lacidipine and Atrial-Fibrillation

The modification of AV conduction induced by 4 mg b.i.d. of lacidipine (L), a new calcium antagonist, was assessed by studying the changes in ventricular rhythm in 10 patients with stable chronic atrial fibrillation (mean age 71 +/- 15) by daily Holter recordings. The study was single blind versus placebo (P), nifedipine (N) 10 mg b.i.d. and for five patients diltiazem (D) 120 mg b.i.d. Five or seven consecutive 24 hours Holter were recorded in the following order: P, P, N or L, P, N or L, D, D. For each hour, an RR histogram was drawn and the 10 per cent and 90 per cent values of the cumulative cycle length curve were computed, as were the total number of QRS, and the mean value of RR intervals. The correlation coefficient between the number of QRS from the same hour on different days, the Student t test between the mean hourly RR interval values and the comparison between the histograms did not demonstrate a significant difference between the placebo, the nifedipine and the lacidipine periods. The only significant changes were induced by diltiazem (p less than 0.01), with a significant prolongation of the RR intervals. This suggests that lacidipine, like nifedipine, has no effect on AV conduction.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Atrial Fibrillation; Calcium Channel Blockers; Dihydropyridines; Drug Evaluation; Electrocardiography, Ambulatory; Female; Heart Conduction System; Humans; Male