2 received sofosbuvir plus weight-based ribavirin, and those with HCV GT3 received daclatasvir (60 mg) plus sofosbuvir. Treatment was continued for 12 weeks in all patients. The primary endpoints were rate of sustained virologic response at 12 weeks after end of therapy (SVR12) and occurrence of adverse events during DAA therapy.. Eighteen (67%) patients had had received interferon-based therapy, and 11 (41%) had compensated cirrhosis. HCV genotypes were GT1a 4 (15%), GT1b 16 (59%), GT1 undetermined 2 (7%), GT2a 1 (4%), GT3a 3 (11%) and GT4a 1 (4%). All patients were on combination antiretroviral therapy (cART) and had undetectable HIV-1 viral load (<20 copies/μL) at baseline. All patients achieved SVR12. Serious adverse events were observed in 3 patients: arteritis of the leg, which resolved after completion of DAA therapy, asymptomatic QT prolongation and gastrointestinal hemorrhage. cART failure was noted in one patient due to emergence of raltegravir resistance during ledipasvir/sofosbuvir treatment. Although α-fetoprotein, Mac-2 binding protein glycosylation isomer (M2BPGi), and Fibro Scan (FS) scores decreased in most patients during DAA therapy, M2BPGi (>2.0 cutoff index) and FS scores (>15.0 kPa) were still high in 6 patients at week 36.. DAA therapy is effective in all patients. However, adverse events and efficacy of cART should be monitored closely.

Topics: Adult; Antiviral Agents; Benzimidazoles; Carbamates; Coinfection; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Fluorenes; Hemophilia A; Hepacivirus; Hepatitis C, Chronic; HIV Infections; HIV-1; Humans; Imidazoles; Interferons; Liver Cirrhosis; Male; Middle Aged; Pyrrolidines; RNA, Viral; Sofosbuvir; Valine; Viral Load

Hepatitis C genotype 6 (HCV-GT6) is one of the most prevalent genotypes in Southeast Asia. Ledipasvir and sofosbuvir fixed-dose combination (LDV/SOF FDC) for 12 weeks has been shown to be effective for multiple HCV genotypes including treatment-naïve HCV-6. Our goal was to examine treatment outcomes in a diverse HCV-6 population.. We prospectively enrolled 60 HCV-GT6 patients at four US centers. Treatment -naïve without cirrhosis patients received open-labeled LDV/SOF FDC orally once a day for 8 weeks; All cirrhotic and/or treatment-experienced patients received LDV/SOF FDC for 12 weeks. The primary outcome was sustained virological response 12 weeks after therapy (SVR12). Secondary outcomes were adverse events (AEs) and/or serious adverse events (SAEs). All patients gave written consent.. Overall mean age was 58±10 and 58% were male. All patients were Asian and foreign born. The 8-week group included 20 patients (33.3%) and the 12-week included 40 patients (66.7%). There were 2 (5%) patients with decompensation, 3 with liver cancer (7.5%), and 14 with prior treatment (35%) in the 12-week group. SVR12 was 95.0% for the 8-week group (19/20) and 95.0% for the 12-week group (38/40). AEs included fatigue (5%), insomnia (3.3%), headache (1.7%), and nausea (1.7%); however, all patients completed the intended treatment duration. There were two treatment-unrelated SAEs.. LDV/SOF FDC for 8 or 12 weeks was safe and effective for patients without cirrhosis or prior treatment failure as well as for patients with cirrhosis and/or prior treatment failure, respectively.

Topics: Aged; Antiviral Agents; Benzimidazoles; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Fluorenes; Hepacivirus; Hepatitis C, Chronic; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Sofosbuvir; Sustained Virologic Response

Use of interferon and ribavirin to treat chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection in kidney transplant recipients is limited because of the risk for allograft rejection and poor tolerability.. To evaluate the safety and efficacy of the interferon- and ribavirin-free regimen ledipasvir-sofosbuvir in kidney transplant recipients with chronic genotype 1 or 4 HCV infection.. Randomized, phase 2, open-label study. (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02251717).. 5 sites in Europe.. Treatment-naive or -experienced kidney transplant recipients with chronic genotype 1 or 4 HCV infection, with or without compensated cirrhosis, and with an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) of 40 mL/min or greater were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive ledipasvir (90 mg) and sofosbuvir (400 mg) for 12 or 24 weeks.. The primary end point was sustained virologic response at 12 weeks after therapy ended (SVR12).. Among 114 patients, the median age was 53 years, 58% were male, 91% had genotype 1 infection, 69% were treatment naive, and 15% had compensated cirrhosis. The median eGFR was 56 mL/min (range, 35 to 135 mL/min). One hundred percent of patients (57 of 57) treated for 12 weeks (95% CI, 94% to 100%) and 100% of those (57 of 57) treated for 24 weeks (CI, 94% to 100%) achieved SVR12. Serious adverse events were reported in 13 patients (11%). Of these, 3 events-syncope, pulmonary embolism, and serum creatinine increase-in 3 patients were determined to be treatment related. One patient permanently discontinued treatment because of an adverse event (syncope). The most frequent adverse events overall were headache (n = 22 [19%]), asthenia (n = 16 [14%]), and fatigue (n = 11 [10%]).. The study was open label, no inferential statistics were planned, and only patients with genotype 1 or 4 infection were included. Few patients with HCV genotype 1a and cirrhosis were enrolled.. Treatment with ledipasvir-sofosbuvir for 12 or 24 weeks was well-tolerated and seemed to have an acceptable safety profile among kidney transplant recipients with HCV genotype 1 or 4 infection, all of whom achieved SVR12.. Gilead Sciences.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Antiviral Agents; Benzimidazoles; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Resistance, Viral; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Fluorenes; Genotype; Glomerular Filtration Rate; Hepatitis C, Chronic; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Kidney Transplantation; Male; Middle Aged; Sofosbuvir

Management of recurrent hepatitis C following liver transplantation still remains a challenge. Here, we report five patients who achieved viral responses following combined treatment with ledipasvir and sofosbuvir. All the patients received tacrolimus for immunosuppression. No dose adjustment was made before the ledipasvir and sofosbuvir therapy. All completed the intended 12-week treatment course with the full dose of ledipasvir and sofosbuvir. There were no significant adverse events greater than grade 2. During the study period, no acute rejection episodes were detected. The trough levels of tacrolimus were maintained stably. Hepatitis C virus RNA was not detected at week 12 in any of the patients. Based on the findings from this pilot study, combined ledipasvir and sofosbuvir therapy for 12 weeks is effective and safe for living - donor liver transplantation recipients with recurrence of hepatitis C virus.

Topics: Antiviral Agents; Benzimidazoles; Female; Fluorenes; Hepatitis C, Chronic; Humans; Liver Transplantation; Male; Middle Aged; Pilot Projects; Sofosbuvir; Treatment Outcome

No all-oral, direct-acting antiviral regimens have been approved for children with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. We conducted a phase 2, multicenter, open-label study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ledipasvir-sofosbuvir in adolescents with chronic HCV genotype 1 infection. One hundred patients aged 12-17 years received a combination tablet of 90 mg ledipasvir and 400 mg sofosbuvir once daily for 12 weeks. On the tenth day following initiation of dosing, 10 patients underwent an intensive pharmacokinetic evaluation of the concentrations of sofosbuvir, ledipasvir, and the sofosbuvir metabolite GS-331007. The primary efficacy endpoint was the percentage of patients with a sustained virologic response at 12 weeks posttreatment. Median age of patients was 15 years (range 12-17). A majority (80%) were HCV treatment-naive, and 84% were infected through perinatal transmission. One patient had cirrhosis, and 42 did not; in 57 patients the degree of fibrosis was unknown. Overall, 98% (98/100; 95% confidence interval 93%-100%) of patients reached sustained virologic response at 12 weeks. No patient had virologic failure. The 2 patients who did not achieve sustained virologic response at 12 weeks were lost to follow-up either during or after treatment. The three most commonly reported adverse events were headache (27% of patients), diarrhea (14%), and fatigue (13%). No serious adverse events were reported. Area under the concentration-time curve (tau) and maximum concentration values for sofosbuvir, ledipasvir, and GS-331007 were within the predefined pharmacokinetic equivalence boundaries of 50%-200% when compared with adults from phase 2 and 3 studies of ledipasvir and sofosbuvir.. Ledipasvir-sofosbuvir was highly effective at treating adolescents with chronic HCV genotype 1 infection; the dose of ledipasvir-sofosbuvir currently used in adults was well tolerated in adolescents and had an appropriate pharmacokinetic profile. (Hepatology 2017;66:371-378).

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adolescent; Antiviral Agents; Benzimidazoles; Child; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Combinations; Female; Fluorenes; Follow-Up Studies; Genotype; Hepacivirus; Hepatitis C, Chronic; Humans; Male; Patient Safety; Risk Assessment; Severity of Illness Index; Sofosbuvir; Treatment Outcome; Viral Load

Patients with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 2 have high rates of response to treatment with sofosbuvir and ribavirin. However, ribavirin is associated with hemolytic events and is poorly tolerated by some patients. We evaluated the effectiveness of sofosbuvir and ledipasvir in treatment-naïve and treatment-experienced patients with HCV genotype 2, comparing 12 versus 8 weeks of treatment.. This Phase 2, open-label study included 2 cohorts in New Zealand. The first received a fixed-dose combination tablet of ledipasvir-sofosbuvir (90/400 mg) once daily for 12 weeks. If this cohort had a 90% rate of sustained virologic response (SVR) 4 weeks after treatment, a second cohort receiving 8 weeks of ledipasvir-sofosbuvir was to be enrolled. The primary endpoint in both cohorts was the percentage of patients with HCV RNA <15 IU/mL 12 weeks after therapy (SVR12).. SVR12 rates were 96% (25/26; 95% CI, 80%-100%) for 12 weeks and 74% (20/27; 95% CI, 54%-89%) for 8 weeks of ledipasvir-sofosbuvir. The single patient receiving 12 weeks of ledipasvir-sofosbuvir who did not reach SVR12 did not complete treatment because of withdrawing consent after receiving 1 dose of study drug. Six of the 7 patients who did not reach SVR12 after 8 weeks of treatment experienced virologic relapse after stopping therapy. The most common adverse events were headache (26% of patients), fatigue (21%), and nausea (17%). No patients discontinued treatment because of an adverse event.. For treatment-naïve and -experienced patients, ledipasvir-sofosbuvir for 12 weeks is highly effective for the treatment of HCV genotype 2 (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02202980).

Topics: Antiviral Agents; Benzimidazoles; Drug Combinations; Fatigue; Female; Fluorenes; Genotype; Headache; Hepacivirus; Hepatitis C, Chronic; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Nausea; Sofosbuvir; Sustained Virologic Response

Interferon- and ribavirin (RBV)-free regimens can improve patient-reported outcomes (PROs) during treatment.. To compare PROs during treatment with ledipasvir and sofosbuvir (LDV/SOF) to placebo and to LDV/SOF + RBV.. Treatment-experienced CH-C genotype 1 patients with compensated cirrhosis (N = 154) were randomized to receive 24 weeks of LDV/SOF or 12 weeks of placebo followed by 12 weeks of LDV/SOF + RBV (the SIRIUS clinical trial). While blinded to their HCV RNA level and study treatment, patients completed PRO questionnaires (SF-36, FACIT-F, CLDQ-HCV, WPAI:SHP) at baseline, during and post-treatment.. Baseline PRO scores were similar between the two study arms. Patients receiving LDV/SOF showed improvement in a number of PROs (predominantly related to mental health) starting as early as 4 weeks after treatment initiation; no PRO decrement from baseline were noted, and no PRO scores were inferior to placebo (all P > 0.05). In the second 12 weeks, patients who were receiving LDV/SOF continued to improve PROs (up to +9.2% from a 100% maximum possible score, P < 0.05), while patients receiving LDV/SOF + RBV had less gains or no improvement in their PRO scores. However, regardless of the regimen, patients who successfully cleared the virus (N = 149) had significant improvement in all aspects of PROs (up to +12.2% by post-treatment week 12, up to +16.9% by week 24).. Treatment-experienced cirrhotic patients experience a notable improvement of their PROs during treatment with LDV/SOF. Furthermore, achieving SVR-12 is associated with significant PRO improvement, which further improves at post-treatment week 24 in this difficult to treat group of patients with chronic hepatitis C.

Topics: Aged; Antiviral Agents; Benzimidazoles; Drug Monitoring; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Fluorenes; Hepacivirus; Hepatitis C, Chronic; Humans; Liver Cirrhosis; Male; Middle Aged; Patient Outcome Assessment; Ribavirin; RNA, Viral; Sofosbuvir

Treatment of genotype 1 hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection with combination directly acting antivirals (DAA) for 8-24 weeks is associated with high rates of sustained virologic response (SVR). We previously demonstrated that adding a third DAA to ledipasvir and sofosbuvir (LDV/SOF) can result in high SVR rates in patients without cirrhosis. In this study, we investigated whether a similar regimen would yield equivalent rates of cure in patients with advanced liver fibrosis.. Fifty patients were enrolled at the Clinical Research Center of the National Institutes of Health and associated healthcare centers. Enrollment and follow-up data from April 2014 to June 2015 are reported here. Eligible participants were aged ≥18 years, had chronic HCV genotype 1 infection (serum HCV RNA ≥2000 IU/mL), and stage 3-4 liver fibrosis. HCV RNA was measured using a reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction assay.. Of patients treated with LDV, SOF, and the NS3/4A protease inhibitor GS-9451 for 6 weeks, 76% (38 of 50; 95% confidence interval, 60%-85%) had SVR achieved 12 weeks after the end of treatment. There was no statistically significant difference in treatment efficacy between treatment-naive patients (72%, 18 of 25) and those with treatment experience (80%; 20 of 25) (P = .51). Overall, 11 patients (22%) experienced virologic relapse, and 1 (2%) was lost to follow-up at 4 weeks after treatment. No serious adverse events, discontinuations, or deaths were associated with this regimen.. Adding a third DAA to LDV/SOF may result in a moderate SVR rate, lower than that observed in patients without cirrhosis. Significant liver fibrosis remains an impediment to achieving SVR with short-duration DAA therapy.. CT01805882.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antiviral Agents; Benzimidazoles; Cohort Studies; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Fluorenes; Genotype; Hepacivirus; Hepatitis C, Chronic; Humans; Liver Cirrhosis; Male; Middle Aged; Quinolines; Sofosbuvir; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult

The optimal retreatment strategy for chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) patients who fail directly-acting antiviral agent (DAA)-based treatment is unknown. In this study, we assessed the efficacy and safety of ledipasvir (LDV) and sofosbuvir (SOF) for 12 weeks in HCV genotype-1 (GT-1) patients who failed LDV/SOF-containing therapy.. In this single-center, open-label, phase 2a trial, 34 participants with HCV (GT-1) and early-stage liver fibrosis who previously failed 4-6 weeks of LDV/SOF with GS-9669 and/or GS-9451 received LDV/SOF for 12 weeks. The primary endpoint was HCV viral load below the lower limit of quantification 12 weeks after completion of therapy (sustained virological response [SVR]12). Deep sequencing of the NS3, NS5A, and NS5B regions were performed at baseline, at initial relapse, prior to retreatment, and at second relapse with Illumina next-generation sequencing technology.. Thirty-two of 34 enrolled participants completed therapy. Two patients withdrew after day 0. Participants were predominantly male and black, with median baseline HCV viral load of 1.3 × 10(6) IU/mL and Metavir fibrosis stage 1 and genotype-1a. Median time from relapse to retreatment was 22 weeks. Prior to retreatment, 29 patients (85%) had NS5A-resistant variants. The SVR12 rate was 91% (31/34; intention to treat, ITT) after retreatment. One patient relapsed.. In patients who previously failed short-course combination DAA therapy, we demonstrate a high SVR rate in response to 12 weeks of LDV/SOF, even for patients with NS5A resistance-associated variants.. NCT01805882.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Antiviral Agents; Benzimidazoles; Female; Fluorenes; Genotype; Hepacivirus; Hepatitis C, Chronic; High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Retreatment; Sequence Analysis, DNA; Sofosbuvir; Treatment Outcome; Viral Load; Viral Nonstructural Proteins

Chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is associated with lower serum concentration of low-density lipoprotein (LDL-C), the primary cholesterol metabolite targeted pharmaceutically to modulate cardiovascular risk. Chronic infection with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and treatment with antiretrovirals (ARVs) are associated with dyslipidemia and increased risk of cardiovascular disease. In subjects coinfected with HIV and HCV, lipid abnormalities associated with either infection alone are often attenuated. Treatment of chronic HCV infection in HIV/HCV-coinfected subjects is now possible with interferon (IFN)-free regimens composed of directly acting antivirals (DAAs). We previously observed a marked increase in serum LDL-C in HCV-monoinfected subjects treated with sofosbuvir and ribavirin (SOF/RBV) that correlated with viral decline in serum, suggesting a direct influence of HCV clearance on serum cholesterol. In the present study, we assessed longitudinal changes in cholesterol in HIV/HCV-coinfected subjects during treatment of HCV genotype-1 (GT1) infection with combination DAA therapy. We report a rapid increase in LDL-C and LDL particle size by week 2 of treatment that was sustained during and after treatment in HIV/HCV-coinfected subjects. No change in serum LDL-C was observed at day 3 of treatment, in spite of a marked reduction in serum HCV viral load, suggesting LDL-C increases do not directly reflect HCV clearance as measured in peripheral blood. After effective DAA therapy for HCV, an increase in LDL should be anticipated in HIV/HCV-coinfected subjects.

Topics: Antiviral Agents; Benzimidazoles; Cardiovascular Diseases; Cholesterol, LDL; Coinfection; Drug Therapy, Combination; Dyslipidemias; Female; Fluorenes; Furans; Hepacivirus; Hepatitis C, Chronic; HIV Infections; HIV-1; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Prospective Studies; Quinolines; Ribavirin; Sofosbuvir; Thiophenes; Uridine Monophosphate

As the treatment of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection has evolved to directly acting antiviral agents, the impact of these directly acting antiviral-only regimens on improving adherence to HCV treatment in HIV/HCV coinfected populations has not been evaluated. The study compared adherence to ledipasvir/sofosbuvir (LDV/SOF) in HCV monoinfected and HIV/HCV coinfected individuals.. Adherence was measured from participants in two phase 2 open-label studies (NCT01805882 and NCT01878799).. HCV treatment-naive, genotype 1 study individuals [HCV monoinfected participants (N = 20) and HIV/HCV coinfected participants, antiretroviral untreated (N = 13) or on combination antiretroviral therapy (N = 37)] were treated with LDV (90 mg) and SOF (400 mg) administered as one tablet once daily for 12 weeks. Adherence was measured using three tools: medication event monitoring system cap, pill count, and patient report.. Participants were predominately African American (83%) and male (73%), with a median age of 59 years. Participants had prompt HCV viral load decline and high adherence rates (97 ± 0.5% by medication event monitoring system). Participant adherence decreased significantly from early (baseline week 4) as compared with late (weeks 8-12) in therapy in all three groups - HCV monoinfected (P = 0.01), HIV/HCV antiretroviral untreated (P = 0.02), and HIV/HCV antiretroviral treated participants (P = 0.01).. Adherence to LDV/SOF in this urban population was high and comparable between HCV monoinfected and HIV/HCV coinfected participants regardless of antiretroviral use.

Topics: Antiviral Agents; Benzimidazoles; Coinfection; Female; Fluorenes; Hepatitis C, Chronic; HIV Infections; Humans; Male; Medication Adherence; Middle Aged; Sofosbuvir; Urban Population

Data about the response of hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 5 to approved and experimental treatment regimens are scarce. We assessed the efficacy and safety of combination therapy with the NS5A inhibitor ledipasvir and the NS5B polymerase inhibitor sofosbuvir in patients with HCV genotype 5.. We did this open-label, multicentre, single-arm, phase 2 trial at five hospitals in France. Eligible patients were at least 18 years old and had chronic infection with HCV genotype 5, with plasma HCV RNA of at least 10,000 IU/mL. We used BLAST analyses of NS5B partial sequences to establish the genotype and subtype at screening. Patients were given a fixed-dose combination tablet of 90 mg ledipasvir and 400 mg sofosbuvir orally once per day for 12 weeks. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with a sustained viral response, defined as HCV RNA concentration less than 15 IU/mL at 12 weeks after the end of treatment (SVR12). We analysed efficacy and safety in all patients who received at least one dose of ledipasvir-sofosbuvir. This trial is registered with EudraCT, number 2013-003978-27, and with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02081079.. From March 7 to June 10, 2014, we recruited 41 patients, including 21 who were treatment naive and 20 who were treatment experienced. All patients were of white ethnic origins. All 41 patients who started treatment completed the full 12 weeks of treatment and had undetectable HCV RNA at their final treatment visit. In the overall study population, 39 (95%, 95% CI 83-99) of 41 patients achieved SVR12. SVR12 was achieved by 20 (95%, 76-100) of the 21 patients who were treatment naive and 19 (95%, 75-100) of the 20 patients who were treatment experienced. Eight (89%) of nine patients with cirrhosis achieved SVR12, whereas 31 (97%) of the 32 patients without cirrhosis achieved SVR12. The two patients who did not reach SVR12 both had IL28B TT genotype and had viral relapse within 4 weeks of the end of treatment. The most common adverse events were asthenia (16 [39%] patients), headache (11 [27%] patients), and fatigue (four [10%] patients). One patient had a serious adverse event, worsening depression, which we judged to be unrelated to study treatment.. The oral regimen of ledipasvir-sofosbuvir is an effective and well-tolerated treatment for patients with HCV genotype 5 infection who are treatment naive or treatment experienced.. Gilead Sciences.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Antiviral Agents; Benzimidazoles; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Fluorenes; France; Genotype; Hepacivirus; Hepatitis C, Chronic; Humans; Liver Cirrhosis; Male; Middle Aged; RNA, Viral; Sofosbuvir; Treatment Outcome; Viral Load

The purpose of the study was to assess the effect of different treatment regimens for chronic hepatitis C on patient-reported outcomes (PROs) of individuals aged 65 and older with chronic hepatitis C. PRO data from eight multinational multicenter Phase 2 and 3 clinical trials were included. Of 3,120 participants in these clinical trials, 229 were aged 65 and older (67.8 ± 3.2, 57% male, 75% treatment-naïve, 22% cirrhotic), and 90 of those received ledipasvir plus sofosbuvir (LDV + SOF), 119 received SOF plus ribavirin (SOF + RBV), and 20 received pegylated IFN, SOF, and RBV (IFN + SOF + RBV). Participants aged 65 and older had slightly more pretreatment PRO impairment in their physical functioning than younger individuals (-3.1% on a normalized 0-100% PRO scale, P < .001). Despite this, these participants experienced significant PRO improvement during treatment with IFN-free RBV-free regimens (up to +8.0%, P < .001), similar to improvements in younger participants. In contrast, participants aged 65 and older experienced substantial decline in PROs while receiving IFN- or RBV-containing regimens (up to -18.9% in IFN + SOF + RBV, -10.4% in IFN-free SOF+RBV, P < .001), and some were greater than in the younger group. Nevertheless, after achieving sustained viral clearance at Posttreatment Week 12, PROs in participants aged 65 and older improved regardless of the regimen (up to +10.4%, P < .001). In multivariate analysis of the cohort aged 65 and older, the use of IFN and RBV was consistently associated with PRO impairment during treatment. The use of an IFN- and RBV-free anti-HCV regimen in older adults with hepatitis C results in significant improvement of PROs.

Topics: Aged; Antiviral Agents; Benzimidazoles; Female; Fluorenes; Hepatitis C, Chronic; Humans; Interferons; Male; Ribavirin; Sofosbuvir; Treatment Outcome

Pegylated-interferon-alpha plus ribavirin is the current standard-of-care regimen for treating chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection in Taiwan; however, interferon-based regimens can be poorly tolerated. The interferon-free, two-drug, fixed-dose combination tablet ledipasvir/sofosbuvir is approved in Europe, the USA, and Japan for treating chronic genotype 1 HCV infection. Little is known about its efficacy/safety in Taiwanese patients.. In this multicenter, open-label, phase 3b (NCT02021656) study, 85 Taiwanese patients (n = 42, treatment-naïve; n = 43, treatment-experienced) with chronic genotype 1 HCV infection (±compensated cirrhosis) received 12 weeks of ledipasvir/sofosbuvir fixed-dose combination tablet. The primary efficacy end point was the proportion of patients with sustained virologic response 12 weeks after treatment discontinuation (SVR12). Safety and pharmacokinetic data were collected.. The overall SVR12 rate was 98% (83/85), with 100% (42/42) and 95% (41/43) of treatment-naïve and treatment-experienced patients, respectively, achieving SVR12. There were no on-treatment virologic failures. One patient relapsed after treatment discontinuation; one patient withdrew consent on day 2. The most common treatment-emergent adverse event (AE) was headache (14%, 12/85). There was one grade 3 AE (small cell lung cancer unrelated to ledipasvir/sofosbuvir), no grade 4 AEs, and four grade 3-4 laboratory abnormalities. Only the patient with small cell lung cancer prematurely discontinued treatment. Two patients reported three serious AEs; none was considered related to ledipasvir/sofosbuvir.. Data from this phase 3b study suggest that 12 weeks of once-daily treatment with the interferon-free, ribavirin-free regimen ledipasvir/sofosbuvir is effective and well-tolerated in Taiwanese patients with chronic genotype 1 HCV infection, irrespective of treatment history.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Benzimidazoles; Carbamates; Drug Combinations; Female; Fluorenes; Genotype; Hepacivirus; Hepatitis C, Chronic; Heterocyclic Compounds, 4 or More Rings; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Sofosbuvir; Tablets; Taiwan; Treatment Outcome

Interferon- and ribavirin (RBV)-containing regimens negatively impact patients' experience. The aim of this study was to quantify the impact of different anti-viral regimens for hepatitis C on patients' work productivity, fatigue, and other patient-reported outcomes (PROs).. The PRO data from multicenter multinational phase 3 clinical trials of sofosbuvir with and without interferon or RBV were retrospectively used. Treatment regimens were classified as interferon+RBV-containing, interferon-free RBV-containing, and interferon-free RBV-free. Four PRO instruments (SF-36, CLDQ-HCV, FACIT-F, and WPAI:SHP) were administered to subjects at baseline, during, and up to 24 weeks after treatment.. We included 3,425 subjects with chronic hepatitis C infection with PRO data. Patients were 62.8% male, 62.2% treatment naive, 18.1% with cirrhosis, and 72.9% with HCV genotype 1. Of the study participants, 546 received interferon+RBV+sofosbuvir, 1,721 received sofosbuvir+RBV, and 1,158 received interferon- and RBV-free ledipasvir+sofosbuvir. At baseline, there were no difference in PROs between treatment groups (all P>0.01). During treatment, the decrements in PROs were up to -23.6% for the interferon+RBV group, up to -7.0% in the sofosbuvir+RBV group, whereas there was an improvement of up to +11.6% in the interferon-free RBV-free group (all P<0.0001). In multivariate analysis, the use of interferon was independently associated with up to -26.0% worsening of the PRO scores during treatment and the use of RBV with up to -9.0% worsening. After 12 weeks post-treatment, in patients with sustained virologic response-12, improvements were observed regardless of the regimen, and these improvements continued to increase by week 24 of follow-up.. The use of interferon- and RBV-free regimens for HCV is associated with better patients' experience and work productivity during treatment.

Topics: Antiviral Agents; Benzimidazoles; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Fluorenes; Hepatitis C, Chronic; Humans; Interferons; Male; Middle Aged; Patient Reported Outcome Measures; Retrospective Studies; Ribavirin; Sofosbuvir

A fixed-dose combination of ledipasvir and sofosbuvir (LDV/SOF) has been approved for treatment of HCV patients. We assessed the effect of LDV/SOF on patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in HIV-HCV-co-infected patients. Patient-reported outcomes data from HIV-HCV-co-infected patients who were treated with LDV/SOF for 12 weeks were collected as a part of a clinical trial (ION-4). Historical controls were HIV-HCV-co-infected patients treated with SOF and ribavirin (RBV) in PHOTON-1. We included 335 HIV-HCV-co-infected patients (SVR-12 in HCV genotype 1 was 96%) who received LDV/SOF, while 223 patients (SVR-12 in HCV genotype 1 was 76.3%) received SOF/RBV. During treatment, patients receiving LDV/SOF showed improvement in all of their PRO scores (+6.0% in activity/energy of CLDQ-HCV, +5.0% in fatigue score of FACIT-F, +6.8% in physical component of SF-36; all P < 0.0001) while those receiving SOF+RBV showed moderate decline in some of their PRO scores (-4.8% in physical functioning of SF-36, -4.4% in fatigue score of FACIT-F, both P < 0.001). Patients who achieved sustained virologic response with LDV/SOF also showed improvement of PROs (average +5.1%) while those treated with SOF/RBV showed less or no improvement (average +1.4%). In a multivariate analysis, in addition to depression and fatigue, receiving SOF+RBV (vs LDV/SOF) was independently associated with more PRO impairment during treatment (beta -6.1 to -12.1%, P < 0.001). Hence, HIV-HCV patients treated with LDV/SOF show significant improvement of their health-related quality of life and other patient-reported outcomes during treatment and after treatment cessation.

Topics: Adult; Antiviral Agents; Benzimidazoles; Efficiency; Fatigue; Female; Fluorenes; Hepatitis C, Chronic; HIV Infections; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Patient Satisfaction; Sofosbuvir; Treatment Outcome

Ledipasvir/sofosbuvir ± ribavirin administered for 12 weeks to patients with genotype-1 HCV infection and compensated cirrhosis is effective and well-tolerated. The Phase II TRILOGY-1 and TRILOGY-2 studies investigated whether ledipasvir/sofosbuvir plus the non-nucleotide NS5B inhibitor GS-9669 or the NS3/4A protease inhibitor vedroprevir could reduce treatment duration and/or eliminate the need for ribavirin in genotype-1 HCV-infected patients with compensated cirrhosis.. In TRILOGY-1, 100 cirrhotic patients were randomized (1:1:1) to 8 weeks of ledipasvir/sofosbuvir plus ribavirin, ledipasvir/sofosbuvir plus GS-9669 250 mg or ledipasvir/sofosbuvir plus GS-9669 500 mg. In TRILOGY-2, 46 previously treated cirrhotic patients were randomized (1:1) to 8 weeks of ledipasvir/sofosbuvir plus vedroprevir ± ribavirin. The primary end points were the proportion of patients with sustained virological response 12 weeks after treatment discontinuation (SVR12) and safety.. In both studies, most patients were male (each 65%) and white (92-96%), infected with HCV genotype-1a (62-70%) and had IL28B non-CC genotypes (82-87%). In total, 37-39% of patients were Hispanic or Latino. SVR12 rates were similar across treatment arms in TRILOGY-1 (82-91%) and TRILOGY-2 (88-95%); no patient had on-treatment virological failure. Two serious adverse events (acute myocardial infarction and cardiomyopathy) were reported in two patients participating in TRILOGY-1, both of whom had pre-existing cardiac conditions. Laboratory abnormalities were infrequent.. All ledipasvir/sofosbuvir-based regimens were well-tolerated. To shorten therapy and eliminate ribavirin, use of a more potent third agent or a third agent with a different mechanism of action may be required.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Antiviral Agents; Benzimidazoles; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Fluorenes; Genotype; Hepacivirus; Hepatitis C, Chronic; Humans; Liver Cirrhosis; Male; Middle Aged; Sofosbuvir

Shortening the duration of treatment with HCV direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) leads to substantial cost reductions. According to the label, sofosbuvir and ledipasvir can be prescribed for 8 weeks (SL8) in noncirrhotic women or men with HCV genotype 1 and low viral loads. However, real-world data about the efficacy and safety of SL8 are largely missing.. Interim results from an ongoing prospective, multicenter cohort of 9 treatment centers in Germany (GECCO). All patients started on treatment with HCV DAAs since January 2014 were included. This report describes safety and efficacy outcomes in 210 patients with HCV monoinfection and 35 with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-HCV coinfection given SL8 in a real-world setting.. Of 1353 patients included into the GECCO cohort until December 2015, a total of 1287 had complete data sets for this analysis; 337 (26.2%) fulfilled the criteria for SL8 according to the package insert, but only 193 (57.2%) were eventually treated for 8 weeks. Another 52 patients did not fulfill the criteria but were treated for 8 weeks. SL8 was generally well tolerated. The overall sustained virologic response rate 12 weeks after the end of treatment was 93.5% (186 of 199). The on-treatment response rate was 99.4% (159 of 160) in HCV-monoinfected and 96.4% (27 of 28) in HIV-HCV-coinfected patients. Ten patients were lost to follow-up.. SL8 seems highly effective and safe in well-selected HCV-monoinfected and HIV-HCV-coinfected patients in a real-world setting.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antiviral Agents; Benzimidazoles; Coinfection; Female; Fluorenes; Germany; Hepatitis C, Chronic; HIV Infections; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Prospective Studies; Sofosbuvir; Viral Load; Young Adult

 Interferon-based hepatitis C virus (HCV) therapy is safe and effective among people receiving opioid substitution therapy (OST), but treatment uptake remains low. Our aim was to evaluate the impact of OST and drug use during therapy on completion, adherence, sustained virologic response (SVR12), and safety of ledipasvir/sofosbuvir ± ribavirin..  The phase 3 ION studies evaluated a fixed-dose combination of ledipasvir/sofosbuvir ± ribavirin administered for 8, 12, or 24 weeks in patients with chronic HCV genotype 1. People with clinically significant drug use (prior 12 months) or noncannabinoids detected at screening by urine drug tests (not explained by prescriptions) were ineligible. Stored samples were available from ION-1 for retrospective testing for illicit drugs by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay..  Among 1952 patients enrolled in the ION studies, 4% (n = 70) were receiving OST. Among those receiving (n = 70) and not receiving OST (n = 1882), there was no difference in treatment completion (97% vs 98%; P = .40), ≥80% adherence (93% vs 92%; P = 1.00), SVR12 (94% vs 97%; P = .28), and serious adverse events (4% vs 3%; P = .43), respectively. Among participants in the ION-1 trial, 23% (n = 196) used illicit drugs during therapy (15% cannabinoids alone; 8% other illicit drugs ± cannabinoids). There was no difference in treatment completion, ≥80% adherence, SVR12, or serious AEs in those with no drug use during treatment compared with those who used cannabinoids and/or other illicit drugs. No cases of HCV reinfection were observed in the 24 weeks following treatment..  OST and drug use during HCV therapy did not impact treatment completion, adherence, SVR12, or safety..  ION-1 (NCT01701401); ION-2 (NCT01768286); and ION-3 (NCT01851330).

Topics: Adult; Antiviral Agents; Benzimidazoles; Data Interpretation, Statistical; Drug Therapy, Combination; Drug Users; Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay; Female; Fluorenes; Genotype; Hepacivirus; Hepatitis C, Chronic; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Opiate Substitution Treatment; Retrospective Studies; Ribavirin; Sofosbuvir; Sustained Virologic Response; Viral Load

To shorten the course of direct-acting antiviral agents for chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection, we examined the antiviral efficacy and safety of 3 weeks of response-guided therapy with an NS3 protease inhibitor and dual NS5A inhibitor-NS5B nucleotide analogue.. In this open-label, phase 2a, single centre study, Chinese patients with chronic HCV genotype 1b infection without cirrhosis were randomly allocated by a computer program to one of three treatment groups (sofosbuvir, ledipasvir, and asunaprevir; sofosbuvir, daclatasvir, and simeprevir; or sofosbuvir, daclatasvir, and asunaprevir) until six patients in each group (1:1:1) achieved an ultrarapid virological response (plasma HCV RNA <500 IU/mL by day 2, measured by COBAS TaqMan HCV test, version 2.0). Patients with an ultrarapid virological response received 3 weeks of therapy. Patients who did not achieve an ultrarapid response were switched to sofosbuvir and ledipasvir for either 8 weeks or 12 weeks. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with a sustained virological response at 12 weeks (SVR12) after treatment completion, analysed in the intention-to-treat population. All patients who achieved an ultrarapid virological response were included in the safety analysis. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02470858.. Between April 5, 2015, and April 15, 2015, 26 eligible patients were recruited. 12 patients were assigned to sofosbuvir, ledipasvir, and asunaprevir; six to sofosbuvir, daclatasvir, and simeprevir; and eight to sofosbuvir, daclatasvir, and asunaprevir. Six patients in each group achieved an ultrarapid virological response (18 [69%]). All patients with an ultrarapid virological response who were given 3 weeks of triple therapy achieved SVR12. The most common adverse events were fatigue (one [17%] of six patients receiving sofosbuvir, ledipasvir, and asunaprevir; one [17%] of six patients receiving sofosbuvir, daclatasvir, and simeprevir; and two [33%] of six patients receiving sofosbuvir, daclatasvir, and asunaprevir) and headache (one [17%] patient in each group). No patients experienced any serious adverse events.. In this proof-of-concept study, all patients with chronic HCV without cirrhosis who achieved an ultrarapid virological response on triple direct-acting antiviral regimens by day 2 and received 3 weeks of treatment were cured, with excellent tolerability. By shortening the duration of therapy from the currently recommended 12 weeks to 3 weeks, we could drastically reduce the cost of therapy and the rate of adverse events. Further large-scale studies should be done to confirm our findings.. Center for AIDS Research, National Institutes of Health, US Department of Energy, National Center for Research Resources and the Office of Research Infrastructure Programs, Cheng Si-Yuan (China-International) Hepatitis Research Foundation, and Humanity and Health Medical Group.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Aged; Antiviral Agents; Benzimidazoles; Carbamates; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Fluorenes; Follow-Up Studies; Hepatitis C, Chronic; Humans; Imidazoles; Intention to Treat Analysis; Isoquinolines; Male; Middle Aged; Proof of Concept Study; Pyrrolidines; Simeprevir; Sofosbuvir; Sulfonamides; Treatment Outcome; Valine; Viral Load

Topics: Antiviral Agents; Benzimidazoles; Fluorenes; Hepacivirus; Hepatitis C, Chronic; Humans; Liver Transplantation; Perioperative Care; RNA, Viral; Sofosbuvir

Direct-acting antiviral drugs have a high cure rate and favourable tolerability for patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV). Shorter courses could improve affordability and adherence. Sofosbuvir and ledipasvir with ribavirin have high efficacy when taken for 8 weeks but not for 6 weeks. We assessed whether the addition of a third direct-acting antiviral drug to sofosbuvir and ledipasvir would allow a shorter treatment duration.. In this single-centre, open-label, phase 2A trial, we sequentially enrolled treatment-naive patients with HCV genotype 1 infection into three treatment groups: 12 weeks of sofosbuvir and ledipasvir; 6 weeks of sofosbuvir, ledipasvir, and GS-9669; or 6 weeks of sofosbuvir, ledipasvir, and GS-9451. Patients and investigators were not masked to treatment assignment. The primary endpoint was the propotion of patients with sustained viral response at 12 weeks after treatment completion (SVR12), assessed by serum HCV RNA concentrations lower than 43 IU/mL (the lower limit of quantification). We did an intention-to-treat analysis for the primary endpoint and adverse events. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01805882.. Between Jan 11, 2013, and Dec 17, 2013, we enrolled 60 patients, and sequentially assigned them into three groups of 20. We noted an SVR12 in all 20 patients (100%, 95% CI 83-100) allocated to sofosbuvir and ledipasvir for 12 weeks; in 19 (95%, 75-100) of the 20 patients allocated to sofosbuvir, ledipasvir, and GS-9669 for 6 weeks (one patient relapsed 2 weeks after completion of treatment); and in 19 (95%, 75-100%) of the 20 patients allocated to sofosbuvir, ledipasvir, and GS-9451 for 6 weeks (one patient was lost to follow-up after reaching sustained viral response at 4 weeks). Most adverse events were mild and no patients discontinued treatment. Two serious adverse events occurred (pain after a post-treatment liver biopsy and vertigo), both unrelated to study drugs.. In this small proof-of-concept study, two different three-drug regimens that were given for 6 weeks resulted in high cure rates for HCV infection with excellent tolerability. Addition of a third potent direct-acting antiviral drug can reduce the duration of treatment required to achieve sustained viral response in patients with chronic HCV genotype 1 infection without cirrhosis.. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), National Cancer Institute and Clinical Center Intramural Program, German Research Foundation, National Institutes of Health, Gilead Sciences.

Topics: Aged; Antiviral Agents; Benzimidazoles; Cohort Studies; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Fluorenes; Furans; Hepacivirus; Hepatitis C, Chronic; Humans; Intention to Treat Analysis; Male; Middle Aged; Quinolines; Ribavirin; RNA, Viral; Sofosbuvir; Thiophenes; Treatment Outcome; Uridine Monophosphate; Viral Load

Compared with other countries, patients with chronic hepatitis C infection in Japan tend to be older, have more advanced liver disease, and are more likely to have been previously treated for hepatitis C. We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of an all-oral, fixed-dose combination of the hepatitis C virus NS5A inhibitor ledipasvir and the NS5B nucleotide polymerase inhibitor sofosbuvir with and without ribavirin for 12 weeks in treatment-naive and previously treated Japanese patients with chronic genotype 1 hepatitis C virus infection.. In this randomised, open-label study, we enrolled patients from 19 clinical Japanese centres. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive either ledipasvir (90 mg) and sofosbuvir (400 mg) or ledipasvir, sofosbuvir, and ribavirin (dosed according to the Japanese Copegus product label-ie, patients ≤60 kg received 600 mg daily, patients >60 kg to ≤80 kg received 800 mg daily, and patients >80 kg received 1000 mg daily) orally once daily for 12 weeks. After completion or early discontinuation of treatment, patients were followed up off-treatment for 24 weeks. Eligible patients were at least 20 years of age with chronic genotype 1 hepatitis C virus infection with serum hepatitis C virus RNA concentrations of at least 5 log10 IU/mL, creatinine clearance of at least 1·0 mL/s, and a platelet count of at least 50 × 10(9) per L. An interactive web response system was used to manage patient randomisation and treatment assignment. Randomisation was stratified by the presence or absence of cirrhosis for treatment-naive patients and stratified by presence or absence of cirrhosis and by previous treatment category (relapser or breakthrough, non-responder, or interferon-intolerant) for previously treated patients. Within each strata, patients were sequentially assigned to either treatment with ledipasvir-sofosbuvir or ledipasvir-sofosbuvir plus ribavirin in a 1:1 ratio with block size of 4. The primary endpoint was sustained virological response 12 weeks after completion of treatment (SVR12) assessed in all patients who were randomly assigned and received at least one dose of study drug; safety outcomes were assessed in all patients who received at least one dose of study drug. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01975675.. Between Oct 15, 2013 and Dec 13, 2013, 341 patients were randomly assigned to treatment groups and received at least one dose of study treatment. SVR12 was achieved in all 171 (100%) patients (83 of 83 treatment naive and 88 of 88 treatment experienced) receiving ledipasvir-sofosbuvir (95% CI 98-100) and 167 (98%) of 170 patients (80 of 83 treatment naive and 87 of 87 treatment experienced) receiving ledipasvir-sofosbuvir plus ribavirin (95% CI 95-100). Of the 76 patients with baseline NS5A resistant variants, 75 (99%) achieved SVR12. Two (1·2%) of 170 patients in the ledipasvir-sofosbuvir plus ribavirin group discontinued treatment because of adverse events. The most common adverse events were nasopharyngitis (50 [29·2%] of 171), headache (12 [7·0%] of 171), and malaise (nine [5·3%] of 171) in patients receiving ledipasvir-sofosbuvir; and nasopharyngitis (40 [23·5%] of 170), anaemia (23 [13·5%] of 170), and headache in those receiving ledipasvir-sofosbuvir and ribavirin (15 [8·8%] of 170).. Although existing regimens for the treatment of hepatitis C virus are effective for many patients, medical needs remain unmet, particularly in Japan where the population with hepatitis C virus genotype 1 is generally older and treatment-experienced, with advanced liver disease. The efficacy, tolerability, and absence of drug-drug interactions of ledipasvir-sofosbuvir suggest that it could be an important option for treatment of genotype 1 hepatitis C virus in Japanese patients.. Gilead Sciences.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antiviral Agents; Asian People; Benzimidazoles; Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions; Female; Fluorenes; Genotype; Hepacivirus; Hepatitis C, Chronic; Humans; Japan; Male; Middle Aged; Ribavirin; Sofosbuvir; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Uridine Monophosphate; Young Adult

Serum levels of the interferon (IFN)-stimulated chemokine CXCL10 are increased during chronic HCV infection and associate with outcome of IFN-based therapy. Elevated levels of NH2-terminal truncated CXCL10 (3-77aa), produced by DPP4 cleavage, negatively associate with spontaneous clearance of acute HCV infection and sustained virological response (SVR) with IFN-based therapy for chronic infection. The association of different CXCL10 forms and DPP4 with outcome during IFN-free HCV therapy has not been examined. Using novel Simoa assays, plasma was analyzed from HCV genotype-1 (GT1) subjects who relapsed (n = 11) or achieved SVR (n = 10) after sofosbuvir and ribavirin (SOF/RBV) treatment, and from SOF/RBV relapsers who achieved SVR with a subsequent SOF/ledipasvir regimen (n = 9). While the NH2-truncated form of CXCL10 was elevated in HCV infection relative to healthy controls, pre-treatment plasma concentrations of CXCL10 forms failed to stratify subjects based on treatment outcome to IFN-free regimens. However, a trend (statistically non-significant) towards elevated higher levels of total and long CXCL10 was observed pre-treatment in subjects who relapsed. All forms of CXCL10 decreased rapidly following treatment initiation and were again elevated in subjects who experienced HCV relapse, indicating that CXCL10 production may be associated with active viral replication. While soluble DPP4 (sDPP4) and NH2-truncated CXCL10 concentrations were highly correlated, on-treatment sDPP4 levels and activity declined more slowly than CXCL10, suggesting differential regulation. These data suggest post-translationally modified forms of CXCL10 will not support the prediction of treatment outcome in HCV GT1 subjects treated with SOF/RBV.

Topics: Adult; Antiviral Agents; Benzimidazoles; Chemokine CXCL10; Convalescence; Dipeptidyl Peptidase 4; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Fluorenes; Hepacivirus; Hepatitis C, Chronic; Humans; Interferons; Male; Protein Processing, Post-Translational; Recurrence; Ribavirin; Sofosbuvir; Treatment Outcome; Viral Load; Virus Replication

Worldwide, although predominantly in low-income countries in the Middle East and Africa, up to 13% of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infections are caused by HCV genotype 4. For patients with HCV genotype 1, the combination of ledipasvir and sofosbuvir has been shown to cure high proportions of patients with excellent tolerability, but this regimen has not been assessed for the treatment of HCV genotype 4. We assessed the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of 12 weeks of combination therapy with ledipasvir and sofosbuvir for patients with chronic HCV genotype 4 infections.. In this single-centre, open-label cohort, phase 2a trial, patients with HCV genotype 4 who were treatment naive or interferon treatment experienced (HIV-negative) were sequentially enrolled at the Clinical Center of the National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA. We gave patients 12 weeks of ledipasvir (90 mg) and sofosbuvir (400 mg) as a single combination tablet once per day. The primary efficacy endpoint was sustained viral response at 12 weeks (SVR12), as measured by the proportion of patients with HCV RNA concentrations less than the lower limit of quantification (COBAS TaqMan HCV test, version 1.0, 43 IU/mL). The primary safety endpoint was the frequency and severity of adverse events. We did our analyses on an intention-to-treat basis. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01805882.. Between Sept 16, 2013, and Nov 2, 2014, we recruited 21 patients. 20 (95%) of 21 patients completed 12 weeks of treatment and achieved SVR12 (95% CI 76-100), including seven patients with cirrhosis. One patient was non-adherent to study drugs and withdrew from the study, but was included in the intention-to-treat analysis. No patients discontinued treatment because of adverse events and no grade 3 or 4 adverse events occurred that were related to study medications. The most common adverse events were diarrhoea (two patients), fatigue (three patients), nausea (two patients), and upper respiratory infections (two patients).. Ledipasvir and sofosbuvir treatment for 12 weeks was well tolerated by patients with HCV genotype 4 and resulted in 100% SVR for all patients who received all 12 weeks of study drugs, irrespective of previous treatment status and underlying liver fibrosis. This is the first report of a single-pill, all-oral, interferon-free, ribavirin-free treatment for patients with HCV genotype 4.. NIAID, National Cancer Institute and Clinical Center Intramural Program. The study was also supported in part by a Cooperative Research and Development Agreement between NIH and Gilead Sciences.

Topics: Aged; Benzimidazoles; DNA, Viral; Drug Combinations; Female; Fluorenes; Genotype; Hepacivirus; Hepatitis C, Chronic; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Sofosbuvir; Viral Load

Effective treatment for hepatitis C virus (HCV) in patients coinfected with human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) remains an unmet medical need.. We conducted a multicenter, single-group, open-label study involving patients coinfected with HIV-1 and genotype 1 or 4 HCV receiving an antiretroviral regimen of tenofovir and emtricitabine with efavirenz, rilpivirine, or raltegravir. All patients received ledipasvir, an NS5A inhibitor, and sofosbuvir, a nucleotide polymerase inhibitor, as a single fixed-dose combination for 12 weeks. The primary end point was a sustained virologic response at 12 weeks after the end of therapy.. Of the 335 patients enrolled, 34% were black, 55% had been previously treated for HCV, and 20% had cirrhosis. Overall, 322 patients (96%) had a sustained virologic response at 12 weeks after the end of therapy (95% confidence interval [CI], 93 to 98), including rates of 96% (95% CI, 93 to 98) in patients with HCV genotype 1a, 96% (95% CI, 89 to 99) in those with HCV genotype 1b, and 100% (95% CI, 63 to 100) in those with HCV genotype 4. Rates of sustained virologic response were similar regardless of previous treatment or the presence of cirrhosis. Of the 13 patients who did not have a sustained virologic response, 10 had a relapse after the end of treatment. No patient had confirmed HIV-1 virologic rebound. The most common adverse events were headache (25%), fatigue (21%), and diarrhea (11%). No patient discontinued treatment because of adverse events.. Ledipasvir and sofosbuvir for 12 weeks provided high rates of sustained virologic response in patients coinfected with HIV-1 and HCV genotype 1 or 4. (Funded by Gilead Sciences; ION-4 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02073656.).

Topics: Anti-Retroviral Agents; Antiviral Agents; Benzimidazoles; Drug Resistance, Viral; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Fluorenes; Genotype; Hepacivirus; Hepatitis C, Chronic; HIV Infections; HIV-1; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; RNA, Viral; Sofosbuvir; Uridine Monophosphate; Viral Load

We performed a phase 2 clinical trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ledipasvir and sofosbuvir, with or without ribavirin, in patients infected with hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 3 or 6.. We performed an open-label study of 126 patients with HCV genotype 3 or 6 infections at 2 centers in New Zealand from April 2013 through October 2014. Subjects were assigned 1 of 4 groups that received 12 weeks of treatment. Previously untreated patients with HCV genotype 3 were randomly assigned to groups given fixed-dose combination tablet of ledipasvir and sofosbuvir (n = 25) or ledipasvir and sofosbuvir along with ribavirin (n = 26). Treatment-experienced patients with HCV genotype 3 (n = 50) received ledipasvir and sofosbuvir and ribavirin. Treatment-naïve or treatment-experienced patients with HCV genotype 6 (n = 25) received ledipasvir and sofosbuvir. The primary end point was the percentage of patients with HCV RNA ≤15 IU/mL 12 weeks after stopping therapy (sustained virologic response at 12 weeks [SVR12]).. Among treatment-naïve genotype 3 patients, 16 of 25 (64%) receiving ledipasvir and sofosbuvir alone achieved SVR12 compared with all 26 patients (100%) receiving ledipasvir and sofosbuvir and ribavirin. Among treatment-experienced patients with HCV genotype 3, forty-one of fifty achieved an SVR12 (82%). Among patients with HCV genotype 6, the rate of SVR12 was 96% (24 of 25 patients). The most common adverse events were headache, upper respiratory infection, and fatigue. One patient with HCV genotype 3 discontinued ledipasvir and sofosbuvir because of an adverse event (diverticular perforation), which was not considered treatment related.. In an uncontrolled, open-label trial, high rates of SVR12 were achieved by patients with HCV genotype 3 infection who received 12 weeks of ledipasvir and sofosbuvir plus ribavirin, and by patients with HCV genotype 6 infection who received 12 weeks of sofosbuvir and ledipasvir without ribavirin. Current guidelines do not recommend the use of ledipasvir and sofosbuvir, with or without ribavirin, in patients with HCV genotype 3 infection. ClinicalTrials.gov Number: NCT01826981.

Topics: Adult; Antiviral Agents; Benzimidazoles; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Fluorenes; Genotype; Hepacivirus; Hepatitis C, Chronic; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; New Zealand; Random Allocation; Ribavirin; RNA, Viral; Sofosbuvir; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Viral Load

The interaction of lipoproteins with hepatitis C virus (HCV) has pathogenic and therapeutic implications. Our aim was to evaluate changes in the apolipoprotein profile of patients with chronic hepatitis C during and after successful cure with ledipasvir and sofosbuvir (LDV/SOF) with and without ribavirin (RBV). One hundred HCV genotype 1 patients who had achieved SVR-12 after treatment with 12 weeks of LDV/SOF ± RBV were selected from the ION-1 clinical trial. Frozen serum samples from baseline, end of treatment and week 4 of follow-up were used to assay apolipoproteins (apoAI, apoAII, apoB, apoCII, apoCIII, apoE) using the Multiplex platform to assess for changes in the apolipoprotein levels. At the end of treatment compared to baseline, a significant reduction in apoAII levels (-14.97 ± 63.44 μg/mL, P = 0.0067) and apoE levels (-4.38 ± 12.19 μg/mL, P < 0.001) was noted. These declines from baseline in apoAII (-16.59 ±66.15 μg/mL, P = 0.0075) and apoE (-2.66 ± 12.64 μg/mL, P = 0.015) persisted at 4 weeks of post-treatment follow-up. In multivariate analysis, treatment with LDV/SOF + RBV was independently associated with reduction in apoE (beta = 5.31 μg/mL, P = 0.002) (compared to RBV-free LDV/SOF) (P < 0.05). In contrast, apoCII levels overall increased from baseline to end of treatment (+2.74 ±11.76 μg/mL, P = 0.03) and persisted at 4 weeks of follow-up (+4.46 ± 12.81 μg/mL from baseline, P = 0.0005). Subgroup analysis revealed an increase in apoCII during treatment only in patients receiving LDV/SOF without RBV (+5.52 ± 11.92 μg/mL, P = 0.0007) but not in patients receiving LDV/SOF + RBV (P = 0.638). Treatment with LDV/SOF ± RBV is associated with a persistent reduction in the apolipoprotein AII and E after achieving cure. These data suggest that treatment with LDV/SOF ± RBV may be associated with alterations in serum apolipoproteins which could potentially impact viral eradication.

Topics: Antiviral Agents; Apolipoproteins; Benzimidazoles; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Fluorenes; Hepacivirus; Hepatitis C, Chronic; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Ribavirin; Sofosbuvir

Treatment of chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection with direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) for 6 weeks achieves sustained virologic response (SVR) rates of 95% in some patients. If effective, shorter therapeutic courses could improve adherence and treatment costs.. To determine factors predictive of SVR to 4 weeks of DAA treatment in patients with stage F0 to F2 liver fibrosis.. Open-label, nonrandomized, phase 2a trial. (Clinical Trials.gov: NCT01805882).. Single-center.. 50 treatment-naive and predominantly African American patients with HCV genotype 1 infection and early-stage liver fibrosis were sequentially enrolled into 2 treatment groups.. 25 participants received a 3-drug regimen consisting of ledipasvir and sofosbuvir plus GS-9451 for 4 weeks, and 25 received a 4-drug regimen consisting of ledipasvir, sofosbuvir, GS-9451, and GS-9669 for 4 weeks.. The primary efficacy end point was SVR12 (HCV RNA level below the lower limit of quantification at posttreatment week 12).. Forty percent (10 of 25) (95% CI, 21% to 61%) of patients in the 3-drug group and 20% (5 of 25) (CI, 7% to 41%) of those in the 4-drug group achieved SVR12. Exploratory analysis suggested that lower baseline HCV viral load, younger age, and HCV genotype 1b were associated with SVR12. Ten patients had baseline HCV variants conferring greater than 20-fold resistance in vitro to at least 1 study DAA; all had viral relapse. Forty-eight percent (12 of 25) of patients receiving the 3-drug regimen and 72% (18 of 25) of those receiving the 4-drug regimen had adverse events, most of which were mild. One participant was lost to follow-up.. Nonrandomized study design and small sample of patients with early-stage fibrosis.. Combination DAA therapy with 3 or 4 drugs for 4 weeks was well-tolerated but resulted in limited cure rates.. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Cancer Institute, and Clinical Center Intramural Program; supported in part by a cooperative research and development agreement between the National Institutes of Health and Gilead Sciences.

Topics: Antiviral Agents; Benzimidazoles; Drug Resistance, Viral; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Fluorenes; Furans; Genotype; Hepatitis C; Hepatitis C, Chronic; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Quinolines; RNA, Viral; Sofosbuvir; Thiophenes; Treatment Outcome; Viral Load

Interferon-based treatment is not suitable for many patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection because of contraindications such as psychiatric illness, and a high burden of adverse events. We assessed the efficacy and safety of an interferon-free regimen--a fixed-dose combination of the nucleotide polymerase inhibitor sofosbuvir (400 mg) and the HCV NS5A inhibitor ledipasvir (90 mg), with and without ribavirin--in patients with genotype-1 hepatitis C infection who were treatment-naive or previously treated with a protease-inhibitor regimen.. For this open-label study, we enrolled 100 adult patients (>18 years) with HCV infection at a centre in the USA between Nov 2, 2012, and Dec 21, 2012. In cohort A, we used a computer-generated sequence to randomly assign (1:1:1; stratified by HCV genotype [1a vs 1b]) 60 non-cirrhotic, treatment-naive patients to receive sofosbuvir plus ledipasvir for 8 weeks (group 1), sofosbuvir plus ledipasvir and ribavirin for 8 weeks (group 2), or sofosbuvir plus ledipasvir for 12 weeks (group 3). In cohort B, we randomly allocated (1:1; stratified by genotype and presence or absence of cirrhosis) 40 patients who previously had virological failure after receiving a protease inhibitor regimen to receive sofosbuvir plus ledipasvir for 12 weeks (group 4) or sofosbuvir plus ledipasvir and ribavirin for 12 weeks (group 5). 22 (55%) of 40 patients in cohort B had compensated cirrhosis. The primary endpoint was sustained virological response 12 weeks after treatment (SVR12), analysed by intention to treat. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01329978.. In cohort A, SVR12 was achieved by 19 (95%) of 20 patients (95% CI 75-100) in group 1, by 21 (100%) of 21 patients (84-100) in group 2, and by 18 (95%) of 19 patients (74-100) in group 3. In cohort B, SVR12 was achieved by 18 (95%) of 19 patients (74-100) in group 4 and by all 21 (100%) of 21 patients (84-100) in group 5. Two patients had viral relapse; one patient was lost to follow-up after achieving sustained virological response 8 weeks after treatment. The most common adverse events were nausea, anaemia, upper respiratory tract infection, and headache. One patient in group five had a serious adverse event of anaemia, thought to be related to ribavirin treatment.. These findings suggest that the fixed-dose combination of sofosbuvir-ledipasvir alone or with ribavirin has the potential to cure most patients with genotype-1 HCV, irrespective of treatment history or the presence of compensated cirrhosis. Further clinical trials are needed to establish the best treatment duration and to further assess the contribution of ribavirin.. Gilead Sciences.

Topics: Antiviral Agents; Benzimidazoles; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Combinations; Female; Fluorenes; Genotype; Hepatitis C, Chronic; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Protease Inhibitors; Ribavirin; RNA, Viral; Sofosbuvir; Treatment Outcome; Uridine Monophosphate; Viral Nonstructural Proteins

This phase II trial assessed the efficacy and safety of a combination regimen of the nonstructural protein (NS)5A inhibitor ledipasvir (LDV), NS3 protease inhibitor vedroprevir (VDV), non-nucleoside NS5B inhibitor tegobuvir (TGV), and ribavirin (RBV) in treatment-naïve patients with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 1 without cirrhosis. Patients were randomized 1:2 to LDV 30 mg once daily (QD; Arm 1; n = 46) or LDV 90 mg QD (Arm 2; n = 94); patients in both arms also received VDV 200 mg QD, TGV 30 mg twice-daily, and RBV 1,000-1,200 mg/day. Patients in Arm 2 with vRVR, defined as HCV RNA below the lower limit of quantification (LLOQ) from treatment weeks 2 to 10, were randomized 1:1 to stop treatment at 12 weeks or continue for 24 weeks. Sustained virologic response 12 weeks after treatment (SVR12) was higher in patients receiving 90 mg of LDV for 24 weeks (63%), compared with LDV 90 mg for 12 weeks (54%) and LDV 30 mg for 24 weeks (48%). In patients with very rapid virologic response (vRVR) in Arm 2, SVR12 was achieved by 68% and 81% of patients treated for 12 and 24 weeks, respectively. Virologic breakthrough was more common in patients with HCV genotype 1a and was associated with resistance-associated variants for all three direct-acting antiviral agents (DAAs); however, in all but 1 patient who relapsed, resistance-associated variants directed against only one or two of the DAAs were detected. The most common adverse events were fatigue, headache, nausea, rash, and diarrhea.. In patients with HCV genotype 1, an interferon-free regimen containing LDV/VDV/TGV/RBV was well tolerated and led to SVR12 in up to 63% of patients. LDV 90 mg is currently being investigated in combination with the nucleotide polymerase inhibitor, sofosbuvir.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Antiviral Agents; Benzimidazoles; Drug Resistance, Viral; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Fluorenes; Genotype; Hepacivirus; Hepatitis C, Chronic; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Purines; Pyridazines; Quinolines; Ribavirin; Treatment Outcome; Viral Nonstructural Proteins; Young Adult

High rates of sustained virologic response were observed among patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection who received 12 weeks of treatment with the nucleotide polymerase inhibitor sofosbuvir combined with the NS5A inhibitor ledipasvir. This study examined 8 weeks of treatment with this regimen.. In this phase 3, open-label study, we randomly assigned 647 previously untreated patients with HCV genotype 1 infection without cirrhosis to receive ledipasvir and sofosbuvir (ledipasvir-sofosbuvir) for 8 weeks, ledipasvir-sofosbuvir plus ribavirin for 8 weeks, or ledipasvir-sofosbuvir for 12 weeks. The primary end point was sustained virologic response at 12 weeks after the end of therapy.. The rate of sustained virologic response was 94% (95% confidence interval [CI], 90 to 97) with 8 weeks of ledipasvir-sofosbuvir, 93% (95% CI, 89 to 96) with 8 weeks of ledipasvir-sofosbuvir plus ribavirin, and 95% (95% CI, 92 to 98) with 12 weeks of ledipasvir-sofosbuvir. As compared with the rate of sustained virologic response in the group that received 8 weeks of ledipasvir-sofosbuvir, the rate in the 12-week group was 1 percentage point higher (97.5% CI, -4 to 6) and the rate in the group that received 8 weeks of ledipasvir-sofosbuvir with ribavirin was 1 percentage point lower (95% CI, -6 to 4); these results indicated noninferiority of the 8-week ledipasvir-sofosbuvir regimen, on the basis of a noninferiority margin of 12 percentage points. Adverse events were more common in the group that received ribavirin than in the other two groups. No patient who received 8 weeks of only ledipasvir-sofosbuvir discontinued treatment owing to adverse events.. Ledipasvir-sofosbuvir for 8 weeks was associated with a high rate of sustained virologic response among previously untreated patients with HCV genotype 1 infection without cirrhosis. No additional benefit was associated with the inclusion of ribavirin in the regimen or with extension of the duration of treatment to 12 weeks. (Funded by Gilead Sciences; ION-3 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01851330.).

Topics: Adult; Aged; Antiviral Agents; Benzimidazoles; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Resistance, Viral; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Fluorenes; Genotype; Hepacivirus; Hepatitis C, Chronic; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Ribavirin; RNA, Viral; Sofosbuvir; Uridine Monophosphate; Viral Load; Young Adult

Effective treatment for hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 1 infection in patients who have not had a sustained virologic response to prior interferon-based therapy represents an unmet medical need.. We conducted a phase 3, randomized, open-label study involving patients infected with HCV genotype 1 who had not had a sustained virologic response after treatment with peginterferon and ribavirin, with or without a protease inhibitor. Patients were randomly assigned to receive the NS5A inhibitor ledipasvir and the nucleotide polymerase inhibitor sofosbuvir in a once-daily, fixed-dose combination tablet for 12 weeks, ledipasvir-sofosbuvir plus ribavirin for 12 weeks, ledipasvir-sofosbuvir for 24 weeks, or ledipasvir-sofosbuvir plus ribavirin for 24 weeks. The primary end point was a sustained virologic response at 12 weeks after the end of therapy.. Among the 440 patients who underwent randomization and were treated, 20% had cirrhosis and 79% had HCV genotype 1a infection. The rates of sustained virologic response were high in all treatment groups: 94% (95% confidence interval [CI], 87 to 97) in the group that received 12 weeks of ledipasvir-sofosbuvir; 96% (95% CI, 91 to 99) in the group that received 12 weeks of ledipasvir-sofosbuvir and ribavirin; 99% (95% CI, 95 to 100) in the group that received 24 weeks of ledipasvir-sofosbuvir; and 99% (95% CI, 95 to 100) in the group that received 24 weeks of ledipasvir-sofosbuvir and ribavirin. No patient discontinued treatment owing to an adverse event. The most common adverse events were fatigue, headache, and nausea.. Treatment with a once-daily, single-tablet regimen of ledipasvir and sofosbuvir resulted in high rates of sustained virologic response among patients with HCV genotype 1 infection who had not had a sustained virologic response to prior interferon-based treatment. (Funded by Gilead Sciences; ION-2 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01768286.).

Topics: Adult; Aged; Antiviral Agents; Benzimidazoles; Drug Combinations; Female; Fluorenes; Genotype; Hepacivirus; Hepatitis C, Chronic; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Nucleotidyltransferases; RNA-Dependent RNA Polymerase; Sofosbuvir; Uridine Monophosphate; Viral Load; Viral Nonstructural Proteins

In phase 2 studies, treatment with the all-oral combination of the nucleotide polymerase inhibitor sofosbuvir and the NS5A inhibitor ledipasvir resulted in high rates of sustained virologic response among previously untreated patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 1 infection.. We conducted a phase 3, open-label study involving previously untreated patients with chronic HCV genotype 1 infection. Patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1:1:1 ratio to receive ledipasvir and sofosbuvir in a fixed-dose combination tablet once daily for 12 weeks, ledipasvir-sofosbuvir plus ribavirin for 12 weeks, ledipasvir-sofosbuvir for 24 weeks, or ledipasvir-sofosbuvir plus ribavirin for 24 weeks. The primary end point was a sustained virologic response at 12 weeks after the end of therapy.. Of the 865 patients who underwent randomization and were treated, 16% had cirrhosis, 12% were black, and 67% had HCV genotype 1a infection. The rates of sustained virologic response were 99% (95% confidence interval [CI], 96 to 100) in the group that received 12 weeks of ledipasvir-sofosbuvir; 97% (95% CI, 94 to 99) in the group that received 12 weeks of ledipasvir-sofosbuvir plus ribavirin; 98% (95% CI, 95 to 99) in the group that received 24 weeks of ledipasvir-sofosbuvir; and 99% (95% CI, 97 to 100) in the group that received 24 weeks of ledipasvir-sofosbuvir plus ribavirin. No patient in either 12-week group discontinued ledipasvir-sofosbuvir owing to an adverse event. The most common adverse events were fatigue, headache, insomnia, and nausea.. Once-daily ledipasvir-sofosbuvir with or without ribavirin for 12 or 24 weeks was highly effective in previously untreated patients with HCV genotype 1 infection. (Funded by Gilead Sciences; ION-1 ClinicalTrials.gov number NCT01701401.).

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antiviral Agents; Benzimidazoles; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Resistance, Viral; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Fluorenes; Genotype; Hepacivirus; Hepatitis C, Chronic; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Ribavirin; RNA, Viral; Sofosbuvir; Uridine Monophosphate; Viral Load; Young Adult

Treatment with GS-9669, a novel nonnucleoside inhibitor (site II) of hepatitis C virus (HCV) nonstructural 5B (NS5B) polymerase, resulted in significant antiviral activity in HCV genotype (GT) 1 patients dosed at 50 and 500 mg once daily (QD) and at 50, 100, and 500 mg twice daily (BID) for 3 days. This report characterizes the virologic resistance to GS-9669 in vitro and in GT1 HCV-infected patients from a phase I clinical study. An in vitro resistance selection study with GS-9669 revealed substitutions at several NS5B residues that conferred resistance. The M423 variants were selected at low drug concentrations (5× the 50% effective concentration [EC50]), and the L419, R422, and I482 variants were selected at higher drug concentrations (20× the EC50). During the phase I clinical study, substitutions at NS5B residues 419, 422, and 486 were the predominant changes associated with GS-9669 monotherapy. Substitutions at position 423 were observed only in GT1a patients in the low-dose groups (50 and 100 mg BID). Interestingly, four HCV patients had substitutions at position 423 at baseline. Consistent with the low resistance level at this position, three patients with M423I or M423V at baseline achieved >2-log10 reductions of HCV RNA when treated with 100 mg BID or with 500 mg QD or BID of GS-9669. The fourth patient, who had the M423V substitution at baseline, had a 4.4-log10 reduction of HCV RNA with 500 mg BID of GS-9669. Phenotypic analyses demonstrated that the viral isolates with multiple GS-9669 resistance-associated variants have reduced susceptibility to GS-9669 and lomibuvir (VX-222) but are not cross-resistant to other classes of HCV inhibitors. (This study has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under registration no. NCT01431898.).

Topics: Adult; Antiviral Agents; Base Sequence; Benzimidazoles; Cell Line; Drug Resistance, Viral; Female; Fluorenes; Furans; Genetic Variation; Hepacivirus; Hepatitis C, Chronic; Humans; Male; Microbial Sensitivity Tests; Molecular Sequence Data; Protein Binding; Quinolines; Ribavirin; Sequence Analysis, RNA; Sofosbuvir; Thiophenes; Treatment Outcome; Uridine Monophosphate; Viral Nonstructural Proteins

The interferon (IFN)-free regimen of sofosbuvir and ribavirin for 24 weeks was recently approved to treat chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 1 (GT-1) infection for patients ineligible for IFN. However, sofosbuvir plus ribavirin therapy is associated with relapse in 15% to 30% of patients with HCV GT-1. Neither the mechanism of relapse nor the optimal re-treatment strategy for these patients is defined.. To assess the safety and efficacy of sofosbuvir plus ledipasvir in patients with chronic HCV GT-1 that relapsed after sofosbuvir plus ribavirin therapy.. Phase 2a, open-label study. (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01805882).. Single U.S site.. 14 patients with HCV GT-1 that relapsed after treatment with sofosbuvir plus ribavirin for 24 weeks were re-treated with sofosbuvir plus ledipasvir for 12 weeks.. HCV RNA concentration and population sequencing to detect NS5B S282T mutations.. All 14 patients treated with sofosbuvir plus ledipasvir for 12 weeks achieved a sustained virologic response, including 7 with advanced liver disease (Knodell Histology Activity Index score of 3 or 4) and 1 with a detectable NS5B S282T mutation after sofosbuvir plus ribavirin therapy. Sofosbuvir plus ledipasvir was well-tolerated with few adverse events. Four grade 3 events (elevated serum creatinine in a patient with baseline renal insufficiency, hypercholesterolemia, and hypophosphatemia) occurred. There were no grade 4 events or treatment discontinuations.. Small sample size.. The fixed-dose combination of sofosbuvir plus ledipasvir was efficacious in a small cohort of patients with HCV GT-1 that relapsed after sofosbuvir plus ribavirin therapy, even in the setting of advanced liver disease. Larger studies are needed to confirm these preliminary efficacy results.. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute, and Gilead Sciences.

Topics: Aged; Antiviral Agents; Benzimidazoles; Drug Therapy, Combination; Fluorenes; Genotype; Hepacivirus; Hepatitis C, Chronic; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Mutation; Recurrence; Ribavirin; RNA, Viral; Sofosbuvir; Uridine Monophosphate

GS-5885 is a novel hepatitis C virus (HCV) NS5A inhibitor. In a 3-day monotherapy study in treatment-naive genotype 1a (GT1a) and GT1b HCV-infected subjects, median viral load reductions ranged from 2.3 to 3.3 log10 HCV RNA IU/ml across dosing cohorts (1, 3, 10, 30, or 90 mg once daily). Here, we report viral sequencing and phenotypic analysis of clinical isolates from this study. Detection of baseline NS5A amino acid substitutions at positions 28, 30, 31, or 93 in GT1a was associated with a reduced treatment response. In the GT1b cohort, Y93H was detected in 100% of subjects at day 4 or 14. In the Gt1a cohort, population sequencing detected NS5A resistance-associated mutations at day 4 or 14 for 3/10 subjects at the 1-mg dose and for all subjects dosed at ≥3 mg. A subset of mutants that confer a low level of reduced susceptibility to GS-5885 was not detected by population sequencing at the 30- and 90-mg doses. Subject-derived M28T, Q30R, L31M, and Y93C mutations all conferred >30-fold reductions in GS-5885 and daclatasvir susceptibilities in vitro. Site-directed NS5A mutants also showed reduced susceptibility to GS-5885. However, all NS5A mutants tested remained fully susceptible to other classes of direct-acting antivirals (DAAs), interferon alpha, and ribavirin. Importantly, the nonoverlapping resistance profile and high potency of GS-5885 support its further development with other direct-acting antivirals for the treatment of chronic HCV. (This study has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under registration number NCT01193478.).

Topics: Antiviral Agents; Benzimidazoles; Drug Resistance, Viral; Fluorenes; Hepacivirus; Hepatitis C, Chronic; Humans; Mutation; Treatment Outcome; Viral Nonstructural Proteins

GS-5885 is an inhibitor of the hepatitis C virus (HCV) NS5A protein and exhibits potent suppression of genotype 1 HCV replicons. The safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, antiviral activity, and resistance profile of once-daily GS-5885 doses of 1-90 mg were evaluated in patients with chronic genotype 1 HCV.. Genotype 1 HCV-infected patients were randomized to 3 days of once-daily (QD) dosing with placebo (n=12) or GS-5885 1 mg (n=10), 3 mg (n=10), 10 mg (n=20), 30 mg (n=10), or 90 mg (n=10). Plasma samples for pharmacokinetics, HCV RNA, and NS5A sequencing were collected through day 14.. GS-5885 was well tolerated and resulted in median maximal reductions in HCV RNA ranging from 2.3 log(10) IU/ml (1 mg QD) to 3.3 log(10) IU/ml (10 mg QD in genotype 1b and 30 mg QD). E(max) modeling indicated GS-5885 30 mg was associated with>95% of maximal antiviral response to HCV genotype 1a. HCV RNA reductions were generally more sustained among patients with genotype 1b vs. 1a. Three of 60 patients had a reduced response and harbored NS5A-resistant virus at baseline. NS5A sequencing identified residues 30 and 31 in genotype 1a, and 93 in genotype 1b as the predominant sites of mutation following GS-5885 dosing. Plasma pharmacokinetics was consistent with QD dosing.. During 3 days of monotherapy, low doses of GS-5885 demonstrated significant antiviral activity in genotype 1a and 1b HCV-infected patients. GS-5885 is currently being evaluated in combination with direct antiviral regimens with and without peginterferon.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Antiviral Agents; Benzimidazoles; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Resistance, Viral; Female; Fluorenes; Genotype; Hepacivirus; Hepatitis C, Chronic; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Placebos; RNA, Viral; Treatment Outcome; Viral Nonstructural Proteins; Young Adult

The development of direct-acting antivirals directed against the Hepatitis C Virus has dramatically modified the therapeutic approach to chronic hepatic viral disease. Larger use of such drugs has also led to increasing reports about their adverse effects. This report aimed to describe a case of leucocytoclasic vasculitis following treatment based on the sofosbuvir/ledipasvir regimen with complete disappearance shortly after withdrawal in a 61-year-old patient treated for genotype 1 hepatitis C.. A 61-year-old Tunisian woman with a history of hepatitis C virus genotype 1 infection developed palpable purpura in front of low extremity articulation, five weeks after the onset of sofosbuvir/Ledipasvir. The histological examination concluded with leucocytoclasic vasculitis, with total disappearance three days after withdrawal. The pre-therapeutic assessment showed no positivity of Cryoglobulinemia. Anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies (ANCA) were negative. A sustained viral response was obtained only 5 weeks after treatment without an increase of viral load during follow-up.. There was a temporal relationship between antiviral treatment and non-ANCA skin vasculitis. The pharmacological department concluded the imputability of antiviral treatment (score I2B2).

Topics: Antibodies, Antineutrophil Cytoplasmic; Antiviral Agents; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Genotype; Hepacivirus; Hepatitis C, Chronic; Humans; Middle Aged; Sofosbuvir; Treatment Outcome; Vasculitis

A patient with genotype 1b chronic hepatitis C virus who had been treated with pegylated interferon and ribavirin (RBV) was treated with glecaprevir/pibrentasvir (GLE/PIB) for 12 weeks. A sustained virological response at post-treatment week 12 (SVR12) was achieved, but relapse occurred approximately 31 weeks after the end of treatment. The patient had a history of allergy to RBV and was treated with ledipasvir/sofosbuvir (LDV/SOF), achieving SVR12 and remaining hepatitis C virus-negative until 24 weeks after the completion of treatment. LDV/SOF can thus be a secondary treatment for GLE/PIB.

Topics: Antiviral Agents; Drug Therapy, Combination; Genotype; Hepacivirus; Hepatitis C; Hepatitis C, Chronic; Humans; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Ribavirin; Sofosbuvir

Chronic hepatitis C [CHC] is a risk factor for porphyria cutanea tarda [PCT]. To assess whether ledipasvir/sofosbuvir is effective for treating both PCT and CHC, we treated patients with CHC + PCT solely with ledipasvir/sofosbuvir and followed them for at least 1 year to assess cure of CHC and remission of PCT.. Between September 2017 and May 2020, 15 of 23 screened PCT + CHC patients were eligible and enrolled. All were treated with ledipasvir/sofosbuvir at recommended doses and durations, according to their stage of liver disease. We measured plasma and urinary porphyrins at baseline and monthly for the first 12 months and at 16, 20, and 24 mos. We measured serum HCV RNA at baseline, 8-12, and 20-24 mos. Cure of HCV was defined as no detectable serum HCV RNA ≥ 12 weeks after the end of treatment (EOT). Remission of PCT was defined clinically as no new blisters or bullae and biochemically as urinary uro- plus hepta-carboxyl porphyrins ≤ 100 mcg/g creatinine.. All 15 patients, 13 of whom were men, were infected with HCV genotype 1. 2/15 withdrew or were lost to follow-up. Of the remaining 13, 12 achieved cure of CHC; 1 had complete virological response, followed by relapse of HCV after ledipasvir/sofosbuvir but was subsequently cured by treatment with sofosbuvir/velpatasvir. Of the 12 cured of CHC, all achieved sustained clinical remission of PCT.. Ledipasvir/sofosbuvir [and likely other direct-acting antivirals] is an effective treatment for HCV in the presence of PCT and leads to clinical remission of PCT without additional phlebotomy or low-dose hydroxychloroquine treatment.. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03118674.

Topics: Antiviral Agents; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Fluorenes; Genotype; Hepacivirus; Hepatitis C, Chronic; Humans; Male; Porphyria Cutanea Tarda; Porphyrins; RNA; Sofosbuvir; Treatment Outcome

Human pegivirus (HPgV) is a single-stranded RNA virus​ that is closely related to hepatitis C virus (HCV)​. HPgV has also been shown to infect patients with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). The mechanisms and disease outcomes of HPgV infections are largely unknown, although it has been implicated in both cancer and neurological diseases. There are no established therapies for HPgV.. To estimate the prevalence of HPgV in a cohort of HCV/HIV co-infected patients undergoing treatment for HCV with direct acting antivirals (DAA) and investigate the effect of DAA therapy on HPgV infection.. RNA was extracted from plasma samples collected at time points before, during, and after DAA. HPgV RNA abundance was quantified by droplet digital PCR assays targeting the NS5A and 5'UTR domains and confirmed by RT-qPCR. Clinical, demographic and treatment data were analysed.. HPgV RNA was detected and quantified in 26 of 100 patients' plasma (26%) before starting DAA. Patients with detectable HPgV were more likely to be male, had higher peak HIV plasma levels, and a history of injection drug use. Patients receiving sofosbuvir/ledipasvir (n = 9) displayed significantly lower HPgV levels at time of DAA completion and had lower post-DAA HPgV rebound​ levels compared to patients receiving sofosbuvir/velpatasvir (n = 11) although both regimens significantly reduced viremia directly following DAA completion. Sustained suppression of HPgV was ​also observed among patients (n = 2) receiving pegylated-interferon.. HPgV RNA ​was frequently detected in HCV/HIV co-infected patients and ​was​ supressed by DAA and pegylated interferon therapies with sofosbuvir-ledipasvir showing greatest antiviral activity. These findings suggest potential treatment strategies for HPgV infections​.

Topics: Antiviral Agents; Coinfection; Female; Hepacivirus; Hepatitis C; Hepatitis C, Chronic; HIV; HIV Infections; Humans; Interferons; Male; Pegivirus; Polyethylene Glycols; RNA, Viral; Sofosbuvir; Viremia

For patients coinfected with hepatitis C virus (HCV) and hepatitis B virus (HBV), HCV treatment with direct-acting antivirals can lead to HBV reactivation. We evaluated HBV reactivation during ledipasvir/sofosbuvir treatment and 108-week follow-up.. In Taiwan, 111 patients with HCV genotype 1 or 2 and HBV received ledipasvir/sofosbuvir (90mg/400mg) once daily for 12 weeks. HBV virologic reactivation was defined as postbaseline increase in HBV DNA from either less than the lower limit of quantification (LLOQ, 20 IU/mL) to equal to or more than LLOQ or equal to or more than LLOQ to >1 log10 IU/mL. HBV clinical reactivation was HBV virologic reactivation with alanine aminotransferase (ALT) >2× upper limit of normal. Factors associated with development of HBV virologic or clinical reactivation were evaluated with logistic regression analysis.. All patients (100%, 111/111) maintained HCV suppression through 108 weeks after treatment. HBV virologic reactivation occurred in 73% of patients (81/111). Clinical reactivation occurred in 9% (10/111). The majority of HBV virologic reactivations (86%, 70/81) occurred by follow-up week 12, whereas clinical reactivation was generally more delayed. Eight (7%, 8/111) initiated HBV therapy. In regression analyses, baseline HBV DNA and hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) levels were associated with HBV virologic reactivation and baseline ALT and HBV DNA, and HBsAg levels were associated with HBV clinical reactivation.. Among HCV/HBV coinfected patients treated with direct-acting antivirals for HCV, HBV virologic reactivation occurred in a majority of patients during treatment and follow-up. In most patients, HBV virologic reactivation was asymptomatic; only a small proportion initiated HBV treatment. Notably, clinical reactivation may still occur >3 months after end of therapy.. NCT02613871.

Topics: Antiviral Agents; Benzimidazoles; Coinfection; DNA, Viral; Fluorenes; Follow-Up Studies; Hepacivirus; Hepatitis B; Hepatitis B Surface Antigens; Hepatitis B virus; Hepatitis C; Hepatitis C, Chronic; Humans; Sofosbuvir; Taiwan

The Taiwan Association for the Study of the Liver (TASL) HCV Registry (TACR) is a nationwide registry of chronic hepatitis C patients in Taiwan. This study evaluated antiviral effectiveness of ledipasvir (LDV)/sofosbuvir (SOF) in patients in the TACR.. Patients enrolled in TACR from 2017-2020 treated with LDV/SOF were eligible. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients with sustained virologic response 12 weeks after end of treatment (SVR12).. 5644 LDV/SOF ± ribavirin-treated patients were included (mean age: 61.4 years; 54.4% female). Dominant viral genotypes were GT1 (50.8%) and GT2 (39.3%). 1529 (27.1%) patients had liver cirrhosis, including 201 (3.6%) with liver decompensation; 686 (12.2%) had chronic kidney disease. SVR12 was achieved in 98.6% of the overall population and in 98.2% and 98.7% of patients with and without cirrhosis, respectively. SVR12 rates in patients with compensated cirrhosis treated with LDV/SOF without RBV were >98%, regardless of prior treatment experience. SVR12 was 98.6%, 98.4%, 100%, 100%, and 98.7% among those with GT1, GT2, GT4, GT5, and GT6 infections, respectively. Although patient numbers were relatively small, SVR12 rates of 100% were reported in patients infected with HCV GT2, GT5, and GT6 with decompensated cirrhosis and 98% in patients with severely compromised renal function. LDV/SOF adherence ≤60% (P < 0.001) was the most important factor associated with treatment failure. Incidence of adverse events was 15.8%, with fatigue being the most common.. LDV/SOF is effective and well tolerated in routine clinical practice in Taiwan. Cure rates were high across patient populations.

Topics: Antiviral Agents; Benzimidazoles; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Fluorenes; Genotype; Hepacivirus; Hepatitis C, Chronic; Humans; Liver Cirrhosis; Male; Middle Aged; Registries; Ribavirin; Sofosbuvir; Taiwan; Uridine Monophosphate

: Background: There are limited data available on the influence of direct-acting antivirals used to treat chronic hepatitis C (CHC) on growth in children. In this study, we aimed to analyze the growth parameters in children treated with ledipasvir/sofosbuvir (LDV/SOF). Methods: We included 38 patients (16 girls and 22 boys) aged 10−17 years treated with LDV/SOF for CHC (33 infected with genotype 1 and 5 with genotype 4; 36 were treated for 12 weeks, and 2 for 24 weeks according to the current guidelines). Patient weight and height were measured at baseline, after 4 weeks of treatment, at the end of the treatment (EOT), and 12 weeks and one year after the EOT. Body mass index (BMI), BMI z and height-for-age (HA) z scores were calculated according to the WHO Child Growth Standards and Growth reference data using the WHO anthropometric calculator AnthroPlus v. 1.0.4. In addition, correlations between BMI z scores and liver fibrosis (liver stiffness measurement, LSM), the aspartate transaminase (AST)-to-platelet ratio index (APRI), fibrosis-4 index (FIB-4) and liver steatosis (controlled attenuation parameter, CAP) were analyzed. Results: At baseline, 5/38 (13%) patients were obese (BMI z score >2 SD), 4/38 (11%) were overweight, and 29 (76%) were normal. A significant increase was observed in mean weight, height and BMI both 12 weeks and one year after the treatment compared to the baseline, whereas no differences were observed for BMI z scores and HA z scores. Baseline BMI z scores correlated with alanine aminotransferase levels (r = 0.33, 95% CI 0.01−0.58, p = 0.04), LSM (r = 0.40, 95% CI 0.09−0.65, p = 0.01), the APRI (r = 0.33, 95% CI 0.02−0.59, p = 0.03), and the CAP (r = 0.40, 95% CI 0.08−0.64, p = 0.01). No similar correlations were reported at 12 weeks posttreatment. Conclusions: Treatment with LDV/SOF in children with CHC (genotypes 1 and 4) did not negatively influence the patients’ growth. However, higher baseline BMI z scores correlated with more advanced liver fibrosis and steatosis in children with CHC.

Topics: Adolescent; Antiviral Agents; Benzimidazoles; Child; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Fluorenes; Genotype; Hepacivirus; Hepatitis C, Chronic; Humans; Liver Cirrhosis; Male; Sofosbuvir; Treatment Outcome

The course of hepatitis C disease has changed with the use of direct-acting antiviral drugs in the treatment of the disease. The aim of this study was to evaluate the real-life efficacy and safety of the sofosbuvir/ledipasvir drug regimen in the treatment of patients with genotype 1b.. Treatment-naive or -experienced 49 genotypes 1b patients treated with sofosbuvir/ledipasvir participated in the study. Laboratory and hepatitis C virus RNA values were evaluated at baseline, week 12, and week 24 of treatment (36th week for those who received 24 weeks of treatment).. The sustained virologic response rate was 100% in patients who completed treatment. At the end of the study, there was a significant decrease in alanine transaminase, aspartate transaminase, gamma-glutamyl transferase, and alpha-fetoprotein levels (P = .000014, P = .000581, P = .000012, and P = .000821), respectively. Renal function tests (creatinine, estimated glomerular filtration rate) worsened (P = .003 and P = .007, respectively). Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) was developed in 2 patients during post-treatment follow-up. In Kaplan-Meier analysis, the probability of not developing HCC was 86.5% at 26 months.. The sofosbuvir/ledipasvir combination is effective in treating genotype 1b chronic hepatitis C with high sustained virologic response rates. Because there are few drug interactions, it may be a suitable option for patients taking multiple medications or who are transplant recipients. Renal function should be monitored closely during and after treatment, as there is a risk of worsening renal function after treatment.

Topics: Antiviral Agents; Benzimidazoles; Carcinoma, Hepatocellular; Drug Therapy, Combination; Fluorenes; Genotype; Hepacivirus; Hepatitis C, Chronic; Humans; Liver Neoplasms; Sofosbuvir; Sustained Virologic Response; Treatment Outcome

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of ledipasvir/sofosbuvir (LDV/SOF) therapy in hepatitis C virus (HCV)-infected Korean patients in a real clinical setting.. A total of 273 patients who received LDV/SOF therapy between May 2016 and February 2021 were consecutively enrolled and analyzed. A per-protocol analysis was performed to evaluate the virologic response.. Seventy-five percent were infected with genotype 1, and 25% were infected with genotype 2. A hundred eightyone (66.3%) patients had chronic hepatitis, 74 (27.1%) had compensated cirrhosis, eight (2.9%) had decompensated cirrhosis, and 10 (3.7%) had undergone liver transplantation. Undetectable HCV RNA at week 4 was achieved in 90.2% (231/256) of patients, 99.2% (250/252) achieved the end of treatment response, and 98.1% (202/206) achieved sustained virologic response at 12 weeks post-treatment (SVR12). According to liver function, the SVR12 rates were 99.3% (135/136) in chronic hepatitis, 96.4% (53/55) in compensated cirrhosis, and 100% (6/6) in decompensated cirrhosis. The SVR12 rates according to the genotype were 98.2% (167/170) for genotype 1 and 97.2% (35/36) for genotype 2. An 8-week LDV/SOF treatment in treatment-naïve chronic hepatitis patients with HCV RNA < 6,000,000 IU/mL at baseline resulted in 100% (23/23) SVR12 rates. Overall, LDV/SOF was tolerated well, with a 0.7% (2/273) discontinuation rate due to adverse events that were unrelated to LDV/SOF.. LDV/SOF is effective and safe for treating HCV-infected Korean patients with high SVR12 rates.

Topics: Antiviral Agents; Cohort Studies; Genotype; Hepacivirus; Hepatitis C; Hepatitis C, Chronic; Humans; Liver Cirrhosis; Republic of Korea; RNA; Sofosbuvir; Treatment Outcome

Chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection represents a crucial health problem in children that greatly influences their quality of life. Many efforts have been directed toward investing in effective drugs with a high safety profile and oral administration for better compliance.. This study aims to assess the safety of a fixed-dose combination of ledipasvir/sofosbuvir plus drug efficacy and sustained virologic response (SVR) at 12 weeks after treatment discontinuation.. One tablet (90 mg ledipasvir, 400 mg sofosbuvir) was administered to treatment-naïve children aged 12-18 years weighing at least 35 kg with chronic HCV infection for 6 months, genotype 4. Patients were divided into 2 groups, (1) without comorbidities (24 patients) and (2) with comorbidities (26 patients).. At the end of the therapy, all patients (100%) had SVR and a significant reduction of liver enzymes with mild tolerable side effects.. Ledipasvir/sofosbuvir fixed-dose combination is a safe and highly effective therapeutic option in Egyptian children aged ≥ 12 years, with chronic HCV infection, genotype 4, either without or with comorbidities.

Topics: Antiviral Agents; Benzimidazoles; Child; Drug Therapy, Combination; Fluorenes; Genotype; Hepacivirus; Hepatitis C, Chronic; Humans; Quality of Life; Sofosbuvir; Treatment Outcome

Patients with thalassemia have a lifelong need for blood transfusion, which makes them more risky to hepatitis C virus (HCV). Iron overload and chronic HCV are considered risk factors for patients with thalassemia to develop liver insults. The aim of the present study is to investigate the safety and efficacy of sofosbuvir/ledipasvir in the treatment of chronic HCV infection in Egyptian adult patients with β- thalassemia major.. A retrospective study included 53 patients with β-thalassemia major with chronic HCV treated with sofosbuvir (400 mg) and ledipasvir (90 mg) as a single pill fixed-dose combination once daily for 12 weeks. The effectiveness of the treatment was assessed by the sustained virologic response (SVR) at 12 weeks after the end of the treatment.. SVR was achieved in 96.23% of patients. 47.17% of patients had minor side effects. There was a significant reduction in ALT, AST, and serum ferritin 12 weeks post-therapy. There was an insignificant change in hemoglobin level or blood transfusion requirement 12 weeks posttherapy. There was no change in iron chelators doses throughout the study period.. Sofosbuvir/ledipasvir regimen seems to be safe and highly effective in the treatment of chronic HCV in patients with β-thalassemia major.

Topics: Adult; Antiviral Agents; Benzimidazoles; beta-Thalassemia; Drug Therapy, Combination; Fluorenes; Genotype; Hepatitis C, Chronic; Humans; Retrospective Studies; Sofosbuvir; Thalassemia; Treatment Outcome; Uridine Monophosphate

Chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection affects 71 million individuals, mostly residing in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) give high rates of sustained virological response (SVR) in high-income countries where a restricted range of HCV genotypes/subtypes circulate.. We studied United Kingdom-resident patients born in Africa to examine DAA effectiveness in LMICs where there is far greater breadth of HCV genotypes/subtypes. Viral genome sequences were determined from 233 patients.. Full-length viral genomic sequences for 26 known subtypes and 5 previously unidentified isolates covering 5 HCV genotypes were determined. From 149 patients who received DAA treatment/retreatment, the overall SVR was 93%. Treatment failure was associated primarily with 2 subtypes, gt1l and gt4r, using sofosbuvir/ledipasvir. These subtypes contain natural resistance-associated variants that likely contribute to poor efficacy with this drug combination. Treatment failure was also significantly associated with hepatocellular carcinoma.. DAA combinations give high SVR rates despite the high HCV diversity across the African continent except for subtypes gt1l and gt4r, which respond poorly to sofosbuvir/ledipasvir. These subtypes are widely distributed across Western, Central, and Eastern Africa. Thus, in circumstances where accurate genotyping is absent, ledipasvir and its generic compounds should not be considered as a recommended treatment option.

Topics: Antiviral Agents; Benzimidazoles; Drug Combinations; Drug Therapy, Combination; Fluorenes; Genotype; Hepacivirus; Hepatitis C, Chronic; Humans; Retreatment; Sofosbuvir; Sustained Virologic Response

Ledipasvir is an effective direct acting antiviral agent used in the treatment of hepatitis C virus. The high price of ledipasvir was a reason for its limited provision to wide population of HCV patients.. Our objective is the formulation of liver targeted drug delivery system that can increase the amount of ledipasvir delivered to liver and prolong its liver residence in an attempt to reduce its recommended dose and its costing in the treatment of HCV.. Different ledipasvir-loaded spanlastic formulations were prepared using the ethanol injection method and evaluated with respect to the particle size, zeta potential, polydispersity index, and entrapment efficiency %. Using Design-Expert ® software, the optimum spanlastics formulation was selected; then, it was coated by synthesized galactosylated chitosan. A pharmacokinetic study was carried out to evaluate the ability of the prepared galactosylated chitosan-coated spanlastics formulation to enhance ledipasvir liver bioavailability when it was administrated via the oral route.. The pharmacokinetic study revealed that the optimized galactosylated chitosan-coated spanlastics exhibited significantly higher liver peak concentration (Cmax) and area under liver concentration versus time curve (AUC0-72 h) and significant prolongation in the liver terminal half life (t½) and mean residence time (MRT) compared to the free ledipasvir dispersion with values of 6270 ng/g, 61,706.3 ng.h/g, 15.85 h, and 24.66 h, respectively.. Enhanced liver bioavailability of ledipasvir has been accomplished using the developed galactosylated chitosan-coated spanlastics which can be a base for probable reduction in the required dose of ledipasvir in HCV treatment.

Topics: Antiviral Agents; Benzimidazoles; Chitosan; Drug Carriers; Fluorenes; Hepatitis C, Chronic; Humans

Hepatitis C virus (HCV)-related decompensated cirrhosis is a severe life-threatening illness. The safety of direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) has opened a gate of hope for that subgroup of patients who were previously contraindicated for interferon therapy.. We aimed at the investigation of the safety and efficacy of different DAAs regimens in the treatment of HCV-related decompensated cirrhosis patients, to determine sustained virological response (SVR)12 rates and to analyze the factors associated with response.. A retrospective, single-center study including HCV-related decompensated cirrhosis patients who received DAAs. Demographic, laboratory and clinical data were analyzed. The SVR12 rate was the primary outcome measure. Secondary outcomes included the predictors of response, changes in the baseline model for end-stage liver disease and child-turcotte-pugh (CTP) scores, and fibroindices (APRI and fibrosis-4 index) at 12 weeks after treatment.. In total, 145 eligible patients (141 with CTP class B and 4 with class C) were enrolled in this study. SVR12 was achieved by 88.06% (118/134) of efficacy population on different DAAs regimens, Treatment was discontinued in 11 patients because of severe side effects without any deaths. Younger age showed a significant positive association with SVR12.. DAAs can be used for the treatment of HCV-related decompensated liver disease, with acceptable SVR12 rates and safety profiles.

Topics: Antiviral Agents; Benzimidazoles; Carbamates; Drug Therapy, Combination; End Stage Liver Disease; Fluorenes; Genotype; Hepacivirus; Hepatitis C; Hepatitis C, Chronic; Humans; Imidazoles; Liver Cirrhosis; Pyrrolidines; Retrospective Studies; Severity of Illness Index; Sofosbuvir; Sustained Virologic Response; Treatment Outcome; Valine

We investigated factors associated with a reduction in the quality of life and their OR of patients with chronic hepatitis C who underwent ledipasvir/sofosbuvir therapy.. The subjects were 141 outpatients who had undergone ledipasvir/sofosbuvir therapy under a diagnosis of genotype I chronic hepatitis C or Child-Pugh A compensated cirrhosis at Hitachi General Hospital. The patient background before ledipasvir/sofosbuvir therapy, laboratory data and the Chronic Liver Disease Questionnaire scores during ledipasvir/sofosbuvir therapy were investigated. The Chronic Liver Disease Questionnaire consists of 29 questions, and the mean value is calculated as the overall score through a 7-step assessment by patients. Using two divisions: a Chronic Liver Disease Questionnaire score of <7 (symptoms are present) and that of 7 (no symptoms), as objective variables, patients with a Chronic Liver Disease Questionnaire score of <7 were defined as having a reduced quality of life. Independent factors significantly associated with a reduction in the quality of life were extracted using logistic regression analysis.. Based on the multivariate analysis, an alanine aminotransferase level of ≥23 U/L (OR: 4.380, 95% CI: 1.394 to 13.756) was extracted as an independent factor associated with a reduction in the quality of life (p<0.05).. An increase in the baseline level of alanine aminotransferase was found to play a role in the reduction in the quality of life of patients with chronic hepatitis C who had undergone ledipasvir/sofosbuvir therapy.

Topics: Antiviral Agents; Benzimidazoles; Drug Therapy, Combination; Fluorenes; Genotype; Hepacivirus; Hepatitis C, Chronic; Humans; Quality of Life; Sofosbuvir

To evaluate the response to treatment by the new directly acting antivirals drugs Sofosbuvir and Ledipasvir (Harvoni), on Iraqi patients diagnosed with hepatitis C infection genotype1 and genotype 4.. This prospective study was conducted in the Gastroenterology unit of Al- Yarmouk Teaching Hospital, Baghdad, Iraq, from February 2019 to February 2020. Included were one hundred patients diagnosed with hepatitis C by antibody test and viral load. All non-cirrhotic participants received a drug containing 400 mg sofosbuvir /90 mg ledipasvir once daily for 12 weeks, whereas the cirrhotics had to take it for 24 weeks. Lab. Investigations and viral load were assessed at baseline, and twelve weeks after end of treatment.. The predominant genotype was 1 with 58 (58 %) patients whereas genotype 4 had 42 (42%) patients. Liver cirrhosis was present in 9(9%) patients and severe renal impairment in 27(27%) patients. Undetectable viral load at the end of treatment (week 12) was observed in 96 (96%) patients whereas 4 (4%) patients were reported as non-responders.. Excellent therapeutic results were achieved with generic combination of sofosbuvir/ledipasvir. The regimen is highly effective and tolerable with the highest viral response observed in HCV patients with genotype 1and 4, inclusive of patients with chronic renal failure or cirrhosis.

Topics: Antiviral Agents; Benzimidazoles; Drug Therapy, Combination; Fluorenes; Genotype; Hepacivirus; Hepatitis C, Chronic; Humans; Pharmaceutical Preparations; Prospective Studies; Ribavirin; Sofosbuvir; Treatment Outcome; Uridine Monophosphate

Egypt has the highest prevalence of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. Anti-HCV antibodies were detectable in 3% of children in Upper Egypt. Our aim was to evaluate the efficacy of ledipasvir/sofosbuvir for chronic HCV genotype 4 in adolescents with/without hematological disorders and to determine the effect of sustained virological response (SVR) on liver stiffness.. Sixty-five adolescents were recruited. There were 3 patient groups: group 1, 44 treatment-naive without hematological disorders; group 2, 6 previously treated; and group 3, 15 treatment-naive with hematological disorders. All patients received sofosbuvir 400 mg/ledipasvir 90 mg per day for 12 weeks. Serum HCV RNA levels were measured before treatment, at week 12, and at 12 weeks after the end of treatment (SVR12). Liver stiffness and the aspartate aminotransferase-platelet ratio index (APRI) score were estimated at baseline and at SVR12.. SVR12 was 100%. At SVR12, there was a significant improvement in liver stiffness in all groups. The APRI score showed significant improvements in groups 1 and 3 (P < .001 and P = .004, respectively). The treatment was well tolerated, with minimal and self-limited side effects.. Treatment of chronic HCV in adolescents using ledipasvir/sofosbuvir was effective, with a cure rate (at SVR12) of 100%. Significant improvement in liver stiffness was found in all groups.

Topics: Adolescent; Antiviral Agents; Benzimidazoles; Drug Therapy, Combination; Elasticity Imaging Techniques; Female; Fluorenes; Hematologic Diseases; Hepacivirus; Hepatitis C, Chronic; Humans; Liver; Male; Sofosbuvir; Treatment Outcome

As patients with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) tend to be older and/or have advanced liver disease in Japan, real-world data are needed to evaluate safe and effective treatment options. The study aim was to assess safety and effectiveness of ledipasvir/sofosbuvir (LDV/SOF) in a real-world cohort of Japanese patients with HCV genotype (GT) 1 infection overall and by patient subgroups: elderly, compensated cirrhotic, advanced fibrotic and those with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). A large prospective observational study was conducted, enrolling adult patients treated for HCV GT1 infection with LDV/SOF at clinical sites across Japan. Patients were observed for safety outcomes during and 4 weeks after treatment, and for sustained virologic response at 12-weeks post-treatment (SVR12). Incidence rates (IRs) of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) and serious ADRs (SADRs) and SVR12 rates were assessed overall and by subgroups. ADR and SADR IRs were low (2.26 and 0.17 per 100 person-months, respectively) and did not significantly differ in elderly patients or those with presence of compensated cirrhosis, worsening fibrosis or HCC. SVR12 rates were high overall (98.5%) and across subgroups investigated (≥94%), including patients who were elderly (98.2%), treatment-experienced (97.6%), advanced fibrotic (≥95.8%), had existing NS5A resistance-associated substitutions reported pre-treatment (95.0%), compensated cirrhosis (95.7%), HCC (94.0%) and other chronic liver diseases (96.1%). In this large, real-world observational study of Japanese patients with HCV GT1 infection, LDV/SOF treatment resulted in low incidence of adverse events, with high real-world effectiveness, even among patients with potentially higher risks of adverse safety outcomes and treatment failure.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Antiviral Agents; Benzimidazoles; Carcinoma, Hepatocellular; Fluorenes; Genotype; Hepacivirus; Hepatitis C, Chronic; Humans; Japan; Liver Neoplasms; Sofosbuvir; Sustained Virologic Response

Genotype 2 (GT2) hepatitis C virus infection is the second common genotype in Taiwan. Real-world experience of ledipasvir/sofosbuvir (LDV/SOF) for GT2 infection is limited. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of LDV/SOF in patients with GT2 chronic hepatitis C (CHC) infection.. CHC patients with GT2 infection receiving 12 weeks LDV/SOF from three hospitals were enrolled. HCV RNA was checked at baseline, end-of-treatment and 12 weeks after completing treatment. Demographic data, adverse events, renal function and metabolic profiles were recorded.. Among 392 enrolled patients, 33 patients (8.4%) were cirrhotic. Sustained virological response (SVR) rate was 96.7% (379/392) by intention-to-treat analysis and 97.2% (379/390) by per-protocol analysis. The SVR rate was lower in cirrhotic patients than in non-cirrhotic patients (90.6% vs 97.8%, p = 0.053). Two cirrhotic patients who took LDV/SOF plus ribavirin both achieved SVR. Neither drug-related severe adverse events nor discontinuation due to drug-related adverse event were reported. The estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) remained stable in patients with chronic kidney disease 3a/3b.. Twelve weeks of LDV/SOF treatment provided an excellent and safe regimen for GT2 CHC infection, particularly in non-cirrhotic patients.

Topics: Antiviral Agents; Benzimidazoles; Drug Therapy, Combination; Fluorenes; Genotype; Hepacivirus; Hepatitis C, Chronic; Humans; Ribavirin; Sofosbuvir; Taiwan; Treatment Outcome

Ledipasvir/sofosbuvir is an oral combination therapy containing fixed doses of direct-acting antiviral agents indicated for the treatment of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. Currently there are limited data on the clinical efficacy of crushed ledipasvir/sofosbuvir administered via feeding tube.. This case report discusses the successful treatment of chronic HCV genotype 1b infection with crushed ledipasvir/sofosbuvir administered through a percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tube in a patient with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) coinfection and high-grade sarcoma who had severe swallowing difficulties. The patient received crushed ledipasvir/sofosbuvir daily for a total of 12 weeks. At 12 weeks the patient had achieved a sustained virologic response.. Currently, ledipasvir/sofosbuvir is available only as a tablet, with limited pharmacokinetic data available to guide clinicians on use of the fixed-dose combination medication in crushed form. This case report highlights our experience treating a patient with HCV/HIV coinfection through administration of crushed ledipasvir/sofosbuvir via PEG tube, which we found to be a safe and effective therapeutic option.

Topics: Antiviral Agents; Benzimidazoles; Coinfection; Drug Therapy, Combination; Fluorenes; Gastrostomy; Genotype; Hepacivirus; Hepatitis C, Chronic; HIV Infections; Humans; Sofosbuvir; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Antiviral Agents; Benzimidazoles; Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid; Fluorenes; Hepatitis C, Chronic; Humans; Reproducibility of Results; Sofosbuvir

To assess the degree of liver stiffness using transient elastography in Egyptian children infected with hepatitis C virus (HCV) at baseline and 1 year after achievement of sustained virologic response (SVR) with direct acting antivirals.. This prospective study included children infected with HCV who received treatment with sofosbuvir/ledipasvir and achieved SVR. At baseline and 1 year after achievement of SVR, the extent of hepatic fibrosis was assessed by transient elastography using FibroScan to measure liver stiffness, in addition to noninvasive markers including aspartate aminotransferase/platelet ratio index (APRI) and fibrosis-4 (FIB-4) index.. The study included 23 cases that had variable degrees of fibrosis at baseline; their ages ranged between 10 and 18 years. At baseline, 13 patients had F1; 3 patients had F1-F2; 1 patient had F2; 3 patients had F3; 2 had F3-F4; and 2 patients with F4. One year after achievement of SVR, there was a statistically significant improvement in liver stiffness, APRI, and FIB-4 index (P = .03, <.001, .02, respectively). In 13 patients (56.5%), the liver stiffness improved; in 7 patients, it was stationary; and the remaining 3 patients showed mild increase in liver stiffness that was, however, associated with improvement in APRI and FIB-4 index. Comorbid conditions and previous treatment with interferon were not associated with increased liver stiffness 1 year after SVR.. Egyptian children infected with HCV genotype 4 achieved significant regression in liver stiffness after treatment with direct acting antivirals.

Topics: Adolescent; Antiviral Agents; Aspartate Aminotransferases; Benzimidazoles; Child; Elasticity Imaging Techniques; Female; Fluorenes; Genotype; Hepatitis C; Hepatitis C, Chronic; Humans; Liver Cirrhosis; Male; Prospective Studies; Sofosbuvir

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) can be eliminated by direct-acting antivirals in patients with decompensated liver cirrhosis. Although viral clearance in decompensated liver cirrhosis leads to improvement of the liver function and quality of life, changes in the skeletal muscle mass after sustained virologic response (SVR) in patients with decompensated liver cirrhosis have not been reported. We present the first report of skeletal muscle mass improvement with the achievement of SVR for HCV in a 76-year-old woman with decompensated liver cirrhosis. After achieving SVR through ledipasvir/sofosbuvir treatment, the patient showed an improvement in her liver function and an increase in her skeletal muscle mass.

Topics: Aged; Antiviral Agents; Benzimidazoles; Female; Fluorenes; Hepacivirus; Hepatitis C; Hepatitis C, Chronic; Humans; Liver Cirrhosis; Muscle, Skeletal; Quality of Life; Sofosbuvir; Treatment Outcome

Direct-Acting agents (DAAs) target and inhibit essential viral replication proteins. They have revolutionized the treatment of Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection reaching high levels of sustained virologic response. However, the detection of basal resistance-associated substitutions (RASs) to DAAs in naïve patients could be important in predicting the treatment outcome in some patients exhibiting failures to DAA-based therapies. Therefore, the aim of this work was to evaluate the presence of RASs as minority variants within intra-host viral populations, and assess their relationship to response to therapy on a multiple times relapser patient infected chronically with HCV.. A male HCV infected-patient with a genotype 1a strain was evaluated. He had previously not responded to dual therapy (pegylated interferon-α plus ribavirin) and was going to start a direct-acting agent-based therapy (DAAs). He showed no significant liver fibrosis (F0). Viral RNA was extracted from serum samples taken prior and after therapy with DAAs (sofosbubir/ledipasvir/ribavirin). NS5A and NS5B genomic regions were PCR-amplified and the amplicons were sequenced using Sanger and next-generation sequencing (NGS) approaches. RASs were searched in in-silico translated sequences for all DAAs available and their frequencies were determined for those detected by NGS technology. Sanger sequencing did not reveal the presence of RASs in the consensus sequence neither before nor after the DAA treatment. However, several RASs were found at low frequencies, both before as well as after DAA treatment. RASs found as minority variants (particularly substitutions in position 93 within NS5A region) seem to have increased their frequency after DAA pressure. Nevertheless, these RASs did not become dominant and the patient still relapsed, despite perfect adherence to treatment and having no other complications beyond the infection (no significant fibrosis, no drug abuse).. This report shows that some patients might relapse after a DAA-based therapy even when RASs (pre- and post-treatment) are detected in very low frequencies (< 1%) within intra-host viral populations. Increased awareness of this association may improve detection and guide towards a personalized HCV treatment, directly improving the outcome in hard-to-treat patients.

Topics: Antiviral Agents; Benzimidazoles; Drug Resistance, Viral; Drug Therapy, Combination; Fluorenes; Genotype; Hepacivirus; Hepatitis C, Chronic; High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Recurrence; Ribavirin; RNA, Viral; Sofosbuvir; Sustained Virologic Response

In this study, we aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of sofosbuvir-based therapies in the treatment of chronic hepatitis C in real-world clinical practice.. Data from patients with chronic hepatitis C treated with SOF/LDV ± RBV or SOF/RBV in 31 centers across Turkey between April 1, 2017, and August 31, 2018, were recorded in a nationwide database among infectious disease specialists. Demographics, clinical, and virological outcomes were analyzed.. A total of 552 patients were included in the study. The mean age of the patients was 51.28 ± 14.2, and 293 (55.8%) were female. The majority had HCV genotype 1b infection (65%), 75.04% of the patients underwent treatment, and non-cirrhosis was present at baseline in 381 patients (72.6%). SOF/LDV ± RBV treatment was given to 477 patients and 48 patients received SOF/RBV according to HCV genotype. The total SVR12 rate was 99% in all patients. Five patients experienced disease relapse during the study and all of them were genotype 2. In patients infected with HCV GT2, SVR12 was 77.3%. SVR was 100% in all patients infected with other HCV genotypes. All treatments were well tolerated by patients without causing severe adverse events. Side effects and side effects-associated treatment discontinuation rates were 28.2% and 0.4%, respectively. Weakness (13.7%) was the common side effect.. The present real-world data of 525 patients with HCV genotypes 1, 1a, 1b, 3, 4, and 5 who underwent SOF/LDV ± RBV treatment in Turkey demonstrated a high efficacy and safety profile. HCV GT2 patients should be treated with more efficacious treatment.

Topics: Antiviral Agents; Benzimidazoles; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Fluorenes; Genotype; Hepacivirus; Hepatitis C; Hepatitis C, Chronic; Humans; Ribavirin; Sofosbuvir; Treatment Outcome; Turkey

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infected adolescents with beta-thalassemia major (BTM) are considered a potential population for HCV micro-elimination model development where BTM may negatively impact the pharmacokinetic exposure parameters of sofosbuvir/ledipasvir (SOF/LED).. The study aimed at studying the effect of BTM on SOF/LED and SOF metabolite (GS-331007) pharmacokinetics.. A prospective, controlled study recruiting BTM and control HCV infected adolescents (Clinicaltrials.gov identifier-NCT04353986). Pharmacokinetic exposure to GS-331007 and LED was the primary pharmacokinetic outcome. No-effect boundaries were set to 90% confidence interval (CI) of exposure geometric mean ratio (GMR) within 70-143%. Dose suitability was based on the 90% CI of exposure GMR within 50-200% compared to adults. The percentage of patients achieving sustained virologic response 12 weeks post-treatment (SVR12) was the primary efficacy endpoint.. Thirteen patients were enrolled per study group. All patients were included in the pharmacokinetic analysis (n=26). BTM patients showed lower GS-331007 and LED exposure that could, respectively, be as low as 45.4% and 36.1% compared to their control group. GS-331007 exposure in BTM patients was nearly half (56.8%, 90% CI 45.3-71.2%) that observed in adults. Despite that low drug exposure in 46.2% of BTM patients may alert dose unsuitability, they achieved SVR12. Moreover, patients with total bilirubin ≥1.93 mg/dL were predicted to have low GS-331007 exposure (0.913 receiver operating characteristic area under the curve with sensitivity and specificity >80%).. The identified systematically lower drug exposure in BTM patients might partially explain relapses or treatment failures among BTM patients reported in other studies. BTM may be a hurdle towards implementing HCV micro-elimination model that may necessitate dose-adjustment.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Antiviral Agents; Benzimidazoles; beta-Thalassemia; Drug Therapy, Combination; Fluorenes; Genotype; Hepacivirus; Hepatitis C; Hepatitis C, Chronic; Humans; Pharmaceutical Preparations; Prospective Studies; Sofosbuvir; Treatment Outcome; Uridine Monophosphate

Infection with hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype (GT) 6 is uncommon in Taiwan, and reports of ledipasvir/sofosbuvir (LDV/SOF) treatment for GT6 are few. This study evaluates the effectiveness and safety of LDV/SOF in treating chronic hepatitis C (CHC) patients with GT6 infection.. CHC patients that were infected with GT6 and treated for 12 weeks with LDV/SOF at two hospitals were enrolled. All patients were followed for an additional 12 weeks after the completion of LDV/SOF treatment. Demographics, HCV viral load, lipid and sugar profiles, and adverse events were recorded and reviewed.. The high SVR and excellent safety of LDV/SOF treatment for GT6 CHC patients suggest that LDV/SOF is a favorable option for treating GT6 CHC patients in Taiwan and Asia.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antiviral Agents; Benzimidazoles; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Fluorenes; Genotype; Hepatitis C, Chronic; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Safety; Sofosbuvir; Taiwan; Treatment Outcome

Chronic Hepatitis C (CHC) is a common progressive healthcare challenge that leads to liver cirrhosis, liver failure, and hepatocellular carcinoma. The optimum therapy was a combination of pegylated interferon and ribavirin, which was associated with moderate response and severe side effects. Sofosbuvir revolutionized CHC treatment, especially in combination with other antiviral agents.. The aim of this study was to compare and evaluate the safety and efficacy of sofosbuvir/ daclatasvir versus sofosbuvir/ledipasvir for the treatment of non-cirrhotic naïve patients with chronic Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) genotype 4 infection for 12 weeks.. One hundred CHC genotype 4 patients (70 females, 30 males) were recruited from the hepatology clinic at the Beni-Suef general hospital. Patients were randomly allocated into two groups that received a 12 weeks treatment of either sofosbuvir 400 mg/daclatasvir 60 mg or sofosbuvir 400 mg/ledipasvir 90 mg. The sustained virological response 12 weeks post-treatment (SVR12) (HCV RNA < Lower Limit of Quantification (LLOQ)) was determined to evaluate efficacy. The clinical laboratory tests and any reported adverse effects starting from the administration of the first dose till 30 days after the last dose were assessed to evaluate safety. The main outcome measure was the assessment of the safety, efficacy and compliance of sofosbuvir/ daclatasvir versus sofosbuvir/ledipasvir for the treatment of non-cirrhotic naïve CHC genotype 4 patients for 12 weeks.. SVR12 was achieved by 98% and 96% of patients receiving sofosbuvir plus ledipasvir and sofosbuvir plus daclatasvir, respectively. The most common adverse events reported were headache, and fatigue. No patients discontinued treatment due to adverse events.. The findings from this study suggest that the 12 weeks treatment regimens of sofosbuvir plus daclatasvir and sofosbuvir plus ledipasvir were both efficacious and well-tolerated in patients with HCV genotype 4 infection. Impact on Practice: In this paper, we report on the most recent approaches in the treatment of Hepatitis C genotype 4 patients in Egypt. This is significant because this article focuses on comparing the efficacy and tolerability of the most commonly used antiviral drugs in Egypt.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Antiviral Agents; Benzimidazoles; Carbamates; Drug Therapy, Combination; Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions; Egypt; Female; Fluorenes; Genotype; Hepatitis C, Chronic; Humans; Imidazoles; Liver Cirrhosis; Male; Middle Aged; Pyrrolidines; Random Allocation; Sofosbuvir; Treatment Outcome; Valine

Ribavirin (RBV) induces nucleotide (nt) substitutions in hepatitis C virus (HCV) genome nonstructural (NS) regions. Although emergence of drug resistance-associated variants is associated with direct-acting antiviral treatment failure, the effect of RBV on genome substitutions in such patients is unknown. Genotype 1b HCV subgenomic replicon cells were treated with RBV for 120 hours. Six patients with chronic genotype 1b with HCV-infected patients who failed to respond to prior daclatasvir plus asunaprevir (DCV/ASV) therapy were treated with 12 weeks of sofosbuvir and ledipasvir plus RBV after 4 weeks of RBV monotherapy. RBV-induced genome mutations in the HCV NS region (nt3493-9301) in replicon cells and in patients during 4 weeks of RBV monotherapy were analyzed by deep sequencing. RBV-associated G-to-A and C-to-U transitions increased in a dose-dependent manner in HCV replicon cells after the RBV treatment. In patients with prior DCV/ASV treatment failures, the median serum HCV RNA level was 6.25 ± 0.31 log IU/mL at the start of RBV therapy and decreased significantly to 5.95 ± 0.4 log IU/mL (P = .03) after 4 weeks of RBV monotherapy. Although predominant HCV genome substitutions rates were similar between nontreatment and RBV-treatment periods (0.042 and 0.031 per base pair, respectively; P  = .248), the frequencies of G-to-A and C-to-U transitions significantly increased after RBV monotherapy. These transitions were enriched, particularly within the HCV NS3 region in all patients. RBV treatment induces G-to-A and C-to-U transitions in the HCV genome even in chronic patients with hepatitis C with prior DCV/ASV treatment failures.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antiviral Agents; Benzimidazoles; Carbamates; Cell Line; Drug Resistance, Viral; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Fluorenes; Genome, Viral; Hepacivirus; Hepatitis C, Chronic; Humans; Imidazoles; Isoquinolines; Male; Mutation; Pyrrolidines; Ribavirin; Sofosbuvir; Sulfonamides; Valine

Mongolia has the highest prevalence of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection worldwide. Ledipasvir/sofosbuvir (LDV/SOF) was introduced to Mongolia since 2016 for HCV eradication. It has been reported that HCV resistance-associated substitutions (RASs) would affect the effectiveness of LDV/SOF in western chronic hepatitis C (CHC) patients. We thus investigated the effectiveness of LDV/SOF and the impact of RAS on the treatment outcome in Mongolian CHC patients.. Patients with genotype (GT) 1b HCV infection were prospectively enrolled in Mongolia and treated with LDV/SOF for 12 weeks. The proportion of pre-treatment NS5A Y93H RAS in viral quasispecies was measured with next-generation sequencing. The endpoint of LDV/SOF effectiveness was sustained virological response at post-treatment week 12 (SVR12).. A total of 94 CHC patients were evaluated. The baseline Y93H proportion was <1% in 74 patients, 1-15% in 7, 15-50% in 2, and ≥50% in 11. All patients completed 12-week LDV/SOF treatment and the SVR rate was 90.4%. The rate of failure to achieve SVR12 for patients with Y93H < 1%, 1-15%, and ≥15% were 0%, 14.3%, and 61.5%, respectively (p for trend = 0.001). In univariable analysis, older age, baseline alanine transaminase level <40 U/mL, and a higher proportion of Y93H were associated with treatment failure. In multivariable analysis, only a higher proportion of Y93H was associated with treatment failure (p = 0.022).. LDV/SOF therapy achieves a high SVR rate in Mongolian CHC GT1b patients without baseline Y93H RAS. A higher proportion of Y93H may severely undermine the effectiveness of LDV/SOF.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Antiviral Agents; Benzimidazoles; Drug Resistance, Viral; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Fluorenes; Genotype; Hepatitis C, Chronic; High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Mongolia; Sofosbuvir; Treatment Failure; Treatment Outcome; Uridine Monophosphate

Topics: Antiviral Agents; Benzimidazoles; Coinfection; Fluorenes; Hepatitis B virus; Hepatitis C, Chronic; HIV Infections; Humans; Recurrence; Sofosbuvir

Topics: Benzimidazoles; Child; Child, Preschool; Fluorenes; Genotype; Hepacivirus; Hepatitis C; Hepatitis C, Chronic; Humans; Sofosbuvir

Direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) play a key role in the eradication of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. However, limited data are available on DAA for treating HCV infection in hemodialysis (HD) patients. This study was to evaluate the pharmacokinetic characteristics and effectiveness of daclatasvir/sofosbuvir (DAC/SOF) and ledipasvir/SOF (LDV/SOF) in HD patients.. Seven patients were given SOF coadministered with DAC or LDV once daily for 12 weeks. The plasma concentrations of SOF007, DAC, and LDV were determined by high-performance liquid chromatography-electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometry.. A sustained virologic response in week 12 (SVR12) was achieved in 6 (100%) patients, except for 1 patient dying due to severe cerebral hemorrhage not related to antiviral therapy. The extraction ratio of SOF007 was 66.67%, and the estimated HD clearance of SOF007 was 5.65 L/h.. The combination of SOF with either DAC or LDV is well tolerated and offers high SVR12 in HD patients.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Benzimidazoles; Carbamates; Clinical Trials as Topic; Drug Monitoring; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Fluorenes; Hepatitis C, Chronic; Humans; Imidazoles; Kidney Failure, Chronic; Male; Middle Aged; Pyrrolidines; Renal Dialysis; Sofosbuvir; Treatment Outcome; Valine

Data on direct-acting antiviral agent (DAA) treatment for mixed genotype hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection are scant. This study examined the effectiveness of glecaprevir/pibrentasvir (GLE/PIB) and ledipasvir/sofosbuvir (LDV/SOF) for mixed HCV genotype infection in a real-world setting in Taiwan. We analysed the data from all patients with mixed HCV genotype infections treated with GLE/PIB or LDV/SOF from 2017 to 2019 in three Chang Gung Memorial Hospitals in Taiwan. The primary treatment outcome was sustained virologic response 12 weeks after treatment cessation (SVR12). Adverse events (AEs) were also evaluated. A total of 5190 HCV patients received DAA treatment during this time period. Among them, 116 patients (2.2%) had mixed infections of any 2 or 3 genotypes of 1a, 1b, 2, 3 and 6. Fifty-four patients received GLE/PIB and 62 received LDV/SOF. SVR12 rates for LDV/SOF vs GLE/PIB therapy were 96.6% (56/58) vs 100% (51/51) by the per-protocol analysis and 90.3% (56/62) vs 94.4% (51/54) by the evaluable population analysis. Two patients with 1b + 6 and 1b + 2 genotype infections in the LDV/SOF group had relapse. Evaluating the GLE/PIB vs LDV/SOF groups for the most common AEs revealed pruritus (16.7% vs 4.8%), abdominal discomfort (5.6% vs 8%) and fatigue (5.6% vs 4.8%). One patient with AE-related treatment discontinuation presented with liver decompensation after 4-week GLE/PIB therapy. DAA-related significant laboratory abnormalities occurred in two patients with >3× elevated bilirubin level in the GLE/PIB group. GLE/PIB and LDV/SOF are well tolerated and achieve high SVR12 rates for patients with mixed HCV genotype infection.

Topics: Aminoisobutyric Acids; Antiviral Agents; Benzimidazoles; Cyclopropanes; Fluorenes; Genotype; Hepacivirus; Hepatitis C; Hepatitis C, Chronic; Humans; Lactams, Macrocyclic; Leucine; Proline; Pyrrolidines; Quinoxalines; Sofosbuvir; Sulfonamides; Sustained Virologic Response; Taiwan

Chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is a leading cause of cirrhosis worldwide and kills more Americans than 59 other infections, including HIV and tuberculosis, combined. While direct-acting antiviral (DAA) treatments are effective, limited uptake of therapy, particularly in high-risk groups, remains a substantial barrier to eliminating HCV. We developed a long-acting DAA system (LA-DAAS) capable of prolonged dosing and explored its cost-effectiveness. We designed a retrievable coil-shaped LA-DAAS compatible with nasogastric tube administration and the capacity to encapsulate and release gram levels of drugs while resident in the stomach. We formulated DAAs in drug-polymer pills and studied the release kinetics for 1 mo in vitro and in vivo in a swine model. The LA-DAAS was equipped with ethanol and temperature sensors linked via Bluetooth to a phone application to provide patient engagement. We then performed a cost-effectiveness analysis comparing LA-DAAS to DAA alone in various patient groups, including people who inject drugs. Tunable release kinetics of DAAs was enabled for 1 mo with drug-polymer pills in vitro, and the LA-DAAS safely and successfully provided at least month-long release of sofosbuvir in vivo. Temperature and alcohol sensors could interface with external sources for at least 1 mo. The LA-DAAS was cost-effective compared to DAA therapy alone in all groups considered (base case incremental cost-effectiveness ratio $39,800). We believe that the LA-DAA system can provide a cost-effective and patient-centric method for HCV treatment, including in high-risk populations who are currently undertreated.

Topics: Animals; Antiviral Agents; Benzimidazoles; Carbamates; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Disease Models, Animal; Drug Carriers; Drug Delivery Systems; Fluorenes; Hepacivirus; Hepatitis C, Chronic; Imidazoles; Liver Cirrhosis; Models, Animal; Pyrrolidines; Ribavirin; Sofosbuvir; Swine; Valine

BACKGROUND Short-course hepatitis C (HCV) treatment with direct-acting antivirals (DAA) under 8 weeks in duration has resulted in variable efficacy rates in HCV mono-infection. Further, DAA courses under 8 weeks in duration have not been studied in HIV/HCV co-infection. We present a case report of 12-week sustained virologic suppression after treatment interruption of ledipasvir/sofosbuvir at 4 weeks in a patient with HIV/HCV co-infection. CASE REPORT A 28-year-old male patient diagnosed with well-controlled HIV infection and HCV co-infection (treatment-naïve, genotype 1a, unknown hepatic fibrosis) started a 12-week course of ledipasvir/sofosbuvir (LDV/SOF) for HCV treatment. The patient completed only 4 weeks of LDV/SOF before returning for follow-up 7 weeks after initiation. Ledipasvir/sofosbuvir treatment was discontinued. Sustained virologic suppression at 12 weeks was observed after completion of a short, 4-week course of LDV/SOF. CONCLUSIONS Compared to currently recommended treatment durations, clinical trials of short-course DAA treatments of less than 8 weeks have not demonstrated successful rates of SVR12. However, in cases of DAA interruption or incomplete treatment, clinicians may choose to assess for SVR12 prior to continuing or restarting the full treatment course.

Topics: Adult; Antiviral Agents; Benzimidazoles; Coinfection; Drug Therapy, Combination; Fluorenes; Hepatitis C, Chronic; HIV Infections; Humans; Male; Sofosbuvir; Sustained Virologic Response

Kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) are frequently infected with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV), which can increase the risk of graft loss. Active HCV infections among KTRs are associated with shorter survival times. The emergence of very efficient interferon-free treatments (direct-acting antivirals [DAAs]) has revolutionized prognoses for chronic viral hepatitis. We performed a multicenter study where HCV (+)/RNA (+) KTRs were followed up and either received DAAs (group A) or not (group B) according to the transplant center. The aim was to assess, in a real-life setting, the impact of DAA therapy and to compare these results with those from HCV RNA (+) KTRs where HCV infection was not treated during the same period.. This study included 66 patients from 11 centers: 44 patients (66.7%; group A) received DAAs, whereas 22 patients did not (group B); the 2 groups were comparable according to baseline data. Most patients (88.6%) received sofosbuvir, 50% received ledipasvir, and 34.7% received daclatasvir. The duration of treatments ranged from 8 to 24 weeks.. HCV RNA clearance (ie, a sustained virologic response) was observed in 95.4% of treated patients. Eradication of HCV led to a significant decrease in liver enzymes (50% reduction for alanine aminotransferase [P ≤ .001] and 41% for gamma glutamyl transpeptidase [P < .001]). Conversely, liver enzymes did not decrease in group B. Death occurred significantly more frequently in nontreated than treated patients (3 in group B vs none in group A, P = .003). Of the 10 treated patients with severe renal impairment before DAA therapy, 6 experienced graft loss.. DAAs are very effective at treating chronic HCV and have an excellent tolerance profile.

Topics: Adult; Antiviral Agents; Benzimidazoles; Carbamates; Female; Fluorenes; France; Hepatitis C, Chronic; Humans; Imidazoles; Kidney Transplantation; Male; Middle Aged; Pyrrolidines; Retrospective Studies; Sofosbuvir; Sustained Virologic Response; Treatment Outcome; Valine

Topics: Acute Kidney Injury; Antiviral Agents; Benzimidazoles; Drug Therapy, Combination; Fluorenes; Genotype; Hepacivirus; Hepatitis C; Hepatitis C, Chronic; Humans; Sofosbuvir; Treatment Outcome

A simple, rapid, sensitive, and precise reversed-phase liquid chromatographic method was developed and validated for the simultaneous determination of four direct-acting antivirals, sofosbuvir (SF), ledipasvir (LD), declatasvir (DC), and simeprevir (SM), in their respective pharmaceutical formulations. Effective chromatographic separation was achieved on an Agilent Eclipse plus C8 column (250 mm × 4.6 mm, 5 µm) at 40 °C with gradient elution using a mobile phase composed of acetonitrile:phosphate buffer (pH 6.5). The quantification of SF and DC was based on peak area measurements at 260 nm, while the quantification of LD and SM was achieved at 330 nm. The linearity was acceptable from 1.0 to 20.0 μg/mL for the studied drugs, with correlation coefficients >0.999. The analytical performance of the newly proposed HPLC procedure was thoroughly validated according to ICH guidelines in terms of linearity, precision (RSD%, 0.39-1.57), accuracy (98.05-101.90%), specificity, limit of detection (LOD) (0.022-0.039 μg/mL), limit of quantification (LOQ) (0.067-0.118 μg/mL), and robustness. The validated HPLC method was successfully used to analyze the abovementioned drugs in their pure and dosage forms without interference from common excipients present in commercial formulations.

Topics: Antiviral Agents; Benzimidazoles; Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid; Chromatography, Reverse-Phase; Fluorenes; Hepatitis C, Chronic; Limit of Detection; Simeprevir; Sofosbuvir; Temperature

Direct acting antiviral (DAA) hepatitis C (HCV) medications are funded in New Zealand since 2016 for some and since 2019 for all genotypes. The purpose of this study was to review New Zealand-wide data of the use of generic HCV DAA medications imported through Tasmanian FixHepC Buyer's Club and the associated side effect profiles.. This is a retrospective data audit on the use of generic DAAs to treat HCV; outcomes from consecutive hepatitis C patients (naïve and pre-treated) treated with generic DAAs (sofosbuvir/ledipasvir, sofosbuvir/daclatasvir, sofosbuvir/ledipasvir, ribavirin) collected from all known sites that used Buyer's club medications in eight New Zealand district health board regions were summarised. Demographic, disease characteristics, FibroScan and blood markers' (platelets, ALT, GGT, AFP) data were collected.. Study sample was 81.8% New Zealand European, 64.8% male of median 56.0 (IQR: 48.0-60.0) years old. Three participants (4.5%) were HIV positive. 74.7% of the participants had signs of fibrosis (F1-F4); 40.5% had cirrhosis/scaring (F4). 61.7% of the patients were naïve to treatment. 42.0%, 40.1% and 12.0% received sofosbuvir/ledipasvir, sofosbuvir/daclatasvir, sofosbuvir/velpatasvir, respectively; 32.1% also received ribavirin. 80.2% of patients received treatment for 12 weeks. 95.1% (154/162) of the sample achieved sustained virological response at 12 weeks post-treatment, 2.5% relapsed, 1.2% were lost to follow-up. The main minor side effects included fatigue, headache, difficulty sleeping, experienced by 21.7%, 7.0%, 7.0%, respectively. An average total cost for medication and monitoring was 2,027 to 2,659 NZD (12 weeks), and 3,054 to 4,260 NZD (24 weeks) per patient.. Generic DAAs to treat hepatitis C are safe, efficient and a cheaper than branded medications option.

Topics: Aged; Antiviral Agents; Benzimidazoles; Carbamates; Drug Therapy, Combination; Drugs, Generic; Female; Fluorenes; Genotype; Hepacivirus; Hepatitis C, Chronic; Heterocyclic Compounds, 4 or More Rings; HIV Seropositivity; Humans; Imidazoles; Liver Cirrhosis; Male; Middle Aged; New Zealand; Pyrrolidines; Retrospective Studies; Sofosbuvir; Sustained Virologic Response; Valine; Viral Load

Topics: Aged; Anti-Arrhythmia Agents; Antiviral Agents; Arrhythmias, Cardiac; Benzimidazoles; Drug Interactions; Drug Therapy, Combination; Flecainide; Fluorenes; Hepatitis C, Chronic; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Sofosbuvir

Recently, a clinical study using a Chronic Liver Disease Questionnaire (CLDQ) showed that ledipasvir/sofosbuvir (LDV/SOF)-treated patients' QOL was more favorable than that of IFN/ribavirin (RBV)-treated patients. However, no study has reported QOL assessment in clinical practice. In this study, we compared the QOL between patients treated with LDV/SOF and those treated with simeprevir (SMV)/peginterferon (Peg-IFN)/RBV to provide QOL information in clinical practice. The subjects were 169 patients with type I chronic hepatitis C or compensated cirrhosis C (Child-Pugh Grade A) who were treated with SMV/Peg-IFN/RBV or LDV/SOF in Hitachi General Hospital. The QOL was assessed ≥2 weeks after the start of administration using the Japanese version of the CLDQ (Kida et al., 2008 version). The total CLDQ score in the LDV/SOF group was significantly higher than in the SMV/Peg-IFN/RBV group (6.59 vs. 6.38, respectively, p=0.007). In particular, the scores for 4 domains (abdominal symptoms, systemic symptoms, activity, and emotional function) in the former were significantly higher than in the latter (p<0.05). Furthermore, the rates of patients scoring 7 (no symptom) on 8 items in the former were significantly higher than in the latter (p<0.05). In clinical practice, LDV/SOF-treated patients' QOL was more favorable than that of those receiving conventional treatment with IFN and RBV. This study may make it possible for health care professionals to provide clinical QOL information on LDV/SOF therapy to patients. Furthermore, QOL information may promote decision-making for treatment, leading to effective treatment.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antiviral Agents; Benzimidazoles; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Fluorenes; Hepatitis C, Chronic; Humans; Interferon-alpha; Male; Middle Aged; Polyethylene Glycols; Quality of Life; Recombinant Proteins; Ribavirin; Simeprevir; Sofosbuvir; Surveys and Questionnaires

To assess the efficacy and safety of sofosbuvir based generic Direct Acting Antivirals (DAAs) in treatment of Hepatitis C virus (HCV) in adolescents with thalassemia major (TM).. In this prospective single-arm study, 18 TM adolescents with Chronic Hepatitis C received sofosbuvir based generic DAAs. Patients with genotype 1 and genotype 3 received ledipasvir and daclatasvir respectively. Two cirrhotic patients with genotype 3 also received ribavirin.. The mean age of patients was 15.1 y, of which 12 had genotype 1, 5 had genotype 3 and 1 had an undetermined genotype. Six patients had cirrhosis and 1 was treatment experienced. Sixteen of 18 patients (89%; 95% confidence interval 74 to 100%) achieved sustained virological response at 3 mo post completion of treatment with DAAs. There was a significant reduction in alanine aminotransferase levels (p < 0.001), HCV RNA load (p < 0.001) and ferritin levels (p < 0.026) at 3 mo post completion of treatment. There were no major adverse events associated with the use of DAAs.. Generic DAAs are effective and safe in TM adolescents with HCV.

Topics: Adolescent; Antiviral Agents; Benzimidazoles; beta-Thalassemia; Carbamates; Child; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Fluorenes; Genotype; Hepacivirus; Hepatitis C; Hepatitis C, Chronic; Humans; Imidazoles; Liver Cirrhosis; Male; Prospective Studies; Pyrrolidines; Ribavirin; Sofosbuvir; Sustained Virologic Response; Treatment Outcome; Valine; Viral Load

Patients with thalassemia may also have cardiac abnormalities due to congenital problems, anemia, and increased burden of iron in their myocardium. This study was designed to evaluate the effects of direct acting antiviral (DAA) therapy on the cardiac function of hepatitis C virus (HCV)-infected patients with thalassemia.. HCV-infected thalassemia patients were enrolled to this prospective evaluation. Daily tablets of 90 mg Ledipasvir (or 60 mg Daclatasvir) plus 400 mg Sofosbuvir (±ribavirin) were prescribed for the patients according to the Iran Hepatitis Network's guidelines. An echocardiography fellow collected the echocardiography findings before and after the treatment of all the patients. The patients were followed up for any cardiac events within 12 weeks after finishing the treatment.. Thirty-two patients with the mean age of 24.2 ± 6.4 years were evaluated. All patients showed a sustained virological response at the 12th week after finishing the treatment. The patients' left ventricular end systolic diameter (3.0 vs 3.24; P = 0.003) and volume (33.8 vs 43.6; P = 0.001), global longitudinal strain of the left ventricle (-22.0 vs -20.6, P = 0.046), and average (-21.4 vs -20.3; P = 0.048), and the right ventricle size (3.12 vs 3.31; P = 0.012) were significantly increased after finishing the treatment. Changes in the abovementioned parameters were not correlated with the patients' myocardium iron load. There were no significant differences in other echocardiographic parameters ( P > 0.05) before and after the treatment.. Sofosbuvir-based regimens for HCV treatment were safe for our HCV-infected patients with thalassemia. Our patients' ejection fraction remained unchanged. Hence, more specialized echocardiographic evaluations were recommended for those with a history of cardiac abnormalities, cardiac iron overload, and in case of any cardiac adverse event during DAA therapy in patients with thalassemia.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Antiviral Agents; Benzimidazoles; Female; Fluorenes; Heart; Heart Diseases; Heart Function Tests; Hepacivirus; Hepatitis C, Chronic; Humans; Male; Prospective Studies; Sofosbuvir; Thalassemia; Young Adult

Data are sparse on treatment of chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) in cancer patients. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of sofosbuvir-based therapy (SOFBT) in cancer patients.. Patients treated with SOFBT at our center during 2014-2017 were included in a prospective observational study. Efficacy [sustained virologic response at 12 weeks after the end of treatment (SVR12)], cancer-related outcomes and adverse events (AEs) were assessed.. We included 153 patients. Most were men (109; 71%), white (92; 60%), non-cirrhotic (105; 69%), and with HCV genotype 1 (110; 72%). The most common cancers were hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) (27; 18%) and multiple myeloma (14; 9%). The overall SVR12 rate was 91% (128/141). SVR12 was 100% in patients treated with ledipasvir/sofosbuvir for 8 weeks. Of the 32 patients initially excluded from cancer clinical trials because of HCV, 27 (84%) were granted cancer therapy access after starting SOFBT. Six patients with indolent non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) received SOFBT without cancer treatment. Two achieved complete remission, one had partial remission, and two had stable cancer. Within 6 months after SOFBT, 5% (6/121) of patients in remission or with stable cancer, had progression or recurrence (two with HCC and one each with esophageal cancer, cholangiocarcinoma, NHL, and tonsillar cancer). No de novo HCCs occurred. AEs were most commonly grade 1-2 (90%).. SOFBT in HCV-infected cancer patients is effective and safe, may permit access to investigational cancer therapy expanding treatment options, may induce remission of NHL, and may be used for 8 weeks.

Topics: Aged; Antiviral Agents; Benzimidazoles; Breast Neoplasms; Carbamates; Carcinoma, Hepatocellular; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Fluorenes; Head and Neck Neoplasms; Hepatitis C, Chronic; Heterocyclic Compounds, 4 or More Rings; Humans; Imidazoles; Interferons; Liver Neoplasms; Lymphoma, Non-Hodgkin; Male; Middle Aged; Multiple Myeloma; Neoplasms; Polyethylene Glycols; Prospective Studies; Pyrrolidines; Ribavirin; Simeprevir; Sofosbuvir; Sustained Virologic Response; Valine

Topics: Africa South of the Sahara; Antiviral Agents; Benzimidazoles; Fluorenes; Hepatitis C, Chronic; Humans; Rwanda; Sofosbuvir

Recently, a controversy has emerged: is the rate of recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) higher following treatment of hepatitis C virus (HCV) with direct-acting antiviral (DAA) therapy? However, the risk of HCC recurrence has not been studied in liver transplant (LTx) recipients who received DAA therapy. The aim of the present study is to compare the rate of HCC recurrence in LTx recipients who did or did not receive DAA therapy.. Sixty-three patients received LTx with HCC. Twenty-seven (42.9%) with HCV received DAA therapy (Group A), 20 (31.7%) with HCV did not receive DAA therapy (Group B), and 16 (25.4%) did not have HCV (Group C).. In group A, three (11%), in group B, one (5%), and in group C, none had recurrence of HCC. Actuarial 4-year recurrence-free survival was 88.9, 95, and 100% in group A, B, and C, respectively (p = 0.37). Group A was subdivided into two groups for comparison with Group B: A1 included five patients who had end of treatment response (ETR) without sustained virological response (SVR), and A2 included 20 patients who achieved SVR. Three patients from A1 had HCC recurrence and no patients from A2 had HCC recurrence. (p = 0.0038; group A1, A2, and B).. The rate of HCC recurrence in LTx patients with DAA therapy was significantly higher with ETR, without SVR, after DAA therapy compared to patients with SVR or patients who did not receive DAA therapy. LTx recipients with HCC receiving DAA therapy requires further studies.

Topics: Aged; Antiviral Agents; Benzimidazoles; Carcinoma, Hepatocellular; Disease-Free Survival; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Fluorenes; Hepatitis C, Chronic; Humans; Liver Neoplasms; Liver Transplantation; Male; Middle Aged; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Ribavirin; Simeprevir; Sofosbuvir; Sustained Virologic Response

Intracellular tenofovir diphosphate concentrations are markedly increased in HIV/HCV coinfected individuals receiving tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) with sofosbuvir-containing treatment. Sofosbuvir may inhibit the hydrolysis of TDF to tenofovir, resulting in increased concentrations of the disoproxil or monoester forms, which may augment cell loading. We sought to quantify tenofovir disoproxil and monoester concentrations in individuals receiving TDF with and without ledipasvir/sofosbuvir.. HIV/HCV coinfected participants receiving TDF-based therapy were sampled pre-dose and 1 and 4 h post-dose prior to and 4 weeks after initiating ledipasvir/sofosbuvir. Tenofovir disoproxil was not detectable. Tenofovir monoester in plasma and tenofovir diphosphate in PBMC and dried blood spots (DBS) were quantified using LC-MS/MS. Geometric mean ratios (week 4 versus baseline) and 95% CIs were generated for the pharmacokinetic parameters. P values reflect paired t-tests.. Ten participants had complete data. At baseline, geometric mean (95% CI) tenofovir monoester plasma concentrations at 1 and 4 h post-dose were 97.4 ng/mL (33.0-287.5) and 0.74 ng/mL (0.27-2.06), respectively. With ledipasvir/sofosbuvir, tenofovir monoester concentrations at 4 h post-dose were 5.02-fold higher (95% CI 1.40-18.05; P = 0.019), but did not significantly differ at 1 h post-dose (1.72-fold higher, 95% CI 0.25-11.78; P = 0.54), possibly due to absorption variability. Tenofovir diphosphate in PBMC and DBS were increased 2.80-fold (95% CI 1.71-4.57; P = 0.001) and 7.31-fold (95% CI 4.47-11.95; P < 0.0001), respectively, after 4 weeks of ledipasvir/sofosbuvir.. Tenofovir monoester concentrations were increased in individuals receiving TDF with ledipasvir/sofosbuvir, consistent with inhibition of TDF hydrolysis. Additional studies are needed to determine the clinical relevance of this interaction.

Topics: Adenine; Adolescent; Adult; Antiviral Agents; Benzimidazoles; Blood Chemical Analysis; Chromatography, Liquid; Drug Interactions; Female; Fluorenes; Hepatitis C, Chronic; HIV Infections; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Phosphorous Acids; Sofosbuvir; Tandem Mass Spectrometry; Tenofovir; Young Adult

 The urgent need in HCV-infected patients with liver disease mandated the rapid implementation of IFN-free DAA combination therapies following their regulatory approval in 2014 and 2015 without full knowledge of the optimal combinations and regimens. Investigating the evolution of the DAA utilization patterns and treatment outcomes could provide learnings for future situations..  This was an analysis of a prospective observational database from the German Hepatitis C Registry (DHC-R) covering a period from May 2014 to September 2015. Adult patients had evidence of chronic HCV GT1 or GT4 infection and were treated with an IFN-free combination regimen of simeprevir (SMV) + sofosbuvir (SOF) or other IFN-free regimens: daclatasvir + sofosbuvir (DCV + SOF), ledipasvir/sofosbuvir (SOF/LDV), paritaprevir/r + ombitasvir ± dasabuvir (PrOD), with or without ribavirine (R)..  A total of 5496 subjects were followed during the period. During this period, clinical recommendations and treatment patterns evolved rapidly in response to new evidence from clinical trials and clinical routine and regulatory approval of additional regimens. High SVR12 rates were seen in this cohort, even in hard-to-treat patient subgroups. In the multivariate analysis, gender, age, advanced cirrhosis, and intensified treatment for cirrhotics were associated with treatment outcome..  Despite limited knowledge of the optimal utilization of the newly approved DAA combinations and treatment durations as well as their comparative efficacy and safety profiles, high SVR rates were achieved regardless of the DAA combination. These outcomes were facilitated by the rapid adaptation of clinical recommendations. Future situations with high unmet medical need may follow a similar approach..  Die dringende Behandlungsbedürftigkeit HCV-infizierter Patienten mit Lebererkrankung verlangte die rasche Einführung IFN-freier DAA-Kombinationstherapien nach ihrer Zulassung in 2014 und 2015 trotz unvollständigem Wissen über deren optimalen Einsatz. Die Untersuchung der Evolution des Einsatzes und der Ergebnisse könnte wichtige Erkenntnisse für zukünftige Situationen bergen..  Diese Analyse einer prospektiven Kohorte des Deutschen Hepatitis C-Registers (DHC-R) deckt den Zeitraum von Mai 2014 bis September 2015 ab. Erwachsene Patienten mit chronischer HCV-GT1 oder GT4-Infektion wurden mit einer IFN-freien Therapie aus Simeprevir (SMV) + Sofosbuvir (SOF), oder anderen IFN-freien Regimen: Daclatasvir + Sofosbuvir (DCV + SOF), Ledipasvir/Sofosbuvir (SOF/LDV), Paritaprevir/r + Ombitasvir ± Dasabuvir (PrOD), mit oder ohne Ribavirin (R) behandelt..  5496 Patienten wurden während des Zeitraums beobachtet. In dieser Periode wandelten sich die klinischen Leitlinien und Behandlungsmuster rasch in Folge neuer Evidenz aus klinischen Studien und klinischer Erfahrung und der Zulassung von neuen Regimen. Hohe SVR12-Raten wurden in dieser Kohorte, selbst in schwierig zu behandelnden Patienten-Subgruppen, beobachtet. Die multivariate Analyse zeigte, dass Geschlecht, Alter, fortgeschrittene Zirrhose und die intensivierte Therapie bei Patienten mit Zirrhose mit dem Behandlungserfolg assoziiert waren..  Trotz begrenzten Wissens um den optimalen Einsatz von neu zugelassenen DAA-Kombinationen und deren Behandlungsdauer sowie dem Vergleich ihrer Wirksamkeits- und Sicherheits-Profile wurden hohe SVR12-Raten mit verschiedenen DAA-Kombinationen erzielt. Diese Ergebnisse wurden unterstützt von einer raschen Adaption klinischer Therapie-Empfehlungen. Zukünftige Szenarien mit einem erheblichen ungedeckten medizinischen Bedarf könnten einem ähnlichen Ansatz folgen.

Topics: Adult; Antiviral Agents; Benzimidazoles; Drug Combinations; Drug Therapy, Combination; Fluorenes; Hepacivirus; Hepatitis C; Hepatitis C, Chronic; Humans; Prospective Studies; Registries; Sofosbuvir; Sustained Virologic Response; Treatment Outcome

To compare the efficacy of sofosbuvir/ledipasvir (SOF/LDV) for 8 weeks (SL8) versus a 12-week course of SOF/LDV (SL12) among HIV/HCV-coinfected patients in clinical practice. In addition we compared sustained virological response (SVR) rates achieved with SL8 in HCV-monoinfected and HIV/HCV-coinfected patients in a real life setting.. In the SL8 group, 107 (51%) HCV-monoinfected and 102 (49%) HIV/HCV-coinfected patients were included. One hundred and sixty-four (43%) HCV-monoinfected subjects and 220 (57%) HIV/HCV-coinfected patients received SL12. SVR12 rates for HIV/HCV-coinfected patients treated with SL8 vs SL12 were SVR12 92.2% vs. 97.3% (p = 0.044) and the respective relapse rates were 4.9% vs. 0.5% (p = 0.013). SVR12 rates for SL8 among HCV-monoinfected and HIV/HCV-coinfected patients were: 96.3% vs. 92.2% (p = 0.243), respectively. The corresponding relapse rates were 0.9% vs. 4.9% (p = 0.112).. HIV/HCV-coinfected patients reach high rates of SVR12 with SL8, although lower than with SL12, mainly due to a higher probability of relapse. SVR12 rates with SL8 are numerically lower and the proportion of relapses higher in HIV/HCVcoinfected patients than in HCV-monoinfected subjects.

Topics: Antiviral Agents; Benzimidazoles; Coinfection; Female; Fluorenes; Hepatitis C, Chronic; HIV Infections; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Recurrence; Retrospective Studies; Sofosbuvir; Sustained Virologic Response; Treatment Outcome

Direct antiviral agents (DAAs) can eliminate hepatitis C virus rapidly and make chronic hepatitis C (CHC) curable. The changes in the innate immune system during treatment with DAAs are still in dispute. To investigate how the functions of natural killer (NK) cells change during and after treatment with DAAs in each NK cell subset. Thirteen CHC patients were treated with sofosbuvir/ledipasvir, and the expression levels of NKp46 and NKG2A were tested via flow cytometry at baseline, at 2, 4, 8 and 12 weeks during the therapy and 12 and 24 weeks after the end of treatment; expression levels were compared between CHC patients and 13 healthy controls. A redirected killing assay was used to detect the cytotoxicity of NK cells. After coculturing NK cells with JFH-Huh7 cells for 72 h, HCV RNA was tested to analyze the inhibition ability of NK cells. All patients achieved sustained virologic response. The expression of the activating receptor NKp46 was decreased first at week 8 during therapy with DAAs and then increased and normalized to levels in healthy controls after treatment with DAAs. The expression of the inhibitory receptor NKG2A was decreased during and after treatment with DAAs. Each NK cell subset has a similar changing trend during and after treatment with DAAs, although some differences can be found earlier and later. The ratio of NKp46 and NKG2A was upregulated after treatment with DAAs. CD56

Topics: Adult; Antiviral Agents; Benzimidazoles; Female; Fluorenes; Hepatitis C, Chronic; Humans; Immunity, Innate; Killer Cells, Natural; Longitudinal Studies; Male; Middle Aged; Natural Cytotoxicity Triggering Receptor 1; NK Cell Lectin-Like Receptor Subfamily C; Sofosbuvir; Time Factors; Young Adult

Despite a known risk of hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation during direct-acting antiviral (DAA) treatment for patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV)-HBV coinfection, it remains unclear whether patients with past HBV infection are at risk for reactivation. This study evaluated the risk of HBV reactivation during treatment with sofosbuvir (SOF)-based regimens, focusing on patients with resolved HBV infection.. This study analyzes the data of 183 consecutive patients treated with SOF-based regimens. From these patients, 63 with resolved HBV infection (negative for hepatitis B surface antigen [HBsAg] and undetectable HBV DNA but positive for hepatitis B core antibody) were eligible for this study. HBV reactivation was defined as a quantifiable HBV DNA level >20 IU/mL.. Among the patients antibody to HBsAg (anti-HBs) positive (10-500 mIU/mL) (n = 30), the titre of anti-HBs was significantly decreased with time, as shown by the results of repeated-measures analysis of variance (P = .0029). Overall, four patients (6.3%) with resolved HBV infection came to have detectable HBV DNA during treatment, including one who had HBV reactivation at week 4 (HBV DNA 80 IU/mL). However, none developed hepatic failure. Among four patients who had detectable HBV DNA during treatment, all were negative or had very low-titre (<20 mIU/mL) anti-HBs at baseline.. The titre of anti-HBs was significantly decreased from the early stage of DAA treatment. Chronic hepatitis C patients with resolved HBV infection and negative or very low-titre anti-HBs at baseline are at risk for having detectable HBV DNA transiently during treatment.

Topics: Aged; Antiviral Agents; Benzimidazoles; DNA, Viral; Female; Fluorenes; Hepacivirus; Hepatitis B; Hepatitis B Antibodies; Hepatitis B virus; Hepatitis C, Chronic; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Retrospective Studies; Ribavirin; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Sofosbuvir; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Virus Activation

Data on persistence of NS5A resistance-associated substitutions (RASs) may have implications for resistance testing approaches and selection of initial and retreatment strategies.. Long-term persistence of NS5A RASs in HCV genotype (GT) 1 infected subjects (n=76) who did not achieve sustained virological response after receiving ledipasvir (LDV) without sofosbuvir (SOF) and were subsequently enrolled in an ongoing 3-year follow-up registry study was investigated by population or deep sequencing.. Of the 76 subjects enrolled, 67 and 9 subjects had GT1a and GT1b infection, respectively. At pretreatment, NS5A RASs were detected in 14% of subjects (11/76) by population sequencing, with three subjects having >1 RAS. All RASs that were detected at pretreatment persisted and were observed at the 96 week visit in the follow-up study (FU96). For the remaining subjects with no detectable RASs at pretreatment, RASs were detected in 98% (63/64) of subjects at virological failure in the parent study and persisted at detectable levels through FU96 in 86% of subjects by deep sequencing (1% cutoff). However, a decline in the quasispecies frequency of most RASs and the number of RASs per subject was observed over time. Phenotypic analysis demonstrated that the majority of NS5A RASs confer similar levels of resistance to LDV and daclatasvir.. The majority of NS5A RASs can persist at detectable levels for >96 weeks post-treatment in subjects who failed treatment with regimens containing an NS5A inhibitor without SOF, suggesting relatively high fitness of NS5A RASs even in the absence of drug pressure.

Topics: Amino Acid Substitution; Antiviral Agents; Benzimidazoles; DNA Mutational Analysis; Drug Resistance, Viral; Female; Fluorenes; Hepacivirus; Hepatitis C, Chronic; Humans; Male; Mutation; Treatment Outcome; Viral Load; Viral Nonstructural Proteins

Topics: Antiviral Agents; Benzimidazoles; Crohn Disease; Fluorenes; Hepatitis C, Chronic; Humans; Short Bowel Syndrome; Sofosbuvir

The effectiveness of a 12-week course of sofosbuvir-ledipasvir in treatment-experienced HCV genotype 1b-infected patients with cirrhosis is still under debate. Our primary endpoint was to compare the sustained virological response at post-treatment week 12 (SVR12) of sofosbuvir-ledipasvir in combination with ribavirin for 12 weeks, and sofosbuvir-ledipasvir alone for 24 weeks. This was a prospective observational study that enrolled 424 (195 naive, 229 experienced; 164 treated for 12 weeks with Ribavirin and 260 with sofosbuvir-ledipasvir alone for 24 weeks) consecutive HCV genotype 1b-infected patients with cirrhosis. The SVR12 rates were 93.9% and 99.2% in patients treated for 12 and 24 weeks, respectively (P = .002). The baseline characteristics of patients treated for 12 weeks were significantly different from those treated for 24 weeks as regards their younger age (P = .002), prevalence of Child-Pugh class A (P = .002), lower MELD scores (P = .001) and smaller number of nonresponders (P = .04). The shorter treatment was significantly associated with a lower SVR12 in univariate and multivariate analyses (P = .007 and P = .008, respectively). The SVR rate was unaffected by age, gender, BMI, Child-Pugh class, MELD score or previous antiviral treatment. Patients receiving ribavirin experienced more episodes of ascites and headache but less recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), and were prescribed more diuretics and cardiopulmonary drugs. No patient discontinued treatment. The therapeutic regimen of sofosbuvir-ledipasvir plus ribavirin administered for 12 weeks was less effective than sofosbuvir-ledipasvir alone given for 24 weeks. At odds with European guidelines, the recommended 12-week treatment with sofosbuvir-ledipasvir alone might be suboptimal for this setting of patients.

Topics: Aged; Antiviral Agents; Benzimidazoles; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Fluorenes; Genotype; Hepatitis C; Hepatitis C, Chronic; Humans; Liver Cirrhosis; Male; Middle Aged; Prospective Studies; Ribavirin; Sofosbuvir; Sustained Virologic Response; Treatment Outcome

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection in end stage renal disease (ESRD) is associated with increased mortality. Recently, numerous directly acting antiviral agents have been approved for the management of HCV. Ledipasvir along with Sofosbuvir has been approved for management of genotype 1 infection in patients with eGFR ≥30 mL/min. However, there is paucity of data regarding its role in the management of patients on dialysis.. This is a single center prospective open label observational study to assess the safety and efficacy of Ledipasvir and Sofosbuvir in hemodialysis (HD) patients who were diagnosed with HCV genotype 1 infection. Eligibility criteria were treatment naive HD patients with normal liver histology. We administered Ledipasvir and Sofosbuvir combination tablet on alternate days for a period of 12 weeks. Primary efficacy end point was the assessment of sustained virological response (SVR12), and the safety end point was the discontinuation of therapy secondary to adverse drug effects.. A total of 21 patients were treated with this regimen. Two patients expired during the study period and are not related to the therapy. SVR12 was achieved in all the 19 patients. None of the patients in our study discontinued the therapy or had severe adverse drug effects. One patient had head ache and another patient had giddiness which were managed symptomatically.. Ledipasvir and Sofosbuvir combination therapy on alternate days, is effective even in ESRD patients, with excellent SVR12 rates, and it is as safe as in other population groups, without any major adverse reactions.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Antiviral Agents; Benzimidazoles; Female; Fluorenes; Hepacivirus; Hepatitis C, Chronic; Humans; Kidney Failure, Chronic; Male; Middle Aged; Prospective Studies; Renal Dialysis; Sofosbuvir; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult

We assessed the effectiveness and safety of sofosbuvir (SOF) combined with ledipasvir (LDV) or daclatasvir (DCV) in 12 heart transplant recipients with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV). The sustained virologic response (SVR12) rate was 100% [95% confidence interval [CI]: 75.8%-100%]. All patients tolerated treatment well without interruption, death, or serious adverse events.

Topics: Adult; Antiviral Agents; Benzimidazoles; Carbamates; Drug Therapy, Combination; Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions; Female; Fluorenes; Heart Transplantation; Hepatitis C, Chronic; Humans; Imidazoles; Male; Middle Aged; Prospective Studies; Pyrrolidines; Sofosbuvir; Sustained Virologic Response; Transplant Recipients; Treatment Outcome; Valine; Young Adult

Chronic, untreated hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is associated with a poor clinical prognosis and a detrimental impact on patients' lives, including on work productivity. To estimate the value of productivity losses due to genotype 1 (GT1) HCV infection in Hong Kong, Singapore, South Korea and Taiwan and to estimate the potential productivity gains associated with treating patients with ledipasvir/sofosbuvir (LDV/SOF) therapy, an economic model was developed with a time horizon of 1 year. Hepatitis C virus patients entered the model at 12 weeks post-treatment, having achieved or not achieved sustained virological response (SVR). Absenteeism and presenteeism rates were taken from a pooled analysis of data from the ION 1-3 studies. These rates were converted into hours of lost productivity, multiplied by the average wage and applied to the total employed, adult GT1 population in each country. Results were compared assuming no treatment, and assuming all patients were treated with LDV/SOF. Total productivity losses due to untreated HCV were: $11.3 million, $17.1 m, $146.0 m and $349.1 m in Hong Kong, Singapore, South Korea and Taiwan. LDV/SOF treatment resulted in economic gains of $4.5 m, $6.8 m, $58.7 m and $138 m, respectively. These gains were due to reduced presenteeism. The results were sensitive to changes in the prevalence of HCV and the average wage. In conclusion, productivity losses due to untreated HCV infection represent a substantial economic burden. By instituting universal HCV treatment with LDV/SOF (or other therapies with high SVR rates), productivity gains can be achieved.

Topics: Absenteeism; Antiviral Agents; Asia; Benzimidazoles; Efficiency; Fluorenes; Genotype; Hepacivirus; Hepatitis C, Chronic; Humans; Sofosbuvir; Treatment Outcome; Work Performance

Direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) have substantially increased sustained virological response rates after liver transplantation, with improved tolerance compared to interferon-based therapy. The influence of immunosuppressive agents on the efficacy of DAAs has not been clarified.. Subgenomic hepatitis C virus (HCV) replicons for genotype (GT) 1b, 2b, 3a, and 4a were treated with the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors everolimus and sirolimus or with the calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) cyclosporine or tacrolimus, either alone or in combination with selected DAAs. Cell proliferation-related effects were excluded with MTT assays. HCV replication activity was quantified by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction or luciferase assay.. Addition of either mTOR inhibitor to the DAA daclatasvir (DAC) resulted in a 30% increase in antiviral activity compared to DAC alone for HCV GT2a, GT3a, and GT4a (all P ≤ .01). Similar results were obtained using sofosbuvir and ledipasvir. In contrast, addition of either mTOR inhibitor to DAC induced a 30% reduction in antiviral activity in GT1b cells (P ≤ .01 vs DAC alone). Neither CNI affects the antiviral activity of the DAAs in any HCV GT.. For patients with HCV GT2a, GT3a, or GT4a infection, mTOR-based immunosuppressive therapy may be beneficial. CNI-based therapy may be more efficacious in GT1b patients, as mTOR inhibitors seem to impair antiviral efficacy of DAAs in HCV GT1b infection.

Topics: Antiviral Agents; Benzimidazoles; Calcineurin Inhibitors; Carbamates; Cell Line; Cyclosporine; Everolimus; Fluorenes; Genotype; Hepacivirus; Hepatitis C; Hepatitis C, Chronic; Humans; Imidazoles; Immunosuppressive Agents; Liver Transplantation; Pyrrolidines; Sirolimus; Sofosbuvir; Valine; Virus Replication

The shortage of livers has led most transplant centers to use extended criteria donors. Hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA-positive donor organs are typically not given to patients who have cleared HCV. A 64-year-old male with chronic hepatitis C, genotype 1b was listed for LT with hepatocellular carcinoma. While on the waiting list, the patient was treated with sofosbuvir, ledipasvir, and ribavirin and achieved an HCV RNA <15 IU/mL by week 10. At week 18 of a planned 24-week treatment course, the patient underwent deceased-donor LT and received an organ from an anti-HCV-positive donor. Treatment was stopped at LT. At week 3 post LT, HCV RNA was detectable and revealed a genotype 3 HCV infection, compatible with transplantation of an organ with established infection. With retreatment with sofosbuvir, daclatasvir, and ribavirin for 12 weeks, the patient achieved a sustained virologic response. This report highlights how antiviral therapies can be used to optimize the outcomes of HCV-infected transplant patients.

Topics: Antiviral Agents; Benzimidazoles; Carcinoma, Hepatocellular; Drug Therapy, Combination; Fluorenes; Genotype; Hepacivirus; Hepatitis C; Hepatitis C, Chronic; Humans; Liver; Liver Transplantation; Male; Middle Aged; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; Ribavirin; RNA, Viral; Sofosbuvir; Sustained Virologic Response; Tissue Donors; Transplant Recipients; Viral Load

Ledipasvir/sofosbuvir (LDV/SOF) for 8 to 24 weeks is approved for the treatment of chronic hepatitis C virus infection (HCV). In the ION-3 study, 8 weeks of LDV/SOF was non-inferior to 12 weeks in previously untreated genotype 1 (GT1) patients without cirrhosis. According to the Summary of Product Characteristics (SmPC), 8-week treatment may be considered in naïve non-cirrhotic GT1-patients. However, there are only limited data on the effectiveness of an 8-week regimen of LDV/SOF under real-world conditions. The aim of the present study was to characterise patients receiving 8 weeks of LDV/SOF compared to those receiving 12 weeks of LDV/SOF, and to describe therapeutic outcomes in routine clinical practice.. The German Hepatitis C-Registry is a large national real-world cohort that analyses effectiveness and safety of antiviral therapies in chronic HCV. This data set is based on 2,404 patients. Treatment with SOF/LDV (without RBV) for 8 or 12 weeks was initiated on or before September 30, 2015.. Overall, 84.6% (2,034/2,404) of the safety population (intention-to-treat-1 [ITT1]) and 98.2% (2,029/2,066) of the per protocol (PP) population achieved sustained virological response at week 12 (SVR12). In the 8-week group, 85.1% (824/968) of ITT1 and 98.3% (821/835) of PP patients achieved SVR12, while in the 12-week group, 85.5% (1,210/1,415) of ITT1, and 98.1% (1,208/1,231) of PP patients achieved SVR12. When treated according to the SmPC, 98.7% (739/749) of the patients achieved SVR12 (PP). Relapse was observed in 9.5% (2/21) of cirrhotic patients treated for 8 weeks (PP).. Under real-world conditions a high proportion of eligible patients receiving 8-week LDV/SOF treatment achieved SVR12. Relapse occurred more frequently in patients who did not meet the selection criteria according to the SmPC.. In a large real-world cohort of patients mainly treated by physicians in private practice in Germany, shorter HCV treatment (8-week) resulted in equivalent cure rates to 12-week treatment in genotype 1 HCV-infected patients. Thus, shorter treatment can be recommended in these patients which would substantially reduce costs of therapy. Clinical Trial number: DRKS00009717 (German Clinical Trials Register, DRKS).

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Benzimidazoles; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Fluorenes; Hepatitis C, Chronic; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Sofosbuvir

Excellent efficacy and safety profile of second-generation DAA combinations improved treatment of chronic hepatitis C (HCV) as well as in HCV recurrence after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). The need of ribavirin addition is under debate as anaemia and decreased renal function are prevalent in transplant cohorts. The aim of this study was thus to assess safety and long-term efficacy of RBV-free DAA combinations in HCV-recurrent patients after OLT.. A total of 62 OLT recipients (male: 50%/81%; age: 60.7 ± 8.5 years [mean ± SD]; GT - 1: 48, GT - 3: 9, GT - 4: 5; cirrhosis: 34%/55% [7%/21% decompensated], fibrosing cholestatic hepatitis: 1%/2%) received RBV-free treatment with second-generation DAA combinations: sofosbuvir (SOF)/daclatasvir (DCV): 42%/68%, SOF/simeprevir (SMV): 10%/16%, SOF/ledipasvir (LDV): 6%/10% and PrOD: 4%/7%.. Data of at least 96 weeks of FUP after treatment cessation (mean: 120; up to 167 weeks) were analysed. All patients showed on-treatment response. By intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis, SVR12 was 97% (60/62, GT-1a: 11/11 [100%]; 1b: 33/34 [97%]; 1g: 1/1 [100%]; subtype not specified: 2/2 [100%]; GT3a: 9/9 [100%]; GT4: 4/5 [80%]) compared to SVR96 of 89% (55/62). No late relapses occurred. In total, 16 severe adverse events occurred, including two newly diagnosed carcinoma (lung cancer, hepatocellular carcinoma). Six patients died; one at treatment week 24 (HCV-RNA undetectable) and five during treatment-free FUP and after achieving SVR (SVR4: N = 1, SVR12: N = 3, after SVR96: N = 1 respectively). Reasons for death were: multi-organ failure (N = 4), impaired graft function (N = 1) and unknown (N = 1).. RBV-free DAA combinations for the treatment of HCV recurrence after OLT are highly efficacious and well tolerated. Our long-term data show that viral eradication is durable but not necessarily translated into beneficial long-term clinical outcome.

Topics: Aged; Antiviral Agents; Austria; Benzimidazoles; Carbamates; Carcinoma, Hepatocellular; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Fluorenes; Follow-Up Studies; Hepacivirus; Hepatitis C, Chronic; Humans; Imidazoles; Liver Neoplasms; Liver Transplantation; Male; Middle Aged; Pyrrolidines; Recurrence; Ribavirin; Simeprevir; Sofosbuvir; Sustained Virologic Response; Valine

A government-funded interferon-free direct-acting antiviral (DAA) treatment programme for chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection has been available in Australia since March 2016. This study assessed the levels and patterns of DAA treatment uptake during March-December 2016 in Australia and described the key features in the development of the programme. All prescriptions in Australia are submitted to the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme by dispensing pharmacies. Data on dispensed DAA prescriptions for a longitudinal cohort of individuals, representing a 10% random sample of the Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme database, were used for estimating DAA treatment uptake and subgroup analyses. The estimated number of 32 400 individuals initiated DAA treatment in 2016, equating to 14% of people with chronic HCV infection in Australia. Most commonly prescribed DAA regimens included sofosbuvir/ledipasvir (56%, n = 18 020), sofosbuvir + daclatasvir (39%, n = 12 600) and sofosbuvir + other agents (4%, n = 1220). Among individuals initiated DAA treatment, 66% (n = 21 430) were men, 43% (n = 13 870) were ≤50 years old and 36% (n = 11 670) had cirrhosis. DAA prescriptions were 62% (n = 20 080) by specialists, 19% (n = 6000) by general practitioners (GP) and 20% (n = 6320) by other physicians. Proportion of individuals prescribed DAA by GPs increased from 8% to 31% and proportion of individuals ≤50 years old increased from 28% to 61% between March and December. In conclusion, rapid treatment scale-up was observed in the first 10 months of unrestricted DAA programme in Australia. The proportion of prescriptions by GPs increased over time, important for broadened access. A trend towards younger age treatment suggested the broadening of DAA-treated population, potentially including individuals at higher risk of HCV transmission.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antiviral Agents; Australia; Benzimidazoles; Carbamates; Drug Utilization; Female; Fluorenes; Hepatitis C, Chronic; Humans; Imidazoles; Longitudinal Studies; Male; Middle Aged; Pyrrolidines; Sofosbuvir; Valine; Young Adult

We aimed to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of 12 or 24 weeks treatment with ledipasvir and sofosbuvir, with or without ribavirin, in treatment-experienced patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 1 infection and cirrhosis in routine clinical practice. Patients were followed in a multi-center, prospective, observational cohort study (HCV-TARGET).. We collected data from 667 treatment-experienced adults with chronic genotype 1 HCV infection who began treatment with ledipasvir and sofosbuvir, with or without ribavirin, from 2011 through September 15, 2016, according to the regional standards of care, at academic (n = 39) and community (n = 18) centers in the United States, Canada, Germany, and Israel. Information was collected from medical records and abstracted into a unique centralized data core. Independent monitors systematically reviewed data entries for completeness and accuracy. Demographic, clinical, adverse event, and virologic data were collected every 12 weeks during treatment and during the follow-up period. The primary efficacy endpoint was sustained virologic response, defined as a level of HCV RNA below the lower limit of quantification or undetectable at a minimum 64 days after the end of treatment (SVR12). The per-protocol population (n = 610) was restricted to patients who completed 12 or 24 weeks of treatment (±2 weeks) and had final virologic outcomes available.. The per-protocol analysis revealed that 579 patients (93.8%) achieved an SVR12, including 50/51 patients who received ledipasvir and sofosbuvir for 12 weeks (98%), 384/408 patients who received ledipasvir and sofosbuvir for 24 weeks (94.1%), 68/70 patients who received ledipasvir and sofosbuvir with ribavirin for 12 weeks (97.1%), and 57/60 patients who received ledipasvir and sofosbuvir with ribavirin for 24 weeks (95%). On multivariate analysis, neither treatment duration nor the addition of ribavirin was associated with SVR12. Compensated cirrhosis (odds ratio [OR] compared to decompensated cirrhosis, 2.41; 95% CI, 1.16-5.02), albumin ≥ 3.5 g/dL (OR, 3.15; 95% CI 1.46-6.80), or total bilirubin ≤ 1.2 mg/dL (OR 3.34; 95% CI, 1.59-7.00) were associated with SVR12.. In an analysis of safety and effectiveness data from the HCV-TARGET study, we found treatment with ledipasvir and sofosbuvir, with or without ribavirin, to be effective and well tolerated by treatment-experienced patients with genotype 1 HCV infection and compensated cirrhosis. There were no significant differences in rate of SVR12 among patients treated with ledipasvir and sofosbuvir for 12 or 24 weeks, with or without ribavirin. Patients with decompensated cirrhosis appear to benefit from the addition of ribavirin or extension of ledipasvir and sofosbuvir treatment to 24 weeks. ClinicalTrials.gov no: NCT10474811.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antiviral Agents; Benzimidazoles; Drug Therapy, Combination; Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions; Europe; Female; Fluorenes; Genotype; Hepacivirus; Hepatitis C, Chronic; Humans; Liver Cirrhosis; Longitudinal Studies; Male; Middle Aged; North America; Prospective Studies; Ribavirin; Sofosbuvir; Sustained Virologic Response; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult

An important subgroup of people who inject drugs (PWID) receiving opioid agonist therapy (OAT) cannot be treated in the setting of a hepatology centre and would not regularly ingest their medication when handed to them for self-administration. Our hypothesis was that chronic hepatitis C in these patients could be ideally managed if modern, interferon-free regimens were administered together with OAT under direct observation of a physician or nurse at a low-threshold facility. In this open-label, noninterventional, proof-of-concept study (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02638233), 40 PWID at risk of nonadherence to direct-acting antivirals (DAA) and previously untreated chronic hepatitis C virus genotype 1 infection without cirrhosis were treated with ledipasvir/sofosbuvir for 8 weeks. Patients received antiviral treatment together with OAT under direct observation of a physician or nurse at a low-threshold facility. By following the concept of directly observed therapy, excellent adherence to antiviral therapy was achieved as follows: only 0.16% (95% CI: 0.03-0.47) of scheduled dates for ingestion of the antiviral therapy in combination with OAT were missed by the 40 patients. The rate of sustained virological response 12 weeks after end of therapy was 100% (95% CI: 91.2-100.0). Between week 12 and week 24 of follow-up reinfections were recorded in 2 of 40 patients (5%). Directly observed therapy of chronic hepatitis C is highly effective in PWID at risk of nonadherence to DAA. By this new concept, a group of difficult-to-treat patients can be cured, who could not have been treated in settings of studies published so far.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antiviral Agents; Benzimidazoles; Directly Observed Therapy; Female; Fluorenes; Genotype; Hepacivirus; Hepatitis C, Chronic; Humans; Male; Medication Adherence; Middle Aged; Sofosbuvir; Substance Abuse, Intravenous; Sustained Virologic Response; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult

Baseline resistance-associated substitutions (RASs) have variable impacts in clinical trials but their prevalence and impact in real-world patients remains unclear. We performed baseline resistance testing using a commercial assay (10% cutoff) for 486 patients treated with LDV/SOF or SMV/SOF, with or without ribavirin, in the multi-center, observational HCV-TARGET cohort. Linkage of RASs was evaluated in selected samples using a novel quantitative single variant sequencing assay. Our results showed that the prevalence of NS3, NS5A, NS5B RASs was 45%, 13%, and 8%, respectively, and 10% of patients harbored RASs in 2 or more drug classes. Baseline LDV RASs in GT1a, TE, and cirrhosis LDV/SOF subgroup was associated with 2-4% lower SVR12 rates. SMV RASs was associated with lower SVR12 rates in GT1a, treatment-experienced, cirrhotics SMV/SOF subgroup. Pooled analysis of all patients with baseline RASs revealed that SVR12 was 100% (19/19) in patients treated for longer than 98 days but was 87% (81/93) in patients treated for shorter than 98 days. These results demonstrate that RASs prevalence and their impact in real world practice are in general agreement with registration trials, and suggest that longer treatment duration may overcome the negative impact of baseline RASs on SVR12 rates in clinical practice.

Topics: Aged; Antiviral Agents; Benzimidazoles; Clinical Trials as Topic; Drug Resistance, Viral; Female; Fluorenes; Genotype; Hepacivirus; Hepatitis C, Chronic; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Prevalence; Simeprevir; Sofosbuvir

Treatment with the combination of ledipasvir and sofosbuvir for 12 weeks has been approved by the Food and Drug Administration for patients with genotype 1 hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection; some patients can be treated with an 8-week course. Guidelines recommend a 12-week treatment course for black patients, but studies have not compared the effectiveness of 8 vs 12 weeks in black patients who are otherwise eligible for an 8-week treatment regimen.. We conducted an observational study of Kaiser Permanente Northern California members with HCV genotype 1 infection who were eligible for 8 weeks of treatment with ledipasvir and sofosbuvir (treatment-naïve, no cirrhosis, no HIV infection, level of HCV RNA <6 million IU/mL) and were treated for 8 or 12 weeks from October 2014 through December 2016. We used χ. Of 2653 patients eligible for 8 weeks of treatment with ledipasvir and sofosbuvir, 1958 (73.8%) received 8 weeks of treatment and 695 (26.2%) received 12 weeks; the proportions of patients with SVR12 were 96.3% and 96.3%, respectively (P = .94). Among 435 black patients eligible for the 8-week treatment regimen, there was no difference in the proportions who achieved an SVR12 following 8 vs 12 weeks' treatment (95.6% vs 95.8%; P = .90). Male sex, higher transient elastography or FIB-4 scores, higher INR and level of bilirubin, lower level of albumin, obesity, diabetes, and ≥15 alcohol drinks consumed/week were independently associated with receiving 12 weeks of treatment among patients eligible for the 8-week treatment regimen, but were not associated with reduced SVR12 after 8 weeks of treatment.. In an observational study of patients who received ledipasvir and sofosbuvir treatment for HCV genotype 1 infection, we found that contrary to guidelines, 8-week and 12-week treatment regimens do not result in statistically significant differences in SVR12 in black patients. Patient characteristics were associated with receipt of 12-week regimens among patients eligible for 8 weeks, but were not associated with reduced SVR12 after 8 weeks. Shorter treatment courses might therefore be more widely used without compromising treatment effectiveness.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antiviral Agents; Benzimidazoles; Black People; California; Female; Fluorenes; Genotype; Hepacivirus; Hepatitis C, Chronic; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Sofosbuvir; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

We aimed to describe the real-world efficacy and safety of combination therapy with ledipasvir and sofosbuvir (LDV/SOF) for chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 1 (GT1) infection.. This retrospective analysis of a prospective, nationwide, multicenter registry included GT1-infected patients treated with LDV/SOF for 12 weeks. We assessed the rate of sustained virological response at 12 weeks post-treatment (SVR12), incidence of adverse events, and serum markers of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).. Among the 1461 patients included (mean age, 69 years; 29.5% aged > 75 years; cirrhosis, 23.8%; history of treatment for HCC, 10.9%), the overall SVR12 rate was 98.4% (1438/1461). Factors associated with treatment failure were cirrhosis (odds ratio, 4.19; p = 0.014) and resistance-associated substitutions (RASs) in NS5A at baseline (odds ratio, 7.78; p = 0.0004). The SVR12 rate in patients with cirrhosis and NS5A RASs was 93.0% compared to 100% in patients without cirrhosis or NS5A RASs. In patients with SVR, the levels of alpha-fetoprotein (AFP), AFP-L3, and Mac-2 binding protein glycosylation isomer (M2BPGi) decreased from baseline to end of treatment (from 13.4 ± 37.6 to 6.0 ± 10.6 ng/mL, p < 0.0001; from 2.2 ± 4.9 to 1.5 ± 6.3%, p < 0.005; and from 3.6 ± 3.7 to 2.0 ± 3.5 cut-off index, p < 0.0001; respectively). Adverse events were rare and not associated with age. No decrease in estimated glomerular filtration rate was observed in patients with baseline chronic kidney disease stage 3.. LDV/SOF therapy is highly effective and safe in elderly Japanese patients with HCV GT1, even in the presence of cirrhosis or NS5A RASs. Patients with SVR may have a lower risk of HCC.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; alpha-Fetoproteins; Antiviral Agents; Benzimidazoles; Carcinoma, Hepatocellular; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Fluorenes; Hepacivirus; Hepatitis C, Chronic; Humans; Japan; Liver Cirrhosis; Liver Neoplasms; Male; Middle Aged; Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide; Prospective Studies; Red Cross; Retrospective Studies; Risk; Sofosbuvir; Sustained Virologic Response; Treatment Failure; Viral Nonstructural Proteins; Young Adult

There is scant data on use of sofosbuvir containing directly acting antiviral (DAA) regimens in chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients. Recently generic versions of DAAs have become available in low-income countries including India. The aim of this study was to study the efficacy and safety of generic sofosbuvir in combination with generic ribavirin, ledipasvir or daclatasvir in HCV-infected patients with CKD including patients with advanced CKD (CKD stage 4 or 5 with an estimated glomerular filtration rate (GFR) <30 mL/min or those on dialysis).. Seventy-one CKD patients (76% male, 84.5% on maintenance haemodialysis, 23.9% cirrhosis) with HCV infection were included in the study. Full-dose sofosbuvir was used in combination with ribavirin (n = 26, for 24 weeks, 69.2% genotype 1, 30.8% genotype 3), ledipasvir (n = 26, for 12 weeks, all genotype 1) and daclatasvir (n = 19, for 12 weeks, all genotype 3).. Sustained virological response (SVR) (HCV RNA <12 IU/mL) at 12 weeks after stopping treatment was seen in 100% of the patients in all the 3 groups. At 24-week follow-up after end of therapy, 1 patient in sofosbuvir plus ledipasvir group relapsed. At 48-week follow-up after end of therapy, 1 more patient in sofosbuvir plus ribavirin group relapsed.. Full-dose sofosbuvir-based DAA therapy using generics is highly effective for individuals with HCV infection and CKD including advanced CKD (CKD stage 4 or 5 with an e-GFR <30 mL/min or those on dialysis).

Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antiviral Agents; Benzimidazoles; Carbamates; Drug Therapy, Combination; Drugs, Generic; Female; Fluorenes; Genotype; Glomerular Filtration Rate; Hepacivirus; Hepatitis C, Chronic; Humans; Imidazoles; India; Liver Cirrhosis; Male; Middle Aged; Pyrrolidines; Renal Dialysis; Renal Insufficiency, Chronic; Ribavirin; Sofosbuvir; Sustained Virologic Response; Treatment Outcome; Valine; Viral Load; Young Adult

Ledipasvir/sofosbuvir (LDV/SOF), an antiviral treatment for hepatitis C virus (HCV), and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF), an antiretroviral for treating human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), may be coadministered in patients coinfected with these viruses. A drug interaction between LDV and TDF could increase TDF-associated nephrotoxicity rates; however, there is minimal clinical evidence describing acute kidney injury (AKI) rates in this population. This study was conducted at a Ryan White-funded facility in Atlanta, Georgia, that cares for over 5,000 patients with AIDS. This retrospective cohort used chart review to assess occurrence of and risk factors for AKI in HIV/HCV-coinfected patients receiving LDV/SOF and antiretroviral therapy (ART). AKI rates were compared between TDF-containing and non-TDF-containing ART groups according to Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) criteria. Additional evaluated risk factors for AKI included chronic kidney disease and use of boosted protease inhibitor-based ART. In the 117 included patients, the overall incidence of AKI was 27.3%. AKI occurred more frequently in the non-TDF group (13/86, 15.1% vs. 19/31, 61.3%, p < .001). All AKI was KDIGO stage 1. From multivariable logistic regression, the only independent predictor of AKI was treatment with non-TDF relative to TDF (adjusted odds ratio 6.51, 95% confidence interval 2.34-18.10, p < .001). In this real-world cohort of HIV/HCV-coinfected patients, KDIGO-defined AKI was common, but occurred less frequently in patients receiving TDF-based ART. Our study suggests that patients with normal baseline renal function can be safely treated with TDF and LDV/SOF without significant nephrotoxicity if renal function is closely monitored.

Topics: Acute Kidney Injury; Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Antiviral Agents; Benzimidazoles; Coinfection; Female; Fluorenes; Georgia; Hepatitis C, Chronic; HIV Infections; Humans; Incidence; Male; Middle Aged; Retrospective Studies; Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors; Risk Factors; Sofosbuvir; Tenofovir; Young Adult

Topics: Antiviral Agents; Benzimidazoles; Fluorenes; Hepacivirus; Hepatitis C, Chronic; Humans; Intention to Treat Analysis; Sofosbuvir

Topics: Antiviral Agents; Benzimidazoles; Fluorenes; Genotype; Hepatitis C, Chronic; Humans; Liver Cirrhosis; Retreatment; Ribavirin; Simeprevir; Sofosbuvir

To evaluate the effects of HCV NS5B amino acid substitutions on treatment outcome in Ledipasvir (LDV)/Sofosbuvir (SOF) for Japanese patients with genotype 1b HCV infection, NS5B sequences were examined in i) seven patients experiencing virologic failure after LDV/SOF in real-world practice, ii) 109 SOF-naïve patients, iii) 165 patients enrolled in Phase-3 LDV/SOF trial. A218S and C316N were detected in all patients with viral relapse; the percentages of these substitutions in SOF-naïve patients were 64.2% and 55.0%, respectively. Genotype 1b HCV strains with NS5B-C316N mutation were located in the leaves different from those in which HCV strains without such substitutions were present on the phylogenetic tree. Structural modeling revealed that amino acid 218 was located on the surface of the NTP tunnel. Free energy analysis based on molecular dynamics simulations demonstrated that the free energy required to pass through the tunnel was larger for triphosphate SOF than for UTP in NS5B polymerase carrying A218S, but not in wild-type. However, no susceptibility change was observed for these substitutions to SOF in replicon assay. Furthermore, the SVR rate was 100% in patients enrolled the Phase-3 trial. In conclusion, NS5B A218S and C316N were detected in all patients who relapsed following LDV/SOF in real-world practice. These substitutions did not impact the overall SVR rate after LDV/SOF, however, further studies are needed to elucidate the impact of these substitutions.

Topics: Amino Acid Substitution; Antiviral Agents; Benzimidazoles; Fluorenes; Hepacivirus; Hepatitis C, Chronic; Humans; Japan; Molecular Dynamics Simulation; Mutation, Missense; Protein Conformation; Recurrence; Sofosbuvir; Sustained Virologic Response; Treatment Outcome; Viral Nonstructural Proteins

Topics: Adult; Antiviral Agents; Benzimidazoles; Diagnosis, Differential; Drug Therapy, Combination; Fluorenes; Hepatitis C, Chronic; Humans; Jaundice, Obstructive; Liver Failure, Acute; Liver Transplantation; Male; Postoperative Complications; Sofosbuvir

Direct acting antivirals (DAAs) are highly effective for treatment of hepatitis C (HCV) but brand products are priced beyond the means of most low and middle income countries (LMICs). Although a few DAAs are offered at reduced prices in access programs, they are still beyond affordability in limited resource settings with a large HCV infected population. Cheap generics might fill this economic need, but studies comparing their clinical efficacy to that of original products are limited.. To compare efficacy of brand and generic DAAs used in the national treatment program in Egypt.. HCV treatment eligible patients (n=971) were enrolled. They were treated with 12 weeks of either sofosbuvir-daclatasvir (SOF-DCV) or SOF-ledipasvir (SOF-LDV). Ribavirin (RBV) was added to patients with cirrhosis and to SOF experienced patients. Patients with cirrhosis who were RBV intolerant were treated for 24 weeks without RBV.. Most patients were males (61.4%), treatment naïve (88.6%), without cirrhosis (61.7%), and the mean age was 51.3±11.31 years. Baseline characteristics were not different in patients treated with brand or generic medications regarding age, liver tests, creatinine, platelets, MELD score, baseline HCV-RNA and transient elastography. Overall sustained virologic response (SVR) rate was 98.1%, which was similar for generic and brand drugs (98.2% vs. 98.1%; p=1), and similar with both regimens used (SOF-DCV±RBV: brand: 98.1%, generic 97.8%; p=0.729, SOF-LDV±RBV: brand 98.2%, generic 100%; p=0.729). AST and ALT decreased significantly with initiation of therapy with both generic and original drugs.. Generic and brand DAAs are equally effective for achieving SVR and improving aminotransferases.

Topics: Adult; Antiviral Agents; Benzimidazoles; Drug Therapy, Combination; Drugs, Generic; Egypt; Female; Fluorenes; Genotype; Hepacivirus; Hepatitis C, Chronic; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Ribavirin; Sofosbuvir; Sustained Virologic Response; Treatment Outcome

Direct-acting antiviral (DAA) drugs have been highly effective in the treatment of chronic hepatitis C (HCV) infection. Limited data exist comparing the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of DAAs in African-American (AA) patients with chronic hepatitis C genotype 1 (HCV GT-1) in the community practice setting. We aim to evaluate treatment response of DAAs in these patients.. All the HCV GT-1 patients treated with DAAs between January 2014 and January 2018 in a community clinic setting were retrospectively analyzed. Pretreatment baseline patient characteristics, treatment efficacy with a sustained virologic response at 12 weeks post-treatment (SVR12), and adverse reactions were assessed.. Two-hundred seventy-eight patients of AA descent were included in the study. One-hundred sixty-two patients were treated with ledipasvir/sofosbuvir (SOF)±ribavirin, 38 were treated with simeprevir/SOF±ribavirin, and 38 patients were treated with SOF/velpatasvir. Overall, SVR at 12 weeks was achieved in 94.6% in patients who received one of the three DAA regimens (93.8% in ledipasvir/SOF group, 92.1% in simeprevir/SOF group, and 97.4% in SOF/velpatasvir group). Previous treatment experience, HCV RNA levels and HIV status had no statistical significance on overall SVR achievement (P=0.905, 0.680, and 0.425, respectively). Compensated cirrhosis in each of the treatment groups did not influence overall SVR of 12. The most common adverse effect was fatigue (27%). None of the patients discontinued the treatment because of adverse events.. In the real-world setting, DAAs are safe, effective, and well tolerated in African-American patients with chronic HCV GT-1 infection with a high overall SVR rate of 94.6%. Treatment rates did not differ on the basis of previous treatment and compensated cirrhosis status.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antiviral Agents; Benzimidazoles; Black or African American; Carbamates; Community Health Centers; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Fluorenes; Genotype; Hepacivirus; Hepatitis C, Chronic; Heterocyclic Compounds, 4 or More Rings; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Retrospective Studies; Ribavirin; Simeprevir; Sofosbuvir; Sustained Virologic Response

Treatment of Hepatitis C virus (HCV) in patients with severe renal insufficiency is cumbersome as sofosbuvir is mainly excreted by the kidneys. There is paucity of data on the use of sofosbuvir and NS5A inhibitors in these patients. We hereby report our experience of treating chronic hepatitis C in patients with severe renal insufficiency with full dose sofosbuvir and NS5A inhibitors. Forty-seven patients with severe renal insufficiency (on dialysis n = 39, predialysis n = 8) with HCV infection were treated between December 2015-August 2017 with full dose sofosbuvir with ledipasvir or daclatasvir for 12/24 weeks depending on the genotype and the presence or absence of cirrhosis. The distribution of HCV genotype was genotype 1 in 32 (68.1%), genotype 3 in 13 (27.7%) and 4 in 2 (4.3%) patients. Among 12 (25.5%) patients with cirrhosis, 7 (14.9%) were decompensated with ascites. All patients had end of treatment response, and sustained viral response at 12 weeks was achieved in 45 (95.7%) patients. There was significant improvement in liver stiffness at 3 months after treatment (8.8 (3.8-42) to 7.1 (3.3-24.1) kPa; (P = 0.047)). There was no change in haemoglobin and eGFR with treatment in predialysis group (haemoglobin- 10.2 ± 1.5 g/dL vs 9.6 ± 1.3 g/dL, P = 0.44; eGFR- 19.8 ± 9.4 mL/min vs 17.9 ± 8.5 mL/min, P = 0.67). Therapy was very well accepted. Full dose sofosbuvir with NS5A inhibitors is a well tolerated and effective therapy for HCV infection in severe renal insufficiency.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antiviral Agents; Benzimidazoles; Carbamates; Female; Fluorenes; Genotype; Glomerular Filtration Rate; Hepacivirus; Hepatitis C, Chronic; Humans; Imidazoles; Male; Middle Aged; Pyrrolidines; Renal Insufficiency; Sofosbuvir; Treatment Outcome; Valine; Viral Nonstructural Proteins; Young Adult

There is a paucity of information on chronic hepatitis C (CHC) patients treated with direct antiviral agents (DAAs) in Asia. We invited Asia-Pacific physicians to collate databases of patients enrolled for CHC treatment, recording baseline clinical, virologic and biochemical characteristics, sustained virologic response at week 12 (SVR12) and virologic failure. SVR12 outcome was based on intention to treat (ITT). Multivariate analysis was used to assess independent risk factors for SVR12 using SPSS version 20. A total of 2171 patients from India (n = 977), Myanmar (n = 552), Pakistan (n = 406), Thailand (n = 139), Singapore (n = 72) and Malaysia (n = 25) were collected. At baseline, mean age was 49 years, 50.2% were males, and 41.8% had cirrhosis. Overall, SVR12 was 89.5% and by genotype (GT) based on ITT and treatment completion, respectively, was 91% and 92% for GT1, 100% and 100% for GT2, 91% and 97% for GT3, 64% and 95% for GT4, 87% and 87% for GT6 and 79% and 91% for GT untested. Patients with cirrhosis had SVR12 of 85% vs 93% for noncirrhosis (P < 0.001) (RR 2.1, 95% CI 1.4-3.1, P = 0.0002). Patients with GT1 and GT3 treated with sofosbuvir/ribavirin (SR) had 88% and 89% SVR12, respectively, but those GT6 treated with sofosbuvir/ledipasvir (SL) had only 77.6% SVR12. Multivariate analysis showed absence of cirrhosis was associated with higher SVR12 (OR 2.0, 95% CI 1.3-3.1, P = 0.002). In conclusion, patients with GT1 and GT3 with/without cirrhosis had surprisingly high efficacy using SR, suggesting that Asians may respond better to some DAAs. However, poor GT6 response to SL suggests this regimen is suboptimal for this genotype.

Topics: Adult; Antiviral Agents; Asia; Benzimidazoles; Female; Fluorenes; Genotype; Hepacivirus; Hepatitis C, Chronic; Humans; Liver Cirrhosis; Male; Middle Aged; Ribavirin; Sofosbuvir; Sustained Virologic Response; Treatment Outcome

Hepatitis B reactivation in patients with resolved HBV can occur during hepatitis C treatment with direct-acting antivirals, but only a few cases have been described. It is not clear which patients are at risk for HBV reactivation and how to manage them.. Three patients (all hepatitis B surface antigen [HBsAg]-negative, antibody to hepatitis B core [anti-HBc] positive and HBV DNA negative) experienced a late HBV reactivation 12 weeks post-treatment but were able to control their viraemia. HCV RNA, HBV DNA, anti-HBc and anti-HBs were measured in these patients and in 37 HBsAg-negative, anti-HBc positive, HBV DNA negative control patients during direct-acting antiviral therapy for chronic hepatitis C.. Baseline anti-HBs do not differ between patients with and without HBV reactivation. Patients with HBV reactivation, however, significantly increased their anti-HBs at time of reactivation, while patients without HBV reactivation show stable anti-HBs during therapy (P=0.007).. Anti-HBs might be an important marker to delineate patients at risk for clinically significant HBV reactivation.

Topics: Antiviral Agents; Benzimidazoles; DNA, Viral; Female; Fluorenes; Hepacivirus; Hepatitis B; Hepatitis B Antibodies; Hepatitis B Core Antigens; Hepatitis B Surface Antigens; Hepatitis B virus; Hepatitis C, Chronic; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Prospective Studies; Sofosbuvir; Viremia; Virus Activation

To investigate how natural killer (NK) cells are affected in the elimination of hepatitis C virus (HCV) by sofosbuvir/ledipasvir, two highly effective direct-acting antivirals (DAAs).. Thirteen treatment-naïve and treatment-experienced chronic hepatitis C (CHC) patients were treated with sofosbuvir/ledipasvir, and NK cells were detected at baseline, weeks 2, 4, 8 and 12 during therapy, and week post of treatment (Pt)-12 and 24 after the end of therapy by multicolor flow cytometry and compared with those from 13 healthy controls.. All patients achieved sustained virological response. There was a significant decline in CD56. NK cells of CHC patients can be affected by DAAs, and phenotypes and function of NK cells recover not at early stage but mainly after the end of sofosbuvir/ledipasvir treatment.

Topics: Adult; Antiviral Agents; Benzimidazoles; Case-Control Studies; Cohort Studies; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Fluorenes; Genotype; Hepacivirus; Hepatitis C, Chronic; Humans; Immunity, Innate; Killer Cells, Natural; Male; Middle Aged; Sofosbuvir; Sustained Virologic Response

There is scarcity of data in literature regarding the treatment response to sofosbuvir- (SOF-) based therapies in Chinese patients with chronic Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) infection. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of SOF-based regimens for chronic hepatitis C (CHC) patients without cirrhosis in a real-world setting in mainland China.. A total of 226 patients receiving SOF plus daclatasvir (DCV), ledipasvir (LDV), or velpatasvir (VEL) were enrolled from December 2014 to June 2017. The primary observation point was the percentage of patients with a sustained virologic response (SVR) at posttreatment week 12 (SVR12), and all adverse events were monitored during treatment and follow-up period.. The overall SVR12 rate was 96% (216/226), and individual SVR12 ranged from 93% to 100% in different treatment groups. No significant differences of efficacy were detected between genotypes 1b and 6a (98% for GT 1b versus 100% for GT 6a, P=0.322). Comparing the high success rates in GT 1b and 6a patients, SVR12 was relatively low in GT 3a and 3b patients. A significant difference in efficacy was observed between GT 3 and not GT 3 patients (77% versus 98%, respectively, P<0.001). No significant differences in efficacy were detected among different regimens (93% versus 97% versus 100%, respectively, P=0.153), gender (95% for male versus 96% for female, P=0.655), or baseline HCV RNA lever (96% versus 95%, respectively, P=0.614). Similar SVR rates were also obtained in naïve and previously treated patients (98% versus 93%, respectively, P=0.100).. NS5B polymerase inhibitor SOF plus one of the NS5A inhibitors, such as DCV, LDV, or VEL for 12 weeks was associated with high SVR12 rates and well tolerated in HCV-infected patients without cirrhosis. Moreover, patients with DAAs failure should be retreated with more effective regimens like SOF/VEL.

Topics: Adult; Antiviral Agents; Benzimidazoles; Carbamates; China; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Fluorenes; Genotype; Hepacivirus; Hepatitis C, Chronic; Heterocyclic Compounds, 4 or More Rings; Humans; Imidazoles; Male; Middle Aged; Pyrrolidines; Retrospective Studies; RNA, Viral; Sofosbuvir; Sustained Virologic Response; Valine; Viral Nonstructural Proteins

Topics: Benzimidazoles; Coinfection; Fluorenes; Hepatitis B; Hepatitis B virus; Hepatitis C, Chronic; HIV Infections; Humans; Sofosbuvir

Topics: Benzimidazoles; Coinfection; Fluorenes; Hepatitis B; Hepatitis B virus; Hepatitis C, Chronic; HIV Infections; Humans; Sofosbuvir

The optimal retreatment regimen for patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection who failed interferon-free, direct-acting antiviral (DAA) therapy is undetermined. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of 12-week retreatment with ledipasvir (LDV) and sofosbuvir (SOF) with add-on ribavirin (RBV) for patients who previously failed to respond to HCV-NS5A inhibitor, daclatasvir (DCV), and HCV-NS3 inhibitor, asunaprevir (ASV), therapy.. This multicenter, prospective study enrolled 15 patients with genotype-1 HCV infection who failed DCV/ASV combination therapy. They were retreated with SOF, LDV, and RBV for 12 weeks and underwent physical examinations and blood tests at baseline, during treatment, and after therapy. At baseline and relapse, NS3/NS5A and NS5B resistance-associated variants (RAVs) were evaluated.. Of the 15 enrolled patients, 73.3% (11/15), 86.7% (13/15), and 0% (0/15) had RAVs in NS3 D168A/V/T/E, NS5A L31I/M/F/V plus Y93H, and NS5B S282T, respectively. Overall, 86.7% (13/15) of patients achieved a sustained viral response, and all patients completed therapy. No patients experienced severe adverse events. Two patients who failed to respond to SOF, LDV, and RBV combination therapy were elderly women, had the IL28B non-TT genotype, and NS5A RAVs in L31I/Y93H or NS5A A92 K at baseline.. This study revealed that SOF, LDV, and RBV combination therapy was effective and well-tolerated for patients with genotype-1 HCV infection who failed DCV and ASV combination therapy. Thus, RBV added to DAA therapy for difficult-to-treat patients might improve treatment outcomes.

Topics: Aged; Antiviral Agents; Benzimidazoles; Carbamates; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Fluorenes; Genotype; Hepacivirus; Hepatitis C, Chronic; Humans; Imidazoles; Isoquinolines; Male; Middle Aged; Prospective Studies; Pyrrolidines; Retreatment; Ribavirin; Sofosbuvir; Sulfonamides; Treatment Outcome; Valine

The availability of direct acting antiviral agents (DAA) has transformed the treatment of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. The current study is a case series that reports the outcomes from a cohort of twenty-five HCV-infected ESRD patients who received a kidney from an anti-HCV-positive deceased organ donor followed by treatment with DAAs in the early post-transplant period. Time to transplantation and the efficacy of DAA therapy as measured by sustained viral response at 12 weeks were assessed. The median waiting time from original date of activation on the United Network Organ Sharing (UNOS) waiting list until transplantation was 427 days; however, the median time from entering the patient into UNet

Topics: Adult; Aged; Antiviral Agents; Benzimidazoles; Carbamates; Donor Selection; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Fluorenes; Follow-Up Studies; Hepatitis C, Chronic; Humans; Imidazoles; Kidney Failure, Chronic; Kidney Transplantation; Male; Middle Aged; Postoperative Care; Pyrrolidines; Retrospective Studies; Ribavirin; Simeprevir; Sofosbuvir; Tissue Donors; Treatment Outcome; Valine

Topics: Anti-HIV Agents; Antiviral Agents; Benzimidazoles; Coinfection; Drug Substitution; Fatal Outcome; Fluorenes; Hepacivirus; Hepatitis B virus; Hepatitis B, Chronic; Hepatitis C, Chronic; HIV Infections; Humans; Interferon alpha-2; Liver Failure, Acute; Male; Middle Aged; Oligopeptides; Ribavirin; Sofosbuvir; Virus Activation

Topics: Adult; Antiviral Agents; Benzimidazoles; Benzoates; beta-Thalassemia; Cryoglobulinemia; Deferasirox; Deferoxamine; Elasticity Imaging Techniques; Female; Ferritins; Fluorenes; Hepatitis C, Chronic; Humans; Iron Chelating Agents; Iron Overload; Liver Cirrhosis; Male; Quality of Life; Sofosbuvir; Triazoles; Viral Load

Ledipasvir and sofosbuvir is a well-tolerated regimen with high sustained virological response (SVR) rates in pre-liver transplant patients infected with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV), but data in liver transplant recipients outside of clinical trials is limited.. To address this knowledge gap and assess SVR rates without the use of ribavirin in liver transplant recipients METHODS: This is a retrospective study examining the treatment of 75 post-liver transplant recipients with ledipasvir and sofosbuvir without ribavirin. Differences between SVR cohorts and predictors of SVR were analysed in an intention-to-treat (ITT) fashion.. A total of 408 genotype 1, HCV patients were treated with ledipasvir/sofosbuvir from October 2014 to August 2015 at our centre. Seventy-three patients were post-liver transplant and were treated with a median of 2.9 years from transplant. Ledipasvir/sofosbuvir achieved an SVR12 of 95.9%. African Americans made up 28.8% of the cohort. Sixty-three per cent of patients were treated previously, including 13.7% of patients previously treated with direct-acting antivirals. Only 2.7% had recurrent allograft cirrhosis, and the majority (90.4%) was on calcineurin inhibitor based immunosuppressive therapy. Approximately 82% of patients had chronic kidney disease (CKD) stage 2 or 3. In univariate logistic regression, only detectable week 8 viral load was predictive of failure to achieve SVR.. Our data confirm excellent SVR outcomes and favourable safety and tolerability profiles with ledipasvir/sofosbuvir without ribavirin in post-liver transplant recipients infected with HCV, despite treatment guidelines to use ribavirin.

Topics: Aged; Antiviral Agents; Benzimidazoles; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Fluorenes; Genotype; Hepacivirus; Hepatitis C, Chronic; Humans; Liver Cirrhosis; Liver Transplantation; Logistic Models; Male; Middle Aged; Retrospective Studies; Sofosbuvir; Sustained Virologic Response; Treatment Outcome; Viral Load

Topics: Aged; Antiviral Agents; Benzimidazoles; Drug Therapy, Combination; Fluorenes; Follow-Up Studies; Genotype; Hepacivirus; Hepatitis C, Chronic; Humans; Male; Ribavirin; Sofosbuvir; Sustained Virologic Response; Viral Load

The aim of this study was to characterize the treatment response and serious adverse events of ledipasvir plus sofosbuvir therapies in Japanese patients infected with hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 1 (GT1). This retrospective study analyzed 240 Japanese HCV GT1 patients treated for 12 weeks with 90 mg of ledipasvir plus 400 mg of sofosbuvir daily. Sustained virological response at 12 weeks post-treatment (SVR12) was achieved in 236 of 240 (98.3%) patients. Among treatment-naïve patients, SVR12 was achieved in 136 of 138 (98.6%) patients, and among treatment-experienced patients, SVR12 was achieved in 100 of 102 (98.0%) patients. In patients previously treated with peginterferon plus ribavirin with various HCV NS3/4A inhibitors, 100% SVR rates (25/25) were achieved. Two relapsers had HCV NS5A resistance-associated variants (RAVs), but no HCV NS5B-S282 was observed after they relapsed. We experienced two patients with cardiac events during treatment. In conclusion, combination of ledipasvir plus sofosbuvir for 12 weeks is a potential therapy for HCV GT1 patients. Caution is needed for HCV NS5A RAVs, which were selected by HCV NS5A inhibitors and cardiac adverse events.

Topics: Aged; Antiviral Agents; Asian People; Benzimidazoles; Carrier Proteins; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Resistance, Viral; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Fluorenes; Genotype; Hepacivirus; Hepatitis C, Chronic; Humans; Interferon-alpha; Interferons; Interleukins; Intracellular Signaling Peptides and Proteins; Japan; Male; Middle Aged; Polyethylene Glycols; Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide; Recombinant Proteins; Retrospective Studies; Ribavirin; RNA, Viral; Sofosbuvir; Treatment Outcome; Viral Nonstructural Proteins

Patients with sickle cell disease are at high risk for chronic hepatitis C infection. Prior treatment has been limited due to the use of ribavirin causing hemolytic anemia and interferon causing cytopenias. We demonstrate the safety and efficacy of fixed-dose combination ledipasvir and sofosbuvir for 12 weeks in this population.

Topics: Adult; Anemia, Sickle Cell; Antiviral Agents; Benzimidazoles; Drug Combinations; Female; Fluorenes; Hepatitis C, Chronic; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Sofosbuvir; Young Adult

Here we describe the case of a HIV-positive patient with acute hepatitis C virus reinfection, who was successfully treated with an interferon-free regimen of ledipasvir/sofosbuvir.

Topics: Antiviral Agents; Benzimidazoles; Coinfection; Fluorenes; Hepatitis C, Chronic; HIV Infections; Homosexuality, Male; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Sofosbuvir; Treatment Outcome

Direct antiviral agents (DAAs) for chronic hepatitis C showed great effectiveness and good safety profile. So far, few data are available about their use in elderly subjects.. To assess management, safety and outcome of DAAs treatments in the elderly.. This retrospective, single-centre study enrolled all patients aged ≥65 years, compared by age (group A: 65-74 years, group B: ≥75 years), who completed DAAs between February 2015-November 2016. Variables potentially associated to adverse events (AEs) were analyzed. Sustained virological response (SVR) was evaluated at 12-weeks follow-up.. DAAs were administered to 221 patients aged ≥65 years (males: 112; group A: 130, group B: 91). Prescribed regimens were: sofosbuvir-based: 44 patients (19.9%), simeprevir-based: 25 (15%), ledipasvir-based: 49 (22.2%), daclatasvir-based: 12 (5.4%), paritaprevir/ritonavir+ombitasvir±dasabuvir: 91 (41.2%). Ribavirin was used in 121 patients. In 58 subjects co-medications were adjusted due to drug interactions. At least one AE occurred in 130 patients, including 13 SAEs, mainly in older subjects (p=0.04). Female sex (p=0.04), liver stiffness (p=0.023), use of simeprevir (p=0.03) and ribavirin (p=0.009) were associated with AEs. SVR-12 was achieved in 96,9% of subjects.. A careful baseline evaluation and a strict monitoring allow to optimise management and outcome of DAAs in elderly.

Topics: Aged; Antiviral Agents; Benzimidazoles; Carbamates; Drug Interactions; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Fluorenes; Hepacivirus; Hepatitis C, Chronic; Humans; Imidazoles; Italy; Logistic Models; Male; Pyrrolidines; Retrospective Studies; Ribavirin; Simeprevir; Sofosbuvir; Sustained Virologic Response; Valine

Treatment of genotype 1 hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection with combination direct acting anti-virals is associated with very high rates of sustained virological response (SVR). Daily combination of ledipasvir and sofosbuvir for 12 weeks is approved for the treatment of genotype 1 HCV patients, though noncirrhotic patients who are naïve to treatment with a baseline HCV RNA <6 million IU/mL can be treated for 8 weeks. This guidance stemmed from a post hoc analysis of the ION 3 clinical trial, which demonstrated similar SVR for patients treated with ledipasvir and sofosbuvir with or without ribavirin for 8 or 12 weeks.. To compare the SVR for 8 weeks vs 12 weeks of ledipasvir and sofosbuvir in HCV infected patients in a real-world setting.. We performed an observational real-world cohort study of treatment success following 8 or 12 weeks of ledipasvir and sofosbuvir for treatment-naïve genotype 1 HCV patients.. A total of 826 patients were treated for either 8 (n=252) or 12 weeks (n=574) with ledipasvir and sofosbuvir and achieved SVR rate of 95.3% and there was no statistical difference in SVR rates in the two groups irrespective of any clinical or virological variables.. In treatment-naïve HCV genotype 1 patients, SVR was 95% in those treated for either 8 weeks or 12 weeks with ledipasvir and sofosbuvir. 8 week ledipasvir and sofosbuvir can reduce costs without compromising outcomes for those patients who qualify for such regimen.

Topics: Aged; Antiviral Agents; Benzimidazoles; Cohort Studies; Female; Fluorenes; Genotype; Hepacivirus; Hepatitis C, Chronic; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Retrospective Studies; Ribavirin; Sofosbuvir; Treatment Outcome

We assessed the impact of direct-acting antiviral (DAA) therapy on liver fibrosis regression measured by transient elastography (TE) in patients with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection.. A prospective cohort study was carried out in HCV monoinfected patients with advanced liver fibrosis or cirrhosis receiving interferon (IFN)-containing or IFN-free DAA therapy. Liver stiffness (LS) score more than 14.5 kPa indicated LS-defined cirrhosis. The primary outcome was improvement in liver stiffness measurement (LSM) at week 24 after treatment measured as (a) decrease in the median LS compared with baseline and (b) at least a 20% decrease in LSM compared with baseline. A multivariate logistic regression model was utilized to identify the factors associated with at least a 20% improvement in LSM.. Of a total of 304 patients, 172 (56.6%) had LS-defined cirrhosis before treatment. LSM decreased from the baseline median value of 16.9 (interquartile range: 11.8-27.7) kPa to a post-treatment week 24 score of 11.9 (interquartile range: 8.2-20.9) kPa (P<0.0001). Of a total of 304 patients, 198 (65.1%) achieved at least a 20% reduction in LS. In multivariate logistic regression analysis, sustained virological response (SVR) was associated significantly with this reduction (P<0.0001). The addition of IFN to the treatment regimen had no impact on the decrease in LSM. Despite decreasing baseline LSM, more than half of the LS-defined cirrhotic patients remained cirrhotic at week 24 after treatment.. In patients with advanced fibrosis, pretreatment LS significantly reduced during DAA therapy. SVR was the only independent factor associated with the regression in LSM. However, irrespective of achieving SVR, liver damage still persisted in a substantial proportion of patients. Thus, early treatment of HCV-infected patients can significantly prevent residual liver damage.

Topics: Adult; Antiviral Agents; Benzimidazoles; Disease Eradication; Drug Therapy, Combination; Elasticity Imaging Techniques; Female; Fluorenes; Genotype; Georgia (Republic); Hepacivirus; Hepatitis C, Chronic; Humans; Interferon alpha-2; Interferon-alpha; Liver Cirrhosis; Male; Middle Aged; Polyethylene Glycols; Prospective Studies; Recombinant Proteins; Ribavirin; Sofosbuvir; Sustained Virologic Response; Treatment Outcome

Interferon-based regimens are associated with a substantial survival benefit for persons infected with hepatitis C virus (HCV). Survival data with direct-acting antiviral agents are not available. We conducted this study to quantify the effect of paritaprevir/ritonavir, ombitasvir, dasabuvir (PrOD) and ledipasvir/sofosbuvir (LDV/SOF) regimens upon mortality.. In the Electronically Retrieved Cohort of HCV Infected Veterans (ERCHIVES), a well-established national cohort of HCV-infected Veterans, we identified HCV-infected persons initiated on PrOD or LDV/SOF, excluding those with human immunodeficiency virus, hepatitis B surface antigen positivity, hepatocellular carcinoma, or missing HCV RNA or FIB-4 scores. For each case, we identified a propensity score-matched control never initiated on treatment. Primary outcome was survival. Outcomes were assessed using frequency of events, Kaplan-Meier curves, and Cox proportional hazards regression analyses.. We identified 1473 persons on PrOD, 5497 on LDV/SOF, and 6970 propensity score-matched untreated persons. Treated persons were more likely to be obese and have cirrhosis, but less likely to have stage 3-5 chronic kidney disease (CKD), alcohol or drug abuse or dependence diagnosis, and anemia. The proportion of persons who died was higher in the untreated group compared with either treatment group (PrOD, 0.3%; LDV/SOF, 1.4%; untreated controls, 2.5%; P < .001). A significantly larger percentage of treated patients survived to 18 months of follow-up, compared with untreated controls (P < .001). In multivariable Cox regression analysis, treatment with either regimen (hazard ratio [HR], 0.43; 95% confidence interval [CI], .33-.57) and attainment of sustained virologic response (SVR) were associated with significantly lower mortality (HR, 0.57; 95% CI, .33-.99).. Treatment with PrOD or LDV/SOF and SVR are associated with a significant mortality benefit, apparent within the first 18 months of treatment.

Topics: 2-Naphthylamine; Aged; Anilides; Antiviral Agents; Benzimidazoles; Carbamates; Cyclopropanes; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Fluorenes; Hepatitis C, Chronic; Humans; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Lactams, Macrocyclic; Macrocyclic Compounds; Male; Middle Aged; Proline; Propensity Score; Proportional Hazards Models; Ritonavir; Sofosbuvir; Sulfonamides; Survival Rate; Sustained Virologic Response; Uracil; Valine

Our objective was to identify drug interactions between ledipasvir (LDV) and sofosbuvir (SOF) against a genotype 1b replicon to determine optimal exposures for each agent that will maximize antiviral activity against susceptible and drug-resistant subpopulations. LDV and SOF were evaluated using a fully factorial experimental design in the BelloCell system. Replicon levels and drug-resistant variants were quantified at various times post-therapy for 14 days and a high-dimensional mathematical model was fit to the data. Mutations associated with SOF resistance were not detected; but LDV-resistant mutants were selected and mutant subpopulations increased as exposure intensity increased. Combination therapy was additive for the total replicon population and the LDV-resistant population, but a threshold concentration of 100 ng/ml of SOF must be attained to suppress LDV-resistant subpopulations. These novel findings hold important implications for not only improving therapeutic outcomes, but also maximizing the clinical utility of LDV and SOF combination regimens.

Topics: Antiviral Agents; Benzimidazoles; Cell Line; Combined Modality Therapy; Drug Interactions; Drug Resistance, Viral; Drug Therapy, Combination; Fluorenes; Genotype; Hepacivirus; Hepatitis C, Chronic; Humans; Models, Theoretical; Sofosbuvir; Uridine Monophosphate

Topics: Anti-Bacterial Agents; Antiviral Agents; Bacterial Translocation; Benzimidazoles; Ceftriaxone; Coinfection; Disease Susceptibility; Esophageal and Gastric Varices; Esophagoscopy; Female; Fluorenes; Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage; Hepatitis C, Chronic; HIV Infections; Humans; Immunocompromised Host; Middle Aged; Peritonitis; Sofosbuvir; Streptococcus salivarius; Substance Abuse, Intravenous

Predictors of treatment efficacy with ledipasvir plus sofosbuvir as direct-acting antiviral (DAA) regimen for HCV infection are still unclear. Retreatment efficacy of ledipasvir plus sofosbuvir for failures to prior DAA regimens, including NS5A inhibitors, are also unknown because resistance-associated variants (RAVs) in NS5A have been shown to persist up to the long-term of post-treatment. One hundred seventy-five patients with chronic HCV genotype 1 infection, without decompensated liver cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma, were evaluated SVR12 by ledipasvir 90 mg plus sofosbuvir 400 mg once-daily for 12 weeks. Overall, SVR12 were 92%, based on intention to treat analysis. In failures to daclatasvir plus asunaprevir, SVR12 were 71%. The study using ultra-deep sequencing showed that ledipasvir plus sofosbuvir was effective to one case of failures to daclatasvir plus asunaprevir with multidrug RAVs (triple mutation in NS3-D168/NS5A-L31/NS5A-Y93). Multivariate analysis identified FIB4 index (<3.25), IL28B rs8099917 (TT type), and NS5A-L31 (Wild type) as significant determinants of SVR12. SVR12 rates in patients with three factors of poor response (RAVs Positive, IL28B non-TT, and FIB4 index ≥3.25) simultaneously were significantly lower than those of the other patients. Prediction of response to therapy based on combination of three predictors had high sensitivity and positive predictive values. In conclusions, this study indicated the favorable efficacy of ledipasvir plus sofosbuvir for HCV genotype 1 infection, including multidrug RAVs in Japan. Treatment efficacy could be predicted by the combination of viral and host factors. J. Med. Virol. 89:284-290, 2017. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antiviral Agents; Benzimidazoles; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Fluorenes; Genotype; Hepacivirus; Hepatitis C, Chronic; Humans; Japan; Male; Middle Aged; Retreatment; Retrospective Studies; Sofosbuvir; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult

Treatment of chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection after renal allograft transplantation has been an obstacle because of contraindications associated with IFN-based therapies. Direct-acting antiviral agents are highly efficient treatment options that do not require IFN and may not require ribavirin. Therefore, we assessed the efficacy and safety of sofosbuvir and ledipasvir in renal transplant patients with chronic HCV infection.. Fifteen renal allograft recipients with therapy-naive HCV genotype (GT) 1a, 1b, or 4 were treated with the combination of sofosbuvir and ledipasvir without ribavirin for 8 or 12 weeks. Clinical data were retrospectively analyzed for viral kinetics and for renal and liver function parameters. Patients were closely monitored for trough levels of immunosuppressive agents, laboratory values, and potential adverse effects.. Ten patients (66%) exhibited a rapid virologic response within 4 weeks (HCV GT1a, n = 4; HCV GT1b, n = 6). The other 5 patients exhibited a virologic response within 8 (HCV GT 1b, n = 4) or 12 weeks (HCV GT4, n = 1). One hundred percent of patients exhibited sustained virologic response at week 12 after the end of treatment. Clinical measures of liver function improved substantially for all patients. Adverse events were scarce; renal transplant function and proteinuria remained stable. Importantly, dose adjustments for tacrolimus were necessary for maintaining sufficient trough levels.. The described regimen appears to be safe and effective for patients after renal transplant and is a promising treatment regimen for eradicating HCV in this patient population.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Antiviral Agents; Benzimidazoles; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Fluorenes; Follow-Up Studies; Hepatitis C, Chronic; Humans; Kidney Transplantation; Male; Middle Aged; Postoperative Complications; Retrospective Studies; Sofosbuvir; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Antiviral Agents; Benzimidazoles; Drug Therapy, Combination; Fluorenes; Hepatitis B; Hepatitis C, Chronic; Humans; Recurrence; Sofosbuvir; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

Hepatitis C is the result of a ribonucleic acid (RNA) virus (hepatitis C virus; HCV). The Japan Society of Hepatology (JSH) estimated that 1.5-2 million people in Japan carry HCV. Six major HCV genotypes (GT) and a large number of subtypes have been described in the literature. In Japan, around 70% to 80% of people are infected with HCV genotype 1b. The progress of the disease primarily affects the liver and may lead to liver cirrhosis, hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and death. Sofosbuvir (SOF) is a nucleotide analogue NS5B inhibitor and ledipasvir (LDV) is an inhibitor of the HCV NS5A protein. They are combined in a single tablet regimen for the treatment of GT1 patients and resulted in sustained virological response (SVR) above 94% in large phase III trials. This analysis assesses the cost-utility of LDV/SOF in GT1 patients in Japan.. A cohort of 10,000 patients was followed through a Markov model until they reached 100 years of age. GT1 treatment-naïve and experienced, non-cirrhotic and cirrhotic patients were studied separately. LDV/SOF was compared to several treatment regimens containing pegylated interferon (PEGIFN), telaprevir (TVR), simeprevir (SMV), daclatasvir (DCV), asunaprevir (ASV) and ribavirin (RBV). Discount rates of 2% were applied to costs and outcomes according to the Japanese guidelines.. LDV/SOF was cost-effective against most comparators with incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) below JPY 5,000,000. By applying a societal perspective, LDV/SOF was the dominant treatment strategy in all cases. Moreover, LDV/SOF reduced the number of cases of advanced liver disease. These results were robust to sensitivity analyses.. LDV/SOF was cost-effective compared to most of the currently recommended treatments. Furthermore, LDV/SOF extends treatments to HCV-infected patients who are ineligible for interferon and RBV-based regimens. LDV/SOF thus has the potential to help reduce the burden of HCV in Japan.

Topics: Antiviral Agents; Benzimidazoles; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Drug Therapy, Combination; Fluorenes; Genotype; Hepacivirus; Hepatitis C, Chronic; Humans; Sofosbuvir

Sofosbuvir/ledipasvir (SOF/LDV) is the first all-oral ribavirin-free treatment approved for chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 6, offering a safe and highly efficacious treatment option. Large studies evaluating real-world outcomes of this regimen are lacking. We aim to evaluate real-world treatment outcomes for HCV genotype 6. A retrospective cohort study evaluated 65 adults (age ≥18) with chronic HCV genotype 6 treated with SOF/LDV without ribavirin at a community gastroenterology clinic in the United States from November 2014 to May 2016. Rates of undetectable virus at week 4 on treatment, at end of treatment (EOT) and SVR12 were stratified by the presence of cirrhosis and prior treatment (treatment naïve vs treatment experienced). Among 65 patients with chronic HCV genotype 6 treated with SOF/LDV (52.3% male, mean age 66.3 years [SD 9.7], 41.5% cirrhosis and 15.4% treatment experienced), 97.3% had undetectable virus at week 4 on treatment, 96.9% had undetectable virus at EOT and 95.3% achieved SVR12. SVR12 was 100% in females vs 91.2% in males, P=.096, and 92.3% in patients with cirrhosis vs 97.4% in those without cirrhosis, P=.347. Resistance testing of treatment failures was attempted but unsuccessful due to lack of conforming primers to define the possible resistance mutations. Among the largest U.S. community-based real-world cohort of Asian chronic HCV genotype 6 patients treated with all-oral SOF/LDV without ribavirin, SVR12 was similar to SVR12 reported in clinical trials, confirming the safety and effectiveness of this regimen and validating current HCV genotype 6 treatment guideline recommendations.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antiviral Agents; Asian; Benzimidazoles; Female; Fluorenes; Genotype; Hepacivirus; Hepatitis C, Chronic; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Retrospective Studies; Sofosbuvir; Sustained Virologic Response; Treatment Outcome; United States; Young Adult

Occult infection with hepatitis C virus (HCV) is defined as the presence of the HCV genome in either liver tissue or peripheral blood monocytes, despite constant negative results from tests for HCV RNA in serum. We investigated whether patients who maintained a sustained virologic response 12 weeks after therapy (SVR12) with direct-acting antiviral (DAA) agents for recurrent HCV infection after liver transplantation had occult HCV infections. We performed a prospective study of 134 patients with recurrent HCV infection after liver transplantation who were treated with DAAs, with or without ribavirin, from 2014 through 2016 (129 patients achieved an SVR12). In >10% of the patients who achieved SVR12 (n = 14), serum levels of aminotransferases did not normalize during or after DAA therapy, or they normalized transiently but then increased sharply after DAA therapy. Of these 14 patients, 9 were assessed for occult HCV infection by reverse transcription quantitative polymerase chain reaction. This analysis revealed that 55% of these patients (n = 5) had an occult infection, with the detection of negative strand viral genome, indicating viral replication. These findings indicate the presence of occult HCV infection in some patients with abnormal levels of serum aminotransferases, despite SVR12 to DAAs for HCV infection after liver transplantation.

Topics: Alanine Transaminase; Antiviral Agents; Aspartate Aminotransferases; Benzimidazoles; Carbamates; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Fluorenes; Hepacivirus; Hepatitis C, Chronic; Humans; Imidazoles; Limit of Detection; Liver Transplantation; Male; Middle Aged; Prospective Studies; Pyrrolidines; Recurrence; Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction; Ribavirin; RNA, Viral; Simeprevir; Sofosbuvir; Sustained Virologic Response; Valine; Viral Load; Virus Replication

Little real-world cohort data has been reported for Asians who have received interferon-free regimens with sofosbuvir (SOF) for chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. We evaluated the effectiveness and safety in clinical practice of ledipasvir (LDV) plus SOF for Japanese patients infected with HCV genotype 1.. This large, multicenter, real-world cohort study consisted of 772 patients treatment-naive or -experienced, with or without compensated cirrhosis, who were treated with LDV (90 mg)/SOF (400 mg) for a fixed 12-week duration. Direct sequence analysis of the NS5A genes (L31 and Y93) was performed at baseline.. Almost all (99.6%) were infected with HCV genotype 1b. The overall sustained virological response 12 weeks after the end of treatment (SVR12) rate was 98.8% (763/772). Multivariable logistic regression analysis extracted male (odds ratio [OR] 6.62, p = 0.024), cirrhosis (OR 20.1, p = 0.0054), and baseline NS5A resistance-associated variants (RAVs) (OR 29.3, p = 0.0018) as independently associated with treatment failure. Notably, the SVR12 rate for cirrhosis patients with baseline NS5A RAVs (87.5%, 49/56) was statistically lower than for the other groups. This tendency was found except for patients with prior daclatasvir/asunaprevir failure. All patients with treatment failure had NS5A Y93H at relapse, whether or not they had NS5A RAVs at baseline. Serious adverse effects were very rare, and discontinuation was required for only five (0.6%) patients.. LDV/SOF for HCV genotype 1b was exceptionally effective, however, NS5A RAVs undermined the virological effect for cirrhosis patients. Moreover, LDV/SOF was shown to be safe, irrespective of age or fibrosis status.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antiviral Agents; Benzimidazoles; Cohort Studies; Drug Resistance, Viral; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Fluorenes; Genotype; Hepacivirus; Hepatitis C, Chronic; Humans; Liver Cirrhosis; Male; Middle Aged; Risk Factors; Sex Factors; Sofosbuvir; Sustained Virologic Response; Treatment Failure; Viral Nonstructural Proteins; Young Adult

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) recurrence after liver transplantation (LT) used to be a serious problem in the era of interferon-based treatment. Since the introduction of modern directly acting antivirals, treatment has become easier and shorter. According to published data, in the natural course of hepatitis C infection the duration of antiviral treatment with sofosbuvir (SOF) and ledipasvir (LDV) may be shortened to 12 instead of 24 weeks, using ribavirin (RBV) in addition. Furthermore, the question of whether or not RBV is really necessary, in a 12-week SOF/LDV treatment in the post-transplant setting, is still unanswered.. At our institution, 100 liver transplant patients with HCV recurrence underwent interferon-free SOF-based treatment. A total of 51 patients received SOF/LDV with or without RBV. Twenty-nine HCV genotype 1 or 4 patients with histologically proven stage 0-2 fibrosis were treated with SOF/LDV for 12 weeks; another 22 patients with advanced fibrosis (stage 3-4) either received SOF/LDV plus weight-adjusted RBV or prolonged treatment for 24 weeks.. End of treatment response and sustained virological response (SVR) were achieved in 100% of the 51 patients, irrespective of the treatment group. Patients with prolonged treatment duration or with RBV developed significantly more adverse events (AEs) compared to the SOF/LDV group: 19 (86.4%) vs 8 (27.6%), P<.001. One of the predominant and most relevant AEs was the development of anemia in 43.1% of 10 patients receiving RBV, which was a significant result (P<.001). RBV co-medication had to be reduced in 11 (55%) patients and then stopped in 8 (40%) patients because of AEs. No significant difference was observed among the groups regarding kidney function.. The SOF/LDV combination is a reliable therapy of recurrent HCV infection after LT. It is easy to administer and to achieve SVR in immunocompromised patients without interactions with immunosuppressive medications. Considering the high rate of AEs, frequent discontinuation of RBV treatment, and the 100% SVR, the use of RBV as co-medication in a 12-week SOF/LDV regimen does not seem to be justified after LT.

Topics: Aged; Antiviral Agents; Benzimidazoles; Drug Interactions; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Fluorenes; Hepacivirus; Hepatitis C, Chronic; Humans; Immunocompromised Host; Immunosuppressive Agents; Liver Transplantation; Male; Middle Aged; Recurrence; Retrospective Studies; Ribavirin; Sofosbuvir

Recently, the treatment of chronic hepatitis C has markedly advanced. A phase III clinical study of combination therapy with sofosbuvir (SOF) and ledipasvir (LDV) was conducted in Japan, and the additive therapeutic effects were reported. In this study, we report the results of treatment in our hospital.. Of 147 patients with chronic type C liver disease who had consulted our hospital since September 2015 and received SOF/LDV therapy, in 91 subjects a sustained virological response of 12 weeks (SVR12) could be evaluated.. In all 91 patients, end treatment response was achieved. Subsequently, recrudescence was noted in 1 before the completion of treatment (week 12); an SVR12 was achieved in 90 patients (99%). The following adverse reactions were observed in 3 patients (3.3%): bradycardia, paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, and heart failure with QT prolongation, which were associated with heart disease.. A favorable SVR was achieved by SOF/LDV therapy even in elderly patients, those with liver cirrhosis, or those having undergone radical treatment of liver cancer. Furthermore, a high tolerance was demonstrated, but adverse reactions associated with the heart may appear in patients with heart disease as an underlying disease; strict management during treatment is necessary.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antiviral Agents; Benzimidazoles; Drug Combinations; Female; Fluorenes; Hepatitis C, Chronic; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Sofosbuvir; Treatment Outcome

Infections with the hepatitis C virus (HCV) are a global public health problem. Long-term consequences are the development of liver cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. Newly introduced direct acting antivirals, especially interferon-free regimens, have improved rates of sustained viral response above 90% in most patient groups and allow treating patients who were ineligible for treatment in the past. These new regimens have replaced former treatment and are recommended by current guidelines. However, there is an ongoing discussion on high pharmaceutical prices. Our aim was to assess the long-term cost-effectiveness of treating hepatitis C genotype 1 patients with sofosbuvir/ledipasvir (SOF/LDV) treatment in Germany.. We used a Markov cohort model to simulate disease progression and assess cost-effectiveness. The model calculates lifetime costs and outcomes (quality-adjusted life years, QALYs) of SOF/LDV and other strategies. Patients were stratified by treatment status (treatment-naive and treatment-experienced) and absence/presence of cirrhosis. Different treatment strategies were compared to prior standard of care. Sensitivity analyses were performed to evaluate model robustness.. Base-case analyses results show that in treatment-naive non-cirrhotic patients treatment with SOF/LDV dominates the prior standard of care (is more effective and less costly). In cirrhotic patients an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of 3,383 €/QALY was estimated. In treatment-experienced patients ICERs were 26,426 €/QALY and 1,397 €/QALY for treatment-naive and treatment-experienced patients, respectively. Robustness of results was confirmed in sensitivity analyses.. Our analysis shows that treatment with SOF/LDV is cost-effective compared to prior standard of care in all patient groups considering international costs per QALY thresholds.

Topics: Adult; Antiviral Agents; Benzimidazoles; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Fluorenes; Genotype; Germany; Hepacivirus; Hepatitis C, Chronic; Humans; Liver Cirrhosis; Liver Transplantation; Markov Chains; Middle Aged; Models, Theoretical; Public Health; Quality of Life; Quality-Adjusted Life Years; Sensitivity and Specificity; Sofosbuvir

Topics: Antiviral Agents; Benzimidazoles; Drug Therapy, Combination; Fluorenes; Genotype; Hepacivirus; Hepatitis C, Chronic; Humans; Liver Transplantation; Sofosbuvir

The efficacy of NS5A inhibitors for the treatment of patients chronically infected with hepatitis C virus (HCV) can be affected by the presence of NS5A resistance-associated substitutions (RASs). We analyzed data from 35 phase I, II, and III studies in 22 countries to determine the pretreatment prevalence of various NS5A RASs, and their effect on outcomes of treatment with ledipasvir-sofosbuvir in patients with genotype 1 HCV.. NS5A gene deep sequencing analysis was performed on samples from 5397 patients in Gilead clinical trials. The effect of baseline RASs on sustained virologic response (SVR) rates was assessed in the 1765 patients treated with regimens containing ledipasvir-sofosbuvir.. Using a 15% cut-off, pretreatment NS5A and ledipasvir-specific RASs were detected in 13% and 8% of genotype 1a patients, respectively, and in 18% and 16% of patients with genotype 1b. Among genotype 1a treatment-naïve patients, SVR rates were 91% (42/46) vs. 99% (539/546) for those with and without ledipasvir-specific RASs, respectively. Among treatment-experienced genotype 1a patients, SVR rates were 76% (22/29) vs. 97% (409/420) for those with and without ledipasvir-specific RASs, respectively. Among treatment-naïve genotype 1b patients, SVR rates were 99% for both those with and without ledipasvir-specific RASs (71/72 vs. 331/334), and among treatment-experienced genotype 1b patients, SVR rates were 89% (41/46) vs. 98% (267/272) for those with and without ledipasvir-specific RASs, respectively.. Pretreatment ledipasvir-specific RASs that were present in 8-16% of patients have an impact on treatment outcome in some patient groups, particularly treatment-experienced patients with genotype 1a HCV.. The efficacy of treatments using NS5A inhibitors for patients with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection can be affected by the presence of NS5A resistance-associated substitutions (RASs). We reviewed results from 35 clinical trials where patients with genotype 1 HCV infection received treatments that included ledipasvir-sofosbuvir to determine how prevalent NS5A RASs are in patients at baseline, and found that ledipasvir-specific RASs were present in 8-16% of patients prior to treatment and had a negative impact on treatment outcome in subset of patient groups, particularly treatment-experienced patients with genotype 1a HCV.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antiviral Agents; Benzimidazoles; Drug Resistance, Viral; Female; Fluorenes; Genotype; Hepatitis C, Chronic; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Treatment Outcome; Viral Nonstructural Proteins; Young Adult

Chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is prevalent among patients with inherited bleeding disorders and is a leading cause of mortality in those with haemophilia.. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of ledipasvir-sofosbuvir and sofosbuvir plus ribavirin in patients with chronic HCV genotype 1-4 infection and an inherited bleeding disorder.. Ledipasvir-sofosbuvir was administered for 12 weeks to patients with genotype 1 or 4 infection and for 12 or 24 weeks to treatment-experienced cirrhotic patients with genotype 1 infection. Patients with genotype 2 and 3 infection received sofosbuvir plus ribavirin for 12 and 24 weeks respectively.. The majority of the 120 treated patients had a severe bleeding disorder (55%); overall, 65% of patients had haemophilia A and 26% of patients had haemophilia B; 22% were HIV coinfected. Sustained virologic response at 12 weeks posttreatment was 99% (98/99) in patients with genotype 1 or 4 infection; 100% (5/5) in treatment-experienced cirrhotic patients with genotype 1 infection; 100% (10/10) in patients with genotype 2 infection; and 83% (5/6) in patients with genotype 3 infection. There were no treatment discontinuations due to adverse events (AEs). The most frequent non-bleeding AEs were fatigue, headache, diarrhoea, nausea and insomnia. Bleeding AEs occurred in 22 patients, of which all but one were considered unrelated to treatment.. Treatment with ledipasvir-sofosbuvir for patients with HCV genotype 1 or 4 infection or sofosbuvir plus ribavirin for patients with genotype 2 or 3 infection was highly effective and well tolerated among those with inherited bleeding disorders.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Antiviral Agents; Benzimidazoles; Drug Combinations; Female; Fluorenes; Hepatitis C, Chronic; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Ribavirin; Sofosbuvir; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult

The optimal therapy for recurrent hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection after liver transplantation has not yet been established. This study aimed to clarify the efficacy and safety of interferon-free therapy with sofosbuvir and ledipasvir without ribavirin for 12 weeks in Japanese patients with HCV genotype 1b infection after living donor liver transplantation.. A cohort study of living donor liver transplant recipients with recurrent HCV genotype 1b infection treated with sofosbuvir (400 mg/day) and ledipasvir (90 mg/day) was performed at six liver transplant centers in Japan.. Fifty-four patients were treated with sofosbuvir and ledipasvir. Thirty-eight patients (70%) were treatment experienced, including 17 patients who had undergone prior direct-acting-antiviral-based triple therapy. Ten patients had resistance-associated substitutions at L31 or Y93 in the NS5A region of the HCV genome. Fifty-three patients completed the 12-week treatment protocol; treatment was discontinued in one patient who developed pneumonia at 4 weeks and died thereafter. All 53 patients who completed the treatment regimen achieved a sustained virological response 12 weeks after completion of treatment. Treatment was well tolerated in most patients, but seven patients developed serious adverse events, including hemorrhagic duodenal ulcers (n = 3), infection (n = 2), pleural effusion (n = 1), and alveolar hemorrhage (n = 1).. Sofosbuvir and ledipasvir treatment without ribavirin for 12 weeks was highly effective in achieving a sustained virological response in Japanese patients who developed recurrent HCV genotype 1b infection after living donor liver transplantation.

Topics: Aged; Antiviral Agents; Benzimidazoles; Drug Resistance, Viral; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Fluorenes; Genotype; Hepacivirus; Hepatitis C, Chronic; Humans; Japan; Liver Transplantation; Living Donors; Male; Middle Aged; Postoperative Period; Recurrence; Ribavirin; Sofosbuvir; Sustained Virologic Response; Viral Nonstructural Proteins

We previously reported results of interferon (IFN)-free daclatasvir and asunaprevir for the treatment of recurrent hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 1 infection after liver transplantation (LT). Here we report three patients who achieved viral response with no effect on the blood concentrations of immunosuppressive agents following sofosbuvir plus ledipasvir treatment. The first patient was a 68-year-old female with HCV-related liver cirrhosis who failed to respond to pegylated-IFN and ribavirin (PEG-IFN/RBV) after living donor LT. She had been treated with 50 mg/day of cyclosporine. The second was a 63-year-old male with HCV-related liver cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma who failed to respond to PEG-IFN/RBV after living donor LT. He had been treated with 50 mg/day of cyclosporine. The third was a 63-year-old female with HCV-related liver cirrhosis. She had been treated with tacrolimus. High alanine aminotransferase levels persisted after LT. Liver biopsy examination revealed active hepatitis or chronic rejection. Therefore, sofosbuvir plus ledipasvir therapy was started. However, the combination treatment was stopped at 4 weeks due to development of interstitial pneumonia. Serum HCV RNA became negative at the time treatment was discontinued and remained negative 12 weeks after cessation of therapy in all three cases. Sofosbuvir plus ledipasvir treatment showed a remarkable viral response with little effect on blood levels of immunosuppressive agents for recurrent HCV genotype 1 infection after LT.

Topics: Aged; Antiviral Agents; Benzimidazoles; Cyclosporine; Drug Interactions; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Fluorenes; Hepacivirus; Hepatitis C, Chronic; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Liver Transplantation; Male; Middle Aged; Recurrence; RNA, Viral; Sofosbuvir; Viral Load

Topics: Antiviral Agents; Benzimidazoles; Diabetes Complications; Fluorenes; Hepatitis C, Chronic; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Sofosbuvir

Repeated measurements of hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA levels during antiviral therapy are recommended to monitor treatment efficacy and adherence. Throughout most direct antiviral agent (DAA) approval studies, HCV RNA cutoffs and endpoints were established with the COBAS TaqMan assay for use with the High Pure System (HPS/CTM). Different assays used in clinical practice may yield different quantitative results and possibly impact treatment decisions.. The concordance of the fully-automated COBAS AmpliPrep/COBAS TaqMan assay (CAP/CTM) with HPS/CTM and its ability to predict response to DAA-treatment with ledipasvir/sofosbuvir was assessed in cirrhotic patients with HCV genotype-1-infection who had failed prior treatment with protease inhibitor-based regimens.. Serum samples from patients (n=154) treated in the phase-2 SIRIUS-study were collected at baseline and during antiviral therapy (weeks 1-8), and were tested in parallel by both assays.. CAP/CTM and HPS/CTM showed significantly different response rates during the early stages of ledipasvir/sofosbuvir treatment. However, on-treatment response was not predictive of SVR with either assay, indicating that determination of on-treatment HCV RNA levels may not be useful to guide treatment decisions.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antiviral Agents; Automation, Laboratory; Benzimidazoles; Drug Monitoring; Fluorenes; Hepacivirus; Hepatitis C, Chronic; Humans; Middle Aged; Molecular Diagnostic Techniques; RNA, Viral; Sofosbuvir; Viral Load; Young Adult

Fatigue is a disturbing symptom of chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. We assessed the effects of sustained virologic response 12 weeks after the end of therapy (SVR12) on fatigue.. We performed a retrospective analysis of 100 patients with chronic HCV infection who achieved an SVR12 after treatment with ledipasvir and sofosbuvir, with or without ribavirin. Data were collected on fatigue-related patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and assessed by using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Fatigue scoring system and the Vitality subscale of Short Form 36. We measured levels of cytokines and growth factors in frozen serum samples collected at baseline, week 12 of treatment, and 4 weeks after treatment. Central fatigue and peripheral or muscle fatigue (PF) were determined by using items from PROs. Serum levels of cytokines, growth factors, serotonin, alanine aminotransferase, and aspartate aminotransferase were measured by using the Bio-Plex, enzyme-linked immunosorbent, and enzymatic assays.. Compared with baseline, 4 weeks after the end of treatment, all fatigue-associated PROs improved significantly. Baseline PROs correlated inversely with serum level of interferon-γ; level of platelet-derived growth factor correlated with PF, central fatigue, and total fatigue score. Only PF correlated with serum level of serotonin. At baseline, high PF scores correlated with high serum levels of serotonin and low levels of interleukin-10 and tumor necrosis factor-α. In multivariate analysis, serum level of interleukin-8 was associated with greater fatigue (P < .02). Reductions in levels of chemokine (C-C motif) ligand 2 (also called monocyte chemotactic protein 1) were associated with fatigue after treatment (P = .0165).. In an analysis of data from patients with chronic HCV infection participating in a clinical trial of ledipasvir and sofosbuvir, SVR12 was associated with reduced fatigue, compared with baseline. High baseline serum levels of interferon-γ were associated with fatigue. Reductions in levels of chemokine (C-C motif) ligand 2 were associated with persistent fatigue after SVR12. Central and peripheral fatigue each associated with different biomarkers, suggesting different pathogenic pathways.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Antiviral Agents; Benzimidazoles; Biomarkers; Blood Chemical Analysis; Cytokines; Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay; Fatigue; Female; Fluorenes; Hepatitis C, Chronic; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Retrospective Studies; Ribavirin; Sofosbuvir; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Antiviral Agents; Benzimidazoles; Fluorenes; Hepacivirus; Hepatitis C, Chronic; Humans; RNA, Viral; Sofosbuvir; Time Factors

CH-C negatively affects work productivity (WP), creating a large economic burden. The aim of this study was to model the impact of sustained virologic response (SVR) on WP in CHC genotype 1 (GT1) patients in five European countries (EU5). Work Productivity and Activity Index-Specific Health Problem questionnaire was administered to patients across the ION clinical trials (n = 629 European patients). The analysis modelled a population of GT1 CHC patients over one year, who had been either not treated or treated with LDV/SOF. Sensitivity analyses assessed the possibility that CHC patients' labour costs were lower than the general population's and presented results by fibrosis stage. Before initiation of treatment, EU patients with CHC GT1 exhibited absenteeism and presenteeism impairments of 3.54% and 9.12%, respectively. About 91.8% of EU patients in the ION trials achieved SVR and improved absenteeism and presenteeism impairments by 16.3% and 19.5%, respectively. Monetizing these data, treatment with LDV/SOF resulted in an annual productivity gain of €435 million and a weighted average per-employed patient (PEP) gain of €900 in the EU5. PEP gains from treatment are projected to be higher in cirrhotic than in noncirrhotic patients. If CHC patients are assumed to earn 20% less than the general population, gains of €348 million (€720 PEP) annually are projected. CHC results in a significant economic burden to European society. Due to improvements in WP, SVR with treatment could provide substantial economic gains, partly offsetting the direct costs related to its widespread use.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antiviral Agents; Benzimidazoles; Disease Eradication; Efficiency; Europe; Female; Fluorenes; Genotype; Hepacivirus; Hepatitis C, Chronic; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Models, Economic; Sofosbuvir; Surveys and Questionnaires; Young Adult

Recently approved, interferon-free medication regimens for treating hepatitis C are highly effective, but extremely costly. We aimed to identify cost-effective strategies for managing treatment-naïve U.S. veterans with new hepatitis C medication regimens. We developed a Markov model with 1-year cycle length for a cohort of 60-year-old veterans with untreated genotype 1 hepatitis C seeking treatment in a typical year. We compared using sofosbuvir/ledipasvir or ombitasvir/ritonavir/paritaprevir/dasabuvir to treat: (1) any patient seeking treatment; (2) only patients with advanced fibrosis or cirrhosis; or (3) patients with advanced disease first and healthier patients 1 year later. The previous standard of care, sofosbuvir/simeprevir or sofosbuvir/pegylated interferon/ribavirin, was included for comparison. Patients could develop progressive fibrosis, cirrhosis, or hepatocellular carcinoma, undergo transplantation, or die. Complications were less likely after sustained virological response. We calculated the incremental cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) and varied model inputs in one-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses. We used the Veterans Health Administration perspective with a lifetime time horizon and 3% annual discounting. Treating any patient with ombitasvir-based therapy was the preferred strategy ($35,560; 14.0 QALYs). All other strategies were dominated (greater costs/QALY gained than more effective strategies). Varying treatment efficacy, price, and/or duration changed the preferred strategy. In probabilistic sensitivity analysis, treating any patient with ombitasvir-based therapy was cost-effective in 70% of iterations at a $50,000/QALY threshold and 65% of iterations at a $100,000/QALY threshold.. Managing any treatment-naïve genotype 1 hepatitis C patient with ombitasvir-based therapy is the most economically efficient strategy, although price and efficacy can impact cost-effectiveness. It is economically unfavorable to restrict treatment to patients with advanced disease or use a staged treatment strategy. (Hepatology 2016;63:428-436).

Topics: Aged; Antiviral Agents; Benzimidazoles; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Drug Combinations; Fluorenes; Hepatitis C, Chronic; Humans; Middle Aged; Quality-Adjusted Life Years; Sofosbuvir; United States; Veterans Health

Novel treatments for hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection are highly efficacious but costly. Thus, many insurers cover therapy only in advanced fibrosis stages. The added health benefits and costs of early treatment are unknown.. To assess the cost-effectiveness of (1) treating all patients with HCV vs only those with advanced fibrosis and (2) treating each stage of fibrosis.. This study used a decision-analytic model for the treatment of HCV genotype 1. The model used a lifetime horizon and societal perspective and was representative of all US patients with HCV genotype 1 who had not received previous treatment. Comparisons in the model included antiviral treatment of all fibrosis stages (METAVIR [Meta-analysis of Histological Data in Virial Hepatitis] stages F0 [no fibrosis] to F4 [cirrhosis]) vs treatment of stages F3 (numerous septa without cirrhosis) and F4 only and by specific fibrosis stage. Data were collected from March 1 to September 1, 2014, and analyzed from September 1, 2014, to June 30, 2015.. Six HCV therapy options (particularly combined sofosbuvir and ledipasvir therapy) or no treatment.. Cost and health outcomes were measured using total medical costs, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs), calculated as the difference in costs between strategies divided by the difference in QALYs.. We simulated 1000 individuals, but present the results normalized to a single HCV-infected person. In the base-case analysis, among patients receiving 8 or 12 weeks of sofosbuvir-ledipasvir treatment, treating all fibrosis stages compared with treating stages F3 and F4 adds 0.73 QALYs and $28,899, for an ICER of $39,475 per QALY gained. Treating at stage F2 (portal fibrosis with rare septa) costs $19,833 per QALY gained vs waiting until stage F3; treating at stage F1 (portal fibrosis without septa), $81,165 per QALY gained compared with waiting until stage F2; and treating at stage F0, $187,065 per QALY gained compared with waiting until stage F1. Results for other regimens show a similar pattern. At base-case drug prices, treating 50% of all eligible US patients with HCV genotype 1 would cost $53 billion. In sensitivity analyses, the ICER for treating all stages vs treating stages F3 and F4 was most sensitive to cohort age, drug costs, utility values in stages F1 and F2, and percentage of patients eligible for 8-week therapy. Except for patients aged 70 years, the ICER remains less than $100,000 per QALY gained. A 46% reduction in cost of sofosbuvir-ledipasvir therapy decreases the ICER for treating at all fibrosis stages by 48%.. In this simulated model, treating HCV infection at early stages of fibrosis appeared to improve health outcomes and to be cost-effective but incurred substantial aggregate costs. The findings may have implications for health care coverage policies and clinical decision making.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Antiviral Agents; Benzimidazoles; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Decision Support Techniques; Drug Therapy, Combination; Fluorenes; Genotype; Hepacivirus; Hepatitis C, Chronic; Humans; Liver Cirrhosis; Middle Aged; Quality-Adjusted Life Years; Severity of Illness Index; Sofosbuvir; Treatment Outcome; United States; Viral Load; Young Adult

Sofosbuvir is widely prescribed for treatment of HCV infection. We compared the sustained virologic response rates (SVR12) and the haematologic toxicity of various sofosbuvir-based regimens in routine clinical practice.. We used ERCHIVES (Electronically Retrieved Cohort of HCV infected Veterans) to identify HCV-infected persons initiated on sofosbuvir-based regimens. Treatment duration and regimen were defined as per labelling guidelines. We excluded persons with HIV, positive hepatitis-B surface antigen, hepatocellular carcinoma and missing HCV RNA.. Among 4257 sofosbuvir-treated persons, sofosbuvir/simeprevir (30%), sofosbuvir/ledipasvir (29%) and sofosbuvir/ribavirin (23%) were the most common combinations prescribed. The mean age (SD) was 60.22 (6.3) years, 96% were male, 22.4% were black, 37.2% had cirrhosis, 29.7% were treatment-experienced; baseline mean HCV RNA was 6.73 log lIU/ml. Comorbidities included: 40.2% alcohol abuse or dependence, 39.7% drug abuse or dependence, 25.1% diabetes and 14.4% stage 3-5 chronic kidney disease. Overall, 86.7% completed a full course of treatment. Overall, SVR12 rates were 88-98% in the sofosbuvir/simeprevir group and 93-98% in the sofosbuvir/ledipasvir group and did not vary based on previous treatment history or cirrhosis at baseline. For genotype 2/3 patients treated with sofosbuvir/ribavirin, SVR12 rates ranged from 69 to 87% with lowest rates in treatment-experienced cirrhotics. For the sofosbuvir/simeprevir and sofosbuvir/ledipasvir groups, grade3/4 haematologic adverse events were uncommon; these trended back close to baseline values after completion of treatment.. Sofosbuvir-based regimens in clinical practice are associated with SVR rates comparable to those seen in clinical trials and low rates of grade 3/4 haematological adverse events.

Topics: Aged; Antiviral Agents; Benzimidazoles; Comorbidity; Databases, Factual; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Fluorenes; Hepacivirus; Hepatitis C, Chronic; Humans; Logistic Models; Male; Middle Aged; Multivariate Analysis; Ribavirin; Simeprevir; Sofosbuvir; Sustained Virologic Response; United States

Elderly subjects have been historically underrepresented in clinical trials involving antiviral hepatitis C therapies. The aim of this analysis was to retrospectively evaluate the safety and efficacy of ledipasvir/sofosbuvir (LDV/SOF) by age groups of <65 years versus ≥65 years among subjects enrolled in phase 3 trials. Four open-label phase 3 clinical trials evaluated the safety and efficacy of LDV/SOF with or without ribavirin (RBV) for the treatment of genotype 1 chronic hepatitis C virus. Sustained virological response at 12 weeks, treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs), and graded laboratory abnormalities were analyzed according to age group. Of the 2293 subjects enrolled in four phase 3 trials, 264 (12%) were ≥65 years of age, of whom 24 were aged ≥75 years. Sustained virological response at 12 weeks was achieved by 97% (1965/2029) of subjects aged <65 years and 98% (258/264) of subjects aged ≥65 years. The most common AEs in both LDV/SOF groups that occurred in ≥10% of subjects were headache and fatigue. The rate of study discontinuation due to AEs was similar in the two age cohorts. The use of RBV in 1042 (45%) subjects increased the number of AEs, treatment-related AEs, and AEs leading to study drug modification/interruption, particularly among elderly subjects.. LDV/SOF with or without RBV was highly effective for treatment of genotype 1 chronic hepatitis C virusin subjects aged 65 and older. Addition of RBV did not increase sustained virological response at 12 weeks rates but led to higher rates of AEs, especially in elderly subjects.

Topics: Age Factors; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antiviral Agents; Benzimidazoles; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Cohort Studies; Confidence Intervals; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Fluorenes; Follow-Up Studies; Genotype; Hepatitis C, Chronic; Humans; Liver Cirrhosis; Male; Patient Safety; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Retrospective Studies; Ribavirin; Risk Assessment; Sex Factors; Sofosbuvir; Treatment Outcome

To compare daclatasvir + asunaprevir (DCV + ASV) versus sofosbuvir/ledipasvir (SOF/LDV) for hepatitis C virus genotype 1b in Japanese patients without NS5A polymorphisms at L31 and Y93H.. All Phase III trials of SOF/LDV and DCV + ASV conducted in Japan were included. To adjust for cross-trial differences, DCV + ASV patients were weighted to match reported SOF/LDV summary baseline characteristics.. After adjustment, the rate of SVR12 (99.3 vs 100%; p = 0.398) and discontinuation due to adverse events (1.3 vs 0.0%; p = 0.327) were similar between patients treated with DCV + ASV (n = 252) and SOF/LDV (n = 171).. After adjusting for cross-trial differences in baseline characteristics, DCV + ASV and SOF/LDV were associated with similar efficacy and discontinuation due to adverse events in the treatment of hepatitis C virus genotype 1b in Japanese patients without NS5A polymorphisms.

Topics: Antiviral Agents; Benzimidazoles; Carbamates; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Drug Therapy, Combination; Fluorenes; Genotype; Hepacivirus; Hepatitis C, Chronic; Humans; Imidazoles; Isoquinolines; Pyrrolidines; Sofosbuvir; Sulfonamides; Valine

Topics: Antiviral Agents; Benzimidazoles; Echocardiography; Electrocardiography; Fluorenes; Follow-Up Studies; Hepatitis C, Chronic; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Myocarditis; Pericarditis; Sofosbuvir

Interferon and ribavirin-free regimens to treat chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection in patients with end stage renal disease are not approved and represent an area of unmet clinical need. We report our experience on the safety and efficacy of sofosbuvir/simeprevir and sofosbuvir/ledipasvir therapy in patients on haemodialysis.. Patients with chronic HCV infection on haemodialysis were included in this study. Patients were started on either sofosbuvir/simeprevir or sofosbuvir/ledipasvir. Routine clinical and laboratory data were collected at baseline and during treatment. The primary outcome was sustained virological response at week 12 (SVR12).. Eight patients with mean age 56.8 ± 20 years were included in this study. Seven were treatment naïve and one was a priori null responder to interferon-based therapy. Four patients were started on sofosbuvir/simeprevir and four on sofosbuvir/ledipasvir for 12 weeks. Therapy was well tolerated overall with nausea/vomiting, pruritus, headache and a 2 g/dl drop in haemoglobin developing in one patient each. No patient discontinued therapy because of side effects. Comparison of labs at baseline and nadir levels during treatment revealed no significant change in haemoglobin (10.8 ± 2.4 g/dl vs 10.3 ± 1.6 g/dl), platelet count (198 ± 164 k/μl vs 184.5 ± 162/μl) and bilirubin (0.3 ± 0.4 mg/dl vs 0.25 ± 0.15 mg/dl). Eight of eight patients had undetectable HCV RNA at the end of treatment. One patient was lost to follow up and the remaining seven achieved SVR12.. Full dose sofosbuvir/simeprevir or sofosbuvir/ledipasvir therapy for HCV-infected patients with end stage renal disease was well tolerated with no discontinuation owing to side effects and no significant adverse events.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Antiviral Agents; Benzimidazoles; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Fluorenes; Glomerular Filtration Rate; Hepacivirus; Hepatitis C, Chronic; Humans; Kidney Failure, Chronic; Male; Middle Aged; Ohio; Renal Dialysis; Simeprevir; Sofosbuvir; Sustained Virologic Response

Ledipasvir (LDV; GS-5885), a component of Harvoni (a fixed-dose combination of LDV with sofosbuvir [SOF]), is approved to treat chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. Here, we report key preclinical antiviral properties of LDV, including in vitro potency, in vitro resistance profile, and activity in combination with other anti-HCV agents. LDV has picomolar antiviral activity against genotype 1a and genotype 1b replicons with 50% effective concentration (EC50) values of 0.031 nM and 0.004 nM, respectively. LDV is also active against HCV genotypes 4a, 4d, 5a, and 6a with EC50 values of 0.11 to 1.1 nM. LDV has relatively less in vitro antiviral activity against genotypes 2a, 2b, 3a, and 6e, with EC50 values of 16 to 530 nM. In vitro resistance selection with LDV identified the single Y93H and Q30E resistance-associated variants (RAVs) in the NS5A gene; these RAVs were also observed in patients after a 3-day monotherapy treatment. In vitro antiviral combination studies indicate that LDV has additive to moderately synergistic antiviral activity when combined with other classes of HCV direct-acting antiviral (DAA) agents, including NS3/4A protease inhibitors and the nucleotide NS5B polymerase inhibitor SOF. Furthermore, LDV is active against known NS3 protease and NS5B polymerase inhibitor RAVs with EC50 values equivalent to those for the wild type.

Topics: Antiviral Agents; Benzimidazoles; Carrier Proteins; Cell Line, Tumor; Drug Combinations; Drug Resistance, Viral; Drug Synergism; Fluorenes; Genotype; HeLa Cells; Hepacivirus; Hepatitis C, Chronic; Humans; Intracellular Signaling Peptides and Proteins; Microbial Sensitivity Tests; Sofosbuvir; Viral Nonstructural Proteins

Recent clinical trials of direct-acting-antiviral agents (DAAs) against hepatitis C virus (HCV) achieved >90% sustained virological response (SVR) rates, suggesting that cure often took place before the end of treatment (EOT). We sought to evaluate retrospectively whether early response kinetics can provide the basis to individualize therapy to achieve optimal results while reducing duration and cost.. 58 chronic HCV patients were treated with 12-week sofosbuvir+simeprevir (n=19), sofosbuvir+daclatasvir (n=19), or sofosbuvir+ledipasvir in three French referral centers. HCV was measured at baseline, day 2, every other week, EOT and 12weeks post EOT. Mathematical modeling was used to predict the time to cure, i.e., <1 virus copy in the entire extracellular body fluid.. All but one patient who relapsed achieved SVR. Mean age was 60±11years, 53% were male, 86% HCV genotype-1, 9% HIV coinfected, 43% advanced fibrosis (F3), and 57% had cirrhosis. At weeks 2, 4 and 6, 48%, 88% and 100% of patients had HCV<15IU/ml, with 27%, 74% and 91% of observations having target not detected, respectively. Modeling results predicted that 23 (43%), 16 (30%), 7 (13%), 5 (9%) and 3 (5%) subjects were predicted to reach cure within 6, 8, 10, 12 and 13weeks of therapy, respectively. The modeling suggested that the patient who relapsed would have benefitted from an additional week of sofosbuvir+ledipasvir. Adjusting duration of treatment according to the modeling predicts reduced medication costs of 43-45% and 17-30% in subjects who had HCV<15IU/ml at weeks 2 and 4, respectively.. The use of early viral kinetic analysis has the potential to individualize duration of DAA therapy with a projected average cost saving of 16-20% per 100-treated persons.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Antiviral Agents; Benzimidazoles; Carbamates; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Fluorenes; Hepatitis C, Chronic; Humans; Imidazoles; Kinetics; Male; Middle Aged; Models, Theoretical; Pyrrolidines; Retrospective Studies; RNA, Viral; Simeprevir; Sofosbuvir; Time Factors; Valine

Prevalence of chronic hepatitis C (CH-C) infection in patients of Asian ancestry ranges between 1% and 20%. Interferon (IFN)- and ribavirin (RBV)-containing regimens for CH-C have a negative impact on patient-reported outcomes (PROs) during treatment. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of IFN-free RBV-free sofosbuvir (SOF)-based regimens on PROs in CH-C patients of Asian ancestry. In this observational retrospective study, the PRO data from 12 multicenter multinational phase 3 clinical trials (2012-2015, conducted in Europe, North America, Australia, and New Zealand) of SOF-based regimens with and without IFN, ledipasvir (LDV), and/or RBV were used. At baseline, during treatment, and post-treatment, patients completed 4 validated PRO questionnaires (SF-36, CLDQ-HCV, FACIT-F, and WPAI:SHP). The resulting PROs in Asian patients were compared across the treatment regimens. Of 4485 of the trials' participants, 106 patients were of Asian ancestry (55.7% male, 69.8% treatment-naïve, 17.0% cirrhotic). In comparison with other patients, the Asian CH-C cohort was younger, had lower BMI, and lower rates of pre-treatment psychiatric comorbidities (anxiety, depression, sleep disorders) (all P < .05). At baseline, Asian patients also had lower SF-36 physical functioning scores (on average, by -5.6% on a normalized 0-100% PRO scale, P = .001). During treatment, Asian CH-C patients experienced a decline in their PRO scores while receiving IFN and/or RBV-containing regimens (up to -19.6%, P < .001). In contrast, patients receiving LDV/SOF experienced no PRO decrement and improvement of some PRO scores during treatment (+9.0% in general health of SF-36, P = .03). After achieving SVR-12, some of the PRO scores in Asian patients improved regardless of the regimen (up to +9.3%, P < .001). In multivariate analysis of Asian patients, the use of LDV/SOF was independently associated with higher PRO scores during and soon after the end of treatment (betas +15.0% to +29.3%, all P < .05). Other predictors of PRO impairment included depression, type 2 diabetes mellitus, and cirrhosis. The use of IFN- and RBV-free LDV/SOF regimens leads to PRO improvement in Asian patients with CH-C during treatment. Achieving SVR-12 results in improvement of PRO scores.

Topics: Antiviral Agents; Asia; Benzimidazoles; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Fluorenes; Hepacivirus; Hepatitis C, Chronic; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Patient Outcome Assessment; Quality of Life; Sofosbuvir; Surveys and Questionnaires

This study compared the cost-effectiveness of direct-acting antiviral therapies currently recommended for treating genotypes (GT) 1 and 4 chronic hepatitis C (CHC) patients in the US.. A cost-effectiveness analysis of treatments for CHC from a US payer's perspective over a lifelong time horizon was performed. A Markov model based on the natural history of CHC was used for a population that included treatment-naïve and -experienced patients. Treatment alternatives considered for GT1 included ombitasvir/paritaprevir/ritonavir + dasabuvir ± ribavirin (3D ± R), sofosbuvir + ledipasvir (SOF/LDV), sofosbuvir + simeprevir (SOF + SMV), simeprevir + pegylated interferon/ribavirin (SMV + PR) and no treatment (NT). For GT4 treatments, ombitasvir/paritaprevir/ritonavir + ribavirin (2D + R), SOF/LDV and NT were compared. Transition probabilities, utilities and costs were obtained from published literature. Outcomes included rates of compensated cirrhosis (CC), decompensated cirrhosis (DCC), hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and liver-related death (LrD), total costs, life-years and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs). Costs and QALYs were used to calculate incremental cost-effectiveness ratios.. In GT1 patients, 3D ± R and SOF-containing regimens have similar long-term outcomes; 3D ± R had the lowest lifetime risks of all liver disease outcomes: CC = 30.2%, DCC = 5.0 %, HCC = 6.8%, LT = 1.9% and LrD = 9.2%. In GT1 patients, 3D ± R had the lowest cost and the highest QALYs. As a result, 3D ± R dominated these treatment options. In GT4 patients, 2D + R had lower rates of liver morbidity and mortality, lower cost and more QALYs than SOF/LDV and NT.. While the results are based on input values, which were obtained from a variety of heterogeneous sources-including clinical trials, the findings were robust across a plausible range of input values, as demonstrated in probabilistic sensitivity analyses.. Among currently recommended treatments for GT1 and GT4 in the US, 3D ± R (for GT1) and 2D + R (for GT4) have a favorable cost-effectiveness profile.

Topics: 2-Naphthylamine; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anilides; Antiviral Agents; Benzimidazoles; Carbamates; Carcinoma, Hepatocellular; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Cyclopropanes; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Fibrosis; Fluorenes; Genotype; Hepacivirus; Hepatitis C, Chronic; Humans; Lactams, Macrocyclic; Liver Neoplasms; Macrocyclic Compounds; Male; Markov Chains; Middle Aged; Models, Econometric; Proline; Quality-Adjusted Life Years; Ribavirin; Simeprevir; Sofosbuvir; Sulfonamides; Uracil; Valine

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antiviral Agents; Benzimidazoles; Carbamates; Drug Therapy, Combination; Fatigue; Female; Fluorenes; Hepatitis C, Chronic; Humans; Imidazoles; Male; Pruritus; Pyrrolidines; Recurrence; Simeprevir; Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders; Sofosbuvir; Sustained Virologic Response; Treatment Outcome; Valine

DAA-based regimens for chronic hepatitis C infection encourage treatment of "difficult-to-treat" cohorts. This study investigated efficacy and safety of DAA-based regimens in HCV patients on dialysis or postkidney or liver/kidney transplantation. Twenty-five patients treated with DAA combinations were evaluated: 10 were on dialysis (eight: hemodialysis, two: peritoneal dialysis), eight were kidney transplant recipients, and seven were liver/kidney transplant recipients. Except for one patient treated with daclatasvir ([DCV]/60 mg/QD)/simeprevir ([SMV]/150 mg/QD), the others received sofosbuvir-based regimens ([SOF];400 mg/QD) combined with SMV:eight, DCV:13 or either ledipasvir ([LDV]90 mg/QD), ribavirin ([RBV];weight based) or pegylated interferon/RBV. HCV-RNA was determined by Abbott RealTime (LLOQ]:12 IU/ml) or Roche AmpliPrep/COBAS TaqMan assay (LLOQ:15 IU/ml); treatment response evaluated every 4 weeks, at the end of treatment, and 4 and 12 weeks thereafter. Twenty-four (96%) patients achieved SVR 12/24 (ITT-analysis). Mean treatment duration was 15.1 ± 5.1 weeks (±SD), and two patients terminated prematurely - both reached SVR12. Six patients were hospitalized due to complications of underlying disease. One patient achieved SVR24 but was re-infected (week 27). Kidney function remained stable; serum creatinine increased in only one patient - SOF was reduced to 400 mg/48 h. Treatment with DAA combinations in renally impaired HCV patients is highly effective and well tolerated. These findings call for further controlled trials and data from real-life cohorts.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Antiviral Agents; Benzimidazoles; Carbamates; Cohort Studies; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Fluorenes; Hepacivirus; Hepatitis C, Chronic; Humans; Imidazoles; Immunosuppressive Agents; Kidney; Kidney Function Tests; Kidney Transplantation; Liver; Liver Transplantation; Male; Middle Aged; Postoperative Period; Preoperative Period; Pyrrolidines; Renal Dialysis; Renal Insufficiency; RNA, Viral; Simeprevir; Sofosbuvir; Valine

We assessed the efficacy and safety of ledipasvir/sofosbuvir plus ribavirin for 24 weeks in 9 human immunodeficiency virus/hepatitis C virus-coinfected patients who relapsed after receiving 12 weeks of treatment with ledipasvir/sofosbuvir. Eight of 9 (89%) achieved sustained virologic response 12 weeks after the end of treatment. One patient relapsed at posttreatment week 4. These results suggest an effective salvage therapy for patients for whom direct-acting antiviral treatment has failed.. NCT02073656.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Antiviral Agents; Benzimidazoles; Coinfection; Drug Therapy, Combination; Fluorenes; Hepacivirus; Hepatitis C, Chronic; HIV; HIV Infections; Humans; Middle Aged; Recurrence; Ribavirin; Salvage Therapy; Sofosbuvir; Treatment Failure

Currently the only Food and Drug Administration-approved treatment for children with chronic hepatitis C virus is pegylated interferon with ribavirin, which is associated with significant adverse effects and low sustained virologic response rates. In this report, we discuss the use of ledipasvir/sofosbuvir to treat an adolescent with cirrhosis secondary to chronic hepatitis C virus.

Topics: Adolescent; Antiviral Agents; Benzimidazoles; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Fluorenes; Hepacivirus; Hepatitis C, Chronic; Humans; Liver Cirrhosis; Sofosbuvir; Viral Load

Topics: Adult; Antiviral Agents; Benzimidazoles; Carbamates; Coinfection; Directly Observed Therapy; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Fluorenes; Hepatitis C, Chronic; HIV Infections; Humans; Imidazoles; Liver Cirrhosis; Male; Medication Adherence; Middle Aged; Opiate Substitution Treatment; Opioid-Related Disorders; Pyrrolidines; Severity of Illness Index; Sofosbuvir; Substance Abuse Treatment Centers; Valine

Real-world data are needed to inform hepatitis C virus (HCV) treatment decisions.. To assess the comparative effectiveness of ledipasvir/sofosbuvir ± ribavirin (LDV/SOF ± RBV) vs. ombitasvir/paritaprevir/ritonavir + dasabuvir (OPrD) ± RBV in genotype 1 HCV patients treated in routine medical practice.. Observational intent-to-treat cohort of genotype 1 patients initiating 8 or 12 weeks of LDV/SOF ± RBV or 12 weeks of OPrD ± RBV. Sustained virological response (SVR) required RNA below the limit of quantification at least 10 weeks after end of treatment.. 6961 patients initiated LDV/SOF (N = 4478), LDV/SOF + RBV (N = 1269), OPrD (N = 297), and OPrD + RBV (N = 917) at 126 facilities. Intention-to-treat SVR rates were 91.4% (3813/4170) for LDV/SOF, 90.0% (1098/1220) for LDV/SOF + RBV, 95.1% (269/283) for OPrD and 85.8% (746/869) for OPrD + RBV. SVR rates in those completing 8 weeks of LDV/SOF were 91.7% (1223/1333) and 12 weeks of LDV/SOF 94.6% (2475/2615), LDV/SOF + RBV 92.2% (1033/1120), OPrD 98.0% (248/253) and OPrD + RBV 95.5% (705/738). Significant predictors of SVR were African American race (OR 0.71, 95%CI 0.59-0.86, P < 0.001), body mass index (BMI) > 30 kg/m(2) (OR 0.73, 95% CI 0.60-0.89, P = 0.002), FIB4 > 3.25 (OR 0.60, 95% CI 0.49-0.72, P < 0.001), OPrD + RBV compared to LDV/SOF (OR 0.60, 95% CI 0.48-0.76, P < 0.001) and subtype 1b (OR 1.38, 95% CI 1.11-1.71, P = 0.003). For those completing 12 weeks, FIB-4 > 3.25 and high BMI remained significant predictors.. In this robust real-world cohort, SVR rates were similar to clinical trials. FIB-4 > 3.25 and high BMI were significant negative predictors of SVR. Reduced odds of SVR in African Americans and with OPrD + RBV likely arose from excess early discontinuation as these factors were no longer significant, when limited to patients completing a 12-week course.

Topics: 2-Naphthylamine; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anilides; Antiviral Agents; Benzimidazoles; Black or African American; Carbamates; Cyclopropanes; Drug Combinations; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Fluorenes; Genotype; Hepacivirus; Hepatitis C, Chronic; Humans; Lactams, Macrocyclic; Macrocyclic Compounds; Male; Middle Aged; Proline; Ribavirin; Ritonavir; RNA, Viral; Sofosbuvir; Sulfonamides; Sustained Virologic Response; Uracil; Valine; Young Adult

New treatments for chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) are highly effective in patients coinfected with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). This study estimated the cost-effectiveness of treatments for genotype 1 (GT1) HCV in HIV-coinfected patients.. A Markov model based on HCV natural history was used. The base-case analysis included both treatment-naïve and -experienced patients. Alternatives were ombitasvir/paritaprevir/ritonavir, dasabuvir with or without ribavirin (3D ± R) for 12 or 24 weeks, sofosbuvir plus peginterferon and R (SOF + PR) for 12 weeks, SOF + R for 24 weeks, and no treatment (NT). A subgroup analysis restricted to treatment-naïve, non-cirrhotic patients compared 3D ± R for 12 weeks to SOF plus ledipasvir (LDV) for 12 weeks and NT. Transition probabilities, utilities, and costs were obtained from the published literature. Outcomes were measured over a lifetime horizon and included rates of compensated cirrhosis, decompensated cirrhosis, hepatocellular carcinoma and liver-related death, total costs, life-years, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), and the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER).. In the base-case, SOF + R was dominated by both SOF + PR and 3D ± R. Compared to SOF + PR, 3D ± R had an ICER of $45,581. The lifetime rates of liver morbidity and mortality were lower among those treated with 3D ± R compared to SOF + PR, SOF + R, or NT. In the subgroup analysis, 3D ± R was cost-effective compared to NT at a threshold of $50,000 per QALY (ICER $27,496). SOF/LDV had an ICER of $104,489 per QALY gained compared to 3D ± R.. In the GT1 HCV population coinfected with HIV, 3D ± R was cost-effective compared to NT, SOF + R, and SOF + PR. In the treatment-naïve sub-population, 3D ± R was cost-effective compared to NT and SOF/LDV.

Topics: 2-Naphthylamine; Adult; Anilides; Antiviral Agents; Benzimidazoles; Carbamates; Carcinoma, Hepatocellular; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Cyclopropanes; Disease Progression; Drug Therapy, Combination; Fluorenes; Genotype; Hepacivirus; Hepatitis C, Chronic; HIV Infections; Humans; Interferon-alpha; Lactams, Macrocyclic; Liver Cirrhosis; Liver Neoplasms; Macrocyclic Compounds; Markov Chains; Middle Aged; Polyethylene Glycols; Proline; Quality-Adjusted Life Years; Recombinant Proteins; Ribavirin; Ritonavir; Sofosbuvir; Sulfonamides; United States; Uracil; Valine

Genotype 4 hepatitis C virus (HCV) was considered difficult to treat in the era of pegylated interferon-alpha (Peg-IFN-α) and ribavirin regimens. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of therapy with the nonstructural (NS) 5A inhibitor, ledipasvir, combined with the NS5B polymerase inhibitor, sofosbuvir, in patients with HCV genotype 4. In this phase 2, open-label study, 44 patients (22 treatment naïve and 22 treatment experienced) received a fixed-dose combination tablet of 90 mg of ledipasvir and 400 mg of sofosbuvir orally once-daily for 12 weeks. The primary endpoint was the percentage of patients with HCV RNA <15 IU/mL 12 weeks after stopping therapy (SVR12). Among study participants, HCV genotype 4 subtypes were well represented (4a, n = 25; 4d, n = 10; other subtypes, n = 9). Ten patients (23%) had compensated cirrhosis. Of the 22 treatment-experienced patients, 21 (95%) had a non-CC IL-28B genotype. All 44 patients completed the full 12 weeks of dosing. The SVR12 rate was 93% (41 of 44; 95% confidence interval, 81-99). SVR12 rates were similar between treatment-naïve (95%; 21 of 22) and treatment-experienced (91%; 20 of 22) patients. All 3 patients who did not achieve SVR12 had virological relapse within 4 weeks of the end of treatment; all 3 had baseline HCV RNA ≥800,000 IU/mL, a non-CC IL-28B genotype, and pretreatment NS5A resistance-associated variants. None of the patients who relapsed had cirrhosis. The most common adverse events were asthenia, headache, and fatigue. No patients experienced a serious adverse event.. The all-oral regimen of ledipasvir and sofosbuvir is an effective and safe treatment for a wide range of HCV 4 subtypes in both treatment-naïve and -experienced patients, including those with compensated cirrhosis. (EudraCT number: 2013-003978-27; Clinicaltrials.gov NCT02081079) (Hepatology 2016;64:1049-1056).

Topics: Adult; Antiviral Agents; Benzimidazoles; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Fluorenes; Genotype; Hepacivirus; Hepatitis C, Chronic; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Sofosbuvir; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) is impaired in HIV/HCV-coinfected patients (HIV/HCV) and further decreased by interferon (IFN)-based therapies. We aimed to investigate the impact of IFN- and ribavirin (RBV)-free therapies on HRQoL and fatigue.Thirty-three HIV/HCV-coinfected patients who underwent HCV therapy with sofosbuvir in combination with daclatasvir or ledipasvir were retrospectively studied and compared to 17 patients who received boceprevir (BOC)/PEGIFN/RBV. HRQoL (mental [MCS] and physical [PCS] component score) and fatigue were assessed using the SF-36 (Short Form 36 Health Survey) and the FSS (Fatigue Severity Scale), respectively. HRQoL/fatigue was evaluated at baseline (BL), midway, and 12 weeks after the end of treatment (FU).At BL, both domains of HRQoL as well as the severity of fatigue were significantly impaired in HIV/HCV, when compared to a healthy population. Already during treatment, IFN/RBV-free therapy improved physical health (PCS: 41.4 ± 9.7 vs. 47.0 ± 11.2; P < 0.01) and reduced fatigue (37.8 ± 14.0 vs. 31.9 ± 15.2; P = 0.01), whereas we observed a substantial worsening of both factors in patients treated with BOC/PEGIFN/RBV. Since these improvements were maintained, patients treated with IFN/RBV-free therapy reported an improvement in physical health (PCS: 41.4 ± 9.7 vs. 45.8 ± 12.7; P < 0.01) and fatigue (37.8 ± 14.0 vs. 30.9 ± 14.8; P = 0.04) at FU. While AIDS-patients had a higher severity of fatigue at BL and showed a reduction of fatigue (42.5 ± 14.0 vs. 31.6 ± 15.7; P = 0.01), mental health only improved in patients without AIDS (MCS: 35.7 ± 5.3 vs.40.7 ± 6.4; P = 0.04). HIV/HCV with severe fatigue at BL (>median BL-FSS) showed most pronounced improvements in severity of fatigue (49.7 ± 7.0 vs. 32.0 ± 16.7; P < 0.01).In contrast to IFN-based regimens, highly effective and well-tolerated IFN-/RBV-free regimens improve HRQoL (especially physical health) and fatigue already during treatment. All patients with HIV/HCV coinfection should be considered for HCV treatment; however, patients with severe fatigue should be prioritized.

Topics: Antiviral Agents; Austria; Benzimidazoles; Carbamates; Coinfection; Fatigue; Female; Fluorenes; Hepatitis C, Chronic; HIV Infections; Humans; Imidazoles; Male; Middle Aged; Pyrrolidines; Quality of Life; Retrospective Studies; Severity of Illness Index; Sofosbuvir; Treatment Outcome; Valine

Patients' experience during treatment may affect treatment adherence. Our aim was to assess the impact of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) on adherence to different anti-hepatitis C virus (HCV) regimens.Clinical, demographic, and PRO data (short form-36 [SF-36], chronic liver disease questionnaire-hepatitis C version [CLDQ-HCV], functional assessment of chronic illness therapy-fatigue [FACIT-F], work productivity and activity impairment: specific health problem [WPAI:SHP]) from 13 multinational clinical trials of anti-HCV treatment were available. Treatment adherence was defined as >80% of prescribed doses taken.Included were 4825 HCV patients. Regimens were grouped into: interferon- and ribavirin (RBV)-containing (±sofosbuvir [SOF]), interferon-free RBV-containing (RBV + SOF ± ledipasvir [LDV]), and interferon-free RBV-free (LDV/SOF). The adherence to these regimens were 77.6%, 84.3%, and 96.2%, respectively (P < 0.0001). Nonadherent patients were more likely to be unemployed and to have a greater PRO impairment at baseline (up to -5.3% lower PRO scores, P < 0.0001). During treatment with interferon- or RBV-based regimens, nonadherent patients experienced lower PROs and had larger decrements from their baseline PRO scores. In contrast, there were no significant declines in PRO scores (all P > 0.05) for the small number of patients who were nonadherent to LDV/SOF. In multivariate analysis, being treatment-naive, longer treatment duration, and receiving an interferon- or RBV-containing regimen were associated with a lower likelihood of adherence (all P < 0.003). Better baseline and on-treatment PRO scores were associated with a higher likelihood of adherence to interferon and RBV.The use of interferon and/or RBV, longer duration of treatment, and lower baseline and on-treatment PRO scores were linked to a decreased likelihood of being adherent to interferon + RBV-containing or interferon-free RBV-containing antiviral regimens. Interferon- and RBV-free regimens were associated with excellent adherence.

Topics: Antiviral Agents; Benzimidazoles; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Female; Fluorenes; Genotype; Hepatitis C, Chronic; Humans; Interferons; Male; Medication Adherence; Middle Aged; Multicenter Studies as Topic; Patient Reported Outcome Measures; Ribavirin; Sofosbuvir

Herein we report a previously undescribed case of treatment-emergent non-structural protein 5A (NS5A) resistance mutations, Q30H and Y93C, leading to a failure of 24-week course of sofosbuvir/ledipasvir+ribavirin therapy for the treatment of hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 1a in interferon-experienced, human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) co-infected patient with cirrhosis.

Topics: Antiviral Agents; Benzimidazoles; Drug Resistance, Viral; Drug Therapy, Combination; Fluorenes; Genotype; Hepacivirus; Hepatitis C, Chronic; HIV Infections; HIV-1; Humans; Liver Cirrhosis; Male; Middle Aged; Mutation, Missense; Ribavirin; Sofosbuvir; Treatment Failure; Viral Nonstructural Proteins

Many patients with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) are on prolonged proton-pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy and wish to remain on PPI therapy once treatment for HCV starts. A preliminary report recently suggested decrease rates of sustained virological response (SVR) for patients taking concomitant PPI and ledipasvir/sofosbuvir (LDV/SOF). We sought to determine the effect of PPI use on the rate of SVR in a real-world cohort of 1,979 patients with chronic HCV treated with LDV/SOF. We collected clinical data and pharmacy dispensing records on patients taking 8, 12, or 24 weeks of LDV/SOF ± ribavirin (RBV). The primary outcome was sustained virological response at 12 weeks after treatment completion (SVR12) in a per-protocol analysis in order to determine the effect of PPI use adjusted for confounders. Statistical adjustment was performed in propensity-matched analysis. Among treatment completers, SVR12 was achieved in 441 (97.1%) of PPI recipients compared with 1,497 (98.2%) in PPI nonrecipients (P = 0.19). Neither low- nor high-dose PPI was associated with decreased SVR, although patients taking twice-daily PPI achieved a lower SVR12 rate (91.2%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 77.0-97.0; P = 0.046). After propensity matching for PPI use, there were no significant associations between SVR12 and any dose or frequency of PPI use. However, in a sensitivity analysis focusing on patients with cirrhosis, twice-daily PPI use was associated with lower odds ratio for SVR12 (0.11; 95% CI, 0.02-0.59).. These data from a cohort of real-world patients receiving hepatitis C antibody therapy with LDF/SOF ± RBV support the prescription labeling suggesting that patients take no more than low-dose (20-mg omeprazole equivalents) PPI daily. (Hepatology 2016;64:1893-1899).

Topics: Antiviral Agents; Benzimidazoles; Cohort Studies; Drug Interactions; Female; Fluorenes; Hepacivirus; Hepatitis C, Chronic; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Proton Pump Inhibitors; Retrospective Studies; Ribavirin; Sofosbuvir; Treatment Outcome

The interferon (IFN)-free regimens for chronic hepatitis C (CHC) have high efficacy and superior health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in European/North American patients. The impact of these regimens on HRQOL of the Japanese CHC patients is not known.The Short Form-36 was administered before, during, and after treatment to CHC patients with genotype 1 treated with ledipasvir/sofosbuvir ± ribavirin (LDV/SOF ± RBV) for 12 weeks and genotype 2 treated with SOF + RBV for 12 weeks in clinical trials. The HRQOL data were analyzed with reference to treatment regimens and clinical factors.A total of 494 CHC patients were included (19% cirrhotic, 69% genotype 1, 52% treatment-naive; 153 received SOF + RBV, 170 received LDV/SOF + RBV, 171 received LDV/SOF). The sustained virologic response-12 rates for these regimens were 97%, 98%, and 100%, respectively. CHC patients treated with LDV/SOF, SOF + RBV, or LDV/SOF + RBV regimens had similar HRQOL scores at baseline. During treatment, more adverse events were experienced by those treated with RBV-containing regimens (46% vs 22%, P < 0.0001). The decrements in HRQOL were also significant in RBV groups: up to -3.8 points (treatment week-4), -5.2 (treatment week-12), and -3.2 (posttreatment week-12) (all P < 0.001). In contrast, RBV-free regimen (LDV/SOF) was associated with an improvement in HRQOL up to +4.1 points throughout the treatment (P < 0.01). In multivariate analysis, the use of RBV was independently associated with lower HRQOL during and after treatment (beta up to -6.4 points, P = 0.0001).Japanese CHC patients treated with RBV-containing regimens show mild HRQOL impairment. In contrast, patients treated with LDV/SOF not only showed high efficacy but also improvement of HRQOL.

Topics: Antiviral Agents; Benzimidazoles; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Fluorenes; Hepatitis C, Chronic; Humans; Japan; Male; Middle Aged; Quality of Life; Ribavirin; Sofosbuvir; Surveys and Questionnaires

Significant progression in the treatment of chronic hepatitis C virus has been made with the introduction of direct-acting antivirals (DAAs). However, limited data are available for the retreatment of individuals who have failed multiple prior DAAs.. We report a single case of an individual who was unsuccessfully treated with five prior hepatitis C virus treatment regimens including simeprevir plus sofosbuvir who was successfully cured after treatment with ledipasvir/sofosbuvir.. Ledipasvir/sofosbuvir may be an option for treating patients who have failed multiple prior DAA regimens; however, further research is warranted.

Topics: Antiviral Agents; Benzimidazoles; Female; Fluorenes; Hepacivirus; Hepatitis C, Chronic; Humans; Middle Aged; Sofosbuvir; Treatment Outcome

To gather data on the antiviral efficacy and safety of second generation direct acting antiviral (DAA) treatment with respect to sustained virological response (SVR) 12 wk after conclusion of treatment, and to determine predictors of SVR12 in this setting.. Two hundred and sixty patients treated with SOF combination partners PR (n = 51), R (n = 10), SMV (n = 30), DCV (n = 81), LDV (n = 73), or 3D (n = 15). 144/260 were pre-treated, 89/260 had liver cirrhosis, 56/260 had portal hypertension with platelets < 100/nL, 25/260 had a MELD score ≥ 10 and 17/260 were post-liver transplantation patients. 194/260 had HCV GT1, 44/260 HCV GT3.. Two hundred and forty/256 (93.7%) patients achieved SVR12 (mITT); 4/260 were lost to follow-up. SVR12 rates for subgroups were: 92% for SOF/DCV, 93% for each SOF/SMV, SOF/PR, 94% for SOF/LDV, 100% for 3D, 94% for pretreated, 87% for liver cirrhosis, 82% for patients with platelets < 100/nL, 88% post-liver transplantation, 95% for GT1a, 93% for GT1b, 90% for GT3, 100% for GT2, 4, and 6. 12 patients suffered from relapse, 6 prematurely discontinued treatment, of which 4 died. Negative predictors of SVR12 were a platelet count < 100/nL, MELD score ≥ 10 (P < 0.0001), liver cirrhosis (P = 0.005) at baseline. In Interferon-free treatment GT3 had significantly lower SVR rates than GT1 (P = 0.016). Side effects were mild.. Excellent SVR12 rates and the favorable side-effect profile of DAA-combination therapy can be well translated into "real-world". Patients with advanced liver disease, signs of portal hypertension, especially with platelets < 100/nL and patients with GT3 are in special need for further research efforts to overcome comparatively higher rates of virological failure.

Topics: Adult; Antiviral Agents; Benzimidazoles; Carbamates; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Fluorenes; Hepacivirus; Hepatitis C, Chronic; Humans; Hypertension, Portal; Imidazoles; Liver Cirrhosis; Liver Transplantation; Male; Middle Aged; Pyrrolidines; Retrospective Studies; Ribavirin; Simeprevir; Sofosbuvir; Treatment Outcome; Valine

Vulnerable populations are disproportionately affected by hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection and experience high rates of health disparity. There are no data on real-world experience with highly efficacious direct-acting anti-HCV treatment in this population.. We aimed to evaluate the real-world experience with sofosbuvir-based regimens among a vulnerable HCV-infected population.. HCV treatment response was assessed among 204 patients who completed 12-24 weeks of sofosbuvir-based regimens (in combination with pegylated interferon and ribavirin, simeprevir, ledipasvir, or daclatasvir) at the San Francisco safety-net healthcare system liver specialty clinic between January 2014 and December 2015. Virologic response during therapy was assessed at weeks 4 and 8, end of therapy, and 12-week treatment discontinuation (SVR 12).. High rates of sustained virologic response can be achieved in safety-net HCV-infected patients. Access to DAA-based regimens is critical to addressing HCV-related health disparity in this at-risk population.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antiviral Agents; Benzimidazoles; Carbamates; Cohort Studies; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Fluorenes; Hepatitis C, Chronic; Humans; Imidazoles; Interferons; Logistic Models; Male; Medication Adherence; Middle Aged; Multivariate Analysis; Polyethylene Glycols; Pyrrolidines; Retrospective Studies; Ribavirin; San Francisco; Simeprevir; Sofosbuvir; Sustained Virologic Response; Treatment Outcome; Valine; Vulnerable Populations; Young Adult

Mental and emotional health (MEH) impairment is commonly encountered in hepatitis C patients. Although the exact mechanism remains unknown, alterations in neurotransmitter and cytokine levels maybe associated with hepatitis C virus (HCV)-related MEH issues.The aim of the study was to assess association of serum biomarkers with self-reports of MEH in HCV patients before treatment and after achieving sustained virologic response (SVR).The HCV genotype-1-infected patients who achieved SVR at 12 weeks after treatment with ledipasvir (LDV)/sofosbuvir (SOF) ± ribavirin (RBV) were selected. Frozen serum samples from baseline, end of treatment (EOT), and posttreatment week 4 (PTW4) were used to assay 16 cytokines and monoamine neurotransmitters. Validated self-reports were used to assess MEH.Hundred patients were evaluated. Mean age was 53 years (57% male, 86% white). Compared with baseline, emotional well-being and emotional health significantly increased by EOT, and role emotional, emotional well-being, and emotional health significantly increased at PTW4 in the RBV-containing arm (P < 0.05). In patients taking LDV/SOF + RBV, serotonin levels were significantly decreased at PTW4 compared with baseline (P = 0.046). Compared with baseline, there were significant decreases in interleukin (IL)-10 levels at EOT and PTW4 in both treatment groups. The changes in IL-8 also differed significantly between LDV/SOF + RBV and LDV/SOF groups (P < 0.05). Changes in dopamine and tryptophan levels at EOT correlated with increasing emotional health scores, whereas changes in monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 at EOT and IL-8 at PTW4 correlated with increasing mental health scores. The neurotransmitters and cytokines were found to be independent predictors of MEH scores in multiple regression analysis.Cytokine and neurotransmitter changes are associated with mental and emotional health. Patient-reported outcome scores change during and after treatment.

Topics: Affective Symptoms; Antiviral Agents; Benzimidazoles; Biomarkers; Cytokines; Female; Fluorenes; Hepatitis C, Chronic; Humans; Male; Mental Disorders; Middle Aged; Neurotransmitter Agents; Retrospective Studies; Ribavirin; Sofosbuvir

To evaluate magnitude/direction of changes in peripheral lipid profiles in patients undergoing direct acting therapy for hepatitis C by genotype.. Mono-infected patients with hepatitis C were treated with guideline-based DAAs at a university-based liver clinic. Patient characteristics and laboratory values were collected before and after the treatment period. Baseline demographics included age, ethnicity, hypertension, diabetes, hyperlipidemia, treatment regimen, and fibrosis stage. Total cholesterol (TCHOL), high density lipoprotein (HDL), low density lipoprotein (LDL), triglycerides (TG), and liver function tests were measured prior to treatment and ETR. Changes in lipid and liver function were evaluated by subgroups with respect to genotype. Mean differences were calculated for each lipid profile and liver function component (direction/magnitude). The mean differences in lipid profiles were then compared between genotypes for differences in direction/magnitude. Lipid profile and liver function changes were evaluated with Levene's test and student's. Three hundred and seventy five patients enrolled with 321 (85.6%) achieving sustained-viral response at 12 wk. 72.3% were genotype 1 (GT1), 18.1% genotype 2 (GT2), 9.7% genotype 3 (GT3). Baseline demographics were similar. Significant change in lipid profiles were seen with GT1 and GT3 (ΔGT1, p and ΔGT3, p), with TCHOL increasing (+5.3,. Successful DAA therapy results in increases in TCHOL, LDL, and HDL and decrease in TG, particularly in GT1/GT3. Changes are most pronounced in GT3.

Topics: Aged; Alanine Transaminase; Antiviral Agents; Benzimidazoles; Cholesterol; Cohort Studies; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Fluorenes; Genotype; Hepacivirus; Hepatitis C, Chronic; Humans; Interferon-alpha; Lipoproteins, HDL; Lipoproteins, LDL; Male; Middle Aged; Polyethylene Glycols; Prospective Studies; Recombinant Proteins; Ribavirin; Simeprevir; Sofosbuvir; Sustained Virologic Response; Treatment Outcome; Triglycerides

Topics: Antiviral Agents; Benzimidazoles; Female; Fluorenes; Furans; Hepatitis C, Chronic; Humans; Male; Quinolines; Ribavirin; RNA, Viral; Sofosbuvir; Thiophenes; Uridine Monophosphate

Patients with chronic hepatitis C (CHC) exhibit reduced work productivity owing to their disease. Historically, most regimens indicated for CHC genotype 1 (GT1) patients were administered with pegylated interferon (Peg-IFN) and/or ribavirin (RBV), which further compromised work productivity during treatment. The aim of this study was to model the impact of LDV/SOF (ledipasvir/sofosbuvir), the first Peg-IFN- and RBV-free regimen for CHC GT1 patients, on work productivity from an economic perspective, compared to receiving no treatment. The WPAI-SHP (Work Productivity and Activity Index-Specific Health Problem) questionnaire was administered to patients across the ION clinical trials (N = 1,923 U.S. patients). Before initiation of treatment, patients with CHC GT1 in the ION trials exhibited absenteeism and presenteeism impairments of 2.57% and 7.58%, respectively. Patients with cirrhosis exhibited greater work productivity impairment than patients without cirrhosis. In total, 93.21% of U.S. patients in the ION trials achieved SVR; these patients exhibited absenteeism and presenteeism impairments of 2.62% (P = 0.76, when compared to baseline) and 3.53% (P < 0.0001), respectively. Monetizing these data to the entire U.S. population, our model projects an annual societal cost of $7.1 billion owing to productivity loss in untreated GT1 CHC patients. Our model projects that, when compared to no treatment, treating all CHC GT1 patients with a regimen with very high viral eradication rates (LDV/SOF) would translate to annual productivity loss savings of $2.7 billion over a 1-year time horizon.. Patients with untreated HCV impose a substantial societal burden owing to reduced work productivity. As a result of improvements in work productivity, treatment of CHC GT1 patients with LDV/SOF-based regimens is likely to result in significant cost savings from a societal perspective, relative to no treatment.

Topics: Antiviral Agents; Benzimidazoles; Costs and Cost Analysis; Efficiency; Fluorenes; Hepatitis C, Chronic; Humans; Models, Economic; Sofosbuvir; United States; Uridine Monophosphate

The fixed dose combination of sofosbuvir and ledipasvir (SOF/LDV) has marked a new era for patients with chronic HCV because it is the first drug to be approved by the FDA that does not include peginterferon or ribavirin. The results of three clinical studies show that SOF/LDV has sustained virologic response of approximately 96% when given as once a day pill for 3 months to both treatment naive and treatment-experienced HCV-1 patients with the exception of prior null responder patients with cirrhosis. Moreover, emerging data in special populations (patients with decompensated cirrhosis, with post-transplant recurrence, with prior SOF-based therapy failure, and with HIV co-infection) show a good tolerance and high sustained virological profile. Many other emerging therapies are now available. Actually, the recommendations of the international guidelines are applicable only for selected patients followed-up by dedicated specialists, including hepatologists and infectologists, and are specifically individualized for patients with advanced fibrosis. We will expect that the landscape for management of HCV will include direct-acting antivirals for treatment of patients with different genotypes and low-grade fibrosis in order to interrupt the progression to late stage of disease and the complications of the infection, including renal disease, thyroid dysfunction, and some cancers.

Topics: Antiviral Agents; Benzimidazoles; Coinfection; Drug Combinations; Fluorenes; Hepacivirus; Hepatitis C, Chronic; HIV Infections; Humans; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Recurrence; Sofosbuvir; Uridine Monophosphate

Sofosbuvir and ledipasvir, which have recently been approved for treatment of chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection, are more efficacious and safer than the old standard of care (oSOC) but are substantially more expensive. Whether and in which patients their improved efficacy justifies their increased cost is unclear.. To evaluate the cost-effectiveness and budget impact of sofosbuvir and ledipasvir.. Microsimulation model of the natural history of HCV infection.. Published literature.. Treatment-naive and treatment-experienced HCV population defined on the basis of HCV genotype, age, and fibrosis distribution in the United States.. Lifetime.. Third-party payer.. Simulation of sofosbuvir-ledipasvir compared with the oSOC (interferon-based therapies).. Quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs), and 5-year spending on antiviral drugs.. Sofosbuvir-based therapies added 0.56 QALY relative to the oSOC at an ICER of $55 400 per additional QALY. The ICERs ranged from $9700 to $284 300 per QALY depending on the patient's status with respect to treatment history, HCV genotype, and presence of cirrhosis. At a willingness-to-pay threshold of $100 000 per QALY, sofosbuvir-based therapies were cost-effective in 83% of treatment-naive and 81% of treatment-experienced patients. Compared with the oSOC, treating eligible HCV-infected persons in the United States with the new drugs would cost an additional $65 billion in the next 5 years, whereas the resulting cost offsets would be $16 billion.. Results were sensitive to drug price, drug efficacy, and quality of life after successful treatment.. Data on real-world effectiveness of new antivirals are lacking.. Treatment of HCV is cost-effective in most patients, but additional resources and value-based patient prioritization are needed to manage patients with HCV.. National Institutes of Health.

Topics: Antiviral Agents; Benzimidazoles; Budgets; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Drug Costs; Fluorenes; Genotype; Hepacivirus; Hepatitis C, Chronic; Humans; Insurance, Health, Reimbursement; Interferon-alpha; Markov Chains; Patient-Specific Modeling; Quality-Adjusted Life Years; Sofosbuvir; United States; Uridine Monophosphate

New interferon-free anti-HCV regimens are highly efficacious with a favorable safety profile. We assessed health-related quality of life (HRQL) and work productivity in patients with different stages of hepatic fibrosis treated with sofosbuvir+ledipasvir.. Four questionnaires [Chronic Liver Disease Questionnaire-HCV (CLDQ-HCV), Short Form-36 (SF-36), Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT-F), Work Productivity and Activity Index:Specific Health Problem (WPAI:SHP)] were administered at baseline, during, and after treatment with sofosbuvir+ledipasvir+ribavirin or sofosbuvir+ledipasvir (ION-1,2,3 clinical trials). Metavir fibrosis stage was determined from pre-treatment liver biopsies.. There were 1005 patients included (stage F0: n=94; F1: n=311; F2: n=301; F3: n=197; F4: n=102). At baseline, patients with more advanced fibrosis had more HRQL impairments, predominantly related to physical functioning (stage 0 vs. stage 4 by up to 0.126 on a normalized 0-1 scale p<0.0001). During and post-treatment, HRQL remained lower in patients with advanced fibrosis. After achieving sustained virologic response, significant improvements from baseline in most HRQL domains were observed regardless of fibrosis stage (by 0.024-0.103 on a 0-1 scale; all p>0.05 across fibrosis stages). In multivariate analysis, advanced fibrosis was independently associated with impairment of HRQL and work productivity (beta up to -0.056 in comparison with none-to-mild fibrosis, p<0.05). However, improvement of HRQL and work productivity after viral clearance was not related to the stage of fibrosis (all p>0.05).. Although advanced hepatic fibrosis is associated with HRQL and work productivity impairment, viral eradication with sofosbuvir+ledipasvir leads to HRQL improvement regardless of fibrosis stage. HCV patients with early fibrosis experience similar improvement of patient reported outcomes as those with advanced fibrosis.

Topics: Antiviral Agents; Benzimidazoles; DNA, Viral; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Fluorenes; Hepacivirus; Hepatitis C, Chronic; Humans; Liver Cirrhosis; Male; Middle Aged; Quality of Life; Sofosbuvir; Surveys and Questionnaires

All oral, highly effective direct-acting antiviral combinations, such as sofosbuvir-ledipasvir, have recently been licensed in Canada but cost as much as $67,000 for a 12-week course of therapy, representing a major economic barrier to predominately single-payer health care systems such as that found in Ontario. In hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 1 noncirrhotic patients with a baseline viral load of <6 × 10(6) IU⁄mL, treatment with sofosbuvir-ledipasvir can be shortened to eight weeks without compromising ≥95% efficacy. The number of HCV-infected patients in Ontario eligible for shortened therapy, and the associated cost savings, are unknown. The authors propose that treating every patient with shortened therapy, regardless of baseline viral load, would lead to significant public cost savings and collateral efficiencies, enabling increased HCV treatment capacity and cure.. The present study designed a three-part model to investigate the cost of cure per patient and cost savings per patient under three eligibility pathways: conservative, permissive and ideal. In the conservative model, every patient is treated for 12 weeks regardless of baseline viral load, whereas in the permissive model, patients with a baseline viral load <6 × 10(6) IU/mL are treated for eight weeks. In the ideal model, every patient receives eight weeks of therapy regardless of baseline viral load. Relapsed patients are retreated for 12 weeks. Data obtained from the Ontario Public Health Laboratory were used to validate the model and generate the outcomes.. In Ontario, 75.34% of HCV genotype 1 patients had a baseline viral load of <6 × 10(6) IU/mL and were eligible for shortened therapy. The cost of cure per patient in the ideal model was $47,328.44, representing a 29% reduction in the cost of curative therapy and 3.5 weeks of shortened treatment duration compared with the conservative model. The ideal model generated a cost savings per patient of $3,855.17 (8% reduction in treatment cost) and 0.7 weeks of shorter therapy compared with the permissive model, and was the shortest and most efficient while maintaining a cure rate ≥95%.. These results demonstrate that recommendations for a shortened treatment course of eight weeks using all-oral direct-acting antivirals in HCV genotype 1 noncirrhotic patients, regardless of baseline viral load, affords significant public cost savings and, on a population level, offers opportunities for expanded HCV treatment and cure.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Antiviral Agents; Benzimidazoles; Cost Savings; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Drug Costs; Drug Therapy, Combination; Eligibility Determination; Fluorenes; Health Services Accessibility; Hepatitis C, Chronic; Humans; Mathematical Computing; Ontario; Reproducibility of Results; Research Design; Risk Assessment; Sofosbuvir; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Viral Load

Topics: Anilides; Antiviral Agents; Benzimidazoles; Carbamates; Cyclopropanes; England; Fluorenes; Hepatitis C, Chronic; Heterocyclic Compounds, 3-Ring; Humans; Imidazoles; Lactams, Macrocyclic; Macrocyclic Compounds; Proline; Public Health; Pyrrolidines; Simeprevir; Sofosbuvir; Sulfonamides; Uridine Monophosphate; Valine

Topics: Antiviral Agents; Bayes Theorem; Benzimidazoles; Clinical Trials as Topic; Drug Therapy, Combination; Fluorenes; Genotype; Hepacivirus; Hepatitis C, Chronic; Humans; Models, Statistical; Sofosbuvir

Resistance-associated variants (RAVs) emerge at multiple positions spanning hepatitis C virus (HCV) NS3/4A and NS5A regions upon failure of asunaprevir/daclatasvir combination therapy. It has not been determined whether the emergence of such RAVs have an impact on re-treatment by a combination of ledipasvir and sofosbuvir, a potent regimen for HCV genotype 1 infection.. TK-NOG human hepatocyte chimeric mice were inoculated with sera from a patient with treatment failure of asunaprevir/daclatasvir therapy.. They developed persistent HCV infection with triple variants of NS3/4A D168V, NS5A L31V plus Y93H. Administration of ledipasvir/GS-558093 (a NS5B nucleotide analog) in these mice failed to achieve end-of-treatment response or sustained virologic response, which was in sharp contrast to the results in mice with wild-type virus infection. The administration of telaprevir/GS-558093 successfully achieved it in those mice.. Treatment failure with asunaprevir/daclatasvir may limit further treatment options. This population may represent a growing unmet medical need.

Topics: Animals; Antiviral Agents; Benzimidazoles; Carbamates; Drug Combinations; Drug Resistance, Multiple, Viral; Female; Fluorenes; Hepacivirus; Hepatitis C, Chronic; Hepatitis, Viral, Animal; Hepatocytes; Humans; Imidazoles; Isoquinolines; Male; Middle Aged; Pyrrolidines; Sofosbuvir; Sulfonamides; Transplantation Chimera; Treatment Failure; Valine

GS-9451 is a selective hepatitis C virus (HCV) NS3 protease inhibitor in development for the treatment of genotype 1 (GT1) HCV infection. Key preclinical properties of GS-9451, including in vitro antiviral activity, selectivity, cross-resistance, and combination activity, as well as pharmacokinetic properties, were determined. In multiple GT1a and GT1b replicon cell lines, GS-9451 had mean 50% effective concentrations (EC50s) of 13 and 5.4 nM, respectively, with minimal cytotoxicity; similar potency was observed in chimeric replicons encoding the NS3 protease gene of GT1 clinical isolates. GS-9451 was less active in GT2a replicon cells (EC50 = 316 nM). Additive to synergistic in vitro antiviral activity was observed when GS-9451 was combined with other agents, including alpha interferon, ribavirin, and the polymerase inhibitors GS-6620 and tegobuvir (GS-9190), as well as the NS5A inhibitor ledipasvir (GS-5885). GS-9451 retained wild-type activity against multiple classes of NS5B and NS5A inhibitor resistance mutations. GS-9451 was stable in hepatic microsomes and hepatocytes from human and three other tested species. Systemic clearance was low in dogs and monkeys but high in rats. GS-9451 showed good oral bioavailability in all three species tested. In rats, GS-9451 levels were ∼40-fold higher in liver than plasma after intravenous dosing, and elimination of GS-9451 was primarily through biliary excretion. Together, these results are consistent with the antiviral activity observed in a recent phase 1b study. The results of in vitro cross-resistance and combination antiviral assays support the ongoing development of GS-9451 in combination with other agents for the treatment of chronic HCV infection.

Topics: Animals; Antiviral Agents; Benzimidazoles; Dogs; Drug Evaluation, Preclinical; Drug Resistance, Viral; Drug Synergism; Drug Therapy, Combination; Fluorenes; Haplorhini; Hepacivirus; Hepatitis C, Chronic; Hepatocytes; Humans; Inhibitory Concentration 50; Interferon-alpha; Protease Inhibitors; Purines; Pyridazines; Quinolines; Rats; Replicon; Ribavirin; Viral Nonstructural Proteins

Topics: Antiviral Agents; Benzimidazoles; Female; Fluorenes; Hepacivirus; Hepatitis C, Chronic; Humans; Male; Sofosbuvir; Uridine Monophosphate

Sofosbuvir is a liver-targeting uridine nucleotide prodrug inhibitor of the hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA-dependent RNA polymerase recently approved by the FDA and EU regulators for treatment of patients infected with genotype 1, 2, 3 and 4 virus. The request for regulatory approval of the fixed-dose combination containing sofosbuvir and the NS5A inhibitor ledipasvir is also under review. Preclinical and clinical studies have shown that sofosbuvir is effective, safe and well tolerated. Review of sofosbuvir's preclinical and clinical profile reveals a drug that has the potential to become the backbone of standard of care. Pursuit of a next generation nucleos(t)ide HCV inhibitor that could compete with sofosbuvir would need to address whatever limitations sofosbuvir exhibits. These include reduced efficacy in genotype 3 patients and use in severe renally impaired patients or those patients currently on drugs that are inducers of P-glycoprotein. However, it has been shown that reduced efficacy in genotype 3 is largely eliminated when sofosbuvir is combined with another oral DAA. Next-generation inhibitors would also benefit by enabling a reduced duration of therapy and an orthogonal resistance profile. The more recent group of nucleos(t)ides in clinical development maintains similarities to sofosbuvir, in that they are uridine nucleotide prodrugs. The question therefore remains whether these new agents will be sufficiently differentiated from sofosbuvir to provide any additional benefit to patients. This paper forms part of a symposium in Antiviral Research on "Hepatitis C: next steps toward global eradication."

Topics: Antiviral Agents; Benzimidazoles; Drug Approval; Drug Discovery; Fluorenes; Hepatitis C, Chronic; Humans; Nucleosides; Nucleotides; Sofosbuvir; Uridine Monophosphate

Topics: Antiviral Agents; Benzimidazoles; Drug Approval; Drug Combinations; Drug Interactions; Fluorenes; Hepacivirus; Hepatitis C, Chronic; Humans; Sofosbuvir; United States; United States Food and Drug Administration; Uridine Monophosphate

Topics: Benzimidazoles; Drug Approval; Drug Combinations; Fluorenes; Hepacivirus; Hepatitis C, Chronic; Humans; Interferons; Sofosbuvir; United States; United States Food and Drug Administration