lacosamide and Hypotension

There are limited data regarding the incidence of adverse events associated with administering lacosamide by intravenous push (IVP) compared with IV piggyback (IVPB).. The objective of this analysis was to compare the safety profile, including cardiovascular effects, sedative effects, and IV site reactions of IVP and IVPB lacosamide administration.. A retrospective pre/post cohort analysis comparing patients who received lacosamide via IVP and IVPB was conducted. Safety end points included hypotension, bradycardia, medication-related sedation, and IV site reactions. The relationship between patient characteristics and the incidence of safety end points was analyzed using the Student. Bradycardia occurred after 0.19% of IVP administrations and 1.09% of IVPB administrations assessed (. IVP lacosamide was associated with a similar incidence of cardiovascular, neurological, and infusion site-related adverse events compared with IVPB, in which nearly every adverse event was deemed clinically insignificant. Lacosamide administered via IVP may be considered a safe alternative method of administration in the acute care setting.

Topics: Academic Medical Centers; Adult; Anticonvulsants; Bradycardia; Cohort Studies; Conscious Sedation; Female; Humans; Hypotension; Incidence; Infusions, Intravenous; Injections, Intravenous; Lacosamide; Male; Middle Aged; Retrospective Studies; Tertiary Care Centers

Perioperative seizure prophylaxis with antiepileptic drugs (AED) has been advocated in patients undergoing supratentorial craniotomy. The practice remains controversial. The reasoning presupposes that the possibility of an adverse drug reaction from the AED is lower than the probability of harm from a seizure. Even short periods of hypotension during the operation can lead to acute kidney and myocardial injury. We retrospectively evaluated cardiovascular effects and tolerability of levetiracetam (LEV) alone, LEV and lacosamid (LCM) as compared to phenytoin (PHT).. After IRB approval, the charts of individuals who underwent craniotomy from April 2007 to September 2011 were reviewed. Those receiving PHT were compared to those receiving LEV alone and LEV/LCM. The patient data included demographic, indication and procedure related data. The cumulative dose of norepinephrine (NET), atropine (ATR) and the change in systolic blood pressure during and after the administration of the AED were analyzed.. Five hundred thirty-eight patients were screened of which 122 were included for analysis. 40 patients with primary or secondary supratentorial brain tumors received LEV (19 female, 21 male; mean age 56 years), 41 patients received LEV/ LCM (16 female, 25 male; mean age 56 years) and 41 patients received PHT (15 female, 26 male; mean age 50 years). The commonest indications for craniotomy were glioblastoma (N.=14 vs. N.=12 vs. N.=15), meningiomas (N.=9 vs. N.=7 vs. N.=10), low-grade gliomas (N.=6 vs. N.=13 vs. N.=6) and brain metastases (N.=5 vs. N.=4 vs. N.=5). 1 LEV/LCM patient (2%) and 4 PHT patients (4.5%) had a seizure despite prophylaxis. Possible side effects were observed in 2 patients associated with PHT. During anesthesia there was a significant drop in systolic blood pressure in the PHT group after administration of the AED perioperatively when compared to LEV (P=0.001) and LEV/LCM (P≤0.0001) respectively. The mean cumulative doses of NET and ATR over the course of the operation did not differ significantly.. LEV alone and in combination with LCM for patients without and with symptomatic epilepsy as seizure prophylaxis provides a safe and feasible alternative to PHT. PHT was associated with an unfavorable drop in blood pressure during anesthesia and more adverse reactions.

Topics: Acetamides; Adult; Anticonvulsants; Blood Pressure; Craniotomy; Female; Humans; Hypotension; Lacosamide; Levetiracetam; Male; Middle Aged; Phenytoin; Piracetam; Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis; Retrospective Studies; Seizures; Supratentorial Neoplasms

Seizures are common in critically ill patients and can impact morbidity and mortality. Traditional anti-epileptic drugs (AEDs) in this setting are not always effective and are associated with adverse events and drug interactions. Lacosamide (LCM) is a new AED which is available in parental form although few studies have evaluated the safety and efficacy of LCM in critically ill patients.. Critically ill patients at Emory University Hospital who received LCM from April 1, 2009 to February 1, 2010 were retrospectively reviewed. Primary outcome measure was incidence and time to seizure cessation. Adverse effects were also recorded.. LCM was administered in 24 patients including 13 episodes of refractory status epilepticus (RSE) occurring in 10 patients and for treatment of isolated seizures or following resolution of RSE in an additional 14 patients. Seizure cessation was achieved in 5/13 (38%) episodes of RSE (mean 11.2 h) while there was at least a 50% decrease in seizure frequency in 7/13 (54%). 11/14 patients (76%) who received LCM for treatment of isolated seizures or prevention of seizure recurrence remained seizure free. Three patients experienced a decline in systolic blood pressure (> 20 mmHg) while one patient experienced unexplained fever and one patient had elevation of liver function tests.. This preliminary data suggests that LCM may be a safe and effective alternative for treatment of seizures in critically ill patients. Further prospective, randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm these findings and further explore the incidence of adverse effects.

Topics: Acetamides; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticonvulsants; Critical Illness; Female; Humans; Hypotension; Intensive Care Units; Lacosamide; Male; Middle Aged; Retrospective Studies; Seizures; Status Epilepticus; Treatment Outcome