insulin-glulisine and Diabetes-Mellitus--Type-2

Insulin allergy is a rare yet severe side effect of exogenous insulin use. Management typically involves use of alternative antihyperglycaemic agents, symptom control with antihistamines, use of different insulin formulations, and induction of tolerance with incremental doses of insulin. This treatment regimen is not always successful, and the use of omalizumab, an anti-IgE monoclonal antibody, has been used to induce tolerance to insulin.. G.M. is a 62-year-old man with Type 2 diabetes mellitus. His condition was not optimized on oral agents, and insulin therapy was required. G.M. had anaphylaxis to insulin NPH, and subsequent skin-prick testing was positive to insulin aspart, insulin NPH, insulin glulisine, insulin detemir, regular insulin, insulin glargine 100 units/ml and insulin glargine 300 units/ml. He received incremental doses of several insulin formulations; however, he experienced diffuse urticaria preventing optimal glycaemic control. Three successful cases have been described in the literature of omalizumab inducing tolerance to exogenous insulin; therefore, G.M. was started on omalizumab. He subsequently tolerated treatment doses of insulin glulisine and insulin detemir with no allergic reactions and with improvement in glycaemic control.. To our knowledge, this is the first described case of allergy to insulin glargine 300 units/ml and reiterates the potential use of omalizumab in insulin allergy. Further research is warranted to determine if omalizumab should be considered standard of care in difficult-to-treat insulin hypersensitivity.

Topics: Anaphylaxis; Anti-Allergic Agents; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Hypersensitivity; Humans; Insulin; Insulin Aspart; Insulin Detemir; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Isophane; Male; Middle Aged; Omalizumab

The use of short-acting insulin analogues (insulin lispro, insulin aspart, insulin glulisine) for adult, non-pregnant people with type 2 diabetes is still controversial, as reflected in many scientific debates.. To assess the effects of short-acting insulin analogues compared to regular human insulin in adult, non-pregnant people with type 2 diabetes mellitus.. For this update we searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, the WHO ICTRP Search Portal, and ClinicalTrials.gov to 31 October 2018. We placed no restrictions on the language of publication.. We included all randomised controlled trials with an intervention duration of at least 24 weeks that compared short-acting insulin analogues to regular human insulin in the treatment of people with type 2 diabetes, who were not pregnant.. Two review authors independently extracted data and assessed the risk of bias. We assessed dichotomous outcomes by risk ratios (RR), and Peto odds ratios (POR), with 95% confidence intervals (CI). We assessed continuous outcomes by mean differences (MD) with 95% CI. We assessed trials for certainty of the evidence using the GRADE approach.. We identified 10 trials that fulfilled the inclusion criteria, randomising 2751 participants; 1388 participants were randomised to receive insulin analogues and 1363 participants to receive regular human insulin. The duration of the intervention ranged from 24 to 104 weeks, with a mean of about 41 weeks. The trial populations showed diversity in disease duration, and inclusion and exclusion criteria. None of the trials were blinded, so the risk of performance bias and detection bias, especially for subjective outcomes, such as hypoglycaemia, was high in nine of 10 trials from which we extracted data. Several trials showed inconsistencies in the reporting of methods and results.None of the included trials defined all-cause mortality as a primary outcome. Six trials provided Information on the number of participants who died during the trial, with five deaths out of 1272 participants (0.4%) in the insulin analogue groups and three deaths out of 1247 participants (0.2%) in the regular human insulin groups (Peto OR 1.66, 95% CI 0.41 to 6.64; P = 0.48; moderate-certainty evidence). Six trials, with 2509 participants, assessed severe hypoglycaemia differently, therefore, we could not summarise the results with a meta-analysis. Overall, the incidence of severe hypoglycaemic events was low, and none of the trials showed a clear difference between the two intervention arms (low-certainty evidence).The MD in glycosylated haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) change was -0.03% (95% CI -0.16 to 0.09; P = 0.60; 9 trials, 2608 participants; low-certainty evidence). The 95% prediction ranged between -0.31% and 0.25%. The MD in the overall number of non-severe hypoglycaemic episodes per participant per month was 0.08 events (95% CI 0.00 to 0.16; P = 0.05; 7 trials, 2667 participants; very low-certainty evidence). The 95% prediction interval ranged between -0.03 and 0.19 events per participant per month. The results provided for nocturnal hypoglycaemic episodes were of questionable validity. Overall, there was no clear difference between the two short-acting insulin analogues and regular human insulin. Two trials assessed health-related quality of life and treatment satisfaction, but we considered the results for both outcomes to be unreliable (very low-certainty evidence).No trial was designed to investigate possible long term effects (all-cause mortality, microvascular or macrovascular complications of diabetes), especially in participants with diabetes-related complications. No tria. Our analysis found no clear benefits of short-acting insulin analogues over regular human insulin in people with type 2 diabetes. Overall, the certainty of the evidence was poor and results on patient-relevant outcomes, like all-cause mortality, microvascular or macrovascular complications and severe hypoglycaemic episodes were sparse. Long-term efficacy and safety data are needed to draw conclusions about the effects of short-acting insulin analogues on patient-relevant outcomes.

Topics: Adult; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Aspart; Insulin Lispro; Quality of Life; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of adding a single bolus dose of insulin glulisine to basal insulin ('basal-plus') in persons with type 2 diabetes.. Data from patients with poor glycemic control on oral antihyperglycemic drugs who were initiated on a 'basal-plus' regimen for up to 6 months were pooled from four randomized, multicenter studies. Glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), fasting blood glucose, postprandial glucose (PPG), insulin dose and demographics were measured at baseline and end of study.. 711 patients with a mean age of 59.9 years and a mean duration of diabetes of 11.0 years were included in the analysis population. A 'basal-plus' regimen was associated with significant decreases in HbA1c and PPG at 6 months, an increase in glargine and glulisine doses and small, but statistically significant, changes in body weight and BMI in all patient subsets. The proportion of patients with HbA1c<7% also increased in all populations studied, while the prevalence of severe hypoglycemia was low and did not significantly differ across patient groups.. These results suggest that the use of 'basal-plus' can achieve a good therapeutic response with a low risk of hypoglycemia and weight gain, regardless of a patient's age or BMI.

Topics: Age Factors; Aged; Biomarkers; Blood Glucose; Body Mass Index; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Male; Middle Aged; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Risk Factors; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Weight Gain

Excellent glycaemic control is essential in pregnancy to optimise maternal and foetal outcomes. The aim of this review is to assess the efficacy and safety of insulin analogues in pregnancy. Insulin lispro and insulin aspart are safe in pregnancy and may improve post-prandial glycaemic control in women with type 1 diabetes. However, a lack of data indicating improved foetal outcomes would suggest that there is no imperative to switch to a short-acting analogue where the woman's diabetes is well controlled with human insulin. There are no reports of the use of insulin glulisine in pregnancy and so its use cannot be recommended. Most studies of insulin glargine in pregnancy are small, retrospective and include women with pre-existing diabetes and gestational diabetes. There appear to be no major safety concerns and so it seems reasonable to continue insulin glargine if required to achieve excellent glycaemic control. A head-to-head comparison between insulin detemir and NPH insulin in women with type 1 diabetes showed that while foetal outcomes did not differ, fasting plasma glucose improved with insulin detemir without an increased incidence of hypoglycaemia. The greater evidence base supports the use of insulin detemir as the first line long-acting analogue in pregnancy but the lack of definitive foetal benefits means that there is no strong need to switch a woman who is well controlled on NPH insulin. There seems little justification in using long acting insulin analogues in women with gestational diabetes or type 2 diabetes where the risk of hypoglycaemia is low.

Topics: Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Diabetes, Gestational; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Detemir; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Isophane; Insulin, Long-Acting; Pregnancy; Pregnancy in Diabetics; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Treatment Outcome

Postprandial glucose excursions can inhibit achievement of good glycaemic control, and possibly have a specific effect on the risk of vascular comorbidities. Rapid-acting analogues control these excursions better than human insulin because their pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) profile is closer to that of meal-time endogenous insulin secretion. Review of the findings of PK/PD studies and clinical trials suggests that the three marketed rapid-acting analogues--insulin lispro, insulin aspart and insulin glulisine--are equally efficacious and safe. In comparison with human insulin when using the same basal insulin, they provide comparable glycaemic control with a reduced risk of hypoglycaemia, although the combination of rapid-acting and basal analogues reduces glycated haemoglobin (HbA(1c)) more than human meal-time insulin combined with neutral protamine Hagedorn (NPH) insulin. Some studies have suggested that insulin glulisine has a slightly faster onset of action compared with insulin lispro or insulin aspart, but this has not been translated into demonstrable clinical benefit. Treatment satisfaction in patients with diabetes has been higher when therapy with a rapid-acting analogue is used instead of human insulin, perhaps due to differences in advised timing of injection. The largest benefits in efficacy, hypoglycaemia incidence, treatment satisfaction and quality of life have occurred when patients receive an all-analogue meal-time plus basal regimen as compared with an all-human insulin regimen. No new safety issues have been identified with the marketed rapid-acting analogues, and their insulin-like growth factor 1 receptor affinity and mitogenic activity are comparable to human insulin.

Topics: Area Under Curve; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Aspart; Insulin Lispro; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Treatment Outcome

We aimed to determine risk factors associated with hypoglycemia during subcutaneous insulin therapy in non-critically ill patients with type 2 diabetes.. We conducted an analysis of three randomized control trials using basal/bolus regimen and regular sliding scale insulin (SSI) in patients with diabetes admitted to medical and surgical settings.. We analyzed medical records of 261 general medicine and 211 noncardiac surgery patients treated with basal/bolus regimen with glargine/glulisine (n = 169), detemir/aspart (n = 67), neutral protamine Hagedorn/regular (n = 63), or with SSI (n = 173). The overall frequency of mild and severe hypoglycemia (<70 and <40 mg/dl) was 19% and 2%, respectively. During treatment, medical patients experienced a higher number of hypoglycemia than surgical patients (23% versus 13%; p = .005), but the rate of severe hypoglycemia was similar between groups (1.9% versus 1.9%; p = not significant). Increasing age, impaired kidney function (glomerular filtration rate < 60 ml/min), total daily insulin dose, and type of insulin regimen (basal/bolus versus SSI) during hospitalization were important contributors for hypoglycemia in both medical and surgical patients. Among these variables, increasing age and type of insulin regimen (basal/bolus versus SSI) were found to be independent predictors of hypoglycemic events.. Mild hypoglycemic events are common during subcutaneous insulin therapy in medical and surgical patients with type 2 diabetes. Increasing age, impaired renal function, daily insulin dose, and insulin regimen (basal/bolus versus SSI) are important predictors of hypoglycemia during insulin therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Topics: Aged; Critical Illness; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Female; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Infusions, Subcutaneous; Inpatients; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Middle Aged; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Risk Factors

The prevalence of diabetes mellitus continues to increase throughout the world with an expected doubling of documented cases between 2006 and 2030, diabetes deaths are expected to increase by more than 50% from 2006 to 2015. Therapeutic interventions should be based on scientific evidence, including earlier insulin initiation and use of a basal-bolus approach that better mimics normal physiology.. This review focuses on insulin glulisine in the basal-bolus approach. It details pharmacological data, clinical efficacy, safety and tolerability, and potential effects on current treatment regimens.. Insulin glulisine offers a more rapid onset of action and shorter duration of action compared with regular human insulin. These characteristics result in an action profile that closely mimics the normal postmeal endogenous insulin response, thus fulfilling the prandial insulin requirement and making the basal-bolus treatment approach clinically achieveable.

Topics: Animals; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin

Insulin glulisine (Apidra) is a human insulin analogue approved for the improvement of glycaemic control in adults, adolescents and children with diabetes mellitus. It has similar binding properties, and is associated with a faster onset but similar level of glucose disposal, to regular human insulin (RHI). Insulin glulisine and insulin lispro have similar effects on glucose levels. Insulin glulisine is effective when compared to other short- and rapid-acting insulins, demonstrating either noninferiority, no significant difference, or superiority in primary endpoints in studies involving patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes. It is more effective and has a faster onset and shorter duration of activity than RHI. Insulin glulisine is as effective as insulin lispro in patients with type 1 diabetes; however, there is a need for further, well designed head-to-head comparisons with insulin lispro in patients with type 2 diabetes and with insulin aspart in patients with type 1 or type 2 diabetes to fully establish the place of insulin glulisine in the management of diabetes. Insulin glulisine has a flexible administration period, as it can be administered immediately before or after meals. Hypoglycaemia, a common risk with insulins, occurs at a similar rate among recipients of insulin glulisine to that seen with other insulins. Thus, insulin glulisine is an effective and well tolerated option for the treatment of patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Blood Glucose; Child; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin

In the early treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), the addition of a basal insulin, such as insulin glargine, to existing oral therapy can help patients attain recommended glycaemic control targets, including haemoglobin A(1c) (HbA(1c)) <7% and fasting blood glucose <5.5 mmol/l (<100 mg/dl). For patients close to but not at target, the management of postprandial glucose excursions with a rapid-acting insulin, such as insulin glulisine, can provide further improvements in glycaemic control. In this review, the options for intensifying insulin therapy with the addition of one or more daily doses of prandial insulin are discussed. In addition, the advantages/disadvantages of choosing a basal-bolus vs. a premixed insulin strategy are discussed. A conceptually simple approach for the treatment of T2DM is for optimization of the basal insulin dose (added to oral antidiabetic drugs) to target fasting glycaemia followed by the addition of a single prandial dose of rapid-acting insulin to target the largest glucose excursion. A second and third dose of prandial insulin can then be added if HbA(1c) remains above target and to manage postprandial glucose excursions at other meals. Prospective studies are underway to further examine this concept and determine the benefit of this approach not only on overall glycaemic control but also on cardiovascular risk.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Postprandial Period; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic

Insulin glulisine injection [3(B)-Lys, 29(B)-Glu-human insulin] is the newest human insulin analogue product for the control of mealtime blood sugar. As with insulin aspart and insulin lispro products, the insulin glulisine product displays faster absorption and onset of action, with a shorter duration of action than that of regular human insulin. The modifications of the amino acid sequence at positions 3 and 29 in the B chain of human insulin simultaneously provide stability to the molecular structure and render the insulin glulisine molecule less likely to self-associate, compared with human insulin, while still allowing the formation of dimers at pharmaceutical concentrations. Unlike other insulin analogue products, this allows for a viable drug product in the absence of hexamer-promoting zinc and, thus, provides immediate availability of insulin glulisine molecules at the injection site for absorption. Pharmacokinetic studies with insulin glulisine have shown an absorption profile with a peak insulin concentration approximately twice that of regular human insulin, which is reached in approximately half the time. Dose proportionality in early, maximum and total exposure is observed for insulin glulisine over the therapeutic relevant dose range up to 0.4 U/kg. The pharmacodynamic profile of insulin glulisine reflects the absorption kinetics by demonstrating a greater rate of glucose utilization, which is completed earlier and at equipotency on a molar base compared with regular human insulin. Dose-proportionality in glucose utilization has been established for insulin glulisine in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus in the dose range of 0.075-0.15 U/kg, and a less than dose-proportional increase above 0.15 U/kg, indicating saturation of insulin action in general. The rapid absorption and action of insulin glulisine show similar low intrasubject variability compared with insulin lispro and regular human insulin when given repeatedly, and have been confirmed in healthy subjects of different body mass indices (BMIs) and ethnic groups, as well as adults and children with type 1 and type 2 diabetes. Furthermore, the early insulin exposure and action of insulin glulisine were slightly -- but consistently -- greater than those of insulin lispro in healthy volunteers across a wide range of BMIs.Meal studies in patients with type 1 diabetes show that insulin glulisine provides better postprandial blood glucose control than regular human insulin when administ

Topics: Amino Acid Sequence; Area Under Curve; Biological Availability; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Humans; Insulin; Molecular Sequence Data; Treatment Outcome

A recent meta-analysis evaluated trials of the rapid-acting analogues insulin lispro and insulin aspart, performed before the introduction of the basal analogues, insulin glargine and insulin detemir. This article reviews the effect of rapid-acting and basal insulin analogues separately and in combination, relative to human insulin. Outcomes evaluated include HbA(1c), hypoglycaemia, postprandial glucose (PPG), and weight changes. Results from trials that matched defined criteria are presented in tables. In type 1 diabetes, compared with human insulin, the rapid-acting analogues generally reduced hypoglycaemia and postprandial glucose, whereas the basal analogues tended to reduce hypoglycaemia -- particularly nocturnal hypoglycaemia. Weight gain may also be reduced with basal analogues, compared with human basal insulin. In type 2 diabetes, premix rapid-acting analogues controlled postprandial glucose better than human insulin mixes; basal analogues used as basal-only therapy reduced hypoglycaemia compared with NPH insulin; and some advantages were apparent with analogues in basal-bolus therapy. Whilst the benefits on individual metabolic and clinical outcomes appear modest, almost all studies report some advantage when using insulin analogues in type 1 and type 2 diabetes. Significant benefits, including PPG lowering with the rapid-acting analogues and the potential for reduction in cardiovascular risk, should be investigated further.

Topics: Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Administration Schedule; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Insulin; Insulin Aspart; Insulin Detemir; Insulin Glargine; Insulin Lispro; Insulin, Isophane; Insulin, Long-Acting; Postprandial Period; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic

SoloStar (sanofi-aventis) is a new, disposable insulin pen for the administration of insulin glargine (Lantus, sanofi-aventis) or insulin glulisine (Apidra, sanofi-aventis). SoloStar was developed to address a wide range of patient needs and demonstrates advancement over previous devices, owing to its appropriate combination of ergonomically-tested and mechanically improved features. The authors report the results of key investigations carried out by sanofi-aventis as part of the SoloStar development plan, including dose accuracy and injection force testing. Comparisons between SoloStar and two commonly used pens, FlexPen (Novo Nordisk) and the Humulin/Humalog pen (Eli Lilly) establish SoloStar as a state of the art pen that is suitable for most patients with diabetes.

Topics: Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Delivery Systems; Equipment Design; Ergonomics; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Injections, Subcutaneous; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Mechanics

Normalization of blood glucose is essential for the prevention of diabetes mellitus (DM)-related microvascular and macrovascular complications. Despite substantial literature to support the benefits of glucose lowering and clear treatment targets, glycemic control remains suboptimal for most people with DM in the United States. Pharmacokinetic limitations of conventional insulins have been a barrier to achieving treatment targets secondary to adverse effects such as hypoglycemia and weight gain. Recombinant DNA technology has allowed modification of the insulin molecule to produce insulin analogues that overcome these pharmacokinetic limitations. With time action profiles that more closely mimic physiologic insulin secretion, rapid acting insulin analogues (RAAs) reduce post-prandial glucose excursions and hypoglycemia when compared to regular human insulin (RHI). Insulin glulisine (Apidra) is a rapid-acting insulin analogue created by substituting lysine for asparagine at position B3 and glutamic acid for lysine at position B29 on the B chain of human insulin. The quick absorption of insulin glulisine more closely reproduces physiologic first-phase insulin secretion and its rapid acting profile is maintained across patient subtypes. Clinical trials have demonstrated comparable or greater efficacy of insulin glulisine versus insulin lispro or RHI, respectively. Efficacy is maintained even when insulin glulisine is administered post-meal. In addition, glulisine appears to have a more rapid time action profile compared with insulin lispro across various body mass indexes (BMIs). The safety and tolerability profile of insulin glulisine is also comparable to that of insulin lispro or RHI in type 1 or 2 DM and it has been shown to be as safe and effective when used in a continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII). In summary, insulin glulisine is a safe, effective, and well tolerated rapid-acting insulin analogue across all BMIs and a worthy option for prandial glucose control in type 1 or 2 DM.

Topics: Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic

The third one so far. Does it offer any advantage over the other two?

Topics: Clinical Trials as Topic; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin

Short acting insulin analogue use for diabetic patients is still controversial, as reflected in many scientific debates.. To assess the effects of short acting insulin analogues versus regular human insulin.. The Cochrane Library (Issue 3, 2005), MEDLINE, EMBASE until September 2005.. Randomised controlled trials with an intervention duration of at least 4 weeks.. Trial selection and evaluation of study quality was done independently by two reviewers.. Altogether 8274 participants took part in 49 randomised controlled studies. Most studies were of poor methodological quality. In patients with type 1 diabetes, the weighted mean difference (WMD) of HbA1c was -0.1% (95% CI: -0.2 to -0.1) in favour of insulin analogue, whereas in patients with type 2 diabetes the WMD was 0.0% (95% CI: -0.1 to 0.0). In subgroup analyses of different types of interventions in type 1 diabetic patients, the WMD in HbA1c was -0.2% (95% CI: -0.3 to -0.1) in favour of insulin analogue in studies using continuous subcutaneous insulin injections (CSII), whereas for conventional intensified insulin therapy (IIT) studies the WMD in HbA1c was -0.1% (95% CI: -0.1 to 0.0). The WMD of the overall mean hypoglycaemic episodes per patient per month was -0.2 (95% CI: -1.1 to 0.7) and -0.2 (95% CI: -0.5 to 0.1) for analogues in comparison to regular insulin in patients with type 1 diabetes and type 2 diabetes, respectively. For studies in type 1 diabetes patients the incidence of severe hypoglycaemia ranged from 0 to 247.3 (median 21.8) episodes per 100 person-years for insulin analogues and from 0 to 544 (median 46.1) for regular insulin, in type 2 the incidence ranged from 0 to 30.3 (median 0.3) episodes per 100 person-years for insulin analogues and from 0 to 50.4 (median 1.4) for regular insulin. No study was designed to investigate possible long term effects (e.g. mortality, diabetic complications), in particular in patients with diabetes related complications.. Our analysis suggests only a minor benefit of short acting insulin analogues in the majority of diabetic patients treated with insulin. Until long term efficacy and safety data are available we suggest a cautious response to the vigorous promotion of insulin analogues. For safety purposes, we need a long-term follow-up of large numbers of patients and well designed studies in pregnant women to determine the safety profile for both the mother and the unborn child.

Topics: Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Aspart; Insulin Lispro; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic

Achieving and maintaining glycemic control (glycated hemoglobin--HbA(1c)< or =7.0% according to American Diabetes Association and < or =6.5% according to International Diabetes Federation) is the primary goal in treating diabetes, which lowers the risk for diabetes-related complications. Insulin therapy is essential for type 1 diabetes treatment. Insulin therapy in type 2 diabetes is initiated when glycemic control is inadequate despite the combination of antihyperglycemic drugs. The type of insulin therapy is selected according to the patient's lifestyle and needs. Multiple insulin injection therapy and premixed insulin therapy are usually administered. In multiple insulin injection therapy, basal insulin is administered one or two times a day, and regular human insulin or rapid-acting insulin analog is administered with each meal. The duration of action of regular insulin is 6-8 hours; therefore, the risk for postprandial hypoglycemia is increased. The action of novel insulin analogs (rapid- and long-acting) closely mimics physiological insulin secretion. Three rapid-acting insulin analogs are currently available: insulin lispro, insulin aspart, and insulin glulisine. Insulin glulisine is the most recently approved rapid-acting insulin analog. It is safe, flexible, and effective in achieving target postprandial glycemic control. Moreover, the pharmacokinetics of insulin glulisine does not depend on the amount of subcutaneous fat. Basal insulins include intermediate-acting human insulins (neutral protamine Hagedorn) and long-acting insulin analogs (insulin glargine, insulin detemir). The latter are the optimal choice covering basal insulin requirement. Compared to neutral protamine Hagedorn insulin, long-acting insulin analogs have no pronounced concentration peak and reduce nocturnal hypoglycemia risk and weight gain.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Age Factors; Aged; Algorithms; Blood Glucose; Child; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Injections, Subcutaneous; Insulin; Insulin Detemir; Insulin Glargine; Insulin Secretion; Insulin, Long-Acting; Life Style; Middle Aged; Risk Factors; Time Factors

The use of insulin pump treatment (CSII: continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion) became widely accepted in the last couple of years. A growing body of experiences accumulated in paediatric practice because CSII is preferable for treating young patients with type 1 diabetes. Nevertheless, CSII can be used, if indicated, for treating type 2 diabetic patients as well. Recently, fast acting insulin analogues are exclusively used for CSII. At moment, clinical observations with insulin lispro and insulin aspart are available but experiences with glulisine are still limited. Although some inconsistencies could be observed in the literature, it is widely accepted, that higher reduction in HbA(1c) values could be achieved by CSII as compared to intensive conservative insulin treatment; this could be more pronounced in cases with high initial HbA(1c) values. CSII with short acting insulin analogues could lead to a higher reduction of HbA(1c) values than CSII with human regular insulin. Moreover, the decrease of hypoglycaemic events could be expected in some cases.

Topics: Administration, Cutaneous; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Infusion Pumps, Implantable; Insulin; Insulin Aspart; Insulin Infusion Systems; Insulin Lispro

Insulin glulisine (Apidra, Sanofi-Aventis), a new and recently approved rapid-acting insulin analogue, mimics the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profiles of physiological human insulin, but has a rapid onset, peak effect at 1h, and a shorter duration of action (approximately 4 h). Its rapid-action properties are maintained across subject types. Formal clinical evaluations show that insulin glulisine can be administered safely and effectively pre- and postmeal. When injected immediately premeal, insulin glulisine provides superior postprandial blood glucose control compared with regular human insulin (RHI) injected 30 min premeal. These data highlight the flexibility in the dosing schedule with insulin glulisine. Clinical trials have demonstrated that insulin glulisine elicits a greater reduction in glycosylated haemoglobin at end point than RHI, in both type 1 and 2 diabetes mellitus. In addition, the safe administration of insulin glulisine by continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion has been demonstrated in patients with type 1 diabetes. In conclusion, insulin glulisine is an effective, safe and well-tolerated rapid-acting insulin analogue.

Topics: Clinical Trials as Topic; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Humans; Insulin

In patients with diabetes, the benefit of conventional insulin therapy can be limited due to difficulty in achieving tight glycemic control, which is critical to reducing the risk of long-term diabetes-related complications. The recent development of recombinant analogs of regular human insulin is changing the clinical management of diabetes. One of the newest members of this class of hypoglycemic agents is insulin glulisine, a rapid-acting insulin analog with a pharmacokinetic profile that more closely mimics the natural pattern of insulin secretion than regular human insulin. Subcutaneous administration of insulin glulisine has a faster subcutaneous absorption, a more rapid onset of activity, and a shorter duration of action than regular human insulin. These properties of insulin glulisine allow it to be administered shortly before or soon after meals by subcutaneous injection or by continuous subcutaneous pump infusion. Insulin glulisine effectively controls postprandial glucose excursions in both type 1 and type 2 diabetic patients without increasing the risk of hypoglycemia. One unit of insulin glulisine has the same glucose-lowering effect as one unit of regular human insulin. Insulin glulisine has a favorable safety profile, which is not significantly different from that of regular human insulin. This review summarizes the current data on the clinical efficacy and safety of insulin glulisine in type 1 and type 2 diabetic patients.

Topics: Animals; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin

Topics: Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Humans; Insulin; Insulin Aspart; Insulin Detemir; Insulin Glargine; Insulin Lispro; Insulin, Long-Acting

Aventis Pharma (formerly Hoechst Marion Roussel) is developing insulin glulisine, a fast-acting insulin analog, for the potential treatment of hyperglycemia in both type 1 and 2 diabetes. Aventis has submitted an NDA and an MAA to the FDA and the EMEA, respectively.

Topics: Animals; Clinical Trials, Phase II as Topic; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Structure-Activity Relationship

This study compares the effects of two different insulin regimens - basal versus bolus insulin - on metabolic and cardiovascular autonomic function in Japanese participants with type 2 diabetes.. Participants were randomly assigned to groups for therapy with insulin glulisine (IGlu) or insulin glargine (IGla). The primary efficacy end-point was glycemic variability, including M-values, mean of glucose levels, and a blood glucose profile of seven time points before and after the intervention. The secondary end-points included pleiotropic effects, including endothelial and cardiac autonomic nerve functions.. Blood glucose levels at all time points significantly decreased in both groups. Post-lunch, post-dinner, and bedtime blood glucose levels were significantly lower in the IGlu group than in the IGla group. Nadir fasting blood glucose levels at the end-point were significantly lower in the IGla group than in the IGlu group. The M-value and mean blood glucose levels were significantly decreased from baseline in both groups, although the former was significantly lower in the IGlu group than in the IGla group. IGla, but not IGlu, was found to elevate 24-h parasympathetic tone, especially during night-time, and it decreased 24-h sympathetic nerve activity, especially at dawn.. Both IGlu and IGla regimens reduced glucose variability, with IGlu bringing a greater reduction in M-value. IGla, but not IGlu, increased parasympathetic tone during night-time and decreased sympathetic nerve activity at dawn. These findings shed light on the previously unrecognized role of night-time basal insulin supplementation on sympathovagal activity in type 2 diabetes patients.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Autonomic Nervous System; Blood Glucose; Circadian Rhythm; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Fasting; Female; Genetic Pleiotropy; Glycemic Control; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Male; Middle Aged; Parasympathetic Nervous System; Sympathetic Nervous System; Treatment Outcome

Many Chinese patients who are uncontrolled by oral antidiabetic drugs (OADs) receive short-term intensive insulin therapy (IIT) in hospital to rapidly relieve glucose-associated toxicity and to preserve/improve β-cell function. However, evidence for optimizing insulin algorithms for maintenance treatment after IIT is lacking. This study will compare the efficacy and safety of basal insulin-based treatment versus twice-daily premixed insulin in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients after short-term in-hospital IIT.. Given the current lack of clinical data, this study will provide evidence supporting safe and effective glycemic control using basal insulin glargine-based therapy plus OADs compared with twice-daily premixed insulin in Chinese patients with T2DM after short-term IIT. This will assist physicians by providing a wider choice of treatments.. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT03359837 (registered on 2 December 2017).

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Blood Glucose; China; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Metformin; Middle Aged; Multicenter Studies as Topic; Patient Satisfaction; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Young Adult

We compared the efficacy and safety of insulin degludec/aspart (IDegAsp) twice-daily injections with insulin glargine 300 U/mL and insulin glulisine basal-bolus therapy (Gla300/Glu) using insulin glargine 300 U/mL (Gla300) and insulin glulisine (Glu).. A total of 20 patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus were treated with IDegAsp twice-daily injections; achievement of target preprandial glucose concentration of 100-130 mg/dL at breakfast and supper was determined using a wearable flash glucose monitoring system. Patients were later switched to Gla300/Glu basal-bolus therapy before breakfast and before supper. Data were collected on days 2-4 and days 12-14 for each treatment period. The study's primary efficacy end-point was the mean percentage of time with a target glucose range of 70-180 mg/dL, and safety end-points were the mean percentage of time with hypoglycemia having glucose levels <70 mg/dL, clinically important hypoglycemia with glucose levels <54 mg/dL and nocturnal (00.00-06.00) hypoglycemia.. Considering efficacy, the mean percentage of time for the target glucose range of IDegAsp was significantly lower than that of Gla300/Glu (73.1 [69.4-81.1] vs 84.2 [80.2-93.1], P = 0.001). Considering safety, the mean percentages of hypoglycemia (<70 mg/dL; 2.1 [0.0-9.4] vs 14.4 [4.4-22.3]), clinically important hypoglycemia (<54 mg/dL; 0.0 [0.0-0.2] vs 1.9 [0.0-5.6]) and nocturnal (00.00-06.00 hours) hypoglycemia (0.5 [0.0-5.9] vs 8.9 [3.1-11.8]) of Gla300/Glu were significantly lower than those of IDegAsp (P = 0.012, 0.036 and 0.007, respectively).. When compared with the IDegAsp twice-daily injections, Gla300/Glu basal-bolus therapy might achieve more effective glycemic control without hypoglycemic risk.

Topics: Aged; Biomarkers; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Aspart; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Patient Safety; Prognosis

We compared the effects of morning administration of insulin glulisine + insulin glargine 300 U/mL (G + G300) with that of insulin lispro + insulin glargine biosimilar (L + GB).. A total of 30 patients with type 2 diabetes who wore a continuous glucose monitoring device on admission after glucose levels were stabilized by morning long-acting and ultra-rapid-acting insulins were randomly allocated to groups who received G + G300 on days 1 and 2, and the same dose L + GB on days 3 and 4, or vice versa. Data collected on days 2 and 4 (mean amplitude of glycemic excursion, mean of daily differences: all days) were analyzed. Insulin was injected at 08.00 h. A day was defined as the period from 08.00 h one day, to 08.00 h the next day. Test meals were given.. Increased post-breakfast glucose level, post-breakfast glucose gradient, mean glucose level, standard deviation and M-value (24 h, 00.00-06.00 h), mean amplitude of glycemic excursion, and mean of daily differences were significantly lower in patients taking G + G300 than those taking L + GB (P ≤ 0.0001-0.04). The area over the glucose curve (<70 mg/dL) was not significantly different between groups. Pre-lunch - pre-breakfast glucose levels were significantly lower in patients taking L + GB than those taking G + G300 (P < 0.0001). The difference in the highest post-breakfast glucose level between groups (Δ = G + G300 - L + GB) was significantly correlated to 24-h mean glucose level (r = 0.40, P = 0.03).. Compared with L + GB, G + G300 decreases post-breakfast glucose level reducing rate of rise of that, nocturnal and 24-h glucose variability and level without causing hypoglycemia, and daily variance.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Blood Glucose; Cross-Over Studies; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin Lispro; Male; Postprandial Period; Treatment Outcome

To evaluate the glycaemic control achieved by prandial once-daily insulin glulisine injection timing adjustment, based on a continuous glucose monitoring sensor, in comparison to once-daily insulin glulisine injection before breakfast in patients with type 2 diabetes who are uncontrolled with once-daily basal insulin glargine.. This was a 24-week open-label, randomized, controlled, multicentre trial. At the end of an 8-week period of basal insulin optimization, patients with HbA1c ≥ 7.5% and FPG < 130 mg/dL were randomized (1:1) to either arm A (no sensor) or arm B (sensor) to receive 16-week intensified prandial glulisine treatment. Patients in arm A received pre-breakfast glulisine, and patients in arm B received glulisine before the meal with the highest glucose elevation based on sensor data. The primary outcome was mean HbA1c at week 24 and secondary outcomes included rates of hypoglycaemic events and insulin dosage.. A total of 121 patients were randomized to arm A (n = 61) or arm B (n = 60). There was no difference in mean HbA1c at week 24 between arms A and B (8.5% ± 1.2% vs 8.4% ± 1.0%; P = .66). The prandial insulin glulisine dosage for arm A and arm B was 9.3 and 10.1 units, respectively (P = .39). The frequency of hypoglycaemic events did not differ between study arms (36.1% vs 51.7%; P = .08).. Using a CGM sensor to identify the meal with the highest glucose excursion and adjusting the timing of prandial insulin treatment did not show any advantage in terms of glycaemic control or safety in our patients.

Topics: Aged; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Monitoring; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Humans; Hyperglycemia; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin Resistance; Intention to Treat Analysis; Lost to Follow-Up; Male; Meals; Middle Aged; Monitoring, Ambulatory; Patient Dropouts; Pilot Projects

The prolonged treatment effects of a short-acting GLP-1RA (glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist), such as lixisenatide, on fasting and postprandial systemic hemodynamics in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients are unknown. In this secondary analysis, we included 34 overweight insulin glargine-treated type 2 diabetes mellitus patients (mean±SD age, 62±7 years; HbA

Topics: Adult; Aged; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Fasting; Female; Gastric Emptying; Hemodynamics; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Male; Middle Aged; Peptides; Postprandial Period; Treatment Outcome

This study investigated the cost per responder and number needed to treat (NNT) in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients for lixisenatide compared to insulin intensification regimens using composite endpoints in the UK, Italy, and Spain.. Efficacy and safety outcomes were obtained from GetGoal Duo-2, a 26-week phase 3 trial comparing lixisenatide vs insulin glulisine (IG) once daily (QD) and three times daily (TID). Response at week 26 was extrapolated to 52 weeks, assuming a maintained treatment effect, based on long-term evidence in other T2DM populations. Responders were defined using composite end-points, based on an HbA1c threshold and/or no weight gain and/or no hypoglycemia. The HbA1c threshold was varied in sensitivity analyses. Annual treatment costs were estimated in euros (1 GBP = 1.26 EUR), including drug acquisition and resource use costs. Cost per responder was computed by dividing annual treatment costs per patient by the proportion of responders.. Lixisenatide was associated with the lowest cost per responder for all composite end-points that included a weight-related component. For the main composite end-point of HbA1c ≤7.5% AND no weight gain AND no symptomatic hypoglycemia, cost per responder results were: UK: 6,867€, 8,746€, and 12,410€; Italy: 7,057€, 9,160€, and 12,844€; Spain: 8,370€, 11,365€, and 17,038€, for lixisenatide, IG QD, and TID, respectively. The NNT analysis showed that, for every 6.85 and 5.86 patients treated with lixisenatide, there was approximately one additional responder compared to IG QD and TID, respectively.. A limitation of the clinical inputs is the lack of 52-week trial data from GetGoal Duo-2, which led to the assumption of a maintained treatment effect from week 26 to 52.. This analysis suggests lixisenatide is an efficient economic resource allocation in the UK, Italy, and Spain.

Topics: Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Therapy, Combination; Fees, Pharmaceutical; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Italy; Models, Econometric; Peptides; Spain; United Kingdom; Weight Gain

The aim of the present 24-week multicentre randomized non-inferiority trial was to compare the efficacy and safety of two insulin intensification strategies in uncontrolled type 2 diabetes despite optimized basal insulin therapy.. Patients with fasting plasma glucose (FPG) <130 mg/dL and HbA1c 7.0%-10.0% while on insulin glargine were randomized to a basal-prandial group (stepwise addition of insulin glulisine) or a premixed insulin group (insulin aspart/insulin aspart protamine 30/70 starting with 6 IU twice daily). The primary endpoint was the change in HbA1c after 24 weeks (non-inferiority margin 0.4%).. At Week 24, the adjusted mean change from baseline HbA1c was -0.94 ± 0.09% and -1.04 ± 0.09% in basal-prandial and premixed insulin groups, respectively, with a mean difference of -0.09% (95% confidence interval [CI] -0.35, 0.16). A lower rate of hypoglycemia with a similar reduction in HbA1c was observed during stabilization of the total daily insulin dose in the premixed insulin group (Weeks 0-12). After stabilization of the total daily insulin dose, the rate of hypoglycemia and the total daily insulin dose were similar in the two groups.. The efficacy and safety of the two intensifying regimens were similar after stabilization of the total daily insulin dose when oral agents were maintained. Starting with a lower total daily insulin dose with a gradual change in the treatment regimen was helpful in reducing the rate of hypoglycemia during initial stabilization of the total daily insulin dose.

Topics: Aged; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Aspart; Insulin Glargine; Insulin Lispro; Male; Time Factors

To use continuous glucose monitoring to examine the effects of insulin initiation with glargine, with or without glulisine, on glycaemic variability and glycaemia in a cohort of people with Type 2 diabetes receiving maximum oral hypoglycaemic agents in primary healthcare.. We conducted a post hoc analysis of continuous glucose monitoring data from 89 participants at baseline and at 24 weeks after insulin commencement. Indicators of glycaemic variability (standard deviation, J-index and mean amplitude of glycaemic excursion) and glycaemia (HbA1c , mean glucose, area under the glucose-time curve) were assessed. Multi-level regression analysis was used to identify the predictors of change.. Complete glycaemic variability data were available for 78 participants. Of these participants, 41% were women, their mean (sd) age was 59.2 (10.4) years, the median (interquartile range) diabetes duration was 10.4 (6.5, 13.3) years and the median (interquartile range) baseline HbA1c was 82.5 (71.6, 96.7) mmol/mol [9.7 (8.7, 11.0)%]. At baseline, BMI correlated negatively with standard deviation (r = -0.30) and mean amplitude of glycaemic excursion (r = -0.26), but not with J-index; HbA1c correlated with J-index (r = 0.61) but not with mean amplitude of glycaemic excursion and standard deviation. After insulin initiation the mean (sd) glucose level decreased [from 12.0 (3.0) to 8.5 (1.6) mmol/l; P < 0.001], as did the median (interquartile range) J-index [from 66.9 (47.7, 95.1) to 36.9 (27.6, 49.8) mmol/l; P < 0.001]. Baseline HbA1c correlated with a greater J-index reduction (r = -0.45; P < 0.001). The mean amplitude of glycaemic excursion and standard deviation values were unchanged. The baseline temporal profile, showing elevated postprandial morning glucose levels, was unchanged after insulin initiation, despite an overall reduction in glycaemia.. Insulin initiation reduced hyperglycaemia but did not alter glycaemic variability in adults with Type 2 diabetes receiving maximum oral hypoglycaemic agents. The most significant postprandial excursions were seen in the morning, which identifies prebreakfast as the most effective target for short-acting insulin therapy.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Blood Glucose; Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring; Cohort Studies; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hyperglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Male; Middle Aged; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult

The analogue insulin glulisine (Glu) shows both more rapid onset and shorter duration of action compared with the other rapid-acting insulin analogues. The current study investigates these properties in regard to the occurrence of hypoglycemia related to exercise. A randomized, single-center, open-label, crossover study was conducted in 12 hospitalized type 2 diabetes patients (all male, mean ± SD age of 51.9 ± 11.3 years; BMI: 25.5 ± 3.9 kg/m2; HbA1c: 11.2 ± 2.4 %). Glu or insulin aspart (Asp) was subcutaneously administered just before breakfast. Insulin dosage was determined as the usual dose of pre-prandial rapid-acting insulin for patients treated with insulin therapy or as 0.1 unit/kg for patients treated with oral anti-hyperglycemic agents. Sixty min after the start of eating, the patients began aerobic exercise on a bicycle ergometer for 30 min at 50% of maximum heart rate. Hypoglycemic episodes (plasma glucose level < 70 mg/dL with or without symptoms) were observed more frequently in Asp group (p < 0.05). Post-exercise plasma glucose levels at 90, 120, and 150 min were significantly lower in Asp group (p < 0.05). In patients with BMI < 25 kg/m2 (n = 6), post-exercise blood glucose levels were significantly lower in Asp group (p < 0.05), while in patients with BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2 (n = 6) the difference was not significant. Glu may therefore be a suitable choice of rapid-acting insulin for patients with type 2 diabetes who are at high risk of post-exercise hypoglycemia.

Topics: Adult; Blood Glucose; Body Mass Index; Cross-Over Studies; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Exercise; Exercise Test; Heart Rate; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Aspart; Male; Middle Aged; Postprandial Period

To test the hypothesis that a 'basal plus' regimen--adding once-daily main-meal fast-acting insulin to basal insulin once daily--would be non-inferior to biphasic insulin twice daily as assessed by glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) concentration (predefined as ≤0.4%), but would provide superior treatment satisfaction.. This open-label trial enrolled adults to an 8- or 12-week run-in period, during which oral therapies except metformin were stopped and insulin glargine dose was titrated. Those with fasting glucose <7 mmol/l but HbA1c >7% (53 mmol/mol) were randomized to insulin glargine/glulisine once daily (n = 170) or insulin aspart/aspart protamine 30/70 twice daily (n = 165) for 24 weeks, with dose titration to glucose targets using standardized algorithms.. For HbA1c, the basal plus regimen was non-inferior to biphasic insulin (least squares mean difference, 0.21%, upper 97.5% confidence limit 0.38%) meeting the predefined non-inferiority margin of 0.4%. Treatment satisfaction (Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire change version and Insulin Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire total scores) significantly favoured basal plus. No difference was observed between the basal plus and the biphasic insulin groups in responders (HbA1c <7%, 20.6 vs 27.9%; p = 0.12), weight gain (2.06 vs 2.50 kg; p = 0.2), diabetes-specific quality of life (Audit of Diabetes-Dependent Quality of Life average weighted impact (AWI) score) and generic health status (five-dimension European Quality of Life questionnaire). Overall hypoglycaemia rates were similar between groups (15.3 vs 18.2 events/patient-year; p = 0.22); nocturnal hypoglycaemia was higher with the basal plus regimen (5.7 vs 3.6 events/patient-year; p = 0.02).. In long-standing type 2 diabetes with suboptimal glycaemia despite oral therapies and basal insulin, the basal plus regimen was non-inferior to biphasic insulin for biomedical outcomes, with a similar overall hypoglycaemia rate but more nocturnal events.

Topics: Aged; Australia; Biphasic Insulins; Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Combinations; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hyperglycemia; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Incidence; Insulin; Insulin Aspart; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Isophane; Intention to Treat Analysis; Male; Middle Aged; Patient Dropouts; Quality of Life; United Kingdom

Few randomized studies have focused on the optimal management of non-intensive care unit patients with type 2 diabetes in Latin America. We compared the safety and efficacy of a basal-bolus regimen with analogues and human insulins in general medicine patients admitted to a University Hospital in Asunción, Paraguay.. In a prospective, open-label trial, we randomized 134 nonsurgical patients with blood glucose (BG) between 140 and 400 mg/dL to a basal-bolus regimen with glargine once daily and glulisine before meals (n = 66) or Neutral Protamine Hagedorn (NPH) twice daily and regular insulin before meals (n = 68). Major outcomes included differences in daily BG levels and frequency of hypoglycemic events between treatment groups.. There were no differences in the mean daily BG (157 ± 37 mg/dL versus 158 ± 44 mg/dL; P = .90) or in the number of BG readings within target <140 mg/dL before meals (76% versus 74%) between the glargine/glulisine and NPH/regular regimens. The mean insulin dose in the glargine/glulisine group was 0.76 ± 0.3 units/kg/day (glargine, 22 ± 9 units/day; glulisine, 31 ± 12 units/day) and was not different compared with NPH/regular group (0.75 ± 0.3 units/kg/day [NPH, 28 ± 12 units/day; regular, 23 ± 9 units/day]). The overall prevalence of hypoglycemia (<70 mg/dL) was similar between patients treated with NPH/regular and glargine/glulisine (38% versus 35%; P = .68), but more patients treated with human insulin had severe (<40 mg/dL) hypoglycemia (7.6% versus 25%; P = .08). There were no differences in length of hospital stay or mortality between groups.. The basal-bolus regimen with insulin analogues resulted in equivalent glycemic control and frequency of hypoglycemia compared to treatment with human insulin in hospitalized patients with diabetes.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Female; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Regular, Human; Male; Middle Aged; Outcome Assessment, Health Care; Paraguay

To evaluate the impact of different subcutaneous basal insulin regimens on glycemic variability (GV) and hospital complications in non-intensive care unit (ICU) patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D).. This study is a post hoc analysis of 279 general medicine and surgery patients treated with either a "Basal Bolus" insulin regimen using glargine once daily and glulisine before meals or a "Basal Plus" regimen using glargine once daily plus correction doses of glulisine before meals for glucose >140 mg/dL. GV was calculated as mean delta (Δ) daily glucose, mean SD, and mean amplitude of glycemic excursions (MAGE).. Treatment with Basal Bolus and Basal Plus regimens resulted in similar mean daily glucose, hypoglycemia, length of stay (LOS), and hospital complications (all P>.05). There were no differences in GV between treatment groups by Δ change (72.5 ± 36 vs. 69.3 ± 34 mg/dL), SD (38.5 ± 18 vs. 37.1 ± 16 mg/dL) and MAGE (67.5 ± 34 vs. 66.1 ± 39 mg/dL) (all P>.05). Surgery patients treated with Basal Bolus had higher GV compared to those treated with Basal Plus (Δ daily glucose and SD: P = .02, MAGE: P = .009), but no difference in GV was found between treatment groups for the general medicine patients (P>.05). Patients with hypoglycemia events had higher GV compared to subjects without hypoglycemia (P<.05), but no association was found between GV and hospital complications (P>.05).. Treating hospitalized, non-ICU, diabetic patients with Basal Plus insulin regimen resulted in similar glucose control and GV compared to the standard Basal Bolus insulin regimen. Higher GV was not associated with hospital complications.

Topics: Aged; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Hospitalization; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Male; Meals; Middle Aged; Retrospective Studies; Treatment Outcome

Premixed insulin is a commonly prescribed formulation for the outpatient management of patients with type 2 diabetes. The safety and efficacy of premixed insulin formulations in the hospital setting is not known.. In a prospective, open-label trial, we randomized general medicine and surgery patients to receive a basal-bolus regimen with glargine once daily and glulisine before meals (n = 33) or premixed human insulin (30% regular insulin and 70% NPH insulin) twice daily (n = 39). Major outcomes included differences in daily blood glucose (BG) levels and frequency of hypoglycemic events (<70 mg/dL) between treatment groups.. At the first prespecified interim analysis, the study was stopped early because of an increased frequency of hypoglycemia >50% in patients treated with premixed human insulin. A total of 64% of patients treated with premixed insulin experienced one or more episodes of hypoglycemia compared with 24% in the basal-bolus group (P < 0.001). There were no differences in mean daily BG level after the first day of insulin treatment (175 ± 32 vs. 179 ± 43 mg/dL, P = 0.64) between groups. A BG target between 80 and 180 mg/dL before meals was achieved in 55.9% of BG readings in the basal-bolus group and 54.3% of BG readings in the premixed insulin group (P = 0.23). There was no difference in the length of hospital stay or mortality between treatment groups.. Inpatient treatment with premixed human insulin resulted in similar glycemic control but in significantly higher frequency of hypoglycemia compared with treatment with basal-bolus insulin regimen in hospitalized patients with diabetes.

Topics: Aged; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Combinations; Female; Hospitalization; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Isophane; Insulin, Regular, Human; Male; Middle Aged; Prospective Studies

OBJECTIVE Diabetes self-management is universally regarded as a foundation of diabetes care. We determined whether comparable glycemic control could be achieved by self-titration versus physician titration of a once-daily bolus insulin dose in patients with type 2 diabetes who are unable to achieve optimal glycemia control with a basal insulin. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS Patients with type 2 diabetes, an HbA1c level >7% (53 mmol/mol), and either nocturnal hypoglycemia episodes or an insufficient basal insulin glargine level (with or without oral agents) to achieve a fasting plasma glucose level ≤6 mmol/L (108 mg/dL) were studied. Participants all had bolus insulin glulisine added at breakfast and were allocated to either algorithm-guided patient self-titration or physician titration. The primary outcome was an HbA1c level ≤7% (53 mmol/mol) without severe hypoglycemia. RESULTS After a mean (SD) follow-up of 159.4 days (36.2 days), 28.4% of participants in the self-titration arm vs. 21.2% in the physician titration arm achieved an HbA1c level of ≤7% (53 mmol/mol) without severe hypoglycemia (between-group absolute difference 7.2%; 95% CI -3.2 to 17.7). The lower end of this 95% confidence interval was within the predetermined noninferiority boundary of -5% (P noninferiority = 0.011). CONCLUSIONS In stable patients with type 2 diabetes who are receiving doses of basal insulin glargine who require bolus insulin, a simple bolus insulin patient-managed titration algorithm is as effective as a physician-managed algorithm.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Algorithms; Blood Glucose; Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Middle Aged; Self Administration; Treatment Outcome

Basal and bolus insulin therapy is required for strict blood control in diabetic patients, which could lead to prevention of vascular complications in diabetes. However, the optimal combination regimen is not well established.. Fifty-nine diabetic patients (49 type 1 and 10 type 2; 52.9 ± 13.3 years old) whose blood glucose levels were uncontrolled (HbA1c  > 6.2%) by combination treatment of basal insulin glargine with multiple daily pre-meal injections of bolus short-acting insulin [aspart (n = 19), lispro (n = 37) and regular human insulin (n = 3)] for at least 8 weeks were enrolled in this study. We examined whether glycaemic control and vascular injury were improved by replacement of short-acting insulin with glulisine. Patient satisfaction was assessed with Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire.. Although bolus and basal insulin doses were almost unchanged before and after replacement therapy, switching to glulisine insulin for 24 weeks significantly decreased level of HbA1c , advanced glycation end products (AGEs), soluble receptor for AGEs (sRAGE), monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1) and urinary albumin excretion. In multiple stepwise regression analysis, change in MCP-1 values from baseline (ΔMCP-1) was a sole determinant of log urinary albumin excretion. ΔAGEs and ΔsRAGE were independently correlated with each other. The relationship between ΔMCP-1 and ΔsRAGE was marginally significant (p = 0.05). Replacement of short-acting insulin by glulisine significantly increased Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire scores.. Our present study suggests that combination therapy of glargine with multiple daily pre-meal injections of glulisine might show superior efficacy in controlling blood glucose, preventing vascular damage and improving treatment satisfaction in diabetic patients.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Biomarkers; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Diabetic Angiopathies; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Resistance; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Humans; Hyperglycemia; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Injections, Subcutaneous; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Japan; Male; Middle Aged; Patient Satisfaction

To assess the effect of initiating insulin treatment on quality of life of patients with type 2 diabetes (T2DM) in the 60-week All-to-Target trial (NCT00384085).. Patient-reported outcomes from a phase IV, multicentre, randomised, open-label, parallel-group study were analysed. Participants were randomised to: insulin glargine with up to one insulin glulisine injection (G + 1); insulin glargine with stepwise addition of up to three insulin glulisine injections (G + 3); or twice-daily premixed 70/30 insulin protamine-aspart/aspart (PM-2). Patient-reported outcome questionnaires were administered at weeks 0, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48 and 60.. There were no between-group differences in the Psychosocial Adjustment to Illness State-Self Report (PAIS-SR) or in the EuroQoL Group Five-Dimension Self-Report Index Questionnaire (EQ-5D) from baseline to week 60; however, PAIS-SR scores improved significantly over this period in the G + 3 group (p = 0.0016) and EQ-5D scores worsened significantly in the PM-2 group (p = 0.02). Hypoglycemia Fear Survey Behaviour and Worry subscales worsened significantly for all groups, with greater deterioration being observed in the PM-2 group than in the G + 1 group (Behaviour, p = 0.0050; Worry, p = 0.0017) and G + 3 groups (Behaviour, p = 0.0105; Worry, p = 0.0016). Total scores on the Diabetes Quality of Life (DQoL) questionnaire improved more in the G + 3 group than in the PM-2 group over the study period (p = 0.0284), with all groups showing a significant improvement in DQoL score over time.. Insulin glargine-based regimens showed advantages over premixed insulin in a number of patient-reported outcome measures. The potential impact on fear of hypoglycaemia may be of particular relevance when addressing the major barriers to early insulin treatment.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anxiety; Blood Glucose; Body Mass Index; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Middle Aged; Patient Outcome Assessment; Quality of Life; Surveys and Questionnaires; United States

Glucose fluctuation often remains to be corrected under basal-supported oral therapy. We investigated the efficacy of adding once-daily rapid-acting insulin in Japanese diabetes patients treated with basal-supported oral therapy.. In this 8-week, parallel-group, randomized, open-label trial, 62 Japanese adults with type 2 diabetes treated with insulin glargine and 50 mg of sitagliptin were randomized into the following two arms: the single-bolus group, in which once-daily insulin glulisine was initiated at a main meal at a fifth (i.e., 20%) the dose of insulin glargine, and the control group, in which the dose of sitagliptin was maximized to 100 mg. The primary end point was the change of glycemic fluctuation assessed with the M-value.. Baseline hemoglobin A1c levels, mean blood glucose profiles, and M-value were 7.2 ± 0.6%, 9.3 ± 1.7 mmol/L, and 21 ± 13 units, respectively. At the end of the study, the single-bolus group had a greater reduction of M-value than the control group (P=0.02); the difference was 6.5 units (95% confidence interval, 1.1-11.9 units). The single-bolus group also had a greater reduction of mean blood glucose levels (P=0.01). There were no significant differences in the incidence of hypoglycemia or the weight change between the two groups (P>0.05).. Adding once-daily insulin glulisine was more effective in controlling the glycemic fluctuation in Japanese type 2 diabetes patients treated with insulin glargine together with sitagliptin.

Topics: Adult; Asian People; Blood Glucose; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Japan; Male; Middle Aged; Pyrazines; Sitagliptin Phosphate; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Triazoles

To evaluate basal and prandial insulin initiation and titration in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) in primary care and to explore the feasibility of retrospective-continuous glucose monitoring (r-CGM) in guiding insulin dosing. The new model of care features General Practitioners (GPs) and Practice Nurses (PNs) working in an expanded role, with Credentialed Diabetes Educator - Registered Nurse (CDE-RN) support.. Insulin-naïve T2DM patients (HbA1c >7.5% [>58 mmol/mol] despite maximal oral therapy) from 22 general practices in Victoria, Australia commenced insulin glargine, with glulisine added as required. Each was randomised to receive r-CGM or self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG). Glycaemic control (HbA1c) was benchmarked against specialist ambulatory patients referred for insulin initiation.. Ninety-two patients mean age (range) 59 (28-77) years; 40% female; mean (SD) diabetes duration 10.5 (6.1) years participated. HbA1c decreased from (median (IQR)) 9.9 (8.8, 11.2)%; 85 (73, 99) mmol/mol to 7.3 (6.9, 7.8)%; 56 (52, 62) mmol/mol at 24 weeks (p < 0.0001). Comparing r-CGM (n = 46) with SMBG (n = 42), there were no differences in major hypoglycaemia (p=0.17) or ΔHbA1c (p = 0.31). More r-CGM than SMBG participants commenced glulisine (26/48 vs. 7/44; p < 0.001). Results were comparable to 82 benchmark patients, with similar low rates of major hypoglycaemia (2/89 vs. 0/82; p = 0.17) and less loss to follow up in the INITIATION group (3/92 vs. 14/82; p = 0.002).. Insulin initiation and titration for T2DM patients in primary care was safe and improved HbA1c with low rates of major hypoglycaemia. CDE-RNs were effective in a new consultant role. r-CGM use in primary care was feasible and enhanced post-prandial hyperglycaemia recognition. Trial registration ACTRN12610000797077.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Australia; Blood Glucose; Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Administration Schedule; Feasibility Studies; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hyperglycemia; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Middle Aged; Patient Acceptance of Health Care; Postprandial Period; Primary Health Care; Retrospective Studies

Effective and easily implemented insulin regimens are needed to facilitate hospital glycemic control in general medical and surgical patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D).. This multicenter trial randomized 375 patients with T2D treated with diet, oral antidiabetic agents, or low-dose insulin (≤ 0.4 units/kg/day) to receive a basal-bolus regimen with glargine once daily and glulisine before meals, a basal plus regimen with glargine once daily and supplemental doses of glulisine, and sliding scale regular insulin (SSI).. Improvement in mean daily blood glucose (BG) after the first day of therapy was similar between basal-bolus and basal plus groups (P = 0.16), and both regimens resulted in a lower mean daily BG than did SSI (P = 0.04). In addition, treatment with basal-bolus and basal plus regimens resulted in less treatment failure (defined as >2 consecutive BG >240 mg/dL or a mean daily BG >240 mg/dL) than did treatment with SSI (0 vs. 2 vs. 19%, respectively; P < 0.001). A BG <70 mg/dL occurred in 16% of patients in the basal-bolus group, 13% in the basal plus group, and 3% in the SSI group (P = 0.02). There was no difference among the groups in the frequency of severe hypoglycemia (<40 mg/dL; P = 0.76).. The use of a basal plus regimen with glargine once daily plus corrective doses with glulisine insulin before meals resulted in glycemic control similar to a standard basal-bolus regimen. The basal plus approach is an effective alternative to the use of a basal-bolus regimen in general medical and surgical patients with T2D.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Female; Hospitalization; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Meals; Middle Aged; Surgical Procedures, Operative; Treatment Outcome

Insulin glulisine (Glu) is a rapidly-acting insulin analog with a faster onset of action than the other insulin analogs of its class, which are insulin aspart (Asp) and insulin lispro (Lisp). While insulin Glu is usually injected just before meals, postprandial injection may help to avoid unexpected postprandial hypoglycemia or hyperglycemia by adjusting the insulin dosage according to food intake. However, the effect of postprandial insulin Glu on the glucose profile has not been evaluated. The aim of this study was to compare daily glucose excursion by continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) between multiple daily doses of preprandial insulin Asp or postprandial insulin Glu. In a randomized cross-over trial, we performed CGM to evaluate the 48-hour glucose profile during treatment with the same dosage of insulin Asp just before each meal in 12 hospitalized patients with type 2 diabetes. Patients also received the same dosage of long-acting insulin glargine at bedtime. The average glucose level, standard deviation of the glucose level, mean amplitude of glucose excursion, and daily glucose profile did not differ between preprandial Asp and postprandial Glu. The incidence of hypoglycemic episodes (glucose level<70 mg/dL with or without symptoms) and the area under the curve of glucose<70 mg/dL also did not differ between the two insulin regimens. Multiple daily injections of preprandial Asp and postprandial Glu achieved the same daily glucose excursion profile. Postprandial injection of Glu may provide greater flexibility for patients who require insulin therapy.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Blood Glucose; Cross-Over Studies; Diabetes Complications; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hyperglycemia; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Aspart; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Middle Aged; Monitoring, Ambulatory

We compared telecare and conventional self-monitored blood glucose (SMBG) programs for titrating the addition of one bolus injection of insulin glulisine in patients with type 2 diabetes uncontrolled on oral hypoglycemic agents for ≥3 months who were first titrated with basal insulin glargine.. This randomized, multicenter, parallel-group study included 241 patients (mean screening glycosylated hemoglobin [HbA(1c)], 8.8% [73 mmol/mol]). In the run-in phase, any antidiabetes medication, except for metformin, was discontinued. Metformin was then up-titrated to 2 g/day (1 g twice daily) until study completion. Following run-in, all patients started glargine for 8-16 weeks, targeting fasting plasma glucose (FPG) ≤5.6 mmol/L using conventional SMBG. Patients with FPG ≤7 mmol/L added a glulisine dose at the meal with the highest postprandial plasma glucose excursion, titrated to target 2-h postprandial plasma glucose level <7.8 mmol/L using telecare or SMBG for 24 weeks. Patients with FPG >7 mmol/L at week 16 were withdrawn from the study.. After glargine titration, 224 patients achieved FPG ≤7 mmol/L, without any difference between telecare and SBMG groups (mean±SD, 6.2±0.8 vs. 6.0±0. 9 mmol/L, respectively). HbA(1c) levels were lower following titration and were similar for telecare and SMBG (7.9±0.9% vs. 7.8±0.9% [63 vs. 62 mmol/mol], respectively). Adding glulisine further reduced HbA(1c) in both groups (-0.7% vs. -0.7%); 45.2% and 54.8% (P=0.14), respectively, of patients achieved HbA(1c) ≤7.0% (≤53 mmol/mol). Weight change and hypoglycemia were similar between groups.. Patients adding one dose of glulisine at the meal with the highest postprandial plasma glucose excursion to titrated basal glargine achieved comparable improvements in glycemic control irrespective of traditional or telecare blood glucose monitoring.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Blood Glucose; Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Fasting; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Injections; Insulin; Male; Metformin; Middle Aged; Monitoring, Physiologic; Postprandial Period; Telemedicine; Treatment Outcome

Renal insufficiency may increase the risk of hypoglycemia in hospitalized patients with diabetes who are treated with insulin. We randomized inpatients with type 2 diabetes and chronic renal failure to treatment with two different dose levels of insulin glargine and glulisine and studied control of hyperglycemia and the frequency of hypoglycemia.. We conducted a multicenter, prospective, randomized trial to compare the efficacy of once-daily glargine and three-times daily glulisine at 0.5 vs. 0.25 units/kg/day. A total of 107 subjects had type 2 diabetes for >1 year, had a glomerular filtration rate <45 mL/min but did not require dialysis, and had an initial blood glucose (BG) >180 mg/dL. Doses were adjusted based on four-times daily BG measurements for 6 days.. Mean BG on the first day was 196 ± 71 mg/dL in the group receiving 0.5 units/kg (0.5 group) and 197 ± 55 mg/dL in the group receiving 0.25 units/kg (0.25 group; P = 0.94). On days 2 to 6, mean BG was 174 ± 52 mg/dL in the 0.5 group and 174 ± 46 mg/dL in the 0.25 group (P = 0.96). There were no significant differences between groups in the percentage of BG values within the target range of 100 to 180 mg/dL on any of the 6 study days. In the 0.5 group, 30% experienced hypoglycemia (BG <70 mg/dL) compared with 15.8% of the 0.25 group (P = 0.08).. Reduction of initial glargine/glulisine insulin weight-based dosing in hospitalized patients with diabetes and renal insufficiency reduced the frequency of hypoglycemia by 50% without compromising the control of hyperglycemia.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Female; Hospitalization; Humans; Hyperglycemia; Hypoglycemia; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Middle Aged; Renal Insufficiency; Treatment Outcome

In patients with diabetes, intraday glucose variability might predict health outcomes independently from glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c).. Our objective was to evaluate patient satisfaction (PS), quality of life (QoL), glycemic control, and variability during insulin intensification to HbA1c below 7.0%.. Eighty-two type 1 and 306 insulin-treated type 2 diabetes patients (47% male; age 54±11 yr; HbA1c=7.8±0.7%) participated in this multicenter, randomized, crossover trial at 52 U.S. centers.. Interventions included insulin glargine plus premeal glulisine (n=192) vs. twice-daily premix 75/25 or 70/30 analog insulin (n=196) for 12 wk and crossed to the alternate arm for 12 wk.. Main outcome measures included PS and QoL questionnaires, 3-d continuous glucose monitoring (CGM), and HbA1c every 4-8 wk.. Mean±se HbA1c change was -0.39±0.09% for glargine-glulisine and -0.05±0.09% for premix (P<0.0001). The PS net benefit scale (0-100) improved from 51.1 to 60.5±1.2 for glargine-glulisine and worsened to 45.4±1.2 for premix (P<0.0001). The PS regimen acceptance scale was comparable (P=0.33). Overall QoL favored glargine-glulisine (P<0.001), as did perceived health (P<0.0001), symptom distress (P<0.0001), general health perceptions (P<0.01), and psychosocial (P<0.02). CGM daily glucose mean, daily glucose sd (glycemic variability), and percent time over 140 mg/dl were lower for glargine-glulisine by 13.1±2.7 mg/dl, 5.9±1.4 mg/dl, and 7.3±1.6%, respectively (all P<0.0001), with no difference in CGM percent time below 70 mg/dl (P=0.09). Symptomatic hypoglycemia rates were comparable. HbA1c, mean CGM daily glucose, and glycemic variability were independent predictors of PS net benefit.. Patient satisfaction was impacted more positively by improved QoL, reduced glucose variability, and better glycemic control with a basal-bolus regimen than negatively by the burden of additional injections, thereby facilitating insulin intensification and the ability to achieve HbA1c below 7.0%.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Blood Glucose; Body Weight; Cross-Over Studies; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Middle Aged; Patient Satisfaction; Quality of Life; Surveys and Questionnaires

The metabolic efficacy of adding prandial insulin in a stepwise manner to a straightforward basal-bolus regimen was compared in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), suboptimally controlled by oral antidiabetic drugs (OADs) and once-daily basal insulin.. In this international randomized, parallel-group, non-inferiority study, 811 patients with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes using basal insulin were switched to insulin glargine (GLAR) for 6 months while continuing OADs. Patients with HbA(1c) > 7% and FPG < 120 mg/dL (n=476) were then randomized to either group 1, GLAR+metformin (MET)+3×insulin glulisine (GLU), group 2, GLAR+MET+1-3×GLU, or group 3, GLAR+MET+insulin secretagogue (IS)+1-3×GLU, for 12 months. Objectives were to show the non-inferiority of efficacy of group 2 vs group 1 and vs group 3. Non-inferiority of group 2 vs group 1 was concluded if the upper limit of the 95% confidence interval (CI) for the HbA(1c) difference was ≤ to 0.4%.. The adjusted HbA(1c) difference of group 2 vs 1 for the per-protocol population crossed the non-inferiority margin (0.228, 95% CI: -0.018-0.473). There was significantly less weight gain in group 2 compared with group 1, but adverse events were otherwise similar between the two groups. In patients with HbA(1c) < 8% at baseline, non-inferiority was achieved in group 2 vs group 1.. Although non-inferiority was not achieved, stepwise intensification of GLU added to GLAR showed efficacy close to that of the basal-bolus approach and with significantly less weight gain.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Analysis of Variance; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Female; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Middle Aged

A multinational, randomized, double-blind, two-way crossover trial to compare the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of bolus, subcutaneously administered insulin glulisine (glulisine) and insulin aspart (aspart) in insulin-naÏve, obese subjects with type 2 diabetes.. Thirty subjects [9/21 females/males; mean ± SD age: 60.7 ± 7.7 years; body mass index (BMI): 33.5 ± 3.3 kg/m(2) ; duration of diabetes: 6.8 ± 4.6 years; HbA1c: 7.1 ± 0.8%] were included in the analysis. They fasted overnight and then received a 0.2 U/kg subcutaneous dose of glulisine or aspart 2 min before starting a standardized test meal, 7 days apart, according to a randomization schedule. Blood samples were taken every 15 min, starting 20 min before the meal and ending 6 h postprandially.. The area under the absolute glucose concentration-time curve between 0 and 1 h after insulin injection and maximal glucose concentration was significantly lower with glulisine than with aspart (p = 0.0455 and 0.0337, respectively). However, for the total study period, plasma glucose concentration was similar for glulisine and aspart. Peak insulin concentration was significantly higher for glulisine than for insulin aspart (p < 0.0001). Hypoglycaemic events (≤ 70 mg/dl with or without symptoms) occurred in 13 and 16 subjects treated with glulisine and aspart, respectively, but there were no cases of severe hypoglycaemia requiring intervention.. Glulisine was associated with lower glucose levels during the first hour after a standard meal; the remaining glucose profiles were otherwise equivalent, with higher insulin levels observed throughout the study period.

Topics: Blood Glucose; Cross-Over Studies; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Double-Blind Method; Eating; Female; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Injections, Subcutaneous; Insulin; Insulin Aspart; Male; Middle Aged; Obesity; Treatment Outcome

The optimal treatment of hyperglycemia in general surgical patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus is not known.. This randomized multicenter trial compared the safety and efficacy of a basal-bolus insulin regimen with glargine once daily and glulisine before meals (n = 104) to sliding scale regular insulin (SSI) four times daily (n = 107) in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus undergoing general surgery. Outcomes included differences in daily blood glucose (BG) and a composite of postoperative complications including wound infection, pneumonia, bacteremia, and respiratory and acute renal failure.. The mean daily glucose concentration after the 1st day of basal-bolus insulin and SSI was 145 ± 32 mg/dL and 172 ± 47 mg/dL, respectively (P < 0.01). Glucose readings <140 mg/dL were recorded in 55% of patients in basal-bolus and 31% in the SSI group (P < 0.001). There were reductions with basal-bolus as compared with SSI in the composite outcome [24.3 and 8.6%; odds ratio 3.39 (95% CI 1.50-7.65); P = 0.003]. Glucose <70 mg/dL was reported in 23.1% of patients in the basal-bolus group and 4.7% in the SSI group (P < 0.001), but there were no significant differences in the frequency of BG <40 mg/dL between groups (P = 0.057).. Basal-bolus treatment with glargine once daily plus glulisine before meals improved glycemic control and reduced hospital complications compared with SSI in general surgery patients. Our study indicates that a basal-bolus insulin regimen is preferred over SSI in the hospital management of general surgery patients with type 2 diabetes.

Topics: Aged; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Female; General Surgery; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Inpatients; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Middle Aged; Perioperative Care; Postoperative Complications; Prospective Studies

Insulin assays are affected by varying degrees of interference from anti-insulin antibodies (IAs) and by cross-reactivity with recombinant insulin analogues. We evaluated the usefulness of the E170 insulin assay by assessing IA effects and cross-reactivity with 2 analogues.. Sera were obtained from 59 type 2 diabetes patients receiving continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion and 18 healthy controls. Insulin levels were determined using an E170 analyzer. To investigate the effects of IAs, we performed IA radioimmunoassays, and analyzed the differences between directly measured insulin (direct insulin) and polyethylene glycol (PEG)-treated insulins (free, IA-unbound; total, IA-bound and unbound insulin). We performed in-vitro cross-reactivity tests with insulin aspart and insulin glulisine.. In IA-positive patients, E170 free insulin levels measured using the E170 analyzer were significantly lower than the direct insulin levels. The mean value of the direct/free insulin ratio and IA-bound insulin, which were calculated as the difference between total and free insulin, increased significantly as endogenous IA levels increased. The E170 insulin assay showed low cross-reactivities with both analogues (< 0.7%).. IAs interfered with E170 insulin assay, and the extent of interference correlated with the IA levels, which may be attributable to the increase in IA-bound insulin, and not to an error in the assay. The E170 insulin assay may measure only endogenous insulin since cross-reactivity is low. Our results suggest that the measurement of free insulin after PEG pre-treatment could be useful for beta cell function assessment in diabetic patients undergoing insulin therapy.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Cross Reactions; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Female; Humans; Infusions, Subcutaneous; Insulin; Insulin Antibodies; Insulin Aspart; Male; Middle Aged; Polyethylene Glycols; Radioimmunoassay; Recombinant Proteins

To test potential differences between the actions of anti-diabetic medications, we examined the effects of oral hypoglycaemic agents versus glargine-apidra insulin therapy in T2DM.. T2DM subjects were randomized to either oral hypoglycaemic agents (pioglitazone, metformin and glipizide, n = 9) or insulin therapy (n = 12) for 6 months. Carotid intimal media thickness, vascular reactivity (flow-mediated vasodilatation; percent change in brachial artery basal diameter post-ischaemia) and sublingual nitrate were measured with ultrasonography. Euglycemic hyperinsulinemic (80 mU/m(2) ) clamp with [3]-3H-glucose and muscle biopsies were performed.. Fasting plasma glucose (~257 to ~124 mg/dL, oral hypoglycaemic agents and ~256 to ~142 mg/dL, IT) and HbA(1c) (~10.3 to ~6.4%, OHA and ~10.7 to ~7.1%, IT) improved comparably. Endogenous glucose production (~2.1 to ~1.7 mg/kg/min, oral hypoglycaemic agents and ~2.3 to ~2.0 mg/kg/min, insulin therapy) and endogenous glucose production suppression by insulin (~0.4 to ~0.3 mg/kg min, oral hypoglycaemic agents and ~0.5 to ~0.7 mg/kg min, insulin therapy) were different. Total glucose disposal × 100 increased in the oral hypoglycaemic agents group (~5.2 to ~8.1; p = 0.03), but not in insulin therapy (~6.0 to ~5.4 mg/kg/min/µU/mL × 100). OHA reduced CIMT (~0.080 to ~0.068 cm; p < 0.05), whereas insulin therapy did not (~0.075 to ~0.072 cm). After sublingual nitrate, brachial artery basal diameter increased in the OHA group (~8.7 to ~18.2%), but not in insulin therapy (~11.2 to ~15.0%; p < 0.02). Except for plasma adiponectin (~7 to ~15, oral hypoglycaemic agents versus ~6 to ~10, IT), changes in inflammatory markers in the circulation and in muscle (IκBα, super-oxidase dismutase 2, monocyte-chemo-attractant protein 1, p-ERK and JNK) were equivalent.. Oral hypoglycaemic agents and insulin therapy treated patients achieved adequate glycemic control and the effects on circulating and muscle inflammatory biomarkers were similar, but only oral hypoglycaemic agents improved insulin sensitivity, vascular function and carotid intimal media thickness. These findings in a small sample suggest that the use of oral hypoglycaemic agents provides additional benefits to patients with T2DM.

Topics: Adult; Body Mass Index; Carotid Arteries; Carotid Artery Diseases; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Diabetic Angiopathies; Drug Combinations; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Inflammation Mediators; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin Resistance; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Metformin; Mexican Americans; Middle Aged; Muscle, Skeletal; Myositis; Pioglitazone; Sulfonylurea Compounds; Thiazolidinediones; Tunica Intima

Stepwise intensification of insulin treatment to match the progressive decline of endogenous insulin secretion has been shown to be an effective management strategy in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). The efficacy of initiating and titrating a single bolus dose of insulin glulisine to baseline insulin glargine plus oral hypoglycaemic agents (OHAs) was investigated.. This was a 6-month, parallel-group, randomized, open-label, Phase IV study conducted in the US, UK and Russia. People with T2DM (HbA(1c) 7.5-9.5%) using any basal insulin underwent a 3-month run-in period on insulin glargine titrated to optimize fasting blood glucose (BG) control. Those with HbA(1c) >7.0% were randomized to either continue prior therapy (n = 57) or to add a single dose of insulin glulisine (n = 49) immediately prior to the main meal for a further 3 months. Two different titration algorithms were employed for the bolus dose, targeting 2-h postprandial BG ≤135 mg/dL (≤7.5 mmol/l; Russia and UK) or pre-meal/bedtime BG 100-120 mg/dl (5.5-6.7 mmol/l; US).. HbA(1c) and fasting plasma glucose levels decreased during the run-in period. In the 3 months after randomization, more participants in the basal-plus-bolus group reached HbA(1c) <7.0% than the basal-only control group (22.4 vs. 8.8%; p < 0.05), with significantly greater reduction of HbA(1c) (-0.37 vs. -0.11%; p = 0.0290). Rates of hypoglycaemia and mean weight change were comparable between the treatment groups.. In people with T2DM inadequately controlled on basal insulin plus OHAs, adding a single injection of insulin glulisine prior to the main meal significantly improves glucose control without undesired side effects.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Algorithms; Biomarkers; Blood Glucose; Body Mass Index; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Administration Schedule; Fasting; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Middle Aged; Postprandial Period; Russia; Treatment Outcome; United Kingdom; United States; Young Adult

Cost can be an important consideration, along with safety and efficacy, in deciding the most appropriate treatment for patients with type 2 diabetes. Both basal-bolus and premixed insulin analogue regimens are widely used in clinical practice; however, limited information is available regarding cost-effectiveness.. The goal of this study was to compare glycemic control, cost-effectiveness, and quality of life effects of insulin glargine plus insulin glulisine (glargine/glulisine) versus premixed insulin analogues in real-world clinical practice.. Adults with type 2 diabetes (glycosylated hemoglobin [HbA(1c)] ≥7.0%) at 3 US endocrinology centers were randomly assigned to receive either glargine/glulisine or premixed insulin analogues and continued treatment following the centers' usual practice. HbA(1c), weight, insulin dose, concomitant oral antidiabetic drug (OAD) usage, and hypoglycemia were evaluated at baseline and 3, 6, and 9 months. Medication costs, including costs for all insulin or OAD regimens, were estimated using published wholesale acquisition costs.. A total of 197 patients were randomized to receive glargine/glulisine therapy (n = 106) or premixed analogue therapy (n = 91). Overall, the mean age was 56 years, the mean duration of diabetes was 13 years, with a mean HbA(1c) of 9.25% and mean BMI of 35.8 kg/m(2) at baseline. Patients randomized to receive glargine/glulisine had a greater mean HbA(1c) reduction from baseline (-2.3%) than patients receiving a premixed analogue regimen (-1.7%). Adjusted mean follow-up HbA(1c) was 6.9% versus 7.5%, respectively (difference, -0.59%; P < 0.01). The glargine/glulisine group also used a lower mean number of OADs (0.86 vs 1.14; difference, -0.28; P = 0.04) but had a higher weight (240 vs 235 lb; difference, 4.55 lb; P = 0.03) than the premixed analogue group at follow-up. There were no significant differences in daily insulin dose and rates of hypoglycemia. Overall medication costs per 1.0% reduction in HbA(1c) were $841 with glargine/glulisine and $1308 with premixed analogues.. Overall, treatment with glargine/glulisine provided greater improvement in glycemic control and may represent a more cost-effective treatment option than premixed regimens for patients with type 2 diabetes in real-world clinical practice. However, due to the pragmatic trial design, the study concluded before follow-up assessments were available for all randomized patients.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Blood Glucose; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Costs; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Middle Aged; Prospective Studies; Quality of Life

Insulin therapy is commonly associated with weight gain. The timing of prandial insulin administration may enhance its efficacy/safety and maintain effective weight control. This study examined the effect of postprandial vs. preprandial insulin glulisine on weight gain and glycaemic control in type 2 diabetes patients taking basal insulin.. This was a multicenter, randomized, open-label trial conducted in 45 centres in the USA. A total of 716 patients with type 2 diabetes and glycated haemoglobin A(1c) (HbA(1c) ) ≥ 7.5% and ≤10.0% were screened; 345 were randomized and 322 comprised the intent-to-treat group (premeal, 163; postmeal, 159). Insulin glargine once daily, ±metformin and subcutaneous injections of premeal or postmeal insulin glulisine were given for 52 weeks. Main outcome measures included changes in HbA(1c) , fasting plasma glucose and weight from study baseline to endpoint (week 52).. At study end, insulin glulisine achieved similar glycaemic control whether it was administered before or after meals (HbA(1c) : 7.04% premeal vs. 7.16% postmeal, p = NS). Overall hypoglycaemia incidence and severe hypoglycaemia rates were not significantly different between premeal and postmeal groups; however, symptomatic and nocturnal hypoglycaemia rates were higher in the postprandial group. Mean body weight was lower in the postmeal group, with the difference between postmeal and premeal weight change from baseline to week 52 of -0.87 kg (p = 0.243).. Postprandial glulisine administration provided similar glycaemic control and was non-inferior to preprandial administration on weight gain, without additional risk of severe hypoglycaemia, showing dosing flexibility and the feasibility of such approach when clinically indicated.

Topics: Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Male; Middle Aged; Postprandial Period; Treatment Outcome; Weight Gain

To determine the functional health status and treatment satisfaction in patients with type 2 diabetes from the Evaluation of Lantus Effect ON Optimization of use of single dose Rapid insulin (ELEONOR) study that investigated whether a telecare program helps optimization of basal insulin glargine with one bolus injection of insulin glulisine.. Functional health status and treatment satisfaction were investigated using the 36-Item Short-Form (SF-36) Health Survey, the World Health Organization Well-Being Questionnaire (WBQ), and the Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire.. Of 291 randomized patients, 238 completed the study (telecare: 114; self-monitoring blood glucose: 124). Significant improvements were detected in most SF-36 domains, in WBQ depression and anxiety scores, and in treatment satisfaction, without differences between study groups.. An insulin regimen that substantially improves metabolic control, while minimizing the risk of hypoglycemia, can positively affect physical and psychologic well-being and treatment satisfaction irrespective of the educational support system used.

Topics: Blood Glucose; Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Patient Satisfaction; Quality of Life; Telecommunications; Treatment Outcome

This study assessed insulin dose and dosing patterns required to optimize glycemic control with an insulin pump in patients with type 2 diabetes.. In this 16-week, open-label, multicenter, pilot study, 56 insulin pump-naive patients treated at baseline with two or more oral antidiabetes agents (OADs), basal insulin with or without OADs, or basal-bolus insulin with or without OADs discontinued all diabetes medications except metformin and initiated insulin pump therapy. Insulin doses were adjusted to optimize glycemic control with the simplest possible insulin regimen. Outcomes included total daily insulin dose, daily basal and bolus insulin doses, number of daily basal rates, hemoglobin A1C, fasting and postprandial glucose, patient-reported outcomes and rate of hypoglycemia.. After 16 weeks of pump therapy, the mean +/- SD total daily insulin dose was 95 +/- 59 U. The percentage of the total daily insulin dose used as basal and as bolus delivery was 55% and 45%, respectively. Eighty-eight percent of patients were treated with two or fewer daily basal rates. Mean A1C was lowered by 1.2 +/- 1.2% (P < 0.001), and there was no severe hypoglycemia. Mean change in body weight was +1.9 +/- 3.3 kg (P < 0.001). Overall treatment preference improved with pump therapy compared to baseline.. Insulin pump therapy using a simple dosing regimen significantly improved glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes. Patients experienced limited weight gain, there was no severe hypoglycemia, and overall treatment preference improved significantly.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Blood Glucose; Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Infusion Systems; Intention to Treat Analysis; Male; Metformin; Middle Aged; Patient Selection; Pilot Projects; Treatment Outcome

To compare the efficacy and safety of the rapid-acting insulin analog glulisine and regular insulin in hyperglycemic hospitalized patients.. A total of 180 hospitalized patients with type 2 diabetes received either glulisine (n = 88) or regular insulin (n = 92) before each meal in combination with insulin glargine at bedtime in a randomized double-blind fashion. All previous diabetes medications were discontinued if applicable. Doses of insulin were adjusted to obtain target blood glucose concentrations of <130 mg/dl before meals and at bedtime while avoiding hypoglycemia.. Overall mean blood glucose concentrations were ∼ 8 mg/dl lower in the glulisine group than in the regular insulin group (152.6 ± 66.6 vs. 160.4 ± 70.8 mg/dl; P < 0.0002). This improvement was wholly due to ∼ 22 mg/dl lower levels after 4 days of therapy (140 ± 55 vs. 162 ± 71 mg/dl; P < 0.0007); after day 4, this difference progressively increased such that mean blood glucose concentrations from day 7 onward were ∼ 31 mg/dl lower in the glulisine group. The mean daily incidence of hypoglycemia was slightly but not significantly lower in the glulisine than the regular insulin group (0.10 ± 0.02 vs. 0.14 ± 0.03 episode/day; P > 0.35).. In hospitalized type 2 diabetic patients, glulisine may provide better glycemic control than regular insulin, especially in those who have a prolonged length of stay.

Topics: Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Middle Aged; Treatment Outcome

Evaluation of a new disposable insulin pen and injection habits of diabetes patients in everyday clinical practice. Injection devices (pens) for insulin application play a major role in treatment acceptance and adherence in insulin-treated diabetes patients. The mechanical disposable pen SoloStar containing the insulin analogs glargine or glulisine (each 100 IE/ml) provides modern design with user-friendly handling features.. In two independent, non-interventional, observational studies conducted nation-wide between April and December 2007 in outpatient practices, patients with diabetes newly instructed on how to use the pen were interviewed by their trainers (physicians, diabetes consultants) after approx. 6-8 weeks of pen use to give feedback on technical deficiencies, handling problems with the pen, injection habits, as well as on pen properties. Trainers were also asked to assess pen properties and particularly to document the time required for pen training. The evaluation applied a grading system similar to that used in German schools (1: very good; 6: very insufficient/failed). Furthermore, trainers were asked to retrospectively record any adverse events occurring during the observational period.. A total of 2,412 trainers from 1,626 centres and 8,428 patients (80% type 2) participated in the studies. In each study 0.5% of patients reported 41 and 19 technical problems with the pen, respectively. Similarly 3% of patients from each study reported handling problems. Recommended changes of needles and safety checks of the pen before each injection were performed by 40% and max. 25% of the patients, respectively. The features of the new disposable pen were all rated "very good" to "good" by the majority of patients and trainers. The best rated features were usability, dose adjustment and the low effort for the dose release. Pen training of patients were rated as "very simple" or "simple" by the training staff and average instruction time was reported not to exceed more than 10 minutes for the majority of patients. In 19 patients (0.2%) a total of 34 adverse events were documented.. The results of these two observational studies showed no relevant technical deficiencies and handling problems associated with the new disposable pen in everyday clinical practice. Ease of use and little time required for pen training may contribute to a high acceptance and satisfaction by the patients and training staff. Injection habits, however, indicated that patients did not well comply with recommendations given for needle changes and safety tests.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Attitude of Health Personnel; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Disposable Equipment; Equipment Failure; Female; General Practice; Germany; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Injections, Subcutaneous; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Middle Aged; Patient Education as Topic; Patient Satisfaction; Surveys and Questionnaires

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of insulin glulisine (glulisine) with and without oral antidiabetic drugs (OAD; sulphonylurea or sulphonylurea + biguanide) relative to that of OAD alone in Japanese and Korean patients with inadequately controlled type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).. In an open, randomized, parallel-group, comparative, controlled trial, 387 patients were randomized and treated with glulisine + OAD (n = 130), glulisine monotherapy (n = 127) or OAD only (n = 130) for 16 weeks. Glulisine was self-injected subcutaneously three times daily (0-15 minutes before meals) at a starting dose of >or=0.2 U/kg/day. Patients titrated the glulisine dose to achieve a 2-h postprandial plasma glucose (2h-PPG) level of 7.1-9.5 mmol/l (128-172 mg/dl) by administering at least one additional unit at each appropriate meal time if the 2h-PPG level was > 9.5 and < 11.1 mmol/l (> 172 and < 200 mg/dl) and by administering at least two additional units if the 2h-PPG level was >or= 11.1 mmol/l (>or= 200 mg/dl). Therapy with OAD was continued at the stable baseline regimen. The primary efficacy endpoint was change in haemoglobin A(1c) (HbA(1c)) from baseline to endpoint in the intention-to-treat population.. At baseline, therapy with OAD was a sulphonylurea only and a sulphonylurea + a biguanide in approximately 24 and 76% of patients respectively. Both glulisine groups had larger reductions in adjusted mean HbA(1c) than the OAD-only group (glulisine + OAD, -2.07%; glulisine monotherapy, -1.25%; OAD only, -0.61%). Superiority of glulisine + OAD and glulisine monotherapy vs. OAD only was shown by differences in adjusted mean HbA(1c) change from baseline values of -1.46% (p < 0.0001) and -0.64% (p < 0.0001) respectively. Both glulisine groups had better 2h-PPG control than the OAD-only group. Mean daily glulisine doses increased from baseline to endpoint (glulisine + OAD, 13.3-22.5 U; glulisine monotherapy, 14.2-38.0 U). The rate of all symptomatic hypoglycaemia events per patient-year in the entire treatment phase was 11.9 in the glulisine + OAD group, 8.8 in the glulisine monotherapy group and 1.7 in the OAD-only group. There was only one event of severe hypoglycaemia, which occurred in the glulisine + OAD group. Efficacy and safety were similar in Japanese and Korean subpopulations.. Both glulisine + OAD and glulisine monotherapy were well tolerated and effective for Japanese and Korean patients with T2DM mellitus inadequately controlled by OAD therapy alone.

Topics: Aged; Biguanides; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Injections, Subcutaneous; Insulin; Male; Middle Aged; Sulfonylurea Compounds

To investigate whether the addition of a single bolus of insulin glulisine (glulisine), administered at either breakfast or main mealtime, in combination with basal insulin glargine (glargine) and oral antidiabetic drugs (OADs), provides equivalent glycaemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes, irrespective of the time of glulisine injection.. A national, multicentre, randomized, open-label, parallel-group study of 393 patients with type 2 diabetes who were suboptimally controlled [haemoglobin A(1c) (HbA(1c)) > 6.5-9.0% and fasting blood glucose (BG) 7.0% at baseline and who reached HbA(1c)

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Middle Aged; Postprandial Period; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Weight Gain; Young Adult

A comparison of the plasma glucose and insulin day profiles between two prandial rapid-acting insulin analogues, insulin glulisine (glulisine) and insulin lispro (lispro), in 18 obese subjects with Type 2 diabetes. Subjects (body mass index: males, 36.7 [33.2-43.8] kg/m(2); females, 40.0 [35.7-46.5] kg/m(2)) received subcutaneous glulisine or lispro (0.15 U/kg) at 4-h intervals immediately (within 2 min) before three standard test meals during each of two 12-h, randomised, open-label, crossover studies (7+/-2-day interval between each). Overall, preprandial-subtracted glucose concentrations (area under the curve) were similar on the glulisine and lispro study days. However, the mean of the three maximal preprandial subtracted plasma glucose concentrations (DeltaGLU(max)) were lower with glulisine versus lispro (12%; p<0.01). Mean concentrations of insulin analogue were significantly higher post-meal with glulisine (p<0.01 for all). Post hoc analysis showed a significantly faster absorption rate for glulisine versus lispro in the first 30 min post-meal (estimated difference 0.48 microU/min; p<0.0001). Only two cases of hypoglycaemia were reported; both from one subject during the lispro day. When glulisine is injected immediately before a meal in obese patients with Type 2 diabetes, glulisine achieves significantly lower glucose excursions over lispro. Significantly faster absorption with higher and sustained post-meal levels of insulin analogue was achieved at every meal with glulisine versus lispro.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Blood Glucose; C-Peptide; Cross-Over Studies; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Female; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Lispro; Male; Middle Aged; Obesity

To investigate the effect of insulin glulisine on postprandial microvascular blood flow in type 2 diabetes.. A total of 15 patients with type 2 diabetes received insulin glulisine or human insulin before a liquid meal test. Thereafter, skin microvascular blood flow was measured by laser Doppler fluxmetry and blood samples were taken for measurement of plasma levels of glucose, insulin, intact proinsulin, asymmetric dimethylarginine, nitrotyrosine, interleukin-18, matrix metalloproteinase-9, oxidized LDL, and free fatty acids.. Insulin glulisine injections resulted in higher postprandial insulin levels (means +/- SEM area under the curve [AUC](0-120) 51.0 +/- 6.8 vs. 38.2 +/- 5.4 mU/l; P = 0.004), while plasma glucose (AUC(0-240) 158 +/- 9 vs. 180 +/- 9 mg/dl; P < 0.05) and intact proinsulin (AUC(0-240) 26.2 +/- 3.5 vs. 31.2 +/- 4.3 pmol/l; P = 0.002) were lower. Microvascular blood flow increased after insulin glulisine injection (27.9 +/- 3.1 to 51.7 +/- 9.9 arbitrary units [AU]; P < 0.05), while only a minor increase was found during human insulin (27.9 +/- 3.1 to 34.4 +/- 7.8 AU; not significant). Asymmetric dimethylarginine and nitrotyrosine levels were reduced after insulin glulisine (P < 0.05).. Insulin glulisine is superior to human insulin in restoring postprandial metabolic and microvascular physiology.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Blood Flow Velocity; Cross-Over Studies; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Endothelium, Vascular; Female; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Laser-Doppler Flowmetry; Male; Microcirculation; Middle Aged; Patient Selection; Postprandial Period; Proinsulin; Tyrosine

Carbohydrate counting is an effective approach to mealtime insulin adjustment in type 1 diabetes but has not been rigorously assessed in type 2 diabetes. We sought to compare an insulin-to-carbohydrate ratio with a simple algorithm for adjusting the dose of prandial insulin glusiline.. This 24-week, multicenter, randomized, controlled study compared two algorithms for adjusting mealtime (glulisine) insulin along with a standard algorithm for adjusting background (glargine) insulin in 273 intent-to-treat patients with type 2 diabetes. Glulisine and glargine were adjusted weekly in both groups based on self-monitored blood glucose (SMBG) results from the previous week. The simple algorithm group was provided set doses of glulisine to take before each meal. The carbohydrate counting (carb count) group was provided an insulin-to-carbohydrate ratio to use for each meal and adjusted their glulisine dose based on the amount of carbohydrate consumed.. A1C levels at week 24 were 6.70% (simple algorithm) and 6.54% (carb count). The respective mean A1C changes from baseline to 24 weeks were -1.46 and -1.59% (P = 0.24). A1C <7.0% was achieved by 73.2% (simple algorithm) and 69.2% (carb count) (P = 0.70) of subjects; respective values for A1C <6.5% were 44.3 and 49.5% (P = 0.28). The total daily dose of insulin was lower, and there was a trend toward less weight gain in carb count group patients. Severe hypoglycemia rates were low and equal in the two groups.. Weekly basal-bolus insulin adjustments based on premeal and bedtime glucose patterns resulted in significant reductions in A1C. Having two effective approaches to delivering and adjusting rapid-acting mealtime insulin may increase physicians' and patients' willingness to advance therapy to a basal-bolus insulin regimen.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Algorithms; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dietary Carbohydrates; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Administration Schedule; Eating; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Metformin; Middle Aged; Racial Groups; United States

Insulin glulisine (glulisine) was evaluated versus regular human insulin (RHI) in Type 2 diabetes (T2DM) patients.. Patients previously on >6 months' continuous insulin treatment aged >or=18 years in a randomized, multinational, controlled, open-label, parallel group, 26-week study received twice-daily NPH insulin and either glulisine (0-15 min before breakfast and dinner; n=448) or RHI (30-45 min before breakfast and dinner; n=442) at least twice daily.. Mean baseline characteristics were similar between groups. There were no differences in baseline to endpoint HbA(1c) reductions (glulisine: -0.32%; RHI: -0.35%; p=0.5726), and the non-inferiority of glulisine versus RHI was demonstrated (difference in adjusted mean change 0.03%; 95% CI: -0.07, 0.13). Postprandially, glulisine lowered plasma glucose significantly more versus RHI at 2h (14.14 mmol/L versus 15.28 mmol/L; p=0.0025) and excursions at 1h (3.99 versus 4.59; p=0.0151) and 2h (4.87 versus 6.03; p=0.0002). No between-group differences occurred in the frequencies and monthly rates of all symptomatic hypoglycaemia; nocturnal hypoglycaemia from Month 4 to treatment end was less frequent with glulisine versus RHI (9.1% versus 14.5%; p=0.029).. Glulisine was non-inferior to RHI in reducing HbA(1c) in T2DM. Glulisine demonstrated superior postprandial glucose control and was associated with fewer nocturnal hypoglycaemic episodes, indicating clinical benefits.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Blood Glucose; Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Male; Middle Aged; Postprandial Period; Treatment Outcome

Insulin glulisine is a novel analog of human insulin designed for use as a rapid-acting insulin. This study compared the safety and efficacy of glulisine with regular human insulin (RHI) in combination with NPH insulin.. In total, 876 relatively well-controlled patients with type 2 diabetes (mean HbA1c 7.55%) were randomized and treated with glulisine/NPH (n = 435) or RHI/NPH (n = 441) for up to 26 weeks in this randomized, multicenter, multinational, open-label, parallel-group study. Subjects were allowed to continue the same dose of prestudy regimens of oral antidiabetic agent (OAD) therapy (unless hypoglycemia necessitated a dose change).. A slightly greater reduction from baseline to end point of HbA1c was seen in the glulisine group versus RHI (-0.46 vs. -0.30% with RHI; P = 0.0029). Also, at end point, lower postbreakfast (156 vs. 162 mg/dl [8.66 vs. 9.02 mmol/l]; P < 0.05) and postdinner (154 vs. 163 mg/dl [8.54 vs. 9.05 mmol/l]; P < 0.05) blood glucose levels were noted. Symptomatic hypoglycemia (overall, nocturnal, and severe) and weight gain were comparable between the two treatment groups. There were no between-group differences in baseline-to-end point changes in insulin dose.. Twice-daily glulisine associated with NPH can provide small improvements in glycemic control compared with RHI in patients with type 2 diabetes who are already relatively well controlled on insulin alone or insulin plus OADs. The clinical relevance of such a difference remains to be established.

Topics: Aged; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Injections, Subcutaneous; Insulin; Insulin, Isophane; International Cooperation; Male; Middle Aged; Probability; Reference Values; Risk Assessment; Severity of Illness Index; Single-Blind Method; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Aged; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Health Care Costs; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Male; Middle Aged; Peptides; Weight Gain

To compare the efficacy and safety of insulin glulisine over regular insulin in patients with type 2 diabetes and severe renal insufficiency.. Our study included 18 patients with type 2 diabetes and a mean (range) estimated glomerular filtration rate of 13.2 mL/minute/1.73 m(2) (5.8-27.6), which corresponds to stage 4-5 chronic kidney disease.. After titration of doses, regular insulin was administered thrice daily on Day 1, along with continuous glucose monitoring for 24 h starting at 7 am. Exactly equal doses of insulin glulisine were administered on Day 2. Area under the curve (AUC) for blood glucose level variation after breakfast (AUC-B 0-4), lunch (AUC-L 0-6), and dinner (AUC-D 0-6) were evaluated.. AUC-B 0-4 and AUC-D 0-6 were significantly lower with insulin glulisine than with regular insulin (AUC-B 0-4: 3.3 ± 4.7 vs. 6.2 ± 5.4 × 10(2) mmol/L·minute, respectively, P = .028; AUC-D 0-6: 1.8 ± 7.3 vs. 6.5 ± 6.2 × 10(2) mmol/L·minute, respectively, P = .023). In contrast, AUC-L 0-6 was higher with insulin glulisine than with regular insulin (AUC-L 0-6: 7.6 ± 6.4 vs. 4.2 ± 8.7 × 10(2) mmol/L·minute, respectively, P = .099), suggesting a prolonged hypoglycemic action of regular insulin after lunch.. Insulin glulisine effectively suppressed postprandial hyperglycemia, whereas regular insulin caused a prolonged hypoglycemic action. These findings support the effectiveness and safety of insulin glulisine in patients with type 2 diabetes and severe renal insufficiency.

Topics: Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Female; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Male; Middle Aged; Renal Insufficiency; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Diabetes Complications; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; General Practice; Humans; Insulin; Retrospective Studies

Due to the progressive nature of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), antidiabetic treatment needs to be continuously intensified to avoid long-term complications. In T2DM patients on either basal insulin-supported oral therapy (BOT) or supplementary insulin therapy (SIT) presenting with HbA1c values above individual targets for 3-6 months, therapy should be intensified. This study investigated effectiveness and tolerability of an intensification of BOT or SIT to a basal-bolus therapy (BBT) regimen in T2DM patients in daily clinical practice.. This noninterventional, 8-month, prospective, multicenter study evaluated parameters of glucose control, occurrence of adverse events (eg, hypoglycemia), and acceptance of devices in daily clinical practice routine after 12 and 24 weeks of intensifying insulin therapy to a BBT regimen starting from either preexisting BOT with insulin glargine (pre-BOT) or preexisting SIT with ≥3 daily injections of insulin glulisine (pre-SIT).. A total of 1,530 patients were documented in 258 German medical practices. A total of 1,301 patients were included in the full analysis set (55% male, 45% female; age median 64 years; body mass index median 30.8 kg/m(2); pre-BOT: n=1,072; pre-SIT: n=229), and 1,515 patients were evaluated for safety. After 12 weeks, HbA1c decreased versus baseline (pre-BOT 8.67%; pre-SIT 8.46%) to 7.73% and 7.66%, respectively (Δ mean -0.94% and -0.80%; P<0.0001). At week 24, HbA1c was further reduced to 7.38% and 7.30%, respectively (Δ mean -1.29% and -1.15%; P<0.0001), with a mean reduction of fasting blood glucose values in both treatment groups by more than 46 mg/dL. An HbA1c goal of ≤6.5% was reached by 17.9% (pre-BOT) and 18.6% (pre-SIT), and an HbA1c ≤7.0% by 46.1% (pre-BOT) and 43.0% (pre-SIT) of patients. During 24 weeks, severe as well as serious hypoglycemic events were rare (pre-BOT: n=5; pre-SIT: n=2; pretreated with both insulins: n=1).. Intensifying glargine-based BOT or glulisine-based SIT to a BBT regimen in poorly controlled T2DM patients in daily routine care led to marked improvements of glycemic control and was well tolerated.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Biomarkers; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Germany; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Injections; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Male; Middle Aged; Prospective Studies; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult

We aimed to identify predictors of hypoglycaemia in patients with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes treated with a single daily bolus of insulin glulisine on top of insulin glargine and oral antidiabetic drugs (basal-plus regimen).. We retrospectively analysed four large basal-plus trials including 713 patients (47% female) with type 2 diabetes, mean age of 59.9 ± 9.5 years and diabetes duration of 11 ± 7.0 years. Predictors for symptomatic, severe and nocturnal hypoglycaemia were identified by multivariate logistic regression analyses, calculation of odds ratios (ORs) and Wald 95% confidence intervals (CIs).. Mean numbers of hypoglycaemic events per year were 4.64 ± 11.4 (symptomatic < 60 mg/dl), 0.59 ± 2.28 (nocturnal) and 0.03 ± 0.22 (severe). A total of 44.5% of patients reached the composite endpoint of glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) <7.0% plus no severe hypoglycaemia, and 26.7% reached the composite of HbA1c <7.0% plus no symptomatic hypoglycaemia. Predictors of nocturnal and symptomatic hypoglycaemia were female gender (OR 1.82; 95% CI 1.07-3.11 and OR 1.89; 95% CI 1.31-2.78), diabetes duration >10 versus <5 years (OR 2.61; 95% CI 1.03-6.59 and OR 2.01; 95% CI 1.15-3.51) and higher basal insulin dose (per unit of increase) (OR 1.01; 95% CI 1.00-1.03 and OR 1.01; 95% CI 1.00-1.02). Conversely, a higher body mass index (BMI) (27-30 vs. <27 kg/m(2) and >30 vs. <27 kg/m(2) ) conferred a reduced risk of symptomatic hypoglycaemia with an OR of 0.53 (95% CI 0.31-0.90) and an OR of 0.61 (95% CI 0.39-0.97).. Female gender, a long diabetes duration and higher basal insulin dose were predictors of hypoglycaemia, while protection was provided by BMI > 30. These results may help to successfully establish basal-plus insulin regimen in individual patients on their transition from basal-only to basal-bolus treatment.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Blood Glucose; Body Mass Index; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Middle Aged; Multicenter Studies as Topic; Predictive Value of Tests; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Retrospective Studies; Sex Factors; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Disease Progression; Drug Therapy, Combination; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Metformin

The effects of switching from prandial premixed insulin therapy (PPT) injected three times a day to basal plus two times bolus insulin therapy (B2B) on glycemic control and quality of life were investigated in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.. The clinical course was prospectively observed during the first 16 weeks after switching to B2B (insulin glargine plus insulin glulisine before breakfast and dinner) in 27 subjects previously treated with PPT using 50/50 premixed insulin. The Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (DTSQ) was administered at the start and end of the study.. The glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) level (8.3% ± 1.8% to 8.2% ± 1.1%) and the DTSQ score did not change between the start and end of the study. An improvement in HbA1c level was found in nine (33%) subjects. The change in HbA1c showed a significant negative correlation with baseline HbA1c, and was significantly better in patients with a baseline HbA1c >8.0% than in those with an HbA1c ≤ 8.0% (-0.9 ± 2.0 versus 0.3 ± 0.6, respectively, P = 0.02). The change in DTSQ score representing treatment satisfaction was significantly greater in patients whose HbA1c level was improved than in those in whom it was not (2.7 ± 3.6 versus -0.8 ± 3.5, P = 0.04).. B2B was noninferior to PPT with regard to HbA1c levels in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. B2B should be considered particularly for subjects whose glycemic control is poor despite PPT.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Middle Aged; Prospective Studies; Quality of Life; Surveys and Questionnaires

Several studies suggest benefits of insulin analogues detemir or glulisine in overweight and obese patients with type 2 diabetes. The present multicentre study therefore examines, whether these insulin analogues are used more frequently in patients with increased body mass index.. Data of 38 560 adult type 2 diabetic patients using insulin analogues, from 150 centres in Germany, registered in a standardized, prospective, computer-based documentation program (DPV), were included. Patients were classified into body mass index categories according to World Health Organization. Analysis was stratified by 3 time periods. To adjust for confounding effects, multivariable logistic regression models were created.. Detemir was preferentially used in overweight (OR 1.36, 95%-CI 1.20-1.53) and obese patients (OR 2.06, 95%-CI 1.84-2.31) compared to normal-weight patients. These effects remained significant after adjusting for sex, age, new/old federal state of Germany, size of centre, treatment in university clinic and clinic/specialized private practice. Models were additionally adjusted for time period and interaction of BMI category with age or sex. For glulisine, a minor effect was present when comparing obese to normal-weight patients (OR 1.26, 95%-CI 1.06-1.50). After adjustment, this finding was no longer significant. Stratified by obesity grade, class III obese patients more frequently used detemir or glulisine compared to class I obese patients. Comparing time periods, odds ratios did not differ, neither for detemir nor for glulisine..  Detemir is used more often in overweight and obese patients compared to normal-weight patients. For glulisine, the relationship is less pronounced.

Topics: Aged; Body Weight; Databases, Factual; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Prescriptions; Female; Germany; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Detemir; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Middle Aged; Obesity; Overweight; Practice Patterns, Physicians'; Registries

Topics: Aged; Autoimmune Diseases; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Hyperinsulinism; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Male; Polyendocrinopathies, Autoimmune; Syndrome

Allergy to insulin became a rare complication due to the introduction of recombinant human insulin preparations. Nevertheless, allergic reactions to components of such preparations can occur. We report a case of a 61-year-old man with an atopic background and affected by diabetes mellitus type 2 since 27 years, who experienced generalized allergy to insulin at the moment of switching oral anti-diabetics to insulin. Prick tests revealed an allergy specifically to zinc, and the patient was treated with zinc-free glulisine insulin. After 8 months of such treatment, patient's glucose is stable and he never experienced allergic reactions to insulin injections. Even insulin allergy due specifically to zinc is rare, such complication must be assessed especially in a patient suffering from multiple allergies.

Topics: Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Hypersensitivity; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin, Isophane; Male; Middle Aged; Zinc

Insulin glulisine has a higher efficacy in reducing postprandial glucose excursions and in restoring normal postprandial microcirculation than rapid human insulin. The aim was to compare the incidence of macro- and microvascular outcomes in Type 2 diabetic patients treated with insulin glulisine or regular human insulin.. Computerized data from 952 glulisine (age: 61 ± 11 y) and 11,157 regular insulin (65 ± 11 y) users in general practices throughout Germany (Disease Analyzer, 11/2004 to 3/2010) were analyzed.. Hazard ratios (HR; Cox regression) for 3.5-year-risk of macro- or microvascular outcomes were adjusted for age, sex, diabetes duration, diabetologist care, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, depression, and comedication (basal insulin, oral antidiabetics). Furthermore, adjustment was carried out for baseline microvascular complications when analyzing macrovascular outcomes and vice versa.. Overall, risk for macro- or microvascular outcomes was 20% lower for insulin glulisine users (p < 0.05). There was a decreased risk for coronary heart disease (HR; 95%CI: 0.78; 0.62 - 0.99), and an indication for a lower risk for incident myocardial infarction (HR: 0.66; 0.43 - 1.02). Also for microvascular complications, the adjusted hazard ratios for retinopathy, nephropathy and neuropathy were below 1.0, indicating a lower risk for the insulin glulisine group, however, which was significant for neuropathy only (HR: 0.74; 0.58 - 0.93).. Prescription of the rapid-acting insulin analog glulisine was associated with a reduced incidence of macro- and microvascular outcomes in Type 2 diabetes under real-life conditions. Given that this was a retrospective database analysis, it is important to confirm this finding in a randomized controlled trial.

Topics: Aged; Chi-Square Distribution; Databases, Factual; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Diabetic Angiopathies; Disease-Free Survival; Female; General Practice; Germany; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Incidence; Insulin; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Male; Microcirculation; Microvessels; Middle Aged; Multivariate Analysis; Proportional Hazards Models; Retrospective Studies; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Aged; Circadian Rhythm; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Substitution; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Antibodies; Male; Treatment Outcome

This report illustrates the treatment progression of a patient with rapidly decompensating type 2 diabetes.. The patient had to transition to insulin therapy within 2 years of her initial diagnosis, following only a brief period of glycemic control with diet management, weight loss, and oral agents. This relatively rapid progression to insulin requirement is occasionally seen in adults with typical type 2 diabetes that may classify as a number of different subtypes of diabetes.. The case presented demonstrates how a simple stepwise approach to dose titration with basal insulin helped a patient with severe depletion of endogenous insulin achieve initial glycemic control, and how the addition of prandial insulin helped control her mealtime glycemic excursions.. The use of basal-prandial insulin therapy is an effective option for patients with rapidly decompensating type 2 diabetes to achieve their glycemic goals without delays and to minimize associated morbidities.

Topics: Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Female; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Middle Aged

This is a case report of a patient with allergy to the rapid acting insulins and rapid acting analogs. Before trying insulin desensitization the treatment was changed to a basal-bolus regimen with glargine and glulisine with no signs of insulin allergy during the months after the start of the treatment.

Topics: Aged; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Hypersensitivity; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Aspart; Insulin, Isophane; Male

OBJECTIVE Pharmacological profiles of biphasic insulin aspart 30/70 (BIAsp 30) once daily (OD), twice daily (b.i.d.), and three times daily (t.i.d.) were compared with other insulin regimens in two crossover glucose clamp studies of insulin-treated type 2 diabetic patients. RESEARCH DESIGNS AND METHODS Study 1 consisted of BIAsp 30 OD, b.i.d., and t.i.d. versus biphasic human insulin 30/70 (BHI 30), OD (n = 24). Study 2 examined BIAsp 30 t.i.d. versus basal-bolus therapy (insulin glargine OD plus insulin glulisine t.i.d.) (n = 24). Pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics (PK/PD) were investigated over 24 h. RESULTS Study 1: PK and PD were markedly different between BIAsp 30 OD and BHI 30 OD: the maximum insulin concentration and glucose infusion rate (GIR) were higher for BIAsp 30; time to maximum metabolism was 1.7 h sooner for BIAsp 30. Study 2: both regimens showed three distinct prandial-related GIR peaks. GIR 24-h area under the curve for BIAsp t.i.d. was higher than for basal-bolus therapy: 2,585.2 vs. 2,289.2 mg/kg. CONCLUSIONS BIAsp had pharmacological advantages over BHI. BIAsp t.i.d. had a similar PD profile to basal-bolus therapy.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Biphasic Insulins; Blood Glucose; Cross-Over Studies; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Administration Schedule; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Aspart; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Isophane; Insulin, Long-Acting; Random Allocation

SoloSTAR (SR) is a new pre-filled insulin pen device for administration of insulin glargine and insulin glulisine. This article reports on the usability of SR, as reported by healthcare professionals (HCPs) and participants, in clinical practice in Australia.. Individuals with Type 1 or Type 2 diabetes were eligible for this 3-month observational survey. Participants were supplied with the insulin glargine SR pens, the instruction leaflet and a toll-free helpline number. Training was offered to all participants. Independent telephone interviews were conducted with participants and HCPs after 6-10 weeks of use of SR.. Overall, 150 HCPs across 93 sites supported this survey. Of these, 65 HCPs (14 doctors; 51 diabetes educators, covering 1669 patients) provided feedback, with the remaining 85 HCPs not responding. All HCPs rated participant training as 'very easy' or 'easy', and most reported that SR had, in their opinion, made training easier (85%) and quicker (98%). Most of the 536 participants reported that ease of learning to use (98%), ease of using (98%) and features (> or = 89%) of SR were 'excellent' or 'good'. SR had positive impacts on various psychological aspects for people with diabetes, including helping overcome reluctance to use insulin, and increasing confidence in their ability to manage their diabetes using insulin.. In this non-randomized, non-interventional, open-label, observational survey of clinical practice, HCPs reported that SR was easy to teach and easy to use for people with diabetes. People with diabetes reported that SR was easy to use and rated specific features of SR highly. Further follow-up surveys and comparative studies in clinical practice are needed to confirm these findings and to determine the impact of SR in diabetes management.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Australia; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Equipment Design; Equipment Safety; Female; Health Educators; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Interviews as Topic; Male; Middle Aged; Physicians; Syringes

Premixed insulin regimens are commonly used for type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients. However, there is limited information regarding next-step therapy options in cases where premixed insulin does not provide adequate glycaemic control. This 12-week observational study of everyday clinical practice evaluated the efficacy and safety of insulin glargine (glargine) plus oral antidiabetic drugs (OADs) in T2DM patients previously treated with premixed insulin.. Type 2 diabetes mellitus patients taking premixed insulin were identified from German clinics and were eligible to switch to glargine plus OADs at the physicians' and patients' discretion, as part of routine clinical practice. The study design and conduct was in accordance with German regulations. Fasting blood glucose (FBG), 2-h postprandial blood glucose (PPBG) and glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA(1c)) were measured at the start and after a 12-week observation period.. A total of 5045 patients were followed-up and received glargine plus OADs. FBG [start to end-point: 9.9 +/- 2.7 to 6.9 +/- 1.5 mmol/l (178 +/- 48 to 124 +/- 26 mg/dl); p < or = 0.001], 2-h PPBG [10.8 +/- 2.8 to 7.8 +/- 1.5 mmol/l (195 +/- 50 to 140 +/- 27 mg/dl)] and HbA(1c) (8.3 +/- 1.2 to 7.2 +/- 0.8%; p < or = 0.001) improved significantly from start to end-point, respectively. A total of 48.9%, 38.4% and 73.9% of patients had FBG < 6.7 mmol/l (< 120 mg/dl), 2-h PPBG < 7.2 mmol/l (< 130 mg/dl) or HbA(1c) < 7.5%, respectively, after 12 weeks. Significant reductions in body weight were observed between the start and end of the observation period. A total of 71 adverse events were reported by 38 patients. Hypoglycaemia was the most common event (n = 16).. This observational study shows that, in T2DM patients inadequately controlled with premixed insulin, switching therapy to glargine plus OADs is associated with significant improvements in FBG and HbA(1c), and is well tolerated in everyday clinical practice. Further intensification of insulin therapy, perhaps by adding one or more injections of prandial insulin, would help provide further improvements in glycaemic control in these patients.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Blood Glucose; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Humans; Hyperglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Male; Middle Aged; Treatment Outcome

Insulin glulisine is a rapid-acting human insulin analogue that has a faster onset of action and shorter duration of action than regular human insulin (RHI) in patients with type 1 or 2 diabetes mellitus and is efficacious in controlling prandial blood glucose levels in these patients. In large, well designed trials in patients with type 1 diabetes, insulin glulisine demonstrated a similar degree of glycaemic control, as measured by glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA(1c)) levels, to RHI after 12 weeks and insulin lispro after 26 weeks. Pre-meal insulin glulisine was also more effective than RHI at controlling 2-hour post-prandial glucose excursions in patients with type 1 or 2 diabetes over a period of 12 weeks. In patients with type 2 diabetes, insulin glulisine induced significantly greater reductions in HbA(1c) levels and 2-hour post-breakfast and post-dinner blood glucose levels than RHI over a period of 26 weeks. Insulin glulisine was generally well tolerated by patients with type 1 or 2 diabetes and had a similar safety profile to insulin lispro or RHI. Severe hypoglycaemia was experienced by similar proportions of insulin glulisine or comparator insulin (insulin lispro or RHI) recipients with type 1 or type 2 diabetes.

Topics: Adult; Area Under Curve; Clinical Trials as Topic; Diabetes Mellitus; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Middle Aged; Molecular Sequence Data; Recombinant Proteins; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Biological Availability; Blood Glucose; Clinical Trials as Topic; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Approval; Humans; Insulin; Obesity; Postprandial Period; Treatment Outcome

The insulin analog LysB3,GluB29-insulin (glulisine) displays accelerated in vivo bioavailability compared with native insulin.. Biological properties of this rapid-acting insulin analog were compared with the actions of native insulin and IGF-I.. The effects of the hormones on hormone binding, glucose uptake, and thymidine uptake were evaluated in cultured human skeletal muscle cells.. This study was performed at a Veterans Administration hospital for patient characterization and tissue biopsies; in vitro studies were performed in a research laboratory.. Skeletal muscle tissue was obtained from nondiabetic (n = 13) and type 2 diabetic (n = 14) subjects.. Cultured skeletal muscle cells were treated acutely (15-90 min) or chronically (16 h) with varying concentrations of hormones.. The main study outcomes were measures of sensitivity (concentration required to attain 50% displacement of specific [125I]insulin or [125I]IGF-I bound and sensitivity (EC50) and potency (maximal response) for hormone binding and biological responses.. Insulin and glulisine were comparable in their ability to displace insulin binding. Neither insulin nor glulisine competed efficiently for IGF-I binding. Insulin, glulisine, and IGF-I were equipotent in the stimulation of glucose uptake. Maximal stimulation of phosphorylation of Akt was greatest for IGF-I, whereas sensitivities were similar to those for glucose uptake. Sensitivities were comparable in muscle cells from nondiabetic and type 2 diabetic subjects. Stimulation of [3H]thymidine uptake was most responsive to IGF-I; insulin and glulisine were equally less effective, with sensitivities approximately 1-2% of that for IGF-I. Stimulation of p42/44 MAPK phosphorylation reflected the behavior of thymidine uptake.. Although altered pharmacokinetics of glulisine can have therapeutic advantages, glulisine is indistinguishable from native insulin at the skeletal muscle level.

Topics: Adult; Cells, Cultured; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; DNA; Female; Glucose; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Resistance; Insulin-Like Growth Factor I; Male; Middle Aged; Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinases; Mitosis; Muscle, Skeletal; Phosphorylation; Signal Transduction; Thymidine

Topics: Administration, Oral; Blood Glucose; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Injections, Intravenous; Insulin; Quality of Life; Time Factors