lacosamide and Epilepsy

Advances in stroke treatment have resulted in a dramatic reduction in stroke mortality. Nevertheless, poststroke seizures and epilepsy are issues of clinical importance affecting survivors. Additionally, stroke is the most common cause of epilepsy in older adults. Although numerous antiseizure medications exist, studies are needed to provide robust evidence of the efficacy and tolerability of these medicines for treating poststroke seizures and epilepsy. Crucially, the newer generations of antiseizure medications require testing. Lacosamide, a third-generation antiseizure medication approved for treating localization-related epilepsy, has a novel mechanism of selectively enhancing the slow inactivation of sodium channels. This literature review evaluated whether lacosamide is effective and safe for the treatment of poststroke seizures and epilepsy. This review critically analyzed studies published in major academic databases (Pubmed, Embase, and Cochrane Library) from inception through June 2022 regarding the interaction of lacosamide with poststroke seizures and epilepsy. We included clinical prospective, retrospective, and case studies on patients with poststroke seizure and epilepsy, lacosamide as a treatment for seizures, neuroprotection in animal models of seizures, and the safety of lacosamide when coadministering anticoagulants. Clinical studies revealed lacosamide to be an effective antiseizure medication with high efficacy and tolerability in patients with poststroke seizures and epilepsy. In animal models, lacosamide proved effective at seizure reduction and neuroprotection. Pharmacokinetic studies demonstrated the safety of lacosamide when coadministering conventional and new anticoagulants. The literature suggests that Lacosamide is a promising candidate antiseizure medication for patients with poststroke seizures and epilepsy.

Topics: Animals; Anticoagulants; Anticonvulsants; Epilepsy; Lacosamide; Prospective Studies; Retrospective Studies; Stroke; Treatment Outcome

A concise review of recent findings in brain tumor-related epilepsy (BTRE), with focus on the effect of antitumor treatment on seizure control and the management of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs).. Isocitrate dehydrogenase mutation and its active metabolite d -2-hydroxyglutarate seem important contributing factors to epileptogenesis in BTRE. A beneficial effect of antitumor treatment (i.e. surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy) on seizure control has mainly been demonstrated in low-grade glioma. AED prophylaxis in seizure-naïve BTRE patients is not recommended, but AED treatment should be initiated after a first seizure has occurred. Comparative efficacy randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are currently lacking, but second-generation AED levetiracetam seems the preferred choice in BTRE. Levetiracetam lacks significant drug-drug interactions, has shown favorable efficacy compared to valproic acid in BTRE, generally causes no hematological or neurocognitive functioning adverse effects, but caution should be exercised with regard to psychiatric adverse effects. Potential add-on AEDs in case of uncontrolled seizures include lacosamide, perampanel, and valproic acid. Ultimately, in the end-of-life phase when oral intake of medication is hampered, benzodiazepines via nonoral administration routes are potential alternatives.. Management of seizures in BTRE is complex and with currently available evidence levetiracetam seems the preferred choice. Comparative efficacy RCTs in BTRE are warranted.

Topics: Anticonvulsants; Benzodiazepines; Brain Neoplasms; Epilepsy; Humans; Isocitrate Dehydrogenase; Lacosamide; Levetiracetam; Seizures; Valproic Acid

Lacosamide (LCM), is a third-generation antiseizure medicine, with limited clinical evidence for use in pediatric populations. We aimed to evaluate evidence for the efficacy and safety of LCM in pediatric patients with epilepsy.. A systematic review was performed using literature published from inception to February 2022 identified in MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, and four Chinese databases. Efficacy and safety outcome data were collected, and a meta-analysis was performed.. Twenty-one studies involving 1230 pediatric patients were included. The median percent reduction in seizure frequency per 28 days from baseline to maintenance was 33.1% (95% confidence interval [CI] 22.7%, 43.5%). After 6 months of treatment, the 50%, 75%, and 100% responder rates were 53.3% (95% CI 40.7%, 65.9%), 28.3% (95% CI 20.8%, 35.8%), and 20.4% (95% CI 12.6%, 28.2%), respectively. After 12 months of treatment, the 50%, 75%, and 100% responder rates were 42.0% (95% CI 29.5%, 54.5%), 19.5% (95% CI 11.1%, 27.8%), and 15.2% (95% CI 6.6%, 23.8%), respectively. The most common adverse events (AEs) were drowsiness (15.0%), dizziness (9.9%), and somnolence (8.3%).. Lacosamide is generally effective and well tolerated to use in children with epilepsy. However, further research with high-quality data and long-term follow-up of LCM use in pediatric populations is needed.

Topics: Anticonvulsants; Child; Epilepsies, Partial; Epilepsy; Humans; Lacosamide; Sleepiness; Treatment Outcome

We carried out a systematic review of published information on transfer of antiseizure medications (ASMs) into breastmilk, ASM serum concentrations in breastfed infants, and the wellbeing of infants breastfed by mothers on ASM treatment. Information was extracted from 85 relevant articles. No data on ASM levels in breastmilk or in breastfed infants was identified for cannabidiol, cenobamate, clobazam, eslicarbazepine-acetate, everolimus, felbamate, fenfluramine, retigabine, rufinamide, stiripentol, tiagabine, and vigabatrin. For ASMs, with available information on levels in breastfed infants, very low concentrations (in the order of 10% or less of maternal serum concentrations) were reported for carbamazepine, gabapentin, levetiracetam, oxcarbazepine, phenytoin, valproate, and clonazepam. Slightly higher levels (up to approximately 30% of maternal serum concentrations) have been observed with lamotrigine and topiramate, and in single case reports for brivaracetam, lacosamide, and perampanel. High infant levels (30% up to 100% of maternal serum concentrations) have been reported with ethosuximide, phenobarbital and zonisamide. Adverse infant effects during breastfeeding by mothers on ASMs appear to be rare regardless of the type of ASM, but systematic study is limited. Prospective long-term follow-up studies of developmental outcomes among children who have been breastfed by mothers taking ASMs are sparse and have mainly involved children whose mothers were taking carbamazepine, lamotrigine, levetiracetam, phenytoin or valproate as monotherapy while breastfeeding. Although these studies have not indicated poorer outcome among breastfed children compared with those who were not breastfed, further data on long-term outcomes are needed to draw firm conclusions. It is concluded that breastfeeding should in general be encouraged in women taking ASMs, given the well-established benefits of breastfeeding with regard to both short- and long-term infant health in the general population. Counselling needs to be individualized including information on the current knowledge regarding the woman's specific ASM treatment.

Topics: Breast Feeding; Cannabidiol; Carbamazepine; Child; Clobazam; Clonazepam; Epilepsy; Ethosuximide; Everolimus; Felbamate; Female; Fenfluramine; Gabapentin; Humans; Infant; Lacosamide; Lamotrigine; Levetiracetam; Oxcarbazepine; Phenobarbital; Phenytoin; Prospective Studies; Tiagabine; Topiramate; Valproic Acid; Vigabatrin; Zonisamide

Status epilepticus is defined as the situation resulting from the failure of the mechanisms responsible for terminating an epileptic seizure. In 2015, an operational concept was adopted internationally in which two times are identified: a first time, at which treatment must begin (five minutes for convulsive status, 10-15 minutes for focal and non-convulsive status); and a second time, after which there is considered to be a high risk of subsequent sequelae (30 minutes in the case of the convulsive). It occurs in 3-42/100,000 children per year, who are refractory or super-refractory in 10-40% of cases.. This article will review the different therapeutic options for status, from early treatment at home to the different first-line (benzodiazepines), second-line (phenobarbital, valproic acid, phenytoin, levetiracetam and lacosamide) or third-line treatments, which include both pharmacological (anaesthetics, propofol, ketamine, lidocaine, topiramate, brivaracetam or perampanel) and non-pharmacological (ketogenic diet, immunomodulatory treatments or epilepsy surgery) therapies.. Early identification and treatment of a prolonged crisis are essential to prevent progression to status. Although with fewer sequelae than in adults, status epilepticus in children represents a cause of mortality of up to 3-5%, while 25% of them will develop subsequent epilepsy, as well as a considerable percentage of neurological sequelae.. Estado epiléptico pediátrico.. Introducción. El estado epiléptico se define como la situación resultante del fallo de los mecanismos responsables de finalizar una crisis epiléptica. En 2015, se adoptó internacionalmente un concepto operativo en el que se identifican dos tiempos: un primer momento, en el que hay que comenzar un tratamiento (cinco minutos para los estados convulsivos, 10-15 minutos para los estados focales y no convulsivos); y un segundo tiempo, a partir del cual se considera que hay un riesgo elevado de secuelas posteriores (30 minutos en los convulsivos). Ocurre en 3-42/100.000 niños al año, y son refractarios o superrefractarios en el 10-40% de las ocasiones. Desarrollo. En este artículo se revisarán las diferentes opciones terapéuticas del estado, desde el tratamiento precoz domiciliario hasta los diferentes tratamientos de primera línea (benzodiacepinas), segunda línea (fenobarbital, ácido valproico, fenitoína, levetiracetam y lacosamida) o tercera línea, que incluyen tanto terapias farmacológicas (anestésicos, propofol, cetamina, lidocaína, topiramato, brivaracetam o perampanel) como no farmacológicas (dieta cetógena, tratamientos inmunomoduladores o cirugía de epilepsia). Conclusiones. Son fundamentales la identificación y el tratamiento precoz de una crisis prolongada para evitar la evolución a estado. Aunque con menores secuelas que en los adultos, el estado epiléptico en niños representa una causa de mortalidad hasta del 3-5%, al mismo tiempo que un 25% de ellos desarrollará una epilepsia posterior, así como un porcentaje considerable de secuelas neurológicas.

Topics: Adult; Anesthetics; Anticonvulsants; Benzodiazepines; Child; Epilepsy; Humans; Ketamine; Lacosamide; Levetiracetam; Lidocaine; Phenobarbital; Phenytoin; Propofol; Seizures; Status Epilepticus; Topiramate; Valproic Acid

Epilepsy is one of the most common brain disorders, affecting more than 50 million people worldwide. Although its treatment is currently symptomatic, the last generation of anti-seizure drugs is characterized by better pharmacokinetic profiles, efficacy, tolerability and safety. Lacosamide is a third-generation anti-seizure drug that stands out due to its good efficacy and safety profile. It is used with effectiveness in the treatment of partial-onset seizures with or without secondary generalization, primary generalized tonic-clonic seizures and off-label in status epilepticus. Despite scarcely performed until today, therapeutic drug monitoring of lacosamide is proving to be advantageous by allowing the control of inter and intra-individual variability and promoting a successful personalized therapy, particularly in special populations. Herein, the pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, and clinical data of lacosamide were reviewed, giving special emphasis to the latest molecular investigations underlying its mechanism of action and therapeutic applications in pathologies besides epilepsy. In addition, the pharmacokinetic characteristics of lacosamide were updated, as well as current literature concerning the high pharmacokinetic variability observed in special patient populations and that must be considered during treatment individualization.

Topics: Animals; Anticonvulsants; Epilepsy; Humans; Lacosamide; Neuralgia

Topics: Animals; Anticonvulsants; Epilepsy; Humans; Lacosamide; Voltage-Gated Sodium Channel Blockers

Lacosamide is an antiepileptic drug (AED) that has linear pharmacokinetics, predictable blood concentrations, and few drug interactions, setting it apart from other AEDs that require vigorous therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) such as phenytoin and carbamazepine. However, there have been reports of altered lacosamide pharmacokinetics in some populations. The purpose of this review is to determine whether lacosamide pharmacokinetics are altered in certain patient populations, suggesting the need for TDM. A literature search of Medline, Scopus, Embase, and Cochrane trials was conducted on January 3, 2019 (and then updated on September 2, 2019) to search for articles relevant to the TDM or pharmacokinetics of lacosamide. A total of 56 relevant articles were found and included in this review. Dose of lacosamide is linearly correlated with plasma concentrations and efficacy. However, currently there is no well-established reference range. Overall, the recommended reference ranges varied from 2.2 to 20 mg/L. Lacosamide has very few clinically relevant drug-drug interactions; however, there seems to be a significant drug interaction between lacosamide and enzyme-inducer AEDs. Based on available literature, it appears that lacosamide pharmacokinetics may be altered in severe renal dysfunction, in patients on dialysis and with extremes of age. More evidence is currently needed on lacosamide pharmacokinetics in pregnancy and critical illness. While it is not practical to utilize TDM for all patients, TDM may be useful in patients taking enzyme-inducer AEDs, in patients with decreased renal function or on dialysis, and older adults.

Topics: Age Factors; Anticonvulsants; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Interactions; Drug Monitoring; Epilepsy; Humans; Kidney Diseases; Lacosamide; Renal Insufficiency; Seizures

Approximately 50% of patients do not achieve seizure control with antiepileptic drug (AED) monotherapy, and polytherapy, with more than one AED, is often required. To date, no evidence-based criteria on how to combine AEDs exist.. This narrative review aimed to provide critical findings of the available literature about the role of pharmacodynamic AEDs' interactions in patients whose epilepsies were treated with polytherapy.. Electronic databases, Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online (MEDLINE) and Excerpta Medica dataBASE (EMBASE), were systematically searched to identify relevant studies on pharmacodynamic AEDs' interactions in patients with epilepsy.. Most data on AED combinations are coming from animal models and preclinical studies. Combining AEDs with different mechanisms of actions seems to have greater effectiveness and lower risk of adverse event development. Conversely, the combination of AEDs may cause pharmacodynamic synergistic effects that may result in not only increased efficacy but also more adverse effects. Despite some AED associations that have been proven to be effective in specific epilepsy/seizure type (e.g., phenobarbital+/phenytoin for tonic seizures and ethosiximide + valproate for absences; lamotrigine + valproate for various epilepsy/seizure types), no clear and definitive evidence exists about AED combinations in humans. Examples of pharmacodynamic interactions that possibly explain the synergistic effects on efficacy or adverse effects include the combination between vigabatrin or pregabalin and sodium channel blockers (supra-additive antiseizure effect) and lacosamide combined with other sodium channel blockers (infra-additive antiseizure effect and neurotoxicity synergistic). The pharmacodynamic lamotrigine-valproate interaction is also supported by synergistic adverse events. Therefore, well-designed double-blind prospective studies recruiting a sufficient number of patients possibly with a crossover design and carefully ascertain the role of pharmacokinetic interactions and variations of AEDs' levels in the blood are needed.

Topics: Animals; Anticonvulsants; Drug Evaluation, Preclinical; Drug Interactions; Drug Therapy, Combination; Epilepsy; Humans; Lacosamide; Lamotrigine; Prospective Studies; Valproic Acid

Mood disorders such as depression and anxiety have a high prevalence in adult patients with epilepsy, and their evaluation is crucial in choosing the most appropriate antiepileptic drug (AED) with regard to side effects, which can account for long-term discontinuation, poor compliance, and ultimately, failure of seizure control. While more evidence is provided for older AEDs on their effect on mood changes, newer AEDs such as lacosamide have not yet been extensively studied. We performed a systematic review of the literature available on the impact of lacosamide on mood in adult patients with epilepsy. A literature search on MEDLINE, COCHRANE, Scielo, and Clinicaltrials.gov databases was performed, and articles where mood scales where specifically reported as primary or secondary outcome measures were included. Articles differed greatly in terms of inclusion criteria, concomitant AEDs, seizure reduction control, and outcome measures. If lacosamide is used as add-on, two studies point towards a beneficial effect on depressive and anxiety symptoms, two studies claim no effects on mood, and one reports a positive effect only in patients with major depressive symptoms at baseline. Additional evidence from either retrospective or comparative drug studies indicates no effects of lacosamide on mood. Even though presently, a negative effect on mood seems unlikely, whether lacosamide could exert a beneficial impact on mood remains controversial. Multicenter, randomized, controlled, double-blind studies are needed to assess the impact on lacosamide on mood disorders, given the low evidence level (Class III and IV) of currently available studies.

Topics: Adult; Anticonvulsants; Clinical Trials as Topic; Double-Blind Method; Epilepsy; Female; Humans; Lacosamide; Male; Middle Aged; Mood Disorders; Retrospective Studies

Cognitive and psychiatric problems are common in people with epilepsy. They can have multiple causes, including structural brain lesions, the active epilepsy, and the effect of anti-epileptic therapy. Since patients' treatment compliance and quality of life are affected by cognitive and emotional status, it is crucial for clinicians to understand how anti-seizure medications (ASMs) affect cognition and mood, and to choose the proper ASM.. To conduct a literature review of the impact on cognition and mood status of lacosamide (LCM) in people with epilepsy.. Wesearched PubMed, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and reference lists of articles for all types of articles with no limitations on publication date.. A total of 251 records were obtained, including 247 articles in PubMed and 4 articles from reference lists. We included 2 meta-analyses, one randomized controlled trials and 14 observational studies after the screening process. Most studies agree LCM has low risk of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) on cognition. Comparisons with other ASMs, LCM may be preferable to carbamazepine, topiramate and perampanel, and not inferior to lamotrigine. In spite of low incident rate, depression is the most common psychiatric change of LCM. There are no consistent positive or negative psychiatric effects of LCM.. Lacosamide has limited impact on cognitive and mood status in this review. Several factors including mechanism of co-administration of ASMs and personal history of psychiatric disorder should be considered as important in the development of cognitive and psychiatric side effects. However, the heterogeneity between studies make the quality of evidence weaker and further trials are needed.

Topics: Adult; Affect; Anticonvulsants; Carbamazepine; Cognition; Epilepsy; Humans; Lacosamide; Lamotrigine; Nitriles; Pyridones; Quality of Life; Topiramate

New information about antiepileptic drugs has arisen since the publication of the Hong Kong Epilepsy Guideline in 2009. This article set out to fill the knowledge gap between 2007 and 2016 on the use of antiepileptic drugs in Hong Kong.. Between May 2014 and April 2016, four consensus meetings were held in Hong Kong, where a group comprising 15 professionals (neurologists, paediatricians, neurosurgeons, radiologists, and clinical psychologists) from both public and private sectors aimed to review the best available evidence and update all practising physicians on a range of clinical issues including drug-related matters. All participants were council members of The Hong Kong Epilepsy Society.. A literature review of the clinical use of antiepileptic drugs as monotherapy suggested Level A evidence for levetiracetam and Level B evidence for lacosamide. No change in the level of evidence was found for oxcarbazepine (Level A evidence) or pregabalin (undesignated), and no evidence was found for perampanel. A literature review on the clinical use of antiepileptic drugs as adjunctive therapy suggested Level A evidence for both lacosamide and perampanel. No change to the level of evidence was found for levetiracetam (Level A evidence), oxcarbazepine (Level A evidence), or pregabalin (Level A evidence). A literature search on the use of generic antiepileptic drugs suggested Level A evidence for the use of lamotrigine in generic substitution.. Three lead authors of the Subcommittee drafted the manuscript that consisted of two parts-part A: evidence on new antiepileptic drugs, and part B: generic drugs. The recommendations on monotherapy/adjunctive therapy were presented during the meetings. The pros and cons for our health care system of generic substitution were discussed. The recommendations represent the 'general consensus' of the participants in keeping with the evidence found in the literature.. Recommendations for the use of levetiracetam, lacosamide, oxcarbazepine, pregabalin, and perampanel were made. The consensus statements may provide a reference to physicians in their daily practice. Controversy exists over the use of generic products among patients who are currently taking brand medications. In this regard, approvals from prescriber and patient are pivotal. Good communication between doctors and patients is essential, as well as enlisting the assistance of doctors, nurses, and pharmacists, therapeutic blood monitoring if available, and the option of brand antiepileptic drug as a self-financed item. The physical appearance of generic drugs should be considered as it may hamper drug compliance. Support from medical services is recommended. In the longer term, the benefit of flexibility and the options to have a balance between the generic and brand drug market may need to be addressed by institutions and regulatory bodies.

Topics: Acetamides; Anticonvulsants; Carbamazepine; Consensus; Drugs, Generic; Epilepsy; Hong Kong; Humans; Lacosamide; Lamotrigine; Levetiracetam; Oxcarbazepine; Piracetam; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Societies, Medical; Triazines

Drugs marketed during the last few years (i.e. Lacosamide, Ruifinamide, Eslicarbazepine acetate, Brivaracetam and Perampanel) are increasingly regarded as third generation AEDs. This paper presents available data about monotherapy with third generation drugs and on-going clinical trials with special attention to the existing debate about monotherapy license in epilepsy.. References were identified by searches of Medline/PubMed. In addition, currently active studies for these AEDs were identified in the ClinicalTrials.gov database. Expert commentary: Results of studies on Eslicarbazepine acetate and Lacosamide clearly suggest good efficacy and tolerability. The selective pharmacological profile, the lack of interactions, the good tolerability with low propensity for cognitive side effects and the availability of different pharmacological formulations represent evident advantages. Although third generation monotherapies are quite promising, long-term safety data is needed in order to understand how these compounds will place in the current armamentarium.

Topics: Acetamides; Adult; Anticonvulsants; Dibenzazepines; Epilepsy; Humans; Lacosamide; Time Factors

The novel antiepileptic drug lacosamide (LCM; SPM927, Vimpat®) has been heralded as having a dual-mode of action through interactions with both the voltage-gated sodium channel and the neurite outgrowth-promoting collapsin response mediator protein 2 (CRMP2). Lacosamide's ability to dampen neuronal excitability through the voltage-gated sodium channel likely underlies its efficacy in attenuating the symptoms of epilepsy (i.e., seizures). While the role of CRMP2 in epilepsy has not been well studied, given the proposed involvement of circuit reorganization in epileptogenesis, the ability of lacosamide to alter CRMP2 function may prove disease modifying. Recently, however, the validity of lacosamide's interaction with CRMP2 has come under scrutiny. In this review, we address the contradictory reports concerning the binding of lacosamide to CRMP2 as well as the ability of lacosamide to directly impact CRMP2 function. Additionally, we address similarly the contradicting reports regarding the potential disease-modifying effect of lacosamide on the development and progression of epilepsy. As the vast majority of antiepileptic drugs influences only the symptoms of epilepsy, the ability to hinder disease progression would be a major breakthrough in efforts to cure or prevent this debilitating syndrome.

Topics: Acetamides; Animals; Epilepsy; Humans; Intercellular Signaling Peptides and Proteins; Lacosamide; Nerve Tissue Proteins; Protein Binding; Protein Structure, Secondary; Protein Structure, Tertiary

To review the evidence for efficacy and safety of lacosamide in adult patients with refractory epilepsy and refractory status epilepticus (RSE).. A systematic literature search of MEDLINE, PubMed, EMBASE, IPA, Google and Google Scholar (through October 2014) was performed.. Fourteen studies assessing lacosamide in 3509 refractory epilepsy patients were included. In 3 RCTs, more patients had at least 50% reduction in seizure frequency with lacosamide compared to placebo with 38.3-41.1%, 38.1-41.2%, and 18.3-25.8%, in the 400 mg/day, 600 mg/day, and placebo groups, respectively. In non-comparative trials, 18-69% of patients achieved at least 50% reduction in seizure frequency, and 1.7-26.2% achieved seizure freedom. Non-responders were documented in two trials, with 26.2-34% having no response. Thirteen studies assessing lacosamide in 390 RSE patients were included. When assessing lacosamide's ability to terminate RSE, one comparative cohort study found no improvement in SE duration or seizure control with addition of lacosamide. Another study documented no difference compared to use of phenytoin. Eleven descriptive studies using lacosamide as add-on RSE therapy revealed seizure termination rates of 0-100% (median 64.7%). In all patients receiving lacosamide, dizziness (21.8%), vision disturbances (10.4%), drowsiness (7.4%), headache (7.0%), nausea (6.5%), and coordination problems (5.8%) were the most common adverse effects.. Based on evidence to date, adjunctive lacosamide is a treatment option to reduce seizure frequency in patients with refractory epilepsy and terminate seizures in patients with RSE. The safety information summary can be used to advise patients of potential adverse effects.

Topics: Acetamides; Anticonvulsants; Epilepsy; Humans; Lacosamide; Seizures

Lacosamide (LCM) is a functionalized amino acid specifically developed for use as an antiepileptic drug (AED) and is currently indicated as adjunctive treatment for partial-onset seizures in adults with focal epilepsy (maximum approved dose 400 mg/day). Characterization of the pharmacokinetic profile is an important aspect in the development of LCM. Studies in healthy subjects and in patients with focal epilepsy have established that LCM has several favorable pharmacokinetic characteristics, including rapid absorption and high oral bioavailability not affected by food, linear and dose-proportional pharmacokinetics, low inter- and intraindividual variability, low plasma protein binding, renal elimination, and a low potential for clinically relevant pharmacokinetic drug-drug interactions both with AEDs and other common medications. Studies have demonstrated bioequivalence among the three LCM formulations (oral tablets, oral solution, and solution for intravenous (IV) infusion), allowing direct conversion to or from oral and IV administration without titration. Thus, the favorable and predictable pharmacokinetic profile and bioequivalence of LCM formulations, coupled with the low potential for clinically relevant pharmacokinetic drug-drug interactions, make LCM an easy-to-use adjunctive treatment for the management of patients with focal epilepsy.

Topics: Acetamides; Animals; Anticonvulsants; Drug Interactions; Epilepsy; Humans; Lacosamide; Treatment Outcome

Defining the tolerability and safety profile of recently marketed antiepileptic drugs, such as lacosamide (LCM), is a prerequisite for their optimal utilization in clinical practice. We aimed to identify any adverse event (AE) associated with LCM treatment by conducting a systematic review and meta-analysis of all available randomized controlled trials (RCTs). We also evaluated the association of serious AEs with LCM, the proportion of study withdrawals due to intolerable AEs at different LCM doses, and whether the tolerability profile of LCM differs according to the disorder in which it was investigated.. We searched MEDLINE and Cochrane CENTRAL to May 2011 for LCM RCTs. Additional studies were identified from reference lists of retrieved papers and from online clinical databases. We selected placebo-controlled, double-blind RCTs and investigated the therapeutic effects of oral LCM in adults with any condition. AEs were assessed for their association with LCM after identification/exclusion of synonyms, rare AEs, and non-assessable AEs. We used risk differences to evaluate the association of any (99% confidence intervals [CIs]) or serious AEs (95% CIs) with LCM and to investigate dose-response relationships of identified AEs.. Ten RCTs (three in pharmacoresistant epilepsy, four in neuropathic pain, one in migraine, one in fibromyalgia, and one in knee osteoarthritis) were included in our study. Their duration varied from 12-18 weeks. The total number of patients included was 3,148. No serious AE was significantly associated with LCM treatment. Of 21 identified AEs, 11 (52%) were found to be significantly associated with LCM. The number of AEs significantly associated with LCM increased with increasing dose: one at 200 mg/day (dizziness); six at 400 mg/day (dizziness, vertigo, abnormal coordination, abnormal vision, nausea, and vomiting); nine at 600 mg/day (dizziness, vertigo, ataxia, balance disorder, diplopia, fatigue, nausea, vomiting, and tremor). The proportion of AE-related study withdrawals also significantly increased with increasing dose. LCM AEs tended to occur more frequently in patients with drug-resistant epilepsy compared with patients with other disorders.. A range of AEs suggestive of vestibulocerebellar dysfunction is significantly associated with LCM treatment and their incidence increases with increasing doses.

Topics: Acetamides; Anticonvulsants; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Epilepsy; Humans; Lacosamide; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic

The search for new, more effective antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) continues. The three most recently approved drugs, the so-called third-generation AEDs, include lacosamide, retigabine and eslicarbazepine acetate and are licensed as adjunctive treatment of partial epilepsy in adults.. For the above three AEDs, their mechanisms of action, pharmacokinetic characteristics, drug-drug interactions, pharmacotherapeutics, dose and administration and therapeutic drug monitoring are reviewed in this paper.. Lacosamide and retigabine act through novel mechanisms, while eslicarbazepine acetate, a pro-drug for eslicarbazepine, acts in a similar manner to several other AEDs. All three AEDs are associated with linear pharmacokinetic and rapid absorption and undergo metabolism. Their drug-drug interaction profile is low (lacosamide and retigabine) to modest (eslicarbazepine) in propensity. At the highest approved doses for the three AEDs, responder rates were similar. The most commonly observed adverse effects compared with placebo were dizziness, headache, diplopia and nausea for lacosamide; dizziness, somnolence and fatigue for retigabine and dizziness and somnolence for eslicarbazepine acetate. The precise role that these new AEDs will have in the treatment of epilepsy and whether they will make a significant impact on the prognosis of intractable epilepsy is not yet known and will have to await further clinical experience.

Topics: Acetamides; Anticonvulsants; Carbamates; Dibenzazepines; Drug Interactions; Epilepsy; Humans; Lacosamide; Phenylenediamines

Cognitive problems are frequently observed in patients with epilepsy and the relative contribution of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) in this respect is determinant. During the past few years, a number of new AEDs have been introduced, and new compounds will be probably available in the forthcoming years. The ideal AED would be the one characterized by good efficacy with no negative effects on cognitive functions, mood and behavior. This paper is aimed at discussing the potential impact on cognition of a number of new compounds, namely lacosamide, rufinamide, retigabine, eslicarbazepine acetate, brivaracetam, perampanel and ganaxolone. In almost all cases, specific data on cognitive functions are not yet available, and it is possible only to speculate on their potential impact considering the mechanism of action and the adverse event profile in placebo-controlled studies. Lacosamide, eslicarbazepine acetate and probably brivaracetam are promising and will probably exhibit very limited impact on cognition. Conversely, retigabine may be more problematic, needing low starting doses and slow titration rates to improve cognitive tolerability. Data on rufinamide are restricted to special populations such as Lennox-Gastaut syndrome. Perampanel and ganaxolone are still in Phase III development, but the mechanism of action of these compounds is in line with a more sedative than neutral profile.

Topics: Acetamides; Animals; Anticonvulsants; Carbamates; Cognition; Cognition Disorders; Epilepsy; Forecasting; Humans; Lacosamide; Phenylenediamines

Lacosamide is a novel antiepileptic drug licensed in the US and Europe as adjunctive therapy for partial-onset seizures in adults. The efficacy, safety, tolerability and favorable pharmacokinetic profile in the adult population suggest that lacosamide could be of benefit for patients with partial-onset seizures.. This paper reviews the available evidence and most recent data concerning the efficacy, safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetics of lacosamide in adults, as well as in the pediatric population.. Lacosamide is one of the newest drugs of the antiepileptic armamentarium, and it is expected to compete directly with compounds that are currently used for adjunctive therapy in adults with refractory partial epilepsy. The intravenous formulation may be used for replacement therapy in patients temporarily unable to take oral medication. An apparent lack of sedative or cognitive effects might render this drug preferable in patients with mental insufficiency and/or epileptic encephalopathy.

Topics: Acetamides; Anticonvulsants; Drug Resistance; Epilepsy; Humans; Lacosamide

The new antiepileptic drug (AED) lacosamide (vimpat, "UCB Pharma") with a new mechanism of action was registered in Russia in 2010. The drug should be used as add-on treatment in patients over 16 years and older with non-controlled focal seizures with- or without secondary localization. The authors review the data of literature and the results of trials on efficacy and safety of lacosamide for peroral and intravenous introduction. Randomized clinical trials of the peroral form of this drug provide evidence that lacosamide is a prospective preparation for complex treatment of drug-resistant epilepsy in the view of its safety and tolerability. The availability of the infusion form is advantageous compared to other AED making it possible to continue treatment in cases when the peroral intake of AED is temporary impossible.

Topics: Acetamides; Administration, Oral; Adolescent; Adult; Anticonvulsants; Child; Child, Preschool; Epilepsy; Humans; Infusions, Intravenous; Lacosamide; Middle Aged; Russia; Young Adult

We will review all available studies on the use of lacosamide in the treatment of partial-onset seizures. The available evidence includes two open-label studies and three randomized controlled trials evaluating the safety and efficacy of oral lacosamide. One open-label study and one randomized controlled trial evaluating the safety and tolerability of intravenous lacosamide was also identified. Lacosamide was found to be efficacious with significant reduction in seizure frequency dosed 400-600 mg daily. Moreover, its adverse drug effects were mild and infrequently reported in the literature. Findings suggest that lacosamide is an effective agent for adjunctive treatment of refractory partial-onset seizures.

Topics: Acetamides; Administration, Oral; Animals; Anticonvulsants; Contraindications; Epilepsies, Partial; Epilepsy; Humans; Injections, Intravenous; Lacosamide; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Status Epilepticus

Despite the large number of antiepileptic drugs (AED) available today, more than 30% of patients with epilepsy do not manage to achieve adequate control over their seizures. For patients, the administration of the latest AED can be a good alternative, prior to surgery or when there are contraindications against it. Third generation AED offer different mechanisms of action and tolerability profiles that are more favourable than those of the first and second generations. Lacosamide has recently been approved by the European Medicines Agency (EMEA) and its United States counterpart (FDA) as an adjuctive AED in partial onset seizures in adults over the age of 16, thus making it a novel option in the treatment of epilepsy.

Topics: Acetamides; Anticonvulsants; Epilepsy; Humans; Lacosamide; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Treatment Outcome

There is a need for newer anti-epileptic drugs (AEDs) with improved efficacy and tolerability. This article reviews AEDs introduced since 2007 and investigational compounds in clinical development.. Two recently introduced AEDs, stiripentol and rufinamide, have been licensed exclusively for orphan indications, that is severe myoclonic epilepsy of infancy (stiripentol, Europe) and Lennox-Gastaut syndrome (rufinamide, Europe and the USA). This signals a welcome new trend to explore novel treatments in specific pediatric syndromes for which there are high therapeutic needs. Two additional AEDs, lacosamide and eslicarbazepine acetate, have been licensed recently for a more traditional indication, refractory partial-onset seizures. Although newly introduced agents given as adjunctive therapy have been found to be superior to placebo in reducing seizure frequency, the ultimate goal of sustained seizure freedom is rarely achieved. Therefore, the search for better agents should continue. Several investigational compounds are currently in various stages of clinical development.. The recent introduction of newer AEDs has enlarged the armamentarium against epilepsy. However, newer agents had only a modest impact on the probability of achieving long-term remission. Novel strategies for the discovery and development of truly innovative AEDs are sorely needed.

Topics: Acetamides; Anticonvulsants; Clinical Trials as Topic; Dioxolanes; Drug Approval; Drug Discovery; Epilepsy; Humans; Lacosamide; Remission Induction; Triazoles

Epilepsy is not a singular disease, but a variety of disorders. It affects up to 0.5% of the population. Over the past decade, researchers have made great advances in the field of epilepsy. These have been accompanied by the licensing of a great number of antiepileptic drugs. However, despite these efforts, up to 15-20% of patients have refractory epilepsy. The novel antiepileptic drugs must suit several requirements: higher efficacy, especially in resistant cases, better tolerability, and improved pharmacokinetic properties. Recently, three new drugs have been introduced to the market. Retigabine is a carbamic derivate, and its anticonvulsive properties are largely due to its ability to prolong the opening of neuronal voltage-gated potassium Kv7.2 and Kv7.3 channels. Lacosamide is a functionalized amino acid, and selectively enhances voltage-gated sodium channel slow inactivation. Eslicarbazepine acetate is a new member of the dibenzazepine family, and blocks the fast inactivated voltage-gated sodium channel. All three of them differ from the foregoing agents in several important ways, including new mechanism of action (retigabine, lacosamide), or pharmacokinetics (eslicarbazepine acetate). These novel anticonvulsants appear to be a safe and effective addition to the armamentarium for the treatment of patients with refractory epilepsy. However, it will take the consideration of new concepts in shaping the new therapeutic algorithm.

Topics: Acetamides; Anticonvulsants; Carbamates; Dibenzazepines; Epilepsy; Humans; Lacosamide; Phenylenediamines

Epilepsy is one of the most common serious neurological conditions worldwide, with an age-adjusted incidence of approximately 50 per 100,000 persons per year in developed countries. Antiepileptic therapy can result in long-term remission in 60-70% of patients, but many patients will require combination treatment to achieve optimal seizure control, as monotherapy is ineffective at controlling seizures in 30-53% of patients. Despite the increase in available treatment options, patient outcomes have not improved significantly and there is still a need for more effective therapies. Drugs used in the treatment of focal-onset seizures are a diverse range of compounds, and in most cases their mechanism of action is unknown or poorly defined. This review discusses the efficacy and safety of the newer adjuvant antiepileptic therapies that may improve outcomes in patients unresponsive to monotherapy, including clobazam, vigabatrin, lamotrigine, gabapentin, topiramate, tiagabine, levetiracetam, oxcarbazepine, pregabalin, zonisamide and eslicarbazepine, with focus on lacosamide. Lacosamide has been shown to exert its anticonvulsant effects predominantly by enhancement of the slow inactivation of voltage-gated sodium channels. Lacosamide is indicated for use as adjuvant treatment of focal-onset seizures in patients with epilepsy, and there is some evidence that it may also be of use in patients with status epilepticus and cancer patients with epilepsy. The efficacy of lacosamide has been assessed in three randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trials, all of which have shown lacosamide to be effective at reducing seizure frequency and increasing 50% responder rates in patients with focal-onset seizures. Long-term lacosamide treatment is generally well tolerated and is not associated with significant drug interactions; the availability of an intravenous form of the drug also makes it particularly useful for a broad range of patients.

Topics: Acetamides; Animals; Anticonvulsants; Drug Interactions; Epilepsies, Partial; Epilepsy; Humans; Lacosamide; Sodium Channels; Treatment Outcome

Epilepsy is one of the most common neurological disorders, affecting up to 2% of the population worldwide. Studies show that patients with refractory seizures have higher morbidity and mortality rates, as well as a poorer quality of life, than those with controlled seizures. Therefore, treatment that reduces the frequency of seizures may improve patients' quality of life. Lacosamide (LCM) is a recently approved anticonvulsant in Europe and the USA which offers new mechanisms of action and favorable safety profiles. Efficacy data have shown fast onset of anticonvulsant effects and significant reduction of partial-onset seizures as adjunctive therapy at LCM 200 and 400 mg/day, even in a severely refractory population.. This article reviews three pivotal clinical trials of LCM, including its efficacy and tolerability over 7 years. In addition, LCM's key pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics from a search of the literature are reviewed in detail. This article also includes recent publications on the safety and use of intravenous LCM solution for patients with epilepsy.. This article provides comprehensive review of efficacy and safety information of LCM along with comprehensive pharmacokinetic information, which includes absolute bioavailability, low protein binding, lack of hepatic enzyme induction or inhibition, and low potential for drug-drug interactions.. Considering the fact that more than 30% of epilepsy patients remain refractory despite various antiepileptic drugs, LCM may provide added benefit to patients with refractory seizures.

Topics: Acetamides; Anticonvulsants; Epilepsy; Humans; Lacosamide; Treatment Outcome

Lacosamide (LCM) is a newer antiepileptic drug with a dual mode of action. It selectively enhances slow inactivation of voltage-gated sodium channels without affecting fast inactivation, and modulates collapsing response mediator protein 2 (CRMP-2). It has a high oral bioavailability of approximately 100%. It has shown potent and broad neuroprotective effects in vitro and in vivo animal models making it a potential candidate for long term treatment of epilepsy. In addition to this, it has demonstrated analgesic activity in various animal models. Apart from this, LCM has demonstrated potent effects in animal models for a variety of CNS disorders like schizophrenia and stress induced anxiety. Various safety pharmacology and toxicology studies have shown that LCM is well tolerated. Clinical trials have also suggested that LCM is a safe, effective, and well tolerated adjunctive treatment for reduction of seizure frequency in patients with highly refractory, partial seizures. Other potential indications of LCM are being investigated.

Topics: Acetamides; Anticonvulsants; Epilepsy; Humans; Lacosamide

Topics: Acetamides; Animals; Anticonvulsants; Disease Models, Animal; Epilepsy; Humans; Lacosamide; Neurons

Lacosamide is a new chemical entity being investigated as an adjunctive treatment for epilepsy, as well as monotherapy for diabetic neuropathic pain. Lacosamide appears to have a dual mode of action: selective enhancement of sodium channel inactivation and modulation of collapsin response mediator protein-2. Rapidly and completely absorbed after oral administration, lacosamide has an elimination half-life of approximately 13 hours and a low potential for drug interactions. Additionally, lacosamide exhibits linear, dose-proportional pharmacokinetics with low intra- and interpatient variability. Randomized controlled trials of adjunctive lacosamide (200, 400, and 600 mg/day) have demonstrated statistically significant reduction in median seizure frequency compared with placebo. In addition, 50% responder rates for lacosamide (400 and 600 mg/day) were statistically superior to placebo. The most frequently reported adverse events (> or =10% of lacosamide-treated patients) included dizziness, headache, and nausea. A double-blind, double-dummy randomized trial of intravenous lacosamide (30- and 60-minute infusion) as replacement for oral lacosamide showed that the safety and tolerability profiles were comparable for intravenous and oral lacosamide. The efficacy and safety results from completed clinical trials, as well as the favorable pharmacokinetic profile, suggest that lacosamide may represent a significant advance in antiepileptic drug therapy.

Topics: Acetamides; Animals; Anticonvulsants; Brain; Clinical Trials as Topic; Epilepsy; Humans; Lacosamide

Lacosamide (LCM), (SPM 927, (R)-2-acetamido-N-benzyl-3-methoxypropionamide, previously referred to as harkoseride or ADD 234037) is a member of a series of functionalized amino acids that were specifically synthesized as anticonvulsive drug candidates. LCM has demonstrated antiepileptic effectiveness in different rodent seizure models and antinociceptive potential in experimental animal models that reflect distinct types and symptoms of neuropathic as well as chronic inflammatory pain. Recent results suggest that LCM has a dual mode of action underlying its anticonvulsant and analgesic activity. It was found that LCM selectively enhances slow inactivation of voltage-gated sodium channels without affecting fast inactivation. Furthermore, employing proteomic affinity-labeling techniques, collapsin-response mediator protein 2 (CRMP-2 alias DRP-2) was identified as a binding partner. Follow-up experiments confirmed a functional interaction of LCM with CRMP-2 in vitro. LCM did not inhibit or induce a wide variety of cytochrome P450 enzymes at therapeutic concentrations. In safety pharmacology and toxicology studies conducted in mice, rats, rabbits, and dogs, LCM was well tolerated. Either none or only minor side effects were observed in safety studies involving the central nervous, respiratory, gastrointestinal, and renal systems and there is no indication of abuse liability. Repeated dose toxicity studies demonstrated that after either intravenous or oral administration of LCM the adverse events were reversible and consisted mostly of exaggerated pharmacodynamic effects on the CNS. No genotoxic or carcinogenic effects were observed in vivo, and LCM showed a favorable profile in reproductive and developmental animal studies. Currently, LCM is in a late stage of clinical development as an adjunctive treatment for patients with uncontrolled partial-onset seizures, and it is being assessed as monotherapy in patients with painful diabetic neuropathy. Further trials to identify LCM's potential in pain and for other indications have been initiated.

Topics: Acetamides; Animals; Anticonvulsants; Disease Models, Animal; Drug Evaluation, Preclinical; Epilepsy; Humans; Intercellular Signaling Peptides and Proteins; Lacosamide; Models, Biological; Nerve Tissue Proteins; Pain

The objective of this study is to evaluate the safety and tolerability of intravenous (IV) lacosamide infusion in patients aged ≥1 month to <17 years with epilepsy.. This Phase 2/3 open-label trial (EP0060; NCT02710890) enrolled patients in two age cohorts (cohort 1: ≥8 to <17 years; cohort 2: ≥1 month to <8 years). Eligible patients were receiving oral lacosamide as adjunctive treatment or monotherapy (in an open-label long-term trial or by prescription) or were not receiving lacosamide before enrolment. Patients initiated IV lacosamide (2-12 mg/kg/day or 100-600 mg/day; 15-60 minutes infusion) as a replacement for oral lacosamide or as adjunctive treatment. The primary outcomes were treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and discontinuations due to TEAEs.. In total, 103 patients were enrolled and completed the trial; 55 patients were included in cohort 1 (≥8 to <17 years), 48 in cohort 2 (≥1 month to <8 years). During the 4 weeks before screening, 74 (71.8%) patients had focal seizures, 12 (11.7%) had generalized seizures, and two (1.9%) had unclassified seizures. Most patients (74 [71.8%]) initiated lacosamide as adjunctive IV treatment. The mean overall duration of exposure to IV lacosamide was 1.18 days. Seventy-nine (76.7%) patients had one IV lacosamide infusion, 20 (19.4%) had two, one (1.0%) had three, and three (2.9%) had 10 infusions. Overall, five (4.9%) patients had a total of seven TEAEs. The only TEAEs reported in two or more patients were increased blood triglycerides (two [1.9%]). No serious or severe TEAEs were reported, and no patients discontinued due to TEAEs. No TEAEs were considered drug-related by the investigator. No consistent or clinically relevant treatment-related changes from baseline were observed for hematology, clinical chemistry parameters, vital signs, or 12-lead electrocardiograms.. IV lacosamide was generally well tolerated in pediatric patients (≥1 month to <17 years) with epilepsy, and no new safety concerns were identified.

Topics: Acetamides; Anticonvulsants; Child; Epilepsy; Humans; Lacosamide; Seizures

Recently, a novel trial design has been proposed to overcome challenges with traditional placebo-controlled trials of antiepileptic drugs in infants and young children (≥1 month of age) (Auvin S, et al. Epilepsia Open 2019;4:537-43). The proposed time-to-event trial design involves seizure counting by caregivers and allows adjustment of the duration of the baseline period and duration of exposure to placebo or potentially ineffective treatment based on the patient's seizure burden and response. We performed post hoc analyses to mimic this trial design and evaluate its viability. As these analyses required trials with prolonged baseline and treatment periods and diary data, which is not a typical design of trials in infants and young children (1 month to <4 years of age), data from two trials in pediatric patients (4-16 years of age) were used.. We performed post hoc analyses of two randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials of adjunctive levetiracetam (N159; NCT00615615) and lacosamide (SP0969; NCT01921205) in children and adolescents (4-16 years of age) with focal-onset seizures. In these analyses, patients were followed until they completed the 10-week maintenance period, discontinued during the maintenance period, or reached their "nth" seizure (n = number of seizures patient had during baseline). Efficacy was assessed by determining time to nth seizure.. In the analyses of both trials, patients on levetiracetam or lacosamide had a 34% lower risk of reaching their baseline seizure count during their 10-week maintenance period than patients on placebo. The previously published primary results of these trials also demonstrated efficacy of adjunctive levetiracetam and lacosamide.. Although these were post hoc analyses of trials in older children (4-16 years of age), our results provide supportive evidence for the utility of the novel time-to-event trial design for future trials in infants and young children (1 month to <4 years of age).

Topics: Adolescent; Anticonvulsants; Child; Child, Preschool; Drug Therapy, Combination; Epilepsies, Partial; Epilepsy; Humans; Lacosamide; Levetiracetam; Seizures

This Phase III, long-term, open-label extension (OLE) trial (EP0009; NCT01832038) was conducted to evaluate the long-term safety, tolerability, and efficacy of adjunctive lacosamide (100-400 mg/day) in Chinese and Japanese people with epilepsy (PWE) (16-70 years) who had completed a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial of adjunctive lacosamide (EP0008; NCT01710657). PWE entered the OLE trial on 200 mg/day lacosamide and up to 3 concomitant antiseizure medications. Dose adjustments were permitted to optimize tolerability and seizure reduction. Safety variables were treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and discontinuations due to TEAEs. Efficacy variables were percent change in focal seizure frequency per 28 days from Baseline of the double-blind trial, ≥50 % and ≥75 % responder rates, seizure-freedom, and proportion of PWE on lacosamide monotherapy. Overall, 473 PWE (74.0 % Chinese and 26.0 % Japanese) were enrolled; 238 (50.3 %) PWE completed the trial and 235 (49.7 %) discontinued, most commonly due to lack of efficacy (81 [17.1 %]), adverse events (55 [11.6 %]), and consent withdrawn (49 [10.4 %]). During the trial, PWE received lacosamide for a median of 1016.0 days (∼3 years), with a total exposure of 1454.8 person-years; 321 (67.9 %) PWE received lacosamide for >24 months, and 246 (52.0 %) for >36 months. The median modal dose of lacosamide was 300 mg/day. Overall, 410/473 (86.7 %) PWE reported TEAEs, 244 (51.6 %) had a TEAE that was considered drug-related, and 49 (10.4 %) discontinued due to a TEAE. The most common TEAEs (≥20 % of PWE) were nasopharyngitis, dizziness, and upper respiratory tract infection. The median reduction in focal seizure frequency per 28 days from Baseline was 57.1 %, and the ≥50 % and ≥75 % responder rates were 57.1 % (269/471) and 29.7 % (140/471), respectively. Among PWE who completed 12, 24, and 36 months of treatment, the 12-, 24-, and 36-month seizure-freedom rates were 3.5 % (13/375), 3.4 % (11/321), and 2.0 % (5/247), respectively. Among PWE exposed to lacosamide for ≥6 months and ≥12 months, the proportions of PWE that maintained continuous monotherapy for ≥6 months and ≥12 months were 5.0 % (21/421) and 5.0 % (19/378), respectively. Overall, lacosamide was well-tolerated as long-term adjunctive therapy in Chinese and Japanese PWE and uncontrolled focal seizures, with improvements in seizure reduction maintained over 36 months of treatment.

Topics: Adult; Anticonvulsants; China; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Combination; Epilepsy; Humans; Japan; Lacosamide; Seizures; Treatment Outcome

Lacosamide (LCM) is a new generation antiepileptic drug. It has only been available in Asia in recent years. A retrospective study at two hospitals in Hong Kong was performed to investigate the post-marketing efficacy and tolerability of the drug. A total of 81 subjects were recruited, among which 88% had drug-resistant epilepsy. The most common type of epilepsy was focal with unknown etiology. All patients used LCM as adjunctive therapy. The 50% responder rate was 42% at 12 weeks after achievement of maximal dose of LCM. No specific factor correlated with responsiveness including concomitant enzyme-inducing or sodium channel blocking anticonvulsants. Withdrawal rate within first 12 weeks after drug initiation was 14% while that at any time upon follow-up was 23%. Two cases of uncommon adverse reaction of myoclonus were also reported. The mechanism was postulated to be the sodium channel inhibiting action of LCM. Our study has shown LCM to have comparable efficacy and tolerability in post-marketing experience when compared with the landmark randomized controlled trials.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticonvulsants; Child; Child, Preschool; Cohort Studies; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Therapy, Combination; Epilepsy; Female; Hong Kong; Humans; Lacosamide; Male; Middle Aged; Retrospective Studies; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult

Psychiatric comorbidities are common in patients with epilepsy. A double-blind noninferiority monotherapy trial (SP0993; NCT01243177) enrolled newly diagnosed patients (≥16 years) with focal or generalized tonic-clonic seizures. Patients were randomized 1:1 to lacosamide or carbamazepine controlled-release (carbamazepine-CR). Here, we report data from an exploratory post hoc analysis of patients who reported ongoing psychiatric conditions (Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities System Organ Class). Of 886 treated patients in the trial, 126 (14.2%; 64 on lacosamide; 62 on carbamazepine-CR) reported at least one ongoing psychiatric condition at screening, most commonly depression (38.1%), insomnia (27.8%), and anxiety (26.2%). In this subgroup, 32/64 (50.0%) patients on lacosamide and 22/62 (35.5%) on carbamazepine-CR completed the trial. The most common reasons for discontinuation in patients on lacosamide and carbamazepine-CR were adverse events (10.9%, 24.2%) and lack of efficacy (18.8%, 11.3%). Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported in 52 (81.3%) of patients on lacosamide and 56 (90.3%) of patients on carbamazepine-CR, most commonly (≥10% patients in either treatment group; lacosamide, carbamazepine-CR) dizziness (12.5%, 16.1%), headache (12.5%, 14.5%), nasopharyngitis (12.5%, 9.7%), fatigue (7.8%, 14.5%), nausea (7.8%, 11.3%), somnolence (1.6%, 12.9%), and gamma-glutamyltransferase increase (1.6%, 12.9%). Overall, 15 (23.4%) lacosamide-treated and 10 (16.1%) carbamazepine-CR treated patients reported psychiatric TEAEs, most commonly (≥3 patients in either treatment group; lacosamide, carbamazepine-CR) depression (4.7%, 0) and anxiety (3.1%, 6.5%). There were no reports of psychotic disorder, epileptic psychosis, acute psychosis, or serious psychiatric TEAEs. Stratified Kaplan-Meier estimates for 6- and 12-month seizure freedom at the last evaluated dose were similar with lacosamide and carbamazepine-CR (6 months 81.0%, 75.6%; 12 months 62.5%, 66.6%). A higher proportion of patients on lacosamide than carbamazepine-CR completed 6 (67.2%, 45.2%) and 12 months (50.0%, 37.1%) of treatment at the last evaluated dose without a seizure. This exploratory post hoc analysis indicated that lacosamide monotherapy was efficacious and generally well tolerated in patients with newly diagnosed epilepsy and concomitant psychiatric conditions. In this subpopulation, lacosamide showed similar efficacy and numerically better effectiveness than carba

Topics: Adult; Aged; Anticonvulsants; Anxiety; Carbamazepine; Delayed-Action Preparations; Depression; Double-Blind Method; Epilepsy; Female; Humans; Lacosamide; Male; Middle Aged; Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders; Treatment Outcome

To assess tolerability and efficacy of lacosamide in adults with cerebrovascular epilepsy etiology (CVEE).. Exploratory post hoc analyses of a double-blind, initial monotherapy trial of lacosamide vs carbamazepine-controlled release (carbamazepine-CR) (SP0993; NCT01243177); a double-blind conversion to lacosamide monotherapy trial (SP0902; NCT00520741); and an observational study of adjunctive lacosamide added to one antiepileptic drug (SP0973 VITOBA; NCT01098162). Patients with CVEE were identified based on epilepsy etiology recorded at baseline.. In the initial monotherapy trial, 61 patients had CVEE (lacosamide: 27; carbamazepine-CR: 34). 20 (74.1%) patients on lacosamide (27 [79.4%] on carbamazepine-CR) reported treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), most commonly (≥10%) headache, dizziness, and fatigue (carbamazepine-CR: headache, dizziness). A numerically higher proportion of patients on lacosamide than carbamazepine-CR completed 6 months (22 [81.5%]; 20 [58.8%]) and 12 months (18 [66.7%]; 17 [50.0%]) treatment without seizure at last evaluated dose. In the conversion to monotherapy trial, 26/30 (86.7%) patients with CVEE reported TEAEs, most commonly (≥4 patients) dizziness, convulsion, fatigue, headache, somnolence, and cognitive disorder. During lacosamide monotherapy, 17 (56.7%) patients were 50% responders and six (20.0%) were seizure-free. In the observational study, 36/83 (43.4%) patients with CVEE reported TEAEs, most commonly (≥5%) fatigue and dizziness. Effectiveness was assessed for 75 patients. During the last 3 months, 60 (80%) were 50% responders and 42 (56.0%) were seizure-free.. These exploratory post hoc analyses suggested lacosamide was generally well tolerated and effective in patients with CVEE, with data from the initial monotherapy trial suggesting numerically better efficacy than carbamazepine-CR.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Anticonvulsants; Carbamazepine; Cerebrovascular Disorders; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Double-Blind Method; Epilepsy; Female; Humans; Lacosamide; Male; Middle Aged; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult

To evaluate the effectiveness and tolerability of lacosamide added to one or two antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) in the treatment of patients with brain tumor-related epilepsy (BTRE), and to evaluate patients' global impression of change and quality of life (QoL).. This was a prospective, multicenter, single-arm, noninterventional study with a 6-month observation period (EP0045; NCT02276053). Eligible patients (≥16 years old) had active BTRE secondary to low-grade glioma (World Health Organization grade 1 and 2) and were receiving treatment with one or two AEDs at baseline. Lacosamide was initiated by the treating physician in the course of routine clinical practice. Primary outcomes were 50% responders (≥50% reduction in focal seizure frequency from baseline) and Patient's Global Impression of Change (PGIC) at month 6. Secondary outcomes included seizure-free status and Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGIC) at month 6, change in QoL (5-Level EuroQol-5 Dimension Quality of Life Assessment) and symptom outcomes (MD Anderson Symptom Inventory-Brain Tumor) from baseline to month 6, and Kaplan-Meier estimated 6-month retention on lacosamide. Safety variables included adverse drug reactions (ADRs).. Patients were recruited from 24 sites in Europe. Ninety-three patients received lacosamide (mean [standard deviation] age = 44.5 [14.7] years; 50 [53.8%] male; median baseline focal seizure frequency = five seizures/28 days [range = 1-280]), of whom 79 (84.9%) completed the study. At 6 months, 66 of 86 (76.7%) patients were 50% responders and 30 of 86 (34.9%) were seizure-free. Improvements on PGIC were reported by 49 of 76 (64.5%) patients. Based on CGIC, 52 of 81 (64.2%) patients improved. QoL and symptoms outcome measures remained stable. Kaplan-Meier estimated 6-month retention rate was 86.0% (N = 93). Fifteen (16.1%) patients reported ADRs; four (4.3%) had ADRs leading to discontinuation (N = 93).. Results of this prospective, noninterventional study suggest that add-on lacosamide is effective and generally well tolerated in patients with BTRE.

Topics: Adult; Anticonvulsants; Brain Neoplasms; Chemotherapy, Adjuvant; Drug Therapy, Combination; Epilepsy; Female; Humans; Lacosamide; Male; Middle Aged; Prospective Studies; Quality of Life; Treatment Outcome

The effects of anticonvulsants on lipids are the subject of considerable concern and investigation, but there are almost no data on this issue from randomized trials. We evaluated serum lipid profiles in adults with newly diagnosed epilepsy, following randomization to lacosamide (LCM) or carbamazepine (CBZ) monotherapy.. We analyzed data from a Phase 3, international, randomized, double-blind trial of LCM vs CBZ for the initial treatment of focal epilepsy. Serum lipid profiles in patients not taking lipid-lowering agents and providing blood samples under fasting conditions before treatment, and following 3 or 12 months of treatment with LCM or CBZ at various doses were analyzed.. At 12 months, 271 patients satisfied the inclusion criteria for the analysis. No change was observed in LCM-treated patients for total cholesterol, cholesterol fractions, or triglycerides. CBZ-treated patients showed an increase of 21.1 mg/dL in total cholesterol, 12.6 mg/dL in low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, 12.5 mg/dL in non-high density lipoprotein (non-HDL) cholesterol, and 8.5 mg/dL in HDL cholesterol; triglycerides remained unchanged. The proportion of patients with elevated total cholesterol levels (above the upper limit of the reference range) did not change in the LCM treatment group (37.0% at Baseline; 34.8% at 12 months), but increased from 30.8% (at Baseline) to 49.6% (at 12 months) in the CBZ treatment group.. This study provides Class II evidence that CBZ elevates serum lipids, whereas LCM has no effect on lipids. It supports LCM as an appropriate choice for new-onset focal epilepsy.

Topics: Anticonvulsants; Carbamazepine; Cholesterol; Cholesterol, HDL; Cholesterol, LDL; Double-Blind Method; Epilepsy; Humans; Lacosamide; Lipids; Triglycerides

A large-scale, double-blind trial (SP0993; NCT01243177) demonstrated that lacosamide was noninferior to controlled-release carbamazepine (carbamazepine-CR) in terms of efficacy, and well tolerated as first-line monotherapy in patients (≥16 years of age) with newly diagnosed epilepsy. We report primary safety outcomes from the double-blind extension of the noninferiority trial (SP0994; NCT01465997) and post hoc analyses of pooled long-term safety and efficacy data from both trials.. Patients were randomized 1:1 to lacosamide or carbamazepine-CR. Doses were escalated (lacosamide: 200/400/600 mg/d; carbamazepine-CR: 400/800/1200 mg/d) based on seizure control. Eligible patients continued randomized treatment in the extension. Primary outcomes of the extension were treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), serious TEAEs, and discontinuations due to TEAEs. Post hoc analyses of data from combined trials included 12- and 24-month seizure freedom and TEAEs by number of comorbid conditions.. A total of 886 patients were treated in the initial trial and 548 in the extension; 211 of 279 patients (75.6%) on lacosamide and 180/269 (66.9%) on carbamazepine-CR completed the extension. In the extension, 181 patients (64.9%) on lacosamide and 182 (67.7%) on carbamazepine-CR reported TEAEs; in both groups, nasopharyngitis, headache, and dizziness were most common. Serious TEAEs were reported by 32 patients (11.5%) on lacosamide and 22 (8.2%) on carbamazepine-CR; 12 (4.3%) and 21 (7.8%) discontinued due to TEAEs. In the combined trials (median exposure: lacosamide 630 days; carbamazepine-CR 589 days), Kaplan-Meier estimated proportions of patients with 12- and 24-month seizure freedom from first dose were 50.8% (95% confidence interval 46.2%-55.4%) and 47.0% (42.2%-51.7%) on lacosamide, and 54.9% (50.3%-59.6%) and 50.9% (46.0%-55.7%) on carbamazepine-CR. Incidences of drug-related TEAEs and discontinuations due to TEAEs increased by number of comorbid conditions and were lower in patients on lacosamide.. Long-term (median ~2 years) lacosamide monotherapy was efficacious and generally well tolerated in adults with newly diagnosed epilepsy. Seizure freedom rates were similar with lacosamide and carbamazepine-CR.

Topics: Adult; Anticonvulsants; Carbamazepine; Delayed-Action Preparations; Dizziness; Double-Blind Method; Epilepsy; Female; Headache; Humans; Lacosamide; Male; Middle Aged; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult

Therapeutic drug monitoring of antiepileptic drugs is based on patient serum samples. In this study, we evaluated the correlation between lacosamide (LCM) steady state concentrations in serum and saliva samples. Additionally, we investigated the relation with daily dose, and assessed the feasibility of saliva collection. This was an open-label, single center study including data from 25 patients at the Bethel Epilepsy Center treated with LCM (50-650 mg/d). Samples were collected in the morning (fasting values) and in selected cases at 50 minutes to 5 hours after the morning dose. Nonsignificant differences in the mean LCM morning (trough) concentration in serum and saliva were observed. Serum and saliva concentrations across all samples were highly correlated, (r = .874), with a slightly lower correlation when only fasting values were analyzed (r = .860). Higher correlation with daily dosages was observed in serum samples (r = .773) than in saliva samples (r = .604). Serum and saliva concentrations increased significantly after intake of the LCM morning dose (P < .001). The median absolute and percentage increase of LCM in serum were moderately lower than in saliva samples, with a few outliers in saliva samples. Consequently, saliva could offer great clinical potential to monitor drug concentrations and guide LCM treatment in epileptic patients.

Topics: Adult; Anticonvulsants; Biomarkers; Drug Monitoring; Epilepsy; Female; Humans; Lacosamide; Male; Middle Aged; Saliva; Young Adult

The objective of this study was to explore whether chronic electrocorticographic (ECoG) data recorded by a responsive neurostimulation system could be used to assess clinical responses to antiepileptic drugs (AEDs).. Antiepileptic drugs initiated and maintained for ≥3 months by patients participating in clinical trials of the RNS. The most commonly added medications were clobazam (n = 41), lacosamide (n = 96), levetiracetam (n = 31), and pregabalin (n = 25). Across all four medications, there were sufficient clinical data for 193 AED Starts to be included in the analyses, and 59 AED Starts were considered clinically beneficial. The proportion of AED Starts that qualified as clinically beneficial was higher for clobazam (53.7%) and levetiracetam (51.6%) than for lacosamide (18.8%) and pregabalin (12%). Across all AED Starts for which RNS ECoG detection settings were held constant, the clinically beneficial AED Starts were associated with a significantly greater reduction in the detection of epileptiform activity (p < 0.001) at 1 (n = 33) and 3 months (n = 30) compared with AED Starts that were not beneficial at 1 (n = 71) and 3 months (n = 60). Furthermore, there was a significant reduction in interictal spike rate and spectral power (1-125 Hz) associated with a clinically beneficial response to an AED Start at 1 (n = 32) and 3 months (n = 35) (p < 0.001). These reductions were not observed at either 1 (n = 59) or 3 months (n = 60) for AED Starts that were not clinically beneficial.. Significant quantitative changes in ECoG data recorded by the RNS System were observed in patients who experienced an additional clinical response to a new AED. While there was variability across patients in the changes observed, the results suggest that quantitative ECoG data may provide useful information when assessing whether a patient may have a favorable clinical response to an AED.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Anticonvulsants; Clobazam; Electrocorticography; Epilepsy; Female; Humans; Lacosamide; Levetiracetam; Male; Middle Aged; Pregabalin; Prospective Studies; Retrospective Studies; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult

We examined the effects of adjunctive lacosamide (LCM) on mood and quality of life (QOL) in adult patients with partial-onset seizures in a prospective, controlled, single-blind study. Patients in whom LCM was added to their AED regimen for clinical indications comprised the LCM group (n=18), while the control group (n=32) comprised patients on ≥2 AEDs with anticipated stable dosing for the duration of the study. Profile of Mood States (POMS) and QOLIE-89 were used to assess mood and QOL at enrollment and 12-16weeks later. Adherence to LCM was measured electronically with the Medication Event Monitoring System (MEMS) and using a self-report measure. There were no significant between-group differences in age, AED load, side-effects (A-B Neurotoxicity Scale), MoCA mental status, or seizure-related factors. LCM adherence (measured by MEMS) was 70.7%. There was a significant decrease in negative mood states in the LCM group (estimated marginal mean at baseline=49.4, at follow-up=29.7; p=0.02), after controlling for seizure freedom. Based on previously reported benchmarks, clinically significant change on the POMS occurred in 7 (38%) LCM patients. The effect of LCM on the overall QOL was not significant (p=0.078). Correlation between POMS Total Mood Distress and Emotional-Wellbeing on the QOLIE-89 was significant (r=-0.783; p=0.01). These results suggest that LCM may have a favorable impact on mood.

Topics: Acetamides; Adult; Affect; Anticonvulsants; Epilepsy; Female; Humans; Lacosamide; Male; Medication Adherence; Middle Aged; Prospective Studies; Quality of Life; Single-Blind Method; Treatment Outcome

Further options for monotherapy are needed to treat newly diagnosed epilepsy in adults. We assessed the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of lacosamide as a first-line monotherapy option for these patients.. In this phase 3, randomised, double-blind, non-inferiority trial, patients from 185 epilepsy or general neurology centres in Europe, North America, and the Asia Pacific region, aged 16 years or older and with newly diagnosed epilepsy were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio, via a computer-generated code, to receive lacosamide monotherapy or controlled-release carbamazepine (carbamazepine-CR) twice daily. Patients, investigators, and trial personnel were masked to treatment allocation. From starting doses of 100 mg/day lacosamide or 200 mg/day carbamazepine-CR, uptitration to the first target level of 200 mg/day and 400 mg/day, respectively, took place over 2 weeks. After a 1-week stabilisation period, patients entered a 6-month assessment period. If a seizure occurred, the dose was titrated to the next target level (400 or 600 mg/day for lacosamide and 800 or 1200 mg/day for carbamazepine-CR) over 2 weeks with a 1-week stabilisation period, and the 6-month assessment period began again. Patients who completed 6 months of treatment and remained seizure-free entered a 6-month maintenance period on the same dose. The primary efficacy outcome was the proportion of patients remaining free from seizures for 6 consecutive months after stabilisation at the last assessed dose. The predefined non-inferiority criteria were -12% absolute and -20% relative difference between treatment groups. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01243177.. The trial was done between April 27, 2011, and Aug 7, 2015. 888 patients were randomly assigned treatment. 444 patients taking lacosamide and 442 taking carbamazepine-CR were included in the full analysis set (took at least one dose of study treatment), and 408 and 397, respectively, were included in the per-protocol set. In the full analysis set, 327 (74%) patients in the lacosamide group and 308 (70%) in the carbamazepine-CR group completed 6 months of treatment without seizures. The proportion of patients in the full analysis set predicted by the Kaplan-Meier method to be seizure-free at 6 months was 90% taking lacosamide and 91% taking carbamazepine-CR (absolute treatment-difference: -1·3%, 95% CI -5·5 to 2·8 relative treatment difference: -6·0%). Kaplan-Meier estimates results were similar in the per-protocol set (92% and 93%; -1·3%, -5·3 to 2·7; -5·7%). Treatment-emergent adverse events were reported in 328 (74%) patients receiving lacosamide and 332 (75%) receiving carbamazepine-CR. 32 (7%) patients taking lacosamide and 43 (10%) taking carbamazepine-CR had serious treatment-emergent adverse events, and 47 (11%) and 69 (16%), respectively, had treatment-emergent adverse events that led to withdrawal.. Treatment with lacosamide met the predefined non-inferiority criteria when compared with carbamazepine-CR. Therefore, it might be useful as first-line monotherapy for adults with newly diagnosed epilepsy.. UCB Pharma.

Topics: Acetamides; Adolescent; Adult; Anticonvulsants; Carbamazepine; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Double-Blind Method; Drug Delivery Systems; Epilepsy; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Lacosamide; Male; Middle Aged; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult

To quantify the relationship between exposure to lacosamide monotherapy and seizure probability, and to simulate the effect of changing the dose regimen.. Structural time-to-event models for dropouts (not because of a lack of efficacy) and seizures were developed using data from 883 adult patients newly diagnosed with epilepsy and experiencing focal or generalized tonic-clonic seizures, participating in a trial (SP0993; ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01243177) comparing the efficacy of lacosamide and carbamazepine controlled-release monotherapy. Lacosamide dropout and seizure models were used for simulating the effect of changing the initial target dose on seizure freedom.. Repeated time-to-seizure data were described by a Weibull distribution with parameters estimated separately for the first and subsequent seizures. Daily area under the plasma concentration-time curve was related linearly to the log-hazard. Disease severity, expressed as the number of seizures during the 3 months before the trial (baseline), was a strong predictor of seizure probability: patients with 7-50 seizures at baseline had a 2.6-fold (90% confidence interval 2.01-3.31) higher risk of seizures compared with the reference two to six seizures. Simulations suggested that a 400-mg/day, rather than a 200-mg/day initial target dose for patients with seven or more seizures at baseline could potentially result in an additional 8% of seizure-free patients for 6 months at the last evaluated dose level. Patients receiving lacosamide had a slightly lower dropout risk compared with those receiving carbamazepine.. Baseline disease severity was the most important predictor of seizure probability. Simulations suggest that an initial target dose >200 mg/day could potentially benefit patients with greater disease severity.

Topics: Acetamides; Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticonvulsants; Computer Simulation; Double-Blind Method; Epilepsy; Female; Humans; Lacosamide; Male; Middle Aged; Models, Biological; Patient Dropouts; Seizures; Severity of Illness Index; Time Factors; Young Adult

This non-interventional study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of intravenous lacosamide (LCM-iv) under routine conditions in daily clinical practice as a prospective registry.. Patients with any type of seizure or epilepsy syndrome were recruited in 16 neurological and neuropediatric centers in Germany if the treating physician decided to administer LCM-iv for any reason. Observation time per patient was 10 days with daily documentation of LCM-iv administration, type and frequency of seizures, currently used drugs and doses, and adverse events. Treatment efficacy, tolerability, and handling of LCM-iv were assessed using a five-step scale.. In 119 patients treating physicians classified epilepsies as focal in 66.1% and generalized in 17.4% (16.5% unclassifiable). Most common etiologies of seizures were tumors (36.1%) and cerebrovascular diseases (21.8%). Reasons for LCM-iv treatment included preparation for surgery (25.2%), convulsive (24.4%) and non-convulsive (18.5%) status epilepticus (SE), series of seizures (16.0%), gastrointestinal causes (5.9%), and acute seizures (4.2%). The median dose of LCM-iv was 300mg per day. In 45 of 64 patients (70.3%) with SE or series of seizures, epileptic activity ceased during observation time. Five patients showed abnormalities in ECG prior to the infusion and one patient afterwards, but during infusion no abnormalities were reported. Treating physicians rated efficacy and tolerability as very good or good in 77.6% and 93.1% of patients, respectively.. This large and independent multicenter registry on the use of LCM-iv in clinical practice demonstrates that LCM-iv is well-tolerated and highly efficacious when given in emergency situations, including patients experiencing SE. It is advisable to perform an electrocardiogram prior to LCM-iv administration.

Topics: Acetamides; Administration, Intravenous; Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticonvulsants; Child; Child, Preschool; Epilepsy; Female; Germany; Humans; Infant; Lacosamide; Male; Middle Aged; Outcome Assessment, Health Care; Registries; Seizures; Status Epilepticus; Young Adult

Lacosamide (LCM) is a novel antiepileptic drug (AED) with potential benefit as adjunctive treatment in patients with partial-onset seizures. As yet, limited information on cognitive effects of LCM is available, especially in real-life settings.. In this open clinical prospective study, the cognitive effects of LCM were evaluated when used as adjunctive antiepileptic therapy in patients with refractory epilepsy.. We included 33 patients aged between 16 and 74 years (mean: 37 years). All patients had a localization-related epilepsy. Patients were assessed at baseline before starting LCM treatment and during follow-up when the optimal clinical dose was achieved.. Subjective complaints were evaluated using the SIDAED; effects on cognition were evaluated using the computerized visual searching task (CVST).. The CVST showed significant faster information processing reaction times at the second evaluation (P = 0.013), which was not correlated with seizure control, type of epilepsy, age, gender, drug load, number of concomitant drugs, dose or duration of LCM treatment. On the SIDAED, patients complained more about their cognitive function at the second evaluation (P = 0.005). For the SIDAED, a positive correlation at follow-up was found between the total severity score and higher age (r = 0.375, P = 0.031), but not with epilepsy factors or treatment characteristics.. Screening of the cognitive effects of LCM showed that LCM does not have negative effects on information processing speed. As this is the most sensitive function for cognitive side effects of AEDs, LCM does not seem to induce the common negative cognitive effects. Remarkably, patients complained more, especially about their cognitive function, which is possible the 'doing better, feeling worse phenomenon'.

Topics: Acetamides; Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Anticonvulsants; Cognition; Epilepsy; Female; Humans; Lacosamide; Male; Middle Aged; Prospective Studies; Treatment Outcome

INTRODUCTION. Eslicarbazepine acetate (ESL) is a new antiepileptic drug (AED) licensed in Spain in February 2011 as an adjunctive therapy in adults with partial seizures with or without secondary generalization. Clinical trials with ESL have demonstrated acceptable efficacy and safety. AIM. To evaluate the results of ESL in our epilepsy unit during its first year of clinical experience with this AED. PATIENTS AND METHODS. We included all patients who started treatment with ESL at our epilepsy unit from March 2011 to May 2012. We collected the following variables: gender, aetiology of epilepsy, epileptogenic area, reason for switch to ESL, clinical response after initiation of ESL, adverse effects of ESL, refractoriness criteria and treatment discontinuation. A bivariate factor-to-factor correlation study was carried out to establish associations between the independent variables and the clinical response. RESULTS. We recruited 105 patients (51.4% male). 20,7% of patients remained seizure-free and 58.4% showed > 50% improvement after introduction of ESL. At 6 months, 18.1% had experienced some type of side effect, with cognitive disorders being the most common, and 11.5% had discontinued treatment. Combination with lacosamide proved to be significantly less effective in the control of seizures. Combination of ESL with the rest of sodium channel inhibitors was similar in efficacy to others combinations. CONCLUSIONS. ESL is a well-tolerated and effective AED when is used as adjunctive treatment with most of other AED in clinical practice.

Topics: Acetamides; Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Anticonvulsants; Cognition Disorders; Depression; Dibenzazepines; Drug Therapy, Combination; Epilepsies, Partial; Epilepsy; Epilepsy, Generalized; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Lacosamide; Male; Middle Aged; Sodium Channel Blockers; Weight Gain; Young Adult

Lacosamide (LCM) and carbamazepine (CBZ) are antiepileptic drugs both acting on neuronal voltage-gated sodium channels. Patch-clamp studies demonstrated significant differences in how LCM and CBZ affect neuronal membrane excitability. Despite valuable information patch-clamp studies provide, they also comprise some constraints. For example, little is known about effects of LCM on intracortical synaptic excitability. In contrast, transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) can describe drug-induced changes at the system level of the human cerebral cortex.. The present study was designed to explore dose-depended effects of LCM and effects of CBZ on motor cortex excitability with TMS in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover trial in healthy human subjects. Subjects received 600 mg CBZ, 200 mg LCM, 400 mg LCM or placebo preceding TMS measurements.. Compared to placebo, TMS motor thresholds were significantly increased after carbamazepine and lacosamide, with a trend for a dose dependent effect of lacosamide. Both, carbamazepine and lacosamide did not affect TMS parameters of intracortical synaptic excitability.. TMS measurements suggest that lacosamide and carbamazepine predominantly act on neuronal membrane excitability.

Topics: Acetamides; Adult; Analysis of Variance; Anticonvulsants; Carbamazepine; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Double-Blind Method; Epilepsy; Evoked Potentials, Motor; Female; Humans; Lacosamide; Male; Motor Cortex; Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation; Young Adult

Lacosamide (LCM) is one of the newer antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) licensed as add-on treatment for partial epilepsy. Data on LCM pharmacokinetics and interactions are limited and partly contradictory. The purpose of this study was to assess the effect of concomitant AED therapy on steady state plasma concentrations of LCM in a population of patients with epilepsy.. Steady state plasma concentrations of LCM were assessed in a cohort of 75 consecutive patients with epilepsy referred to the Laboratory of Clinical Neuropharmacology for AED therapeutic monitoring over 16 months. Plasma LCM concentrations were measured by high-performance liquid chromatography with spectrophotometric detection.. Median morning trough plasma concentration-to-weight-adjusted dose ratio of LCM [(mg/L)/(mg/kg/d)] was significantly reduced (0.94 versus 1.35, P < 0.001) in patients treated with LCM plus AED strong inducers of cytochrome P450 metabolism, namely, carbamazepine, phenobarbital, and phenytoin (group A, n = 33), compared with a pool of patients not comedicated with AED strong inducers, predominantly including oxcarbazepine, levetiracetam, lamotrigine, and valproic acid (group B, n = 42). The 2 groups were comparable for age, gender, weight, LCM daily dose, and dosing frequency. LCM plasma concentrations were linearly related to daily drug doses, regardless of concomitant AED therapy, over a dose range from 75 to 600 mg/d, although, at a given drug dose, a large interpatient variability was observed in matched, plasma drug concentration.. Our findings confirm, in a real-patient clinical setting, preliminary evidence from randomized, clinical trials showing that carbamazepine, phenobarbital, or phenytoin significantly reduces the overall systemic exposure to LCM. From a practical point of view, patients on concomitant AED strong inducers may require a 30% higher dose of LCM compared with patients not receiving strongly inducing AED cotherapy, to achieve the same plasma drug concentration.

Topics: Acetamides; Adult; Anticonvulsants; Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid; Cohort Studies; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Monitoring; Drug Therapy, Combination; Epilepsy; Female; Humans; Lacosamide; Male; Middle Aged; Prospective Studies; Spectrophotometry; Young Adult

This multicenter, prospective study investigates the efficacy and safety of lacosamide adjunctive therapy in pediatric and adult patients with uncontrolled epilepsy.. This study was carried out between September 2010 and December 2011 at 16 Italian and 1 German neurologic centers. Lacosamide was added to the baseline therapy at a starting dose of 1 mg/kg/day in patients aged <16 years (group A) and 100 mg daily in subjects aged 16 and older (group B), and titrated to the target dose, ranging from 3 to 12 mg/kg/day or from 100 to 600 mg daily, respectively. After completing the titration period, patients entered a 12-month maintenance period and they were followed up at 3, 6 and 12 months. The primary assessment of efficacy was based on the change from baseline in seizure frequency per 28 days and was evaluated at 3, 6 and 12 months as follows: number and proportion of 100% responders, 50% responders, non-responders and worsening patients. Safety evaluation was also performed at 3, 6 and 12 months.. A total of 118 patients (59 group A, 59 group B) with uncontrolled generalized and focal epilepsy were enrolled. Patient mean±SD age was 15.9±6.80 years and the age range was 4-38 years. At 3-month evaluation, of 118 treated patients 56 subjects (47.4% group A; 47.4% group B; p=0.8537) experienced at least a 50% reduction in seizure frequency. At 6 and 12-month follow-up, the 50% responders were 57 (52.5% group A; 44.1% group B; p=0.4612) and 51 (47.4% group A; 39% group B; p=0.4573), respectively. Thirty-five subjects (30.5% group A; 28.8% group B; p=1) experienced side effects during the treatment period. The most common adverse events were dyspepsia for group A and dizziness for group B.. Lacosamide may be a useful and safe pharmacological treatment option for both pediatric and adult patients with uncontrolled seizures.

Topics: Acetamides; Adolescent; Adult; Anticonvulsants; Child; Child, Preschool; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Therapy, Combination; Epilepsy; Female; Humans; Lacosamide; Male; Treatment Outcome

The safety and effectiveness of lacosamide, an antiepileptic drug (AED) that selectively enhances the slow inactivation of voltage-gated sodium channels without affecting rapid inactivation, has been demonstrated in randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials in adults with focal epileptic seizures. Although lacosamide is approved for use in patients over 16 years of age, limited clinical experience exists for younger patients.. To assess the efficacy and tolerability of lacosamide in children with refractory epilepsy. DesignMethods: The trial was a prospective, open-label, observational, multicenter study. A total of 130 patients aged less than 16 years (range 6 months to 16 years) with refractory epilepsy who had initiated treatment with lacosamide were enrolled at 18 neuropediatric units in hospitals across Spain. Patients with a variety of etiologies were enrolled, including those with partial epilepsies and symptomatic, generalized epilepsy syndromes. Lacosamide (VIMPAT®; UCB Pharma SA, Brussels, Belgium) was primarily administered once every 12 hours as an oral solution or as an oral tablet, with an initial dose of 1-2 mg/kg/day in the majority of cases. The majority of patients were also receiving stable concomitant therapy with ≥1 other AED. Treatment response to lacosamide was determined by assessing the change in seizure frequency after 3 months of lacosamide therapy. Responders were defined as patients who achieved a seizure frequency reduction of >50%. Tolerability was assessed by the reporting of adverse effects, laboratory testing, and electroencephalography recordings.. Lacosamide was dosed at a mean of 6.80 ± 2.39 mg/kg/day. After 3 months of lacosamide therapy, 62.3% of patients achieved a >50% reduction in seizure frequency, with complete seizure suppression being reported in 13.8% of patients. Adverse effects occurred in 39 patients (30%), but no dose-response relationship was observed in terms of these events. In ten patients, instability, difficulty walking, an inability to relate to subjective elements, and blurred vision or dizziness were reported. A total of 13 patients discontinued treatment - in five of these patients, symptom intensity remained unchanged despite dose reduction, which led to treatment discontinuation. The symptoms were markedly different in each patient, preventing determination of a causal factor(s).. The results of this study provide preliminary evidence for the efficacy of lacosamide in children with refractory epilepsy. Further evaluation in a randomized, controlled trial is needed to validate the efficacy in this population and to fully investigate the adverse effects described here. We recommend an initial dose of 1-2 mg/kg/day, uptitrated to 6-9 mg/kg/day over 4-6 weeks.

Topics: Acetamides; Adolescent; Anticonvulsants; Child; Child, Preschool; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Epilepsy; Female; Humans; Infant; Lacosamide; Male; Observation; Prospective Studies; Spain; Treatment Outcome

Lacosamide (LCM) is an antiepileptic drug (AED) that has demonstrated a good efficacy in controlling seizures as an add-on in adult epilepsy. To date, there have been no studies on LCM in patients with brain tumor-related epilepsy (BTRE). To evaluate efficacy and tolerability of LCM as an add-on in BTRE, we followed 14 patients suffering from BTRE who had already been treated with other AEDs and who had not experienced adequate seizure control. Eleven patients underwent chemotherapy while being treated with LCM. Mean duration of follow up was 5.4 months (min < 1 max 10 months). Mean seizure number in the last month prior to the introduction of LCM had been 15.4. At last follow-up, the mean seizure number was reduced to 1.9/month. Lacosamide mean dosage was of 332.1 mg/day (min 100 max 400 mg/day). Responder rate was 78.6%. One patient discontinued LCM because of side-effects. There were no other reported side-effects. Preliminary data on the use of LCM in add-on in patients with BTRE indicate that this drug may represent a valid alternative as an add-on in this particular patient population. However, larger samples are necessary in order to draw definitive conclusions.

Topics: Acetamides; Adult; Anticonvulsants; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Brain Neoplasms; Epilepsy; Female; Humans; Lacosamide; Male; Middle Aged; Young Adult

We aimed to evaluate the effect of the ABCC2 1249G>A (rs2273697) and -24C>T (rs717620) polymorphisms on lacosamide (LCM) plasma concentrations and the efficacy of LCM in Uygur pediatric patients with epilepsy.. We analyzed 231 pediatric patients with epilepsy, among which 166 were considered to be LCM responsive. For drug assays, 2-3 mL of venous blood was collected from each patient just before the morning LCM dose was administered (approximately 12 hours after the evening dose, steady-state LCM concentrations). The remaining samples after routine therapeutic drug monitoring were used for genotyping analysis. The χ 2 test and Fisher exact test were utilized for comparative analysis of the allelic and genotypic distribution of ABCC2 polymorphisms between the LCM-resistant and LCM-responsive groups. The Student t test or Mann-Whitney U test was conducted to analyze differences in plasma LCM concentration among pediatric patients with epilepsy with different genotypes.. Patients with the ABCC2 1249G>A GA genotype (0.7 ± 0.3 mcg/mL per kg/mg) and AA genotype (0.5 ± 0.3 mcg/mL per kg/mg) showed significantly ( P < 0.001) lower LCM concentration-to-dose (CD) ratios than patients with the GG genotype (1.0 ± 0.4 mcg/mL per kg/mg). Moreover, patients with the ABCC2 -24C>T CT genotype (0.6 ± 0.2 mcg/mL per kg/mg) and TT genotype (0.6 ± 0.3 mcg/mL per kg/mg) presented a significantly ( P < 0.001) lower LCM CD ratio than patients with the CC genotype (1.1 ± 0.4 mcg/mL per kg/mg).. The ABCC2 1249G>A (rs2273697) and ABCC2 -24C>T (rs717620) polymorphisms can affect plasma LCM concentrations and treatment efficacy among a population of Uygur pediatric patients with epilepsy, causing these patients to become resistant to LCM. In clinical practice, ABCC2 polymorphisms should be identified before LCM treatment, and then, the dosage should be adjusted for pediatric patients with epilepsy accordingly.

Topics: Anticonvulsants; Child; Epilepsy; Genotype; Humans; Lacosamide; Multidrug Resistance-Associated Protein 2; Multidrug Resistance-Associated Proteins; Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide

Estimation of serum concentrations of antiseizure medications (ASMs) based on dried capillary blood is an alternative method for therapeutic drug monitoring of epilepsy. The aim of this study was to validate the conversion factors for lacosamide (LCM), lamotrigine (LTG), and levetiracetam (LEV), which were determined in an independent patient sample in a previous study, and identify the most accurate conversion method (simple ratio and regression).. Venous and capillary blood samples were collected from adult inpatients with epilepsy treated with LCM (n = 25), LTG (n = 27), and/or LEV (n = 29) before the morning dose (T1) and approximately 2 hours after (T2). Capillary blood was collected using volumetric absorptive microsampling, and the ASM concentrations were measured using a validated liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry method for dried blood samples. Serum concentrations were estimated using conversion factors and compared with those measured using routine laboratory methods.. For all 3 ASMs, the simple ratio approach performed better than the regression approach. Intraclass correlation coefficients revealed a high agreement between the estimated and measured serum concentrations (LCM T1: 0.93, T2: 0.90; LTG T1: 0.91, T2: 0.91; and LEV T1: 0.97, T2: 0.94). The criteria of the European Medicines Agency for cross-validation were fulfilled for LCM (T1: 72%; T2: 75%) and LEV (T1: 86%; T2: 75%), whereas for LTG, this was only true for capillary blood concentrations ≤11 µ g/mL [42.9 µ mol/L; T1: 72% (vs. 63% for total range), T2: 67% (vs. 62%)].. Estimating serum concentrations using capillary blood concentrations is feasible and accurate for LCM and LEV over a wide concentration range, as found in clinical practice. The applicability of this mehod for LTG is limited by its greater variability at higher concentrations; however, acceptable results were achieved for the large proportion of patients with low and medium LTG concentrations.

Topics: Adult; Anticonvulsants; Drug Monitoring; Epilepsy; Humans; Lacosamide; Lamotrigine; Levetiracetam

Topics: Anticonvulsants; Epilepsy; Heart Arrest; Humans; Lacosamide; Seizures

The impact of individual patient variables on drug metabolism is particularly important for antiseizure medication, and lacosamide has not been studied in Chinese pediatric patients with epilepsy. This study evaluated the effects of dose, age, sex, medication time, seizure type, and concomitant enzyme-inducing antiseizure medications (EIASMs) on the plasma concentration of lacosamide.. A total of 500 pediatric patients from two hospitals in China were enrolled in this study. Lacosamide plasma concentration was processed using an ultra-performance liquid chromatography assay. Efficacy was evaluated based on the four-grade therapeutic effect criteria developed by the first National Epilepsy Academic Conference of the Chinese Medical Association.. The responder rate to lacosamide therapy was 72.2% (361/500). There was a weaker relationship between the lacosamide daily dose and lacosamide plasma concentration (r = 0.238). Lacosamide plasma concentrations of patients ranged from 1.5 to 19.7 µg/mL, with a mean of 6.9 ± 3.2 µg/mL. The study results showed a significant contribution of age, body mass index, epilepsy duration, medication time, and EIASMs to the lacosamide plasma concentration (p < 0.05). Patients taking concomitant EIASMs with lacosamide had a significantly lower mean lacosamide plasma concentration (5.9 ± 2.6 µg/mL) than patients taking concomitant non-EIASMs (7.5 ± 3.5 µg/mL, p < 0.001).. To ensure the clinical efficacy and safety of lacosamide therapy in pediatric patients, it is necessary to monitor the plasma concentration.

Topics: Acetamides; Anticonvulsants; Child; Drug Monitoring; Epilepsy; Humans; Lacosamide

Lacosamide (LCM) is a third-generation antiseizure medication (ASM), and its effect on sleep architecture was supported by a few studies in patients with drug-resistant epilepsy in which LCM was used as an add-on treatment. To gather knowledge on ASMs effects on sleep, this study aimed at evaluating the effects of LCM monotherapy on sleep in patients with focal epilepsy. Ten patients diagnosed with epilepsy (mean age 58.00 ± 14.77, 60.0% female, mean monthly seizure frequency 1.20 ± 2.48) starting LCM as monotherapy were included. Sleep architecture was assessed through polysomnography at baseline and at the 6-month follow-up visit. A significant decrease was observed in seizure frequency (p = 0.004), being all patients seizure-free at follow-up. At baseline, eight patients had poor sleep efficiency (< 85%). Sleep efficiency increased at follow-up, with only three patients having an index < 85% (p = 0.022). From baseline to follow-up, a significant decrease was observed in sleep latency (p = 0.022) and wakefulness after sleep onset (p = 0.047). Moreover, a significant decrease was observed in the percentage of stage 1 (Md = 6.70 vs Md = 3.85, p = 0.005) and stage 3 (Md = 27.70 vs Md = 22.35, p = 0.01) of Non-REM sleep. This study suggests that LCM monotherapy may positively impact sleep architecture in patients with epilepsy. The sleep efficiency improvement and the decrease of sleep latency and wakefulness after sleep onset observed at follow-up highlight better sleep stability and continuity in patients treated with LCM. Notably, all patients were seizure-free at follow-up, and seizure freedom may also concur to sleep structure improvement.

Topics: Acetamides; Anticonvulsants; Epilepsy; Female; Humans; Lacosamide; Male; Seizures; Sleep; Treatment Outcome

The efficacy and safety of lacosamide (LCM) monotherapy in Chinese pediatric patients with epilepsy have not been established. Therefore, this real-world retrospective study aimed to assess the efficacy of 12 months after achievement the maximal dose and tolerability of LCM as monotherapy for epilepsy treatment in pediatric patients.. Pediatric patients were administered LCM monotherapy in two ways: primary or conversion monotherapy. Seizure frequency was recorded as an average per month for the preceding three months at baseline and then at each follow-up period for three, six, and 12 months.. Primary monotherapy with LCM was administered to 37 (33.0%) pediatric patients, whereas conversion to monotherapy was achieved in 75 (67.0%) pediatric patients. The responder rates of pediatric patients receiving primary monotherapy with LCM at three, six, and 12 months were 75.7% (28 of 37), 67.6% (23 of 34), and 58.6% (17 of 29), respectively. The responder rates of pediatric patients receiving conversion to monotherapy with LCM at three, six, and 12 months were 80.0% (60 of 75), 74.3% (55 of 74), and 68.1% (49 of 72), respectively. The incidence of adverse reactions with conversion to LCM monotherapy and primary monotherapy was 32.0% (24 of 75) and 40.5% (15 of 37), respectively.. LCM is an effective and well-tolerated treatment option as monotherapy for the treatment of epilepsy.

Topics: Anticonvulsants; Child; Epilepsy; Humans; Lacosamide; Retrospective Studies; Treatment Outcome

Lacosamide is a newer antiepileptic medication used in refractory neonatal seizures with limited safety and efficacy data. This case series spans 4 years and includes 38 neonates cared for in the neonatal, pediatric, and cardiovascular intensive care units, who received lacosamide for refractory seizures. Because lacosamide affects atrioventricular node function in adults, among other metrics, electrocardiogram (ECG) changes were monitored closely in these neonates. Within this cohort, 2 neonates were found to have atrial bigeminy on ECG and telemetry. Otherwise, lacosamide was generally well tolerated with sleepiness being the most common symptom noted. This case series reports data on the tolerability of lacosamide and emphasizes the importance of monitoring key cardiac intervals with ECG before and after the use of lacosamide in this population.

Topics: Acetamides; Adult; Anticonvulsants; Child; Epilepsy; Humans; Infant, Newborn; Lacosamide; Seizures; Treatment Outcome

Epilepsy is a common neurological disease requiring long-term therapy also during pregnancy. Most studies on pregnancy outcomes in women with epilepsy are based on antiseizure medication (ASM) in monotherapy. However, about 20-30% of epilepsy patients require polytherapy and newer ASMs are an option, when seizure control is not achieved with first line ASMs.. Observational study evaluating the use of newer ASMs with marketing authorization since 2005 reported to the Embryotox Center of Clinical Teratology and Drug Safety in Pregnancy between 2004 and 2019. In addition, course and outcome of lacosamide exposed pregnancies were analysed.. Our study confirms the increasing use of newer ASMs also in pregnant women. This is especially true for lacosamide, eslicarbazepine and brivaracetam with rising numbers of exposed pregnancies soon after marketing authorization. Analysis of 55 prospectively and 10 retrospectively ascertained lacosamide exposed pregnancies does not indicate increased risks of major birth defects or spontaneous abortion. However, bradycardia observed in 3 neonates might be related to prenatal lacosamide exposure.. Available data do not support the assumption of lacosamide being a major teratogen. The increasing use of newer ASMs during pregnancy underscores the need for more studies to guide preconception counselling, especially for lacosamide, eslicarbazepine and brivaracetam.

Topics: Anticonvulsants; Epilepsy; Female; Humans; Infant, Newborn; Lacosamide; Pregnancy; Pregnancy Outcome; Retrospective Studies

The Thr226Met pathologic variant of the

Topics: Child; Epilepsies, Myoclonic; Epilepsy; Epilepsy, Generalized; Humans; Lacosamide; Mutation; NAV1.1 Voltage-Gated Sodium Channel; Sodium Channel Blockers

Lacosamide (LCM) is a new-generation anti-seizure medication approved for monotherapy and add-on therapy for focal-onset epilepsy. It has novel pharmacodynamics and favorable pharmacokinetic qualities with good clinical response. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness and tolerability of LCM when used in the immediate switch from sodium channel blockers in patients with focal-onset and generalized-onset epilepsies. This retrospective, multicenter observational study was conducted with adult patients who received LCM as mono- or polytherapy through immediate switch with 6 to 52 months follow-up. The clinical data obtained during the follow-up period were analyzed to assess retention rate, seizure freedom, more than 50% seizure reduction, and adverse effects. A total of 32 patients (eight females, 24 males) with a median age of 49.75 (range, 23-86) years, median age at epilepsy onset of 32.58 (range, 0.5-85) years, and median epilepsy duration of 17.17 (range, 1-46) years were included in this study. Seizure frequency was between 1 and 90 in the past 6 months. Seven (21.9%) of the patients had structural brain lesions and 27 (84.4%) of the patients had EEG abnormalities. The adverse effects leading to switching were hyponatremia, rash, elevated liver enzymes, pain, and erectile dysfunction. At 14.34 (range, 6-52) months follow-up, 30 (93.75%) patients in total retained LCM, 20 (66.7%) of them were seizure-free, and 13 were on LCM monotherapy. Responder rate was 81.25%. Eight (25%) of the patients experienced adverse effects after the immediate switch. One patient with generalized-onset epilepsy needed to quit LCM due to an increase in seizures. Seizure frequency did not change in three patients in the focal-onset group. Immediate switch to LCM showed favorable outcomes with a significant reduction in seizure frequency, high retention rates, and tolerable adverse effect profiles in both focal-onset and generalized-onset seizures.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticonvulsants; Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions; Epilepsies, Partial; Epilepsy; Female; Humans; Lacosamide; Male; Middle Aged; Retrospective Studies; Sodium Channel Blockers; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult

We describe the case of a 22-year-old male who developed thyroid storm necessitating therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE). The patient's past medical history was complicated by epilepsy, for which he took lacosamide. Little evidence was available to guide lacosamide dosing during TPE. Because of an exacerbation of the patient's underlying epilepsy in the context of the thyroid storm, we conducted therapeutic medication monitoring of lacosamide concentrations to guide management.. We arranged for measurement of the lacosamide concentration immediately before TPE (5.1 μg/mL) and 2.5 hours after the initial measurement (3.4 μg/mL) to determine the amount of lacosamide removed by TPE. Utilizing population pharmacokinetic parameters, we calculated the expected concentration and compared this to the measured concentration. The difference between these values was used to determine the percentage removed via TPE compared to the expected post-TPE concentration. We found that one TPE session removed an additional 20% of serum lacosamide.. TPE appeared to remove an additional 20% of lacosamide when compared to the expected post-TPE concentration.

Topics: Adult; Drug Monitoring; Epilepsy; Humans; Lacosamide; Male; Plasma Exchange; Thyroid Crisis; Young Adult

This retrospective, observational study used US claims data to assess retention rates on cenobamate compared with four branded antiseizure medications (ASMs) in patients with epilepsy.. Adults (≥18 years) with prevalent epilepsy (ICD-10 code G40.xx) and ≥ 1 prescription for cenobamate or any of the newer branded ASMs (brivaracetam, eslicarbazepine, lacosamide, or perampanel) between May 1, 2020 and December 31, 2021 were identified from the HealthVerity Marketplace database. At least 360 days of continuous enrollment was required before and after the index date (Day 1 of initiating cenobamate or branded ASM). Patients were followed until cessation of cenobamate or branded ASM or the end of data collection using Kaplan-Meier methods. Retention was compared between cenobamate and the branded ASMs (both as a group and individually) using Chi-square tests.. In total, 4109 patients were included (195 cenobamate; 3914 branded ASMs). A higher proportion of patients in the cenobamate group compared with the branded ASMs group had concurrent focal and generalized epilepsy (65.6% vs 40.0%) and were on ≥ 3 concomitant ASMs (48.2% vs 12.8%) at the index date. Median time to discontinuation (i.e., the time that half the patients discontinued) was not quite reached after 12 months in the cenobamate group (50.3% of patients remained on cenobamate) and was 7.7 months in the branded ASMs group. Retention was significantly higher with cenobamate vs the branded ASMs group (p = 0.04545) and vs the individual ASMs lacosamide (p = 0.03044) and perampanel (p = 0.01558). Twelve-month retention rates (95% confidence intervals) were 50.3% (43.1%-57.0%) for cenobamate, 40.5% (38.9%-42.0%) for branded ASMs overall, 42.3% (38.6%-46.0%) for brivaracetam, 44.1% (39.2%-49.0%) for eslicarbazepine, 39.9% (38.0%-41.8%) for lacosamide, and 36.8% (31.9%-41.8%) for perampanel.. In this real-world analysis, retention was significantly higher with cenobamate vs a pooled group of four branded ASMs despite a greater frequency of patients in the cenobamate group having characteristics of more difficult-to-treat epilepsy.

Topics: Adult; Anticonvulsants; Epilepsy; Humans; Lacosamide; Retrospective Studies; Treatment Outcome; United States

Status epilepticus in poststroke epilepsy is a challenging condition because of multiple vascular comorbidities and the advanced age of patients. Data on third-generation antiseizure medication (ASM) in this condition are limited. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of third-generation ASMs in the second- or third-line therapy of benzodiazepine-refractory status epilepticus in poststroke epilepsy following acute ischemic stroke.. Data on the effectiveness of third-generation ASMs in patients with status epilepticus in poststroke epilepsy were gathered from two German Stroke Registries and the Mainz Epilepsy Registry. We included only cases with epilepsy remote to the ischemic event. No patients with acute symptomatic seizures were included. The following third-generation ASMs were included: brivaracetam, lacosamide, eslicarbazepine, perampanel, topiramate, and zonisamide. The assessment of effectiveness was based on seizure freedom within 48 h since the start of therapy with the respective ASM. Seizure freedom was evaluated both clinically (clinical evaluation at least three times per day) and by daily electroencephalogram records.. Of the 138 patients aged 70.8 ± 8.1 years with benzodiazepine-refractory status epilepticus in ischemic poststroke epilepsy, 33 (23.9%) were treated with lacosamide, 24 (17.4%) with brivaracetam, 23 (16.7%) with eslicarbazepine, 21 (15.2%) with perampanel, 20 (14.5%) with topiramate, and 17 (12.3%) with zonisamide. Seizure freedom within 48 h was achieved in 66.7% of patients with lacosamide, 65.2% with eslicarbazepine, 38.1% with perampanel, 37.5% with brivaracetam, 35.0% with topiramate, and 35.3% with zonisamide (p < 0.05 for comparison of lacosamide or eslicarbazepine to other ASMs).. Based on these data, lacosamide and eslicarbazepine might be more favorable in the treatment of refractory status epilepticus in poststroke epilepsy, when administered as second- or third-line ASMs before anesthesia. Because of the fact that these ASMs share the same mechanism of action (slow inactivation of sodium channels), our findings could motivate further research on the role that this pharmaceutical mechanism of action has in the treatment of poststroke epilepsy.. This study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05267405).

Topics: Aged; Anticonvulsants; Benzodiazepines; Epilepsy; Humans; Ischemic Stroke; Lacosamide; Middle Aged; Retrospective Studies; Seizures; Status Epilepticus; Topiramate; Zonisamide

P-glycoprotein, encoded by ABCB1 (or MDR1), may contribute to drug resistance in epilepsy by limiting gastrointestinal absorption and brain access to antiseizure medications. The study aimed to evaluate the impact of ABCB1 polymorphisms on lacosamide (LCM) serum concentrations in Uygur pediatric patients with epilepsy.. The serum concentrations of LCM were determined by ultrahigh performance liquid chromatography, and the ABCB1 polymorphism was analyzed through polymerase chain reaction-fluorescence staining in situ hybridization. The χ2 test and the Fisher exact test were used to analyze the allelic and genotypic distributions of ABCB1 polymorphisms between the drug-resistant and drug-responsive patient groups. Differences in steady-state and dose-corrected LCM serum concentrations between different genotypes were analyzed using the one-way analysis of variance and the Mann-Whitney test.. A total of 131 Uygur children with epilepsy were analyzed, and of them, 41 demonstrated drug resistance. The frequency of the GT genotype of ABCB1 G2677T/A was significantly higher in the drug-resistant group than that in the drug-responsive group (P < 0.05, OR = 1.966, 95% CI, 1.060-3.647). Patients with the G2677T/A-AT genotype had a statistically significantly lower concentration-to-dose (CD) value than patients with the G2677T/A-GG genotype (mean: 0.6 ± 0.2 versus 0.8 ± 0.5 mcg/mL per mg/kg, P < 0.001). Significantly lower LCM serum concentrations were observed in ABCB1 C3435T CT and TT genotype carriers than those in the CC carriers (P = 0.008 and P = 0.002), and a significantly lower LCM CD value was observed in ABCB1 C3435T CT genotype carriers than that in the CC carriers (P = 0.042).. ABCB1 G2677T/A and C3435T polymorphisms may affect LCM serum concentrations and treatment efficacy in Uygur pediatric patients with epilepsy, leading to drug resistance in pediatric patients.

Topics: ATP Binding Cassette Transporter, Subfamily B; Child; Epilepsy; Gene Frequency; Genotype; Haplotypes; Humans; Lacosamide; Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide

We explored the efficacy and safety of lacosamide combined with inhibitors of fast-inactivated sodium channels or with other antiepileptic drugs, in patients with drug refractory focal epilepsy associated with intellectual or psychiatric disability.. Observational study of lacosamide including the monitoring of lacosamide trough plasma levels and of electroencephalograms.. Lacosamide add-on allowed dose reduction of previous therapies and reduced the frequency of seizures, showing good tolerability even at high doses, without exceeding reference plasma levels.

Topics: Adult; Anticonvulsants; Drug Resistant Epilepsy; Drug Therapy, Combination; Epilepsy; Humans; Lacosamide; Treatment Outcome

During pregnancy in women with epilepsy, lower blood concentrations of antiseizure medications can have adverse clinical consequences.. To characterize pregnancy-associated concentration changes for several antiseizure medications among women with epilepsy.. Enrollment in this prospective, observational cohort study, Maternal Outcomes and Neurodevelopmental Effects of Antiepileptic Drugs (MONEAD), occurred from December 19, 2012, to February 11, 2016, at 20 US sites. Enrolled cohorts included pregnant women with epilepsy and nonpregnant control participants with epilepsy. Inclusion criteria were women aged 14 to 45 years, an intelligence quotient greater than 70 points, and, for the cohort of pregnant women, a fetal gestational age younger than 20 weeks. A total of 1087 women were assessed for eligibility; 397 were excluded and 230 declined. Data were analyzed from May 1, 2014, to June 30, 2021.. Medication plasma concentrations in women taking monotherapy or in combination with noninteracting medications. The cohort of pregnant women was monitored through 9 months post partum, with similar time points for control participants.. Dose-normalized concentrations were calculated as total or unbound plasma medication concentrations divided by total daily dose. Phlebotomy was performed during 4 pregnancy study visits and 3 postpartum visits for the pregnant women and 7 visits over 18 months for control participants. The primary hypothesis was to test pregnancy changes of dose-normalized concentrations from nonpregnant postpartum samples compared with those of control participants.. Of the 351 pregnant women and 109 control participants enrolled in MONEAD, 326 pregnant women (median [range] age, 29 [19-43] years) and 104 control participants (median [range] age, 29 [16-43] years) met eligibility criteria for this analysis. Compared with postpartum values, dose-normalized concentrations during pregnancy were decreased by up to 56.1% for lamotrigine (15.60 μg/L/mg to 6.85 μg/L/mg; P < .001), 36.8% for levetiracetam (11.33 μg/L/mg to 7.16 μg/L/mg; P < .001), 17.3% for carbamazepine (11.56 μg/L/mg to 7.97 μg/L/mg; P = .03), 32.6% for oxcarbazepine (11.55 μg/L/mg to 7.79 μg/L/mg; P < .001), 30.6% for unbound oxcarbazepine (6.15 μg/L/mg to 4.27 μg/L/mg; P < .001), 39.9% for lacosamide (26.14 μg/L/mg to 15.71 μg/L/mg; P < .001), and 29.8% for zonisamide (40.12 μg/L/mg to 28.15 μg/L/mg; P < .001). No significant changes occurred for unbound carbamazepine, carbamazepine-10,11-epoxide, and topiramate, although a decrease was observed for topiramate (29.83 μg/L/mg to 13.77 μg/L/mg; P = .18). Additionally, compared with dose-normalized concentrations from control participants, pregnancy dose-normalized median (SE) concentrations decreased significantly by week of gestational age: carbamazepine, -0.14 (0.06) μg/L/mg (P = .02); carbamazepine unbound, -0.04 (0.01) μg/L/mg (P = .01); lacosamide, -0.23 (0.07) μg/L/mg (P < .001); lamotrigine, -0.20 (0.02) μg/L/mg (P < .001); levetiracetam, -0.06 (0.03) μg/L/mg (P = .01); oxcarbazepine, -0.14 (0.04) μg/L/mg (P < .001); oxcarbazepine unbound, -0.11 (0.03) μg/L/mg (P < .001); and zonisamide, -0.53 (0.14) μg/L/mg (P < .001) except for topiramate (-0.35 [0.20] μg/L/mg per week) and carbamazepine-10,11-epoxide (0.02 [0.01] μg/L/mg).. Study results suggest that therapeutic drug monitoring should begin early in pregnancy and that increasing doses of these anticonvulsants may be needed throughout the course of pregnancy.

Topics: Adult; Anticonvulsants; Carbamazepine; Epilepsy; Female; Humans; Lacosamide; Lamotrigine; Levetiracetam; Oxcarbazepine; Pregnancy; Prospective Studies; Topiramate; Zonisamide

The relationship between treatment efficacy/tolerability and the dose/blood concentration of lacosamide (LCM) was investigated in a clinical cohort of Japanese pediatric patients with epilepsy.. This retrospective analysis reviewed the medical records of patients treated with LCM for >6 months at the Department of Pediatrics, Hiroshima University Hospital, from September 2017 to January 2021. The collected data included age, sex, epilepsy type, seizure type, seizure frequency before and after treatment initiation, adverse events leading to LCM discontinuation, dose at any evaluation point, serum concentration, and concomitant antiepileptic drugs (AEDs).. The study included 51 patients (31 male patients) between the ages of 2 and 19 years. All patients were Japanese. Epilepsy was classified as focal in 44 patients, generalized in six patients, and combined generalized and focal in one patient. The 50% responder rate for LCM treatment was 56.9%. Seven patients experienced complete seizure control (absence of seizures for 6 months before the follow-up visit). A relationship between dose and blood concentration was identified. Although the blood LCM concentration was higher in the responders than in the nonresponders (7.86 vs. 6.16 μg/mL; p = 0.028), there was no significant difference in dose between the two groups. Lacosamide showed efficacy at a dose >5 mg/kg/day in more than half of the 50% responders. The treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) included seizure aggravation in five patients, irritability in two patients, and somnolence and drug eruption in one patient each. In six patients with TEAEs, the TEAEs developed within 1 month after treatment initiation and led to LCM discontinuation.. In Japanese pediatric patients with epilepsy, LCM treatment is effective, particularly at higher doses. The blood concentration may be related more to efficacy than to dose. Lacosamide is generally well-tolerated by pediatric patients, and should be used at the maximum tolerable dose (needed to be gradually increased) in patients with otherwise insufficient seizure control. As TEAEs leading to discontinue treatment likely occur in early phase, it is needed to monitor patients carefully if TEAEs would happen in that phase.

Topics: Acetamides; Adolescent; Anticonvulsants; Child; Child, Preschool; Drug Therapy, Combination; Epilepsies, Partial; Epilepsy; Female; Humans; Japan; Lacosamide; Male; Retrospective Studies; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult

This study was undertaken to characterize antiseizure medication (ASM) treatment pathways in Medicare beneficiaries with newly treated epilepsy.. This was a retrospective cohort study using Medicare claims. Medicare is the United States' federal health insurance program for people aged 65 years and older plus younger people with disabilities or end-stage renal disease. We included beneficiaries with newly treated epilepsy (International Classification of Diseases codes for epilepsy/convulsions 2014-2017, no ASM in the previous 2 years). We displayed the sequence of ASM fills using sunburst plots overall, then stratified by mood disorder, age, and neurologist prescriber. We tabulated drug costs for each pathway.. We included 21 458 beneficiaries. Levetiracetam comprised the greatest number of pill days (56%), followed by gabapentin (11%) and valproate (8%). There were 22 288 unique treatment pathways. The most common pathways were levetiracetam monotherapy (43%), gabapentin monotherapy (10%), and valproate monotherapy (5%). Gabapentin was the most common second- and third-line ASM. Whereas only 2% of pathways involved first-line lacosamide, those pathways accounted for 19% of cost. Gabapentin and valproate use was increased and levetiracetam use was decreased in beneficiaries with mood disorders compared to beneficiaries without mood disorders. Levetiracetam use was increased and gabapentin, valproate, lamotrigine, and topiramate use was decreased in beneficiaries aged >65 years compared with those aged 65 years or less. Lamotrigine, levetiracetam, and lacosamide use was increased and gabapentin use was decreased in beneficiaries whose initial prescriber was a neurologist compared to those whose prescriber was not a neurologist.. Levetiracetam monotherapy was the most common pathway, although substantial heterogeneity existed. Lacosamide accounted for a small percentage of ASMs but a disproportionately large share of cost. Neurologists were more likely to prescribe lamotrigine compared with nonneurologists, and lamotrigine was prescribed far less frequently than may be endorsed by guidelines. Future work may explore patient- and physician-driven factors underlying ASM choices.

Topics: Aged; Anticonvulsants; Epilepsy; Gabapentin; Humans; Lacosamide; Lamotrigine; Levetiracetam; Medicare; Retrospective Studies; United States; Valproic Acid

Lacosamide (LCM) is a third-generation anti-seizure medication (ASM) approved for focal onset epilepsy in patients aged ≥ 4.378 Previous studies have reported an efficacy of LCM as add-on treatment in brain tumor-related epilepsy (BTRE). To date, there are no studies in the literature focusing on lacosamide used in monotherapy to treat BTRE. In our retrospective study we investigated efficacy and tolerability of LCM in monotherapy in a multicenter national cohort of primary brain tumor patients.. We collected from 12 Italian Centers 132 patients with primary brain tumors who were treated with LCM in monotherapy. For each patient we evaluated seizure freedom at 3 and 6 months (primary endpoints), side effects and drop-out rate (secondary endpoints).. Overall, LCM led to seizure freedom in 64.4% of patients at 3 months and 55% at 6 months. Patients who used two or more ASMs before LCM had a worse seizure control than patients in monotherapy with LCM as first choice. In 14 patients, we observed seizure control despite tumor progression on magnetic resonance (MRI). Multivariate analysis showed that gross-total resection at diagnosis was significantly associated with higher seizure freedom rate at 6 months. Side effects were mainly mild (grade 1-2 according to CTCAE classification) and drop-out rate was low (1.5%). Main side effects were dizziness and somnolence.. This is the first study showing a good efficacy and tolerability of LCM when used in monotherapy in BTRE. Further prospective studies are needed to confirm these preliminary data, investigating also quality of life and neurocognitive functions.

Topics: Acetamides; Anticonvulsants; Brain Neoplasms; Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions; Epilepsies, Partial; Epilepsy; Humans; Lacosamide; Quality of Life; Retrospective Studies; Seizures; Treatment Outcome

Specific antiseizure medications (ASM) would improve the outcome in post-stroke epilepsy (PSE). The aim of this multicenter observational study was to compare different antiseizure monotherapies in PSE.. We collected the data from 207 patients with PSE who did not change their initial antiseizure monotherapy during the period of 12 months. Efficacy was assessed by a standardized three month seizure frequency and seizure freedom. Safety was estimated by the reported side effects.. The mean three month seizure frequency was 1.9 ± 3.1 on eslicarbazepine, 2.1 ± 3.2 on lacosamide, 3.4 ± 4.4 on levetiracetam, 4.3 ± 6.8 on lamotrigine, and 5.1 ± 7.3 on valproate (p < 0.05 for eslicarbazepine or lacosamide in comparison with levetiracetam, lamotrigine and valproate, respectively). The lowest seizure frequency and the highest seizure freedom was observed on ASMs acting via the slow inactivation of sodium channels in comparison to other mechanisms of action (0.7 ± 0.9 vs 2.2 ± 2.4, p < 0.01). Among side effects, the most frequently reported were vertigo (25%) and tiredness (15.9%). They were similar in all investigated groups of ASM. The independent factors increasing seizure frequency that were identified in multiple regression analyses were increased size of infarction, cortical involvement, hemorrhagic transformation, neurological deficits at admission and functional impairment. Administration of ASM with the mechanism of action via the slow inactivation of sodium channels was an independent factor decreasing the seizure frequency.. Our data show that antiseizure medications acting via the slow inactivation of sodium channels, such as lacosamide and eslicarbazepine, are well tolerated and might be associated with better seizure control in PSE.

Topics: Anticonvulsants; Epilepsies, Partial; Epilepsy; Humans; Lacosamide; Lamotrigine; Levetiracetam; Seizures; Sodium Channels; Stroke; Valproic Acid

Drug treatment for children with epilepsy should, ideally, be governed by evidence from adequate and well-controlled clinical studies. However, these studies are difficult to conduct, and so direct evidence supporting the informed use of specific drugs is often lacking. The Research Roundtable for Epilepsy (RRE) met in 2020 to align on an approach to therapy development for focal seizures in children age 1 month <2 years of age.. The RRE reviewed the regulatory landscape, epidemiology, seizure semiology, antiseizure medicine pharmacology, and safety issues applicable to this population.. After reviewing evidence, the conclusion was that pediatric efficacy trials would be impracticable to conduct but a waiver of the regulatory requirement to conduct any study would lead to an absence of information to guide dosing in a critical population. Review of available data and discussion of RRE attendees led to the conclusion that the requirements for extrapolation of efficacy from older children down to infants from age 1 month to <2 years old appeared to be met. After the RRE, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved brivaracetam for use in children with focal epilepsy above the age of 1 month in August 2021 and lacosamide in October 2021, both based on the principle of extrapolation from data in older children.. These recommendations should result in more rapid accessibility of antiseizure medications for infants.

Topics: Adolescent; Anticonvulsants; Child; Epilepsies, Partial; Epilepsy; Humans; Infant; Lacosamide; Seizures

To determine the economically justifiable price (EJP) of cenobamate to become a cost-effective alternative compared with third-generation anti-seizure medications in the treatment of focal-onset seizures (FOS) in adult patients with drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE) in Spain.. Cost-effectiveness analysis compared cenobamate with brivaracetam, perampanel, eslicarbazepine acetate, and lacosamide. Markov model simulation of treatment pathway over a 60-year time horizon is presented. We determined the effectiveness and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) of health status and disutilities associated with treatment-related adverse events. Acquisition costs and use of medical resources were obtained from published literature and expert opinion. Base-case of cenobamate's EJP calculated applying a willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of €21,000/QALY. Analyses were performed at different thresholds, including dominant price scenario. Result robustness was assessed through sensitivity analyses.. Base-case shows that cenobamate's daily EJP of €7.30 is cost-effective for a threshold of €21,000/QALY. At a daily price of €5.45, cenobamate becomes dominant over all treatment alternatives producing cost-savings for the national health system (NHS). Sensitivity analyses supported the robustness of base-case findings.. Treatment with cenobamate produces incremental clinical benefit over third-generation ASMs, and at the base-case, EJP could represent a cost-effective option for the adjunctive treatment of FOS in adult patients with DRE in Spain.

Topics: Adult; Carbamates; Chlorophenols; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Epilepsy; Humans; Lacosamide; Quality-Adjusted Life Years; Spain; Tetrazoles

Many pharmacokinetic studies of lacosamide (LCM) have been reported, but no large-scale clinical study has been conducted on genetic polymorphisms that affect the metabolism of LCM. Therefore, we designed a pharmacogenetic study of LCM to explore the effect of genetic polymorphisms on serum LCM concentration. We evaluated the pharmacodynamic characteristics of LCM, including clinical efficacy and toxicity.. Adult patients with epilepsy who received LCM at Seoul National University Hospital were enrolled. Blood samples were obtained from 115 patients taking LCM for more than 1 month with unchanged doses and were used to analyze the serum LCM concentration, the concentration/dose (C/D) ratio and the single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) of the cytochrome P450 (CYP)2C9 and CYP2C19 genes. In addition, clinical information-including efficacy, toxicity, and concomitant drugs-was collected.. The serum LCM concentration showed a linear correlation with the daily dose (r = .66, p < .001). In genetic analysis, 43 patients (38.7%) were extensive metabolizers (EMs), 51 (45.9%) were intermediate metabolizers (IMs), and 17 (15.3%) were poor metabolizers (PMs). In the group comparison, mean serum concentrations and the C/D ratio showed significant differences between the three groups (p = .01 and p < .001, respectively). The C/D ratios of IM (27.78) and PM (35.6) were 13% and 39% higher than those of EM (25.58), respectively. In the pharmacodynamic subgroup analysis, patients in the ineffective LCM group had significantly lower serum concentrations (6.39 ± 3.25 vs. 8.44 ± 3.68 μg/ml, p = .024), whereas patients with adverse events had higher serum concentrations than those without adverse events (11.03 ± 4.32 vs. 7.4 ± 3.1 μg/ml, p < .001). Based on this, we suggest a reference range for LCM in the Korean population (6-9 μg/ml).. Genetic polymorphisms of the CYP2C19 gene affect the serum LCM concentration. Because efficacy and toxicity are apparently related to serum LCM levels, the genetic phenotype of CYP2C19 should be considered when prescribing LCM for patients with epilepsy.

Topics: Anticonvulsants; Cytochrome P-450 CYP2C19; Epilepsy; Humans; Lacosamide; Polymorphism, Genetic; Republic of Korea

Lacosamide is a novel antiepileptic drug. Although many antiepileptic drugs reportedly pose a risk to fetuses, patients with epilepsy are advised to continue their medications during pregnancy. There have been few reports on lacosamide use during pregnancy, and its effects on the fetus remain unclear. Here, we report a case of lacosamide use during pregnancy. The 33-year-old patient was treated with oral lacosamide (400 mg/d) for symptomatic partial epilepsy. She was concomitantly treated with folic acid (5 mg/d) beginning 4 days before her last menstrual cycle. She was also concomitantly treated with oral perampanel (2 mg/d) at 5-7 weeks' gestation for seizure control but discontinued perampanel after the pregnancy was discovered. She progressed through her pregnancy with only mild seizures. Fetal growth was normal and ultrasonography revealed no external malformations. The patient had an elective cesarean section at 37 weeks and 2 days owing to a previous post-cesarean pregnancy. Her baby boy weighed 3025 g; his Apgar score was 8 and 9, 1 and 5 min, respectively, and his umbilical artery blood pH was 7.348. He had no congenital anomalies and no neonatal drug withdrawal symptoms. This suggests that lacosamide may have a low risk of teratogenicity and fetal toxicity. Thus, this case is valuable for clinicians who are considering the administration of antiepileptic drugs during pregnancy. In the future, more reports on the use of lacosamide during pregnancy should be collected.

Topics: Adult; Anticonvulsants; Cesarean Section; Epilepsy; Female; Humans; Infant; Lacosamide; Male; Pregnancy; Seizures; Treatment Outcome

Lacosamide (LCM) is a third-generation antiepileptic drug (AED) that affects sodium channel inactivation. AEDs can affect multiple organ systems and blood parameters. Carbamazepine (CBZ) reportedly affects blood sodium, lipid, and immunoglobulin levels and thyroid function. Despite multiple studies on the adverse effects of AEDs, few reports have discussed the impact of LCM on blood parameters. The purpose of this study was to clarify the effects of LCM on blood parameters.. We retrospectively examined the medical records of 15 children and adolescents in whom LCM was initiated between April 2017 and March 2021, 6 and 12 months after treatment initiation. Blood cell counts, biochemical and thyroid function, and immunoglobulin levels were investigated at baseline and 6 and 12 months after initiation of LCM.. Neutrophil levels were significantly reduced 12 months after LCM initiation (p = 0.0046); however, the value was not abnormal. Immunoglobulin A was significantly elevated 6 and 12 months after LCM initiation (p = 0.0078 and 0.020, respectively). No significant difference was identified in the other parameters. Electrolyte and lipid levels and thyroid function remained unaffected, unlike with CBZ.. LCM may affect the immune system, as well as hematological parameters. Further investigation with larger samples is required in the future to assess the clinical impact.

Topics: Acetamides; Adolescent; Anticonvulsants; Blood Cells; Carbamazepine; Child; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Epilepsy; Humans; Immunoglobulin A; Lacosamide; Lipids; Retrospective Studies; Treatment Outcome

To examine the efficacy and tolerance of the antiseizure medications lacosamide (LCM) and levetiracetam (LEV) in patients with benign infantile epilepsy (BIE).. The clinical data of 24 children with BIE seen between 2014 and 2020 were collected retrospectively, and treatment, effectiveness, and adverse effects were examined. PRRT2 gene analysis was performed using Sanger sequencing.. Of the 24 children with BIE, 14 were treated with antiseizure medications. PRRT2 gene analysis was performed in 14 children, and mutations were identified in 4, including a pair of siblings. All five children treated with LCM became seizure-free, similar to those treated with carbamazepine. The LCM does was 2 mg/kg/day in all cases. There were no adverse effects in any patient treated with LCM. By contrast, both patients treated with LEV had seizure recurrence. In one patient, LEV was replaced with CBZ, resulting in seizure freedom.. Low-dose LCM was effective and well tolerated in patients with BIE, whereas LEV was insufficiently effective.

Topics: Anticonvulsants; Child; Epilepsy; Humans; Lacosamide; Retrospective Studies; Sodium Channel Blockers

This study has developed and validated a novel UPLC method to quantify lacosamide (LCM), oxcarbazepine (OXC), and lamotrigine (LTG) in children with epilepsy in Xinjiang, China. Phenytoin sodium was used as the internal standard. The mobile phase contained ammonium dihydrogen phosphate solution (10 mmol/L, pH = 4.0) and methanol (55:45, v/v). The flow rate, injection volume, column temperature, and detection wavelength were 0.2 mL/min, 2 μL, 30°C, and 240 nm, respectively. The method was linear within 0.5-40, 2.5-80, and 2.5-40 μg/mL for LCM, 10-hydroxycarbazepine (MHD), and LTG, respectively (r

Topics: Adolescent; Anticonvulsants; Child; Child, Preschool; China; Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid; Epilepsy; Humans; Infant; Lacosamide; Lamotrigine; Limit of Detection; Linear Models; Oxcarbazepine; Reproducibility of Results

Lacosamide (LCM) was approved in China in 2018. However, the safety of LCM has not been established in pediatric patients. Therefore, the objective of this study was to investigate its safety, efficacy, and tolerability in pediatric patients living in Uygur, Northwest China.. This is a retrospective analysis of pediatric patients diagnosed with epilepsy and on LCM therapy at a medical center. The seizure frequencies at 3, 6, and 12 months after starting LCM therapy were recorded and compared with the baseline monthly frequency. The primary outcome variables were the 50% responder and seizure-free rates. The secondary outcome variables included the terminal 6-month seizure remission and percentages of discontinuation due to a lack of efficacy and tolerability. Safety variables included the incidence and type of adverse reactions.. Seventy-two pediatric patients with epilepsy living in Uygur, China and receiving LCM treatment were included in the present study. Fifty (69%) children responded to LCM therapy with a more than 50% reduction in the frequency of seizures. Seizure-free rates increased over time, at 14%, 19%, and 20% at 3, 6, and 12 months, respectively. The number of baseline anti-seizure medications (ASMs) and order of LCM introduction significantly impacted the likelihood of seizure remission during the 12-month follow-up period (p < 0.05). During the entire period of LCM treatment, twenty-two children (30.5%) experienced at least one adverse reaction.. This retrospective study of 72 pediatric patients with epilepsy in Uygur, China, showed that LCM therapy is safe and effective for epilepsy in children, resulting in a reduction in the seizure rate.

Topics: Anticonvulsants; Child; China; Epilepsies, Partial; Epilepsy; Humans; Lacosamide; Retrospective Studies; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Anticonvulsants; Epilepsy; Female; Humans; Lacosamide; Pregnancy

Brugada syndrome may be unmasked by non-antiarrhythmic pharmaceuticals or drugs. Lacosamide is an antiepileptic agent with a novel mechanism of sodium channel inhibition and has the potential to cause cardiac sodium channel blockade.. In this report, we describe the case of patient with a history of a seizure disorder who presented with Brugada I electrocardiogram morphology in the setting of septicemia.. Brugada I electrocardiogram morphology was unmasked by lacosamide antiepileptic monotherapy.. Lacosamide therapy was discontinued.. Normalization of the electrocardiogram and resolution of Brugada morphology occurred on hospital day 1.. Caution should be exercised in the use of lacosamide in those at risk for conduction delay, or in combination therapy with medications that impair renal clearance, metabolism of lacosamide, or that display inherent sodium channel blocking properties.

Topics: Aged, 80 and over; Anticonvulsants; Brugada Syndrome; Electrocardiography; Epilepsy; Humans; Lacosamide; Male; Renal Elimination; Sepsis; Voltage-Gated Sodium Channel Blockers

Combination therapy with two or three antiseizure medications (ASMs) is sometimes a preferred method of treatment in epilepsy patients. (1) Background: To detect the most beneficial combination among three ASMs, a screen test evaluating in vivo interactions with respect to their anticonvulsant properties, was conducted on albino Swiss mice; (2) Methods: Classification of interactions among lacosamide (LCM) and selected second-generation ASMs (lamotrigine (LTG), pregabalin (PGB), oxcarbazepine (OXC), and topiramate (TPM)) was based on the isobolographic analysis in the mouse maximal electroshock-induced seizure (MES) model. Interactions among LCM and second-generation ASMs were visualized using a polygonogram; (3) Results: In the mouse MES model, synergy was observed for the combinations of LCM + TPM + PGB and LCM + OXC + PGB. Additivity was reported for the other combinations tested i.e., LCM + LTG + TPM, LCM + LTG + PGB, LCM + LTG + OXC, and LCM + OXC + TPM in this seizure model. No adverse effects associated with triple ASM combinations, containing LCM and second-generation ASMs were observed in mice; (4) Conclusions: The combination of LCM + TPM + PGB was the most beneficial combination among the tested in this study, offering synergistic suppression of tonic-clonic seizures in mice subjected to the MES model. Both the isobolographic analysis and polygonogram method can be recommended for experimental epileptology when classifying interactions among the ASMs.

Topics: Animals; Anticonvulsants; Disease Models, Animal; Drug Interactions; Drug Synergism; Drug Therapy, Combination; Electroshock; Epilepsy; Lacosamide; Lamotrigine; Male; Mice; Oxcarbazepine; Pregabalin; Seizures; Topiramate

Optimal treatment with antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) is an important part of care for brain tumor patients with epileptic seizures. Lamotrigine and lacosamide are both examples of frequently used non-enzyme inducing AEDs with limited to no drug-drug interactions, reducing the risk of unfavorable side effects. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of lamotrigine versus lacosamide.. In this multicenter study we retrospectively analyzed data of patients with diffuse grade 2-4 glioma with epileptic seizures. All patients received either lamotrigine or lacosamide during the course of their disease after treatment failure of first-line monotherapy with levetiracetam or valproic acid. Primary outcome was the cumulative incidence of treatment failure, from initiation of lamotrigine or lacosamide, with death as competing event, for which a competing risk model was used. Secondary outcomes were uncontrolled seizures after AED initiation and level of toxicity.. We included a total of 139 patients of whom 61 (44%) used lamotrigine and 78 (56%) used lacosamide. At 12 months, there was no statistically significant difference in the cumulative incidence of treatment failure for any reason between lamotrigine and lacosamide: 38% (95%CI 26-51%) versus 30% (95%CI 20-41%), respectively. The adjusted hazard ratio for treatment failure of lacosamide compared to lamotrigine was 0.84 (95%CI 0.46-1.56). The cumulative incidences of treatment failure due to uncontrolled seizures (18% versus 11%) and due to adverse events (17% versus 19%) did not differ significantly between lamotrigine and lacosamide.. Lamotrigine and lacosamide show similar effectiveness in diffuse glioma patients with epilepsy.

Topics: Anticonvulsants; Epilepsy; Glioma; Humans; Lacosamide; Lamotrigine; Retrospective Studies; Seizures; Treatment Outcome

The primary objective of this trial (SP1042; NCT02582866) was to assess long-term safety and tolerability of lacosamide monotherapy (200-600 mg/day) in adults with focal (partial-onset) seizures or generalized tonic-clonic seizures (without clear focal origin). This Phase III, long-term, open-label, multicenter, follow-up trial enrolled patients with epilepsy who were taking lacosamide in, and completed, the previous double-blind trial (SP0994; NCT01465997). Primary safety outcomes were treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), discontinuations due to TEAEs, and serious TEAEs. One hundred and six patients were enrolled and received lacosamide: 84 (79.2%) completed the trial and 22 (20.8%) discontinued. The median duration of exposure was 854.0 days, with a median modal dose of 200 mg/day. Ninety-six (90.6%), 64 (60.4%), and 44 (41.5%) patients had ≥12, ≥24, and ≥36 months of lacosamide exposure, respectively. At least one TEAE was reported by 61 (57.5%) patients. The most common (≥4%) TEAEs were headache (10 [9.4%]), nasopharyngitis (eight [7.5%]), and back pain (five [4.7%]). One (0.9%) patient discontinued due to a TEAE (sudden unexpected death in epilepsy; not considered drug-related), 14 (13.2%) patients reported serious TEAEs, and seven (6.6%) patients reported TEAEs that were considered drug-related. Overall, long-term lacosamide monotherapy was generally well tolerated up to 600 mg/day, with no new safety signals identified.

Topics: Adult; Anticonvulsants; Epilepsy; Humans; Lacosamide; Seizures; Treatment Outcome

Lacosamide (LCM) is a new antiseizure medication, and intravenous (IV) loading of LCM is recently used against status epilepticus. IV loading of LCM is usually well-tolerated; however, there are concerns about LCM-induced serious adverse cardiac events. This study was aimed at investigating whether rapid IV loading of LCM is associated with adverse cardiac or hemodynamic events in cases of epilepsy emergencies in real-world settings.. We reviewed medical records of consecutive adult epilepsy patients who received a single loading dose (400 mg) of IV LCM between January 2019 and December 2020 and included patients who exhibited status epilepticus or acute repetitive seizures. Electrocardiography findings, blood pressure, and heart rate before and after the IV infusion of LCM were collected.. Of the 85 patients included, 32.9 % (28/85 patients) had experienced at least one cardiac adverse event. The most common adverse events were new-onset first-degree atrioventricular block (19 patients) and hypotension (seven patients). Atrial fibrillation and bradycardia developed in two patients and atrial flutter in one. There were significant increases in the mean PR interval (from 169.3 msec to 184.5 msec, P < 0.01) and decreases in the mean heart rate (from 91.7 to 86.9, P = 0.01) after IV loading of LCM. Older age was significantly associated with a higher magnitude of the PR interval difference between before and after IV loading of LCM.. In cases of epilepsy emergencies, adverse cardiac events commonly developed after IV loading of LCM, although most adverse events were mild in severity or not clinically significant. Elderly patients or patients with underlying cardiac diseases were prone to exhibiting a more prolonged PR interval after IV loading of LCM. Thus, the loading dose of IV LCM should be infused under careful ECG monitoring in these patients.

Topics: Acetamides; Adult; Aged; Anticonvulsants; Epilepsy; Humans; Lacosamide; Treatment Outcome

Still considered a new ASD, teratogenicity from lacosamide (LCM) exposure during pregnancy is unknown. LCM metabolism through several cytochrome P450 enzymes and minor glucuronidation metabolism in the liver may increase during pregnancy and theoretically lead to lower LCM levels during pregnancy and the risk of increased seizures. Our objective was to determine the impact of pregnancy on serum LCM levels in a series of women with epilepsy (WWE). We identified seven pregnancies with exposure to LCM with at least one level drawn during pregnancy. Patient ages ranged from 18 to 38 years (mean 26.4 years) and total daily doses of LCM ranged from 200 to 600 mg/day. Two patients had increased dose adjustments in response to breakthrough seizures. Dose normalized concentrations (DNC) showed an overall decrease over time through each trimester (p = 0.002) and significantly lower during trimester 2 and 3 (p = 0.001 and p = 0.004, respectively) compared to pre-pregnancy levels. There were no significant changes in seizure frequency and none of the neonates had teratogenic findings at time of birth. We are the first to report a case series on the changes in LCM levels during pregnancy with significant decreased LCM DNC levels during the second and third trimesters in comparison to pre-pregnancy values.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Anticonvulsants; Epilepsy; Female; Humans; Infant, Newborn; Lacosamide; Pregnancy; Seizures; Young Adult

In our recent studies, we identified compound N-benzyl-2-(2,5-dioxopyrrolidin-1-yl)propanamide (AS-1) as a broad-spectrum hybrid anticonvulsant which showed potent protection across the most important animal acute seizure models such as the maximal electroshock (MES) test, the subcutaneous pentylenetetrazole (s.c. PTZ) test, and the 6-Hz (32 mA) test in mice. Therefore, AS-1 may be recognized as a candidate for new anticonvulsant effective in different types of human epilepsy with a favorable safety margin profile determined in the rotarod test in mice. In the aim of further pharmacological evaluation of AS-1, in the current study, we examined its activity in the 6-Hz (44 mA) test, which is known as the model of drug-resistant epilepsy. Furthermore, we determined also the antiseizure activity in the kindling model of epilepsy induced by repeated injection of pentylenetetrazole (PTZ) in mice. As a result, AS-1 revealed relatively potent protection in the 6-Hz (44 mA) test, as well as delayed the progression of kindling induced by repeated injection of PTZ in mice at doses of 15 mg/kg, 30 mg/kg, and 60 mg/kg. Importantly, the isobolographic analysis showed that a combination of AS-1 and valproic acid (VPA) at the fixed ratio of 1:1 displayed a supra-additive (synergistic) interaction against PTZ-induced seizures in mice. Thus, AS-1 may be potentially used in an add-on therapy with VPA. Moreover, incubation of zebrafish larvae with AS-1 substantially decreased the number, cumulative but not the mean duration of epileptiform-like events in electroencephalographic assay. Finally, the in vitro ADME-Tox studies revealed that AS-1 is characterized by a very good permeability in the parallel artificial membrane permeability assay test, excellent metabolic stability on human liver microsomes (HLMs), no significant influence on CYP3A4/CYP2D6 activity, and moderate inhibition of CYP2C9 in a concentration of 10 μM, as well as no hepatotoxic properties in HepG2 cells (concentration of 10 μM).

Topics: Animals; Anticonvulsants; Behavior, Animal; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Epilepsy; Ethosuximide; Lacosamide; Levetiracetam; Male; Mice; Pentylenetetrazole; Pyrrolidines; Seizures; Valproic Acid; Zebrafish

Searching for the new and effective anticonvulsants in our previous study we developed a new hybrid compound C-11 derived from 2-(2,5-dioxopyrrolidin-1-yl) propanamide. C11 revealed high efficacy in acute animal seizure models such as the maximal electroshock model (MES), the pentylenetetrazole model (PTZ) and the 6 Hz (6 Hz, 32 mA) seizure model, as well as in the kindling model of epilepsy induced by repeated injection of PTZ in mice. In the aim of further in vivo C11 characterization, in the current studies we evaluated its influence on cognitive functions, neurodegeneration and neurogenesis process in mice after chronical treatment. All experiments were performed on 6 weeks old male C57/BL mice. The following drugs were used: C11, levetiracetam (LEV), ethosuximide (ETS) and lacosamide (LCM). We analyzed proliferation, migration and differentiation of newborn cells as well as neurodegenerative changes in a mouse brain after long-term treatment with aforementioned AEDs. Additionally, we evaluated changes in learning and memory functions in response to chronic C11, LEV, LCM and ETS treatment. C11 as well as LEV and ETS did not disturb the proliferation of newborn cells compared to the control mice, whereas LCM treatment significantly decreased it. Chronic AEDs therapy did not induce significant neurodegenerative changes. Behavioral studies with using Morris Water Maze test did not indicate any disturbances in the spatial learning and memory after C11 as well as LEV and ETS treatment in comparison to the control group except LCM mice where significant dysfunctions in time, distance and direct swim to the platform were observed. Interestingly, results obtained from in vivo MRI spectroscopy showed a statistically significant increase of one of the neurometabolites- N-acetyloaspartate (NAA) for LCM and LEV mice. A new hybrid compound C11 in contrast to LCM has no negative impact on the process of neurogenesis and neurodegeneration in the mouse hippocampus. Furthermore, chronic treatment with C11 turned out to have no negative impact on cognitive functions of treated mice, which, is certainly of great importance for further more advanced preclinical and especially clinical trials.

Topics: Animals; Anticonvulsants; Brain; Cognition; Epilepsy; Ethosuximide; Hippocampus; Lacosamide; Levetiracetam; Male; Mice; Mice, Inbred C57BL; Neurogenesis; Pentylenetetrazole; Spatial Memory

Lacosamide (LCM) is an antiepileptic drug (AED) with insufficient clinical experience in patients with intellectual disability (ID). They often have more severe epilepsy with comorbidities. The objective was to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of lacosamide (LCM) in patients with refractory epilepsy with and without ID in a real-life setting, taking drug monitoring (TDM) data into account therapeutic.. Retrospectively, we identified 344 patients using LCM from the TDM service covering the majority of the country, at the National Center for Epilepsy in Norway (2013-2018). Clinical and TDM data were available for 132 patients.. Forty-four of the 132 patients (33%) had ID. The retention rate was significantly higher in the ID vs the non-ID group after 1 year (84% vs 68%, P < .05). By combining clinical and TDM data, we demonstrated that 37/38 responding patients had serum concentrations above the lower limit of the reference range (>10 µmol/L), and 16/17 with lower concentrations were non-responders. Mean serum concentration/dose ratios were similar in both groups, 0.06 and 0.07 µmol/L/mg. There were no significant differences regarding efficacy and tolerability. The risk of LCM withdrawal was significantly higher when LCM was added to sodium channel blockers, even if the latter was discontinued.. Lacosamide was generally well tolerated in patients with drug-resistant epilepsy, where one third had ID, and in these patients the retention rate was higher. The combination of clinical and TDM data could possibly facilitate LCM therapy in these vulnerable patients.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Anticonvulsants; Drug Monitoring; Epilepsy; Female; Humans; Intellectual Disability; Lacosamide; Male; Middle Aged; Sodium Channel Blockers

Lacosamide (LCM) is a third-generation anti-epileptic drug (AED) for partial-onset epilepsy with minimal hepatic metabolism and drug-drug interactions. The impact of individual patient variables such as race on drug metabolism have been under-reported in AEDs and LCM has not been specifically investigated. Our aim was to assess the role race plays on serum LCM levels in the management of epilepsy. Thus, we retrospectively reviewed patients with focal seizures who received LCM and had LCM levels as part of their routine clinical care in our Level IV Epilepsy Center. Variables including age, race, gender, LCM serum levels, LCM daily dose, and concomitant AEDs were collected and analyzed. A total of 93 patients with 1-3 clinic visits yielded 122 LCM serum levels. African Americans (AA) comprised 62.3% of our serum samples. Daily LCM doses averaged 350 mg/day (range 50-1000 mg/day). Eighty-nine percent of patients took 1-2 other AEDs. Overall, AA patients had lower LCM levels (mean 6.8 μg/mL) compared to White patients (mean of 7.1 μg/mL) (p = .017) even when considering for the daily dose effect (p = .007). Analysis of co-variables did not have significant effect on LCM levels. Overall, AA patients had a weaker relationship between LCM daily dose (adjusted for weight) and serum levels as compared to White patients and require a higher LCM dose per weight to achieve similar levels. Differences in pharmacogenetics may play an important role in these findings and focus on how these variations impact seizure burden.

Topics: Acetamides; Adult; Anticonvulsants; Epilepsy; Humans; Lacosamide; Retrospective Studies; Treatment Outcome

Ring chromosome 20 syndrome is a rare chromosomal disorder characterized by refractory seizure, mental retardation, and behavioral problems. Although there are reports of the effective treatment of patients with antiepileptic drugs (AEDs), no study has reported the effects of lacosamide(LCM) in children with this syndrome. We report a 7-year-old boy with this syndrome whose refractory and behavioral abnormalities have been remarkably improved by treatment with LCM.. The patient was a 7-year-old boy with no medical or family history of epilepsy. He developed epilepsy with cessation of movement and derivation of the eyes followed by hyperkinetic seizures that made him squeak strangely and cling to his parents. The seizures lasted for less than a minute and were frequent (they occurred more than 30 times a day), particularly at night. Behavioral abnormalities such as hyperactivity also presented. Brain magnetic resonance imaging revealed no structural abnormalities, but an interictal electroencephalogram (EEG) indicated spikes and waves in the frontal lobe dominantly, and ictal single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) revealed a blood flow increase in the bilateral orbital frontal area in comparison to interictal SPECT. After chromosome examination, we diagnosed the patient with ring chromosome 20 syndrome (4/30 mosaic). Carbamazepine was ineffective, and seizures were exacerbated with levetiracetam (LEV). LCM was added to the treatment regimen with valproic acid (VPA) and lamotrigine (LTG); consequently, the seizures disappeared, and EEG results also improved. The patient's behavioral disorders, such as hyperactivity, were improved, and he was able to return to elementary school.. Although VPA and LTG are generally effective for the treatment of ring chromosome 20 syndrome, they do not completely suppress seizures. LCM can be considered an effective option for seizure control in patients with this syndrome.

Topics: Anticonvulsants; Carbamazepine; Child; Electroencephalography; Epilepsy; Humans; Lacosamide; Lamotrigine; Levetiracetam; Male; Ring Chromosomes; Seizures; Treatment Outcome; Valproic Acid

Launching polytherapy with two or three antiseizure drugs (ASDs) in patients with epilepsy is still problematic. The choice of ASDs to combine them together is usually based on clinicians' experience and it requires knowledge about mechanisms of action of the studied ASDs and their drug-drug interactions, whose nature may be favorable, neutral or unfavorable. To characterize three-drug interaction among lacosamide (LCM), lamotrigine (LTG) and valproate (VPA), the type I isobolographic analysis was used. The antiseizure effects of three-drug combination were analyzed in a model of maximal electroshock-induced seizures (MES) in albino Swiss mice.. The seizure activity in mice was evoked by alternating current stimulation (25 mA, 500 V, 50 Hz, 0.2 s). Both, the type I isobolographic analysis and the test of parallelism of dose-response effects of the ASDs were used so as to properly classify interaction among three ASDs, administered in a fixed ratio combination of 1:1:1.. The three-drug mixture of LCM, LTG and VPA at the fixed ratio of 1:1:1 protected the experimental mice from MES-induced seizures; however, the reported interaction was sub-additive (antagonistic; p < 0.01) with isobolography.. The antagonistic pharmacodynamic interaction among LCM, LTG and VPA in the MES test in mice cannot be transferred to clinical settings and this unfavorable combination should not be recommended for patients with epilepsy.

Topics: Animals; Anticonvulsants; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Interactions; Drug Synergism; Drug Therapy, Combination; Electroshock; Epilepsy; Lacosamide; Lamotrigine; Male; Mice; Seizures; Valproic Acid

Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS) and toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN) are immune-mediated diseases characterized by an extensive loss of the epidermal skin layer, often resulting in death. SJS and TEN are often triggered by certain drugs, including antiepileptic drugs (AEDs). Epilepsy is very difficult to treat and often involves the combination of two or more AEDs. In this study, we quantified not only the risk of SJS or TEN associated with single-AED therapy but also the risk related to concomitant AED treatment using reporting-derived signals.. An analysis of the Japanese Adverse Drug Event Report (JADER) database was performed from the first quarter of 2004 to the fourth quarter of 2018. The single-AED signals were evaluated using the proportional reporting ratio (PRR), and the combination therapy signals were evaluated using Ω shrinkage measure and combination risk ratio (CRR).. SJS signals were associated with 11 AEDs, and TEN signals were related to 12 AEDs. Moreover, the following AED combinations were associated with SJS signals: carbamazepine-lorazepam (Ω. This study identified two AED combinations that increased the SJS signals and seven combinations that increased the TEN signals. Although AED monotherapies require attention for SJS and TEN, some AED combinations require extra caution.

Topics: Anticonvulsants; Carbamazepine; Clobazam; Clonazepam; Databases, Factual; Drug Therapy, Combination; Epilepsy; Gabapentin; Humans; Japan; Lacosamide; Lamotrigine; Levetiracetam; Lorazepam; Pharmacovigilance; Phenytoin; Stevens-Johnson Syndrome; Valproic Acid

Lacosamide is a novel anticonvulsant that acts by enhancing sodium channel slow inactivation. The aims of this study were to evaluate the influence of concomitant antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) on serum lacosamide concentration and explore the relationship between lacosamide serum concentration and both clinical response and adverse effects.. The authors analyzed 649 serum samples from 426 Japanese patients with epilepsy. The concentration-to-dose (CD) ratio of lacosamide was compared among patients on various AED regimens. Clinical information about seizure frequency and adverse events was obtained from clinical records.. In patients who did not receive enzyme-inducing AEDs, the CD ratio (mean ± SD) of lacosamide was 1.84 ± 0.68. By contrast, the CD ratio in patients who received phenytoin, carbamazepine, and phenobarbital was 1.42 ± 0.66 (22.8% lower), 1.46 ± 0.40 (20.7% lower), and 1.36 ± 0.38 (26.1% lower), respectively. Seventy-four patients (17.3%) achieved >50% seizure reduction. The median lacosamide concentration in patients who received and did not receive a sodium channel blocker was 6.6 mcg/mL (26.4 μmol/L) and 8.4 mcg/mL (33.6 μmol/L), respectively. Adverse events, including dizziness, somnolence, diplopia, and anorexia, were reported by 70 patients (16.4%). The incidence rate in patients treated with sodium channel blockers was significantly higher than that in patients not treated with these drugs (21.1% vs. 10.3%; P < 0.005), and the median lacosamide concentration in these patient groups was 5.1 (20.4 μmol/L) and 7.5 mcg/mL (30 μmol/L), respectively.. Therapeutic drug monitoring of lacosamide is clinically useful because it allows physicians to estimate the extent of drug interactions and adjust the dose in individual AED regimens.

Topics: Adult; Anticonvulsants; Asian People; Carbamazepine; Drug Interactions; Drug Monitoring; Drug Therapy, Combination; Epilepsy; Female; Humans; Lacosamide; Male; Phenobarbital; Phenytoin; Sodium Channel Blockers

Lacosamide is a novel antiepileptic with neuroprotective properties. The present study examined the effectiveness of Lacosamide on cognitive functioning, psychiatric symptoms, and resilience in patients of refractory partial epilepsy. This prospective study was conducted at Sheikh Zayed Hospital;Rahim Yar Khan, Nishter Hospital, Multan; and Bahawal Victoria Hospital, Bahawalpur, Pakistan, from November 2017 till May 2018.Thirty-six patients of refractory partial onset epilepsy and 36 healthy individuals particiated in the study.The participants completed brief psychiatric rating scale and brief resilience scale, while their informants completed everyday cognition questionnaire in baseline (pre-treatment) and post-Lacosamide treatment testing sessions. Patients with epilepsy had cognitive deficits, psychiatric symptoms, and lesser resilience in contrast with healthy individuals. Lacosamide treatment improved everyday cognition, reduced psychiatric symptoms and improved resilience in patients with epilepsy. Lacosamide is efficacious in the treatment of everyday cognitive impairment, psychiatric symptoms and resilience in patients with epilepsy.

Topics: Anticonvulsants; Cognition; Cognitive Dysfunction; Epilepsy; Humans; Lacosamide; Pakistan; Prospective Studies; Treatment Outcome

Lacosamide (LCM) was initially approved in Taiwan in March 2014 for use as adjunctive therapy for focal impaired awareness seizures and secondarily generalized seizures (SGS) in patients with epilepsy ≥16 years of age. The efficacy and tolerability of adjunctive LCM for the treatment of patients with focal seizures have been demonstrated in randomized, placebo-controlled trials. However, the trials do not reflect a flexible dose setting. This study (EP0063) was conducted to assess the safety and tolerability of LCM in real-world clinical practice in Taiwan. Effectiveness of LCM was also assessed as an exploratory objective.. EP0063 was a multicenter, prospective, noninterventional study with an expected observation period of 12 months ± 60 days. Eligible patients were ≥16 years of age, had focal impaired awareness seizures and/or SGS (in line with approved indication in Taiwan at the time of the study), were taking at least one concomitant antiseizure medication (ASM), and had at least one seizure in the 3 months before baseline. Patients were prescribed LCM by their treating physician in the course of routine clinical practice. The primary safety variable was treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) spontaneously reported to, or observed by, the treating physician. Based on safety data from previous studies of LCM and known side effects of other ASMs, certain TEAEs (including but not limited to cardiac and electrocardiogram, suicidality, and rash related terms) were analyzed separately. Effectiveness variables included Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGIC) and change in 28-day seizure frequency from baseline to 12 months (or final visit), and freedom from focal seizures.. A total of 171 patients were treated with LCM, of whom 139 (81.3%) completed the study. The Kaplan-Meier estimated 12-month retention was 82.9%. Patients had a mean (standard deviation [SD], range) age of 38.5 (14.0, 16-77) years, and 96 (56.1%) were male. Patients were taking a mean (SD, range) of 2.8 (1.1, 1-6) ASMs at baseline. Mean (SD, range) duration of LCM treatment was 288.7 (111.9, 2-414) days, and the mean (SD, range) daily dosage of LCM was 205.0 (82.7, 50.0-505.2) mg/day. Overall, 95 (55.6%) patients reported at least one TEAE, most commonly dizziness (33 [19.3%] patients). Drug-related TEAEs were reported in 74 (43.3%) patients, and drug-related TEAEs leading to discontinuation of LCM were reported in 14 (8.2%) patients. Two (1.2%) patients died during LCM treatment, which were considered not related to LCM. Two (1.2%) patients had suicidality-related TEAEs; these TEAEs were considered either not related to LCM or the relationship was not recorded. Rash-related TEAEs were reported in five (2.9%) patients (considered LCM-related in two patients). Based on the CGIC, at 12 months (or final visit), 109 (63.7%) patients were considered to have improved, 54 (31.6%) had no change, and the remaining eight (4.7%) were minimally worse. At 12 months (or final visit), the median percentage change in focal seizure frequency was -50.0. During the first 6 months of the study, 21 (12.3%) patients were free from focal seizures; 37 (21.6%) patients were free from focal seizures in the last 6 months of the study; and 14 (8.2%) were free from focal seizures for the full 12 months of the study.. Results of this prospective, noninterventional study suggest that adjunctive LCM was generally safe and well tolerated in this patient group in real-world practice in Taiwan. Effectiveness was also favorable, with more than 60% of patients considered to be improved by their physician at 12 months (or final visit).

Topics: Acetamides; Adult; Aged; Anticonvulsants; Drug Therapy, Combination; Epilepsy; Humans; Infant; Lacosamide; Male; Middle Aged; Prospective Studies; Taiwan; Treatment Outcome

The objective of this study was to evaluate all-cause and epilepsy-specific healthcare resource utilization and costs following lacosamide (LCM) initiation as adjunctive therapy for the treatment of epilepsy.. A noninterventional retrospective database analysis was conducted that examined patients diagnosed as having epilepsy who added LCM to existing antiepileptic drug (AED) therapy between 2009 and 2016 (the first LCM prescription was the index event). This study used a single-case design whereby patients served as their own controls. Patients were further required to have a minimum of 12 months of continuous eligibility before (preindex period) and after (postindex period) their index event. In the 12-month postindex period, the only allowed AED regimen change was the addition of LCM. Demographic and clinical characteristics were measured at index and during the preindex period, respectively. All-cause and epilepsy-specific healthcare resource utilization and costs were measured and compared in the pre- and postindex periods. Paired t- and McNemar's tests were conducted to assess the significant differences between pre- and postindex. Univariate analyses were used to analyze the impact of LCM on specific subpopulations.. The study sample comprised of 2171 patients: mean (standard deviation [SD]) age: 38.9 (19.3) years; 52.6% female. Just over half (56%) of these patients were on monotherapy before adding LCM. Prior to adding LCM, 28.8% of patients had an epilepsy-specific inpatient (IP) admission, and 35.7% of patients had an all-cause IP admission, compared with 18.2% and 26.1% of patients in the post-LCM period, respectively (both p < 0.0001). Likewise, 35.6% of patients had an epilepsy-specific emergency room (ER) visit, and 50.0% had an all-cause ER visit prior to adding LCM, compared with 23.8% and 42.1% in post-LCM, respectively (both p < 0.0001). After adding LCM, one-year mean [SD] epilepsy-specific IP admission costs decreased by 42.9% ($13,647 [$52,290] to $7788 [$32,321]), and all-cause IP admission costs decreased by 38.6% ($20,654 [$72,716] to $12,688 [$46,120]) (both p < 0.0001). One-year epilepsy-specific mean [SD] ER costs decreased by 35.2% ($691 [$1756] to $448 [$1909]; p < 0.0001), and all-cause ER cost decreased by 17.8% ($1217 [$3014] to $1000 [$2970]; p < 0.01).. Epilepsy-related IP hospitalizations and ER visits (indicators of seizures) were significantly reduced in patients with epilepsy 12 months after adding LCM as an adjunctive therapy to existing AED treatment in a real-world setting, leading to reduced healthcare resource utilization and epilepsy costs.

Topics: Adult; Anticonvulsants; Drug Therapy, Combination; Epilepsy; Female; Health Resources; Hospitalization; Humans; Lacosamide; Longitudinal Studies; Male; Middle Aged; Patient Acceptance of Health Care; Retrospective Studies; Seizures; United States; Young Adult

A combined adult and pediatric population pharmacokinetic model including covariate effects was developed; simulations were subsequently performed to guide intravenous pediatric dosing adaptations. Two pharmacokinetic trials with sparse blood sampling were conducted in children with epilepsy and two trials in healthy adults with serial blood sampling. Lacosamide plasma concentration-time data were available from 43 healthy adults (18-45 years of age; body weight 50-101 kg; n = 1735 concentration vs time records), and from 79 children with epilepsy (6 months-17 years of age; body weight 6-76 kg; n = 402 concentration vs time records), with 14, 22, 25 and 18 participants in age groups <2 years, 2 to <6 years, 6 to <12 years and 12 to <18 years, respectively. A two-compartment population pharmacokinetic model was developed using nonlinear mixed effects modeling. Plasma clearance was scaled using a fixed allometric exponent on body weight, while central volume of distribution used a freely estimated allometric exponent. The model-based pharmacokinetic predictions suggested that there is no need to adapt the recommendations regarding intravenous infusion durations in children compared with adults.

Topics: Administration, Intravenous; Adolescent; Adult; Age Factors; Anticonvulsants; Body Weight; Child; Child, Preschool; Computer Simulation; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Epilepsy; Female; Humans; Lacosamide; Male; Middle Aged; Models, Biological; Young Adult

A pediatric population pharmacokinetic model including covariate effects was developed using data from 2 clinical trials in pediatric patients with epilepsy (SP0847 and SP1047). Lacosamide plasma concentration-time data (n = 402) were available from 79 children with body weights ranging from 6 to 76 kg, and a balanced age distribution (6 months to <2 years: n = 14; 2 to <6 years: n = 22; 6 to <12 years: n = 25; 12 to <18 years: n = 18). A single-compartment population pharmacokinetic model with first-order absorption and elimination described the data adequately. Plasma clearance was modeled using allometric scaling on body weight with a freely estimated allometric exponent, while volume of distribution used a fixed theoretical allometric exponent. Covariate search identified a significant effect of enzyme-inducing antiepileptic drugs resulting in a 35% decrease in lacosamide average plasma concentration. No additional effects on clearance could be attributed to race, sex, age, or renal function. Different dosing adaptation schemes by body weight bands were simulated to approximate, in pediatric patients aged 4 to 17 years, the same average plasma concentration as in adult patients receiving the maximum recommended lacosamide daily dose.

Topics: Adolescent; Age Factors; Anticonvulsants; Body Weight; Child; Child, Preschool; Clinical Trials as Topic; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Epilepsy; Female; Humans; Infant; Lacosamide; Male; Models, Biological

The indication for the antiepileptic drug lacosamide (LCM) was recently extended to include children from the age of 4 years. Real-life data on the use and serum concentrations of LCM in children and adolescents are limited. The purpose of this study was to investigate the use of LCM in this patient group in relation to age, comedication, dose, serum concentrations and duration of treatment, and to examine pharmacokinetic variability.. Children and adolescents (<18 years) who had serum concentrations of LCM measured from January 2012 to June 2018 were retrospectively identified from the therapeutic drug monitoring databases at 2 national epilepsy centers in Norway and Denmark. Clinical data were collected from request forms and medical records.. Data from 124 patients were included, 61 girls/63 boys. Weight was available for 76 patients. Median age was 15 years (range 2-17 years), dose of LCM 300 mg/d (76-600 mg/d), and serum concentration 18 µmol/L (5-138 µmol/L) [4.5 mg/L (1.3-34.5 mg/L)]. Pharmacokinetic variability was demonstrated as the concentration/(dose/kg) ratio ranged from 1.3 to 9.4 (µmol/L)/(mg/kg) and was affected by age. Polytherapy with 1-3 other antiepileptic drugs was noted in 107 patients (86%). Treatment was continued beyond 1 year in 71% (n = 45) of the 63 patients where such information was available, and all of these 45 patients had serum concentrations within the defined reference range. The 1-year retention rate was higher in patients not concomitantly using other sodium channel-blocking drugs (82% versus 56%).. The study demonstrates pharmacokinetic variability in and between age groups, which indicates usefulness of therapeutic drug monitoring. More than two-thirds of patients continued treatment beyond 1 year, suggesting reasonable effectiveness.

Topics: Adolescent; Anticonvulsants; Child; Child, Preschool; Denmark; Drug Monitoring; Drug Therapy, Combination; Epilepsy; Female; Humans; Lacosamide; Male; Norway; Retrospective Studies

Lacosamide (LCM) is a recently developed sodium channel blocker (SCB), which acts mainly on the slow activation state in sodium channels. Although LCM shares a range of dose-dependent adverse effects with traditional SCBs, it has several advantages in that it does not induce hepatic drug metabolizing enzymes and has less risk of drug interactions and idiosyncratic adverse effects.. We retrospectively analyzed the efficacy and tolerability of switching from traditional SCBs to LCM. The reason for the switch was classified as insufficient efficacy, adverse effects, or concern about metabolic derangement, resulting in conditions such as atherosclerosis and osteoporosis, with long-term use of traditional SCBs.. Seventy-five patients were switched to LCM from traditional SCBs. The overall rate of successful switching was high (81.3%, 61/75 patients). However, the success rate was strongly dependent on the reason for the switch; patients with insufficient efficacy on SCBs had less chance of a successful switch (71.8%, 28/39 patients) than those with adverse effects (89.5%, 17/19) or concerns about metabolic derangement (94.1%, 16/17, p =  0.038). Patients with insufficient efficacy were significantly younger (p =  0.004) and had a higher chance of drug-resistant epilepsy (p =  0.004) than those in the other two groups.. Our study shows that switching from traditional SCBs to LCM is usually successful and the likelihood of a successful switch is higher in patients when the reason for the switch is adverse effects or concerns about metabolic derangement on traditional SCBs.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticonvulsants; Drug Interactions; Drug Substitution; Electroencephalography; Epilepsy; Female; Humans; Lacosamide; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Male; Middle Aged; Retrospective Studies; Sodium Channel Blockers; Young Adult

Lacosamide is a third-generation antiepileptic drug. Its likely mechanism of action is via neuronal sodium channel blockade, via a unique manner compared with other antiepileptic drugs that block sodium channels. A paucity of information exists regarding lacosamide overdosage. Lacosamide overdosage is thought to cause QRS prolongation and seizures, due to its effect of sodium channel blockade. The potential efficacy of sodium bicarbonate to reverse the effects of lacosamide has not been well studied. Furthermore, prior reports of lacosamide toxicity have occurred in the setting of concomitant polypharmacy. Thus, the isolated toxic effects of the drug have not been well elucidated.. We report a case of a suspected, single-ingestion overdose on lacosamide. The patient developed signs of cardiotoxicity and seizure. WHY SHOULD AN EMERGENCY PHYSICIAN BE AWARE OF THIS?: After lacosamide overdosage, the emergency physician must be capable of acute management of subsequent lacosamide toxicity. Understanding the mechanisms of action causing toxicity due to this drug can help the clinician to anticipate the interventions that may be needed or useful to treat this potentially toxic ingestion.

Topics: Arrhythmias, Cardiac; Cardiotoxicity; Drug Overdose; Electrocardiography; Epilepsy; Female; Humans; Lacosamide; Middle Aged; Seizures; Sodium Bicarbonate

Depression is the main psychiatric comorbidity in epilepsy with an estimated prevalence between 20% and 55% and one of the main determinants of quality of life. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of lacosamide (LCM) on mood and anxiety symptoms in patients with focal onset seizures (FOS). The secondary objective was to evaluate if the potential modifications in variables were related to seizure control or to the intrinsic effect of LCM.. We performed a prospective multicenter study in 8 tertiary epilepsy centers in adults with FOS in which LCM was initiated as add-on therapy. Patients' mood and quality of life were evaluated through questionnaires and scales such as the Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II), the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI-S/T), the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), and the Quality of Life in Epilepsy-10 (QOLIE-10). Initiation of psychotropic medication was not allowed during the observation period. Patients with diagnosis of major depression or bipolar disorder were excluded. Evaluations were scheduled before LCM treatment, at 3 and 6months.. Forty-nine patients were included (51% female) with an average age of 39.5years (range 18-65). At the start of treatment with LCM, 65.3% of the patients were on treatment with one antiepileptic drug (AED). Based on BDI-II, 38.8% of patients had depressive symptoms and 46.9% according to HADS Depression (HADS-D), 63.3% of patients presented pathological levels of anxiety (STAI-S/T), and 44.9% according to HADS Anxiety (HADS-A). Quality of Life in Epilepsy-10 showed that 57.1% of patients had a relevant reduction in their quality of life. After LCM, the score on the BDI-II depression scale decreased significantly (p<0.001). Based on the STAI and HADS-anxiety scales, patients who had a pathological anxiety at baseline, significantly improved. The QOLIE-10 improved significantly over the observation period (p<0.001). At 6months, 28.3% of patients were seizure-free (67.4% were responders). The improvements on depression and anxiety scores were not statistically related to seizure control.. Lacosamide seems to have a positive effect on depressive and anxiety symptoms. Although the efficacy of LCM in seizure control was demonstrated, the antidepressant and anxiolytic effect on mood and anxiety seems to be an independent factor.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Affect; Aged; Anticonvulsants; Anxiety; Cognition; Depression; Drug Resistant Epilepsy; Epilepsy; Female; Humans; Lacosamide; Male; Middle Aged; Prospective Studies; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Quality of Life; Seizures; Surveys and Questionnaires; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult

Topics: Acetamides; Anticonvulsants; Epilepsy; Humans; Lacosamide

Reporting of 'real-world' data on efficacy and tolerability of antiepileptic medications helps to inform physicians on how newer medications perform in the clinical setting, outside of the strict regimens of clinical trials. We report our experience of prescribing lacosamide monotherapy to a diverse range of patients at our epilepsy centre.. We performed a single-centre, retrospective review of all patients who had been prescribed lacosamide monotherapy over the last 8 years. Efficacy is pragmatically reported based on reduction of seizure frequency and lacosamide retention rates.. We identified 45 patients who were commenced on lacosamide monotherapy. Intent-to-treat analysis demonstrated a 51% (n = 23) 12 month retention rate. Forty percent (n = 18) achieved a greater than 50% reduction in seizure frequency and 35.5% (n = 16) became seizure free.. We report real-world data showing a significant reduction in seizure frequency, a moderate rate of retention and an excellent side effect profile in our cohort of patients prescribed lacosamide monotherapy.

Topics: Anticonvulsants; Cohort Studies; Epilepsy; Female; Humans; Lacosamide; Male; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Acetamides; Anticonvulsants; Carbamazepine; Delayed-Action Preparations; Dibenzazepines; Epilepsy; Humans; Lacosamide

Topics: Acetamides; Anticonvulsants; Carbamazepine; Delayed-Action Preparations; Dibenzazepines; Epilepsy; Humans; Lacosamide

Epilepsy is a serious neurological disease affecting about 1% of people worldwide (65 million). Seizures are controllable with antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) in about 70% of epilepsy patients, however, there remains about 30% of patients inadequately medicated with these AEDs, who need a satisfactory control of their seizure attacks. For these patients, one of the treatment options is administration of 2 or 3 AEDs in combination.. To determine the anticonvulsant effects of a combination of 3 selected AEDs (i.e., lacosamide - LCM, lamotrigine - LTG and phenobarbital - PB) at the fixed-ratio of 1:1:1 in a mouse maximal electroshock-induced (tonic-clonic) seizure model by using isobolographic analysis.. Seizure activity was evoked in adult male albino Swiss mice by a current (sinewave, 25 mA, 500 V, 50 Hz, 0.2 s stimulus duration) delivered via auricular electrodes. Type I isobolographic analysis was used to detect interaction for the 3-drug combination.. With type I isobolographic analysis, the combination of LCM, LTG and PB (at the fixed-ratio of 1:1:1) exerted additive interaction in the mouse maximal electroshock-induced (tonic-clonic) seizure model.. The combination of LCM with LTG and PB produced additive interaction in the mouse tonicclonic seizure model, despite various molecular mechanisms of action of the tested AEDs.

Topics: Animals; Anticonvulsants; Disease Models, Animal; Drug Synergism; Drug Therapy, Combination; Epilepsy; Lacosamide; Lamotrigine; Male; Mice; Phenobarbital; Seizures

Withdrawal of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) is a standard procedure during presurgical epilepsy assessment. Rapid and, at times, even pre-hospital withdrawal of medication is performed in some centres to enhance the yield of recorded seizures during video-EEG monitoring. AED withdrawal, however, affects the propensity and speed of propagation of epileptic activity, may evoke more severe seizures, and may cause pitfalls in EEG interpretation. We report a case which had been recommended to undergo intracranial EEG recordings in order to clarify apparently discordant MRI findings and ictal EEG patterns when monitoring was performed following complete AED withdrawal. Re-evaluation to assess scalp EEG patterns at several drug levels during slow AED tapering showed a loss of localizing information with AED withdrawal due to contralateral and bitemporal spread of frontal epileptic activity. Our report demonstrates that in individual cases, rapid AED withdrawal during presurgical video-EEG monitoring can impair the validity of EEG recordings and lead to unnecessary risks and investigations during workup.

Topics: Acetamides; Anticonvulsants; Brain; Electroencephalography; Epilepsy; Humans; Lacosamide; Levetiracetam; Male; Piracetam; Preoperative Period; Seizures; Young Adult

This retrospective longitudinal study aims to compare the longer-term cognitive and behavioral side effects of adjunctive antiepileptic treatment with perampanel (PER) and lacosamide (LCM), two third generation antiepileptic drugs with suggested favorable cognitive profiles. The two drugs were monitored according to a previously established routine diagnostic protocol (Helmstaedter et al. E&B 2013;26:182-7) which facilitates the retrospective comparison of antiepileptic drug tolerability in a naturalistic outpatient setting.. Records from 94 patients were evaluated who underwent neuropsychological assessment before and under adjunctive treatment with either PER (n = 57) or LCM (n = 37). Cognition was assessed using the EpiTrack screening for executive functions and a VLMT short form for verbal memory. Subjective assessments included a German QOLIE-10 adaptation (quality of life) and an extended Adverse Events Profile (AEP). The median follow-up interval was 36 weeks.. Multivariate repeated measures statistics revealed a non-significant trend towards an interaction effect "time - treatment arm" on both executive function and memory. When analyzed separately executive functions and memory scores significantly improved under LCM (t = -2.76 p < 0.01 and t = -2.44 p < 0.05 respectively). Subjectively, PER was associated with improvements in 2/18 physiological domains and in the LCM group 1/9 cognitive domains deteriorated. Seizure freedom was achieved for five patients treated with LCM (14%) and 15 treated with PER (26%, χ. In a naturalistic outpatient setting, chronic adjunctive treatment with PER and LCM did not negatively affect cognition and LCM may even improve cognition. Neither drug increased self-reported irritability or aggression. This suggests favorable longer-term tolerability.

Topics: Acetamides; Adult; Anticonvulsants; Cognition; Drug Therapy, Combination; Epilepsy; Executive Function; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Lacosamide; Longitudinal Studies; Male; Memory; Multivariate Analysis; Neuropsychological Tests; Nitriles; Outpatients; Pyridones; Quality of Life; Retrospective Studies; Treatment Outcome

Electronic health record (EHR) databases are a potential source for conducting research to generate real world evidence on patient outcomes. The objective of the study was to evaluate the feasibility of using EHR data to assess seizure outcomes in patients treated with lacosamide (LCM) monotherapy.. This was a retrospective cohort study conducted using the Optum clinical EHR database. The study sample comprised patients ≥17 years of age with epilepsy or seizures and treated with LCM monotherapy between 1 January 2009 and 31 December 2013. Structured and unstructured data from prescribed medication and abstracted physician note records were used to identify patients with epilepsy treated with LCM monotherapy and measure seizure frequency outcomes. The index date was the first date of LCM monotherapy, with a 6-month baseline period. Patients were observed for up to 12 months beginning on the index date (follow-up period). The EHR data were not sufficient to compute days supply and explicit duration of LCM and other antiepileptic drug (AED) therapies; therefore, LCM monotherapy was estimated from prescription dates of AEDs. Outcomes were change in seizures per month or change in seizure frequency category from baseline to follow-up. Descriptive statistics were used to describe baseline characteristics and study outcomes.. A total of 10,988 patients with at least one LCM prescription were identified during the study period, 470 of whom met all the selection criteria and were included in the study sample. Although many patients had abstracted physician note records that referred to their seizures, only 3.2% of the patients had seizure frequency information that could be used to quantify the number of seizures per month in both the baseline and follow-up periods; thus, this information could not be used to assess the effectiveness of LCM monotherapy on seizure outcomes.. Lacosamide monotherapy effectiveness was not estimated because the EHR prescription record data did not have sufficient information on days supply. Additionally, most patients' records did not contain adequate information to allow for evaluation of quantitative changes in seizure frequency based on the number of seizures per month. More studies are needed to validate these study findings.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Anticonvulsants; Cohort Studies; Electronic Health Records; Epilepsy; Female; Humans; Lacosamide; Male; Middle Aged; Retrospective Studies; Seizures; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult

Lacosamide (LCM) is a new antiepileptic drug (AED). The purpose of the study was to investigate the effects of LCM dose, body weight, height, sex, age, and concomitant AEDs on LCM trough serum concentrations (at a steady state) in patients with epilepsy.. A total number of 3154 blood samples of 973 consecutive patients of the Mara Hospital (Bethel Epilepsy Centre) were evaluated. Generalized estimating equation (GEE) models were used for statistical analyses.. GEE analyses showed that LCM trough serum concentrations were significantly correlated with the body weight-normalized LCM dose (range: 0.44-25.7 mg/kg; 45-1050 mg) and significantly dependent on comedication and age. Compared with adults (18-60 years), the LCM trough serum concentrations of children aged 6-12 years and children younger than 6 years were significantly lower (-21% to -38%, respectively) and those of elderly patients (>60 years) were significantly higher (+20%). Sex had no significant influence. Carbamazepine, phenytoin, primidone, phenobarbital, and methsuximide decreased LCM trough serum concentrations significantly by 30%, 32%, 34%, 39%, and 41%, respectively, whereas other AEDs (eg, oxcarbazepine, eslicarbazepine acetate, valproate) had no significant or only a minor impact (zonisamide) on LCM trough concentrations. In children, the effect of enzyme-inducing AEDs was more marked. Of note, the number of blood samples (n = 151) of patients younger than 12 (n = 78) was comparatively low. Alternative GEE models confirmed the effect of comedication, whereas the effect of age, especially in children, depended on adjustment of LCM dosage to body weight, body surface area, or approximated volume of distribution.. In accordance with previous therapeutic drug monitoring studies, our results confirmed that enzyme inducers reduce the LCM trough serum concentrations by 30%-40%. In children, the effects of comedication are more pronounced but should be confirmed by further studies.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Age Factors; Anticonvulsants; Child; Child, Preschool; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Interactions; Epilepsy; Female; Humans; Lacosamide; Male; Middle Aged; Models, Biological; Retrospective Studies; Young Adult

Therapeutic doses of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) may alter EEG background activity, which is considered an index of the functional state of the brain. Quantitative analysis (qEEG) of EEG background activity is a valid instrument to assess the effects of many centrally active drugs on the central nervous system, including AEDs. Lacosamide (LCM) is a new AED that could be a valid therapeutic choice in patients with brain tumor-related epilepsy (BTRE).. We used qEEG to analyze the possible effect of LCM as an add-on, on background EEG activity after 4 months in patients with BTRE.. We consecutively recruited sixteen patients with BTRE: Five dropped out for disease progression, five for scarce compliance, and six completed the study. For these reasons qEEG was performed at first visit and after 4 months only in six patients. For all frequency bands, LCM revealed no changes of mean relative power during rest with eyes closed, hyperpnoea (HP), and mental arithmetic task (MA); significant increment was found only in the theta mean relative power during opening and closing eyes (BR). After four months of therapy with LCM, one patient was seizure free, four had a seizure reduction ≥50%, and one showed a worsening in seizure frequency <50%.. Despite the limitation of a small series, these findings suggest that LCM seems to have only a mild interference on EEG background activity and confirm that LCM has a good efficacy on seizure control in patients with BTRE. This is the first study that evaluates the effect of LCM on background EEG activity, using qEEG in BTRE patients. Future research in this area could include prospective studies with qEEG for a longer follow-up period to assess the impact of AEDs on brain functions in this particular fragile patient population.

Topics: Adult; Anticonvulsants; Brain Neoplasms; Disease Progression; Electroencephalography; Epilepsy; Female; Glioma; Humans; Lacosamide; Male; Middle Aged; Psychological Tests; Research Design; Rest; Seizures

Voltage-gated sodium channel alpha subunit 2 (SCN2A) gene mutations are associated with neonatal seizures and a wide range of epilepsy syndromes. Previous reports suggest that traditional sodium channel blockers (SCBs) such as phenytoin, carbamazepine, and lamotrigine have a beneficial effect on SCN2A-related neonatal seizures, as they counteract the gain-of-function effect of mutated Nav1.2 channels. Additionally, SCBs are beneficial against other sodium and potassium channel-related neonatal seizures. There are, however, few reports describing the effect of the new SCB lacosamide against neonatal and infantile epileptic seizures. We report herein two neonates with intractable neonatal seizures with SCN2A pathogenic missense variants. Both infants showed temporary seizure relief following IV administrations of phenytoin, but were resistant to a combination of antiepileptic drugs, while complete seizure control was achieved following lacosamide administration. We suggest that SCBs, e.g. phenytoin, should be introduced early for refractory neonatal seizures of non-lesional and presumably genetic origin. If any beneficial response to a SCB is noted, this should prompt an initiation of additional SCBs. New clinical trials will provide data on the efficacy and safety of the new SCB lacosamide for genetic neonatal seizures and perhaps neonatal seizures in general.

Topics: Drug Resistant Epilepsy; Electroencephalography; Epilepsy; Female; Humans; Infant, Newborn; Infant, Newborn, Diseases; Lacosamide; Male; Mutation, Missense; NAV1.2 Voltage-Gated Sodium Channel; Spasms, Infantile; Voltage-Gated Sodium Channel Blockers

Psychiatric comorbidities are common in people with epilepsy. A retrospective study of characteristics associated with withdrawal due to psychiatric side effects was undertaken in patients with treated epilepsy participating in prospective audits with new antiepileptic drugs (AEDs). A total of 1058 treated patients with uncontrolled seizures (942 focal-onset seizures, 116 generalized genetic epilepsies [GGEs]) participated in eight prospective, observational audits from 1996 to 2014. These patients were prescribed adjunctive topiramate (n=170), levetiracetam (n=220), pregabalin (n=135), zonisamide (n=203), lacosamide (n=160), eslicarbazepine acetate (n=52), retigabine (n=64), or perampanel (n=54). Doses were titrated according to efficacy and tolerability to optimize zeizure outcomes and reduce side effects. Psychiatric comorbidities were recorded prior to and after the addition of each AED. At baseline, patients with focal-onset seizures (189 of 942; 20.1%) were statistically more likely to have psychiatric diagnoses compared to patients with GGEs (14 of 116, 12.1%; p=0.039). Following adjunctive AED treatment, neuropsychiatric adverse effects led to AED withdrawal in 1.9-16.7% of patients. Patients with a pre-treatment psychiatric history (22 of 209; 10.5%) were statistically more likely to discontinue their new AED due to psychiatric issues compared to patients with no previous psychiatric diagnosis (50 of 849; 5.9%; p=0.017). Patients receiving sodium channel blocking AEDs (4 of 212, 1.9%) were statistically less likely to develop intolerable psychiatric problems, compared to those on AEDs possessing other mechanisms of action (68 of 846, 8.0%; p=0.012). Depression was the commonest problem, leading to discontinuation of AEDs in 2.8% (n=30) patients. Aggression was statistically more common in men (11 of 527, 2.1%) compared to women (1 of 531, 0.2%; p=0.004). Patients with learning disability (12 of 122, 9.8%; p=0.0015) were statistically less likely to have psychiatric issues prior to adjunctive AED treatment compared to other patients (208 of 936, 22.2%), but there were no statistically significant differences once the new AEDs were added (8 of 122 patients with learning disability, 6.6%; 64 of 936 other patients, 6.8%). Awareness of these issues may assist clinicians in avoiding, identifying and treating psychiatric comorbidities in people with epilepsy.

Topics: Acetamides; Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticonvulsants; Dibenzazepines; Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions; Epilepsy; Female; Fructose; Humans; Lacosamide; Levetiracetam; Male; Medical Audit; Mental Disorders; Middle Aged; Nitriles; Piracetam; Pregabalin; Prospective Studies; Pyridones; Retrospective Studies; Seizures; Sodium Channel Blockers; Topiramate; Young Adult

Information on the use of lacosamide and concomitant antiepileptic and non-antiepileptic drugs (non-AEDs) is available from clinical trials and observational studies with small sample sizes. This retrospective cohort study was conducted to gain insight into the use of lacosamide in a large number of patients with epilepsy in real-life clinical practice with less restrictive selection criteria compared with clinical trial participants. The Truven Health MarketScan (Commercial Claims and Medicare Supplemental) database was used to identify patients with a prior diagnosis of epilepsy with at least one prescription claim for lacosamide between June 2009 and September 2013 and continuous health insurance enrolment with medical and pharmacy coverage during the 1-year pre-index baseline period. A total of 8859 eligible patients were identified, of whom, at index (lacosamide initiation), 16.8% received lacosamide as monotherapy and 54.0% as polytherapy. The median prescription duration was 196days (Interquartile range 69-476days). Levetiracetam was the most frequently prescribed concomitant AED across all age groups, followed by phenytoin among older (>65years) and lamotrigine among younger patients. Older patients who had LCM monotherapy at initiation, were prescribed fewer concomitant AEDs, but more non-AEDs. The most common non-AED medications were prescribed for pain, psychiatric conditions, hyperlipidemia and gastrointestinal diseases across all age groups. Overall, results suggest that the lacosamide use is driven predominantly by age and that there is substantial use of lacosamide monotherapy (16.8%), despite lack of indication at the time of the study. Results also reveal substantial use of concomitant non-AEDs; 90.4% among patients >65years of age and 54.3% among those ≤17years, confirming the high prevalence of comorbidities among patients with epilepsy across all ages. Despite the availability of numerous newer AEDs, older AEDs are still being frequently prescribed, especially for elderly patients, notably phenytoin. This warrants careful consideration, given the strong propensity of enzyme-inducing AEDs to interact with other drugs, producing unwanted side effects. These results highlight the value of real-life prescription patterns and the potential in informing treatment decisions to ensure patients receive appropriate treatment.

Topics: Acetamides; Adolescent; Adult; Age Factors; Aged; Anticonvulsants; Drug Prescriptions; Epilepsy; Female; Humans; Lacosamide; Male; Middle Aged; Retrospective Studies; United States; Young Adult

Brain tumor-related epilepsy (BTRE) is often drug resistant and patients can be forced to take polytherapy that can adversely affect their quality of life (QoL). Lacosamide (LCM) is a new antiepileptic drug (AED) used as adjunctive therapy in patients with partial seizures with or without secondary generalization, with a favorable pharmacokinetic profile that seems to be effective and well tolerated. Therefore it represents a possible therapeutic choice for patients with BTRE. We propose a prospective study with a historical control group to evaluate the effect of LCM as add-on therapy on seizure control and quality of life in patients with BTRE. This study has been designed to test the superiority of Lacosamide over Levetiracetam as an add-on. We compared a prospective cohort of 25 patients treated with Lacosamide with a historical control group (n=19) treated with Levetiracetam as an add-on.. We recruited 25 adult patients (M 18, F 7; mean age 41.9) affected by BTRE with uncontrolled partial-onset seizures treated with AED polytherapy. We added LCM as an add-on. Patients were evaluated at baseline, after 3months and at 6months. This population has been compared with a historical control group of 19 BTRE adult patients (M 13, F 6; median age 48.0, range: 28-70) with uncontrolled partial-onset seizures treated with LEV as add-on. The patients underwent QoL, mood and adverse events tests (Adverse Event Profile-AEP) and evaluation of seizure frequency.. Twelve patients had high grade gliomas, and thirteen had low grade gliomas. During follow-up, thirteen patients underwent chemotherapy, three radiotherapy and five patients had disease progression. Nine patients had simple partial seizures, eight had complex partial seizures, and eight had secondary generalized seizures. Fifteen patients were in monotherapy and ten in polytherapy with AEDs. LCM was added up to reach the maximum dosage of 400mg/die (mean final dose 300mg/die). Four patients dropped out due to poor compliance and 1 for inefficacy. In the historical control group treated with LEV (mean final dose 2000mg/die) 12 patients had high-grade gliomas, and 7 had low grade gliomas. Thirteen patients were in monotherapy and 6 in polytherapy with AEDs. In the 22 patients evaluable of 25 patients treated with LCM, we observed at final follow-up 7 patients seizure free, 12 with a significant reduction of seizures≥50%, 2 stable and 1 patient with number of seizures increased. Mean seizure frequency at baseline compared with baseline period: the mean number of seizures significantly decreased from baseline (9.4) to final follow-up (1.2) (P=0.005). The Responder Rate was 86.4%. Comparing responder rate of 22 evaluable patients with LCM with responder rate of 19 patients with LEV we didn't observe significant differences (p=0.31). In our patients treated with LCM we didn't observe significant difference at 3 and 6months in QoL tests results; we observe a significant reduction in the mean score of Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) and Barthel Index (BI) between baseline and 6months of follow-up (KPS p=0.003; BI p=0.007). No clinical side effects were observed.. Comparing the LCM with the historical group treated with LEV in add-on, we observed that LCM seems to have a higher clinical efficacy than LEV. In our patients, we did not observe any significant changes in QoL tests, indicating stability in all quality of life domains explored, despite the objective worsening in their functional status. Although this is a small series with a relatively short follow-up, our data indicates that LCM in add-on in patients with BTRE appears to be as effective as LEV in add-on, without impact on mood and quality of life.

Topics: Acetamides; Adult; Affect; Aged; Anticonvulsants; Brain Neoplasms; Drug Therapy, Combination; Epilepsies, Partial; Epilepsy; Female; Historically Controlled Study; Humans; Lacosamide; Levetiracetam; Male; Middle Aged; Outcome Assessment, Health Care; Piracetam; Prospective Studies; Quality of Life

This study aimed to analyze the retention rate of lacosamide (LCM) in patients with epilepsy and intellectual disabilities (IDs), to identify factors influencing retention rate, and to investigate the LCM retention rate with and without concomitant sodium channel blocker (SCB). We hypothesized that the retention rate of LCM with concomitant SCB would be lower than without SCB.. Using the Kaplan-Meier estimator, we conducted a monocentric, retrospective, observational, open-label study to evaluate LCM retention rates in patients with IDs and drug-resistant epilepsy. In addition, the impact of therapy-related variables on the long-term retention of LCM was evaluated.. One hundred thirty-six subjects with IDs and drug-resistant epilepsy were included (age 2-66 years); most patients had focal epilepsy. Long-term retention rates were 62.0% at 1 year, 43.7% at 2 years, and 29.1% at 3 and 4 years. Reasons for LCM discontinuation included insufficient therapeutic benefits (69%), adverse events (11%), or a combination of both factors (8%). The LCM retention rate was influenced by the number of background antiepileptic drugs (AEDs). An additional and independent influence of concomitant therapy with SCB on retention rate could not be confirmed.. One of the major challenges in medically caring for patients with epilepsy and IDs is the high rate of drug resistance. However, there is a lack of evidence-based information about the efficacy and tolerability of AEDs in this population. It has been shown that concomitant SCB use is a key factor in increasing the risk of LCM failure in children with epilepsy. This finding has not been replicated in our predominantly adult sample of patients with IDs.

Topics: Acetamides; Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Anticonvulsants; Child; Child, Preschool; Drug Resistant Epilepsy; Drug Therapy, Combination; Epilepsies, Partial; Epilepsy; Female; Humans; Intellectual Disability; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Lacosamide; Longitudinal Studies; Male; Medication Adherence; Middle Aged; Retrospective Studies; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult

Lacosamide (LCM) is a third-generation antiepileptic drug (AED) for which there is limited experience in the treatment of elderly patients with epilepsy. This study was performed to evaluate the use of LCM in this particular patient group, focusing on its tolerability and effectiveness. This is a retrospective, single-center study, in patients over 60years old treated with LCM between 1/2010 and 5/2015. Altogether, 233 elderly patients receiving LCM were identified; of these, 67 fulfilled the inclusion criteria, i.e., LCM administered for at least 2weeks.. Lacosamide was initiated for acute seizure disorders (prolonged complex partial seizures, recurrent seizures, or status epilepticus) in 54 patients (81%) and for chronic epilepsy in 13 patients in an outpatient setting. The mean follow-up period for LCM treatment was 14months. The mean daily dose of LCM at the end of follow-up was 368mg (range: 100-600) for those 57 patients that continued treatment. Ten patients (15%) stopped LCM treatment but none because of lack of efficacy and only three patients (4%) because of side effects. The most frequent side effects were dizziness, fatigue, and tremor.. Lacosamide was well tolerated even at relatively high doses and in combination therapy.

Topics: Acetamides; Age Factors; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticonvulsants; Epilepsy; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Lacosamide; Male; Middle Aged; Retrospective Studies; Treatment Outcome

Despite significant progress in developing new drugs for seizure control, epilepsy still affects 1% of the global population and is drug-resistant in more than 30% of cases. To improve the therapeutic efficacy of epilepsy medication, a promising approach is to deliver anti-epilepsy drugs directly to affected brain areas using local drug delivery systems. The drug delivery systems must meet a number of criteria, including high drug loading efficiency, biodegradability, neuro-cytocompatibility and predictable drug release profiles. Here we report the development of fibre- and sphere-based microcapsules that exhibit controllable uniform morphologies and drug release profiles as predicted by mathematical modelling. Importantly, both forms of fabricated microcapsules are compatible with human brain derived neural stem cells and differentiated neurons and neuroglia, indicating clinical compliance for neural implantation and therapeutic drug delivery.

Topics: Acetamides; Capsules; Cell Differentiation; Cell Survival; Drug Carriers; Drug Liberation; Electricity; Epilepsy; Humans; Lacosamide; Lactic Acid; Materials Testing; Microspheres; Neural Stem Cells; Polyglycolic Acid; Polylactic Acid-Polyglycolic Acid Copolymer

Acute seizures are common in critically ill children. These patients would benefit from intravenous anti-seizure medications with few adverse effects. We reviewed the usage and effects of intravenous lacosamide in critically ill children with seizures or status epilepticus.. This retrospective series included consecutive patients who received at least one dose of intravenous lacosamide from April 2011 to February 2016 in the pediatric intensive care unit of a quaternary care children's hospital, including patients with new lacosamide initiation and continuation of outpatient oral lacosamide. Dosing and prescribing practices were reviewed. Adverse effects were defined by predefined criteria, and most were evaluated during the full admission.. We identified 51 intensive care unit admissions (47 unique patients) with intravenous lacosamide administration. Lacosamide was utilized as a third or fourth-line anti-seizure medication for acute seizures or status epilepticus in the lacosamide-naïve cohort. One patient experienced bradycardia and one patient experienced a rash that were considered potentially related to lacosamide. No other adverse effects were identified, including no evidence of PR interval prolongation.. Lacosamide was well tolerated in critically ill children. Further study is warranted to evaluate the effectiveness of earlier lacosamide use for pediatric status epilepticus and acute seizures.

Topics: Acetamides; Adolescent; Anticonvulsants; Child; Child, Preschool; Cohort Studies; Critical Illness; Electroencephalography; Epilepsy; Female; Humans; Infant; Infant, Newborn; Injections, Intravenous; Lacosamide; Male; Retrospective Studies

We describe the effectiveness of lacosamide as adjunctive therapy in patients with epilepsy and an intellectual disability. This information is relevant, as few data exist pertaining to this population with a high prevalence of (intractable) epilepsy.. We performed a retrospective study in three specialised institutions. Inclusion criteria were (1) focal onset or symptomatic generalized (2) therapy-resistant epilepsy, (3) intellectual disability and (4) residence in a care-facility for people with intellectual disabilities (PWID). The primary outcome variables were the retention rates of lacosamide, estimated through Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. Secondary outcomes were reported seizure control, side effects and clinical factors influencing discontinuation.. One hundred and thirty-two patients were included. The median retention time of lacosamide in our cohort was four years. The estimated one-, two- and three-year retention rates of lacosamide were 64%, 57% and 56% respectively. Severity of intellectual disability and seizure type did not influence whether lacosamide was continued. In 48.5% of patients, a reduction of seizure activity was reported. Side effects were at least part of the reason for discontinuing treatment in 26.5% of all patients. Common side effects were tiredness/somnolence (in 30.3%), aggression/agitation (24.2%), and instable gait (15.2%). Five deaths during follow-up were considered unlikely to be related to the use of lacosamide. One patient died unexpectedly within two months of treatment onset, probably this was a case of SUDEP.. These retention rates of lacosamide in PWID are similar to rates of previously registered anti-epileptic drugs in PWID. Behavioural side effects were noted in a high proportion compared to the general literature on lacosamide. Other side effects were in line with this literature. Lacosamide seems effective and safe for PWID and refractory epilepsy.

Topics: Acetamides; Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Anticonvulsants; Epilepsy; Female; Humans; Intellectual Disability; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Lacosamide; Longitudinal Studies; Male; Middle Aged; Retrospective Studies; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult

In most cases, the etiology of epilepsy is unknown, although some individuals may develop epilepsy as a result of certain brain injuries, following a stroke, a brain tumor or because of drugs and alcohol. Even some rare genetic mutations may be related to the onset of the condition. Seizures are the result of excessive and abnormal activity of neurons in the cerebral cortex. In this case report we show a clinical case of refractory epilepsy due to pain related to uncontrolled dysmenorrhea. The patient, 43 yrs old, had a history of epilepsy of 20 years and ovarian cancer. She was treated with lamotrigine, clonazepam and levomepromazina maleato. At admission the patient shew seizures due to pain related to dysmenorrhea. In emergency we treated with verapamil hydrochloride 10 mg ev, subsequently verapamil hydrochloride 20 mg in 250 ml of saline solution as maintenance dose. Then we decided to administer a loading dose of 100 mg cpr of Lacosamide to stop the treatment with verapamil hydrochloride. With Lacosamide we solved the seizures in 24 hours.

Topics: Acetamides; Adult; Anticonvulsants; Dysmenorrhea; Epilepsy; Female; Humans; Lacosamide

Monitoring serum levels of lacosamide, other than to establish individualized reference ranges may be helpful in several settings, including patients with liver and/or kidney failure or settings that may result in altered pharmacokinetic characteristics and to assess patients' compliance with therapy. In this study, the EurekaOne liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) method (in use method) and the ARK immunoassay method (new method) for lacosamide monitoring were compared.. Lacosamide concentrations were determined in 39 patient samples using (1) antiepileptic drug LC-MS/MS kit by EurekaOne on a Thermo Fisher Scientific TSQuantum Access Max system and (2) the lacosamide immunoassay by ARK Diagnostic Inc. (research use only kit), on a Abbott Architect System.. Measured total imprecision of the new method is 6.29% at 6.59 μmol/L, 8.82% at 30.20 μmol/L, and 6.45% at 64.51 μmol/L. Passing-Bablok regression analysis showed a nonsignificant intercept of -0.03015 [95% confidence interval (CI), -1.2243 to 0.8593] and a slope of 1.05 (95% CI, 0.9973-1.1166), showing that the method does not deviate from linearity and absence of proportional systematic error. Bland-Altman analysis showed a systematic bias of -3.296% (95% CI, -5.81 to -0.78) with 95% of the LC-MS/MS-ARK mean % of differences ranging from -18.5 to 11.9. Despite this bias, data of the combined imprecision of the 2 methods show that the new method is still acceptable within the maximum allowable error of 15%.. The performance of the new ARK method on the Architect system is acceptable and may be used routinely to measure serum lacosamide concentration in the clinic although the nature of the bias has to be carefully addressed.

Topics: Acetamides; Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Anticonvulsants; Child; Chromatography, Liquid; Drug Monitoring; Epilepsy; Female; Humans; Immunoassay; Lacosamide; Male; Mass Spectrometry; Middle Aged; Social Validity, Research; Young Adult

Lamotrigine (LTG) is a popular modern antiepileptic drug (AED), however, its mechanism of action has yet to be fully understood, as it is known to modulate many members of several ion channel families. In heterologous systems, LTG inhibits Cav2.3 (R-type) calcium currents, which contribute to kainic-acid- (KA) induced epilepsy in vivo. To gain insight into the role of R-type currents in LTG drug action in vivo, we compared the effects of LTG to topiramate and lacosamide in Cav2.3-deficient mice and controls on KA-induced seizures.. Behavioral seizure rating and quantitative electrocorticography were performed after injection of 20 mg/kg [and 30 mg/kg] KA. One hour before KA injection, mice were pretreated with either 30 mg/kg LTG, 50 mg/kg topiramate (TPM) or 30 mg/kg lacosamide (LSM).. Ablation of Cav2.3 reduced total seizure scores by 28.6% (p=0.0012) and pretreatment with LTG reduced seizure activity of control mice by 23.2% (p=0.02). In Cav2.3-deficient mice LTG pretreatment increased seizure activity by 22.1% (p=0.018) and increased the percentage of degenerated CA1 pyramidal neurons (p=0.02). All three tested AEDs reduced seizure activity in control mice, however only the non-calcium channel modulating AED, LSM had an anticonvulsive effect in Cav2.3-deficient mice. Furthermore LTG altered electrocorticographic parameters differently in the two genotypes, decreasing relative power of ictal spikes in control mice compared to Cav2.3-defcient mice.. These findings give first in vivo evidence for an essential role for Cav2.3 in LTG pharmacology and shed light on a paradoxical effect of LTG in their absence. Furthermore, LTG appears to promote ictal activity in Cav2.3-deficient mice resulting in increased neurotoxicity in the CA1 region. This paradoxical mechanism, possibly reflecting rebound hyperexcitation of pyramidal CA1 neurons after increased inhibition, may be key in understanding LTG-induced seizure aggravation, observed in clinical practice.

Topics: Acetamides; Animals; Anticonvulsants; Behavior, Animal; Calcium Channels, R-Type; Electrocorticography; Epilepsy; Fructose; Genotype; Immunohistochemistry; Kainic Acid; Lacosamide; Lamotrigine; Mice; Mice, Inbred C57BL; Mice, Knockout; Neuroprotective Agents; Pyramidal Cells; Topiramate; Triazines

In human epilepsy, pharmacoresistance to antiepileptic drug therapy is a major problem affecting ~30% of patients with epilepsy. Many classical antiepileptic drugs target voltage-gated sodium channels, and their potent activity in inhibiting high-frequency firing has been attributed to their strong use-dependent blocking action. In chronic epilepsy, a loss of use-dependent block has emerged as a potential cellular mechanism of pharmacoresistance for anticonvulsants acting on voltage-gated sodium channels. The anticonvulsant drug lacosamide (LCM) also targets sodium channels, but has been shown to preferentially affect sodium channel slow inactivation processes, in contrast to most other anticonvulsants.. We used whole-cell voltage clamp recordings in acutely isolated cells to investigate the effects of LCM on transient Na. We show here that LCM exerts its effects primarily via shifting the slow inactivation voltage dependence to more hyperpolarized potentials in hippocampal dentate granule cells from control and epileptic rats, and from patients with epilepsy. It is important to note that this activity of LCM was maintained in chronic experimental and human epilepsy. Furthermore, we demonstrate that the efficacy of LCM in inhibiting high-frequency firing is undiminished in chronic experimental and human epilepsy.. Taken together, these results show that LCM exhibits maintained efficacy in chronic epilepsy, in contrast to conventional use-dependent sodium channel blockers such as carbamazepine. They also establish that targeting slow inactivation may be a promising strategy for overcoming target mechanisms of pharmacoresistance.

Topics: Acetamides; Adult; Analysis of Variance; Animals; Anticonvulsants; Biophysics; Cells, Cultured; Disease Models, Animal; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Electric Stimulation; Epilepsy; Hippocampus; Humans; In Vitro Techniques; Lacosamide; Membrane Potentials; Muscarinic Agonists; Neurons; Patch-Clamp Techniques; Pilocarpine; Rats, Wistar; Sodium Channels

Topics: Carbamazepine; Delayed-Action Preparations; Double-Blind Method; Epilepsy; Humans; Lacosamide

To estimate the rate of long-term lacosamide retention among a real-world group of patients at a tertiary epilepsy center in Ireland.. One-hundred adults first prescribed lacosamide for epilepsy between January 2010 and August 2014 at Cork University Hospital were randomly selected for a retrospective analysis of medical records covering two years of subsequent epilepsy clinic follow-up to ascertain whether lacosamide was continued or withdrawn.. Of 100 patients, (51 males, mean age 40.8years, 94 with drug-resistant epilepsy, 76 with focal epilepsy, 25 with intellectual disabilities, 34 with mental health disorders, and 42 with medical comorbidities), lacosamide was prescribed as an adjunct in 85. Lacosamide retention at 12 and 24months was 76% and 71%, respectively. Twenty-five patients stopped lacosamide due to ineffective seizure control. Adverse-effects were responsible for lacosamide discontinuation in three patients and one patient stopped lacosamide pre-pregnancy.. The relatively high retention rate at two years suggests that lacosamide is generally well tolerated among people with a range of different epilepsy subtypes, intellectual disabilities, medical comorbidities, and mental health disorders, and can aid seizure control in adult patients with a range of difficult-to-treat epilepsies.

Topics: Acetamides; Adult; Anticonvulsants; Drug Therapy, Combination; Epilepsy; Female; Humans; Ireland; Lacosamide; Male; Retrospective Studies; Treatment Failure; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Acetamides; Administration, Oral; Adult; Anticonvulsants; Electroencephalography; Epilepsy; Female; Humans; Lacosamide; Ring Chromosomes; Treatment Outcome

To review our clinical experience with intravenous (iv) lacosamide (LCM) in children less than 12 years old.. Use of LCM to treat children with epilepsy has been supported by multiple studies with limited information on iv use in children.. All children given iv LCM were identified from 2009 to 2015. Records were audited for demographics, seizure classification, etiology, EEG, imaging, indication. Baseline seizure frequency was based on parental reporting, continuous video EEG and direct observation.. 47 patients were identified with median age 6.5 years, 18 less than 3 years old, including 8 younger than 12 months. LCM was an adjunctive therapy of ≥2 antiepileptic drugs (AEDs). LCM was administered intravenously to treat epilepsia partialis continua (n = 3, dose range 5-10 mg/kg), status epilepticus (n = 11, median dose 7.2 mg/kg, range 4-11 mg/kg), and acute exacerbation of seizure frequency (n = 18, median dose 4.5 mg/kg, range 1-11 mg/kg). Parenteral form was substituted for oral form for 10 children treated with maintenance LCM unable to ingest/tolerate enteral medication and 5 who were given iv LCM to initiate maintenance treatment (median dose 4 mg/kg, range: 2-10 mg/kg). The infusion was effective for 24 out of 37 children (65%) naive to LCM. Sedation (one with ataxia) was noted in 5/36 children (14%), without any other identified adverse events.. This is the first published retrospective study of very young critically ill children receiving iv LCM. The acute tolerability at this dosing range represents a positive trend and need confirmation from larger studies.

Topics: Acetamides; Adolescent; Anticonvulsants; Child; Child, Preschool; Epilepsy; Female; Humans; Infant; Infusions, Intravenous; Lacosamide; Male; Retrospective Studies; Seizures; Treatment Outcome

To evaluate the effectiveness of lacosamide (LCM) in pediatric patients, using time to treatment failure as the outcome measure, and to assess the impact of concomitant sodium channel blocker (SCB) use on LCM retention.. This is a retrospective cohort study of patients <21 years old receiving LCM from 2010 to 2015. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were generated for time to LCM failure, defined as discontinuation of LCM or addition of another antiepileptic therapy. The impact of concomitant use of traditional SCB agents (phenytoin, carbamazepine, oxcarbazepine, and/or lamotrigine) and other factors including age, seizure types, fast drug titration, and prior antiepileptic drug history were evaluated using Cox regression.. The analysis cohort included 223 patients, of whom 116 were taking one or more SCBs, with median follow-up of 7.4 months (1-53 months). For all patients, the probability of remaining on LCM without addition of another therapy was 44.7% at 12 months and 25.6% at 24 months. Concomitant SCB use was an independent predictor of time to LCM failure (hazard ratio [HR] 1.91, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.38-2.65, p < 0.001).Although treatment emergent adverse effects were reported more often in patients taking SCB (65% vs. 39%, p < 0.001), intolerability was rarely the sole reason cited for LCM discontinuation, and SCB use was strongly associated with LCM failure, even when controlling for presence of treatment emergent adverse effects (adjusted HR 1.99, 95% CI 1.36-2.90, p < 0.001).. This study provides observational evidence for treatment persistence of LCM in children, in a large cohort with long-term follow-up, using time to treatment failure as the outcome measure. Concomitant SCB use was a key factor increasing risk of LCM failure, but not due to treatment-emergent adverse effects alone.

Topics: Acetamides; Adolescent; Age Factors; Age of Onset; Anticonvulsants; Child; Child, Preschool; Cohort Studies; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Therapy, Combination; Epilepsy; Female; Humans; Infant; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Lacosamide; Male; Sodium Channel Blockers; Treatment Failure; Young Adult

Topics: Acetamides; Anticonvulsants; Electroencephalography; Epilepsy; Humans; Lacosamide; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Male; Psychotic Disorders; Tomography Scanners, X-Ray Computed; Young Adult

The choice of antiepileptic drug (AED) therapy in patients with brain tumor-related epilepsy (BTRE) is complicated, and there are a lack of robust clinical trial data to date.. The NEOPLASM (Neuroncologic Patients treated with LAcoSaMide) study was a 6-month, multicenter, retrospective, observational study in patients with BTRE treated with lacosamide. Patients were started on lacosamide because of a lack of efficacy or adverse events (AEs) with prior AEDs or suitability versus other AEDs, according to clinical practice. The primary efficacy variable was the seizure-free rate at 6months. Safety variables included the proportion of patients with an AE and the proportion with an AE that led to discontinuation.. Overall, 105 patients from 14 hospital centers were included in the analysis. Treatment with lacosamide for 6months resulted in a 30.8% seizure-free rate, and 66.3% of patients had a ≥50% seizure reduction (responders). In the subset of patients included because of a lack of efficacy with prior AEDs, seizure-free rates were 28.0%, and 66.7% of patients were responders. No statistically significant differences in efficacy were observed according to the mechanism of action or enzyme-inducing properties of concomitant AEDs. Adverse events were reported by 41.9% of patients at 6months, and 4.7% of them led to discontinuation. The most common AEs were somnolence/fatigue and dizziness. Notably, 57.1% of the patients who were switched to lacosamide because of AEs with their previous therapy did not report any AE at 6-month follow-up.. In this open-label, observational study, lacosamide appeared to be effective and well tolerated in a large population of patients with BTRE. Lacosamide may therefore be a promising option for the treatment of patients with BTRE.

Topics: Acetamides; Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticonvulsants; Brain Neoplasms; Epilepsy; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Lacosamide; Male; Middle Aged; Retrospective Studies; Seizures; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult

While most antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) have been associated with various adverse effects on bone health, for the recently introduced lacosamide (LCM) no corresponding data have been published. The present study evaluates the effect of LCM on bone mineral density, bone turnover markers, and bone mechanical strength in a rat model.. 16 orchidectomized Wistar rats were divided into control and experimental groups, 8 rats each. Dual energy X-ray absorptiometry was used to measure bone mineral density (BMD). As bone metabolism markers, the concentrations of bone markers were assayed in bone homogenate. In addition, both femurs were measured and used for biomechanical testing.. Compared to the control group, we found lower BMD in the experimental group in the area of the left (8%) as well as the right femur (12%), all differences being statistically significant. In both femur diaphyses, but not in lumbar vertebrae, BMD was lower in the LCM group, suggesting a preferential effect on cortical bone. However, neither the thickness of the diaphyseal cortical bone nor the fragility in biomechanical testing was different between the groups. Of the bone metabolism markers, the significant decline was in procollagen type I N-terminal peptide (PINP) levels (37.4%), suggesting a decrease in osteoid synthesis.. We assume then that long-lasting exposure to LCM can represent a certain risk to the health of bone in the setting of gonadal insufficiency. Further studies will be needed to confirm these findings and to determine how high the risk will be in comparison to the other AEDs.

Topics: Absorptiometry, Photon; Acetamides; Animals; Anticonvulsants; Biomechanical Phenomena; Bone and Bones; Bone Density; Disease Models, Animal; Epilepsy; Femur; Lacosamide; Male; Rats; Rats, Wistar

A simple gas chromatographic method with mass spectrometry detection was developed and validated for the determination of lacosamide in human plasma. Lacosamide and the internal standard, levetiracetam-d6, were extracted from 200 μL plasma, by a solid-phase extraction through HF Bond Elut C18 columns, and derivatized using N-methyl-N-tert-butyldimethylsilyltrifluoroacetamide with 1% tert-butyldimethylsilylchloride in acetonitrile. The limit of quantification was found to be 0.20 μg/mL and the assay was linear up to 20.0 μg/mL with correlation coefficient ≥0.994. The intra- and interday precision values were <4.1% in terms of relative standard deviation (%) and the values of intra- and interday accuracy were found to be within -7.2 and 5.3% in terms of relative error (%). Absolute recovery of the method for lacosamide was determined at three concentration levels and ranged from 92.5 to 97.6%. The developed method uses small volumes of plasma and proved to be simple, rapid, and sensitive for the determination of lacosamide in plasma. This method can be used in routine every day analysis of plasma samples obtained from patients who follow respective antiepileptic treatment and for the investigation of clinical and forensic cases where lacosamide is involved.

Topics: Acetamides; Anticonvulsants; Calibration; Drug Monitoring; Epilepsy; Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry; Humans; Lacosamide; Quality Control

Depression and anxiety are common in patients with epilepsy. Moreover, some antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) have mood stabilizing and anxiolytic effects, while others may worsen psychiatric symptoms. The effects of lacosamide, a third generation AED approved for the treatment of focal onset seizures, on depressive and anxiety symptoms are unknown. We evaluated changes in depression and anxiety following the initiation of lacosamide. We compared patients' scores on the Neurological Disorders Depression Inventory for Epilepsy (NDDI-E, n = 91) and Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-item (GAD-7, n = 20) scales prior to and following lacosamide treatment. Following the initiation of lacosamide, there were no significant changes in NDDI-E scores when all patients were analyzed aggregately (baseline: 12.14 ± 4.64 vs post-treatment: 11.91 ± 4.14, p = 0.51). Similarly, the mean GAD-7 scores at baseline (4.10 ± 4.52) and after treatment (4.75 ± 5.51) did not differ (p = 0.23). In the 25 patients with initial NDDI-E scores of >15, lacosamide was associated with a significant decrease in depressive symptoms (baseline: 17.60 ± 1.63 vs post-treatment: 14.64 ± 2.78, p < 0.001). NDDI-E and GAD-7 scores pre- and post-lacosamide initiation were not significantly affected by a history of mood disorders, concomitant psychiatric medications, or concomitant AEDs with mood-stabilizing effects.

Topics: Acetamides; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticonvulsants; Antidepressive Agents; Anxiety Disorders; Depressive Disorder; Epilepsy; Humans; Lacosamide; Middle Aged; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Young Adult

Lacosamide (LCM) is a novel anti-epileptic drug (AED) that enhances the slow inactivation of voltage-gated sodium channels. Its efficacy as adjunctive therapy for focal seizures is confirmed in adult placebo controlled trials with >50% reduction in seizure frequency in up to 50% patients. There is paucity of data on its efficacy and tolerance in treatment-resistant epilepsy in childhood (TREC). This study aims to assess efficacy and tolerance of LCM as adjunct therapy in TREC.. Audit of medical records and seizure diaries in children with TREC on LCM. A response (RR) was defined as ≥50% reduction in seizure frequency.. Forty children (age range: 2-19 years) with TREC received LCM as add-on therapy. All had abnormal electroencephalograms, and 36 had abnormal neuroimaging. All children failed >2 AED trials, nine had trialled the ketogenic diet, five had failed the vagal nerve stimulator and 11 had failed resective epilepsy surgery. Median dose and duration of LCM therapy were 5.7 mg/kg/day and 10.5 months, respectively. RR was seen in 20% with persistence of RR in 8/36, 8/30 and 8/26 children on LCM at 3-, 6- and 9-month follow-up. Two children became seizure free. Retention on LCM was 65% at 9 months. LCM was well tolerated with minor side effects in seven children; no child discontinued LCM because of side effects.. LCM is a well-tolerated AED with RR in 20%: in 5%, it resulted in seizure freedom. LCM may be useful even in TREC when seizures have not responded to intervention with multiple modalities.

Topics: Acetamides; Adolescent; Anticonvulsants; Child; Child, Preschool; Combined Modality Therapy; Drug Resistant Epilepsy; Drug Therapy, Combination; Epilepsy; Humans; Lacosamide; Medical Audit; Young Adult

Lacosamide (LCS) was approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 2008 as adjunctive therapy to other anti-epileptic drugs (AEDs) to treat focal-onset seizures, with or without secondary generalization. Its role in the treatment of epilepsy in individuals with tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC) has yet to be determined. This study evaluates LCS treatment of focal-onset refractory epilepsy in patients with TSC. From November 2009 to June 2014, 46 TSC patients followed by a single neurologist were treated with LCS. Forty-eight percent were responders (seizure reduction ≥50%). No significant differences between responders and non-responders in demographic characteristics were found. LCS appears to be an effective and safe treatment of refractory focal onset seizures in TSC. Determining the long-term tolerability and efficacy of LCS in TSC patients requires additional clinical experience.

Topics: Acetamides; Adolescent; Adult; Anticonvulsants; Child; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Epilepsy; Female; Humans; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Lacosamide; Male; Psychometrics; Retrospective Studies; Tuberous Sclerosis; Young Adult

Lacosamide treats partial seizures by enhancing slow inactivation of voltage-gated sodium channels. The described cardiac toxicity of lacosamide in the literature to date includes atrioventricular blockade (PR prolongation), atrial flutter, atrial fibrillation, sinus pauses, ventricular tachycardia and a single cardiac arrest. We report a second case of cardiac arrest following an intentional lacosamide overdose.. A 16 year-old female with a seizure disorder was found unresponsive in pulseless ventricular tachycardia after intentionally ingesting 4.5 g (76 mg/kg) lacosamide, 120 mg (2 mg/kg) cyclobenzaprine and an unknown amount of levetiracetam. Exact time of ingestion was unknown. Her initial electrocardiogram (ECG) demonstrated sinus tachycardia at 139 beats per minute, QRS duration 112 ms, and terminal R-wave in lead aVR > 3 mm. Despite treatment with 150 mEq of sodium bicarbonate, she had persistent EKG findings eight hours after presentation. Her serum lacosamide concentration nine hours after presentation was elevated at 22.8 μg/mL, while serum cyclobenzaprine concentration was 16 ng/mL (therapeutic: 10-30 ng/mL), and serum levetiracetam concentration was 22.7 μg/mL (therapeutic: 12-46 μg/mL). On hospital day three, ECG demonstrated resolution of the terminal R-wave with QRS of 78 ms. The patient recovered without physical or neurologic sequelae.. The patient's lacosamide, cyclobenzaprine and levetiracetam overdose was associated with QRS prolongation and terminal right axis deviation--suggesting sodium channel blockade as a likely etiology for her cardiac arrest. Cyclobenzaprine has potential for sodium channel blockade and ventricular dysrhythmias although cardiac toxicity due to cyclobenzaprine alone is rare. The combination of cyclobenzaprine with lacosamide may have resulted in cardiovascular collapse. In conclusion, overdose of lacosamide combined with therapeutic concentrations of sodium channel blocking xenobiotics may cause cardiac conduction delays and cardiac arrest.

Topics: Acetamides; Adolescent; Amitriptyline; Anticonvulsants; Drug Interactions; Drug Overdose; Electrocardiography; Epilepsy; Female; Heart Arrest; Humans; Lacosamide; Levetiracetam; Piracetam; Risk Factors; Sodium Bicarbonate; Sodium Channel Blockers; Sodium Channels; Suicide, Attempted; Tachycardia, Ventricular; Treatment Outcome

This study was carried out to estimate the exposure of the central nervous system (CNS) to the antiepileptic drug (AED) lacosamide, under steady state conditions, in patients with epilepsy who take oral lacosamide alongside up to three other AEDs.. Twenty-seven serum and cerebral spinal fluid (CSF) samples were collected from 21 patients receiving lacosamide for the treatment of epilepsy (50-600 mg/day over two or three doses). This included 23 time-matched pairs of serum and CSF samples from 19 patients. The concentration of lacosamide in each sample was determined using high-performance liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (HPLC-MS/MS). Linear regression was used to characterize the relationship between the CSF-to-serum ratio of lacosamide concentration and the time since dosing, the daily lacosamide dose, or the daily dose normalized by volume of distribution (Vd , approximated to total body water), and between the drug concentrations in each compartment (CSF vs. serum).. Concentrations of lacosamide in CSF (mean ± standard deviation [SD] 7.37 ± 3.73 μg/ml, range 1.24-14.95, n = 27) and serum (mean ± SD 8.16 ± 3.82 μg/ml, range 2.29-15.45, n = 27) samples showed a good correlation over the dose range investigated. The mean CSF-to-serum ratio of lacosamide concentrations was 0.897 ± 0.193 (range 0.492-1.254, n = 23 time-matched pairs) and was independent of lacosamide dose.. Drug concentrations in the CSF are often used to indicate those in the brain interstitial fluid. In patients with epilepsy who follow a stable oral AED dosing regimen, lacosamide concentration in CSF is approximately 85% of that found in serum, suggesting that serum may be a valuable indicator of lacosamide concentration in the CNS.

Topics: Acetamides; Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Anticonvulsants; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Epilepsy; Female; Humans; Lacosamide; Male; Middle Aged; Young Adult

The site of action for antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) is within the brain; however, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) concentration is highly variable. Lacosamide (LCM) is approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for treatment of partial-onset seizures in adults, and has linear pharmacokinetics in serum. Penetration across the blood-brain barrier (BBB) is unknown. This study aims to provide additional insights into the pharmacokinetics of LCM.. Thirty adults undergoing craniotomy for treatment of intractable epilepsy or brain tumor were recruited and were either taking LCM long term (group 1, n = 15), or were LCM naive, receiving LCM as prophylaxis for surgery (group 2, n = 15). All patients received one intravenous (IV) dose (15 min infusion) immediately prior to craniotomy. CSF and arterial blood were collected simultaneously following craniotomy. LCM concentrations were measured in serum and CSF.. LCM concentration differences between groups 1 and 2 for both CSF and serum were statistically significant (p ≤ 0.0005), but there was no statistically significant difference in CSF/serum ratios (group 1 = 0.726 ± 0.231; group 2 = 0.556 ±0.241; p = 0.0585). LCM concentration in serum correlated positively with CSF concentration in group 1 (Pearson r = 0.8527, p < 0.0001). The time interval between the end of dose delivery and sample collection correlated positively with the CSF/serum ratio for the drug-naive group (Pearson r = 0.6525; p = 0.0084). Treatment with other AEDs did not affect LCM distribution between serum and CSF.. Although chronic dosing resulted in higher LCM concentrations in serum and CSF compared to drug-naive patients, the CSF/serum ratio was not affected by LCM pretreatment. These data suggest that LCM serum concentration may reliably predict CSF concentration.

Topics: Acetamides; Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Anticonvulsants; Blood-Brain Barrier; Brain Neoplasms; Craniotomy; Drug Administration Schedule; Epilepsy; Female; Humans; Lacosamide; Male; Middle Aged; Young Adult

Lacosamide is a sodium channel blocker antiepileptic drug authorized as an adjunctive therapy for focal seizures in adolescents and adults.. To analyze the efficacy and safety of lacosamide in Galicia according to its use in daily clinical practice.. Retrospective observational study in patients who started treatment with lacosamide between January 2014 and June 2013 in 10 hospitals in Galicia, Spain. Its efficacy and safety at 3, 6 and 12 months after starting lacosamide was assessed.. We included 184 patients with a mean age of 44.2 ± 17.4 years old; 56.5% (n = 104) were male; 173 patients constituted the efficacy population. Mean duration of epilepsy was 18.8 ± 15.5 years. Seizure frequency was 2.5 ± 1.6 episodes/month. After 12 months, 68.2% of patients (n = 118) had >= 50% improvement (responders) and among them, 54 (45.8% of responder patients) were seizure free. Twenty-three percent (n = 43) suffered from adverse events after 12 months, being dizziness (10.3%) and instability (3.3%) the most frequently reported. After the 12 month visit, 87.5% of patients (n = 161) continued treatment with lacosamide.. Lacosamide provides a very good efficacy and safety profile for patients with focal refractory epilepsy. High percentage of responders may be related to a less refractory population compared to other daily clinical practice studies. It constitutes an attractive therapeutic option for the treatment of focal epilepsies.. Experiencia clinica con lacosamida en Galicia: estudio GALACO.

Topics: Acetamides; Adult; Anticonvulsants; Drug Therapy, Combination; Epilepsy; Female; Humans; Lacosamide; Male; Middle Aged; Nervous System Diseases; Retrospective Studies; Sodium Channel Blockers; Spain

A series of fluorinated analogs of the potent investigative anticonvulsant agent (4S,8aS)-4-phenylperhydropyrrolo[1,2-a]pyrazine-2,6-dione 1 was prepared and characterized by IR, 1H, 13C NMR and mass spectral data. The compounds have been evaluated in the in vivo rodent models of epilepsy. They displayed high activity in the 'classical' maximal electroshock seizure (MES) and subcutaneous Metrazol (scMET) tests as well as in the 6Hz model of pharmacoresistant limbic seizures. The results showed that incorporating fluorine atoms into the phenyl ring of 1 can be beneficial for the anticonvulsant potency. The most promising meta-trifluoromethyl and meta-trifluoromethoxy derivatives (4S,8aS)-5h and (4S,8aS)-5l, respectively, displayed very broad spectra of activity across the preclinical seizure models.

Topics: Animals; Anticonvulsants; Disease Models, Animal; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Electroshock; Epilepsy; Halogenation; Hydrocarbons, Fluorinated; Male; Mice; Molecular Structure; Pentylenetetrazole; Pilocarpine; Pyrazines; Pyrroles; Rats; Rats, Sprague-Dawley; Seizures; Structure-Activity Relationship

The ultimate treatment goal in epilepsy therapy is always freedom from seizures with as few treatment adverse effects as possible. If seizures persist with the first monotherapy, alternative monotherapy with another antiepileptic drug (AED) should be considered. Continuing seizures should lead to a reevaluation of differential diagnosis and adherence. Epilepsy surgery as an alternative therapy may be suitable in selected cases. If the diagnosis of epilepsy is established and epilepsy surgery is not appropriate, AED treatment should be optimized. Evidence for how to proceed is lacking. Concepts such as rational polytherapy have been advocated but remain speculative concerning better efficacy based on the use of AEDs with differing modes of action. A variety of new AEDs including rufinamide, lacosamide, vigabatrin, perampanel, and retigabine have been recently introduced in the United States. They are briefly characterized in this update review.

Topics: Acetamides; Anticonvulsants; Drug Therapy, Combination; Epilepsy; Humans; Lacosamide; Nitriles; Pyridones; Receptors, AMPA; Vigabatrin

Epilepsy is one of the most common neurological disorders. Despite the development of new antiepileptic drugs (AEDs), ∼ 30% of epilepsy patients experience recurrent seizures and even more experience side effects. Therefore, there is still need for new AEDs with enhanced effectiveness and tolerability.. The article is based on a search using PubMed, including articles published between 1999 and 2013. It is focused on the pharmacokinetic, pharmacological and clinical data of lacosamide (LCM) for the treatment of epilepsy.. Along with favorable tolerability and pharmacokinetic profiles, LCM has been demonstrated to significantly reduce seizure frequency in patients with partial-onset seizures when prescribed as adjunctive treatment at doses of 200 and 400 mg/day. LCM has a unique mechanism of action, selectively enhancing slow inactivation of voltage-gated sodium channels. Its mechanism of action could be exploited to reduce the percentage of pharmacoresistant patients. Although LCM is not FDA approved for treatment of status epilepticus, it has demonstrated promising preliminary results. Large prospective studies are needed to verify these. In addition, the results of ongoing trials will help to confirm if LCM could be used as a monotherapy regimen in the treatment of partial-onset seizures and generalized tonic-clonic seizures.

Topics: Acetamides; Anticonvulsants; Clinical Trials, Phase II as Topic; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Drug Evaluation, Preclinical; Drug Interactions; Epilepsy; Humans; Lacosamide; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Treatment Outcome

Lacosamide (LCM), a new antiepileptic drug (AED) approved as adjunctive therapy for the treatment of patients with partial-onset seizures, has limited pharmacokinetic and drug interaction data. The main objectives of the present study were to investigate the effects of dose, age, gender, and hepatic enzyme-inducing AEDs on the pharmacokinetics of LCM as assessed by steady state serum LCM values.. An LCM AED therapeutic drug monitoring database was analyzed with regard to LCM serum concentrations and other relevant patient and AED drug information. One hundred twenty eight sera were identified. These were collected from 68 women and 61 men aged 19-66 years, who were prescribed a median LCM dose of 300 mg (range 50-600 mg).. Serum LCM concentrations were observed in the following main groupings: LCM monotherapy (n = 5), LCM with nonenzyme-inducing AEDs (n = 50), LCM with enzyme-inducing AEDs (n = 49), LCM with valproic acid (n = 20), and LCM with enzyme-inducing AEDs plus valproic acid (n = 4). Analysis of variance showed a correlation of dose with LCM concentrations (r = 0.53, P < 0.001), and women had statistically higher mean LCM concentration than did men, 37.2 ± 23.6 versus 26.8 ± 12.9 μmol/L (P = 0.001). Serum LCM concentrations were significantly lower (P = 0.002) in the enzyme-inducing AED group (carbamazepine and phenytoin) compared with the LCM monotherapy group and the nonenzyme-inducing group, 23.5 ± 11.0, 34.5 ± 7.7, and 32.7 ± 17.9 μmol/L, respectively.. Serum LCM concentrations increased dose dependently, were age independent, and were higher in women compared with men. Carbamazepine and phenytoin can significantly decrease serum LCM concentrations, probably via induction of LCM metabolism.

Topics: Acetamides; Adult; Aged; Anticonvulsants; Carbamazepine; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Interactions; Drug Monitoring; Drug Therapy, Combination; Enzyme Induction; Epilepsy; Female; Humans; Lacosamide; Male; Middle Aged; Phenytoin; Retrospective Studies; Seizures; Valproic Acid

Cutaneous eruptions and hypersensitivity represent frequently reported side effects of anti-seizure medications. However, these side-effects have rarely been previously reported for lacosamide, a newer-generation anti-seizure medication with a novel mechanism of action. Here, we report a case of diffuse skin eruption in a patient with history of epilepsy soon after initiation of lacosamide. The rash resolved after discontinuation of lacosamide and use of antihistamines and steroids. We also review the information on drug hypersensitivity syndrome.

Topics: Acetamides; Adult; Anticonvulsants; Epilepsy; Exanthema; Female; Humans; Lacosamide

Epileptic syndromes with continuous spikes-waves during sleep (CSWS) represent a wide spectrum of epileptic disorders having CSWS as a common EEG-feature. Defined therapeutic strategies are still lacking. We evaluated the efficacy of lacosamide add-on therapy on the EEG, behavior, and cognition in children with CSWS.. Eight children with CSWS refractory to other conventional antiepileptic drugs were included in the study. A 24-h EEG recording was performed at 6-month-interval in all patients. The spike-wave index (SWI) was obtained in each 24-h EEG recording. Neuropsychological data were obtained before lacosamide introduction and after a minimum of 12 months of therapy.. After a 6-month period of therapy, 75% of patients was defined as responder, 12.5% as partial responder and another 12.5% as non-responder. In particular, 24-h EEG normalized in 3 cases (37%). After a minimum of 12 months, 24-h EEG normalized in another patient while two patients showed electroclinical relapses. A total of 62.5% of patients was therefore defined as responder. Neuropsychological functions slightly improved in 25% of patients.. Although further studies are needed to validate our observations, this study suggests that lacosamide add-on therapy may be safe and effective in children affected by CSWS.

Topics: Acetamides; Adolescent; Anticonvulsants; Child; Electroencephalography; Epilepsy; Female; Humans; Lacosamide; Male; Neuropsychological Tests; Sleep

Lacosamide is a US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved antiepileptic drug for patients 17 years or older with partial epilepsy. There are sparse data on children. The objective of our study was to evaluate its efficacy/safety in children with refractory epilepsy. Forty children (mean age 14.3 years) were treated with lacosamide at our institution (adjunctive therapy in 36, monotherapy in 4). Fifteen patients had symptomatic focal epilepsy, 2 had cryptogenic focal epilepsy, 20 had symptomatic generalized epilepsy, and 3 had cryptogenic generalized epilepsy. Two had juvenile myoclonic epilepsy and 5 had Lennox-Gastaut syndrome. Forty-two percent had at least >50% reduction in seizure frequency, and 6 became seizure free. Average dose was 7 mg/kg/d and average follow-up was 9.2 months. Responders had a 76.5% mean decrease in seizures. Fifteen children experienced an adverse reaction and 7 discontinued lacosamide (4: Ineffective, I: insurance denial, 1: tremor, 1: behavior). Lacosamide is effective and well-tolerated in children with refractory epilepsy.

Topics: Acetamides; Adolescent; Anticonvulsants; Child; Child, Preschool; Epilepsy; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Infant; Lacosamide; Male; Retrospective Studies; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult

Topics: Acetamides; Anticonvulsants; Cardiovascular System; Drug Overdose; Epilepsy; Fatal Outcome; Heart Arrest; Heart Conduction System; Humans; Hypertension; Lacosamide; Male; Middle Aged; Multiple Organ Failure; Suicide

Magnetoencephalography (MEG) is increasingly used in the non-invasive presurgical evaluation of patients with refractory focal epilepsy. Combination of MEG and magnetic resonance imaging of the brain can estimate the location of the epileptiform discharges. We report a case of a patient with paroxysmal sensory symptoms. All previous investigations where normal, but by the use of MEG we were able to identify the epileptic focus in the insular region. MEG has a better spatial resolution than electroencefalography, and it is more sensitive to tangentially oriented dipoles. MEG should be considered in the workup of patients with refractory focal epilepsy.

Topics: Acetamides; Adult; Anticonvulsants; Cerebral Cortex; Electroencephalography; Epilepsy; Female; Frontal Lobe; Humans; Lacosamide; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Magnetoencephalography

Lacosamide (LCM) is a recently licensed antiepileptic drug available in the UK since 2008. It is thought to act through modulation of sodium channel slow inactivation. Its efficacy and tolerability have been shown in several regulatory randomised controlled trials, but assessments of its performance in large naturalistic settings are rare. We assessed a large cohort of consecutive people who started LCM at a single tertiary epilepsy centre, from June 2008 to June 2011. Forty-five percent of the 376 people included were still taking LCM at last follow-up, with estimated retention was 62% at one year, 45% at two years and 35% at three years. Eighteen percent reported a period of improvement in terms of significant seizure reduction or seizure freedom of at least six months duration whilst on LCM, of whom four people were seizure free for at least one year. Long-term efficacy in our centre appears similar to zonisamide and pregabalin when compared to historical controls. Adverse events were reported by 61%, CNS-related in the vast majority. Most clinical factors did not affect retention; withdrawal occurred more often because of inefficacy than because of adverse events. Retention rates for LCM, when compared to historical controls appear similar to lamotrigine, topiramate, pregabalin, zonisamide, higher than gabapentin, and lower than levetiracetam.

Topics: Acetamides; Adolescent; Adult; Age of Onset; Aged; Anticonvulsants; Cohort Studies; Drug Resistance; Drug Therapy, Combination; Epilepsy; Female; Humans; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Lacosamide; Male; Middle Aged; Seizures; Survival Analysis; Treatment Failure; Young Adult

Lacosamide is approved for the adjunctive treatment of partial-onset seizures in adults. Phase II/III clinical trials suggest that it is a safe, effective and well-tolerated medication. However, there is little post-marketing information available about this medication.. We report our clinical experience from a tertiary referral epilepsy centre, which has been using lacosamide for the past 18 months, with 128 patients treated during this time.. Fifty-three patients (41%) achieved at least a 50% reduction in seizure frequency, with 14 patients (11%) achieving seizure freedom for a mean time of 35 weeks. This 50% responder rate matches, and the seizure free rate outperforms that seen in previous pooled trials. The efficacy of lacosamide did not vary with concurrent sodium channel blocking agent (SCB) use, and a statistically significant dose-dependent response was not shown, which is in contrast to previous trials. Treatment emergent adverse effects (TEAEs) were noted in 52 patients (41%), with 24 patients (19%) discontinuing the medication. TEAEs were more frequent in patients on concurrent SCBs, affecting 51% vs. 28% of patients not on other SCBs. This increased risk of TEAEs from concurrent SCB use was of statistical significance (P = 0.01). The most frequently noted TEAEs from lacosamide were dizziness, sedation and diplopia, which all appeared to be dose-related.. This post-marketing analysis suggests that lacosamide in clinical practice at least mirrors, and possibly outperforms the results seen in previous phase II/III trials.

Topics: Acetamides; Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Anticonvulsants; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Therapy, Combination; Epilepsy; Female; Humans; Lacosamide; Male; Middle Aged; Sodium Channel Blockers; Young Adult

In this retrospective controlled study, the impact of adjunctive lacosamide (LCM) on cognition in patients with epilepsy was evaluated and compared with that of topiramate (TPM) and lamotrigine (LTG) in a naturalistic outpatient setting. Cognition was investigated by means of objective assessment of executive functions (EpiTrack®) and verbal memory and by subjective ratings of self-perceived side effects (cognition, mood, and vegetative). Quality of life was assessed using the QOLIE-10 questionnaire. Patients underwent assessment at baseline and after a median follow-up interval of 32 weeks. Forty-four patients were treated with LCM, 11 with LTG, and 15 with TPM. Treatment arms differed with regard to the age at onset of epilepsy (LTG>TPM) and to seizure control from baseline to follow-up, which was best in patients whose seizures were treated with LTG (55% vs. 16% in patients whose seizures were treated with LCM and 13% in patients whose seizures were treated with TPM). Groups did not differ in the type of epilepsy, daily drug load or drug load change, nor in baseline seizure frequency. Repeated measures statistics controlling for epilepsy onset and seizure outcome showed deteriorated executive functions with TPM (F=7.5, p=0.001). On an individual level (reliable change indices), 53% of the patients whose seizures were treated with TPM showed losses in this domain (LCM 14%, LTG 27%) and none of the patients showed improvement (LCM 23%, LTG 27%; χ(2)=11.8, p=0.019). No differences in memory, quality of life, or mood were noted among patients in the three treatment arms. Subjective cognitive complaints increased in 5 of the 9 patients whose seizures were treated with TPM (LCM 1/9, LTG 0/9; χ(2)=11.9, p=0.025). The findings of this study demonstrate for the first time that the cognitive side effect profile of LCM is comparable to that of LTG and superior to that of TPM. This is indicated by both subjective and objective measures. Given the naturalistic setting and the retrospective nature of the study, a follow-up prospective, randomized trial with larger sample sizes is required to confirm these findings.

Topics: Acetamides; Adolescent; Adult; Anticonvulsants; Cognition; Epilepsy; Executive Function; Female; Fructose; Humans; Lacosamide; Lamotrigine; Male; Memory; Middle Aged; Neuropsychological Tests; Outpatients; Quality of Life; Retrospective Studies; Topiramate; Treatment Outcome; Triazines

Despite the introduction of multiple new antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) in the past 20 years, about 30% of patients with epilepsy continue to experience uncontrolled seizures or significant side effects.. To present our experience with lacosamide therapy in children with drug-resistant epilepsy.. We retrospectively reviewed the medical charts of all patients receiving oral lacosamide until October 2010. Efficacy was determined according to seizure frequency during the week prior to treatment initiation and the week after the maximal dosage of lacosamide was attained.. Seventeen patients (10 boys) aged 1.5-16 (mean - 8 ± 4.7) years were identified. Nine patients had epilepsy attributed to a structural cause, six patients had epilepsy of unknown cause, and two had Lennox-Gastaut syndrome. Mean epilepsy duration was 5.4 ± 3.3 years. The mean number of previous AEDs was 6.6 ± 2. Lacosamide was added to the baseline AEDs in13 patients. The mean duration of follow-up was 9.1 ± 4.4 months. Six (35%) patients had at least a 50%.seizure reduction (mean - 76%). Social, behavioral, and/or motor improvement were noted in seven (41%) patients. Lacosamide was discontinued in six (35%) patients because of inefficacy. Side effects were reported in 10 (59%) patients.. Lacosamide seems to be effective and safe according to the data in our small cohort. Further prospective studies on lacosamide efficacy and safety in a large number of children are warranted.

Topics: Acetamides; Adolescent; Anticonvulsants; Child; Child, Preschool; Cohort Studies; Drug Resistance; Epilepsy; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Infant; Lacosamide; Male; Retrospective Studies; Treatment Outcome

The outcomes of adult epilepsy patients prescribed lacosamide for additional seizure control. Responders were defined as having at least a 50% decrease in seizure frequency Sixty-seven patients were evaluated. Forty-six out of 67 patients (69%) were responders. Twelve of 14 patients not taking sodium channel-acting AEDs were responders (86%) and 34/53 patients taking sodium channel-acting AEDs were responders (64%) (difference not significant).

Topics: Acetamides; Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticonvulsants; Epilepsy; Female; Humans; Lacosamide; Male; Middle Aged; Product Surveillance, Postmarketing; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult

Treatment of refractory idiopathic primary generalized epilepsy can be very challenging, with limited drug options, especially in young women of childbearing age. Here we describe the cases of two young women with refractory idiopathic primary generalized epilepsy refractory to multiple antiepileptic drugs in monotherapy or combination before achieving a long-term remission with adjunctive lacosamide (LCS) treatment. Larger, randomized prospective studies are necessary to establish the effectiveness of lacosamide in these patients.

Topics: Acetamides; Anticonvulsants; Drug Therapy, Combination; Epilepsy; Female; Humans; Lacosamide; Young Adult

Topics: Acetamides; Anticonvulsants; Child, Preschool; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Epilepsy; Female; Humans; Lacosamide

Lacosamide is a new antiepileptic drug that is currently approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for adults 17 years or older for partial-onset seizures. The authors reviewed 21 pediatric patients (<17 years) with various seizure types who were started on oral lacosamide as part of a prospective add-on study as adjunctive therapy for refractory epilepsy. Five patients were excluded due to less than 3 months of meaningful follow-up. Maintenance dosages used ranged from 2.4 to 19.4 mg/kg/d. Eight of 16 (50%) patients had greater than 50% reduction in seizure frequency with adjunctive lacosamide therapy. Eight (50%) patients had generalized epilepsy including 4 with Lennox-Gastaut syndrome. Lacosamide was effective therapy for most seizure types but was particularly effective for partial-onset seizures. Lacosamide was effective in treating 5 of 8 (62.5%) localization-related epilepsies but only 2 of 8 (25%) generalized epilepsies, both Lennox-Gastaut syndrome patients with greater than 90% seizure reduction. None of these very refractory patients remained seizure free.

Topics: Acetamides; Adolescent; Anticonvulsants; Child; Child, Preschool; Diet, Ketogenic; Epilepsy; Female; Humans; Infant; Lacosamide; Male; Pediatrics; Prospective Studies; Treatment Outcome; Vagus Nerve Stimulation

Lacosamide (LCS) is a new antiepileptic drug (AED) licensed in the European Union (EU) and United States (US) in 2008.. To evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of add-on LCS in an out-patient epilepsy clinic setting to obtain useful information for everyday practice.. We pooled data retrospectively from the case note of patients with refractory epilepsy in whom LCS had been prescribed in 19 hospitals across the United Kingdom.. Four hundred and three patients were included (mean age 41.9 years, 50.6% women, 18.1% with learning disabilities (LD)). Mean follow-up (FU) was 11.6 months (range one day to 42 months). Most patients (86.9%) presented with symptomatic partial epilepsy (SPE) and 80% were taking two or more antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) when LCS was added (mean 2, range 0-4). Retention rates were 80% at six months, 68% at one year and 45% at two years. The efficacy of LCS was evaluated at three months and at the final FU. At three months one hundred and eight patients (31.1%) reported ≥ 50% seizure reduction and 32 (9.2%) were seizure free. At the final FU 102 (37.5%) reported ≥ 50% seizures reduction and 28 (9.8%) were seizure free. One hundred and ninety three patients (48.7%) reported adverse effects (AEs). The most frequent were sedation and dizziness, followed by nausea. Lacosamide was discontinued in 150 patients (38%), 60 due to AEs alone.. LCS appears to be an effective and safe AED when used as adjunctive therapy in patients with refractory partial epilepsy.

Topics: Acetamides; Administration, Oral; Adult; Anticonvulsants; Drug Therapy, Combination; Epilepsy; Female; Humans; Lacosamide; Male; Retrospective Studies

A number of novel pyrrole[1,2-a]pyrazine derivatives were synthesized and evaluated in in vivo animal models of epilepsy. Among them, several compounds displayed promising seizure protection in the maximal electroshock seizure (MES), subcutaneous metrazol seizure (scMET), 6 Hz and pilocarpine-induced status prevention (PISP) tests, with ED(50) values comparable to the reference anticonvulsant drugs (AEDs). A critical influence of the stereochemistry and conformational preferences of the pyrrole[1,2-a]pyrazine core on in vivo pharmacological activity was observed. The mechanism of the anticonvulsant action of the agents synthesized is most probably not via inhibition of the voltage-dependent sodium (Na(+)) currents.

Topics: Animals; Anticonvulsants; Diketopiperazines; Electroshock; Epilepsy; Humans; Male; Mice; Models, Molecular; Pentylenetetrazole; Rats; Rats, Sprague-Dawley; Rats, Wistar; Seizures; Sodium Channel Blockers; Sodium Channels

Lacosamide is a new antiepileptic drug that has a novel mechanism of action, linear pharmacokinetics, and proven efficacy in the adjunctive treatment of partial-onset seizures. We ascertained the relationship between serum and saliva lacosamide concentrations so as to determine whether saliva may be a useful alternative to serum for therapeutic drug monitoring.. Blood samples were obtained from 98 people with intractable epilepsy (51 male; mean age 43 ± 12; range 19-76 years) prescribed lacosamide as adjunctive therapy. For 48 patients, concurrent saliva samples were also collected. Lacosamide concentrations in serum (free and total) and in saliva were determined by high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC).. Linear regression analysis showed a good correlation between lacosamide dose and both total (r(2) = 0.825; n = 32) and free (r(2) = 0.815; n = 29) serum concentrations, and lacosamide serum total and free concentrations were linearly related (r(2) = 0.721; n = 97). There was also a good correlation between saliva lacosamide and both total (r(2) = 0.842; n = 49) and free (r(2) = 0.828; n = 47) serum lacosamide concentrations. Based on the saliva data, the protein binding of lacosamide in serum is calculated to be 87 ± 4% and is comparable to the value calculated by direct measurement of the free and total lacosamide concentration in serum (91 ± 4%).. These data support the use of saliva as a viable alternative to serum for monitoring lacosamide therapy in patients with epilepsy.

Topics: Acetamides; Adult; Aged; Anticonvulsants; Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Epilepsy; Female; Humans; Lacosamide; Linear Models; Male; Middle Aged; Saliva; Young Adult

Lacosamide is a new antiepileptic drug (AED) apparently devoid of major pharmacokinetic interactions. Data from a small postmarketing assessment suggest people who had lacosamide co-prescribed with a voltage-gated sodium channel (VGSC)-blocking AED seemed more likely to discontinue lacosamide because of tolerability problems. Among 39 people with refractory epilepsy who developed neurotoxicity (diplopia, dizziness, drowsiness) on lacosamide treatment given in combination with VGSC-blocking AEDs, we identified 7 (17.9%) without any changes in serum levels of other AEDs in whom the symptoms were ameliorated by dose reduction of the concomitant VGSC-blocking AED. Symptoms in these people seem to have arisen from a pharmacodynamic interaction between lacosamide and other VGSC-blocking AEDs. Slow-inactivated VGSCs targeted by lacosamide might be more sensitive to the effects of conventional VGSC-blocking AEDs. Advising people to reduce concomitantly the conventional VGSC-blocking AEDs during lacosamide uptitration in cases of neurotoxicity might improve the tolerability of combination treatment.

Topics: Acetamides; Adult; Aged; Anticonvulsants; Drug Interactions; Epilepsy; Female; Humans; Lacosamide; Male; Middle Aged; Neurotoxicity Syndromes; Sodium Channel Blockers

Topics: Acetamides; Adult; Anticonvulsants; Carbamazepine; Epilepsy; Female; Humans; Lacosamide

Lacosamide (LCM) is a novel anticonvulsant that modulates voltage-dependent sodium channels. Although it is known to cause a slight, dose-dependent prolongation of the PR interval on the ECG, third-degree atrioventricular (AV) block has been described as an adverse event in only a few patients participating in diabetic neuropathic pain studies and in no patient with epilepsy. We describe an 89-year old patient with decreased renal function and taking two other negative dromotropic agents who accidentally received two intravenous boli of 400 mg LCM within 6 hours. She had a normal PQ interval before and after the first dose of LCM and developed a reversible complete AV block approximately 30 minutes after the second bolus. We conclude that particular caution must be exercised when using very high doses of LCM in patients with significant cardial and renal risk factors.

Topics: Acetamides; Aged, 80 and over; Antibodies; Anticonvulsants; Atrioventricular Block; Electrocardiography; Electroencephalography; Epilepsy; Female; Humans; Lacosamide; Receptors, N-Methyl-D-Aspartate

Topics: Acetamides; Administration, Oral; Anticonvulsants; Drug Interactions; Epilepsy; Humans; Lacosamide

To obtain better understanding of the effect of lacosamide (LCM) in clinical practice, laboratory and clinical data of 17 patients under treatment with LCM as an add-on antiepileptic drug (AED) were retrospectively evaluated.. Total LCM serum concentrations were obtained at hourly intervals for up to 5h and 8h after morning dose. Adverse drug reactions (ADR) were assessed.. LCM serum concentrations showed high fluctuations during the day with a steep increase within the first 3h after intake (mean 87.8%; range: 44.4-149.0%) under b.i.d. Mean trough and peak concentrations of LCM were 5.0 μg/ml (range: 1.8-9.5 μg/ml) and 9.7 μg/ml (range: 4.0-18.3 μg/ml), respectively; mean dose 353 mg/d (range: 200-600mg/d). Twelve patients showed ADRs. After conversion to t.i.d. or dose reduction LCM serum concentration showed lower fluctuations during the day and a lower increase after intake (mean: 50.0%, range: 27.1-66.7%); peak LCM was 9.4 μg/ml (range: 4.7-11.6 μg/ml), mean dose 388 mg/d (range: 300-500 mg/d). These interventions led to amelioration of the ADR.. Changing the dose regimen from two to three times daily could reduce fluctuations of LCM during the day and improve tolerability of LCM in patients with ADR.

Topics: Acetamides; Adult; Anticonvulsants; Chromatography, Liquid; Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions; Epilepsy; Female; Humans; Lacosamide; Male; Middle Aged; Time Factors; Young Adult

Topics: Acetamides; Anticonvulsants; Epilepsy; Female; Humans; Lacosamide; Middle Aged; Migraine Disorders

We performed a retrospective study in patients with poorly controlled epilepsy treated with add-on lacosamide (LCM) to investigate the relationship of LCM-related adverse events with LCM serum concentration and weight-dependent dosage. We collected serum concentrations, weight-related dosages, and occurrences of the seven most frequent adverse events according to the randomized double-blind, placebo-controlled trials. Seventy of 131 patients could be sufficiently evaluated. LCM serum concentrations and weight-related dosages in patients with and without typical adverse events did not differ significantly. Closer analysis of the data suggested that dizziness as the leading adverse event occurred significantly more often if LCM was combined with classic sodium channel blockers. There was a significant correlation between LCM serum concentrations and co-medication, so there is still evidence for dependent variables that might have a relevant impact in individual cases. However, our data do not allow definition of a safety range for LCM.

Topics: Acetamides; Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Anticonvulsants; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Interactions; Epilepsy; Female; Humans; Lacosamide; Linear Models; Longitudinal Studies; Male; Middle Aged; Retrospective Studies; Statistics, Nonparametric; Young Adult

Numerous patients who are prescribed antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) for epileptic seizures are already receiving other agents for the treatment of co-morbid conditions, which frequently occur alongside epilepsy. This raises additional clinical considerations and makes the use of AEDs with good safety profiles and fewer drug-drug interactions attractive. Second and third-generation anticonvulsant drugs are associated with fewer pharmacological interactions and improved tolerability compared with first-generation drugs. Furthermore, second and third-generation anticonvulsant drugs are associated with linear pharmacokinetic profiles and differing mechanisms of action, making them ideal for pluripathological and polymedicated patients. In this report, we highlight the efficacy of one such agent, lacosamide, in five patients with co-morbidities and unusual presentations of epilepsy, including a patient with paraneoplastic encephalitis caused by microcytic lung carcinoma, one with a brain tumour and one with Alzheimer's disease, as well as a case of catamenial epilepsy and one of refractory convulsive status epilepticus. In all patients, lacosamide was associated with a substantial reduction in seizure frequency and effective control of seizure episodes. Treatment was generally well tolerated in all patients, indicating that lacosamide is an effective treatment option for a variety of patients with epileptic seizures.

Topics: Acetamides; Adult; Aged, 80 and over; Anticonvulsants; Drug Interactions; Epilepsy; Female; Humans; Lacosamide; Male; Middle Aged; Treatment Outcome

Lacosamide (Vimpat) is a newly licensed novel antiepileptic drug. We report a case of refractory convulsive status epilepticus (CSE) that was successfully controlled with lacosamide. The 38-year-old male patient was admitted for a series of complex partial seizures with secondary generalization leading to refractory CSE. During the transport to the hospital the patient was given 22.5 mg diazepam, 12.5 mg etomidate, and 5 mg midazolam without success. An additional dose of 4 mg lorazepam and a dose of 1,500 mg levetiracetam after admission were yet without clinical effect. A further treatment with lacosamide (300 mg via percutaneous gastric fistula) resulted in complete clinical remission of the epileptic activity within 30 min. The application of lacosamide resulted in cessation of CSE and was well tolerated. To our knowledge, this is the first case of successful treatment of refractory CSE with lacosamide. Further studies are needed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of lacosamide in treatment of SE.

Topics: Acetamides; Adult; Anticonvulsants; Diazepam; Drug Resistance; Drug Therapy, Combination; Epilepsy; Etomidate; Humans; Lacosamide; Levetiracetam; Male; Midazolam; Piracetam; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Status Epilepticus; Treatment Outcome

The anticonvulsant drug lacosamide selectively enhances slow inactivation of voltage-gated sodium channels and has been shown to be an effective add-on treatment for partial-onset seizures. Common adverse events (frequency 10%) of lacosamide doses up to 600 mg/day include nonspecific central nervous system effects (e.g., dizziness, ataxia, diplopia, and somnolence). There are no human data regarding the safety of very high dosages of lacosamide. We report the clinical course of a patient with bitemporal epilepsy who ingested 12 g of lacosamide, 56 g of gabapentin, 2g of topiramate, and 2.8 g of zonisamide during a suicide attempt. The patient was found comatose and experienced repeated generalized tonic-clonic seizures, aspiration with subsequent pneumonia, hypotension, and an increase in PR interval. Complete physical recovery occurred after several days of supportive treatment. We conclude that intoxication with lacosamide, in combination with overdoses of multiple AEDs, can be survived without sequelae, even after ingestion of 12 g lacosamide.

Topics: Acetamides; Adult; Anticonvulsants; Coma; Drug Administration Routes; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Therapy, Combination; Epilepsy; Female; Humans; Lacosamide; Suicide, Attempted

To calculate cost per additional quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) for lacosamide as adjunctive treatment for patients with uncontrolled partial-onset seizures as compared to no adjunctive treatment.. A decision-tree simulation model was constructed to calculate the number of seizures and health-care utilization for treated and untreated with lacosamide, respectively. Prices from 2007 were used for all costs.. All results were calculated for a 24-, 18-, 12- and 6-months follow-up. The cost per additional QALY was estimated to euro 27,641 (24 months). Using a willingness-to-pay threshold for a QALY of euro 50,000 the net marginal value of using lacosamide was estimated to about euro 850,000 per 1000 patients.. The estimated cost per QALY gained falls within the range of reported estimates of the willingness-to-pay for an additional QALY. The results imply that lacosamide is cost-effective in the treatment of uncontrolled partial-onset seizures (1 euro approximately 9.6 SEK).

Topics: Acetamides; Anticonvulsants; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Epilepsy; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Lacosamide; Quality-Adjusted Life Years; Retrospective Studies; Sensitivity and Specificity; Sweden; Treatment Outcome

A simple high-performance liquid chromatographic micromethod is described for the quantitation of the new antiepileptic drug lacosamide in serum of patients. Serum (100 microL) was first precipitated with 10 microL 60% perchloric acid and 10 microL supernatant injected directly into the high-performance liquid chromatograph. Chromatographic separation was achieved by use of a steel cartridge column (125 x 3 mm inside diameter) packed with Hypersil BDS C-18, at 40 degrees C, and with a gradient elution system comprising methanol, formic acid and water. The eluent was monitored at 215 nm by diode array detection and the calibration curve was linear in the range of 10 to 250 micromol/L. Recovery ranged from 99% to 106%. The limit of quantification was 1 micromol/L and the intrabatch and interbatch coefficients of variation were less than 5%. No interference from commonly prescribed antiepileptic drugs (clobazam, clonazepam, carbamazepine, carbamazepine-10,11-epoxide, gabapentin, lamotrigine, levetiracetam, oxcarbazepine, phenobarbital, phenytoin, primidone, pregabalin, valproic acid, and vigabatrin) was observed, so the method can be used to routinely monitor lacosamide in patients on polytherapy antiepileptic drug regimens.

Topics: Acetamides; Anticonvulsants; Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Monitoring; Epilepsy; Humans; Lacosamide; Quality Control; Reference Standards; Reproducibility of Results

The anti-epileptic drug (R)-lacosamide ((2R)-2-(acetylamino)-N-benzyl-3-methoxypropanamide (LCM)) modulates voltage-gated sodium channels (VGSCs) by preferentially interacting with slow inactivated sodium channels, but the observation that LCM binds to collapsin response mediator protein 2 (CRMP-2) suggests additional mechanisms of action for LCM. We postulated that CRMP-2 levels affects the actions of LCM on VGSCs. CRMP-2 labeling by LCM analogs was competitively displaced by excess LCM in rat brain lysates. Manipulation of CRMP-2 levels in the neuronal model system CAD cells affected slow inactivation of VGSCs without any effects on other voltage-dependent properties. In silico docking was performed to identify putative binding sites in CRMP-2 that may modulate the effects of LCM on VGSCs. These studies identified five cavities in CRMP-2 that can accommodate LCM. CRMP-2 alanine mutants of key residues within these cavities were functionally similar to wild-type CRMP-2 as assessed by similar levels of enhancement in dendritic complexity of cortical neurons. Next, we examined the effects of expression of wild-type and mutant CRMP-2 constructs on voltage-sensitive properties of VGSCs in CAD cells: 1) steady-state voltage-dependent activation and fast-inactivation properties were not affected by LCM, 2) CRMP-2 single alanine mutants reduced the LCM-mediated effects on the ability of endogenous Na(+) channels to transition to a slow inactivated state, and 3) a quintuplicate CRMP-2 alanine mutant further decreased this slow inactivated fraction. Collectively, these results identify key CRMP-2 residues that can coordinate LCM binding thus making it more effective on its primary clinical target.

Topics: Acetamides; Animals; Binding Sites; Cells, Cultured; Electrophysiology; Epilepsy; Immunoblotting; Intercellular Signaling Peptides and Proteins; Lacosamide; Male; Nerve Tissue Proteins; Rats; Rats, Sprague-Dawley; Sodium Channels

The mechanism of action of several antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) rests on their ability to modulate the activity of voltage-gated sodium currents that are responsible for fast action potential generation. Recent data indicate that lacosamide (a compound with analgesic and anticonvulsant effects in animal models) shares a similar mechanism. When compared with other AEDs, lacosamide has the unique ability to interact with sodium channel slow inactivation without affecting fast inactivation. This article reviews these findings and discusses their relevance within the context of neuronal activity seen during epileptiform discharges generated by limbic neuronal networks in the presence of chemical convulsants. These seizure-like events are characterized by sustained discharges of sodium-dependent action potentials supported by robust depolarizations, thus providing synchronization within neuronal networks. Generally, AEDs such as phenytoin, carbamazepine and lamotrigine block sodium channels when activated. In contrast, lacosamide facilitates slow inactivation of sodium channels both in terms of kinetics and voltage dependency. This effect may be relatively selective for repeatedly depolarized neurons, such as those participating in seizure activity in which the persistence of sodium currents is more pronounced and promotes neuronal excitation. The clinical effectiveness of lacosamide has been demonstrated in randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled, adjunctive-therapy trials in patients with refractory partial seizures. Further studies should determine whether the effects of lacosamide in animal models and in clinical settings are fully explained by its selective action on sodium current slow inactivation or whether other effects (e.g. interactions with the collapsin-response mediator protein-2) play a contributory role.

Topics: Acetamides; Animals; Anticonvulsants; Clinical Trials as Topic; Disease Models, Animal; Epilepsy; Humans; Ion Channel Gating; Lacosamide; Models, Molecular; Sodium Channels

We report our 6 months of experience with adjunctive lacosamide in 25 patients with pharmacoresistant focal epilepsy. Baseline characteristics of our patients were similar to those of the populations in the three clinical trials that evaluated lacosamide for refractory focal epilepsy. One patient experienced sustained seizure freedom for 5 months; two more patients had nonsustained periods of seizure freedom of 1 and 4 months. A total of eight patients (32%) reported a greater than 50% reduction in seizure frequency. Thirteen patients (52%) reported side effects during the titration, mostly dizziness, fatigue, nausea, and gait instability. In five patients (20%), these disappeared during the maintenance phase and/or with dose reduction. Two patients lost more than 10% of their body weight. Otherwise, in terms of efficacy and adverse effects, our data mirror the profile of lacosamide described in the three clinical trials. Substantial weight loss may occur in individual patients.

Topics: Acetamides; Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Anticonvulsants; Cohort Studies; Electroencephalography; Epilepsy; Female; Germany; Humans; Lacosamide; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Male; Middle Aged; Product Surveillance, Postmarketing; Video Recording; Young Adult

This paper comprises a series of experiments in rodent models of partial and generalized epilepsy which were designed to describe the anti-convulsant profile of the functionalized amino acid lacosamide. Lacosamide was effective against sound-induced seizures in the genetically susceptible Frings mouse, against maximal electroshock test (MES)-induced seizures in rats and mice, in the rat hippocampal kindling model of partial seizures, and in the 6Hz model of psychomotor seizures in mice. The activity in the MES test in both mice (4.5mg/kg i.p.) and rats (3.9 mg/kg p.o.) fell within the ranges previously reported for most clinically available anti-epileptic drugs. At both the median effective dose for MES protection, as well as the median toxic dose for rotorod impairment, lacosamide elevated the seizure threshold in the i.v. pentylenetetrazol seizure test, suggesting that it is unlikely to be pro-convulsant at high doses. Lacosamide was inactive against clonic seizures induced by subcutaneous administration of the chemoconvulsants pentylenetetrazol, bicuculline, and picrotoxin, but it did inhibit NMDA-induced seizures in mice and showed full efficacy in the homocysteine model of epilepsy. In summary, the overall anti-convulsant profile of lacosamide appeared to be unique, and the drug displayed a good margin of safety in those tests in which it was effective. These results suggest that lacosamide may have the potential to be clinically useful for at least the treatment of generalized tonic-clonic and partial-onset epilepsies, and support ongoing clinical trials in these indications.

Topics: Acetamides; Animals; Anticonvulsants; Bicuculline; Cobalt; Convulsants; Electroshock; Epilepsies, Partial; Epilepsy; Epilepsy, Generalized; Epilepsy, Reflex; Excitatory Amino Acid Agonists; GABA Antagonists; Homocysteine; Kindling, Neurologic; Lacosamide; Male; Mice; N-Methylaspartate; Neurotoxicity Syndromes; Pentylenetetrazole; Picrotoxin; Rats; Rats, Sprague-Dawley; Status Epilepticus

We examined effects of the novel anticonvulsant lacosamide and its inactive isomer (SPM 6953) in an in vitro model of epileptiform activity. Focal field potential recordings (34+/-0.2 degrees C) were obtained from 17 to 22 day old rat brain slices. Physiological synaptic transmission (fEPSP amplitude and duration) in CA1 of rat hippocampus was not significantly altered (P > 0.05, n = 4) by lacosamide (1 microM-1 mM). Recording from visual cortex during application of 4-aminopyridine (4-AP; 100 microM) revealed both spontaneous and evoked 'ictal like' discharges. Spontaneous ictal like discharges in the visual cortex were blocked by 100 microM carbamazepine (CBZ), 100 microM pentobarbital and 200 microM phenobarbital (PHB) but were insensitive to the anti-absence drug ethosuximide (750 microM; n = 4, P > 0.05). Lacosamide reduced tonic duration and maximal firing frequency with EC(50)s of 41 and 71 microM, respectively. In contrast, the S stereoisomer (100-320 microM) produced no significant effect on spontaneous ictal activity (n = 3-4, P > 0.05). Seizures induced by high frequency (100 Hz, 1s) stimulation were selectively reduced in amplitude by PHB (200 microM) and frequency by CBZ (100 microM; n = 6) and lacosamide (100 microM; n = 4). GABAergic negative going potentials were attenuated by CBZ (irreversible with washing) and lacosamide (reversible) but not by PHB. We conclude that lacosamide blocks 4-AP induced epileptiform activity in the visual cortex. This novel anticonvulsant drug appears to inhibit epileptogenesis (seizure spread) by interacting with a stereoselective, but as yet unidentified, target site in rodent neocortex in the mid-micromolar range.

Topics: 2-Amino-5-phosphonovalerate; 4-Aminopyridine; 6-Cyano-7-nitroquinoxaline-2,3-dione; Acetamides; Animals; Anticonvulsants; Carbamazepine; Convulsants; Electrophysiology; Epilepsy; Excitatory Amino Acid Antagonists; Extracellular Space; Female; In Vitro Techniques; Lacosamide; Male; Membrane Potentials; Patch-Clamp Techniques; Phenobarbital; Picrotoxin; Potassium Channel Blockers; Prohibitins; Rats; Rats, Sprague-Dawley; Synaptic Transmission; Visual Cortex

The current treatment of epilepsy focuses exclusively on the prophylaxis or suppression of seizures and thus provides merely a symptomatic treatment, without clear influence on the course of the disease. There is a need for new drugs that act at different molecular targets than currently available antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) and for new therapies designed to block the process of epileptogenesis. In recent years, different research lines have examined the epileptogenic process in order to understand the different stages in this process, and with the hope that early recognition and intervention could prevent the development or progression of epilepsy. In animals, acquired epilepsy is studied most commonly with the kindling model and status epilepticus models. In the present study, we used the kindling model to evaluate whether the novel AED lacosamide affects kindling-induced epileptogenesis. This drug does not seem to act by any of the mechanisms of currently available AEDs, but the exact molecular mechanisms of action of lacosamide have not yet been clarified.. Groups of 9-10 rats were treated with either vehicle or different doses of lacosamide (3, 10, or 30 mg/kg/day) over 22-23 days during amygdala kindling.. Daily administration of lacosamide during kindling acquisition produced a dose-dependent effect on kindling development. While the drug was inactive at 3 mg/kg/day, significant retardation of kindling was observed at 10 mg/kg/day, by which the average number of stimulations to reach kindling criterion was increased by >90%. A significant inhibitory effect on kindling acquisition was also observed with 30 mg/kg/day, but this dose of lacosamide was associated with adverse effects.. The present data demonstrate that lacosamide, in addition to exerting anticonvulsant activity, has the potential to retard kindling-induced epileptogenesis. Whether this indicates that lacosamide possesses antiepileptogenic or disease-modifying potential needs to be further evaluated, including studies in other models of acquired epilepsy.

Topics: Acetamides; Amygdala; Animals; Anticonvulsants; Disease Models, Animal; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Electric Stimulation; Electrodes, Implanted; Electroencephalography; Epilepsy; Female; Kindling, Neurologic; Lacosamide; Rats; Rats, Wistar

Topics: Amides; Anticonvulsants; Epilepsy; Humans; Multicenter Studies as Topic; Propane; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic