lacosamide and Epilepsies--Partial

Lacosamide (LCM), is a third-generation antiseizure medicine, with limited clinical evidence for use in pediatric populations. We aimed to evaluate evidence for the efficacy and safety of LCM in pediatric patients with epilepsy.. A systematic review was performed using literature published from inception to February 2022 identified in MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, and four Chinese databases. Efficacy and safety outcome data were collected, and a meta-analysis was performed.. Twenty-one studies involving 1230 pediatric patients were included. The median percent reduction in seizure frequency per 28 days from baseline to maintenance was 33.1% (95% confidence interval [CI] 22.7%, 43.5%). After 6 months of treatment, the 50%, 75%, and 100% responder rates were 53.3% (95% CI 40.7%, 65.9%), 28.3% (95% CI 20.8%, 35.8%), and 20.4% (95% CI 12.6%, 28.2%), respectively. After 12 months of treatment, the 50%, 75%, and 100% responder rates were 42.0% (95% CI 29.5%, 54.5%), 19.5% (95% CI 11.1%, 27.8%), and 15.2% (95% CI 6.6%, 23.8%), respectively. The most common adverse events (AEs) were drowsiness (15.0%), dizziness (9.9%), and somnolence (8.3%).. Lacosamide is generally effective and well tolerated to use in children with epilepsy. However, further research with high-quality data and long-term follow-up of LCM use in pediatric populations is needed.

Topics: Anticonvulsants; Child; Epilepsies, Partial; Epilepsy; Humans; Lacosamide; Sleepiness; Treatment Outcome

This is an updated version of the Cochrane review published in 2015. Around half of people with epilepsy will not achieve seizure freedom on their first antiepileptic drug; many will require add-on therapy. Around a third of people fail to achieve complete seizure freedom despite multiple antiepileptic drugs. Lacosamide has been licenced as an add-on therapy for drug-resistant focal epilepsy.. To evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of lacosamide as an add-on therapy for children and adults with drug-resistant focal epilepsy.. We searched the following databases (22 August 2019): the Cochrane Register of Studies (CRS Web), including the Cochrane Epilepsy Group Specialized Register and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE (Ovid, 1946 to 20 August 2019), ClinicalTrials.gov, and the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP), with no language restrictions. We contacted UCB Pharma (sponsors of lacosamide).. Randomised controlled trials of add-on lacosamide in people with drug-resistant focal epilepsy.. We used standard Cochrane methodology, assessing the following outcomes: 50% or greater reduction in seizure frequency; seizure freedom; treatment withdrawal; adverse events; quality of life; and cognitive changes. The primary analyses were intention-to-treat. We estimated summary risk ratios (RR) for each outcome presented with 99% confidence intervals (CI), except for 50% or greater seizure reduction, seizure freedom and treatment withdrawal which were presented with 95% CIs. We performed subgroup analyses according to lacosamide dose and sensitivity analyses according to population age, whereby data from children were excluded from the meta-analysis.. We included five trials (2199 participants). The risk of bias for all studies was low to unclear. All studies were placebo-controlled and assessed doses from 200 mg to 600 mg per day. One study evaluated lacosamide in children; all other studies were in adults. Trial duration ranged from 24 to 26 weeks. All studies used adequate methods of randomisation and were double-blind. Overall, the certainty of the evidence for the outcomes was judged as moderate to high, with the exception of seizure freedom which was low. The RR for a 50% or greater reduction in seizure frequency for all doses of lacosamide compared with placebo was 1.79 (95% CI 1.55 to 2.08; 5 studies; 2199 participants; high-certainty evidence). The RR for seizure freedom for all doses of lacosamide compared with placebo was 2.27 (95% CI 1.35 to 3.83; 5 studies; 2199 participants; low-certainty evidence). The RR for treatment withdrawal for all doses of lacosamide compared with placebo was 1.57 (95% CI 1.24 to 1.98; 5 studies; 2199 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). The estimated effect size for most outcomes did not change considerably following sensitivity analysis. For seizure freedom, however, the RR nearly doubled upon the exclusion of data from children (RR 4.04, 95% CI 1.52 to 10.73). Adverse events associated with lacosamide included: abnormal co-ordination (RR 6.12, 99% CI 1.35 to 27.77), blurred vision (RR 4.65, 99% CI 1.24 to 17.37), diplopia (RR 5.59, 99% CI 2.27 to 13.79), dizziness (RR 2.96, 99% CI 2.09 to 4.20), nausea (RR 2.35, 99% CI 1.37 to 4.02), somnolence (RR 2.04, 99% CI 1.22 to 3.41), vomiting (RR 2.94, 99% CI 1.54 to 5.64), and number of participants experiencing one or more adverse events (RR 1.12, 99% CI 1.01 to 1.24). Adverse events that were not significant were: vertigo (RR 3.71, 99% CI 0.86 to 15.95), rash (RR 0.58, 99% CI 0.17 to 1.89), nasopharyngitis (RR 1.41, 99% CI 0.87 to 2.28), headache (RR 1.34, 99% CI 0.90 to 1.98), fatigue (RR 2.11, 99% CI 0.92 to 4.85), nystagmus (RR 1.47, 99% CI 0.61 to 3.52), and upper respiratory tract infection (RR 0.70, 99% CI 0.43 to 1.15).. Lacosamide is effective and well-tolerated in the short term when used as add-on treatment for drug-resistant focal epilepsy. Lacosamide increases the number of people with 50% or greater reduction in seizure frequency and may increase seizure freedom, compared to placebo. Higher doses of lacosamide may be associated with higher rates of adverse events and treatment withdrawal. Additional evidence is required assessing the use of lacosamide in children and on longer-term efficacy and tolerability.

Topics: Adult; Anticonvulsants; Bias; Child; Drug Resistant Epilepsy; Drug Therapy, Combination; Epilepsies, Partial; Humans; Lacosamide; Placebos; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Seizures

Extrapolation of efficacy data from adults to children is accepted for focal epilepsy - the antiepileptic drug, lacosamide, has been approved for the treatment of children ≥4 years of age on this basis. Since many small-scale, open-label studies are reported in the literature before approval, a systematic review was conducted to ascertain whether results of these could be used to support extrapolation in epilepsy in the future. In the absence of randomised trials, a second analysis was conducted for reports on lacosamide use in adults with generalized epilepsies. Twenty-seven articles were included in the paediatric qualitative synthesis, and 14 in the adult. Paediatric studies were analysed separately based on seizure type: focal, generalised and mixed. In focal epilepsy, safety and seizure-related findings mirrored those observed in the adult Phase II/III trials, supporting the feasibility of data extrapolation. Few studies reported outcomes in children with epilepsies associated with generalised seizures, and those that included children with different seizure types, mostly did not provide results separately. Lacosamide treatment appeared beneficial for children and adults experiencing tonic-clonic and myoclonic seizures. Reports of seizure aggravation were inconsistent and, in many cases, could not be clearly attributed to lacosamide. Given the absence of sufficient data, evidence for the feasibility of extrapolation was not as clear-cut as it was in focal epilepsy. These results highlight the complexities of conducting trials in the generalised epilepsy setting, and the importance of studies in the real-life setting and of analysing efficacy data per generalized seizure type and syndrome.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Age Factors; Anticonvulsants; Child; Child, Preschool; Epilepsies, Partial; Female; Humans; Lacosamide; Male; Observational Studies as Topic

Eslicarbazepine (ESL), Lacosamide (LAC), Perampanel (PER) and Brivaracetam (BRV), have recently been marketed as third-generation antiepileptic drugs (AEDs). We conducted a meta-analysis to indirectly compare overall efficacy and tolerability between third-generation AEDs in uncontrolled focal epilepsy.. We performed an online database search using Pubmed, Embase, Cochrane Online Library, and Clinicaltrial.gov for all available randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that investigated the therapeutic effects over a range of AED doses versus placebo. We then compared clinical efficacy and tolerability between these newer AEDs using Indirect Treatment Comparison software.. Nineteen RCTs with a total of 7245 patients were included in our study. There were no significant differences in the risk difference of 50% responder rates and seizure free rates between third generation AEDs, regardless of dose. The risk of treatment emergent adverse events was significantly higher with ESL and PER treatment compared to BRV at all doses combined. Withdrawal rates due to adverse events were also significantly higher in patients treated with the highest doses of LAC and PER versus BRV, while treatment with ESL or LAC was related to higher withdrawal rates versus BRV when all doses were combined.. Our analysis suggested there were no significant differences in efficacy between third generation AEDs in uncontrolled focal epilepsy. BRV may have the best tolerability profile. The other AEDs were associated with a higher risk for intolerable adverse, especially when taken at a high doses. The results from these indirect comparisons warrant further examination and verification through future well-designed trials.

Topics: Anticonvulsants; Dibenzazepines; Epilepsies, Partial; Humans; Lacosamide; Nitriles; Pyridones; Pyrrolidinones; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic

Lacosamide (Vimpat

Topics: Animals; Anticonvulsants; Epilepsies, Partial; Humans; Lacosamide; Seizures

The goal of pharmacologic therapy with antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) is to reduce the frequency of seizures and achieve a seizure-free state with minimal side effects. However 30% of patients treated with available AEDs continue to experience uncontrolled seizures. There is still need for new AEDs with enhanced effectiveness and tolerability. Areas covered: The present manuscript is based on an extensive Internet and PubMed search from 1992 to 2017. It is focused on the pharmacokinetic properties of lacosamide (LCM) for the treatment of partial-onset seizures. Expert opinion: LCM is an anticonvulsant approved as add-on treatment or monotherapy of partial-onset seizures with or without secondary generalization. LCM shares many of the pharmacokinetic characteristics of an ideal AED. LCM displays linear and dose-proportional pharmacokinetics, rapid and complete absorption from the gastrointestinal tract, low plasma-protein binding, renal excretion and a terminal half-life that supports twice-daily dosing. Because the bioavailability and tolerability of oral and intravenous LCM are comparable, LCM offers the advantage of direct conversion from oral to intravenous administration, and vice versa, without the need for titration or dose adjustment. Further studies are needed to determine optimal timing, dosing, as well as the safety and efficacy of LCM in status epilepticus.

Topics: Acetamides; Anticonvulsants; Biological Availability; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Administration Schedule; Epilepsies, Partial; Half-Life; Humans; Lacosamide

The objective of the study was to evaluate the dose effects of lacosamide on the efficacy and safety as adjunctive therapy for partial-onset seizure in adults. We searched online databases such as Pubmed, Embase, Cochrane Online Library, and Clinicaltrial.gov for randomized control trials. A meta-analysis was performed on RevMan 5.3 software. Four randomized control trials with 1855 patients out of 310 citations and 30 registered trials were identified. 400 mg/d was more effective than 200 mg/d [RR 1.23 (95 % CI 1.05-1.45), P = 0.01], but the 600 mg/d didn't show more benefit than 400 mg/d [RR 1.01 (95 % CI 0.81-1.27), P = 0.90]. Increasing the dosage led to higher incidence of quitting the medication because of adverse events [400 vs. 200 mg/d RR 2.17 (95 % CI 1.15-4.11), P = 0.02; 600 vs. 400 mg/d RR 1.55 (95 % CI 1.12-2.15), P = 0.009]. Incidence of serious adverse events did not occur with the increase of dose [400 vs. 200 mg/d RR 1.26 (95 % CI 0.50-3.20), P = 0.62], [600 vs. 400 mg/d RR 0.52 (95 % CI 0.21-1.30), P = 0.16]. A dose of 400 mg/d resulted in a higher chance of dizziness [RR 1.50 (95 % CI 1.02-2.20), P = 0.04], vomiting [RR 1.73 (95 % CI 1.03-2.90), P = 0.04], and diplopia [RR 1.98 (95 % CI 1.19-3.30), P = 0.008] than that of 200 mg/d. 400 mg/d is the optimal dose for efficacy. The dose of 200 mg/d has the best safety for less occurrence of adverse events and less quitting. Current evidence suggests that a dose of 600 mg/d is unnecessary, except for particular reasons.

Topics: Acetamides; Adult; Anticonvulsants; Databases, Factual; Epilepsies, Partial; Female; Humans; Lacosamide; Male; Middle Aged; Treatment Outcome

Eslicarbazepine acetate (ESL) and lacosamide (LCM) have recently emerged as add-on treatments in patients with focal epilepsy experiencing seizures despite adequate monotherapy. Both drugs enhance slow inactivation of voltage-gated sodium channels. To date no randomized controlled trial (RCT) has directly compared ESL with LCM as add-on treatments for focal epilepsy. Our aim was to indirectly compare the efficacy of ESL and LCM used as add-on treatments in patients with focal epilepsy using common reference-based indirect comparison meta-analysis.. We systematically searched RCTs in which ESL or LCM has been used as add-on treatment in patients with focal epilepsy and compared with placebo. Following outcomes were considered: ≥50% reduction in seizure frequency; seizure freedom; treatment withdrawal for any reason; ≥25% increase in seizure frequency. Random-effects Mantel-Haenszel meta-analyses were performed to obtain odds ratios (ORs) for the efficacy of ESL or LCM versus placebo. Adjusted indirect comparisons were then made between ESL and LCM using the obtained results, and comparing the minimum and the highest effective recommended daily dose of each drug.. Eight studies were included. Indirect comparisons adjusted for dose-effect showed no difference between ESL and LCM for responder rate, seizure freedom, and withdrawal rates. We could not assess increase in seizure frequency due to lack of data.. Indirect comparisons failed to find a significant difference in efficacy between add-on ESL and LCM in patients with focal epilepsy. Direct head-to-head clinical trials comparing ESL with LCM as add-on antiepileptic treatment are required to confirm these results.

Topics: Acetamides; Anticonvulsants; Dibenzazepines; Epilepsies, Partial; Humans; Lacosamide

Brivaracetam (BRV), eslicarbazepine acetate (ESL), lacosamide (LCM), and perampanel (PER) have been recently marketed as adjunctive treatments for focal onset seizures. To date, no randomized controlled trial (RCT) has directly compared BRV with ESL, LCM, or PER.. To compare BRV with the other add-on AEDs in patients with uncontrolled focal epilepsy, estimating their efficacy and tolerability through an adjusted, common-reference based indirect comparison meta-analysis.. We systematically searched RCTs in which add-on treatment with ESL or LCM in patients with focal onset seizures have been compared with placebo. Efficacy and tolerability outcomes were considered. Random-effects Mantel-Haenszel meta-analyses were performed to obtain odds ratios (ORs) for the efficacy of BRV, LCM, ESL, or PER versus placebo. Adjusted indirect comparisons were then made between BRV and the other three AEDs using the obtained results, comparing the minimum and the highest effective recommended daily dose of each drug.. Seventeen RCTs, with a total of 4971 patients were included. After adjusting for dose-effects, indirect comparisons showed no difference between BRV and LCM, ESL, or PER for responder rate and seizure freedom. Lower adverse events were observed with high dose BRV compared to high dose ESL or PER, but no difference was found in withdrawing because of adverse events.. Indirect comparisons do not demonstrate a significant difference in efficacy between add-on BRV and LCM, ESL, or PER in focal epilepsy, and might suggest a better tolerability of BRV than ESL, and possibly also PER, at the highest effective recommended dose.

Topics: Acetamides; Anticonvulsants; Dibenzazepines; Drug Therapy, Combination; Epilepsies, Partial; Humans; Lacosamide; Nitriles; Pyridones; Pyrrolidinones; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic

Lacosamide-a third-generation antiepileptic drug available in multiple formulations-was first approved in 2008 as adjunctive therapy for partial-onset seizures (POS) in adults. In 2014, lacosamide was approved as monotherapy for POS by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA). A loading dose administration was approved in 2013 by the European Medicines Agency and in 2014 by the FDA. Unlike traditional sodium channel blockers affecting fast inactivation, lacosamide selectively enhances sodium channel slow inactivation. This mechanism of action results in stabilization of hyperexcitable neuronal membranes, inhibition of neuronal firing and reduction in long-term channel availability without affecting physiological function. Lacosamide is rapidly absorbed, with maximum plasma concentrations reached 0.5-4 h after intake. Oral bioavailability is high (100 %) for a dose up to 800 mg. Bioavailability is irrespective of food intake. Variability in pharmacokinetic parameters is low (coefficients of variation almost all <20 %). The pharmacokinetic profile of lacosamide is consistent in healthy subjects and across different patient populations studied. Lacosamide elimination from plasma occurs with a terminal half-life of approximately 13 h in young subjects and 14-16 h in elderly subjects; this difference does not impact the dose regimen. Lacosamide produces a pharmacodynamic effect that is closely correlated with its plasma concentration. The pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic relationship for reduction of seizure frequency can be described by a maximum effect (E max) model. Lacosamide does not induce or inhibit cytochrome P450 enzymes or known drug transporter systems, has low protein binding of less than 15 % and, because it has multiple elimination pathways, it has no clinically relevant interactions with commonly prescribed medications.

Topics: Acetamides; Administration, Oral; Age Factors; Anticonvulsants; Biological Availability; Cytochrome P-450 Enzyme System; Drug Interactions; Epilepsies, Partial; Humans; Lacosamide; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic

Around half of people with epilepsy will not achieve seizure freedom on their first antiepileptic drug; many will require add-on treatment with another drug. Sometimes multiple treatment combinations are tried to achieve maximum seizure control, although around a third of people do not achieve complete seizure control. Lacosamide is an antiepileptic drug that has been licensed as an add-on treatment for partial epilepsy.. To evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of lacosamide when used as an add-on treatment for patients with drug-resistant partial epilepsy.. We searched the Cochrane Epilepsy Group's Specialized Register (21 May 2015), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL , The Cochrane Library Issue 4, April 2015), MEDLINE (Ovid, 1946 to 21 May 2015), Scopus (1823 to 13 November 2014), ClinicalTrials.gov (21 May 2015) and the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP, 21 May 2015). We imposed no language restrictions. We contacted UCB (sponsors of lacosamide) and experts in the field.. Randomised controlled trials of add-on lacosamide in people with drug-resistant partial epilepsy.. Two review authors independently assessed trials for inclusion and extracted the relevant data. We assessed the following outcomes: (1) 50% or greater reduction in seizure frequency; (2) seizure freedom; (3) treatment withdrawal for any reason; and (4) adverse events. Primary analyses were intention-to-treat. Summary risk ratios were estimated for each outcome.. We included three trials in our review (1311 participants), which were classified as having low risk of bias. All trials were placebo-controlled and assessed doses ranging from 200 mg to 600 mg per day. Trial duration ranged from 24 to 26 weeks. All trials used adequate methods of randomisation and were double-blind. Overall the quality of the evidence was rated as moderate to high. The overall risk ratio for a 50% or greater reduction in seizure frequency for all doses of lacosamide compared with placebo was 1.70 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.38 to 2.10); for seizure freedom for all doses of lacosamide compared with placebo was 2.50 (95% CI 0.85 to 7.34); and for treatment withdrawal for all doses of lacosamide compared with placebo was 1.88 (95% CI 1.40 to 2.52). Adverse effects significantly associated with lacosamide were abnormal co-ordination (risk ratio (RR) 6.12, 99% CI 1.35 to 27.77), diplopia (RR 5.29, 99% CI 1.97 to 14.23), dizziness (RR 3.53, 99% CI 2.20 to 5.68), nausea (RR 2.37, 99% CI 1.23 to 4.58) and vomiting (RR 3.49, 99% CI 1.43 to 8.54). Adverse effects that were not statistically significant were headache (RR 1.34, 99% CI 0.83 to 2.18), fatigue (RR 2.11, 99% CI 0.92 to 4.85), nystagmus (RR 1.47, 99% CI 0.61 to 3.52) and somnolence (RR 1.44, 99% CI 0.67 to 3.09).. This review has shown lacosamide to be effective and fairly well tolerated in the short term when used as add-on treatment for drug-resistant partial epilepsy in adults. Higher doses of lacosamide may be more associated with adverse effects and withdrawal of the drug than lower doses. Additional evidence on children is needed, and longer-term efficacy is unknown.

Topics: Acetamides; Adult; Anticonvulsants; Drug Resistant Epilepsy; Drug Therapy, Combination; Epilepsies, Partial; Humans; Lacosamide; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Seizures

This article lays the background for, and discusses the practical issues surrounding, the adjunctive use of the last four antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) to be licensed for the treatment of pharmacoresistant focal seizures in the UK and elsewhere. More than 30% of adolescent and adult patients will not be fully controlled on the currently available therapeutic armamentarium. After not responding to their first three AED schedules, only a handful of patients attained seizure freedom on subsequent regimens. To optimise the response to any new AED in this setting, it is often necessary to reduce the existing drug burden. The pharmacology, tolerability and safety, and everyday use of lacosamide, eslicarbazepine acetate, retigabine (ezogabine) and perampanel will be reviewed and discussed. This will be accompanied by data from prospective audits with each drug undertaken at the Western Infirmary in Glasgow, Scotland, and a report of their successful introduction in an illustrative case. Overall, there is a large variation in the course of refractory epilepsy and the effect of AED therapy on this process seems minimal. Nevertheless, a number of patients will benefit from the introduction of each new AED, with some becoming seizure-free.

Topics: Acetamides; Adult; Aged; Animals; Anticonvulsants; Carbamates; Dibenzazepines; Drug Resistant Epilepsy; Epilepsies, Partial; Female; Humans; Lacosamide; Male; Middle Aged; Nitriles; Phenylenediamines; Pyridones

Lacosamide (Vimpat(®)) is a functionalized amino acid available orally (as a solution or tablets) and as an intravenous infusion for use as monotherapy (only in the USA) or adjunctive therapy for the treatment of focal seizures in adult and adolescent (aged ≥17 years in the USA) patients with epilepsy. As adjunctive therapy to other antiepileptic drugs (AEDs), lacosamide provided effective seizure control and was generally well tolerated in adults and adolescents (aged ≥16 years) in randomized clinical trials and in the real-world setting. In clinical trials, adjunctive lacosamide provided significantly greater reductions in 28-day seizure rates than adjunctive placebo, with these benefits maintained after up to 8 years of therapy in open-label extension studies. Moreover, patients were effectively switched from oral to short-term intravenous adjunctive therapy at the same dosage, which may be particularly beneficial in situations where oral therapy is not suitable. Conversion to lacosamide monotherapy was superior to a historical-control cohort in patients with focal seizures converting from previous AED therapy. In the absence of head-to-head comparisons with other AEDs, the exact position of lacosamide relative to other AEDs remains to be fully determined. In the meantime, oral and intravenous lacosamide provides a useful option as monotherapy (only in the USA) or adjunctive therapy for the treatment of focal seizures in adult and adolescent (aged ≥17 years in the USA) patients with epilepsy.

Topics: Acetamides; Adolescent; Adult; Animals; Anticonvulsants; Drug Therapy, Combination; Epilepsies, Partial; Humans; Lacosamide; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic

Secondary generalized tonic-clonic seizures (SGTCS) are among the most severe forms of seizures, and the main risk factor for sudden unexpected death in epilepsy (SUDEP). Whether some antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) might be more efficacious than others on SGTCS in patients with drug-resistant focal epilepsy thus represents an important clinical issue for which no data are currently available.. We performed a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of adjunctive AED in which information on efficacy outcomes (i.e., responder rate and/or frequency per 28 days relative to baseline) were available both for all seizure types and for SGTCS. The primary analysis evaluated the efficacy of AEDs on all types of seizure and on SGTCS by comparing the responder rates for AED and for placebo.. Responder rate was available both for all seizure types and for SGTCS in 13 of the 72 eligible trials, evaluating 7 AEDs. Only three AEDs--lacosamide, perampanel and topiramate--showed greater efficacy than placebo. However, confidence intervals of relative risks overlapped for all AEDs but pregabalin, which demonstrated significantly lower efficacy than lacosamide, perampanel, and topiramate. Moreover, there was a nonsignificant trend toward a lower relative risk of responder rate for SGTCS than for all seizure types, which appeared related to a greater response to placebo for this outcome.. Indirect comparison of AEDs using randomized placebo-controlled add-on trials does not support robust differences between AEDs to prevent SGTCS. Alternative designs for evaluation of therapeutic interventions in patients at risk for SGTCS-related complications are required.

Topics: Acetamides; Anticonvulsants; Chronic Disease; Death, Sudden; Early Medical Intervention; Epilepsies, Partial; Fructose; Humans; Lacosamide; Nitriles; Pyridones; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Recurrence; Risk Factors; Seizures; Topiramate; Treatment Outcome

Lacosamide is an antiepileptic drug (AED) available in multiple formulations that was first approved in 2008 as adjunctive therapy for partial-onset seizures (POS) in adults. Unlike traditional sodium channel blockers affecting fast inactivation, lacosamide selectively enhances sodium channel slow inactivation. This mechanism of action results in stabilization of hyperexcitable neuronal membranes, inhibition of neuronal firing, and reduction in long-term channel availability without affecting physiological function. Lacosamide has a well-characterized and favorable pharmacokinetic profile, including a fast absorption rate, minimal or no interaction with cytochrome P-450 izoenzymes, and a low potential for drug-drug interactions. Lacosamide clinical development included three placebo-controlled, double-blind, randomized trials conducted in more than 1300 patients, each demonstrating safety and efficacy of lacosamide compared to placebo as adjunctive therapy for adults with POS. The clinical use of lacosamide may broaden, pending results of trials evaluating its use as monotherapy for POS in adults, as treatment for epilepsy in pediatric subjects, and as adjunctive treatment for uncontrolled primary generalized tonic-clonic seizures in those with idiopathic generalized epilepsy.

Topics: Acetamides; Animals; Anticonvulsants; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Epilepsies, Partial; Humans; Lacosamide; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Treatment Outcome

Lacosamide (Vimpat(®)) is a functionalized amino acid available orally (as a syrup or tablet) and as an intravenous infusion. It is believed to exert its antiepileptic effect by selectively enhancing the slow inactivation of voltage-gated sodium channels. Lacosamide is approved in several countries worldwide as an adjunctive therapy for the treatment of partial-onset seizures; however, prescribing regulations differ between countries. This article reviews the use of lacosamide as indicated in adults and adolescents (aged 16-18 years) in the EU, where it is approved in this patient population as an adjunctive therapy to other AEDs in the treatment of partial-onset seizures, with or without secondary generalization. In three randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre studies in adults and adolescents (aged 16-18 years) with partial-onset seizures, adjunctive therapy with oral lacosamide (administered for an initial titration period followed by 12 weeks' maintenance therapy) generally reduced the frequency of seizures to a significantly greater extent than placebo, with antiepileptic efficacy sustained following longer-term treatment (up to 8 years) in this patient population. Oral and intravenous lacosamide were generally well tolerated in clinical studies, with the majority of adverse events being mild or moderate in severity. Very common adverse reactions following adjunctive therapy with oral lacosamide included diplopia, dizziness, headache and nausea; the tolerability profile of intravenous lacosamide appeared consistent with that of oral lacosamide, although intravenous administration was associated with local adverse events, such as injection site discomfort or pain, irritation and erythema. Thus, oral and intravenous lacosamide as an adjunctive therapy to other AEDs provides a useful option in the treatment of patients with partial-onset seizures.

Topics: Acetamides; Administration, Intravenous; Administration, Oral; Animals; Anticonvulsants; Clinical Trials as Topic; Disease Management; Drug Therapy, Combination; Epilepsies, Partial; Humans; Lacosamide; Seizures

Lacosamide is a third-generation antiepilepsy drug approved for adjunctive treatment of partial-onset seizures in adults. The pharmacology of lacosamide includes linear kinetics, complete bioavailability, and no major drug interactions. Lacosamide produces slow inactivation of neuronal sodium channels, which differentiates it from other sodium channel modulators, such as carbamazepine and phenytoin. The drug was effective with no major safety problems detected in three large placebo-controlled pivotal trials and has been released in Europe and the US at 200-400 mg/day, divided b.i.d.; an intravenous formulation is approved for temporary conversion from oral therapy. This article reviews the clinical development, pharmacology, and uses of lacosamide for treating partial-onset seizures in adults.

Topics: Acetamides; Adult; Anticonvulsants; Chemotherapy, Adjuvant; Clinical Trials, Phase II as Topic; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Epilepsies, Partial; Humans; Lacosamide; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Seizures; Treatment Outcome

Lacosamide (LCM) is an antiepileptic drug approved as adjunctive therapy for partial-onset seizures in adults. It has a mechanism of action that differs from other antiepileptic drugs in that it selectively enhances sodium channel slow inactivation, which is in contrast to 'traditional' sodium channel blockers (e.g., carbamazepine, oxcarbazepine, lamotrigine and phenytoin) that primarily affect fast inactivation. The pharmacokinetic profile of LCM is well characterized and includes a fast rate of absorption, little or no interaction with cytochrome P450 isoenzymes, limited effect of age and gender on plasma levels, and low potential for drug-drug interactions. Safety and efficacy data from three double-blind, placebo-controlled trials, as well as pooled and post hoc analyses of these three trials, have been published, and demonstrate the safety and rapid-onset efficacy of LCM in adults with treatment-refractory partial-onset seizures. LCM is available in tablets and an intravenous formulation when oral administration is temporarily not feasible.

Topics: Acetamides; Animals; Anticonvulsants; Clinical Trials as Topic; Epilepsies, Partial; Humans; Lacosamide; Treatment Outcome

We will review all available studies on the use of lacosamide in the treatment of partial-onset seizures. The available evidence includes two open-label studies and three randomized controlled trials evaluating the safety and efficacy of oral lacosamide. One open-label study and one randomized controlled trial evaluating the safety and tolerability of intravenous lacosamide was also identified. Lacosamide was found to be efficacious with significant reduction in seizure frequency dosed 400-600 mg daily. Moreover, its adverse drug effects were mild and infrequently reported in the literature. Findings suggest that lacosamide is an effective agent for adjunctive treatment of refractory partial-onset seizures.

Topics: Acetamides; Administration, Oral; Animals; Anticonvulsants; Contraindications; Epilepsies, Partial; Epilepsy; Humans; Injections, Intravenous; Lacosamide; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Status Epilepticus

This article provides a short but comprehensive pharmacotherapeutic update of adjunctive therapy with lacosamide for partial-onset seizures in adult patients.. PubMed, Centre for Reviews and Dissemination databases, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, EconLit were searched from January 1999 to September 2010. Studies evaluating intravenous lacosamide were excluded because this article focuses on chronic adjunctive therapy.. Three randomised, multicentre, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials have investigated the efficacy of lacosamide in 1300 adults with epilepsy. The median percent reduction in seizure frequency per 28 days from baseline to maintenance was 18.4% for placebo, 33.3% for lacosamide 200 mg/day (p < 0.01), 36.8% for 400 mg/day (p < 0.001), 39.4% for 600 mg/day. The percentage of patients attaining a seizure frequency reduction of ≥50% was 22.6% with placebo, 34.1% with lacosamide 200 mg/day (p < 0.05), 39.7% with lacosamide 400 mg/day (p < 0.001), 39.6% with lacosamide 600 mg/day. Three open-label extension studies showed that long-term treatment with lacosamide produced sustained efficacy in and was well-tolerated by patients. Three economic evaluations used a similar design to determine the cost effectiveness of lacosamide from the healthcare payer perspective in Sweden, Finland and Belgium. These studies showed that standard anti-epileptic drug therapy plus lacosamide is likely to constitute a cost-effective alternative. The budget impact of introducing lacosamide is likely to be limited.. The evidence on lacosamide was limited and studies suffered from a number of methodological limitations. Lacosamide appears to be a safe, efficacious and cost-effective adjunctive therapy for partial-onset epileptic seizures in adult patients. However, these results need to be validated by studies that explore the impact of lacosamide in real-life clinical practice.

Topics: Acetamides; Adult; Anticonvulsants; Chemotherapy, Adjuvant; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Epilepsies, Partial; Humans; Lacosamide; Multicenter Studies as Topic; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Review Literature as Topic

Epilepsy is one of the most common serious neurological conditions worldwide, with an age-adjusted incidence of approximately 50 per 100,000 persons per year in developed countries. Antiepileptic therapy can result in long-term remission in 60-70% of patients, but many patients will require combination treatment to achieve optimal seizure control, as monotherapy is ineffective at controlling seizures in 30-53% of patients. Despite the increase in available treatment options, patient outcomes have not improved significantly and there is still a need for more effective therapies. Drugs used in the treatment of focal-onset seizures are a diverse range of compounds, and in most cases their mechanism of action is unknown or poorly defined. This review discusses the efficacy and safety of the newer adjuvant antiepileptic therapies that may improve outcomes in patients unresponsive to monotherapy, including clobazam, vigabatrin, lamotrigine, gabapentin, topiramate, tiagabine, levetiracetam, oxcarbazepine, pregabalin, zonisamide and eslicarbazepine, with focus on lacosamide. Lacosamide has been shown to exert its anticonvulsant effects predominantly by enhancement of the slow inactivation of voltage-gated sodium channels. Lacosamide is indicated for use as adjuvant treatment of focal-onset seizures in patients with epilepsy, and there is some evidence that it may also be of use in patients with status epilepticus and cancer patients with epilepsy. The efficacy of lacosamide has been assessed in three randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trials, all of which have shown lacosamide to be effective at reducing seizure frequency and increasing 50% responder rates in patients with focal-onset seizures. Long-term lacosamide treatment is generally well tolerated and is not associated with significant drug interactions; the availability of an intravenous form of the drug also makes it particularly useful for a broad range of patients.

Topics: Acetamides; Animals; Anticonvulsants; Drug Interactions; Epilepsies, Partial; Epilepsy; Humans; Lacosamide; Sodium Channels; Treatment Outcome

Lacosamide is an antiepileptic drug (AED) approved for the adjunctive treatment of partial-onset seizures in adults. Completed phase II/III clinical trials of lacosamide provide a valuable opportunity to evaluate clinically relevant aspects of the resulting large patient pool.. To provide insight into the clinical utility of lacosamide by performing a priori-defined and post hoc analyses on a large, pooled patient population.. Pooled data from three randomized, double-blind, multicentre, placebo-controlled phase II/III trials.. Adult patients with partial-onset seizures with or without secondary generalization (N = 1294).. Four- to six-week titration followed by 12-week maintenance treatment with lacosamide (Vimpat®) 200, 400 or 600 mg/day or placebo.. A priori-defined primary efficacy variables for the pooled analysis were change in seizure frequency per 28 days and the proportion of patients experiencing a ≥50% reduction in seizure frequency (50% responder rate) from Baseline to the Maintenance Phase; a priori-defined secondary efficacy variables were the proportion of patients achieving a ≥75% reduction in seizure frequency from Baseline to the Maintenance Phase (75% responder rate), the proportion of Maintenance Phase completers remaining seizure free throughout the entire Maintenance Phase and the percentage of seizure-free days during the Maintenance Phase for patients entering the Maintenance Phase. The pooled analyses of the change in seizure frequency, and 50% and 75% responder rates were performed with an intent-to-treat (ITT) approach, including all patients receiving at least one dose of trial medication and having at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment. Similar analyses of the two primary efficacy variables and 75% responder rates were also performed using a modified ITT population (ITTm) that included ITT patients who entered the Maintenance Phase. Additional post hoc efficacy analyses were an evaluation of onset of efficacy and assessment of efficacy in patients grouped by prior surgical history and individual concomitant AED use. In addition, pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modelling was performed, and safety data were assessed.. In this pooled analysis of 1294 difficult-to-treat patients, all three dosages of lacosamide (200, 400 and 600 mg/day) showed a significant improvement compared with placebo for median percent seizure reduction (ITT and ITTm; p < 0.05 for 200 mg/day, p < 0.001 for 400 and 600 mg/day), as well as for 50% responder rate (ITT and ITTm; p < 0.05 for 200 mg/day, p < 0.001 for 400 and 600 mg/day). Evaluation of 75% responder rate in the phase II/III pooled population showed that a significantly higher proportion of patients randomized to lacosamide 400 or 600 mg/day achieved a ≥75% reduction in seizure frequency compared with placebo (ITT and ITTm; p < 0.001); statistical significance was not observed for lacosamide 200 mg/day (ITT and ITTm). A total of 2.7%, 3.3% and 4.8% of patients completing the Maintenance Phase in the lacosamide 200, 400 and 600 mg/day groups, respectively, experienced no seizures throughout the entire Maintenance Phase (placebo group = 0.9%). The mean change from baseline in the percentage of seizure-free days in patients entering the Maintenance Phase for the phase II/III pool was 8.0%, 11.6% and 14.7% with lacosamide 200 (p = 0.077), 400 (p < 0.001) and 600 (p < 0.001) mg/day groups, respectively, compared with 6.1% in the placebo group. The onset of efficacy relative to placebo was evident by the first week of treatment with lacosamide. Efficacy was similar in lacosamide-treated patients reporting prior surgical intervention for epilepsy compared to lacosamide-treated patients with no prior surgical intervention. Lacosamide showed a reduction in seizures, regardless of the concomitant AEDs used. The preferred pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic model (E(max)) supported the therapeutic dose range of lacosamide, and no additional safety concerns were identified in the phase II/III pooled analysis.. Results of these a priori-defined and post hoc pooled data analyses from phase II/III trials demonstrate that lacosamide effectively reduces seizures in patients at all three dosages evaluated with an early onset of efficacy, regardless of patient surgical history and concomitant AED regimen.

Topics: Acetamides; Adult; Anticonvulsants; Clinical Trials, Phase II as Topic; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Double-Blind Method; Epilepsies, Partial; Female; Humans; Lacosamide; Male; Models, Biological; Multicenter Studies as Topic; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

Lacosamide, a new antiepileptic drug (AED) with a different pharmacological action that enhances sodium channel slow inactivation, is approved for the adjunctive treatment of partial-onset seizures in adults. Previous analyses of pooled phase II/III trials have demonstrated that lacosamide provides additional efficacy when added to a broad range of AEDs.. To further evaluate the efficacy and safety of lacosamide by grouping patients based upon the sodium channel-blocking properties of their concomitant AEDs.. Post hoc exploratory analyses were performed on pooled data in which patients were grouped based upon inclusion or non-inclusion of at least one 'traditional' sodium channel-blocking AED (defined as carbamazepine, lamotrigine, oxcarbazepine and phenytoin derivatives) as part of their concomitant AED regimen.. Data pooled from previously conducted phase II/III clinical trials of lacosamide.. Adult patients with partial-onset seizures with or without secondary generalization (N = 1308).. Four- to six-week Titration Phase followed by 12-week maintenance treatment with adjunctive lacosamide (Vimpat®) [200, 400 or 600 mg/day] or placebo.. Efficacy variables included change in seizure frequency per 28 days and the proportion of patients experiencing a ≥50% reduction in seizure frequency (50% responder rate) from Baseline to the Maintenance Phase. The proportion of patients experiencing a ≥75% reduction in seizure frequency from Baseline to the Maintenance Phase (75% responder rate) was also assessed. Safety parameters assessed were treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and discontinuation due to TEAEs. Additional safety assessments were changes in ECG and laboratory parameters as well as vital signs (including bodyweight).. Of 1308 patients in the pooled phase II/III population, the majority (82%) were using at least one 'traditional' sodium channel-blocking concomitant AED. In this subgroup of patients, adjunctive lacosamide showed significant reductions in seizure frequency (p < 0.01, all dosages) and significantly greater 50% and 75% responder rates (p < 0.01 for 400 mg/day; p < 0.01 [50% responder rate] and p < 0.05 [75% responder rate] for 600 mg/day) compared with placebo; these effects were similar to the results seen in the pooled phase II/III population. TEAEs and discontinuations due to TEAEs in this subgroup were dose related and similar to the pooled phase II/III population. In the remaining subgroup of patients, i.e. those not taking 'traditional' sodium channel-blocking AEDs as part of their concomitant AED regimen (n = 231; 18%), a pronounced, dose-related seizure reduction was observed with lacosamide (p < 0.01, 400 and 600 mg/day for median percent seizure reduction and 50% or 75% responder rates). Also in this group, incidences of TEAEs were low, and discontinuations due to TEAEs did not appear to increase with dose. Analyses of ECG, laboratory and vital signs (including bodyweight) assessments did not identify abnormalities in either subgroup that were outside of the known safety profile of lacosamide observed in the pooled phase II/III population.. In this post hoc exploratory analysis, adjunctive lacosamide demonstrated significant seizure reduction over placebo regardless of the inclusion of 'traditional' sodium channel blockers in the concomitant AED regimen. Future prospective studies evaluating single AED combinations (e.g. lacosamide plus one other drug) are needed to better evaluate the potential for additive or synergistic effects of lacosamide in combination with AEDs not considered 'traditional' sodium channel blockers.

Topics: Acetamides; Adult; Anticonvulsants; Clinical Trials, Phase II as Topic; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Combination; Epilepsies, Partial; Female; Humans; Lacosamide; Male; Middle Aged; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Sodium Channel Blockers; Treatment Outcome

Lacosamide is a functionalized amino acid, the antiepileptic effects of which appear to be due to a novel mode of action, namely the selective enhancement of slow inactivation of voltage-gated sodium channels. Lacosamide is available as oral or intravenous formulations. Bioequivalence between the oral tablet and the oral syrup of lacosamide has been established. The bioavailability of the oral lacosamide tablet was similar to that of a 30- or 60-minute intravenous infusion of lacosamide administered at the same dosage. Oral lacosamide when added concomitantly with between one and three antiepileptic drugs was effective in adult patients with uncontrolled partial-onset seizures with or without secondary generalization, according to pooled data (n = 1308) from three phase II/III studies that had a 12-week maintenance phase. The percentage of patients with a >or=50% reduction from baseline to the maintenance phase in seizure frequency was significantly greater with oral lacosamide 200 or 400 mg/day (34% and 40%) than with placebo (23%). The median percentage reduction in seizure frequency per 28 days from baseline to the maintenance phase was significantly greater with lacosamide 400 mg/day than with placebo in each of the three phase II/III studies. Lacosamide was generally well tolerated in adult patients with partial-onset seizures, with most treatment-emergent adverse events being of mild or moderate severity. Dizziness was the most common treatment-related adverse event. When used as short-term replacement for oral lacosamide, intravenous lacosamide was well tolerated when administered as a 15-, 30- or 60-minute infusion.

Topics: Acetamides; Anticonvulsants; Biological Availability; Drug Therapy, Combination; Epilepsies, Partial; Humans; Lacosamide; Seizures; Therapeutic Equivalency

To review the pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, efficacy, and safety of lacosamide, a new agent for use as adjunctive treatment in partial-onset seizures and a potential agent for treatment of neuropathic pain.. A MEDLINE search (1966-July 2009) was conducted using the key words lacosamide, harkoseride, SPM-927, ADD-234037, epilepsy, anticonvulsant, and neuropathic pain. Bibliographies of all articles retrieved were also reviewed.. All studies including humans and published in English with data describing lacosamide for the adjunctive treatment of partial-onset seizures and for treatment of neuropathic pain were reviewed.. Lacosamide is a functionalized amino acid molecule that selectively enhances the slow inactivation of voltage-gated sodium channels and interacts with the collapsin-response mediator protein-2. With its bioavailability of approximately 100%, minimal protein binding, and few drug-drug interactions, lacosamide has a favorable pharmacokinetic profile. Recent data suggest that lacosamide may have a role as adjunctive treatment of partial-onset seizures. Open-label studies showed a 14-47% reduction in seizure frequency, while placebo-controlled trials demonstrated a 26-40% reduction in seizure frequency. The 50% responder rates ranged from 32.7% to 41.2% with varying doses of lacosamide. Although lacosamide use is not approved by the Food and Drug Administration for treatment of neuropathic pain, studies demonstrated reductions of 2.01-3.60 in pain scale scores. The most common adverse effects, occurring in greater than 10% of subjects in the clinical trials, include arthralgia, ataxia, blurred vision, diplopia, dizziness, fatigue, headache, injection site pain (only in intravenous studies), nausea, tremor, upper respiratory tract infection, and vomiting.. Lacosamide is an effective agent for adjunctive treatment of refractory partial-onset seizures. Its exact role in the treatment of neuropathic pain needs to be determined.

Topics: Acetamides; Analgesics; Anticonvulsants; Chemotherapy, Adjuvant; Diabetic Neuropathies; Epilepsies, Partial; Humans; Lacosamide; Multicenter Studies as Topic; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Seizures

Lacosamide (Vimpat) is an aniepileptic drug with a new, dual mode of action. Lacosamide enhances slow inactivation of voltage-gated sodium channels and modulates the collapsin response mediator protein-2 (CRMP-2), a protein, which is part of neuronal signal transduction pathways and which is attributed to neuroprotection. Reduction of seizure frequency could be demonstrated in several clinical studies in patients with partial-onset seizures who received lacosamide in addition to other antiepileptic drugs.

Topics: Acetamides; Administration, Oral; Anticonvulsants; Clinical Trials as Topic; Epilepsies, Partial; Humans; Injections, Intravenous; Lacosamide

Lacosamide, (R)-2-acetamido-N-benzyl-3-meth- oxypropionamide, is a new chemical entity specifically synthesized as an anticonvulsive drug candidate, which appears to have a novel dual mode of action. Its pharmacokinetic characteristics have been studied in young and elderly healthy adults, as well as in adults with epilepsy or diabetic neuropathic pain. After oral administration, lacosamide is rapidly and completely absorbed. An elimination half-life of 13 hours allows for twice-daily dosing. Lacosamide has a low potential for drug-drug interactions. Both oral and intravenous formulations of lacosamide are being developed. In completed placebo-controlled clinical trials, lacosamide has demonstrated efficacy as adjunctive therapy for reduction of seizure frequency in patients with uncontrolled partial-onset seizures, and has been generally well tolerated. For patients treated with lacosamide, the most frequently reported adverse events in placebo-controlled trials include dizziness, headache, nausea and diplopia. When used as short-term replacement for oral lacosamide, intravenous lacosamide has a comparable safety profile to oral lacosamide. Results from clinical trials to date suggest that lacosamide may be a useful pharmacological treatment option for patients with partial-onset seizures.

Topics: Acetamides; Anticonvulsants; Drug Therapy, Combination; Drugs, Investigational; Epilepsies, Partial; Humans; Lacosamide

Currently recommended dosing of lacosamide often necessitates long titration periods. However, the use of a regimen consisting of initial loading dose of 200 mg followed by a maintenance dose of 200 mg/day in practice suggests tolerability of more rapid titration schedules. We aimed to clarify whether the shortened titration schedule affects tolerability of lacosamide.. We evaluated the safety of two rapid titration protocols designed to reach the target dose of 400 mg/day within 1 week, and the conventional weekly titration protocol (reaching the target dose of 400 mg/day in three weeks). The ≥50% responder rate and steady-state plasma concentration of lacosamide were also analyzed. Adverse events were assessed at 1 week and 5 weeks after reaching the target dose.. Seventy-five patients with epilepsy were enrolled and evenly distributed to three titration protocols, from which 5 patients were lost to follow-up and excluded from the safety analysis. Discontinuation of lacosamide or dose reductions due to adverse events occurred in 32 patients (46%), of whom a large majority (74%) had experienced adverse events after reaching 400 mg/day, demonstrating apparent dose-dependency. There was no difference in safety outcomes among the three titration groups. Concomitant use of sodium channel blockers significantly increased the risk of adverse events.. Rapid titration protocols for lacosamide were not associated with an increased risk of adverse events compared to the conventional weekly titration protocol. Uptitration of lacosamide at shorter intervals to an effective target dosage may be feasible in appropriate clinical situations.

Topics: Acetamides; Anticonvulsants; Epilepsies, Partial; Humans; Lacosamide; Prospective Studies; Treatment Outcome

Recently, a novel trial design has been proposed to overcome challenges with traditional placebo-controlled trials of antiepileptic drugs in infants and young children (≥1 month of age) (Auvin S, et al. Epilepsia Open 2019;4:537-43). The proposed time-to-event trial design involves seizure counting by caregivers and allows adjustment of the duration of the baseline period and duration of exposure to placebo or potentially ineffective treatment based on the patient's seizure burden and response. We performed post hoc analyses to mimic this trial design and evaluate its viability. As these analyses required trials with prolonged baseline and treatment periods and diary data, which is not a typical design of trials in infants and young children (1 month to <4 years of age), data from two trials in pediatric patients (4-16 years of age) were used.. We performed post hoc analyses of two randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials of adjunctive levetiracetam (N159; NCT00615615) and lacosamide (SP0969; NCT01921205) in children and adolescents (4-16 years of age) with focal-onset seizures. In these analyses, patients were followed until they completed the 10-week maintenance period, discontinued during the maintenance period, or reached their "nth" seizure (n = number of seizures patient had during baseline). Efficacy was assessed by determining time to nth seizure.. In the analyses of both trials, patients on levetiracetam or lacosamide had a 34% lower risk of reaching their baseline seizure count during their 10-week maintenance period than patients on placebo. The previously published primary results of these trials also demonstrated efficacy of adjunctive levetiracetam and lacosamide.. Although these were post hoc analyses of trials in older children (4-16 years of age), our results provide supportive evidence for the utility of the novel time-to-event trial design for future trials in infants and young children (1 month to <4 years of age).

Topics: Adolescent; Anticonvulsants; Child; Child, Preschool; Drug Therapy, Combination; Epilepsies, Partial; Epilepsy; Humans; Lacosamide; Levetiracetam; Seizures

The aim of this study was to evaluate the tolerability and efficacy of lacosamide (LCM) in Lebanese children with focal-onset seizures and to determine if specific variables are predictive of better effectiveness.. This is a retrospective analysis from three medical centers on consecutive children diagnosed with focal onset seizures and initiated on LCM. The seizure frequencies following the introduction of LCM were recorded and compared to the baseline monthly frequency at 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months. The primary efficacy variables were the 50% responder and seizure-free rates. The secondary outcome variables included the terminal 6-month seizure remission and percentages of discontinuation due to lack of efficacy or tolerability.. 58 patients with a mean age of 10 years experiencing a mean of 36.2 seizures per month during baseline were included. The seizure-free rates were 32.8%, 29.7%, and 12.5% at 6, 12 and 24 months follow up, respectively. Patients concomitantly treated with a sodium channel blocker were less likely to achieve a terminal 6-month seizure remission while the early introduction of LCM resulted in a significantly higher likelihood of attaining such a remission. 74.1% of patients were still maintained on LCM at the last follow-up. The most common adverse events consisted of dizziness, somnolence, nausea, vomiting, and rarely double vision.. LCM is efficacious and overall well tolerated in children with focal-onset seizures and exhibits higher efficacy with early introduction and when added to a non-sodium channel blocker.

Topics: Anticonvulsants; Child; Epilepsies, Partial; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Lacosamide; Lebanon; Male; Outcome Assessment, Health Care; Product Surveillance, Postmarketing; Retrospective Studies

To evaluate safety and tolerability of adjunctive lacosamide in children with focal seizures.. Patients were eligible for this open-label, fixed-titration trial (SP0847; NCT00938431) if aged 1 month-17 years with focal seizures taking 1-3 antiepileptic drugs. Findings from Cohort 1, aged 5-11 years, who received lacosamide ≤8 mg/kg/day, informed dosing for age-based cohorts 2-5, who then received ≤12 mg/kg/day (≤600 mg/day). Oral lacosamide was initiated at 2 mg/kg/day (1 mg/kg bid) and uptitrated by 2 mg/kg/day/week to the maximum cohort-defined dose (maximum trial duration: 13 weeks). Patients who did not achieve the maximum cohort-defined dose were discontinued.. Forty-seven patients (aged 6 months-≤17 years) enrolled (≥1 month-<4 years: n = 15; ≥4-<12 years: n = 23; ≥12-≤17 years: n = 9). 24/47 (51.1%) patients completed the trial at the maximum cohort-defined dose and 40/47 (85.1%) continued lacosamide in the extension trial. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported by 42/47 (89.4%) patients. The most common TEAEs (≥10% of patients) were vomiting (21.3%), diarrhea (14.9%), somnolence (12.8%), irritability, dizziness, and pyrexia (10.6% each). Twenty (42.6%) patients discontinued due to TEAEs, most commonly vomiting (8.5%), gait disturbance, dizziness, and somnolence (6.4% each). Six (12.8%) patients reported serious TEAEs, most commonly status epilepticus (3/47; 6.4%).. This fixed-titration trial supports the safety of adjunctive lacosamide in children (aged 6 months-≤17 years) with focal seizures. The TEAE profile was generally consistent with that observed in trials in adults, and no new safety concerns were identified.

Topics: Adolescent; Anticonvulsants; Child; Child, Preschool; Drug Therapy, Combination; Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions; Epilepsies, Partial; Female; Humans; Infant; Lacosamide; Male

To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of lacosamide in a real-life setting with the use of a flexible dose titration schedule and individualised maintenance doses up to the maximum approved dose of 400 mg/day. Adults with a diagnosis of focal seizures, with or without secondary generalization, were enrolled in this open-label Phase IV trial (NCT01235403). Lacosamide was initiated at 100 mg/day (50 mg bid) and uptitrated over a 12-week period to 200, 300 or 400 mg/day, based on safety and seizure control. Although dose increases were to be in increments of 100 mg/day, intermediate doses were permitted at each escalation step for one week for patients known to be particularly sensitive to starting new AEDs. After receiving a stable, effective dose for three weeks, patients entered the 12-week maintenance period. Primary outcomes were incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and withdrawal due to TEAEs. Seizure outcomes, all secondary, were median focal seizure frequency, ≥50% reduction in focal seizure frequency, and seizure freedom. One hundred patients with a mean age of 44 years were enrolled and 74 completed the trial. The incidence of TEAEs was 64.0% (n=100), with the most frequently reported (≥5% of patients) being dizziness, headache, and asthenia. Fourteen patients withdrew due to TEAEs, most frequently due to dizziness (six patients; 6.0%), vomiting (two patients; 2%), and tremor (two patients; 2%). Among patients with baseline and maintenance phase seizure data (n=75), median reduction in focal seizure frequency from baseline was 69.7% and the ≥50% responder rate was 69.3%. Among 74 patients who completed the maintenance phase, 21 (28.4%) were seizure-free. Flexible lacosamide dosing in this open-label trial was associated with a favourable tolerability and safety profile; the nature of the TEAEs was consistent with that observed in previous pivotal trials. Treatment with lacosamide was also associated with effective seizure control.

Topics: Acetamides; Adult; Aged; Anticonvulsants; Drug Administration Schedule; Epilepsies, Partial; Female; Humans; Lacosamide; Male; Middle Aged; Outcome Assessment, Health Care; Young Adult

The objective of the study was to investigate the effects of lacosamide (LCM) on daytime sleepiness ascertained by the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) in adults with focal epilepsy in a randomized, controlled design.. Subjects taking ≤2 AEDs for ≥4weeks underwent polysomnography with EEG followed by the maintenance of wakefulness test (MWT) and completed the ESS and other patient-reported outcomes (PROs) at baseline, LCM 200mg/day, and LCM 400mg/day (Visit 4; V4). Primary endpoint was ESS change (V4 to baseline) between LCM and placebo. Noninferiority test on ESS used a one-sided t-test based on a hypothesized difference of 4-point change between groups. Superiority test used a two-sided t-test to investigate the difference in change in PROs and MWT mean sleep latency (MSL) between groups. Fifty-five subjects provided 80% power to show noninferiority of LCM assuming 10% dropout.. Fifty-two subjects (mean age: 43.5±13.2years, 69% female, median monthly seizure frequency: 1 [0, 4.0]) participated. Baseline group characteristics including age, sex, ethnicity, standardized AED dose, seizure frequency, and ESS were similar. Abnormal baseline ESS scores were found in 35% of subjects. Noninferiority test found a ≤4-point increase in ESS (mean [95% CI]) in LCM subjects vs. placebo (-1.2 [-2.9, 0.53] vs. -1.1 [-5.2, 3.0], p=0.027) at V4. No significant difference in change in PROs, MSL, seizure frequency, or AED standardized dose was observed between groups.. Our interventional trial found that LCM is not a major contributor to daytime sleepiness based on subjective and objective measures. Inclusion of sleepiness measures in AED trials is warranted given the high prevalence of sleep-wake complaints in people with epilepsy.

Topics: Acetamides; Adult; Anticonvulsants; Epilepsies, Partial; Female; Humans; Lacosamide; Male; Middle Aged; Patient Reported Outcome Measures; Polysomnography; Sleep Stages; Treatment Outcome; Wakefulness

To assess prospectively the effectiveness of lacosamide (LCM) added to levetiracetam (LEV) after down-titration of a concomitant sodium channel blocker (SCB) among patients with focal epilepsy not adequately controlled on LEV and SCB.. In this open-label trial, LCM was initiated at 100 mg/day and up-titrated to 200-600 mg/day over 9 weeks; SCB down-titration started when LCM dose reached 200 mg/day. Patients remained on stable LCM/LEV doses for 12 weeks' maintenance (21-week treatment period). The primary outcome was retention rate on LCM.. Due to recruitment challenges, fewer than the planned 300 patients participated in the trial, resulting in the trial being underpowered. Overall, 120 patients (mean age 39.7 years) started and 93 completed the trial. The most frequently used SCBs were lamotrigine (39.2%), carbamazepine (30.8%) and oxcarbazepine (27.5%). Eighty-four patients adhered to protocol and discontinued their SCB after cross-titration, but there was insufficient evidence for 36 patients. Retention rate was 73.3% (88/120) for all patients and 83.3% (70/84) for those with evidence of SCB discontinuation. Seizure freedom for patients completing maintenance was 14.0% (13/93). Discontinuation due to adverse events (6.7%) and lack of efficacy (3.3%) occurred primarily during cross-titration. Most frequently reported adverse events during treatment were dizziness (23.3%), headache (15.0%) and fatigue (8.3%).. In patients with uncontrolled seizures on LEV/SCB, the LCM/LEV combination appeared to be effective and well tolerated. A cross-titration schedule-flexible LCM up-titration, concomitant SCB down-titration and stable background LEV-could present a feasible and practical approach to initiating LCM while minimizing pharmacodynamic interactions with a SCB.

Topics: Acetamides; Adult; Anticonvulsants; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Therapy, Combination; Epilepsies, Partial; Female; Humans; Lacosamide; Levetiracetam; Male; Middle Aged; Piracetam; Sodium Channel Blockers

Assess cognitive effects of adjunctive perampanel in adolescents.. In this double-blind study (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01161524), patients aged 12 to <18 years with partial-onset seizures despite receiving 1-3 antiepileptic drugs were randomized (2:1) to perampanel or placebo. Perampanel was increased weekly in 2-mg increments to 8-12 mg/day (6-week titration; 13-week maintenance). Changes in neuropsychological outcomes were assessed at end of maintenance: Cognitive Drug Research (CDR) System Global Cognition Score (primary end point), five CDR System domain T-scores (secondary end points), letter fluency, category fluency, and Lafayette Grooved Pegboard Test (LGPT).. One hundred thirty-three patients were randomized. In the full analysis set, there were no differences of perampanel (n = 79) vs. placebo (n = 44) in CDR System Global Cognition Score (least squares mean change, -0.6 vs. 1.6; p = 0.145), Quality of Working Memory (1.1 vs. 2.0; p = 0.579), or Power of Attention (-6.9 vs. -2.7; p = 0.219). There were small differences with perampanel vs. placebo in other CDR System domains: improvements in Quality of Episodic Memory (3.0 vs. -1.2; p = 0.012), and worsening in Continuity of Attention (-3.3 vs. 1.6; p = 0.013) and Speed of Memory (0.3 vs. 7.0; p = 0.032). Letter fluency, category fluency, and LGPT were not significantly different between groups. The most frequent adverse events with perampanel were dizziness (30.6%) and somnolence (15.3%).. Perampanel did not differ from placebo in the global cognitive score, two of five subdomains, and four other cognitive measures. Perampanel was worse on two and better on one subdomain.

Topics: Acetamides; Adolescent; Anticonvulsants; Attention; Carbamazepine; Child; Cognition; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Combination; Epilepsies, Partial; Female; Fructose; Humans; Lacosamide; Lamotrigine; Levetiracetam; Male; Memory, Short-Term; Neuropsychological Tests; Nitriles; Oxcarbazepine; Piracetam; Pyridones; Topiramate; Treatment Outcome; Triazines; Valproic Acid

The objective of this study was to examine cognitive and quality-of-life measures/quality of life outcomes with adjunctive lacosamide therapy in patients with treatment-resistant partial epilepsy.. This was a prospective, open-label, nonblinded, adjunctive therapy test-retest (within subjects) study of patients with treatment-resistant partial epilepsy in which outcome (cognitive functioning and mood/quality of life) was measured in the same subject before and after adjunctive lacosamide administration for 24weeks. The cognitive assessment included the following: Controlled Oral Word Association Test, Buschke Selective Reminding Test, Brief Visuospatial Memory Test-Revised, Stroop Color Word Test, Symbol Digit Modalities Test, Digit Span, Digit Cancellation, and Trails A and B. The quality-of-life measures/quality-of-life assessment included the following: Beck Depression Inventory-II, Profile of Mood States, and Quality of Life Inventory-89. Lacosamide was started at 100mg (50mg twice daily) and could be titrated as needed up to 400mg/day (200mg twice daily). Baseline concomitant AEDs were kept constant. Composite scores were calculated for a pre-post difference score for the cognitive and mood/quality-of-life measures separately and used in regression analyses to correct for the effects of age, education, seizure frequency, seizure severity, dose of lacosamide, and number of AEDs at baseline.. Thirty-four patients were enrolled (13 males, 21 females). Mean age was 38.8±2.43years. Mean seizure frequency decreased significantly from 2.0±2.55 seizures per week at baseline to 1.02±1.72 seizures per week at posttreatment (t=4.59, p<.0001) with a 50% responder rate seen in 18 patients (52.9%). No significant differences were found on the composite scores of the cognitive or the mood/quality-of-life measures after 6months of lacosamide.. Lacosamide appeared to have low risks of significant changes in cognition or mood/quality of life. In addition, the present study supports prior studies that have proven lacosamide as an effective adjunctive therapy for the treatment of resistant partial epilepsy.

Topics: Acetamides; Adult; Affect; Anticonvulsants; Cognition; Depression; Drug Resistant Epilepsy; Drug Therapy, Combination; Epilepsies, Partial; Female; Humans; Lacosamide; Male; Neuropsychological Tests; Prospective Studies; Psychiatric Status Rating Scales; Quality of Life; Seizures; Treatment Outcome

Treatment with enzyme-inducing antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) such as carbamazepine (CBZ) can lead to changes in reproductive, endocrine, and lipid parameters, resulting in clinical symptoms for some patients. Previous studies indicate that these changes can be reversed by switching to a nonenzyme-inducing AED. Lacosamide is a newer-generation AED, not known to induce or strongly inhibit cytochrome P450 (CYP450) enzymes. In this phase IIIb, prospective, multicenter, open-label, single-arm trial (NCT01375374), the serum concentrations of CYP-related reproductive hormones, thyroid hormones, and lipids were assessed in otherwise healthy male patients with focal seizures (N=11), before and after a switch from CBZ (600-1200mg/day at baseline) to lacosamide (target dose: 400mg/day by the end of titration) as adjunctive treatment to the nonenzyme-inducing AED levetiracetam (LEV, stable dosage of >1000mg/day throughout). Cross titration took place over 4weeks, followed by an 8-week maintenance period. Serum measurements were conducted at baseline and at the end of maintenance. The median serum sex-hormone-binding globulin (SHBG) concentration was towards the higher end of the normal range at baseline and decreased following the switch (61.7 to 47.5nmol/L, N=10, p=0.027 by Wilcoxon signed-rank test). Free androgen index (100×testosterone/SHBG) and free thyroxine serum concentration increased (25.4 to 36.4 and 13.0 to 14.9pmol/L, respectively, both N=10 and p=0.002). At baseline, the median progesterone serum concentration was below the normal range (0.7nmol/L), whereas median cholesterol and low-density lipoprotein concentrations were above the normal range (5.5 and 3.6mmol/L, respectively). By the end of maintenance, all measured parameters were within the normal range. The safety and tolerability profile of lacosamide was consistent with that observed in previous studies. Furthermore, antiseizure efficacy appeared to be maintained, suggesting that deinduction of CYP enzymes following a switch from CBZ to lacosamide as adjunctive therapy to LEV is feasible within 8weeks and is associated with normalization of serum parameters.

Topics: Acetamides; Adult; Anticonvulsants; Carbamazepine; Cholesterol; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Substitution; Drug Therapy, Combination; Epilepsies, Partial; Humans; Lacosamide; Levetiracetam; Lipids; Lipoproteins, LDL; Male; Piracetam; Progesterone; Prospective Studies; Sex Hormone-Binding Globulin; Testosterone; Thyroxine; Treatment Outcome

To evaluate the cardiac safety of adjunctive lacosamide in a large pool of adults with partial-onset seizures (POS).. Post-randomization changes from baseline for electrocardiographic (ECG) measurements, diagnostic findings, and relevant adverse events (AEs) were compared for pooled data from three randomized, placebo-controlled trials of adjunctive lacosamide for the treatment of POS.. Lacosamide did not prolong the QTc interval or affect heart rate as determined by an analysis of data from patients randomized to lacosamide 200, 400, or 600 mg/day (n = 944) compared with placebo (n = 364). After 12-week maintenance treatment, mean changes from baseline for QRS duration were similar between the placebo and lacosamide 200 and 400 mg/day groups (0.0, -0.2, and 0.4 ms), but slightly increased for lacosamide 600 mg/day (2.3 ms). A small, dose-related mean increase in PR interval was observed (-0.3, 1.4, 4.4, and 6.6 ms for the placebo and lacosamide 200, 400, and 600 mg/day groups, respectively). First-degree atrioventricular (AV) block was reported as a non-serious AE in 0.0%, 0.7%, 0.2%, and 0.5% of patients in the same respective groups. Second- or higher degree AV block was not observed. There was no evidence of a PR-interval-related pharmacodynamic interaction of lacosamide with either carbamazepine or lamotrigine.. Evaluation of the pooled cardiac safety data from patients with POS showed that adjunctive lacosamide at the maximum recommended dose (400 mg/day) was not clearly associated with any cardiac effect other than a small, dose-related increase in PR interval that had no evident symptomatic consequence.

Topics: Acetamides; Administration, Oral; Adult; Anticonvulsants; Epilepsies, Partial; Female; Heart Rate; Humans; Lacosamide; Male; Middle Aged

The objective of this study was to describe a priori protocol-defined analyses to evaluate the safety and tolerability of adjunctive oral lacosamide (200-600 mg/day) in adults (ages 16-70 years) with partial-onset seizures (POS) using data pooled from three similarly designed randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials (SP667, SP754 [NCT00136019], SP755 [NCT00220415]).. Patients with POS (≥2 years' duration, ≥2 previous antiepileptic drugs [AEDs]) uncontrolled by a stable dosing regimen of 1-3 concomitant AEDs were randomized to treatment with lacosamide at doses of 200 mg/day, 400 mg/day, or 600 mg/day, or placebo. Studies comprised a 4- to 6-week titration phase to target dose followed by a 12-week maintenance phase. Safety outcomes included treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) of particular relevance to patients with POS, overall TEAEs, and discontinuations due to TEAEs. Post hoc analyses included evaluation of TEAEs potentially related to cognition and TEAEs leading to discontinuation analyzed by concomitant AEDs.. One thousand three hundred eight patients were randomized to and received treatment; 944 to lacosamide and 364 to placebo. Most patients (84.4%) were taking 2 or 3 concomitant AEDs. The most common drug-associated TEAEs (reported by ≥5% of patients in any lacosamide dose group and with an incidence at least twice that reported for placebo during the treatment phase) were dizziness (30.6% for lacosamide vs 8.2% for placebo), nausea (11.4% vs 4.4%), and diplopia (10.5% vs 1.9%). Common drug-associated TEAEs generally appeared to be dose-related, and the incidence of each was lower during the 12-week maintenance phase than during the titration phase. Most TEAEs were either mild or moderate in intensity; severe TEAEs were predominantly observed with lacosamide 600 mg/day. No individual serious TEAE occurred in ≥1% of all lacosamide-treated patients. Treatment-emergent adverse events led to discontinuation in 8.1%, 17.2%, and 28.6% of the lacosamide 200-, 400-, and 600-mg/day groups, respectively (vs 4.9% of placebo). Few TEAEs were related to rash, weight loss/gain, changes in clinical chemistry parameters, or psychiatric disturbances, or were seizure-related. The odds of reporting any potential cognition-related TEAE vs placebo increased with dose and were similar between lacosamide doses of 200 and 400mg/day and placebo (odds ratio 1.3, 95% confidence interval 0.7-2.4). Discontinuations due to TEAEs based on most commonly used AEDs taken in combination with lacosamide (all doses combined) were carbamazepine (15.3% [51/334] vs 3.9% [5/129] placebo), lamotrigine (19.2% [56/291] vs 4.3% [5/117]), and levetiracetam (10.1% [28/278] vs 3.9% [4/103]).. The safety and tolerability profile of adjunctive lacosamide in this detailed evaluation was similar to that observed in the individual double-blind trials. Adjunctive lacosamide was associated with TEAEs related to the nervous system and gastrointestinal tract, predominantly during titration.

Topics: Acetamides; Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Anticonvulsants; Body Weight; Cognition; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Double-Blind Method; Drug Eruptions; Drug Therapy, Combination; Epilepsies, Partial; Female; Humans; Lacosamide; Male; Middle Aged; Seizures; Substance Withdrawal Syndrome; Young Adult

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of conversion to lacosamide 400 mg/day monotherapy in adults with focal epilepsy.. This historical-controlled, double-blind study (NCT00520741) enrolled patients aged 16-70 years on stable doses of 1-2 antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) and experiencing 2-40 partial-onset seizures per 28 days during the 8-week prospective Baseline. Patients were randomized to lacosamide 400 or 300 mg/day (3:1 ratio), starting at 200 mg/day and titrated over 3 weeks to randomized dose. Patients then withdrew background AEDs over 6 weeks and entered a 10-week Monotherapy Phase. The primary assessment was the Kaplan-Meier-predicted percentage of patients on 400 mg/day in the full analysis set (FAS) meeting ≥ 1 predefined seizure-related exit criterion by day 112, compared with the historical-control threshold (65.3%).. Four hundred twenty-five patients were enrolled and were eligible for safety analyses (400 mg/day, n = 319; 300 mg/day, n = 106). A total of 271 (63.8%) of 425 patients completed the Lacosamide Maintenance Phase (combined AED Withdrawal and Monotherapy Phases). Among 284 patients in the 400 mg/day group in the FAS, 82 (28.9%) met ≥ 1 exit criterion; the Kaplan-Meier-predicted exit percentage at day 112 for 400 mg/day (30.0%; 95% confidence interval [CI] 24.6-35.5%) was lower than the historical control. When exit events, withdrawal due to treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), and withdrawal due to lack of efficacy were summed (n = 90), the predicted exit percentage (32.3%; 95% CI 26.8-37.8%) was also lower than the historical control. Most patients receiving 400 mg/day reported some improvement on the Clinical Global Impression of Change (75.4%) and Patient Global Impression of Change (74.3%). Overall, the most common (>10%) TEAEs were dizziness (24.0%), headache (14.4%), nausea (13.4%), convulsion (11.5%), somnolence (10.4%), and fatigue (10.1%); most (74.1%) were mild-to-moderate in intensity. Seventy-two patients (16.9%) discontinued due to TEAEs. Seventeen patients (4%, all receiving 400 mg/day) experienced serious AEs.. Lacosamide 400 mg/day monotherapy was effective, with a favorable safety profile in patients with focal epilepsy.

Topics: Acetamides; Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Anticonvulsants; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Double-Blind Method; Drug Administration Schedule; Epilepsies, Partial; Female; Headache; Humans; Lacosamide; Male; Middle Aged; Nausea; Prospective Studies; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult

The purpose of this post hoc exploratory analysis was to determine the effects of the antiepileptic drug, lacosamide, on focal (partial-onset) seizure subtypes. Patient data from the three lacosamide pivotal trials were grouped and pooled by focal seizure subtype at Baseline: simple partial seizures (SPS), complex partial seizures (CPS), and secondarily generalized partial seizures (SGPS). Both efficacy outcomes (median percent change from Baseline to Maintenance Phase in seizure frequency per 28 days and the proportion of patients experiencing at least a 50% reduction in seizures) were evaluated by lacosamide dose (200, 400, or 600 mg/day) compared to placebo for each seizure subtype. An additional analysis was performed to determine whether a shift from more severe focal seizure subtypes to less severe occurred upon treatment with lacosamide. In patients with CPS or SGPS at Baseline, lacosamide 400 mg/day (maximum recommended daily dose) and 600 mg/day reduced the frequency of CPS and SGPS compared to placebo. Likewise, a proportion of patients with CPS and SGPS at Baseline experienced at least a 50% reduction in the frequency of CPS and SGPS (≥50% responder rate) in the lacosamide 400 and 600 mg/day groups compared with placebo. For both outcomes, numerically greatest responses were observed in the lacosamide 600 mg/day group among patients with SGPS at Baseline. In patients with SPS at Baseline, no difference between placebo and lacosamide was observed for either efficacy outcome. An additional exploratory analysis suggests that in patients with SPS at Baseline, CPS and SGPS may have been shifted to less severe SPS upon treatment with lacosamide. The results of these exploratory analyses revealed reductions in CPS and SGPS frequency with adjunctive lacosamide. Reduction in CPS and SGPS may confound assessment of SPS since the CPS or SGPS may possibly change to SPS by effective treatment.

Topics: Acetamides; Adult; Anticonvulsants; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Double-Blind Method; Epilepsies, Partial; Female; Humans; Lacosamide; Male; Treatment Outcome

Long-term (up to 8 years of exposure) safety and efficacy of the antiepileptic drug lacosamide was evaluated in this open-label extension trial (SP615 [ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00552305]). Patients were enrolled following participation in a double-blind trial or one of two open-label trials of adjunctive lacosamide for partial-onset seizures. Dosage adjustments of lacosamide (100-800 mg/day) and/or concomitant antiepileptic drugs were allowed to optimize tolerability and seizure reduction. Of the 370 enrolled patients, 77%, 51%, and 39% had >1, >3, or >5 years of lacosamide exposure, respectively. Median lacosamide modal dose was 400mg/day. Common treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were dizziness (39.7%), headache (20.8%), nausea (17.3%), diplopia (17.0%), fatigue (16.5%), upper respiratory tract infection (16.5%), nasopharyngitis (16.2%), and contusion (15.4%). Dizziness (2.2%) was the only TEAE that led to discontinuation in >2% of patients. Ranges for median percent reductions in seizure frequency were 47-65%, and those for ≥ 50% responder rates were 49-63% for 1-, 3-, and 5-year completer cohorts. Exposure to lacosamide for up to 8 years was generally well tolerated, with a safety profile similar to previous double-blind trials, and efficacy was maintained.

Topics: Acetamides; Adult; Anticonvulsants; Drug Therapy, Combination; Epilepsies, Partial; Female; Humans; Lacosamide; Male; Middle Aged; Seizures; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

INTRODUCTION. Eslicarbazepine acetate (ESL) is a new antiepileptic drug (AED) licensed in Spain in February 2011 as an adjunctive therapy in adults with partial seizures with or without secondary generalization. Clinical trials with ESL have demonstrated acceptable efficacy and safety. AIM. To evaluate the results of ESL in our epilepsy unit during its first year of clinical experience with this AED. PATIENTS AND METHODS. We included all patients who started treatment with ESL at our epilepsy unit from March 2011 to May 2012. We collected the following variables: gender, aetiology of epilepsy, epileptogenic area, reason for switch to ESL, clinical response after initiation of ESL, adverse effects of ESL, refractoriness criteria and treatment discontinuation. A bivariate factor-to-factor correlation study was carried out to establish associations between the independent variables and the clinical response. RESULTS. We recruited 105 patients (51.4% male). 20,7% of patients remained seizure-free and 58.4% showed > 50% improvement after introduction of ESL. At 6 months, 18.1% had experienced some type of side effect, with cognitive disorders being the most common, and 11.5% had discontinued treatment. Combination with lacosamide proved to be significantly less effective in the control of seizures. Combination of ESL with the rest of sodium channel inhibitors was similar in efficacy to others combinations. CONCLUSIONS. ESL is a well-tolerated and effective AED when is used as adjunctive treatment with most of other AED in clinical practice.

Topics: Acetamides; Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Anticonvulsants; Cognition Disorders; Depression; Dibenzazepines; Drug Therapy, Combination; Epilepsies, Partial; Epilepsy; Epilepsy, Generalized; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Lacosamide; Male; Middle Aged; Sodium Channel Blockers; Weight Gain; Young Adult

For clinical trial design and for clinical practice, it is of importance to assess factors associated with placebo response in patients with refractory epilepsy. We determined factors associated with placebo response in 359 adult patients with refractory focal epilepsy participating in three randomized placebo-controlled trials of the new antiepileptic drug lacosamide. At the end of the randomized 12-week maintenance period, 81 (23%) of the 359 patients randomized to placebo achieved at least a 50% seizure reduction (responders) compared to baseline. In contrast, 278 (77%) patients did not achieve a 50% seizure reduction (non-responders) compared to baseline. In multivariate analysis, five factors, which were present prior to the exposure to placebo, were found to be associated with placebo response. Higher age at study entry improved the chances of placebo response for each year [p=0.023, odds ratio (OR) 1.034 (95% confidence interval (95% CI): 1.005-1.063)]. In contrast, a lower chance of placebo response was seen with age at diagnosis of epilepsy of 6-20 years compared to ≤5 years [p=0.041, OR 0.475 (95% CI: 0.232-0.971)]. A history of 7 or more prior lifetime AEDs lowered the chance of achieving placebo response compared to 1-3 prior lifetime AEDs [p<0.001, OR 0.224 (95% CI: 0.101-0.493)] as did a baseline seizure frequency >10 seizures per 28 days compared to ≤5 seizures per 28 days [p=0.026, OR 0.431 (95% CI: 0.205-0.904)]. Prior epilepsy surgery lowered the likelihood of placebo response [p=0.02, OR 0.22 (95% CI: 0.062-0.785)]. We suggest that age at exposure to placebo, age at diagnosis of epilepsy, the number of prior lifetime AEDs, baseline seizure frequency and a history of epilepsy surgery appear to be associated with placebo response in adults with refractory focal epilepsy.

Topics: Acetamides; Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Anticonvulsants; Double-Blind Method; Electroencephalography; Epilepsies, Partial; Female; Humans; Lacosamide; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Male; Middle Aged; Placebo Effect; Placebos; Tomography, X-Ray Computed; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult

The aim of the study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of lacosamide (100-400 mg per day) as adjunctive treatment to other antiepileptic drugs (AED) in patients with uncontrolled partial epilepsy. A retrospective evaluation of efficacy and safety of lacosamide was made in 56 patients, aged 17-58 years, with focal seizures with- or without secondary localization during 6 months. Lacosamide was used with other AED (carbamazepine, oxcarbazepine, lamotrigine, valproates, levetiracetam, topiramate); in 73,2% patients it was administered with two additional AED. In 69,6% patients, the dose of lacosamide was 300 mg per day. The complete cessation of seizures was achieved in 8 (14,3%) patients, 18 (32,1%) patients had 50-75% reduction in seizures, 17 (30,4%) had 50% reduction. There were no changes in 3 (23,2) patients. Dose-dependent adverse effects were diplopia, vertigo, sleepiness, skin allergic reactions. No side-effects were caused by drug intolerance. Lacosamide is believed to open new possibilities in treatment of epilepsy.

Topics: Acetamides; Adult; Anticonvulsants; Drug Resistance; Drug Therapy, Combination; Epilepsies, Partial; Female; Humans; Lacosamide; Male; Middle Aged

To examine the safety and tolerability of rapidly initiating adjunctive lacosamide via a single intravenous loading dose followed by twice-daily oral lacosamide in lacosamide-naive adults with partial-onset seizures.. This open-label, multicenter trial, enrolled patients with epilepsy who were taking 1-2 antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) in one of four sequential cohorts containing 25 subjects each. An intravenous lacosamide loading dose (200, 300, or 400 mg) was administered over 15 min followed 12 h later by initiation of oral dosing consisting of one-half of the loading dose administered twice daily for 6.5 days. The first cohort was administered lacosamide 200 mg/day, followed by a cohort at 300 mg/day, and then a cohort at 400 mg/day. The results from each cohort were evaluated before enrolling the next highest dose level. The fourth cohort enrolled patients at the highest dose with clinically acceptable safety and tolerability results. Safety evaluations included treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), patient withdrawals due to TEAEs, and changes in vital signs, 12-lead electrocardiography (ECG) studies, laboratory parameters, and clinical examinations. Postinfusion lacosamide plasma concentrations were also evaluated.. A total of 100 patients were enrolled, 25 in each cohort. The loading dose for the repeat cohort was 300 mg; therefore, 25 patients were enrolled at 200 mg/day, 50 at 300 mg/day, and 25 at 400 mg/day. Most TEAEs occurred within the first 4 h following infusion; dose-related TEAEs (incidence ≥10%) during this timeframe included dizziness, somnolence, and nausea. Seven patients withdrew, all due to TEAEs: three (6%) from the combined 300 mg group and four (16%) from the 400 mg group; four of these patients discontinued within 4 h following infusion. The most common TEAEs leading to discontinuation (overall incidence >1%) were dizziness (6%), nausea (5%), and vomiting (3%). No clinically relevant pattern of changes from baseline ECG, clinical laboratory parameters, or vital signs were observed. Trough plasma concentrations suggested that near steady-state lacosamide concentrations were achieved with a single intravenous loading dose.. Intravenous loading doses of 200 and 300 mg lacosamide administered over 15 min followed by oral lacosamide were well tolerated in lacosamide-naive patients. The 400-mg loading dose was less well tolerated due to a higher frequency of dose-related TEAEs. These results support the feasibility of rapid initiation of adjunctive lacosamide treatment.

Topics: Acetamides; Administration, Oral; Adolescent; Adult; Anticonvulsants; Drug Administration Schedule; Epilepsies, Partial; Female; Humans; Injections, Intravenous; Lacosamide; Male; Middle Aged; Young Adult

This study investigates immediate efficacy and safety of intravenous application of de novo lacosamide (LCM) as add-on therapy in patients with pharmacoresistant focal epilepsy.. During presurgical video-electroencephalography (EEG) monitoring, 17 adult inpatients received LCM infusion (200 mg every 12 h for 2-3 days) followed by oral formulation with the same regimen. Before and after intravenous application of LCM, seizures and interictal epileptiform discharges (IEDs) recorded with continuous video-EEG monitoring were analyzed, and an assessment of adverse events (AEs) was performed daily. To evaluate the midterm tolerability and efficacy, follow-up visits were conducted 1 and 3 months after discharge from hospital.. In the acute phase, intravenous initiation of LCM was well tolerated with few mild or moderate AEs (3 of 17, 17.6%). A significant reduction of seizure frequency in the treatment phase as compared to mean seizure frequency in the 2-day baseline phase was achieved (p < 0.05 for the first treatment day, and p < 0.005 for the second treatment day). On the first treatment day, 61.5% of the patients were seizure free, and 84.6% on the second treatment day. IED reduction after intravenous application of LCM was not significant. After 1 month, the 50% responder rate was 46.6% and after the 3-month period, 42.8%.. Our data suggest that rapid intravenous initiation of de novo LCM is safe and may protect against seizures in a rapid and midterm time window.

Topics: Acetamides; Administration, Oral; Adult; Anticonvulsants; Drug Administration Schedule; Electroencephalography; Epilepsies, Partial; Female; Humans; Infusions, Intravenous; Lacosamide; Male; Treatment Outcome

To evaluate the long-term (up to 5 years exposure) safety and efficacy of lacosamide as adjunctive therapy in patients with uncontrolled partial-onset seizures taking one to three concomitant antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) in open-label extension trial SP756 (NCT00522275).. Patients who completed the double-blind trial SP754 (NCT00136019) were eligible to participate in this open-label extension trial (SP756). At the conclusion of trial SP754, patients had transitioned to lacosamide 200 mg/day. Subsequent dosage adjustments of lacosamide (100-800 mg/day) and/or concomitant AEDs were allowed to optimize tolerability and seizure reduction. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), vital signs, body weight, clinical laboratory data, electrocardiography studies, and seizure frequency were evaluated.. A total of 308 patients received open-label lacosamide and 138 patients (44.8%) completed the long-term trial. The median modal dose (defined as the daily lacosamide dose a patient received for the longest duration during the treatment period) was 500 mg/day. The percentages of patients with lacosamide exposure >1, >2, >3, or >4 years were 75%, 63%, 54%, and 29%, respectively. Primary reasons for discontinuation were lack of efficacy (26%) and adverse events (11%). Common TEAEs (≥15%) were dizziness, headache, contusion, nausea, convulsion, nasopharyngitis, fall, vomiting, and diplopia. TEAEs that led to discontinuation in ≥1.0% of patients were dizziness (1.6%) and convulsion (1.0%). The median percent reductions from baseline of trial SP754 in 28-day seizure frequency were 53.4%, 55.2%, 58.1%, and 62.5%, respectively, for 1-, 2-, 3-, and 4-year completers. The ≥50% responder rates were 52.8%, 56.5%, 58.7%, and 62.5% for 1-, 2-, 3-, and 4-year completers, respectively. Seven of eight patients on lacosamide monotherapy for ≥12 months were deemed 50% responders. Of patients exposed to lacosamide ≥2 years, 3.1% remained seizure-free for a period ≥2 years.. Long-term (up to 5 years) lacosamide treatment was generally well tolerated. The safety profile of lacosamide observed in this trial is consistent with that established in previous double-blind, placebo-controlled trials. Although the open-label trial design limits the analysis of efficacy, long-term reduction in seizure frequency and maintenance of efficacy was observed.

Topics: Acetamides; Adult; Anticonvulsants; Dizziness; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Resistance; Drug Synergism; Drug Therapy, Combination; Epilepsies, Partial; Female; Humans; Lacosamide; Male; Middle Aged; Nausea; Time; Treatment Outcome

Lacosamide is a new antiepileptic drug effective for adjunctive treatment of partial-onset seizures. We evaluated the safety and tolerability of an intravenous (i.v.) formulation of lacosamide (200-800 mg/day) infused over 10, 15, and 30 min as short-term replacement for oral lacosamide in patients with partial-onset seizures.. This multicenter, open-label, inpatient trial enrolled 160 patients from ongoing open-label, long-term trials who were taking stable doses of oral lacosamide and up to three concomitant antiepileptic drugs (AEDs). Serial cohorts of patients were converted from oral lacosamide treatment to the same intravenous doses infused over progressively shorter infusion durations: 30, 15, and 10 min for 2-5 days. A data monitoring committee (DMC) reviewed safety data for each cohort. The safety of intravenous lacosamide was assessed from adverse events (AEs), laboratory variables, electrocardiography findings, and physical/neurologic examinations.. A total of 160 patients received lacosamide 200-800 mg/day, i.v., for 2-5 days, of which 69% received 400-800 mg/day doses. The most common AEs (reported by or=400 mg/day). Injection-site events were rare and did not appear to be linked to infusion doses or rates. Lacosamide plasma concentrations were linearly related to dose across the cohorts.. This comprehensive evaluation supports the safety of an intravenous lacosamide infusion duration as short as 15 min for short-term (2-5 days) replacement for patients temporarily unable to take oral lacosamide.

Topics: Acetamides; Administration, Oral; Adult; Aged; Cohort Studies; Diplopia; Drug Administration Schedule; Epilepsies, Partial; Female; Humans; Infusions, Intravenous; Internationality; Lacosamide; Male; Middle Aged; Seizures; Young Adult

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of lacosamide (400 and 600 mg/day) as adjunctive treatment in patients with uncontrolled partial-onset seizures taking one to three concomitant antiepileptic drugs (AEDs).. This multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial randomized patients 1:2:1 to placebo, lacosamide 400 mg, or lacosamide 600 mg/day. After an 8-week baseline period, patients began treatment with placebo or lacosamide 100 mg/day, were force-titrated weekly (100 mg/day increments) to the target dose, and entered a 12-week maintenance period.. A total of 405 patients were randomized and received trial medication. Most (82.1%) were taking two to three concomitant AEDs. Median percent reductions in seizure frequency per 28 days from baseline to maintenance (intention-to-treat, ITT) were 37.3% for lacosamide 400 mg/day (p = 0.008) and 37.8% for lacosamide 600 mg/day (p = 0.006) compared to 20.8% for placebo, with responder rates of 38.3% and 41.2%, respectively, compared to placebo (18.3%, p < 0.001; ITT). Patients randomized to lacosamide showed large reductions in secondarily generalized tonic-clonic seizures, with median percent reductions in seizure frequency of 59.4% for lacosamide 400 mg/day and 93.0% for lacosamide 600 mg/day compared to 14.3% for placebo, and responder rates of 56.0% and 70.2% compared to placebo (33.3%). Dose-related adverse events included dizziness, nausea, and vomiting.. Adjunctive treatment with lacosamide 400 and 600 mg/day reduced seizure frequency for patients with uncontrolled partial-onset seizures. Lacosamide 400 mg/day provided a good balance of efficacy and tolerability; lacosamide 600 mg/day may provide additional benefit for some patients as suggested by secondary efficacy analyses, including response in patients with secondarily generalized tonic-clonic seizures.

Topics: Acetamides; Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Dizziness; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Combination; Epilepsies, Partial; Female; Humans; Lacosamide; Male; Middle Aged; Seizures; Young Adult

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of lacosamide (200 and 400 mg/day) when added to one to three concomitant antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) in patients with uncontrolled partial-onset seizures.. This multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial randomized patients (age 16-70 years) with partial-onset seizures with or without secondary generalization to placebo, lacosamide 200, or lacosamide 400 mg/day. The trial consisted of an 8-week baseline, a 4-week titration, and a 12-week maintenance period.. Four hundred eighty-five patients were randomized and received trial medication. Among these, 87% were taking two or more concomitant AEDs. Median percent reduction in seizure frequency per 28 days from baseline to maintenance period (intent-to-treat, ITT) was 20.5% for placebo, 35.3% for lacosamide 200 mg/day (p = 0.02), and 36.4% for 400 mg/day (p = 0.03). In the per protocol population, the reductions were 35.3% for lacosamide 200 mg/day (p = 0.04) and 44.9% for 400 mg/day (p = 0.01) compared to placebo (25.4%). The 50% responder rate for lacosamide 400 mg/day (40.5%) was significant (p = 0.01) over placebo (25.8%), but was not for 200 mg/day (35.0%). In the per protocol population, the 50% responder rate for lacosamide 400 mg/day (46.3%) was significant (p < 0.01) compared with the placebo responder rate (27.5%). Dose-related adverse events (AEs) included dizziness, nausea, and vomiting. Clinically relevant changes in the mean plasma concentrations of commonly used AEDs were not observed.. Results of this trial demonstrated the efficacy and tolerability of adjunctive lacosamide 200 and 400 mg/day and support that lacosamide may be an advantageous option for the treatment of partial-onset seizures in patients with epilepsy.

Topics: Acetamides; Adolescent; Adult; Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting Systems; Anticonvulsants; Biological Availability; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Combination; Epilepsies, Partial; Female; Humans; Lacosamide; Male; Metabolic Clearance Rate; Middle Aged; Young Adult

This multicenter, double-blind, double-dummy, randomized, inpatient trial evaluated the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of intravenous lacosamide as replacement for oral lacosamide in patients with partial-onset seizures.. Patients were enrolled from an ongoing open-label extension trial of oral lacosamide and randomized (2:1) to either intravenous lacosamide and oral placebo or intravenous placebo and oral lacosamide. During the 2-day inpatient treatment period, patients received twice-daily doses of lacosamide equivalent to their current daily dose of oral lacosamide. The first 30 patients enrolled received infusions with 60-min durations and the next 30 received infusions with 30-min durations.. Of 60 patients randomized, 59 completed the trial. Treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs) were reported by 16 patients and included dizziness, headache, back pain, somnolence, and injection site pain. The tolerability profile of intravenous lacosamide was consistent with that of oral lacosamide. All AEs were considered mild or moderate in intensity, and no serious AEs or AEs leading to withdrawal were reported.. Intravenous lacosamide, administered as 60- or 30-min twice-daily infusions, showed a similar safety and tolerability profile to oral lacosamide when used as replacement therapy. Results from this trial support further investigation of intravenous lacosamide at shorter infusion durations.

Topics: Acetamides; Administration, Oral; Adult; Anticonvulsants; Back Pain; Dizziness; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Double-Blind Method; Drug Administration Schedule; Epilepsies, Partial; Female; Headache; Humans; Infusion Pumps; Infusions, Intravenous; Lacosamide; Male; Middle Aged; Placebos; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of lacosamide when added to 1 or 2 antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) in adults with uncontrolled partial-onset seizures, and assess plasma concentrations of concomitant AEDs to determine any potential for drug interactions.. During this multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, patients were randomized to placebo or lacosamide 200, 400, or 600 mg/day after an 8-week baseline period. Lacosamide was titrated in weekly increments of 100 mg/day over 6 weeks and maintained for 12 weeks. Results were analyzed on an intention-to-treat basis.. Four hundred eighteen patients were randomized and received trial medication; 312 completed the trial. The median percent reduction in seizure frequency per 28 days was 10%, 26%, 39%, and 40% in the placebo, lacosamide 200, 400, and 600 mg/day treatment groups, respectively. The median percent reduction in seizure frequency over placebo was significant for lacosamide 400 mg/day (p=0.0023) and 600 mg/day (p=0.0084). The 50% responder rates were 22%, 33%, 41%, and 38% for placebo, lacosamide 200, 400, and 600 mg/day, respectively. The 50% responder rate over placebo was significant for lacosamide 400 mg/day (p=0.0038) and 600 mg/day (p=0.0141). Adverse events that appeared dose-related included dizziness, nausea, fatigue, ataxia, vision abnormal, diplopia, and nystagmus. Lacosamide did not affect mean plasma concentrations of concomitantly administered AEDs.. In this trial, adjunctive lacosamide significantly reduced seizure frequency in patients with uncontrolled partial-onset seizures. Along with favorable pharmacokinetic and tolerability profiles, these results support further development of lacosamide as an AED.

Topics: Acetamides; Administration, Oral; Anticonvulsants; Ataxia; Dizziness; Double-Blind Method; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Therapy, Combination; Epilepsies, Partial; Humans; Lacosamide; Nausea; Placebos; Treatment Outcome

Lacosamide (LCM) is a new-generation anti-seizure medication approved for monotherapy and add-on therapy for focal-onset epilepsy. It has novel pharmacodynamics and favorable pharmacokinetic qualities with good clinical response. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness and tolerability of LCM when used in the immediate switch from sodium channel blockers in patients with focal-onset and generalized-onset epilepsies. This retrospective, multicenter observational study was conducted with adult patients who received LCM as mono- or polytherapy through immediate switch with 6 to 52 months follow-up. The clinical data obtained during the follow-up period were analyzed to assess retention rate, seizure freedom, more than 50% seizure reduction, and adverse effects. A total of 32 patients (eight females, 24 males) with a median age of 49.75 (range, 23-86) years, median age at epilepsy onset of 32.58 (range, 0.5-85) years, and median epilepsy duration of 17.17 (range, 1-46) years were included in this study. Seizure frequency was between 1 and 90 in the past 6 months. Seven (21.9%) of the patients had structural brain lesions and 27 (84.4%) of the patients had EEG abnormalities. The adverse effects leading to switching were hyponatremia, rash, elevated liver enzymes, pain, and erectile dysfunction. At 14.34 (range, 6-52) months follow-up, 30 (93.75%) patients in total retained LCM, 20 (66.7%) of them were seizure-free, and 13 were on LCM monotherapy. Responder rate was 81.25%. Eight (25%) of the patients experienced adverse effects after the immediate switch. One patient with generalized-onset epilepsy needed to quit LCM due to an increase in seizures. Seizure frequency did not change in three patients in the focal-onset group. Immediate switch to LCM showed favorable outcomes with a significant reduction in seizure frequency, high retention rates, and tolerable adverse effect profiles in both focal-onset and generalized-onset seizures.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticonvulsants; Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions; Epilepsies, Partial; Epilepsy; Female; Humans; Lacosamide; Male; Middle Aged; Retrospective Studies; Sodium Channel Blockers; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult

The purpose of this study was to determine the efficacy of lacosamide (LCM) on interictal epileptiform discharges (IEDs) and evaluate the relationships between IEDs and seizure outcome in pediatric patients with focal epilepsy.. Patient inclusion criteria included (1) newly diagnosed focal epilepsy with unknown etiology; and (2) electroencephalogram recorded twice (before and after starting LCM) under the same conditions. The difference between the highest number of IEDs over five successive minutes (IEDs/5 min) and the location of IEDs was determined. Seizure outcome was evaluated one year after achieving the maintenance dose of LCM. Responders were identified as showing a ≥50% reduction in the pre-LCM seizure frequency.. Of 22 patients, 10 showed an increase in IEDs/5 min after starting LCM. The median IEDs/5 min before and after starting LCM was not significantly different, at 1.5 (interquartile range: 0, 31.75) and 10.5 (0, 80.5), respectively. No relationship was identified between the difference in IEDs/5 min and seizure outcome. Patients with multiple regional or diffuse IEDs had significantly poorer seizure outcome compared with patients without those IEDs (P = 0.036 and P = 0.039, respectively). Of 10 patients with single regional IEDs, a tendency of IEDs to disappear was observed between patients with frontal and non-frontal IEDs.. The effects of LCM on the number of IEDs may be unrelated to seizure outcome. LCM may be ineffective at improving seizure outcomes in patients with multiple regional or diffuse IEDs.

Topics: Child; Electroencephalography; Epilepsies, Partial; Humans; Lacosamide; Seizures

The relationship between treatment efficacy/tolerability and the dose/blood concentration of lacosamide (LCM) was investigated in a clinical cohort of Japanese pediatric patients with epilepsy.. This retrospective analysis reviewed the medical records of patients treated with LCM for >6 months at the Department of Pediatrics, Hiroshima University Hospital, from September 2017 to January 2021. The collected data included age, sex, epilepsy type, seizure type, seizure frequency before and after treatment initiation, adverse events leading to LCM discontinuation, dose at any evaluation point, serum concentration, and concomitant antiepileptic drugs (AEDs).. The study included 51 patients (31 male patients) between the ages of 2 and 19 years. All patients were Japanese. Epilepsy was classified as focal in 44 patients, generalized in six patients, and combined generalized and focal in one patient. The 50% responder rate for LCM treatment was 56.9%. Seven patients experienced complete seizure control (absence of seizures for 6 months before the follow-up visit). A relationship between dose and blood concentration was identified. Although the blood LCM concentration was higher in the responders than in the nonresponders (7.86 vs. 6.16 μg/mL; p = 0.028), there was no significant difference in dose between the two groups. Lacosamide showed efficacy at a dose >5 mg/kg/day in more than half of the 50% responders. The treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) included seizure aggravation in five patients, irritability in two patients, and somnolence and drug eruption in one patient each. In six patients with TEAEs, the TEAEs developed within 1 month after treatment initiation and led to LCM discontinuation.. In Japanese pediatric patients with epilepsy, LCM treatment is effective, particularly at higher doses. The blood concentration may be related more to efficacy than to dose. Lacosamide is generally well-tolerated by pediatric patients, and should be used at the maximum tolerable dose (needed to be gradually increased) in patients with otherwise insufficient seizure control. As TEAEs leading to discontinue treatment likely occur in early phase, it is needed to monitor patients carefully if TEAEs would happen in that phase.

Topics: Acetamides; Adolescent; Anticonvulsants; Child; Child, Preschool; Drug Therapy, Combination; Epilepsies, Partial; Epilepsy; Female; Humans; Japan; Lacosamide; Male; Retrospective Studies; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult

Childhood epilepsy with centrotemporal spikes (CECTS) is known as age-limited focal epilepsy syndrome in childhood. Lacosamide is a third-generation antiepileptic drug. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of lacosamide monotherapy for the treatment of CECTS.. We enrolled 18 patients (6 girls and 12 boys) who met the following criteria: 1) the age of onset of the seizures was between 3 and 13 years of age; 2) showing at least hemifacial and/or oropharyngeal seizures; 3) interictal discharges in central and/or middle temporal electrodes; 4) no intellectual disability; 5) treatment duration of lacosamide monotherapy over 6 months. We retrospectively collected and analyzed clinical data and treatment information. We evaluated the seizure occurrences during 0-3, 4-6, and 7-12 months from the treatment initiation and the last 6 months of the follow-up. We also evaluated the outcomes as seizure-free if the patients developed no seizures both over 6 months and 3 times of pretreatment mean seizure interval at the last follow-up.. Of the patients, 39%, 67% and 72% were seizure-free during 0-3, 4-6, and 7-12 months from treatment initiation, respectively. Finally, 83% of the patients achieved seizure freedom. Seizure freedom was achieved in 72% during the first 4 months of treatment. All patients continued lacosamide monotherapy during the study, although four patients showed transient fatigue or somnolence.. Lacosamide showed good efficacy for controlling seizures with fewer adverse effects, and therefore may be a good candidate as a first-line medication for the treatment of new-onset CECTS.

Topics: Anticonvulsants; Epilepsies, Partial; Female; Humans; Infant; Lacosamide; Male; Retrospective Studies; Seizures; Treatment Outcome

Lacosamide (LCM) is a third-generation anti-seizure medication (ASM) approved for focal onset epilepsy in patients aged ≥ 4.378 Previous studies have reported an efficacy of LCM as add-on treatment in brain tumor-related epilepsy (BTRE). To date, there are no studies in the literature focusing on lacosamide used in monotherapy to treat BTRE. In our retrospective study we investigated efficacy and tolerability of LCM in monotherapy in a multicenter national cohort of primary brain tumor patients.. We collected from 12 Italian Centers 132 patients with primary brain tumors who were treated with LCM in monotherapy. For each patient we evaluated seizure freedom at 3 and 6 months (primary endpoints), side effects and drop-out rate (secondary endpoints).. Overall, LCM led to seizure freedom in 64.4% of patients at 3 months and 55% at 6 months. Patients who used two or more ASMs before LCM had a worse seizure control than patients in monotherapy with LCM as first choice. In 14 patients, we observed seizure control despite tumor progression on magnetic resonance (MRI). Multivariate analysis showed that gross-total resection at diagnosis was significantly associated with higher seizure freedom rate at 6 months. Side effects were mainly mild (grade 1-2 according to CTCAE classification) and drop-out rate was low (1.5%). Main side effects were dizziness and somnolence.. This is the first study showing a good efficacy and tolerability of LCM when used in monotherapy in BTRE. Further prospective studies are needed to confirm these preliminary data, investigating also quality of life and neurocognitive functions.

Topics: Acetamides; Anticonvulsants; Brain Neoplasms; Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions; Epilepsies, Partial; Epilepsy; Humans; Lacosamide; Quality of Life; Retrospective Studies; Seizures; Treatment Outcome

In newly diagnosed neurocysticercosis (NCC) with seizures, the choice of anti-seizure medication (ASM) seems to be arbitrary due to a lack of comparative studies. Although oxcarbazepine (OXC) is often considered efficacious for focal seizures in NCC, due to adverse effects, newer ASMs like levetiracetam (LCM) and lacosamide are also being explored.. This study was performed by case record review of children with newly diagnosed solitary viable parenchymal NCC aged 4-18years who received lacosamide and OXC at least for 12 weeks between August 2019 and April 2021, from a prospective registry of a tertiary care teaching hospital in north India. Seizure control, electroencephalographic abnormalities, resolution of inflammatory granulomas and adverse effects were compared between two arms at 12 and 24 weeks.. Total 31 (8.3 ± 4.7 years, 19 boys) and 72 (8.6 ± 4.2 years, 43 boys) completed at least 12 weeks follow-up in LCM and OXC groups, out of which 2 and 51 completed at least 24 weeks follow-up in LCM and OXC groups, respectively. The occurrence of breakthrough seizure was comparable in both arms at 12 and 24 weeks (1/31 and 2/22 in lacosamide group vs. 2/72 and 4/51 in OXC group, p = 0.66 and 0.59, respectively). Patients receiving OXC had more frequent treatment-emergent adverse events (p = 0.0001) and four patients required discontinuation due to severe adverse events (SAEs), while none in the lacosamide group had SAEs.. Lacosamide appears to be efficacious and safe for achieving seizure freedom in patients with solitary viable parenchymal neurocysticercosis.

Topics: Anticonvulsants; Child; Epilepsies, Partial; Female; Humans; Lacosamide; Levetiracetam; Male; Neurocysticercosis; Oxcarbazepine; Seizures; Treatment Outcome

Specific antiseizure medications (ASM) would improve the outcome in post-stroke epilepsy (PSE). The aim of this multicenter observational study was to compare different antiseizure monotherapies in PSE.. We collected the data from 207 patients with PSE who did not change their initial antiseizure monotherapy during the period of 12 months. Efficacy was assessed by a standardized three month seizure frequency and seizure freedom. Safety was estimated by the reported side effects.. The mean three month seizure frequency was 1.9 ± 3.1 on eslicarbazepine, 2.1 ± 3.2 on lacosamide, 3.4 ± 4.4 on levetiracetam, 4.3 ± 6.8 on lamotrigine, and 5.1 ± 7.3 on valproate (p < 0.05 for eslicarbazepine or lacosamide in comparison with levetiracetam, lamotrigine and valproate, respectively). The lowest seizure frequency and the highest seizure freedom was observed on ASMs acting via the slow inactivation of sodium channels in comparison to other mechanisms of action (0.7 ± 0.9 vs 2.2 ± 2.4, p < 0.01). Among side effects, the most frequently reported were vertigo (25%) and tiredness (15.9%). They were similar in all investigated groups of ASM. The independent factors increasing seizure frequency that were identified in multiple regression analyses were increased size of infarction, cortical involvement, hemorrhagic transformation, neurological deficits at admission and functional impairment. Administration of ASM with the mechanism of action via the slow inactivation of sodium channels was an independent factor decreasing the seizure frequency.. Our data show that antiseizure medications acting via the slow inactivation of sodium channels, such as lacosamide and eslicarbazepine, are well tolerated and might be associated with better seizure control in PSE.

Topics: Anticonvulsants; Epilepsies, Partial; Epilepsy; Humans; Lacosamide; Lamotrigine; Levetiracetam; Seizures; Sodium Channels; Stroke; Valproic Acid

Drug treatment for children with epilepsy should, ideally, be governed by evidence from adequate and well-controlled clinical studies. However, these studies are difficult to conduct, and so direct evidence supporting the informed use of specific drugs is often lacking. The Research Roundtable for Epilepsy (RRE) met in 2020 to align on an approach to therapy development for focal seizures in children age 1 month <2 years of age.. The RRE reviewed the regulatory landscape, epidemiology, seizure semiology, antiseizure medicine pharmacology, and safety issues applicable to this population.. After reviewing evidence, the conclusion was that pediatric efficacy trials would be impracticable to conduct but a waiver of the regulatory requirement to conduct any study would lead to an absence of information to guide dosing in a critical population. Review of available data and discussion of RRE attendees led to the conclusion that the requirements for extrapolation of efficacy from older children down to infants from age 1 month to <2 years old appeared to be met. After the RRE, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved brivaracetam for use in children with focal epilepsy above the age of 1 month in August 2021 and lacosamide in October 2021, both based on the principle of extrapolation from data in older children.. These recommendations should result in more rapid accessibility of antiseizure medications for infants.

Topics: Adolescent; Anticonvulsants; Child; Epilepsies, Partial; Epilepsy; Humans; Infant; Lacosamide; Seizures

Lacosamide is characterized by its novel dual mode of action on account of its structural components; its molecule contains a functional amino acid that selectively and slowly promotes the inactivation of voltage-gated sodium channels.. This study aims to assess the effectiveness and tolerability of Lacosamide with respect to its use in the treatment of focal epileptic patients.. This retrospective cohort study used data collected from the clinical notes or diaries of all epileptic patients who were treated in King Abdullah Medical City during the time period from 2014 to 2019. The multivariate Generalized Estimating Equation (GEE) repeated measure logistic regression analysis was used to assess the odds of having an improvised seizure rate.. Majority of the focal epileptic patients (57.9%) were diagnosed with temporal epilepsy, while 26.3% patients had frontal epileptic lesion/diagnoses. Majority of the patients (54.4%) had received a combination of old and new treatment. Out of the seven patients who reported side effects, 57.14% experienced dizziness and headache, tremors (n = 1), loss of balance (n = 1) and increased seizure with abnormal vision acuity and psychosis (n = 1). 84.2% patients experienced reduced median seizure frequency in 12-month period. However, on the basis of clinical characteristics, no significant difference was observed in the seizure control rate. No statistically significant differences were observed between male and female patients with respect to their average improvement rate across the four time points.. Lacosamide is an effective and well tolerable drug for patients with focal epilepsy.

Topics: Adult; Anticonvulsants; Cohort Studies; Epilepsies, Partial; Female; Humans; Lacosamide; Male; Middle Aged; Retrospective Studies; Saudi Arabia; Seizures; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult

Lacosamide (LCM) was approved in China in 2018. However, the safety of LCM has not been established in pediatric patients. Therefore, the objective of this study was to investigate its safety, efficacy, and tolerability in pediatric patients living in Uygur, Northwest China.. This is a retrospective analysis of pediatric patients diagnosed with epilepsy and on LCM therapy at a medical center. The seizure frequencies at 3, 6, and 12 months after starting LCM therapy were recorded and compared with the baseline monthly frequency. The primary outcome variables were the 50% responder and seizure-free rates. The secondary outcome variables included the terminal 6-month seizure remission and percentages of discontinuation due to a lack of efficacy and tolerability. Safety variables included the incidence and type of adverse reactions.. Seventy-two pediatric patients with epilepsy living in Uygur, China and receiving LCM treatment were included in the present study. Fifty (69%) children responded to LCM therapy with a more than 50% reduction in the frequency of seizures. Seizure-free rates increased over time, at 14%, 19%, and 20% at 3, 6, and 12 months, respectively. The number of baseline anti-seizure medications (ASMs) and order of LCM introduction significantly impacted the likelihood of seizure remission during the 12-month follow-up period (p < 0.05). During the entire period of LCM treatment, twenty-two children (30.5%) experienced at least one adverse reaction.. This retrospective study of 72 pediatric patients with epilepsy in Uygur, China, showed that LCM therapy is safe and effective for epilepsy in children, resulting in a reduction in the seizure rate.

Topics: Anticonvulsants; Child; China; Epilepsies, Partial; Epilepsy; Humans; Lacosamide; Retrospective Studies; Treatment Outcome

Lacosamide (LCM) is the antiepileptic drug approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration in 2008 that facilitates slow activation of the voltage-gated sodium channels. Neutropenia and cardiac events including sinus node dysfunction (SND) and atrioventricular block have been previously reported as adverse effects of LCM. To date, there have been no reports of severe agranulocytosis resulting in death associated with LCM. Additionally, there have been no reports of concomitant SND and agranulocytosis after LCM administration. Herein we report the first case of LCM-induced severe SND followed by agranulocytosis.. The patient with focal epilepsy was initiated on LCM 100 mg/day and the dose was increased to 200 mg/day on the 9. This case illustrates the need for careful follow-up of the electrocardiogram and the complete blood cell counts when initiating LCM. Moreover, it should be noticed that various side effects may occur simultaneously in the early period of LCM use, even for a short time and at low dosages.

Topics: Aged; Agranulocytosis; Anticonvulsants; Electrocardiography; Epilepsies, Partial; Female; Humans; Lacosamide; Sick Sinus Syndrome

Lacosamide (LCM), the R-enantiomer of 2-acetamido-N-benzyl-3-methoxypropionamide, is a newer approved antiseizure medication characterized by a novel pharmacodynamic and favorable pharmacokinetic profile that was approved as adjunctive treatment for adults with focal onset and focal to bilateral tonic-clonic seizures in 2008, and recently also for monotherapy. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness and tolerability of LCM as first add-on or conversion monotherapy in adult subjects with focal epilepsy.. We retrospectively included all adult patients who received LCM as first add-on regimen or as substitution monotherapy at least 12 months before starting the chart review, with a historical baseline of 6 months prior to day of the first administration of LCM. The choice of treatment was made independently by the epilepstologists, according to routine clinical practice. Clinical data were obtained at 3, 6, and 12 months after subjects started LCM and then analyzed to assess retention rate, seizure freedom, and adverse events (AE).. A total of 101 patients (58 men) with a mean age of 44 years and a median epilepsy duration of 6.6 years (range 1-53) were included in the study. At 12 months 72 patients retained LCM, 54 (75%) of them were seizure free, 44 (81.5%) in monotherapy and 10 (18.5%) in add-on LCM treatment. Among all subjects, 31 (57.4%) were free from seizure under LCM monotherapy throughout the entire observation period. Thirty one out of 72 (43%) PwE who retained LCM at 12 months, were free from seizures throughout the entire observation period. The maintenance median dosage of LCM was 200 mg/day. Ten (10%) subjects reported mild to moderate AE, most commonly drowsiness and dizziness. No serious AE were documented.. This real-life study confirms that LCM is an effective and well tolerated treatment option as first add-on or conversion monotherapy for focal seizures.

Topics: Adult; Anticonvulsants; Epilepsies, Partial; Humans; Lacosamide; Male; Retrospective Studies; Treatment Outcome

Some antiepileptic drugs (AEDs), like sodium channel blockers are significantly associated with autonomic dysfunction in patients with epilepsy. Unlike other sodium-blockers AEDs, lacosamide (LCM) is a third generation AEDs which enhances the slow inactivation of voltage-gated sodium channels. So far, data about LCM on autonomic nervous system are still unknown. This study was designed to investigate cardiovascular autonomic and sudomotor function in patients affected by focal epilepsy on LCM monotherapy, compared to patients treated with carbamazepine (CBZ) monotherapy and healthy subjects.. Patients on LCM underwent autonomic function tests including head up tilt test (HUTT), Valsalva maneuver, deep breathing, hand grip, and cold face. Heart rate variability (HRV) analysis was performed in rest condition and during HUTT. Sudomotor function was assessed through Sudoscan. All results were compared with patients on carbamazepine (CBZ) monotherapy and with healthy subjects.. Fourteen patients on LCM monotherapy, 12 patients on CBZ monotherapy and 16 healthy controls were studied. At cardiovascular function tests, delta systolic blood pressure (∆SBP) at 3 min of HUTT and ∆SBP early phase II-late phase II at Valsalva maneuver were significantly lower in CBZ group compared to LCM patients. Spectral analysis of HRV showed no significant differences among LCM, CBZ and control groups. No difference in sudomotor function was found in all three groups.. In conclusion, our findings suggest that LCM and CBZ on monotherapy do not affect autonomic cardiovascular and sudomotor functions compared to controls. Nevertheless, patients on CBZ showed a lower sympathetic reactivity with respect to LCM.

Topics: Anticonvulsants; Carbamazepine; Epilepsies, Partial; Hand Strength; Humans; Lacosamide

To perform a clinical/economic comparison of monotherapy with antiepileptic drugs (AED) in patients with newly diagnosed focal epilepsy (FE) based on the results of previous studies.. The most common AEDs (carbamazepine (CBZ), oxcarbazepine (OXZ), lamotrigine (LTG), lacosamide (LCM)) were compared in patients, aged 16 years and over, with illness duration of five years.. CBZ, OXZ and LCM can be used as monotherapy in patients with newly diagnosed FE. Monotherapy with LCM is associated with lowest costs for stopping focal seizures and the highest percentage of seizure-free patients. CBZ remains the most economical AED: the cost-effectiveness is minimal compared to all other AEDs used in the study. However, monotherapy with LCM is advisable if it is necessary to minimize side-effects in patients with newly diagnosed FE.. Цель исследования. Клинико-экономическое сравнение эффективности монотерапии противоэпилептическими препаратами (ПЭП) у пациентов с впервые диагностированной фокальной эпилепсией (ФЭ) на основании результатов опубликованных ранее исследований. Материал и методы. Проведено сравнение наиболее часто используемых в клинической практике ПЭП с длительностью применения в течение 5 лет у пациентов 16 лет и старше: карбамазепина (КБЗ), окскарбазепина (ОКЗ), ламотриджина (ЛТД), лакосамида (ЛКМ). Результаты и заключение. Установлено что КБЗ, ОКЗ и ЛКМ целесообразно использовать в качестве монотерапии у больных с впервые диагностированной ФЭ. Монотерапия ЛКМ была связана с наименьшими затратами на купирование фокальных приступов и с наибольшим процентом больных без приступов. КБЗ по-прежнему остается самым экономичным ПЭП: показатель 'затраты-эффективность' при лечении КБЗ в течение 5 лет был минимальным среди сравниваемых ПЭП. Однако при необходимости минимизировать побочные действия у больных с впервые возникшей ФЭ целесообразно проводить монотерапию ЛКМ.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Anticonvulsants; Carbamazepine; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Economics, Pharmaceutical; Epilepsies, Partial; Humans; Lacosamide; Lamotrigine; Oxcarbazepine; Retrospective Studies

Epilepsy is the most common serious neurological disorder worldwide. Approximately 40% of patients with focal epileptic seizures remain uncontrolled with antiepileptic drug (AED) monotherapy or polytherapy. Lacosamide has been recently approved by the European Medicines Agency as monotherapy for the treatment of focal seizures. The aim of this study was to estimate the cost-effectiveness of lacosamide compared with zonisamide as first-line treatment of focal epilepsy in patients with epilepsy aged ≥ 16 years to inform clinical decision-making in Greece.. A discrete event simulation model was adapted to reflect treatment pathways and resource use within the Greek national healthcare system, as specified by clinical experts. The model captures time-varying events and patient characteristics. Clinical inputs were sourced from pivotal trials and a network meta-analysis comparing lacosamide with other AEDs. The model predicts disease progression and seizures, relevant and most common adverse events, withdrawal due to lack of efficacy or adverse events, and epilepsy-specific and all-cause mortality over a 2-year time horizon. Unit costs were retrieved from published Greek sources. Health outcomes were measured as quality-adjusted life years (QALYs); secondary outcome was the cost per seizure avoided. Robustness of the results was tested with univariate and probabilistic sensitivity analyses.. The lacosamide treatment pathway was associated with higher costs (i.e. €1,064) and an additional 0.119 QALYs when compared with zonisamide, resulting in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of €8,938 per QALY gained. The sensitivity analyses demonstrated that the results are most sensitive to the efficacy and utility estimates.. There are a number of limitations which stem from the process of model adaptation and lack of local real-world evidence.. Lacosamide is a cost-effective option at a willingness-to-pay threshold of €30,000 per QALY, representing a valuable monotherapy treatment option for patients with focal epileptic seizures in the Greek setting.

Topics: Adult; Anticonvulsants; Computer Simulation; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Disease Progression; Epilepsies, Partial; Female; Greece; Health Expenditures; Health Resources; Humans; Lacosamide; Male; Middle Aged; Quality-Adjusted Life Years; Zonisamide

Epilepsy management in elderly patients is often complex because of several concomitant comorbidities that may limit the use of some antiepileptic drugs (AEDs). Levetiracetam (LEV) is a second-generation AED widely used in elderly patients with epilepsy while lacosamide (LCM), which has been recently approved in European Union (EU) as monotherapy for the treatment of focal onset seizures, is affected by a scarcity of data in such frail population. This study is aimed at assessing the efficacy and the tolerability of LCM as monotherapy in elderly patients affected by focal onset epilepsy compared with those receiving LEV.. A retrospective chart review of patients aged ≥65 years suffering from focal onset seizures, with or without secondary generalization on LCM monotherapy or LEV monotherapy, was performed. Data regarding demographic characteristics, seizure type and etiology, LCM and LEV daily dose, number of lifetime AEDs, seizure frequency at baseline and at 12 months of follow-up, and seizure freedom rates were reported.. In this observational retrospective study, 22 patients on LCM (10 males, 12 females, mean age: 76.23 ± 7.5) and 24 patients on LEV (10 males, 14 females, mean age: 73.58 ± 6.39) were enrolled. Mean LCM daily dose was 204.51 ± 88.51 mg and mean LEV daily dose was 1281.25 ± 378.15 mg. All patients had comorbidities on chronic treatment. At 12 months of follow-up, mean monthly seizure frequency reduced from 4.23 ± 8.53 to 0.33 ± 0.9 (p < .001) in LCM group and from 2.29 ± 6.11 to 0.2 ± 0.81 (p < .001) in LEV group. Furthermore, 16/22 (72.7%) LCM patients were seizure-free at 12 months of follow-up while seizure freedom was achieved by 17/24 (70.8%) patients in LEV group.. Epilepsy management in elderly patients is often challenging. In this retrospective real-life study, the efficacy and the tolerability of LCM as monotherapy was favorable even at low doses in older patients and comparable with LEV with a high rate of long-term seizure freedom. Considering the frequent comorbidities and the risk of drug-drug interactions, LCM monotherapy may be a valuable option in elderly patients with focal onset epilepsy because of its favorable pharmacokinetic profile.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticonvulsants; Comorbidity; Drug Interactions; Epilepsies, Partial; European Union; Female; Frail Elderly; Humans; Lacosamide; Levetiracetam; Male; Retrospective Studies; Treatment Outcome

Seizures in up to 30% of children with epilepsy become refractory to treatment, decreasing their quality of life. Studies suggest that lacosamide may be effective in pediatric patients with refractory epilepsy.. To assess the effectiveness and safety of lacosamide in a population of children with mostly focal refractory epilepsy.. Retrospective analysis of children aged <18years presenting to a single hospital in Spain. Data from baseline, and 3, 6, and 12months after lacosamide initiation were collected and analyzed. Response to lacosamide was categorized by seizure frequency (seizure freedom or ≥75%, ≥50%, and <50% reduction in seizures).. One hundred ninety-one pediatric patients (~55% male) with focal epilepsy treated with lacosamide were included. The mean age at lacosamide initiation was 9.4years, and the mean duration of epilepsy was 5.4years. Seizure-free rates at 3, 6, and 12months were 9.7%, 11.8%, and 16.0%. At 12months, 44.4% of the population had a ≥50% reduction in seizure frequency. When analyzing response according to the number of previous/concomitant AEDs, those patients who received ≤2 previous AEDs/fewer concomitant AEDs had significantly greater response rates than those who received greater numbers of previous/concomitant AEDs; however, no predictive factors for response were identified. The most common adverse events were seizure number increased (14.7%), diplopia (5.2%), dizziness (3.7%), ataxia (2.1%), and drowsiness (2.1%).. Lacosamide use in children with refractory focal epilepsy can result in a reduction in seizure rate that improves progressively over time with few adverse effects, making lacosamide a promising option in these patients.

Topics: Adolescent; Anticonvulsants; Ataxia; Child; Dizziness; Drug Resistant Epilepsy; Epilepsies, Partial; Female; Humans; Lacosamide; Male; Quality of Life; Retrospective Studies; Seizures; Spain; Treatment Outcome

The objective of this study was to analyze the effectiveness and long-term tolerability of adjuvant lacosamide (LCM) in a multicenter cohort. We aim to assess outcomes of LCM-containing antiepileptic drug (AED) combinations based upon 'mechanism of action' (MoA) and patient's clinical features.. Consecutive patients commenced on LCM, with focal epilepsy were identified from three Australian hospitals. The 12-month efficacy endpoints were greater than 50% reduction in seizure frequency (responders) and seizure freedom. Tolerability endpoints were cessation of LCM for any reason, cessation due to side-effects and censoring due to inefficacy. Outcomes were assessed according to concomitant AEDs according to their MoA and the clinical risk factor profile.. Three hundred ten patients were analyzed and followed for median 17.3months. Two hundred ninety-nine (97%) had drug-resistant epilepsy, and 155 (50%) had tried more than 7 AEDs at LCM commencement. Adjuvant LCM was associated with responder and seizure freedom rate of 29% and 9% respectively at 12months. Lower baseline seizure frequency, a prior 6-month period of seizure freedom at any time since epilepsy diagnosis and being on fewer concomitant AEDs were predictive of 12-month seizure freedom. Previous focal to bilateral tonic-clonic seizures (FBTCS), lower baseline seizure frequency, and concomitant AED reduction after LCM commencement were associated with improved LCM tolerability. No specific MoA AED combinations offered any efficacy or tolerability advantage.. Adjuvant LCM is associated with seizure freedom rates of 9% at 12months after commencement and is predicted by lower prior seizure frequency, a period of 6months or longer of seizure freedom since diagnosis and fewer concomitant AEDs. While the broad MoA of concomitant AEDs did not influence efficacy or tolerability outcomes, we have provided a framework that may be utilized in future studies to help identify optimal synergistic AED combinations.

Topics: Acetamides; Adolescent; Adult; Anticonvulsants; Australia; Cohort Studies; Drug Resistant Epilepsy; Epilepsies, Partial; Female; Humans; Lacosamide; Male; Retrospective Studies; Seizures; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult

The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of open-label lacosamide in patients with refractory sleep-related hypermotor epilepsy. The study was a case review of eight patients with refractory sleep-related hypermotor epilepsy treated with lacosamide. Seizure diaries compared the mean baseline seizure frequency with the most recent 3 months of follow-up. Five (62.5%) patients were responders, defined as ≥50% reduction in seizure frequency, over a mean duration of exposure of 21.5 months. The mean maintenance dose of lacosamide was 400 mg/day. No-one reported worsening of seizures. Lacosamide was well tolerated with initial fatigue being the main side-effect. Lacosamide is a potentially efficacious adjunctive therapy in patients with refractory sleep-related hypermotor epilepsy. A double-blind placebo-controlled study would determine its efficacy.

Topics: Adult; Anticonvulsants; Epilepsies, Partial; Female; Humans; Lacosamide; Male; Middle Aged; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult

Lacosamide (LCM) was recently introduced in the Middle East. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of LCM in patients with focal onset seizures and determine if our results are comparable with those derived from Western countries.. This is a retrospective analysis from two medical centers on consecutive patients diagnosed as having focal onset seizures and treated with add-on LCM. The primary efficacy variables were the 50% responder and seizure-free rates, and the secondary outcome variables included the percentages of patients who achieved seizure remission during the last 6-month follow-up period and the percentages of discontinuation due to lack of efficacy or tolerability.. One hundred four patients with a mean age of 30.9 years and experiencing a mean of 9.4 seizures per month during baseline were included. The 50% responder rates were 69% and 70% at 6- and 24-month follow-ups, respectively. Patients concomitantly treated with a sodium channel blocker were less likely to achieve seizure remission during the last 6-month follow-up period while the early introduction of LCM resulted in a significantly higher likelihood of achieving such a remission. Eighty-eight percent of patients were still maintained on LCM at the last follow-up, and the most common adverse events consisted of dizziness and somnolence, double vision, and nausea/vomiting.. Our data show similar efficacy and tolerability to those reported from Western countries. Our results also substantiate the early introduction of LCM and support the dose reduction of baseline AED especially that of sodium channel blockers to minimize adverse events.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Anticonvulsants; Child; Dizziness; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Epilepsies, Partial; Female; Humans; Lacosamide; Male; Middle Aged; Middle East; Product Surveillance, Postmarketing; Retrospective Studies; Seizures; Treatment Outcome; Vomiting; Young Adult

Lacosamide selectively enhances slow inactivation of voltage-gated sodium channels to achieve seizure reduction. We studied the effect of intravenous lacosamide given as one of three single doses on EEG and electrocardiogram, as well as its tolerability in patients with drug-resistant epilepsy.. This Canadian, investigator-initiated, multicenter, double-blind study recruited patients with refractory focal epilepsy admitted to a seizure monitoring unit. Participants received a loading dose of 100, 200, or 400 mg lacosamide over 30 minutes during continuous monitoring by video-EEG and 12-lead electrocardiogram. The number of interictal spikes, frequency and quantity of background EEG rhythms, corrected QT interval (QTc), PR interval, heart rate (HR), blood pressure, and respiration rate during 60 minutes before the administration were compared with 60 minutes after the infusion. We documented any adverse event during and after the infusion.. Seventy-one patients completed the study. There was a significant decrease in interictal spikes (P = 0.039) and decreased frequency of the alpha rhythm (P = 0.003). No significant difference in beta, theta, and delta frequency or amount was noted. There were significant increases in PR interval (153.4-155.8 ms, P = 0.031) and HR (73.4-75.5 bpm, P = 0.022), but QTc, blood pressure, and respiration rate were not affected. Twelve patients (16.9%) experienced transient and mild adverse events, mainly dizziness and leg tingling. More adverse events occurred with 400 mg lacosamide than with the lower doses (P = 0.048).. Intravenous lacosamide is effective in decreasing interictal spikes. Despite a small effect on EEG and electrocardiogram rhythms, it is well tolerated with no serious adverse events.

Topics: Acetamides; Administration, Intravenous; Adult; Anticonvulsants; Blood Pressure; Brain; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Double-Blind Method; Drug Resistant Epilepsy; Electrocardiography; Electroencephalography; Epilepsies, Partial; Female; Heart; Heart Rate; Humans; Lacosamide; Male; Respiration

The study aims to retrospectively compare the efficacy of lacosamide (LCS) and levetiracetam (LEV) in add-on treatment in patients with partial-onset epilepsy.. Patients who have been followed-up for at least one year due to diagnosis of partial epilepsy between September 2014 and December 2017 and who had no seizure control, despite using at least two antiepileptic monotherapies, and therefore undergone LEV or LCS add-on treatment were retrospectively reviewed. Of the patients, total number of seizures and seizure control rates 6 months before and 3 and 6 months after the add-on treatment were compared.. There was no statistically significant difference between the 30 patients in the LEV group (12 females, 18 males, mean age 29.7±6.6) and 28 patients in the LCS group (12 females, 16 males, mean age 28.2±6.4) in terms of age, gender and the duration of illness. When the LEV and LCS groups were evaluated separately, the mean number of seizures within 3 and 6 months after the add- on treatment were significantly lower than the mean number of seizures in the last 6 months before the add-on treatment (p<0.005 and p<0.005 respectively). There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups when compared with each other in terms of the rate of decrease in number of seizures and seizure control before and after the add-on treatment (p=0.445 and p=0.238, respectively).. LCS appears to be as effective as the currently well-established LEV in the treatment of partial onset seizures. No comparative study was found in the literature similar to this subject matter. There is a need for prospective studies for the comparison of the efficacies of these two drugs.. A vizsgálat célja a lacosamid (LCS) és a levetiracetam (LEV) kiegészítő kezelés hatékonyságának retrospektív összehasonlítása parciális kezdetű epilepsziában szenvedő betegek esetén.. Olyan betegek szerepeltek a vizsgálatban, akik parciális kezdetű epilepszia diagnózisát 2014 szeptembere és 2017 decembere között állapították meg, és utánkövetésük legalább egy évig zajlott, továbbá akiknél nem lehetett rohamkontrollt elérni legalább két epilepsziaellenes monoterápia alkalmazásával, ezért vagy LEV, vagy LCS kiegészítő kezelésben részesültek. Összehasonlítottuk a betegek hat hónappal a kiegészítő kezelés előtt mért összes rohamszámát és rohamkontrollarányaikat a kiegészítő kezelés után három, illetve hat hónappal mért értékekkel.. A LEV-csoportba 30 beteg (12 nő, 18 férfi, átlagéletkor 29,7±6,6 év), az LCS-csoportba 28 beteg került (12 nő, 16 férfi, átlagéletkor 28,2±6,4 év); a két csoport között nem volt statisztikailag szignifikáns különbség az életkor, a nem és a betegség fennállásának időtartama szempontjából. A LEV- és az LCS-csoport önálló értékelése esetén a kiegészítő kezelés után három és hat hónappal mért átlagos rohamszám szignifikánsan alacsonyabb volt, mint a kiegészítő kezelés előtt hat hónappal (p<0,005 és p<0,005). A két csoport eredményeit egymással összehasonlítva nem volt szignifikáns különbség a rohamszám csökkenésében és a rohamkontroll kiegészítő kezelés előtti, illetve utáni értékében (p=0,445 és p=0,238).. Az LCS ugyanolyan hatékonynak bizonyult a parciális kezdetű epilepszia kiegészítő kezelésében, mint a jelenleg leginkább használatos LEV. A szakirodalomban nem találtunk hasonló összehasonlító vizsgálatot. A jövőben prospektív vizsgálatokban kell összehasonlítani a két szer hatékonyságát.

Topics: Adult; Anticonvulsants; Drug Resistant Epilepsy; Drug Therapy, Combination; Epilepsies, Partial; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Lacosamide; Levetiracetam; Male; Retrospective Studies; Seizures; Treatment Outcome

Many patients with epilepsy need a second antiepileptic drug (AED), due either to inefficacy or side effects of the first tried one. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of lacosamide (LCM) as first add-on therapy in the real-life setting.. LACONORTE is a multicenter, retrospective, one-year study. Patients with focal epilepsy on monotherapy with another AED who were started on lacosamide as first add-on therapy were included. Clinical data was obtained at 3, 6 and 12 months and then analyzed.. Seventy-three patients (48.6% men) with a mean age of 50.3 and a median duration of the epilepsy of 3.0 years (range 0-65) were included. At 1 year, 91.8% were responders (with at least 50% reduction in the number of seizures) and 64.4% of all patients and 75.8% of those with secondary generalization were seizure-free. Fifteen patients (20.5%) had adverse events (AE), most of them were transient and no severe AEs were reported. LCM was withdrawn in 2 patients due to intolerance and in 1 patient because of inefficacy. Neither side effects nor withdrawal seemed to be related to total dose or to escalating regimes. Seventy patients (95.9%) continued on LCM after the last visit (median dose 200 mg/day, ranging 100-400). Eighteen (24.7%) converted to monotherapy during the 12-month period, 83.3% of them remaining seizure-free.. These results of real-life setting show LCM to be efficacious and safe when used as first add-on therapy for focal-onset epilepsy. Most adverse events were mild and/or transient.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticonvulsants; Epilepsies, Partial; Female; Humans; Lacosamide; Male; Middle Aged; Retrospective Studies; Spain; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult

Post marketing analysis of anti-epileptic drug (AED) efficacy and tolerability is of great value to the clinician since it is more representative of clinical practice than clinical trial data. We analyzed our experience with lacosamide (LCM) in patients treated after marketing.. We identified all patients who were treated with LCM during the four year period after marketing, excluding patients who were in clinical trials. We recorded demographic data and analyzed efficacy and tolerability in patients who had at least one follow up visit or telephone call 3 months after the initiation of LCM.. A total of 165 patients met our inclusion criteria. The mean age was 41 years. The majority of the cohort had focal epilepsy (146 patients) (88.4%). The mean duration of treatment was 31.2 months. Eighty one patients (49.1%) were continuing LCM at last follow up. Adverse effects (AEs) and discontinuation were significantly more common when LCM was added to one or more Na-channel blocking agents (NCB) (p = 0.0003 and 0.17). The 50% responder rate was 26% at 3 months and increased to 49% at 36 months. Patients were more likely to continue the drug and less likely to have AEs with slower titration over >4 weeks (p = 0.02 for each). Four or more previously failed AEDs predicted poorer response rate compared to three or less AEDs (p = 0.001).. LCM use in clinical practice was associated with greater rate of seizure freedom than in clinical trials. Discontinuation and occurrence of AEs were significantly more likely with faster titration and adding LCM to NCB agents.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Anticonvulsants; Cohort Studies; Drug Therapy, Combination; Epilepsies, Partial; Female; Humans; Lacosamide; Male; Middle Aged; Seizures; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult

Topics: Aged; Anticonvulsants; Creatine Kinase; Epilepsies, Partial; Humans; Lacosamide; Male; Rhabdomyolysis

Lacosamide (LCM) due to no known drug interaction and the absence of metabolic enzyme induction is a good candidate for an add-on medication, especially in combination with lamotrigine, levetiracetam (LEV), oxcarbazepine, topiramate, and valproic acid (VPA). Here we report for the first time, to our knowledge, that LCM can lower VPA and LEV serum levels. At present, there are no known explicable mechanisms of action of LCM, which lowers VPA and LEV. Here observed drug interaction of LCM is of clinical significance, which might be useful for other colleagues in the field.

Topics: Acetamides; Adolescent; Anticonvulsants; Brain Neoplasms; Drug Interactions; Epilepsies, Partial; Humans; Lacosamide; Levetiracetam; Neoplasms, Neuroepithelial; Piracetam; Seizures; Valproic Acid

Brain tumor-related epilepsy (BTRE) is often drug resistant and patients can be forced to take polytherapy that can adversely affect their quality of life (QoL). Lacosamide (LCM) is a new antiepileptic drug (AED) used as adjunctive therapy in patients with partial seizures with or without secondary generalization, with a favorable pharmacokinetic profile that seems to be effective and well tolerated. Therefore it represents a possible therapeutic choice for patients with BTRE. We propose a prospective study with a historical control group to evaluate the effect of LCM as add-on therapy on seizure control and quality of life in patients with BTRE. This study has been designed to test the superiority of Lacosamide over Levetiracetam as an add-on. We compared a prospective cohort of 25 patients treated with Lacosamide with a historical control group (n=19) treated with Levetiracetam as an add-on.. We recruited 25 adult patients (M 18, F 7; mean age 41.9) affected by BTRE with uncontrolled partial-onset seizures treated with AED polytherapy. We added LCM as an add-on. Patients were evaluated at baseline, after 3months and at 6months. This population has been compared with a historical control group of 19 BTRE adult patients (M 13, F 6; median age 48.0, range: 28-70) with uncontrolled partial-onset seizures treated with LEV as add-on. The patients underwent QoL, mood and adverse events tests (Adverse Event Profile-AEP) and evaluation of seizure frequency.. Twelve patients had high grade gliomas, and thirteen had low grade gliomas. During follow-up, thirteen patients underwent chemotherapy, three radiotherapy and five patients had disease progression. Nine patients had simple partial seizures, eight had complex partial seizures, and eight had secondary generalized seizures. Fifteen patients were in monotherapy and ten in polytherapy with AEDs. LCM was added up to reach the maximum dosage of 400mg/die (mean final dose 300mg/die). Four patients dropped out due to poor compliance and 1 for inefficacy. In the historical control group treated with LEV (mean final dose 2000mg/die) 12 patients had high-grade gliomas, and 7 had low grade gliomas. Thirteen patients were in monotherapy and 6 in polytherapy with AEDs. In the 22 patients evaluable of 25 patients treated with LCM, we observed at final follow-up 7 patients seizure free, 12 with a significant reduction of seizures≥50%, 2 stable and 1 patient with number of seizures increased. Mean seizure frequency at baseline compared with baseline period: the mean number of seizures significantly decreased from baseline (9.4) to final follow-up (1.2) (P=0.005). The Responder Rate was 86.4%. Comparing responder rate of 22 evaluable patients with LCM with responder rate of 19 patients with LEV we didn't observe significant differences (p=0.31). In our patients treated with LCM we didn't observe significant difference at 3 and 6months in QoL tests results; we observe a significant reduction in the mean score of Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) and Barthel Index (BI) between baseline and 6months of follow-up (KPS p=0.003; BI p=0.007). No clinical side effects were observed.. Comparing the LCM with the historical group treated with LEV in add-on, we observed that LCM seems to have a higher clinical efficacy than LEV. In our patients, we did not observe any significant changes in QoL tests, indicating stability in all quality of life domains explored, despite the objective worsening in their functional status. Although this is a small series with a relatively short follow-up, our data indicates that LCM in add-on in patients with BTRE appears to be as effective as LEV in add-on, without impact on mood and quality of life.

Topics: Acetamides; Adult; Affect; Aged; Anticonvulsants; Brain Neoplasms; Drug Therapy, Combination; Epilepsies, Partial; Epilepsy; Female; Historically Controlled Study; Humans; Lacosamide; Levetiracetam; Male; Middle Aged; Outcome Assessment, Health Care; Piracetam; Prospective Studies; Quality of Life

This study aimed to analyze the retention rate of lacosamide (LCM) in patients with epilepsy and intellectual disabilities (IDs), to identify factors influencing retention rate, and to investigate the LCM retention rate with and without concomitant sodium channel blocker (SCB). We hypothesized that the retention rate of LCM with concomitant SCB would be lower than without SCB.. Using the Kaplan-Meier estimator, we conducted a monocentric, retrospective, observational, open-label study to evaluate LCM retention rates in patients with IDs and drug-resistant epilepsy. In addition, the impact of therapy-related variables on the long-term retention of LCM was evaluated.. One hundred thirty-six subjects with IDs and drug-resistant epilepsy were included (age 2-66 years); most patients had focal epilepsy. Long-term retention rates were 62.0% at 1 year, 43.7% at 2 years, and 29.1% at 3 and 4 years. Reasons for LCM discontinuation included insufficient therapeutic benefits (69%), adverse events (11%), or a combination of both factors (8%). The LCM retention rate was influenced by the number of background antiepileptic drugs (AEDs). An additional and independent influence of concomitant therapy with SCB on retention rate could not be confirmed.. One of the major challenges in medically caring for patients with epilepsy and IDs is the high rate of drug resistance. However, there is a lack of evidence-based information about the efficacy and tolerability of AEDs in this population. It has been shown that concomitant SCB use is a key factor in increasing the risk of LCM failure in children with epilepsy. This finding has not been replicated in our predominantly adult sample of patients with IDs.

Topics: Acetamides; Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Anticonvulsants; Child; Child, Preschool; Drug Resistant Epilepsy; Drug Therapy, Combination; Epilepsies, Partial; Epilepsy; Female; Humans; Intellectual Disability; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Lacosamide; Longitudinal Studies; Male; Medication Adherence; Middle Aged; Retrospective Studies; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult

Lacosamide (LCM) is an effective antiepileptic drug (AED) approved for the treatment of focal epilepsy in both children and adults. The aim of this observational study was to review our centre's experience with LCM and to characterise its efficacy and tolerability as an adjunct therapy in children with refractory focal epilepsy.. We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 12 paediatric patients who underwent treatment with LCM from January 2014 to December 2015. We recorded the treatment response at three time points: at 3 and 6 months after LCM therapy and at the final follow-up visit. Children showing seizure reduction ≥ 50% were considered responders.. We included 12 patients (five boys), and their mean age was 13.8 years (range: 6.2-17.6 years) at the end of LCM treatment. The average length of follow-up after starting LCM was 23 months (11-37 months). Eight patients (66%) had > 50% reduction in seizures at the 3-month follow-up visit, and seven (58%) had > 50% reduction at the 6-month follow-up visit. Six patients (50%) maintained ≥ 50% reduction in seizures at the final follow-up visit. Two patients (16.6%) were seizure free at the 6-month and final follow-up visits. Common adverse side effects included dizziness, ataxia, nausea, and vomiting. Two patients developed status epilepticus (SE), one each at 3 and 11 days after the first LCM dose; they both discontinued treatment.. Our study points to the efficacy of LCM in a small paediatric group. Furthermore, it was important to report status epilepticus after LCM administration in the paediatric population for the first time.

Topics: Acetamides; Adolescent; Anticonvulsants; Child; Drug Resistant Epilepsy; Epilepsies, Partial; Female; Humans; Lacosamide; Male; Retrospective Studies; Treatment Outcome

Encefalopatia hiperamonemica inducida por acido valproico.

Topics: Acetamides; Anticonvulsants; Brain Diseases, Metabolic; Carnitine; Coma; Drug Therapy, Combination; Electroencephalography; Epilepsies, Partial; Female; Humans; Hyperammonemia; Lacosamide; Lactulose; Middle Aged; Models, Biological; Valproic Acid; Young Adult

We evaluated the impact of planned dose reduction and mechanism of action of concomitant AEDs on tolerability in adults with partial-onset seizures undergoing lacosamide (LCM) titration.. Data were collected at baseline and 3-6 and 12-24 months post-LCM initiation. Subjects were categorized as having planned reduction of concomitant AEDs or not; AEDs were categorized as traditional sodium channel blockers (TSCB) or non-TSCB (NTSCB). Groups with/without planned reduction were compared on the presence and number of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) using chi-square tests or logistic regression and on time to LCM discontinuation with time-to-event methods controlling for standardized (STD) AED dose, a measure of concomitant AED load. Similar analyses were performed comparing subjects taking TSCB and NTSCB agents and used to identify relationships with ≥50% decreases in seizure frequency.. One hundred six adults (mean age 41.4 ± 13.4; 50% male) underwent LCM titration from June 2009-2011 with complete data. Reduction of concomitant AEDs was planned at the time of LCM initiation in 59 (55.7%) subjects. Fewer subjects with planned reduction had TEAEs (49.2% vs. 68.1%; p=0.05), and these subjects had a lower risk of TEAEs (OR 0.36; p=0.019) after adjusting for STD AED dose. The hazard ratio (95% CI) for LCM discontinuation was 0.46 (0.23, 0.94) in subjects with planned reduction of concomitant AEDs vs. others (p=0.033) and 3.29 (1.01, 10.70) in subjects taking TSCB vs. NTSCB agents (p=0.048). Among all cases, those who ever had TEAEs had significantly higher STD dose at both follow-up visits (p=0.033 and p=0.023, respectively). Seizure outcomes were not significantly different between groups at the last follow-up assessment.. Planned reduction of concomitant AEDs during LCM initiation and the use of NTSCB agents only are associated with a reduced risk of TEAEs and LCM discontinuation in adults with partial-onset seizures. This study extends prior observations by considering total AED load in the assessment of tolerability and supports the benefits of early reduction of concomitant AEDs during LCM initiation.

Topics: Acetamides; Adult; Aged; Anticonvulsants; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Therapy, Combination; Epilepsies, Partial; Female; Humans; Lacosamide; Male; Middle Aged; Retrospective Studies; Seizures; Sodium Channel Blockers; Time; Treatment Outcome

To evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of intravenous lacosamide (vimpat) in inpatients with frequent partial-onset seizures and affective and cognitive disorders.. Fifteen patients were enrolled including 14 patients diagnosed with «organic personality disorder associated with epilepsy» (cryptogenic or symptomatic epilepsy with frequent partial-onset and/or secondary-generalized seizures (serial seizures in some cases) and 1 patient with a preliminary diagnosis of «organic schizophrenia-like disorder», which was changed for «organic personality disorder associated with epilepsy» after examination. Patients were treated with 2--3 antiepileptic drugs (AEDs), but no one of them received earlier lacosamide. Lacosamide was used intravenously in drops in the dose of 200 or 400 mg daily during 5 days.. In 4 patients with marked personality disorders, the frequency of seizures decreased by 75%, no seizures were noted after 2--3 days of treatment in 11 patients. A positive effect of lacosamide on the affective sphere and quality-of-life was observed in 11 (73.4%) patients with epilepsy. Mild and moderate adverse effects were found only in 2 patients. It has been concluded that lacosamide demonstrates the high efficacy in patients with frequent drug-resistant seizures.. Цель исследования - изучение эффективности и безопасности инъекционной формы лакосамида - препарата вимпат (раствор для внутривенного введения) у больных с эпилепсией с частыми приступами, аффективными и когнитивными нарушениями, в условиях психиатрического стационара. Материал и методы. Наблюдали 15 пациентов: 14 - с диагнозом 'органическое расстройство личности в связи с эпилепсией'. В этих случаях речь шла о криптогенной и симптоматической эпилепсии с частыми сложными парциальными и/или вторично-генерализованными приступами (в части случаев со склонностью к серийности); у 1 пациента был выставлен предварительный диагноз 'органическое шизофреноподобное расстройство', измененный после обследования на 'органическое расстройство личности в связи с эпилепсией'. Все пациенты лечились 2-3 противоэпилептическими средствами, но ни один из них ранее лакосамид не получал. Лакосамид назначали внутривенно капельно по 200-400 мг/сут в течение 5 дней. Результаты и заключение. У 4 пациентов с выраженными изменениями личности произошло урежение приступов на 75%, у 11 - приступов не наблюдалось уже после 2-3 дней применения препарата. У 11 (73,4%) пациентов с эпилепсией выявлено положительное влияние лакосамида на аффективную сферу и качество жизни. Легкие и средней степени выраженности нежелательные явления имели место только в 2 случаях. Сделан вывод о высокой эффективности лакосамида у больных с частыми резистентными приступами.

Topics: Acetamides; Administration, Intravenous; Adolescent; Adult; Anticonvulsants; Epilepsies, Partial; Female; Hospitals, Psychiatric; Humans; Lacosamide; Male; Middle Aged; Personality Disorders; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult

This noninterventional, observational, postauthorization safety study (SP0942, NCT00771927) evaluated the incidence of predefined cardiovascular- (CV) and psychiatric-related treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), in patients with epilepsy and uncontrolled partial-onset seizures, when initiating adjunctive therapy with lacosamide or another approved antiepileptic drug (AED) according to standard medical practice. Active recording of predefined TEAEs of interest took place at three-monthly recommended visits for up to 12months. Of 1004 patients who received at least one dose of adjunctive AEDs, 511 initially added lacosamide therapy, 493 added another AED, 69 were ≥65years of age, and 72 took concomitant antiarrhythmic drugs. Patients in the lacosamide cohort had a higher median frequency of partial-onset seizures (6.0 versus 3.5 per 28days) despite taking more concomitant AEDs (84.9% versus 66.9% took ≥2) at baseline. Patients who added lacosamide took a modal dose of 200mg/day over the treatment period (n=501), and 50.1% (256/511) completed 12months of treatment. Fifty-one point nine percent (256/493) of patients who added another AED completed the study, with the most commonly added AED being levetiracetam (28.4%). Four patients (0.8%) in each cohort, all <65years of age, reported predefined CV-related TEAEs. None were considered serious or led to discontinuation. One event each of sinus bradycardia (lacosamide), atrioventricular block first degree (lacosamide), and syncope (other AED) were judged to be treatment-related. Another patient in the other AED cohort reported bradycardia while taking concomitant antiarrhythmic drugs. Predefined psychiatric-related TEAEs were reported by 21 patients (4.1%) in the lacosamide cohort and 27 patients (5.5%) in the other AED cohort. Depression was the most common to be treatment-related (7/11 and 12/18 of patients reporting treatment-related psychiatric TEAEs, respectively). Serious psychiatric-related TEAEs were reported by four patients who added lacosamide (two cases of depression, two of suicide attempt) and one who added another AED (depression). Seven deaths occurred, all of which were considered unrelated/unlikely related to study medication. This thorough evaluation revealed a low incidence of predefined CV- and psychiatric-related TEAEs in patients taking adjunctive AED therapy according to standard medical practice. No specific safety concerns related to adjunctive lacosamide therapy were noted.

Topics: Acetamides; Adult; Aged; Anticonvulsants; Combined Modality Therapy; Drug Therapy, Combination; Epilepsies, Partial; Female; Humans; Lacosamide; Levetiracetam; Longitudinal Studies; Male; Middle Aged; Piracetam; Seizures; Treatment Outcome

To document reversible cognitive deterioration associated to high doses of zonisamide, using the Reliable Change Index to control practice effects derived from repetitive neuropsychological assessments.. A 11 year-old boy with tuberous sclerosis complex and left frontal refractory epilepsy, evaluated within a paediatric epilepsy surgery program. The epileptogenic zone was found to be related with a tuber situated on the left inferior frontal gyrus. The effects of high doses of zonisamide simulate a disturbance of eloquent cortex within the epileptogenic zone and the impact of uncontrolled seizures on cognitive functioning over the language-dominant hemisphere. Drug withdrawal significantly improved total intelligence index, verbal comprehension intellectual index and specific language-sustained cognitive abilities, beyond practice effects.. The differentiation between cognitive effects of drugs and functional deficits resulting from eloquent cortex involvement within the epileptogenic zone can be of crucial importance in the decision-making process for epilepsy surgery.. Deterioro neuropsicologico reversible asociado a zonisamida en un paciente pediatrico con esclerosis tuberosa.. Objetivo. Documentar el deterioro cognitivo reversible asociado a altas dosis de zonisamida, utilizando indices de cambio fiable para controlar los efectos de practica derivados de evaluaciones neuropsicologicas repetidas. Caso clinico. Niño de 11 años con complejo esclerosis tuberosa y epilepsia refractaria del lobulo frontal izquierdo, evaluado en el contexto de un programa de cirugia de la epilepsia pediatrica. La zona epileptogena se relaciono con un tuber epileptogeno localizado en el giro frontal inferior del hemisferio izquierdo. Los efectos de altas dosis de zonisamida mimetizaron una afectacion de la corteza elocuente en la zona epileptogena y un impacto de las crisis no controladas en el funcionamiento cognitivo asociado al hemisferio dominante para el lenguaje. La retirada del farmaco mejoro significativamente, mas alla de los efectos de practica, el cociente intelectual total, el indice intelectual de comprension verbal y habilidades cognitivas especificas sustentadas en el lenguaje. Conclusiones. La diferenciacion entre los efectos cognitivos de los farmacos y la existencia de un deficit funcional por afectacion de la corteza elocuente en el area epileptogena puede ser crucial para la toma de decisiones en cirugia de la epilepsia.

Topics: Acetamides; Anticonvulsants; Benzodiazepines; Child; Clobazam; Cognition Disorders; Dibenzazepines; Drug Substitution; Drug Therapy, Combination; Epilepsies, Partial; Frontal Lobe; Humans; Isoxazoles; Lacosamide; Language Disorders; Learning Disabilities; Male; Memory Disorders; Neuroimaging; Nitriles; Pyridones; Tuberous Sclerosis; Zonisamide

Two cases with partial onset epilepsy who developed status epilepticus (SE) on lacosamide (LCM) monotherapy are reported. LCM is an effective adjunctive antiepileptic drug (AED) for partial-onset epilepsy and as infusion in SE. It has also shown efficacy in monotherapy. The reported cases achieved control of seizures with adjunctive LCM treatment and were afterwards converted to monotherapy. Both patients subsequently developed SE while on LCM monotherapy. They were on monotherapy for at least 2 months after withdrawal of concomitant AEDs precluding the possibility of withdrawal-induced SE. Pharmacovigilance is indicated when LCM is administered in monotherapy in order to assess its proper therapeutic potential and its putative limitations especially in cases where it may prove ineffective. Moreover, vigilance is necessary whenever any concomitant antiepileptic is tapered regardless of the substances used. Higher doses may be needed when an AED is used in monotherapy.

Topics: Acetamides; Adult; Anticonvulsants; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Epilepsies, Partial; Humans; Lacosamide; Male; Middle Aged; Seizures; Status Epilepticus; Treatment Outcome

Age- and sex-related differences in body composition could affect the pharmacokinetic parameters of administered drugs. The purpose of this post hoc analysis was to investigate the influences of age and sex on the pharmacokinetics of lacosamide.. This post hoc analysis used pharmacokinetic data taken at steady state from (i) two phase I studies of oral lacosamide in healthy adult subjects (n = 66), and (ii) a population pharmacokinetic analysis carried out using data from two phase III studies of adjunctive oral lacosamide in adults (n = 565) with focal epilepsy taking 1-3 concomitant anti-epileptic drugs. Phase I data were stratified by age and sex as 'younger female' (aged 18-40 years), 'younger male' (aged 18-45 years) or 'elderly male/female' (aged ≥65 years), then normalized by body weight (lean body weight or fat-free mass), height or volume of distribution, and analysed using non-compartmental analysis. Population pharmacokinetic data were stratified by sex and analysed using a one-compartment model.. Minor numerical differences between lacosamide exposure [the area under the concentration-time curve at steady state over the dosage interval (AUCτ,ss)] and the maximum plasma concentration at steady state (C max,ss) in subjects of different ages or sexes were noted. The differences could be explained by a scaling factor between the drug applied and the plasma concentration. Following normalization by lean body weight or volume of distribution, an analysis of relative bioavailability resulted in 90 % confidence intervals of the ratios for AUCτ,ss and C max,ss for age (elderly to younger) or sex (male to female) falling within the range accepted for equivalence (80-125 %); without normalization, the 90 % confidence intervals were outside this range. Minor numerical differences in lacosamide plasma concentrations were noted in the comparison between male and female patients (aged 16-71 years) with focal epilepsy. Simulations using different body weights demonstrated a minimal effect of body weight on lacosamide plasma concentrations in adult patients with focal epilepsy.. Age and sex had no relevant effects on the rates of absorption and elimination of lacosamide in this post hoc analysis, as the minor numerical differences could be explained by the main scaling factor for body weight or volume of distribution. The pharmacokinetic profile of lacosamide was unaffected by age or sex in adults with focal epilepsy.

Topics: Acetamides; Adolescent; Adult; Age Factors; Aged; Area Under Curve; Biological Availability; Epilepsies, Partial; Female; Healthy Volunteers; Humans; Lacosamide; Male; Middle Aged; Models, Biological; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Sex Factors; Young Adult

A retrospective study in adult partial epilepsy on the efficacy of lacosamide in relation to previous antiepileptic drug experiences.. We analysed 3-65 months' data on epilepsy-care of 43 pharmacoresistant partial epilepsy patients treated with lacosamide. Further analysis of antiepileptic drug history was carried out in strictly selected subgroups of patients with good and poor therapeutic response to lacosamide (10 and 9 patients, respectively) for 2-10 years long retrospective follow up.. Adult patients with partial-onset seizures had been treated previously with three or more lifetime antiepileptic drugs without permanent success.. Six patients (14%) were seizure free, eleven patients (25%) have experienced important improvement (their seizure-frequency decreased by at least 50%) for more than 12 months. Fourteen patients (32%) improved for less than 6 months and then have relapsed; and add-on lacosamide proved ineffective in 12 patients (28%). Those selected 10 patients successfully treated with lacosamide (seizure free for at least six months) favourably responded to carbamazepine or oxcarbazepine earlier and levetiracetam was ineffective or even caused worsening. The selected lacosamide-unresponsive nine patients responded unfavourably to carbamazepine or oxcarbazepine earlier. Fifteen patients (35%) suffered side effects as dizziness or sleepiness, in 11 of them lacosamide was combined with a "traditional" sodium-channal blocker antiepileptic drug.. Lacosamide is an effective add-on antiepileptic drug in difficult-to treat adult partial epilepsy patients. Our data suggest that good lacosamide response may be expected in those patients who reacted favourably to "traditional" sodium-channel blocker carbamazepine or oxcarbazepine earlier.

Topics: Acetamides; Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Anticonvulsants; Carbamazepine; Drug Resistance; Drug Therapy, Combination; Epilepsies, Partial; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Lacosamide; Male; Middle Aged; Oxcarbazepine; Recurrence; Retrospective Studies; Treatment Outcome

To evaluate the 1-year efficacy and safety of oral lacosamide as conversion monotherapy in adult patients with partial onset seizures with or without generalization.. We prospectively followed-up consecutive patients converted to lacosamide monotherapy after 1-year seizure freedom on lacosamide add-on therapy and withdrawal of the concurrent antiepileptic drug (AED). Seizure occurrence, treatment compliance and drug toxicity were assessed every 3 months up to 1 year. The study outcomes were the retention rate of lacosamide as single AED and the seizure freedom under lacosamide monotherapy at 1 year from withdrawal of background AED. The safety variable was the prevalence of lacosamide related adverse events (AEs).. Among the 58 included patients, at 1 year from withdrawal of background medication, 37 (63.8%) retained lacosamide as single AED and 32 (55.2%) were free from seizure occurrence under lacosamide monotherapy throughout the entire follow-up. The history of less than three lifetime AEDs turned out to be significant predictor of seizure freedom (adjusted OR = 6.38, 95% CI 1.85-21.98, p = 0.003). Twelve (20.8%) subjects reported mild to moderate AEs, with the commonest being drowsiness, dizziness, and headache.. Conversion to lacosamide monotherapy could be effective and well tolerated in selected adults patients with partial onset seizures who had achieved seizure freedom during lacosamide add-on therapy.

Topics: Acetamides; Adult; Anticonvulsants; Epilepsies, Partial; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Lacosamide; Male; Middle Aged; Statistics, Nonparametric; Treatment Outcome

The goal of this study is to report the efficacy and tolerability of lacosamide (LCM) monotherapy, as first-line and conversion regimens, in the treatment of patients with partial-onset seizures.. We retrospectively reviewed the charts of patients with focal epilepsy on LCM monotherapy from six centers in Spain. Efficacy and tolerability were evaluated in the overall group and in subgroups of patients who were naive to antiepileptic drug (AED) therapy (Group 1) and those who had previously been treated with AEDs (Group 2).. Sixty-six patients were identified including 18 patients in Group 1 and 48 patients in Group 2. Patients were followed up for 0.5-54 months in monotherapy (mean 15.5 months). Forty-two (63.6%) patients remained seizure-free during all the follow-up. At 6 and 12 months, seizure-free rates were 77.6% and 72.3%, respectively. The drug was withdrawn in 10 (15%) patients (3 side effects, 6 lack of efficacy, 1 other reason). Fifteen (22.7%) patients reported mild to moderate side effects with the use of LCM. No differences were found between Groups 1 and 2 regarding efficacy outcomes or tolerability issues.. In our series more than two-thirds of the patients remained seizure-free on LCM monotherapy. Side effects were generally mild and led to discontinuation in only 3/66 (4.5%) patients. Our experience suggests that LCM monotherapy, either as first-line or after conversion, may be a valuable option for patients with focal epilepsy.

Topics: Acetamides; Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticonvulsants; Epilepsies, Partial; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Lacosamide; Male; Middle Aged; Retrospective Studies; Seizures; Spain; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult

Evidence for the efficacy and safety of adjunctive lacosamide in the treatment of partial-onset seizures (POS) was gained during placebo-controlled clinical trials in patients with treatment-resistant seizures who were taking one to three concomitant antiepileptic drugs (AEDs). The VITOBA study (NCT01098162) evaluated the effectiveness and tolerability of adjunctive lacosamide added to one baseline AED in real-world clinical practice.. We conducted a 6-month observational study at 112 sites across Germany. Adult patients (≥ 16 years) with POS received lacosamide adjunctive to only one baseline AED. Seizure frequency reduction at the end of the observation period was compared with a 3-month retrospective baseline period.. Five hundred seventy-one patients received lacosamide at least once (Safety Set [SS]); 520 provided evaluable seizure records (Full Analysis Set [FAS]); and 499 took in-label dosages of lacosamide (up to 400 mg) and were evaluated for effectiveness (modified FAS). Median baseline seizure frequency was 2.0 per 28 days: 47.1% of patients (235/499, mFAS) took a concomitant sodium channel-blocking (SCB) AED; 38.1% (190/499) had only one lifetime AED; and 18.4% (92/499) were aged ≥ 65 years (mFAS). At the final visit, 72.5% (358/494) of patients showed a ≥ 50% reduction in seizure frequency from baseline, 63.8% (315/494) showed a ≥ 75% reduction, and 45.5% (225/494) were seizure-free. Seizure freedom rates were higher in patients aged ≥ 65 years (56.7%) compared with patients aged <65 years (43.1%), in patients with ≤ 5 years epilepsy duration (52.5%) versus >5 years duration (41.0%), and when added to first monotherapy (60.5%) rather than as a later therapy option. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported by 48.5% (277/571) of patients (SS), with a profile similar to that observed in pivotal trials; 466 of patients (81.6%, SS) continued lacosamide therapy after the trial.. These results suggest that lacosamide use, added to one concomitant AED, was effective at improving seizure control and was well tolerated in patients treated in routine clinical practice.

Topics: Acetamides; Adolescent; Adult; Age Factors; Aged; Anticonvulsants; Drug Synergism; Drug Therapy, Combination; Epilepsies, Partial; Female; Humans; Lacosamide; Male; Middle Aged; Prospective Studies; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult

Lacosamide is an antiepileptic drug approved for the treatment of focal epilepsy in adult patients. The aim of this observational study was to review our centre's experience with lacosamide and to characterize its effectiveness and tolerability as an adjunctive antiepileptic drug in a retrospective cohort of children with refractory focal epilepsy.. We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 22 patients who received lacosamide from November 2009 to April 2014 at the CHU Ste-Justine, University of Montreal. Treatment responders were defined as children with a ≥50% reduction in seizure frequency compared to baseline, and this was determined three months after the initiation of treatment and at the last follow-up visit.. We included 14 boys and eight girls with a mean age of 12.9 years (SD: 5.2; range: 5.2-20.7 years) at the initiation of treatment. The average length of follow-up was 11.9 months. Patients had previously received an average of 7.5 antiepileptic drugs. The mean number of concomitant antiepileptic drugs was 2.3. The mean initial and maintenance doses were 2.9 and 8.4 mg/kg/d, respectively. Thirteen (59%) and ten (45%) patients were responders after three months of treatment and at the last follow-up visit, respectively. One became seizure-free. Adverse effects were reported in 11 patients and none were severe. Responders and non-responders were identical with respect to all studied parameters except gender, with the proportion of responders being greater in girls than in boys (75% vs 29%; p=0.035).. Our study adds evidence that lacosamide appears to be a safe and effective adjunctive therapy for children with refractory focal epilepsy.

Topics: Acetamides; Adolescent; Anticonvulsants; Child; Child, Preschool; Combined Modality Therapy; Diet, Ketogenic; Drug Resistant Epilepsy; Epilepsies, Partial; Female; Humans; Lacosamide; Male; Retrospective Studies; Treatment Outcome; Vagus Nerve Stimulation; Young Adult

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of lacosamide in pediatric patients with refractory focal epilepsy.. We reviewed retrospectively the medical records of children younger than 18 years of age treated at Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, in whom oral lacosamide was used as an adjunctive treatment for refractory focal epilepsy. Clinical information regarding the patients' epilepsy and the outcome of lacosamide treatment was gathered and analyzed.. Twenty-one patients (16 boys, 5 girls) were included, with a median age of 13.9 (range, 1.2-17.9) years. The mean number of concomitant antiepileptic drugs was 3.0 (range, 1-6) and the mean duration of follow-up was 10.1 (range, 6.1-13.0) months. The mean maintenance dose of lacosamide was 5.4 (range, 1.4-9.8) mg/kg/day. Fourteen patients (67%) were responders; four of these were seizure free at the last follow-up. Seven patients (33%) were nonresponders: two of these presented with <50% seizure reduction and five showed no change in seizure frequency. Two patients (10%) discontinued oral lacosamide because of adverse events (aggressive behavior and depression). Mild transient treatment-related adverse events were observed in eight of the 21 patients (38%).. Lacosamide represents a useful drug that is effective for a wide range of pediatric refractory focal epilepsy and is well tolerated.

Topics: Acetamides; Adolescent; Anticonvulsants; Child; Child, Preschool; Drug Therapy, Combination; Epilepsies, Partial; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Infant; Lacosamide; Male; Retrospective Studies; Treatment Outcome

Lacosamide is effective and well-tolerated antiepileptic drug (AED) in both children and adults.. This multicentric, prospective study investigates the efficacy and safety of lacosamide adjunctive therapy in children aged less than four years presenting with refractory focal seizures.. Lacosamide was added to the baseline therapy at a starting dose of 1-2 mg/kg/day and titrated to the final dose, ranging from 7 to 15.5 mg/kg/day. Efficacy was evaluated after a three-month period of therapy. When possible, we compared the initial efficacy and the retention after a minimum of 12 months of lacosamide, with regard to loss of efficacy (defined as the return to the baseline seizure frequency).. Twenty-four children were enrolled in the study. Mean age was 2.7 years. After a minimum three-month period of lacosamide add-on therapy, ten (42%) patients were responders (more than a 50% decrease in seizure frequency), of whom 4 (17%) became seizure free. Retention rate, after a minimum of 12 months of lacosamide, was evaluated in a group of 18 patients. In the latter group, eight patients (44%) were initial responders (three of whom seizure free). After 12 months of follow-up, four of them (22%) maintained the improvement, 2 (11%) of whom remained seizure free. A loss of efficacy was observed in 4 of the initial responders (50%). Adverse events were seen in 8 (33%) patients.. We conclude that lacosamide is an effective and a well-tolerated antiepileptic drug in an etiologically wide range of focal seizures. Therefore, lacosamide might represent a possible therapeutic option in infants and young children affected by uncontrolled focal epilepsy.

Topics: Acetamides; Anticonvulsants; Child, Preschool; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Therapy, Combination; Epilepsies, Partial; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Infant; Lacosamide; Male; Prospective Studies; Seizures; Severity of Illness Index; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Acetamides; Anticonvulsants; Electroencephalography; Epilepsies, Partial; Humans; Lacosamide; Levetiracetam; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Male; Middle Aged; Neurologic Examination; Piracetam; Seizures; Toothbrushing

Epilepsy causes psychiatric disorders in 20-40% of patients impacting negatively on their quality of life. Lacosamide is a new antiepileptic as adjunctive therapy in partial seizures with or without generalization.. We conducted a study to assess the impact of lacosamide as to the quality of life of epileptic patients. We used the HAD scale for anxiety and depression and QOLIE-10 scale for quality of life. We evaluated the efficacy and tolerability.. We collected prospectively poorly controlled epileptic patients are and added lacosamide treatment. Baseline visit, at 3 and 6 months were performed. The questionnaires are completed and the epilepsy information has been collected.. 31 patients, age 45.5 ± 17.2 years, 64.5% males are included. Number of previous monthly crisis 1.6 ± 1.8. HAD anxiety scale shows a significant improvement at 3 and 6 months. HAD scale for depression reflects a significant improvement in quality parameters. QOLIE-10 shows significant improvement for the group with low quality of life after 3 and 6 months. After 6 months 61.3% of patients have a seizure reduction equal or more than 50% and 54.8% are seizure free. Dizziness is the most common side effect (22.8%). 74.2% continued treatment.. Lacosamide may improve anxiety, depression and quality of life of epileptic patients regardless of seizure control. Response to treatment, adherence and side effects are similar to previous studies.. Efecto de la lacosamida sobre la calidad de vida del paciente con epilepsia.. Introduccion. La epilepsia provoca trastornos psiquiatricos en un 20-40% de los pacientes y repercute de forma negativa en su calidad de vida. La lacosamida es un nuevo antiepileptico que se utiliza como terapia añadida en crisis parciales con o sin generalizacion. Objetivo. Hemos realizado un estudio para valorar el impacto de la lacosamida en cuanto a la calidad de vida del paciente con epilepsia. Se han utilizado la escala hospitalaria de ansiedad y depresion (HADS) y la escala de calidad de vida en la epilepsia (QOLIE-10). Se ha valorado la eficacia y la tolerabilidad. Pacientes y metodos. Se recogen prospectivamente pacientes con epilepsia mal controlada y a los que se añade lacosamida. Se realiza una visita basal, a los tres y a los seis meses. Se cumplimentan los cuestionarios y se recaban los datos sobre la epilepsia. Resultados. Se incluyen 31 pacientes, con una edad media de 45,5 ± 17,2 años, un 64,5% varones. El numero de crisis mensuales previas es de 1,6 ± 1,8. La HADS para ansiedad muestra una mejoria significativa a los tres y seis meses. La HADS para depresion refleja una mejoria significativa en los parametros cualitativos. La QOLIE-10 muestra mejoria significativa para el grupo con baja calidad de vida previa a los tres y seis meses. Tras seis meses, el 61,3% de los pacientes presenta una reduccion de las crisis igual o superior al 50%, y el 54,8% esta libre de crisis. El mareo es el efecto secundario mas frecuente (22,8%). El 74,2% continua con el tratamiento. Conclusiones. La lacosamida podria mejorar la ansiedad, depresion y calidad de vida del paciente epileptico con independencia del control de las crisis. La respuesta al tratamiento, la adhesion y los efectos secundarios son similares a estudios previos.

Topics: Acetamides; Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticonvulsants; Anxiety; Depression; Disorders of Excessive Somnolence; Drug Therapy, Combination; Epilepsies, Partial; Female; Humans; Lacosamide; Male; Middle Aged; Nausea; Prospective Studies; Quality of Life; Severity of Illness Index; Sodium Channel Blockers; Young Adult

A unicentre, prospective study was performed to investigate the efficacy of lacosamide as adjunctive therapy in children with refractory partial epilepsy.. The study was performed at a tertiary care hospital over a period of 30 months between November 2011 and May 2014. Seventy-nine children with refractory partial epilepsy (age 5-15 years) who had failed two or more antiepileptic drugs and in whom lacosamide was used as an add-on drug were enrolled. Lacosamide tablets were administered orally, at a dose of 25 mg for 1 week followed by 50 mg twice daily for the remaining period. Efficacy and tolerability evaluation was performed at every visit of titration, maintenance period (3 months), and two follow-up visits at monthly interval. Electrocardiogram and liver function tests were performed before enrollment and at the end of 3 months of lacosamide therapy. Patient's caregiver or investigator observed adverse events were recorded in a predesigned pro forma.. A total of 79 patients with uncontrolled partial epilepsy screened from 531 epileptic children were enrolled, after they satisfied the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The mean age of children enrolled was 8.8 ± 3.1 years (range 5-15 years); 53 children (67.0%) were boys. Mean weight of the patients was 24.2 ± 9.8 kg. The mean age at the onset of seizures was 6.4 ± 3.5 years. The mean dose of lacosamide administered was 4.1 mg/kg. Three patients (3.8%) dropped out of the study, because of vomiting, aggressive behavior, and poor response, respectively. Of 76 patients (96.2%) entering the maintenance period, 35 patients (44.3%) were seizure free, 32 patients (40.6%) indicated ≥50% reduction in seizure frequency, 3 patients (3.8%) indicated 25-49% seizure reduction, and 9 patients (11.4%) either had no change in seizure frequency or experience increase in seizure frequency.. Lacosamide is an effective add-on antiepileptic drug for children with refractory partial epilepsy and is well tolerated.

Topics: Acetamides; Adolescent; Anticonvulsants; Child; Child, Preschool; Drug Resistance; Drug Therapy, Combination; Epilepsies, Partial; Female; Humans; Lacosamide; Male; Treatment Outcome

Valproic acid is commonly used in the treatment of both focal and generalized epilepsies and is often well tolerated. There are many reported cases of hyperammonemic encephalopathy and other well-known side effects reported during use of valproic acid either alone or in combination with other antiepileptics. This case report demonstrates valproic acid toxicity in the presence of lacosamide, which has not previously been reported. Full recovery occurred after withdrawal of both valproic acid and lacosamide.

Topics: Acetamides; Anticonvulsants; Child, Preschool; Drug Therapy, Combination; Epilepsies, Partial; Female; Humans; Hyperammonemia; Lacosamide; Valproic Acid

Lacosamide is approved as adjunctive therapy for focal epilepsies. The number of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) tried is associated with prognosis. This multicenter, retrospective, observational study (LACO-EXP) in Spain in 500 adult patients with focal epilepsies examined the efficacy and tolerability of add-on lacosamide. Factors associated with better efficacy/tolerability were analyzed. After 12months, the responder rate (≥50% reduction in seizure frequency) was 57.1%, and the seizure-free rate was 14.9%. Efficacy was better when lacosamide was the first or second add-on AED, although there was a small chance to be seizure-free even for patients who had received ≤10 prior AEDs. The mechanism of action of concomitant AEDs is important in all the stages, but differences are smaller in the early stages. Lacosamide was generally well tolerated. A slower dosage-titration schedule was associated with a lower adverse event rate. Further investigation of the timing of initiation of lacosamide add-on therapy and ideal combinations of AEDs is required.

Topics: Acetamides; Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticonvulsants; Epilepsies, Partial; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Lacosamide; Male; Middle Aged; Observation; Retrospective Studies; Spain; Statistics, Nonparametric; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult

Topics: Acetamides; Epilepsies, Partial; Humans; Lacosamide; Male; Middle Aged; Suicidal Ideation

Lacosamide, a recently introduced antiepileptic drug, acts by enhancing the slow inactivation of voltage-dependent sodium channels. Cardiac conduction disturbances, namely atrial fibrillation and atrioventricular block, have been reported in patients with epilepsy. We report a patient with drug-resistant focal epilepsy who developed asymptomatic sinus node dysfunction following lacosamide use, which resolved on stopping lacosamide. This is the first report of sinus node dysfunction associated with lacosamide therapy.

Topics: Acetamides; Anticonvulsants; Electrocardiography; Epilepsies, Partial; Female; Humans; Lacosamide; Middle Aged; Sick Sinus Syndrome

To calculate comparative incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (cost per quality-adjusted life year, QALY) and net marginal benefits for retigabine as add-on treatment for patients with uncontrolled focal seizures as compared to add-on lacosamide treatment and no add-on treatment, respectively.. Calculations were performed using a validated decision-tree model. The study population consisted of adult patients with focal-onset epilepsy in published randomized placebo-controlled add-on trials of retigabine or lacosamide. Healthcare utilization and QALY for each treatment alternative were calculated. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis was performed using the specification of this model as a basis for Monte Carlo simulations. 2009 prices were used for all costs.. Results were reported for a 2-year follow-up period. Retigabine add-on treatment was both more effective and less costly than lacosamide add-on treatment, and the cost per additional QALY for the retigabine no add-on (standard) therapy comparison was estimated at 2009€ 15,753. Using a willingness-to-pay threshold for a QALY of € 50,000, the net marginal values were estimated at 2009€ 605,874 for retigabine vs lacosamide and 2009€ 2,114,203 for retigabine vs no add-on, per 1,000 patients. The probabilistic analyses showed that the likelihood that retigabine treatment is cost-effective is at least 70%.. The estimated cost per additional QALY, for the retigabine vs no add-on treatment comparison, is well within the range of newly published estimates of willingness to pay for an additional QALY. Thus, add-on retigabine treatment for people with focal-onset epilepsy with no/limited response to standard antiepileptic treatment appears to be cost-effective.

Topics: Acetamides; Adult; Anticonvulsants; Carbamates; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Drug Therapy, Combination; Epilepsies, Partial; Health Care Costs; Humans; Lacosamide; Phenylenediamines; Quality-Adjusted Life Years; Sensitivity and Specificity; Sweden

To determine whether pharmacodynamic interactions between high doses of lacosamide (400-800 mg/day) and concomitant sodium channel antiepilepsy drugs (AEDs) can be minimized in patients with drug-resistant partial-onset seizures.. Patients were rapidly initiated with high-dose lacosamide (100 mg/week; increases to 400 to 800 mg/day), while simultaneously tapering concomitant sodium channel AEDs. Seizure frequency and side effects were evaluated at six time points: baseline, titration, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months.. Twenty-three patients had a baseline median of 4 seizures/month with persisting partial-onset seizures, despite previous treatment with an average of 6.8 AEDs. Mean decreases in monthly seizure frequency were as follows: 3 months 49.9% (P = 0.011), 6 months 55.4% (P = 0.010), 9 months 60.8% (P = 0.002) and 12 months 58.2% (P = 0.011). Most adverse events were mild CNS-related symptoms and occurred transiently only during titration - there was no significant relationship (χ(2) < 1.5, P > 0.1) between lacosamide dose and the presence of side effects at 3, 6, 9 or 12 months.. Drug-resistant patients rapidly titrated to high doses of lacosamide with simultaneous tapering of traditional sodium channel AEDs had marked reduction in CNS-related adverse events compared with patients treated in three previous pivotal trials that used fixed doses of concomitant AEDs.

Topics: Acetamides; Adult; Aged; Anticonvulsants; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Interactions; Drug Therapy, Combination; Epilepsies, Partial; Female; Humans; Lacosamide; Male; Middle Aged; Prospective Studies; Seizures; Sodium Channel Blockers; Treatment Outcome

The Quality of Life Inventory in Epilepsy (QOLIE-31) is a valuable tool to assess the impact of antiepileptic drugs on patients' lives, but interpretation of mean score changes can be challenging. Minimally important change (MIC) thresholds can be used to describe the proportion of clinically improved or worsened patients. Pooled data from Phase II/III trials of adjunctive lacosamide in patients with treatment-resistant partial-onset seizures were used to estimate MIC thresholds for the QOLIE-31 total score and subscales. Using multiple distribution- and anchor-based estimation methods, the optimal MIC value for the total score in this population of patients with treatment-resistant seizures was 5 points, which is lower than those previously reported in the literature for mixed populations. MIC estimates varied substantially across QOLIE-31 subscales. Taken together, these results demonstrate that intrinsic characteristics of a patient population impact what should be considered as MIC, a key consideration in the clinical interpretation of QOLIE-31 change scores.

Topics: Acetamides; Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Anticonvulsants; Clinical Trials as Topic; Double-Blind Method; Epilepsies, Partial; Humans; Lacosamide; Middle Aged; Models, Statistical; Multicenter Studies as Topic; Psychological Tests; Quality of Life; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult

There has been little long-term success with polytherapy for patients with refractory partial-onset epilepsy. The rational combination of antiepileptic drugs based on their mechanism of action may help improve treatment efficacy and tolerability. Lacosamide, a novel sodium channel blocker (SCB), was investigated in 158 patients with partial-onset epilepsy in the prospective, multicenter, observational, RELACOVA cohort study conducted in Spain. After 12 months' treatment with lacosamide, 47% of patients were responders (≥50% reduction in seizure frequency) and 24% were seizure free. Lacosamide was well tolerated; dizziness was the most frequent adverse event. Efficacy was better (responder rate, 65% vs 38%; seizure free rate, 35% vs 17%) and there was a lower adverse event rate (33% vs 58%) in patients receiving non-SCBs (n=49) versus those receiving SCBs (n=104) as concomitant therapy at baseline. Further investigation of lacosamide combination therapy is warranted.

Topics: Acetamides; Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticonvulsants; Chi-Square Distribution; Child; Cohort Studies; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Administration Schedule; Epilepsies, Partial; Female; Humans; Lacosamide; Male; Middle Aged; Observation; Sodium Channel Blockers; Spain; Time Factors; Young Adult

Lacosamide is an anti-epileptic drug, indicated as adjunctive therapy for patients with focal seizures with or without secondary generalization. This study aims to assess the cost effectiveness of standard anti-epileptic drug therapy plus lacosamide 300 mg/day compared with standard therapy alone from the perspective of the Belgian healthcare payer.. The treatment pathway of a hypothetical cohort of 1000 patients over 2 years was simulated using a decision tree. Data about health state probabilities, seizure frequency and utility values were taken from lacosamide trials or from the literature. Effectiveness measures included the number of seizures avoided and the number of quality-adjusted life-years gained. Unit costs were taken from national references. Resource use was estimated by a panel of eight neurologists with extensive experience in epilepsy. The price year was 2008. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were conducted.. Over a 24-month period, standard anti-epileptic drug therapy plus lacosamide led to a reduction of seven seizures, an increase of 0.038 quality-adjusted life-years and a cost decrease of &U20AC;3619 per patient compared with standard therapy alone. Using a willingness to pay of &U20AC;30 000 per quality-adjusted life-year, the net monetary benefit of standard anti-epileptic drug therapy plus lacosamide amounted to &U20AC;4754. The probability of standard anti-epileptic drug therapy plus lacosamide being cost effective was 97.3%, 99.8%, 99.9% and 100% at 6, 12 , 18 and 24 months, respectively.. In patients with difficult-to-treat epilepsy, standard anti-epileptic drug therapy plus lacosamide appears to be a cost-effective option in Belgium.

Topics: Acetamides; Anticonvulsants; Belgium; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Decision Trees; Drug Costs; Drug Therapy, Combination; Epilepsies, Partial; Humans; Lacosamide; Quality-Adjusted Life Years

The results of adjunctive lacosamide treatment in 18 pediatric patients with pharmacoresistant focal epilepsy are reported. All had severe forms of focal epilepsy with or without secondary generalization and were concurrently receiving one to three other antiepileptic drugs. Lacosamide was administered orally, and final dose, after slow titration, ranged between 1.7 and 10 mg/kg. Mean treatment duration was 8 months (range=3 weeks-17 months). Treatment efficacy was assessed at two time points with a 1-year interval. The reported greater than 50% reduction in seizure frequency was 36% in the initial short-term and 20% in the following long-term assessment. Side effects, mostly somnolence and irritability, were reported by 39% of patients in both evaluations. Our data suggest that lacosamide treatment in pediatric patients is safe at doses up to 10 mg/kg/day without any major side effects, but studies in larger series are needed to validate and extend these findings.

Topics: Acetamides; Administration, Oral; Adolescent; Anticonvulsants; Child; Child, Preschool; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Therapy, Combination; Epilepsies, Partial; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Lacosamide; Male; Pediatrics; Treatment Outcome

We report our pediatric experience with lacosamide, a new antiepileptic drug, approved by the US Food and Drug Administration as adjunctive therapy in focal epilepsy in patients more than 17 years old. We retrospectively reviewed charts for lacosamide use and seizure frequency outcome in patients with focal epilepsy (Wilcoxon signed rank test). Sixteen patients (7 boys) were identified (median dose 275 mg daily, 4.7 mg/kg daily; mean age 14.9 years, range 8-21 years). Patients were receiving a median of 2 antiepileptic drugs (interquartile range [IQR] 1.7-3) in addition to having undergone previous epilepsy surgery (n=3), vagus nerve stimulation (n=9), and ketogenic diet (n=3). Causes included structural (encephalomalacia and diffuse encephalitis, 1 each; stroke in 2) and genetic abnormalities (Aarskog and Rett syndromes, 1 each) or cause not known (n=10). Median seizure frequency at baseline was 57 per month (IQR 7-75), and after a median follow-up of 4 months (range 1-13 months) of receiving lacosamide, it was 12.5 per month (IQR 3-75), (P<0.01). Six patients (37.5%; 3 seizure free) were classified as having disease that responded to therapy (≥50% reduction seizure frequency) and 10 as having disease that did not respond to therapy (<50% in 3; increase in 1; unchanged in 6). Adverse events (tics, behavioral disturbance, seizure worsening, and depression with suicidal ideation in 1 patient each) prompted lacosamide discontinuation in 4/16 (25%). This retrospective study of 16 children with drug-resistant focal epilepsy demonstrated good response to adjunctive lacosamide therapy (median seizure reduction of 39.6%; 37.5% with ≥50% seizure reduction) without severe adverse events.

Topics: Acetamides; Adolescent; Anticonvulsants; Child; Drug Resistance; Epilepsies, Partial; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Lacosamide; Male; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Retrospective Studies; Young Adult

Topics: Acetamides; Aged, 80 and over; Anticonvulsants; Brain; Brain Infarction; Electroencephalography; Epilepsies, Partial; Female; Humans; Lacosamide; Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Lacosamide (LCM) was licensed in the United Kingdom in 2008 for the adjunctive treatment of partial-onset seizures. It exerts its effect by enhancing sodium channel slow inactivation. This article reports preliminary outcomes with adjunctive LCM in the everyday clinical setting. To date, 113 patients (57 males, 56 females; aged range=18-74 years, median=39 years) with uncontrolled partial-onset seizures (monthly frequency range=1-300, median=4) have been included in the audit. Patients were taking 1-4 (median=1) antiepileptic drugs (AEDs), having previously tried 1-12 (median 3) drug schedules. After 12 weeks on stable AED dosing, LCM was added, aiming at an initial target range of 200-400mg/day. Review took place every 6-8 weeks until one of four endpoints was reached: seizure freedom for ≥6 months on a given LCM dose; ≥50% (responder) or <50% (marginal benefit) seizure reduction over 6 months compared with baseline on the highest tolerated LCM dose; withdrawal of LCM because of lack of efficacy, side effects, or both. An endpoint has been reached by 65 (57.5%) patients so far. Seventeen (26.2%) have remained seizure free on a median daily LCM dose of 100mg (range=50-300 mg). Patients were more likely to become seizure free when LCM was used as a first add-on (15/36, 41.7%), compared with a later treatment schedule (1/27, 3.7%, P=0.001). With appropriate dose manipulation, patients taking traditional sodium blockers (5/26, 19.2%) were as likely to become seizure free as those taking AEDs with other mechanisms of action only (11/37, 29.7%). Fifty percent or greater seizure reduction was achieved in an additional 16 (24.6%) patients (1 monotherapy); 18 (27.7%) reported marginal benefit. Two patients were established on LCM monotherapy (one seizure free, one responder). Patients remaining on LCM were as likely to also be taking sodium blockers only (23/27, 85.1%) as AEDs with other mechanisms (26/36, 72.2%). LCM was withdrawn in 14 patients (12.3% of ongoing patients, 21.5% of those at an endpoint; 10 for side effects, 4 for lack of efficacy). The most common side effects leading to withdrawal were sedation, ataxia, and dizziness. Of the 10 with side effects, only 2 patients took concomitant sodium blockers. Patients on sodium valproate were more likely to discontinue LCM (8/21, P=0.018) than those also taking other AEDs; 5 of the 8 did so because of side effects and 3 because of lack of efficacy. In patients with partial-onset seizures, LCM is an effective

Topics: Acetamides; Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Anticonvulsants; Clinical Trials as Topic; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Interactions; Epilepsies, Partial; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Lacosamide; Male; Middle Aged; Retrospective Studies; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult

This retrospective study reports the early experience with lacosamide (LCM) as adjunctive therapy in Spanish patients with refractory focal epilepsy. Sixty patients (mean age 38.3 years, 54% women, mean epilepsy duration 27.2 years, mean seizure rate 9.7/month, and 28% with mainly nocturnal seizures) taking ≥2 antiepileptic drugs (mean 2.2) were included. LCM maintenance doses were 200, 300, 400, and 500mg/day in 31, 16, 10, and 3 patients, respectively. Patients were followed up for 13-24 months. Twenty-eight patients (47%) reported a ≥50% reduction in seizure frequency. A ≥50% reduction in seizure frequency was reported by 65% and 40% of patients in the nocturnal seizure and diurnal seizure subgroups, respectively (p>0.05). Of the 28 responders, 2 achieved stable periods of seizure freedom of 6 and 11 months after starting LCM. Twenty patients (33%) reported drug-related adverse events (AEs); the most common was dizziness (16 patients). LCM was withdrawn in 8 patients (13%). There were no serious AEs. These results support the efficacy and safety of adjunctive LCM in patients with partial-onset seizures.

Topics: Acetamides; Adult; Aged; Anticonvulsants; Drug Therapy, Combination; Epilepsies, Partial; Female; Humans; Lacosamide; Male; Middle Aged; Retrospective Studies; Seizures; Young Adult

Topics: Acetamides; Anticonvulsants; Epilepsies, Partial; Humans; Lacosamide

Generalised epileptic status is a medical emergency with a well-defined therapeutic algorithm. Nevertheless, in the partial status, treatment must be tailored to each patient and the risk of intensive treatment has to be assessed. Unlike generalised epileptic status, partial status is not considered a medical emergency, which means that when it comes to choosing a type of treatment the risk-benefit ratio must be carefully evaluated bearing in mind the characteristics of each particular case.. A 72-year-old male with partial status secondary to an ischaemic lesion which was refractory to conventional treatment; treatment was established with lacosamide and his condition was rapidly inverted. This is the third case that has been reported of epileptic status being treated with this drug and the second in which it is employed orally.. Although further research is required, lacosamide could be a good therapeutic option with few interactions and side effects.

Topics: Acetamides; Administration, Oral; Aged; Electroencephalography; Epilepsies, Partial; Humans; Lacosamide; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Male

Lacosamide (LCM) is a novel antiepileptic drug that exerts a strong antiepileptic effect via slow inactivation of voltage-gated sodium channels. LCM has been approved by the Food and Drug Administration for treatment of partial seizures at doses up to 400mg/day. Clinical trials have employed doses up to 600mg/day. LCM has been associated with atrial fibrillation at high doses (600mg/day) in patients with diabetes who had risk factors for heart disease. To our knowledge, atrial flutter or atrial fibrillation has not been reported in people with epilepsy. We report atrial flutter/atrial fibrillation at high doses of LCM (600mg/day) in a patient with epilepsy who had no significant risk factors for heart disease, which resolved following discontinuation of LCM. The literature regarding LCM-related cardiac death and arrhythmia is discussed. Physicians should be aware of the potential cardiac effects of this novel antiepileptic drug.

Topics: Acetamides; Adult; Anticonvulsants; Atrial Fibrillation; Atrial Flutter; Electrocardiography; Epilepsies, Partial; Female; Humans; Lacosamide

Topics: Acetamides; Anticonvulsants; Double-Blind Method; Epilepsies, Partial; Humans; Lacosamide; Placebos; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Acetamides; Anticonvulsants; Drug Approval; Epilepsies, Partial; Humans; Lacosamide; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; United States

Topics: Acetamides; Anticonvulsants; Atrioventricular Block; Carbamazepine; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Combination; Epilepsies, Partial; Europe; Humans; Lacosamide; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic

In August 2008, lacosamide (Vimpat; UCB), was granted market authorization by the European Commission as an adjunctive therapy for partial-onset seizures with or without secondary generalization in patients with epilepsy. It was approved by the FDA as an adjunctive therapy for partial-onset seizures in October 2008.

Topics: Acetamides; Adult; Analgesics; Animals; Anticonvulsants; Disease Models, Animal; Epilepsies, Partial; Epilepsy, Temporal Lobe; Humans; Lacosamide; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Rats

Topics: Acetamides; Administration, Oral; Anticonvulsants; Drug Approval; Epilepsies, Partial; Humans; Injections, Intravenous; Lacosamide; Sodium Channel Blockers; United States; United States Food and Drug Administration

This paper comprises a series of experiments in rodent models of partial and generalized epilepsy which were designed to describe the anti-convulsant profile of the functionalized amino acid lacosamide. Lacosamide was effective against sound-induced seizures in the genetically susceptible Frings mouse, against maximal electroshock test (MES)-induced seizures in rats and mice, in the rat hippocampal kindling model of partial seizures, and in the 6Hz model of psychomotor seizures in mice. The activity in the MES test in both mice (4.5mg/kg i.p.) and rats (3.9 mg/kg p.o.) fell within the ranges previously reported for most clinically available anti-epileptic drugs. At both the median effective dose for MES protection, as well as the median toxic dose for rotorod impairment, lacosamide elevated the seizure threshold in the i.v. pentylenetetrazol seizure test, suggesting that it is unlikely to be pro-convulsant at high doses. Lacosamide was inactive against clonic seizures induced by subcutaneous administration of the chemoconvulsants pentylenetetrazol, bicuculline, and picrotoxin, but it did inhibit NMDA-induced seizures in mice and showed full efficacy in the homocysteine model of epilepsy. In summary, the overall anti-convulsant profile of lacosamide appeared to be unique, and the drug displayed a good margin of safety in those tests in which it was effective. These results suggest that lacosamide may have the potential to be clinically useful for at least the treatment of generalized tonic-clonic and partial-onset epilepsies, and support ongoing clinical trials in these indications.

Topics: Acetamides; Animals; Anticonvulsants; Bicuculline; Cobalt; Convulsants; Electroshock; Epilepsies, Partial; Epilepsy; Epilepsy, Generalized; Epilepsy, Reflex; Excitatory Amino Acid Agonists; GABA Antagonists; Homocysteine; Kindling, Neurologic; Lacosamide; Male; Mice; N-Methylaspartate; Neurotoxicity Syndromes; Pentylenetetrazole; Picrotoxin; Rats; Rats, Sprague-Dawley; Status Epilepticus