insulin-glargine and Pain

Pain resulting from injections has a potential influence on the acceptance and thus on the success of insulin treatment. Systematic investigation in humans has suggested that individuals perceive more pain during SC injection of acidic solutions than neutral solutions. Insulin glargine is a long-acting (up to 24-hour duration of effect), parenteral blood glucose-lowering agent. Unlike other insulins, it is injected as an acidic solution (pH 4).. The aim of this study was to assess whether the SC injection of insulin glargine is more painful than neutral insulin in a clinical setting.. This single-center, prospective, controlled, noninterventional study was performed in consecutively enrolled male and female pediatric patients (7-21 years) with type 1 diabetes mellitus who self-injected insulin >or=3 times per day and who had diabetes duration of >or=6 months. The study was conducted from September 1, 2005, to December 30, 2005, at the Diabetes Clinic, University Children's Hospital, Ulm, Germany. No changes to the patients' current insulin regimen were made. Based on their existing insulin treatment, patients were assigned to 1 of 2 treatment groups: (1) the acidic insulin group, which injected insulin glargine, and (2) the neutral insulin group, which injected neutral protamine Hagedorn or Semilente insulin. All patients also injected shortacting regular insulin or insulin analogs. Pain during SC insulin injection and during self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) (the internal control) was assessed using a standardized, noninterventional protocol and optimized combined 10-cm visual analog scale and 5-point verbal rating scale (minimum = I cannot feel it at all; maximum = it hurts me). Patients were instructed to document pain immediately after insulin injection and SMBG at home 3 times a day on 3 different days.. A total of 112 patients (mean [SD] age, 14.6 [3.0] years; sex, 60 [53.6%] male; mean [SD] glycosylated hemoglobin [HbA(1c)], 8.0% [1.4%]; mean [SD] diabetes duration, 6.1 [3.9] years) completed the study. Pain scores reported by the acidic group (n = 76) were not significantly different when compared with those of the neutral group (n = 36) (4.0 [2.0] vs 4.2 [1.9]). Pain scores were also similar for the injection of short-acting insulin in those from the acidic group when compared with those from the neutral group (3.7 [1.7] vs 4.1 [2.1]). Insulin injections were generally perceived as more painful than SMBG (3.9 [1.7] vs 2.9 [1.8]; P < 0.001). Using the Spearman rank correlation coefficient, pain perception was determined to be independent of age, gender, HbA(1c) level, and duration of diabetes.. Despite its acidic formulation (pH 4), insulin glargine was not perceived as more painful during SC injection than neutral long-acting or shortacting insulin in these pediatric patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring; Case-Control Studies; Child; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1; Female; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Injections, Subcutaneous; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Isophane; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Pain; Pain Measurement; Prospective Studies; Self Administration

Objective We compared the pain accompanying the injection of high-concentration (300 units/mL) insulin glargine (U300G) with that accompanying the injection of conventional (100 units/mL) insulin glargine (U100G). Methods U100G was switched to U300G at basically the same dosage. Visual analog scales were used to assess the quality of life (QOL). The primary outcome was the change in the pain accompanying injections in those using ≥30 units of U100G compared with those using <30 units at baseline. Standardized mean differences (Cohen's d) were used to measure the effect size. Patients Adult patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus using U100G. Results One hundred and eight patients were recruited. The numbers of patients who used U100G at ≥30 units, 20 to <30 units, 10 to <20 units, and <10 units were 13, 14, 34, and 47, respectively. The improvement in the pain score was not significant for ≥30 units compared with <30 units (-50.3±24.0 vs. -40.4±28.5, p=0.25, d=0.38), but a significant difference was observed for ≥20 units compared with <20 units (-50.8±22.7 vs. -38.4±29.1, p=0.03, d=0.48), as well as for ≥10 units compared with <10 units (-48.1±25.0 vs. -33.0±29.7, p<0.01, d=0.56). When all patients were analyzed together, significant improvements in the pain score (-41.5±28.0, p<0.01), ease of use score (-37.5±32.2, p<0.01), force needed to inject score (-46.5±28.6, p<0.01), and preference for U300G compared with U100G score (-45.8±33.1, p<0.01) were observed. Conclusion There is possibility that switching from U100G to U300G might be associated with better QOL for patients who require insulin glargine injections. To prove this hypothesis, a randomized controlled trial (preferably double-blinded) will be required in the future.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Compounding; Female; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Injections, Subcutaneous; Insulin Glargine; Male; Middle Aged; Pain; Pain Measurement; Patient Preference; Psychometrics; Quality of Life

The study was designed to evaluate real-world data on clinical and economic outcome differences between patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) who use insulin glargine with vial-and-syringe delivery and those who switch to pen administration.. This retrospective study analyzed medical and pharmacy claims information from the national managed-care IMPACT(®) database (Ingenix Inc., Salt Lake City, UT). Adults with T2DM treated with insulin glargine were evaluated. Clinical and economic outcomes over 1 year were compared between individuals who had converted from administering glargine via vial-and-syringe to the SoloSTAR(®) (sanofi-aventis U.S., Bridgewater, NJ) pen (Switchers) and patients who continued to use vial-and-syringe administration (Continuers). Patients from each cohort were matched using propensity score matching for a comparison sample.. In total, 3,893 eligible patients were identified (665 Switchers and 3,228 Continuers), with a matched cohort with 603 patients in each group. Baseline characteristics were similar between groups. One-year treatment persistence was significantly higher with Switchers versus Continuers (65.3% vs. 49.8%; P<0.0001). Medication possession ratio was also significantly higher among Switchers (0.79 vs. 0.76; P=0.0173). Insulin use and glycemic control were similar between groups. Healthcare utilization and total costs were also similar between groups. Higher prescription costs among Switchers were offset by lower overall and diabetes-related outpatient and inpatient costs.. Switching from insulin glargine vial-and-syringe administration to pen delivery resulted in improved treatment adherence and persistence, with comparable clinical and economic outcomes.

Topics: Anxiety; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Disposable Equipment; Drug Delivery Systems; Drug Dosage Calculations; Equipment Design; Female; Health Care Costs; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Injections, Subcutaneous; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Medication Adherence; Middle Aged; Pain; Patient Preference; Patient Satisfaction; Retrospective Studies; Syringes

Insulin therapy is recommended for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and an initial A1C level greater than 9 percent, or if diabetes is uncontrolled despite optimal oral glycemic therapy. Insulin therapy may be initiated as augmentation, starting at 0.3 unit per kg, or as replacement, starting at 0.6 to 1.0 unit per kg. When using replacement therapy, 50 percent of the total daily insulin dose is given as basal, and 50 percent as bolus, divided up before breakfast, lunch, and dinner. Augmentation therapy can include basal or bolus insulin. Replacement therapy includes basal-bolus insulin and correction or premixed insulin. Glucose control, adverse effects, cost, adherence, and quality of life need to be considered when choosing therapy. Metformin should be continued if possible because it is proven to reduce all-cause mortality and cardiovascular events in overweight patients with diabetes. In a study comparing premixed, bolus, and basal insulin, hypoglycemia was more common with premixed and bolus insulin, and weight gain was more common with bolus insulin. Titration of insulin over time is critical to improving glycemic control and preventing diabetes-related complications.

Topics: Blood Glucose; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Therapy, Combination; Family Practice; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Metformin; Pain; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Treatment Outcome; Weight Gain