insulin-glargine and Vomiting

To assess the effect of baseline body mass index (BMI) and the occurrence of nausea and/or vomiting on weight loss induced by semalgutide, a once-weekly glucagon-like peptide 1 analogue for the treatment of type 2 diabetes. Semaglutide demonstrated superior reductions in HbA1c and superior weight loss (by 2.3-6.3 kg) versus different comparators across the SUSTAIN 1 to 5 trials; the contributing factors to weight loss are not established.. Subjects with inadequately controlled type 2 diabetes (drug-naïve or on background treatment) were randomized to subcutaneous semaglutide 0.5 mg (excluding SUSTAIN 3), 1.0 mg (all trials), or comparator (placebo, sitagliptin, exenatide extended release or insulin glargine). Subjects were subdivided by baseline BMI and reporting (yes/no) of any nausea and/or vomiting. Change from baseline in body weight was assessed within each trial and subgroup. A mediation analysis separated weight loss into direct or indirect (mediated by nausea or vomiting) effects.. Clinically relevant weight-loss differences were observed across all BMI subgroups, with a trend towards higher absolute weight loss with higher baseline BMI. Overall, 15.2% to 24.0% and 21.5% to 27.2% of subjects experienced nausea or vomiting with semaglutide 0.5 and 1.0 mg, respectively, versus 6.0% to 14.1% with comparators. Only 0.07 to 0.5 kg of the treatment difference between semaglutide and comparators was mediated by nausea or vomiting (indirect effects).. In SUSTAIN 1 to 5, semaglutide-induced weight loss was consistently greater versus comparators, regardless of baseline BMI. The contribution of nausea or vomiting to this weight loss was minor.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Body Mass Index; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Exenatide; Female; Glucagon-Like Peptides; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine; Male; Middle Aged; Nausea; Sitagliptin Phosphate; Treatment Outcome; Vomiting; Weight Loss

We explored the safety and efficacy of exenatide BID v. insulin glargine in a subgroup of Polish patients with type 2 diabetes sub-optimally controlled with metformin plus a sulfonylurea, participating in a 26-week randomised, controlled open-label trial.. In Poland, 80 patients (HbA1c 7-10%, BMI 25-45 kg/m(2)) were randomised to exenatide 10 μg BID (n = 40) or insulin glargine once daily (n = 40). We present exploratory analyses on HbA1c, glucose profiles, body weight, hypoglycaemia and adverse events (AEs).. Mean (SD) baseline HbA1c was 7.9% (0.86) for exenatide and 7.8% (1.02) for insulin glargine. At Week 26, LS mean (SEM) HbA1c decreased in both groups (exenatide -0.72% [0.12]; glargine -0.64% [0.12]), as did fasting glucose. Postprandial glucose excursions after breakfast and dinner were smaller in patients treated with exenatide. LS mean (SEM) body weight decreased by -1.9 (0.48) kg with exenatide and increased by 1.6 (0.48) kg with glargine (group difference [95%CI]: -3.5 kg [-4.9 to -2.2]). Hypoglycaemia was low in both groups; nocturnal hypoglycaemia was reported for three v. seven patients (three v. 24 episodes) in the exenatide and glargine groups, respectively. Adverse events were more common with exenatide (nausea n = 22 v. n = 1, vomiting n = 5 v. n = 0, headache n = 8 v. n = 2).. This exploratory analysis confirms that findings from the global study apply to patients treated with exenatide BID and glargine in Poland, showing that exenatide BID was as effective as insulin glargine. Data suggested that changes in HbA1c were similar, with fasting glucose changes greater in the glargine group and postprandial changes greater in the exenatide BID group. Exenatide BID was associated with weight reduction, less nocturnal hypoglycaemia, but more gastrointestinal events compared to glargine.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Aged; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Administration Schedule; Exenatide; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Headache; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Metformin; Middle Aged; Nausea; Peptides; Sulfonylurea Compounds; Venoms; Vomiting

Physicians may use either insulin or exenatide injections for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus who have poor glycemic control despite taking oral blood glucose-lowering drugs.. To compare effects of exenatide and insulin glargine on glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus that is suboptimally controlled with metformin and a sulfonylurea.. 26-week multicenter, open-label, randomized, controlled trial.. 82 outpatient study centers in 13 countries.. 551 patients with type 2 diabetes and inadequate glycemic control (defined as hemoglobin A1c level ranging from 7.0% to 10.0%) despite combination metformin and sulfonylurea therapy.. Exenatide, 10 microg twice daily, or insulin glargine, 1 daily dose titrated to maintain fasting blood glucose levels of less than 5.6 mmol/L (<100 mg/dL).. Hemoglobin A1c level, fasting plasma glucose level, body weight, 7-point self-monitored blood glucose, standardized test-meal challenge, safety, and tolerability.. Baseline mean hemoglobin A1c level was 8.2% for patients receiving exenatide and 8.3% for those receiving insulin glargine. At week 26, both exenatide and insulin glargine reduced hemoglobin A1c levels by 1.11% (difference, 0.017 percentage point [95% CI, -0.123 to 0.157 percentage point]). Exenatide reduced postprandial glucose excursions more than insulin glargine, while insulin glargine reduced fasting glucose concentrations more than exenatide. Body weight decreased 2.3 kg with exenatide and increased 1.8 kg with insulin glargine (difference, -4.1 kg [CI, -4.6 to -3.5 kg]). Rates of symptomatic hypoglycemia were similar, but nocturnal hypoglycemia occurred less frequently with exenatide (0.9 event/patient-year versus 2.4 events/patient-year; difference, -1.6 events/patient-year [CI, -2.3 to -0.9 event/patient year]). Gastrointestinal symptoms were more common in the exenatide group than in the insulin glargine group, including nausea (57.1% vs. 8.6%), vomiting (17.4% vs. 3.7%) and diarrhea (8.5% vs. 3.0%).. The trial was open-label and did not assess clinical complications related to diabetes. Of the 551 participants, 19.4% of those receiving exenatide and 9.7% of those receiving insulin glargine withdrew from the study. Only 21.6% of the insulin glargine group and 8.6% of the exenatide group achieved the target level for fasting plasma glucose of less than 5.6 mmol/L (<100 mg/dL).. Exenatide and insulin glargine achieved similar improvements in overall glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes that was suboptimally controlled with oral combination therapy. Exenatide was associated with weight reduction and had a higher incidence of gastrointestinal adverse effects than insulin glargine.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Blood Glucose; Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Exenatide; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Middle Aged; Nausea; Peptides; Venoms; Vomiting

Topics: Adult; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1; Female; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Nausea; Vomiting

Topics: Adult; Aged; Blood Glucose; Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Exenatide; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Injections, Subcutaneous; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Middle Aged; Nausea; Peptides; Venoms; Vomiting