isepamicin has been researched along with Skin-Diseases--Bacterial* in 3 studies
3 trial(s) available for isepamicin and Skin-Diseases--Bacterial
Article | Year |
---|---|
Comparison of the efficacy and safety of isepamicin and amikacin in the treatment of skin and skin structure infections.
Two hundred and three patients with skin and skin structure infections were treated with isepamicin once daily or amikacin twice daily in an open, randomised, comparative multicentre trial. Patients were randomised to treatment with isepamicin or amikacin in a 2:1 ratio. Severe infections (63 patients) were treated with isepamicin 15 mg/kg once daily (n = 15) or amikacin 7.5 mg/kg twice daily (n - 18), less severe infections (140 patients) with isepamicin 8 mg/kg once daily (n = 93) or amikacin 7.5 mg/kg twice daily (n = 47). The overall clinical response rate at the end of treatment was excellent in all treatment groups (94-96% cured or improved) with no significant differences between isepamicin and amikacin in patients with either server or less severe infections. The most commonly isolated target pathogens were Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Escherichia coli, Proteus mirabilis and Staphylococcus aureus. Overall, in patients who had a valid target pathogen isolated prior to treatment and who met other evaluability criteria, bacteriological eradication was achieved in over 90% of patients; amikacin patients with severe infections had a somewhat lower eradication rate (82%). Over all infections, 4/110 (4%) patients in the isepamicin group and 5/54 (9%) patients in the amikacin had organisms which persisted. Adverse events were reported in 12% of patients in the isepamicin group and 6% in the amikacin group. The most frequently reported adverse event in the isepamicin group as headache. Two patients (one in each treatment group), both of whom experienced skin rashes, were withdrawn. Potentially clinically significant changes in serum creatinine occurred in two patients, who received isepamicin and one who received amikacin (who was withdrawn from the study). Ototoxicity was rare, occurring in one patient treated with isepamicin. Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Amikacin; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Drug Administration Schedule; Escherichia coli Infections; Female; Gentamicins; Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Proteus Infections; Proteus mirabilis; Pseudomonas aeruginosa; Pseudomonas Infections; Skin Diseases, Bacterial; Staphylococcal Skin Infections; Staphylococcus aureus | 1995 |
Evaluation of the efficacy and safety of isepamicin in the treatment of various bacterial infections.
A multicentre, non-comparative study evaluated the efficacy and safety of the new aminoglycoside isepamicin in hospitalised patients with various infections. Isepamicin was administered once daily with the daily dosage stratified according to the severity of infection: 15 mg/kg isepamicin for severe potentially systemic infections (53 patients) or 8 mg/kg isepamicin for less severe and localised infections (56 patients). The largest groups of patients had urinary tract infection (n = 54) or lower respiratory tract infection (n = 31); smaller numbers of patients were enrolled with skin and soft tissue infections (n = 9), intra-abdominal infections (n = 8) or obstetric and gynaecological infections (n = 7). In the patients receiving 15 mg/kg isepamicin, clinical cure or improvement occurred in 19/21 patients with lower respiratory tract infections, 8/13 patients with urinary tract infections, 6/6 patients with skin infections, 5/6 patients with intra-abdominal infections and 6/7 patients with obstetric gynaecological infections. In the patients receiving 8 mg/kg isepamicin, 40 out of 41 patients with urinary tract infections were considered cured or improved as were 8/10 patients with lower respiratory tract infections, 1/3 patients with skin infections and 1/2 patients with intra-abdominal infections. Nine per cent of patients reported at least on adverse event during the study. Two patients (one from each dosage group) discontinued treatment because of adverse events, respiratory disorder and erythematous rash, but neither event was considered to be severe of life threatening No patients had evidence of ototoxicity by pure-tone audiometry and no patients had potentially significant increases in serum creatinine which were considered to be treatment related. The results of this study indicate that treatment with isepamicin once daily is effective and well tolerated in hospitalised adults with various infections. Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Bacterial Infections; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Genital Diseases, Female; Gentamicins; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Respiratory Tract Infections; Skin Diseases, Bacterial; Urinary Tract Infections | 1995 |
Overview of the efficacy of isepamicin in the adult core clinical trial programme.
The efficacy of once-daily administration of isepamicin in hospitalized adult patients has been assessed in a multinational clinical trails programme. Following a small phase II programme, the phase III programmed assessed four main indications: lower respiratory tract infections (including nosocomial pneumonia), urinary tract, intra-abdominal and skin and soft tissue infections. The phase III trials were open, prospective, multicentre studies in which 1443 patients were randomised to receive either isepamicin (n = 1005) or amikacin (n = 438). The daily dose of isepamicin was dependent on the severity of infection (8 or 15 mg/kg once daily) while all patients received amikacin 7.5 mg/kg twice daily. A study of patients with nosocomial pneumonia had an additional treatment arm of isepamicin 7.5 mg/kg twice daily. The aminoglycosides were combined with other antimicrobial agents in accordance with current clinical practice depending on the site and severity of the infection and the type of organism isolated. Overall, clinical cure or improvement response rates of the isepamicin and amikacin regimens were comparable, ranging from 76-95% in the intent-to-treat population. Lower clinical response rates (62-63%) was observed in severely ill patients with nosocomial pneumonia in both the isepamicin and amikacin treatment groups. In the efficacy population, organism elimination rates of 90% were achieved with isepamicin and amikacin. Therefore, in adult patients with a wide range of infections requiring aminoglycoside therapy, once-daily dosing with isepamicin is as effective as twice- daily dosing with amikacin. Topics: Abdomen; Adult; Aged; Amikacin; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Bacteremia; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Gentamicins; Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections; Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Prospective Studies; Respiratory Tract Infections; Skin Diseases, Bacterial; Urinary Tract Infections | 1995 |