insulin-glargine and Postoperative-Complications

Kidney transplantation is the preferred management for patients with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD). However, it is often complicated by worsening or new-onset diabetes. The safety and efficacy of glucose-lowering agents after kidney transplantation is largely unknown. This is an update of a review first published in 2017.. To evaluate the efficacy and safety of glucose-lowering agents for treating pre-existing and new onset diabetes in people who have undergone kidney transplantation.. We searched the Cochrane Kidney and Transplant Register of Studies up to 16 January 2020 through contact with the Information Specialist using search terms relevant to this review. Studies in the Register are identified through searches of CENTRAL, MEDLINE, and EMBASE, conference proceedings, the International Clinical Trials Register (ICTRP) Search Portal and ClinicalTrials.gov.. All randomised controlled trials (RCTs), quasi-RCTs and cross-over studies examining head-to-head comparisons of active regimens of glucose-lowering therapy or active regimen compared with placebo/standard care in patients who have received a kidney transplant and have diabetes were eligible for inclusion.. Four authors independently assessed study eligibility and quality and performed data extraction. Continuous outcomes were expressed as post-treatment mean differences (MD) or standardised mean difference (SMD). Adverse events were expressed as post-treatment absolute risk differences (RD). Dichotomous clinical outcomes were presented as risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI).. Ten studies (21 records, 603 randomised participants) were included - three additional studies (five records) since our last review. Four studies compared more intensive versus less intensive insulin therapy; two studies compared dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors to placebo; one study compared DPP-4 inhibitors to insulin glargine; one study compared sodium glucose co-transporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors to placebo; and two studies compared glitazones and insulin to insulin therapy alone. The majority of studies had an unclear to a high risk of bias. There were no studies examining the effects of biguanides, glinides, GLP-1 agonists, or sulphonylureas. Compared to less intensive insulin therapy, it is unclear if more intensive insulin therapy has an effect on transplant or graft survival (4 studies, 301 participants: RR 1.12, 95% CI 0.32 to 3.94; I. The efficacy and safety of glucose-lowering agents in the treatment of pre-existing and new-onset diabetes in kidney transplant recipients is questionable. Evidence from existing studies examining the effect of intensive insulin therapy, DPP-4 inhibitors, SGLT inhibitors and glitazones is mostly of low to very low certainty. Appropriately blinded, larger, and higher quality RCTs are needed to evaluate and compare the safety and efficacy of contemporary glucose-lowering agents in the kidney transplant population.

Topics: Adamantane; Bias; Cause of Death; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Fasting; Glycated Hemoglobin; Graft Survival; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Kidney Transplantation; Nitriles; Pioglitazone; Postoperative Complications; Pyrrolidines; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Sitagliptin Phosphate; Sodium-Glucose Transporter 2 Inhibitors; Thiazolidinediones; Transplant Recipients; Vildagliptin

The optimal treatment of hyperglycemia in general surgical patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus is not known.. This randomized multicenter trial compared the safety and efficacy of a basal-bolus insulin regimen with glargine once daily and glulisine before meals (n = 104) to sliding scale regular insulin (SSI) four times daily (n = 107) in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus undergoing general surgery. Outcomes included differences in daily blood glucose (BG) and a composite of postoperative complications including wound infection, pneumonia, bacteremia, and respiratory and acute renal failure.. The mean daily glucose concentration after the 1st day of basal-bolus insulin and SSI was 145 ± 32 mg/dL and 172 ± 47 mg/dL, respectively (P < 0.01). Glucose readings <140 mg/dL were recorded in 55% of patients in basal-bolus and 31% in the SSI group (P < 0.001). There were reductions with basal-bolus as compared with SSI in the composite outcome [24.3 and 8.6%; odds ratio 3.39 (95% CI 1.50-7.65); P = 0.003]. Glucose <70 mg/dL was reported in 23.1% of patients in the basal-bolus group and 4.7% in the SSI group (P < 0.001), but there were no significant differences in the frequency of BG <40 mg/dL between groups (P = 0.057).. Basal-bolus treatment with glargine once daily plus glulisine before meals improved glycemic control and reduced hospital complications compared with SSI in general surgery patients. Our study indicates that a basal-bolus insulin regimen is preferred over SSI in the hospital management of general surgery patients with type 2 diabetes.

Topics: Aged; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Female; General Surgery; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Inpatients; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Middle Aged; Perioperative Care; Postoperative Complications; Prospective Studies

Traditionally hyperglycemia in surgical inpatients has been managed with six-hourly sliding-scale regular insulin. However, this approach is usually ineffective in preventing hyperglycemia since no basal insulin is provided. We compared glycemic control using NPH and regular insulin versus glargine insulin alone in patients after cardiovascular surgery on a general surgical ward.. Ninety-four hyperglycemic patients were randomized to subcutaneous insulin using twice-daily NPH/regular or once-daily glargine if they required at least 1 unit/h of intravenous insulin at the time of transfer from the ICU. NPH/regular was adjusted twice daily; glargine was adjusted once daily. Blood glucose was measured four times daily and targeted to 80-140 mg/dL.. The mean blood glucose after NPH/regular (124 mg/dL) and glargine (131 mg/dL) was similar (P = 0.065). In the subgroup of patients with a history of diabetes, mean blood glucose was significantly lower after NPH/regular (133 mg/dL) versus glargine (154 mg/dL) (P = 0.016). Blood glucose less than 60 mg/dL was significantly less common after glargine (0.5%) as compared with NPH/regular (2%) (P = 0.036).. Once-daily glargine insulin provides good glycemic control in hyperglycemic patients after cardiovascular surgery. Although twice-daily NPH/regular insulin provided better control than glargine insulin monotherapy, the simplicity and safety of glargine insulin make it an attractive option for the management of postoperative hyperglycemia. Patients with established diabetes will achieve better glucose control with NPH/regular insulin as compared with glargine but have a higher incidence of hypoglycemia.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Blood Glucose; Cardiovascular Surgical Procedures; Female; Humans; Hyperglycemia; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Isophane; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Middle Aged; Postoperative Complications

Among patients with type 2 diabetes treated with insulin, perioperative hyperglycemia and hypoglycemia may cause undesirable symptoms, surgery delay or cancellation, or unexpected hospitalization. Our objective was to compare preoperative glargine dosing regimens on perioperative glycemic control in patients undergoing ambulatory surgery.. Observational study.. Pre- and postoperative holding areas.. One hundred fifty patients with type 2 diabetes using a once daily, evening insulin glargine regimen undergoing ambulatory surgery were included.. None.. To conduct the analysis, patients were divided into four groups based on the percentage of normal evening glargine dose taken. Group 1 took no glargine. Group 2 took 33%-57%. Group 3 took 60%-87% and Group 4 took 100% of their normal dose. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients in each group with blood glucose in the target range (100-180 mg/dL), and the incidence of hypoglycemia (defined as BG <70 mg/dL or symptomatic, requiring glucose).. Group 3 had the highest proportion (78%) of patients within target range (P<.001) and Group 4 had the highest proportion of patients with hypoglycemia (P=.01). Patients in Group 3 were significantly more likely to achieve target blood glucose than patients in either Group 1 (P=.001) or Group 4 (P=.002).. Our study shows that the percent of normal insulin dose given the evening before surgery directly impacts perioperative glucose levels in ambulatory surgery patients. Patients taking 60%-87% of their usual dose the evening before surgery were likely to arrive in target blood glucose range with decreased risk for hypoglycemia. The mean and mode dose taken in Group 3 were 73% and 75%, respectively, suggesting that the optimal dose may be 75% of normal dose.

Topics: Adult; Ambulatory Surgical Procedures; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Humans; Hyperglycemia; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine; Male; Postoperative Complications; Preoperative Care

It is known that after pancreatectomy, patients experience hyposecretion of endogenous insulin and frequently develop diabetes. However, it has been unclear whether combination therapy with glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists and basal insulin is effective for such patients. In the present study, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of combination therapy with long-acting insulin glargine and the glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist lixisenatide in patients who developed diabetes after pancreatectomy.. Japanese patients who developed diabetes after pancreatectomy were eligible for this study. Participants were treated with combination therapy of glargine and lixisenatide for 12 weeks. Fasting and postprandial plasma glucose, C-peptide immunoreactivity, glycated hemoglobin, bodyweight, visceral fat and subcutaneous fat were measured.. At 12 weeks after initiation of lixisenatide, glycated hemoglobin levels decreased from 8.46 ± 1.64% to 6.81 ± 1.15%. In addition, 1-h postprandial plasma glucose and 2-h postprandial plasma glucose levels significantly decreased from 222.9 ± 56.2 mg/dL to 125.1 ± 37.5 mg/dL (P < 0.001) and from 247.5 ± 56.8 mg/dL to 115.1 ± 29.0 mg/dL (P < 0.001), respectively. Neither hypoglycemia nor clinically relevant adverse events occurred during this study.. The present study shows that combination therapy with basal insulin and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists after partial pancreatectomy can be a useful therapeutic option for providing effective glycemic control with a reduced risk of hypoglycemia.

Topics: Adipose Tissue; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Blood Glucose; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine; Japan; Male; Pancreatectomy; Peptides; Postoperative Complications; Postprandial Period; Risk; Treatment Outcome