isepamicin and Pneumonia--Bacterial

A population approach was used to determine isepamicin pharmacokinetics in 196 intensive care unit patients treated for nosocomial pneumonia with isepamicin and a broad-spectrum beta-lactam. Patients were randomized in four groups with respect to the following isepamicin dosing regimens: (i) 15 mg/kg od for 5 days or (ii) 10 days, (iii) 25 mg/kg on the first day followed by 15 mg/kg od for 4 days or (iv) 9 days. A total of 1489 serum isepamicin concentrations were measured (median, eight per patient; range, 1-18). Mean +/- S.D. 1 h-peak levels at day 1 were 76 +/- 32 mg/L after the 25 mg/kg dose (n = 85) and 43 +/- 15 mg/L after the 15 mg/kg dose (n = 99). A bicompartmental model was fitted to the data by a mixed-effect modelling approach. Isepamicin clearance was related to age, bodyweight and serum creatinine level. Central volume of distribution was related to bodyweight. Pharmacokinetic parameters were independent of the dosage in the range 15-25 mg/kg and were not different in the patients treated for 5 or 10 days. Bayesian estimates of individual pharmacokinetic parameters were used to calculate various surrogate markers of isepamicin exposure to be tentatively correlated with clinical outcome and nephrotoxicity. No correlation was found between peak, AUC or their ratio with MIC and clinical efficacy. A weak correlation was found between the increase of serum creatinine level (day 1 versus day 5) and isepamicin 24 h trough level at day 1 (R2 = 0.10). These data do not favour a systematic therapeutic monitoring of isepamicin in intensive care unit patients, at least with the doses and antibiotic combinations used in this study.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Bayes Theorem; Creatinine; Cross Infection; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Female; Gentamicins; Humans; Intensive Care Units; Kidney; Male; Middle Aged; Models, Biological; Pneumonia, Bacterial; Treatment Outcome

Isepamicin is a new aminoglycoside antibiotic which has a superior stability to aminoglycoside-inactivating enzymes compared with other available aminoglycosides. In this multicentre, randomised, open study, the safety and efficacy of isepamicin plus ceftazidime was compared with that of amikacin plus ceftazidime in adults with acute lower respiratory tract infection. Patients with severe infections received intravenous administration of isepamicin 15 mg/kg once daily + ceftazidime 2g twice daily (n = 121) or amikacin 7.5 mg/kg twice daily + ceftazidime 2g twice daily (n = 61). Those with less severe infection received intramuscular or intravenous administration of isepamicin 8 mg/kg once daily + ceftazidime 1g twice daily (n = 56) or amikacin 7.5 mg/kg twice daily + ceftazidime 1g twice daily (n = 28). In the efficacy populations, the proportion of patients clinically cured in the isepamicin group (87/100; 87%) was similar to that in the amikacin group (36/47; 77%). Significantly more patients in the isepamicin group were cured or improved compared with the amikacin group (97% vs 89%; p = 0.042). The difference between treatment groups was also significant in patients with pneumonia (p = 0.05). The most commonly isolated target organisms were Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureus and Klebsiella pneumoniae. The proportion of patients in the efficacy population whose pretreatment valid target organisms were eliminated was similar in each treatment group (90% isepamicin vs 89% amikacin). A retrospective analysis showed there were slightly fewer clinical successes and a higher death rate in patients with nosocomial rather than community acquired pneumonia. Both treatments were well tolerated . Fourteen per cent of isepamicin and 11% of amikacin patients experienced adverse events. The incidence of ototoxicity and nephrotoxicity was low.

Topics: Acute Disease; Amikacin; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Bronchitis; Ceftazidime; Cross Infection; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Gentamicins; Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Pneumonia, Bacterial; Respiratory Tract Infections; Retrospective Studies

In a prospective multicentre open trial, hospitalised adult patients with acute lower respiratory tract infections, mainly pneumonia or bronchitis, were randomised to receive either isepamicin 8 or 15 mg/kg once daily depending on the severity of the infection or amikacin 7.5 mg/kg twice daily. Patients with infections known to be caused by Pseudomonas aeruginosa were to be given concomitant treatment with ceftazidime. In the intent-to-treat population, i.e. patients who received at least one dose randomised treatment, a clinical cure or improvement at the end of treatment was seen in 112/125 (90%) isepamicin patients and 55/60 (92%) amikacin patients. The corresponding rates for patients with a primary diagnosis of pneumonia were 45/52 (87%) and 25/28 (89%). Cure/improvement rates for patients with P. aeruginosa as the causative pathogen (34 of whom also received ceftazidime) were 28/30 (93%) and 16/18 (89%), respectively. In the efficacy population (patients who had a valid pretreatment culture and who met other evaluability criteria), total elimination (documented or presumed if infection had resolved) of target pathogens occurred in 54/63 (86%) of isepamicin patients and 25/30 (83%) of amikacin patients. P. aeruginosa, Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae and Staphylococcus aureus were commonly isolated pathogens. Treatment-related adverse were mainly mild or moderate in severity and occurred in 10% of isepamicin patients and 13% of amikacin patients. Four patients (3 isepamicin and 1 amikacin) discontinued treatment because of severe adverse events and a further isepamicin patient withdrew because of a mild adverse event. Nephrotoxicity and ototoxicity occurred infrequently.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Amikacin; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Bronchitis; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Gentamicins; Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections; Humans; Klebsiella Infections; Klebsiella pneumoniae; Male; Middle Aged; Pneumonia, Bacterial; Prospective Studies; Pseudomonas aeruginosa; Pseudomonas Infections; Respiratory Tract Infections

Isepamicin is a new aminoglycoside antibiotic which possesses greater stability to aminoglycoside-inactivating enzymes compared with other available aminoglycosides. In this prospective, randomised, open trial, the safety and efficacy of intravenous administration of isepamicin was compared with that of intravenous amikacin in seriously ill adults with nosocomial pneumonia or septicaemia. Each study aminoglycoside was administered concurrently with ceftazidime or imipenem. Patients were randomised to receive isepamicin 15 mg/kg once daily, isepamicin 7.5 mg/kg twice daily or amikacin 7.5 mg/kg twice daily. For patients with nosocomial pneumonia, the proportions of patients in the intent-to-treat population (n = 130) who were clinically cured at the end of treatment were similar in each treatment group: 18/44 (41%) isepamicin once daily; 19/45 (42%) isepamicin twice daily; and 17/41 (42%) amikacin. Corresponding results for the efficacy population (n = 58) were: 12/20 (60%) isepamicin once daily; 14/21 (67%) isepamicin twice daily; 9/17 (53%) amikacin. In patients with septicaemia, clinical cure was achieved in 8/10 (80%) patients treated with isepamicin once daily, compared with 8/13 (62%) patients who received isepamicin twice daily, and 7/12 (58%) patients treated with amikacin. For both diagnoses, there were no statistically significant differences between the treatment groups in clinical cure rate. The most commonly isolated target pathogen was Pseudomonas aeruginosa. For both nosocomial pneumonia and septicaemia, the proportion of patients in the intent-to-treat population whose pretreatment valid target pathogens were eliminated was similar in each treatment group. In total, 51 patients (30%) died during study, mostly due to disease progression or complications, or concurrent illness. All three treatment regimens were well tolerated. The proportion of patients experiencing at least one adverse event was 11%, 25% and 9% for isepamicin once daily, isepamicin twice daily and amikacin, respectively. The incidence of ototoxicity and nephrotoxicity was relatively low in both treatment groups.

Topics: Amikacin; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Bacteremia; Cross Infection; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Gentamicins; Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections; Humans; Lactams; Male; Middle Aged; Pneumonia, Bacterial; Prospective Studies