iothalamate-meglumine and Colorectal-Neoplasms

To evaluate the impact of the inclusion of computed tomographic colonography (CTC) involving faecal tagging and no laxatives on the computed tomography (CT) study routinely used in staging patients with colorectal cancer.. CTC was performed on 25 patients who had a diagnosis of colorectal carcinoma, with pathological correlation. Researchers recorded the accuracy of the CTC for staging colorectal cancer, as well as any changes to the plans for surgery based on this exam. The patients' tolerance of the preparation required and the quality of the exams was also evaluated.. All exams were well-tolerated, and only one had unsatisfactory quality. CTC identified all the carcinomas and had an overall accuracy of 80%, 60.1% and 100% for the evaluation of tumour depth, lymph nodes and metastases respectively. CTC identified all polyps greater than 9 mm. Following CTC, changes to surgical plans were observed in 20.8% of the cases, all with incomplete optical colonoscopies.. CTC proved useful for the pre-operative evaluation of patients with a diagnosis of colorectal carcinoma, affecting plans for surgery in a expressive number of patients with an incomplete colonoscopy.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Colonography, Computed Tomographic; Colorectal Neoplasms; Contrast Media; Female; Humans; Iothalamate Meglumine; Lymphatic Metastasis; Male; Middle Aged; Neoplasm Staging; Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted; Sensitivity and Specificity; Triiodobenzoic Acids

To evaluate the minimal iodine contrast medium load necessary for an optimal computed tomography colonography tagging quality.. Faecal occult blood test positive patients were randomly selected for one of three iodine bowel preparations: (1) 3 × 50 ml meglumine ioxithalamate (45 g iodine), (2) 4 × 25 ml meglumine ioxithalamate (30 g iodine); or (3) 3 × 25 ml (22.5 g iodine) meglumine ioxithalamate. Two experienced readers assessed the tagging quality per colonic segment on a five-point scale and the presence of adherent stool. Also semi-automatic homogeneity measurements were performed. Patient acceptance was assessed with questionnaires.. Of 70 eligible patients, 45 patients participated (25 males, mean age 62 years). Each preparation group contained 15 patients. The quality of tagging was insufficient (score 1-2) in 0% of segments in group 1; 4% in group 2 (p<0.01 versus group 1); and 5% in group 3 (p=0.06 versus group 1). In group 1 in 11% of the segments adherent stool was present compared with 49% in group 2 and 41% in group 3 (p<0.01, group 2 and 3 versus group 1). Homogeneity was 85, 102 (p<0.01), and 91 SD HU (p=0.26) in groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively. In group 1 two patients experienced no burden after contrast agent ingestion compared to one patient in group 2 and nine patients in group 3 (p=0.017).. A dose of 3 × 50 ml meglumine ioxithalamate is advisable for an optimal tagging quality despite beneficial effects on the patient acceptance in patients receiving a lower dose.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Cathartics; Colonography, Computed Tomographic; Colorectal Neoplasms; Contrast Media; Drug Administration Schedule; Feasibility Studies; Feces; Female; Humans; Iothalamate Meglumine; Male; Medication Adherence; Middle Aged; Patient Satisfaction; Reproducibility of Results

To compare the diagnostic accuracy of fluorine 18 fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) in the detection of colon lesions with that of delayed PET/computed tomography (CT) performed after the administration of a laxative-augmented contrast medium.. All patients gave written informed consent according to the guidelines issued by the institutional review board. In a prospective study performed from November 2005 to December 2006, images obtained in 847 patients were reviewed by two physicians in consensus. Colorectal FDG uptake on initial PET images that exceeded background FDG accumulation was graded as minimal, equivocal, or positive. When the initial PET scan revealed a colorectal region of increased uptake, either oral or anal laxative-augmented contrast medium was administered on the basis of the site of colorectal FDG focus and delayed PET/CT was performed. Initial PET findings were reevaluated and revised when necessary. Comparison was performed on a per-patient basis. Findings at histopathologic analysis and clinical follow-up served as the reference standard. The accuracy of PET was compared with that of PET/CT by using the McNemar test.. Colorectal FDG foci were seen on initial images in 137 patients. Uptake on the initial images was reported as minimal in 14 patients, equivocal in 68, and positive in 55. With use of a laxative-augmented contrast medium and delayed PET/CT, the proportions of equivocal and positive results decreased by 84% (57 of 68 patients) and 58% (18 of 31 patients), respectively. The accuracy of delayed PET/CT in the depiction of colorectal cancer was greater than that of initial PET (93.4% [128 of 137 patients] vs 71.5% [98 of 137 patients], respectively; P < .01).. Delayed PET/CT with laxative-augmented contrast medium is more accurate than initial PET alone in the detection of colorectal cancer. This approach has promise as a tool for guiding decisions about how to treat patients with colorectal FDG foci.. http://radiology.rsna.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10.1148/radiol.11101193/-/DC1.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Citric Acid; Colonoscopy; Colorectal Neoplasms; Female; Fluorodeoxyglucose F18; Humans; Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted; Iothalamate Meglumine; Laxatives; Male; Middle Aged; Neoplasm Staging; Organometallic Compounds; Positron-Emission Tomography; Prospective Studies; Radiopharmaceuticals; Reference Standards; Tomography, X-Ray Computed

The aim of this study was to compare a 1-day with a 2-day iodine bowel preparation for CT colonography in a positive faecal occult blood test (FOBT) screening population.. One hundred consecutive patients underwent CT colonography and colonoscopy with segmental unblinding. The first 50 patients (group 1) ingested 7 50 ml iodinated contrast starting 2 days before CT colonography. The latter 50 patients (group 2) ingested 4 50 ml iodinated contrast starting 1 day before CT colonography. Per colonic segment measurements of residual stool attenuation and homogeneity were performed, and a subjective evaluation of tagging quality (grade 1-5) was done. Independently, two reviewers performed polyp and carcinoma detection.. The tagging density was 638 and 618 HU (p = 0.458) and homogeneity 91 and 86 HU for groups 1 and 2, respectively (p = 0.145). The tagging quality was graded 5 (excellent) in 90% of all segments in group 1 and 91% in group 2 (p = 0.749). Mean per-polyp sensitivity for lesions >or=10 mm was 86% in group 1 and 97% in group 2 (p = 0.355). Patient burden from diarrhoea significantly decreased for patients in group 2.. One-day preparation with meglumine ioxithalamate results in an improved patient acceptability compared with 2-day preparation and has a comparable, excellent image quality and good diagnostic performance.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Attitude to Health; Colonography, Computed Tomographic; Colorectal Neoplasms; Contrast Media; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Humans; Intestines; Iothalamate Meglumine; Male; Middle Aged; Patient Acceptance of Health Care; Reproducibility of Results; Sensitivity and Specificity

The purpose of this study was to determine whether the interval change in hepatic colorectal metastases as assessed with serial computed tomographic (CT) scans without contrast material enhancement differs from that as assessed using serial, portal dominant phase, contrast-enhanced CT scans.. Unenhanced and contrast-enhanced abdominal CT scans were obtained in 28 patients. Three radiologists separately reviewed serial unenhanced and contrast-enhanced studies to assess the interval change in liver metastases. These radiologists recorded total number of lesions, bidimensional measurements of the largest lesions (as many as three), and overall impressions regarding the interval change (none, worse, or better).. Among the 84 judgments (28 patients x 3 radiologists), comparisons of unenhanced and contrast-enhanced CT studies were concordant in 60 assessments (71%). Nineteen (23%) showed mild disagreement. Of these, contrast-enhanced CT studies demonstrated disease stability when unenhanced CT studies demonstrated otherwise in 11 judgments, whereas unenhanced CT studies demonstrated stability when contrast-enhanced CT studies demonstrated otherwise in eight assessments. Furthermore, of the five marked disagreements, two resulted from a conclusion of interval improvement on unenhanced CT studies and a conclusion of interval worsening on contrast-enhanced CT studies, whereas three demonstrated the opposite. Neither set of serial CT studies systematically resulted in under- or overestimation of disease progression (McNemar Q test, P < .25).. The authors found no consistent pattern to demonstrate that serial unenhanced or contrast-enhanced CT studies resulted in over- or underestimation of disease progression.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Colorectal Neoplasms; Contrast Media; Disease Progression; Female; Humans; Iothalamate Meglumine; Liver Neoplasms; Male; Middle Aged; Radiographic Image Enhancement; Time Factors; Tomography, X-Ray Computed; Triiodobenzoic Acids

To investigate whether measurements of hepatic metastases from colorectal carcinoma before contrast material administration are significantly different statistically from measurements after contrast material administration.. Twenty-four patients with hepatic metastases from colorectal carcinoma underwent spiral computed tomography (CT) with 7-mm collimation. The liver was imaged before and in the portal-dominant phase after intravenous contrast material administration. For each scan, one to three discrete liver lesions were selected for measurement (n = 49). Three experienced radiologists performed independent measurements of the selected lesions on both pre- and postcontrast images at a computer workstation. A three-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed: subjects by raters (the three independent radiologists) by pre- or postcontrast status. The dependent variable was the product of bidimensional measurements.. Sixty-seven percent (33 of 49) of the lesions were measured as larger on precontrast images; 33% (16 of 49), as smaller. There was high interrater reliability, with an intraclass correlation coefficient greater than 0.9 ANOVA showed significant subject, rater, and contrast material effects (P < .001) for the largest lesions in each liver. Contrast material status was a significant factor for all lesion sizes (P < .003).. On average, hepatic metastases from colorectal carcinoma are significantly smaller after contrast material administration.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Barium Sulfate; Colorectal Neoplasms; Contrast Media; Diatrizoate; Diatrizoate Meglumine; Female; Humans; Iothalamate Meglumine; Liver; Liver Neoplasms; Male; Middle Aged; Sensitivity and Specificity; Tomography, X-Ray Computed; Triiodobenzoic Acids

To evaluate the efficacy of two distinct imaging techniques to predict, before operation, unresectability compared with standard computed tomographic scan (CT).. Accurate preoperative identification of the number, size, and location of hepatic lesions is crucial in planning hepatic resection for colorectal hepatic metastases. Although infusion-enhanced CT is the standard, its limitations are the imaging of relatively isodense and/or small (< 1 cm) lesions. The increased sensitivity of CT arterial portography (CTAP) may be offset by false-positive results caused by benign lesions and flow artifacts.. Fifty-eight selected patients considered to be eligible for resection by standard CT had laparotomy. Before operation and in addition to CT, all patients had CT arterial portography and hepatic artery perfusion scintigraphy (HAPS) using radiolabeled macroaggregated albumin. Early studies showed an increased sensitivity for detecting small lesions using the invasive CTAP. Similarly, the HAPS study has detected malignant lesions not observed by standard CT.. Of 58 patients having laparotomy, 40 were resectable by either lobectomy (22) or trisegmentectomy (1) and the rest by single or multiple wedge resections. Eighteen patients could not be resected because of combined intra- and extrahepatic disease or the number and location of metastases. Standard CT detected 64% of all lesions (12% of lesions less than 1 cm). Unresectability was accurately predicted by CTAP and HAPS in 16 (88%) and 15 (83%), respectively, of the 18 patients considered ineligible for resection at laparotomy. Of the 40 patients who had resection for possible cure, CTAP and HAPS falsely predicted unresectability in 6 of 40 patients (15%) and in 10 of 40 patients (25%), respectively. The positive predictive value for unresectability of CTAP and HAPS was 73% and 60%, respectively. False-positive lesions after CTAP included hemangiomas, cysts, granulomas, and flow artifacts. False-positive HAPS lesions included patients in whom no tumor was found at surgery but with some identified by intraoperative ultrasound, blind biopsy, and blind resection.. False-positive results by HAPS and CTAP may limit the ability of these tests to accurately predict unresectability before operation and may deny patients the chance for surgical resection. The HAPS study does, however, detect small lesions not seen by CT or CTAP. Standard CT, although less sensitive, followed by surgery and intraoperative ultrasound, does not necessarily preclude patients who could be resected.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Colorectal Neoplasms; False Positive Reactions; Female; Humans; Iothalamate Meglumine; Liver Neoplasms; Male; Middle Aged; Portography; Predictive Value of Tests; Radionuclide Imaging; Sensitivity and Specificity; Technetium Tc 99m Aggregated Albumin; Tomography, X-Ray Computed

The purpose of this study was to determine whether delayed computed tomography (DCT) of the liver would more accurately detect hepatic malignancy when compared with bolus contrast-enhanced dynamic computed tomography (BCDCT). Fifty-one patients who required operation for intra-abdominal malignancy (92% with colorectal cancers) underwent preoperative BCDCT followed by DCT. At operation, palpation and intraoperative ultrasound (IOUS) examination of the liver were performed for localization and biopsy of tumor nodules. The standard for diagnosis was defined for this study as the combined results of IOUS, palpation, and biopsy. The sensitivities of BCDCT and DCT for hepatic metastases were 50% and 54%, respectively, with a corresponding specificity of 72% for each. DCT demonstrated no significant improvement over BCDCT in the detection of individual hepatic lesions. The sensitivity of palpation for the detection of metastases was 82%, equal to that of IOUS. Both palpation and IOUS were significantly superior to BCDCT or DCT in excluding false-positive and false-negative results (p < 0.001). IOUS failed to identify surface lesions less than 1.0 cm in diameter (sensitivity: 40%). Conversely, palpation was limited in the detection of subsurface tumors less than 1.0 cm in diameter (sensitivity: 33%). Combined IOUS and palpation were significantly more accurate in the detection of hepatic metastases than any single modality that was evaluated (p < 0.001).

Topics: Colorectal Neoplasms; Female; Humans; Intraoperative Care; Iothalamate Meglumine; Laparotomy; Liver; Liver Neoplasms; Male; Middle Aged; Palpation; Predictive Value of Tests; Prospective Studies; Sensitivity and Specificity; Tomography, X-Ray Computed; Ultrasonography