lactoferrin and Critical-Illness

Diarrhea has great impact on enteral nutrition. The purpose of this review is to identify the factors leading to diarrhea during enteral nutrition and to provide the published updates on diarrhea prevention through nutritional intervention.. Diarrhea in enteral fed patients is attributed to multiple factors, including medications (major contributor), infections, bacterial contamination, underlying disease, and enteral feeding. Diet management can alleviate diarrhea in enteral feeding. High content of fermentable oligosaccharides, disaccharides, and monosaccharides and polyols (FODMAPs) in enteral formula is postulated to induce diarrhea and lower FODMAPs formula may reduce the likelihood of diarrhea in enterally fed patients. Fiber-enriched formula can reduce the incidence of diarrhea and produce short-chain fatty acids for colonocytes. Ingesting prebiotics, nonviable probiotics or probiotic derivatives, and human lactoferrin may provide alternatives for reducing/preventing diarrhea.. Enteral feeding is not generally considered the primary cause of diarrhea, which is frequently linked to prescribed medications. When diarrhea is apparent, healthcare members should evaluate the possible risk factors and systematically attempt to eliminate the underlying causes of diarrhea before reducing or suspending enteral feeding. Lower FODMAPs formula, prebiotics, probiotic derivatives, and lactoferrin may be used to manage enteral feeding-related diarrhea.

Topics: Critical Illness; Cross Infection; Diarrhea; Diet; Dietary Fiber; Disaccharides; Enteral Nutrition; Gastrointestinal Tract; Humans; Hypoalbuminemia; Lactoferrin; Microbiota; Monosaccharides; Oligosaccharides; Prebiotics; Probiotics

Randomized controlled trials in the ICU often fail to show differences in endpoints between groups. We sought to explore reasons for this at a molecular level by analyzing transcriptomic data from a recent negative trial. Our objectives were to determine if randomization successfully balanced transcriptomic features between groups, to assess transcriptomic heterogeneity among the study subjects included, and to determine if the study drug had any effect at the gene expression level.. Bioinformatics analysis of transcriptomic and clinical data collected in the course of a randomized controlled trial.. Tertiary academic mixed medical-surgical ICU.. Adult, critically ill patients expected to require invasive mechanical ventilation more than 48 hours.. Lactoferrin or placebo delivered enterally and via an oral swab for up to 28 days.. We found no major imbalances in transcriptomic features between groups. Unsupervised analysis did not reveal distinct clusters among patients at the time of enrollment. There were marked differences in gene expression between early and later time points. Patients in the lactoferrin group showed changes in the expression of genes associated with immune pathways known to be associated with lactoferrin.. In this clinical trial, transcriptomic data provided a useful complement to clinical data, suggesting that the reasons for the negative result were less likely related to the biological efficacy of the study drug, and may instead have been related to poor sensitivity of the clinical outcomes. In larger studies, transcriptomics may also prove useful in predicting response to treatment.

Topics: Aged; Anti-Infective Agents; Cohort Studies; Critical Illness; Female; Gene Expression; Gene Expression Profiling; Humans; Intensive Care Units; Lactoferrin; Male; Middle Aged; Respiration, Artificial

To obtain preliminary evidence for the efficacy of lactoferrin as a preventative measure for nosocomial infections and inform the conduct of a definitive study.. Phase 2, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.. Medical-surgical ICUs.. Adult, critically ill patients receiving invasive mechanical ventilation.. Randomized, eligible, consenting patients expected to require invasive mechanical ventilation more than 48 hours received lactoferrin both enterally and via an oral swab or a placebo of sterile water for up to 28 days.. Of the 214 patients who were randomized, 212 received at least one dose of the intervention and were analyzed (107 lactoferrin and 105 placebo). Protocol adherence was 87.5%. Patients receiving lactoferrin were older (mean [SD], 66.3 [13.5] vs 62.5 [16.2] yr), had a higher Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score (26.8 [7.8] vs 23.5 [7.9]), and need for vasopressors (79% vs 70%). Antibiotic-free days (17.3 [9.0] vs 18.5 [7.1]; p = 0.91) and nosocomial infections (0.3 [0.7] vs 0.4 [0.6] per patient; p = 0.48) did not differ between lactoferrin and placebo groups, respectively. Clinical outcomes for lactoferrin versus placebo were as follows: ICU length of stay (14.5 [18.0] vs 15.0 [37.3] d; p = 0.82), hospital length of stay (25.0 [25.9] vs 28.1 [44.6] d; p = 0.57), hospital mortality (41.1% vs 30.5%; p = 0.11), and 90-day mortality (44.9% vs 32.4%; p = 0.06). Biomarker levels did not differ between the groups.. Lactoferrin did not improve the primary outcome of antibiotic-free days, nor any of the secondary outcomes. Our data do not support the conduct of a larger phase 3 trial.

Topics: Aged; Anti-Infective Agents; Critical Illness; Cross Infection; Double-Blind Method; Female; Humans; Lactoferrin; Male; Middle Aged

In a controlled pilot study of 32 critically ill patients, we have attempted prospectively to identify laboratory variables which can be used to select and monitor patients on antithrombin (AT) therapy. Patients with plasma AT levels less than 70% of normal were randomized to receive (AT group) or not to receive AT concentrate (non-AT group). The groups did not differ in median age, sex, median APACHE II and TISS scores, number of days spent in the Intensive Care Unit or mortality rate. At the time of inclusion all patients had activated coagulation and fibrinolysis demonstrated as high levels of soluble fibrin, thrombin-antithrombin complexes and fibrin-D-dimers (twice, four and ten times the upper reference range, respectively). In the AT group these levels decreased faster and the prothrombin complex concentration increased more rapidly to normal (i.e. the prothrombin time decreased). The level of C-reactive protein which was high in both groups on inclusion (139 and 98 mg/l, respectively) decreased by 40% in the AT group but did not change in the control group. Our study indicates that laboratory variables normalize faster in seriously ill patients who have activated coagulation and fibrinolysis when they receive AT concentrate and that the variables mentioned above seem to be useful for monitoring the treatment.

Topics: Aged; Antithrombin III; Antithrombins; Blood Coagulation; C-Reactive Protein; Critical Illness; Female; Fibrinolysis; Hemostasis; Humans; Lactoferrin; Length of Stay; Male; Middle Aged; Peptide Hydrolases; Pilot Projects; Plasminogen Activator Inhibitor 1; Prospective Studies; Severity of Illness Index; Survival Rate; von Willebrand Factor

The aim of the study was to investigate whether lactoferrin can improve the immune competence of cells from patients with systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS). We studied the effect of lactoferrin (LF) on the proliferative response of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) to lipopolisaccharide (LPS) in vitro and its influence on production of 2 proinflammatory cytokines: interleukin-6 (IL-6) and tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-alpha). Three groups of patients: septic survivors, septic nonsurvivors and multiple trauma patients, were investigated. Blood samples were taken upon admission to intensive care unit and after 2, 3 and 5 days. The proliferative response of PBMC in vitro was tested using 3-day culture with LPS. Cell proliferation/death was measured using MTT colorimetric method. The spontaneous and LPS-induced activity of TNF-alpha and IL-6 were measured with bioassays using indicator cell lines WEHI-164.13 and 7TD1, respectively. We demonstrated that LF inhibited the proliferative response, both spontaneous and LPS-induced, in all groups of patients. Lactoferrin alone was a good inducer of IL-6 and TNF-alpha production by monoclear cells in vitro. Addition of LF to the cultures of LPS-activated mononuclear cells stimulated IL-6 production, most markedly in the group of septic survivor patients (mean 1479, 1452, 1728, 1980 pg/ml on day 1, 2, 3 and 6 respectively). Lactoferrin also upregulated TNF-alpha production. That effect was very significant in the septic survivor patients (mean 7407, 6739, 7498 and 8509 pg/ml on day 1, 2, 3 and 5 respectively) and less pronounced in the group of trauma patients. We conclude that lactoferrin exhibited regulatory actions on the altered reactivity of PBMC from patients with sepsis and multiple injury. Lactoferrin is a good inducer of IL-6 and TNF-alpha production. However, in most cases of septic nonsurvivors LF could not abolish low reactivity of cells with regard to cytokine production.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Cells, Cultured; Critical Illness; Female; Humans; Interleukin-6; Lactoferrin; Leukocytes, Mononuclear; Lipopolysaccharides; Lymphocyte Activation; Male; Middle Aged; Prospective Studies; Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome; Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha