lde225 and Dysgeusia

Basal cell carcinoma (BCC) of the skin is the most common form of skin cancer in the United States. In life-threatening, advanced BCC, sonic hedgehog inhibitors (SSHis) remain a pre-eminent treatment option for locally advanced BCC and metastatic BCC.. In this updated systematic review and meta-analysis, we aimed to better characterize the efficacy and safety of SSHis by including final updates from pivotal clinical trials and additional new recent studies.. An electronic database search was performed for articles including clinical trials, prospective case series, and retrospective medical record reviews on human subjects. Overall response rates (ORRs) and complete response rates (CRRs) were the primary outcomes. For safety assessment, the prevalence of the following adverse effects was analyzed: muscle spasms, dysgeusia, alopecia, weight loss, fatigue, nausea, myalgias, vomiting, skin squamous cell carcinoma, increased creatine kinase, diarrhea, decreased appetite, and amenorrhea. Analyses were performed using R statistical software. Data were pooled using linear models with fixed effects meta-analysis for primary analyses, along with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) and p-values. Intermolecular differences were calculated using Fisher's exact test.. A total of 22 studies (N = 2384 patients) were included in the meta-analysis: 19 studies assessing both efficacy and safety, 2 studies assessing safety only, and 1 study assessing efficacy only. Overall, the pooled ORR for all patients was 64.9% (95% CI 48.2-81.6%), implicating there is at least a partial response (z = 7.60, p < 0.0001) in most patients receiving SSHis. The ORR for vismodegib was 68.5% and 50.1% for sonidegib. The most common adverse effects for vismodegib and sonidegib were muscle spasms (70.5% and 61.0%, respectively), dysgeusia (58.4% and 48.6%, respectively), and alopecia (59.9% and 51.1%, respectively). Patients were likely to experience weight loss (35.1%, p < 0.0001) from vismodegib. Alternatively, patients taking sonidegib experienced more nausea, diarrhea, increased creatine kinase levels, and decreased appetite compared with those receiving vismodegib.. SSHis are an effective treatment for advanced BCC disease. Given the high discontinuation rates, management of patient expectations is warranted for compliance and achieving long-term efficacy. It is essential to stay updated with the latest discoveries on the efficacy and safety of SSHis.

Topics: Alopecia; Anilides; Antineoplastic Agents; Carcinoma, Basal Cell; Creatine Kinase; Diarrhea; Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions; Dysgeusia; Female; Hedgehog Proteins; Humans; Nausea; Retrospective Studies; Skin Neoplasms; Spasm; Weight Loss

Basal cell carcinoma (BCC) is the most common malignancy in fair-skinned populations. Most cases are successfully treated with surgery, but in advanced BCC—including locally advanced BCC and metastatic BCC—surgery is likely to result in substantial morbidity or unlikely to be effective. In those patients, the systemic Hedgehog inhibitors (HHIs) sonidegib and vismodegib are the only approved pharmacologic treatment option. Although a number of clinical studies highlight the similarities and differences between the two HHIs, no head-to-head clinical comparison is available. Results from the pivotal BOLT and ERIVANCE clinical studies for sonidegib and vismodegib, respectively, demonstrate similar efficacy measured by objective response rate, complete response rate, and histologic tumor subtype. Safety results for both studies are comparable with similar common adverse events reported for muscle spasms, alopecia, and dysgeusia. A notable difference between sonidegib and vismodegib is their respective pharmacokinetic profiles with sonidegib reaching peak concentration in plasma within 2–4 hours of dosing and steady state in plasma achieved by week 17 of treatment, while vismodegib reaches peak plasma concentration approximately 2 days after a single dose and steady state within 21 days of repeated dosing. This review compares efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetics of sonidegib and vismodegib based on published literature to date. J Drugs Dermatol. 2021;20(2):156-165. doi:10.36849/JDD.5657\ \ THIS ARTICLE HAD BEEN MADE AVAILABLE FREE OF CHARGE. PLEASE SCROLL DOWN TO ACCESS THE FULL TEXT OF THIS ARTICLE WITHOUT LOGGING IN. NO PURCHASE NECESSARY. PLEASE CONTACT THE PUBLISHER WITH ANY QUESTIONS.

Topics: Alopecia; Anilides; Biphenyl Compounds; Carcinoma, Basal Cell; Clinical Trials, Phase II as Topic; Dysgeusia; Hedgehog Proteins; Humans; Multicenter Studies as Topic; Progression-Free Survival; Pyridines; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Signal Transduction; Skin Neoplasms; Spasm

Sonic hedgehog inhibitors (SHHis) provide an additional treatment option for basal cell carcinomas (BCCs), especially for metastatic or locally advanced BCC. However, studies have been heterogeneous and lacked direct comparisons between molecules.. To determine the efficacy and safety of the class of molecules SHHi for treating BCC and to compare them individually.. We performed a PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses)-compliant systematic review of studies followed by a meta-analysis.. Eighteen articles were included in our meta-analysis; 16 articles were combined for efficacy and 16 for safety. In locally advanced BCC, overall response rates (ORRs) were similar for vismodegib and sonidegib (69% vs 57%, respectively) but not complete response rates (31% vs 3%, respectively). In metastatic disease, the ORR of vismodegib was 2.7-fold higher than the ORR of sonidegib (39% vs 15%, respectively). For side effects affecting a majority of patients, prevalences for muscle spasms (67.1%), dysgeusia (54.1%), and alopecia (57.7%) were in similar proportions for sonidegib and vismodegib. Patients receiving sonidegib experienced more upper gastrointestinal distress than patients receiving vismodegib.. SHHis induce a partial response to locally advanced BCC disease. Side effects are common, similar across molecules, associated with high discontinuation rates, and warrant discussion beforehand.

Topics: Alopecia; Anilides; Antineoplastic Agents; Biphenyl Compounds; Carcinoma, Basal Cell; Clinical Trials as Topic; Dysgeusia; Gastrointestinal Diseases; Hedgehog Proteins; Humans; Muscular Diseases; Neoplasm Proteins; Prospective Studies; Pyridines; Skin Neoplasms

Until recently, advanced BCC were only accessible to a highly morbid surgery not necessarily proving to be carcinologic, and leaving terrible dysmorphic sequelae hard to accept by the patient. Another possibility, the only one in case of metastatic BCC, was chemotherapy which efficacy has never been proven in a clinical trial. Radiotherapy is most often not accessible because of previous radiotherapy or because of the localization or the extension of the lesion. The discovery of the importance of the sonic hedgehog pathway in the physiopathology of BCC has opened a new strategy with the development of targeted anti SMO drugs inactivating the pathway. Two molecules have become available following Phase I and II studies: vismodegib (Erivedge®) the first in class indicated for locally advanced and metastatic BCC and sonidegib (Odomzo®) indicated only for locally advanced BCC. The pharmacokinetic profiles of sonidegib and vismodegib showed several differences. No head to head comparative studies are available between these two drugs. Their pivotal phase II studies had similar study designs and endpoints. The objective response rate (ORR) by central review for vismodegib was 47.6% (95% CI 35.5-60.6) at 21 months follow-up. The ORR for sonidegib according to central review at 18 months follow-up is 56.1% (95% CI 43.3-68.3). Although both treatments share a similar adverse event profile with possible numerically differences in incidence, most patients will discontinue hedgehog inhibitors treatment in the long term because of side effects. Some resistant cases to these drugs have been described but are rather rare. In case of resistance or bad tolerability to the drug future hopes rely on immunotherapy currently under investigation. © 2018. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved. Cet article fait partie du numéro supplément Prise en charge des carcinomes basocellulaires difficiles à traiter réalisé avec le soutien institutionnel de Sun Pharma.

Topics: Alopecia; Anilides; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Basal Cell Nevus Syndrome; Biphenyl Compounds; Carcinoma, Basal Cell; Cisplatin; Clinical Trials as Topic; Drug Resistance, Neoplasm; Dysgeusia; Fluorouracil; Hedgehog Proteins; Humans; Molecular Targeted Therapy; Multicenter Studies as Topic; Muscle Cramp; Mutation; Neoplasm Proteins; Patched-1 Receptor; Patched-2 Receptor; Pyridines; Signal Transduction; Skin Neoplasms; Smoothened Receptor

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Alopecia; Antineoplastic Agents; Biphenyl Compounds; Carcinoma, Basal Cell; Drug Tapering; Dysgeusia; Female; Hedgehog Proteins; Humans; Male; Molecular Targeted Therapy; Neoplasm Proteins; Pyridines; Retrospective Studies; Skin Neoplasms; Smoothened Receptor; Spasm; Treatment Outcome; Weight Loss

Topics: Aged; Anilides; Biphenyl Compounds; Carcinoma, Basal Cell; Dysgeusia; Female; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Muscle Cramp; Nausea; Pyridines; Skin Neoplasms

Topics: Alopecia; Anilides; Antineoplastic Agents; Biphenyl Compounds; Carcinoma, Basal Cell; Creatine Kinase; Dysgeusia; Female; Hedgehog Proteins; Humans; Muscular Diseases; Ovarian Diseases; Pyridines; Skin Neoplasms; Weight Loss

Topics: Animals; Antineoplastic Agents; Biphenyl Compounds; Carcinoma, Basal Cell; Cell Differentiation; Cell Proliferation; Chorda Tympani Nerve; Disease Models, Animal; Dysgeusia; Hedgehog Proteins; Humans; Mice; Mice, Inbred C57BL; Mice, Knockout; Pyridines; Recovery of Function; Signal Transduction; Skin Neoplasms; Smoothened Receptor; Stem Cells; Taste; Taste Buds; Tongue