insulin-glargine and Diabetes-Mellitus--Type-2

The objective of this article was to review pharmacology, efficacy, safety, and place in therapy of tirzepatide, a dual glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) and glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonist.. PubMed/MEDLINE and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched through September 7, 2022, using the keyword "tirzepatide.". Clinical trials with available results were included.. Seven published phase 3, multicenter, randomized, parallel-group trials investigated efficacy and safety of tirzepatide versus placebo, semaglutide, insulin degludec, and insulin glargine for type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) treatment. Studies included adults with uncontrolled T2DM and body mass index above 23 or 25 kg/m. Studies demonstrated greater A1c lowering and weight reduction versus placebo and active comparators with AE similar to semaglutide, suggesting tirzepatide will be a valuable addition to the growing list of antidiabetic medications. Although tirzepatide's effects on major cardiovascular events was not increased when compared with insulin glargine, further evidence is needed to assess long-term implications on cardiovascular outcomes compared with agents with proven cardiovascular benefits.. Tirzepatide has the potential to significantly impact the clinical management of T2DM, and results of ongoing clinical trials will help to fully determine its place in therapy.

Topics: Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Gastric Inhibitory Polypeptide; Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine; Multicenter Studies as Topic; Weight Loss

To compare the clinical efficacy and safety of glargine-U100 (Lantus/Gla-100) with glargine-U300 (Toujeo/Gla-300) in adult patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) and type 1 diabetes (T1D).. A literature search on Gla-300/Gla-100 in diabetes management was conducted using the MEDLINE/Embase/Cochrane databases from inception to 10 January 2021. Eligible studies considered for inclusion were parallel-design, randomized controlled trials (RCTs). The Cochrane risk-of-bias tool was used to evaluate the quality of the included studies. The random-effects model was applied for interpretation of the results.. Of 5348 records screened, 592 were assessed for eligibility and 15 RCTs were considered for data extraction and meta-analysis (T2D [N = 10; n = 7082]; T1D [N = 5; n = 2222]). In patients with T1D, all safety parameters were comparable between Gla-100 and Gla-300. In T2D, statistically significant differences were observed in favour of Gla-300 over Gla-100 for nocturnal and total hypoglycaemia. For efficacy parameters, a statistically and clinically significant difference favouring Gla-100 in basal insulin dose requirement was observed for both T2D and T1D. Change in HbA1c showed a statistically but not clinically significant reduction with Gla-100 compared with Gla-300 in T1D. Statistically significant but clinically less relevant differences favoured Gla-300 for control of body weight in T1D and T2D and Gla-100 for fasting blood glucose in T2D.. Gla-100 and Gla-300 had comparable efficacy and safety profiles in both T1D and T2D populations. Gla-300 showed a lower risk of nocturnal and total hypoglycaemia, significant in insulin-experienced/exposed patients with T2D. Patients on Gla-300 required significantly more units of insulin daily than the Gla-100 group to achieve equivalent efficacy.

Topics: Adult; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Regular, Human; Treatment Outcome

Insulin therapy should ideally mimic a basal-bolus pattern. Lente, NPH, NPH/regular mixes, PZI, glargine U100, and detemir are intermediate-acting formulations that are administered twice daily in dogs. To minimize hypoglycemia, intermediate-acting insulin protocols are usually geared towards alleviating (but not eliminating) clinical signs. Insulin glargine U300 and insulin degludec meet the criteria for an effective and safe basal insulin in dogs. In most dogs, good control of clinical signs is achieved when using a basal insulin alone. In a small minority, bolus insulin at the time of at least one meal per day may be added to optimize glycemic control.

Topics: Animals; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dog Diseases; Dogs; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine

No insulin formulation should be considered best by default for management of feline diabetes. Rather, the choice of insulin formulation should be tailored to the specific clinical situation. In most cats that have some residual beta cell function, administering only a basal insulin might lead to complete normalization of blood glucose concentrations. Basal insulin requirements are constant throughout the day. Therefore, for an insulin formulation to be effective and safe as a basal insulin, its action should be roughly the same every hour of the day. At present, only insulin glargine U300 approaches this definition in cats.

Topics: Animals; Blood Glucose; Cat Diseases; Cats; Diabetes Mellitus; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine

Understanding the pharmacology of insulin and how it relates to the pathophysiology of diabetes can lead to better clinical outcomes. No insulin formulation should be considered "best" by default. Insulin suspensions (NPH, NPH/regular mixes, lente, and PZI) as well as insulin glargine U100 and detemir are intermediate-acting formulations that are administered twice daily. For a formulation to be an effective and safe basal insulin, its action should be roughly the same every hour of the day. Currently, only insulin glargine U300 and insulin degludec meet this standard in dogs, whereas in cats, insulin glargine U300 is the closest option.

Topics: Animals; Cat Diseases; Cats; Diabetes Mellitus; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dog Diseases; Dogs; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine

Our aim in this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of commercially available fixed-ratio combinations (FRCs) of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) and basal insulins by a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of people with type 2 diabetes.. We present a systematic review and network meta-analyses of RCTs of individuals with type 2 diabetes randomized to FRCs or to their components for ≥24 weeks. All reports were obtained from PubMed or ClinicalTrials.gov up to February 28, 2022. The primary outcome was glycated hemoglobin (A1C) level attained. Secondary outcomes included fasting plasma glucose, change in body weight, and incident hypoglycemia. Treatment effects were estimated as mean difference (MD) and standard error (SE), or as odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) using the fixed combination of insulin glargine 100 IU/mL and lixisenatide (iGlarLixi) as reference.. We included 29 RCTs from among the 1,404 articles identified. No direct comparisons between FRCs were found. After excluding some insulin-capped trials to reach model consistency, both FRCs were more efficacious regarding A1C than their components, but no difference between FRCs was found (MD, -0.10%; SE, 0.10%). The effect of the fixed combination of insulin degludec and liraglutide (IDegLira) (MD, -0.47 mmol/L; SE, 0.24 mmol/L) and basal insulins was similar to that of iGlarLixi (reference) on fasting glucose, whereas GLP-1RAs had lower efficacy than iGlarLixi. Weight gain was lower with GLP-1RAs and IDegLira (MD, -0.72 kg; SE, 0.32 kg) than with iGlarLixi (reference) and higher with basal insulins. Incident hypoglycemia (based on different definitions) was least frequent with GLP-1RAs, followed by IDegLira (OR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.39 to 1.57), iGlarLixi (reference), and basal insulins.. For A1C, both FRCs were more efficacious over their individual components, with similar efficacies of the 2 FRCs.

Topics: Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Combinations; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine; Liraglutide; Network Meta-Analysis; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic

To investigate the effectiveness, safety, optimal starting dose, optimal maintenance dose range, and target fasting plasma glucose of five basal insulins in insulin-naïve patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.. MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library were searched from January 2000 to February 2022. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were followed and the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations (GRADE) approach was adopted. The registration ID is CRD42022319078 in PROSPERO.. Among 11 163 citations retrieved, 35 publications met the planned criteria. From meta-analyses and network meta-analyses, we found that when injecting basal insulin regimens at bedtime, the optimal choice in order of most to least effective might be glargine U-300 or degludec U-100, glargine U-100 or detemir, followed by neutral protamine hagedorn (NPH). Injecting glargine U-100 in the morning may be more effective (ie, more patients archiving glycated hemoglobin < 7.0%) and lead to fewer hypoglycemic events than injecting it at bedtime. The optimal starting dose for the initiation of any basal insulins can be 0.10-0.20 U/kg/day. There is no eligible evidence to investigate the optimal maintenance dose for basal insulins.. The five basal insulins are effective for the target population. Glargine U-300, degludec U-100, glargine U-100, and detemir lead to fewer hypoglycemic events than NPH without compromising glycemic control.

Topics: Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Detemir; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Isophane; Insulin, Long-Acting

The objective of this study was to provide recommendations regarding effectiveness, safety, optimal starting dose, optimal maintenance dose range, and target fasting plasma glucose of five basal insulins (glargine U-300, degludec U-100, glargine U-100, detemir, and insulin protamine Hagedorn) in insulin-naïve adult patients with type 2 diabetes in the Asia-Pacific region. Based on evidence from a systematic review, we developed an Asia-Pacific clinical practice guideline through comprehensive internal review and external review processes. We set up and used clinical thresholds of trivial, small, moderate, and large effects for different critical and important outcomes in the overall certainty of evidence assessment and balancing the magnitude of intervention effects when making recommendations, following GRADE methods (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation). The AGREE (Appraisal of Guidelines, Research and Evaluation) and RIGHT (Reporting Items for practice Guidelines in HealThcare) guideline reporting checklists were complied with. After the second-round vote by the working group members, all the recommendations and qualifying statements reached over 75% agreement rates. Among 44 contacted external reviewers, we received 33 clinicians' and one patient's comments. The overall response rate was 77%. To solve the four research questions, we made two strong recommendations, six conditional recommendations, and two qualifying statements. Although the intended users of this guideline focused on clinicians in the Asia-Pacific region, the eligible evidence was based on recent English publications. We believe that the recommendations and the clinical thresholds set up in the guideline can be references for clinicians who take care of patients with type 2 diabetes worldwide.. 【提要】 为亚太地区初次使用胰岛素的成人2型糖尿病患者提供关于5种基础胰岛素(甘精胰岛素U-300、德谷胰岛素U-100、甘精胰岛素U-100型、地特胰岛素和中性鱼精蛋白胰岛素)的有效性、安全性、最佳起始剂量、最佳维持剂量范围和目标空腹血浆葡萄糖的推荐。基于系统回顾的证据，本综述通过全面的内部审核和外部审核流程制定了亚太地区临床实践指南。本综述在整体证据确定性评估中为不同重要和关键结局设置了微小、小、中等和大效应的临床阈值，并遵循GRADE(评估、发展、评价、建议的分级)方法来平衡干预效果的大小以进行推荐。本综述遵守了AGREE(指南评估、研究和评估)和RIGHT(卫生保健实践指南报告项目)指南报告检查清单。在工作组成员进行第二轮投票后，所有推荐和限定性陈述的一致率均达到了75%以上。在联系的44名外部评审人员中，本研究收到了33名临床医生和1名患者的意见。总体应答率为77%。为解决4个研究问题，本研究提出了2个强烈推荐、6个有条件推荐和2个限定性陈述。尽管本指南的预期用户主要是亚太地区的临床医生，但所选的证据基于最近的英文出版物。本综述提示，指南中制定的推荐和临床阈值可以成为全球关注2型糖尿病患者的临床医生的参考。.

Topics: Adult; Asia; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Humans; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting

Insulin Icodec is a novel basal insulin analogue designed for once-weekly administration, therefore might propitiate reduction in the frequency of injections and facilitate treatment adherence. This study aimed to determine the glycemic control and safety profile of Insulin Icodec, compared with Glargine U100 in patients with diabetes mellitus type 2.. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCT) data comparing OnceWeekly Insulin Icodec and Once-Daily Insulin Glargine U100 in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases were searched for trials published up to May 14, 2022. Data were extracted from published reports and quality assessment was performed per Cochrane recommendations.. Three studies were included comprising 453 patients, 230 (50.77%) using Once-Weekly Insulin Icodec and 223 (49.22%) using Once-Daily Insulin Glargine U100. In the pooled data, Glycated Hemoglobin (MD -0.20% CI -0.33 to -0.07%; P=0.002) change from baseline demonstrated a significantly higher reduction in the Icodec group. Time with Glucose in Range (MD 6.60% CI 3.63 to 9.57%; P < 0.0001) and Insulin Dose Difference (MD 0.97UI CI 0.76 to 1.18UI; P < 0.0001) were higher in the Icodec group. There was no significant difference in fasting plasma glucose, body weight change, hypoglycemia or any adverse event evaluated.. OnceWeekly Insulin Icodec was associated with a small reduction in Glycated Hemoglobin, as well as higher Time with Glucose in Range, with similar hypoglycemic adverse events, when compared with Once-Daily Insulin Glargine U100.

Topics: Blood Glucose; Clinical Trials, Phase II as Topic; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Glucose; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic

To compare the efficacy and safety of insulin glargine-300 once daily (Gla-300) with insulin degludec/aspart (IDegAsp) once daily in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) inadequately controlled on oral anti-diabetic drugs (OADs).. A systematic literature review of randomized controlled trials was followed by an indirect treatment comparison of studies involving insulin naïve adults, inadequately controlled [glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) ≥7.0%] on OADs, who received Gla-300 or IDegAsp once daily. Outcomes of interest were change in HbA1c, blood glucose, weight and insulin dose, as well as incidence and event rate of hypoglycaemia and other adverse events.. Four trials with broadly similar baseline patient characteristics were included in the meta-analyses and indirect treatment comparison. At 24-28 weeks, the indirect comparison of Gla-300 to IDegAsp once daily estimated no statistically significant difference for change in HbA1c (%) from baseline [mean difference of 0.10% (95% CI: -0.20, 0.39; p = .52)]; a statistically significant mean difference of -1.31 kg (95% CI: -1.97, -0.65; p < .05) for change in body weight from baseline; statistically significant odds ratios of 0.62 (95% CI: 0.41, 0.93; p < .05) for incidence of any hypoglycaemia; and 0.47 (95% CI: 0.25, 0.87; p < .05) for incidence of anytime confirmed hypoglycaemia (plasma glucose <3.0-3.1 mmol/L). No significant differences were observed for insulin dose and adverse events.. In insulin-naïve patients with T2D inadequately controlled on OADs, commencing Gla-300 shows a comparable HbA1c reduction, but with significantly less weight gain and a lower incidence of any and confirmed hypoglycaemia compared with commencing IDegAsp.

Topics: Adult; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Aspart; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Regular, Human

iGlarLixi is a fixed-ratio combination of insulin glargine 100 U/mL and lixisenatide used in the treatment of type 2 diabetes. iGlarLixi has proven clinical benefits in terms of glycemia, weight control, and safety, defined by the risk of hypoglycemia. It simultaneously targets many pathophysiologic abnormalities which are at the root of type 2 diabetes and thus presents a complementary mode of action. Finally, it may also address diabetes treatment burden, and, by decreasing the complexity of treatment, it may improve patient adherence and persistence and fight against clinical inertia. This article reviews the results of major randomized controlled trials in people with type 2 diabetes that compared iGlarLixi to other therapeutic regimens, representing different intensification strategies, such as basal supported oral therapy, oral antidiabetic drugs, and a combination of the latter with glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists. Moreover, as a supplement to randomized trials, data from real-world evidence have also been included.

Topics: Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Combinations; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine

A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to synthesize the available data from clinical trials and assess the safety issues of tirzepatide (pancreatitis and gallbladder or biliary disease) in type 2 diabetes (T2D) and obesity.. A systematic search was conducted in three electronic databases, namely Embase, PubMed, and the Cochrane Library, up until March 1, 2023, to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing tirzepatide to either placebo or active hypoglycemic drugs in individuals with T2D and obesity. Heterogeneity was assessed using the I2 value and Cochran's Q test, and a fixed effects model was employed to estimate the safety profile of tirzepatide. The safety outcomes of interest, including pancreatitis, the composite of gallbladder or biliary diseases, cholecystitis, and cholelithiasis and biliary diseases, were evaluated. (The composite of gallbladder or biliary diseases incorporated cholelithiasis, cholecystitis, other gallbladder disorders, and biliary diseases.).. A total of nine trials with 9871 participants (6828 in the tirzepatide group and 3043 in the control group) that met the pre-specified criteria were included. When compared to all control groups consisting of basal insulin (glargine or degludec), selective GLP1-RA (dulaglutide or semaglutide once weekly), and placebo, an increased risk of pancreatitis was not found to be significantly associated with tirzepatide (RR 1.46, [95% CI] 0.59 to 3.61; I2 = 0.0%, p = 0.436). For gallbladder or biliary disease, the composite of gallbladder or biliary disease was significantly associated with tirzepatide compared with placebo or basal insulin (RR 1.97, [95% CI] 1.14 to 3.42; I2 = 0.0%, p = 0.558), but not with the risk of cholelithiasis, cholecystitis or biliary diseases.. Based on the currently available data, tirzepatide appears to be safe regarding the risk of pancreatitis. However, the increased risk of the composite outcome of gallbladder or biliary diseases observed in RCTs warrants further attention from physicians in clinical practice.. https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO, identifier CRD42023412400.

Topics: Cholecystitis; Cholelithiasis; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Humans; Insulin Glargine; Obesity; Pancreatitis

The evolution of basal insulin therapy over the past 100 years since the discovery of insulin is a testimony to the biomedical bench-to-bedside process, wherein incremental advances in the basic sciences are progressively translated over time into a series of enhancements in clinical care, each building upon the success of its predecessors. The emergence of recombinant DNA technology and the resultant biosynthesis of human insulin in the 1980s provided the critical capacity to bioengineer designer insulin analogues with pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties that can better mimic, although not fully replicate, the effects of endogenous insulin secretion. Through these efforts, basal insulin therapy has progressed over this time from first-generation analogues (glargine U-100, detemir) to second-generation analogues (glargine U-300, degludec) to ultra-long-acting formulations that are suitable for administration once weekly (icodec). Each iteration in this progression has represented a step closer towards the goal of replicating the continuous secretion of insulin that normally comprises the basal output of the pancreatic beta-cells between meals, during episodes of fasting and overnight. However, it may be that we may have reached the achievable limit in the context of an "open-loop" approach, such that only with the addition of closed loop control will we be able to achieve physiologic basal insulin replacement. In this review, we will examine the evolution of basal insulin therapy over the past 100 years and its implications for patient care and outcomes in current practice and the future.

Topics: Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Insulin, Regular, Human

Recent studies have found compared with insulin glargine (IGlar), insulin degludec/aspart (IDeg/Asp) may provide adequate glycemic control and prevent hypoglycemia events in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Consequently, we performed a meta-analysis to appraise and compare the efficiency and safety of IDeg/Asp and IGlar in the treatment of T2DM. We sought the databases including PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Cochrane library to confirm related articles which inspected the effect of IDeg/Asp versus IGlar for the treatment of T2DM until May 2021. Finally, six randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of 1,346 patients were included. The results showed that IDeg/Asp significantly decreased the mean hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) level but was prone to serious adverse events, and IGlar increased the nocturnal confirmed hypoglycemia events. Besides, there were no significant changes in other indicators, including mean fasting plasma glucose (FPG) level, nine-point self-measured plasma glucose (SMPG) level, and adverse events. What's more, we found that there was no significant difference in the occurrence of hypoglycemia overall, but our subgroup analysis of confirmed hypoglycemia revealed the population in this subgroup (duration of diabetes ≤11 years) might has its particularity effecting the hypoglycemia outcome. Concerning efficiency, IDeg/Asp may have advantages in controlling the mean HbA1c level. Regarding safety, IGlar might increase the risk of nocturnal confirmed hypoglycemia. Further evidence is needed to compare better the efficiency and safety of IDeg/Asp versus IGlar therapy.

Topics: Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Aspart; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic

Clinical differences between degludec U100 (Deg-100) and glargine U300 (Gla-300) in type 1 diabetes (T1D) were unknown.. To indirectly compare the safety, efficacy, and cost-effectiveness between Deg-100 and Gla-300 in T1D adults via systematic review.. Medline, the Cochrane Library, ClinicalTrials.gov, and Google Scholar were searched (October 2021). Randomized controlled trials comparing Deg-100 or Gla-300 vs. glargine U100 in T1D adults (follow-up ≥ 12 weeks) were selected and analyzed using a frequentist network meta-analysis. Cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) was conducted over a 1-year time horizon from societal perspectives.. Nine trials were included. Efficacy analysis suggested that Deg-100 was non-inferior to Gla-300 in reducing HbA. Low-certainty indirect evidence suggested that Deg-100 appeared to have a favorable reduction in rates of severe hypoglycemia and more cost-effective compared with Gla-300 in T1D adults.

Topics: Adult; Blood Glucose; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting

Performing an updated meta-analysis to compare the safety and efficacy of insulin glargine and insulin detemir in adults with type 1 and type 2 diabetes.. Electronic databases were searched up to 18 August 2021. A random-effects model was applied to pool data from included studies to calculate the standardized mean differences (SMDs) for the continuous variables and relative risks (RRs) for the dichotomous variable.. Nine studies compared insulin detemir and insulin glargine in type 2 diabetes and three studies in patients with type 1 diabetes. The pooled SMD of weight gain was -0.59 (95% CI -1.05 to -0.14; P=0.01; I. It was found that there is no clinically considerable difference between the impacts of insulin detemir and insulin glargine in diabetic patients. The only statistically significant differences were less weight gain in type 2 diabetes and fewer episodes of severe hypoglycemia in type 1 diabetes with insulin detemir.

Topics: Adult; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Detemir; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Weight Gain

Currently, glycemic variability has more deleterious effects than sustained hyperglycemia and is closely associated with acute and chronic complications of diabetes. Reducing glycemic excursion is becoming another vital goal of glycemic control in clinical practice. This study aimed to determine whether insulin degludec (IDeg) or insulin glargine (IGla) was more beneficial for reducing glycemic fluctuations.. This research was constructed according to the PRISMA guidelines. We searched eight databases and ClinicalTrials.gov from their inception to 30 November 2021. All randomized controlled trials comparing the efficacy of glucose variability between IDeg and IGla in diabetic patients were included.. Fourteen trials with 8,683 participants were included. In patients with T1DM, IDeg was associated with a lower mean (MD: -16.25, 95% CI -29.02 to -3.07, P = 0.01) and standard deviation (P = 0.03) compared to IGla in fasting blood glucose (FBG); in people with T2DM, IDeg was related to a lower mean of FBG versus insulin glargine 100 U/ml (IGla100) (P <0.001) and had a more extended time in the range (TIR) than IGla100 (SMD: 0.15, 95% CI 0.02 to 0.27, P = 0.02) but not longer than insulin glargine 300 U/ml (IGla300). Moreover, IDeg had a lower coefficient of variation of FBG than IGla (P = 0.0254). For other indicators of glycemic variability, namely, standard deviation of blood glucose for 24 h, the mean of 24-h blood glucose, mean amplitude of glycemic excursion, the coefficient of variation for 24 h, the mean of daily differences, area under the glucose curve, and M-value, no significant differences were identified between IDeg and IGla, regardless of T1DM or T2DM.. Based on the current studies, there was comparable efficacy between IDeg and IGla from multiple aspects of glycemic variability, regardless of T1DM or T2DM. However, IDeg may be superior to IGla in reducing FBG variability in T1DM and T2DM. Nonetheless, due to the limitations of the original studies, it is still unclear whether IDeg is superior to both IGla100 and IGla300. In T2DM, IDeg had more extended TIR than IGla100 but not longer than IGla300. Additionally, more well-designed randomized controlled trials comparing IDeg with IGla300 for different indicators of glycemic variability are still warranted.. PROSPERO, CRD42021283203.

Topics: Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic

Glucagon-like peptide 1(GLP-1) receptor agonists are used in patients with type 2 diabetes as hypoglycemic drugs; a growing body of evidence has clarified their renoprotective benefits. We performed a meta-analysis to summarize the most recent evidence on the renal benefits of GLP-1 receptor agonists from clinical trials of patients with type 2 diabetes.. This meta-analysis used a fixed-effects model to estimate the risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) to investigate the effect of GLP-1 receptor agonists on the renal protection. The outcomes were a composite renal outcome, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) decrease, new macroalbuminuria, doubling of serum creatinine, end-stage renal disease (ESRD) and renal death. We also checked the composite renal outcome of the patient subgroups based on the structural source of human GLP-1 or exendin-4.. Among the 12 articles screened, seven studies involving 48101 patients met pre-specified criteria and were included. In general, the use of GLP-1 receptor agonists reduced the risk of the composite renal outcome by 17% (RR 0·83 [95% CI 0·79-0·88]; P < 0·00001), with no significant interaction in subgroups analysis (P = 0.66); the risk of new-onset of persistent macroalbuminuria was reduced by 25% (RR 0·75 [95%CI 0·69-0·81]; P < 0·00001) compared to placebo. However, GLP-1 receptor agonists had no significant effect on eGFR decrease (RR 0·92 [95% CI 0·83-1.01]; P = 0·09), doubling of serum creatinine (RR 0·97 [95% CI 0·78-1.21]; P = 0·79), or end-stage renal disease (RR 0·81 [95% CI 0·62-1.06]; P = 0·12) compared to placebo or insulin glargine (AWARD-7) in patients with type 2 diabetes.. GLP-1 receptor agonists, regardless of their structural homology, have significant benefits in reducing the risk of the composite renal outcome, especially in new macroalbuminuria compared with placebo or insulin glargine in patients with type 2 diabetes.

Topics: Creatinine; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Exenatide; Glucagon-Like Peptide 1; Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine; Kidney Failure, Chronic

Insulin icodec is currently the most advanced candidate insulin suitable for once-weekly administration. We aim to conduct a systematic review of the literature to find out the efficacy and safety of insulin icodec in patients with diabetes mellitus.. We systematically searched the electronic database of PubMed, and Google Scholar from inception until August 20, 2022, using MeSH keywords. Ongoing trials of insulin icodec were additionally searched from the ClinicalTrials.Gov. We retrieved all the available granular details of phase 1 to phase 3 studies of insulin icodec in both type 1 and type 2 diabetes.. Phase 1 study showed insulin icodec having a half-life of 196 h (>1 week) while a steady state is achieved after 3 to 4 weekly injections. Phase 2 studies compared once-weekly icodec to insulin glargine (U-100) and found a similar glucose control with no significantly greater hypoglycemia risks. Top-line results from the five phase 3 studies reported better glucose control with once-weekly icodec compared to both once-daily insulin glargine (ONWARDS 1) and once-daily degludec (in both ONWARDS 2 and 4) with similar rates of hypoglycemia in type 2 diabetes, although there was a higher hypoglycemic event with insulin icodec in type 1 diabetes (ONWARDS 6) compared to once-daily degludec despite a similar glycemic control.. A brighter prospect of once-weekly insulin icodec is on the card in particular in type 2 diabetes in terms of reducing injection pricks by >85% vs. once-daily basal insulin analogs, although few unknowns still exist.

Topics: Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine

The goal of this study was to compare the efficacy and tolerability of insulin degludec with those of other long-acting insulin analogues (insulin glargine and insulin detemir) in patients with type 1 or 2 diabetes mellitus (T1D or T2D).. Those randomized controlled trials comparing insulin degludec with other long-acting insulin analogues in the treatment of patients with T1D or T2D published on or before August 21, 2022, were retrieved from PubMed, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, and EMBASE. The efficacy end points were the changes from baseline in hemoglobin A. Data from a total of 20 trials (19,048 patients) were included. The differences in the reductions in glycosylated hemoglobin between insulin degludec and other long-acting basal insulin analogues (insulin glargine and insulin detemir) used for the treatment of patients with T1D or T2D were not significant. However, the reduction in FPG was greater with insulin degludec (-0.370 mmol/L; 95% CI, -0.473 to -0.267 mmol/L; P ≤ 0.001). Throughout the treatment periods of all of the available trials, the estimated rate ratios of overall and nocturnal hypoglycemia were significantly decreased with insulin degludec compared with insulin glargine or insulin detemir in patients with T1D or T2D; the differences in the risks for severe hypoglycemia were not significant.. Compared with other long-acting insulin analogues (insulin glargine and insulin detemir), insulin degludec was associated with a significantly decreased FPG, with lower prevalences of overall and nocturnal hypoglycemia.

Topics: Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Detemir; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting

Type 1 diabetes is characterized by insulin deficiency and requires near-physiological insulin replacement. In most patients, this is accomplished by basal bolus therapy consisting of a long-acting basal insulin administered once or twice daily and short-acting insulin with main meals. Several long-acting insulin analogs have been developed to optimize basal insulin therapy.. This paper reviews the design of - and data from - randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to assess glucose lowering efficacy and safety of long-acting insulin analogs for the treatment of type 1 diabetes.. Due to the non-inferiority treat-to-target design of insulin, RCTs treatment differences primarily appear as differences in hypoglycemia risk. Data suggest that the first generation long-acting insulin analogs insulin glargine U100 and insulin detemir have a similar glucose lowering efficacy compared to NPH insulin but a lower risk of hypoglycemia, particularly during nighttime. The newer analogs insulin glargine U300 and insulin degludec provide non-inferior efficacy, although insulin glargine U300 is less potent unit-to-unit. Insulin degludec reduces hypoglycemia risk compared to insulin glargine U100. Future studies should explore the potential for further improvement of treatment results in type 1 diabetes by a structured approach to personalization of basal insulin therapy.

Topics: Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting

Hypoglycemia, the condition of low blood sugar, is a common occurance in people with diabetes using insulin therapy. Protecting against hypoglycaemia by engineering an insulin preparation that can auto-adjust its biological activity to fluctuating blood glucose levels has been pursued since the 1970s, but despite numerous publications, no system that works well enough for practical use has reached clinical practise.. This review will summarise and scrutinise known approaches for producing glucose-sensitive insulin therapies. Notably, systems described in patent applications will be extensively covered, which has not been the case for earlier reviews of this area.. The vast majority of published systems are not suitable for product development, but a few glucose-sensitive insulin concepts have recently reached clinical trials, and there is hope that glucose-sensitive insulin will become available to people with diabetes in the near future.

Topics: Animals; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Glucose Transporter Type 1; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Polymers

Insulin is a lifesaving drug for patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus. Many type 2 diabetes mellitus patients will eventually require insulin. The rapid-acting and long-acting insulin analogues (RAIAs and LAIAs) have a pharmacological profile that closely mimics normal human physiology when compared to Neutral Protamine Hagedorn (NPH) insulin and regular human insulin, respectively. Glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) were found to have a proven cardiovascular safety. They are preferred over insulin in many recent guidelines. Fixed-ratio combinations of GLP-1RAs and insulin are also recommended when either of these molecules fail to achieve glycaemic control. Despite decades of experience in using insulin, there is a debate among the scientific community over the safety of exogenous insulin, especially regarding their cardiovascular safety and the risk of cancer. There is also an ongoing debate regarding the safety, even though two long-acting insulin analogues (glargine and degludec) have proven their cardiovascular non-inferiority. Drugs with proven safety are often preferred in patients with pre-existing cardiovascular disease or at high risk of cardiovascular disease. In this review we will critically analyse efficacy and safety issues related to insulin molecules to help in clinical decision making.

Topics: Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting

Topics: Clinical Trials as Topic; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Injections, Subcutaneous; Insulin Glargine

Treatment of type 2 diabetes (T2D) requires progressive therapy intensification to reach and maintain individualized glycemic targets. iGlarLixi, a fixed-ratio combination of insulin glargine 100 U/mL (iGlar) and lixisenatide (Lixi), has been shown to provide robust HbA

Topics: Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Combinations; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine

One of the effective and consistent ways to achieve glycaemic control for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is once-daily basal insulin. But it is also associated with adverse outcomes such as hypoglycaemia. Dulaglutide, a novel long-acting GLP-1 receptor agonist, may be a more suitable therapy. The present meta-analysis aims to assess the efficacy and safety of once-weekly glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist dulaglutide compared with insulin glargine for the treatment of T2DM.. We searched PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library from inception to December 2020. Randomized clinical trials comparing dulaglutide with insulin glargine in adults with T2DM were included. Revman5.2 software was used for meta-analysis.. We included 5 studies with 3383 randomized participants. Compared with insulin glargine, dulaglutide 1.5 mg led to greater mean HbA1c reduction (MD = -0.33%, 95% CI = -0.52, -0.15) whereas dulaglutide 0.75 mg did not (MD = -0.21%, 95% CI = -0.43, 0.01). Body weight loss was seen with dulaglutide whereas weight gain was seen with insulin glargine. The risk of hypoglycaemia was lower in dulaglutide 0.75 mg and 1.5 mg groups than in insulin glargine group,whereas dulaglutide had a statistically higher gastrointestinal adverse events incidence than insulin glargine.. Compared with insulin glargine, dulaglutide may serve as an effective alternative to provide improvement in glycaemic control with weight loss and less hypoglycaemia in patients with T2DM. It may be a more suitable therapy instead of basal insulin.

Topics: Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Administration Schedule; Glucagon-Like Peptides; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Immunoglobulin Fc Fragments; Insulin Glargine; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Recombinant Fusion Proteins; Weight Gain; Weight Loss

The discovery of insulin in 1921 and the progress achieved in the ensuing century highlight the promise and challenge of biochemically modifying the molecule to achieve optimization of its delivery and therapeutic efficacy. Normal endogenous insulin secretion consists of a highly orchestrated physiologic loop wherein multiple metabolic signals trigger the pancreatic β cells to secrete the precise amount of insulin into the portal system required to maintain euglycemia. Accordingly, in the treatment of diabetes, attempting to replicate this complex physiology with exogenous insulin therapy given subcutaneously presents a clinical challenge. In this context, recombinant DNA-based technology has enabled the development of insulin analogs that have been specifically designed to confer advantageous pharmacodynamic features that can better mimic endogenous insulin secretion. In this review, we discuss the development of the most widely available insulin preparations and provide evidence-based insight into their use in clinical practice.

Topics: Blood Glucose; Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Delivery Systems; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin Lispro

Evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) has shown that second-generation basal insulin (BI) analogues, insulin glargine 300 U/mL (Gla-300) and insulin degludec (IDeg), provide similar glycaemic control, with a lower risk of hypoglycaemia compared with the first-generation BI analogue insulin glargine 100 U/mL (Gla-100) in people with type 2 diabetes (T2D). However, the highly selected participants and frequent follow-up of RCTs may not be truly representative of real-life clinical practice. It is important to assess the safety and effectiveness of these second-generation BI analogues in real-life clinical practice settings. The DELIVER programme utilized electronic healthcare records from the United States to compare clinical outcomes in people with T2D who received either Gla-300 or other BI analogues in real-world clinical practice. This review provides a concise overview of the results of the DELIVER studies. Overall, Gla-300 provided similar antihyperglycaemic effectiveness and a lower risk of hypoglycaemia versus the first-generation BI analogues Gla-100 and insulin detemir in people with T2D who had switched BIs. In those who were insulin-naïve, initiation with Gla-300 versus Gla-100 was associated with significantly better antihyperglycaemic effectiveness and similar or lower hypoglycaemic risk. Both glycaemic control and hypoglycaemia risk were also shown to be similar with Gla-300 and IDeg, in people who had switched BIs and in those who were insulin-naïve. In addition, the DELIVER 2 study reported that people with T2D who switched to Gla-300 had reduced healthcare resource utilization, with an overall saving of US$1439 per person per year compared with those who switched to another BI analogue. Overall, the real-world DELIVER programme showed that the glycaemic control with a low risk of hypoglycaemia observed with Gla-300 in RCTs was also seen in standard clinical practice.

Topics: Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine

To evaluate efficacy and safety of Gla-300 with Gla-100 in a patient-level meta-analysis among large East Asian patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).. A patient level meta-analysis of three EDITION studies with similar design and endpoints were conducted over 6-months treatment period. The analysis included 547 patients treated with Gla-300 and 348 patients treated with Gla-100.. Over 6-month treatment period, mean change in HbA1c was similar for Gla-300 [Least square (LS) mean, (SE): -1.13 (0.05) % and Gla-100: -1.14 (0.05) %], showing non-inferiority of Gla-300 to Gla-100 (LS mean difference: 0.02%, 95% CI: -0.08 to 0.11). Gla-300 was associated with reduced risk of hypoglycemic event (confirmed ≤ 3.9 mmol/L or severe) vs Gla-100 at any time of day or at night (00:00-05:59 h). The event rates of hypoglycemia were consistently lower with Gla-300 than Gla-100. Severe hypoglycemia was rare in both treatment groups. Weight gain was minimal in both treatment groups.. Gla-300 provides comparable glycemic control to Gla-100 in East Asian patients with broad clinical spectrum of T2DM, with consistently less hypoglycemia at any time of the day and night.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Asia, Eastern; Asian People; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Glycemic Control; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine; Male; Middle Aged; Multicenter Studies as Topic; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Weight Gain

Many patients with type 2 diabetes will ultimately require the inclusion of basal insulin in their treatment regimen. Since most people with type 2 diabetes are managed in the community, it is important that primary care providers understand and correctly manage the initiation and titration of basal insulins, and help patients to self-manage insulin injections. Newer, long-acting basal insulins provide greater stability and flexibility than older preparations and improved delivery systems. Basal insulin is usually initiated at a conservative dose of 10 units/day or 0.1-0.2 units/kg/day, then titrated thereafter over several weeks or months, based on patients' self-measured fasting plasma glucose, to achieve an individualized target (usually 80-130 mg/dL). Through a shared decision-making process, confirmation of appropriate goals and titration methods should be established, including provisions for events that might alter scheduled titration (e.g. travel, dietary change, illness, hospitalization, etc.). Although switching between basal insulins is usually easily accomplished, pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic differences between formulations require clinicians to provide explicit guidance to patients. Basal insulin is effective long-term, but overbasalization (continuing to escalate dose without a meaningful reduction in fasting plasma glucose) should be avoided.Key messagesPrimary care providers often initiate basal insulin for people with type 2 diabetes.Basal insulin is recommended to be initiated at 10 units/day or 0.1-0.2 units/kg/day, and doses must be titrated to agreed fasting plasma glucose goals, usually 80-130 mg/dL. A simple rule is to gradually increase the initial dose by 1 unit per day (NPH, insulin detemir, and glargine 100 units/mL) or 2-4 units once or twice per week (NPH, insulin detemir, glargine 100 and 300 units/mL, and degludec) until FPG levels remain consistently within the target range. If warranted, switching between basal insulins can be done using simple regimens.The dose of basal insulin should be increased as required up to approximately 0.5-1.0 units/kg/day in some cases. Overbasalization (continuing to escalate dose without a meaningful reduction in fasting plasma glucose) is not recommended; rather re-evaluation of individual therapy, including consideration of more concentrated basal insulin preparations and/or short-acting prandial insulin as well as other glucose-lowering therapies, is suggested.

Topics: Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Detemir; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Primary Health Care

NO. Insulin glargine may lead to less patient-reported, symptomatic, and nocturnal hypoglycemia, although overall, there may not be a difference in the risk for severe hypoglycemia orhypoglycemiarelated emergency department (ED) visits and hospitalizations (strength of recommendation [SOR]: B, systematic review of randomized controlled trials [RCTs], individual RCTs, and observational study).

Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Female; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Isophane; Male; Middle Aged; Treatment Outcome

To assess the efficacy and safety of iGlarLixi, a fixed-ratio combination of basal insulin glargine 100 U/mL and lixisenatide (glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist) versus IDegAsp, a co-formulation of basal insulin degludec 100 U/mL with rapid-acting insulin aspart.. A systematic literature search of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was performed. Outcomes from eligible RCTs were compared by an indirect treatment comparison using a Bayesian framework. Subanalyses of Japanese and international trials were performed.. Eight RCTs (duration 26-30 weeks) were included. Mean difference in HbA1c change with iGlarLixi exceeded that for IDegAsp: -0.64 (95% credible interval -1.01, -0.28) %-units (-7.0 [-11.0, -3.1] mmol/mol) for all trials, -0.39 (-0.55, -0.23) %-units (-4.3 [-6.0, -2.5] mmol/mol) for international, and -0.88 (-1.11, -0.64) %-units (-9.6 [-12.1, -7.0] mmol/mol) for Japanese trials. HbA1c target achievement (<7.0%-units [<53 mmol/mol]) was greater for iGlarLixi in all trials (odds ratio 2.50 [1.06, 5.56]) and Japanese trials (2.17 [1.27, 3.70]), but not in international trials (2.17 [0.42, 11.11]). Analyses suggesting differences in mean postmeal self-measured plasma glucose were significantly lower by 1.0-2.0 mmol/L (18-36 mg/dL) with iGlarLixi in all analyses. Bodyweight change was more favourable (1-2 kg) for iGlarLixi versus IDegAsp for all analyses (P < 0.05). Comparisons of hypoglycaemia were inconclusive owing to differences in definitions between studies. Adverse events were more frequent with iGlarLixi because of gastrointestinal intolerance.. iGlarLixi appears to offer clinical benefit in glucose control and bodyweight change in people needing both basal and meal-time intervention.

Topics: Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Combinations; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine

Over 10 million people in Japan have known or suspected type 2 diabetes (T2D), and this number is expected to rise. Although many people require therapy escalation because of the progressive nature of T2D, this appears to be suboptimal in Japanese real-world clinical practice. Insulin therapy tends to be introduced only when glycaemic control is very poor (mean glycated haemoglobin >9%). Although basal insulin therapy is effective in reducing fasting plasma glucose (FPG), postprandial plasma glucose often remains uncontrolled. Basal-bolus insulin regimens are complex and carry the risk of weight gain and hypoglycaemia. Recently, fixed-ratio combinations (FRCs) of BI and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) have shown efficacy in reducing both FPG and postprandial plasma glucose with a single injection and without increased risk of hypoglycaemia or weight gain. IDegLira, a titratable FRC of insulin degludec (100 U/mL) and liraglutide, is currently available in Japan and the United States/European Union at a ratio of 1 U (unit):0.036 mg. iGlarLixi (insulin glargine 100 U/mL and lixisenatide at a ratio of 1:1 (20 U/20 μg) has recently been approved in Japan. Phase 3 trials in Japan for IDegLira (DUAL Japan) and iGlarLixi (LixiLan JP) have shown that both FRCs are efficacious. This review provides an overview of IDegLira and iGlarLixi (Japanese formulation) and considers their potential use as new therapeutic options to address the clinical need for early glycaemic control in Japanese people with T2D.

Topics: Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine; Japan

Severe hypoglycaemia (SH) remains a challenge to people with type 1 diabetes (T1DM), and new-generation basal insulins may improve patient outcomes. This post hoc meta-analysis explored the risk of SH with insulin glargine 300 U/mL (Gla-300) versus glargine 100 U/mL (Gla-100) in a pooled population with T1DM from three randomized, multicentre, 6-month similarly designed phase 3 trials: EDITION 4, EDITION JP 1 and EDITION JUNIOR. Endpoints included incidence and time to first occurrence of SH. Among 629 and 626 participants randomized to Gla-300 and Gla-100, respectively, glycated haemoglobin reductions were similar. Fewer participants experienced ≥1 SH event with Gla-300 (6.2%) than with Gla-100 (9.3%). From baseline to month 6, the risk of a first SH event was lower with Gla-300: hazard ratio 0.65 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.44-0.98; stratified log-rank test P = 0.038]. SH event rates were numerically lower with Gla-300 versus Gla-100 from baseline to month 6 [relative risk (RR) 0.80 (95% CI 0.49-1.29); P = 0.356] and baseline to week 8 [RR 0.73 (95% CI 0.37-1.44); P = 0.369]. Thus, Gla-300 demonstrated similar glycaemic control with lower risk of SH versus Gla-100, particularly during the titration period.

Topics: Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hyperglycemia; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine; Risk

To estimate the relative treatment effect between the fixed-ratio combinations iGlarLixi and IDegLira (glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonist with basal insulin) in people with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled on a glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonist.. A systematic literature review of randomized controlled trials followed by an indirect treatment comparison was performed to compare the efficacy and safety of the available fixed-ratio combinations. Main outcomes were glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) change and target achievement [<6.5% and <7.0% (<48 and <53 mmol/mol)], fasting plasma glucose, self-monitored plasma glucose, body weight, and incidence and rate of hypoglycaemia.. From 4850 abstracts screened, 78 qualified for full-text article review and two randomized controlled trials were included. Baseline characteristics were similar in the two studies. The mean difference at 26 weeks between IDegLira and iGlarLixi was -0.36 (95% credible intervals -0.58, -0.14) % [-3.9 (-6.3, -1.5) mmol/mol] for HbA1c and -1.0 (-1.6, -0.4) mmol/L for fasting plasma glucose. No significant differences were found in HbA1c target attainment, preprandial or postprandial self-monitored plasma glucose, or body weight change. Formal comparisons of hypoglycaemia were limited by differences in definitions between the studies: in non-sulphonylurea users, incidence was 28% for IDegLira ('confirmed' at ≤3.1 mmol/L); for iGlarLixi, incidence was 9% ('documented symptomatic' at <3.0 mmol/L).. Results of this indirect treatment comparison using two studies suggest iGlarLixi and IDegLira appear to offer similar benefits for HbA1c target achievement. However, the findings suggest differences in other glycaemia results and hypoglycaemia, which may reflect differences in study design and titration approaches.

Topics: Adult; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Combinations; Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Liraglutide; Peptides

Insulin is the most effective antihyperglycemic treatment and basal insulin is the preferred initial formulation in patients with type 2 diabetes. However, its effects are dose-dependent, so adequate titration is necessary to reach targets. We performed a meta-analysis to compare the efficacy and safety of patient-led versus physician-led titration of basal insulin in patients with uncontrolled type 2 diabetes.. Four databases were searched from database inception through March 2020. Randomized controlled studies with at least 12 weeks of follow-up of patients with type 2 diabetes allocated to patient-led versus physician-led titration of basal insulin were selected. Data on glycemic endpoints (hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), fasting plasma glucose (FPG), hypoglycemia) and other outcomes (insulin dose, body weight, patient-reported outcomes, adverse events, rescue medication, discontinuation) were extracted. Data were pooled using a random-effects model.. Six studies evaluating 12 409 patients were finally included. Compared with the physician-led performance, patient-led titration was associated with a statistically significant higher basal insulin dose (+6 IU/day), leading to benefits on HbA1c (-0.1%) and FPG (-5 mg/dL), despite a higher risk of any level hypoglycemia (relative risk=1.1) and a slight increase in body weight (+0.2 kg). No difference was found for the other outcomes.. The present study showed that patient-led titration of basal insulin was not inferior to physician-led titration in patients with uncontrolled type 2 diabetes. Therefore, diabetes self-management education and support programs on basal insulin should be widely adopted in clinical practice and patients provided with tools to self-adjust their dose when necessary.

Topics: Algorithms; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Humans; Insulin Glargine; Physicians; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic

To assess the efficacy and safety of iGlarLixi, a fixed-ratio combination of insulin glargine 100 U/mL and lixisenatide, relative to premix insulin and other insulin options through network meta-analysis.. A systematic literature search identified randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing iGlarLixi, premix insulin or basal insulin (BI) in combination with meal-time insulin, in people inadequately controlled with BI. Eligible RCTs were compared using Bayesian network meta-analysis.. Eight RCTs, some open-label, involving 3538 participants, with a study duration of 24-30 weeks were included. The estimated difference in HbA1c reduction with iGlarLixi compared with premix insulin was -0.50%-units (95% credible interval: -0.93 to -0.06) with 98% probability of iGlarLixi being superior to premix. Estimates for iGlarLixi versus meal-time + BI (thrice-daily meal-time insulin + basal) and basal-plus (once-daily meal-time insulin + BI) were -0.35 (-0.89 to +0.13)%-units and -0.68 (-1.18 to -0.17)%-units with probabilities of real difference of 94% and 99%, respectively. Safety outcome analysis suggested that iGlarLixi had lower rates of both confirmed and documented symptomatic hypoglycaemia compared with premix insulin (probabilities of 85% and 93%, respectively) and lower weight gain (probability 98%).. iGlarLixi showed similar or improved efficacy and safety versus other intensification choices from BI included in this study, providing a clinically relevant treatment option in people with type 2 diabetes not well controlled on BI.

Topics: Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Combinations; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Network Meta-Analysis; Peptides

Most practice guidelines recommend the use of longacting or pre-mixed insulin at the initiation of insulin therapy in type 2 diabetes, especially in patients not achieving glycaemic goals. Nonetheless, there are some specific indications where basal bolus insulin is the preferred regimen for insulin initiation. These include the "5S" situations - 'Severe' hyperglycaemia, 'Symptomatic' diabetes, 'Sick' diabetes (acute or chronic comorbidity), 'Special' situations (pregnancy, childhood, adolescence) and 'Secondary' diabetes (pancreatic, drug-induced, endocrine disorders). This review describes a practical approach to initiation and follow up of basal bolus insulin regimens.

Topics: Adolescent; Blood Glucose; Child; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Treatment Outcome

Kidney transplantation is the preferred management for patients with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD). However, it is often complicated by worsening or new-onset diabetes. The safety and efficacy of glucose-lowering agents after kidney transplantation is largely unknown. This is an update of a review first published in 2017.. To evaluate the efficacy and safety of glucose-lowering agents for treating pre-existing and new onset diabetes in people who have undergone kidney transplantation.. We searched the Cochrane Kidney and Transplant Register of Studies up to 16 January 2020 through contact with the Information Specialist using search terms relevant to this review. Studies in the Register are identified through searches of CENTRAL, MEDLINE, and EMBASE, conference proceedings, the International Clinical Trials Register (ICTRP) Search Portal and ClinicalTrials.gov.. All randomised controlled trials (RCTs), quasi-RCTs and cross-over studies examining head-to-head comparisons of active regimens of glucose-lowering therapy or active regimen compared with placebo/standard care in patients who have received a kidney transplant and have diabetes were eligible for inclusion.. Four authors independently assessed study eligibility and quality and performed data extraction. Continuous outcomes were expressed as post-treatment mean differences (MD) or standardised mean difference (SMD). Adverse events were expressed as post-treatment absolute risk differences (RD). Dichotomous clinical outcomes were presented as risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI).. Ten studies (21 records, 603 randomised participants) were included - three additional studies (five records) since our last review. Four studies compared more intensive versus less intensive insulin therapy; two studies compared dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors to placebo; one study compared DPP-4 inhibitors to insulin glargine; one study compared sodium glucose co-transporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors to placebo; and two studies compared glitazones and insulin to insulin therapy alone. The majority of studies had an unclear to a high risk of bias. There were no studies examining the effects of biguanides, glinides, GLP-1 agonists, or sulphonylureas. Compared to less intensive insulin therapy, it is unclear if more intensive insulin therapy has an effect on transplant or graft survival (4 studies, 301 participants: RR 1.12, 95% CI 0.32 to 3.94; I. The efficacy and safety of glucose-lowering agents in the treatment of pre-existing and new-onset diabetes in kidney transplant recipients is questionable. Evidence from existing studies examining the effect of intensive insulin therapy, DPP-4 inhibitors, SGLT inhibitors and glitazones is mostly of low to very low certainty. Appropriately blinded, larger, and higher quality RCTs are needed to evaluate and compare the safety and efficacy of contemporary glucose-lowering agents in the kidney transplant population.

Topics: Adamantane; Bias; Cause of Death; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Fasting; Glycated Hemoglobin; Graft Survival; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Kidney Transplantation; Nitriles; Pioglitazone; Postoperative Complications; Pyrrolidines; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Sitagliptin Phosphate; Sodium-Glucose Transporter 2 Inhibitors; Thiazolidinediones; Transplant Recipients; Vildagliptin

Approximately 50% of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) do not achieve glycemic targets and require treatment intensification. A fixed-ratio combination of a glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist (GLP-1 RA) with basal insulin, such as lixisenatide with insulin glargine (iGlarLixi), exploits the complementary mechanisms of action of each component to address hyperglycemia while mitigating potential adverse events (AEs). The iGlarLixi dose is titrated considering the effect of basal insulin on fasting plasma glucose, and the fixed-ratio combination ensures that the lixisenatide dose never exceeds 20 μg/day. We describe the characteristics of iGlarLixi therapy, based on the LixiLan clinical program, and provide guidance on the characteristics of patients likely to benefit from such treatment in routine clinical practice. In the phase III LixiLan trials, iGlarLixi resulted in significantly greater reductions in glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), better achievement of HbA1c targets, less glycemic variability versus insulin glargine, lixisenatide or GLP-1 RA alone, and was associated with weight control, less hypoglycemia versus insulin glargine, and fewer GI AEs versus lixisenatide. Findings were consistent regardless of age, diabetes duration, and baseline HbA1c. The efficacy, safety, and convenient once-daily administration schedule of iGlarLixi make it a valuable treatment option for patients with T2DM requiring treatment intensification.

Topics: Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Combinations; Female; Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor; Glycated Hemoglobin; Glycemic Control; Humans; Hyperglycemia; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine; Male; Peptides

Evidence that antihyperglycaemic therapy is beneficial for people with type 2 diabetes mellitus is conflicting. While the United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) found tighter glycaemic control to be positive, other studies, such as the Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes (ACCORD) trial, found the effects of an intensive therapy to lower blood glucose to near normal levels to be more harmful than beneficial. Study results also showed different effects for different antihyperglycaemic drugs, regardless of the achieved blood glucose levels. In consequence, firm conclusions on the effect of interventions on patient-relevant outcomes cannot be drawn from the effect of these interventions on blood glucose concentration alone. In theory, the use of newer insulin analogues may result in fewer macrovascular and microvascular events.. To compare the effects of long-term treatment with (ultra-)long-acting insulin analogues (insulin glargine U100 and U300, insulin detemir and insulin degludec) with NPH (neutral protamine Hagedorn) insulin (human isophane insulin) in adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus.. For this Cochrane Review update, we searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, ICTRP Search Portal and ClinicalTrials.gov. The date of the last search was 5 November 2019, except Embase which was last searched 26 January 2017. We applied no language restrictions.. We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the effects of treatment with (ultra-)long-acting insulin analogues to NPH in adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus.. Two review authors independently selected trials, assessed risk of bias, extracted data and evaluated the overall certainty of the evidence using GRADE. Trials were pooled using random-effects meta-analyses.. We identified 24 RCTs. Of these, 16 trials compared insulin glargine to NPH insulin and eight trials compared insulin detemir to NPH insulin. In these trials, 3419 people with type 2 diabetes mellitus were randomised to insulin glargine and 1321 people to insulin detemir. The duration of the included trials ranged from 24 weeks to five years. For studies, comparing insulin glargine to NPH insulin, target values ranged from 4.0 mmol/L to 7.8 mmol/L (72 mg/dL to 140 mg/dL) for fasting blood glucose (FBG), from 4.4 mmol/L to 6.6 mmol/L (80 mg/dL to 120 mg/dL) for nocturnal blood glucose and less than 10 mmol/L (180 mg/dL) for postprandial blood glucose, when applicable. Blood glucose and glycosylated haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) target values for studies comparing insulin detemir to NPH insulin ranged from 4.0 mmol/L to 7.0 mmol/L (72 mg/dL to 126 mg/dL) for FBG, less than 6.7 mmol/L (120 mg/dL) to less than 10 mmol/L (180 mg/dL) for postprandial blood glucose, 4.0 mmol/L to 7.0 mmol/L (72 mg/dL to 126 mg/dL) for nocturnal blood glucose and 5.8% to less than 6.4% HbA1c, when applicable. All trials had an unclear or high risk of bias for several risk of bias domains. Overall, insulin glargine and insulin detemir resulted in fewer participants experiencing hypoglycaemia when compared with NPH insulin. Changes in HbA1c were comparable for long-acting insulin analogues and NPH insulin. Insulin glargine compared to NPH insulin had a risk ratio (RR) for severe hypoglycaemia of 0.68 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.46 to 1.01; P = 0.06; absolute risk reduction (ARR) -1.2%, 95% CI -2.0 to 0; 14 trials, 6164 participants; very low-certainty evidence). The RR for serious hypoglycaemia was 0.75 (95% CI 0.52 to 1.09; P = 0.13; ARR -0.7%, 95% CI -1.3 to 0.2; 10 trials, 4685 participants; low-certainty evidence). Treatment with insulin glargine reduced the incidence of confirmed hypoglycaemia and confirmed nocturnal hypoglycaemia. Treatment with insulin detemir compared to NPH insulin found an RR for severe hypoglycaemia of 0.45 (95% CI 0.17 to 1.20; P = 0.11; ARR -0.9%, 95% CI -1.4 to 0.4; 5 trials, 1804 participants; very low-certainty evidence). The Peto odds ratio for serious hypoglycaemia was 0.16, 95% CI 0.04 to 0.61; P = 0.007; ARR -0.9%, 95% CI -1.1 to -0.4; 5 trials, 1777 participants; low-certainty evidence). Treatment with detemir also reduced the incidence of confirmed hypoglycaemia and confirmed nocturnal hypoglycaemia. Information on patient-relevant outcomes such. While the effects on HbA1c were comparable, treatment with insulin glargine and insulin detemir resulted in fewer participants experiencing hypoglycaemia when compared with NPH insulin. Treatment with insulin detemir also reduced the incidence of serious hypoglycaemia. However, serious hypoglycaemic events were rare and the absolute risk reducing effect was low. Approximately one in 100 people treated with insulin detemir instead of NPH insulin benefited. In the studies, low blood glucose and HbA1c targets, corresponding to near normal or even non-diabetic blood glucose levels, were set. Therefore, results from the studies are only applicable to people in whom such low blood glucose concentrations are targeted. However, current guidelines recommend less-intensive blood glucose lowering for most people with type 2 diabetes in daily practice (e.g. people with cardiovascular diseases, a long history of type 2 diabetes, who are susceptible to hypoglycaemia or older people). Additionally, low-certainty evidence and trial designs that did not conform with current clinical practice meant it remains unclear if the same effects will be observed in daily clinical practice. Most trials did not report patient-relevant outcomes.

Topics: Bias; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Hemoglobin A; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Detemir; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Isophane; Insulin, Long-Acting; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic

Ever since the discovery of insulin a century ago, relentless attempts have been made to develop insulins that closely mimic the timeaction- profile of human physiologic insulin. The early basal insulins like neutral protamine Hagedorn (NPH), were intermediate-acting, with high risk of hypoglycemia. These primary limitations led to attempts at developing improved basal insulins with a longer duration of action. After several attempts at prolonging insulin action using phenol and structural modifications of the insulin hexamer, insulin glargine was developed in 1988. The superior and unique pharmacological properties, longer duration of action, and significantly lowered risk of hypoglycemia enabled insulin glargine to be distinguished from NPH as a better basal insulin, providing holistic glycemic control. The present review highlights the circumstances that led to the search of truly basal insulins, focusing on the journey of insulin glargine 100 U/mL (Gla-100).

Topics: Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting

Fueled by perceptions regarding Indian dietary patterns and premixed insulin's claim to fame of providing dual fasting and post-prandial control, there was a greater inclination towards using premixed insulins in clinical practice until the last decade. However, the advent of insulin glargine 100 U/mL (Gla-100) opened up a new dimension in insulin therapy landscape in India. The data from the last 5 years reveal that Gla-100 has gained more traction among Indian clinical practitioners. Basis evidences that have emerged from various clinical studies, this present review elaborates on certain key issues which have helped Gla-100 carve its own niche and effected a progressive shift in insulin prescription pattern in India.

Topics: Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; India; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulins

Cardiovascular diseases (CVD) risk in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is two to four folds higher than in individuals without T2DM. Insulin therapy was speculated to be atherogenic- thereby aggravating CVD risk years ago. However, cardiovascular outcome trials (CVOTs) such as the Outcome Reduction with Initial Glargine Intervention (ORIGIN), and its extended follow-up study - ORIGIN and Legacy Effects (ORIGINALE) conclusively established the long-term cardiovascular (CV) safety of basal insulin, such as insulin glargine 100 U/mL (Gla-100). Moreover, these studies hinted at the possible benefits of early insulin therapy-including stalling the progression of diabetes with minimal weight gain and hypoglycemia risk. This review highlights the background developments which led to the ORIGIN trial. Additionally, it also dwells on the critical insights to emerge from this trial pertaining to the CV safety of basal insulin Gla-100 in high CV risk individuals with T2DM.

Topics: Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Follow-Up Studies; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine

Type 2 diabetes is a chronic, progressive disease with increasing prevalence and still late diagnostic. This leads to an increase in the incidence of chronic complications, with signifi cantly increasing health costs. There is also a delay in the onset of insulin therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes for causes related to both patients and physicians. Despite advances in treatment, a low proportion of patients achieve adequate glycemic control. The high hypoglycemia prevalence, consequence of insulin, has led to the development of a new generation long-acting basal insulins to achieve a more stable and prolonged action profile, reducing the variability and risk of hypoglycemia. The EDITION program evaluated the efficacy and safety of glargine U300 compared to glargine U100 in patients with type 1 and 2 diabetes at different stages of the disease. Gla-300 is a new formulation of insulin glargine which has a more stable and prolonged pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profile. Gla-300 demonstrated efficacy and tolerability comparable to glargine U100, with a significant decrease in the risk of hypoglycemia, at night and in 24 hours, providing greater flexibility in the injection schedule, with a window of 6 hours. No increase in weight was observed compared to glargine U100. Bright study (2018) compared glargine U300 vs. degludec U100, demonstrating greater benefit in relation to the risk of hypoglycemia with Gla-300 during titration period. Gla-300 is a last-generation basal insulin, available to improve metabolic control, with a lower risk of hypoglycemia.. La diabetes mellitus tipo 2 tiene evolución crónica y progresiva, prevalencia creciente y aún es diagnosticada tardíamente. Esto conlleva mayor incidencia de complicaciones crónicas, con incremento de costos en salud. Existe retraso en el inicio de insulinoterapia por causas relacionadas tanto al paciente como al médico. A pesar de los avances en su tratamiento, una baja proporción de enfermos logra control glucémico adecuado. La alta prevalencia de hipoglucemia en pacientes insulino-tratados, impulsó el desarrollo de una nueva generación de insulinas basales de acción prolongada, mayor estabilidad con menor variabilidad y riesgo de hipoglucemias. El programa EDITION evaluó la eficacia y seguridad de glargina U300 vs. glargina U100 en pacientes con diabetes tipo 1 y 2, en distintas etapas de la enfermedad. Glargina U300 es una nueva formulación de insulina glargina con perfil farmacocinético y farmacodinámico más estable y prolongado que glargina U100. Glargina U300 demostró eficacia y tolerabilidad comparable a glargina U100, con descenso significativo del riesgo de hipoglucemias nocturnas y en 24 horas, aportando mayor flexibilidad en el horario de inyección, con una ventana de 6 horas. Además, no se observó mayor aumento de peso que con glargina U100. El estudio Bright (2018) comparó glargina U300 vs. degludec U100, demostrando mayor beneficio en relación al riesgo de hipoglucemia con Gla-300 durante el período de titulación. Gla-300 es una insulina basal de última generación, disponible para mejorar el control metabólico, con menor riesgo de hipoglucemia.

Topics: Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Evidence-Based Medicine; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine

Estimates suggest that there are currently 122.8 million adults 65-99 years of age living with diabetes, of whom 90-95% are diagnosed with type 2 diabetes (T2D). Over the past two decades, a greater understanding of the complex and multifactorial pathogenesis of T2D has resulted in the development and introduction of new-generation classes of glucose-lowering therapies, which are now extensively endorsed by prevailing guidelines and are increasingly being used worldwide. These newer agents may further assist in the effective pharmacological management of T2D through the provision of patient-centered care that acknowledges multimorbidity and is respectful of and responsive to individual patient preferences and barriers. Given these considerations, the therapeutic approach in older patients with T2D is complex, particularly in those who have functional dependence, frailty, dementia, or who are at end-of-life. It is currently too early to draw conclusions on the long-term use of newer glucose-lowering agents in this population, as their efficacy and safety in older adults remains largely unknown. In this review, we will discuss considerations for the use of glucose-lowering treatments in older adults, with particular focus on the use of basal insulin and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists, and the rationale for the use of combination therapy comprising these agents. Finally, we will review clinical data from studies of the fixed-ratio combination of insulin glargine and lixisenatide in older patients with T2D. FUNDING: Sanofi US, Inc.

Topics: Activities of Daily Living; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Aging; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Frailty; Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Peptides

The EDITION trials in type 2 diabetes demonstrated comparable glycaemic control with less nocturnal and anytime (24-hour) hypoglycaemia for insulin glargine 300 U/mL (Gla-300) versus glargine 100 U/mL (Gla-100). However, the predefined nocturnal window (0:00-5:59 AM) may not be the most relevant for clinical practice. This post-hoc analysis compared expansions of the predefined nocturnal interval during basal insulin treatment without prandial insulin. Patient-level, 6-month data, pooled from the EDITION 2 and 3 trials and the EDITION JP 2 trial (N = 1922, basal insulin only) were analysed. Accompanying hypoglycaemia during treatment with Gla-300 was compared to that during treatment with Gla-100, using predefined (0:00-5:59 AM) and expanded (10:00 PM-5:59 AM, 0:00-7:59 AM, 10:00 PM to pre-breakfast SMPG) windows. Confirmed (≤3.9 mmol/L [≤70 mg/dL]) or severe hypoglycaemic events were reported most frequently between 6:00 AM and 8:00 AM. Windows expanded beyond 6:00 AM included more events than other windows. The percentage of participants with at least one event was lower with Gla-300 than Gla-100 in all windows examined. Expanding the nocturnal interval allows better assessment of the risk of hypoglycaemia associated with basal insulin. The risk of nocturnal hypoglycaemia was consistently lower with Gla-300 versus Gla-100 using all four windows.

Topics: Adult; Circadian Rhythm; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Male; Multicenter Studies as Topic; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Retrospective Studies; Risk Factors; Time Factors

Topics: Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Approval; Drug Combinations; Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Liraglutide; Medication Adherence; Peptides; Practice Guidelines as Topic

Second-generation basal insulin analogues (e.g. insulin degludec, insulin glargine 300 U/mL), were designed to further extend the duration of insulin action and reduce within-day and day-to-day variability, and consequently hypoglycaemia risk, versus earlier long-acting basal insulins. This review examines the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic characteristics of insulin degludec (100, 200 U/mL) and insulin glargine (100, 300 U/mL), and their influence on clinical outcomes.. Available pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic publications comparing insulin degludec and insulin glargine were reviewed.. Both insulin degludec and insulin glargine 300 U/mL have more prolonged and stable pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic profiles than the earlier basal insulin analogue, insulin glargine 100 U/mL. Insulin glargine 300 U/mL (0.4 U/kg, morning) showed a more stable pharmacodynamic profile (20% lower within-day variability [P = 0.047]) and more even 24-h distribution (over each 6-h quartile) than insulin degludec 100 U/mL, whereas the supratherapeutic 0.6 U/kg dose demonstrated a similar, albeit non-significant, trend. In contrast, a second clamp study indicated lower day-to-day variability in the 24-h glucose-lowering effect (variance ratio 3.70, P < 0.0001), and more even dosing over each 6-h quartile, with insulin degludec 200 U/mL versus insulin glargine 300 U/mL (0.4 U/kg, evening). Methodological differences and differences in bioequivalence that may explain these discrepancies are discussed.. Compared with earlier insulin analogues, second-generation basal insulins have improved pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic profiles that translate into clinical benefits, primarily reduced nocturnal-hypoglycaemia risk. Additional head-to-head comparisons of insulin degludec and insulin glargine 300 U/mL at bioequivalent doses, utilising continuous glucose monitoring and/or real-world evidence, are required to elucidate the differences in their pharmacological and clinical profiles.

Topics: Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Prognosis

To identify factors associated with achievement of glycated haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) target at 24 weeks after commencing basal insulin therapy in individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).. Post-hoc pooled analysis of 16 randomized, treat-to-target trials involving individuals with T2DM inadequately controlled with oral anti-hyperglycaemic drugs (n = 3415) initiated on once-daily insulin glargine 100 U/mL (Gla-100). Clinical outcomes were assessed by HbA1c response at 24 weeks and individuals were classified as "good responders" with HbA1c <7.0% (<53 mmol/mol) or as "poor responders" with HbA1c ≥7.0% (≥53 mmol/mol). Univariable and multivariable stepwise logistic regression analyses were performed to identify predictive factors for attaining HbA1c <7.0%.. Lower levels of baseline HbA1c, fasting plasma glucose (FPG) and post-prandial plasma glucose (PPG), higher body mass index (BMI), shorter diabetes duration and male sex were associated with a good glycaemic response, but not age or baseline C-peptide levels. Gla-100 dose (U/kg) was highest in the poor-responder group, which had the fewest hypoglycaemia episodes. Univariable analysis for achievement of HbA1c <7.0% confirmed these observations. Multivariable analysis retained baseline HbA1c, body weight, BMI, sex, 2-hours PPG and diabetes duration as predictors of a good response. Continued use of sulfonylureas, hypoglycaemia and change in body weight were indicative of poor response.. Baseline HbA1c was the strongest determinant for achieving target HbA1c <7.0% by supplementary Gla-100 therapy, while sex and BMI were also useful indicators. However, age and C-peptide levels at baseline did not predict glycaemic response to the introduction of basal insulin.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Insulin Glargine; Male; Middle Aged; Patient Care Planning; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult

To review evidence comparing benefits and harms of long-acting insulins in patients with type 1 and 2 diabetes.. MEDLINE and two Cochrane databases were searched during February 2018. Two authors selected studies meeting inclusion criteria and assessed their quality. Comparative studies of adult or paediatric patients with diabetes treated with insulin degludec, detemir or glargine were included. Meta-analysis was used to combine results of similar studies, and the I. Of 2534 citations reviewed, 70 studies met the inclusion criteria. No statistically significant differences in HbA1c were seen between any two insulins or formulations. Hypoglycaemia was less probable with degludec than with glargine, including nocturnal hypoglycaemia in type 1 (rate ratio 0.68, 95% CI 0.56-0.81) and type 2 diabetes (rate ratio 0.73, 95% CI 0.65-0.82), and severe hypoglycaemia in type 2 diabetes (relative risk 0.72, 95% CI 0.54-0.96). Patients with type 2 diabetes had higher rates of withdrawal because of adverse events when treated with detemir compared with glargine (relative risk 2.1, 95% CI 1.4-3.3). Adults taking detemir gained about 1 kg less body weight than those taking degludec (type 1) or glargine (type 2).. No differences in glycaemic control were seen between insulin degludec, detemir and glargine. Hypoglycaemia was less probable with degludec than glargine, and patients taking detemir gained less body weight than those given degludec or glargine. In type 2 diabetes, withdrawals as a result of adverse events were more probable with detemir than glargine.

Topics: Blood Glucose; Comparative Effectiveness Research; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Insulin Detemir; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Treatment Outcome; Weight Gain

New concentrated insulins (exceeding 100 units/mL) and dedicated devices have recently become available, offering new treatment options for people with diabetes, for basal and prandial insulin supplementation. The concentrated insulin formulations range from 2-fold concentration (insulin lispro 200 units/mL) with rapid-acting prandial action to 5-fold concentration (human regular insulin, 500 units/mL) with basal and short-acting prandial actions. Long-acting basal insulins include degludec 200 units/mL and glargine 300 units/mL. Concentrated insulins have been developed with the goal of easing insulin therapy by reducing the volume and number of injections and in some cases making use of altered pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties. This review summarizes the unique characteristics of each concentrated insulin to help healthcare providers and people with diabetes understand how to best use them.

Topics: Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Compounding; Drug Therapy, Combination; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine; Insulin Lispro; Insulin, Long-Acting; Insulin, Regular, Human; Insulins

The recent introduction of the second-generation long-acting analogue insulins degludec and insulin glargine U300 have increased the choice of basal insulin therapy for patients with type 2 diabetes. The pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of these insulins result in a flatter profile that lasts over 24 h and provides an increased window of administration of 6 h once daily. Large-scale multicentre randomised clinical trial programmes (BEGIN for degludec U100 and U200 and EDITION for glargine U300) evaluating these insulin therapies against glargine U100 have demonstrated that they are either non-inferior or superior for glycaemic efficacy and safety, but less likely to result in severe or nocturnal hypoglycaemia than glargine U100. The disposable pen devices for these insulins have been designed with patient satisfaction and convenience in mind. No concerns have arisen with adverse events with insulin analogues or cardiovascular safety from the ORIGIN and DEVOTE trials. As they demonstrate equivalent glycaemic efficacy to other basal insulins, they should be considered more in selected patient groups including those with recurrent or increased risk of hypoglycaemia, especially severe or nocturnal episodes, in the elderly or those living alone, and in patients with multiple co-morbidities such as cardiovascular or renal disease.

Topics: Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Administration Schedule; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Treatment Outcome

Diabetes during pregnancy has been linked to unfavorable maternal-fetal outcomes. Human insulins are the first drug of choice because of the proven safety in their use. However, there are still questions about the use of insulin analogs during pregnancy. The objective of the present study was to determine the effectiveness of insulin analogs compared with human insulin in the treatment of pregnant women with diabetes through a systematic review with meta-analysis. The search comprised the period since the inception of each database until July 2017, and the following databases were used: MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE, ISI Web of Science, LILACS, Scopus, SIGLE and Google Scholar. We have selected 29 original articles: 11 were randomized clinical trials and 18 were observational studies. We have explored data from 6,382 participants. All of the articles were classified as having an intermediate to high risk of bias. The variable that showed favorable results for the use of insulin analogs was gestational age, with a mean difference of - 0.26 (95 % confidence interval [CI]: 0.03-0.49;. Diabetes durante a gestação tem sido relacionado a desfechos materno-fetais desfavoráveis. As insulinas humanas são a primeira escolha medicamentosa, devido à comprovada segurança no seu uso. Entretanto, ainda há questionamentos sobre o uso dos análogos da insulina na gestação. O objetivo do presente estudo foi determinar a efetividade dos análogos da insulina comparados às insulinas humanas no tratamento de gestantes com diabetes por meio de uma revisão sistemática com metanálise. A busca compreendeu desde o início de cada base de dados até julho de 2017, e foi realizada nos seguintes bancos de dados: MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE, ISI Web of Science, LILACS, Scopus, SIGLE e Google Scholar. Selecionamos 29 artigos originais, sendo 11 ensaios clínicos randomizados e 18 estudos observacionais. Exploramos dados de 6.382 participantes. Todos os artigos foram classificados como sendo de intermediário a alto risco de viés. A variável que demonstrou resultado favorável ao uso dos análogos da insulina foi idade gestacional, com uma diferença média de - 0.26 (95% índice de confiança [IC]: 0.03–0.49;

Topics: Abortion, Spontaneous; Birth Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Diabetes, Gestational; Female; Fetal Macrosomia; Gestational Age; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Aspart; Insulin Glargine; Insulin Lispro; Observational Studies as Topic; Pregnancy; Prenatal Care; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Treatment Outcome

Since the introduction of insulin as a life-saving agent for patients with type 1 diabetes, insulin preparations have evolved to approximate physiologic insulin delivery profiles to meet prandial and basal insulin needs. While prandial insulins are designed to have quick time-action profiles that minimize postprandial glucose excursions, basal insulins are designed to have a protracted time-action profile to facilitate basal glucose control over 24 h. Given that all insulins have the same mechanism of action at the target tissue level, the differences in time-action profiles are achieved through different mechanisms of protraction, resulting in different behaviors in the subcutaneous space and different rates of absorption into the circulation. Herein, we evaluate the differences in basal insulin preparations based on their differential mechanisms of protraction, and the resulting clinical action profiles. Multiple randomized control trials and real-world evidence studies have demonstrated that the newer second-generation basal insulin analogs, insulin glargine 300 units/mL and insulin degludec 100 or 200 units/mL, provide stable glycemic control with once-daily dosing and are associated with a reduced risk of hypoglycemia compared with previous-generation basal insulin analogs insulin glargine 100 units/mL and insulin detemir. These advantages can lead to decreased healthcare resource utilization and cost. With this collective knowledge, healthcare providers and payers can make educated and well-informed decisions when determining which treatment regimen best meets the needs of each individual patient.Funding: Sanofi US, Inc.

Topics: Blood Glucose; Delayed-Action Preparations; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Detemir; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Postprandial Period

To investigate the efficacy and safety of insulin glargine 300 U/mL (Gla-300) vs insulin glargine 100 U/mL (Gla-100) over 12 months in a patient-level meta-analysis, using data from the EDITION studies in people with type 2 diabetes (T2DM).. EDITION 1, 2 and 3 were multicentre, randomized, open-label, 2-arm, parallel-group, treat-to-target phase IIIa studies. Similar study designs and endpoints enabled a meta-analysis to be conducted.. Reductions in glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) were better sustained over 12 months with Gla-300 than with Gla-100 (least squares [LS] mean difference in change from baseline: -0.10 % [95% confidence interval {CI} -0.18 to -0.02] or -1.09 mmol/mol [95% CI -2.01 to -0.20]; P = .0174). Risk of confirmed (≤3.9 mmol/L) or severe hypoglycaemia was 15% lower with Gla-300 vs Gla-100 at night (relative risk 0.85 [95% CI 0.77-0.92]) and 6% lower at any time of day (relative risk 0.94 [95% CI 0.90-0.98]). Rates of hypoglycaemia were 18% lower with Gla-300 vs Gla-100 at night (rate ratio 0.82 [95% CI 0.67-0.99]), but comparable at any time of day. HbA1c <7.0 % without nocturnal hypoglycaemia was achieved by 24% more participants with Gla-300 than with Gla-100 (relative risk 1.24 [95% CI 1.03-1.50]). Severe hypoglycaemia was rare; in both treatment groups the incidence of events at any time of day was ≤3.6%, while rates were ≤0.08 events per participant-year.. In a broad population of people with T2DM over 12 months, use of Gla-300 provided more sustained glycaemic control and significantly lower hypoglycaemia risk at night and at any time of day compared with Gla-100.

Topics: Body Weight; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine; Multicenter Studies as Topic; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Treatment Outcome

The inability to achieve optimal diabetes glucose control in people with diabetes is multifactorial, but one contributor may be inadequate control of postprandial glucose. In patients treated with multiple daily injections of insulin, both the dose and timing of meal-related rapid-acting insulin are key factors in this. There are conflicting opinions and evidence on the optimal time to administer mealtime insulin. We performed a comprehensive literature search to review the published data, focusing on the use of rapid-acting insulin analogues in patients with Type 1 diabetes. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic studies of rapid-acting insulin analogues, together with postprandial glucose excursion data, suggest that administering these 15-20 min before food would provide optimal postprandial glucose control. Data from clinical studies involving people with Type 1 diabetes receiving structured meals and rapid-acting insulin analogues support this, showing a reduction in post-meal glucose levels of ~30% and less hypoglycaemia when meal insulin was taken 15-20 min before a meal compared with immediately before the meal. Importantly, there was also a greater risk of postprandial hypoglycaemia when patients took rapid-acting analogues after eating compared with before eating.

Topics: Blood Glucose; Clinical Studies as Topic; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Aspart; Insulin Glargine; Insulin Lispro; Insulins; Postprandial Period

Subcutaneous once-daily LY2963016 insulin glargine (LY insulin glargine) [Abasaglar

Topics: Biosimilar Pharmaceuticals; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine

To evaluate the effect of concomitant dipeptidyl peptidase IV inhibitor (DPPIVi) use on efficacy and safety of insulin glargine 300 U/mL (Gla-300) versus glargine 100 U/mL (Gla-100) in people with type 2 diabetes on oral antihyperglycaemic drugs.. A post hoc patient-level meta-analysis was performed using data from EDITION 2 (basal insulin [N = 811]) and EDITION 3 (insulin-naïve [N = 878]), multicentre, randomised, open-label, parallel-group, phase 3a trials of similar design. Endpoints analysed included HbA1c, hypoglycaemia and adverse events, investigated in subgroups of participants with and without concomitant DPPIVi use.. Of 1689 participants randomised, 107 (13%, Gla-300) and 133 (16%, Gla-100) received DPPIVi therapy. The least squares mean change in HbA1c (baseline to month 6) was comparable between treatment groups, irrespective of DPPIVi use (no evidence of heterogeneity of treatment effect across subgroups, p = 0.753), although group sizes were unbalanced. The cumulative mean number of confirmed (≤3.9 mmol/L [≤70 mg/dL]) or severe hypoglycaemic events, and the risk and annualised rate of such events, were consistently lower for Gla-300 than Gla-100 during the night (between 00:00 and 05:59 h) or at any time of day (24 h period), irrespective of DPPIVi use. Severe hypoglycaemia occurred in 8/838 and 10/844 participants in the Gla-300 and Gla-100 groups, respectively, and was not affected by DPPIVi use. The adverse event profile was similar between treatment groups and DPPIVi subgroups.. Glycaemic control with Gla-300 was comparable to Gla-100, with less hypoglycaemia during the night and at any time of day (24 h), irrespective of concomitant DPPIVi use.. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01499095; NCT01676220.

Topics: Aged; Blood Glucose; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine; Male; Middle Aged; Multicenter Studies as Topic; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic

Insulin allergy is a rare yet severe side effect of exogenous insulin use. Management typically involves use of alternative antihyperglycaemic agents, symptom control with antihistamines, use of different insulin formulations, and induction of tolerance with incremental doses of insulin. This treatment regimen is not always successful, and the use of omalizumab, an anti-IgE monoclonal antibody, has been used to induce tolerance to insulin.. G.M. is a 62-year-old man with Type 2 diabetes mellitus. His condition was not optimized on oral agents, and insulin therapy was required. G.M. had anaphylaxis to insulin NPH, and subsequent skin-prick testing was positive to insulin aspart, insulin NPH, insulin glulisine, insulin detemir, regular insulin, insulin glargine 100 units/ml and insulin glargine 300 units/ml. He received incremental doses of several insulin formulations; however, he experienced diffuse urticaria preventing optimal glycaemic control. Three successful cases have been described in the literature of omalizumab inducing tolerance to exogenous insulin; therefore, G.M. was started on omalizumab. He subsequently tolerated treatment doses of insulin glulisine and insulin detemir with no allergic reactions and with improvement in glycaemic control.. To our knowledge, this is the first described case of allergy to insulin glargine 300 units/ml and reiterates the potential use of omalizumab in insulin allergy. Further research is warranted to determine if omalizumab should be considered standard of care in difficult-to-treat insulin hypersensitivity.

Topics: Anaphylaxis; Anti-Allergic Agents; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Hypersensitivity; Humans; Insulin; Insulin Aspart; Insulin Detemir; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Isophane; Male; Middle Aged; Omalizumab

To determine the safety and efficacy of insulin degludec versus glargine in patients with type 1 (T1D) and type 2 (T2D) diabetes mellitus.. Databases were searched until July 5, 2017. We included randomized controlled trials comparing degludec with glargine in diabetic patients, each with a minimum of 16 weeks of follow-up.. Eighteen trials with 16,791 patients were included. Degludec was associated with a statistically significant reduction in risk for all confirmed hypoglycemia at the maintenance treatment period [estimated rate ratio (ERR) 0.81; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.72‒0.92; P = 0.001], nocturnal confirmed hypoglycemia at the entire (ERR 0.71; 95% CI 0.63‒0.80; P < 0.001) and maintenance treatment period (ERR 0.65; 95% CI 0.59‒0.71; P < 0.001), all irrespective of the pooled diabetic populations and follow-up durations. The differences in the rate of hypoglycemia were more pronounced in nocturnal period and maintenance period and in T2D than T1D patients. Degludec reduced the incidence of severe hypoglycemia in T2D [ERR 0.65; (0.52; 0.89); P = 0.005] but not T1D patients. HbA1c concentration was slightly higher in degludec over glargine but was not clinically relevant [estimated treatment difference (ETD) 0.03; 95% CI - 0.00 to 0.06%; P = 0.06]. Fasting plasma glucose level was lower in degludec-treated patients (ETD - 0.28 mmol/L; 95% CI - 0.44 to - 0.11 mmol/L; P = 0.001). Several subgroup analyses showed largely consistent findings. The rates of adverse events including total mortality and cardiovascular events were not significantly different between two treatment strategies.. Insulin degludec appears to have better safety in reducing hypoglycemic events with similar efficacy compared with insulin glargine.

Topics: Databases, Factual; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Treatment Outcome

As Type 2 diabetes progresses, treatment is intensified with additional therapies in an effort to manage hyperglycaemia effectively and therefore avoid complications. When greater efficacy is required, options for injectable treatments include glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists and insulin, which may be added on to oral glucose-lowering treatments. Among individuals receiving long-acting basal insulin as their first injectable treatment, ~40-60% are unable to achieve or maintain their target HbA

Topics: Administration, Oral; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Glucagon; Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hyperglycemia; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Incretins; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Peptides; Postprandial Period; Treatment Outcome

Many individuals with type 2 diabetes (T2D) will eventually require insulin therapy to help achieve and maintain adequate glycemic control. However, the use of insulin can be associated with adverse effects such as hypoglycemia and weight gain, and in some patients the addition of insulin to treatment regimens is often still insufficient to achieve target glycemic control. Combining basal insulin with a glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist (GLP-1 RA) for the treatment of patients with T2D has been demonstrated to be effective and well tolerated, while mitigating many of the adverse events associated with giving either of these drug classes alone. Two titratable, fixed-ratio combination therapies, iGlarLixi and IDegLira, that combine basal insulin and a GLP-1 RA in a once-daily subcutaneous injection are currently approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of patients with T2D. The fixed-ratio combination iGlarLixi combines insulin glargine 100 Units/mL with lixisenatide, while IDegLira combines insulin degludec 100 Units/mL with liraglutide. While these new fixed-ratio combinations contain antihyperglycemic medications that are familiar to most health care providers, there are many questions relating to their use when formulated as a fixed-ratio combination therapy. This article discusses the 'top 10' considerations that health care providers should know about these novel combination therapies as these agents begin to gain an increasing presence in clinical practice.

Topics: Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Combinations; Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Liraglutide; Patient Selection; Peptides; Weight Gain

The alarming rise in the number of people living with type 2 diabetes (T2D) presents primary care physicians with increasing challenges associated with long-term chronic disease care. Studies have shown that the majority of patients are not achieving or maintaining glycemic goals, putting them at risk of a wide range of diabetes-related complications. Disease- and self-management programs have been shown to help patients improve their glycemic control, and are likely to be of particular benefit for patients with diabetes dealing with these issues. Anticipatory guidance is an individualized, proactive approach to patient education and counseling by a health-care professional to support patients in better coping with problems before they arise. It has been shown to improve disease outcomes in a variety of chronic conditions, including diabetes. While important at all stages, anticipatory guidance may be of particular importance during changes in treatment regimens, and especially during transition to, and escalation of, insulin-based regimens. The aim of this article is to provide advice to physicians on anticipatory guidance for basal-insulin dosing, focusing on appropriate basal-insulin-dose increase and prevention of potentially deleterious basal-insulin doses, so called overbasalization. It also provides an overview of new treatment options for patients with T2D who are not well controlled on basal-insulin therapy, fixed-ratio combinations of basal insulin and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists, and advice on the type of anticipatory guidance needed to ensure safe and appropriate switching to these therapies.

Topics: Counseling; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Disease Management; Drug Combinations; Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Patient Education as Topic; Peptides; Self Care; Self-Management

Diabetes, particularly type 2 diabetes (T2D), has become an epidemic in the United States, with a significant portion of patients unable to meet recommended glycemic targets. All individuals with type 1 diabetes (T1D) and a significant majority of those with T2D will ultimately require insulin therapy. However, there are several barriers to its use. The introduction of the new, ultra-long-acting basal insulins degludec and glargine U-300, and the single-injection combinations of insulin degludec/liraglutide and insulin glargine U-100/lixisenatide, offer options that may overcome several of those barriers, including the high risk of hypoglycemia, glycemic variability, and relatively short duration of action. This article spotlights the outcomes of the phase 3 clinical trials for these newer formulations, as well as more recent meta-analyses and real-world studies. It also highlights the implications for managed care plans as they move to add these insulins to their formularies.

Topics: Diabetes Mellitus; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Humans; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Managed Care Programs; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Treatment Outcome

To assess the impact of duration of prior basal insulin therapy on study outcomes in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus receiving insulin glargine 300 U/mL (Gla-300) or insulin glargine 100 U/mL (Gla-100) for 6 months.. A post hoc patient-level meta-analysis of data from the EDITION 1 and 2 studies. Outcomes included: HbA. Switching to Gla-300 from other basal insulin therapies provided comparable glycaemic control with lower risk of hypoglycaemia versus Gla-100, regardless of duration of prior basal insulin therapy.. NCT01499082, NCT01499095 (ClinicalTrials.gov).

Topics: Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Female; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine; Male; Middle Aged

Basal insulin analogues aim for protracted glycemic control with minimal adverse effects.. To assess the comparative efficacy and safety of basal insulin analogues for adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).. Several databases from inception to April 2018 without language restrictions, ClinicalTrials.gov to April 2018, references of reviews, and meeting abstract books.. Randomized trials lasting at least 12 weeks that compared efficacy (change in hemoglobin A1c [HbA1c] level from baseline [primary outcome]; percentage of patients with HbA1c level <7% at end of study and change in body weight [secondary outcomes]) and safety (hypoglycemia) of basal insulin analogues.. Two authors independently extracted data and assessed risk of bias for each outcome. All authors evaluated overall confidence in the evidence.. Thirty-nine trials (26 195 patients) assessed 10 basal insulin analogues. Low- to very-low-quality evidence indicated that thrice-weekly degludec (Deg-3TW) was inferior to most other regimens for reducing HbA1c level, with mean differences ranging from 0.21% (vs. degludec, 100 U/mL [Deg-100]) to 0.32% (vs. glargine, 300 U/mL [Glar-300]). High- to moderate-quality evidence suggested that detemir had a favorable weight profile versus all comparators, and Glar-300 was associated with less weight gain than glargine, 100 U/mL (Glar-100); Deg-100; degludec, 200 U/mL (Deg-200); Deg-3TW; and LY2963016. Low- and very-low-quality evidence suggested that Deg-100, Deg-200, and Glar-300 were associated with lower incidence of nocturnal hypoglycemia than detemir, Glar-100, LY2963016, and neutral protamine lispro (NPL). Incidence of severe hypoglycemia did not differ among regimens, except NPL, which was associated with increased risk versus Deg-100, detemir, Glar-100, and Glar-300.. Results are based mostly on indirect comparisons. Confidence in summary estimates is low or very low due to individual-study limitations, imprecision, or inconsistency.. Low-quality evidence suggests that basal insulin analogues for T2DM do not substantially differ in their glucose-lowering effect. Low- and very-low-quality evidence suggests some regimens may be associated with lower risk for nocturnal hypoglycemia (Deg-100, Deg-200, and Glar-300) or less weight gain (detemir and Glar-300).. None. (PROSPERO: CRD42016037055).

Topics: Adult; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Detemir; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Network Meta-Analysis; Risk Assessment

The objective of this literature review was to evaluate the costs associated with the use of long-acting insulin analogues (LAIAs) compared with non-LAIA agents, including human insulin, oral antidiabetic drugs, and other injectable therapies, in the treatment of patients with type 1 diabetes (T1D) or type 2 diabetes (T2D).. A systematic review of the medical literature (MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane, EconLit) conducted from 2004 to 2016.. The review protocol was developed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Inclusion criteria for studies were: patients with T1D and/or T2D, LAIA intervention, and comparators, including oral antidiabetics (OADs) or neutral protamine Hagedorn (NPH). Outcomes of interest were adherence measures; economic outcomes, including total costs, cost savings, and willingness-to-pay; and cost-effectiveness or incremental cost-effectiveness analyses. Real-world costs of individual LAIAs were also evaluated and are often compared against those of other LAIAs in the economic analyses.. We identified and included 117 relevant studies. Patients using LAIAs had higher drug costs than those using OADs and NPH but had neutral or reduced total and diabetes-related costs compared with patients using non-LAIAs. Use of LAIA pen-delivery systems may lead to improved adherence and reduction in costs. Patients receiving insulin glargine demonstrated higher adherence and persistence than patients on insulin detemir. Economic models suggest that LAIAs are more cost-effective than NPH for T1D; for T2D, insulin glargine is more costly than NPH but less so than insulin detemir.. Despite higher drug costs, the real-world overall medical costs of LAIAs are not significantly different from those of NPH in patients with diabetes. The findings may be helpful for formulary decision making for patients with diabetes in a cost-constrained environment.

Topics: Cost-Benefit Analysis; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Costs; Female; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Quality-Adjusted Life Years; United States

The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of intensive insulin therapy (premixed insulin lispro vs. insulin glargine) in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).. MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, and www.clinicaltrials.gov were systematically searched for randomized clinical trials (RCTs) of patients with T2DM treated with either premixed insulin lispro or insulin glargine for a duration of 24 weeks.. A total of 13 RCTs and 5401 patients were included in this study. In parallel trials and crossover trials, premixed insulin lispro was found to be superior to insulin glargine at reducing glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) (parallel trials: weighted mean difference [WMD] -0.18%; 95% confidence interval [CI] -0.31 to -0.06; P = 0.004; crossover trials: WMD 0.37%; 95% CI -0.51 to -0.23; P < 0.00001). Premixed insulin lispro resulted in more weight gain than insulin glargine (parallel trials: WMD +0.64 kg; 95% CI +0.14 to +1.15; P = 0.01; crossover trials: WMD +0.74 kg; 95% CI +0.19 to +1.29; P = 0.009), and premixed insulin lispro was associated with a higher risk of hypoglycemia than insulin glargine (parallel trials: odds ratio [OR] 1.20; 95% CI 1.06-1.36; P = 0.005; crossover trials: OR 2.24; 95% CI 1.45-3.46; P = 0.0003).. Premixed insulin lispro provides a larger reduction in HbA1c and is associated with a significantly higher risk of hypoglycemia and greater weight gain in patients with T2DM. These findings may be helpful in selecting therapy for individual subjects.

Topics: Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine; Insulin Lispro; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Weight Gain

Topics: Adult; Biosimilar Pharmaceuticals; Blood Glucose; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Approval; European Union; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Injections, Subcutaneous; Insulin Glargine; Male; Treatment Outcome

Three higher concentration insulin products (insulin lispro 200 units/mL, insulin degludec 200 units/mL, and insulin glargine 300 units/mL) received US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval in 2015. Although human regular insulin 500 units/mL (U-500) was approved in 1997, a pen and dedicated U-500 syringe became available in 2016. These products offer more treatment options for the increasing numbers of patients requiring insulin to achieve and maintain glycemic targets. Higher concentration insulins have some unique safety and efficacy considerations. Important considerations when transitioning patients from the 100 unit/mL concentration (U-100) to the higher concentration include bioequivalence, pen dose increments, and pen appearance. Bioequivalent insulins have similar pharmacokinetic properties and no dose adjustments are expected when transitioning from the U-100 to the higher concentration. In contrast, higher concentration insulins with different pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties compared with the U-100 formulation may require dose adjustments. In order to provide safe and effective therapy to patients with higher daily insulin dose requirements, it is important for healthcare professionals to become very familiar with the characteristics of and differences between each of the higher concentration insulins. This paper highlights differences between the U-100 and higher concentration insulins and focuses on practical aspects of use.

Topics: Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine; Insulin Lispro; Insulin, Long-Acting; Insulins; Therapeutic Equivalency

To review the safety and efficacy of iGlarLixi, a titratable fixed-ratio combination of insulin glargine 100 U/mL (iGlar) and lixisenatide, a glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist.. A literature search of MEDLINE for all English-language primary articles through June 2016, using the terms LixiLan, iGlarLixi and insulin glargine and lixisenatide, and a search of abstracts presented at the 2016 Scientific Sessions of the American Diabetes Association were performed.. All studies assessing the efficacy and/or safety of iGlarLixi were evaluated.. iGlarLixi has been approved in the United States for glycemic control in people with type 2 diabetes (T2D) inadequately controlled with basal insulin (<60 U/d) or lixisenatide. In clinical trials, iGlarLixi was associated with significantly greater reductions from baseline in glycated hemoglobin A. iGlarLixi is a titratable fixed-ratio combination that shows improved efficacy and comparable or improved safety outcomes relative to its separate constituents, offering an alternative approach to intensification of therapy in T2D.

Topics: Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Combinations; Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine; Peptides; Treatment Outcome

To evaluate the 3-year efficacy and safety of exenatide once weekly (QW) for type 2 diabetes (T2D) in a large clinical population.. This post hoc analysis of three DURATION studies examined pooled efficacy and adverse events with exenatide QW from the 2.5- to 3-year completer populations; insulin glargine (glargine) was a reference (DURATION-3). Patients randomized to exenatide QW during the controlled study periods continued controlled treatment (DURATION-3) or single-arm treatment (DURATION-1; DURATION-2) with exenatide QW for the study duration.. In the exenatide QW group (N=329), reductions from baseline in HbA1c, fasting glucose, and body weight were maintained from weeks 4 to 156 (HbA1c: -1.1±1.3%; fasting glucose: -1.7±2.7mmol/L; body weight: -2.4±5.6kg; P<0.05). Glycemic efficacy with exenatide QW and glargine was similar (HbA1c reduction: -0.8±1.0%; N=158); body weight increased with glargine (+2.0±4.9kg). Variable reductions in systolic blood pressure and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol occurred with exenatide QW. At week 156, 48.3% and 30.7% of exenatide QW recipients achieved HbA1c goals of <7.0% and ≤6.5%, respectively. No new safety or tolerability issues were identified.. Exenatide QW improved glycemic outcomes and was well tolerated in patients with T2D for up to 156weeks.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Administration Schedule; Exenatide; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Middle Aged; Peptides; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Treatment Outcome; Venoms

Achieving and maintaining glycemic control is important for people with type 2 diabetes (T2D), to reduce disease-related complications and mortality; however, about half of US patients fail to meet glycemic targets. iGlarLixi, a titratable fixed-ratio combination of insulin glargine 100 U/mL (iGlar) and lixisenatide for once-daily administration, was recently approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for use in adults with T2D inadequately controlled on basal insulin (<60 U daily) or lixisenatide. iGlar and lixisenatide have complementary mechanisms of action, primarily targeting fasting plasma glucose and postprandial plasma glucose, respectively. In the US, iGlarLixi is available in a 3:1 ratio of iGlar and lixisenatide, respectively, across the dosage range of 15-60 U of iGlar and 5-20 µg of lixisenatide.. This study identified phase 3 trials which assessed the efficacy and safety of iGlarLixi. Relevant trials were LixiLan-O, which compared iGlarLixi with iGlar or lixisenatide alone in insulin-naïve patients, and LixiLan-L, which compared iGlarLixi with iGlar alone in insulin-experienced patients.. Patients on iGlarLixi experienced greater A1C reduction and were more likely to achieve A1C <7.0% than its comparators. iGlarLixi mitigated the weight gain associated with iGlar without increasing hypoglycemia risk, and resulted in a lower frequency of gastrointestinal adverse events compared with lixisenatide.. iGlarLixi provides a new approach to therapy intensification in patients with T2D. iGlarLixi showed greater A1C efficacy compared with either iGlar or lixisenatide, mitigating iGlar-associated weight gain, without increasing hypoglycemia risk, and reducing the gastrointestinal side-effects seen with lixisenatide.

Topics: Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine; Peptides; Postprandial Period; Weight Gain

To evaluate the efficacy and adverse effects of IDegLira and IGlarLixi treatment and to perform a comparison between two strategies.. The registration number is CRD42017053952. Randomized controlled trials of IGlarLixi treatment or IDegLira treatment compared with placebo or active hypoglycemic agents in type 2 diabetes were included.. Eight trials were included. The absolute HbA1c change relative to baseline after IGlarLixi treatment was -1.50% with significance (95% CI, -1.89% to -1.12%, p < 0.01); the absolute HbA1c change after IDegLira treatment was -1.89% with significance (95% CI, -2.04% to -1.73%, p < 0.01). Comparisons between IGlarLixi treatment and IDegLira treatment indicated no significant differences between groups. The absolute weight change after IGlarLixi treatment significantly decreased (weighted mean difference (WMD), -0.62 kg; 95% CI, -0.93 to -0.31 kg, p = < 0.01), but the absolute weight change after IDegLira treatment was not significantly changed (WMD, -0.81 kg; 95% CI, -3.26 to 1.65 kg, p = 0.52). There were no significant differences between groups.. Glucose control of IGlarLixi treatment or IDegLira treatment was significantly lower than that at baseline. Comparisons between the two treatment groups indicated no significant differences between groups in absolute HbA1c changes or body weight changes relative to baseline.

Topics: Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Liraglutide; Peptides; Weight Loss

Concentrated insulin analogs have recently been approved and are available for clinical use in the management of diabetes mellitus. One new product is insulin glargine U-300 (Sanofi), a basal concentrated insulin of 300 U/mL. Several studies have been conducted and completed evaluating blood samples for the pharmacokinetics of insulin glargine U-300 and euglycemic clamp procedures for the pharmacodynamics. This concentrated insulin has a low within-day variability and high day-to-day reproducibility, allowing for a more constant and prolonged duration of action, compared with insulin glargine U-100 (100 U/mL). Insulin glargine U-300 is equally effective, when compared with insulin glargine U-100 for glycemic control in patients with type 1 and 2 diabetes mellitus. Insulin glargine U-300 has a similar efficacy profile to insulin glargine U-100 for glycemic control, yet with lower rates of nocturnal and severe hypoglycemia. Insulin glargine U-300 can be considered an acceptable basal insulin for patients with type 1 and 2 diabetes mellitus, and it has a potential role among patients who are naïve to insulin therapy or require titration of basal insulin. Titration of insulin glargine U-300 would result in less volume and a lower risk of hypoglycemia, compared with insulin glargine U-100. This article evaluates and summarizes the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of insulin glargine U-300, for patients with type 1 or 2 diabetes mellitus, and summarizes its application to clinical practice.

Topics: Animals; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine

Since 2005, several glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) have been approved to treat people with type 2 diabetes. These agents are considered for use at the same point in the treatment paradigm as basal insulins. A comprehensive comparison of these drug classes, therefore, can help inform treatment decisions. This systematic review and meta-analysis assessed the clinical efficacy and safety of GLP-1 RAs compared with basal insulins.. MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL and PubMed databases were searched. Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) of ≥16 weeks' duration comparing GLP-1 RAs vs basal insulins in adults with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled with oral antihyperglycemic drugs were included. Data on the change from baseline to 26 weeks (±10 weeks) of treatment in hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) and weight, as well as the proportion of patients experiencing hypoglycaemia, were extracted. Fixed-effect pairwise meta-analyses were conducted where data were available from ≥2 studies.. Fifteen RCTs were identified and 11 were meta-analysed. The once-weekly GLP-1 RAs, exenatide long acting release (LAR) and dulaglutide, led to greater, statistically significant mean HbA1c reductions vs basal insulins (exenatide: -0.31% [95% confidence interval -0.42, -0.19], dulaglutide: -0.39% [-0.49, -0.29]) whilst once-daily liraglutide and twice-daily exenatide did not (liraglutide: 0.06% [-0.06, 0.18], exenatide: 0.01% [-0.11, 0.13]). Mean weight reduction was seen with all GLP-1 RAs while mean weight gain was seen with basal insulins. Interpretation of the analysis of hypoglycaemia was limited by inconsistent definitions and reporting. Because of the limited number of available studies sensitivity analyses to explore heterogeneity could not be conducted.. Although weight reduction is seen with all GLP-1 RA's, only the once-weekly agents, exenatide LAR and dulaglutide, demonstrate significant HbA1c reductions when compared to basal insulins.

Topics: Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Exenatide; Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor; Glucagon-Like Peptides; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Immunoglobulin Fc Fragments; Incretins; Insulin; Insulin Detemir; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Liraglutide; Peptides; Recombinant Fusion Proteins; Venoms

The worrisome rise in pediatric type 2 diabetes (T2DM) is most prevalent among minority ethnic/racial populations. Typically, T2DM occurs during puberty in high risk obese adolescents with evidence of insulin resistance. Screening for T2DM in obese youth can be a daunting task for pediatricians and differentiating between pediatric T1DM and T2DM in obese youth can be challenging for pediatric endocrinologists. There is very limited data regarding the prevalence of T2DM among youth < 10 years of age. Here we present the case of a 5-year-old Hispanic male diagnosed with T2DM after referral by his pediatrician for abnormal weight gain, acanthosis nigricans and an elevated HbgA1c. He subsequently became symptomatic for diabetes with confirmed hyperglycemia and HbgA1c of 9.7% (83 mmol/mol) at the time of formal diagnosis. Type 1 diabetes autoantibodies (GAD65, Islet, and ZincT8) and monogenic diabetes genetic tests were negative. Due to elevated liver enzymes and baseline HbgA1c, he received basal insulin as his initial therapy. In this paper, we will discuss this case and present an IRB approved retrospective review of the characteristics of the 20 T2DM patients <10 years of age identified to date in our pediatric diabetes center. This review highlights that while uncommon, the diagnosis of T2DM merits consideration even in prepubertal children. This is especially true when working with a high risk population, such as our Hispanic South Texas youth.

Topics: Acanthosis Nigricans; Age of Onset; Body Mass Index; Child, Preschool; Combined Modality Therapy; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Diet, Reducing; Family Health; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Healthy Lifestyle; Hispanic or Latino; Humans; Hyperglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine; Male; Obesity, Morbid; Pediatric Obesity; Risk; Texas; Treatment Outcome

Older adults are at an increased risk of developing type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Although oral agents (i.e., metformin) are the preferred first-line therapy, older adults often eventually require the addition of insulin to control their blood glucose. Long-acting insulin analogues are the preferred insulin products for older adults with T2DM. Insulin degludec and insulin glargine U-300 are both new generation long-acting insulins. When compared with the standard of care, long-acting insulin product insulin glargine U-100, insulin degludec, and insulin glargine U-300 had similar glucose-lowering effects, longer half-lives and durations of action, and a more even distribution over a 24-hour period. Additionally, the new generation insulins were superior with regard to rates and severity of nocturnal hypoglycemia. The long-term cardiovascular safety of these products has not been established yet. Although the new generation long-acting insulins will not revolutionize diabetes management, they appear to be an improvement over previous long-acting insulins.

Topics: Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic

Evaluate efficacy and hypoglycaemia according to concomitant oral antidiabetes drug (OAD) in people with type 2 diabetes initiating insulin glargine 100U/mL (Gla-100) or neutral protamine Hagedorn (NPH) insulin once daily.. Four studies (target fasting plasma glucose [FPG] ⩽100mg/dL [⩽5.6mmol/L]; duration ⩾24weeks) were included. Standardised data from 2091 subjects (Gla-100, n=1024; NPH insulin, n=1067) were analysed. Endpoints included glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) and FPG change, glycaemic target achievement, hypoglycaemia, weight change, and insulin dose.. Mean HbA1c and FPG reductions were similar with Gla-100 and NPH insulin regardless of concomitant OAD (P=0.184 and P=0.553, respectively) and similar proportions of subjects achieved HbA1c <7.0% (P=0.603). There was a trend for more subjects treated with Gla-100 achieving FPG ⩽100mg/dL versus NPH insulin (relative risk [RR] 1.09 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.97-1.23]; P=0.135). Plasma glucose confirmed (<70mg/dL) overall and nocturnal hypoglycaemia incidences and rates were lower with Gla-100 versus NPH insulin (overall RR 0.93 [95% CI 0.87-1.00]; P=0.041; nocturnal RR 0.73 [95% CI 0.65-0.83]; P<0.001). After 24weeks, weight gain and insulin doses were higher with Gla-100 versus NPH insulin (2.7kg vs 2.3kg, P=0.009 and 0.42U/kg vs 0.39U/kg; P=0.003, respectively). Insulin doses were higher when either insulin was added to sulfonylurea alone.. Pooled results from treat-to-target trials in insulin-naïve people with type 2 diabetes demonstrate a significantly lower overall and nocturnal hypoglycaemia risk across different plasma glucose definitions with Gla-100 versus NPH insulin at similar glycaemic control. OAD therapy co-administered with Gla-100 or NPH insulin impacts glycaemic control and overall nocturnal hypoglycaemia risk.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Clinical Trials, Phase IV as Topic; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Incidence; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Isophane; Male; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Sulfonylurea Compounds; Treatment Outcome; Weight Gain

The goal of this post hoc analysis was to determine key patient and treatment-related factors impacting glycosylated hemoglobin (A1C) and hypoglycemia in patients with uncontrolled type 2 diabetes who were initiated to basal insulin (neutral protamine Hagedorn [NPH] or glargine).. Using individual patient-level data pooled from 6 treat-to-target trials, 2600 patients with type 2 diabetes on oral antidiabetic agents initiated to insulin glargine or NPH and treated for 24 to 36 weeks were analyzed.. Both treatments led to significant reduction in A1C levels compared with baseline, with no differences between treatment groups (mean ± standard deviation; glargine: -1.32 ± 1.2% vs NPH: -1.26 ± 1.2%; P = 0.15), with greater reduction in the BMI ≥30 kg/m group than in the BMI <30 kg/m group. Glargine reduced A1C significantly more than NPH in the BMI <30 kg/m group (-1.30 ± 1.18% vs -1.14 ± 1.22, respectively; P = 0.008), but not in the BMI ≥ 30 kg/m group (-1.37 ± 1.19 vs -1.48 ± 1.22, respectively; P = 0.18). Similar proportions of patients achieved A1C target of <7% (glargine 30.6%, NPH 29.1%; P = 0.39). Incidence of severe and severe nocturnal hypoglycemia was significantly lower in glargine versus NPH-treated patients (2.0% vs 3.9%; P = 0.04, and 0.7% vs 2.1%; P = 0.002, respectively), and occurred primarily in the BMI <30 kg/m group.. Initiation of basal insulin is highly effective in lowering A1C after oral antidiabetic agent failure. Glargine decreases A1C more than NPH in nonobese patients, and reduces the risk for severe and severe nocturnal hypoglycemia versus NPH both in obese and nonobese patients, but more so in nonobese patients. Thus, it is the nonobese patients who may benefit more from initiation of basal insulin as glargine than NPH.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Blood Glucose; Body Mass Index; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Isophane; Male; Middle Aged; Obesity; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult

Despite improvements in anti-hyperglycemic therapies, there are many unmet clinical needs that hinder successful glycemic control in people being treated with current basal insulin analogs.. This paper reviews the unmet needs associated with current basal insulin therapy and describes the most recent basal insulins for the treatment of diabetes.. PubMed was searched for articles on basal insulin analogs published between 2000 and April 2016.. Although long-acting insulin analogs, such as insulin glargine 100 units/mL and insulin detemir, have come towards approximating physiologic basal insulin levels, limitations such as hypoglycemia and intra- and inter-individual variability are associated with their use resulting in glycemic fluctuations. Some basal insulins lack 24 hour coverage, requiring some patients to split their dose, increasing the number of injections required to maintain glycemic control. Fear of hypoglycemia and the need for additional injections often leads to poor compliance and suboptimal glycemic control. Long-acting insulin analogs, such as insulin glargine 300 units/mL and insulin degludec, have improved upon the shortcomings of the current basal insulin analogs. Improved pharmacodynamic/pharmacokinetic profiles afford lower intra-patient variability and an extended duration of action, providing full and stable 24 hour basal insulin coverage with once daily dosing, and comparable efficacy to insulin glargine with lower rates of hypoglycemia.. The improved pharmacodynamic/pharmacokinetic profiles of new long-acting insulin formulations provide greater glycemic control with once daily dosing. With the growing number of therapeutic choices available, physicians have more scope to individualize patient options for basal insulin therapy.

Topics: Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of adding a single bolus dose of insulin glulisine to basal insulin ('basal-plus') in persons with type 2 diabetes.. Data from patients with poor glycemic control on oral antihyperglycemic drugs who were initiated on a 'basal-plus' regimen for up to 6 months were pooled from four randomized, multicenter studies. Glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), fasting blood glucose, postprandial glucose (PPG), insulin dose and demographics were measured at baseline and end of study.. 711 patients with a mean age of 59.9 years and a mean duration of diabetes of 11.0 years were included in the analysis population. A 'basal-plus' regimen was associated with significant decreases in HbA1c and PPG at 6 months, an increase in glargine and glulisine doses and small, but statistically significant, changes in body weight and BMI in all patient subsets. The proportion of patients with HbA1c<7% also increased in all populations studied, while the prevalence of severe hypoglycemia was low and did not significantly differ across patient groups.. These results suggest that the use of 'basal-plus' can achieve a good therapeutic response with a low risk of hypoglycemia and weight gain, regardless of a patient's age or BMI.

Topics: Age Factors; Aged; Biomarkers; Blood Glucose; Body Mass Index; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Male; Middle Aged; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Risk Factors; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Weight Gain

A prospective meta-analysis of phase 3 trials showed lower rates of nocturnal hypoglycaemia with insulin degludec vs. insulin glargine. We investigated the consistency of the results across different definitions of hypoglycaemia.. This post-hoc, patient-level meta-analysis included six randomized, controlled, 26- or 52-week phase 3a trials in insulin-naïve participants with Type 2 diabetes mellitus (Type 2 diabetesinsulin naïve ), participants with Type 2 diabetes mellitus using basal-bolus therapy (Type 2 diabetesBB ) and those with Type 1 diabetes mellitus. We used three definitions of hypoglycaemia and different timescales for the nocturnal period. Rates were analysed for the entire core trial period, the 'maintenance period' only, and the extension trial set population. Analyses utilized a negative binomial regression model.. In Type 2 diabetesinsulin naïve participants, risk of nocturnal hypoglycaemia was significantly lower with insulin degludec vs. insulin glargine for all hypoglycaemia definitions and trial periods. Risk was also lower for the timescale 21.59-05.59, but not 00.01-07.59. For Type 2 diabetesBB , nocturnal hypoglycaemia rates were lower with insulin degludec vs. insulin glargine across all definitions, timescales and trial periods, with one exception. For individuals with Type 1 diabetes mellitus, nocturnal hypoglycaemia risk was significantly lower with insulin degludec during the maintenance period for the original definition (plasma glucose < 3.1 mmol/l, timescale 00.01-05.59) and in the extension trial set population for all hypoglycaemia definitions except for the nocturnal timescale 00.01-07.59.. Compared with insulin glargine, insulin degludec is associated with lower rates of nocturnal hypoglycaemia in people with Type 2 diabetes mellitus, and similar or lower rates in Type 1 diabetes mellitus, across different definitions.

Topics: Circadian Rhythm; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Administration Schedule; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Precision Medicine; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Reproducibility of Results; Risk

The progressive nature of Type 2 diabetes necessitates treatment intensification over time in order to maintain glycaemic control, with many patients ultimately requiring insulin therapy. While insulin has unlimited potential efficacy, its initiation is often delayed and improvements in glycaemic control are typically accompanied by weight gain and an increased risk of hypoglycaemia, particularly as HbA1c approaches and falls below target levels. This may account for the sub-optimal control often achieved after insulin initiation. Combining insulin with antihyperglycaemic therapies that have a low risk of hypoglycaemia and are weight-neutral or result in weight loss is a therapeutic strategy with the potential to improve Type 2 diabetes management. Although the effects differ with each individual class of therapy, clinical trials have shown that adding a glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist, dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor or sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitor to insulin regimens can offer a significant reduction in HbA1c without substantially increasing hypoglycaemia risk, or weight. The evidence and merit of each approach are reviewed in this paper. Once-daily co-formulations of a basal insulin and a glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist have been developed (insulin degludec/liraglutide) or are under development (lixisenatide/insulin glargine). Insulin degludec/liraglutide phase III trials and a lixisenatide/insulin glargine phase II trial have shown robust HbA1c reductions, with weight loss and a low risk of hypoglycaemia. With insulin degludec/liraglutide now approved in Europe, an important consideration will be the types of patients who may benefit most from a fixed-ratio combination; this is discussed in the present review, and we also take a look toward future developments in the field.

Topics: Blood Glucose; Clinical Trials as Topic; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Drug Combinations; Drug Therapy, Combination; Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Incretins; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Liraglutide; Peptides; Sodium-Glucose Transporter 2; Sodium-Glucose Transporter 2 Inhibitors

A meta-analysis was conducted to assess the clinical efficacy and safety of dulaglutide in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Medline, Embase, Cochrane Library and www. clinicaltrials. gov (up to February 15(th), 2015) were searched. Randomized controlled trials comparing dulaglutide to other drugs for T2DM were collected. Twelve RCTs were included, and the overall bias was low. As the monotherapy, compared with control (placebo, metformin and liraglutide), dulaglutide resulted in a significant reduction in HbA1c (WMD, -0.68%; 95% CI, -0.95 to -0.40), FPG (WMD, -0.90 mmol/L; 95% CI, -1.28 to -0.52), a similar risk of hypoglycemia (7.8% vs. 10.6%), less body weight loss (WMD, 0.51 kg; 95% CI, 0.27 to 0.75). As an add-on intervention with oral antihyperglycemic medication (OAM) and insulin, compared with control (placebo, sitagliptin, exenatide, liraglutide and glargine), dulaglutide lowered HbA1c (WMD, -0.51%; 95% CI, -0.68 to -0.35) and body weight significantly (WMD, -1.30 kg, 95% CI, -1.85 to -1.02) notably, and elicited a similar reduction in FPG (WMD, -0.19 mmol/L; 95% CI, -1.20 to 0.82), an similar incidence of hypoglycemia (24.5% vs. 24.5%). This meta-analysis revealed the use of dulaglutide as a monotherapy or an add-on to OAM and lispro appeared to be effective and safe for adults with T2DM.

Topics: Blood Glucose; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Exenatide; Glucagon-Like Peptides; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Immunoglobulin Fc Fragments; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Liraglutide; Metformin; Patient Safety; Peptides; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Recombinant Fusion Proteins; Sitagliptin Phosphate; Treatment Outcome; Venoms

To compare the efficacy and safety of a concentrated formulation of insulin glargine (Gla-300) with other basal insulin therapies in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).. This was a network meta-analysis (NMA) of randomised clinical trials of basal insulin therapy in T2DM identified via a systematic literature review of Cochrane library databases, MEDLINE and MEDLINE In-Process, EMBASE and PsycINFO.. Changes in HbA1c (%) and body weight, and rates of nocturnal and documented symptomatic hypoglycaemia were assessed.. 41 studies were included; 25 studies comprised the main analysis population: patients on basal insulin-supported oral therapy (BOT). Change in glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) was comparable between Gla-300 and detemir (difference: -0.08; 95% credible interval (CrI): -0.40 to 0.24), neutral protamine Hagedorn (NPH; 0.01; -0.28 to 0.32), degludec (-0.12; -0.42 to 0.20) and premixed insulin (0.26; -0.04 to 0.58). Change in body weight was comparable between Gla-300 and detemir (0.69; -0.31 to 1.71), NPH (-0.76; -1.75 to 0.21) and degludec (-0.63; -1.63 to 0.35), but significantly lower compared with premixed insulin (-1.83; -2.85 to -0.75). Gla-300 was associated with a significantly lower nocturnal hypoglycaemia rate versus NPH (risk ratio: 0.18; 95% CrI: 0.05 to 0.55) and premixed insulin (0.36; 0.14 to 0.94); no significant differences were noted in Gla-300 versus detemir (0.52; 0.19 to 1.36) and degludec (0.66; 0.28 to 1.50). Differences in documented symptomatic hypoglycaemia rates of Gla-300 versus detemir (0.63; 0.19 to 2.00), NPH (0.66; 0.27 to 1.49) and degludec (0.55; 0.23 to 1.34) were not significant. Extensive sensitivity analyses supported the robustness of these findings.. NMA comparisons are useful in the absence of direct randomised controlled data. This NMA suggests that Gla-300 is also associated with a significantly lower risk of nocturnal hypoglycaemia compared with NPH and premixed insulin, with glycaemic control comparable to available basal insulin comparators.

Topics: Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine

The common insulin concentration in most preparations of insulin is 100 units per mL or U-100. Human regular U-500 insulin was the first concentrated insulin introduced and it has been available in the United States since the 1950s. Humulin R is the only human regular U-500 available on the market. Human regular U-500 is five times more concentrated than U-100 and because of its pharmacodynamic properties, works as both a basal and a bolus insulin. Human regular U500 allows for delivery of a larger insulin dose with a smaller volume leading to better absorption compared to U-100 and has traditionally been used in patients with moderate to severe insulin resistance. More recently other forms of concentrated insulin have become available and the newer concentrated insulin preparations can be used in diabetic patients with or without insulin resistance. Our intent is to provide primary care physicians with a review of the pharmacology and current literature on concentrated insulins as well as recommendations for patient selection, dose initiation, and dose adjustment.

Topics: Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Compounding; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin Lispro; Insulin Resistance; Insulin, Long-Acting; Patient Selection; Pregnancy; Pregnancy in Diabetics

Topics: Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Home Health Nursing; Humans; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Patient Safety; Treatment Outcome

Novel insulins have entered the market during recent years. The ultra-long acting insulins, insulin degludek and insulin glargine, the latter having a strength of 300 U/ml, exhibit a steady and predictable action curve. Studies have indicated that significantly fewer hypoglycemiae occur when using degludek in patients with either type 1 or type 2 diabetes, whereas similar evidence about glargine (300 U/mI) has been obtained in the treatment of type 2 diabetes. The long duration of action of both insulins brings long-needed flexibility to.their dosing.

Topics: Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Humans; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Insulins

Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is a progressive disease, often requiring exogenous insulin therapy and treatment intensification. Despite new therapies, most patients do not reach the recommended HbA1c targets, among them a significant proportion of patients on premixed insulins. The aim was to summarize published data in Adriatic countries on effectiveness of insulin glargine based therapy in type 2 diabetic patients suboptimally controlled on premix insulin.. A meta-analysis was carried out in major medical databases up to April 2014, focusing on Adriatic region. We searched observational studies with duration of at least 6 months, evaluating effectiveness and safety of insulin glargine (IGlar), in combination with OAD or bolus insulin in patients with T2 failing premixed insulin therapy. Outcomes included values of HbA1c, fasting blood glucose and two hours post-prandial glucose concentration as well as changes in body mass index after at least 6 months of study duration.. Three prospective, observational, multicentric trials (698 patients in total) were included. The basal bolus regimen with glargine significantly reduced HbA1c (Mean Difference, MD=2.27, CI [1.76, 2.78]), fasting glucose (MD=5.15, CI [4.86, 5.44]) and 2-hours postprandial glucose concentration (MD=6.94, CI [6.53, 7.34]). No significant changes were found in BMI after switching from premixes to IGlar based treatment.. Insulin glargine based therapy following premix failure is efficacious and safe option of type 2 diabetes treatment intensification.

Topics: Blood Glucose; Clinical Trials as Topic; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Europe, Eastern; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine; Male; Multicenter Studies as Topic; Observational Studies as Topic

Biosimilar medicinal products have been in use in the European Union since 2006. In September 2014, insulin glargine (LY IGlar) was approved as a long-acting insulin analogue. In accordance with EMA (European Medicines Agency) and FDA (Food and Drug Administration) guidelines, analytical, preclinical and clinical studies were submitted demonstrating drug safety and biosimilarity of LY IGlar with the reference insulin glargine (IGlar).. In a review article, study data collected in the clinical development of LY IGlar are summarized.. A program of Phase 1 studies investigated whether the criteria for bioequivalence were met. Based on these standards, the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of the two insulins were shown to be similar. The clinical comparability of LY IGlar versus IGlar was demonstrated in two Phase 3 studies in patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes. The tolerability profiles of LY IGlar and IGlar were similar in these studies; no significant differences were observed in the rate of adverse events, hypoglycemic events or immunogenicity.. The results of these studies show that LY IGlar represents an alternative treatment option for basal insulin therapy in patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes because its efficacy and tolerability is similar to that of IGlar.

Topics: Biosimilar Pharmaceuticals; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine

Insulin is the mainstay of pharmacotherapy in pregnancy complicated by diabetes. This review covers the various insulin regimes and preparations, explaining how to use them, and decide appropriate doses in pregnancy. It approaches insulin treatment from a patient - centred, as well as physician and obstetrician friendly viewpoint, providing pragmatic guidance for management of diabetes in pregnancy.

Topics: Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Aspart; Insulin Detemir; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Pregnancy; Pregnancy in Diabetics

Basal insulin peglispro (BIL) is a novel basal insulin with a flat, prolonged activity profile. BIL has been demonstrated in a dog model, in healthy men and in patients with type 1 diabetes (T1D) to have significant hepato-preferential action resulting from reduced peripheral activity. In the IMAGINE-Phase 3 clinical trial program, more than 6000 patients were included, of whom ~3900 received BIL. Of the 7 pivotal IMAGINE trials, 3 studies were double-blinded and 3 were in T1D patients. BIL consistently demonstrated a greater HbA1c reduction, less glycaemic variability and a clinically relevant reduction in the rates of nocturnal hypoglycaemia across comparator [glargine and isophane insulin (NPH)] studies. Trials using basal/bolus regimens had higher rates of total hypoglycaemia with BIL due to higher rates of daytime hypoglycaemia. Severe hypoglycaemia rates were similar to comparator among both patients with T1D or type 2 diabetes (T2D). T1D patients lost weight compared with glargine (GL). Patients with T2D tended to gain less weight with BIL than with glargine. Compared to glargine, BIL was associated with higher liver fat, triglycerides and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels, including a higher frequency of elevation of ALT ≥3 times the upper limit of normal, but without severe, acute drug-induced liver injury. Injection site reactions, primarily lipohypertrophy, were more frequent with BIL. In conclusion, BIL demonstrated better glycaemic control with reduced glucose variability and nocturnal hypoglycaemia but higher triglycerides, ALT and liver fat relative to conventional comparator insulin. The hepato-preferential action of BIL with reduced peripheral activity may account for these findings.

Topics: Alanine Transaminase; Blood Glucose; Clinical Trials, Phase II as Topic; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin Lispro; Insulin, Isophane; Liver; Polyethylene Glycols; Treatment Outcome; Triglycerides; Weight Loss

The aim of the present study was to compare the reported efficacy and safety of glucagon-like peptide-l receptor agonist (GLP-1RA) and insulin glargine (IGlar) for poorly controlled type 2 diabetes.. Medline, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and clinicaltrials.gov were carried out. References and cited papers of relevant articles were also checked.. Seven trials met the inclusion criteria. GLP-1RA showed equivalent or superior efficacy to IGlar for reducing hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), with a greater proportion of patients achieving HbAlc<7%. GLP-1RA also favored decreased body weight, total cholesterol (TC), low-density lipoprotein (LDL), and systolic blood pressure (SBP). Serious adverse events were uncommon and not significantly different. More patients taking GLP-1RA experienced gastrointestinal complications: nausea, diarrhea, and vomiting. Severe hypoglycemia events were rare, and minor hypoglycemia was less common for GLP-1RA.. GLP-1RA showed greater efficacy compared to IGlar for type 2 diabetes, and it may also prove beneficial for other diabetes-associated characteristics, including obesity, hypertension, and hyperlipidemia.

Topics: Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine

Topics: Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Substitution; Female; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Detemir; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male

A variety of basal insulin preparations are used to treat patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). We aimed to summarize scientific evidence on relative efficacy and safety of insulin glargine (IGlar) and other insulins in T2DM.. A systematic review was carried out in major medical databases up to December 2012. Relevant studies compared efficacy and safety of IGlar, added to oral drugs (OAD) or/and in combination with bolus insulin, with protamine insulin (NPH) or premixed insulin (MIX) in the same regimen, as well as with insulin detemir (IDet), in T2DM. Target HbA1c level without hypoglycemic events was considered the primary endpoint.. Twenty eight RCTs involving 12,669 T2DM patients followed for 12-52 weeks were included in quantitative analysis. IGlar + OAD use was associated with higher probability of reaching target HbA1c level without hypoglycemia as compared to NPH + OAD (RR = 1.32 [1.09, 1.59]) or MIX without OAD (RR = 1.61 [1.22, 2.13]) and similar effect as IDet + OAD (RR = 1.07 [0.87, 1.33]) and MIX + OAD (RR = 1.09 [0.86, 1.38]). IGlar + OAD demonstrated significantly lower risk of symptomatic hypoglycemia as compared to NPH + OAD (RR = 0.89 [0.83, 0.96]), MIX + OAD (RR = 0.75 [0.68, 0.83]) and MIX without OAD(RR = 0.75 [0.68, 0.83]), but not with IDet + OAD (RR = 0.99 [0.90, 1.08]). In basal-bolus regimens, IGlar demonstrated similar proportion of T2DM patients achieving target HbA1c as compared to NPH (RR = 1.14 [0.91, 1.44]) but higher than MIX (RR = 1.26 [1.12, 1.42) or IDet (RR = 1.38 [1.11, 1.72]). The risk of severe hypoglycemia was lower in IGlar than in NPH (RR = 0.77 [0.63, 0.94]), with no differences in comparison with MIX (RR = 0.74 [0.46, 1.20]) and IDet (RR = 1.10 [0.54, 2.25]). IGlar + OAD has comparable safety profile to NPH, with less frequent adverse events leading to treatment discontinuation than MIX + OAD (RR = 0.41 [0.22, 0.76]) and IDet + OAD (RR = 0.40 [0.24, 0.69]). Also severe adverse reactions were less common for IGlar + OAD when compared to MIX + OAD (RR = 0.71 [0.52; 0.98]).. For the majority of examined efficacy and safety outcomes, IGlar use in T2DM patients was superior or non-inferior to the alternative insulin treatment options.

Topics: Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Detemir; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Isophane; Insulin, Long-Acting; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Treatment Outcome

Cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of mortality in type 2 diabetes mellitus. Hyperinsulinemia is associated with increased cardiovascular risk, but the effects of exogenous insulin on cardiovascular disease progression have been less well studied. Insulin has been shown to have both cardioprotective and atherosclerosis-promoting effects in laboratory animal studies. Long-term clinical trials using insulin to attain improved diabetes control in younger type 1 and type 2 diabetes patients have shown improved cardiovascular outcomes. Shorter trials of intensive diabetes control with high insulin use in higher risk patients with type 2 diabetes have shown either no cardiovascular benefit or increased all cause and cardiovascular mortality. Glargine insulin is a basal insulin analog widely used to treat patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes. This review focuses on the effects of glargine on cardiovascular outcomes. Glargine lowers triglycerides, leads to a modest weight gain, causes less hypoglycemia when compared with intermediate-acting insulin, and has a neutral effect on blood pressure. The Outcome Reduction With Initial Glargine Intervention (ORIGIN trial), a 6.2 year dedicated cardiovascular outcomes trial of glargine demonstrated no increased cardiovascular risk.

Topics: Biomarkers; Blood Glucose; Cardiovascular Diseases; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Administration Schedule; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

To determine the impact of gender on glycaemic control and hypoglycaemia in insulin-naïve patients with type 2 diabetes (T2DM).. Data were pooled from six randomized clinical trials of insulin glargine or NPH insulin in insulin-naïve, inadequately controlled patients. Female [n = 1251; mean glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) level 8.99%, age 56.91 years, diabetes duration 9.84 years] and male patients (n = 1349; mean HbA1c 8.9%, age 57.47 years, diabetes duration 10.13 years) were started on and treated with insulin glargine or NPH insulin for 24-36 weeks. HbA1c and fasting blood glucose levels, percent achieving HbA1c target of <7% and insulin dose change were recorded.. For both men and women, HbA1c levels were significantly reduced over time (p < 0.001); a significantly greater HbA1c reduction was observed in men than in women (-1.36 vs. -1.22; p = 0.002). Significantly fewer women achieved target HbA1c of <7% (p < 0.001). At the study end, women had a significantly higher insulin dose/kg than men (0.47 vs. 0.42 U/kg; p < 0.001). The incidence rates of severe and severe nocturnal hypoglycaemia were significantly higher in women (3.28% vs. 1.85%; p < 0.05 and 2.24% vs. 0.59%; p < 0.001, respectively). Women were more likely to experience severe hypoglycaemia [odds ratio (OR) 1.80; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.08, 3.00; p = 0.02] and severe nocturnal hypoglycaemia (OR: 3.80; 95% CI 1.72, 8.42; p = 0.001).. These observations confirm studies that found a smaller improvement in HbA1c and greater hypoglycaemia in women during insulin treatment. Physicians should be aware of the need to determine and closely monitor dosing, particularly in women, to optimize the balance between glycaemic control and hypoglycaemia risk.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Fasting; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Isophane; Male; Middle Aged; Prevalence; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Sex Factors; Treatment Outcome

To conduct a patient-level meta-analysis of the EDITION 1, 2 and 3 studies, which compared the efficacy and safety of new insulin glargine 300 U/ml (Gla-300) with insulin glargine 100 U/ml (Gla-100) in people with type 2 diabetes (T2DM) on basal and mealtime insulin, basal insulin and oral antihyperglycaemic drugs, or no prior insulin, respectively.. The EDITION studies were multicentre, randomized, open-label, parallel-group, phase IIIa studies, with similar designs and endpoints. A patient-level meta-analysis of the studies enabled these endpoints to be examined over 6 months in a large population with T2DM (Gla-300, n = 1247; Gla-100, n = 1249).. No significant study-by-treatment interactions across studies were found, enabling them to be pooled. The mean change in glycated haemoglobin was comparable for Gla-300 and Gla-100 [each -1.02 (standard error 0.03)%; least squares (LS) mean difference 0.00 (95% confidence interval (CI) -0.08 to 0.07)%]. Annualized rates of confirmed (≤3.9 mmol/l) or severe hypoglycaemia were lower with Gla-300 than with Gla-100 during the night (31% difference in rate ratio over 6 months) and at any time (24 h, 14% difference). Consistent reductions were observed in percentage of participants with ≥1 hypoglycaemic event. Severe hypoglycaemia at any time (24 h) was rare (Gla-300: 2.3%; Gla-100: 2.6%). Weight gain was low (<1 kg) in both groups, with less gain with Gla-300 [LS mean difference -0.28 kg (95% CI -0.55 to -0.01); p = 0.039]. Both treatments were well tolerated, with similar rates of adverse events.. Gla-300 provides comparable glycaemic control to Gla-100 in a large population with a broad clinical spectrum of T2DM, with consistently less hypoglycaemia at any time of day and less nocturnal hypoglycaemia.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine; Male; Middle Aged; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic

Toujeo, the new 300 IU/mL formulation of insulin glargine, is as effective as insulin glargine 100 IU/mL (Lantus) in lowering HbA1c, and might cause less hypoglycemia.

Topics: Animals; Blood Glucose; Clinical Trials as Topic; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting

The limitations of current basal insulin preparations include concerns related to their pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties, hypoglycaemia, weight gain, and perception of management complexity, including rigid dosing schedules. Insulin degludec (IDeg) is a novel basal insulin with improved pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties compared to insulin glargine (IGlar) including a long half-life of ∼25 h and a duration of action >42 h at steady state, providing a flat and stable blood glucose-lowering effect when injected once daily. Evidence from phase 3a clinical trials with a treat-to-target design in patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes has shown that IDeg has similar efficacy to IGlar, with a 9% and 26% reduction in risk of overall and nocturnal hypoglycaemia, respectively (in the pooled population) during the entire treatment period, and a 16% and 32% reduction during the maintenance period, respectively. Given its pharmacodynamic properties, IDeg offers a broad dosing window, allowing for flexible dose administration, if required. Two different formulations of IDeg are available (100 units/mL [U100] and 200 units/mL), the latter providing the same IDeg dose as the U100 formulation in half the injection volume. The unique pharmacokinetic profile of IDeg facilitates glycaemic control while minimising the risk of nocturnal hypoglycaemia.

Topics: Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Administration Schedule; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Weight Gain

Insulin glargine 100 units/ml (Gla-100) has become a standard of care in diabetes treatment over the past decade, providing 24-h basal insulin coverage after once-daily subcutaneous injection for many people with diabetes, with a well-established efficacy and safety profile. New insulin glargine 300 units/ml (Gla-300) is a basal insulin that provides the same number of units as Gla-100 in a third of the volume. Compared with Gla-100, Gla-300 has shown more constant and prolonged pharmacokinetic (PK)/pharmacodynamic (PD) profiles. This review summarizes the findings from the EDITION series of clinical trials that investigated Gla-300 in individuals with type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus. Overall, Gla-300 has been shown to achieve similar glycaemic control with less, or similar, nocturnal hypoglycaemia compared with Gla-100, and a trend towards lower hypoglycaemia at any time of day. The EDITION series of clinical trials also provides some evidence for less weight gain with Gla-300 than with Gla-100. In addition, the PK/PD profiles of Gla-300 may allow more flexibility in the timing of doses, improving convenience; thus, Gla-300 could offer several positive features for individuals with diabetes requiring basal insulin therapy.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Clinical Trials, Phase I as Topic; Clinical Trials, Phase II as Topic; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Compounding; Drug Therapy, Combination; Evidence-Based Medicine; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hyperglycemia; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Injections, Subcutaneous; Insulin Glargine; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Weight Gain

Basal insulin analogues have a reduced risk of hypoglycaemia compared with NPH insulin, but hypoglycaemia still remains a major impediment to achieving recommended fasting plasma glucose (FPG) targets in patients with diabetes. Insulin degludec (IDeg) is a new basal insulin that forms soluble multihexamers after subcutaneous injection resulting in an ultra-long duration of action and stable glucose-lowering effect. The aim of this analysis was to compare the effect of IDeg on FPG and nocturnal confirmed hypoglycaemia as compared to insulin glargine (IGlar).. Data were included from seven phase 3a, randomised, open-label, treat-to-target clinical trials in which once-daily IDeg was compared with once-daily IGlar. Two trials included a total of 957 patients with type 1 diabetes (T1D) and five trials included a total of 3360 patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D); all trials were 26 or 52 weeks in duration. Confirmed hypoglycaemia was defined as plasma glucose <3.1 mmol/L or severe episodes requiring assistance, and nocturnal hypoglycaemia occurred between 00:01 and 05:59. In all trials, the mean end-of-trial FPG was lower for IDeg than IGlar, reaching statistical significance in three trials. Similarly, IDeg was associated with a lower rate of nocturnal confirmed hypoglycaemia vs. IGlar, which was statistically significant in three trials, regardless of type of diabetes or background therapy.. This analysis shows that the lower rate of nocturnal confirmed hypoglycaemia seen with IDeg relative to IGlar is accompanied by a reduced mean FPG, in particular in patients with T2D.

Topics: Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Fasting; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic

The major abnormality in both type 1 and type 2 diabetes is insulin deficiency. The methods of replacing insulin have improved throughout the decades, but hypoglycemia is still the limiting factor for many individuals with diabetes, and it prevents them from achieving ideal glycemic targets. New insulin and newer delivery systems are being developed that can improve some of the limitations of current insulins or make the delivery of insulins more acceptable for some patients. Extending the duration of action of basal insulins and shortening the peak of fast-acting insulins may have advantages for individuals with diabetes. Different delivery systems may make insulin more acceptable to patients and may have other advantages, which may aid in attaining better glycemic control.

Topics: Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Delivery Systems; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic

To describe the studies evaluating the efficacy and safety of new insulin glargine 300 U/mL (Gla-300) as a basal insulin in the treatment of type 1 (T1DM) and type 2 (T2DM) diabetes mellitus.. A literature search of MEDLINE was conducted (January 2008-June 2015) using the terms U300, Gla-300, and insulin glargine 300 units/mL and supplemented with congress abstracts published in 2014 and 2015.. All English language studies assessing the efficacy and/or safety of Gla-300 were evaluated.. The efficacy and safety of once-daily Gla-300 has been compared with insulin glargine 100 U/mL (Gla-100) in the EDITION trials, 6 phase-3, multinational, open-label studies in T1DM and T2DM. Across these studies, Gla-300 consistently demonstrated glycemic control comparable to Gla-100; a mean (standard error) change in glycated hemoglobin A1c of -1.02% (0.03) with both Gla-100 (n = 1235) and Gla-300 (n = 1239) was seen in a patient-level meta-analysis. Gla-300 was associated with comparable or reduced nocturnal hypoglycemia compared with Gla-100; the relative risk for nocturnal hypoglycemia with Gla-300 versus Gla-100 was 0.75 (95% CI = 0.68 to 0.83) in a patient-level meta-analysis. There is also some evidence for less weight gain with Gla-300 compared with Gla-100, despite a higher insulin dose. Gla-300 was well tolerated, with the number of adverse events being comparable to that with Gla-100.. These results suggest that Gla-300 may have a place as an alternative, long-acting basal insulin for patients with T1DM or T2DM, with the possibility for improved tolerability.

Topics: Blood Glucose; Clinical Trials as Topic; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine

Several studies have suggested that anti-diabetic insulin analogue treatment might increase cancer risk. The aim of this study was to review the postulated association between insulin and insulin analogue treatment and breast cancer development, and plausible mechanisms.. A systematic literature search was performed on breast cell-line, animal and human studies using the key words 'insulin analogue' and 'breast neoplasia' in MEDLINE at PubMed, EMBASE, and ISI Web of Science databases. A quantitative and qualitative review was performed on the epidemiological data; due to a limited number of reported estimates, a meta-analysis was performed for glargine only. A comprehensive overview was composed for in vitro and animal studies. Protein and gene expression was analysed for the cell lines most frequently used in the included in vitro studies.. In total 16 in vitro, 5 animal, 2 in vivo human and 29 epidemiological papers were included. Insulin AspB10 showed mitogenic properties in vitro and in animal studies. Glargine was the only clinically available insulin analogue for which an increased proliferative potential was found in breast cancer cell lines. However, the pooled analysis of 13 epidemiological studies did not show evidence for an association between insulin glargine treatment and an increased breast cancer risk (HR 1.04; 95 % CI 0.91-1.17; p=0.49) versus no glargine in patients with diabetes mellitus. It has to be taken into account that the number of animal studies was limited, and epidemiological studies were underpowered and suffered from methodological limitations.. There is no compelling evidence that any clinically available insulin analogue (Aspart, Determir, Glargine, Glulisine or Lispro), nor human insulin increases breast cancer risk. Overall, the data suggests that insulin treatment is not involved in breast tumour initiation, but might induce breast tumour progression by up regulating mitogenic signalling pathways.

Topics: Animals; Breast Neoplasms; Cell Line, Tumor; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Female; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine; MCF-7 Cells; Risk

Treat-to-target trial designs compare investigational insulins with a standard insulin. Treat-to-target trials force-titrate insulin dosages to achieve a prespecified treatment goal. With comparable glycaemic control, comparisons of safety endpoints such as hypoglycaemia can be made to establish the risk-benefit profile of the new insulin. Glargine versus NPH showed comparable A1C reductions; however, A1C <7% without associated nocturnal hypoglycaemia was reached in more patients on glargine and overall hypoglycaemia was lower. Detemir versus glargine showed non-inferiority between the groups; however, with less weight gain and more injection site reactions with detemir. Detemir/aspart versus glargine/aspart showed non-inferiority between the treatments, however, with less weight gain in the detemir group but comparable risk of hypoglycaemia. Degludec in combination with aspart versus glargine/aspart showed comparable A1C reductions. However, degludec-treated patients had less overall hypoglycaemia and less nocturnal hypoglycaemia. Because insulin titrations are guided by goal attainment with each treatment, treat-to-target trials enable clinicians to determine differences in non-glycaemic treatment effects, such as rates of hypoglycaemia and weight gain, at the same level of glycaemic control.

Topics: Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Aspart; Insulin Detemir; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Risk Assessment; Treatment Outcome

To assess patient-reported outcomes associated with initiating insulin glargine among insulin-naïve patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).. This was a pooled analysis of patient-level data from Phase 3, randomized controlled trials evaluating once-daily insulin glargine vs. comparator treatment for ≥24 weeks in previously insulin-naïve adult patients with T2DM and poor glycaemic control. Eligible studies utilized strict, predefined insulin titration algorithms with weekly dose-adjustment to achieve fasting plasma glucose (FPG) levels of ≤5.6 mmol/l. Treatment satisfaction was measured using the Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (DTSQ) change (c) and status (s) versions.. A total of 1577 patients from four studies were included; 830 patients treated with insulin glargine and 747 with comparators. At week 24, DTSQc scores improved in both groups with a significantly higher increase in treatment satisfaction for insulin glargine vs. comparators (13.5 vs. 12.1; p < 0.0001). Multivariate regression analysis revealed that significant predictors of DTSQc improvement at week 24 were insulin glargine treatment (p < 0.0001), higher baseline DTSQs (p < 0.0001), and lower baseline body weight (p = 0.0103). Greater improvement in DTSQc at week 24 was significantly associated with decrease from baseline in glycosylated haemoglobin (p < 0.001) and FPG (p = 0.0001); a numerically more positive change in weight from baseline approached significance (p = 0.07).. Initiation of insulin glargine in insulin-naïve patients with T2DM is associated with greater improvements in treatment satisfaction than alternative interventions, with perceived improvements in glycaemic control and baseline weight likely to be important factors.

Topics: Blood Glucose; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Administration Schedule; Endpoint Determination; Fasting; Female; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Patient Satisfaction; Quality of Life; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Surveys and Questionnaires; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

Because of the progressive nature of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), insulin therapy will eventually become necessary in most patients. Recent evidence suggests that maintaining optimal glycemic control by early insulin therapy can reduce the risk of microvascular and macrovascular complications in patients with T2DM. The present review focuses on relevant clinical evidence supporting the use of premixed insulin analogues in T2DM when intensifying therapy, and as starter insulins in insulin-naïve patients. Our aim is to provide relevant facts and clinical evidence useful in the decision-making process of treatment selection and individualized treatment goal setting to obtain sustained blood glucose control.

Topics: Biphasic Insulins; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Aspart; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Isophane; Insulin, Long-Acting; Insulin, Short-Acting; Treatment Outcome

This meta-analysis of 5 trials from the Phase 3a insulin degludec (IDeg) clinical trial program evaluated the risk of hypoglycemia in a subset of subjects with type 2 diabetes (T2D) who required high basal insulin doses at the end of the trials.. This meta-analysis compared glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), fasting plasma glucose (FPG), basal insulin dose, body weight, and rates of overall and nocturnal confirmed hypoglycemia in a pooled population of T2D subjects using >60 U basal insulin at trial completion. Five Phase 3a, open-label, randomized, treat-to-target, confirmatory 26- or 52-week trials with IDeg (n = 2,262) versus insulin glargine (IGlar) (n = 1,110) administered once daily were included. Overall confirmed hypoglycemia was defined as self-measured blood glucose >56 mg/dL or any episode requiring assistance; nocturnal confirmed hypoglycemia had an onset between 00:01 and 05:59 AM.. More than one-third of IDeg- (35%) and IGlar- (34%) treated T2D subjects required >60 U of basal insulin daily at the ends of the trial. Patients achieved similar mean HbA1c values (estimated treatment difference [ETD] IDeg - IGlar: 0.05%, P = .44) while mean FPG values were lower with IDeg than IGlar (ETD: -5.9 mg/dL, P = .04) at end-of-trial. There was a 21% lower rate of overall confirmed hypoglycemic episodes for IDeg (estimated rate ratio [RR] IDeg/IGlar: 0.79, P = .02) and a 52% lower rate of nocturnal confirmed hypoglycemic episodes for IDeg (RR: 0.48, P<.01).. In this post hoc meta-analysis, more than 30% of subjects with T2D required >60 U/day of basal insulin at the end of the trials. In these individuals, IDeg achieves similar HbA1c reduction with significantly less overall and nocturnal confirmed hypoglycemia compared with IGlar.

Topics: Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Risk

The aim of this analysis was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of insulin degludec (IDeg) versus insulin glargine (IGlar) in adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) who are considered appropriate for treatment with a basal insulin analogue, using a short-term economic model.. Meta-analysis data from three phase III clinical studies were used to populate a simple and transparent short-term model. The costs and effects of treatment with IDeg versus IGlar were calculated over a 12-month period. The analysis was conducted from the perspective of the UK National Health Service. Sensitivity analyses were conducted to assess the degree of uncertainty surrounding the results.. IDeg is a cost-effective treatment option versus IGlar in patients with T2DM using basal insulin. Base case incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were estimated at £15,795 per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) and £13,078 per QALY, which are below commonly accepted thresholds for cost-effectiveness. Sensitivity analyses demonstrated that hypoglycaemia event rates had an important effect on the results. With higher event rates for non-severe hypoglycaemia IDeg was less costly and more effective than IGlar (dominant). Conversely, using lower event rates for severe hypoglycaemia generated higher ICERs. Using hypoglycaemia rates from a subgroup of patients who experienced ≥1 hypoglycaemic event per year IDeg was highly cost-effective versus IGlar; with estimated ICERS of £4887 and £2625 per QALY.. This short-term modelling approach allows the economic evaluation of newer insulin analogues when advanced long-term modelling based on HbA1c differences is inappropriate. For patients with T2DM who are considered appropriate for treatment with a basal insulin analogue, IDeg is a cost-effective treatment option compared with IGlar and offers additional benefits to subgroups of patients, such as those suffering from recurrent hypoglycaemia.

Topics: Adult; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Health Care Costs; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Models, Economic; National Health Programs; Quality-Adjusted Life Years; Treatment Outcome; United Kingdom

To review the available evidence regarding dosing conversion between glargine and detemir in an effort to assist clinicians in performing dosing conversion.. A MEDLINE literature search was performed using the search terms glargine and detemir for articles published through August 2013.. All English-language clinical trials were reviewed for inclusion of dosing and/or pharmacokinetic data.. A total of 7 large (n ≥ 258) randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing glargine and detemir in patients with type 1 and 2 diabetes had dosing equivalency data available. In these 7 RCTs, on average, a 38% higher detemir dose was required (range = 8.0%-77.2%) to achieve glucose control comparable to that achieved with glargine. A 24-hour isoglycemic clamp study conducted in 11 patients with type 1 diabetes demonstrated that the duration of action of detemir is dose dependent, with increasing doses of detemir resulting in increased duration of action of detemir. Pharmacokinetic studies conducted in patients with type 2 diabetes are conflicting, although the majority of evidence suggests that glargine provides a longer duration of glycemic control as compared with detemir.. When performing conversion between glargine and detemir, prescribers should be aware that higher doses of detemir as compared with glargine may be necessary to achieve the same glycemic control. Additionally, twice-daily injections of detemir should be considered in clinical situations in which glucose control appears to decline after 12 hours, especially with doses ≤0.4 units/kg/d in patients with type 1 diabetes.

Topics: Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Detemir; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting

It is uncertain whether the addition of biphasic insulin analogues to oral antidiabetic drugs (OADs) is as effective and safe as basal insulin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). We performed a systematic review to compare glycaemic control and selected clinical outcomes in T2DM patients inadequately controlled with OADs whose treatment was intensified by adding biphasic insulin aspart (BIAsp 30) or insulin glargine (IGlar).. The analysis included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) identified by a systematic literature search in medical databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, The Cochrane Library and other sources) up to March 2013. Studies met the inclusion criteria if they compared BIAsp 30 vs. IGlar added to at least one OAD in T2DM patients. Trials applying different OADs in both treatment arms were also included. Results were presented as weighted mean difference (WMD) or odds ratio (OR) with a 95% confidence interval (CI).. Five trials, including a total number of 1758 patients followed up from 24 to 28 weeks, were identified. Quantitative synthesis demonstrated that BIAsp 30 reduced HbA1c level more efficiently than IGlar [5 RCTs; WMD (95% CI): -0.21% (-0.35%, -0.08%)]. Differences were observed in favour of BIAsp for lower mean prandial glucose increment [3 RCTs; WMD (95% CI): -14.70 mg/dl (-20.09, -9.31)]; no difference was observed for fasting plasma glucose [3 RCTs; WMD (95% CI): 7.09 mg/dl (-15.76, 29.94)]. We found no evidence for higher risk of overall [2 RCTs; 63% vs. 51%; OR = 1.77 (0.91; 3.44)] and severe hypoglycaemic episodes [4 RCTs; 0.98% vs. 1.12%; OR (95% CI) = 0.88 (0.31, 2.53)] in the BIAsp 30 group as compared with IGlar group. Twice-daily administration of BIAsp 30 resulted in larger weight gain [2 RCTs; WMD (95% CI) = 1.78 kg (1.04; 2.52)].. BIAsp 30 added to OAD therapy results in a better glycaemic control as compared with IGlar in T2DM patients. BIAsp 30 use is associated with slightly larger weight gain but no rise in risk of severe hypoglycaemic episodes.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Biphasic Insulins; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Fasting; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Aspart; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Isophane; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Middle Aged; Postprandial Period; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Treatment Outcome; Weight Gain

Diabetes mellitus is a common endocrine disorder in feline practice, affecting approximately 1 in 200 cats. The majority of diabetic cats have type 2 diabetes mellitus, which results from a combination of peripheral insulin resistance and a progressive reduction in insulin production.. While usually easy to diagnose, management of diabetes mellitus presents a number of challenges for practitioners and clients alike. Practitioners must decide on diet, insulin type and dose, monitoring method and intensity, and concomitant therapy, which will vary based on individual patient and client needs, and geographic location. Practitioners may also encounter patients with diabetic ketoacidosis or other diabetic complications, and patients with multiple concurrent diseases. Clients may be challenged by the substantial time and financial commitment involved in owning a diabetic cat.. Understanding the pathophysiology, optimal treatment protocols and current goals of diabetes management will benefit practitioners managing diabetic cats. This article reviews the most current management plans for feline diabetics. It places particular emphasis on best practice for achieving diabetic remission, which is an attainable goal in the majority of newly diagnosed diabetic cats.. The information in this article is drawn from the recent human and veterinary literature, including prospective and retrospective studies. The body of prospective clinical data on the use of newer, long-acting insulins (glargine and especially detemir) in cats is limited, but growing.

Topics: Animals; Cat Diseases; Cats; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Diabetic Ketoacidosis; Drug Administration Schedule; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Detemir; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting

The basal insulin products currently on market do not optimally mimic endogenous insulin secretion. These unmet clinical needs have fueled the development of new basal insulin analogues for improving their pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics profile.. We review the recent literature investigating the efficacy and safety of new basal insulin analogues in type 2 diabetes, as in the USA, insulin utilization accounted for 26% of treatment visits for these patients in 2012. Insulin degludec is a desB30 insulin acylated at the LysB29 residue with a glutamate linker and 16-carbon fatty diacyl side chain. Insulin lispro has been PEGylated at lysine B28, via a urethane bond, which increases the hydrodynamic size of the molecule and reduces its absorption and clearance following subcutaneous administration. Glargine U300 represents a new high-strength glargine formulation (300 U/ml): once injected, U300 forms a compact subcutaneous depot with a smaller surface area to produce a more gradual and prolonged release. Both PEG-lispro and glargine U300 are not yet on the market.. Ultra-long acting and high-strength formulations of new basal analogues have the potential for less glycemic variability, less (nocturnal) hypoglycemia and weight-loss advantage for PEG-lispro. However, these new basal insulin analogues need to be monitored closely for adverse signals.

Topics: Animals; Biomarkers; Blood Glucose; Chemistry, Pharmaceutical; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Design; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine; Insulin Lispro; Insulin, Long-Acting; Insulins; Polyethylene Glycols; Treatment Outcome

Therapies targeting the action of incretin hormones have been under close scrutiny in recent years. The incretin effect has been defined as postprandial enhancement of insulin secretion by gut-derived factors. Likewise, incretin mimetics and incretin effect amplifiers are the two different incretin-based treatment strategies developed for the treatment of diabetes. Although, incretin mimetics produce effects very similar to those of natural incretin hormones, incretin effect amplifiers act by inhibiting dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) enzyme to increase plasma concentration of incretins and their biologic effects. Because glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) is an incretin hormone with various anti-diabetic actions including stimulation of glucose-induced insulin secretion, inhibition of glucagon secretion, hepatic glucose production and gastric emptying, it has been evaluated as a novel therapeutic agent for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). GLP-1 also manifests trophic effects on pancreas such as pancreatic beta cell growth and differentiation. Because DPP-4 is the enzyme responsible for the inactivation of GLP-1, DPP-4 inhibition represents another potential strategy to increase plasma concentration of GLP-1 to enhance the incretin effect. Thus, anti-diabetic properties of these two classes of drugs have stimulated substantial clinical interest in the potential of incretin-based therapeutic agents as a means to control glucose homeostasis in T2DM patients. Despite this fact, clinical use of GLP-1 mimetics and DPP-4 inhibitors have raised substantial concerns owing to possible side effects of the treatments involving increased risk for pancreatitis, and C-cell adenoma/carcinoma. Thus, controversial issues in incretin-based therapies under development are reviewed and discussed in this manuscript.

Topics: Animals; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptidyl Peptidase 4; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Exenatide; Gastric Inhibitory Polypeptide; Glucagon-Like Peptide 1; Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Incretins; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin Secretion; Insulin-Secreting Cells; Insulin, Long-Acting; Peptides; Receptors, Glucagon; Venoms

Evaluate early (0-12 weeks) and later (12-24 weeks) treatment outcomes in subjects with type 2 diabetes not achieving glycaemic control with oral antidiabetes drugs (OADs).. Selected data were pooled from 15 randomised, controlled treat-to-target (fasting plasma glucose < 100mg/dL [< 5.6 mmol/L]) trials adding insulin glargine to metformin, a sulphonylurea, or both. Glycaemic and hypoglycaemia parameters, insulin dose, and body weight at weeks 12 and 24 were assessed using individualised subject-level data.. Data from 2837 subjects were analysed. HbA1c decreased from 8.8% (73 mmol/mol) at baseline by 1.4% (15 mmol/mol) at Week 12, and a further 0.2% (2 mmol/mol) at Week 24 in the pooled population. Similar reductions were observed across the different treatment groups. HbA1c < 7.0% (<53 mmol/mol) was reached by 34.8% of participants at Week 12 and an additional 24.3% by Week 24. Hypoglycaemia incidence and rates were similar during the early and continued treatment periods across all treatment combinations, but were markedly lower for insulin glargine plus metformin versus the other 2 regimens.. Early and sustained glycaemic benefits with a low-risk of hypoglycaemia are observed after initiation of insulin glargine in a pooled type 2 diabetes cohort previously uncontrolled on OADs.

Topics: Blood Glucose; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Metformin; Middle Aged; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Sulfonylurea Compounds; Treatment Outcome

Insulin glargine (100 U/ml; U100) was the first long-acting basal insulin analog to be introduced into clinical practice and it remains the most widely used. Although U100 is an effective and safe treatment, research is ongoing to optimize the time-action profile. The focus of this review is insulin glargine [rDNA origin] injection 300 U/ml (U300), a novel formulation that contains a higher concentration of insulin than U100.. The clinical efficacy and safety of U300 in patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus are discussed, with an emphasis on recently released data from the Phase III EDITION clinical trials.. The higher concentration of insulin in U300 results in a distinct pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profile. U300 has a longer duration of action than U100 and plasma insulin exposure is less variable. Both insulin formulations exhibit a similar efficacy and safety profile, but importantly, U300 is associated with less body weight gain and a lower incidence of hypoglycaemic events.

Topics: Clinical Trials, Phase II as Topic; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Hormone Replacement Therapy; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting

GLP-1 receptors agonists have been a substantial change in treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus, and its weekly administration has broken pre-established schemes. Daily exenatide is administered every 12 hours (BID) subcutaneously, while weekly exenatide is administered once a week. Both molecules share a common mechanism of action but have differential effects on basal and postprandial glucose. We review the major clinical trials with both exenatide BID and weekly exenatide. It can be concluded that exenatide BID shows a hypoglycemic effect similar to other treatments for type 2 DM but adding significant weight loss with low incidence of hypoglycemia. Weekly exenatide decreases HbA1c similar to liraglutide but larger than exenatide BID, both glargine and biphasic insulin, sitagliptin, and pioglitazone, maintaining weight loss and adding to gastrointestinal intolerance the induration at the injection site as a side effect.

Topics: Delayed-Action Preparations; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Drug Administration Schedule; Exenatide; Female; Gastrointestinal Diseases; Glucagon-Like Peptide 1; Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hyperglycemia; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Incretins; Injections, Subcutaneous; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Liraglutide; Male; Metformin; Peptides; Pioglitazone; Receptors, Glucagon; Thiazolidinediones; Venoms; Weight Loss

Insulin therapy is the most physiological and effective glucose-lowering treatment for diabetic patients, in which the risk of complications increases proportionally to HbA1c levels. Intensive glucose therapy has been demonstrated to be capable of reducing microvascular risk, a benefit maintained in the long period and also accompanied by a reduction in risk of cardiovascular (CV) disease, but increasing hypoglycaemic episodes. The aim of this review is to provide an overview starting from the burden of disease and critical aspects of acceptance and self-management of insulin therapy, and a comparison of the clinical pharmacology of human and insulin analogues available at present. Insulin is an important component of intensive type 2 diabetes management but some patient/physician barriers - hypoglycemia, fear of reduced quality of life (QoL), absence of insulin preparations that allow one to fully tailor treatment to individual needs, etc. - don't make it possible to obtain an optimal insulin therapy and often also produce a low compliance with the insulin regimen (missing injections have to be considered when analyzing the reasons for suboptimal glycaemic control). Current rapid and long-acting analogues only partially solve problems linked to insulin therapy like flexibility and QoL, but hypoglycaemia still represents an important cause of hospitalization, increased health expenditure and CV mortality. New insulin preparations, like degludec, should be helpful in the future for getting over barriers linked to insulin therapy.

Topics: Biomarkers; Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Treatment Outcome

To evaluate health-related quality of life (health utility) scores in patients with diabetes receiving insulin degludec (IDeg) or insulin glargine (IGlar).. Patient-level data from six, randomized, controlled, open-label, multicentre, confirmatory, treat-to-target trials of 26- or 52 weeks' duration were pooled in this analysis. The Short Form 36 (SF-36) version-2 health questionnaire was completed by patients at baseline and end-of-trial. SF-36 scores for 4001 individual patients were then mapped onto the EuroQol-5D health utility scale, which has a range from -0.59 (a state worse than death) to 1.00 (perfect health).. IDeg treatment exhibited a significant improvement in health status of 0.005 (CI: 0.0006; 0.009) points compared with IGlar (p < 0.024). Gender, region, trial and age also had a significant influence on estimated utility scores as did baseline utility scores, p < 0.05. Prior to the removal of interaction variables a difference of 0.008 points was observed, p < 0.045. Previous insulin treatment did not have an impact on the final outcome.. This study shows that IDeg is associated with a modest, but statistically significant, improvement in health utility compared with IGlar in patients with diabetes.

Topics: Blood Glucose; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Middle Aged; Multicenter Studies as Topic; Quality of Life; Quality-Adjusted Life Years; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Socioeconomic Factors; Surveys and Questionnaires; Treatment Outcome

To determine whether baseline characteristics, especially haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), predict the likelihood of reaching HbA1c ≤ 7.0% or the risk of experiencing hypoglycaemia after the addition of insulin glargine to oral therapy in type 2 diabetes.. Pooled patient-level data from 12 prospective, randomized, controlled studies that used insulin glargine in a treat-to-target titration regimen seeking fasting glucose levels ≤5.5 mmol/l (100 mg/dl) were analysed. Baseline characteristics were evaluated by logistic regression models as predictors of reaching a target HbA1c ≤ 7.0% or experiencing confirmed hypoglycaemia. The effect of prior glycaemic control was further explored by analysis of categorical ranges of baseline HbA1c.. Of 2312 participants, 95% completed 24 weeks of treatment. Lower HbA1c at baseline was independently associated with reaching HbA1c target [adjusted odds ratio (OR) for 1% difference: 0.538, p < 0.0001] and also with likelihood of experiencing confirmed hypoglycaemic events (adjusted OR: 0.835, p < 0.0001) at week 24. In an unadjusted analysis by baseline HbA1c range, the strong association between baseline control and attaining target HbA1c was confirmed (75% with baseline HbA1c < 8.0%, 60% with baseline HbA1c ≥ 8.0 and <9.0% and 38% with baseline HbA1c ≥ 9.0% attained HbA1c ≤ 7.0%). The incidence of hypoglycaemia confirmed <3.9 mmol/l (70 mg/dl) was higher in the lower baseline HbA1c ranges but severe hypoglycaemia was infrequent at all baseline HbA1c levels.. Systematically titrated insulin glargine, added to oral agents, was effective over a wide range of baseline HbA1c. Lower baseline HbA1c was the best clinical predictor of achieving HbA1c ≤ 7.0% and also associated with higher risk of glucose-confirmed hypoglycaemia. Severe hypoglycaemia was infrequent using this treatment approach.

Topics: Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Fasting; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Incidence; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Middle Aged; Predictive Value of Tests; Prospective Studies; Risk Assessment; Treatment Outcome

Excellent glycaemic control is essential in pregnancy to optimise maternal and foetal outcomes. The aim of this review is to assess the efficacy and safety of insulin analogues in pregnancy. Insulin lispro and insulin aspart are safe in pregnancy and may improve post-prandial glycaemic control in women with type 1 diabetes. However, a lack of data indicating improved foetal outcomes would suggest that there is no imperative to switch to a short-acting analogue where the woman's diabetes is well controlled with human insulin. There are no reports of the use of insulin glulisine in pregnancy and so its use cannot be recommended. Most studies of insulin glargine in pregnancy are small, retrospective and include women with pre-existing diabetes and gestational diabetes. There appear to be no major safety concerns and so it seems reasonable to continue insulin glargine if required to achieve excellent glycaemic control. A head-to-head comparison between insulin detemir and NPH insulin in women with type 1 diabetes showed that while foetal outcomes did not differ, fasting plasma glucose improved with insulin detemir without an increased incidence of hypoglycaemia. The greater evidence base supports the use of insulin detemir as the first line long-acting analogue in pregnancy but the lack of definitive foetal benefits means that there is no strong need to switch a woman who is well controlled on NPH insulin. There seems little justification in using long acting insulin analogues in women with gestational diabetes or type 2 diabetes where the risk of hypoglycaemia is low.

Topics: Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Diabetes, Gestational; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Detemir; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Isophane; Insulin, Long-Acting; Pregnancy; Pregnancy in Diabetics; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Treatment Outcome

Elderly patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) present therapeutic challenges related to co-morbidities, treatment adherence, and safety. This study examines the efficacy and safety of insulin glargine compared to other glucose-lowering interventions in younger and older adults.. In this pooled analysis of 24-week data from nine prospective open-label, multicenter, phase 3/4, two-arm, parallel-group, randomized controlled trials, patients with T2DM aged 18-80 years received insulin glargine (used as a basal insulin regimen) or comparators (including rosiglitazone, pioglitazone, insulin lispro, insulin lispro 75/25, NPH insulin, NPH insulin 30/70, and lifestyle/dietary measures). Endpoints included change from baseline to week 24 in: glycated hemoglobin; fasting plasma glucose; body weight; body mass index; insulin dose; incidence of nocturnal, daytime, or any hypoglycemia. Results were stratified by age (<65, ≥65, 65-74, and ≥75 years) and treatment (insulin glargine or comparator).. A total of 2,938 patients were included (2,263 aged <65 years, 675 aged ≥65 years). Similar levels of glycemic control were achieved in both younger (<65 years) and older (≥65 years) patients with T2DM. Insulin glargine was associated with better glycemic control and a reduced incidence of daytime and any hypoglycemia versus comparator interventions in both younger and older T2DM patients.. This analysis suggests that insulin glargine may represent a safe option to improve glycemic control in older patients with T2DM.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Blood Glucose; Body Mass Index; Body Weight; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Clinical Trials, Phase IV as Topic; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Administration Schedule; Humans; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Middle Aged; Multicenter Studies as Topic; Prospective Studies; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult

To compare the impact of diabetes duration on hypoglycaemia in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) treated with insulin glargine or NPH insulin.. A pooled analysis of 24-week patient level data from randomized controlled studies comparing once-daily insulin glargine with once-daily NPH insulin in insulin-naïve adult patients with T2DM was performed, stratifying patients into quartiles by duration of diabetes: <5.8 years; 5.8 to <9.2 years; 9.2 to <14 years and ≥14 years. Daytime and nocturnal hypoglycaemia events were evaluated.. Data from 2330 patients in four randomized controlled trials were included in the analysis; 1258 treated with insulin glargine and 1072 with NPH insulin. The rates of daytime hypoglycaemia were similar for insulin glargine and NPH insulin, irrespective of disease duration. Patients with longer T2DM duration treated with glargine experienced greater glycated haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) reductions. Rates of severe nocturnal hypoglycaemia and nocturnal hypoglycaemia [self-monitored blood glucose < 70 mg/dl (3.89 mmol/l) and < 50 mg/dl (2.78 mmol/l)] were all significantly and positively correlated with the duration of diabetes for patients treated with NPH insulin but not with insulin glargine. Despite improvements in HbA1c, rates of symptomatic nocturnal hypoglycaemia were significantly lower with insulin glargine than with NPH insulin in patients with longer T2DM duration.. There is a lower risk for nocturnal hypoglycaemia with insulin glargine than with NPH insulin. When considering diabetes duration, insulin glargine (compared to NPH insulin) may be particularly beneficial in patients with a longer duration of T2DM.

Topics: Analysis of Variance; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Isophane; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Middle Aged; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Risk Factors; Time Factors

The main objective of the ORIGIN study was an observation of the effects of treatment with insulin analogue, insulin glargine on cardiovascular complications in patients with severe atherosclerosis and early stages of well-compensated diabetes and prediabetes. The authors expected that a long-term reduction of glycaemia on an empty stomach will reduce the number of occurrences of cardiovascular complications. The study, which was conducted over a period of more than six years, showed neither a positive nor a negative effect of insulin treatment on cardiovascular complications. The second main objective of the study was the following: to compare the effect of the omega-3 fatty acid treatment versus placebo on the development of cardiovascular complications. However, no influence of n-3 fatty acids on the development of cardiovascular complications was found. The study investigated whether the insulin glargine treatment leads to an increased number of cancer occurrences. No correlation between cancer and the insulin glargine treatment was proven in this study. Long-term insulin treatment in the early stages of diabetes led to a minimal increase in weight through the course of six years (1.5 kg) and to three times more hypoglycaemia occurrences compared to placebo. However, the number of hypoglycaemia occurrences was very small.. The study has confirmed the safety of the insulin glargine treatment combined with metformin in the early stages of diabetes, without an increased number of atherosclerosis or cancer occurrences, and with minimal weight gain.

Topics: Cardiovascular Diseases; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Fatty Acids, Omega-3; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Neoplasms; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic

The pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, clinical efficacy, adverse effects, administration, dosage, place in therapy, and cost of extended-release exenatide are reviewed.. Regular-release exenatide has a half-life of 2.4 hours and is administered twice daily. In order to allow for once-weekly administration, exenatide was encapsulated in poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) microspheres, a biodegradable polymer. After subcutaneous injection, the microspheres slowly degrade, and the drug is released. A single injection of extended-release exenatide reaches maximum plasma concentration after 4-8 hours and remains at therapeutic levels for 8-16 hours, depending on the dosage. Based on the pharmacokinetics of a single dose, researchers determined that 0.8- and 2-mg once-weekly doses were likely to maintain therapeutic levels in the serum. Patients who used extended-release exenatide monotherapy had significantly lower glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) levels and lost more weight than those receiving sitagliptin or pioglitazone (p < 0.05). In combination with metformin, extended-release exenatide reduced HbA1c levels more than did insulin glargine. This new formulation reduced HbA1c levels by 1.5-1.9%, fasting blood glucose concentrations by 31-42 mg/dL, and weight by 2.3-3.7 kg. The most common adverse events were injection-site reactions and transient nausea. Postmarketing reports have described acute pancreatitis and acute necrotizing or hemorrhagic pancreatitis in patients treated with exenatide. The published average wholesale price for a one-month supply of extended-release exenatide 2 mg is $388.. Extended-release exenatide taken once weekly is an effective second-line therapy for patients with type 2 diabetes who have not achieved glycemic goals with metformin alone.

Topics: Blood Glucose; Clinical Trials, Phase II as Topic; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Delayed-Action Preparations; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Costs; Drug Therapy, Combination; Evidence-Based Medicine; Exenatide; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Injections, Subcutaneous; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Metformin; Peptides; Pioglitazone; Pyrazines; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Sitagliptin Phosphate; Thiazolidinediones; Treatment Outcome; Triazoles; Venoms

Topics: Clinical Trials as Topic; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Neoplasms; Observational Studies as Topic; Risk Factors; Signal Transduction

Primary care practitioners are increasingly responsible for the management of the escalating numbers of patients with type 2 diabetes. The majority of these patients will require insulin replacement therapy as their disease progresses, because glycemic control is often unsustainable using oral antidiabetic drugs. This review explains the practicalities of initiating and optimizing basal insulin in clinical practice, emphasizing the need for regular glycated hemoglobin (A1c) monitoring to allow timely initiation of insulin when the A1c target is not met. The importance of patient education in overcoming barriers to insulin is discussed, as well as the choice of available basal insulins and the necessity to optimize basal insulin dosage by self-titration. The traditional view of insulin therapy as a last resort is challenged with the modern basal insulin analogues (insulin detemir and insulin glargine), which offer simple and effective glycemic control with a reduced risk of hypoglycemia compared with older insulin formulations such as neutral protamine Hagedorn.

Topics: Decision Making; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Detemir; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Patient Education as Topic; Primary Health Care

The progressive nature of type 2 diabetes (T2D) requires practitioners to periodically evaluate patients and intensify therapy when glycemic targets become unattainable with their current treatment regimen. Traditional first- and second-line antidiabetic agents such as metformin and the sulfonylureas do not prevent the characteristic decline in beta-cell function associated with T2D; insulin replacement therapy can therefore quickly become a necessity in some patients. Basal insulin initiation provides an excellent platform to which rapid-acting prandial insulin doses can easily be added, potentially in a stepwise manner, as disease progresses. Premix insulin regimens are another effective intensification option following basal insulin initiation, but are most effective in insulin-naïve patients. The use of insulin in combination with modern T2D agents, such as the incretin-based therapies, has the potential to improve glycemic control while limiting insulin-associated weight gain and hypoglycemia. Further clinical data and approval are required before practitioners can fully endorse this novel approach.

Topics: Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Fasting; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Detemir; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting

During the past 10 years, several new basal insulin analogs have been developed. There has been for 3 years controversy on the potential increased risk for cancer with insulin glargine, which ceased with the publication of the ORIGIN trial in 2012. In insulin-treated persons with type 2 diabetes, it is usual to recommend that plasma insulin concentrations remain within a 50-200 pmol/L range in order to avoid overinsulinization, a potential causative factor for increased mitogenicity. Such concentrations are achieved when daily doses of insulin glargine or NPH insulin approximate 0.4 units/kg. However, the total plasma insulin concentrations are much greater in persons treated with insulin detemir and especially insulin degludec. These insulins derive their protracted action from the insertion of a long chain fatty acid moiety to the insulin molecule thereby increasing albumin binding. As a consequence, in persons with type 2 diabetes, stable total plasma concentrations as high as either 1600 or 6000 pmol/L are observed for insulin detemir or degludec, respectively. At present, the free to bound ratio of plasma insulin concentrations remains unknown for these two compounds. A first requirement is to understand how these insulins are eliminated or degraded and secondly to quantify the respective contributions of the free and bound fractions. Therefore, prior to early phase 2 or 3 randomized clinical trials, a better comprehension of the metabolism of all the new insulins would be invaluable.

Topics: Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Detemir; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Isophane; Insulin, Long-Acting

Insulin have been recommended to decrease glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) level in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients whose blood glucose control are unsatisfactory by using oral hypoglycemic drugs.. To systematically estimate the therapeutic effect and security of insulin glargine and insulin detemir for treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus.. We searched the Cochrane library, PubMed, EMBASE, etc databases. Quality evaluation of all randomized control tests (RCT) enrolled was conducted according to Cochrane manual, and meta-analysis was performed by using RevMan5.0 software.. Both insulin glargine and insulin detemir can effectively control T2DM patient's blood glucose.. Insulin detemir has evident superiority on reducing body weight than insulin glargine. As the doses are concerned, daily insulin dose of insulin detemir is higher than insulin glargine.

Topics: Blood Glucose; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Insulin Detemir; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting

Elderly patients with diabetes are more vulnerable to the occurrence and effects of hypoglycaemia; therefore, treatments with low risk of hypoglycaemia are preferred in this population. This study aimed to compare hypoglycaemia rates between insulin degludec (IDeg) and insulin glargine (IGlar) in elderly patients.. Hypoglycaemia data from patients ≥65 years of age with type 1 (T1DM) or type 2 (T2DM) diabetes from seven randomised, treat-to-target phase IIIa trials were used to compare IDeg and IGlar in a pre-planned meta-analysis. Overall, 917/4345 (21 %) randomised patients in the seven trials were elderly (634 IDeg, 283 IGlar). Overall confirmed hypoglycaemia was defined as <3.1 mmol/L or severe hypoglycaemia (symptoms requiring external assistance). Nocturnal hypoglycaemia included confirmed episodes from 0001 to 0559 hours (inclusive). Treatment comparisons of hypoglycaemia in T1DM patients were not performed due to low numbers of elderly patients with T1DM randomised (43 IDeg, 18 IGlar); statistical comparisons were also not made for severe hypoglycaemia due to the low number of events.. In elderly patients with T2DM, the rate of overall confirmed hypoglycaemia was significantly lower with IDeg than IGlar [estimated rate ratio (ERR) 0.76 (0.61; 0.95)95 % CI]; nocturnal confirmed hypoglycaemia was also significantly lower with IDeg [ERR 0.64 (0.43; 0.95)95 % CI]. Confirmed hypoglycaemia occurred in the majority of T1DM patients, whereas severe episodes occurred infrequently and at similar rates in both treatment groups in T1DM and T2DM.. Results of this pre-planned meta-analysis in elderly patients with diabetes demonstrate a significant reduction in hypoglycaemic events with IDeg relative to IGlar.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Blood Glucose; Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring; Clinical Trials as Topic; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Equipment Design; Germany; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Injections; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Prediabetic State; Reproducibility of Results

Topics: Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Detemir; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Isophane; Insulin, Long-Acting; Weight Gain

The glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) exenatide once weekly (ExQW) and liraglutide once daily (QD) are indicated to improve glycaemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes. Although glycaemic control with ExQW versus liraglutide QD 1.8 mg has been directly compared, no studies have compared ExQW with liraglutide QD 1.2 mg or determined the probable relative efficacies of various injectable therapies for glycaemic control; therefore, a network meta-analysis was performed to address these questions.. A systematic review identified randomized controlled trials of ≥24 weeks that compared ExQW, liraglutide QD (1.2 mg, 1.8 mg), insulin glargine, exenatide twice daily (ExBID), or placebo. Twenty-two studies evaluating 11 049 patients were included in the network meta-analysis. Mean differences in HbA1c relative to placebo or each other and probability rankings were estimated.. Estimated mean differences in HbA1c versus placebo were -1.15% (95% CrI: -1.31 to -1.00) for ExQW, -1.01% (95% CrI: -1.18 to -0.85) for liraglutide 1.2 mg, and -1.18% (95% CrI: -1.32 to -1.04) for liraglutide 1.8 mg. HbA1c differences for ExQW versus liraglutide 1.2 mg and 1.8 mg were -0.14% (95% CrI: -0.34 to 0.06) and 0.03% (95% CrI: -0.14 to 0.18), respectively. The estimated mean difference in HbA1c between liraglutide 1.2 mg and 1.8 mg was 0.17% (95% CrI: 0.02-0.30). Results were consistent when adjusted for background antihyperglycaemic medications and diabetes duration.. This network meta-analysis did not identify meaningful differences in HbA1c lowering between ExQW and both liraglutide doses, suggesting that these GLP-1 RAs have similar glycaemic effects.

Topics: Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Administration Schedule; Exenatide; Female; Glucagon-Like Peptide 1; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Liraglutide; Male; Peptides; Treatment Outcome; Venoms

Hypoglycaemia and the fear of hypoglycaemia are barriers to achieving normoglycaemia with insulin. Insulin degludec (IDeg) has an ultra-long and stable glucose-lowering effect, with low day-to-day variability. This pre-planned meta-analysis aimed to demonstrate the superiority of IDeg over insulin glargine (IGlar) in terms of fewer hypoglycaemic episodes at equivalent HbA1c in type 2 and type 1 diabetes mellitus (T2DM/T1DM).. Pooled patient-level data for self-reported hypoglycaemia from all seven (five in T2DM and two in T1DM) randomized, controlled, phase 3a, treat-to-target trials in the IDeg clinical development programme comparing IDeg once-daily (OD) vs. IGlar OD were analysed.. Four thousand three hundred and thirty subjects (2899 IDeg OD vs. 1431 IGlar OD) were analysed. Among insulin-naïve T2DM subjects, significantly lower rates of overall confirmed, nocturnal confirmed and severe hypoglycaemic episodes were reported with IDeg vs. IGlar: estimated rate ratio (RR):0.83[0.70;0.98](95%) (CI) , RR:0.64[0.48;0.86](95%) (CI) and RR:0.14[0.03;0.70](95%) (CI) . In the overall T2DM population, significantly lower rates of overall confirmed and nocturnal confirmed episodes were reported with IDeg vs. IGlar [RR:0.83[0.74;0.94](95%) (CI) and RR:0.68[0.57;0.82](95%) (CI) ). In the T1DM population, the rate of nocturnal confirmed episodes was significantly lower with IDeg vs. IGlar during maintenance treatment (RR:0.75[0.60;0.94](95%) (CI) ). Reduction in hypoglycaemia with IDeg vs. IGlar was more pronounced during maintenance treatment in all populations.. The limitations of this study include the open-label design and exclusion of subjects with recurrent severe hypoglycaemia. This meta-analysis confirms that similar improvements in HbA1c can be achieved with fewer hypoglycaemic episodes, particularly nocturnal episodes, with IDeg vs. IGlar across a broad spectrum of patients with diabetes.

Topics: Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Multicenter Studies as Topic; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Risk Factors; Treatment Outcome

To compare the effect of insulin degludec and insulin glargine on health-related quality of life in patients with Type 2 diabetes starting on insulin therapy.. Patient-level data from three open-label, randomized, treat-to-target trials of 26 or 52 weeks' duration were pooled using a weighted analysis in conjunction with a fixed-effects model. Insulin-naive patients received either insulin degludec (n = 1290) or insulin glargine (n = 632) once daily, in combination with oral anti-diabetic drugs. Glycaemic control was assessed via HbA(1c) and fasting plasma glucose concentrations. Rates of hypoglycaemia, defined as plasma glucose < 3.1 mmol/l (< 56 mg/dl), were recorded. Health-related quality of life was evaluated using the 36-item Short Form (SF-36(®) ) version 2 questionnaire. Statistical analysis was performed using a generalized linear model with treatment, trial, anti-diabetic therapy at baseline, gender, region and age as explanatory variables.. Insulin degludec was confirmed as non-inferior to insulin glargine based on HbA(1c) concentrations. In each trial comprising the meta-analysis, fasting plasma glucose and confirmed overall and nocturnal (00.01-05.59 h) hypoglycaemia were all numerically or significantly lower with insulin degludec vs. insulin glargine. At endpoint, the overall physical health component score was significantly higher (better) with insulin degludec vs. insulin glargine [+0.66 (95% CI 0.04-1.28)], largely attributable to a difference [+1.10 (95% CI 0.22-1.98)] in the bodily pain domain score. In the mental domains, vitality was significantly higher with insulin degludec vs. insulin glargine [+0.81 (95% CI 0.01-1.59)].. Compared with insulin glargine, insulin degludec leads to improvements in both mental and physical health status for patients with Type 2 diabetes initiating insulin therapy.

Topics: Blood Glucose; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Middle Aged; Multicenter Studies as Topic; Quality of Life; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Surveys and Questionnaires; Treatment Outcome

In 2009, several epidemiological studies suggested a higher frequency of malignancy in insulin glargine -treated patients. A number of follow-up epidemiological population studies as well as two randomized, controlled clinical studies, one a 5000-patient retinopathy study and the other a 12,000-patient cardiovascular outcomes trial (ORIGIN), found no higher frequency of malignancy in glargine-treated patients.. We reviewed the existing literature as well as U.S. FDA records to investigate the association of cancer, diabetes, and insulin. There is a 20 - 40% higher incidence of malignancy in type 2 diabetes patients. Certain cancers are more common, including hepatocellular and pancreatic carcinoma, colorectal cancer, renal cancer, and breast and endometrial cancer, and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. There are numerous inter-related factors which may promote both diabetes and malignancy, including dietary patterns, obesity, insulin resistance, and alcoholism. Patients who receive insulin treatment are typically older and "sicker" than those who receive oral agents.. It is very difficult to prove causal associations between diabetes and cancer due to the host of confounding factors. The hypothesis that hyperinsulinemia and IGF-1 receptor activation promote cancer is strong, but confounded by the association of hyperinsulinemia with obesity, which separately promotes malignancy. Although statistical techniques to adjust for confounding variables can improve epidemiological comparisons, the lesson of the glargine cancer controversy is that controlled clinical trials are the only means to definitely prove hypotheses.

Topics: Animals; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Neoplasms; Receptor, IGF Type 1

Insulin has an important role in the treatment of diabetic patients. Further, it can result in undesirable side effects. One of the problems that are associated with insulin therapy is allergic reactions. Although insulin allergy is uncommon, especially in patients with type-2 diabetes, but when it occurs, its management can be difficult. We report a 55-year-old woman with poorly controlled type-2 diabetes and insulin allergy. She revealed hypersensitivity reactions including urticaria and respiratory symptoms, immediately after injection. So, specific immunotherapy with other insulin preparations was done. Finally, after specific immunotherapy, we were able to treat the patient with short- and long-acting analogs successfully.

Topics: Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Hypersensitivity; Female; Humans; Immunotherapy; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Middle Aged; Substrate Specificity

In people with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), the incretin effect is reduced, but the recent advent of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors and glucagon-like peptide (GLP)-1 agonists/analogues has enabled restoration of at least some of the function of the incretin system, with accompanying improvements in glycaemic control. Two GLP-1 receptor agonists/analogues are currently approved for the treatment of T2DM-exenatide (Byetta®, Eli Lilly & Co., Indianapolis, IN, US) and liraglutide (Victoza®, Novo Nordisk, Bagsvaerd, Denmark); a once-weekly formulation of exenatide (Bydureon®, Eli Lilly & Co.) has also been approved by the European Medicines Agency. The National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) has recently published guidance on the use of liraglutide in T2DM, based on evidence from the Liraglutide Effect and Action in Diabetes (LEAD) Phase III trial programme, which compared liraglutide with existing glucose-lowering therapies, such as exenatide and insulin glargine. The LEAD programme reported HbA1c reductions from 0.8 to 1.5% with liraglutide (1.2 and 1.8 mg), accompanied by low rates of hypoglycaemia and some weight loss; side effects were primarily gastrointestinal in nature (e.g. nausea and diarrhoea). Based on the findings of the LEAD studies and the NICE recommendation, liraglutide now represents an important therapy widely available in the UK for certain patient groups, including those with a body mass index (BMI) ≥35.0 kg/m(2) , and patients with a BMI <35 kg/m(2) who are considered unsuitable for insulin and are failing to meet targets for glycaemic control with oral agents. NICE guidelines still suggest that most patients without considerable obesity (BMI <35 kg/m(2) ) are probably best managed using insulin therapy. Evidence also suggests a future role for GLP-1 mimetics in combination with basal insulin.

Topics: Algorithms; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Administration Schedule; Evidence-Based Medicine; Exenatide; Female; Glucagon-Like Peptide 1; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Detemir; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Liraglutide; Male; Peptides; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; United Kingdom; Venoms; Weight Loss

Liraglutide is a once-daily human glucagon-like peptide-1 analogue used in the treatment of type 2 diabetes (T2D). It has been prospectively investigated in a series of multinational, randomised, controlled phase 3 trials (the Liraglutide Effect and Action in Diabetes programme), as well as in an additional direct head-to-head study with sitagliptin. These trials were designed to clarify the use and safety of liraglutide in clinical practice across the treatment continuum of T2D, and consequently involved a large number and diverse range of patients. These studies also included active comparisons against antidiabetic agents including metformin, rosiglitazone, glimepiride, insulin glargine, exenatide and sitagliptin, and therefore have helped to examine clinical differences and similarities between liraglutide and these commonly used agents.

Topics: Blood Glucose; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Exenatide; Female; Glucagon-Like Peptide 1; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Liraglutide; Male; Metformin; Peptides; Pyrazines; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Rosiglitazone; Sitagliptin Phosphate; Sulfonylurea Compounds; Thiazolidinediones; Treatment Outcome; Triazoles; Venoms

Recently, more and more attention has been drawn on the long-term effects of insulin glargine. Here we strived to estimate the association of cancer occurrence with the use of insulin glargine.. We searched all the publications regarding the association between cancer occurrence and the use of insulin glargine using the US National Library of Medicine's PubMed database. Data were independently extracted and analyzed using random or fixed effects meta-analysis depending upon the degree of heterogeneity.. Seven cohort studies were included in the meta-analysis. Cancer occurrence had no significant difference in glargine-treated patients compared to patients treated with other insulins (RR=0.86, 95% CI=0.69-1.07, p=0.17, P(heterogeneity)<0.00001). In our subgroup analysis, glargine, compared to other insulins, did not increase the risk of breast cancer (RR=1.14, 95% CI=0.65-2.02, p=0.65, P(heterogeneity)=0.002), prostate cancer (RR=1.00, 95% CI=0.79-1.26, p=0.99, P(heterogeneity)=0.78), pancreatic cancer (RR=0.57, 95% CI=0.14-2.35, p=0.44, P(heterogeneity)=0.0002) and gastrointestinal cancer (RR=0.80, 95% CI=0.62-1.02, p=0.07, P(heterogeneity)=0.86).. This meta-analysis of open-label studies does not support an increased cancer risk in patients treated with insulin glargine. The result provides confidence for the development of insulin glargine, but needs confirmation by further clinical studies.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Cohort Studies; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Female; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Middle Aged; Neoplasms; Risk

Topics: Cost-Benefit Analysis; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Costs; Drug Monitoring; Drug Therapy, Combination; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Detemir; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Insulin, Short-Acting; United Kingdom

In the last couple of years, the intensive conservative insulin treatment (basal-bolus regime) became more and more popular even in patients with type 2 diabetes. Using this insulin treatment, continuous patient education, co-operation between the medical team (diabetologist, dietician and diabetes-nurses) and the patient as well as the availability of modern insulins, pens and glucometers are of great importance. Clearly, the basal-bolus treatment with human insulin has advantages over the conservative (conventional) treatment with twice daily premix insulins. Moreover, the basal-bolus treatment with insulin-analogues proved to be superior in some aspects as compared to human insulins. The intensive insulin treatment (basal-bolus regime with insulin-analogues) approaches the optimal insulin substitution and, with its use the adequate correction of each element of the glucose triad (fasting blood glucose, postprandial blood glucose, HbA1c) should be considered feasible even in patients with type 2 diabetes.

Topics: Blood Glucose; Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Disposable Equipment; Drug Administration Schedule; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Injections, Subcutaneous; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin-Secreting Cells; Insulin, Long-Acting; Insulins; Patient Care Team; Patient Education as Topic; Postprandial Period; Treatment Outcome

We aimed to determine risk factors associated with hypoglycemia during subcutaneous insulin therapy in non-critically ill patients with type 2 diabetes.. We conducted an analysis of three randomized control trials using basal/bolus regimen and regular sliding scale insulin (SSI) in patients with diabetes admitted to medical and surgical settings.. We analyzed medical records of 261 general medicine and 211 noncardiac surgery patients treated with basal/bolus regimen with glargine/glulisine (n = 169), detemir/aspart (n = 67), neutral protamine Hagedorn/regular (n = 63), or with SSI (n = 173). The overall frequency of mild and severe hypoglycemia (<70 and <40 mg/dl) was 19% and 2%, respectively. During treatment, medical patients experienced a higher number of hypoglycemia than surgical patients (23% versus 13%; p = .005), but the rate of severe hypoglycemia was similar between groups (1.9% versus 1.9%; p = not significant). Increasing age, impaired kidney function (glomerular filtration rate < 60 ml/min), total daily insulin dose, and type of insulin regimen (basal/bolus versus SSI) during hospitalization were important contributors for hypoglycemia in both medical and surgical patients. Among these variables, increasing age and type of insulin regimen (basal/bolus versus SSI) were found to be independent predictors of hypoglycemic events.. Mild hypoglycemic events are common during subcutaneous insulin therapy in medical and surgical patients with type 2 diabetes. Increasing age, impaired renal function, daily insulin dose, and insulin regimen (basal/bolus versus SSI) are important predictors of hypoglycemia during insulin therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Topics: Aged; Critical Illness; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Female; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Infusions, Subcutaneous; Inpatients; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Middle Aged; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Risk Factors

We compared the effect of insulin lispro protamine suspension (ILPS) with that of insulin glargine and insulin detemir, all given as basal supplementation, in the treatment of patients with type 2 diabetes.. We conducted an electronic search until February 2012, including online registries of ongoing trials and abstract books. All randomized controlled trials comparing ILPS with insulin glargine or detemir with a duration of ≥12 weeks were included.. We found four trials lasting 24-36 weeks involving 1,336 persons: three studies compared ILPS with glargine, and one trial compared ILPS with detemir. There was no significant difference in change in HbA(1c) level between ILPS and comparators, in the proportion of patients achieving the HbA(1c) goals of ≤6.5 or <7%, in weight change, or in daily insulin doses. There was no difference in overall hypoglycemia, but nocturnal hypoglycemia occurred significantly more with ILPS than with comparator insulins (mean difference 0.099 events/patient/30 days [95% CI 0.03-0.17]). In a prespecified sensitivity analysis comparing data obtained in patients who remained on their once-daily insulin regimen, not significantly different event rates for nocturnal hypoglycemia were observed between ILPS and comparator insulins (0.063 [-0.007 to 0.13]), and ILPS was associated with lower insulin dose (0.07 units/kg/day [0.05-0.09]).. There is no difference between ILPS and insulin glargine or detemir for targeting hyperglycemia, but nocturnal hypoglycemia occurred more frequently with ILPS than with comparator insulins. Nocturnal hypoglycemia was not significantly different in people who injected insulin once daily.

Topics: Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Detemir; Insulin Glargine; Insulin Lispro; Insulin, Long-Acting; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic

The relationship between diabetes and pancreatic cancer is complex. Diabetes or impaired glucose tolerance is present in more than 2/3rd of pancreatic cancer patients. Epidemiological studies have consistently shown a modest increase in the risk of pancreatic cancer in type 2 diabetes, with an inverse relationship to duration of disease. Additionally, recent studies suggest that anti-diabetic medications may modulate the risk of pancreatic cancer in type 2 diabetes. Subjects >50 years of age with new onset diabetes are at higher risk of having pancreatic cancer. However, to screen new-onset diabetes for pancreatic cancer, additional markers are needed that can distinguish pancreatic cancer-associated diabetes from type 2 diabetes.

Topics: Age Factors; Body Mass Index; Clinical Trials as Topic; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Early Detection of Cancer; Evidence-Based Medicine; Global Health; Glucose Intolerance; Humans; Hyperinsulinism; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Meta-Analysis as Topic; Metformin; Obesity; Pancreatic Neoplasms; Prevalence; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors

The role of insulin glargine as a risk factor for cancer is controversial in human studies. The aim of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the relationship between insulin glargine and cancer incidence.. All observational studies and randomized controlled trials evaluating the relationship of insulin glargine and cancer risk were identified in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library and the Chinese Biomedical Medical Literature Database, through March 2012. Odds ratios (ORs) with corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated with a random-effects model. Confidence in the estimates of the obtained effects (quality of evidence) was assessed by using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach.. A total of 11 studies including 448,928 study subjects and 19,128 cancer patients were finally identified for the meta-analysis. Insulin glargine use was associated with a lower odds of cancer compared with non-glargine insulin use (OR 0.81, 95% CI 0.68 to 0.98, P = 0.03; very low-quality evidence). Glargine did not increase the odds of breast cancer (OR 0.99, 95% CI 0.68 to 1.46, P = 0.966; very low-quality evidence). Compared with non-glargine insulin, no significant association was found between insulin glargine and prostate cancer, pancreatic cancer and respiratory tract cancer. Insulin glargine use was associated with lower odds of other site-specific cancer.. Results from the meta-analysis don't support the link between insulin glargine and an increased risk of cancer and the confidence in the estimates of the effects is very low. Further studies are needed to examine the relation between insulin glargine and cancer risk, especially breast cancer.

Topics: Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Neoplasms; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Risk Factors

To give an overview on the relationship between diabetes mellitus and increased cancer risk.. We identified studies evaluating the association between diabetes mellitus, its treatment with insulin and insulin analogues and malignancies, paying special attention to studies on in vitro and in vivo effects of the long-acting analogue insulin glargine.. Even although the pathophysiological mechanisms underlying the relationship between elevated cancer risk and Type 2 diabetes mellitus are not completely understood, hyperinsulinaemia in the presence of insulin resistance appears to be a key factor. Because of the mitogenic actions of insulin at high concentrations, hyperinsulinaemia may favour tumorigenesis. In line with this, an insulin-based therapy is associated with an increased cancer risk, whereas an insulin-sensitizing treatment results in a cancer risk reduction. Furthermore, alterations of the insulin receptor profile on tumour cells may contribute to an enhanced susceptibility towards insulin. Studies on the analogue insulin glargine have been controversial. In vitro data pointed to an elevated mitogenicity of insulin glargine, whereas in vivo data did not confirm cancerogenous effects. Moreover, recently published clinical studies on the association of insulin glargine (Lantus®) and cancer suggest that treatment with insulin glargine is not associated with increased cancer risk.. The relationship between elevated cancer risk and Type 2 diabetes mellitus has been shown by numerous epidemiological studies, with endogenous and exogenous hyperinsulinaemia in the presence of insulin resistance as potential underlying pathophysiological mechanisms. Recent clinical studies do not support an increased cancer risk in patients treated with insulin glargine.

Topics: Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Female; Humans; Hyperinsulinism; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Neoplasms; Risk Factors

Two basal insulin analogues, insulin glargine once daily and insulin detemir once or twice daily, are marketed in Canada.. To estimate the long-term costs of insulin glargine once daily (QD) versus insulin detemir once or twice daily (QD or BID) for type 1 (T1DM) and type 2 (T2DM) diabetes mellitus from a Canadian provincial government's perspective.. A cost-minimization analysis comparing insulin glargine (IGlarg) to insulin detemir (IDet) was conducted using a validated computer simulation model, the CORE Diabetes Model. Lifetime direct medical costs including costs of insulin treatment and diabetes complications were projected. T1DM and T2DM patients' daily insulin dose (T1DM: IGlarg QD 26.2 IU; IDet BID 33.6 IU; T2DM: IGlarg QD 47.2 IU; IDet QD 65.7 IU or IDet BID 80.4 IU) was derived from a meta-analysis of randomized trials. All patients were assumed to stay on the same treatment for life. Costs were discounted at 5% per annum and reported in 2010 Canadian Dollars.. The meta-analysis showed T1DM and T2DM patients had similar HbA(1c) change from baseline when receiving IGlarg compared to IDet (T1DM: 0.002%-points; p = 0.97; T2DM: -0.05%-points; p = 0.28). Treatment of T1DM patients with IGlarg versus IDet BID resulted in lifetime cost savings of $4231 per patient. Treatment of T2DM patients with IGlarg resulted in lifetime cost savings of $4659 per patient versus IDet QD and cost savings of $8709 per patient versus IDet BID.. Similar HbA(1c) change from baseline can be achieved with a lower IGlarg than IDet dose. From the perspective of a Canadian provincial government, treatment of T1DM and T2DM patients with IGlarg instead of IDet can generate long-term cost savings. Main limitations include trial data were derived from multi-country studies rather than the Canadian population and self-monitoring blood glucose costs were not included.

Topics: Cost-Benefit Analysis; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Health Care Costs; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Detemir; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Markov Chains; Models, Economic; Risk

To evaluate the benefits of initiating insulin at an earlier versus later treatment stage, and regimens with/without sulfonylurea (SU).. Pooled analysis of 11 prospective randomized clinical trials, including 2171 adults with uncontrolled type 2 diabetes initiating insulin glargine following a specific titration algorithm. Clinical outcomes were glycated haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) reduction, per cent achieving HbA1c ≤ 7.0%, weight gain and hypoglycaemic events. Statistical analysis compared outcomes 24 weeks after basal insulin initiation in patients previously uncontrolled on 0/1 oral antidiabetic drug (OAD) versus 2 OADs, and in patients taking metformin (MET) or SU alone or in combination at baseline. A meta-analysis was also conducted.. For the pooled analysis, patients on 0/1 OAD and those on MET monotherapy at baseline had the largest 24-week reductions in HbA1c following the addition of insulin glargine (∼0.44 U/kg). Of patients failing MET/SU monotherapy and MET + SU in combination, 68.1, 50.4 and 56.4% achieved HbA1c ≤ 7.0%, respectively (p = 0.0006). Weight gain was lowest when basal insulin was added to MET. Patients on 0/1 OAD at baseline had significantly less symptomatic hypoglycaemia when basal insulin was added than those on 2 OADs (p = 0.0007). Despite higher insulin doses, those taking MET alone had less hypoglycaemia than those taking SU or MET + SU. Results were confirmed in the meta-analysis.. Adding insulin glargine to MET monotherapy early in treatment may provide efficacy/safety benefits over regimens including SU. This may reflect treatment earlier in the disease and supports the inclusion of insulin as a second step in the American Diabetes Association/European Association for the Study of Diabetes treatment algorithm.

Topics: Algorithms; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Metformin; Middle Aged; Prospective Studies; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Sulfonylurea Compounds; Treatment Outcome

Insulin glargine is the first 24-h recombinant DNA insulin analog introduced to the market. Substitution of glycine for asparagine and addition of two arginine residues raise the isoelectric point of insulin glargine and result in microprecipitates, delaying absorption from subcutaneous tissue. This delayed absorption result in fairly flat 24-h insulin concentration profiles with no discernible peak. Large, multicenter, randomized, controlled trials in patients with type 2 diabetes show that although NPH insulin and insulin glargine are equally effective in lowering glycosylated hemoglobin (A1c) and fasting blood glucose, there is a clear advantage of insulin glargine over NPH insulin in reducing nocturnal and overall hypoglycemia. Lower risk of hypoglycemia with glargine was also consistently demonstrated by trials comparing insulin glargine and premixed analog insulins. These studies also showed greater reduction in A1c with twice-daily premixed insulins compared with glargine, when insulin glargine was administered without mealtime insulin coverage. Insulin glargine was also compared with another insulin analog, insulin detemir. Trials showed that both insulin analogs are equally effective in lowering A1c and have comparable risk of hypoglycemia. Trials comparing insulin glargine with glucagon-like peptide-1 agonists showed comparable significant reductions in A1c with both regimens. Insulin glargine is well tolerated, has low immunogenicity, reduced risks for acute myocardial infarction, and a lower risk of hypoglycemia compared with NPH insulin in individuals with type 2 diabetes.

Topics: Blood Glucose; Clinical Trials as Topic; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting

Primary goals in the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) include lowering blood glucose levels sufficiently to prevent micro- and macrovascular complications while limiting side effects, such as hypoglycemia and excessive weight gain. Patients with T2DM are typically treated initially with oral antidiabetes agents; however, as the disease progresses, most will require insulin to maintain glycemic control. Often insulin therapy is initiated with basal insulin, and the objective of this article is to present the conceptual aspects of basal insulin therapy and use these concepts to illustrate important clinical aspects. This will be accomplished within a broader contextual discussion of the normal physiologic patterns of insulin secretion, which consist of sustained levels of basal insulin production throughout the day, superimposed with bursts of insulin secretion following a meal (termed bolus or prandial insulin secretion) that slowly decay over 1 to 3 hours. Long-acting basal insulin analogs form a key component of basal-bolus therapy and provide basal support for patients with T2DM. Insulin therapy is often initiated with basal insulin, and newer long-acting analogs, such as insulin glargine and insulin detemir, provide steady, reliable basal insulin coverage in addition to significant advantages over traditional long-acting insulins. This article will integrate conceptual aspects of basal insulin therapy in the context of physiology, molecular pharmacology, and clinical implications of modern basal insulin analogs to provide a foundational understanding of basal insulin biology and physiology.

Topics: Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Homeostasis; Humans; Insulin; Insulin Detemir; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Isophane; Insulin, Long-Acting; Liver; Signal Transduction

Type 2 diabetes mellitus and malignant tumors are frequent diseases worldwide. The incidence of these two diseases is growing continuously and causes serious health care problem. Population based epidemiologic studies show that the coexistence of type 2 diabetes and malignant tumors is more frequent than expected by the age-corrected incidence and prevalence of each disease. Epidemiologic studies and meta-analyses show that type 2 diabetes increases the risk and tumor specific mortality of certain cancers. The overlapping risk factors of the diseases suggest a relationship between type 2 diabetes and malignant tumors, with a significant role of obesity as a major risk factor. In the pathophysiology of type 2 diabetes there are several biological processes, which may explain the higher cancer risk in type 2 diabetes. In vitro experiments, and in vivo animal studies show that the mitotic effect of hyperinsulinemia plays an important role in the relationship of cancer and type 2 diabetes mellitus. Recent studies show that the different treatment modalities, antidiabetic drugs and their combinations used for the treatment of type 2 diabetes can modify cancer risk. The majority of the data show that metformin therapy decreases, while insulin secretagog drugs slightly increase the risk of certain types of cancers in type 2 diabetes. Metformin can decrease cell proliferation and induce apoptosis in certain cancer cell lines. Endogenous and exogenous (therapy induced) hyperinsulinemia may be mitogenic and may increase the risk of cancer in type 2 diabetes. Human studies showed that the analogue insulin glargin increases the risk of certain cancers. As a result of conceptual weaknesses in study design, data collection, and statistical methods the results of these studies are questionable. According to present knowledge, obtaining and maintaining optimal metabolic target values with the appropriate choice of treatment modality is the aim of treatment in type 2 diabetes. Presently, study results showing elevated mitogenic potential with some antidiabetic treatment modalities are not taken into account, when considering the choice of antidiabetic treatment in type 2 diabetic patients. In the care of patients with increased cancer risk, oncologic considerations should be taken into account. Well designed, prospective, clinical studies would be necessary to demonstrate the possible correlation between treatment modalities of type 2 diabetes and change of cancer risk in

Topics: Adipokines; Age Factors; Animals; Cytokines; Diabetes Complications; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Feeding Behavior; Humans; Hyperglycemia; Hyperinsulinism; Hypoglycemic Agents; Incidence; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin Resistance; Insulin, Long-Acting; Metformin; Motor Activity; Neoplasms; Obesity; Prevalence; Research Design; Risk Factors; Sex Factors; Smoking; Sulfonylurea Compounds; Thiazolidinediones

Chronically elevated blood glucose levels are associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Many diabetes patients will eventually require insulin treatment to maintain good glycaemic control. There are still uncertainties about the optimal insulin treatment regimens for type 2 diabetes, but the long-acting insulin analogues seem beneficial. Several reviews have compared either insulin detemir or insulin glargine to NPH insulin, but research directly comparing both insulin analogues is limited.. To assess the effects of insulin detemir and insulin glargine compared with each other in the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus.. We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, The Cochrane Library, online registries of ongoing trials and abstract books. Date of last search was January 2011.. All randomised controlled trials comparing insulin detemir with insulin glargine with a duration of 12 weeks or longer were included.. Two authors independently selected the studies and extracted the data. Pooling of studies by means of random-effects meta-analysis was performed.. This review examined four trials lasting 24 to 52 weeks involving 2250 people randomised to either insulin detemir or glargine. Overall, risk of bias of the evaluated studies was high. Insulin glargine was dosed once-daily in the evening. Insulin detemir was initiated once-daily in the evening with the option of an additional dose in the morning in three studies and initiated twice-daily in one study. Of randomised patients 13.6% to 57.2% were injecting insulin detemir twice-daily at the end of trial.Glycaemic control, measured by glycosylated haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) and HbA1c equal to or less than 7% with or without hypoglycaemia, did not differ statistically significantly between treatment groups.The results showed no significant differences in overall, nocturnal and severe hypoglycaemia between treatment groups.Insulin detemir was associated with less weight gain. Treatment with insulin glargine resulted in a lower daily basal insulin dose and a lower number of injection site reactions.There was no significant difference in the variability of FPG or glucose values in 24-hour profiles between treatment groups. It was not possible to draw conclusions on quality of life, costs or mortality. Only one trial reported results on health-related quality of life and showed no significant differences between treatment groups.. Our analyses suggest that there is no clinically relevant difference in efficacy or safety between insulin detemir and insulin glargine for targeting hyperglycaemia. However, to achieve the same glycaemic control insulin detemir was often injected twice-daily in a higher dose but with less weight gain, while insulin glargine was injected once-daily, with somewhat fewer injection site reactions.

Topics: Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Detemir; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic

Exenatide once-weekly (EQW [2 mg s.c.]) is under development as monotherapy as an adjunct to diet and exercise or as a combination therapy with an oral antidiabetes drug(s) in adults with type 2 diabetes. This long-acting formulation contains the active ingredient of the original exenatide twice-daily (EBID) formulation encapsulated in 0.06-mm-diameter microspheres of medical-grade poly-(D,L-lactide-co-glycolide) (PLG). After mechanical suspension and subcutaneous injection by the patient, EQW microspheres hydrate in situ and adhere to one another to form an amalgam. A small amount of loosely bound surface exenatide, typically less than 1%, releases in the first few hours, whereas drug located in deeper interstices diffuses out more slowly (time to maximum, ~2 weeks). Fully encapsulated exenatide (i.e., drug initially inaccessible to diffusion) releases over a still longer period (time to maximum, ~7 weeks) as the PLG matrix hydrolyzes into lactic acid and glycolic acid, which are subsequently eliminated as carbon dioxide and water. For EQW, plasma exenatide concentrations reach the therapeutic range by 2 weeks and steady state by 6-7 weeks. This gradual approach to steady state seems to improve tolerability, as nausea is less frequent with EQW than EBID. EQW administrations may be associated with palpable skin nodules that generally resolve without further medical intervention. In comparative trials, EQW improved hemoglobin A1c more than EBID, sitagliptin, pioglitazone, or insulin glargine and reduced fasting plasma glucose more than EBID. Weight loss due to EQW or EBID was similar. EQW is the first glucose-lowering agent that is administered once weekly.

Topics: Adult; Blood Glucose; Capsules; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Exenatide; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Injections, Subcutaneous; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Lactic Acid; Peptides; Pioglitazone; Polyglycolic Acid; Polylactic Acid-Polyglycolic Acid Copolymer; Pyrazines; Sitagliptin Phosphate; Thiazolidinediones; Triazoles; Venoms

Conventional basal insulin preparations have to be resuspended prior to injection and have low therapeutic efficacy and drawbacks like nocturnal hypoglycaemia. There is evidence supporting improved pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profiles of basal insulin analogues, glargine and detemir as compared with NPH. Initiation and titration of basal insulin analogues helps patients to improve compliance due to low injection frequency compared to the conventional basal insulin. The unique protraction mechanism adds advantage to insulin detemir in terms of high predictability. Also these analogues have better patient adherence, improved quality of life and higher treatment satisfaction. So basal insulin analogues particularly are better treatment options for treatment of diabetes.

Topics: Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Injections; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Patient Acceptance of Health Care; Patient Compliance; Quality of Life

Oral hypoglycaemic agents become less effective as beta cell function declines. Thus many patients with type 2 diabetes will ultimately require treatment with insulin. There are two main approaches to starting insulin: (a) as a basal supplement with an intermediate to long-acting preparation (NPH, glargine or detemir) plus oral agents; (b) as a premixed insulin regimen. Almost all the studies have shown similar glucose control with both NPH and the new insulin analogs. Further analyses between these insulins have documented significant reductions in hypoglycaemia especially at night with the insulin analogs. The weight gain is an important issue in patients with diabetes. It appears that insulin detemir studies have reported weight neutrality or less weigh gain or even weight loss. However, most insulin glargine studies have reported a weight gain. On the other hand insulin analogs have the important disadvantage of high cost. It is important to take in to account all the above factors such as cost, weight gain, number of insulin injections and hypoglycaemia while prescribing insulin.

Topics: Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Detemir; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Isophane; Insulin, Long-Acting; Weight Gain

Topics: Algorithms; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Gliclazide; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Metformin; Middle Aged; Risk Factors

Although diabetes has been known to increase the risk of cancer for over a century, it was not until recently when this area gained momentum and generated a lot of interest. That is in- part because of the rising global diabetes epidemic and the wide spread use of insulin analogues, metformin and other anti-diabetic agents, providing hypothesis generating data on the cancer risk in the diabetic population. Type 2 diabetes is associated with increased risk of breast, colon, pancreatic and other types of cancer, while type 1 diabetes is associated with increase in stomach, pancreatic, endometrial and cervical cancer. Mechanisms postulated for increased cancer risk in diabetes include hyperglycemia, hyperinsulinemia with stimulation of IGF-1 axis, obesity that serves as a common soil hypothesis for both cancer and diabetes as well as other factors such as increased cytokine production. More recently some antidiabetic agents have been thought to increase cancer risk such as insulin glargine, while metformin appears to lower cancer risk. In this review, we present the evidence for the link between diabetes and cancer highlighting the general mechanisms proposed for such a link as well as specific hypotheses for individual cancer. We will also discuss the role of insulin, metformin and other antidiabetic agents in cancer risk.

Topics: Diabetes Complications; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Insulins; Metformin; Neoplasms; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors

The treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) has been revolutionized by the introduction of novel therapeutic regimens following the clinical approval of the long-acting basal insulin glargine 10 years ago, followed by insulin detemir and, more recently, agents that target the glucagon-like peptide (GLP)-1 system with dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP-4)-resistant products, such as liraglutide and exenatide, and DPP-4 inhibitors, such as sitagliptin, saxagliptin, alogliptin, and vildagliptin. The position and clinical efficacy of the GLP-1 mimetics are less well understood, however, and how they should be best used in the context of the established clinical efficacy of long-acting insulin analogs is yet to be defined. The aim of this review is to provide a summary of the efficacy, safety, and weight changes associated with long-acting insulin analogs (insulin glargine and insulin detemir) and two GLP-1 mimetics (exenatide and liraglutide). MEDLINE, EMBASE, and BIOSIS databases were searched with a timeframe of January 1, 2003-January 12, 2009 using the following terms: "Insulin glargine," with the co-indexing terms "LANTUS" and "HOE901"; "Insulin detemir," with the co-indexing term "Levemir"; "Exenatide"; and "Liraglutide." This literature review demonstrates that GLP-1 and basal insulin therapies are effective treatment options for insulin-naïve patients with suboptimal glycemic control with oral hypoglycemic agents. There are potential advantages of basal insulin and GLP-1 therapies in particular populations of patients. Further comparative data are needed to fully investigate the relative positioning of these therapies within the T2DM treatment paradigm.

Topics: Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Glucagon-Like Peptide 1; Humans; Hyperglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Detemir; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Isophane; Insulin, Long-Acting

Insulin Glargine is recommended as a once-daily basal insulin. We report a patient in whom nocturnal administration of Glargine was associated with significant morning hypoglycemia despite titration of insulin dose. Changing the Glargine regimen to morning administration did not result in improvement. However, changing to a twice-daily regimen of Glargine resulted in the resolution of the hypoglycemia. Few studies have addressed the role of multiple daily injections of Glargine and this remains a valuable option in the management of diabetic patients. Prior studies using multiple daily injections with NPH insulin and Ultralente have demonstrated success. We propose that patients with hypoglycemia despite titration of once daily Glargine should be considered for a twice-daily regimen. Despite a slight increase in cost and inconvenience for the patient, the increases frequency of administration may result in a greater success in achieving glycemic targets.

Topics: Adult; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Injections; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting

Basal insulin analogues are an effective treatment for type 2 diabetes with proven efficacy, and insulins NPH, detemir and glargine have shown comparable glycaemic control. However, pharmacokinetics and clinical studies highlight the advantages of insulins detemir and glargine over insulin NPH in terms of once-daily dosing, reduced risk of hypoglycaemia, reduced within-patient variability, appropriate duration of action and simple titration. Insulin detemir has demonstrated the additional advantage of less weight gain. Introduction of insulin detemir, at the appropriate time, can help empower patients to reach glycaemic targets, with a reduced risk of hypoglycaemia and less weight gain.

Topics: Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Detemir; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Isophane; Insulin, Long-Acting

Numerous epidemiological studies have demonstrated an association between increased risk of cancer development and progression and type 2 diabetes mellitus as well as obesity. The underlying mechanisms remain elusive, but hyperinsulinaemia in the presence of insulin resistance appears to be an important factor. Hyperinsulinaemia may favour tumorigenesis, as insulin has not only metabolic actions, but is also mitogenic at high concentrations. Besides, susceptibility of tumour cells against insulin may be increased due to changes in the insulin receptor profile. A diabetes therapy with insulin or sulfonylureas, which leads to elevated exogenous or endogenous insulin levels, appears to be related with an increased cancer risk, whereas administration of metformin or thiazolidinediones, which is associated with a decrease of insulin concentrations, results in risk reduction. However, in light of the numerous epidemiological studies showing an association between increased cancer risk and reduced physical activity one cannot exclude that hyperinsulinaemia in the presence of insulin resistance is only a surrogate parameter of reduced physical activity. In the past years, several insulin analogues have been developed which may have altered mitogenic actions compared to human insulin due to their structural changes. For the long-acting analogue insulin glargine, in vitro data, though controversial, pointed to an increased mitogenicity that was, however, not confirmed by in vivo studies. Recently, six clinical studies have been published that analysed the association between the application of insulin glargine (Lantus) and cancer development. The current clinical data do not allow the conclusion that treatment with insulin glargine is associated with increased cancer risk. On the other hand, prospective studies that exclude an impact on cancer risk in risk populations are currently not available. Future studies are required to investigate whether a subpopulation characterised by a less rapid metabolization of insulin glargine in vivo may be at increased cancer risk. In the present article, we give an overview on the association between diabetes mellitus, its treatment with insulin analogues, and cancer.

Topics: Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Exercise; Humans; Hyperinsulinism; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin Resistance; Insulin, Long-Acting; Mutagenicity Tests; Neoplasms; Obesity; Risk Factors

Insulin is essential for the management of type 1 diabetes and is more commonly being used for the treatment of type 2 diabetes. Insulin pen devices were first introduced over 20 years ago and have evolved to provide significant practical advantages compared with the vial and syringe. Pen devices are now used by patients with diabetes worldwide, but there are marked geographical variations in the use of reusable and disposable pens. In some countries the vial and syringe is still the most popular method of administering insulin, whereas in other countries the use of reusable or disposable pens is more prevalent. Therefore, the aim of this review is to discuss the factors that seem to be involved in these differences, which include patient access to insulin, cost, and physician/patient awareness and preference. Inpatient use of insulin is also common, and the use of insulin pens could offer substantial benefits in this patient population, not only during the admission period but also after discharge from the hospital. However, the evidence base for inpatient use is still weak, and more studies are needed to investigate the use of insulin pens in this patient population.

Topics: Costs and Cost Analysis; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Disposable Equipment; Equipment Reuse; Hypoglycemic Agents; Injections, Subcutaneous; Inpatients; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin Infusion Systems; Insulin, Long-Acting; Patient Preference; Perception; Physicians, Family

This pedagogical review illustrates the differences between pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) measures, using insulin therapy as the primary example. The main conclusion is that PD parameters are of greater clinical significance for insulin therapy than PK parameters. The glucose-clamp technique, the optimal method for determining insulin PD, is explained so that the reader can understand the important studies in the literature. Key glucose-clamp studies that compare two basal insulin analogues - insulin glargine and insulin detemir - to Neutral Protamine Hagedorn insulin and to each other are then presented. The review further explains how PD parameters have been translated into useful clinical concepts and simple titration algorithms for everyday clinical practice. Finally, the necessity of overcoming patient and/or physician barriers to insulin therapy and providing continuing education and training is emphasised.

Topics: Blood Glucose; Clinical Trials as Topic; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Glucose Clamp Technique; Half-Life; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Detemir; Insulin Glargine; Insulin Secretion; Insulin, Isophane; Insulin, Long-Acting

Most guidelines suggest that failure of oral antidiabetic drugs should be followed by the addition of a basal insulin with aggressive titration of the dose. In most countries, neutral protamine Hagedorn (NPH)-insulin, glargine and detemir are the only choices. Clinical trials show that the metabolism and metabolic outcomes after treatment with intermediate- or long-acting insulins differ little. Despite this, the hypoglycaemic potential, effect on body weight and adherence to insulin treatment may affect the choice of basal insulin. Adherence seems to be negatively correlated to the prescribed dose and the number of injections. Furthermore, the choice of basal insulin might be influenced by the number of units necessary to achieve the goal for HbA1c.. By searching the literature systematically, we identified all randomised clinical trials comparing long-acting insulins (human NPH-insulin and the analogues glargine and detemir) for the treatment of type 2 diabetes conducted over the last 10 years. We continued by reviewing only studies in which similar antihyperglycaemic potential of the treatments was achieved.. According to the inclusion criteria for this review, all drugs were efficacious regarding the main purpose of decreasing glycaemia. For an equal efficacy, we were able to detect other differences between the treatments and, furthermore, an estimate on the number of units of insulin needed to achieve comparable glycaemic control.. The analysis confirmed a favourable profile of both analogues regarding hypoglycaemia. For detemir, we additionally identified a favourable profile regarding weight gain and need for an increased number of units of insulin to achieve comparable glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA1c) responses. We conclude that the efficacy of insulin treatment seems to vary little between the available products, however doses needed to achieve similar effects vary; units used per HbA1c reduction could be a relevant parameter for the choice of insulin.

Topics: Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Detemir; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Isophane; Insulin, Long-Acting; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Weight Gain

In May 2008, the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) issued an updated guideline [clinical guideline (CG) 66] for the management of all aspects of type 2 diabetes. This report aims to provide information on new drug developments to support a 'new drugs update' to the 2008 guideline.. To review the newer agents available for blood glucose control in type 2 diabetes from four classes: the glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) analogue exenatide; dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors sitagliptin and vildagliptin; the long-acting insulin analogues, glargine and detemir; and to review concerns about the safety of the thiazolidinediones.. The following databases were searched: MEDLINE (1990-April 2008), EMBASE (1990-April 2008), the Cochrane Library (all sections) Issue 2, 2008, and the Science Citation Index and ISI Proceedings (2000-April 2008). The websites of the American Diabetes Association, the European Association for the Study of Diabetes, the US Food and Drug Administration, the European Medicines Evaluation Agency and the Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency were searched, as were manufacturers' websites.. Data extraction was carried out by one person, and checked by a second. Studies were assessed for quality using standard methods for reviews of trials. Meta-analyses were carried out using the Cochrane Review Manager (RevMan) software. Inclusion and exclusion criteria were based on current standard clinical practice in the UK, as outlined in NICE CG 66. The outcomes for the GLP-1 analogues, DPP-4 inhibitors and the long-acting insulin analogues were: glycaemic control, reflected by glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) level, hypoglycaemic episodes, changes in weight, adverse events, quality of life and costs. Modelling of the cost-effectiveness of the various regimes used the United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Outcomes Model.. Exenatide improved glycaemic control by around 1%, and had the added benefit of weight loss. The gliptins were effective in improving glycaemic control, reducing HbA1c level by about 0.8%. Glargine and detemir were equivalent to Neutral Protamine Hagedorn (NPH) (and to each other) in terms of glycaemic control but had modest advantages in terms of hypoglycaemia, especially nocturnal. Detemir, used only once daily, appeared to cause slightly less weight gain than glargine. The glitazones appeared to have similar effectiveness in controlling hyperglycaemia. Both can cause heart failure and fractures, but rosiglitazone appears to slightly increase the risk of cardiovascular events whereas pioglitazone reduces it. Eight trials examined the benefits of adding pioglitazone to an insulin regimen; in our meta-analysis, the mean reduction in HbA1c level was 0.54% [95% confidence interval (CI) -0.70 to -0.38] and hypoglycaemia was marginally more frequent in the pioglitazone arms [relative risk (RR) 1.27, 95% CI 0.99 to 1.63]. In most studies, those on pioglitazone gained more weight than those who were not. In terms of annual drug acquisition costs among the non-insulin regimes for a representative patient with a body mass index of around 30 kg/m2, the gliptins were the cheapest of the new drugs, with costs of between 386 pounds and 460 pounds. The glitazone costs were similar, with total annual costs for pioglitazone and for rosiglitazone of around 437 pounds and 482 pounds, respectively. Exenatide was more expensive, with an annual cost of around 830 pounds. Regimens containing insulin fell between the gliptins and exenatide in terms of their direct costs, with a NPH-based regimen having an annual cost of around 468 pounds for the representative patient, whereas the glargine and detemir regimens were more expensive, at around 634 pounds and 716 pounds, respectively. Comparisons of sitagliptin and rosiglitazone, and of vidagliptin and pioglitazone slowed clinical equivalence in terms of quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), but the gliptins were marginally less costly. Exenatide, when compared with glargine, appeared to be cost-effective. Comparing glargine with NPH showed an additional anticipated cost of around 1800 pounds. Within the comparison of detemir and NPH, the overall treatment costs for detemir were slightly higher, at between 2700 pounds and 2600 pounds.. The UKPDS Outcomes Model does not directly address aspects of the treatments under consideration, for example the direct utility effects from weight loss or weight gain, severe hypoglycaemic events and the fear of severe hypoglycaemic events. Also, small differences in QALYs among the drugs lead to fluctuations in incremental cost-effectiveness ratios.. Exenatide, the gliptins and detemir were all clinically effective. The long-acting insulin analogues glargine and detemir appeared to have only slight clinical advantages over NPH, but had much higher costs and did not appear to be cost-effective as first-line insulins for type 2 diabetes. Neither did exenatide appear to be cost-effective compared with NPH but, when used as third drug after failure of dual oral combination therapy, exenatide appeared cost-effective relative to glargine in this analysis. The gliptins are similar to the glitazones in glycaemic control and costs, and appeared to have fewer long-term side effects. Therefore, it appears, as supported by recent NICE guidelines, that NPH should be the preferred first-line insulin for the treatment of type 2 diabetes. More economic analysis is required to establish when it becomes cost-effective to switch from NPH to a long-acting analogue. Also, long-term follow-up studies of exenatide and the gliptins, and data on combined insulin and exenatide treatment, would be useful.

Topics: Adamantane; Body Weight; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Exenatide; Glucagon-Like Peptide 1; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Nitriles; Peptides; Pyrazines; Pyrrolidines; Quality of Life; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Sitagliptin Phosphate; State Medicine; Thiazolidinediones; Triazoles; United Kingdom; Venoms; Vildagliptin

To estimate absolute and relative incidence rates of hypoglycaemia when using once-daily evening or morning regimens of insulin glargine (glargine) versus once-daily evening NPH insulin (NPH) using individual patient data (IPD).. Randomized controlled trials with accessible IPD and including white European people with type 2 diabetes (T2DM) using glargine or NPH once-daily (with oral glucose-lowering drugs) were identified. Two study pools were analysed: evening glargine versus evening NPH (pool 1); and morning glargine versus evening NPH (pool 2). The number-needed-to-treat to avoid hypoglycaemia was calculated for glargine versus NPH.. In study pool 1 (n = 2711), the risk of nocturnal hypoglycaemia was approximately halved with glargine compared with NPH [odds ratios (OR): 0.44-0.52, p < 0.001-0.047]. This led to a significant reduction in anytime risk of symptomatic hypoglycaemia [plasma glucose (PG) <3.9 mmol/l, OR: 0.64, p = 0.018; PG <2.0 mmol/l, OR: 0.51, p < 0.001]. In study pool 2 (n = 470), although a strong numerical reduction in all types of nocturnal hypoglycaemia was observed (OR: 0.16-0.64), statistical significance was reached only for symptomatic hypoglycaemia with PG <3.9 mmol/l (p < 0.001). Eight (pool 1) or five (pool 2) people with T2DM needed to use glargine rather than NPH to avoid one person from experiencing a nocturnal symptomatic hypoglycaemic event within a median of about 25 weeks of starting insulin.. This meta-analysis of open-label studies provides confidence that reductions of around 50% of risk for nocturnal hypoglycaemia can be achieved with using glargine instead of NPH.

Topics: Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Female; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Isophane; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Risk Assessment; Treatment Outcome

Type 2 diabetes mellitus has been associated with an increased risk of hepatic, pancreatic, colon, endometrial, breast, and bladder cancer. Although a mechanism of action for the increased risk has been postulated, no definitive evidence has been completely elucidated in the medical literature. Results of recently released studies documented the use of specific antidiabetic drugs with increased rates of cancer. The insulin analog glargine was the focus of four observational studies published in 2009 that outlined an increase in the rates of cancer associated with its use. In contrast, the use of metformin has been shown to possibly decrease the rate of specific cancers when used in the treatment of type 2 diabetes. These data regarding cancer risk and antidiabetic drugs are contradictory and at this time are inconclusive. Until results of long-term randomized prospective studies are available to elucidate a correlation with cancer and insulin, we must continue treating diabetes in order to avert the long-term complications of the disease.

Topics: Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Metformin; Neoplasms; Risk

A pooled analysis of randomized controlled trials of individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) was conducted to compare dosing and impact of two basal insulin analogs, insulin glargine (glargine) and insulin detemir (detemir), on weight and hemoglobin A1c (A1c).. Twenty-two studies of at least 20 weeks in duration in individuals with T2DM initiating glargine/detemir were included. Results were combined using a weighted-average method and a bivariate random effect model. Outcomes included changes in weight, A1c, and insulin dose from study start to end.. One study was head-to-head comparison of glargine and detemir. Detemir (four studies) was administered once or twice daily, with 50% starting on detemir once daily but needing therapy intensification. Glargine was used once daily in all 22 studies. The Egger test was borderline significant for change in weight over the course of the treatment for glargine (0.29; 90% confidence interval [CI] -0.01, 0.58), and heterogeneity was not observed for detemir (-0.18; 90% CI -0.59, 0.23). Heterogeneity was observed for change in A1c over the course of the treatment (glargine, -1.19, 90% CI -1.74, -0.63; detemir, -2.65, 90% CI -4.86, -0.45). Nonheterogeneity for change in A1c over the course of the treatment was achieved by excluding five studies for glargine and one study for detemir; however, all studies were included in subsequent analyses. In the unadjusted model, glargine and detemir showed similar results for mean A1c change (-1.4% vs. -1.4%), weight gain (2.5 vs. 1.7 kg), and weight/A1c (1.8 vs. 1.2 kg/%). A significantly higher detemir dose was needed to achieve the same A1c change (51.5 vs. 38.8 U/day).. Although absolute weight gain was higher with glargine versus detemir, weight gain per A1c change was similar. A higher detemir dose was required to achieve a similar A1c reduction.

Topics: Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Detemir; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic

Among the growing population of individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus, many patients are failing to meet glycemic targets and are therefore at increased risk of complications.. Rapid-acting insulin analogs (ie, aspart, lispro, glulisine) have a pharmacokinetic profile that mirrors endogenous insulin more closely than regular human insulin. These insulin analogs can also be given closer to mealtimes and are less likely to cause hypoglycemia. Long-acting insulin analogs (ie, detemir, glargine) have relatively flat time-action profiles and last up to 24 hours, thus simulating endogenous basal insulin more precisely than neutral protamine Hagedorn insulin and producing less nocturnal hypoglycemia. The simplicity and efficacy of insulin analogs should help facilitate a patient's transition to insulin therapy. Current guidelines advocate starting insulin therapy in patients who have not achieved glycemic targets or those with glycated hemoglobin greater than 8.5% and adjusting doses as necessary. Two case studies illustrate the benefits of insulin analog therapy.. Insulin analogs offer many benefits over human insulins, including improved physiologic profile, greater convenience, reduced risk of hypoglycemia, and, in some instances, less weight gain. Combined, these elements may increase a patient's adherence to treatment, potentially increasing the level of glycemic control and improving the prognosis in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Topics: Algorithms; Amyloid; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Exenatide; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Detemir; Insulin Glargine; Insulin Secretion; Insulin, Long-Acting; Islet Amyloid Polypeptide; Life Style; Male; Middle Aged; Pancreas; Patient Compliance; Peptides; Venoms

Insulin Glargine was the first long-acting insulin analog produced by recombinant DNA technology, approved for use by the US FDA in April 2000 and by the European Agency for the Evaluation of Medicinal Products in June, 2000. It has become the most widely used insulin in the USA owing to its long duration of action without a pronounced peak. The principal advantage of insulin Glargine over neutral protamine Hagedorn (NPH) insulin is in a lower frequency of hypoglycemic reactions, thus affording improved safety. It is used in both type 1 and type 2 diabetes, usually as a single daily dose. In type 2 patients, it is often the first insulin introduced as a single daily dose. Although insulin Glargine is typically administered as a single nighttime dose, it can be given in the morning or at any other time convenient for the patient. In labile type 1 diabetes, it is often most effective given as two daily injections. In obese, insulin-resistant patients, it may be best to administer insulin Glargine in two separate doses, owing to the high volumes of injected insulin required. Insulin Glargine does not treat postprandial hyperglycemia. It is necessary to supplement with short-acting insulin at mealtimes to control glucose surges after meals. Insulin Glargine is effective in hospitalized and postsurgical patients on account of its lack of pronounced insulin peaks and long duration of action. Although there is considerable use of Glargine in pregnant diabetic women, there is no definitive study to confirm its benefits. Insulin Glargine is thought to coprecipitate supplementary short-acting insulins when co-administered in the same syringe. Therefore, more injections are typically needed in the usual treatment regimen for insulin requiring diabetes. In many cases, constant basal insulin levels may be achieved with multiple overlapping doses of NPH insulin given together with short-acting insulin at mealtimes. Such a therapy may be less costly, but the major advantage of insulin Glargine remains the greater safety of a lower frequency of hypoglycemic reactions.

Topics: Adult; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin Infusion Systems; Insulin, Long-Acting; Patient Satisfaction; Pregnancy; Pregnancy in Diabetics; Quality of Life; Young Adult

Topics: Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting

The natural progression of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) requires continuing medical care, early insulin intensification and patient self-management education to reduce the risk of long-term complications, including microvascular and macrovascular complications. However, too few people are on insulin, and all too commonly have poor glycaemic control. This paradigm significantly increases the risk for long-term complications. It is becoming increasingly apparent that the early introduction of basal insulin, such as insulin glargine, is essential to provide clinically important improvements in glycaemic control. In this review, we discuss the rationale for the earlier insulinization in T2DM in order to reach and maintain treatment targets and to provide further support for the recent American Diabetes Association and European Association for the Study of Diabetes consensus statement.

Topics: Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting

Insulin therapy is often essential in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) but is typically not initiated early enough or aggressive enough, leading to worsening of glycaemic control and the majority of people staying above recommended haemoglobin A(1c) (HbA(1c)) targets of <7%. The extensive clinical experience gained with insulin glargine, in particular, the low risk of hypoglycaemia and consistent improvements in HbA(1c), suggests that insulin glargine can be initiated aggressively to help patients reach such HbA(1c) targets. However, many clinicians may be unaware of how easy it is to initiate insulin glargine. Indeed, the once-daily injection of insulin glargine plus once-daily measurement of blood glucose should provide little difficulty for patients. In the current review, the options for the initiation of insulin glargine in T2DM and how the patient can become more involved in management of their diabetes are discussed. The advantages of insulin glargine in randomized controlled trials and how these have translated into everyday clinical practice are also discussed.

Topics: Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Patient Education as Topic; Power, Psychological; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Titrimetry

Within the USA, between 1980 and 2005, the prevalence of diagnosed diabetes has increased in all age groups, with the age group 65-74 years having the highest prevalence. The treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) in elderly people is made more difficult than in their younger counterparts, primarily owing to the impact of co-morbidities, complications and hypoglycaemia as well as technical difficulties with insulin injections. Accordingly, the treatment approach for elderly patients with T2DM may need to be modified to accommodate co-morbidities and illnesses associated with ageing. Risks associated with insulin therapy, particularly hypoglycaemia, have traditionally limited the use of insulin in this patient population. Insulin glargine is associated with a low risk of hypoglycaemia compared with neutral protamine Hagedorn insulin, for example, and could thus provide a treatment of choice for healthcare providers when considering the increasing prevalence of diabetes in the elderly population. A regimen based on insulin glargine plus oral agents provides clinicians with a tool to help meet therapeutic targets in this population without increasing risk of hypoglycaemia.

Topics: Aged; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting

Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and obesity commonly co-exist. Improved clinical management of T2DM and improved glycaemic control with traditional therapies including insulin usually result in some weight gain - a frequently perceived barrier to the introduction of insulin by both patient and healthcare professionals. Weight gain of 2.5 kg per 1% change in haemoglobin A(1c) (HbA(1c)) is common in many studies. Strategies to minimize weight gain, particularly in obese patients, are essential to help patients better manage their diabetes and improve quality of life. Insulin analogues with lower risk of hypoglycaemia and better within-patient variability compared with human insulin may help facilitate reaching treatment goals. Moreover, weight gain can be minimized by earlier insulinization and the use of basal insulin, such as insulin glargine, instead of premixed insulin. Data specific to the obese patient with T2DM are presented; they are currently limited but do indicate that insulin glargine therapy is associated with improved glycaemic control as well as less weight gain than other insulins, such as premixed insulin and prandial insulin regimens. Retrospective subanalyses of earlier trials and ongoing studies would shed further light on the impact of insulin therapy in obese people with T2DM in addition to determination of optimal therapeutic strategies.

Topics: Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Overweight; Weight Gain

Insulin therapy becomes essential for many people with type 2 diabetes. After starting insulin, people with diabetes that is poorly controlled with oral agents typically report improved well-being and treatment satisfaction. However, healthcare professionals and people with type 2 diabetes are often reluctant to begin insulin treatment, citing concerns such as time/resources needed to educate patients, increased risks of hypoglycaemia and fear of injections, which lead them to focus on intensifying conventional oral therapy. Insulin glargine, which offers people with diabetes a once-a-day injection regimen with low risk of hypoglycaemia, is more likely to overcome such initial barriers than other more complex insulin regimens. Once-daily insulin glargine, in combination with modern glucose-dependent oral agents that do not need to be chased with food to prevent hypoglycaemia, does not require the fixed mealtimes and set amounts of carbohydrates necessary with twice-daily injection mixes and older sulphonylureas. We know that it is such dietary restrictions that cause the most damage to quality of life (QoL). To avoid damaging QoL unnecessarily and to ensure optimal satisfaction with treatment, it is important to evaluate the effects of treatment on QoL, treatment satisfaction and other patient-reported outcomes (PROs) using questionnaires validated for this purpose, such as the widely used Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire and the Audit of Diabetes-Dependent Quality of Life measure. A systematic electronic literature search identified reports of studies evaluating PROs associated with insulin glargine in comparison with other treatments. The studies show that insulin glargine is usually associated with greater improvements in treatment satisfaction and other PROs compared with intensifying oral therapy or alternative insulin regimens.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Female; Health Status; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Middle Aged; Patient Satisfaction; Quality of Life; Surveys and Questionnaires; Treatment Outcome

Diabetes mellitus is a major public health problem, in particular because of long-term complications affecting essential organs, such as the eyes and kidneys, which can lead to a reduction in life expectancy and high healthcare costs. The number of individuals with diabetes mellitus is projected to rise worldwide from 171 million people in 2000 to 366 million people in 2030. With the number of patients with diabetes continually growing, the burden of pressure on worldwide health systems is huge. Accordingly, regulatory and marketing approvals of new medicines are beginning to incorporate economic evaluation techniques to determine their cost-effectiveness. Overall, the studies included in this review show that the initiation of insulin glargine is cost-effective and is expected to lead to substantial improvements in both life years (LYs) and quality-adjusted LYs compared with neutral protamine Hagedorn insulin.

Topics: Cost-Benefit Analysis; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Costs; Health Care Costs; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Isophane; Insulin, Long-Acting; Quality-Adjusted Life Years

In the early treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), the addition of a basal insulin, such as insulin glargine, to existing oral therapy can help patients attain recommended glycaemic control targets, including haemoglobin A(1c) (HbA(1c)) <7% and fasting blood glucose <5.5 mmol/l (<100 mg/dl). For patients close to but not at target, the management of postprandial glucose excursions with a rapid-acting insulin, such as insulin glulisine, can provide further improvements in glycaemic control. In this review, the options for intensifying insulin therapy with the addition of one or more daily doses of prandial insulin are discussed. In addition, the advantages/disadvantages of choosing a basal-bolus vs. a premixed insulin strategy are discussed. A conceptually simple approach for the treatment of T2DM is for optimization of the basal insulin dose (added to oral antidiabetic drugs) to target fasting glycaemia followed by the addition of a single prandial dose of rapid-acting insulin to target the largest glucose excursion. A second and third dose of prandial insulin can then be added if HbA(1c) remains above target and to manage postprandial glucose excursions at other meals. Prospective studies are underway to further examine this concept and determine the benefit of this approach not only on overall glycaemic control but also on cardiovascular risk.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Postprandial Period; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic

Basal insulin administered to type-2 diabetic patients with poor glycaemic control when managed with oral anti-diabetics (OADs) alone can lead to an increased risk of weight gain and hypoglycaemia. In the absence of head-to-head trials, an indirect comparison of the once-daily insulin detemir with insulin glargine was conducted on the following outcomes: weight gain, hypoglycaemic episodes, and HbA(1c).. Parallel-group randomised controlled trials of at least 20 weeks duration that compared once-daily evening glargine or detemir with a common comparator, neutral protamine Hagedorn insulin (evening), were selected. Trials focused on insulin-naïve, type-2 diabetic patients poorly controlled with OAD. Five open-label trials were identified (n = 2,092 patients; n = 1 detemir and n = 4 glargine trials), with an indirect comparison of glargine (n = 869 patients) and detemir trials (n = 169 patients) carried out using meta-regression to control for covariates. Weight gain was analysed as weighted mean differences (WMD), hypoglycaemic episodes as odds ratios (OR), and HbA(1c) at the end of study as standardised mean differences (SMD).. Patients receiving evening detemir gained significantly less weight (unadjusted WMD -1.22 kg, 95% CI -2.15, -0.29 kg; p = 0.010) and significantly fewer of them experienced hypoglycaemic episodes versus evening glargine (unadjusted OR 0.52, 95% CI 0.28, 0.98; p = 0.044). There was no significant difference between treatments for the mean HbA(1c) level at study endpoint (unadjusted SMD 0.09, 95% CI -0.16, 0.33; p = 0.480).. Once-daily use of insulin detemir resulted in significantly less weight gain and fewer hypoglycaemic episodes than glargine, while maintaining clinically appropriate HbA(1c) levels in type-2 diabetic patients currently receiving OAD.

Topics: Aged; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Detemir; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Isophane; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Middle Aged; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Regression Analysis; Weight Gain

Insulin glargine (Lantus) was the first recombinant-DNA long-acting insulin analogue to be licensed for use in the treatment of diabetes mellitus.. This review considers the use of insulin glargine in the treatment of type 2 diabetes (T2DM).. Medline, Cochrane and Embase databases were searched for relevant papers from the year 2000 onwards.. Overall glargine provides at least equivalent glycaemic control and is associated with less hypoglycaemia, especially nocturnal hypoglycaemia owing to its 24 h peakless profile, which allows more aggressive titration to achieve glycaemic targets. Glargine has been shown to be safely initiated both individually and within a group setting and titration algorithms self-managed by patients are effective in achieving diabetes control. Despite these advantages, caution is needed as clinical guidelines do not advocate its use in all people with T2DM until clinical efficacy and cost effectiveness have been proved. However, insulin glargine is a welcome addition to the plethora of treatment options available for T2DM.

Topics: Algorithms; Clinical Trials as Topic; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting

The insulin treatment in type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM 2) is an explosive subject within health economics. This article discusses the significance of treating DM 2 patients with long-acting insulin analogues. Several studies have shown that the therapy with insulin glargine ist associated with a markedly lower rate of hypoglycaemia compared to NPH insulin. As the improvement of HbA1c is accompanied by a higher risk for hypoglycaemia, this goal is accomplished more effectively and safely with long acting insulin analogues.

Topics: Delayed-Action Preparations; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Germany; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Prognosis; Risk Factors

This article considers the costs that arise in the context of the medical management of diabetes mellitus (DM) under different therapeutic regimes. The following evaluations were used in assessing these costs: the LIVE-KK study, a routine data analysis, the LIVE-SPP study, a medical practice data analysis and the LIVE-DE study (a medical practice data survey). Overall the available information indicates that the total cost of the treatment based on insulin gargine is comparable to that incurred with the NPH insulin-based treatment. The treatment showing a medical advantage is thus also the most cost-effective treatment. Another favourable aspect is that patients remain on the combination treatment of insulin glargine with oral antidiabetic drugs longer than is the case with the combination treatment of NPH insulin plus oral antidiabetics.

Topics: Costs and Cost Analysis; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Germany; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting

Based on the LAPTOP trial, a cost and a benefit assessment were undertaken. The cost analysis was performed as a desk-top evaluation using the cost minimization method. The benefit assessment was done as a simulation using the diabetes mellitus model (DMM). In each analysis either cost or benefit of treating diabetes mellitus with oral antidiabetic drug(s) supported by insulin glargine were compared to those with conventional insulin treatment using premixed insulin twice daily. The cost benefit analysis demonstrated that treatment with insulin glargine plus oral antidiabetics was less expensive than the conventional insulin treatment with premixed insulin. Furthermore, avoidance of diabetic complications was better with insulin glargine plus oral antidiabetics than with premixed insulin alone.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Computer Simulation; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Models, Economic

The focus of this article is the satisfaction and health-related quality of life felt by patients with diabetes mellitus. Taking the LIVE-DE study as an example, it is demonstrated how various regimens of insulin treatment affect patient satisfaction. The standardized Insulin Treatment Experience Questionnaire (ITEQ) was produced for this purpose. It has 28 defined questions and answers. The 28 items describe in eight categories the experiences and problems which diabetic patients have had. It was found that there were significant differences between the insulin glargine and the NPH insulin-based regimens regarding quality of life and satisfaction with the treatment, a difference that ranged from small to moderate in favour of insulin glargine.

Topics: Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Health Status; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Patient Satisfaction; Quality of Life; Surveys and Questionnaires; Treatment Outcome

Intensive insulin therapy aimed at achieving normoglycaemia is becoming increasingly accepted in the treatment of type 2 diabetes (T2DM) to reduce the risk of diabetes-related complications. Insulin therapy is increasingly combined with oral antidiabetic drugs (OADs) to moderate insulin dosage, reduce weight gain and confer cardiovascular protection. However, traditional insulins are associated with limitations that may act as barriers to initiation, and intensive use of insulin therapy. The advent of newer, longer-acting, basal insulin analogues, such as insulin glargine (glargine) and insulin detemir (detemir), offer improved pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profiles compared with neutral protamine Hagedorn insulin (NPH). This potentially provides concomitant improvements in safety, efficacy and variability of glycaemic control. This paper reviews the properties of these new long-acting, basal insulin analogues and their potential roles in facilitating the initiation and optimisation of insulin therapy. Studies that reported the use of insulin and insulin analogues for the treatment of T2DM were identified using Medline. Key search terms included: 'insulin glargine', 'insulin detemir', 'NPH insulin', 'basal insulin', 'long-acting insulin', 'insulin analogue', 'pharmacokinetics', 'pharmacodynamics', 'dose titration', 'algorithms' and 'type 2 diabetes'. Abstracts presented at the American Diabetes Association and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes annual congresses were also searched. The data show that the long-acting insulin analogues glargine and detemir both offer a low risk of hypoglycaemia and improved glycaemic control. Aggressive dose titration with glargine and detemir facilitates attainment of glycaemic control targets. The goal of achieving good glycaemic control with a low risk of hypoglycaemia may be more feasible with newer insulin therapies as part of a simple basal insulin regimen with continued OADs.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Amino Acid Sequence; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Detemir; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Molecular Sequence Data; Recombinant Proteins

We systematically analysed evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) examining the safety and efficacy of neutral protamine Hagedorn (NPH) insulin and glargine in the management of adults with Type 2 diabetes.. Studies were identified by searching medline (1966-March 2007), embase (1974-2007), American Diabetes Association abstract database and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials using Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) diabetes mellitus, Type 2, insulin, insulin isophane, hypoglycaemic agents and the keywords glargine and NPH. Data on study design, participants, fasting plasma glucose (FPG), glycated haemoglobin (HbA(1c)), body weight and hypoglycaemia were independently abstracted by two investigators using a standardized protocol.. Data from a total of 4385 participants in 12 RCTs were pooled using a random-effects model. The mean net change (95% confidence interval) for FPG, HbA(1c) and body weight for patients treated with NPH insulin as compared with glargine was 0.21 mmol/l (-0.02 to 0.45), 0.08% (-0.04 to 0.21) and -0.33 kg (-0.61 to -0.06), respectively, with negative values favouring NPH and positive values favouring glargine. More participants experienced symptomatic and nocturnal hypoglycaemia on NPH than glargine, but there was no significant difference in confirmed or severe episodes.. We identified no difference in glucose-lowering between insulin glargine and NPH insulin, but less patient-reported hypoglycaemia with glargine and slightly less weight gain with NPH in adults with Type 2 diabetes.

Topics: Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Female; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Isophane; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Middle Aged; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Statistics as Topic; Weight Gain

Insulin is an effective medication for lowering hemoglobin A(1c) values and can be used for both basal and prandial coverage of hyperglycemia in Type 1 and Type 2 diabetes. Despite its effectiveness there is still reluctance by patients and physicians to add insulin into the treatment regimen for Type 2 diabetes when needed. One of the key barriers to initiating insulin therapy is the method of delivery. Insulin delivery pens are continually developed as a means to improve upon the vial and syringe and to make it easier for patients to incorporate insulin therapy into their lifestyles. The SoloSTAR pen (Sanofi-Aventis, Paris, France) was developed to make insulin delivery easier and to help eliminate barriers to the initiation of insulin therapy. In this article, we discuss the features and characteristics of SoloSTAR that overcome existing unmet needs.

Topics: Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Injections, Subcutaneous; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Syringes

Long-acting insulin analogues, in comparison with NPH insulin, should warrant a greater reproducibility of absorption after subcutaneous injection, providing better metabolic control with reduced hypoglycaemic risk. Aim of the present meta-analysis is the assessment of differences with respect to HbA1c, incidence of hypoglycaemia, weight gain, between NPH human insulin and each long-acting analogue.. All randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with a duration >12 weeks comparing long-acting insulin analogues (detemir or glargine) with NPH insulin in type 2 diabetic patients were retrieved; data on HbA1c and BMI at endpoint, and incidence of any, symptomatic, nocturnal, and severe hypoglycaemia, were extracted and meta-analysed.. A total of 14 RCTs was retrieved and included in the analysis. Long-acting analogues did not produce any significant improvement of HbA1c, in comparison with NPH human insulin. When trials with different analogues were analysed separately, NPH showed a significant superiority (by 0.1%) over detemir, but not over glargine. When analysing the effect of long-acting analogues on body weight, detemir, but not glargine, was associated with a significantly smaller weight gain than human insulin Both analogues were associated with a reduced risk for nocturnal and symptomatic hypoglycaemia (OR: 0.46[0.38-0.55] and 0.69[0.60-0.80]; all p<0.01).. Long-acting insulin analogues in type 2 diabetic patients does not seem to provide a better glycemic control in comparison with NPH insulin, whereas it reduces the risk of nocturnal and symptomatic hypoglycemia. Detemir, but not glargine, could be associated with smaller weight gain than NPH insulin.

Topics: Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Isophane; Insulin, Long-Acting; Middle Aged; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic

A recent meta-analysis evaluated trials of the rapid-acting analogues insulin lispro and insulin aspart, performed before the introduction of the basal analogues, insulin glargine and insulin detemir. This article reviews the effect of rapid-acting and basal insulin analogues separately and in combination, relative to human insulin. Outcomes evaluated include HbA(1c), hypoglycaemia, postprandial glucose (PPG), and weight changes. Results from trials that matched defined criteria are presented in tables. In type 1 diabetes, compared with human insulin, the rapid-acting analogues generally reduced hypoglycaemia and postprandial glucose, whereas the basal analogues tended to reduce hypoglycaemia -- particularly nocturnal hypoglycaemia. Weight gain may also be reduced with basal analogues, compared with human basal insulin. In type 2 diabetes, premix rapid-acting analogues controlled postprandial glucose better than human insulin mixes; basal analogues used as basal-only therapy reduced hypoglycaemia compared with NPH insulin; and some advantages were apparent with analogues in basal-bolus therapy. Whilst the benefits on individual metabolic and clinical outcomes appear modest, almost all studies report some advantage when using insulin analogues in type 1 and type 2 diabetes. Significant benefits, including PPG lowering with the rapid-acting analogues and the potential for reduction in cardiovascular risk, should be investigated further.

Topics: Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Administration Schedule; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Insulin; Insulin Aspart; Insulin Detemir; Insulin Glargine; Insulin Lispro; Insulin, Isophane; Insulin, Long-Acting; Postprandial Period; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic

SoloStar (sanofi-aventis) is a new, disposable insulin pen for the administration of insulin glargine (Lantus, sanofi-aventis) or insulin glulisine (Apidra, sanofi-aventis). SoloStar was developed to address a wide range of patient needs and demonstrates advancement over previous devices, owing to its appropriate combination of ergonomically-tested and mechanically improved features. The authors report the results of key investigations carried out by sanofi-aventis as part of the SoloStar development plan, including dose accuracy and injection force testing. Comparisons between SoloStar and two commonly used pens, FlexPen (Novo Nordisk) and the Humulin/Humalog pen (Eli Lilly) establish SoloStar as a state of the art pen that is suitable for most patients with diabetes.

Topics: Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Delivery Systems; Equipment Design; Ergonomics; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Injections, Subcutaneous; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Mechanics

The incretin hormone glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) is being synthesized from L-cells in the gut and enhances glucose-induced insulin secretion. Metabolic control of type 2 diabetic patients can be markedly improved by additional administration of GLP-1, however, this peptide is almost immediately degraded and therefore has little clinical value. The synthetic GLP-1 agonist exenatide underlies a different metabolism and has recently been approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for the adjunctive treatment of patients with type 2 diabetes who are suboptimally controlled with metformin and/or sulfonylurea. First controlled clinical trials provided evidence that glycaemic control under exenatide administered twice daily in a dose of 5-10 microg was not inferior to conventional insulin therapy. Novel aspects in the treatment of type 2 diabetes by GLP-1 receptor stimulation further include its influence on the insulin secretory pattern, insulin/glucagon ratio, body weight and possibly even pancreatic beta cell mass. However, a general application of exenatide in the treatment of type 2 diabetes will also largely depend on the therapy behavior of patients, a possible immunogenicity and the rate of adverse events. Furthermore, a possible indication for exenatide as first-line therapy of type 2 diabetes and the prognostic relevance of this novel therapeutic approach have yet to be defined.

Topics: Amino Acid Sequence; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Interactions; Drug Therapy, Combination; Exenatide; Gastric Emptying; Gastrointestinal Diseases; Glucagon-Like Peptide 1; Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Metformin; Peptides; Receptors, Glucagon; Sulfonylurea Compounds; Venoms

Insulin is one of the fundamental tools for the management of diabetes mellitus. All type 1 diabetic patients and most of the type 2 require the appropriate support of insulin for good glycemic control, long term healthy outcome and also to overcome the acute crisis. It is almost impossible to mimic the endogenous physiological insulin secretion curve by external administration of short acting human insulin and conventional intermediate acting insulin, neutral protamin Hagedorn (NPH), the so called basal insulin. Short acting human insulin has got a delayed onset of action, late peak and a long tail leading to postprandial hyperglycemia and late hypoglycemia. The so called basal insulin (NPH) is not truly a basal or peakless insulin. Its onset of action takes about 2 - 4 hours with a peak action and a tail. It can not maintain a constant basal level leading to premeal and fasting hyperglycemia and chance of hypoglycemia during peak action, particularly after night injection. To overcome the limitations of human insulin, during the last decade, three ultrashort acting and two long acting basal analogues have been developed by modifications of primary molecule of human insulin. The ultrashort acting analogue insulins are insulin lispro, insulin aspart and insulin glulisine. The basal analogues are insulin glargin and insulin detemir. The pharmacokinetic profiles of novel analogue molecules provide a better opportunity to mimic a physiological pattern of insulin administration, better glycemic control, less chance of hypoglycemia, greater flexibility and a healthy longterm outcome.

Topics: Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Detemir; Insulin Glargine; Insulin Lispro; Insulin, Long-Acting

Despite indications from epidemiological trials that higher blood glucose concentrations are associated with a higher risk for developing micro- and macrovascular complications, evidence for a beneficial effect of antihyperglycaemic therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus is conflicting. Two large studies, the United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) and the University Group Diabetes Program (UGDP), did not find a reduction of cardiovascular endpoints through improvement of metabolic control. The theoretical benefits of newer insulin analogues might result in fewer macrovascular and microvascular events.. To assess the effects of long-term treatment with long-acting insulin analogues (insulin glargine and insulin detemir) compared to NPH insulin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.. Studies were obtained from computerised searches of MEDLINE, EMBASE, The Cochrane Library and communication with experts in the field as well as insulin producing companies.. Studies were included if they were randomised controlled trials in adults with diabetes mellitus type 2 and had a trial duration of at least 24 weeks.. Two authors independently assessed trial quality and extracted data. Pooling of studies by means of random-effects meta-analyses was performed.. Six studies comparing insulin glargine to NPH (Neutral Protamine Hagedorn) insulin and two studies comparing insulin detemir to NPH insulin were identified. In these trials, 1715 patients were randomised to insulin glargine and 578 patients to insulin detemir. Duration of the included trials ranged from 24 to 52 weeks. Metabolic control, measured by glycosylated haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) as a surrogate endpoint, and adverse effects did not differ in a clinical relevant way between treatment groups. While no statistically significant difference for severe hypoglycaemia rates was shown in any of the trials, the rate of symptomatic, overall and nocturnal hypoglycaemia was statistically significantly lower in patients treated with either insulin glargine or detemir. No evidence for a beneficial effect of long-acting analogues on patient-oriented outcomes like mortality, morbidity, quality of life or costs could be obtained.. Our analysis suggests, if at all only a minor clinical benefit of treatment with long-acting insulin analogues for patients with diabetes mellitus type 2 treated with "basal" insulin regarding symptomatic nocturnal hypoglycaemic events. Until long-term efficacy and safety data are available, we suggest a cautious approach to therapy with insulin glargine or detemir.

Topics: Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Detemir; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Isophane; Insulin, Long-Acting; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic

The development of a variety of new substances will considerably expand the therapeutic choices in the treatment of type 2 diabetes. In 2006, the endocannabinoid receptor blocker Rimonabant has been approved for the treatment of type 2 diabetes in Germany. This compound has led to significant reductions of body weight along with improvements of HbA1c levels and lipid profiles, but the lack of health insurance coverage limits its large scale use in germany. In April 2007, the first members of the GLP 1 analogues/incretin mimetics (exenatide, Byetta) and DPP 4 inhbitors (sitagliptin, Januvia) have become available for the treatment of type 2 diabetes in Germany. Both drugs have significantly lowered HbA1c levels in clinical studies. In addition, the incretin mimetics have caused a progressive reduction of body weight, while the DPP 4 inhibitors have been rather weight neutral. Sitagliptin can be administered orally, whereas exenatide has to be injected subcutaneously. Neither the DPP 4 inhibitors, nor the incretin mimetics have led to the development of hypoglycaemia, unless combined with sulfonylureas. Overall, the introduction of these new drug classes will certainly broaden our therapeutic choices in the management of type 2 diabetes. The long-term effects of these drugs on the development of diabetic complications in long-term trials remains to be awaited.

Topics: Adamantane; Blood Glucose; Clinical Trials as Topic; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptidyl Peptidase 4; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Exenatide; Glucagon-Like Peptide 1; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Liraglutide; Nitriles; Peptides; Piperidines; Pyrazines; Pyrazoles; Pyrrolidines; Rimonabant; Sitagliptin Phosphate; Triazoles; Venoms; Vildagliptin

The basal insulin analogues glargine and detemir have been subject to a series of trials comparing their clinical profiles to the conventional preparation, neutral protamine Hagedorn (NPH). Careful review of these trials provides opportunities to learn clinically useful lessons about these insulins.. MedLine-indexed trials comparing glargine or detemir to NPH were scrutinized for control, tolerability and dose data. Separate considerations were made for types 1 and 2 diabetes, and for basal-bolus and basal plus oral glucose-lowering drugs (OGLD) therapy. Attention was paid to dosing schedules and 24-h glycaemic profiles.. Collectively, the trials demonstrated an improved balance between glycaemic control and tolerability for both analogues compared to NPH, regardless of regimen and diabetes type. Neither once-daily glargine nor detemir reliably provides 24-h basal insulin replacement in all patients with type 1 diabetes; a waning of effect frequently obliges twice-daily administration. When added to OGLDs in type 2 diabetes, goal-titrated once-daily basal insulin generally lowered HbA(1c) by approximately 1.5%, whereas twice-daily administration tended to increase insulin dose disproportionately to improvement in control. Hence, adding bolus insulin may be a preferable intensification method to dividing the basal dose. Varying injection time or dividing the basal insulin dose predictably affects the pattern of hypoglycaemia and bolus dose requirements. Morning administration tends to require higher dosing than evening administration.. Scrutiny of trials involving glargine and detemir has increased our understanding of how best to dose basal insulins. An individualized approach is still necessary however, and several questions remain that require further research.

Topics: Controlled Clinical Trials as Topic; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Administration Schedule; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Detemir; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting

Type 2 diabetes is a progressive disease characterized by insulin resistance and declining beta-cell function, often leading to a requirement for insulin therapy to maintain good glycemic control and prevent diabetes-associated complications. Adequate insulin dosing is crucial to the achievement of good glycemic control with minimal hypoglycemia, and dose titration immediately following insulin initiation is needed to ensure its success. Insulin may be initiated as an add-on therapy to oral treatment using a single evening basal insulin dose and titrating according to fasting blood glucose (FBG) levels (with an ideal target of <5.5 mmol/L [<100 mg/dL] to achieve glycosylated hemoglobin [HbA1c] <7%).. This review investigated options for, and clinical efficacy of, titration algorithms of insulin glargine in type 2 diabetes.. Articles from peer-reviewed journals were identified through searches of MEDLINE (years: 2000-2006). Search terms included insulin glargine, titration, algorithm, and type 2 diabetes. Studies were assessed and included in this review if they provided information regarding the method of dose titration of insulin glargine used.. A total of 12 studies were identified and included in this review. In the 24-week Treat-to-Target study, in which 756 patients were randomized to receive either insulin glargine or neutral protamine Hagedorn (NPH) insulin, once-daily using a simple titration regimen (titration of daily insulin dose by 0-2, 2, 4, or 6-8 IU if mean fasting plasma glucose over the 3 previous days was >or=5.6-<6.7, >or=6.7-<7.8, >or=7.8-<10.0 or >or=10 mmol/L [>or=100-<120, >or=120-<140, >or=140-<180, or >or=180 mg/dL], respectively, in the absence of plasma glucose <4.0 mmol/L [<72 mg/dL]) more patients reached HbA1c

Topics: Algorithms; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic

Topics: Algorithms; Blood Glucose; Clinical Trials as Topic; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Exenatide; Glucagon-Like Peptide 1; Humans; Hyperglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Liraglutide; Peptides; Postprandial Period; Pyrazines; Risk Factors; Sitagliptin Phosphate; Triazoles; Venoms

This analysis first modeled the interaction between hypoglycemia and glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) in clinical trials that compared insulin glargine (glargine) with human neutral protamine Hagedorn insulin (NPH) in patients with type 1 or type 2 diabetes mellitus. The model was then used to compare rates of hypoglycemia associated with use of these insulins.. Patient-level data from all randomized Phase III/IV clinical trials sponsored by the manufacturer of glargine that compared glargine and NPH and were available in May 2004 were included in the model. In addition, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and BIOSIS were searched for comparative randomized controlled trials of glargine and NPH using the terms insulin glargine, HOE 901, neutral protamine Hagedorn insulin, and NPH insulin. Studies were excluded from the analysis if patient-level data were not available. Unadjusted rates of symptomatic, confirmed, and severe hypoglycemia were compared with those derived from negative binomial regression analysis, which stratified the results by HbA1c at end point (with last observation carried forward), treatment, and duration of diabetes. In addition, the analysis was stratified by Phase III studies (which focused on determining tolerability and efficacy before regulatory approval) and Phase IV studies (which compared the clinical efficacy of the 2 insulins). The first month of the study was not included in the analysis because of continual adjustment of the insulin dose and maintenance of previous NPH in some studies.. Eleven sponsored randomized trials were included in the model (total of 5074 patients). Four other sponsored trials were not included because the databases were not finalized, and 3 investigator-initiated trials were not included because patient-level data were unavailable. Rates of hypoglycemia had a curvilinear relationship with HbAlc, increasing at lower end-point HbAlc values. In combined analyses of the studies of type 1 and type 2 diabetes, unadjusted rates of hypoglycemia were lower for glargine than NPH: 6.1% lower for all symptomatic hypoglycemia, 21.6% lower for confirmed hypoglycemia, and 23.9% lower for severe hypoglycemia (all, P < 0.05). When modeled using the negative binomial distribution with end-point HbA1c as a covariate, the corresponding results were 9.1% (P < 0.05), 26.6% (P < 0.001), and 30.0% (P = 0.08), respectively. When only Phase IV trials were analyzed, the relative reductions with glargine were 16.2% (P < 0.01), 40.8% (P < 0.01), and 46.8% (P < 0.05). The results of the separate analyses of studies of type 1 and type 2 diabetes were comparable.. Based on the results of this analysis, calculated unadjusted hypoglycemia event rates appear to underestimate the differences between glargine and NPH. In most of the present analyses, unadjusted rates were significantly lower with glargine than NPH. Adjustment for end-point HbA1c resulted in greater relative reductions in the risk of hypoglycemia for glargine compared with NPH. The adjusted risk reduction with glargine was highest in the Phase IV studies.

Topics: Binomial Distribution; Blood Glucose; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Clinical Trials, Phase IV as Topic; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Isophane; Insulin, Long-Acting; Models, Statistical; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Treatment Outcome

Most patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus will eventually require insulin therapy to achieve or maintain adequate glycaemic control. The introduction of insulin analogues, with pharmacokinetics that more closely mimic endogenous insulin secretion, has made physiologic insulin replacement easier to achieve for many patients. However, there are also concerns regarding alteration of binding affinities for the insulin receptor (IR) or insulin-like growth factor-1 receptor (IGF-1R) may increase the mitogenic potential of some analogues. Therefore, this article will review the relevant preclinical and clinical data to assess the mitogenic potential of insulin glargine, a basal insulin analogue, compared with regular human insulin (RHI). Searches of the PubMed database were performed using terms that included 'IR,' 'insulin-like growth factor-1,' 'IGF-1R,' 'type 2 diabetes mellitus,' and 'insulin glargine.' Original articles and reviews of published literature were retrieved and reviewed. Although one study reported increased binding affinity of insulin glargine for the IGF-1R and increased mitogenic potential in cells with excess IGF-1Rs (Saos/B10 osteosarcoma cells), most in vitro binding-affinity and cell-culture studies have demonstrated behaviour of insulin glargine comparable to that of RHI for both IR and IGF-1R binding, insulin signalling, and metabolic and mitogenic potential.Currently published in vivo carcinogenic studies and human clinical trial data have shown that insulin glargine is not associated with increased risk for either cancer or the development or progression of diabetic retinopathy.

Topics: Animals; Cell Line; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Metabolic Clearance Rate; Receptor, Insulin; Signal Transduction

Insulin is an effective treatment for type 2 diabetes (T2D), a progressive condition in which insulin deficiency is one of the core defects. When patients with T2D are unable to achieve glycemic goals with diet and oral antihyperglycemic medications, a common starting insulin regimen consists of basal or premixed insulin added to oral antihyperglycemic medications. When glycemic goals are not achieved with the initial insulin regimen, a basal-bolus regimen is necessary.. This article reviews clinical-trial data on the efficacy and safety profile of prandial premixed insulin analogues (insulin aspart and insulin lispro) compared with basal insulin analogues (insulin glargine, insulin detemir, and insulin lispro protamine suspension), with or without a prandial insulin analogue, in the management of T2D.. A systematic search of Ovid, MEDLINE, and EMBASE (1995-2007) was performed to identify published randomized controlled trials comparing prandial premixed insulin analogues with basal insulin analogues, with or without prandial insulin, in patients with T2D. The search terms were premixed insulin analogues, premixed insulin, biphasic insulin aspart, insulin aspart 70/30, insulin aspart 50/50, premixed insulin lispro, insulin lispro 75/25, insulin lispro 50/50, glargine, and detemir. Abstracts presented at the 2005 and 2006 meetings of the American Diabetes Association and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes and bibliographies of the identified studies were also reviewed. Predetermined criteria for study inclusion were treatment duration of at least 12 weeks, T2D diagnosed using valid criteria, use of a basal insulin analogue (with or without rapid-acting insulin) as a study comparator, and use of well-accepted end points (eg, glycosylated hemoglobin [HbA(1c)], hypoglycemia, preprandial and postprandial blood glucose).. Of the identified randomized controlled trials, 3 studies compared premixed insulin analogues containing 70% or 75% basal and 30% or 25% rapid-acting insulin analogue with basal insulin analogues only, and 3 studies evaluated premixed insulin analogues containing 50% basal and 50% rapid-acting insulin analogue with basal insulin analogues only. Use of prandial premixed insulin analogues was associated with better overall and postprandial glycemic control. In the studies that compared twice-daily premixed insulin analogues with a basal insulin analogue, changes in HbA(1c) ranged from -1.00% to -2.79% and from -0.42% to -2.36%, respectively (P < 0.01). In the studies that compared thrice-daily premixed insulin analogues with a basal insulin analogue, changes in HbA(1c) ranged from -0.72% to -1.2% and from -0.3% to -0.75%, respectively (P < 0.01). These results were achieved with some increase in overall hypoglycemia, but not in nocturnal or severe hypoglycemia. Doses of the premixed insulin analogues were adjusted during the titration period to achieve glycemic goals.. The results of this systematic review suggest that regimens consisting of prandial premixed insulin analogues, which provide both basal and prandial insulin coverage, may be used as an initial insulin regimen in patients with T2D to enable better overall, preprandial, and postprandial glycemic control compared with a basal insulin analogue regimen alone. Premixed insulin analogues are an effective option for initiating and intensifying insulin therapy in patients with T2D.

Topics: Body Weight; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Administration Schedule; Evidence-Based Medicine; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Aspart; Insulin Detemir; Insulin Glargine; Insulin Lispro; Insulin, Long-Acting; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic

Insulin is an effective treatment for type 2 diabetes (T2D), a progressive condition in which insulin deficiency is one of the core defects. When patients with T2D are unable to achieve glycemic goals with diet and oral antihyperglycemic medications, a common starting insulin regimen consists of basal or premixed insulin added to oral antihyperglycemic medications. When glycemic goals are not achieved with the initial insulin regimen, a basal-bolus regimen is necessary.. This article reviews clinical-trial data on the efficacy and safety profile of prandial premixed insulin analogues (insulin aspart and insulin lispro) compared with basal insulin analogues (insulin glargine, insulin detemir, and insulin lispro protamine suspension), with or without a prandial insulin analogue, in the management of T2D.. A systematic search of Ovid, MEDLINE, and EMBASE (1995-2007) was performed to identify published randomized controlled trials comparing prandial premixed insulin analogues with basal insulin analogues, with or without prandial insulin, in patients with T2D. The search terms were premixed insulin analogues, premixed insulin, biphasic insulin aspart, insulin aspart 70/30, insulin aspart 50/50, premixed insulin lispro, insulin lispro 75/25, insulin lispro 50/50, glargine, and detemir. Abstracts presented at the 2005 and 2006 meetings of the American Diabetes Association and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes and bibliographies of the identified studies were also reviewed. Predetermined criteria for study inclusion were treatment duration of at least 12 weeks, T2D diagnosed using valid criteria, use of a basal insulin analogue (with or without rapid-acting insulin) as a study comparator, and use of well-accepted end points (eg, glycosylated hemoglobin [HbA1c], hypoglycemia, preprandial and postprandial blood glucose).. Of the identified randomized controlled trials, 3 studies compared premixed insulin analogues containing 70% or 75% basal and 30% or 25% rapid-acting insulin analogue with basal insulin analogues only, and 3 studies evaluated premixed insulin analogues containing 50% basal and 50% rapid-acting insulin analogue with basal insulin analogues only. Use of prandial premixed insulin analogues was associated with better overall and postprandial glycemic control. In the studies that compared twice-daily premixed insulin analogues with a basal insulin analogue, changes in HbA1c ranged from -1.00% to -2.79% and from -0.42% to -2.36%, respectively (P < 0.01). In the studies that compared thrice-daily premixed insulin analogues with a basal insulin analogue, changes in HbA1c ranged from -0.72% to -1.2% and from -0.3% to -0.75%, respectively (P < 0.01). These results were achieved with some increase in overall hypoglycemia, but not in nocturnal or severe hypoglycemia. Doses of the premixed insulin analogues were adjusted during the titration period to achieve glycemic goals.. The results of this systematic review suggest that regimens consisting of prandial premixed insulin analogues, which provide both basal and prandial insulin coverage, may be used as an initial insulin regimen in patients with T2D to enable better overall, preprandial, and postprandial glycemic control compared with a basal insulin analogue regimen alone. Premixed insulin analogues are an effective option for initiating and intensifying insulin therapy in patients with T2D.

Topics: Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Evidence-Based Medicine; Humans; Insulin; Insulin Aspart; Insulin Detemir; Insulin Glargine; Insulin Lispro; Insulin, Long-Acting; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic

The initiation of insulin therapy is a significant event for patients with diabetes and the physicians who care for them. Reluctance to begin insulin is multifactorial, with major stumbling blocks being the perceived complexity of insulin and fear of hypoglycemia. Recent guidelines supporting earlier introduction of insulin to achieve glycemic goals in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus will require that traditional approaches to insulin therapy be altered and a new paradigm be introduced into clinical practice. In particular, an understanding of the role of basal insulin in the regulation of glucose and the development of strategies to implement basal insulin therapy can provide a transition that is rational and highly effective in most patients. The strategy also offers a unique approach to diabetes education that permits a focused and patient-specific correction to glucose abnormalities.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Combined Modality Therapy; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Detemir; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting

Insulin treatment in Type 1 and Type 2 diabetes has come a long way since its discovery by Banting and Best in 1922. Early insulin therapy was life-saving, but was associated with practical problems and had side effects such as lipoatrophy. Initial modifications of insulin structure produced several classes of insulins with varying pharmacokinetics, but did not sufficiently mimic physiological insulin release. Novel long- and short-acting insulin analogues, the so-called 'designer insulins', developed through genetic engineering in the 1990s, paved the way for more physiological insulin therapy, which was theoretically less problematic in terms of hypoglycaemia and patient satisfaction. Insulin glargine (glargine) was the first DNA-recombinant long-acting insulin analogue. The replacement of asparagine with glycine and the addition of two arginine molecules in the molecular structure results in modified pharmacokinetics. Consequently, glargine has a longer, often 24-h profile, which is described as 'peakless' compared with other insulins such as neutral protamine Hagedorn insulin (NPH) and insulin ultralente. Since its launch, the use of glargine in Type 1 and Type 2 diabetes has been extensively reviewed to determine its place in the current insulin market. A potential advantage of glargine seems to be a lower risk of hypoglycaemia, particularly at night. The UK National Institute of Clinical Excellence has recommended that glargine is a treatment option for people with Type 1 diabetes. In Type 2 diabetes, it has been advised that glargine only be considered for: those who require assistance to administer insulin injections; those whose lifestyle is restricted significantly by recurrent symptomatic hypoglycaemic episodes; or those who would otherwise need twice-daily basal insulin injections in combination with oral glucose-lowering drugs.

Topics: Amino Acid Sequence; Animals; Blood Glucose; Delayed-Action Preparations; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Injections, Subcutaneous; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Molecular Sequence Data; Patient Satisfaction; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic

For both type 1 and type 2 diabetes, tight glycaemic control is vital to reduce the risk of long-term complications. However, this must be achieved with minimal risk of hypoglycaemia. Glargine is a new long-acting insulin analogue with an action profile designed to overcome this and has now been in clinical use for a number of years. In many countries glargine is widely used. Here we present an update on the clinical information available on glargine with respect to glycaemic control, the risk of hypoglycaemia and quality of life in both type 1 and type 2 diabetes.

Topics: Blood Glucose; Child; Diabetes Mellitus; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Quality of Life; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic

Achieving and maintaining glycemic control (glycated hemoglobin--HbA(1c)< or =7.0% according to American Diabetes Association and < or =6.5% according to International Diabetes Federation) is the primary goal in treating diabetes, which lowers the risk for diabetes-related complications. Insulin therapy is essential for type 1 diabetes treatment. Insulin therapy in type 2 diabetes is initiated when glycemic control is inadequate despite the combination of antihyperglycemic drugs. The type of insulin therapy is selected according to the patient's lifestyle and needs. Multiple insulin injection therapy and premixed insulin therapy are usually administered. In multiple insulin injection therapy, basal insulin is administered one or two times a day, and regular human insulin or rapid-acting insulin analog is administered with each meal. The duration of action of regular insulin is 6-8 hours; therefore, the risk for postprandial hypoglycemia is increased. The action of novel insulin analogs (rapid- and long-acting) closely mimics physiological insulin secretion. Three rapid-acting insulin analogs are currently available: insulin lispro, insulin aspart, and insulin glulisine. Insulin glulisine is the most recently approved rapid-acting insulin analog. It is safe, flexible, and effective in achieving target postprandial glycemic control. Moreover, the pharmacokinetics of insulin glulisine does not depend on the amount of subcutaneous fat. Basal insulins include intermediate-acting human insulins (neutral protamine Hagedorn) and long-acting insulin analogs (insulin glargine, insulin detemir). The latter are the optimal choice covering basal insulin requirement. Compared to neutral protamine Hagedorn insulin, long-acting insulin analogs have no pronounced concentration peak and reduce nocturnal hypoglycemia risk and weight gain.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Age Factors; Aged; Algorithms; Blood Glucose; Child; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Injections, Subcutaneous; Insulin; Insulin Detemir; Insulin Glargine; Insulin Secretion; Insulin, Long-Acting; Life Style; Middle Aged; Risk Factors; Time Factors

Insulin glargine is an analogue of human insulin that is modified to provide a consistent level of plasma insulin over a long duration. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic studies show that a single injection of insulin glargine leads to a smooth 24-hour time-action profile with no undesirable pronounced peaks of activity. In clinical trials, this profile has been associated with at least equivalent, if not better, glycemic control than other traditional basal insulins and a significantly lower rate of overall and nocturnal hypoglycemia. The convenience of a once-daily injection, a lack of need for resuspension (insulin glargine is a clear solution when injected), and lower rates of hypoglycemia should translate into improvements in patient treatment satisfaction. This review appraises the evidence for the view that insulin glargine represents an advance in basal insulin therapy for both type 1 and type 2 diabetes patients.

Topics: Blood Glucose; Cardiovascular Diseases; Delayed-Action Preparations; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Diabetic Angiopathies; Drug Administration Schedule; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Injections, Subcutaneous; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Patient Compliance; Patient Satisfaction; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Risk Factors; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring; Child; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Aspart; Insulin Glargine; Insulin Lispro; Insulin, Long-Acting; Pregnancy

The primary aim of insulin therapy is to replace endogenous insulin secretion in patients with type 1 or type 2 diabetes between meals and overnight as well as postprandially. The most frequently used insulin for basal therapy is the intermediate-acting neutral protamin Hagedorn (NPH) insulin, although it does not correspond to a physiological profile. Insulin glargine is a new extended-action recombinant insulin analog, which is absorbed slowly into the bloodstream, reaching peak action in about 4 h and maintaining this concentration profil for 24-30 h. Some studies demonstrated that insulin glargine reduces the incidence of hypoglycemia and is at least as effective as NPH insulin given once or twice daily. It is equally effective administered before breakfast, dinner or at bedtime. Similar absorption rates were recorded after subcutaneous injection in differents part of body. The continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion utilizing an external insulin infusion pump (CSII) is one approach to intensive insulin therapy. Some studies indicate that pump therapy is associated with improved glycemic control compared with traditional insulin therapies and with significant decreases in frequency of both mild and severe hypoglycemic episodes. The author summarizes the indication, the effect and side effects of pump therapy.

Topics: Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Administration Schedule; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin Infusion Systems; Insulin, Isophane; Insulin, Long-Acting

Topics: Adult; Aged; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Female; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Middle Aged; Obesity

Insulin glargine (LANTUS) is a once-daily basal insulin analog with a smooth 24-h time-action profile that provides effective glycemic control with reduced hypoglycemia risk (particularly nocturnal) compared with NPH insulin in patients with type 2 diabetes. A recent "treat-to-target" study has shown that more patients on insulin glargine reached HbA(1c) levels < or =7.0% without confirmed nocturnal hypoglycemia compared with NPH insulin. We further assessed the risk for hypoglycemia in a meta-analysis of controlled trials of a similar design for insulin glargine versus once- or twice-daily NPH insulin in adults with type 2 diabetes.. All studies were 24-28 weeks long, except one 52-week study, for which interim 20-week data were used.. Patient demographics were similar between the insulin glargine (n = 1,142) and NPH insulin (n = 1,162) groups. The proportion of patients achieving target HbA(1c) (< or =7.0%) was similar between insulin glargine-and NPH insulin-treated patients (30.8 and 32.1%, respectively). There was a consistent significant reduction of hypoglycemia risk associated with insulin glargine, compared with NPH insulin, in terms of overall symptomatic (11%; P = 0.0006) and nocturnal (26%; P < 0.0001) hypoglycemia. Most notably, the risk of severe hypoglycemia and severe nocturnal hypoglycemia were reduced with insulin glargine by 46% (P = 0.0442) and 59% (P = 0.0231), respectively.. These results confirmed that insulin glargine given once daily reduces the risk of hypoglycemia compared with NPH insulin, which can facilitate more aggressive insulin treatment to a HbA(1c) target of < or =7.0% in patients with type 2 diabetes.

Topics: Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Isophane; Insulin, Long-Acting

Topics: Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Humans; Insulin; Insulin Aspart; Insulin Detemir; Insulin Glargine; Insulin Lispro; Insulin, Long-Acting

Insulin treated diabetic patients have often to contend with variability in the action of injected insulin and to some unpredictibility in glycemic control. The variability in blood glucose control seems particularly important with long-acting insulins. Insulin detemir belongs to a new class of non-crystalline form of long-acting insulin analogs. Absorption of insulin detemir is dependent on neither appropriate resuspension before injection and dissolution of crystals in the subcutaneous tissue, as is the case for NPH insulin, nor on formation and dissolution of microprecipitates, as is the case for insulin glargine. In euglycemic glucose clamp studies, insulin detemir was associated with significantly less within-subjects variability for the pharmacodynamic endpoints than both NPH insulin and insulin glargine. Three, up to 6 months trials, carried out in patients with type 1 diabetes have shown that the day-to-day within-subject variations in plasma glucose were significantly lower with insulin detemir than with human NPH insulin. Similar results have been reported in patients with type 2 diabetes. Nightly 8-h plasma glucose recordings showed a smoother and more stable profile with insulin detemir than with NPH insulin. In patients with type 1 diabetes the combination of insulin detemir with mealtime insulin aspart, a fast-acting insulin analog, provides a smoother and more stable profile with lower post-prandial plasma glucose levels that the combination of NPH insulin with regular human insulin before each meal. In several trials, the risk of hypoglycemia, particularly of nocturnal hypoglycemia, was significantly lower with insulin detemir than with NPH insulin. In conclusion insulin detemir offers a better reproducibility as compared with other basal insulins, reduces the risk of hypoglycemia, and may lead the patients to titrate their insulin doses more easily and therefore to achieve more often glycemic objectives. The combination of rapid- and long-acting insulin analogs reproduces a more physiological insulin secretion and thereby reduces the risk of hypoglycemia and improves the overall 24-h glycemic profile.

Topics: Blood Glucose; Circadian Rhythm; Delayed-Action Preparations; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Detemir; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Isophane; Insulin, Long-Acting; Reproducibility of Results

The primary aim of insulin therapy is to replace endogenous insulin secretion in patients with type 1 or type 2 diabetes in a physiologically sound manner, mimicking normal secretion patterns to adequately regulate glucose metabolism. The currently available human insulins for basal therapy--neutral protamine Hagedorn (NPH), Lente and Ultralente--and analogs such as insulin glargine, differ in pharmacokinetic properties. Clinical trial data indicate that insulin glargine may satisfy basal insulin requirements, with an improved safety profile relative to other available insulins used for basal supplementation. This review describes the unique pharmacokinetic properties and clinical efficacy of insulin glargine.

Topics: Clinical Trials as Topic; Diabetes Mellitus; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Humans; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting

The burden of type 2 diabetes mellitus will become even greater in coming decades as more young people present with the disease and patients live longer with the devastating complications of chronic hyperglycemia. Conventional and largely ineffectual treatment strategies consisting of lifestyle measures and long-term oral therapy are being challenged by studies showing that the early addition of insulin to oral agents can significantly improve glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes. Further, 2 recent randomized, controlled trials support the clinical utility of supplementing oral pharmacotherapy with once-daily insulin glargine to achieve and maintain target glycosylated hemoglobin levels < or =7%. This simple treat-to-target strategy may be readily adopted in general practice through a widely translatable algorithm moving from oral pharmacotherapy to early addition of basal insulin glargine if glycemic targets are not met. The once-daily flexible dosing of insulin glargine and its smooth, flat profile, associated with fewer episodes of nocturnal hypoglycemia, make it among the safest and most practical tools to date for transforming the paradigm of type 2 diabetes management.

Topics: Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hyperglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting

Insulin glargine is a long-acting insulin analogue, with a longer duration of action and a flatter time-action profile compared with NPH insulin. These properties can be predicted to result in higher glucose levels during the night and lower glucose levels after dinner following bedtime injection of insulin glargine compared with an equal dose of NPH insulin injected at bedtime. In two large-scale clinical trials involving either insulin-naïve (426 patients treated for 1 year) or previously insulin-treated (518 patients treated for 28 weeks) patients with type 2 diabetes, comparing addition of once-daily insulin glargine or NPH insulin to oral agents, these predictions were proven to be correct. Nocturnal hypoglycaemia was reduced by 58% in insulin-naive patients and by 22% in previously insulin-treated patients, and dinner-time glucose control was significantly better with insulin glargine than with NPH insulin once daily in the study in insulin-naive patients. The 'treat-to-target study' (756 insulin-naive patients treated for 24 weeks) showed that good glycaemic control can be achieved with aggressive titration of the insulin dose with either once-daily insulin glargine or NPH insulin combined with oral agents (mean endpoint HbA(1c) was 6.96% with insulin glargine and 6.97% with NPH insulin); however, this was achieved with less variability and nocturnal hypoglycaemia with insulin glargine. These data support use of insulin glargine instead of NPH insulin for basal insulin replacement in patients with type 2 diabetes.

Topics: Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Administration Schedule; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic

The prescription of insulin glargine has increased in Sweden and during 2003 the cost in the county of Skåne equalled all intermediate-acting insulins (ATC-code A10AC01). To investigate the evidence behind claimed advantages of insulin glargine over existing therapy, we carried out a systematic review. We analysed the available documentation presented after registration of the drug by the drug regulatory authorities FDA and EMEA. Data presented at the authorithies' Internet sites was approached. All published studies not included in the registration file were also included in the analysis. Data on glycemic control, expressed as HbA1c, and hypoglycemia was registered. Most studies included a comparison with NPH insulin, incorporating both type 1 and type 2-diabetes. In six pivotal studies there were no significant difference between the two insulin treatments regarding HbA1c, nor was there any substancial evidence concerning differences regarding hypoglycemia. According to FDA, no claim of superiority of insulin glargine could be expressed as all studies had an open design. Studies not included at registration did not add any new evidence. The claimed advantages of insulin glargine does not seem to be substantiated by available evidence.

Topics: Clinical Trials as Topic; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Evidence-Based Medicine; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Isophane; Insulin, Long-Acting; Meta-Analysis as Topic

Topics: Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Administration Schedule; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic

A better diabetes regulation seems possible, with the aid of the recently available insulin analogs than with isophane insulin, for patients with diabetes mellitus type 1 or 2. The glycaemic regulation can be improved and/or the chances of hypoglycaemia can be reduced by reduced variability in the resorption of (insulin glargine) or by binding to the serum albumin (insulin detemir). With poor regulation it seems possible to bring about a substantial HbA1c reduction without an increase in hypoglycaemic incidents, and with reasonable to good regulation to achieve a reduction of the number of hypoglycaemias whilst HbA1c remains the same.

Topics: Blood Glucose; Delayed-Action Preparations; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Isophane; Insulin, Long-Acting

Insulin glargine is the first long-acting basal insulin analogue indicated for subcutaneous administration once daily at bedtime in adults with type 1 or type 2 diabetes mellitus and pediatric patients aged > or = 6 years with type 1 diabetes. It differs in structure from native human insulin by 3 amino acids, a structural modification that provides a delayed onset of action and a constant, peakless effect that has a duration of at least 24 hours.. The goal of this article was to help determine the current place in therapy of insulin glargine by reviewing all available efficacy and tolerability data published since its introduction onto the market.. Relevant English-language articles were identified through searches of MEDLINE, PubMed, and EMBASE from 1966 to October 2002 and PREMEDLINE for November 2002. The search terms used were insulin, analogs, analogues, diabetes mellitus, glargine, HOE901, HOE-901, efficacy, safety, comparative study, treatment outcome, and case report. The reference lists of the identified articles were searched for additional relevant publications. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic data were reviewed and summarized. All large clinical trials (> or = 100 patients) evaluating the efficacy and tolerability of insulin glargine in patients with type 1 or type 2 diabetes were included in the review. Studies were compared in terms of their designs, primary and secondary efficacy parameters (glycosylated hemoglobin [HbA(1c)], fasting plasma glucose [FPG] and/or fasting blood glucose [FBG] level, incidence of hypoglycemia), and tolerability assessments.. Fourteen trials met the criteria for inclusion in this review, 7 of them published only in abstract form. All were multicenter, randomized, open-label, parallel-group trials conducted in Europe or the United States, and ranged in duration from 4 to 52 weeks. They compared insulin glargine with neutral protamine Hagedorn (NPH) insulin given once or twice daily in >5000 patients with type 1 or type 2 diabetes, or in insulin-naive patients with type 2 diabetes that was poorly controlled by oral antidiabetic agents. Insulin doses were individually titrated to achieve a target FBG level < or =120 mg/dL (6.7 mmol/L). The studies were typically statistically underpowered to detect a significant difference in HbA(1c) between treatment groups; only 3 trials were of an adequate size to have 90% statistical power to detect a mean 0.5% difference in HbA(1c). Furthermore, analysis of the data from these trials was associated with a number of methodologic problems relating to inconsistencies in reporting. Given these limitations, the available data suggest that insulin glargine treatment produces statistically significant reductions in FPG or FBG levels at end point both compared with baseline and compared with NPH insulin (P < 0.001) without achieving overall significant improvements in HbA(1c) values. However, a recent abstract of a small 52-week trial in patients with type 1 diabetes reported a 0.4% additional decrease in HbA(1c) with insulin glargine treatment compared with NPH insulin. Patients have reported greater treatment satisfaction with insulin glargine compared with NPH insulin. The findings varied regarding weight gain, overall incidence of hypoglycemia, and incidence of nocturnal hypoglycemia. Currently, the cost of insulin glargine is twice that of NPH insulin on a per-unit basis.. As a basal insulin replacement, insulin glargine administered once daily demonstrates a steady time-action profile over 24 hours without a pronounced peak. Based on the evidence from published clinical trials, insulin glargine appears to have equal clinical efficacy to NPH insulin, produces similar reductions in HbA(1c), and is associated with lower FPG and FBG levels and a consistent and significant reduction in the incidence of nocturnal hypoglycemia in patients with type 2 diabetes.

Topics: Clinical Trials as Topic; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Therapy, Combination; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Injections, Subcutaneous; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Quality of Life

Tight glycaemic control (ideally, HbA1c<7%) is central to reducing the risk of long-term complications of diabetes. This approach, for both Type 1 and Type 2 diabetes, commonly involves the use of basal insulin, and must be achieved with minimal risk of hypoglycaemia (particularly nocturnal episodes). Indeed, concern around hypoglycaemia is a major barrier to achieving tight glycaemic control, and is a common problem with those protracted-acting insulins most frequently used in clinical practice for basal insulin supply. Other drawbacks include inter- and intra-patient variability that compromises dosing reproducibility and unsuitability for single daily dosing. New long-acting human insulin analogues with action profiles designed to overcome these problems are now available in clinical practice or are under evaluation in clinical trials. Clinical evidence suggests efficacy and safety advantages for these analogues over NPH insulin (the most commonly used basal insulin), and may bring closer the goal of tight glycaemic control in patients with diabetes.

Topics: Carrier Proteins; Delayed-Action Preparations; Diabetes Mellitus; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Administration Schedule; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Infusions, Parenteral; Insulin; Insulin Detemir; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Isophane; Insulin, Long-Acting

Management of type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus with intensive insulin therapy usually includes an intermediate- or long-acting basal component for between-meal and nocturnal glycemic control, together with preprandial bolus injections of a short-acting insulin for control of meal-stimulated increases in serum glucose levels. Although the ideal basal/bolus insulin combination has yet to be found, recent developments may provide safer and more effective options. Two new short-acting semisynthetic analogs--insulin lispro and insulin aspart--can be administered as preprandial bolus injections closer to mealtime than regular human insulin, thereby synchronizing insulin administration and food absorption. In clinical trials, postprandial increases in blood glucose levels were significantly less after treatment with insulin lispro or insulin aspart than with premeal regular insulin. Because of their short duration of action, a slightly greater basal insulin supply may be needed when insulin lispro or insulin aspart is used. Inhalation devices for aerosolized regular human insulin offer another alternative to premeal subcutaneous bolus injections. Inhaled insulin is absorbed more rapidly than subcutaneous regular insulin and may therefore be given closer to mealtime. For basal therapy, insulin glargine, a new long-acting analog, is absorbed more slowly after subcutaneous administration than are conventional neutral protamine Hagedorn (NPH) and ultralente insulin, and has a relatively flat metabolic effect. Clinical trials indicate that insulin glargine is at least as effective as NPH insulin and ultralente insulin, and is associated with a reduced risk of nocturnal hypoglycemia. Other long-acting analogs, such as fatty acid acylated insulins, have been tested in animal models and are being evaluated in clinical studies.

Topics: Administration, Inhalation; Blood Glucose; Chemistry, Pharmaceutical; Clinical Trials as Topic; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Humans; Injections, Subcutaneous; Insulin; Insulin Aspart; Insulin Glargine; Insulin Lispro; Insulin, Long-Acting

Topics: Clinical Trials as Topic; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting

Insulin therapy is ultimately necessary for the control of blood glucose in a majority of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Unfortunately, the pharmacokinetic characteristics of previously available rapid-, intermediate-, and long-acting preparations make sustained normoglycemia almost impossible. Advances in molecular genetic engineering have made possible the development of insulin analogues with pharmacokinetics that more closely mimic the needs of patients with type 2 diabetes. In the following article, we explore the insulin analogues currently available for clinical use, their pharmacokinetics, and the rationale for their use in the treatment of type 2 diabetes, and follow-up with a brief examination of future developments.

Topics: Administration, Inhalation; Administration, Oral; Carrier Proteins; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Aspart; Insulin Detemir; Insulin Glargine; Insulin Lispro; Insulin, Long-Acting

Insulin glargine is a recombinant human insulin analog produced by DNA technology using a nonpathogenic strain of Escherichia coli. Two modifications of human insulin result in a stable molecule which is soluble in slightly acidic conditions (pH 4.0) and precipitates in the neutral pH of subcutaneous tissue. Because of these properties, absorption of insulin glargine is delayed and the analog provides a fairly constant, basal insulin supply without peaks in plasma insulin levels for approximately 24 hours, similar to that achieved by a continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion. Insulin glargine is indicated as a once daily subcutaneous injection to provide basal glycemic control in adults and children aged >6 years with type 1 diabetes mellitus and in adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Fasting plasma glucose and fasting blood glucose levels generally improved to a greater extent in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus receiving insulin glargine than patients who administered Neutral Protamine Hagedorn (NPH) insulin. In patients with type 1 or 2 disease, glycosylated hemoglobin levels were slightly reduced and to a similar extent with insulin glargine and NPH insulin. Most clinical trials in patients with type 1 or 2 diabetes mellitus demonstrated a lower incidence of hypoglycemia, especially nocturnal hypoglycemia, with insulin glargine compared with NPH insulin. One of the most common adverse events with insulin glargine treatment was injection site pain which, in some studies, occurred more frequently than in patients receiving NPH insulin. In all cases the symptoms were mild and treatment discontinuation was not required. Otherwise, the drug is well tolerated and does not appear to be immunogenic. In conclusion, insulin glargine once a day provides basal control of glycemia for approximately 24 hours without inducing peaks in plasma insulin levels in patients with type 1 or 2 diabetes mellitus. In long-term, well designed trials insulin glargine once daily improved glycemic control at least as effectively as NPH insulin given once or twice daily. The drug was well tolerated and in most studies the incidence of nocturnal hypoglycemia was significantly less in patients treated with insulin glargine compared with patients receiving NPH insulin. Therefore, insulin glargine is likely to be a useful addition to the armamentarium of insulin therapy by establishing basal glycemic control with once daily administration and a reduced risk of nocturnal hypogl

Topics: Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting

Insulin glargine is a recombinant human insulin analogue produced by DNA technology using a nonpathogenic strain of Escherichia coli. Two modifications of human insulin result in a stable molecule which is soluble in slightly acidic conditions (pH 4.0) and precipitates in the neutral pH of subcutaneous tissue. Because of these properties, absorption of insulin glargine is delayed and the analogue provides a fairly constant, basal insulin supply without peaks in plasma insulin levels for approximately 24 hours, similar to that achieved by a continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion. Insulin glargine is indicated as a once daily subcutaneous injection to provide basal glycaemic control in adults and children aged >6 years with type 1 diabetes mellitus and in adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Fasting plasma glucose and fasting blood glucose levels generally improved to a greater extent in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus receiving insulin glargine than patients who administered Neutral Protamine Hagedorn (NPH) insulin. In patients with type 1 or 2 disease, glycosylated haemoglobin levels were slightly reduced and to a similar extent with insulin glargine and NPH insulin. Most clinical trials in patients with type 1 or 2 diabetes mellitus demonstrated a lower incidence of hypoglycaemia, especially nocturnal hypoglycaemia, compared with NPH insulin. One of the most common adverse events with insulin glargine treatment was injection site pain which, in some studies, occurred more frequently than in patients receiving NPH insulin. In all cases the symptoms were mild and treatment discontinuation was not required. Otherwise, the drug is well tolerated and does not appear to be immunogenic.. Insulin glargine once a day provides basal control of glycaemia for approximately 24 hours without inducing peaks in plasma insulin levels in patients with type 1 or 2 diabetes mellitus. In long term, well designed trials insulin glargine once daily improved glycaemic control at least as effectively as NPH insulin given once or twice daily. The drug was well tolerated and in most studies the incidence of nocturnal hypoglycaemia was significantly less in patients treated with insulin glargine compared with patients receiving NPH insulin. Therefore, insulin glargine is likely to be a useful addition to the armamentarium of insulin therapy by establishing basal glycaemic control with once daily administration and a reduced risk of nocturnal hypoglycaemia.

Topics: Absorption; Area Under Curve; Blood Glucose; Child; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Patient Satisfaction; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Treatment Outcome

Type 2 diabetes natural history and progressive deterioration requires a therapeutic approach starting with diet and physical activity changes, then associated with pharmacological interventions (monotherapy, then multiple therapy). When oral anti-diabetics at optimal dosage have failed to maintain good diabetic control (HbA1c 6.5% Pounds), insulin treatment has to be considered and should be used when diabetic controls remain poor (HbA1c > 8%). The most adequate insulin regimen are bedtime NPH associated or not with oral anti-diabetics, or alternatively 2 daily injections (morning and evening) of intermediate insulin. Intensive insulin (3 daily injections or more), and particularly the use of short-acting analogues is an effective regimen when bedtime or conventional regimen have failed. Insulin glargin could be an interesting alternative to bedtime NPH but needs further data in type 2 diabetes. Insulin treatment has to be initiated with an adequate patient (and family) education. Glycaemic objectives (fasting blood glucose and HbA1c) should be regularly assessed and adapted taking into consideration diabetic control, clinical effects and safety assessments (weight gain, hypoglycaemic events...).

Topics: Administration, Oral; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Forecasting; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting

To describe the phase 3a ONWARDS clinical development programme investigating insulin icodec (icodec), a once-weekly basal insulin, including the design and rationale for each of the ONWARDS 1-6 trials.. Six randomized controlled trials have been initiated in adults with type 2 diabetes (T2D) (insulin-naive: ONWARDS 1, 3 and 5; previously insulin-treated: ONWARDS 2 and 4) and type 1 diabetes (T1D) (ONWARDS 6). Each trial will investigate icodec use in a unique clinical scenario, with consideration of long-term safety and varied comparator treatments (insulin glargine U100 or U300 or insulin degludec). ONWARDS 5 will incorporate real-world elements and a digital dose titration solution to guide icodec dosing. The primary objective for each of the trials is to compare the change in HbA1c from baseline to week 26 or week 52 between icodec and comparator arms. Secondary objectives include investigating other glycaemic control and safety parameters, such as fasting glucose, time in glycaemic range and hypoglycaemia. Patient-reported outcomes will assess treatment satisfaction.. The ONWARDS 1-6 trials will evaluate the efficacy and safety of once-weekly icodec compared with currently available daily basal insulin analogues in T2D and T1D. These trials will generate comprehensive evidence of icodec use in diverse populations across the spectrum of diabetes progression and treatment experience.

Topics: Adult; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine

To explore the effect of active insulin titration versus usual titration on glycaemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus uncontrolled with oral antidiabetic drugs (OADs).. In a 24-week, prospective and randomized study, 172 patients with uncontrolled type 2 diabetes were randomly assigned to either active titration or usual titration. Efficacy and safety outcomes included changes in glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) and fasting plasma glucose, percentage of individuals achieving HbA1c<53 mmol/mol, and hypoglycaemic events.. At Week 24, change in HbA1c was -1.08% ± 1.60% in the active titration group and -0.95% ± 1.34% in the usual titration group (P = 0.569). The percentages of individuals achieving HbA1c<53 mmol/mol were 29.4% and 16.1% in the active and usual titration groups, respectively (P = 0.037). There was no significant difference in the incidence of hypoglycaemia between the two groups. Multivariate logistic regression indicated that, with active titration, baseline HbA1c levels and postprandial glucose excursion were significantly associated with achieving HbA1c<53 mmol/mol.. Addition of basal insulin using active titration for 24 weeks provided a higher rate of HbA1c target achievement without significant hypoglycaemia compared to usual titration in individuals with uncontrolled type 2 diabetes.

Topics: Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Detemir; Insulin Glargine; Prospective Studies

To compare the efficacy and safety of degludec U100 versus glargine U300 for the early postoperative management of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2D) undergoing coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery.. A total of 239 patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive a basal-bolus regimen in the early postoperative period using degludec U100 (n = 122) or glargine U300 (n = 117) as basal and glulisine before meals. The primary outcome was mean differences between groups in their daily BG concentrations. The major safety outcome was the occurrence of hypoglycemia.. There were no differences in mean daily BG concentrations (157 vs. 162 mg/dl), mean percentage of readings within target BG of 70-180 mg/dl (74% vs. 73%), daily basal insulin dose (19 vs. 21 units/day), length of stay (median [IQR]: 9 vs. 9 days), or hospital complications (21.3% vs. 21.4%) between treatment groups. There were no differences in the proportion of patients with BG <70 mg/dl (15.6% vs. 23.1%) or <54 mg/dl (1.6% vs. 4.3%) between degludec-100 and glargine-300 groups.. Treatment with degludec U100 is as effective and safe as glargine U300 for the early postoperative hospital management of patients with T2D undergoing CABG.

Topics: Blood Glucose; Coronary Artery Bypass; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine; Postoperative Period

To determine the effectiveness and safety of early combination of insulin glargine with intravenous (IV) insulin infusion compared with IV insulin infusion alone in the management of diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA).. This was a single-centre, open-label, randomized controlled trial of adults aged 18 years or older diagnosed with DKA. The 'early glargine' group was given subcutaneous insulin glargine 0.3 units/kg within the first 3 hours of DKA diagnosis, in addition to the standard IV insulin infusion. The control group received standard IV insulin treatment only. The primary outcome was the time to DKA resolution. The other outcomes included rebound hyperglycaemia, mortality, hypoglycaemia and hypokalaemia, as well as the length of hospital stay (LOS).. A total of 60 patients (30 patients per group) were enrolled. Most patients (76.7%) had type 2 diabetes. Both groups were similar in baseline characteristics, except for higher serum beta-hydroxybutyrate and lower pH levels in the early glargine group. The mean ± standard deviation time to DKA resolution in the early glargine group was significantly faster than the control group (9.89 ± 3.81 vs. 12.73 ± 5.37 hours; P = .022). The median (interquartile range) LOS was significantly shorter in the early glargine group than in the control group (4.75 [3.53-8.96] vs. 15.25 [5.71-26.38] days; P = .024). The incidence of rebound hyperglycaemia, all-cause mortality, hypoglycaemia and hypokalaemia was similar between the groups.. Early combination of insulin glargine with IV insulin infusion led to a faster DKA resolution and a shorter LOS, without increasing hypoglycaemia and hypokalaemia.

Topics: Adult; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Diabetic Ketoacidosis; Humans; Hyperglycemia; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Hypokalemia; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Regular, Human

To compare nocturnal glucose profiles according to hourly plasma glucose measurements during treatment with insulin degludec and insulin glargine U100 in a cohort of people with type 1 diabetes prone to nocturnal severe hypoglycaemia.. The HypoDeg trial is a 2-year investigator-initiated, randomized, controlled crossover trial in 149 participants randomized to treatment with insulin degludec and insulin glargine U100 for 12 months each. The 51 participants in this predefined substudy stayed at least one night in hospital during each treatment arm for plasma glucose samples to be taken. Endpoints were glucose profiles, including mean plasma glucose, glycaemic variability and risk of hypoglycaemia.. There were no differences between treatments regarding mean plasma glucose. We saw a flatter glucose profile during insulin degludec compared with insulin glargine U100 treatment, which had a nadir at 4:00 AM, with a subsequent rise. During treatment with insulin degludec, the participants had lower glycaemic variability, with an estimated treatment difference of -4.3% (95% confidence interval [CI] -8.1 to -0.5; P < 0.05). Participants treated with insulin degludec were less likely to experience nocturnal hypoglycaemia below 3.0 mmol/L (hazard ratio 0.36 [95% CI 0.17-0.73; P < 0.05]).. Based on nocturnal plasma glucose measurements, treatment with insulin degludec compared with insulin glargine U100 administered in the evening results in lower glycaemic variability and lower risk of nocturnal hypoglycaemia without differences in mean plasma glucose.

Topics: Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine

Basal insulin glargine has a neutral effect on cardiovascular risk in type 2 diabetes (T2DM). In practice, basal insulin is often paired with a glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist (GLP1-RA) or meal insulin; however, the cardiovascular implications of these combinations have not been fully elucidated. In this context, we sought to evaluate the vascular function effects of adding the GLP1-RA exenatide or meal insulin lispro to basal glargine therapy in early T2DM.. In this 20-week trial, adults with T2DM of < 7-years duration were randomized to 8-weeks treatment with (i) insulin glargine (Glar), (ii) glargine + thrice-daily lispro (Glar/Lispro), or (iii) glargine + twice-daily exenatide (Glar/Exenatide), followed by 12-weeks washout. At baseline, 8-weeks, and washout, fasting endothelial function was assessed with reactive hyperemia index (RHI) measurement by peripheral arterial tonometry.. At baseline, there were no differences in blood pressure (BP), heart rate (HR) or RHI between participants randomized to Glar (n = 24), Glar/Lispro (n = 24), and Glar/Exenatide (n = 25). At 8-weeks, Glar/Exenatide decreased systolic BP (mean - 8.1 mmHg [95%CI - 13.9 to - 2.4], p = 0.008) and diastolic BP (mean - 5.1 mmHg [- 9.0 to - 1.3], p = 0.012) compared to baseline, with no significant changes in HR or RHI. Notably, baseline-adjusted RHI (mean ± SE) did not differ between the groups at 8-weeks (Glar 2.07 ± 0.10; Glar/Lispro 2.00 ± 0.10; Glar/Exenatide 1.81 ± 0.10; p = 0.19), nor did baseline-adjusted BP or HR. There were no differences between the groups in baseline-adjusted RHI, BP or HR after 12-weeks washout.. Adding either exenatide or lispro to basal insulin therapy does not appear to affect fasting endothelial function in early T2DM.. ClinicalTrials.Gov NCT02194595.

Topics: Adult; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Exenatide; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin Lispro; Insulin, Long-Acting

Basal Insulin Fc (BIF; insulin efsitora alfa; LY3209590), a fusion protein combining a novel single-chain insulin variant with a human IgG Fc domain, is designed for once-weekly basal insulin administration. This phase 2 study assessed safety and efficacy of BIF versus degludec in 265 patients with type 1 diabetes (T1D) using multiple daily injections.. During this randomized, parallel, open-label study, patients with T1D were randomized (1:1) to receive BIF once weekly or degludec once daily over the 26-week treatment period. Both groups were titrated to a fasting glucose level of 80-100 mg/dL. The primary end point was HbA1c change from baseline to week 26 (noninferiority margin, 0.4%). Secondary end points included percent time in range (TIR) (70-180 mg/dL), continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) fasting glucose (FG) level, and rate of hypoglycemia.. After 26 weeks, patients receiving BIF had noninferior HbA1c change from baseline versus those receiving degludec, with a statistically significant treatment difference of 0.17% (90% CI 0.01, 0.32; P = 0.07) favoring the comparator. Percent TIR was similar for patients in the BIF (56.1%) and degludec (58.9%; P = 0.112) groups at week 26. FG values were significantly higher for patients receiving BIF (158.8 mg/dL) versus degludec (143.2 mg/dL; P = 0.003). Rates of CGM-derived hypoglycemia were not statistically significantly different for BIF and degludec over 24 h for level 1 (P = 0.960) or level 2 (P = 0.517) hypoglycemia during the treatment period. Occurrence of serious adverse events was similar between the BIF and degludec groups.. Once-weekly BIF demonstrated noninferior glycemic control to once-daily degludec (treatment difference: 0.17% favoring degludec) and no difference in hypoglycemia or other safety findings in patients with T1D.

Topics: Blood Glucose; Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Glycated Hemoglobin; Glycemic Control; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine

Basal insulin Fc (BIF) (insulin efsitora alfa; LY3209590), a fusion protein combining a novel single-chain insulin variant with a human IgG Fc domain, is designed for once-weekly basal insulin administration. This phase 2 study assessed the safety and efficacy of BIF versus degludec in insulin-naive patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) previously treated with oral antihyperglycemic medications.. During this randomized, parallel, open-label study, 278 insulin-naive patients with T2D were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive BIF once weekly or degludec once daily over the 26-week treatment period. Both groups were titrated to fasting glucose of 80-100 mg/dL (4.4 to <5.6 mmol/L). The primary end point was HbA1c change from baseline to week 26 (noninferiority margin 0.4%). Secondary end points included fasting blood glucose (FBG), six-point glucose profiles, and rate of hypoglycemia.. After 26 weeks of treatment, BIF demonstrated a noninferior HbA1c change from baseline versus degludec, with a treatment difference of 0.06% (90% CI -0.11, 0.24; P = 0.56). Both BIF and degludec treatment led to significant reductions in FBG from baseline. At week 26, the between-treatment difference for BIF versus degludec was 4.7 mg/dL (90% CI 0.1, 9.3; P = 0.09). The rate of level 2 hypoglycemia was low and not significantly different between treatment groups (BIF 0.22 events/patient/year, degludec 0.15 events/patient/year; P = 0.64); there was no severe hypoglycemia. The occurrence of treatment-emergent adverse events was also similar between BIF and degludec.. Once-weekly BIF achieved excellent glycemic control similar to degludec, with no concerning hypoglycemia or other safety findings.

Topics: Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Glucose; Glycated Hemoglobin; Glycemic Control; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Regular, Human

To evaluate the efficacy of iGlarLixi in the Asian Pacific (AP) population with type 2 diabetes (T2D) using derived time-in-ranges calculated from seven-point self-measured blood glucose.. Two phase III trials were analysed. LixiLan-O-AP was performed in insulin-naive T2D patients (n = 878) randomized to iGlarLixi, glargine 100 units/mL (iGlar) or lixisenatide (Lixi). LixiLan-L-CN was performed in insulin-treated T2D patients (n = 426) randomized to iGlarLixi or iGlar. Changes in derived time-in-ranges from baseline to end-of-treatment (EOT) and estimated treatment differences (ETDs) were analysed. The proportions of patients achieving 70% or higher derived time-in-range (dTIR), 5% or higher dTIR improvement, and the composite triple target (≥ 70% dTIR, < 4% derived time-below-the-range [dTBR] and < 25% derived time-above-the-range [dTAR]) were calculated.. The changes from baseline to EOT in dTIR with iGlarLixi were greater versus iGlar (ETD. iGlarLixi achieved greater improvements in dTIR parameters versus iGlar or Lixi in insulin-naïve and insulin-experienced AP people with T2D.

Topics: Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Combinations; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Regular, Human

A cost-effectiveness analysis was conducted to compare insulin glargine 300 U/mL (Gla-300) versus insulin degludec 100 U/mL (IDeg-100) in insulin-naïve adults with type 2 diabetes (T2D) sub-optimally controlled with oral anti-diabetic drugs (OADs).. The BRAVO diabetes model was used to assess costs and outcomes for once-daily Gla-300 versus once-daily IDeg-100 from a US healthcare sector perspective. Baseline clinical data were based on BRIGHT, a 24-week, non-inferiority, randomised control trial comparing Gla-300 and IDeg-100 in adults with T2D sub-optimally controlled with OADs (with or without glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists). Treatment costs were based on doses observed in BRIGHT as well as net prices. Costs associated with complications were based on published literature. Lifetime costs (US$) and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) were predicted and used to calculate incremental cost-effectiveness ratio estimates; extensive scenario and sensitivity analyses were conducted.. Overall lifetime medical costs were estimated to be $327,904 and $330,154 for people receiving Gla-300 and IDeg-100, respectively; insulin costs were $43,477 and $44,367, respectively. People receiving Gla-300 gained 8.024 QALYs and 18.55 life-years, while people receiving IDeg-100 gained 7.997 QALYs and 18.52 life-years. Because Gla-300 was associated with a cost-saving of $2250 and 0.027 additional QALYs, it was considered to be dominant compared with IDeg-100. Results of the scenario and sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of the base case results.. Gla-300 was the dominant treatment option compared with IDeg-100 based on the willingness-to-pay threshold of $50,000/QALY. Results remained robust against a wide range of alternative assumptions on key parameters.

Topics: Adult; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Cost-Effectiveness Analysis; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine

To assess insulin glargine 100 U/mL (IGlar-100) treatment outcomes according to newly-defined subgroups of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).. Insulin-naïve T2DM participants (n = 2684) from nine randomised clinical trials initiating IGlar-100 were pooled and assigned to subgroups "Mild Age-Related Diabetes (MARD)", "Mild Obesity Diabetes (MOD)", "Severe Insulin Resistant Diabetes (SIRD)", and "Severe Insulin Deficient Diabetes (SIDD)", according to age at onset of diabetes, baseline HbA1c, BMI, and fasting C-peptide using sex-specific nearest centroid approach. HbA1c, FPG, hypoglycemia, insulin dose, and body weight were analysed at baseline and 24 weeks.. Subgroup distribution was MARD 15.3 % (n = 411), MOD 39.8 % (n = 1067), SIRD 10.5 % (n = 283), SIDD 34.4 % (n = 923). From baseline HbA1c 8.0-9.6% adjusted least square mean reductions after 24 weeks were similar between subgroups (1.4-1.5 %). SIDD was less likely to achieve HbA1c < 7.0 % (OR: 0.40 [0.29, 0.55]) than MARD. While the final IGlar-100 dose (0.36 U/kg) in MARD was lower than in other subgroups (0.46-0.50 U/kg), it had the highest hypoglycemia risk. SIRD had lowest hypoglycemia risk and SIDD exhibited greatest body weight gain.. IGlar-100 lowered hyperglycemia similarly in all T2DM subgroups, but level of glycemic control, insulin dose, and hypoglycemia risk differed between subgroups.

Topics: Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin Resistance; Male

Insulin icodec (icodec) is a basal insulin analogue suitable for once-weekly dosing. ONWARDS 4 aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of once-weekly icodec compared with once-daily insulin glargine U100 (glargine U100) in individuals with long-standing type 2 diabetes on a basal-bolus regimen.. In this 26-week, phase 3a, randomised, open-label, multicentre, treat-to-target, non-inferiority trial, adults from 80 sites (outpatient clinics and hospital departments) across nine countries (Belgium, India, Italy, Japan, Mexico, the Netherlands, Romania, Russia, and the USA) with type 2 diabetes (glycated haemoglobin [HbA. Between May 14 and Oct 29, 2021, 746 participants were screened for eligibility, of whom 582 (78%) were randomly assigned (291 [50%] to icodec treatment and 291 [50%] to glargine U100 treatment). Participants had a mean duration of type 2 diabetes of 17·1 years (SD 8·4). At week 26, estimated mean change in HbA. In people with long-standing type 2 diabetes on a basal-bolus regimen, once-weekly icodec showed similar improvements in glycaemic control, with fewer basal insulin injections, lower bolus insulin dose, and with no increase in hypoglycaemic rates compared with once-daily glargine U100. Key strengths of this trial include the use of masked continous glucose monitoring; the high trial completion rate; and the inclusion of a large, diverse, and multinational population. Limitations include the relatively short trial duration and the open-label design.. Novo Nordisk.

Topics: Adult; Blood Glucose; Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Substitution; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Treatment Outcome

We investigated the pathophysiology of the dawn phenomenon by examining the effects of changes in blood glucose levels from late night to early morning on various hormones in a group taking glargine BS and a group taking Lantus XR, with the goal of achieving better glycemic control. Patients with types 1 and 2 diabetes scheduled for inpatient education were divided into BS and XR groups. Blood glucose levels were tracked from 0:00 to 7:00, while blood samples were extracted at 3:00 and 7:00 to measure glucose levels and hormones related to the dawn phenomenon. Overall, we analyzed blood sample and intermittently scanned Continuous Glucose Monitoring data of 43 and 40 patients, respectively. From 0:00 to 7:00, the mean blood glucose was significantly lower in the BS group, although the fluctuation was similar (p < 0.0001). The BS group also exhibited significantly higher ∆ACTH (p = 0.0215) and ∆ cortisol (p = 0.0430) than the XR group. In the BS group, ∆Glu exhibited a significant negative correlation with ∆ACTH and ∆cortisol (p = 0.0491). Similar findings were not observed in the XR group. These results suggest that XR may be a better choice for long-acting insulin since it is less likely to induce cortisol secretion. Further, analysis of the dawn phenomenon and non-dawn phenomenon groups showed the mean CPR levels at 3:00 and 7:00 were significantly higher in the latter (p = 0.0135). This supports the conventional belief that appropriate basal insulin replacement therapy is a beneficial treatment for the dawn phenomenon.

Topics: Biosimilar Pharmaceuticals; Blood Glucose; Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Humans; Hydrocortisone; Hyperglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine

Type 2 diabetes (T2D) is the leading cause of kidney disease in the US. It is not known whether glucose-lowering medications differentially affect kidney function.. To evaluate kidney outcomes in the Glycemia Reduction Approaches in Diabetes: A Comparative Effectiveness (GRADE) trial comparing 4 classes of glucose-lowering medications added to metformin for glycemic management in individuals with T2D.. A randomized clinical trial was conducted at 36 sites across the US. Participants included adults with T2D for less than 10 years, a hemoglobin A1c level between 6.8% and 8.5%, and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) greater than or equal to 60 mL/min/1.73 m2 who were receiving metformin treatment. A total of 5047 participants were enrolled between July 8, 2013, and August 11, 2017, and followed up for a mean of 5.0 years (range, 0-7.6 years). Data were analyzed from February 21, 2022, to March 27, 2023.. Addition of insulin glargine, glimepiride, liraglutide, or sitagliptin to metformin, with the medication combination continued until the HbA1c was greater than 7.5%; thereafter, insulin was added to maintain glycemic control.. Chronic eGFR slope (change in eGFR between year 1 and trial end) and a composite kidney disease progression outcome (albuminuria, dialysis, transplant, or death due to kidney disease). Secondary outcomes included incident eGFR less than 60 mL/min/1.73 m2, 40% decrease in eGFR to less than 60 mL/min/1.73 m2, doubling of urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio (UACR) to 30 mg/g or greater, and progression of Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes stage. Analyses were intention-to-treat.. Of the 5047 participants, 3210 (63.6%) were men. Baseline characteristics were mean (SD) age 57.2 (10.0) years; HbA1c 7.5% (0.5%); diabetes duration, 4.2 (2.7) years; body mass index, 34.3 (6.8); blood pressure 128.3/77.3 (14.7/9.9) mm Hg; eGFR 94.9 (16.8) mL/min/1.73 m2; and median UACR, 6.4 (IQR 3.1-16.9) mg/g; 2933 (58.1%) were treated with renin-angiotensin-aldosterone inhibitors. Mean chronic eGFR slope was -2.03 (95% CI, -2.20 to -1.86) mL/min/1.73 m2 per year for patients receiving sitagliptin; glimepiride, -1.92 (95% CI, -2.08 to -1.75) mL/min/1.73 m2 per year; liraglutide, -2.08 (95% CI, -2.26 to -1.90) mL/min/1.73 m2 per year; and insulin glargine, -2.02 (95% CI, -2.19 to -1.84) mL/min/1.73 m2 per year (P = .61). Mean composite kidney disease progression occurred in 135 (10.6%) patients receiving sitagliptin; glimepiride, 155 (12.4%); liraglutide, 152 (12.0%); and insulin glargine, 150 (11.9%) (P = .56). Most of the composite outcome was attributable to albuminuria progression (98.4%). There were no significant differences by treatment assignment in secondary outcomes. There were no adverse kidney events attributable to medication assignment.. In this randomized clinical trial, among people with T2D and predominantly free of kidney disease at baseline, no significant differences in kidney outcomes were observed during 5 years of follow-up when a dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitor, sulfonylurea, glucagonlike peptide 1 receptor agonist, or basal insulin was added to metformin for glycemic control.. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01794143.

Topics: Adult; Albuminuria; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Disease Progression; Female; Glomerular Filtration Rate; Glucose; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine; Kidney; Kidney Diseases; Liraglutide; Male; Metformin; Middle Aged; Sitagliptin Phosphate

Tirzepatide is a once-weekly GIP/GLP-1 receptor agonist. In this phase 3, randomized, open-label trial, insulin-naive adults (≥18 years of age) with type 2 diabetes (T2D) uncontrolled on metformin (with or without a sulphonylurea) were randomized 1:1:1:1 to weekly tirzepatide 5 mg, 10 mg or 15 mg or daily insulin glargine at 66 hospitals in China, South Korea, Australia and India. The primary endpoint was non-inferiority of mean change in hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) from baseline to week 40 after treatment with 10 mg and 15 mg of tirzepatide. Key secondary endpoints included non-inferiority and superiority of all tirzepatide doses in HbA1c reduction, proportions of patients achieving HbA1c < 7.0% and weight loss at week 40. A total of 917 patients (763 (83.2%) in China) were randomized to tirzepatide 5 mg (n = 230), 10 mg (n = 228) or 15 mg (n = 229) or insulin glargine (n = 230). All doses of tirzepatide were non-inferior and superior to insulin glargine for least squares mean (s.e.) reduction in HbA1c from baseline to week 40: tirzepatide 5 mg, 10 mg and 15 mg, -2.24% (0.07), -2.44% (0.07) and -2.49% (0.07), respectively, and insulin glargine, -0.95% (0.07), with a treatment difference ranging from -1.29% to -1.54% (all P < 0.001). Proportions of patients achieving HbA1c < 7.0% at week 40 were greater in tirzepatide 5-mg (75.4%), 10-mg (86.0%) and 15-mg (84.4%) groups compared to insulin glargine (23.7%) (all P < 0.001). All tirzepatide doses led to superior body weight reduction at week 40: tirzepatide 5 mg, 10 mg and 15 mg, -5.0 kg (-6.5%), -7.0 kg (-9.3%) and -7.2 kg (-9.4%), respectively, compared to insulin glargine, 1.5 kg (+2.1%) (all P < 0.001). The most common adverse events with tirzepatide were mild to moderate decreased appetite, diarrhea and nausea. No severe hypoglycemia was reported. Tirzepatide demonstrated superior reductions in HbA1c versus insulin glargine in an Asia-Pacific, predominately Chinese, population with T2D and was generally well tolerated. ClinicalTrials.gov registration: NCT04093752 .

Topics: Adult; Asia; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Infant, Newborn; Insulin Glargine

This subanalysis of the SoliMix trial assessed the efficacy and safety of advancing basal insulin (BI) therapy with iGlarLixi versus BIAsp 30 in people with type 2 diabetes (T2D) living in Latin American (LATAM) countries, i.e. Argentina and Mexico (N = 160).. SoliMix (EudraCT: 2017-003370-13) was a 26-week, open-label, multicentre study, where adults with T2D suboptimally controlled with BI plus one or two oral glucose-lowering drugs and glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) ≥7.5% to ≤10% were randomized to once-daily iGlarLixi or twice-daily BIAsp 30. Primary efficacy endpoints were non-inferiority in HbA1c reduction (margin 0.3%) or superiority in body weight change for iGlarLixi versus BIAsp 30.. Both primary efficacy endpoints were met in the LATAM region. After 26 weeks, HbA1c was reduced by 1.8% with iGlarLixi and 1.4% with BIAsp 30, meeting non-inferiority [least squares mean difference -0.47% (95% confidence interval: -0.82, -0.11); p < .001]. iGlarLixi was superior to BIAsp 30 for body weight change [least squares mean difference -1.27% (95% confidence interval: -2.41, -0.14); p = .028]. iGlarLixi was also superior to BIAsp 30 for HbA1c reduction (p = .010). A greater proportion of participants achieved HbA1c <7% without weight gain and HbA1c <7% without weight gain and without hypoglycaemia with iGlarLixi versus BIAsp 30. Incidence and rates of American Diabetes Association Level 1 and 2 hypoglycaemia were lower with iGlarLixi versus BIAsp 30.. Once-daily iGlarLixi provided better glycaemic control with weight benefit and less hypoglycaemia than twice-daily premix BIAsp 30. iGlarLixi may be a favourable alternative to premix BIAsp 30 in people with suboptimally controlled T2D to advance BI therapy in the LATAM region.

Topics: Adult; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Combinations; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine; Latin America; Treatment Outcome; Weight Gain

Insulin icodec is an investigational once-weekly basal insulin analogue for diabetes management.. We conducted a 78-week randomized, open-label, treat-to-target phase 3a trial (including a 52-week main phase and a 26-week extension phase, plus a 5-week follow-up period) involving adults with type 2 diabetes (glycated hemoglobin level, 7 to 11%) who had not previously received insulin. Participants were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive once-weekly insulin icodec or once-daily insulin glargine U100. The primary end point was the change in the glycated hemoglobin level from baseline to week 52; the confirmatory secondary end point was the percentage of time spent in the glycemic range of 70 to 180 mg per deciliter (3.9 to 10.0 mmol per liter) in weeks 48 to 52. Hypoglycemic episodes (from baseline to weeks 52 and 83) were recorded.. Each group included 492 participants. Baseline characteristics were similar in the two groups. The mean reduction in the glycated hemoglobin level at 52 weeks was greater with icodec than with glargine U100 (from 8.50% to 6.93% with icodec [mean change, -1.55 percentage points] and from 8.44% to 7.12% with glargine U100 [mean change, -1.35 percentage points]); the estimated between-group difference (-0.19 percentage points; 95% confidence interval [CI], -0.36 to -0.03) confirmed the noninferiority (P<0.001) and superiority (P = 0.02) of icodec. The percentage of time spent in the glycemic range of 70 to 180 mg per deciliter was significantly higher with icodec than with glargine U100 (71.9% vs. 66.9%; estimated between-group difference, 4.27 percentage points [95% CI, 1.92 to 6.62]; P<0.001), which confirmed superiority. Rates of combined clinically significant or severe hypoglycemia were 0.30 events per person-year of exposure with icodec and 0.16 events per person-year of exposure with glargine U100 at week 52 (estimated rate ratio, 1.64; 95% CI, 0.98 to 2.75) and 0.30 and 0.16 events per person-year of exposure, respectively, at week 83 (estimated rate ratio, 1.63; 95% CI, 1.02 to 2.61). No new safety signals were identified, and incidences of adverse events were similar in the two groups.. Glycemic control was significantly better with once-weekly insulin icodec than with once-daily insulin glargine U100. (Funded by Novo Nordisk; ONWARDS 1 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04460885.).

Topics: Adult; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Administration Schedule; Follow-Up Studies; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting

Mathieu C, Ásbjörnsdóttir B, Bajaj HS, et al.

Topics: Blood Glucose; Clinical Protocols; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine

Non-surgical options for inducing type 2 diabetes remission are limited. We examined whether remission can be achieved by combining lifestyle approaches and short-term intensive glucose-lowering therapy.. In this trial, 160 patients with type 2 diabetes on none to two diabetes medications other than insulin were randomised to (a) an intervention comprising lifestyle approaches, insulin glargine/lixisenatide and metformin, or (b) standard care. Participants with glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) <7.3% (56 mmol/mol) at 12 weeks were asked to stop diabetes medications and were followed for an additional 52 weeks. The primary outcome was diabetes relapse defined as HbA1c ≥6.5% (48 mmol/mol) at 24 weeks or thereafter, capillary glucose ≥10 mmol/L on ≥50% of readings, or use of diabetes medications, analysed as time-to-event. Main secondary outcomes included complete or partial diabetes remission at 24, 36, 48 and 64 weeks defined as HbA1c <6.5% (48 mmol/mol) off diabetes medications since 12 weeks after randomisation. A hierarchical testing strategy was applied.. The intervention significantly reduced the hazard of diabetes relapse by 43% (adjusted hazard ratio 0.57, 95% confidence interval 0.40-0.81; p = .002). Complete or partial diabetes remission was achieved in 30 (38.0%) intervention group participants versus 16 (19.8%) controls at 24 weeks and 25 (31.6%) versus 14 (17.3%) at 36 weeks [relative risk 1.92 (95% confidence interval 1.14-3.24) and 1.83 (1.03-3.26), respectively]. The relative risk of diabetes remission in the intervention versus control group was 1.88 (1.00-3.53) at 48 weeks and 2.05 (0.98-4.29) at 64 weeks.. A 12-week intensive intervention comprising insulin glargine/lixisenatide, metformin and lifestyle approaches can induce remission of diabetes.

Topics: Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine; Life Style; Metformin; Treatment Outcome

To determine the efficacy and safety of once-weekly dulaglutide added to basal insulin in Chinese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) with inadequate glycaemic control.. In the phase III, double-blind AWARD-CHN3 study, Chinese patients with T2DM (N = 291) and glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) ≥7.0% and ≤11.0% receiving stable doses of basal insulin glargine with metformin and/or acarbose were randomized (1:1) to receive add-on dulaglutide 1.5 mg once weekly or placebo once weekly. The primary endpoint was the superiority of dulaglutide/glargine to placebo/glargine for change from baseline in HbA1c at Week 28.. The least squares (LS) mean ± standard error change in HbA1c from baseline to Week 28 was -2.0 ± 0.08% with dulaglutide/glargine and -1.1 ± 0.07% with placebo/glargine (LS mean difference: -1.0%, 95% confidence interval [CI] -1.1 to -0.8; P < 0.001), and more patients receiving dulaglutide/glargine achieved HbA1c levels <7.0% (75.9% vs. 33.8%; P < 0.001 vs. placebo/glargine). Body weight decreased with dulaglutide/glargine and increased with placebo/glargine (LS mean difference: -1.2 kg, 95% CI -1.8 to - 0.6; P < 0.001). Reductions in fasting serum glucose were greater with dulaglutide/glargine than with placebo/glargine (LS mean difference: -0.8 mmol/L, 95% CI -1.1 to - 0.5; P < 0.001). The incidence of hypoglycaemia was similar with dulaglutide/glargine and placebo/glargine (29.2% vs. 31.3%; P = 0.704); no patient in either group had severe hypoglycaemia. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events with dulaglutide/glargine were decreased appetite (22.2%), diarrhoea (13.2%) and nausea (10.4%).. Dulaglutide added to basal insulin was efficacious and well tolerated in Chinese patients with T2DM.

Topics: Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Combination; East Asian People; Glucagon-Like Peptides; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Immunoglobulin Fc Fragments; Insulin Glargine; Recombinant Fusion Proteins

Inadequate dose titration and poor adherence to basal insulin can lead to suboptimal glycemic control in persons with type 2 diabetes (T2D). Once-weekly insulin icodec (icodec) is a basal insulin analogue that is in development and is aimed at reducing treatment burden.. To compare the effectiveness and safety of icodec titrated with a dosing guide app (icodec with app) versus once-daily basal insulin analogues (OD analogues) dosed per standard practice.. 52-week, randomized, open-label, parallel-group, phase 3a trial with real-world elements. (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04760626).. 176 sites in 7 countries.. 1085 insulin-naive adults with T2D.. Icodec with app or OD analogue (insulin degludec, insulin glargine U100, or insulin glargine U300).. The primary outcome was change in glycated hemoglobin (HbA. The estimated mean change in HbA. Inability to differentiate the effects of icodec and the dosing guide app.. Compared with OD analogues, icodec with app showed superior HbA. Novo Nordisk A/S.

Topics: Adult; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Mobile Applications

Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) related bone fracture. The effects of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor analogs for the treatment of T2DM on bone are controversial in human studies. This study aimed to compare the effects of GLP-1 receptor analogs exenatide and insulin glargine treatment on bone turnover marker levels and bone mineral density (BMD) in postmenopausal female patients with T2DM. Thirty female patients with T2DM who were naive to insulin and incretin-based treatments, with spontaneous postmenopause, were randomized to exenatide or insulin glargine arms and were followed up for 24 weeks. BMD was evaluated using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and bone turnover markers by serum enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. The body mass index significantly decreased in the exenatide group compared to the glargine group (P < .001). Receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa-B (RANK) and RANK ligand (RANKL) levels were significantly decreased with exenatide treatment (P = .009 and P = .015, respectively). Osteoprotegerin (OPG) level significantly increased with exenatide treatment (P = .02). OPG, RANK, RANKL levels did not change with insulin glargine treatment. No statistically significant difference was found between the pre- and posttreatment BMD, alkaline phosphatase, bone-specific alkaline phosphatase, and type 1 crosslinked N-telopeptide levels in both treatment arms. Despite significant weight loss with exenatide treatment, BMD did not decrease, OPG increased, and the resorption markers of RANK and RANKL decreased, which may reflect early antiresorptive effects of exenatide via the OPG/RANK/RANKL pathway.

Topics: Alkaline Phosphatase; Bone Density; Bone Remodeling; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Exenatide; Female; Humans; Insulin Glargine; Osteoprotegerin; Postmenopause; RANK Ligand; Receptor Activator of Nuclear Factor-kappa B

Rosenstock J, Bain SC, Gowda A, et al; ONWARDS 1 Trial Investigators.

Topics: Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Glucose; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine

Tirzepatide is a glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist used for the treatment of type 2 diabetes. Efficacy and safety of adding tirzepatide vs prandial insulin to treatment in patients with inadequate glycemic control with basal insulin have not been described.. To assess the efficacy and safety of tirzepatide vs insulin lispro as an adjunctive therapy to insulin glargine.. This open-label, phase 3b clinical trial was conducted at 135 sites in 15 countries (participants enrolled from October 19, 2020, to November 1, 2022) in 1428 adults with type 2 diabetes taking basal insulin.. Participants were randomized (in a 1:1:1:3 ratio) to receive once-weekly subcutaneous injections of tirzepatide (5 mg [n = 243], 10 mg [n = 238], or 15 mg [n = 236]) or prandial thrice-daily insulin lispro (n = 708).. Outcomes included noninferiority of tirzepatide (pooled cohort) vs insulin lispro, both in addition to insulin glargine, in HbA1c change from baseline at week 52 (noninferiority margin, 0.3%). Key secondary end points included change in body weight and percentage of participants achieving hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) target of less than 7.0%.. Among 1428 randomized participants (824 [57.7%] women; mean [SD] age, 58.8 [9.7] years; mean [SD] HbA1c, 8.8% [1.0%]), 1304 (91.3%) completed the trial. At week 52, estimated mean change from baseline in HbA1c with tirzepatide (pooled cohort) was -2.1% vs -1.1% with insulin lispro, resulting in mean HbA1c levels of 6.7% vs 7.7% (estimated treatment difference, -0.98% [95% CI, -1.17% to -0.79%]; P < .001); results met noninferiority criteria and statistical superiority was achieved. Estimated mean change from baseline in body weight was -9.0 kg with tirzepatide and 3.2 kg with insulin lispro (estimated treatment difference, -12.2 kg [95% CI, -13.4 to -10.9]). The percentage of participants reaching HbA1c less than 7.0% was 68% (483 of 716) with tirzepatide and 36% (256 of 708) with insulin lispro (odds ratio, 4.2 [95% CI, 3.2-5.5]). The most common adverse events with tirzepatide were mild to moderate gastrointestinal symptoms (nausea: 14%-26%; diarrhea: 11%-15%; vomiting: 5%-13%). Hypoglycemia event rates (blood glucose level <54 mg/dL or severe hypoglycemia) were 0.4 events per patient-year with tirzepatide (pooled) and 4.4 events per patient-year with insulin lispro.. In people with inadequately controlled type 2 diabetes treated with basal insulin, weekly tirzepatide compared with prandial insulin as an additional treatment with insulin glargine demonstrated reductions in HbA1c and body weight with less hypoglycemia.. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04537923.

Topics: Aged; Blood Glucose; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin Lispro; Internationality; Male; Middle Aged; Treatment Outcome

Limited data exist about the use of insulin degludec in the hospital. This multicentre, non-inferiority, open-label, prospective randomized trial compared the safety and efficacy of insulin degludec-U100 and glargine-U100 for the management of hospitalized patients with type 2 diabetes.. In total, 180 general medical and surgical patients with an admission blood glucose (BG) between 7.8 and 22.2 mmol/L, treated with oral agents or insulin before hospitalization were randomly allocated (1:1) to a basal-bolus regimen using degludec (n = 92) or glargine (n = 88), as basal and aspart before meals. Insulin dose was adjusted daily to a target BG between 3.9 and 10.0 mmol/L. The primary endpoint was the difference in mean hospital daily BG between groups.. Overall, the randomization BG was 12.2 ± 2.9 mmol/L and glycated haemoglobin 84 mmol/mol (9.8% ± 2.0%). There were no differences in mean daily BG (10.0 ± 2.1 vs. 10.0 ± 2.5 mmol/L, p = .9), proportion of BG in target range (54·5% ± 29% vs. 55·3% ± 28%, p = .85), basal insulin (29.6 ± 13 vs. 30.4 ± 18 units/day, p = .85), length of stay [median (IQR): 6.7 (4.7-10.5) vs. 7.5 (4.7-11.6) days, p = .61], hospital complications (23% vs. 23%, p = .95) between treatment groups. There were no differences in the proportion of patients with BG <3.9 mmol/L (17% vs. 19%, p = .75) or <3.0 mmol/L (3.7% vs. 1.3%, p = .62) between degludec and glargine.. Hospital treatment with degludec-U100 or glargine-U100 is equally safe and effective for the management of hyperglycaemia in general medical and surgical patients with type 2 diabetes.

Topics: Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Glycated Hemoglobin; Hospitals; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Inpatients; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Prospective Studies

Multiple daily injection therapy for early glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus is associated with hypoglycemia and weight gain. This study aimed to compare the efficacy (time in range of glucose level 70-180 mg/dL), safety (time below range level 1 of glucose <70 mg/dL), glycemic variability changes, therapeutic indices, body mass index and titration periods between multiple daily injection and insulin glargine U100 and lixisenatide (iGlarLixi) combination (iGlarLixi + insulin glulisine; injected once daily [evenings]) therapies using intermittent continuous glucose monitoring.. A total of 40 hospitalized patients with type 2 diabetes were randomly assigned to the iGlarLixi + insulin glulisine group or the multiple daily injection group. An intermittent continuous glucose monitoring system was attached, and each injection was adjusted to achieve the target glucose level according to the respective titration algorithm. Times in and below the range were analyzed using data collected on days 11-13 of the intermittent continuous glucose monitoring.. The time in range did not significantly differ between the groups. However, the time below range level 1 was lower in the iGlarLixi + insulin glulisine group (P = 0.047). The changes in glycemic variability, therapeutic indices and body mass index were not significantly different between the groups, although the titration period was significantly shorter in the iGlarLixi + insulin glulisine group (P = 0.033).. iGlarLixi + insulin glulisine combination therapy is safe and equally efficacious as multiple daily injection therapy for glycemic control, while avoiding hypoglycemia risk and reducing the number of injections are required.

Topics: Blood Glucose; Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Japan; Peptides

To assess the efficacy and safety of iGlarLixi (the titratable fixed-ratio combination of insulin glargine 100 U/mL [iGlar] plus lixisenatide [Lixi]), in adults with type 2 diabetes (T2D) with glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) levels ≥8% (≥64 mmol/mol).. The LixiLan-O study (NCT02058147) compared iGlarLixi with iGlar or Lixi in adults with T2D inadequately controlled on metformin ± a second oral antidiabetes drug (OAD). This exploratory analysis evaluated the LixiLan-O subgroup of participants with baseline HbA1c levels of ≥8% (≥64 mmol/mol) who were receiving metformin plus a second OAD at screening.. The mean diabetes duration was 10.0 years, and the mean duration of second OAD use was 4.5 years. iGlarLixi demonstrated greater mean reductions from baseline in HbA1c and 2-hour postprandial glucose (PPG) compared with iGlar or Lixi (HbA1c -1.9% vs. -1.6% or -1.0% [-20 vs. -17 or -10 mmol/mol; 2-hour PPG -7.2 vs. -4.6 or -5.5 mmol/L). Greater proportions of participants achieved HbA1c <7% (<53 mmol/mol) with iGlarLixi versus iGlar or Lixi (67% vs. 51% or 18%), and the composite endpoints of HbA1c <7% (<53 mmol/mol) with no body weight gain (36% vs. 19% or 16%), and HbA1c <7% (<53 mmol/mol) with no body weight gain and no documented symptomatic hypoglycaemia (plasma glucose ≤3.9 mmol/L; 28% vs. 15% or 15%). The incidence rates of documented symptomatic hypoglycaemia were 29.0%, 27.9% and 12.1% for iGlarLixi, iGlar and Lixi, respectively.. Adults with T2D and HbA1c ≥64 mmol/mol (≥8%) despite two OADs at screening achieved better glycaemic control with iGlarLixi versus iGlar or Lixi, without increased risk of hypoglycaemia versus iGlar.

Topics: Adult; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Combinations; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine

Data analyses from Swedish individuals with newly diagnosed diabetes have suggested that diabetes could be classified into five subtypes that differ with respect to the progression of dysglycaemia and the incidence of diabetes consequences. We assessed this classification in a multiethnic cohort of participants with established and newly diagnosed diabetes, randomly allocated to insulin glargine vs standard care.. In total, 7017 participants from the Outcome Reduction with Initial Glargine Intervention (ORIGIN) trial were assigned to the five predefined diabetes subtypes (namely, severe auto-immune diabetes, severe insulin-deficient diabetes, severe insulin-resistant diabetes, mild obesity-related diabetes, mild age-related diabetes) based on the age at diabetes diagnosis, BMI, HbA. The five diabetes subtypes were replicated in the ORIGIN trial and exhibited similar baseline characteristics in Europeans and Latin Americans, compared with the initially described clusters in the Swedish cohort. We confirmed differences in renal outcomes, with a higher incidence of events in the severe insulin-resistant diabetes subtype compared with the mild age-related diabetes subtype (i.e., chronic kidney disease stage 3A: HR 1.49 [95% CI 1.31, 1.71]; stage 3B: HR 2.25 [1.82, 2.78]; macroalbuminuria: HR 1.56 [1.22, 1.99]). No differences were observed in the incidence of retinopathy and cardiovascular diseases after adjusting for multiple hypothesis testing. Diabetes subtypes also differed in glycaemic response to glargine, with a particular benefit of receiving glargine (vs standard care) in the severe insulin-deficient diabetes subtype compared with the mild age-related diabetes subtype, with a decreased occurrence of hyperglycaemia by 13% (OR 1.36 [1.30, 1.41] on glargine; OR 1.49 [1.43, 1.57] on standard care; p for interaction subtype × intervention = 0.001).. Cluster analysis enabled the characterisation of five subtypes of diabetes in a multiethnic cohort. Both the incidence of renal outcomes and the response to insulin varied between diabetes subtypes. These findings reinforce the clinical utility of applying precision medicine to predict comorbidities and treatment responses in individuals with diabetes.. ORIGIN trial, ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00069784.

Topics: Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Treatment Outcome

For people with type 1 diabetes, there are limited evidence-based resources to support self-management when traveling across multiple time zones. Here, we compared glycemic control on insulin degludec versus glargine U100 as the basal insulin for adults using multiple daily injections (MDI) while traveling across multiple time zones.. This randomized crossover pilot study compared insulin degludec versus glargine U100 for adults with type 1 diabetes using MDI insulin during long-haul travel to and from Hawaii to New York. Insulin degludec was administered daily at the same time regardless of time zone, and glargine was administered per travel algorithm. Primary end point was the percentage of time in range (TIR) between 70 and 140 mg/dL during the initial 24 h after each direction of travel. Secondary end points included standard continuous glucose monitoring metrics, jet lag, fatigue, and sleep.. The study enrolled 25 participants (56% women, mean ± SD age of 35 ± 14.5 years, HbA1c of 7.4 ± 1.2% [57 ± 13.1 mmol/mol], and diabetes duration of 20.6 ± 15 years). There was no significant difference in glycemic outcomes between the two arms of the study, including TIR, hypoglycemia, or hyperglycemia. Neither group achieved >70% TIR 70-180 mg/dL during travel. Jet lag was greater on glargine U100 in eastward travel but not westward. Fatigue was greater after westward travel on glargine. Sleep was not significantly different between basal insulins.. In adults with type 1 diabetes using MDI of insulin and traveling across multiple time zones, glycemic outcomes were similar comparing insulin degludec and glargine U100.

Topics: Adult; Blood Glucose; Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Middle Aged; Pilot Projects; Young Adult

The aim of the study was to evaluate remission of type 2 diabetes following a short-term intervention with insulin glargine, sitagliptin/metformin, and lifestyle approaches.. In this open multicenter trial, 102 patients with type 2 diabetes were randomized to 1) a 12-week intervention with sitagliptin/metformin, insulin glargine, and lifestyle therapy or 2) control group. Participants with HbA1c <7.3% (<56 mmol/mol) at 12 weeks were asked to stop diabetes medications and were followed for evidence of relapse over 52 weeks. Diabetes relapse criteria included HbA1c ≥6.5% (≥48 mmol/mol), ≥50% of capillary glucose readings >10 mmol/L over 1 week, and reinitiation of diabetes medications with or without abnormal fasting plasma glucose (FPG) or 2-h plasma glucose on an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT). Time-to-relapse analysis was conducted to compare the treatment groups with (primary analysis) and without (supplementary analysis) FPG/OGTT relapse criteria.. With the FPG/OGTT relapse criteria included, the hazard ratio (HR) of relapse was 0.72 (95% CI 0.47-1.10) in the intervention group compared with the control group (primary analysis), and the number of participants remaining in remission was not significantly different between treatment groups at 24, 36, 48, and 64 weeks. In the supplementary analyses without these criteria, HR of relapse was 0.60 (95% CI 0.39-0.95), and the number of participants remaining in remission was significantly higher (26 vs. 10%) in the intervention group at 36 weeks.. Although our primary outcome was not statistically significant, the tested approach deserves further study with further optimization of its components.

Topics: Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine; Metformin; Sitagliptin Phosphate; Treatment Outcome

This post hoc analysis examines the relationship between glycemic variability (GV) and fasting plasma glucose (FPG) targets used to achieve glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) < 7%, and HbA1c levels after 24 weeks of treatment with insulin glargine and oral antidiabetic drugs (OADs) in Chinese participants with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) from the BEYOND III FPG GOAL trial (NCT02545842).. Participants were randomized for three FBG targets (≤ 5.6 mmol/L, ≤ 6.1 mmol/L, and ≤ 7.0 mmol/L) receiving insulin glargine 100 U/mL were analyzed for mean change from baseline to 24 weeks in postprandial glucose (PPG) excursion and FPG coefficient of variation (FPG-CV). The study analyzed change from baseline in HbA1c and the proportion of participants who achieved HbA1c < 7% at 24 weeks, according to their baseline FPG-CV and change from baseline in PPG excursion.. The change in PPG excursion and FPG-CV from baseline to 24 weeks was not significantly different between the three groups stratified by randomization or by 24-week FPG levels. While the change in HbA1c from baseline to 24 weeks was slightly higher among participants with baseline FPG-CV < 33.3% (vs. > 66.7%; P = 0.023), a higher proportion of participants with baseline FPG-CV < 33.3% achieved HbA1c < 7% (P = 0.021).. GV was not associated with either target FPG levels or HbA1c < 7.0% after 24 weeks of treatment with insulin glargine and OADs.. Clinicaltrials.gov identifier NCT02545842.

Topics: Blood Glucose; China; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Fasting; Glycated Hemoglobin; Goals; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine

The effects of tirzepatide, a dual glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist, as an addition to insulin glargine for treatment of type 2 diabetes have not been described.. To assess the efficacy and safety of tirzepatide added to insulin glargine in patients with type 2 diabetes with inadequate glycemic control.. Randomized phase 3 clinical trial conducted at 45 medical research centers and hospitals in 8 countries (enrollment from August 30, 2019, to March 20, 2020; follow-up completed January 13, 2021) in 475 adults with type 2 diabetes and inadequate glycemic control while treated with once-daily insulin glargine with or without metformin.. Patients were randomized in a 1:1:1:1 ratio to receive once-weekly subcutaneous injections of 5-mg (n = 116), 10-mg (n = 119), or 15-mg (n = 120) tirzepatide or volume-matched placebo (n = 120) over 40 weeks. Tirzepatide was initiated at 2.5 mg/week and escalated by 2.5 mg every 4 weeks until the assigned dose was achieved.. The primary end point was mean change from baseline in glycated hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) at week 40. The 5 key secondary end points included mean change in body weight and percentage of patients achieving prespecified HbA1c levels.. Among 475 randomized participants (211 [44%] women; mean [SD] age, 60.6 [9.9] years; mean [SD] HbA1c, 8.31% [0.85%]), 451 (94.9%) completed the trial. Treatment was prematurely discontinued by 10% of participants in the 5-mg tirzepatide group, 12% in the 10-mg tirzepatide group, 18% in the 15-mg tirzepatide group, and 3% in the placebo group. At week 40, mean HbA1c change from baseline was -2.40% with 10-mg tirzepatide and -2.34% with 15-mg tirzepatide vs -0.86% with placebo (10 mg: difference vs placebo, -1.53% [97.5% CI, -1.80% to -1.27%]; 15 mg: difference vs placebo, -1.47% [97.5% CI, -1.75% to -1.20%]; P < .001 for both). Mean HbA1c change from baseline was -2.11% with 5-mg tirzepatide (difference vs placebo, -1.24% [95% CI, -1.48% to -1.01%]; P < .001]). Mean body weight change from baseline was -5.4 kg with 5-mg tirzepatide, -7.5 kg with 10-mg tirzepatide, -8.8 kg with 15-mg tirzepatide and 1.6 kg with placebo (5 mg: difference, -7.1 kg [95% CI, -8.7 to -5.4]; 10 mg: difference, -9.1 kg [95% CI, -10.7 to -7.5]; 15 mg: difference, -10.5 kg [95% CI, -12.1 to -8.8]; P < .001 for all). Higher percentages of patients treated with tirzepatide vs those treated with placebo had HbA1c less than 7% (85%-90% vs 34%; P < .001 for all). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events in the tirzepatide groups vs placebo group were diarrhea (12%-21% vs 10%) and nausea (13%-18% vs 3%).. Among patients with type 2 diabetes and inadequate glycemic control despite treatment with insulin glargine, the addition of subcutaneous tirzepatide, compared with placebo, to titrated insulin glargine resulted in statistically significant improvements in glycemic control after 40 weeks.. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04039503.

Topics: Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Gastric Inhibitory Polypeptide; Glycated Hemoglobin; Glycemic Control; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Injections, Subcutaneous; Insulin Glargine; Male; Metformin; Middle Aged; Weight Loss

To evaluate the immunogenicity of LY2963016 insulin glargine (LY IGlar) versus originator insulin glargine (IGlar [Lantus®]) in Chinese patients with type 1 (T1DM) or type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).. ABES and ABET were prospective, randomized, active control, open-label, phase III studies, which enrolled Chinese patients with T1DM (N = 272) and T2DM (N = 536), respectively. Using data from these trials, immunogenicity of LY IGlar and IGlar was evaluated by comparing the proportion of patients with detectable anti-insulin glargine antibodies and the median antibody levels (percent binding) between the treatment groups. The incidence of anti-insulin antibodies and treatment-emergent antibody response (TEAR) were compared using Fisher's exact test or Pearson's chi-squared test. Levels of anti-insulin antibodies were compared using the Wilcoxon rank-sum test. We also evaluated the relationship between antibody formation or TEAR and clinical outcomes using analysis of covariance, negative binomial regression, or partial correlations.. There were no significant treatment differences in the incidence of detectable anti-insulin antibodies, median antibody levels or TEAR, overall or at Week 24 with last observation carried forward, and median antibody levels were low (<5%) after 24 weeks of treatment, in patients with T1DM or T2DM. Levels of anti-insulin antibodies and development of TEAR were not associated with efficacy (glycated haemoglobin, insulin dose [U/kg/d] and hypoglycaemia) or safety outcomes.. The immunogenicity profiles of LY IGlar and IGlar are similar, with low levels of anti-insulin antibodies observed for both insulins. No association was observed between antibody levels or TEAR status and clinical outcomes.

Topics: Blood Glucose; China; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Antibodies; Insulin Glargine; Prospective Studies

Multiple studies support the efficacy of combining a glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonist (GLP-1RA) with basal insulin in people with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled on dual/triple oral therapy. Fixed-ratio combinations of basal insulin + GLP-1RA represent a further advance to facilitate management. We assessed the impact of fixed-ratio combination basal insulin + GLP-1RA treatment on β-cell function.. We analysed data from 351 participants in the LixiLan-G trial (NCT02787551) randomized to receive iGlarLixi (insulin glargine 100 U/ml + lixisenatide) or to continue daily/weekly GLP-1RA, both on top of metformin. Participants received a 2-h meal tolerance test before randomization and at study end (26 weeks), with timed plasma glucose and C-peptide determinations. β-cell function parameters were resolved using mathematical modelling.. In the GLP-1RA group (n = 162), both body weight and glycated haemoglobin decreased at week 26, yet none of the insulin secretion/β-cell function parameters changed significantly. In contrast, in the iGlarLixi group (n = 189), glycated haemoglobin decreased significantly more than in the GLP-1RA group (p < .0001) despite an increase in body weight (+1.7 ± 3.9 kg, p < .0001). Fasting and stimulated insulin secretion decreased at Week 26 (both p < .0001 vs. GLP-1RA), while β-cell glucose sensitivity increased by a median 35% (p = .0032 vs. GLP-1RA). The incremental meal tolerance test glucose area showed a larger reduction with iGlarLixi versus GLP-1RA (p < .0001).. In people with type 2 diabetes on metformin, 26-week treatment with iGlarLixi resulted in a marked improvement in β-cell function concomitant with sparing of endogenous insulin release and a reduction in meal absorption.

Topics: Blood Glucose; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Combinations; Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Metformin; Peptides

To aim of this analysis was to investigate the extent and evaluate risk factors of residual hyperglycaemia in Chinese individuals with type 2 diabetes (T2D) initiating basal insulin.. FPG GOAL was a 24-week, open-label, treat-to-target randomised controlled trial in Chinese individuals with T2D inadequately controlled with oral anti-hyperglycaemic drugs initiating treatment with basal insulin. This analysis categorised participants into the following glycaemic control categories: hyperglycaemia [glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) ≥ 53 mmol/mol (≥ 7%), fasting plasma glucose (FPG) ≥ 7.0 mmol/L], residual hyperglycaemia [HbA1c ≥ 53 mmol/mol (≥ 7%), FPG < 7.0 mmol/L], discordant [HbA1c < 53 mmol/mol (< 7%), FPG ≥ 7.0 mmol/L] and at target [HbA1c < 53 mmol/mol (< 7%), FPG < 7.0 mmol/L]. The proportion of participants in each glycaemic control category was assessed at weeks 12 and 24. Multivariable regression analyses were conducted to evaluate risk factors for residual hyperglycaemia.. Of the 914 participants included, 22.1% had residual hyperglycaemia, 31.9% had hyperglycaemia, 11.1% were discordant and 29.3% were at target at week 24. More participants who were randomised to a fasting blood glucose (FBG) target of > 3.9 to ≤ 5.6 mmol/L had residual hyperglycaemia compared with participants randomised to a FBG target of > 3.9 to ≤ 6.1 mmol/L or > 3.9 to ≤ 7.0 mmol/L. Multivariable analysis indicated that higher HbA1c and lower FPG levels at baseline were associated with greater proportion of residual hyperglycaemia.. Some Chinese individuals with T2D may have residual hyperglycaemia 3-6 months after initiating basal insulin treatment and require further intensified treatment. Higher HbA1c and lower FPG levels could be risk factors for residual hyperglycaemia.. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT02545842.

Topics: Blood Glucose; China; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Disease Progression; Fasting; Glycated Hemoglobin; Glycemic Control; Goals; Humans; Hyperglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine; Risk Factors

To compare the efficacy and safety of iGlarLixi with insulin glargine 100 units/mL (iGlar) and lixisenatide (Lixi), in Asian Pacific people with suboptimally controlled type 2 diabetes (T2D) on metformin with or without a second oral antihyperglycaemic drug (OAD).. After 24 weeks, greater reductions in HbA1c from baseline (67 mmol/mol; 8.3%) were seen with iGlarLixi (-21 mmol/mol; -1.9%) compared with iGlar (-16 mmol/mol; -1.4%; P < 0.0001) and Lixi (-10 mmol/mol; -0.9%; P < 0.0001). Greater proportions of participants achieved HbA1c <53 mmol/mol (<7%) with iGlarLixi versus iGlar or Lixi (79%, 60% and 30%, respectively), overall and as composite endpoints including weight and hypoglycaemia. iGlarLixi improved 2-hour postprandial glucose versus iGlar and Lixi and mitigated the weight gain seen with iGlar (least squares mean difference -1.1 kg; P < 0.0001). Documented ≤3.9 mmol/L (≤70 mg/dL) hypoglycaemia was similar between iGlarLixi and iGlar (both 3.38 events per participant-year). The incidence rates of nausea and vomiting were lower with iGlarLixi (14% and 6%) than Lixi (21% and 11%).. iGlarLixi achieved significant HbA1c reductions, to near-normoglycaemic levels, compared with iGlar or Lixi, with no meaningful additional risk of hypoglycaemia and mitigated body weight gain versus iGlar, with fewer gastrointestinal adverse events versus Lixi. iGlarLixi with specifically adapted ratios may provide an efficacious and well-tolerated treatment option for Asian Pacific people with T2D.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Combinations; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine; Metformin; Middle Aged; Peptides; Sodium-Glucose Transporter 2 Inhibitors; Weight Gain

To investigate whether an increased bolus: basal insulin ratio (BBR) with liver-targeted bolus insulin (BoI) would increase BoI use and decrease hypoglycaemic events (HEv).. We enrolled 52 persons (HbA1c 6.9% ± 0.12%, mean ± SEM) with type 1 diabetes using multiple daily injections. Hepatic-directed vesicle (HDV) was used to deliver 1% of peripheral injected BoI to the liver. A 90-day run-in period was used to introduce subjects to unblinded continuous glucose monitoring and optimize standard basal insulin (BaI) (degludec) and BoI (lispro) dosing. At 90 days, BoI was changed to HDV-insulin lispro and subjects were randomized to an immediate 10% or 40% decrease in BaI dose.. At 90 days postrandomization, total insulin dosing was increased by ~7% in both cohorts. The -10% and -40% BaI cohorts were on 7.7% and 13% greater BoI with 6.9% and 30% (P = .02) increases in BBR, respectively. Compared with baseline at randomization, nocturnal level 2 HEv were reduced by 21% and 43%, with 54% and 59% reductions in patient-reported HEv in the -10% and -40% BaI cohorts, respectively.. Our study shows that liver-targeted BoI safely decreases HEv and symptoms without compromising glucose control. We further show that with initiation of liver-targeted BoI, the BBR can be safely increased by significantly lowering BaI dosing, leading to greater BoI usage.

Topics: Blood Glucose; Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin Lispro; Insulin, Long-Acting; Insulin, Regular, Human; Liver

To compare the efficacy and safety of once-weekly (OW) semaglutide versus thrice-daily (TID) insulin aspart (IAsp) in participants with inadequately controlled type 2 diabetes (T2D) treated with insulin glargine (IGlar) and metformin.. SUSTAIN 11 (NCT03689374) was a randomized (1:1), parallel, open-label, multinational, phase 3b trial. After a 12-week run-in to optimize once-daily IGlar U100, 1748 adults with T2D (HbA1c >7.5% to ≤10.0%) were randomized to OW semaglutide or TID IAsp as add-on to optimized IGlar and metformin for 52 weeks. The primary outcome was change in HbA1c from randomization to week 52. Confirmatory secondary endpoints included the occurrence of severe hypoglycaemic episodes and change in body weight (BW). Safety was assessed.. HbA1c (randomization: 8.6% [70.0 mmol/mol]) decreased by 1.5% points (16.6 mmol/mol) and 1.2% points (13.4 mmol/mol) with semaglutide (n = 874) and IAsp (n = 874), respectively (estimated treatment difference [ETD] -0.29% points [95% confidence interval {CI} -0.38; -0.20]; P < .0001 for non-inferiority). Few severe hypoglycaemic episodes were recorded in either group, with no statistically significant difference between the groups. Change in BW from randomization (87.9 kg) to week 52 was in favour of semaglutide (-4.1 kg) versus IAsp (+2.8 kg) (ETD -6.99 kg [95% CI -7.41; -6.57]). A higher proportion of participants experienced adverse events with semaglutide (58.5%) versus IAsp (52.1%); most were mild to moderate.. In this basal insulin-treated population, OW semaglutide improved glycaemic control to a greater extent than TID IAsp and provided numerically greater weight loss.

Topics: Adult; Blood Glucose; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Glucagon-Like Peptides; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Aspart; Insulin Glargine; Metformin; Treatment Outcome

For the treatment of diabetes mellitus (DM) in dogs, novel insulins with decreased injection frequency while maintaining safety and efficacy are desirable. Insulin fused with immunoglobulin-fragment-crystallizable (Fc) has an ultra-long plasma half-life because it recycles through cells, protected from proteolysis.. Glycemic control can be achieved in diabetic dogs with a recombinant fusion protein of a synthetic insulin and canine Fc (AKS-218d) administered subcutaneously once-weekly.. Five client-owned dogs with naturally occurring DM.. Prospective clinical trial in dogs with DM that were recruited from the UC Davis Veterinary Teaching Hospital and local veterinary clinics. Dogs previously controlled using intermediate-acting insulin q12h were transitioned to once-weekly injections of a preliminary construct identified as AKS-218d. The dose of AKS-218d was titrated weekly for 8 weeks based on clinical response and continuous interstitial glucose monitoring. Clinical signs, body weight, serum fructosamine concentrations, and mean interstitial glucose concentrations (IG) over the preceding week were compared between baseline (before AKS-218d) and during the last week of treatment. Data were compared using nonparametric paired tests.. Once-weekly AKS-218d, compared to baseline twice-daily insulin therapy, resulted in no significant changes in clinical signs, median (range) body weight (+0.4 kg [-0.5-1.1]; P = .6), fructosamine concentration (-75 mmol/L [-215 to +126]; P = .4), or mean IG (+81 mg/dL [-282 to +144]; P = .8). No adverse reactions were reported.. Control of clinical signs, body weight, and maintenance of glycemia was achieved with this once-weekly novel insulin construct in 4 of 5 dogs.

Topics: Animals; Blood Glucose; Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dog Diseases; Dogs; Fructosamine; Hospitals, Animal; Hospitals, Teaching; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Prospective Studies

To compare the efficacy and safety of basal insulin glargine 100 units/ml (Gla) + 2-3 oral antihyperglycaemic drugs (OADs) with twice-daily premixed insulin aspart 70/30 (Asp30) + metformin (MET) after short-term intensive insulin therapy in adults with type 2 diabetes in China.. This open-label trial enrolled insulin-naïve adults with type 2 diabetes and an HbA1c of 7.5%-11.0% (58-97 mmol/mol) despite treatment with 2-3 OADs. All participants stopped previous OADs except MET, then received short-term intensive insulin therapy during the run-in period, when those with a fasting plasma glucose of less than 7.0 mmol/L and 2-hour postprandial glucose of less than 10.0 mmol/L were randomized to Gla + MET + a dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor or twice-daily Asp30 + MET. If HbA1c was more than 7.0% (>53 mmol/mol) at week 12, participants in the Gla group were added repaglinide or acarbose, at the physician's discretion, and participants in the Asp30 group continued to titrate insulin dose. The change in HbA1c from baseline to week 24 was assessed in the per protocol (PP) population (primary endpoint).. There were 384 enrollees (192 each to Gla and Asp30); 367 were included in the PP analysis. The threshold for non-inferiority of Gla + OADs versus Asp30 + MET was met, with a least squares mean change from baseline in HbA1c of -1.72% and -1.70% (-42.2 and -42.1 mmol/mol), respectively (estimated difference -0.01%; 95% CI -0.20%, 0.17% [-0.1 mmol/mol; 95% CI -2.2, 1.9]). Achievement of HbA1c less than 7.0% (<53 mmol/mol) was comparable between the groups (60% vs. 57%). The proportion of participants with any (24% vs. 38%; P = .003), symptomatic (19% vs. 31%; P = .007) or confirmed hypoglycaemia (18% vs. 33%; P < .001) was lower in the Gla + OADs group.. Compared with Asp30 + MET, Gla + 2-3 OADs showed similar efficacy but a lower hypoglycaemia risk in Chinese individuals with type 2 diabetes who had undergone short-term intensive insulin therapy.

Topics: Adult; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Regular, Human; Metformin

To compare the efficacy and safety of a simple daily titration algorithm compared with a weekly dose adjustment of iGlarLixi in people with type 2 diabetes.. LixiLan ONE CAN (NCT03767543), a randomized, 26-week, open-label, multicentre phase 3 trial conducted in Canada, involved 265 people with type 2 diabetes and an HbA1c of ≥7.5% to ≤ 10.5% or less (≥58 to ≤91 mmol/mol) on basal insulin for 6 months or longer. Participants were randomized 1:1 with instructions to self-titrate iGlarLixi daily (1 unit/day) or once weekly (2 or 4 units/week) to a common target fasting plasma glucose of 4.4 to 5.6 mmol/L (79 to 101 mg/dl). The primary objective was to show non-inferiority of the daily versus weekly titration algorithm.. At 26 weeks, daily titration of iGlarLixi was not inferior to a weekly titration for both the prespecified primary endpoint of change in HbA1c from baseline (least square [LS] mean change: -1.24% vs. -0.92%, respectively; LS mean difference: 0.32%; 95% CI [0.07, 0.57]; P < .0001) and for the secondary endpoint of change in weight from baseline (LS mean change: -0.22 vs. +0.81 kg, respectively; LS mean difference: 1.03 kg; 95% CI [0.01, 2.06]; P < .0001). Indeed, for both the primary and secondary outcome, the daily titration of iGlarLixi was superior. There were no statistically significant differences in hypoglycaemia incidence between the two titration strategies during the 26-week study.. A daily titration algorithm for switching basal insulin to iGlarLixi was shown to be non-inferior and superior for glycaemic control and weight compared with weekly titration.

Topics: Algorithms; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Combinations; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine; Peptides

Administration of supplemental sliding scale insulin for correction of hyperglycemia in non-intensive care unit (ICU) patients with type 2 diabetes is frequently used with basal-bolus insulin regimens. In this noninferiority randomized controlled trial we tested whether glycemic control is similar with and without aggressive sliding scale insulin treatment before meals and bedtime in patients treated with basal-bolus insulin regimens.. Patients with type 2 diabetes with admission blood glucose (BG) 140-400 mg/dL treated with basal-bolus insulin were randomized to intensive (correction for BG >140 mg/dL, n = 108) or to nonintensive (correction for BG >260 mg/dL, n = 107) administration of rapid-acting sliding scale insulin before meals and bedtime. The groups received the same amount of sliding scale insulin for BG >260 mg/dL. Primary outcome was difference in mean daily BG levels between the groups during hospitalization.. Mean daily BG in the nonintensive group was noninferior to BG in the intensive group with equivalence margin of 18 mg/dL (intensive 172 ± 38 mg/dL vs. nonintensive 173 ± 43 mg/dL, P = 0.001 for noninferiority). There were no differences in the proportion of target BG readings of 70-180 mg/dL, <70 or <54 mg/dL (hypoglycemia), or >350 mg/dL (severe hyperglycemia) or total, basal, or prandial insulin doses. Significantly fewer subjects received sliding scale insulin in the nonintensive (n = 36 [34%]) compared with the intensive (n = 98 [91%] [P < 0.0001]) group with no differences in sliding scale insulin doses between the groups among those who received sliding scale insulin (intensive 7 ± 4 units/day vs. nonintensive 8 ± 4 units/day, P = 0.34).. Among non-ICU patients with type 2 diabetes on optimal basal-bolus insulin regimen with moderate hyperglycemia (BG <260 mg/dL), a less intensive sliding scale insulin treatment did not significantly affect glycemic control.

Topics: Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Humans; Hyperglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Regular, Human

The objective of this study was to compare initiation of a fixed-ratio combination of insulin glargine and lixisenatide (iGlarLixi) vs insulin glargine U100 (iGlar) along with gliclazide, exclusively in people of South Asian origin with type 2 diabetes (T2D).. The Variability of glucose Assessed in a Randomized trial comparing the Initiation of A Treatment approach with biosimilar basal Insulin analog Or a titratable iGlarLixi combinatioN in type 2 diabetes among South Asian participants (VARIATION 2 SA) trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03819790) randomized insulin-naïve adults with T2D having glycated hemoglobin (A1C) 7.1% to 11% to initiate either iGlarLixi or iGlar + gliclazide. Insulin doses were titrated similarly to a prebreakfast glucose target of 4.0 to 5.5 mmol/L. Average time in range (TIR) on a masked continuous glucose monitor (CGM), A1C, fasting plasma glucose (FPG) and weight were assessed at the end of the 12-week treatment period.. Mean baseline characteristics for the 104 randomized participants were similar between treatment groups, including the following: age, 59±11 years; diabetes duration, 13.7±7.3 years; and A1C, 8.5%±1.2%. Coprimary outcomes of average TIRs within 24- and 12-h (6 am to 6 pm) periods at the end of trial were 70.5%±16.8% and 72.9%±17.6% for iGlarLixi, whereas these TIRs were 65.6%±21.6% and 67.3%±20.7% for the iGlar + gliclazide regimen, respectively, with no significant differences between groups (p=0.35 for 24-h TIR and p=0.14 for 12-h TIR). No significant difference in secondary outcomes was observed between treatment groups. Self-reported hypoglycemic events throughout the trial period and CGM-reported hypoglycemia (<4 and <3 mmol/L) were similar between randomized treatments.. Initiation of iGlarLixi resulted in similar TIR, A1C, FPG, weight and hypoglycemia compared with the more affordable option of starting iGlar + gliclazide in adults of South Asian origin with T2D.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Biosimilar Pharmaceuticals; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Combinations; Gliclazide; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Middle Aged

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of iGlarLixi compared with iGlar in Chinese adults with type 2 diabetes advancing therapy from basal insulin ± oral antihyperglycaemic drugs.. LixiLan-L-CN (NCT03798080) was a 30-week randomized, active-controlled, open-label, parallel-group, multicentre study. Participants were randomized 1:1 to iGlarLixi or iGlar. The primary objective was to show the superiority of iGlarLixi over iGlar in glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) change from baseline to Week 30.. iGlarLixi provided better glycaemic control and facilitated more participants to reach glycaemic targets alongside beneficial effects on body weight, no additional risk of hypoglycaemia, and few gastrointestinal AEs, supporting iGlarLixi use as an efficacious and well tolerated therapy option in Chinese people with long-standing T2D advancing therapy from basal insulin.

Topics: Adult; Blood Glucose; China; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Combinations; Glycated Hemoglobin; Glycemic Control; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine; Middle Aged; Obesity; Peptides

Exenatide is a glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) analogs. The effects of GLP-1 analogs on myocardial function are controversial.. The purpose of this study is to compare the effects of exenatide and insulin glargine on subclinical right and left ventricular dysfunction.. In this study, 27 patients with type 2 diabetes were randomized into exenatide and insulin glargine treatment groups. The patients were monitored for six months by conventional echocardiography (ECHO) and 2D-speckle-tracking echocardiography (2D-STE) to evaluate right and left ventricular functions.. ECHO parameters did not change significantly pre- and post-treatment, except for the tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE) values. Post-treatment TAPSE values significantly increased in both groups compared to pre-treatment values. In the insulin group, values for 2D-STE parameters of the left ventricular global longitudinal strain (LVGLS) based on apical long-axis (ALA) images increased significantly (p: 0.047) compared to pre-treatment values; however, apical 4-chamber (A4C), apical 2-chamber (A2C), LVGLS, and right ventricular global longitudinal strain (RVGLS) values did not change. In the exenatide group, LVGLS based on A4C values improved (p: 0.048), while ALA, A2C, and LVGLS values did not change. Moreover, the RVGLS values improved significantly after exenatide treatment (p: 0.002). Based on 2D-STE parameters the two treatments did not differ statistically in either pre- or post-treatment periods.. Glp-1 treatment can improve left ventricular regional and right ventricular global subclinical dysfunction. Therefore, early GLP-1 treatment may be recommended in diabetic patients with a high risk of cardiac dysfunction.

Topics: Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Exenatide; Glucagon-Like Peptide 1; Humans; Insulin Glargine; Ventricular Dysfunction, Right

Data are lacking on the comparative effectiveness of commonly used glucose-lowering medications, when added to metformin, with respect to microvascular and cardiovascular disease outcomes in persons with type 2 diabetes.. We assessed the comparative effectiveness of four commonly used glucose-lowering medications, added to metformin, in achieving and maintaining a glycated hemoglobin level of less than 7.0% in participants with type 2 diabetes. The randomly assigned therapies were insulin glargine U-100 (hereafter, glargine), glimepiride, liraglutide, and sitagliptin. Prespecified secondary outcomes with respect to microvascular and cardiovascular disease included hypertension and dyslipidemia, confirmed moderately or severely increased albuminuria or an estimated glomerular filtration rate of less than 60 ml per minute per 1.73 m. During a mean 5.0 years of follow-up in 5047 participants, there were no material differences among the interventions with respect to the development of hypertension or dyslipidemia or with respect to microvascular outcomes; the mean overall rate (i.e., events per 100 participant-years) of moderately increased albuminuria levels was 2.6, of severely increased albuminuria levels 1.1, of renal impairment 2.9, and of diabetic peripheral neuropathy 16.7. The treatment groups did not differ with respect to MACE (overall rate, 1.0), hospitalization for heart failure (0.4), death from cardiovascular causes (0.3), or all deaths (0.6). There were small differences with respect to rates of any cardiovascular disease, with 1.9, 1.9, 1.4, and 2.0 in the glargine, glimepiride, liraglutide, and sitagliptin groups, respectively. When one treatment was compared with the combined results of the other three treatments, the hazard ratios for any cardiovascular disease were 1.1 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.9 to 1.3) in the glargine group, 1.1 (95% CI, 0.9 to 1.4) in the glimepiride group, 0.7 (95% CI, 0.6 to 0.9) in the liraglutide group, and 1.2 (95% CI, 1.0 to 1.5) in the sitagliptin group.. In participants with type 2 diabetes, the incidences of microvascular complications and death were not materially different among the four treatment groups. The findings indicated possible differences among the groups in the incidence of any cardiovascular disease. (Funded by the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases and others; GRADE ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01794143.).

Topics: Albuminuria; Blood Glucose; Cardiovascular Diseases; Comparative Effectiveness Research; Diabetes Complications; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Diabetic Neuropathies; Drug Therapy, Combination; Dyslipidemias; Glomerular Filtration Rate; Glycated Hemoglobin; Heart Failure; Humans; Hypertension; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine; Liraglutide; Metformin; Microvessels; Sitagliptin Phosphate; Sulfonylurea Compounds

The comparative effectiveness of glucose-lowering medications for use with metformin to maintain target glycated hemoglobin levels in persons with type 2 diabetes is uncertain.. In this trial involving participants with type 2 diabetes of less than 10 years' duration who were receiving metformin and had glycated hemoglobin levels of 6.8 to 8.5%, we compared the effectiveness of four commonly used glucose-lowering medications. We randomly assigned participants to receive insulin glargine U-100 (hereafter, glargine), the sulfonylurea glimepiride, the glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist liraglutide, or sitagliptin, a dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitor. The primary metabolic outcome was a glycated hemoglobin level, measured quarterly, of 7.0% or higher that was subsequently confirmed, and the secondary metabolic outcome was a confirmed glycated hemoglobin level greater than 7.5%.. A total of 5047 participants (19.8% Black and 18.6% Hispanic or Latinx) who had received metformin for type 2 diabetes were followed for a mean of 5.0 years. The cumulative incidence of a glycated hemoglobin level of 7.0% or higher (the primary metabolic outcome) differed significantly among the four groups (P<0.001 for a global test of differences across groups); the rates with glargine (26.5 per 100 participant-years) and liraglutide (26.1) were similar and lower than those with glimepiride (30.4) and sitagliptin (38.1). The differences among the groups with respect to a glycated hemoglobin level greater than 7.5% (the secondary outcome) paralleled those of the primary outcome. There were no material differences with respect to the primary outcome across prespecified subgroups defined according to sex, age, or race or ethnic group; however, among participants with higher baseline glycated hemoglobin levels there appeared to be an even greater benefit with glargine, liraglutide, and glimepiride than with sitagliptin. Severe hypoglycemia was rare but significantly more frequent with glimepiride (in 2.2% of the participants) than with glargine (1.3%), liraglutide (1.0%), or sitagliptin (0.7%). Participants who received liraglutide reported more frequent gastrointestinal side effects and lost more weight than those in the other treatment groups.. All four medications, when added to metformin, decreased glycated hemoglobin levels. However, glargine and liraglutide were significantly, albeit modestly, more effective in achieving and maintaining target glycated hemoglobin levels. (Funded by the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases and others; GRADE ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01794143.).

Topics: Blood Glucose; Comparative Effectiveness Research; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Drug Therapy, Combination; Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine; Liraglutide; Metformin; Sitagliptin Phosphate; Sulfonylurea Compounds; Treatment Outcome

Combining a glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist (GLP1-RA) with basal insulin is an emerging option when initiating injectable therapy in longstanding type 2 diabetes (T2DM). Recognizing that short-term insulin therapy can improve beta-cell function and induce glycemic remission in early T2DM, we hypothesized that adding the short-acting GLP1-RA exenatide to basal insulin in early T2DM may enhance the achievability of these outcomes. In this completed, 20-week, open-label, parallel-arm trial at an academic hospital, 103 individuals aged 30-80 years with <7 years duration of T2DM were randomized (by computer-generated sequence) to 8-weeks treatment with (i) insulin glargine (Glar; n = 33), (ii) glargine + thrice-daily lispro (Glar/Lispro; n = 35), or (iii) glargine + twice-daily exenatide (Glar/Exenatide; n = 35), followed by 12-weeks washout. The analyzed population of 102 participants (median 3.5 years of T2DM, A1c 6.6% ±0.7%) consisted of 33 on Glar, 35 on Glar/Lispro and 34 on Glar/Exenatide. Oral glucose tolerance tests at baseline, 4-weeks, 8-weeks and 20-weeks enabled assessment of beta-cell function (Insulin Secretion-Sensitivity Index-2 (ISSI-2)) and glycemic control. Mean ISSI-2 over the 8-week intervention (primary outcome) did not differ across the groups (Glar/Exenatide 237 ± 11; Glar/Lispro 208 ± 11; Glar 223 ± 11; p = 0.19). Baseline-adjusted A1c at 8-weeks (secondary outcome) was lowest in Glar/Exenatide followed by Glar/Lispro and Glar (mean 5.9% vs 6.0% vs 6.2%; p = 0.0007). After 12-weeks washout, however, neither baseline-adjusted A1c nor baseline-adjusted ISSI-2 (secondary outcomes) differed between the groups, nor did (additional outcome) rates of remission (Glar/Exenatide 26.7%, Glar/Lispro 43.8%, Glar 32.1%; p = 0.35). There were no severe hypoglycemia episodes. In conclusion, adding exenatide to basal insulin in early T2DM does not further enhance underlying beta-cell function or the capacity to achieve diabetes remission, despite yielding on-treatment glycemic benefit.

Topics: Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Exenatide; Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin Lispro; Insulin, Long-Acting

To compare the efficacy and safety of two insulin self-titration algorithms, Implementing New Strategies with Insulin Glargine for Hyperglycemia Treatment (INSIGHT) and EDITION, for insulin glargine 300 units/mL (Gla-300) in Korean individuals with uncontrolled type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).. In a 12-week, randomized, open-label trial, individuals with uncontrolled T2DM requiring basal insulin were randomized to either the INSIGHT (adjusted by 1 unit/day) or EDITION (adjusted by 3 units/week) algorithm to achieve a fasting self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) in the range of 4.4 to 5.6 mmol/L. The primary outcome was the proportion of individuals achieving a fasting SMBG ≤5.6 mmol/L without noct urnal hypoglycemia at week 12.. Of 129 individuals (age, 64.1±9.5 years; 66 [51.2%] women), 65 and 64 were randomized to the INSIGHT and EDITION algorithms, respectively. The primary outcome of achievement was comparable between the two groups (24.6% vs. 23.4%, P=0.876). Compared with the EDITION group, the INSIGHT group had a greater reduction in 7-point SMBG but a similar decrease in fasting plasma glucose and glycosylated hemoglobin. The increment of total daily insulin dose was significantly higher in the INSIGHT group than in the EDITION group (between-group difference: 5.8±2.7 units/day, P=0.033). However, body weight was significantly increased only in the EDITION group (0.6±2.4 kg, P=0.038). There was no difference in the occurrence of hypoglycemia between the two groups. Patient satisfaction was significantly increased in the INSIGHT group (P=0.014).. The self-titration of Gla-300 using the INSIGHT algorithm was effective and safe compared with that using the EDITION algorithm in Korean individuals with uncontrolled T2DM (ClinicalTrials.gov number: NCT03406663).

Topics: Aged; Algorithms; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Female; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine; Middle Aged; Republic of Korea

To compare the benefits of iGlarLixi, a fixed-ratio combination of insulin glargine 100 U/mL and lixisenatide (iGlarLixi), with insulin glargine (iGlar) for reducing residual hyperglycaemia (defined as HbA1c ≥ 7% despite fasting plasma glucose [FPG] < 130 mg/dL) in Japanese people with type 2 diabetes (T2D) inadequately controlled on oral antidiabetic drugs.. The open-label LixiLan JP-O2 study compared iGlarLixi with iGlar over 26 weeks in 521 people with T2D. This post hoc analysis assessed the proportions of participants with residual hyperglycaemia in the overall population, and in subgroups defined by age and dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor (DPP4i) use at screening.. At 26 weeks, significantly fewer participants had residual hyperglycaemia in the iGlarLixi versus the iGlar arm (8.1% vs. 19.6%; P = .0002). There was also less residual hyperglycaemia with iGlarLixi than iGlar in all subgroup analyses: 9.0% versus 16.8% in participants aged younger than 65 years (P = .0369); 6.5% versus 24.2% in participants aged 65 years or older (P = .0008); 10.1% versus 20.5% (P = .0202) in participants with DPP4i use; and 6.2% versus 18.8% in those without DPP4i use (P = .0024). The proportion reaching both HbA1c less than 7% and FPG less than 130 mg/dL was higher with iGlarLixi versus iGlar in the overall population (50.8% vs. 31.5%; P < .0001), and in all studied subgroups.. iGlarLixi reduced the prevalence of residual hyperglycaemia in Japanese people with uncontrolled T2D compared with iGlar, both in the overall population and in subgroups defined by age and DPP4i use at screening.

Topics: Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Combinations; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hyperglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine; Japan; Peptides

Type 2 diabetes causes cardio-renal complications and is treated with different combination therapies. The renal hemodynamics profile of such combination therapies has not been evaluated in detail.. Patients (N = 97) with type 2 diabetes were randomized to receive either empagliflozin and linagliptin (E+L group) or metformin and insulin glargine (M+I group) for 3 months. Renal hemodynamics were assessed with para-aminohippuric acid and inulin for renal plasma flow (RPF) and glomerular filtration rate (GFR). Intraglomerular hemodynamics were calculated according the Gomez´ model.. Treatment with E+L reduced GFR (p = 0.003), but RPF remained unchanged (p = 0.536). In contrast, M+I not only reduced GFR (p = 0.001), but also resulted in a significant reduction of RPF (p < 0.001). Renal vascular resistance (RVR) decreased with E+L treatment (p = 0.001) but increased with M+I treatment (p = 0.001). The changes in RPF and RVR were different between the two groups (both p. In patients with type 2 diabetes and preserved renal function treatment with M+I resulted in reduction of renal perfusion and increase in vascular resistance, in contrast to treatment with E+I that preserved renal perfusion and reduced vascular resistance. Moreover, different underlying effects on the resistance vessels have been estimated according to the Gomez model, with M+I increasing R. The study was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02752113) on April 26, 2016.

Topics: Aged; Benzhydryl Compounds; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Diabetic Nephropathies; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Germany; Glomerular Filtration Rate; Glucosides; Hemodynamics; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine; Linagliptin; Male; Metformin; Middle Aged; Prospective Studies; Renal Plasma Flow; Sodium-Glucose Transporter 2 Inhibitors; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

Hypoglycemic drugs affect the bone quality and the risk of fractures in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). We aimed to investigate the effects of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) and insulin on bone mineral density (BMD) in T2DM.. In this single-blinded study, a total of 65 patients with T2DM were randomly assigned into four groups for 52 weeks: the exenatide group (. Compared with baseline, the glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) decreased significantly in the exenatide (8.11 ± 0.24% vs. 7.40 ± 0.16%,. Compared with the placebo, GLP-1RAs demonstrated an increase of BMD at multiple sites of the body after treatment, which may not exacerbate the consequences of bone fragility. Therefore, GLP-1RAs might be considered for patients with T2DM. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01648582.

Topics: Bone Density; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Exenatide; Female; Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor; Glucagon-Like Peptides; Humans; Immunoglobulin Fc Fragments; Insulin Glargine; Male; Middle Aged; Recombinant Fusion Proteins

This study hypothesized that the insulin Degludec may have benefit if used in management of diabetes mellitus after renal transplantation to achieve better control at the critical time of adjustment of immunosuppressive regimens during the first year post transplant.. Fifty patients with Type 2 diabetes Mellitus after renal transplantation with stable serum creatinine with glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1C) 7 to 11% were included in the study to receive either Insulin Degludec or Insulin Glargine. Fasting blood glucose, 2 hour post-prandial levels and (HbA1c), were measured at 12, 16, 26, 40, and 52 weeks after renal transplantation also hypoglycemic episodes were documented all through the study.. Despite both groups are matched as regards demographic and metabolic data, FPG, and 2h PPG were lower in insulin Degludec group all through the study. HbA1c most pronounced decline, occurred at 52th week of treatment in both groups. The most important clinically relevant finding in our study was that; the overall confirmed hypoglycemia rates and the rate of nocturnal confirmed hypoglycemia was significantly lower with Degludec treated group (P < .001).. Insulin Degludec provides optimum glycemic control in in the first year post-renal transplant patients with significantly lower rate of hypoglycemia. DOI: 10.52547/ijkd.6131.

Topics: Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Kidney Transplantation; Pilot Projects

This study aims at evaluating glycemic control during Basalin or Lantus administration in adults with controlled type 2 diabetes mellitus using continuous glucose monitoring system (CGM).. 47 patients with well-controlled T2DM using both Basalin and oral hypoglycemic drugs were recruited. CGM were applied from day 1 to day 3 with the unchanged dose of Basalin and then removed from day 4. A washout was performed with Lantus at the same dose as Basalin from day 4 to day 10. Then patients were continued to install the CGM under Lantus administration from day 11 to day 13. Variables of CGM, such as the area under the curve (AUC) for both hyperglycemia and hypoglycemia, 24h mean blood glucose (24h MBG), 24h standard deviation of blood glucose (24h SDBG), 24h mean amplitude of glycemic excursion (24h MAGE), PT (percentage of time), and time in range (TIR), were calculated and compared between Basalin group and Lantus group.. The group of Lantus showed lower 24h MBG (p<0.01), 24h MAGE (p<0.05), and lower 24h SDBG (p<0.01) than the Basalin group. Lantus-treated patients had a lower PT and AUC when the cut-off point for blood glucose was 10 mmol/L (p<0.05) and 13.9 mmol/L (p<0.05), respectively. In this study, no patient developed symptomatic hypoglycemia, few hypoglycemia was observed and there was no difference of hypoglycemia between the two groups.. In patients with well-controlled T2DM who were treated with insulin glargine, Lantus group showed lower MBG, GV, and lower PT (BG > 10.0 mmol/L, BG > 13.9 mmol/L) than Basalin group. In summary, for T2DM population with HbA1c ≤ 7%, Lantus may be a better choice compared with Basalin.

Topics: Aged; Aniline Compounds; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Female; Glycemic Control; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine; Male; Middle Aged; Prospective Studies

In the AWARD-7 trial of participants with type 2 diabetes (T2DM) and moderate-to-severe CKD, dulaglutide (DU) treatment slowed decline in eGFR compared with insulin glargine (IG). Treatment with doses of either DU or IG resulted in similar levels of glycemic control and BP. The aim of this analysis was to determine the risk of clinical event outcomes between treatment groups.. Participants with T2DM and CKD categories 3-4 were randomized (1:1:1) to 0.75 or 1.5 mg DU weekly or IG daily as basal therapy, with titrated insulin lispro, for 1 year. The time to occurrence of the composite outcome of ≥40% eGFR decline, ESKD, or death due to kidney disease was compared using a Cox proportional-hazards model.. Patients treated with 1.5 mg DU weekly versus IG daily for 1 year had a lower risk of ≥40% eGFR decline or ESKD events in the overall study population (5% versus 11%; hazard ratio, 0.45; 95% CI, 0.20 to 0.97;. Treatment with 1.5 mg DU weekly was associated with a clinically relevant risk reduction of ≥40% eGFR decline or ESKD compared with IG daily, particularly in the macroalbuminuria subgroup of participants with T2DM and moderate-to-severe CKD.

Topics: Albuminuria; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Glucagon-Like Peptides; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Immunoglobulin Fc Fragments; Insulin Glargine; Recombinant Fusion Proteins; Renal Insufficiency, Chronic

Insulin degludec/liraglutide (IDegLira) results in glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) levels comparable with basal-bolus (BB) therapy. Here, we assessed the effect of once-daily IDegLira compared with BB (once-daily insulin glargine 100 U/mL and insulin aspart ≤4 times/day) across subgroups with varying characteristics.. Compared with BB, and in all subgroups, IDegLira treatment consistently gave similar HbA1c reductions, less severe or blood glucose-confirmed hypoglycemia, lower end-of-trial (EOT) total daily insulin dose, and weight loss. In all subgroups, mean EOT HbA1c was ≤53 mmol/mol (≤7.0%). The greatest HbA1c reduction occurred in the highest baseline HbA1c subgroup. Overall, mean EOT daily insulin dose was 0.43 to 0.52 U/kg with IDegLira and 0.74 to 1.07 U/kg with BB. More participants achieved the triple composite endpoint (HbA1c <53 mmol/mol [<7.0%] without weight gain or hypoglycemia) with IDegLira vs BB across the baseline HbA1c subgroups (≤58.5 mmol/mol [44.6% vs 7.0%], >58.5 to ≤69.4 mmol/mol [41.1% vs 8.3%], and >69.4 mmol/mol [23.8% vs 3.4%]).. These results support initiating IDegLira in patients with varying baseline characteristics and uncontrolled T2D on basal insulin.. NCT02420262.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Combinations; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Liraglutide; Middle Aged; Young Adult

This study compares the effects of two different insulin regimens - basal versus bolus insulin - on metabolic and cardiovascular autonomic function in Japanese participants with type 2 diabetes.. Participants were randomly assigned to groups for therapy with insulin glulisine (IGlu) or insulin glargine (IGla). The primary efficacy end-point was glycemic variability, including M-values, mean of glucose levels, and a blood glucose profile of seven time points before and after the intervention. The secondary end-points included pleiotropic effects, including endothelial and cardiac autonomic nerve functions.. Blood glucose levels at all time points significantly decreased in both groups. Post-lunch, post-dinner, and bedtime blood glucose levels were significantly lower in the IGlu group than in the IGla group. Nadir fasting blood glucose levels at the end-point were significantly lower in the IGla group than in the IGlu group. The M-value and mean blood glucose levels were significantly decreased from baseline in both groups, although the former was significantly lower in the IGlu group than in the IGla group. IGla, but not IGlu, was found to elevate 24-h parasympathetic tone, especially during night-time, and it decreased 24-h sympathetic nerve activity, especially at dawn.. Both IGlu and IGla regimens reduced glucose variability, with IGlu bringing a greater reduction in M-value. IGla, but not IGlu, increased parasympathetic tone during night-time and decreased sympathetic nerve activity at dawn. These findings shed light on the previously unrecognized role of night-time basal insulin supplementation on sympathovagal activity in type 2 diabetes patients.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Autonomic Nervous System; Blood Glucose; Circadian Rhythm; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Fasting; Female; Genetic Pleiotropy; Glycemic Control; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Male; Middle Aged; Parasympathetic Nervous System; Sympathetic Nervous System; Treatment Outcome

The objective of this retrospective study was to investigate the efficacy of adding remogliflozin to current insulin glargine plus two oral drug i.e. metformin and teneligliptin therapy in poorly controlled Indian type 2 diabetes.. 173 study participants were initially selected from patient database who continued on their insulin glargine or received an increased dose of insulin glargine along with other OHA based therapy (Group A) and 187 were selected who had received remogliflozin (100 mg BD) (Group B) in addition to insulin glargine along with other OHA based therapy. Glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c), total daily insulin dose, body weight, and the number of hypoglycemic events were recorded at weeks 0, 12 and 24.. During the study, mean values of HbA1c, FBG and P2BG were significantly reduced in both groups. Insulin requirements decreased from 45.8 ± 16.7 IU/day to 38.5 ± 13.5 IU/day at week 12 (P < 0.001) and at week 24 even further decreased to 29.5 ± 14.5 IU/Day. Twenty three patients in group B were able to cease insulin treatment altogether after 24 week treatment. It has been observed that to attain tight blood glucose control, we need to increase insulin dose in group A from 45.5 ± 16.5 IU/Day to 51.5 ± 14.5 at week 12 (P<0.01), which further increased to 53.8 ± 12.8 IU/Day at week 24 (P<0.01). Adding remogliflozin showed significant effect on blood pressure (P < 0.001) and weight reduction (P < 0.001). It has been observed that 38% patients achieved targeted HbA1c (≤7%) in group B where it was 22% in group A.. Results demonstrate that in uncontrolled T2DM patients, remogliflozin 100 mg BD can successfully lay a foundation for prolonged good glycemic control. Early addition of remogliflozin with insulin glargine plus OHAs may be an alternative compared to intensive up titration of insulin daily dose in people with uncontrolled T2DM.

Topics: Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Metformin; Obesity; Pharmaceutical Preparations; Retrospective Studies

Topics: Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine; Insulin Lispro

To compare glycemic efficacy of Technosphere insulin (TI) versus that of insulin aspart (IA), each added to basal insulin, in type 2 diabetes.. This randomized, 24-week trial included subjects aged from 18 to 80 years who were treated with subcutaneous insulin for 3 months and had glycated hemoglobin (HbA1C) levels of 7.0% to 11.5%. After receiving stabilized insulin glargine doses during a 4-week lead in, the subjects were randomized to TI or IA. The primary end point was an HbA1C change from baseline, with the differences analyzed by equivalence analyses.. Both TI and IA resulted in significant and clinically meaningful HbA1C reductions. TI also resulted in significant and clinically meaningful weight reductions. These data support the use of inhaled insulin as a treatment option for individuals with type 2 diabetes.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Aspart; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Middle Aged; Young Adult

To better understand outcomes in people with type 2 diabetes at high risk of hypoglycemia, we conducted post hoc analyses in subgroups of participants from the real-world ACHIEVE Control study (NCT02451137) with ≥1 hypoglycemia risk factor.. Insulin-naive adults with type 2 diabetes and A1c ≥8% were randomized 1:1 to insulin glargine 300 U/mL (Gla-300) or standard-of-care basal insulin (SOC-BI). Participants had documented history of ≥1 risk factors for hypoglycemia: chronic kidney disease, cardiovascular disease, dementia or blindness, age ≥65 years, or history of hypoglycemia. Outcomes included individualized A1c target attainment without documented symptomatic hypoglycemia (blood glucose [BG] ≤3.9 mmol/L or <3.0 mmol/L) or severe hypoglycemia, A1c target attainment, and absence of documented symptomatic or severe hypoglycemia at 6 and 12 months.. Within subgroups, odds ratios generally showed trends favoring Gla-300 versus SOC-BI, particularly for hypoglycemia avoidance in participants ≥65 years of age (BG ≤3.9 mmol/L; odds ratio, 1.52; 95% confidence interval, 1.14-2.03) and those with chronic kidney disease (BG ≤3.9 mmol/L; odds ratio, 2.28; 95% confidence interval, 1.26-4.12). Results were consistent with the overall population.. These data suggest potential benefit of Gla-300 versus SOC-BI for avoiding hypoglycemia in participants with ≥1 hypoglycemia risk factor.

Topics: Aged; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Regular, Human

This post hoc analysis investigated whether baseline patient characteristics and previous antihyperglycaemic drugs were associated with HbA. HbA. Comparably fair glycaemic control and similarly low hypoglycaemia risk were achieved in almost all patient subgroups with patient- versus physician-led Gla-300 titration. These results reinforce efficacy and safety of Gla-300 self-titration across a range of phenotypes of insulin-naïve people with T2DM.. EudraCT 2015-001167-39.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Dosage Calculations; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Glycemic Control; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Incidence; Insulin Glargine; Italy; Male; Middle Aged; Physician-Patient Relations; Physicians; Retrospective Studies; Self-Management; Titrimetry

To compare a glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist with basal insulin at hospital discharge in patients with uncontrolled type 2 diabetes in a randomized clinical trial.. A total of 273 patients with glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) 7%-10% (53-86 mol/mol) were randomized to liraglutide (n = 136) or insulin glargine (n = 137) at hospital discharge. The primary endpoint was difference in HbA1c at 12 and 26 weeks. Secondary endpoints included hypoglycaemia, changes in body weight, and achievement of HbA1c <7% (53 mmol/mol) without hypoglycaemia or weight gain.. The between-group difference in HbA1c at 12 weeks and 26 weeks was -0.28% (95% CI -0.64, 0.09), and at 26 weeks it was -0.55%, (95% CI -1.01, -0.09) in favour of liraglutide. Liraglutide treatment resulted in a lower frequency of hypoglycaemia <3.9 mmol/L (13% vs 23%; P = 0.04), but there was no difference in the rate of clinically significant hypoglycaemia <3.0 mmol/L. Compared to insulin glargine, liraglutide treatment was associated with greater weight loss at 26 weeks (-4.7 ± 7.7 kg vs -0.6 ± 11.5 kg; P < 0.001), and the proportion of patients with HbA1c <7% (53 mmol/mol) without hypoglycaemia was 48% versus 33% (P = 0.05) at 12 weeks and 45% versus 33% (P = 0.14) at 26 weeks in liraglutide versus insulin glargine. The proportion of patients with HbA1c <7% (53 mmol/mol) without hypoglycaemia and no weight gain was higher with liraglutide at 12 (41% vs 24%, P = 0.005) and 26 weeks (39% vs 22%; P = 0.014). The incidence of gastrointestinal adverse events was higher with liraglutide than with insulin glargine (P < 0.001).. Compared to insulin glargine, treatment with liraglutide at hospital discharge resulted in better glycaemic control and greater weight loss, but increased gastrointestinal adverse events.

Topics: Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Glycated Hemoglobin; Hospitals; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine; Liraglutide; Patient Discharge; Treatment Outcome

Premix insulin is commonly used in some regions of the world, despite the higher risk of hypoglycaemia and weight gain compared with basal insulin, based on the premise that it offers a simplified insulin regimen. iGlarLixi is a once-daily titratable fixed-ratio formulation that combines basal insulin glargine 100 units/mL (iGlar) and the GLP-1 RA, lixisenatide, which offers a single-injection option for treatment intensification, with improved HbA1c reductions, similar hypoglycaemia risk and more favourable bodyweight profiles over iGlar alone. This randomized controlled study directly compares, for the first time, treatment intensification with iGlarLixi versus premix insulin analogue biphasic insulin aspart 30 (BIAsp 30) in adults with T2D inadequately controlled on basal insulin in combination with one or two oral antihyperglycaemic drugs.. This was an open-label, active-controlled, comparative, parallel-group, multicentre, phase 3b study. In total, 887 adults with T2D uncontrolled on basal insulin were randomized to switch to either iGlarLixi once daily, or BIAsp 30 twice daily, for 26 weeks.. Overall, 887 participants were enrolled (mean age 59.8 years, 50.2% female) from 89 centres in 17 countries. At baseline, 65.6% had a duration of T2D of 10 years or longer, and the mean HbA1c at baseline was 8.6%.. The study directly compared the efficacy and safety of iGlarLixi versus BIAsp 30 in people with T2D uncontrolled on basal insulin and one or more oral antihyperglycaemic agents. These results provide robust clinical data that may inform clinicians in their therapeutic management of people with T2D uncontrolled on basal insulin requiring additional therapy.

Topics: Adult; Biphasic Insulins; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Combinations; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Aspart; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Isophane; Male; Middle Aged

To compare the efficacy and safety of LY2963016 insulin glargine (LY IGlar) with insulin glargine (Lantus; IGlar) combined with oral antihyperglycaemic medications (OAMs) in insulin-naive Chinese patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D).. In this phase III, open-label trial, adult patients with T2D receiving two or more OAMs at stable doses for 12 weeks or longer, with HbA1c of 7.0% or more and 11.0% or less, were randomized (2:1) to receive once-daily LY IGlar or IGlar for 24 weeks. The primary outcome was non-inferiority of LY IGlar to IGlar at a 0.4% margin, and a gated secondary endpoint tested non-inferiority of IGlar to LY IGlar (-0.4% margin), assessed by least squares (LS) mean change in HbA1c from baseline to 24 weeks.. Patients assigned to LY IGlar (n = 359) and IGlar (n = 177) achieved similar and significant reductions (p < .001) in HbA1c from baseline. LY IGlar was non-inferior to IGlar for change in HbA1c from baseline to week 24 (-1.27% vs. -1.23%; LS mean difference: -0.05% [95% CI, -0.19% to 0.10%]) and IGlar was non-inferior to LY IGlar. The study therefore showed equivalence of LY IGlar and IGlar for the primary endpoint. At week 24, there were no between-group differences in the proportion of patients achieving an HbA1c of less than 7.0%, seven-point self-measured blood glucose, insulin dose or weight gain. Adverse events, allergic reactions, hypoglycaemia and insulin antibodies were similar in the two groups.. Once-daily LY IGlar and IGlar, combined with OAMs, provide effective and similar glycaemic control with comparable safety profiles in insulin-naive Chinese patients with T2D.

Topics: Adult; Blood Glucose; China; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine

Many patients with type 2 diabetes treated with premixed insulin gradually have inadequate glycemic control and switch to a basal-bolus regimen, which raises some concerns for weight gain and increased hypoglycemic risk. Switching to combination use of glp-1 agonist and basal insulin may be an alternative option.. After a 12-week premixed human insulin 70/30 dosage optimization period, 200 patients with HbA1c of 7.0% to 10.0% were randomized into 24-week treatment groups with exenatide twice a day plus glargine or with aspart 70/30 twice a day.. After 24 weeks, the patients receiving exenatide plus glargine (n = 90) had improved HbA1c control compared with those receiving aspart 70/30 (n = 90) (least squares mean change: ‒0.59 vs ‒0.13%; difference [95% CI]: ‒0.45 [‒0.74 to ‒0.17]) in the full analysis set population. Weight decreased 3.5 kg with exenatide and decreased 0.4 kg with aspart 70/30 (P < .001). The insulin dose was reduced 10.7 units/day (95% CI, ‒12.2 to ‒9.2 units; P < .001) with exenatide, and increased 9.7 units/day (95% CI, 8.2 to 11.2 units; P < .001) with aspart 70/30. The most common adverse events were gastrointestinal adverse effects in the exenatide group (nausea [21%], vomiting [16%], diarrhea [13%]). The incidence of hypoglycemia was similar in 2 groups (27% for exenatide and 38% for aspart 70/30; P = .1).. In premixed human insulin‒treated patients with type 2 diabetes with inadequate glycemic control, switching to exenatide twice a day plus glargine was superior to aspart 70/30 twice a day for glycemic and weight control.

Topics: Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Exenatide; Glycated Hemoglobin; Glycemic Control; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Aspart; Insulin Glargine; Metformin

Diabetes mellitus type two is one of the major cardiovascular risk factors. Treatment of diabetes can reduce this risk, but the treatment options differ a lot in their risk-reducing capabilities. We compared the impact of insulin degludec (IDeg-100) and insulin glargine U300 (IGlar-300) on cardiovascular risk parameters - glycaemic variability (GV), arterial stiffness and lipid parameters - in insulin naive patients with DMT2.. To 23 individuals who previously had uncontrolled DMT2 on two or more oral antidiabetic drugs, IGlar-300 and IDeg-100 were applied for 12 weeks and then switched in a cross over design manner. Prior and after of each insulin phase, we analysed biochemical parameters,7-point SMBG profile over three days and arterial stiffness which was assessed indirectly by measuring the augmentation index (AIx) on the principles of applanation tonometry.. There were no significant differences between IGlar-300 and IDeg-100 regarding reduction of mean glucose values and coefficient of variation (CV). Both insulins insignificantly reduced AIx for standardised pulse of 75 beats/min and without differences between them. IGlar-300 and IDeg-100 reduced triglycerides and increased HDL with no significant difference between the two insulins. IGlar-300 increased the total cholesterol level and IDeg-100 decreased total cholesterol, but without statistically significant difference. IGlar-300 increased LDL level by 0.508 mmol/L and IDeg-100 decreased LDL by 0.217 mmol/L, with statistically significant difference (p = 0.0215).. This study did not show significant difference between IGlar-300 and IDeg-100 regarding glycaemic parameters and augmentation index using the same dose of 0.2 IU/kg for both insulins, but it has revealed possible differences in impact on lipid profile.. Clinicaltrials.gov, NCT04692415 . Retrospectively registered on December 31th 2020.

Topics: Aged; Blood Glucose; Croatia; Cross-Over Studies; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Lipid Metabolism; Lipids; Male; Middle Aged; Treatment Outcome; Vascular Stiffness

Topics: Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Aspart; Insulin Glargine

Treatments for type 2 diabetes targeting baseline glucose levels but not postprandial glucose can result in normalized fasting blood glucose but suboptimal overall glycemic control (high glycated hemoglobin): residual hyperglycemia. In Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes the predominant pathophysiology is a lower insulin secretory capacity, and residual hyperglycemia is common with basal insulin treatment. Single-injection, fixed-ratio combinations of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists and basal insulin have been developed. iGlarLixi (insulin glargine 100 units/mL [iGlar]: lixisenatide ratio of 1 unit:1 µg) is for specific use in Japan. Post-hoc analysis of the LixiLan JP-L trial (NCT02752412) compared the effect of iGlarLixi with iGlar on this specific subpopulation with residual hyperglycemia.. Outcomes at week 26 (based on the last observation carried forward) were assessed in patients in the modified intent-to-treat population with baseline residual hyperglycemia.. Overall, 83 (32.5%) patients in the iGlarLixi group and 79 (30.7%) patients in the iGlar group had baseline residual hyperglycemia. The proportion of patients with residual hyperglycemia at week 26 decreased to 15.7% in the iGlarLixi group, and increased to 36.9% in the iGlar group. Patients in the iGlarLixi group had significantly greater reductions in glycated hemoglobin compared with the iGlar group (-0.72% difference between groups; P < 0.0001).. New data from this post-hoc analysis of the JP-L trial show that treatment with the fixed-ratio combination iGlarLixi reduced the proportion of Japanese patients with residual hyperglycemia from baseline to week 26 and significantly reduced glycated hemoglobin vs similar doses of iGlar alone.

Topics: Aged; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Combinations; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Glycemic Control; Humans; Hyperglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine; Insulins; Japan; Male; Middle Aged; Peptides; Treatment Outcome

To test the hypothesis that the addition of periodic courses of short-term intensive insulin therapy (IIT) could enhance the effect of metformin (MET) maintenance therapy on preservation of beta-cell function following induction IIT.. In this multicentre, randomized controlled trial, 108 adults with type 2 diabetes (median 1.3 years' duration; HbA1c 6.6% ± 0.6%) were randomized to 3 weeks of induction IIT (glargine, lispro) followed by MET maintenance, either with or without periodic 2-week courses of IIT every 3 months for 2 years. Beta-cell function was assessed by the Insulin Secretion Sensitivity Index-2 (ISSI-2) at an oral glucose tolerance test every 3 months.. In both arms, induction IIT increased ISSI-2, improved whole-body insulin sensitivity and reduced hepatic insulin resistance (all P ≤ .0004). The primary outcome of baseline-adjusted ISSI-2 at 2 years was not improved by the addition of intermittent IIT (MET + IIT) and was slightly higher in the MET arm (baseline-adjusted difference -35 [95% CI: -66, -3]), with three additional beta-cell measures showing no significant differences. Baseline-adjusted HbA1c at 2 years did not differ between MET and MET + IIT (6.3% ± 0.1% vs. 6.4% ± 0.1%, P = .46), with 32.6% of participants in each arm maintaining HbA1c of 6.0% or less at 2 years.. Although initial induction IIT induces metabolic improvement, subsequent repeat courses of IIT every 3 months do not further enhance the effect of MET maintenance therapy on beta-cell function.

Topics: Adult; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Regular, Human; Metformin

The presence of islet autoantibodies and islet reactive T cells (T+) in adults with established type 2 diabetes (T2D) have been shown to identify those patients with more severe β-cell dysfunction. However, at what stage in the progression toward clinical T2D does islet autoimmunity emerge as an important component influencing β-cell dysfunction? In this ancillary study to the Restoring Insulin SEcretion (RISE) Study, we investigated the prevalence of and association with β-cell dysfunction of T+ and autoantibodies to the 65 kDa glutamic acid decarboxylase antigen (GADA) in obese pre-diabetes adults with impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) and recently diagnosed treatment naïve (Ndx) T2D. We further investigated the effect of 12 months of RISE interventions (metformin or liraglutide plus metformin, or with 3 months of insulin glargine followed by 9 months of metformin or placebo) on islet autoimmune reactivity. We observed GADA(+) in 1.6% of NdxT2D and 4.6% of IGT at baseline, and in 1.6% of NdxT2D and 5.3% of IGT at 12 months, but no significant associations between GADA(+) and β-cell function. T(+) was observed in 50% of NdxT2D and 60.4% of IGT at baseline, and in 68.4% of NdxT2D and 83.9% of IGT at 12 months. T(+) NdxT2D were observed to have significantly higher fasting glucose (

Topics: Autoantibodies; Autoantigens; Autoimmunity; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Glucose Intolerance; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine; Islets of Langerhans; Liraglutide; Metformin; T-Lymphocytes

MYL-1501D is a proposed biosimilar to insulin glargine. The noninferiority of MYL-1501D was demonstrated in patients with type 1 diabetes and type 2 diabetes in 2 phase 3 trials. Immunogenicity of MYL-1501D and reference insulin glargine was examined in both studies.. INSTRIDE 1 and INSTRIDE 2 were multicenter, open-label, randomized, parallel-group studies. In INSTRIDE 1, patients with type 1 diabetes received MYL-1501D or insulin glargine over a 52-week period. In INSTRIDE 2, patients with type 2 diabetes treated with oral antidiabetic drugs, insulin naive or not, received MYL-1501D or reference insulin glargine over a 24-week period. Incidence rates and change from baseline in relative levels of antidrug antibodies (ADA) and anti-host cell protein (anti-HCP) antibodies in both treatment groups were determined by a radioimmunoprecipitation assay and a bridging immunoassay, respectively. Results were analyzed using a mixed-effects model (INSTRIDE 1) or a nonparametric Wilcoxon rank sum test (INSTRIDE 2).. Total enrollment was 558 patients in INSTRIDE 1 and 560 patients in INSTRIDE 2. The incidence of total and cross-reactive ADA was comparable between treatment groups in INSTRIDE 1 and INSTRIDE 2 (P > 0.05 for both). A similar proportion of patients had anti-HCP antibodies in both treatment groups in INSTRIDE 1 at week 52 (MYL-1501D, 93.9 %; reference insulin glargine, 89.6 %; P = 0.213) and in INSTRIDE 2 at week 24 (MYL-1501D, 87.3 %; reference insulin glargine, 86.9 %; P > 0.999).. In INSTRIDE 1 and INSTRIDE 2, similar immunogenicity profiles were observed for MYL-1501D and reference insulin glargine in patients with type 1 diabetes and type 2 diabetes, respectively.. ClinicalTrials.gov, INSTRIDE 1 ( NCT02227862 ; date of registration, August 28, 2014); INSTRIDE 2 ( NCT02227875 ; date of registration, August 28, 2014).

Topics: Adult; Biosimilar Pharmaceuticals; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Female; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Immunogenetic Phenomena; Insulin Glargine; Male; Middle Aged

We aimed to investigate the effect of dosage reduction of four hypoglycemic multidrug regimens on the incidences of acute glycemic complications in people with type 2 diabetes who fast during Ramaḍān.. We conducted an open-label, parallel-group, randomized controlled trial at a tertiary care center in Amman, Jordan. We recruited adults with type 2 diabetes who expressed an intention to fast during Ramaḍān and were adherent to one of four regimens-namely: metformin and glimepiride; metformin and vildagliptin; metformin and insulin glargine U100; or, metformin, insulin glargine U100, and human regular insulin. We randomly assigned participants in a 2:1 ratio to low- or regular-dosage therapy. The primary outcomes were the incidences of hypoglycemia and hyperglycemia during the 29 days of Ramaḍān 2017, and the secondary outcomes were the incidences of diabetic ketoacidosis and hyperosmolar hyperglycemic state during the same period.. We randomly assigned 687 participants to low-dosage therapy (. Dosage reduction decreases the incidence of hypoglycemia without a concomitant increase in the incidences of hyperglycemia, diabetic ketoacidosis, and hyperosmolar hyperglycemic state in people with type 2 diabetes who fast during Ramaḍān.. www.ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier NCT04237493.

Topics: Aged; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Fasting; Female; Glycemic Control; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine; Islam; Male; Metformin; Middle Aged; Sulfonylurea Compounds; Vildagliptin

To compare time in range (TIR) with use of insulin degludec U100 (degludec) versus insulin glargine U100 (glargine U100) in people with type 2 diabetes.. We conducted a randomized, crossover, multicentre trial comparing degludec and glargine U100 in basal insulin-treated adults with type 2 diabetes and ≥1 hypoglycaemia risk factor. There were two treatment periods, each with 16-week titration and 2-week maintenance phases (with evaluation of glucose using blinded professional continuous glucose monitoring). The once-weekly titration (target: 3.9-5.0 mmol/L) was based on pre-breakfast self-measured blood glucose. The primary endpoint was percentage of TIR (3.9─10.0 mmol/L). Secondary endpoints included overall and nocturnal percentage of time in tight glycaemic range (3.9-7.8 mmol/L), and mean glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) and glucose levels.. At baseline, participants (n = 498) had a mean (SD) age of 62.8 (9.8) years, a diabetes duration of 15.1 (7.7) years and an HbA1c level of 59.6 (11.0) mmol/mol (7.6 [1.0]%). Noninferiority and superiority were confirmed for degludec versus glargine U100 for the primary endpoint, with a mean TIR of 72.1% for degludec versus 70.7% for glargine U100 (estimated treatment difference [ETD] 1.43% [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.12, 2.74; P = 0.03] or 20.6 min/d). Overall time in tight glycaemic range favoured degludec versus glargine U100 (ETD 1.5% [95% CI: 0.15, 2.89] or 21.9 min/d). Degludec also reduced nocturnal time below range (TBR; <3.9 mmol/L) compared with glargine U100 (ETD -0.88% [95% CI: -1.34, -0.42] or 12.7 min/night; post hoc) and significantly fewer nocturnal hypoglycaemic episodes of <3.0 mmol/L were observed.. Degludec, compared with glargine U100, provided more TIR and time in tight glycaemic range, and reduced nocturnal TBR in insulin-treated people with type 2 diabetes.

Topics: Adult; Blood Glucose; Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring; Cross-Over Studies; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Middle Aged; Risk Factors

Topics: Adult; Aged; Blood Glucose; Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Fasting; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine; Male; Middle Aged; Prospective Studies; Weight Gain

To further investigate glycaemic control and hypoglycaemia in BRIGHT, focusing on the titration period.. BRIGHT was a multicentre, open-label, randomized, active-controlled, two-arm, parallel-group, 24-week study in insulin-naïve patients with uncontrolled type 2 diabetes initiated on glargine 300 U/mL (Gla-300) (N = 466) or degludec (IDeg-100) (N = 463). Predefined efficacy and safety outcomes were investigated during the initial 12-week titration period. In addition, patients' characteristics and clinical outcomes were assessed descriptively, stratified by confirmed (≤3.9 mmol/L) hypoglycaemia incidence during the initial titration period.. At week 12, HbA1c was comparable between Gla-300 (7.32%) and IDeg-100 (7.23%), with similar least squares (LS) mean reductions from baseline (-1.37% and - 1.39%, respectively; LS mean difference of 0.02; 95% confidence interval: -0.08 to 0.12). Patients who experienced hypoglycaemia during the initial titration period had numerically greater HbA1c reductions by week 12 than patients who did not (-1.46% vs. -1.28%), and higher incidence of anytime (24 hours; 73.3% vs. 35.7%) and nocturnal (00:00-06:00 hours; 30.0% vs. 11.9%) hypoglycaemia between weeks 13-24.. The use of Gla-300 resulted in similar glycaemic control as IDeg-100 during the initial 12-week titration period of the BRIGHT study, when less anytime (24 hours) hypoglycaemia with Gla-300 versus IDeg-100 has been reported. Experiencing hypoglycaemia shortly after initiating Gla-300 or IDeg-100 may be associated with hypoglycaemia incidence in the longer term, potentially impacting glycaemic management.

Topics: Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Glycated Hemoglobin; Glycemic Control; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting

Variations in the prevalence and etiology of type 2 diabetes (T2D) across race and ethnicity may affect treatment responses. Semaglutide is a glucagon-like peptide-1 analog approved for once-weekly, subcutaneous treatment of T2D.. To compare semaglutide efficacy and safety in race and ethnicity subgroups across the SUSTAIN trials.. Post hoc analysis of data from phase 3 randomized SUSTAIN 1-5 and 7 (pooled), and SUSTAIN 6 trials.. 3074 subjects (SUSTAIN 1-5 and 7) and 1648 subjects (SUSTAIN 6).. Semaglutide 0.5 or 1.0 mg, placebo, or active comparator (sitagliptin 100 mg, exenatide extended release 2.0 mg, insulin glargine 100IU/ml and dulaglutide 0.75 or 1.5 mg).. Change in hemoglobin A1C (HbA1c) and body weight from baseline to weeks 30, 40 and 104, and other efficacy and safety endpoints.. HbA1c was reduced from baseline by 1.0 to 1.5 percentage points and 1.3 to 2.0 percentage points, and body weight was reduced by 2.3 to 4.7 kg and 3.6 to 6.1 kg with semaglutide 0.5 and 1.0 mg, respectively, across race and ethnicity subgroups. Minor changes in blood pressure and lipid profiles were observed. Adverse events (AEs) were reported in similar proportions of subjects across trials. More Asian versus other race subgroups discontinued treatment prematurely due to AEs. The most commonly reported AEs were gastrointestinal disorders.. In this SUSTAIN trials post hoc analysis, semaglutide was associated with consistent and clinically relevant reductions in HbA1c and body weight in subjects with T2D, with minor variations in efficacy and safety outcomes associated with race or ethnicity.

Topics: Adult; Blood Glucose; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Ethnicity; Female; Glucagon-Like Peptides; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Immunoglobulin Fc Fragments; Insulin Glargine; Male; Middle Aged; Racial Groups; Recombinant Fusion Proteins; Treatment Outcome

To examine the glucose-lowering mechanisms of the glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist lixisenatide after two subsequent meals and in combination with basal insulin.. Twenty-eight metformin-treated patients with type 2 diabetes were randomly assigned to treatment sequences with either lixisenatide or insulin glargine alone for 4 weeks, and a combination of both treatments for 4 weeks. Metabolic examinations were performed before and after each treatment period following breakfast and a late lunch 8 hours later.. Lixisenatide mainly reduced postprandial glycaemia, while insulin glargine mainly reduced fasting glucose after breakfast (P < 0.05). This was partially preserved after a late lunch (P < 0.05). After breakfast, lixisenatide reduced insulin secretion and glucagon levels significantly. These effects were lost after a late lunch. Insulin glargine did not significantly reduce glucagon or insulin secretion. Gastric emptying was slowed by lixisenatide, but not by insulin glargine after breakfast. After the late lunch, lixisenatide slightly accelerated gastric emptying.. Lixisenatide decelerates gastric emptying after breakfast, thereby reducing glycaemic excursions, insulin secretion and glucagon levels. The glycaemic reduction persists until after a late lunch, despite accelerated gastric emptying. The combination with insulin glargine enhances the glucose-lowering effect because of complementary modes of action.

Topics: Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Gastric Emptying; Glucagon; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Meals; Peptides; Postprandial Period

To compare the efficacy and safety of Gla-300 versus Gla-100 in insulin-naïve people with type 2 diabetes in Asia Pacific.. In this open-label, randomized, active-controlled, 26-week study, insulin-naïve participants with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled with non-insulin antihyperglycaemic drugs were randomized (2:1) to Gla-300 or Gla-100. The initial daily dose of basal insulin was 0.2 U/kg and was adjusted at least weekly for 8-12 weeks to a target fasting self-monitored plasma glucose (SMPG) of 4.4-5.6 mmol/L.. Of the 604 participants randomized, 570 (Gla-300, n = 375; Gla-100, n = 195) completed the study. Non-inferiority of Gla-300 versus Gla-100 in HbA1c reduction from baseline to week 26 was confirmed. In the Gla-300 and Gla-100 groups, 51.1% and 52.2% of participants achieved the HbA1c target of <7.0% (rate ratio [95% CI]: 0.98 [0.84 to 1.14]) and 19.1% and 21.9% achieved the target without hypoglycaemia during the last 12 weeks of treatment (rate ratio [95% CI]: 0.87 [0.63 to 1.20]). Changes in fasting plasma glucose and 24-hour average eight-point SMPG were comparable between groups. Incidence of hypoglycaemia at any time of day was similar between treatment groups at week 26, but incidence of any nocturnal hypoglycaemia was numerically lower with Gla-300 than Gla-100 over the initial 12-week titration period and 26-week on-treatment period. Rates of adverse events were similar between groups and low for serious adverse events.. Glycaemic control of Gla-300 is non-inferior to Gla-100 with a similar or lower incidence and proportion of hypoglycaemia in people with type 2 diabetes in Asia Pacific, reinforcing the results in the global EDITION programme.

Topics: Asia; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine

Preserved vascular function represents a key prognostic factor in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), but data on vascular parameters in this patient cohort are scarce. Patients with T2DM often need more than one drug to achieve optimal glucose control. The aim of this study was to analyse the efficacy of two combination therapies on vascular function in subjects with T2DM.. This prospective, randomized study included 97 subjects with T2DM. Subjects were randomized to either the combination therapy empagliflozin (E) 10 mg with linagliptin (L) 5 mg once daily or metformin (M) 850 or 1000 mg twice daily with insulin glargine (I) once daily. At baseline and after 12 weeks, subjects had peripheral office and 24-h ambulatory blood pressure (BP) measurement and underwent vascular assessment by pulse wave analysis under office and ambulatory conditions. Office, 24-h ambulatory and central BP as well as pulse pressure (PP) decreased after 12 weeks of treatment with E + L, whereas no change was observed in M + I. There were greater decreases in 24-h ambulatory peripheral systolic (between-group difference: -5.2 ± 1.5 mmHg, P = 0.004), diastolic BP (-1.9 ± 1.0 mmHg, P = 0.036), and PP (-3.3 ± 1.0 mmHg, P = 0.007) in E + L than M + I. Central office systolic BP (-5.56 ± 1.9 mmHg, P = 0.009), forward pressure height of the pulse wave (-2.0 ± 0.9 mmHg, P = 0.028), 24-h ambulatory central systolic (-3.6 ± 1.4 mmHg, P = 0.045), diastolic BP (-1.95 ± 1.1 mmHg, P = 0.041), and 24-h pulse wave velocity (-0.14 ± 0.05m/s, P = 0.043) were reduced to a greater extent with E + L.. Beyond the effects on glycaemic control, the combination therapy of E + L significantly improved central BP and vascular function compared with the classic combination of M + I.. NCT02752113.

Topics: Aged; Arterial Pressure; Benzhydryl Compounds; Biomarkers; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Germany; Glucosides; Humans; Insulin Glargine; Linagliptin; Male; Metformin; Middle Aged; Prospective Studies; Sodium-Glucose Transporter 2 Inhibitors; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Vascular Stiffness

Effective glycemic control can reduce the risk of complications and their related costs in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D). Many patients fail to reach hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) ≤ 6.5% or < 7.0%, often due to adverse effects of treatment, such as hypoglycemia and weight gain. Glycemic targets should be individualized and consider multiple factors, including the risk of adverse events and the patient's characteristics and comorbid conditions.. To compare the odds and annual cost of achieving treatment targets, which incorporate HbA1c targets of < 7.5%, < 8.0%, and ≤ 9.0%, with insulin degludec/liraglutide (IDegLira) versus basal insulin and basal-bolus therapy.. This is a post hoc analysis of the DUAL V and DUAL VII 26-week trials, which randomized patients with T2D uncontrolled (HbA1c 7%-10%) on insulin glargine 100 units/mL (IGlar U100) and metformin to IDegLira or continued IGlar U100 titration (DUAL V) or IGlar U100 + insulin aspart (DUAL VII), all with metformin. Proportions of patients achieving HbA1c targets (< 7.5%, < 8.0%, and ≤ 9.0%) by the end of trial were assessed via 3 outcomes: alone, without either hypoglycemia or weight gain (double composite outcome), or without a combination of hypoglycemia and weight gain (triple composite outcome). The cost per patient achieving the triple composite outcome at each HbA1c target (< 7.5%, < 8.0%, and ≤ 9.0%) was calculated by dividing the annual cost of treatment by the proportion of patients achieving the target. This short-term (1-year) cost-effectiveness analysis was conducted from the perspective of a U.S. health care payer.. More patients achieved HbA1c < 7.5% (. Based on data from DUAL V and DUAL VII, this analysis showed that a greater or similar proportion of patients with T2D reached HbA1c targets with IDegLira compared with IGlar U100/basal-bolus therapy. Odds of achieving double or triple composite outcomes of HbA1c reduction without hypoglycemia and/or without weight gain were greatest for IDegLira. Short-term cost analyses based on the triple composite outcomes suggest that IDegLira is a cost-effective treatment option in the United States compared with either uptitration of IGlar U100 or basal-bolus therapy.. This study was supported by Novo Nordisk A/S. The analysis was based on the DUAL V (NCT01952145) and DUAL VII (NCT02420262) trials, which were funded and conducted by Novo Nordisk. This post hoc analysis was conceived and interpreted by the authors and drafted with medical writing support that was funded by Novo Nordisk. Novo Nordisk also reviewed the manuscript for medical accuracy. Hunt and Malkin are employees of Ossian Health Economics and Communications, which received consulting fees from Novo Nordisk during the conduct of this study and has received consulting fees from Novo Nordisk, unrelated to this study. Mocarski, Ranthe, and Schiffman are employees of Novo Nordisk and Novo Nordisk A/S. Cannon has received speaker fees/honoraria from Abbvie, Amgen, and Janssen; speaker fees from Novo Nordisk; and has stock ownership in Novo Nordisk. Bargiota has received speaker fees/honoraria from AstraZeneca, Eli Lilly, MSD, Novo Nordisk, Sanofi, Boehringer Ingelheim, and Novartis. Billings has received personal fees from Novo Nordisk, Sanofi, and Dexcom, unrelated to this study. Leiter reports grants and personal fees from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Merck, Novo Nordisk, Sanofi, Servier, and GSK, unrelated to this study. Doshi has no relevant conflicts of interest to disclose. Parts of this study were presented as a poster at the AMCP Managed Care & Specialty Pharmacy Annual Meeting; April 23-26, 2018; Boston, MA.

Topics: Adult; Blood Glucose; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Combinations; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Liraglutide; Metformin; United States

This report presents the efficacy and safety of insulin degludec/liraglutide (IDegLira) versus insulin glargine 100 units/mL (IGlar U100) as initial injectable therapy at 26 weeks in the 104-week DUAL VIII durability trial (NCT02501161). Participants (N = 1012) with type 2 diabetes (T2D) uncontrolled on oral antidiabetic drugs (OADs) were randomized 1:1 to open-label IDegLira or IGlar U100. Visits were scheduled at weeks 1, 2, 4 and 12, and every 3 months thereafter. After 26 weeks, glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) reductions were greater with IDegLira versus IGlar U100 (-21.5 vs. -16.4 mmol/mol [-2.0 vs. -1.5%]), as was the percentage of participants achieving HbA1c <53 mmol/mol (78.7% vs. 55.7%) and HbA1c targets without weight gain and/or hypoglycaemia. Estimated treatment differences for insulin dose (-13.01 U) and body weight change (-1.57 kg) significantly favoured IDegLira. The hypoglycaemia rate was 44% lower with IDegLira versus IGlar U100. Safety results were similar. In a trial resembling clinical practice, more participants receiving IDegLira than IGlar U100 met treatment targets, supporting use of IDegLira as an initial injectable therapy for people with T2D uncontrolled on OADs and eligible for insulin initiation.

Topics: Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Liraglutide

To determine the safety of a higher starting dose of basal insulin in overweight/obese patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D).. At the end of study (n = 866), 11.0% patients treated with the 0.3 U/kg starting insulin dose experienced overall confirmed hypoglycaemia versus 8.6% of patients treated with 0.2 U/kg (estimated difference 2.1%, 95% confidence interval - 1.68, 5.89). The proportions of patients with symptomatic (9.8% vs 7.0%; P = 0.128) and nocturnal hypoglycaemia (2.7% vs 1.2%; P = 0.102) were similar in the two groups. There were no events of severe hypoglycaemia or FBG <3.0 mmol/L during the 16-week treatment, and achievement of HbA1c <7.0% (53 mmol/mol) (37.1% vs 37.1%) or FPG <5.6 mmol/L (15.9% vs 16.3%), <6.1 mmol/L (27.6% vs 26.1%), or < 7.0 mmol/L (48.8% vs 48.3%) without hypoglycaemia were comparable in the two groups. Moreover, the mean time was shorter (4.53, 3.95 and 2.74 weeks vs 5.51, 5.21 and 3.64 weeks) and number of titrations was lower (3.5, 3.0 and 2.0 vs 4.3, 4.0 and 2.8) to achieve self-monitored FBG targets of <5.6, <6.1 and <7.0 mmol/L in the higher versus the standard insulin dose group (all P < 0.01).. Among overweight/obese patients with T2D, a higher insulin starting dose was as safe as the standard starting dose, and self-monitored FBG targets were achieved earlier with the higher versus the standard dose.

Topics: Adult; Blood Glucose; China; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine; Obesity; Overweight

The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy of exenatide and insulin glargine in patients with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD).. We performed a 24-week randomized controlled multicentre clinical trial. Seventy-six patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive exenatide or insulin glargine treatment. The endpoints included changes in liver fat content (LFC), visceral adipose tissue (VAT), and subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT) measured by magnetic resonance spectroscopy, blood glucose, liver enzymes, lipid profile, body weight, and Fibrosis-4 index (FIB-4).. LFC, VAT, SAT, and FIB-4 were significantly reduced after exenatide treatment (ΔLFC, -17.55 ± 12.93%; ΔVAT, -43.57 ± 68.20 cm. Both exenatide and insulin glargine reduced LFC in patients with drug-naive T2DM and NAFLD; however, exenatide showed greater reductions in body weight, visceral fat area, liver enzymes, FIB-4, postprandial plasma glucose, and LDL-C.

Topics: Biomarkers; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Exenatide; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine; Male; Middle Aged; Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease; Prognosis

Efficacy and safety of dapagliflozin plus saxagliptin (DAPA + SAXA) were compared with insulin glargine (INS) in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) in a 52-week extension study.. This international Phase 3 study randomized adults with T2D on metformin with/without sulphonylurea. They received DAPA + SAXA or INS for 24 weeks (short-term) with a 28-week (long-term) extension. Week 52 exploratory endpoints included adjusted mean change from baseline in glycated haemoglobin A. Of the 1163 patients enrolled, 643 received treatment; 600 (DAPA + SAXA, 306; INS, 294) entered the long-term phase. At 52 weeks, HbA1c [adjusted least squares (LS) mean; 95% confidence interval (CI)] decreased more with DAPA + SAXA (-1.5% [-1.6%, -1.4%]) than with INS (-1.3% [-1.4%, -1.1%]); the LS mean difference (95% CI) was -0.25% (-0.4%, -0.1%; P = 0.009). Total body weight reduced with DAPA + SAXA [LS mean (95% CI): -1.8 kg (-2.4, -1.3)] and increased with INS [LS mean (95% CI): +2.8 kg (2.2, 3.3)]. More patients on DAPA + SAXA (17.6%) achieved HbA1c <7.0% without hypoglycaemia versus those on INS (9.1%). Rescue medication was required by 77 patients (23.8%) and 97 patients (30.4%) in the DAPA + SAXA and INS groups, respectively.. DAPA + SAXA treatment was non-inferior to INS in reducing HbA1c and body weight, and in achieving optimal glycaemic control without hypoglycaemia in patients with T2D 52 weeks after initiation.

Topics: Adamantane; Adult; Benzhydryl Compounds; Blood Glucose; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptides; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Glucosides; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine; Male; Metformin; Treatment Outcome

To assess efficacy and safety of fixed-ratio (1:1) combination insulin glargine and lixisenatide (iGlarLixi) compared to insulin glargine U100 (iGlar), with metformin, in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) inadequately controlled on basal insulin and oral antidiabetic drugs (OADs).. This 26-week, randomized, open-label study compared iGlarLixi to iGlar, both with metformin in adult Japanese patients with T2DM and hemoglobin (Hb) A1c ≥7.5% to ≤9.5%, treated with basal insulin and 1 or 2 OADs. Five hundred and twelve patients were randomized after a 12-week run-in, when iGlar was introduced and/or further titrated and OADs other than metformin were stopped. The primary endpoint was change in HbA1c from baseline to week 26.. iGlarLixi (n = 255) demonstrated significantly greater reductions in HbA1c (-1.27%) than iGlar (n = 257, -0.53%) (LS mean difference: -0.74%, P < .0001) at week 26, confirming the superiority of iGlarLixi. Significantly, more iGlarLixi patients reached target HbA1c <7% at week 26 (51.8% vs 16.0% for iGlar). iGlarLixi patients lost weight in contrast to iGlar patients (-0.51 kg vs +0.55 kg). Documented symptomatic hypoglycemia (plasma glucose ≤ 3.9 mmol/L) was observed in 18.8% of iGlarLixi patients vs 16.7% of iGlar patients. iGlarLixi patients had more gastrointestinal-related adverse events than iGlar patients (33.3% vs 8.6%), primarily nausea (16.9% vs 0.8%). However, the treatment was generally well-tolerated.. A once-daily injection of iGlarLixi with metformin is an effective, well-tolerated, and simple therapeutic intervention providing significant improvement in glycemic control in Japanese patients with T2DM inadequately controlled on basal insulin and up to two OADs. Clinical Trial Number: NCT02752412.

Topics: Adult; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Combinations; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine; Japan; Peptides

Topics: Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Inpatients; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Parenteral Nutrition, Total; Prospective Studies; Risk Factors

To determine the early benefit:risk balance of dulaglutide versus insulin glargine in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).. This post hoc analysis used data from a randomized, open-label study (AWARD-2; modified intention-to-treat group) in which suboptimally controlled metformin + glimepiride-treated patients received dulaglutide 1.5 mg (n = 273) or insulin glargine (n = 262). Two composite endpoints were used: for weeks 2-20, fasting serum glucose (FSG) <130 mg/dL (<7.2 mmol/L) without hypoglycemia (blood glucose ≤70 mg/dL [≤3.9 mmol/L] or severe hypoglycemia); at week 26, patients with glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) <7.0% (<53.0 mmol/mol) or reduction from baseline ≥1.0% (≥10.9 mmol/mol), no hypoglycemia (as defined above) and no weight gain. Odds ratios (ORs) were generated using logistic regression analysis.. The probability of reaching the FSG target without hypoglycemia was higher with dulaglutide than with insulin glargine at weeks 4 (OR 1.78; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.22-2.60) and 8 (OR 1.69; 95% CI 1.15-2.48). The proportion of patients achieving the 26-week endpoint was higher with dulaglutide (37.4% vs. 10.3%; OR 5.28; 95% CI 3.28-8.48).. Dulaglutide's balanced efficacy-to-safety profile compares favorably with that of insulin glargine and is apparent soon after treatment initiation and after 6 months of therapy.

Topics: Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Therapy, Combination; Glucagon-Like Peptides; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Immunoglobulin Fc Fragments; Insulin Glargine; Recombinant Fusion Proteins

Chinese guidelines for the treatment of type 2 diabetes (T2D) recommend basal or premixed insulins as insulin starters after failed oral antihyperglycaemic medication (OAM). This pragmatic study compared effectiveness and safety of add-on basal insulin analog (BI) and mid-mixture insulin analog (MMI; 50:50 premixed insulin) as starter insulin regimens in Chinese patients with T2D in a real-world setting.. This was a multicentre, open-label, randomized, parallel, pragmatic trial. Patients receiving OAMs were randomized 1:1 to BI (n = 410) or MMI (n = 404) for 24 weeks. Insulin titration and OAM adjustment were determined by investigators following usual standard-of-care. The primary outcome was change in glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) from baseline.. Least-squares mean changes in HbA1c from baseline to week 24 were -2.00% and -2.15% for BI and MMI groups, respectively (P = .13). The MMI group demonstrated a greater reduction in concomitant OAM therapies used than BI group (53.8% vs. 35.3%, respectively; P < .001). Very limited daily insulin dose increments were observed from baseline to week 24 in both BI and MMI groups (2.5 U/day and 1.8 U/day, respectively). Although both insulin analogs were well-tolerated without severe hypoglycaemia, small weight gains were seen with both treatments. Higher total hypoglycaemia rates were noticed with the MMI group, while nocturnal hypoglycaemia events were comparable.. In real-world settings, BI and MMI provided similar improvement in glucose control without conceding hypoglycaemia. The BI group received a greater number of OAMs in real-world settings. Limited insulin dose titration was observed, while more adjustments occurred with OAM usage.

Topics: Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine

To assess efficacy and safety of 26-week treatment with insulin glargine/lixisenatide fixed-ratio combination (iGlarLixi) compared with insulin glargine U100 (iGlar) in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) inadequately controlled on oral antidiabetic drugs (OADs).. This phase 3, multicentre, open-label, 1:1 randomized, parallel-group study compared efficacy of iGlarLixi and iGlar in patients with T2DM, HbA1c of ≥7.5% to ≤9.5% and fasting plasma glucose ≤10.0 mmol/L (180 mg/dL). The primary endpoint was change in HbA1c from baseline to week 26.. HbA1c reduction was significantly greater with iGlarLixi than with iGlar; significantly more patients achieved HbA1c <7%, with no additional risk of hypoglycemia and without weight gain. iGlarLixi (1:1) provided an effective treatment option for Japanese patients with T2DM inadequately controlled on OADs. Clinical Trial Number: NCT02752828.

Topics: Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Combinations; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine; Japan; Middle Aged; Peptides

This study aimed to evaluate the short-term cost-effectiveness of insulin degludec 200 units/mL (degludec) versus insulin glargine 300 units/mL (glargine U300) from a Dutch societal perspective.. A previously published model estimated costs [2018 euros (EUR)] and effectiveness [quality-adjusted life years (QALYs)] with degludec compared with glargine U300 over a 1-year time horizon. The model captured hypoglycaemia rates and insulin dosing. Clinical outcomes were informed by CONCLUDE (NCT03078478), a head-to-head randomised controlled trial in insulin-experienced patients with type 2 diabetes.. Treatment with degludec was associated with mean annual cost savings (EUR 24.71 per patient) relative to glargine U300, driven by a lower basal insulin dose and lower severe hypoglycaemia rate with degludec compared with glargine U300. Lower rates of non-severe nocturnal and severe hypoglycaemia resulted in improved effectiveness (+ 0.0045 QALYs) with degludec relative to glargine U300. In sensitivity analyses, changes to the vast majority of model parameters did not materially affect model outcomes.. This short-term analysis, informed by the latest clinical trial evidence, demonstrated that degludec was a cost-effective treatment option relative to glargine U300. As such, our modelling analysis suggests that degludec would represent an efficient use of Dutch public healthcare resources in this patient population.

Topics: Cost-Benefit Analysis; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Ethnicity; Female; Health Expenditures; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Models, Econometric; Netherlands; Quality-Adjusted Life Years

To evaluate the efficacy of iGlarLixi by C-peptide levels and duration of diabetes in an exploratory analysis of the LixiLan-G study.. LixiLan-G was a 26-week, randomized, open-label study in adults with type diabetes (T2D) inadequately controlled while on a glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist (GLP-1 RA), with metformin, with or without pioglitazone and/or a sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitor. This analysis investigated the efficacy of switching to iGlarLixi by fasting baseline quartile C-peptide levels and baseline quartile of duration of T2D compared with continued GLP-1 RA use.. Change in glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) from baseline to week 26 was significantly greater with iGlarLixi compared with continued GLP-1 RAs across all fasting C-peptide quartiles (-1.00% to -1.06% vs. -0.23% to -0.54% range, respectively) and irrespective of all T2D duration quartiles (-0.94% to -1.07% vs. -0.25% to -0.50% range). A significantly greater proportion of participants in the iGlarLixi arm achieved an HbA1c of <7% across all C-peptide quartiles (51%-73% range) than in the GLP-1 RA arm (19%-32% range). The greatest reductions in HbA1c in participants receiving iGlarLixi were observed in those with the shortest duration of disease, although consistently greater than reductions observed with continued GLP-1 RAs. Reductions in HbA1c were comparable across C-peptide quartiles within the iGlarLixi arm.. The results of this study suggest that iGlarLixi is an effective treatment option, irrespective of C-peptide levels or duration of diabetes, in adults with insufficiently controlled T2D receiving GLP-1 RAs.

Topics: Adult; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Combinations; Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine; Peptides

Globally, nearly half of patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) do not successfully achieve target HbA1c with basal insulin, despite meeting fasting plasma glucose (FPG) targets. In this post hoc analysis of the LixiLan-L study, we determined whether iGlarLixi, a fixed-ratio combination of insulin glargine Gla-100 (iGlar) and the glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist lixisenatide (Lixi), addresses the challenge of reducing residual hyperglycaemia in patients with T2D. In LixiLan-L, a randomized, open-label study, 1018 patients with T2D on basal insulin for ≥6 months ± oral antidiabetes drugs entered a 6-week run-in period, during which they were switched to and/or optimized for a daily dose of iGlar while continuing only metformin. Following the run-in period, 736 patients were then randomized to receive iGlarLixi or were continued on iGlar for 30 weeks ± metformin. Residual hyperglycaemia was defined as HbA1c ≥ 7.0% despite FPG of <140 mg/dL. The proportion of patients with residual hyperglycaemia was similar in both treatment arms at screening (~~42%), and increased after the run-in period (~~62%). After 30 weeks, the proportion of patients with residual hyperglycaemia declined to 23.8% in the iGlarLixi versus 47.1% in the iGlar arm (P < .0001). The proportion of patients achieving both HbA1c (<7.0%) and FPG (<140 mg/dL) targets was higher in the iGlarLixi compared with the iGlar arm (50.3% vs. 27.4%, respectively; P < .0001). iGlarLixi effectively reduces residual hyperglycaemia in patients with T2D on basal insulin therapy.

Topics: Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Combinations; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hyperglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine

To examine diabetes remission following a short-term intensive metabolic intervention combining lifestyle and glucose-lowering approaches.. We conducted an open-label, randomized controlled trial in 154 patients with type 2 diabetes up to 8 years in duration on 0 to 2 glucose-lowering medications. Participants were randomized to (a) a 12-week intensive intervention comprising lifestyle approaches and treatment with insulin glargine, metformin, and dapagliflozin or (b) standard diabetes care. At 12 weeks, diabetes medications were discontinued in participants with hemoglobin A1c (HbA1C) < 7.3% (56 mmol/mol). Participants were then followed for diabetes relapse until 64 weeks. The primary outcome was complete or partial diabetes remission (HbA1C < 6.5% [48 mmol/mol] off chronic diabetes drugs) at 24 weeks. Main secondary outcomes were complete or partial diabetes remission at 36, 48, and 64 weeks.. The primary outcome was achieved in 19 (24.7%) intervention group participants and 13 (16.9%) control group participants at 24 weeks (relative risk [RR] 1.5; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.8-2.7). The relative risks of remission at 36, 48, and 64 weeks were 2.4 (95% CI, 1.2-5.0), 2.1 (95% CI, 1.0-4.4), and 1.8 (95% CI, 0.7-4.7), respectively. In an exploratory analysis, the intervention reduced the hazard of diabetes relapse with overt hyperglycemia by 43% (hazard ratio 0.57; 95% CI, 0.39-0.81).. Our primary outcome of diabetes remission at 24 weeks was not statistically significantly different. However, our overall results suggest that some patients with early type 2 diabetes are able to achieve sustained diabetes remission following a short-term intensive intervention. Further studies are needed to optimize the combined therapeutic approach used.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Benzhydryl Compounds; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Exercise; Female; Glucosides; Glycated Hemoglobin; Healthy Lifestyle; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine; Male; Metformin; Middle Aged; Recurrence; Remission Induction; Secondary Prevention; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

To report the effectiveness and safety of insulin glargine 300 U/mL (Gla-300) versus standard-of-care basal insulin analogues (SOC-BI) at 12 months in the ACHIEVE Control trial, which is a prospective pragmatic randomized real-life study in insulin-naïve adults with type 2 diabetes (T2D).. A total of 3304 insulin-naïve adults with T2D and glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) concentration of 64 to 97 mmol/mol (8.0% to 11.0%) after ≥1 year of treatment with two or more antihyperglycaemic agents were randomized to Gla-300 or SOC-BI. Key secondary endpoints included HbA1c target attainment without documented symptomatic (≤3.9 mmol/L [≤70 mg/dL]) or severe hypoglycaemia at 12 months.. At 12 months, 26.1% (Gla-300) and 23.7% (SOC-BI) of adults achieved HbA1c targets without documented symptomatic (≤3.9 mmol/L [≤70 mg/dL]) or severe hypoglycaemia (odds ratio [OR] 1.14, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.97-1.35); 33.0% and 29.5%, respectively, achieved HbA1c targets without documented symptomatic (<3.0 mmol/L [<54 mg/dL]) or severe hypoglycaemia (OR 1.19, 95% CI 1.02-1.38). The OR for HbA1c target achievement was 1.15 (95% CI 0.99-1.34), and favoured Gla-300 versus SOC-BI for absence of documented symptomatic or severe hypoglycaemia at 12 months for both ≤3.9 mmol/L (≤70 mg/dL; OR 1.21, 95% CI 1.05-1.40) and < 3.0 mmol/L (<54 mg/dL; OR 1.26, 95% CI 1.07-1.48).. Gla-300 tended to be associated with lower hypoglycaemia risk than SOC-BI in real-world clinical practice during the 12-month follow-up.

Topics: Adult; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Prospective Studies

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of iGlarLixi in Mexican patients with type 2 diabetes who participated in the LixiLan clinical trials and compare results with the rest of the patients.. Data was collected for Mexican patients who participated in either of three studies: phase 2 trial LixiLan-POC, that compared iGlarLixi vs insulin glargine (iGlar) on inadequately controlled patients with metformin; phase 3 trial LixiLan-O, comparing iGlarLixi vs iGlar and lixisenatide on inadequately controlled patients with oral antidiabetic agents; and finally the phase 3 trial LixiLan-L, comparing iGlarLixi vs iGlar on inadequately controlled patients with basal insulin. The primary endpoint was the change in HbA1c from baseline to end of treatment.. In the Mexican population, treatment with iGlarLixi significantly improved HbA1c compared with each component alone achieving an average of 6.5%; (6.17%, 6.63% and 6.73% for the LixiLan-POC, O and L studies respectively) and an average HbA1c reduction from baseline of 1.6%, for the three studies at end of treatment period.. The efficacy and safety profile of iGlarLixi demonstrate a fair or better composite endpoint of HbA1c without hypoglycemia and no weight gain compared to overall trial population, which could help improve Mexican patients' outcomes.

Topics: Aged; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Combinations; Ethnicity; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine; Male; Metformin; Mexico; Middle Aged; Peptides; Treatment Outcome

FPG GOAL was a 24-week, open-label, treat-to-target randomized controlled trial which demonstrated that the optimal self-monitored fasting blood glucose (SM-FBG) target for most Chinese individuals with type 2 diabetes (T2D) using insulin glargine 100 IU/mL was 3.9-6.1 mmol/L. Individuals who achieved lower fasting plasma glucose (FPG) levels might achieve the target HbA1c of < 7% without increasing the risk of hypoglycemia.. For this post hoc analysis, individuals were redivided into three groups based on their actual laboratory FPG levels at 24 weeks: level 1, ≤ 5.6 mmol/L; level 2, > 5.6 to ≤ 6.1 mmol/L; and level 3, > 6.1 to ≤ 7.0 mmol/L.. At week 24, 863 individuals with diabetes had available FPG data and 179, 122, and 179 individuals achieved FPG levels 1, 2, and 3, respectively. The proportion of individuals with HbA1c < 7% or HbA1c < 7% without hypoglycemia (≤ 3.9 or ≤ 3.0 mmol/L) was significantly higher in FPG levels 1 (p < 0.01) and 2 (p < 0.05) than in level 3. The least squares mean changes from baseline in HbA1c (- 1.77% and - 1.66% vs - 1.34%; both p < 0.001) and 2-h postprandial glucose (- 3.88 mmol/L and - 3.98 mmol/L vs - 3.22 mmol/L; both p < 0.05) were also significantly higher in FPG levels 1 and 2 compared with level 3. Linear regression analysis showed a moderate relationship between FPG and HbA1c levels at 24 weeks (r = 0.449).. Chinese individuals with T2D who achieved lower FPG levels with insulin glargine 100 IU/mL were more likely to achieve the recommended target HbA1c of < 7% compared with those with higher FPG levels. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT02545842.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Asian People; Blood Glucose; Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring; China; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Fasting; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine; Male; Middle Aged; Postprandial Period; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult

To compare the safety and efficacy of insulin glargine 300 U/mL (Gla-300) versus first-generation standard-of-care basal insulin analogues (SOC-BI; insulin glargine 100 U/mL or insulin detemir) at 6 months.. In the 12-month, open-label, multicentre, randomized, pragmatic ACHIEVE Control trial, insulin-naïve adults with type 2 diabetes (T2D) and glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) 64 to 97 mmol/mol (8.0%-11.0%) after ≥1 year of treatment with ≥2 diabetes medications were randomized to Gla-300 or SOC-BI. The composite primary endpoint, evaluated at 6 months, was the proportion of participants achieving individualized HbA1c targets per Healthcare Effectiveness Data and Information Set (HEDIS) criteria without documented symptomatic (blood glucose ≤3.9 mmol/L [≤70 mg/dL]) or severe hypoglycaemia at any time of the day at 6 months.. Of 1651 and 1653 participants randomized to Gla-300 and SOC-BI, respectively, 31.3% and 27.9% achieved the composite primary endpoint at 6 months (odds ratio [OR] 1.19, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.01-1.39; P = 0.03 for superiority); 78.4% and 75.3% had no documented symptomatic or severe hypoglycaemia (OR 1.19, 95% CI 1.01-1.41). Changes from baseline to month 6 in HbA1c, fasting plasma glucose, weight, and BI analogue dose were similar between groups.. Among insulin-naïve adults with poorly controlled T2D, Gla-300 was associated with a statistically significantly higher proportion of participants achieving individualized HEDIS HbA1c targets without documented symptomatic or severe hypoglycaemia (vs SOC-BI) in a real-life population managed in a usual-care setting. The ACHIEVE Control study results add value to treatment decisions and options for patients, healthcare providers, payers and decision makers.

Topics: Adult; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine

This study assessed the efficacy and safety of insulin glargine 300 U/mL (Gla-300) during hospitalization and therapy intensification at discharge in insufficiently controlled people with type 2 diabetes.. COBALTA (for its acronym in Spanish, COntrol Basal durante la hospitalizacion y al ALTA) was a multicenter, open-label, single-arm, phase IV trial including 112 evaluable inpatients with type 2 diabetes insufficiently controlled (glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) 8%-10%) with basal insulin and/or non-insulin antidiabetic drugs. Patients were treated with a basal-bolus-correction insulin regimen with Gla-300 during the hospitalization and with Gla-300 and/or non-insulin antidiabetics for 6 months after discharge. The primary endpoint was the HbA1c change from baseline to month 6 postdischarge.. HbA1c levels decreased from 8.8%±0.6% at baseline to 7.2%±1.1% at month 6 postdischarge (p<0.001, mean change 1.6%±1.1%). All 7-point blood glucose levels decreased from baseline to 24 hours predischarge (p≤0.001, mean changes from 25.1±66.6 to 63.0±85.4 mg/dL). Fasting plasma glucose also decreased from baseline to 24 hours predischarge (p<0.001), month 3 (p<0.001) and month 6 (p<0.001) postdischarge (mean changes 51.5±90.9, 68.2±96.0 and 77.6±86.4 mg/dL, respectively). Satisfaction was high and hyperglycemia/hypoglycemia perception was low according to the Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire at month 6 postdischarge. The incidence of confirmed (glucose<70 mg/dL)/severe hypoglycemia was 25.0% during hospitalization and 59.1% 6 months after discharge. No safety concerns were reported.. Inpatient and intensification therapy at discharge with Gla-300 improved significantly glycemic control of patients with type 2 diabetes insufficiently controlled with other basal insulin and/or non-insulin antidiabetic medication, with high treatment satisfaction. Gla-300 could therefore be a treatment choice for hospital and postdischarge diabetes management.

Topics: Aftercare; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Hospitalization; Humans; Insulin Glargine; Patient Discharge

It is thought that a reduction in the frequency of basal insulin injections might facilitate treatment acceptance and adherence among patients with type 2 diabetes. Insulin icodec is a basal insulin analogue designed for once-weekly administration that is in development for the treatment of diabetes.. We conducted a 26-week, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, phase 2 trial to investigate the efficacy and safety of once-weekly insulin icodec as compared with once-daily insulin glargine U100 in patients who had not previously received long-term insulin treatment and whose type 2 diabetes was inadequately controlled (glycated hemoglobin level, 7.0 to 9.5%) while taking metformin with or without a dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitor. The primary end point was the change in glycated hemoglobin level from baseline to week 26. Safety end points, including episodes of hypoglycemia and insulin-related adverse events, were also evaluated.. A total of 247 participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive icodec or glargine. Baseline characteristics were similar in the two groups; the mean baseline glycated hemoglobin level was 8.09% in the icodec group and 7.96% in the glargine group. The estimated mean change from baseline in the glycated hemoglobin level was -1.33 percentage points in the icodec group and -1.15 percentage points in the glargine group, to estimated means of 6.69% and 6.87%, respectively, at week 26; the estimated between-group difference in the change from baseline was -0.18 percentage points (95% CI, -0.38 to 0.02, P = 0.08). The observed rates of hypoglycemia with severity of level 2 (blood glucose level, <54 mg per deciliter) or level 3 (severe cognitive impairment) were low (icodec group, 0.53 events per patient-year; glargine group, 0.46 events per patient-year; estimated rate ratio, 1.09; 95% CI, 0.45 to 2.65). There was no between-group difference in insulin-related key adverse events, and rates of hypersensitivity and injection-site reactions were low. Most adverse events were mild, and no serious events were deemed to be related to the trial medications.. Once-weekly treatment with insulin icodec had glucose-lowering efficacy and a safety profile similar to those of once-daily insulin glargine U100 in patients with type 2 diabetes. (Funded by Novo Nordisk; NN1436-4383 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03751657.).

Topics: Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Double-Blind Method; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Metformin; Middle Aged

Cardiovascular outcomes in clinical trials with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients have shown that glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist can have a beneficial effect on the kidney. This trial aimed to assess the effects of exenatide on renal outcomes in patients with T2DM and diabetic kidney disease (DKD).. We performed a randomized parallel study encompassing 4 general hospitals. T2DM patients with an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) ≥30 mL/min/1.73 m2 and macroalbuminuria, defined as 24-h urinary albumin excretion rate (UAER) >0.3 g/24 h were randomized 1:1 to receive exenatide twice daily plus insulin glargine (intervention group) or insulin lispro plus glargine (control group) for 24 weeks. The primary outcome was the UAER percentage change from the baseline after 24 weeks of intervention. The rates of hypoglycemia, adverse events (AEs), and change in eGFR during the follow-up were measured as safety outcomes.. Between March 2016 and April 2019, 92 patients were randomized and took at least 1 dose of the study drug. The mean age of the participants was 56 years. At baseline, the median UAER was 1,512.0 mg/24 h and mean eGFR was 70.4 mL/min/1.73 m2. After 24 weeks of treatment, the UAER percentage change was significantly lower in the intervention group than in the control group (p = 0.0255). Moreover, the body weight declined by 1.3 kg in the intervention group (the difference between the 2 groups was 2.7 kg, p = 0.0001). Compared to the control group, a lower frequency of hypoglycemia and more gastrointestinal AEs were observed in the intervention group.. Exenatide plus insulin glargine treatment for 24 weeks resulted in a reduction of albuminuria in T2DM patients with DKD.

Topics: Albuminuria; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Diabetic Nephropathies; Disease Progression; Drug Therapy, Combination; Exenatide; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine; Male; Middle Aged; Treatment Outcome

Type 2 diabetes mellitus is closely related to nonalcoholic fatty liver disease(NAFLD). More and more attention has been paid to the efficacy of liraglutide in the treatment of NAFLD, but the clinical evidence is still insufficient.. The purpose of this study was to use proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy (H-MRS) assessment of metformin alone poor blood glucose control of obese patients type 2 diabetes with NAFLD, added with insulin glargine, liraglutide or placebo effect in improving the fatty liver.. This is a 26-week, single-center, prospective, randomized placebo-controlled study. From September 2016 to July 2018, 128 patients with type 2 diabetes and NAFLD were enrolled in the China joint logistics team 900 hospital. The primary endpoints were the changes in intrahepatic content of lipid (IHCL), abdominal adiposity [subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT) and visceral adipose tissue (VAT)], from baseline to week 26 (end of treatment) and the changes in liraglutide group or insulin glargine group versus change in placebo group. Secondary endpoints included the changes in liver function (AST and ALT), glycemia (HbA1c and FPG), body weight, and BMI.. A total of 96 patients with type 2 diabetes and NAFLD under inadequate glycemic control by metformin were randomized (1:1:1) to receive add-on insulin glargine, liraglutide, or placebo. After 26 weeks of treatment, compared to the placebo group, in the liraglutide and insulin glargine groups, IHCL significantly decreased from baseline to week 26 (liraglutide 26.4% ± 3.2% to 20.6% ± 3.9%, P < 0.05; insulin glargine 25.0% ± 4.3% to 22.6% ± 5.8%, P > 0.05). SAT and VAT decreased significantly in the liraglutide group and in the insulin glargine group (P < 0.05). ΔSAT and ΔVAT were greater with liraglutide than insulin glargine, they were significantly different between the two groups (ΔSAT, -36 vs. - 24.5, P < 0.05; and ΔVAT, -47 vs. - 16.6, P > 0.05). In the liraglutide group, AST, ALT, and HOMA-IR decreased significantly from baseline. There was no significant difference in glucose-lowering among the three groups. During the treatment, the safety of the three groups performed well.. Compared with placebo, treatment with liraglutide plus an adequate dose of metformin (2000 g/ day) for 26 weeks is more effective in reducing IHCL, SAT and VAT in patients with type 2 diabetes and NAFLD. And it has additional advantages in weight loss, waist circumference reduction and liver function improvement.

Topics: Adult; Blood Glucose; Body Weight; China; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine; Intra-Abdominal Fat; Liraglutide; Liver; Male; Metformin; Middle Aged; Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease; Obesity; Prospective Studies; Subcutaneous Fat; Treatment Outcome; Weight Loss

To explore the impact of baseline characteristics on clinical outcomes in the phase 3 LixiLan JP trials which evaluated the efficacy and safety of iGlarLixi, a titratable fixed-ratio combination of insulin glargine 100 units/mL (iGlar) and GLP-1 RA lixisenatide (Lixi), vs Lixi (JP-O1, NCT02749890) or iGlar (LixiLan JP-O2, NCT02752828; JP-L, NCT02752412) in Japanese people with type 2 diabetes uncontrolled on oral antidiabetes drugs (OADs; JP-O1, JP-O2) or OADs and basal insulin (JP-L).. HbA1c reductions were consistently greater with iGlarLixi vs iGlar or Lixi across all subgroups, and iGlarLixi was equally effective in all subgroups. Incidences of documented symptomatic hypoglycaemia (plasma glucose ≤3.9 mmol/L) were higher with iGlarLixi vs Lixi and generally comparable with iGlar. Across age subgroups, incidences of gastrointestinal disorders with iGlarLixi were higher vs iGlar, but lower vs Lixi. Median time to HbA1c or FPG control was shorter with iGlarLixi vs iGlar.. iGlarLixi was consistently effective across all baseline characteristic subgroups, with more patients achieving glycaemic control vs iGlar early in treatment.

Topics: Aged; Blood Glucose; Child, Preschool; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Combinations; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Infant; Insulin Glargine; Japan; Peptides

Older people with type 2 diabetes (T2DM) are at an increased risk of hypoglycaemia and its consequences. However, efficacy and safety data for basal insulin therapy are limited in these individuals. This patient-level meta-analysis assessed the treatment effects of insulin glargine 300 U/mL (Gla-300) versus glargine 100 U/mL (Gla-100) in people with T2DM ≥ 65 years old.. Data were pooled for patients randomised to receive Gla-300 or Gla-100 in the Phase 3a, treat-to-target EDITION 1, 2 and 3 trials. Glycaemic efficacy, hypoglycaemia, changes in body weight and insulin dosage and adverse events were examined over 6 months' treatment with Gla-300 versus Gla-100 for participants aged ≥ 65 and < 65 years.. Gla-300 was associated with a reduced risk of nocturnal hypoglycaemia versus Gla-100, accompanied by comparable glycaemic improvement, for people aged ≥ 65 and < 65 years with T2DM.

Topics: Adult; Age Factors; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Glycemic Control; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine; Male; Middle Aged

There is no established insulin regimen in T2DM patients receiving parenteral nutrition.. To compare the effectiveness (metabolic control) and safety of two insulin regimens in patients with diabetes receiving TPN.. Prospective, open-label, multicenter, clinical trial on adult inpatients with type 2 diabetes on a non-critical setting with indication for TPN. Patients were randomized on one of these two regimens: 100% of RI on TPN or 50% of Regular insulin added to TPN bag and 50% subcutaneous GI. Data were analyzed according to intention-to-treat principle.. 81 patients were on RI and 80 on GI. No differences were observed in neither average total daily dose of insulin, programmed or correction, nor in capillary mean blood glucose during TPN infusion (165.3 ± 35.4 in RI vs 172.5 ± 43.6 mg/dL in GI; p = 0.25). Mean capillary glucose was significantly lower in the GI group within two days after TPN interruption (160.3 ± 45.1 in RI vs 141.7 ± 43.8 mg/dL in GI; p = 0.024). The percentage of capillary glucose above 180 mg/dL was similar in both groups. The rate of capillary glucose ≤70 mg/dL, the number of hypoglycemic episodes per 100 days of TPN, and the percentage of patients with non-severe hypoglycemia were significantly higher on GI group. No severe hypoglycemia was detected. No differences were observed in length of stay, infectious complications, or hospital mortality.. Effectiveness of both regimens was similar. GI group achieved better metabolic control after TPN interruption but non-severe hypoglycemia rate was higher in the GI group.. This trial is registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT02706119.

Topics: Aged; Combined Modality Therapy; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Female; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Injections, Subcutaneous; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Male; Parenteral Nutrition, Total; Prospective Studies; Spain; Treatment Outcome

Diabetic dyslipidaemia is a major risk factor for accelerated atherosclerosis. Glycaemic treatments that improve dyslipidaemia may help reduce the burden of atherosclerosis. This analysis investigated the effect of iGlarLixi [insulin glargine U100 (iGlar) and lixisenatide] versus iGlar on lipid profiles in patients with type 2 diabetes uncontrolled on basal insulin. Data from LixiLan-L were used to estimate changes in fasting lipid levels from baseline to week 30, overall and in patients stratified by achievement of glycaemic targets {2-hour postprandial glucose [≤10, >10 mmoL/L], fasting plasma glucose [≤6.1, >6.1 mmoL/L], HbA1c [≤7, >7% (≤53, >53 mmol/mol)]}. At week 30, median percentage change in triglycerides remained nearly unchanged (0.3% increase) with iGlarLixi versus a 6.5% increase with iGlar (P = 0.035; overall); similarly, trends towards better total and LDL cholesterol levels were observed with iGlarLixi versus iGlar. In patient subgroups achieving glycaemic targets, all lipid variables except for HDL cholesterol improved with iGlarLixi but not with iGlar. In summary, patients with type 2 diabetes uncontrolled on basal insulin showed improved fasting lipid profiles with iGlarLixi compared with iGlar, particularly when achieving glycaemic targets.

Topics: Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine; Lipids; Peptides

Heart failure (HF) is a common cardiovascular complication of type 2 diabetes (T2D). This secondary analysis investigated baseline factors and treatment differences associated with risk of hospitalization for HF (hHF), and the possible association between severe hypoglycemia and hHF.. DEVOTE was a treat-to-target, double-blind cardiovascular outcomes trial in patients (n = 7637) with T2D and high cardiovascular risk randomized to insulin degludec (degludec) or insulin glargine 100 units/mL (glargine U100). The main endpoint of this secondary analysis was time to first hHF (standardized MedDRA Query definition). Severe hypoglycemia was adjudicated (American Diabetes Association definition). The main endpoint and the temporal association between severe hypoglycemia and hHF were analyzed with a Cox proportional hazards regression model. Predictors of time to first hHF were identified using baseline variables.. Overall, 372 (4.9%) patients experienced hHF (550 events). There was no significant difference in the risk of hHF between treatments (hazard ratio [HR] 0.88 [0.72;1.08]. In patients with T2D and high cardiovascular risk there were no treatment differences in terms of hHF. Prior HF was the strongest predictor of future hHF events, and there was an association between severe hypoglycemia and subsequent hHF. Further research should evaluate whether the risk of hHF can be modified by treatments aimed at reducing hypoglycemia. Trial Registration NCT01959529.

Topics: Aged; Biomarkers; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Disease Progression; Double-Blind Method; Female; Heart Failure; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Middle Aged; Patient Admission; Prospective Studies; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

In 2013, a randomized, double-blind, active comparator-controlled, event-driven cardiovascular outcomes trial (DEVOTE) was initiated to compare the cardiovascular safety of insulin degludec (degludec) versus insulin glargine 100 units/mL (glargine U100) in patients with type 2 diabetes at high risk of cardiovascular events. The FDA agreed that an interim analysis could form the basis for an early regulatory approval. We report here the operational model developed to support the DEVOTE interim analysis and the results.. The interim analysis model was designed to reduce the risk of any confidentiality breaches. The Data Access Management Plan comprehensively described the interim analysis operational processes and procedures to maintain the integrity of the ongoing trial while the interim analysis was conducted, submitted, and acted upon by the FDA, and also until completion of the full trial. Most importantly, those who were unblinded to the interim results were limited to a team of 14 members.. A total of 150 first major adverse cardiovascular events were recorded at cut-off for the interim analysis. The estimated hazard ratio was 0.92 (95% CI 0.67, 1.27) and non-inferiority to glargine U100 was confirmed as the upper bound of the confidence interval was below 1.8, as prespecified. Based on these results, the FDA approved the use of degludec and degludec/insulin aspart (IDegAsp) in the United States in 2015 before trial completion.. The DEVOTE interim analysis succeeded as a model by which to conduct an interim analysis and submit confidential data for regulatory review and action while continuing the trial to address a primary hypothesis.

Topics: Cardiovascular System; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Double-Blind Method; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Treatment Outcome

Compared with glargine 100 U/mL (Gla100), glargine 300 U/mL (Gla300) and degludec (Deg) - the ultralong-acting insulins - reportedly have more stable effects and reduce the risk of hypoglycemia. Currently, they are considered to be the most useful basal insulins. The present study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of Gla300 and Deg on glycemic control using continuous glucose monitoring.. In this single-center, open-label, parallel-group, two-period, cross-over study, 30 patients with type 2 diabetes were randomized to once-daily Gla300 followed by Deg with the same units (n = 15) or vice versa (n = 15). The primary end-points of this study were the mean percentage of time within the target glucose range of 70-180 mg/dL as efficacy and hypoglycemia of <70 mg/dL as safety indicators, as measured using continuous glucose monitoring during each treatment period.. The mean percentage of time within the target glucose range was not different between Gla300 and Deg (77.8 ± 19.2 vs 76.9 ± 18.3%, P = 0.848). However, the mean percentage of time of hypoglycemia with Gla300 was significantly lower than that of Deg (1.3 ± 2.7 vs 5.5 ± 6.4%, P = 0.002). In the secondary safety end-points, the mean percentage of time of severe hypoglycemia (<54 mg/dL) or nocturnal hypoglycemia with Gla300 was also significantly lower than that of Deg.. The present study showed the comparable efficacy of Gla300 and Deg on glycemic control; however, the risk of hypoglycemia was markedly lower for Gla300 than for Deg.

Topics: Aged; Biomarkers; Blood Glucose; Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring; Cross-Over Studies; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Prognosis; Safety

Degludec is a long-acting insulin with a longer duration of action and a greater day-to-day reproducibility of absorption in comparison with previous long-acting insulin formulations. The aim is the definition of the change in insulin needs in patients switching from detemir/glargine to degludec in real-life conditions.. In this retrospective cohort observational study, all outpatients with either type 1 or type 2 diabetes, starting therapy with degludec insulin-after a prior treatment with either detemir or glargine insulin for at least 6 months-were included.. The analysis was performed on 266 patients, 172 and 96 with type 1 and type 2 diabetes, respectively. The equations describing the relationship between baseline and follow-up doses of basal insulin (6 months) were Y = 3.39 + 0.78X and Y = 0.44 + 0.69X, in patients receiving detemir/glargine either once or twice daily, respectively (Y = degludec dose at 6 months and X = basal insulin dose at switch). The corresponding equations for prandial insulin doses were y = 1.83 + 0.83*x and y = 2.85 + 0.80*x for those on pre-switch once or twice-daily basal insulin, respectively. In type 2 diabetes, the switch was associated with a reduction of basal insulin doses only in those with a prior twice-daily treatment with basal insulin. The reduction of prandial insulin reached statistical significance only in patients previously treated with basal insulin once daily.. The present results provide a suggestion for a simple method for the adjustment of basal and prandial insulin doses in type 1 diabetic patients, switching from glargine or detemir to degludec.

Topics: Adult; Biomarkers; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Middle Aged; Prognosis; Retrospective Studies

We compared the efficacy and safety of insulin glargine 300 U/mL (Gla300) and insulin degludec U100 (Deg) using a flash glucose monitoring system.. A total of 24 Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes were randomized to receive once-daily Gla300 (n = 12) or Deg (n = 12) in the morning. The primary end-points were the mean percentage of time in the target glucose range (70-179 mg/dL) and hypoglycemia (<70 mg/dL), as measured using flash glucose monitoring during the last 7 days of each 14-day period.. The percentages of time with glucose levels <70 mg/dL were not significantly different between the two insulin treatments. No significant differences were observed in the percentages of time with glucose levels of 70-179 mg/dL or ≥180 mg/dL. The percentage of time with nocturnal hypoglycemia with Gla300 was significantly lower than that with Deg treatment (P = 0.021). This difference might be attributable to the difference in the duration of action between the two formulations, and the incidence of nocturnal hypoglycemia with Deg treatment was associated with the concomitant use of metformin (P = 0.035).. The two formulations were comparable in efficacy, whereas the incidence of nocturnal hypoglycemia was significantly lower with Gla300. Thus, the present study suggests that, although Gla300 and Deg are comparable long-acting insulin analogs, Gla300 is safer with respect to the incidence of hypoglycemia.

Topics: Aged; Biomarkers; Blood Glucose; Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring; Cross-Over Studies; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Prognosis

To assess the non-inferiority of MYL-1501D, a proposed biosimilar or follow-on biological agent to marketed insulin glargine, to reference insulin glargine (Lantus®; Sanofi-Aventis US LLC, Bridgewater, New Jersey) based on change in glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c).. INSTRIDE 2 was a multicentre, open-label, randomized, parallel-group, phase III non-inferiority study comparing the efficacy and safety of MYL-1501D with those of reference insulin glargine in insulin-naive and insulin-non-naive patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus receiving oral antidiabetic drugs (OADs). The primary efficacy endpoint was change in HbA1c from baseline to week 24. Secondary endpoints included metabolic readouts (eg, changes in fasting plasma glucose, insulin dosage, self-monitored blood glucose), immunogenicity and adverse events, including hypoglycaemia and nocturnal hypoglycaemic events.. In all, 560 patients were randomized to MYL-1501D or insulin glargine in combination with OADs for 24 weeks. The mean change in HbA1c from baseline to week 24 was -0.60% (95% CI -0.78, -0.41) and - 0.66% (95% CI -0.84, -0.48) for MYL-1501D and reference insulin glargine, respectively. MYL-1501D was well tolerated and had a safety profile similar to that of reference insulin glargine.. Demonstration of non-inferiority between MYL-1501D and reference insulin glargine for reduction of HbA1c during 24 weeks of treatment was achieved. The two treatment groups were similar in terms of secondary endpoints, including hypoglycaemia and nocturnal hypoglycaemia, local and systemic reactions, other safety variables, and immunogenicity.

Topics: Biosimilar Pharmaceuticals; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine; Male; Middle Aged

To compare the efficacy and safety of once-weekly dulaglutide with that of insulin glargine in combination with metformin and/or a sulphonylurea in mainly Asian patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).. In this 52-week, randomized, parallel-arm open-label study, we enrolled patients aged ≥18 years with T2DM for at least 6 months and a glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) concentration ≥53.0 mmol/mol (7.0%) and ≤96.7 mmol/mol (11.0%). The primary outcome was change in HbA1c from baseline to week 26 to determine non-inferiority of dulaglutide 1.5 mg versus glargine.. A total of 774 patients from China, South Korea, Mexico and Russia were randomly assigned (1:1:1) to dulaglutide 1.5 mg, dulaglutide 0.75 mg or glargine treatment groups. The patients' mean age was 55 years and the average T2DM duration was ~8 years. The least squares mean (SE) changes from baseline in HbA1c at 26 weeks were - 18.9 (0.73) mmol/mol (-1.73 [0.067]%) for dulaglutide 1.5 mg and -14.5 (0.73) mmol/mol (-1.33 [0.067]%) for dulaglutide 0.75 mg, compared with -12.7 (0.73) mmol/mol (-1.16 [0.067]%) for glargine. Statistical criteria for superiority were met with both dulaglutide 1.5 mg and dulaglutide 0.75 mg. More patients in the dulaglutide 1.5 and 0.75 mg groups achieved HbA1c target <53.0 mmol/mol (<7.0%) than in the glargine group at week 26 (P < 0.001 and P = 0.004, respectively). Body weight decreased with dulaglutide and increased with glargine. The incidence and rate of total hypoglycaemia were lower with dulaglutide versus glargine. Gastrointestinal adverse events, including diarrhoea and nausea, were the most frequently reported for patients taking dulaglutide.. Once-weekly dulaglutide provides greater improvement in HbA1c, with weight loss and less hypoglycaemia, than once-daily insulin glargine in a population of mainly Asian patients with T2DM who had failed to achieve optimal glycaemic control on metformin and/or a sulphonylurea.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Asian People; Blood Glucose; China; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Glucagon-Like Peptides; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Immunoglobulin Fc Fragments; Insulin Glargine; Male; Metformin; Mexico; Middle Aged; Recombinant Fusion Proteins; Republic of Korea; Russia; Sulfonylurea Compounds; Treatment Outcome

To investigate efficacy, safety and usability of the GlucoTab system for glycaemic management using insulin glargine U300 in non-critically ill hospitalized patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D).. In this open, non-controlled single-arm pilot study, glycaemic control at the general ward of a tertiary care hospital was guided by a mobile decision support system (GlucoTab) for basal-bolus insulin dosing using the novel basal insulin analogue insulin glargine U300 for the first time. Glycaemic control was surveilled with capillary glucose measurements and continuous glucose monitoring (CGM). The primary endpoint was efficacy of glycaemic management, defined as the percentage of blood glucose measurements within the target range of 3.9 to 7.8 mmol/L.. Treatment with GlucoTab using insulin glargine U300 in hospitalized patients with T2D is effective and safe.

Topics: Aged; Algorithms; Blood Glucose; Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring; Decision Support Techniques; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Dosage Calculations; Female; Hospitalization; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Insulin Glargine; Insulin Infusion Systems; Male; Middle Aged; Mobile Applications; Pilot Projects; Risk Factors

To investigate the effect of antidiabetic agents on nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), 75 patients with T2DM and NAFLD under inadequate glycemic control by metformin were randomized (1:1:1) to receive add-on liraglutide, sitagliptin, or insulin glargine in this 26-week trial. The primary endpoint was the change in intrahepatic lipid (IHL) from baseline to week 26 as quantified by magnetic resonance imaging-estimated proton density fat fraction (MRI-PDFF). Secondary endpoints included changes in abdominal adiposity (subcutaneous adipose tissue [SAT] and visceral adipose tissue [VAT]), glycated hemoglobin, and body weight from baseline to week 26. We analysed data from intent-to-treat population. MRI-PDFF, VAT, and weight decreased significantly with liraglutide (15.4% ± 5.6% to 12.5% ± 6.4%, P < 0.001; 171.4 ± 27.8 to 150.5 ± 30.8, P = 0.003; 86.6 ± 12.9 kg to 82.9 ± 11.1 kg, P = 0.005, respectively) and sitagliptin (15.5% ± 5.6% to 11.7% ± 5.0%, P = 0.001; 153.4 ± 31.5 to 139.8 ± 27.3, P = 0.027; 88.2 ± 13.6 kg to 86.5 ± 13.2 kg, P = 0.005, respectively). No significant change in MRI-PDFF, VAT, or body weight was observed with insulin glargine. SAT decreased significantly in the liraglutide group (239.9 ± 69.0 to 211.3 ± 76.1; P = 0.020) but not in the sitagliptin and insulin glargine groups. Changes from baseline in MRI-PDFF, VAT, and body weight were significantly greater with liraglutide than insulin glargine but did not differ significantly between liraglutide and sitagliptin. Conclusion: Combined with metformin, both liraglutide and sitagliptin, but not insulin glargine, reduced body weight, IHL, and VAT in addition to improving glycemic control in patients with T2DM and NAFLD.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Blood Glucose; Body Weight; Comorbidity; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine; Linear Models; Lipid Metabolism; Liraglutide; Male; Metformin; Middle Aged; Multivariate Analysis; Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease; Prognosis; Prospective Studies; Sitagliptin Phosphate; Treatment Outcome

The efficacy and safety of insulin degludec/liraglutide (IDegLira) in older patients has not yet been reported. This analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of IDegLira in patients aged ≥65 years.. A post hoc analysis compared results of patients aged ≥65 versus <65 years from DUAL II, III, and V. These were 26-week, phase 3, randomized, twoarm parallel, treat-to-target trials in patients already taking injectable glucose-lowering agents. We evaluated 311 patients aged <65 and 87 patients aged ≥65 years from DUAL II, 326 patients <65 years and 112 patients ≥65 years from DUAL III, and 412 patients <65 years and 145 patients ≥65 years from DUAL V. Patients were randomized to IDegLira or insulin degludec (DUAL II), IDegLira or unchanged glucagon-like peptide 1-receptor agonist (GLP-1RA) (DUAL III), or IDegLira or IGlar U100 (DUAL V).. In patients ≥65 years, hemoglobin A1C decreased to a greater extent with IDegLira than with comparators (estimated treatment differences, -1.0% [-1.5; -0.6]. Patients aged ≥65 years on basal insulin or GLP-1RA can improve glycemic control with IDegLira, and it is well tolerated overall.. A1C = hemoglobin A1C; AE = adverse event; CI = confidence interval; Degludec = insulin degludec; EOT = end of trial; ETD = estimated treatment difference; FPG = fasting plasma glucose; GLP-1RA = glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonist; IDegLira = insulin degludec/liraglutide; IGlar U100 = insulin glargine 100 U/mL; SU = sulfonylurea; T2D = type 2 diabetes.

Topics: Aged; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Combinations; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Liraglutide

To compare the effects of continuing versus discontinuing sitagliptin when initiating and intensively titrating insulin glargine.. Eligible patients had inadequately controlled type 2 diabetes on metformin (≥1500 mg/d) in combination with a dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitor and/or a sulphonylurea. Those on metformin + sitagliptin were directly randomized; all others were switched to metformin + sitagliptin (discontinuing other DPP-4 inhibitors and sulphonylureas) and stabilized during a run-in period. At randomization, patients were allocated to continuing sitagliptin or discontinuing sitagliptin, with both groups initiating insulin glargine and titrating to a target fasting glucose of 4.0 to 5.6 mmol/L.. A total of 743 participants (mean glycated haemoglobin [HbA1c] 72.6 mmol/mol [8.8%], disease duration 10.8 years), were treated. After 30 weeks, the mean HbA1c and least squares (LS) mean change from baseline in HbA1c were 51.4 mmol/mol (6.85%) and -20.5 mmol/mol (-1.88%) in the sitagliptin group and 56.4 mmol/mol (7.31%) and -15.5 mmol/mol (-1.42%) in the placebo group; the difference in LS mean changes from baseline HbA1c was -5.0 mmol/mol (-0.46%; P < 0.001). The percentage of participants with HbA1c <53 mmol/mol (<7.0%) was higher (54% vs. 35%) and the mean daily insulin dose was lower (53 vs. 61 units) in the sitagliptin group. Despite lower HbA1c, event rates and incidences of hypoglycaemia were not higher in the sitagliptin group. Adverse events overall and changes from baseline in body weight were similar between the two treatment groups.. When initiating insulin glargine therapy, continuation of sitagliptin, compared with discontinuation, resulted in a clinically meaningful greater reduction in HbA1c without an increase in hypoglycaemia. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02738879.

Topics: Aged; Deprescriptions; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine; Least-Squares Analysis; Male; Metformin; Middle Aged; Sitagliptin Phosphate; Treatment Outcome

Basal insulin therapy often involves a compromise between achievement of glycaemic targets and avoidance of hypoglycaemia, dependent on how intensively insulin is titrated. In the Phase 3a EDITION 1, 2 and 3 studies, insulin glargine 300 U/mL (Gla-300) provided glycaemic control equivalent to that of insulin glargine 100 U/mL (Gla-100), with less hypoglycaemia in individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). The current study evaluated the rates of confirmed (≤3.9 mmol/L [≤70 mg/dL]) or severe hypoglycaemia over six months of treatment with Gla-300 or Gla-100 in the EDITION studies, as a function of HbA1c. Analysis was performed on patient-level data pooled from the three EDITION studies, and annualized hypoglycaemia rate as a function of HbA1c at Month 6 was fitted using a negative binomial regression model. Participants treated with Gla-300 experienced a consistently lower rate of confirmed (≤3.9 mmol/L [≤70 mg/dL]) or severe hypoglycaemia as compared with those treated with Gla-100, regardless of HbA1c at Month 6. Results suggest that treatment with Gla-300 vs Gla-100 could allow individuals with T2DM to achieve equivalent glycaemic control with less hypoglycaemia.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Insulin Glargine; Intention to Treat Analysis; Male; Metformin; Middle Aged; Young Adult

Maintaining optimal glycaemic control reduces the risk of micro- and macrovascular complications in patients with type 2 diabetes. Typically, glycaemic control is based on glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) as a measure of mean glucose concentration; however, this marker does not accurately reflect glycaemic variability (GV), which is characterized by the amplitude, frequency and duration of hypo- and hyperglycaemic fluctuations. In the present study, we analysed data from the LixiLan-O trial, which compared iGlarLixi, a titratable fixed-ratio combination of the glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist lixisenatide (Lixi) and long-acting basal insulin glargine 100 units/mL (iGlar), with its individual components, and the LixiLan-L trial, which compared iGlarLixi with iGlar. The GV features that were measured were mean and SD of self-measured plasma glucose (SMPG), high blood glucose index (HBGI) and low blood glucose index, area under the SMPG curve for each patient (AUCn), mean absolute glucose (MAG) and mean amplitude of glycaemic excursions (MAGE). By week 30, iGlarLixi improved all GV markers from baseline, with no increased hypoglycaemia risk. Significant improvements were observed in SMPG, SD of SMPG, HBGI, AUCn, MAG and MAGE compared with iGlar, and in SMPG, HBGI and AUCn, compared with Lixi.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Combinations; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Insulin Glargine; Male; Middle Aged; Peptides; Retrospective Studies

To confirm non-inferiority of insulin degludec/insulin aspart (IDegAsp) once-daily (OD) versus insulin glargine (IGlar) U100 OD + insulin aspart (IAsp) OD for HbA. A 38-week, randomised, open-label, treat-to-target (HbA. For W0-W26, mean percentage-change (standard deviation) HbA. IDegAsp OD/BID are effective treatment intensification options versus multiple injection basal-bolus therapies, achieving similar glycaemic control, with significantly less nocturnal hypoglycaemia.

Topics: Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Female; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Aspart; Insulin Glargine; Male; Middle Aged

The use of incretin-based therapy, rather than or complementary to, insulin therapy is an active area of research in hospitalized patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D). We determined the glycaemic efficacy and safety of linagliptin compared to a basal-bolus insulin regimen in hospitalized surgical patients with T2D.. This prospective open-label multicentre study randomized T2D patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery with admission blood glucose (BG) of 7.8 to 22.2 mmol/L who were under treatment with diet, oral agents or total insulin dose (TDD) ≤ 0.5 units/kg/day to either linagliptin (n = 128) daily or basal-bolus (n = 122) with glargine once daily and rapid-acting insulin before meals. Both groups received supplemental insulin for BG > 7.8 mmol/L. The primary endpoint was difference in mean daily BG between groups.. Mean daily BG was higher in the linagliptin group compared to the basal-bolus group (9.5 ± 2.6 vs 8.8 ± 2.3 mmol/L/dL, P = 0.03) with a mean daily BG difference of 0.6 mmol/L (95% confidence interval 0.04, 1.2). In patients with randomization BG < 11.1 mmol/L (63% of cohort), mean daily BG was similar in the linagliptin and basal-bolus groups (8.9 ± 2.3 vs 8.7 ± 2.3 mmol/L, P = 0.43); however, patients with BG ≥ 11.1 mmol/L who were treated with linagliptin had higher BG compared to the basal-bolus group (10.9 ± 2.6 vs 9.2 ± 2.2 mmol/L, P < 0.001). Linagliptin resulted in fewer hypoglycaemic events (1.6% vs 11%, P = 0.001; 86% relative risk reduction), with similar supplemental insulin and fewer daily insulin injections (2.0 ± 3.3 vs 3.1 ± 3.3, P < 0.001) compared to the basal-bolus group.. For patients with T2D undergoing non-cardiac surgery who presented with mild to moderate hyperglycaemia (BG < 11.1 mmol/L), daily linagliptin is a safe and effective alternative to multi-dose insulin therapy, resulting in similar glucose control with lower hypoglycaemia.

Topics: Aged; Amputation, Surgical; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Digestive System Surgical Procedures; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Gynecologic Surgical Procedures; Hospitalization; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Short-Acting; Linagliptin; Male; Middle Aged; Orthopedic Procedures; Perioperative Care; Surgical Procedures, Operative; Treatment Outcome; Urologic Surgical Procedures

This post-hoc analysis of the DURATION-3 study aimed to identify factors associated with sustained glycaemic response with exenatide once weekly (QW) or insulin glargine (IG) among patients with type 2 diabetes. Response was defined as achieving treatment target of HbA1c <7.0% (<53 mmol/mol) at Week 26; sustained responders maintained the treatment target for ≥80% of remaining visits, including one during the final 6 months. Of 467 patients, 287 (61.5%) completed 156 weeks of treatment. At Week 26, 175 patients (61.0%) (exenatide QW, n = 95; IG, n = 80) achieved an HbA1c response. At Week 156, 84 of 175 responders (48.0%) had sustained response, with more sustained responders with exenatide QW (22.7% vs 13.9% with IG; P < 0.03). Logistic regression identified three predictors of sustained response: (a) exenatide QW vs IG treatment (odds ratio, 2.584 [95% confidence interval, 1.288-5.187]; P = 0.0075), (b) lower HbA1c at Week 26 (0.139 [0.053-0.366]; P < 0.0001), and (c) lower fasting serum glucose at Week 26 (0.693 [0.541-0.888]; P = 0.0037). A regression model was used to estimate the likelihood of sustained response with either treatment. This analysis provides a helpful tool for predicting sustained response with exenatide QW or IG.

Topics: Aged; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Administration Schedule; Exenatide; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine; Logistic Models; Male; Middle Aged; Prognosis; Treatment Outcome

This study assessed the efficacy and safety of iGlarLixi (a titratable, fixed-ratio combination of insulin glargine [iGlar] plus lixisenatide) in older patients with type 2 diabetes.. This post hoc analysis used patient-level data from patients aged ≥65 years from the phase III LixiLan-O and LixiLan-L studies, which compared iGlarLixi with iGlar and lixisenatide (LixiLan-O only). Efficacy endpoints were changes in glycated hemoglobin A1C, fasting plasma glucose, postprandial glucose, weight, and achievement of A1C <7.0% (53 mmol/mol). Safety measures included incidence of documented symptomatic hypoglycemia (defined as typical symptoms of hypoglycemia plus self-measured plasma glucose ≤70 mg/dL [3.9 mmol/L]), severe hypoglycemia (requiring assistance of another person), and incidence of gastrointestinal adverse events. Results were compared with those from patients aged <65 years.. In both trials, older patients treated with iGlarLixi achieved significantly greater reductions in A1C at Week 30 than comparators. Treatment with iGlarLixi mitigated insulin-associated weight gain and lixisenatide-associated gastrointestinal events. Results were largely comparable between patients aged ≥65 versus <65 years.. iGlarLixi provides significant improvements in glycemic control in patients aged ≥65 years without increasing hypoglycemia risk. As a once-daily injection, it simplifies treatment regimens and may contribute to improved adherence in this patient population.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Blood Glucose; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Combinations; Fasting; Gastrointestinal Diseases; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine; Peptides; Postprandial Period

The efficacy/safety of device-supported versus routine titration with Gla-300 in type 2 diabetes (T2DM) was evaluated.. AUTOMATIX was a 16-week, randomized, open-label, parallel-group, multicenter, noninferiority trial in insulin-treated or insulin-naïve people with T2DM. The fasting self-monitored plasma glucose (FSMPG) target was 90-130 mg/dL (5.0-7.2 mmol/L). Primary endpoint: proportion of participants achieving target FSMPG at week 16 without severe hypoglycemia. Secondary endpoints included: proportion reaching FSMPG target without confirmed (≤70 mg/dL [≤3.9 mmol/L]) or severe hypoglycemia; time to first achieve FSMPG target; mean FSMPG and HbA1c change (baseline to week 16). Safety endpoints included hypoglycemia and adverse events. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) were also assessed.. Device-supported self-titration had a good safety/efficacy profile, and was noninferior to routine titration and well accepted by diabetes specialists and patients.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Blood Glucose; Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Female; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine; Male; Middle Aged

The goal of this study was to investigate the long-term economic outcomes of insulin degludec versus insulin glargine use in Chinese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) whose oral antidiabetic drugs did not provide sufficient glycemic control.. A published and validated Chinese diabetes health policy model, which reflects Chinese T2DM epidemiologic profiles, was used to assess the lifetime economic outcomes of microvascular and macrovascular complications and mortality. Efficacy and safety, medical expenditure, and utility data were derived from the literature, which were assigned to model variables for estimating the quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) and costs, as well as incremental cost-effectiveness ratios. The analysis was conducted from the perspective of Chinese health care service providers. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed.. Compared with insulin glargine, insulin degludec was associated with 0.0053 QALY at an additional cost of $3278 in our simulated cohort. This outcome resulted in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of insulin degludec over insulin glargine of $613,443 per QALY gained. The one-way sensitivity analyses indicated that the results were sensitive to several model inputs.. Insulin degludec is unlikely to be cost-effective compared with insulin glargine for Chinese patients with T2DM whose disease is inadequately controlled with oral antidiabetic drugs.

Topics: Asian People; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Quality-Adjusted Life Years

Insulin-treated patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) and obesity are challenged in achieving body weight stability or reduction, in addition to glycaemic control. Post-hoc analyses of body weight and insulin dose data from the AWARD-4 trial involved comparison of treatment with once-weekly dulaglutide 1.5 mg (N = 295) or 0.75 mg (N = 293) and treatment with daily insulin glargine (N = 296), each with prandial insulin lispro (± metformin).. Changes in weight and in the proportion of patients without weight gain or with weight loss of at least 3%, 5% or 10% or composites of HbA1c less than 7% without weight gain and weight loss of at least 3% after 52 weeks were compared between the dulaglutide (either dose) groups and the insulin glargine group, overall and by baseline BMI (<30, 30-<35, ≥35 kg/m. The following parameters were statistically significant (P < 0.01) in favour of the dulaglutide-treated groups, at lower mean total daily insulin doses, vs the insulin glargine group. The achieved targets were more pronounced with dulaglutide 1.5 mg than with insulin glargine: LSM weight change difference, -3.23 kg; proportion of patients without weight gain, 49.0% vs 19.0%; proportion of patients with weight loss ≥3%, 21.7% vs 5.7% or with weight loss ≥5%, 10.5% vs 2.4%; proportion of patients with HbA1c <7% without weight gain, 26.2% vs 7.9%; proportion of patients with HbA1c <7% and weight loss ≥3%, 11.9% vs 1.4%, respectively. Treatment effect for these parameters was not significantly different across BMI categories.. Larger proportions of patients in late-stage T2D needing treatment intensification achieved glycemic control without weight gain or with weight loss at lower insulin doses with once-weekly dulaglutide plus daily prandial insulin than with a basal-bolus insulin regimen, overall and across all three BMI subgroups.

Topics: Aged; Body Mass Index; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Double-Blind Method; Female; Glucagon-Like Peptides; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Immunoglobulin Fc Fragments; Insulin Glargine; Insulin Lispro; Male; Middle Aged; Recombinant Fusion Proteins; Weight Loss

The impact of insulin or omega-3 supplements on the incidence and progression of peripheral artery disease (PAD) in patients with dysglycaemia has not been well studied. The Outcome Reduction with an Initial Glargine INtervention (ORIGIN) trial randomized participants with dysglycaemia and cardiovascular risk factors to titrated insulin glargine vs standard care, and to either 1 g of omega-3 per day or placebo. We assessed incident PAD, defined as the composite of either asymptomatic or symptomatic PAD according to the randomized interventions in the 11 119 ORIGIN participants whose baseline ankle-brachial index (ABI) was >0.9 (no PAD), and PAD progression in the 971 ORIGIN participants whose baseline ABI was ≤0.9. Hazard ratios (HR) were adjusted for confounders. During a 6.2-year follow-up period, allocation to insulin glargine vs standard care had a neutral effect on the composite of PAD incidence (HR, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.86-1.15) and progression (HR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.63-1.22). Similar findings were noted for allocation to omega-3 vs placebo for PAD incidence (HR, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.89-1.18) and progression (HR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.67-1.28). In this large study, neither insulin glargine nor omega-3 affected the incidence or progression of PAD.

Topics: Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Disease Progression; Fatty Acids, Omega-3; Female; Humans; Insulin Glargine; Male; Middle Aged; Peripheral Arterial Disease; Treatment Outcome

Because of its physico-chemical properties, insulin glargine is usually not mixable with rapid insulins. BioChaperone BC147 is a polyanionic amphiphilic polymer, solubilizing insulin glargine at neutral pH, and thus enabling stable glargine formulation with fast-acting insulin lispro (BioChaperone glargine lispro co-formulation [BC Combo]). We investigated pharmacokinetic (PK) endpoints and postprandial glucose (PPG) control after administration of BC Combo (75% insulin glargine, 25% insulin lispro), insulin lispro Mix25 (LMix) and separate injections of insulins glargine (75% total dose) and lispro (25% total dose [G + L]) immediately before ingestion of a mixed meal in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), using a randomized, double-blind, double-dummy crossover study design. Participants received individualized bolus doses (mean 0.62 U/kg) of BC Combo, LMix or G + L, together with a solid mixed meal (610 kcal, 50% carbohydrate, 30% fat, 20% protein). Insulin dosages were kept constant for each study day. Thirty-nine participants with T2DM (mean ± SD age and glycated haemoglobin 60.8 ± 7.5 years and  64 ± 6 mmol/mol, respectively) were randomized. BC Combo improved the predefined primary endpoint, early PPG control, compared to LMix (incremental area under the blood glucose concentration-time curve from 0 to 2 hours after the meal [ΔAUC

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Combinations; Female; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine; Insulin Lispro; Male; Middle Aged; Postprandial Period; Young Adult

The aim of this study was to describe the risks of cardiovascular (CV) events and severe hypoglycaemia with insulin degludec (degludec) vs insulin glargine 100 units/mL (glargine U100) in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) aged 65 years or older.. A total of 7637 patients in the DEVOTE trial, a treat-to-target, randomized, double-blind trial evaluating the CV safety of degludec vs glargine U100, were divided into three age groups (50-64 years, n = 3682; 65-74 years, n = 3136; ≥75 years, n = 819). Outcomes by overall age group and randomized treatment differences were analysed for major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), all-cause mortality, severe hypoglycaemia and serious adverse events (SAEs).. Patients with increasing age had higher risks of CV death, all-cause mortality and SAEs, and there were non-significant trends towards higher risks of MACE and severe hypoglycaemia. Treatment effects on the risk of MACE, all-cause mortality, severe hypoglycaemia and SAEs were consistent across age groups, based on the non-significant interactions between treatment and age with regard to these outcomes.. There were higher risks of CV death, all-cause mortality and SAEs, and trends towards higher risks of MACE and severe hypoglycaemia with increasing age after adjusting for baseline differences. The effects across age groups of degludec vs glargine U100 on MACE, all-cause mortality and severe hypoglycaemia were comparable, suggesting that the risk of MACE, as well as all-cause mortality, is similar and the risk of severe hypoglycaemia is lower with degludec regardless of age. Evidence is conclusive only until 74 years of age.

Topics: Aged; Cardiovascular Diseases; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Female; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Middle Aged

To compare the efficacy and safety of self- versus physician-managed titration of insulin glargine 300 U/mL (Gla-300) in people with inadequately controlled type 2 diabetes.. Take Control (EudraCT number: 2015-001626-42) was a 24-week, multi-national, open-label, controlled, two-arm, parallel-group study in insulin-naïve and pre-treated participants, randomized 1:1 to a self- or physician-managed titration of Gla-300. The fasting self-monitored plasma glucose (SMPG) target was 4.4 to 7.2 mmol/L. The primary outcome was non-inferiority of glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) change from baseline to week 24. Secondary outcomes included SMPG target achievement without hypoglycaemia, hypoglycaemia incidence, adverse events and participant-reported outcomes (PROs).. At week 24, the least squares (LS) mean HbA1c reduction was 0.97% (10.6 mmol/mol) and 0.84% (9.2 mmol/mol) in the self- and physician-managed groups, respectively, with an LS mean difference of -0.13% [95% confidence interval -0.2619 to -0.0004] (-1.4 mmol/mol [-2.863 to -0.004]), demonstrating non-inferiority (P < 0.0001) and superiority (P = 0.0247) of self- versus physician-managed titration. Significantly more of the self- than physician-managed group achieved SMPG target without hypoglycaemia (67% vs 58%; P = 0.0187). Overall, hypoglycaemia incidence was similar in each group. No safety concerns were reported. In both groups, similar PRO improvements were observed for distress related to diabetes disease burden and for confidence in diabetes self-management, with even more individuals achieving a clinically relevant reduction in emotional burden and fewer individuals with high emotional burden in the self-managed group.. Self-managed titration of Gla-300 was superior to physician-managed titration in terms of HbA1c reduction, accompanied by similar total PRO scores, with a clinically relevant reduction in emotional burden, and similar hypoglycaemia frequency.

Topics: Aged; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine; Male; Middle Aged; Self-Management

We compared the efficacy and safety of insulin degludec/aspart (IDegAsp) twice-daily injections with insulin glargine 300 U/mL and insulin glulisine basal-bolus therapy (Gla300/Glu) using insulin glargine 300 U/mL (Gla300) and insulin glulisine (Glu).. A total of 20 patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus were treated with IDegAsp twice-daily injections; achievement of target preprandial glucose concentration of 100-130 mg/dL at breakfast and supper was determined using a wearable flash glucose monitoring system. Patients were later switched to Gla300/Glu basal-bolus therapy before breakfast and before supper. Data were collected on days 2-4 and days 12-14 for each treatment period. The study's primary efficacy end-point was the mean percentage of time with a target glucose range of 70-180 mg/dL, and safety end-points were the mean percentage of time with hypoglycemia having glucose levels <70 mg/dL, clinically important hypoglycemia with glucose levels <54 mg/dL and nocturnal (00.00-06.00) hypoglycemia.. Considering efficacy, the mean percentage of time for the target glucose range of IDegAsp was significantly lower than that of Gla300/Glu (73.1 [69.4-81.1] vs 84.2 [80.2-93.1], P = 0.001). Considering safety, the mean percentages of hypoglycemia (<70 mg/dL; 2.1 [0.0-9.4] vs 14.4 [4.4-22.3]), clinically important hypoglycemia (<54 mg/dL; 0.0 [0.0-0.2] vs 1.9 [0.0-5.6]) and nocturnal (00.00-06.00 hours) hypoglycemia (0.5 [0.0-5.9] vs 8.9 [3.1-11.8]) of Gla300/Glu were significantly lower than those of IDegAsp (P = 0.012, 0.036 and 0.007, respectively).. When compared with the IDegAsp twice-daily injections, Gla300/Glu basal-bolus therapy might achieve more effective glycemic control without hypoglycemic risk.

Topics: Aged; Biomarkers; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Aspart; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Patient Safety; Prognosis

This study aimed to investigate the safety of insulin degludec (degludec) in relation to age and risk of hypoglycaemia post hoc in individuals with type 2 diabetes (T2D) (SWITCH 2 trial).. In this crossover study, individuals with T2D who were at risk of hypoglycaemia were randomized to double-blind treatment with degludec or insulin glargine 100 units/mL (glargine U100) ± oral antidiabetic drugs. After 32 weeks, patients crossed over to the other treatment. Primary endpoint was number of overall severe (positively adjudicated) or glucose-confirmed (plasma glucose <56 mg/dL; 3.1 mmol/L) symptomatic hypoglycaemia events during the two 16-week maintenance periods.. Treatment with degludec was safe and effective, with a frequency of hypoglycaemia lower than that with glargine U100 in both younger and older individuals (>65 years) with T2D.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Cross-Over Studies; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Double-Blind Method; Female; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Middle Aged; Young Adult

The optimal fasting blood glucose (FBG) target of achieving HbA1c less than 7.0% in type 2 diabetes (T2D) patients remains controversial. This open-label trial randomized (1:3:3) 947 adults with uncontrolled T2D (HbA1c >7% to ≤10.5%) who were using one to three oral antidiabetic drugs to achieve an FBG target of 3.9 < FBG ≤5.6 mmol/L (Group 1), 3.9 < FBG ≤6.1 mmol/L (Group 2) or of 3.9 < FBG ≤7.0 mmol/L (Group 3). Targets were achieved using a pre-defined insulin glargine 100 U/mL titration scheme. The primary endpoint was proportion of patients achieving HbA1c <7.0% at 24 weeks. At 24 weeks, 44.4%, 46.1% and 37.7% of patients achieved HbA1c <7.0% in Groups 1, 2 and 3, respectively (P = 0.017; Group 2 vs Group 3). Alert hypoglycaemia (glucose ≤3.9 mmol/L) was significantly more frequent in Group 1 than in Group 3 (38.9 vs 23.3%; P < 0.001) but was not in Group 2 vs Group 3 (27.5% vs 23.3%; P = 0.177). Clinically important hypoglycaemia (glucose ≤3.0 mmol/L) was reported in 4.8%, 2.0% and 3.8% of patients in Groups 1, 2 and 3, respectively. In conclusion, the optimal FBG target for most Chinese patients with T2D appears to be 3.9-6.1 mmol/L.

Topics: Adult; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Fasting; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Goals; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine; Male; Middle Aged; Reference Values; Treatment Outcome

Fostering patient's self-managing of basal insulin therapy could improve glucose control, by removing patient's and physician's barriers to basal insulin initiation, titration and glucose monitoring. The Italian Titration Approaches Study (ITAS) aims at demonstrating non-inferiority (<0.3% margin) in efficacy of glucose control (change in glycated hemoglobin [HbA1c] after 24 weeks) by the same titration algorithm of insulin glargine 300 U/mL (Gla-300), managed by the (nurse assisted) patient versus the physician, in insulin naïve patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM), uncontrolled with previous treatments.. ITAS is a phase IV, 24-week, national, multicenter, open label, randomized (1:1) parallel group study. 458 patients were enrolled, 359 randomized, and 339 completed the study, in 46 Italian centers. Baseline characteristics and previous medications of the ITT population (N = 355) are reported. Mean ± SD age, T2DM duration, HbA1c, FPG and BMI were 64.0 ± 9.8 years, 11.6 ± 7.6 years, 8.79 ± 0.65%, 170.9 ± 42.3 mg/dL, and 30.3 ± 5.6 kg/m. ITAS is the first study to compare two different managers (nurse-assisted patient vs physician) of the same titration algorithm of Gla-300 in insulin naïve patients with T2DM in unsatisfactory glucose control. This study might provide novel evidence on the efficacy/effectiveness of patient-managed titration algorithm of Gla-300 in a pragmatic setting and may reduce barriers to basal insulin initiation and its titration.

Topics: Aged; Biomarkers; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine; Italy; Male; Middle Aged; Nurse's Role; Patient Participation; Physician's Role; Self Care; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

In this study, we compared the effect on diabetic retinopathy (DR) between oral antidiabetic drugs (OADs) alone and in combination with basal insulin-supported OADs therapy (BOT). [Correction added on 11 November 2019, after first online publication: In Abstract under Background section, "DR" has been corrected into "diabetic retinopathy (DR)".] METHODS: Between January 2015 and January 2018, this study enrolled 290 patients (age 18-65 years) with diabetes duration between 0 and 5 years. Patients were randomly assigned to receive OADs or BOT after 14 days intensive insulin treatment. Examinations were performed at the beginning and end of the study.. Fewer patients developed DR in the BOT than OADs group (8 [6.06%] vs 12 [8.3%], respectively), and all cases of DR were non-proliferative. Blood glucose concentrations were higher in the BOT than OADs group at the 3rd month, but lower in the former at the 6th and 12th month. The rate of reaching target HbA1c ≤7% was lower in the BOT than OADs group at the 3rd month (63.6% vs 72.2%, respectively), similar between the two groups at the 6th month (60.6% vs 66.6%, respectively) and higher in the BOT group at the 12th month (75.0% vs 61.1%, respectively). The SD of fasting blood glucose (FBG), coefficient of variation of FBG, SD of blood glucose (SDBG), and mean amplitude of glycemic excursions were lower in the BOT than OADs group. Changes in the levels of three cytokines (interleukin [IL]-1β, IL-6, and IL-17α) were significantly less in the BOT than OADs group.. Twelve months of BOT decreased the incidence of DR in short-duration type 2 diabetes by reducing glycemia more effectively, stably, and completely than OADs alone.. 背景: 在本研究中, 我们比较单纯口服抗糖尿病药物(oral antidiabetic drugs, OADs)和基础胰岛素联合口服抗糖尿病药物(basal insulin-supported OADs therapy, BOT)两种治疗方案对糖尿病视网膜病变(diabetic retinopathy, DR)的影响。 方法: 本研究在2015年1月到2018年1月共入组290例糖尿病患者, 他们的年龄介于18到65岁之间, 糖尿病病程在0到5年之间。入组的患者先接受14天的胰岛素强化治疗, 然后被随机分入OAD组或者BOT组。在研究开始时和研究结束时进行相应的检查。 结果: 与OADs组相比, BOT组更少患者出现DR [BOT组8例 (6.60%) vs. OADs组12例 (8.3%)], 并且所有出现DR的患者, 其DR都属于非增殖性病变。BOT组第3个月的血糖水平较OADs组高, 但其第6个月和第12个月的血糖水平则较OADs组低。HbA1c(≤7%)的达标率, 第3个月BOT组低于OADs组(分别为63.6% 和72.2%), 第6个月两组近似(分别为60.6% 和66.6%), 第12个月BOT组高于OADs组(分别为75.0% 和61.1%)。BOT组的空腹血糖标准差、空腹血糖变异系数、血糖标准差和血糖波动平均幅度均低于OADs组。BOT组中三个细胞因子(IL-1β、IL-6和IL-17α)的变化水平显著低于OADs组。 结论: 对于病程较短的2型糖尿病患者, 12个月的BOT方案能通过更有效、平稳、全面地降低血糖而降低DR的发生率。.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Biomarkers; Blood Glucose; China; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Diabetic Retinopathy; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Incidence; Injections; Insulin Glargine; Interleukins; Male; Middle Aged; Prospective Studies; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult

A head-to-head trial (NCT03078478) between insulin degludec and insulin glargine U300 with the primary objective of comparing the risk of hypoglycemia is being conducted. During trial conduct, safety concerns related to the glycemic data collection system led to a postinitiation protocol amendment, described here.. This randomized (1:1), open-label, treat-to-target, multinational trial was initiated in March 2017 with a planned treatment period of 52 weeks (16 weeks titration + 36 weeks maintenance). Overall, ~1600 insulin-experienced patients at risk of developing hypoglycemia based on predefined risk factors were included. The protocol amendment implemented in February 2018 resulted in assuring patient safety and an extension of the total treatment period up to 88 weeks (16 weeks titration + variable maintenance 1 + 36 weeks maintenance 2). The original glycemic data collection system (MyGlucoHealth blood glucose meter + electronic diary) was discontinued because of safety concerns and replaced with an Abbott blood glucose meter and paper diary to collect self-measured blood glucose and hypoglycemic episodes. The primary endpoint of number of severe or blood-glucose confirmed symptomatic hypoglycemic episodes will be evaluated with the same analysis duration and statistical methods as the original protocol. Only relevant changes were implemented to maintain patient safety while permitting evaluation of the scientific objectives of the trial.. These observations highlight the importance of safety surveillance during trial conduct despite the use of currently marketed glucose monitoring devices. The prompt protocol amendment and ensuing actions ensured that the scientific integrity of the trial was not compromised.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Blood Glucose; Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring; Chemotherapy, Adjuvant; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Female; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Middle Aged; Research Design; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult

This study compared the efficacy and safety of lixisenatide with placebo as add-on therapy to basal insulin (BI) in adults aged ≥70 years with type 2 diabetes (T2D), with or without moderate renal insufficiency.. This post hoc analysis evaluated data from non-frail patients with T2D inadequately controlled on BI with or without oral antidiabetic drugs (n = 108), randomized to once-daily lixisenatide 20 μg or placebo for 24 weeks (GetGoal-O Study). The primary endpoint was the change in HbA1c from baseline to Week 24. Secondary endpoints included changes from baseline in fasting plasma glucose, 2-hour postprandial plasma glucose (PPG), average seven-point self-monitored plasma glucose (SMPG), area under the curve for SMPG, daily BI dose, body weight, proportion of patients achieving HbA1c > 0.5%, and composite endpoints. Safety outcomes included the incidence of documented symptomatic hypoglycemia (plasma glucose <60 mg/dL) and gastrointestinal treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs). Outcomes were also analyzed by the occurrence of moderate renal insufficiency.. Compared with placebo, lixisenatide-treated patients had significantly greater reductions in HbA1c, 2-hour PPG, average seven-point SMPG, and body weight. Documented symptomatic hypoglycemia was approximately two-fold higher in patients treated with placebo than lixisenatide (12.7% vs 5.7%). GI TEAEs occurred more frequently in the lixisenatide- than placebo-treated group (34% vs 9.1%). Moderate renal insufficiency (estimated glomerular filtration rate between ≥30 and <60 mL/min/1.73 m. Add-on therapy with lixisenatide in non-frail patients aged ≥70 years with T2D uncontrolled with BI is effective, safe, and well tolerated and should be considered in this population.. 背景: 这项研究在伴有或不伴中度肾功能不全的≥70岁2型糖尿病(type 2 diabetes, T2D)成人患者中, 比较了利西那肽与安慰剂作为基础胰岛素(basal insulin, BI)添加治疗的疗效及安全性。 方法: 这项事后分析所评估的数据来自经BI联合或者不联合口服降糖药治疗后血糖仍控制不佳的非脆性T2D患者(n=108), 将其随机分配至每日一次20 μg利西那肽治疗组或安慰剂组, 治疗24周(GetGoal-O研究)。主要终点为从基线至第24周的HbA1c变化。次要终点包括空腹血糖、餐后2小时血糖、平均7点自我监测血糖(self-monitored plasma glucose, SMPG)、SMPG曲线下面积、每日BI剂量、体重、HbA1c降幅>0.5%的患者比例以及复合终点相对于基线的变化。安全性结局包括记录的症状性低血糖(血糖<60 mg/dl)及治疗期间胃肠道不良事件(treatment-emergent adverse events, TEAEs)的发生率。还通过中度肾功能不全的发生对结果进行了分析。 结果: 与安慰剂组相比, 利西那肽治疗组的HbA1c、餐后2小时血糖、平均7点SMPG以及体重下降均更显著。安慰剂组中记录的症状性低血糖发生率大约是利西那肽治疗组患者的2倍(分别为12.7%与5.7%)。利西那肽治疗组的胃肠道TEAEs发生率高于安慰剂组(分别为34%与9.1%)。中度肾功能不全(估算的肾小球滤过率≥30至<60 ml/min/1.73 m

Topics: Age Factors; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Biomarkers; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Incretins; Insulin Glargine; Male; Peptides; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

To assess the efficacy and safety of iGlarLixi (titratable fixed-ratio combination of insulin glargine (iGlar) and lixisenatide) in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) living in North America (NA; USA and Canada) compared with the rest of the world (RoW).. Post hoc analysis included patient-level data from 509 sites/centers across two phase III trials: LixiLan-O (NCT02058147; insulin-naive patients; NA, n=371; RoW, n=796) and LixiLan-L (NCT02058160; inadequately controlled patients on basal insulin; NA, n=196; RoW, n=535). Efficacy outcomes were: change from baseline to Week 30 in glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), postprandial glucose (PPG), PPG excursions, fasting plasma glucose (FPG) and body weight; proportion of patients achieving HbA1c <42 mmol/mol (<7.0%); proportion of patients achieving composite endpoint: HbA1c <42 mmol/mol (<7.0%), no weight gain or symptomatic hypoglycemia (blood glucose ≤3.9 mmol/L (≤70 mg/dL)). Safety endpoints included incidence of documented symptomatic hypoglycemia and gastrointestinal (GI) adverse events.. Significantly larger reductions (p≤0.003) in HbA1c from baseline to Week 30 were achieved with iGlarLixi, compared with iGlar or lixisenatide, in NA and RoW patients in LixiLan-O (iGlarLixi vs iGlar: -0.31 and -0.29, respectively; iGlarLixi vs lixisenatide: -0.84 and -0.69, respectively) and in LixiLan-L (iGlarLixi vs iGlar: -0.5 and -0.51, respectively). Documented symptomatic hypoglycemia was similar between NA and RoW patients. iGlarLixi resulted in significant weight benefits versus iGlar (change from baseline -1.58 and -1.29 kg for NA and RoW patients, respectively; p. iGlarLixi improved glycemic parameters versus iGlar or lixisenatide alone in both NA and RoW patients, with beneficial weight effects versus iGlar. iGlarLixi treatment responses, hypoglycemia risk and GI adverse events in NA patients were comparable with patients in the RoW.. Clinicaltrials.gov NCT02058147 and NCT02058160.

Topics: Aged; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Combinations; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Insulin Glargine; Male; Middle Aged; North America; Peptides

Lilly insulin glargine (LY IGlar; Basaglar. Patients from India and East Asia (Korea and Taiwan) with T2DM who were insulin naïve (glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) ≥ 7.0% and ≤ 11.0%) or on basal insulin (HbA1c ≤ 11.0%) were randomized to receive LY IGlar or IGlar along with oral antihyperglycemic medications (OAMs) for 24 weeks. Patients were instructed to self-titrate from the starting dose by 1 unit/day until fasting blood glucose (FBG) ≤ 5.6 mmol/L (100 mg/dL) was achieved. The key outcome was HbA1c change from baseline to Week 24.. Within-group least-squares mean (LSM) decrease (baseline to Week 24) in HbA1c was similar between treatments. The upper limit of confidence interval (CI) for treatment difference was below the defined 0.4% noninferiority margin in India (LY IGlar: - 0.83%; IGlar: - 0.62%; difference [95% CI] - 0.21 [- 0.70, 0.28]) and East Asia (LY IGlar: - 1.28%; IGlar: - 1.26%; difference [95% CI] - 0.02 [- 0.34, 0.30]) subpopulations. Results of other efficacy and safety endpoints at Week 24 were similar between treatments in both subpopulations. LSM self-monitored FBG levels were similar between treatments at all visits in both subpopulations except at Week 24 in the India subpopulation (LY IGlar: 5.65 [0.10] mmol/L or 101.8 [1.86] mg/dL; IGlar: 5.18 [0.10] mmol/L or 93.3 [1.75] mg/dL; p = 0.002).. Efficacy and safety profiles of LY IGlar and IGlar, in combination with OAMs, were similar in India and East Asia subpopulations. This was consistent with the ELEMENT 5 total population.. NCT02302716.

Topics: Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; India; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Male; Middle Aged; Prospective Studies; Republic of Korea; Taiwan

In this post hoc analysis of the randomized controlled LixiLan-O trial in insulin-naive patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) not controlled with metformin, with or without a second oral antihyperglycaemic drug (OAD), the efficacy and safety of the fixed-ratio combination, iGlarLixi (insulin glargine 100 U [iGlar] and lixisenatide [Lixi]), compared to its individual components was assessed in two patient subgroups: group 1) baseline HbA1c ≥9% (n = 134); group 2) inadequate control (HbA1c ≥7.0% and ≤9.0%) despite administration of two OADs at screening (n = 725). Treatment with iGlarLixi resulted in significantly greater reduction in least squares mean HbA1c compared to treatment with iGlar or Lixi alone in both subgroups (group 1: 2.9%, 2.5%, 1.7% and group 2: 1.5%, 1.2%, 0.7%, respectively). Target HbA1c less than 7% was achieved in more than 70% of patients using iGlarLixi in both subgroups, while mitigating the weight gain observed with use of iGlar alone. Rates of hypoglycaemic events were low overall. These results suggest that treatment with iGlarLixi achieves superior glycaemic control compared to treatment with iGlar or Lixi alone in T2DM patients with HbA1c ≥9% or in those inadequately controlled with two OADs.

Topics: Adult; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine; Least-Squares Analysis; Male; Middle Aged; Peptides; Treatment Outcome; Weight Gain

To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of insulin degludec (degludec) versus insulin glargine 100 units/mL (glargine U100) in basal-bolus regimens for patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) at high cardiovascular (CV) risk based on the DEVOTE CV outcomes trial.. A microsimulation model, informed by clinical outcomes from the subgroup of patients using basal-bolus insulin therapy in DEVOTE (NCT01959529) and by the UKPDS Outcomes Model 2 risk equations, was used to model direct costs (2018 GBP) and effectiveness outcomes [quality-adjusted life years (QALYs)] with degludec versus glargine U100 over a 40-year time horizon. The model captured the development of eight diabetes-related complications, death, severe hypoglycemia and insulin dosing. This analysis was conducted from the perspective of National Health Service (NHS) England.. Treatment with degludec versus glargine U100 in basal-bolus regimens was associated with improved clinical outcomes at a higher cost per patient [incremental cost effectiveness ratio (ICER): £14,956 GBP/QALY]. Degludec remained cost effective versus glargine U100 in all exploratory sensitivity analyses, with ICERs below the widely accepted willingness-to-pay threshold, although the result was most sensitive to assumptions regarding the persistence of treatment effects.. Our long-term modeling analysis suggested that degludec was cost effective (from the perspective of NHS England) versus glargine U100 in basal-bolus regimens for patients with T2D at high CV risk. Our findings raise important questions regarding how to model the health economics of diabetes therapies.

Topics: Aged; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Double-Blind Method; Female; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Middle Aged; Monte Carlo Method; Quality-Adjusted Life Years; State Medicine; United Kingdom

We evaluated risk factors for clinically relevant hypoglycaemia (blood glucose <3 mmol/L) in patients with type 2 diabetes during insulin glargine self-titration. Data were from two clinical trials in which patients were able to improve glycaemic control by self-titration of insulin glargine using a simple algorithm.. We performed post hoc analyses of pooled treatment groups from each of two Phase 3 studies comparing LY2963016 with LANTUS: ELEMENT-2 (double-blind) and ELEMENT-5 (open label). Clinically relevant hypoglycaemia was analysed by category of HbA1c (<7%, 7%-8.5%, >8.5%) at Week 12 (titration period) and at Week 24 (overall study), and by subgroups of age (<65, ≥65 years) and previous insulin use (naïve or not).. In the ELEMENT-2 study (N = 756), there were no overall differences in rate or incidence of hypoglycaemia among HbA1c categories. In the ELEMENT-5 study (N = 493), patients with HbA1c greater than 8.5% had a lower rate and incidence of hypoglycaemia throughout the study compared to those in the lower HbA1c categories. In both studies, patients 65 years of age or older, compared to those less than 65 years, had a higher rate and incidence of hypoglycaemia during the titration phase, had lower baseline HbA1c, and experienced smaller increases in dose, with no differences in HbA1c post baseline. The rate and incidence of hypoglycaemia was similar between naïve patients and patients previously using basal insulin, across all levels of glycaemic control. With the exception of the older subgroup, hypoglycaemia rates were similar during titration and maintenance periods.. Our results support broader use of self-titration algorithms for patients with type 2 diabetes.

Topics: Aged; Algorithms; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Female; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Incidence; Insulin Glargine; Male; Middle Aged; Self Care

The short-term efficacy and safety of insulin degludec U100 (IDeg) in patients with type 2 diabetes have not been reported widely. We compared insulin IDeg and insulin glargine U100 (IGla) for glycemic control and glucose variability in hospitalized patients with type 2 diabetes. In an open-label, multicenter, randomized controlled trial, 74 patients were randomly assigned to either the IDeg (36 patients) or IGla (38 patients) group and were administered with basal-bolus therapy during hospitalization. Following the start of the treatment, on day 11, glucose variability was assessed by continuous glucose monitoring. A fasting blood glucose level of 110 mg/dL and 2-hour postprandial blood glucose level of 180 mg/dL throughout at least one day during the observation period were achieved in 31.3% (10/32) and 30.6% (11/36) of the patients in the IDeg and IGla groups, respectively. The 6-point self-monitoring of blood glucose profiles showed a significant difference between the two groups. On day 7, the intra-day variation was larger in the IDeg group than in the IGla group. The incidence of hypoglycemia or glucose variability was comparable in the two groups. This study suggests that short-term efficacy and safety of IDeg and IGla in patients with type 2 diabetes during the initial phase of basal-bolus therapy were comparable, and these results can help in deciding which treatment to opt for.

Topics: Aged; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Fasting; Female; Hospitalization; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Meals; Middle Aged; Postprandial Period; Treatment Outcome

To examine the efficacy and safety of once-daily insulin degludec/insulin aspart (IDegAsp) or once-daily second-generation basal insulin analogs (insulin degludec and insulin glargine 300 units/mL) in insulin-naïve Japanese adults with type 2 diabetes in routine clinical practice. A 12-week multicenter, open-label, randomized, pilot study was performed in 52 subjects with type 2 diabetes treated with oral antidiabetic drugs (OADs). Subjects were randomized to once-daily IDegAsp (n = 26) or basal insulin (n = 26). The primary endpoint was percent change in HbA1c from baseline to week 12. Furthermore, it was analyzed post hoc in subgroups stratified by baseline HbA1c. During a follow-up period, percent change in HbA1c was not significantly different between the two groups (p = 0.161). Daily insulin doses and frequency of overall hypoglycemia were also similar in the two groups. In post hoc analyses, once-daily basal insulin was more effective than IDegAsp in subjects with HbA1c more than or equal to 8.5% (p < 0.05); however, in subjects with HbA1c less than 8.5%, once-daily IDegAsp showed a significant improvement in percent change in HbA1c at week 12, compared with basal insulin (p < 0.01). Although there was no apparent difference in the HbA1c-lowering effects between two groups, when compared in subjects with HbA1c less than 8.5%, once-daily IDegAsp showed a significant effect in comparison with once-daily basal insulin. These findings suggest that the baseline HbA1c level might provide the important information for choosing IDegAsp or basal insulin in patients insufficiently controlled with OADs. This trial was registered with UMIN (no. UMIN000035431).

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Aged; Blood Glucose; Delayed-Action Preparations; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Combinations; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Japan; Male; Middle Aged; Pilot Projects

Glycemic control in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) is particularly hard to achieve because of a slower insulin degradation by the kidney. It might modify the long-acting insulin analogue pharmacokinetics, increasing its time-action and the risk of hypoglycemia. However, because this insulin has no peak action, it might be a more tolerable approach to patients with CKD. This hypothesis remains to be tested, because no study has thus far examined the efficacy and safety profile of long-acting basal analogues in patients with significant loss of renal function. The purpose of this study was to compare the glycemic response to treatment with glargine U100 or neutral protamine Hagedorn (NPH) insulin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and CKD stages 3 and 4.. Our results found that insulin glargine U100 could be effective, once it improved glycemic control, reducing HbA

Topics: Aged; Blood Glucose; Cross-Over Studies; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine; Male; Middle Aged; Renal Insufficiency, Chronic; Treatment Outcome

We compared the effects of morning administration of insulin glulisine + insulin glargine 300 U/mL (G + G300) with that of insulin lispro + insulin glargine biosimilar (L + GB).. A total of 30 patients with type 2 diabetes who wore a continuous glucose monitoring device on admission after glucose levels were stabilized by morning long-acting and ultra-rapid-acting insulins were randomly allocated to groups who received G + G300 on days 1 and 2, and the same dose L + GB on days 3 and 4, or vice versa. Data collected on days 2 and 4 (mean amplitude of glycemic excursion, mean of daily differences: all days) were analyzed. Insulin was injected at 08.00 h. A day was defined as the period from 08.00 h one day, to 08.00 h the next day. Test meals were given.. Increased post-breakfast glucose level, post-breakfast glucose gradient, mean glucose level, standard deviation and M-value (24 h, 00.00-06.00 h), mean amplitude of glycemic excursion, and mean of daily differences were significantly lower in patients taking G + G300 than those taking L + GB (P ≤ 0.0001-0.04). The area over the glucose curve (<70 mg/dL) was not significantly different between groups. Pre-lunch - pre-breakfast glucose levels were significantly lower in patients taking L + GB than those taking G + G300 (P < 0.0001). The difference in the highest post-breakfast glucose level between groups (Δ = G + G300 - L + GB) was significantly correlated to 24-h mean glucose level (r = 0.40, P = 0.03).. Compared with L + GB, G + G300 decreases post-breakfast glucose level reducing rate of rise of that, nocturnal and 24-h glucose variability and level without causing hypoglycemia, and daily variance.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Blood Glucose; Cross-Over Studies; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin Lispro; Male; Postprandial Period; Treatment Outcome

The present phase 3, randomized, open-label study compared the efficacy and safety of basal insulin peglispro with insulin glargine after 26 weeks of treatment when added to oral antihyperglycemic medications in insulin-naïve Asian patients with type 2 diabetes.. The primary objective was to show non-inferiority of the change in glycated hemoglobin from baseline to 26 weeks.. At 26 weeks, insulin peglispro was non-inferior to glargine, meeting the primary objective. Patients receiving insulin peglispro (n = 192) showed a greater reduction in glycated hemoglobin from baseline compared with glargine (n = 196); -1.6 vs -1.4%, P = 0.005) and in fasting serum glucose (-61.2 vs -54.8 mg/dL, P = 0.02). A significantly higher proportion of patients receiving insulin peglispro achieved glycated hemoglobin <7% (57 vs 44%, P = 0.012). Insulin peglispro patients showed significantly less weight gain from baseline (1.1 vs 1.6 kg, P = 0.03). Relative rates (insulin peglispro/glargine) of total and nocturnal hypoglycemia through 26 weeks were 1.06 (P = 0.67) and 0.7 (P = 0.10), respectively. Significantly more insulin peglispro-treated patients experienced adverse events compared with glargine-treated patients (P = 0.042). Alanine aminotransferase and aspartate aminotransferase were significantly increased from baseline with insulin peglispro compared with glargine at week 26 (3.5 vs -4.6 IU/L and 2.8 vs -1.5 IU/L, respectively; P < 0.001). The incidence of injection site reactions was low and did not differ between the treatments.. Insulin peglispro provided better glycemic control vs glargine with no differences in hypoglycemia and increased aminotransferases in insulin-naïve Asian patients with type 2 diabetes.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Asian People; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine; Insulin Lispro; Male; Middle Aged; Polyethylene Glycols; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Anti-Obesity Agents; Blood Glucose; Body Mass Index; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Combinations; Drug Monitoring; Drug Resistance, Multiple; Drug Therapy, Combination; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hyperglycemia; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Incretins; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Liraglutide; Metformin; Obesity; Overweight; Weight Gain; Weight Loss

In this post hoc analysis we compared glycaemic control and hypoglycaemia between insulin glargine 300 U/mL (Gla-300) and glargine 100 U/mL (Gla-100) administered once daily in people with type 2 diabetes (T2DM) from the EDITION 1 (basal plus mealtime insulin) and EDITION 2 (basal insulin plus oral antihyperglycaemic drugs) trials who were previously receiving twice-daily insulin. At randomization, 16.9% and 20.0% of people in EDITION 1 and 2, respectively, were receiving twice-daily basal insulin. Glycated haemoglobin change from baseline to Month 6 was similar over 6 months with Gla-300 or Gla-100 (least squares mean difference -0.01%; 95% confidence interval [CI] -0.27 to 0.24] in EDITION 1 and 0.16%; 95% CI -0.25 to 0.57, in EDITION 2). Participants previously receiving twice-daily insulin in EDITION 1 had a lower risk of confirmed (≤3.9 mmol/L [≤70 mg/dL]) or severe hypoglycaemia with Gla-300 vs Gla-100 at night (00:00-05:59 hours), but not at any time (24 hours); in EDITION 2 the risk was reduced at night and any time (24 hours). In conclusion, Gla-300 provided similar glycaemic control with less hypoglycaemia compared with Gla-100 in people with T2DM switching from twice-daily to once-daily basal insulin.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Blood Glucose; Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Compounding; Drug Monitoring; Drug Therapy, Combination; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hyperglycemia; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Injections, Subcutaneous; Insulin Glargine; Intention to Treat Analysis; Osmolar Concentration; Severity of Illness Index

In the Outcome Reduction with an Initial Glargine Intervention (ORIGIN) trial (Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT000069784), titrated doses of basal insulin glargine targeting fasting normoglycaemia had a neutral effect on cardiovascular outcomes. The dose of insulin required to achieve normoglycaemia provides a unique measurement of each individual's resistance to insulin's action, and was therefore used to examine the link between insulin resistance and cardiovascular outcomes.. Self-titration of insulin doses targeting a fasting plasma glucose ≤5.3 mmoL/L (95 mg/dL) was promoted at every visit and cardiovascular and other serious health outcomes were ascertained. All analyses were restricted to participants allocated to insulin glargine, who added it to lifestyle or 1 glucose-lowering oral agent at randomization. Normoglycaemia was defined as a fasting plasma glucose <5.6 mmol/L and HbA1c <6% at the 2-year visit. The median of the natural logarithm of insulin doses (expressed per kg of fat-free mass), recorded at every visit from randomization until either the penultimate visit or the first occurrence of a cardiovascular outcome, was analysed.. Higher median insulin doses did not reflect incident cardiovascular events overall or in the subset that achieved normoglycaemia. When the dose taken before a cardiovascular event or the penultimate visit was analysed, the adjusted hazard of the composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction or stroke was 0.94 (95% CI 0.88, 1.00) per unit higher dose overall, and 0.91 (95% CI 0.81, 1.01) in the normoglycaemic subset.. Insulin resistance may not promote cardiovascular outcomes in individuals with dysglycaemia.

Topics: Aged; Analysis of Variance; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Diabetic Angiopathies; Female; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine; Insulin Resistance; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Stroke; Treatment Outcome

The double-blind Trial Comparing Cardiovascular Safety of Insulin Degludec vs Insulin Glargine in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes at High Risk of Cardiovascular Events (DEVOTE) assessed the cardiovascular safety of insulin degludec. The incidence and rates of adjudicated severe hypoglycaemia, and all-cause mortality were also determined. This paper reports a secondary analysis investigating associations of severe hypoglycaemia with cardiovascular outcomes and mortality.. In DEVOTE, patients with type 2 diabetes were randomised to receive either insulin degludec or insulin glargine U100 (100 units/ml) once daily (between dinner and bedtime) in an event-driven, double-blind, treat-to-target cardiovascular outcomes trial. The primary outcome was the first occurrence of an adjudicated major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE; cardiovascular death, non-fatal myocardial infarction or non-fatal stroke). Adjudicated severe hypoglycaemia was the pre-specified secondary outcome. In the present analysis, the associations of severe hypoglycaemia with both MACE and all-cause mortality was evaluated in the pooled trial population using time-to-event analyses, with severe hypoglycaemia as a time-dependent variable and randomised treatment as a fixed factor. An investigation with interaction terms indicated that the effect of severe hypoglycaemia on the risk of MACE and all-cause mortality were the same for both treatment arms, and so the temporal association for severe hypoglycaemia with subsequent MACE and all-cause mortality is reported for the pooled population.. There was a non-significant difference in the risk of MACE for individuals who had vs those who had not experienced severe hypoglycaemia during the trial (HR 1.38, 95% CI 0.96, 1.96; p = 0.080) and therefore there was no temporal relationship between severe hypoglycaemia and MACE. There was a significantly higher risk of all-cause mortality for patients who had vs those who had not experienced severe hypoglycaemia during the trial (HR 2.51, 95% CI 1.79, 3.50; p < 0.001). There was a higher risk of all-cause mortality 15, 30, 60, 90, 180 and 365 days after experiencing severe hypoglycaemia compared with not experiencing severe hypoglycaemia in the same time interval. The association between severe hypoglycaemia and all-cause mortality was maintained after adjustment for the following baseline characteristics: age, sex, HbA. The results from these analyses demonstrate an association between severe hypoglycaemia and all-cause mortality. Furthermore, they indicate that patients who experienced severe hypoglycaemia were particularly at greater risk of death in the short term after the hypoglycaemic episode. These findings indicate that severe hypoglycaemia is associated with higher subsequent mortality; however, they cannot answer the question as to whether severe hypoglycaemia serves as a risk marker for adverse outcomes or whether there is a direct causal effect.. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01959529.

Topics: Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Double-Blind Method; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male

The objective of this study was to evaluate the long-term cost effectiveness of exenatide once weekly (ExQW) versus insulin glargine (IG) or liraglutide 1.2 mg (Lira1.2mg) for the treatment of adult patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) not adequately controlled on oral antidiabetic drug (OAD) therapy in Greece.. The published and validated Cardiff Diabetes Model was used to project clinical and economic outcomes over a patient's lifetime. Clinical data were retrieved from a head-to-head clinical trial (DURATION 3) and a published network meta-analysis comparing ExQW with IG or Lira1.2mg, respectively. Following a Greek third-party payer perspective, direct medical costs related to drug acquisition, consumables, developed micro- and macrovascular complications, maintenance treatment, as well as treatment-related adverse events were considered. Cost and utility data were extracted from literature and publicly available official sources and assigned to model parameters to calculate total quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) and total costs as well as incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs). Sensitivity analyses explored the impact of changes in input data.. Over a patient's lifetime, ExQW was associated with 0.458 or 0.039 incremental QALYs compared with IG or Lira1.2mg, respectively, at additional costs of €2061 or €110, respectively. The ICER for ExQW was €4499/QALY compared with IG and €2827/QALY compared with Lira1.2mg. Results were robust across various one-way and scenario analyses. At the defined willingness-to-pay threshold of €36,000/QALY, probabilistic sensitivity analysis showed that ExQW had a 100 or 88.2% probability of being cost effective relative to IG or Lira1.2mg, respectively.. ExQW was estimated to be cost effective relative to IG or Lira1.2mg for the treatment of T2DM in adults not adequately controlled on OAD therapy in Greece.

Topics: Cost-Benefit Analysis; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Exenatide; Female; Greece; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine; Liraglutide; Male; Middle Aged; Models, Theoretical; Peptides; Quality-Adjusted Life Years; Venoms

Assess efficacy, hypoglycemia, and weight gain in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) treated with insulin glargine 300 U/mL (Gla-300) or 100 U/mL (Gla-100) across different age groups.. Pooled data were generated for patients randomized to Gla-300 or Gla-100 in the EDITION 2 (NCT01499095) and 3 (NCT01676220) studies. In 4 age groups (<55, ≥55 to <60, ≥60 to <65, ≥65 years), glycated hemoglobin A1C (A1C), percentage of patients reaching A1C <7.5% (58 mmol/mol), weight change, confirmed hypoglycemia (blood glucose ≤70 mg/dL), and/or severe hypoglycemia (events requiring third-party assistance) were analyzed with descriptive statistics and logistic, binomial, and analysis of covariance regression modeling.. A1C reductions from baseline and proportions of patients at target were similar for Gla-300 and Gla-100 across all age groups at 6 and 12 months, but hypoglycemia incidence and event rate were lower with Gla-300 at 6 (both P<.001) and 12 months ( P<.001 and P = .005, respectively). Patients on Gla-300 gained less weight than those on Gla-100 at 6 ( P = .027) and 12 months ( P = .021). Changes in weight and daily weight-adjusted insulin dose decreased with increasing age at 6 ( P<.001 and P = .017, respectively) and 12 months ( P<.001 and P = .011, respectively).. Older patients with T2D may benefit from treatment with Gla-300, which is associated with a lower hypoglycemia rate and less weight gain with similar efficacy compared with Gla-100.. A1C = glycated hemoglobin A1C BMI = body mass index Gla-100 = insulin glargine 100 U/mL Gla-300 = insulin glargine 300 U/mL OAD = oral antidiabetes drug T2D = type 2 diabetes.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Aging; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Incidence; Insulin Glargine; Male; Middle Aged; Weight Gain; Young Adult

To identify baseline characteristics associated with better efficacy and safety responses to twice-daily insulin lispro low mixture (LM) or once-daily insulin glargine (IG) in insulin-naïve patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D).. This post hoc analysis of the DURABLE study used the gradient-boosting method to generate hypothetical outcomes with the alternative treatment to assigned study drug to evaluate the potential additional benefit of one insulin over the other in association with influential baseline covariates in the same patient. The magnitude of additional benefit was further quantified by the generalized linear model and recursive partitioning regression tree method.. Baseline characteristics with the highest relative influence on 24-week outcomes in the overall population (LM, n = 1045; IG, n = 1046) were: for HbA1c change: fasting plasma glucose (FPG) (29.31%), age (28.57%); for reaching target HbA1c <7% (<53 mmol/mol): weight (22.41%); for weight change: weight (18.54%); for FPG: FPG (43.66%), age (20.8%); for 30-day hypoglycemia: FPG (57.09%), weight (10.1%). LM showed superiority over IG for HbA1c reduction and reaching HbA1c <7% overall, with clinically significant differences in HbA1c reduction (>0.4%) in some subpopulations. IG was superior over LM in most patients for less weight gain and hypoglycemia and lower FPG.. Differences in magnitude of response to twice-daily LM and once-daily IG in association with baseline characteristics of insulin-naïve patients with T2D were found. Future real-world studies using these statistical methods could help identify patients who respond better to certain insulin regimens to help guide clinicians in treatment decisions.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Female; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine; Insulin Lispro; Male; Middle Aged; Treatment Outcome

To obtain estimates of the relative treatment effects between insulin degludec/liraglutide (IDegLira) and insulin glargine U100/lixisenatide (iGlarLixi) in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) uncontrolled on basal insulin therapy.. Data from phase 3 trials providing evidence for estimating the relative efficacy and safety of IDegLira vs iGlarLixi in patients uncontrolled on basal insulin-only regimens were used in this analysis. Outcomes of interest were changes in HbA. The assumptions made in the indirect comparison and differences between the included trials in baseline HbA. The results of this indirect treatment comparison demonstrate that, among patients with T2DM uncontrolled on basal insulin, treatment with IDegLira results in a greater reduction of HbA

Topics: Adult; Aged; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Combinations; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Liraglutide; Male; Middle Aged; Peptides; Weight Loss

To compare outcomes between Asian and non-Asian patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) inadequately controlled on oral antidiabetic drugs (OADs) initiating insulin glargine 100 units (U)/mL (Gla-100) in randomised controlled clinical trials.. Post hoc analysis of patient-level data (Asian n = 235; non-Asian n = 3351) from 16 trials.. At baseline, Asian patients were younger with lower body mass index (BMI), fasting C-peptide, and fasting plasma glucose (FPG) than non-Asian patients (all P < .001). Asian patients had a higher mean glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA1c) at Week 24 and less reduction in HbA1c from baseline (7.4% vs. 7.2%; -1.3% vs. -1.6%, respectively; P = .0001), and were less likely to achieve HbA1c <7.0% (40% vs. 47%; P = .002) than non-Asian patients. Reductions in FPG and rates of hypoglycaemia were similar between Asian and non-Asian patients. Asian patients had less weight gain than non-Asian patients (+1.3 vs. +1.9 kg, respectively, P = .013).. In our post hoc meta-analysis, Gla-100 effectively lowers HbA1c and FPG in Asian patients with T2D uncontrolled on OADs with similar incidence of hypoglycaemia and less absolute weight gain compared with non-Asian patients. At a similar FPG reduction, fewer Asian patients achieved HbA1c target <7.0%, suggesting that prandial glucose needs to be addressed.

Topics: Asian People; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Female; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine; Male; Middle Aged

SAR342434 (SAR-Lis) is a biosimilar (follow-on) of insulin lispro (U100; Humalog. SORELLA 2 was a 6-month, randomized, open-label, Phase 3 study (NCT02294474). Insulin doses were adjusted to achieve fasting and 2-h postprandial glucose targets according to American Diabetes Association guidelines. Primary endpoint was the HbA. A total of 505 patients were randomized (1:1) to multiple daily injections of SAR-Lis (n = 253) or Ly-Lis (n = 252) plus once-daily GLA-100. Least square (LS) mean (standard error) change in HbA. Results from this controlled study in patients with T2DM also using GLA-100 support similar efficacy and safety (including immunogenicity) of SAR-Lis and Ly-Lis.

Topics: Aged; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Female; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine; Insulin Lispro; Male; Middle Aged

To describe in type 2 diabetes the 24-hour distribution of hypoglycaemia and compare the frequency of nocturnal events based on a predefined nocturnal window or an expanded interval, using illustrative data for two insulin glargine formulations.. Temporal distribution of hypoglycaemic events was assessed descriptively and by profile using participant-level data from three randomized trials comparing insulin glargine 300 U/mL (Gla-300) and 100 U/mL (Gla-100). Risk of hypoglycaemia and annualized event rates were compared for the predefined nocturnal interval (00:00 to 05:59h) and an expanded window (22:00h to the pre-breakfast glucose measurement).. Confirmed (≤3.9mmol/L [≤70 mg/dL]) or severe hypoglycaemic events were reported most frequently between 06:00 and 10:00 h with both insulins. Nearly threefold more events were identified using the expanded nocturnal interval. Risk of ≥1 nocturnal event was 25% lower with Gla-300 than Gla-100 with the predefined, and 16% lower with the expanded interval; annualized event rates were 31% and 24% lower with the predefined and expanded window, respectively. The between-insulin difference in number of nocturnal events depended markedly on the chosen nocturnal interval (556 vs. 1145 fewer events with Gla-300 using the predefined vs. expanded interval).. The predefined 00:00-05:59h nocturnal interval excluded many hypoglycaemic events occurring during the actual overnight interval. While Gla-300 reduced hypoglycaemic events versus Gla-100 (regardless of the interval considered), the results obtained using the expanded window better reflect the clinical experience of people treated with basal insulin.

Topics: Aged; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Female; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Insulin Glargine; Male; Middle Aged; Time Factors

Safe and easily implemented treatment regimens are needed for the management of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) in long-term care (LTC) and skilled nursing facilities.. This 6-month open-label randomized controlled trial compared the efficacy and safety of a DPP4 inhibitor (linagliptin) and basal insulin (glargine) in LTC residents with T2DM.. Three LTC institutions affiliated with a community safety-net hospital, US Department of Veterans Affairs and Emory Healthcare System in Atlanta, Georgia.. A total of 140 residents with T2DM treated with oral antidiabetic agents or low-dose insulin (≤0.1 U/kg/d), with fasting or premeal blood glucose (BG) > 180 mg/dL and/or HbA1c >7.5%.. Baseline antidiabetic therapy, except metformin, was discontinued on trial entry. Residents were treated with linagliptin 5 mg/d (n = 67) or glargine at a starting dose of 0.1 U/kg/d (n = 73). Both groups received supplemental rapid-acting insulin before meals for BG > 200 mg/dL.. Primary outcome was mean difference in daily BG between groups. Main secondary endpoints included differences in frequency of hypoglycemia, glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c), complications, emergency department visits, and hospital transfers.. Treatment with linagliptin resulted in no significant differences in mean daily BG (146 ± 34 mg/dL vs. 157 ± 36 mg/dL, P = .07) compared to glargine. Linagliptin treatment resulted in fewer mild hypoglycemic events <70 mg/dL (3% vs. 37%, P < .001), but there were no differences in BG < 54 mg/dL (P = .06) or <40 mg/dL (P = .05) compared to glargine. There were no significant between-group differences in HbA1c, length of stay, complications, emergency department visits, or hospitalizations.. Treatment with linagliptin resulted in noninferior glycemic control and in significantly lower risk of hypoglycemia compared to insulin glargine in long-term care and skilled nursing facility residents with type 2 diabetes.

Topics: Aged; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine; Linagliptin; Male; Residential Facilities; Skilled Nursing Facilities

To evaluate the glycaemic control achieved by prandial once-daily insulin glulisine injection timing adjustment, based on a continuous glucose monitoring sensor, in comparison to once-daily insulin glulisine injection before breakfast in patients with type 2 diabetes who are uncontrolled with once-daily basal insulin glargine.. This was a 24-week open-label, randomized, controlled, multicentre trial. At the end of an 8-week period of basal insulin optimization, patients with HbA1c ≥ 7.5% and FPG < 130 mg/dL were randomized (1:1) to either arm A (no sensor) or arm B (sensor) to receive 16-week intensified prandial glulisine treatment. Patients in arm A received pre-breakfast glulisine, and patients in arm B received glulisine before the meal with the highest glucose elevation based on sensor data. The primary outcome was mean HbA1c at week 24 and secondary outcomes included rates of hypoglycaemic events and insulin dosage.. A total of 121 patients were randomized to arm A (n = 61) or arm B (n = 60). There was no difference in mean HbA1c at week 24 between arms A and B (8.5% ± 1.2% vs 8.4% ± 1.0%; P = .66). The prandial insulin glulisine dosage for arm A and arm B was 9.3 and 10.1 units, respectively (P = .39). The frequency of hypoglycaemic events did not differ between study arms (36.1% vs 51.7%; P = .08).. Using a CGM sensor to identify the meal with the highest glucose excursion and adjusting the timing of prandial insulin treatment did not show any advantage in terms of glycaemic control or safety in our patients.

Topics: Aged; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Monitoring; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Humans; Hyperglycemia; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin Resistance; Intention to Treat Analysis; Lost to Follow-Up; Male; Meals; Middle Aged; Monitoring, Ambulatory; Patient Dropouts; Pilot Projects

To test the hypothesis that "induction" intensive insulin therapy (IIT) needs to be followed by "maintenance therapy" to preserve β-cell function, and to evaluate the impact on β-cell function over 2 years of two approaches to maintenance therapy: intermittent short-term IIT every 3 months vs daily metformin.. In this trial, 24 adults with a mean type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) duration of 2.0 ± 1.7 years and glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) levels 6.4 ± 0.1% (46 ± 1.1mmol/mol) were randomized to 3 weeks of induction IIT (glargine, lispro) followed by either repeat IIT for up to 2 weeks every 3 months or daily metformin. Participants underwent serial assessment of β-cell function using the Insulin Secretion-Sensitivity Index-2 (ISSI-2) on an oral glucose tolerance test every 3 months.. The primary outcome of baseline-adjusted ISSI-2 at 2 years was higher in the metformin arm compared with intermittent IIT (245.0 ± 31.7 vs 142.2 ± 18.4; P = .008). Baseline-adjusted HbA1c at 2 years (secondary outcome) was lower in the metformin arm (6.0 ± 0.2% vs 7.3 ± 0.2%; P = .0006) (42 ± 2.2 vs 56 ± 2.2mmol/mol). At study completion, 66.7% of participants randomized to metformin had an HbA1c concentration ≤ 6.0% (≤42mmol/mol), compared with 8.3% of those on intermittent IIT (P = .009). There were no differences in insulin sensitivity.. After induction IIT, metformin was superior to intermittent IIT for maintaining β-cell function and glycaemic control over 2 years. The strategy of induction and maintenance therapy to preserve β-cell function warrants exploration in early T2DM.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine; Insulin Lispro; Insulin Secretion; Insulin-Secreting Cells; Male; Metformin; Middle Aged; Pilot Projects; Treatment Outcome

To assess efficacy and safety of dulaglutide 1.5 mg combined with insulin, categorized by subgroups of baseline glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c; ≤9% and >9% [≤74.9 and >74.9 mmol/mol]), age (<65 and ≥65 years), and duration of diabetes (<10 and ≥10 years) at 6 months in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D).. This pooled analysis was conducted in a population of patients with T2D with similar baseline characteristics who were included in the AWARD-4 and AWARD-9 clinical trials and randomized to dulaglutide 1.5 mg (pooled mean baseline age 59 years, duration of diabetes 13 years, HbA1c 8.4% [68.3 mmol/mol]). Weight and hypoglycaemia were analysed by individual trial. In AWARD-4, dulaglutide plus lispro three times daily was assessed against glargine plus lispro three times daily. In AWARD-9, dulaglutide added to glargine was assessed against placebo added to glargine. Insulins were titrated to target in both trials.. A total of 445 patients were included in this analysis (73% with HbA1c ≤9%, 27% [≤74.9 mmol/mol] with HbA1c >9% [>74.9 mmol/mol]; 70% aged <65 years, 30% aged ≥65 years; 36% with duration of diabetes <10 years, 64% with duration of diabetes ≥10 years). At 6 months, dulaglutide 1.5 mg significantly reduced HbA1c in all subgroups (P < .001), with the highest reduction observed in patients with baseline HbA1c >9% (>74.9 mmol/mol) (range - 1.3% to -2.5% [-14.2 to -27.3 mmol/mol]). The incidence rates of documented symptomatic and severe hypoglycaemia were similar in all subgroups in both trials. The most common adverse events observed in each trial were gastrointestinal in nature.. Dulaglutide 1.5 mg combined with basal or prandial insulin is efficacious for patients with T2D irrespective of age, duration of diabetes or baseline HbA1c.

Topics: Adult; Age Factors; Aged; Analysis of Variance; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Glucagon-Like Peptides; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Immunoglobulin Fc Fragments; Insulin Glargine; Insulin Lispro; Male; Middle Aged; Recombinant Fusion Proteins; Treatment Outcome

To compare the efficacy and safety of adding the glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist exenatide once weekly (QW) 2 mg or placebo among patients with type 2 diabetes who were inadequately controlled despite titrated insulin glargine (IG) ± metformin.. This multicentre, double-blind study (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02229383) randomized (1:1) patients with persistent hyperglycaemia after an 8-week titration phase (glycated haemoglobin [HbA1c] 7.0%-10.5% [53-91 mmol/mol]) to exenatide QW or placebo. The primary endpoint was HbA1c change from baseline to week 28. Secondary endpoints included body weight, 2-hour postprandial glucose, and mean daily IG dose.. Of 464 randomized patients (mean: age, 58 years; HbA1c, 8.5% [69 mmol/mol]; diabetes duration, 11.3 years), 91% completed 28 weeks. Exenatide QW + IG vs placebo + IG significantly reduced HbA1c (least-squares mean difference, -0.73% [-8.0 mmol/mol]; 95% confidence interval, -0.93%, -0.53% [-10.2, -5.8 mmol/mol]; P < .001; final HbA1c, 7.55% [59 mmol/mol] and 8.24% [67 mmol/mol], respectively); body weight (-1.50 kg; -2.17, -0.84; P < .001); and 2-hour postprandial glucose (-1.52 mmol/L [-27.5 mg/dL]; -2.15, -0.90 [-38.7, -16.2]; P < .001). Significantly more exenatide QW + IG-treated patients vs placebo + IG-treated patients reached HbA1c <7.0% (<53 mmol/mol) (32.5% vs 7.4%; P < .001); daily IG dose increased by 2 and 4 units, respectively. Gastrointestinal and injection-site adverse events were more frequent with exenatide QW + IG (15.1% and 7.8%, respectively) than with placebo + IG (10.8% and 3.0%, respectively); hypoglycaemia incidence was similar between the exenatide QW + IG (29.7%) and placebo + IG (29.0%) groups, with no major hypoglycaemic events.. Among patients with inadequate glycaemic control, exenatide QW significantly improved glucose control and decreased body weight, without increased hypoglycaemia or unexpected safety findings.

Topics: Aged; Body Mass Index; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Double-Blind Method; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Monitoring; Drug Therapy, Combination; Exenatide; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hyperglycemia; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Incretins; Insulin Glargine; Male; Middle Aged; Obesity; Weight Loss

To study the effectiveness of exenatide with metformin and sequential treatment with exenatide and glargine added to metformin and their influence on insulin sensitivity and adipose distribution.. 20 newly diagnosed obese type 2 diabetic patients were enrolled, and 2-month washout treatment of metformin, 6-month exenatide treatment, and 6-month glargine treatment were administrated sequentially accompanied with previous metformin. Glucolipid metabolic parameters were compared among groups. Adipose distribution was quantified with computerized tomography according to anatomy, dividing into visceral adipose tissue (VAT) and subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT), adding up to total adipose tissue (TAT).. The 6-month exenatide treatment dramatically ameliorated the glucose and lipid profile, improved insulin sensitivity, and mainly decreased VAT and also the ratio of VAT/SAT (RVS). The following 6-month glargine treatment increased VAT. The whole 12-month sequential treatment with exenatide and glargine added to metformin basically improved the insulin sensitivity and glucolipid control though VAT rebounded at the end, however without deteriorating the other parameters.. Exenatide is an ideal treatment for obese type 2 diabetic patients in the aspect of adipose tissue distribution. Sequential treatment of exenatide and glargine could be an alternative for low-income patients who cannot afford GLP-1 agonist for long time. This trial is registered with ChiCTR-OOC-17013679.

Topics: Adiposity; Adult; Aged; Blood Glucose; Body Fat Distribution; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Exenatide; Female; Humans; Insulin Glargine; Insulin Resistance; Insulin, Long-Acting; Intra-Abdominal Fat; Male; Metformin; Middle Aged; Obesity, Abdominal; Peptides; Venoms

To compare the continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) or insulin glargine based multiple injections (MDI) therapy on glycemic variations in diabetic patients receiving PN outside of intensive care settings. This was a single-center, randomized, open-label trial. Patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) who were receiving parenteral nutrition (PN) were recruited. After baseline data were collected, recruited patients were then randomized 1:1 to a CSII group or a MDI group. All patients were subjected to a 4-day retrospective Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM). The primary endpoint was the differences of the 24-hrs mean amplitude of glycemic excursion (MAGE) in patients receiving the PN therapy between the two groups. A total of 102 patients with T2D receiving PN were recruited. Patients in the CSII group had a significantly decreased mean glucose level (MBG), the standard deviation of MG (SDBG), MAGE, and the coefficient of variation (CV%) compared to those in MDI group (all P < 0.01). Furthermore, we found that the patients who received a bolus insulin dose required maintaining euglycemic control was gradually decreased during the PN period in both groups at the endpoint. The administration of insulin via CSII led to a significant decrease in glycemic variations in patients receiving PN.

Topics: Aged; Blood Glucose; Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Injections, Subcutaneous; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Male; Middle Aged; Outpatients; Parenteral Nutrition; Retrospective Studies

To compare the efficacy and safety of MK-1293 insulin glargine (Mk-Gla) and Lantus (Sa-Gla) in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).. This Phase 3, randomized, active-controlled, open-label, 24-week clinical trial (ClinicalTrials.gov number NCT02059187) enrolled 531 participants with T2DM (HbA1c ≤11.0%) either eligible for or currently taking basal insulin (≥10 U/day). Participants were randomized 1:1 to once-daily Mk-Gla (n = 263) or Sa-Gla (n = 263). Titration of insulin was guided by a fasting plasma glucose (FPG)-based dosing algorithm. The primary efficacy objective was to demonstrate the non-inferiority of change from baseline in HbA1c (margin of 0.40% [4.4 mmol/mol]) with Mk-Gla versus Sa-Gla after 24 weeks. The primary safety objective was anti-insulin antibody development after 24 weeks.. For Mk-Gla and Sa-Gla, the least squares (LS) mean HbA1c change from baseline (95% CI) was -1.28 (-1.41, -1.15)% (-14.0 [-15.4, -12.6] mmol/mol) and -1.30 (-1.43, -1.18)% (-14.2 [-15.6, -12.8] mmol/mol). The LS mean HbA1c difference (Mk-Gla minus Sa-Gla) was 0.03 (-0.12, 0.18)% (0.3 [-1.4, 1.9] mmol/mol), meeting non-inferiority and equivalence (secondary objective) criteria. Insulin doses, FPG, and seven-point plasma glucose profiles were similar between groups. Safety and tolerability, including anti-insulin antibody responses, hypoglycaemia, adverse events and body weight, were similar between insulins. The efficacy and safety of Mk-Gla and Sa-Gla were similar both in participants who were insulin-treated or insulin-naïve at baseline.. Mk-Gla and Sa-Gla demonstrated similar efficacy and safety over 24 weeks of treatment in people with T2DM.

Topics: Aged; Algorithms; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Antibodies; Insulin Glargine; Least-Squares Analysis; Male; Middle Aged; Treatment Outcome

To assess the effect of baseline body mass index (BMI) and the occurrence of nausea and/or vomiting on weight loss induced by semalgutide, a once-weekly glucagon-like peptide 1 analogue for the treatment of type 2 diabetes. Semaglutide demonstrated superior reductions in HbA1c and superior weight loss (by 2.3-6.3 kg) versus different comparators across the SUSTAIN 1 to 5 trials; the contributing factors to weight loss are not established.. Subjects with inadequately controlled type 2 diabetes (drug-naïve or on background treatment) were randomized to subcutaneous semaglutide 0.5 mg (excluding SUSTAIN 3), 1.0 mg (all trials), or comparator (placebo, sitagliptin, exenatide extended release or insulin glargine). Subjects were subdivided by baseline BMI and reporting (yes/no) of any nausea and/or vomiting. Change from baseline in body weight was assessed within each trial and subgroup. A mediation analysis separated weight loss into direct or indirect (mediated by nausea or vomiting) effects.. Clinically relevant weight-loss differences were observed across all BMI subgroups, with a trend towards higher absolute weight loss with higher baseline BMI. Overall, 15.2% to 24.0% and 21.5% to 27.2% of subjects experienced nausea or vomiting with semaglutide 0.5 and 1.0 mg, respectively, versus 6.0% to 14.1% with comparators. Only 0.07 to 0.5 kg of the treatment difference between semaglutide and comparators was mediated by nausea or vomiting (indirect effects).. In SUSTAIN 1 to 5, semaglutide-induced weight loss was consistently greater versus comparators, regardless of baseline BMI. The contribution of nausea or vomiting to this weight loss was minor.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Body Mass Index; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Exenatide; Female; Glucagon-Like Peptides; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine; Male; Middle Aged; Nausea; Sitagliptin Phosphate; Treatment Outcome; Vomiting; Weight Loss

Treatment with basal insulin in Chinese populations is currently sub-optimal, with delayed initiation of insulin treatment and inadequate dose titration. Increasing the initial dose of insulin may be a practicable and effective solution to the problem of titration. A higher initial dose will be helpful for patients to achieve the blood glucose target and improve treatment satisfaction and compliance as well require fewer steps to titrate. Considering that overweight and obese patients usually require higher insulin doses because of insulin resistance, a higher initial dose of the basal insulin is feasible in overweight and obese patients with type 2 diabetes. However, safety is an important issue needing to be considered for higher initial dose treatment. The aim of this study is to assess the safety and efficacy of higher (0.3 U/kg) compared with standard (0.2 U/kg) starting doses of basal insulin in overweight and obese Chinese patients with type 2 diabetes who have failed to achieve glycaemic control using oral antidiabetic drugs (OADs).. This is a phase IV, randomized, non-inferiority, open-label trial that will be conducted at approximately 50 centers in China. Eight hundred eighty overweight and obese adult Chinese patients with type 2 diabetes will be randomized to receive higher (0.3 U/kg) or standard (0.2 U/kg) starting doses of basal insulin glargine (100 U/ml) during a 16-week period. The primary endpoint is whether a higher initial dose of basal insulin (0.3 U/kg) is non-inferior to a standard initial dose (0.2 U/kg) based on the percentage of patients with at least one episode of hypoglycaemia (≤ 3.9 mmol/l or severe) over 16 weeks. Secondary endpoints include evaluation of glycosylated haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), fasting blood glucose, postprandial blood glucose, insulin dose and safety.. This study is the first randomized-controlled study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of basal insulin treatment with a higher starting dose versus standard starting dose in overweight and obese Chinese patients with type 2 diabetes. Results of this study could generate evidence to support the feasibility of a higher starting dose of basal insulin in diabetes management of overweight and obese Chinese patients, therefore providing an easy approach to improve diabetes management.. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT02836704. Registered on July 7th 2016.. Sanofi China.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; China; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Female; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine; Male; Middle Aged; Overweight

To explore if clinical effects and hypoglycaemia risks associated with insulin glargine 300 U/mL (Gla-300) and 100 U/mL (Gla-100) differed by sulphonylurea and/or glinide (SU/G) treatment.. A post hoc subgroup analysis of 12-month treatment data from the EDITION Japan 2 trial, a randomized, open-label, phase 3 study of Japanese people with type 2 diabetes receiving once-daily Gla-300/Gla-100 + oral antihyperglycaemic drugs. Participants previously receiving SU/G (+SU/G) were compared with those not taking SU/G (-SU/G). Endpoints included HbA1c, hypoglycaemia and body weight.. For +SU/G (n = 152, 63%), HbA1c was reduced from baseline to month 12 for Gla-300 (8.1% to 7.6%) and Gla-100 (8.2% to 7.8%). For -SU/G (n = 89, 37%), reductions were 7.8% to 7.4%, and 7.9% to 7.5% for Gla-300 and Gla-100, respectively. A lower annualized rate of hypoglycaemia with Gla-300 versus Gla-100 was observed at night (00:00-05:59 hours; p = 0.0001) and any time of day (24 hour; p = 0.0015). Irrespective of the insulin used, the incidence and rate of confirmed (≤3.9 mmol/L [≤70 mg/dL]) or severe hypoglycaemia appeared higher in +SU/G versus -SU/G; overall, a reduced incidence of nocturnal hypoglycaemia, and rate of hypoglycaemia at any time, was observed in -SU/G versus +SU/G. In the -SU/G subgroup, body weight gain differences were observed between Gla-300 and Gla-100 (p < 0.0001).. Participants with prior and continued SU/G use had similar therapeutic responses with basal insulin but greater risk of hypoglycaemia than those not using SU/G; hypoglycaemia risk was lower with Gla-300 than Gla-100 in both subgroups.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Blood Glucose; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine; Japan; Male; Middle Aged; Sulfonylurea Compounds

Few studies have evaluated continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) in older patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) not using injectable therapy. CGM is useful for investigating hypoglycemia and glycemic variability, which is associated with complications in T2DM.. A CGM substudy of Individualized treatMent aPproach for oldER patIents in a randomized trial in type 2 diabetes Mellitus (IMPERIUM)) was conducted. Patients were vulnerable (moderately ill and/or frail) older (≥65 years) individuals with suboptimally controlled T2DM. Strategy A comprised glucose-dependent therapies (n = 26) with a nonsulfonylurea oral antihyperglycemic medication (OAM) and a glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist as the first injectable. Strategy B comprised non-glucose-dependent therapies (n = 21) with sulfonylurea as the preferred OAM and insulin glargine as the first injectable. Primary endpoints were duration and percentage of time spent with blood glucose (BG) ≤70 mg/dL over 24 hours at week 24.. Duration and percentage of time spent with hypoglycemia at ≤70 mg/dL were similar for Strategy A and Strategy B; glycemic control improved similarly in both arms (LSM change in HbA1c at week 24; A = -1.2%, B = -1.4%). Duration and percentage time spent with euglycemia and hyperglycemia were also similar in both arms. However, Strategy A was associated with lower within-day (21.1 ± 1.2 vs 25.1 ± 1.4, P = .046) and between-day (5.4 ± 1.0 vs 9.1 ± 1.3, P = .038) BG variability (coefficient of variance [LSM ± SE]) at week 24.. This CGM substudy in older patients with T2DM showed lower within- and between-day BG variability with glucose-dependent therapies but similar HbA1c reductions and hypoglycemia duration with glucose-independent strategies.

Topics: Age Factors; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Blood Glucose; Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Female; Frail Elderly; Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Incidence; Injections, Subcutaneous; Insulin Glargine; Male; Sulfonylurea Compounds; Treatment Outcome

SENIOR compared the efficacy and safety of insulin glargine 300 units/mL (Gla-300) with glargine 100 units/mL (Gla-100) in older people (≥65 years old) with type 2 diabetes.. SENIOR was an open-label, two-arm, parallel-group, multicenter phase 3b trial designed to enroll ∼20% of participants aged ≥75 years. Participants were randomized 1:1 to Gla-300 or Gla-100, titrated to a fasting self-monitored plasma glucose of 5.0-7.2 mmol/L (90-130 mg/dL).. Efficacy and safety of Gla-300 was demonstrated in older people (≥65 years of age) with type 2 diabetes, with comparable reductions in HbA

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Aging; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Fasting; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Incidence; Insulin Glargine; Male; Treatment Outcome

This post hoc analysis of gastrointestinal (GI) adverse events (AEs) from the phase 3 LixiLan-L (NCT02058160) and LixiLan-O (NCT02058147) trials aimed to determine the frequency and timing of nausea, vomiting, and diarrhoea for iGlarLixi, a titratable, fixed-ratio combination of insulin glargine 100 units/mL (iGlar) and lixisenatide, versus iGlar alone or iGlar and lixisenatide alone, in patients with type 2 diabetes uncontrolled with oral antidiabetes drugs (OADs) or basal insulin ± OADs. In iGlarLixi-treated patients, the rate of GI AEs during the initial weeks of treatment was lower versus patients treated with lixisenatide alone (9.6% and 11.7% of iGlarLixi-treated patients in LixiLan-L and LixiLan-O, respectively, vs. 27.5% of lixisenatide-treated patients in LixiLan-O). Beyond day 60, these rates were generally low and similar to those of lixisenatide. These lower rates are likely due to the gradual titration of lixisenatide in iGlarLixi. Median durations of intermittent GI AEs in the iGlarLixi arms were 6.0, 2.0 and 2.5 days (LixiLan-L), and 5.0, 1.0 and 3.5 days (LixiLan-O), respectively. iGlarLixi-associated GI AEs were transient, mostly mild or moderate in severity, and occurred mainly during initial titration.

Topics: Adult; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Combinations; Female; Gastrointestinal Diseases; Humans; Incidence; Insulin Glargine; Male; Peptides; Postprandial Period; Retrospective Studies

Pediatric type 2 diabetes prevalence is increasing, with β-cell dysfunction key in its pathogenesis. The RISE Pediatric Medication Study compared two approaches-glargine followed by metformin and metformin alone-in preserving or improving β-cell function in youth with impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) or recently diagnosed type 2 diabetes during and after therapy withdrawal.. Ninety-one pubertal, overweight/obese 10-19-year-old youth with IGT (60%) or type 2 diabetes of <6 months duration (40%) were randomized to either 3 months of insulin glargine with a target glucose of 4.4-5.0 mmol/L followed by 9 months of metformin or to 12 months of metformin alone. β-Cell function (insulin sensitivity paired with β-cell responses) was assessed by hyperglycemic clamp at baseline, 12 months (on treatment), and 15 months (3 months off treatment).. No significant differences were observed between treatment groups at baseline, 12 months, or 15 months in β-cell function, BMI percentile, HbA. In youth with IGT or recently diagnosed type 2 diabetes, neither 3 months of glargine followed by 9 months of metformin nor 12 months of metformin alone halted the progressive deterioration of β-cell function. Alternate approaches to preserve β-cell function in youth are needed.

Topics: Adolescent; Age Factors; Blood Glucose; Child; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Glucose Intolerance; Glucose Tolerance Test; Humans; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin Resistance; Insulin-Secreting Cells; Male; Metformin; Young Adult

Despite their widespread use in this population, data on the pharmacodynamic (PD) properties of the insulin analogs detemir and glargine in severely obese patients with type 2 diabetes are lacking.. The primary objective of the study was to compare the PD properties of two different doses of the basal insulin analogs detemir and glargine in patients with type 2 diabetes and a BMI > 35 kg/m2. PD data were derived from euglycemic clamp studies over 30 hours and each subject was studied for four times after the subcutaneous injection of a lower (0.8 U/kg body weight) and higher (1.6 U/kg body weight) dose of both detemir and glargine using a single-blind, randomised cross-over design.. Six male and four female patients with type 2 diabetes and a mean BMI of 43.2±5.1 kg/m2 (mean age 55.7±2 years, mean HbA1c 7.2±0.3%) completed the study. The total GIRAUC0-30 (mean difference 1224 mg/kg, 95%CI 810-1637, p = 0.00001), GIRAUC0-24 (mean difference 1040 mg/kg, 95%CI 657-1423; p = 0.00001), GIRAUC24-30 (mean difference 181 mg/kg, 95%CI 64-298; p = 0.004), GIRmax (mean difference 0.93 mg/kg/min, 95%CI 0.22-1.64, p = 0.01) and time to GIRmax (+1.9 hours, 95%CI 0.5-3.2; p = 0.009) were higher after the higher doses of both insulins, without significant differences between detemir and glargine. However, during the last 6 hours of the clamp the GIRAUC24-30 was significantly increased with glargine (mean difference 122 mg/kg, 95%CI 6-237, p = 0.043), reflecting a more pronounced late glucose lowering effect.. A clear dose-response relationship can be demonstrated for both insulin analogs, even at very high doses in severely obese patients with type 2 diabetes. Compared to detemir, glargine has a more pronounced late glucose lowering effect 24-30 h after its injection.. Controlled-Trials.com ISRCTN57547229.

Topics: Adult; Biomarkers; Blood Glucose; C-Peptide; Cross-Over Studies; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Female; Glucose Clamp Technique; Humans; Insulin Detemir; Insulin Glargine; Male; Middle Aged; Obesity

The clinical and economic impact of diabetes is growing in the US. Choosing therapies that are both effective and cost-effective is becoming increasingly important. The aim of the present analysis was to assess the long-term cost-effectiveness of IDegLira for treatment of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus not meeting glycemic targets on basal insulin, vs insulin glargine U100 plus insulin aspart, in the US setting.. Long-term projections of cost-effectiveness outcomes were made using the IQVIA CORE Diabetes Model. Clinical inputs were based on the DUAL VII trial, with costs (accounted from a healthcare payer perspective) and utilities based on published sources. Future costs and clinical benefits were discounted at 3% annually.. IDegLira was associated with increased discounted life expectancy by 0.02 years and increased discounted quality-adjusted life expectancy by 0.22 quality-adjusted life years compared with insulin glargine U100 plus insulin aspart. Evaluation of direct medical costs suggested that the mean cost per patient with IDegLira was $3,571 lower than with insulin glargine U100 plus insulin aspart. The cost saving was driven predominantly by the lower acquisition cost of IDegLira compared with insulin glargine U100 plus insulin aspart, with further cost savings identified as a result of avoided treatment of diabetes-related complications. IDegLira was associated with improved clinical outcomes at a reduced cost compared with insulin glargine U100 plus insulin aspart.. Based on clinical trial data, the present analysis suggests that IDegLira is associated with improved clinical outcomes and cost savings compared with treatment with insulin glargine U100 plus insulin aspart for patients with type 2 diabetes not achieving glycemic control on basal insulin in the US. Therefore, IDegLira is likely to be considered dominant (cost saving and more effective) and, consequently, highly cost-effective in the US setting.

Topics: Aged; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Diabetes Complications; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Combinations; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Health Expenditures; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Aspart; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Lipids; Liraglutide; Male; Middle Aged; Models, Econometric; Monte Carlo Method; Quality-Adjusted Life Years

We compared the satisfaction levels of patients with type 2 diabetes undergoing combination therapy with lixisenatide (LIX) and basal insulin with that of patients undergoing multiple daily insulin injection (MDI) therapy.. The study was a 12-week open-label, randomized, multicenter, controlled trial. Participants were Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes receiving MDI for >3 months. Patients were randomly assigned to each treatment cohort: (i) a group that continued MDI (MDI group); and (ii) a group that switched from MDI to combination therapy with LIX and basal insulin (LIX group). The primary outcome was change in Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire scores from baseline to 12 weeks between these two groups. Key secondary outcomes were glycated hemoglobin and body weight changes.. A total of 31 patients were initially enrolled in the study, and 26 of them completed the study. The change in Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire scores in the LIX group was significantly greater compared with that in the MDI group. Mean changes in glycated hemoglobin levels were -0.05 ± 0.37% in the MDI group and 0.04 ± 0.38% in the LIX group (P = 0.36). Mean changes in body weight were +0.6 ± 1.8 kg in the MDI group and -2.5 ± 1.8 kg in the LIX group (P < 0.01).. Switching from MDI to combination therapy with LIX and basal insulin improved satisfaction levels while maintaining glycemic control in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes.

Topics: Aged; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Male; Middle Aged; Patient Satisfaction; Peptides

Medical strategies targeting remission of type 2 diabetes have not been systematically studied.. This trial assessed the feasibility, safety, and potential to induce remission of a short-term intensive metabolic strategy.. A randomized, parallel, open-label pilot trial with 83 participants followed for 52 weeks.. Ambulatory care.. Patients with type 2 diabetes of up to 3 years in duration.. Participants were randomized to: (1) an 8-week intensive metabolic intervention, (2) a 16-week intensive metabolic intervention, or (3) standard diabetes care. During the intensive intervention period, weight loss and normoglycemia were targeted using lifestyle approaches and treatment with metformin, acarbose, and insulin glargine. Diabetes drugs were then discontinued in the intervention groups and participants were followed for hyperglycemic relapse.. On-treatment normoglycemia.. At 8 weeks, 50.0% of the 8-week intervention group vs 3.6% of controls achieved normoglycemia on therapy [relative risk (RR), 14.0; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.97 to 99.38), and at 16 weeks, these percentages were 70.4% in the 16-week group and 3.6% in controls (RR, 19.7; 95% CI, 2.83 to 137.13). Twelve weeks after completion of the intervention, 21.4% of the 8-week group compared with 10.7% of controls (RR, 2.00; 95% CI, 0.55 to 7.22) and 40.7% of the 16-week group compared with 14.3% of controls (RR, 2.85; 95% CI, 1.03 to 7.87) met hemoglobin A1C criteria for complete or partial diabetes remission.. A short course of intensive lifestyle and drug therapy achieves on-treatment normoglycemia and promotes sustained weight loss. It may also achieve prolonged, drug-free diabetes remission and strongly supports ongoing studies of novel medical regimens targeting remission.

Topics: Acarbose; Aged; Ambulatory Care; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Diet, Reducing; Exercise; Feasibility Studies; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine; Life Style; Male; Metformin; Middle Aged; Pilot Projects; Remission Induction; Weight Reduction Programs

Several pharmacological treatment options are available for type 2 diabetes; however, many patients do not achieve optimum glycaemic control and therefore new therapies are necessary. We assessed the efficacy and safety of semaglutide, a glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) analogue in clinical development, compared with insulin glargine in patients with type 2 diabetes who were inadequately controlled with metformin (with or without sulfonylureas).. We did a randomised, open-label, non-inferiority, parallel-group, multicentre, multinational, phase 3a trial (SUSTAIN 4) at 196 sites in 14 countries. Eligible participants were insulin-naive patients with type 2 diabetes, aged 18 years and older, who had insufficient glycaemic control with metformin either alone or in combination with a sulfonylurea. We randomly assigned participants (1:1:1) to either subcutaneous once-weekly 0·5 mg or 1·0 mg semaglutide (doses reached after following a fixed dose-escalation regimen) or once-daily insulin glargine (starting dose 10 IU per day, then titrated weekly to a pre-breakfast self-measured plasma glucose target of 4·0-5·5 mmol/L [72-99 mg/dL]) for 30 weeks. In all treatment groups, previous background metformin and sulfonylurea treatment was continued throughout the trial. We did the randomisation using an interactive voice or web response system. The primary endpoint was change in mean HbA. Between Aug 4, 2014, and Sept 3, 2015, we randomly assigned 1089 participants to treatment; the mITT population consisted of 362 participants assigned to 0·5 mg semaglutide, 360 to 1·0 mg semaglutide, and 360 to insulin glargine. 49 (14%) participants assigned to 0·5 mg semaglutide discontinued treatment prematurely, compared with 55 (15%) assigned to 1·0 mg semaglutide, and 26 (7%) assigned to insulin glargine. Most discontinuations were due to adverse events-mostly gastrointestinal with semaglutide, and others such as skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders (eg, rash, pruritus, and urticaria) with insulin glargine. From a mean baseline HbA. Compared with insulin glargine, semaglutide resulted in greater reductions in HbA. Novo Nordisk A/S.

Topics: Aged; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Glucagon-Like Peptides; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine; Male; Metformin; Middle Aged

To evaluate the pharmacodynamics of lixisenatide once daily vs sitagliptin once daily in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes receiving insulin glargine U100.. This multicentre, open-label, phase IV study (NEXTAGE Study; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02200991) randomly assigned 136 patients to either lixisenatide once daily via subcutaneous injection (10 µg initially increased weekly by 5 up to 20 µg) or once-daily oral sitagliptin 50 mg. The primary endpoint was the change in postprandial glucose (PPG) exposure 4 hours after a standardized breakfast (PPG area under the plasma glucose concentration-time curve [AUC. Lixisenatide reduced PPG significantly more than sitagliptin, when these agents were added to basal insulin glargine U100, and was well tolerated.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Biomarkers; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Resistance; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Gastric Emptying; Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hyperglycemia; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Injections, Subcutaneous; Insulin Glargine; Japan; Male; Middle Aged; Peptides; Postprandial Period; Sitagliptin Phosphate

We analyzed the efficacy and safety of once weekly dulaglutide 0.75 mg by sex in 2 randomized, controlled phase 3 studies in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes (a 52-week monotherapy study [comparator liraglutide 0.9 mg] and a 26-week combination therapy study [comparator insulin glargine]). Females comprised 18% of patients in the monotherapy study and 29% of patients in the combination therapy study. Mean reductions from baseline in glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) were similar between the sexes for dulaglutide- and liraglutide-treated patients (range -1.17% to -1.49%). Females had numerically greater weight loss or less weight gain than males across all treatment groups. The percentages of patients with reductions in both HbA1c and weight from baseline were also greater for females than for males in all treatment groups. In all treatment groups, the incidences of treatment-emergent adverse events tended to be greater among females than among males. No differences in the incidences of total or nocturnal hypoglycemia were observed between the sexes in any treatment group. Overall, in 2 studies in Japan, across all treatment groups it appeared that HbA1c lowering was unaffected by patient sex, while female patients had greater weight loss or less weight gain and greater incidence of adverse events, including nausea, compared to male patients. Incidences of patients discontinuing dulaglutide early due to adverse event were low (<10%) for both sexes, and no new safety concerns related to dulaglutide were identified for either sex. Therefore, the benefit/risk ratio for dulaglutide remains unchanged, positive for both sexes.

Topics: Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Glucagon-Like Peptides; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Immunoglobulin Fc Fragments; Insulin Glargine; Japan; Liraglutide; Male; Middle Aged; Recombinant Fusion Proteins; Sex Factors; Treatment Outcome

To assess the impact of baseline characteristics on clinical outcomes in the LixiLan-L trial, a randomized open-label trial designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of iGlarLixi, a novel fixed-ratio combination of insulin glargine 100 U (iGlar) plus lixisenatide, in comparison with iGlar over 30 weeks in a population of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) inadequately controlled on a previous regimen of basal insulin alone or in combination with 1 or 2 oral glucose-lowering drugs.. Compared with the iGlar treatment group, patients treated with iGlarLixi showed consistently greater reductions in HbA1c during the treatment period, with higher percentages of patients achieving the HbA1c target level of <7% (<53 mmol/mol) in all of the subpopulations tested (P < .0001 for all), having consistent mitigation of body weight gain and with no major differences in the incidence of hypoglycaemia.. iGlarLixi consistently improved glycaemic control compared with iGlar in all baseline characteristic subgroups of patients with T2DM inadequately controlled with insulin, including difficult-to-treat subgroups of patients with long duration of diabetes, obesity and high HbA1c. Clinical trial number: NCT02058160 (clinicaltrials.gov).

Topics: Adult; Aged; Blood Glucose; Body Mass Index; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Combinations; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Insulin Glargine; Male; Middle Aged; Peptides; Time Factors

Primary objective: Identify risk factors associated with severe hypoglycemia (SH) and investigate the association between mild hypoglycemia and SH in people with type 2 diabetes starting insulin. Secondary objectives: Investigate the association of demographics and clinical factors with SH incidence.. Integrated trial database data were obtained for 3 randomized controlled trials that included insulin-naïve people with type 2 diabetes initiating basal (insulin glargine) versus biphasic (insulin lispro mixture) insulin. Standard definitions were used for SH; mild hypoglycemia was defined as all non-SH. Cox regression identified risk factors associated with SH and the correlation between SH and mild hypoglycemia.. Data were pooled (N=2931). During 24-48weeks' treatment, 2127 (72.6%) participants experienced ≥1 mild hypoglycemic event but no SH (mean mild hypoglycemia rate=2.33/month). 56 participants (1.9%) experienced ≥1 SH event plus mild hypoglycemia (mean mild hypoglycemia rate=3.95/month); 748 participants (25.5%) had no hypoglycemia. Among factors tested, only mild hypoglycemia rate/month was associated with SH. SH risk was higher (HR=4.24; 95%CI=2.57-6.99;p<0.0001) for participants experiencing multiple mild hypoglycemic events/month compared with those experiencing ≤1 mild hypoglycemic event/month.. Mild hypoglycemia may predict the first SH event, which is important because SH is a strong and consistent risk factor for morbidity/mortality.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Female; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin Lispro; Male; Middle Aged; Risk Factors; Severity of Illness Index

Fibrinolytic factors, plasminogen activator inhibitor-1, tissue plasminogen activator, tissue plasminogen activator/plasminogen activator-complex and the haemostatic factor von Willebrand factor are known markers of cardiovascular disease. Their plasma levels are adversely affected in patients with dysglycaemia, and glucose normalization with insulin glargine might improve the levels of these factors.. Prespecified Swedish substudy of the Outcome Reduction with an Initial Glargine Intervention trial (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00069784). Tissue plasminogen activator activity, tissue plasminogen activator antigen, plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 antigen, tissue plasminogen activator/plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 complex and von Willebrand factor were analysed at study start, after 2 years and at the end of the study (median follow-up of 6.2 years).. Of 129 patients (mean age of 64 ± 7 years, females: 19%), 68 (53%) and 61 (47%) were randomized to the insulin glargine and standard care group, respectively. Allocation to insulin glargine did not significantly affect the studied fibrinolytic markers or von Willebrand factor compared to standard care. Likewise, there were no significant differences in plasminogen activator inhibitor-1, tissue plasminogen activator antigen and von Willebrand factor. During the whole study period, the within-group analysis revealed a curvilinear pattern and significant changes for tissue plasminogen activator/plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 complex, tissue plasminogen activator antigen and von Willebrand factor in the insulin glargine but not in the standard care group.. In people with dysglycaemia and other cardiovascular risk factors, basal insulin does not improve the levels of markers of fibrinolysis or von Willebrand factor compared to standard glucose-lowering treatments.

Topics: Aged; Biomarkers; Blood Glucose; Cardiovascular Diseases; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Female; Fibrinolysis; Glucose Intolerance; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine; Male; Middle Aged; Plasminogen Activator Inhibitor 1; Risk Factors; Sweden; Time Factors; Tissue Plasminogen Activator; Treatment Outcome; von Willebrand Factor

It is known that β-cell function can be enhanced by direct stimulation of insulin secretion or by induction of β-cell rest, but whether both strategies can complement each other has not yet been examined. A total of 28 people with type 2 diabetes (glycated haemoglobin 7.8% ± 0.5%) were treated with either lixisenatide or titrated insulin glargine, followed by their combined administration, each over 4 weeks. First- and second-phase insulin secretion during an intravenous glucose challenge were calculated. First- and second-phase insulin secretion were not increased with glargine alone, but increased after addition of lixisenatide ( P  < .001). Lixisenatide alone increased first- and second-phase insulin secretion ( P  < .01). Addition of insulin glargine tended to further increase first-phase insulin secretion (P = .054), as well as insulin and C-peptide concentrations ( P  < .05). Second-phase insulin secretion was not affected by the addition of glargine. The sequence of initiating lixisenatide or glargine had no effect on the final measures of glycaemia or insulin secretion. Thus, lixisenatide and, to a lesser extent, insulin glargine, increase glucose-stimulated insulin secretion in an additive manner.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin Secretion; Insulin-Secreting Cells; Male; Middle Aged; Peptides

Topics: Body Mass Index; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Disease Progression; Drug Combinations; Drug Resistance; Drug Therapy, Combination; Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hyperglycemia; Hypoglycemia; Insulin Glargine; Middle Aged; Obesity; Peptides; Postprandial Period; Weight Gain

To compare insulin glargine 300 U/mL (Gla-300) with glargine 100 U/mL (Gla-100) in Japanese adults with uncontrolled type 2 diabetes on basal insulin and oral anti-hyperglycaemic drugs over 12 months.. EDITION JP 2 was a randomised, open-label, phase 3 study. Following a 6-month treatment period, participants continued receiving previously assigned once daily Gla-300 or Gla-100, plus oral anti-hyperglycaemic drugs, in a 6-month extension period. Glycaemic control, hypoglycaemia and adverse events were assessed.. Over 12 months, Gla-300-treated participants achieved sustained glycaemic control and experienced less hypoglycaemia, particularly at night, versus Gla-100, supporting 6-month results.

Topics: Adult; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Humans; Hyperglycemia; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine; Japan; Male; Middle Aged; Treatment Outcome

To determine whether previously reported reductions in hypoglycemia associated with insulin glargine 300 U/mL (Gla-300) compared with insulin glargine 100 U/mL (Gla-100) are impacted by patient risk category in type 2 diabetes (T2D), clinical performance measures based on the Healthcare Effectiveness Data and Information Set (HEDIS) were applied to patient-level data from the EDITION 2 and EDITION 3 clinical trials that compared Gla-300 and Gla-100.. In this post hoc analysis, patients were stratified as low risk (LR) if patients were <65 years old with no comorbidities derived from HEDIS (HbA1c target <7.0% [53 mmol/mol]), or as high risk (HR) if patients were either ≥65 years old or had one or more HEDIS-defined comorbidities (HbA1c target <8.0% [64 mmol/mol]). Primary endpoint was a composite of patients achieving HbA1c target without confirmed or severe hypoglycemia over 6 months in the different treatment groups in each of the EDITION trials.. There was a statistically nonsignificant trend of more patients treated with Gla-300 achieving the composite endpoint compared with Gla-100 in both the LR and HR patient cohorts, regardless of prior insulin experience. A similar trend was observed for the composite endpoint of HbA1c target without nocturnal hypoglycemia.. There is a consistent, nonsignificant trend suggesting that Gla-300 might reduce the burden of hypoglycemia compared with Gla-100 in patients with T2D irrespective of whether they are classed as LR or HR based on age- and National Committee for Quality Assurance Healthcare Effectiveness Data and Information Set-derived comorbidities.

Topics: Activities of Daily Living; Aged; Cohort Studies; Delayed-Action Preparations; Diabetes Complications; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Monitoring; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hyperglycemia; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Incidence; Insulin Glargine; Middle Aged; Osmolar Concentration; Reproducibility of Results; Retrospective Studies; Risk; Severity of Illness Index; United States

Multiple bloodglucose-lowering agents have been linked to cardiovascular events. Preliminary studies showed improvement in left ventricular (LV) function during glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist administration. Underlying mechanisms, however, are unclear. The purpose of this study was to investigate myocardial perfusion and oxidative metabolism in type 2 diabetic (T2DM) patients with LV systolic dysfunction as compared to healthy controls. Furthermore, effects of 26-weeks of exenatide versus insulin glargine administration on cardiac function, perfusion and oxidative metabolism in T2DM patients with LV dysfunction were explored.. Twenty-six T2DM patients with LV systolic dysfunction (cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) derived LV ejection fraction (LVEF) of 47 ± 13%) and 10 controls (LVEF of 59 ± 4%, P < 0.01 as compared to patients) were analyzed. Both myocardial perfusion during adenosine-induced hyperemia (P < 0.01), and coronary flow reserve (P < 0.01), measured by [. T2DM patients with LV systolic dysfunction did not have altered myocardial efficiency as compared to healthy controls. Exenatide or insulin glargine had no effects on cardiac function, perfusion or oxidative metabolism. Trial registration NCT00766857.

Topics: Aged; Coronary Circulation; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Diabetic Cardiomyopathies; Energy Metabolism; Exenatide; Female; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Incretins; Insulin Glargine; Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Cine; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Perfusion Imaging; Myocardium; Netherlands; Oxidation-Reduction; Oxygen Consumption; Peptides; Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography; Recovery of Function; Stroke Volume; Systole; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Venoms; Ventricular Dysfunction, Left; Ventricular Function, Left

We have previously reported that once-weekly albiglutide was noninferior to thrice-daily lispro for glycemic lowering, with decreased weight and risk of hypoglycemia, in patients inadequately controlled on basal insulin over 26 weeks. Findings after 52 weeks reveal similar responses to albiglutide as an add-on to insulin glargine.

Topics: Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Monitoring; Drug Resistance; Drug Therapy, Combination; Glucagon-Like Peptide 1; Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hyperglycemia; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Incidence; Incretins; Insulin Glargine; Insulin Lispro; Meals; Risk; Weight Gain; Weight Loss

Not only within-day glycemic variability but also day-to-day glycemic variability is a risk factor for diabetic patients. However, the ways of controlling day-to-day glycemic variability are unclear. We hypothesized that the durability of basal insulin plays an important role in controlling day-to-day glycemic variability in type 2 diabetes patients, and we therefore aimed to evaluate whether glargine U300, which exhibits prolonged absorption compared with glargine U100 but the same composition as glargine U100, would lead to improved day-to-day glycemic variability.. This was a single-center, randomized, open-label, crossover study in type 2 diabetes patients using basal insulin therapy. After switching from 4 weeks of treatment with glargine U100 or U300, the patients performed continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) for 72 h in an environment with routine activities and mealtimes. The mean of daily difference (MODD) was assessed as day-to-day glycemic variability.. We enrolled 22 patients, and 17 patients completed the study. The MODD assessed as day-to-day glycemic variability was significantly lower with glargine U300 than with glargine U100 (1.8 ± 0.6 mmol/L vs. 2.4 ± 0.9 mmol/L, P = 0.006). No significant difference was observed in short-term glycemic variability between the two glargine formulations as measured by the standard deviation, coefficient of variation, mean amplitude of glucose excursion.. Compared with glargine U100 treatment, glargine U300 treatment improved the MODD as assessed by CGM in type 2 diabetes patients. These findings suggest that the durability of basal insulin may be associated with day-to-day glycemic variability in type 2 diabetes patients.

Topics: Aged; Blood Glucose; Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring; Cross-Over Studies; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Female; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine; Male; Middle Aged; Treatment Outcome

Degludec is an ultralong-acting, once-daily basal insulin that is approved for use in adults, adolescents, and children with diabetes. Previous open-label studies have shown lower day-to-day variability in the glucose-lowering effect and lower rates of hypoglycemia among patients who received degludec than among those who received basal insulin glargine. However, data are lacking on the cardiovascular safety of degludec.. We randomly assigned 7637 patients with type 2 diabetes to receive either insulin degludec (3818 patients) or insulin glargine U100 (3819 patients) once daily between dinner and bedtime in a double-blind, treat-to-target, event-driven cardiovascular outcomes trial. The primary composite outcome in the time-to-event analysis was the first occurrence of an adjudicated major cardiovascular event (death from cardiovascular causes, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or nonfatal stroke) with a prespecified noninferiority margin of 1.3. Adjudicated severe hypoglycemia, as defined by the American Diabetes Association, was the prespecified, multiplicity-adjusted secondary outcome.. Of the patients who underwent randomization, 6509 (85.2%) had established cardiovascular disease, chronic kidney disease, or both. At baseline, the mean age was 65.0 years, the mean duration of diabetes was 16.4 years, and the mean (±SD) glycated hemoglobin level was 8.4±1.7%; 83.9% of the patients were receiving insulin. The primary outcome occurred in 325 patients (8.5%) in the degludec group and in 356 (9.3%) in the glargine group (hazard ratio, 0.91; 95% confidence interval, 0.78 to 1.06; P<0.001 for noninferiority). At 24 months, the mean glycated hemoglobin level was 7.5±1.2% in each group, whereas the mean fasting plasma glucose level was significantly lower in the degludec group than in the glargine group (128±56 vs. 136±57 mg per deciliter, P<0.001). Prespecified adjudicated severe hypoglycemia occurred in 187 patients (4.9%) in the degludec group and in 252 (6.6%) in the glargine group, for an absolute difference of 1.7 percentage points (rate ratio, 0.60; P<0.001 for superiority; odds ratio, 0.73; P<0.001 for superiority). Rates of adverse events did not differ between the two groups.. Among patients with type 2 diabetes at high risk for cardiovascular events, degludec was noninferior to glargine with respect to the incidence of major cardiovascular events. (Funded by Novo Nordisk and others; DEVOTE ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01959529 .).

Topics: Aged; Blood Glucose; Cardiovascular Diseases; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Double-Blind Method; Female; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Incidence; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Male; Middle Aged

Standardized patient-reported outcome (PRO) questionnaires can be utilized to evaluate treatment satisfaction (subjective evaluation of treatment) in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D). These outcomes are important because they may affect patient adherence and overall study results.. PROs were evaluated in two randomized 26-week clinical trials in Japanese patients with T2D taking dulaglutide 0.75 mg (dulaglutide) once weekly; comparators were once-daily liraglutide (0.9 mg/day) and once-weekly placebo in one study and once-daily insulin glargine (glargine) in the other study. The Perceptions About Medications-Diabetes 21 Questionnaire - Japanese version (PAM-D21-J) and the Injectable Diabetes Medication Questionnaire - Japanese version (IDMQ-J) were completed by patients in both studies. These measures were both considered exploratory endpoints. All scale scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores reflecting better outcomes.. Patients reported that dulaglutide was more convenient and flexible than liraglutide (PAM-D21-J Convenience/Flexibility subscale: dulaglutide least-square mean [LSM], 84.58; liraglutide LSM, 78.94; p = .026), and that they were more satisfied with dulaglutide than with liraglutide (IDMQ-J Satisfaction subscale: dulaglutide, 75.24; liraglutide, 69.53; p = .012). Patients also reported that dulaglutide was more convenient and flexible than glargine (PAM-D21-J Convenience/Flexibility subscale: dulaglutide, 87.89; glargine, 79.22; p < .001), and that they were more satisfied with dulaglutide than with glargine (IDMQ-J Satisfaction subscale: dulaglutide, 78.86; glargine, 69.66; p < .001), and felt dulaglutide was more effective than glargine, with fewer symptoms and adverse events (PAM-D21-J Perceived Effectiveness subscale: dulaglutide, 77.61; glargine, 67.22; p < .001; Emotional Effects subscale: dulaglutide, 93.02; glargine, 89.55; p = .017; IDMQ-J Blood Glucose Control subscale: dulaglutide, 76.33; glargine, 67.57; p < .001). In addition, patients responded that dulaglutide was superior to placebo in the PAM-D21-J Convenience/Flexibility, Perceived Effectiveness, and Emotional Effects subscales and all IDMQ-J subscales (Satisfaction, Ease of Use, Lifestyle Impact, Blood Glucose Control).. Overall, after 26 weeks of once-weekly dulaglutide administration in Japanese patients with T2D, PROs were generally positive versus the three comparator treatments (liraglutide, glargine, and placebo), suggesting increased treatment satisfaction through better blood glucose control and convenience/flexibility and reduced negative emotional effects of diabetes.. ClinicalTrials.gov (monotherapy study: NCT01558271 , registered March 12, 2012; combination therapy study: NCT01584232 , registered April 23, 2012).

Topics: Aged; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Glucagon-Like Peptides; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Immunoglobulin Fc Fragments; Insulin Glargine; Liraglutide; Male; Middle Aged; Patient Reported Outcome Measures; Quality of Life; Recombinant Fusion Proteins

To explore if efficacy and safety findings for insulin glargine 300U/mL (Gla-300) versus insulin glargine 100U/mL (Gla-100), observed over 6 months in insulin-naïve people with type 2 diabetes, are maintained after 12 months.. EDITION 3 was a phase 3a, randomized, multicentre, open-label, parallel-group, treat-to-target study of once-daily Gla-300 versus Gla-100 (target fasting self-monitored plasma glucose, 4.4-5.6mmol/L [80-100mg/dL]). Participants completing the initial 6-month treatment phase continued their previously allocated basal insulin.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Female; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine; Male; Middle Aged; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult

Insulin degludec (IDeg) is an ultra-long-acting insulin that has a smooth time/action profile over more than 42h. The present study compared the effects of IDeg and insulin glargine (IGlar) on HbA1c reduction and on within-subject day-to-day variability of fasting blood glucose (FBG) in insulin-naïve patients with type 2 diabetes.. Eligible patients were randomly allocated at a 3:1 ratio to receive once-daily IDeg (n=31) or IGlar (n=12). Both basal insulins were administered before breakfast and titrated to achieve a target FBG <110mg/dl. The primary endpoints were the change in HbA1c from baseline to 24weeks of treatment, as well as the standard deviation (SD) and coefficient of variation (CV) of FBG from 8 to 12weeks and from 20 to 24weeks. Secondary endpoints included the QOL evaluated by the Diabetes Therapy-Related QOL questionnaire.. After 24weeks, HbA1c was decreased by 1.6% in the IDeg group and 1.7% in the IGlar at the same insulin dosage. At 24weeks, FBG was significantly lower in the IDeg group than in the IGlar group and the CV of FBG was significantly smaller in the IDeg group. The frequency of total and severe hypoglycemic episodes did not differ between the groups. In the IDeg group, QOL showed significant improvement regarding anxiety and dissatisfaction with treatment.. Treatment with IDeg or IGlar achieved similar improvement in glycemic control in insulin-naïve patients with type 2 diabetes. The day-to-day variation of FBG was smaller in patients receiving IDeg.

Topics: Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Fasting; Female; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Middle Aged

Subcutaneous insulin glargine/lixisenatide (Suliqua™) is a titratable, fixed-ratio combination of a long-acting basal insulin analogue and a glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonist for the treatment of adult patients with inadequately controlled type 2 diabetes. Once-daily insulin glargine/lixisenatide, in combination with metformin, provided effective glycaemic control and was generally well tolerated in the 30-week, multinational, phase 3 LixiLan-O and LixiLan-L trials in insulin-naive and -experienced adult patients with inadequately controlled type 2 diabetes. Although long-term clinical experience with this fixed-ratio combination is currently lacking, given its convenient once-daily regimen and beneficial effects on glycaemic control and bodyweight loss in the absence of an increase in the incidence of hypoglycaemia, insulin glargine/lixisenatide is an emerging option for the treatment of adult patients with type 2 diabetes to improve glycaemic control when this has not been provided by metformin alone or metformin combined with another OAD or basal insulin.

Topics: Adult; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Combinations; Drug Therapy, Combination; Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine; Metformin; Peptides

Hypoglycemia, a serious risk for insulin-treated patients with type 2 diabetes, negatively affects glycemic control.. To test whether treatment with basal insulin degludec is associated with a lower rate of hypoglycemia compared with insulin glargine U100 in patients with type 2 diabetes.. Randomized, double-blind, treat-to-target crossover trial including two 32-week treatment periods, each with a 16-week titration period and a 16-week maintenance period. The trial was conducted at 152 US centers between January 2014 and December 2015 in 721 adults with type 2 diabetes and at least 1 hypoglycemia risk factor who were previously treated with basal insulin with or without oral antidiabetic drugs.. Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive once-daily insulin degludec followed by insulin glargine U100 (n = 361) or to receive insulin glargine U100 followed by insulin degludec (n = 360) and randomized 1:1 to morning or evening dosing within each treatment sequence.. The primary end point was the rate of overall symptomatic hypoglycemic episodes (severe or blood glucose confirmed [<56 mg/dL]) during the maintenance period. Secondary end points were the rate of nocturnal symptomatic hypoglycemic episodes (severe or blood glucose confirmed, occurring between 12:01 am and 5:59 am) and the proportion of patients with severe hypoglycemia during the maintenance period.. Of the 721 patients randomized (mean [SD] age, 61.4 [10.5] years; 53.1% male), 580 (80.4%) completed the trial. During the maintenance period, the rates of overall symptomatic hypoglycemia for insulin degludec vs insulin glargine U100 were 185.6 vs 265.4 episodes per 100 patient-years of exposure (PYE) (rate ratio = 0.70 [95% CI, 0.61-0.80]; P < .001; difference, -23.66 episodes/100 PYE [95% CI, -33.98 to -13.33]), and the proportions of patients with hypoglycemic episodes were 22.5% vs 31.6% (difference, -9.1% [95% CI, -13.1% to -5.0%]). The rates of nocturnal symptomatic hypoglycemia with insulin degludec vs insulin glargine U100 were 55.2 vs 93.6 episodes/100 PYE (rate ratio = 0.58 [95% CI, 0.46-0.74]; P < .001; difference, -7.41 episodes/100 PYE [95% CI, -11.98 to -2.85]), and the proportions of patients with hypoglycemic episodes were 9.7% vs 14.7% (difference, -5.1% [95% CI, -8.1% to -2.0%]). The proportions of patients experiencing severe hypoglycemia during the maintenance period were 1.6% (95% CI, 0.6%-2.7%) for insulin degludec vs 2.4% (95% CI, 1.1%-3.7%) for insulin glargine U100 (McNemar P = .35; risk difference, -0.8% [95% CI, -2.2% to 0.5%]). Statistically significant reductions in overall and nocturnal symptomatic hypoglycemia for insulin degludec vs insulin glargine U100 were also seen for the full treatment period.. Among patients with type 2 diabetes treated with insulin and with at least 1 hypoglycemia risk factor, 32 weeks' treatment with insulin degludec vs insulin glargine U100 resulted in a reduced rate of overall symptomatic hypoglycemia.. clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT02030600.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Blood Glucose; Cross-Over Studies; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Double-Blind Method; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Middle Aged; Risk Factors

Diabetes therapies that provide durable glycaemic control for people with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) are needed. We present efficacy results of albiglutide, a glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist, in people with T2DM over a 3-year period.. Five of the 8 HARMONY phase 3 trials, comparing albiglutide with other therapies or placebo across a spectrum of clinical care, lasted for a preplanned 3years. Participants with uncontrolled hyperglycaemia who met predetermined criteria could receive rescue medication. The ability to remain on study medication without needing additional rescue was an efficacy measure. Glycaemic measures and body weight were analysed in 2 populations: those who remained rescue-free and all participants.. Participants (n=3132) were randomised to albiglutide or comparator. A greater proportion of participants who received albiglutide remained rescue-free (55-71%) compared with placebo (35-51%; p<0.001 to p=0.002). The proportion of rescue-free participants with albiglutide did not differ from glimepiride or insulin glargine, was higher than with sitagliptin (p=0.013), and lower than with pioglitazone (p=0.045). At 3years, albiglutide was associated with clinically significant reductions in hyperglycaemia (eg, rescue-free participants: HbA1c -0.52% [SE0.11] to -0.98% [0.12]; -5.7mmol/mol [1.2] to -10.7mmol/mol [1.3] and all participants: HbA1c -0.29% [0.11] to-0.92% [0.13]; -3.2mmol/mol [1.2] to -10.1mmol/mol [1.4]). Albiglutide was also associated with modest reductions in body weight vs pioglitazone, glimepiride, and insulin glargine, which were associated with weight gain.. These 3-year efficacy data support long-term use of albiglutide in the management of people with T2DM. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00849056, NCT00849017, NCT00838903, NCT00838916, NCT00839527.

Topics: Blood Glucose; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Glucagon-Like Peptide 1; Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hyperglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine; Male; Pioglitazone; Sitagliptin Phosphate; Sulfonylurea Compounds; Thiazolidinediones; Treatment Outcome

It was uncertain whether an algorithm that involves increasing insulin dosages by 1 unit/day may cause more hypoglycemia with the longer-acting insulin glargine 300 units/mL (GLA-300). The objective of this study was to compare safety and efficacy of 2 titration algorithms, INSIGHT and EDITION, for GLA-300 in people with uncontrolled type 2 diabetes mellitus, mainly in a primary care setting.. This was a 12-week, open-label, randomized, multicentre pilot study. Participants were randomly assigned to 1 of 2 algorithms: they either increased their dosage by 1 unit/day (INSIGHT, n=108) or the dose was adjusted by the investigator at least once weekly, but no more often than every 3 days (EDITION, n=104). The target fasting self-monitored blood glucose was in the range of 4.4 to 5.6 mmol/L.. The percentages of participants reaching the primary endpoint of fasting self-monitored blood glucose ≤5.6 mmol/L without nocturnal hypoglycemia were 19.4% (INSIGHT) and 18.3% (EDITION). At week 12, 26.9% (INSIGHT) and 28.8% (EDITION) of participants achieved a glycated hemoglobin value of ≤7%. No differences in the incidence of hypoglycemia of any category were noted between algorithms. Participants in both arms of the study were much more satisfied with their new treatment as assessed by the Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire. Most health-care professionals (86%) preferred the INSIGHT over the EDITION algorithm. The frequency of adverse events was similar between algorithms.. A patient-driven titration algorithm of 1 unit/day with GLA-300 is effective and comparable to the previously tested EDITION algorithm and is preferred by health-care professionals.

Topics: Algorithms; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Female; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine; Male; Middle Aged; Pilot Projects

Basal insulin peglispro (BIL) has a peripheral-to-hepatic distribution of action that resembles endogenous insulin and a prolonged duration of action with a flat pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic profile at steady state, characteristics that tend to reduce hypoglycemia risk compared to insulin glargine (GL). The primary objective was to demonstrate that clinically significant hypoglycemia (blood glucose ≤54 mg/dL [3.0 mmol/L] or symptoms of severe hypoglycemia) occurred less frequently within 84 h after a double dose (DD) of BIL than a DD of GL.. This was a randomized, double-blind, two-period crossover study in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) previously treated with insulin (N = 68). For the first 3 weeks of each of the two crossover periods, patients received an individualized dose of BIL or GL once nightly (stable dose for 2 weeks/period). Then, during a 7-day inpatient stay with frequent blood glucose monitoring and standardized meals, one DD of study insulin was given. Glucose was infused if blood glucose was ≤54 mg/dL (3.0 mmol/L) or for symptoms of severe hypoglycemia.. Within 84 h after the DD, a significantly smaller proportion of patients experienced clinically significant hypoglycemia with BIL compared to GL (BIL, 6.6%; GL, 35.5%; odds ratio for BIL/GL 0.13 [95% confidence interval 0.04-0.39]; P < 0.001). Adverse event profiles were similar for the two insulins. Serum alanine aminotransferase and triglyceride levels were significantly higher with BIL versus GL.. BIL has a markedly lower risk of hypoglycemia than GL when replicating a double-dose error in patients with T2D.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Blood Glucose; Cross-Over Studies; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Double-Blind Method; Female; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine; Insulin Lispro; Male; Middle Aged; Polyethylene Glycols; Risk; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult

To investigate whether sodium glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i), tofogliflozin or ipragliflozin, achieve optimal glycemic variability, when used together with insulin glargine 300 U/mL (Glargine 300). Thirty patients with type 2 diabetes were randomly allocated to 2 groups. For the first group: After admission, tofogliflozin 20 mg was administered; Fasting plasma glucose (FPG) levels were titrated using an algorithm and stabilized at 80 mg/dL level with Glargine 300 for 5 days; Next, glucose levels were continuously monitored for 2 days using continuous glucose monitoring (CGM); Tofogliflozin was then washed out over 5 days; Subsequently, ipragliflozin 50 mg was administered; FPG levels were titrated using the same algorithm and stabilized at 80 mg/dL level with Glargine 300 for 5 days; Next, glucose levels were continuously monitored for 2 days using CGM. For the second group, ipragliflozin was administered prior to tofogliflozin, and the same regimen was maintained. Glargine 300 and SGLT2i were administered at 8:00 AM. Data collected on the second day of measurement (mean amplitude of glycemic excursion [MAGE], average daily risk range [ADRR]; on all days of measurement) were analyzed. Area over the glucose curve (<70 mg/dL; 0:00 to 6:00, 24-h), M value, standard deviation, MAGE, ADRR, and mean glucose levels (24-h, 8:00 to 24:00) were significantly lower in patients on tofogliflozin than in those on ipragliflozin. Tofogliflozin, which reduces glycemic variability by preventing nocturnal hypoglycemia and decreasing postprandial glucose levels, is an ideal SGLT2i when used together with Glargine 300 during basal insulin therapy.

Topics: Activities of Daily Living; Aged; Benzhydryl Compounds; Blood Glucose; Cross-Over Studies; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Glucosides; Humans; Hyperglycemia; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine; Japan; Male; Membrane Transport Modulators; Middle Aged; Monitoring, Ambulatory; Risk; ROC Curve; Sodium-Glucose Transporter 2; Sodium-Glucose Transporter 2 Inhibitors; Thiophenes

To quantify whether insulin therapy, and concomitant weight gain, affects recreational physical activity and TV viewing time using data from the Outcomes Reduction with an Initial Glargine Intervention (ORIGIN) trial.. 12,537 insulin-naïve individuals with dysglycaemia were randomised to receive either basal insulin glargine or standard care and followed for a median of 6.2years. Complete recreational physical activity and TV viewing time questionnaires across baseline, 2year follow-up and study end were available for 8954 participants. Differences between groups at follow-up were assessed by analysis of covariance.. At follow-up, there was no difference in physical activity or TV viewing time between those taking insulin glargine and those receiving standard care, despite body weight increasing by 1.66 (7.56) kg in the insulin glargine group and reducing by -0.65 (7.90) kg in the standard care group (P<0.001). The dose of insulin glargine was not associated with changes in physical activity.. Despite modest weight gain, insulin glargine did not adversely impact recreational physical activity levels within an international cohort with dysglyaemia. ORIGIN ClinicalTrials.gov number: NCT00069784.

Topics: Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Exercise; Female; Humans; Insulin Glargine; Male; Middle Aged; Television; Weight Gain

Early stages of chronic kidney disease are associated with an increased cardiovascular risk in patients with established type 2 diabetes and macrovascular disease. The role of early stages of chronic kidney disease on macrovascular outcomes in prediabetes and early type 2 diabetes mellitus is not known. In the Outcome Reduction with an Initial Glargine Intervention (ORIGIN) trial, the introduction of insulin had no effect on cardiovascular outcomes compared with standard therapy. In this post hoc analysis of ORIGIN, we compared cardiovascular outcomes in subjects without to those with mild (Stages 1-2) or moderate chronic kidney disease (Stage 3).. Τwo co-primary composite cardiovascular outcomes were assessed. The first was the composite end point of nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke, or death from cardiovascular causes; and the second was a composite of any of these events plus a revascularization procedure, or hospitalization for heart failure. Several secondary outcomes were prespecified, including microvascular outcomes, incident diabetes, hypoglycemia, weight, and cancers.. Complete renal function data were available in 12,174 of 12,537 ORIGIN participants. A total of 8114 (67%) had no chronic kidney disease, while 4060 (33%) had chronic kidney disease stage 1-3. When compared with nonchronic kidney disease participants, the risk of developing the composite primary outcome (nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke, or cardiovascular death) in those with mild to moderate chronic kidney disease was 87% higher; hazard ratio (HR) 1.87; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.71-2.04 (P < .0001). The presence of chronic kidney disease 1-3 was also associated with a greater than twofold higher risk for both all-cause mortality (HR 2.17; 95% CI, 1.98-2.38; P < .0001) and cardiovascular mortality (HR 2.39; 95% CI, 2.13-2.69; P < .0001). Moreover, patients with mild to moderate chronic kidney disease had significantly higher risk for nonfatal myocardial infarction (50%), nonfatal stroke (68%), any stroke (84%), the above composite primary end point plus revascularization or heart failure requiring hospitalization (59%), or a major coronary artery disease event (56%). Furthermore, in patients with chronic kidney disease and early diabetes mellitus type 2, the primary end point occurred 83% more frequently as compared with nonchronic kidney disease participants (HR 1.83; 95% CI, 1.67-2.01; P < .001) and in patients with prediabetes and chronic kidney disease 67% more frequently (HR 1.67; 95% CI,1.25-2.24; P < .001).. In high-risk patients with dysglycemia (prediabetes and early diabetes), mild and moderate chronic kidney disease significantly increased cardiovascular events.

Topics: Aged; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Diabetic Nephropathies; Female; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine; Male; Middle Aged; Prediabetic State; Renal Insufficiency, Chronic; Treatment Outcome

The efficacy and safety of once-weekly dulaglutide 0.75 mg (dulaglutide) compared with once-daily insulin glargine (glargine) in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes were evaluated according to subgroups stratified by baseline glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) (≤8.5% or >8.5%). This exploratory analysis of a randomized, open-label, phase 3 study included 361 patients. In both HbA1c subgroups (patients with baseline HbA1c ≤8.5% or >8.5%), a statistically significantly greater reduction in HbA1c was observed in dulaglutide-treated patients compared with glargine-treated patients after 26 weeks of treatment (HbA1c ≤8.5%: dulaglutide, -1.27%; glargine, -0.72%; HbA1c >8.5%: dulaglutide, -2.04%; glargine, -1.47%; p < 0.001 for both). Mean body weight was decreased from baseline in both subgroups of the dulaglutide group and increased in both subgroups of the glargine group; there were statistically significant differences between the treatment groups in both subgroups (p < 0.05 for both). In both subgroups, similar reductions in fasting blood glucose were observed for dulaglutide- and glargine-treated patients, and a greater reduction in postprandial blood glucose was observed for dulaglutide-treated patients compared with glargine-treated patients. Although dulaglutide increased gastrointestinal adverse events compared with glargine in both subgroups, all gastrointestinal events of diarrhea, nausea, constipation, and vomiting in dulaglutide-treated patients were mild in intensity and well tolerated. In both subgroups, there was a lower incidence of hypoglycemia with dulaglutide than with glargine. Dulaglutide demonstrated significantly greater HbA1c reduction compared with glargine, with an acceptable safety profile, regardless of baseline HbA1c.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Female; Glucagon-Like Peptides; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Immunoglobulin Fc Fragments; Insulin Glargine; Japan; Male; Middle Aged; Recombinant Fusion Proteins; Treatment Outcome

This 28-week, randomized, double-blind study compared a once-weekly injection of dulaglutide 1.5 mg to placebo, both added to titrated once-daily insulin glargine (with or without metformin), in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and inadequate glycemia control (control defined as hemoglobin A. Patients not naive to injectable therapy were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive dulaglutide/glargine or placebo/glargine; glargine was titrated to a fasting plasma glucose target of 71 to 99 mg/dL. The Impact of Weight on Self-Perceptions (IW-SP), the EQ-5D-5L (measure of health status), the 18-item Diabetes Health Profile (DHP-18), and the Medication Device Delivery Assessment (MDDAB) instruments for assessing the dulaglutide Single-Use Pen (SUP) and glargine-delivery device were administered at baseline and 28 weeks, and also at 6 or 12 weeks for some measures. A mixed model for repeated measures was used for analyzing changes from baseline scores.. At 28 weeks, improvements observed in the transformed total scores on the IW-SP and DHP-18 Disinhibited Eating domain were significantly greater with dulaglutide/glargine compared with placebo/glargine (least squares mean differences, +6.06 [P = 0.019] and -4.50 [P = 0.017], respectively). There were no significant overall between-treatment differences in quality of life as measured by the EQ-5D-5L or the Barriers to Activities and Psychological Distress domains of the DHP-18. Of all patients, 95% reported that overall, the dulaglutide SUP was "easy" or "very easy" to use at 28 weeks. Device-features scores showed that most patients liked the dulaglutide SUP features, with the 3 highest-rated items relating specifically to features of the needle (not having to touch the needle, not having to attach the needle, and automatic insertion). The majority of patients (~90%) "agreed" or "strongly agreed" that they were satisfied with the overall dulaglutide SUP injection experience at 28 weeks.. Dulaglutide/glargine-treated patients had greater improvements in weight-related quality-of-life measures compared with placebo/glargine-treated patients, which may be clinically relevant when evaluating treatment options for insulin-requiring patients who often gain weight with insulin monotherapy. Results from the MDDAB indicated overall satisfaction with the dulaglutide SUP injection experience, which may be an important factor in some patients when initiating parenteral therapy. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02152371.

Topics: Aged; Blood Glucose; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Double-Blind Method; Female; Glucagon-Like Peptides; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Immunoglobulin Fc Fragments; Insulin Glargine; Male; Metformin; Middle Aged; Patient Reported Outcome Measures; Quality of Life; Recombinant Fusion Proteins

To characterize the effects of hepato-preferential basal insulin peglispro (BIL) and insulin glargine on insulin resistance (lipoprotein insulin resistance index [LP-IR]) and inflammation (GlycA), and to explore the biological implications.. This substudy included 847 patients with Type 1 diabetes (T1D) or Type 2 diabetes (T2D) in four cohorts of the BIL development program. LP-IR and GlycA were measured before and after insulin treatment. Correlations between LP-IR, GlycA, clinical parameters and liver biomarkers were assessed.. LP-IR and GlycA were higher in T2D than T1D. LP-IR increased in patients switched from basal insulins to BIL but not in insulin-naive patients. GlycA decreased in T2D patients treated with BIL and T1D patients treated with glargine.. These exploratory analyses help to characterize differences in biological effects between BIL and glargine treatment.

Topics: Aged; Biomarkers; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Female; Humans; Insulin Glargine; Insulin Resistance; Lipoproteins; Male; Middle Aged

Subclinical myocardial injury, as measured by high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T (hsTnT), and myocardial stress, as measured by N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), are related to glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus, and are strong predictors of adverse cardiovascular outcomes. We sought to determine whether antihyperglycemic therapy improves measures of myocardial injury and myocardial stress in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.. We randomized, in a 2×2 factorial fashion, 438 patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus to insulin glargine, metformin, the combination, or placebo and measured changes in NT-proBNP and hsTnT after 12 weeks of therapy. At baseline, the median (Q1-Q3) plasma concentration was 35.4 (15.7-86.3) ng/L for NT-proBNP and 6.7 (4.6-10.1) ng/L for hsTnT. The adjusted (95% confidence interval) change in NT-proBNP concentration was 20.7% (7.9-35.0) in the insulin arm compared with 0.13% (-10.8 to 12.5) in the no-insulin arm (. Insulin glargine was associated with a significant 20.7% increase in NT-proBNP, a marker of myocardial stress, after 12 weeks of therapy. No change in hsTnT, a marker of myocardial injury, was observed. The changes were independent of substantial improvements in glucose control.. URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00366301.

Topics: Biomarkers; Blood Glucose; Cardiovascular Diseases; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine; Male; Metformin; Middle Aged; Natriuretic Peptide, Brain; Peptide Fragments; Risk Factors; Troponin T

To investigate, in a 26-week, open-label, randomized, treat-to-target trial, the efficacy and safety of insulin degludec/insulin aspart (IDegAsp) once daily vs insulin glargine (IGlar) once daily in adults with Type 2 diabetes, inadequately controlled on basal insulin.. Participants were randomized (1:1) to IDegAsp once daily or IGlar once daily in combination with existing oral antidiabetic drugs. IDegAsp once daily was administered with the main evening meal or the largest meal of the day (agreed at baseline); dosing time was maintained throughout the trial. Participants titrated their insulin dose weekly to a mean pre-breakfast self-measured plasma glucose target [3.9-4.9 mmol/l (70-89 mg/dl)].. In participants with Type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled on basal insulin, IDegAsp once daily improved glycaemic control and was non-inferior to IGlar once daily. IDegAsp led to higher rates of overall hypoglycaemia than IGlar, with no significant difference in rates of nocturnal hypoglycaemia.

Topics: Aged; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Combinations; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Middle Aged; Patient Care Planning; Treatment Outcome

Hyperglycemia is a major complication of parenteral nutrition (PN). Guidelines for hyperglycemia management in noncritically ill patients cite basal insulin administration but do not recommend a regimen. The GLUCOSE-in-PN study aimed to compare the efficacy of glargine insulin versus continuously infused regular insulin in PN (RI-in-PN) to achieve glycemic control in noncritically ill surgical patients with diabetes who were receiving PN.. This prospective randomized open-label study was conducted at King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre. Noncritically ill surgical patients with diabetes who were receiving PN were randomized to receive basal glargine insulin or RI-in-PN on day 4 of PN support. Mean blood glucose levels were compared on study days 5-9. The percentages of blood glucose measurements at goal were compared between groups.. Sixty-seven PN treatment episodes were analyzed. There were no statistically significant differences in mean glucose levels between groups on any study day ( P > .1). Overall glycemic control rates were 52.24% (glargine insulin) and 47.76% (RI-in-PN; P = .06). A significantly higher percentage of hyperglycemia was observed on day 5 for glargine insulin versus RI-in-PN (22.39% vs 5.97%, P = .0059). Blood glucose measurements indicated 6 hypoglycemic events: 2 for glargine insulin (5.7%) and 4 for RI-in-PN (11.4%; P > .1).. Both glargine insulin and RI-in-PN are effective basal insulin modalities for blood glucose control in noncritically ill surgical patients with diabetes who are receiving PN. Uncontrolled hyperglycemic events occurred more frequently with glargine insulin, and the rate of hypoglycemia was acceptable for both regimens.

Topics: Aged; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Female; Humans; Hyperglycemia; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Incidence; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Male; Middle Aged; Parenteral Nutrition; Postoperative Care; Prospective Studies

The aim of the randomized present study was to compare the therapeutic efficacy and safety of a combination of sitagliptin, a dipeptidyl peptidase (DPP)-4 inhibitor, plus insulin glargine (GL + sita) with that of premixed insulin aspart 30 (NOV) for type 2 diabetes (T2D) patients controlled with oral hypoglycemic drugs (HbA1c 7 %-9 %).. Sixty-five patients were randomized (1:  1) to the GL + sita (n = 33) and NOV (n = 32) groups and were treated with the combination regimen or premixed insulin twice a day for 16 weeks. The primary endpoint was mean change in HbA1c. Secondary endpoints included fasting blood glucose, blood glucose profiles (seven time points), rate of achieving target HbA1c (<7 % or ≤6.5 %), insulin dose, incidence of hypoglycemia, and body weight.. After 16 weeks, there was no significant difference in HbA1c between the two groups, although more patients achieved HbA1c <7.0 % in the GL + sita group. There was a significant difference in body weight changes between the GL + sita and NOV groups (-0.45 vs 1.52 kg, respectively; P < 0.001). Mean plasma glucose and the mean amplitude of glycemic excursion were significantly lower in the GL + sita than NOV group (P < 0.005), as was the incidence of symptomatic hypoglycemia (2.85 % vs. 13.3 %, respectively; P < 0.001).. The combination of GL + sita greatly improved HbA1c in T2D patients (HbA1c 7 %-9 %) with an efficacy that was equal to that of premixed insulin. Thus, GL + sita treatment is a viable option for patients who fail to achieve glycemic control using oral hypoglycemic drugs.

Topics: Adult; Blood Glucose; Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring; C-Peptide; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine; Male; Middle Aged; Sitagliptin Phosphate; Treatment Outcome

Basal insulin peglispro (BIL) is a novel PEGylated basal insulin with a flat pharmacokinetic and glucodynamic profile and reduced peripheral effects, which results in a hepato-preferential action. In Phase 3 trials, patients with T1DM treated with BIL had lower prandial insulin requirements, yet improved prandial glucose control, relative to insulin glargine (GL). We hypothesized that this may be because of an enhanced sensitivity to prandial insulin with BIL resulting from lower chronic peripheral insulin action.. Two open-label, randomized, 2-period crossover clinical studies were conducted in 28 patients with T1DM and 24 patients with T2DM. In each study period, patients received once-daily, individualized, stable, subcutaneous doses of BIL or GL for 5 weeks before a euglycaemic 2-step hyperinsulinemic clamp procedure (with [6,6-. There were no statistically significant differences between BIL and GL in key measures of hepatic (% Ra suppression during the low-dose insulin infusion; 78.7% with BIL, 81.8% with GL) or peripheral (M-value and M/I during the high-dose insulin infusion, Rd and SI) insulin sensitivity in patients with T1DM or T2DM.. The need to reduce prandial insulin observed with BIL during phase 3 trials cannot be explained by the differential effects of BIL and GL on sensitivity to prandial insulin in either T1DM or T2DM.

Topics: Adult; Blood Glucose; Cross-Over Studies; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Female; Glucose Clamp Technique; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine; Insulin Lispro; Insulin Resistance; Liver; Male; Meals; Metformin; Middle Aged; Polyethylene Glycols; Treatment Outcome

Effective glycemic control can reduce the risk of complications and their related costs in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). However, many patients fail to reach glycemic targets, often because of adverse effects of treatment (including hypoglycemia or weight gain). The present analysis evaluated the short-term cost-effectiveness of IDegLira versus continued up-titration of insulin glargine U100 in patients with T2DM failing to achieve glycemic control on basal insulin in the US setting.. The cost per patient achieving treatment target (cost of control) was assessed for various single and composite endpoints for the entire trial population and in patients with baseline glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) >8.0% and HbA1c >9.0%. The proportions of patients achieving treatment targets were analyzed using data obtained in the DUAL V study. Costs were accounted based on published wholesale acquisition costs.. When assessing the full trial population, IDegLira was associated with lower annual cost of control than continued up-titration of insulin glargine U100 for patients achieving HbA1c ≤6.5% without confirmed hypoglycemia (by $10,608), HbA1c ≤6.5% without weight gain (by $29,215), and HbA1c ≤6.5% without confirmed hypoglycemia and weight gain (by $57,351). A similar pattern was observed when multifactorial treatment targets were based on achieving a glycemic target of 7.0%. When only HbA1c was considered, IDegLira was associated with a lower cost per patient achieving HbA1c ≤6.5% (by $3306) but cost of control was equivalent for a target of HbA1c <7.0%. In patients with baseline HbA1c >8.0% and HbA1c >9.0%, IDegLira was associated with a lower cost of control for all treatment targets.. The significantly greater clinical efficacy in terms of bringing patients to treatment targets identified in the DUAL V study results in lower cost of control values for IDegLira versus continued up-titration of insulin glargine U100 in the USA. This suggests IDegLira is a cost-effective treatment option in the USA.. Novo Nordisk A/S and Novo Nordisk Inc.

Topics: Blood Glucose; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Combinations; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Liraglutide; Weight Gain

To compare the addition of weekly dulaglutide vs the addition of placebo to titrated glargine in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) with sub-optimum glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) concentration.. Patients (N = 300) from this phase III, double-blind, parallel-arm, placebo-controlled study were randomized to weekly subcutaneous injections of dulaglutide 1.5 mg or placebo with titrated daily glargine (mean ± standard deviation baseline dose: 39 ± 22 U), with or without metformin (≥1500 mg/d). The primary endpoint was superiority of dulaglutide/glargine to placebo/glargine with regard to change from baseline in HbA1c level at 28 weeks.. Least squares (LS) mean ± standard error (s.e.) HbA1c changes from baseline were -1.44 ± 0.09% (-15.74 ± 0.98 mmol/mol) with dulaglutide/glargine and -0.67 ± 0.09% (-7.32 ± 0.98 mmol/mol) with placebo/glargine at 28 weeks (LS mean difference [95% confidence interval] -0.77% [-0.97, -0.56]; P < .001). Body weight decreased with dulaglutide/glargine and increased with placebo/glargine (LS mean difference: -2.41 ± 0.39 kg; P < .001). Increases from baseline in mean glargine dose were significantly smaller with dulaglutide/glargine vs placebo/glargine (13 ± 2 U [0.1 ± 0.02 U/kg] vs 26 ± 2 U [0.3 ± 0.02 U/kg], respectively; P < .001; LS mean ± s.e. final dose: dulaglutide/glargine, 51 ± 2 U; placebo/glargine, 65 ± 2 U). The hypoglycaemia rate (≤3.9 mmol/L threshold) was 7.69 ± 15.15 and 8.56 ± 16.13 events/patient/year, respectively (P = .488). One episode of severe hypoglycaemia occurred in the dulaglutide/glargine group. Common gastrointestinal adverse events with dulaglutide were nausea (12.0%), diarrhoea (11.3%) and vomiting (6.0%).. Weekly dulaglutide 1.5 mg added to basal insulin is an efficacious and well tolerated treatment option for patients with T2D.

Topics: Aged; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Double-Blind Method; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Monitoring; Drug Resistance; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor; Glucagon-Like Peptides; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hyperglycemia; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Immunoglobulin Fc Fragments; Incretins; Injections, Subcutaneous; Insulin Glargine; Intention to Treat Analysis; Male; Middle Aged; Patient Dropouts; Recombinant Fusion Proteins

The aim of the present 24-week multicentre randomized non-inferiority trial was to compare the efficacy and safety of two insulin intensification strategies in uncontrolled type 2 diabetes despite optimized basal insulin therapy.. Patients with fasting plasma glucose (FPG) <130 mg/dL and HbA1c 7.0%-10.0% while on insulin glargine were randomized to a basal-prandial group (stepwise addition of insulin glulisine) or a premixed insulin group (insulin aspart/insulin aspart protamine 30/70 starting with 6 IU twice daily). The primary endpoint was the change in HbA1c after 24 weeks (non-inferiority margin 0.4%).. At Week 24, the adjusted mean change from baseline HbA1c was -0.94 ± 0.09% and -1.04 ± 0.09% in basal-prandial and premixed insulin groups, respectively, with a mean difference of -0.09% (95% confidence interval [CI] -0.35, 0.16). A lower rate of hypoglycemia with a similar reduction in HbA1c was observed during stabilization of the total daily insulin dose in the premixed insulin group (Weeks 0-12). After stabilization of the total daily insulin dose, the rate of hypoglycemia and the total daily insulin dose were similar in the two groups.. The efficacy and safety of the two intensifying regimens were similar after stabilization of the total daily insulin dose when oral agents were maintained. Starting with a lower total daily insulin dose with a gradual change in the treatment regimen was helpful in reducing the rate of hypoglycemia during initial stabilization of the total daily insulin dose.

Topics: Aged; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Aspart; Insulin Glargine; Insulin Lispro; Male; Time Factors

Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) are associated with reduced appetite and body weight. We investigated whether these effects could be mediated by the central nervous system (CNS).. We performed a randomized crossover study in obese patients with type 2 diabetes (n = 20, mean age 59.3 ± 4.1 years, mean BMI 32 ± 4.7 kg/m(2)), consisting of two periods of 12-week treatment with either liraglutide 1.8 mg or insulin glargine. Using functional MRI, we determined the effects of treatment on CNS responses to viewing food pictures in the fasted condition and 30 min after meal intake.. After 12 weeks, the decrease in HbA1c was larger with liraglutide versus insulin glargine (Δ-0.7% vs. -0.2%, P < 0.001). Body weight decreased during liraglutide versus insulin glargine (Δ-3.3 kg vs. 0.8 kg, P < 0.001). After 10 days, patients treated with liraglutide, compared with insulin glargine, showed decreased responses to food pictures in insula and putamen (P ≤ 0.02). In addition, liraglutide enhanced the satiating effect of meal intake on responses in putamen and amygdala (P ≤ 0.05). Differences between liraglutide and insulin glargine were not observed after 12 weeks.. Compared with insulin, liraglutide decreased CNS activation significantly only after short-term treatment, suggesting that these effects of GLP-1RA on the CNS may contribute to the induction of weight loss, but not necessarily to its maintenance, in view of the absence of an effect of liraglutide on CNS activation in response to food pictures after longer-term treatment.

Topics: Blood Glucose; Body Weight; Brain; Cross-Over Studies; Cues; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Fasting; Female; Food; Glucagon-Like Peptide 1; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Liraglutide; Male; Middle Aged; Obesity; Satiation

The aim of the study was to compare body composition and epicardial fat thickness changes in insulin-naïve inadequately controlled patients with type 2 diabetes following basal insulin initiation with detemir vs. glargine. Six-month, open-label, interventional randomized pilot study was conducted. Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and echocardiography were used to estimate the body composition and epicardial fat thickness respectively. Thirty-six patients in the detemir group and 20 in the glargine group completed the study. Study groups baseline characteristics were comparable. At 6 months, for similar glycemic control, those on detemir significantly gained less total weight (0.6±2.5 vs. 4.2±4.1 kg, p=0.004), total fat mass (0.9±2.2 vs. 2.9±2.4 kg, p=0.02), and truncal fat mass (0.8±1.5 vs. 2.1±1.7 kg, p=0.02), with a loss in truncal lean mass (- 0.8±1.9 kg vs. 0.3±1.7 kg; p=0.02). EFT significantly decreased from baseline in both group (detemir - 1.7±0.52-mm, glargine - 1.1±1.6-mm; p<0.05, without significant difference inter-groups). Within the detemir group, epicardial fat thickness change correlated with truncal fat and total fat mass changes (r=0.65, p=0.06 and r=0.60, p=0.07). In conclusion, detemir resulted in less fat mass gain, a trend for a more pronounced epicardial fat thickness reduction when compared with glargine.

Topics: Adiposity; Blood Glucose; Body Composition; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Female; Humans; Insulin Detemir; Insulin Glargine; Male; Middle Aged; Pericardium

To compare the immunogenicity profiles and the potential effects on clinical outcomes of LY2963016 insulin glargine (LY IGlar) and Lantus® insulin glargine (IGlar), products with identical primary amino acid sequences, in patients with type 1 or type 2 diabetes mellitus (T1DM or T2DM).. To assess immunogenicity, anti-insulin glargine antibodies (measured as percent binding) were compared between treatments in 52-week (open-label) and 24-week (double-blind) randomized studies in total study populations of patients with T1DM (N = 535) and T2DM (N = 756), respectively, and two subgroups of patients with T2DM: insulin-naïve patients and those reporting prestudy IGlar treatment (prior IGlar). Relationships between insulin antibody levels and clinical outcomes were assessed using analysis of covariance and partial correlations. Insulin antibody levels were assessed using Wilcoxon rank sum. Treatment comparisons for treatment-emergent antibody response (TEAR) and incidence of detectable antibodies were analysed using Fisher's exact test.. No significant treatment differences were observed for insulin antibody levels, incidence of detectable anti-insulin glargine antibodies, or incidence of TEAR [overall and endpoint, by last-observation-carried-forward (LOCF)] in patients with T1DM or patients with T2DM, including the insulin-naïve subgroup. A statistically significant difference was noted in the overall incidence of detectable antibodies but not at endpoint (LOCF) nor in TEAR for the prior IGlar subgroup of patients with T2DM. Insulin antibody levels were low (<5%) in both treatment groups. Insulin antibody levels or developing TEAR was not associated with clinical outcomes.. LY IGlar and IGlar have similar immunogenicity profiles; anti-insulin glargine antibody levels were low for both treatments, with no observed effect on efficacy and safety outcomes.

Topics: Asymptomatic Diseases; Biosimilar Pharmaceuticals; Cross Reactions; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Double-Blind Method; Drug Hypersensitivity; Humans; Hyperglycemia; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Immunogenetic Phenomena; Incidence; Insulin Antibodies; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Regular, Human; Recombinant Proteins

To use continuous glucose monitoring to examine the effects of insulin initiation with glargine, with or without glulisine, on glycaemic variability and glycaemia in a cohort of people with Type 2 diabetes receiving maximum oral hypoglycaemic agents in primary healthcare.. We conducted a post hoc analysis of continuous glucose monitoring data from 89 participants at baseline and at 24 weeks after insulin commencement. Indicators of glycaemic variability (standard deviation, J-index and mean amplitude of glycaemic excursion) and glycaemia (HbA1c , mean glucose, area under the glucose-time curve) were assessed. Multi-level regression analysis was used to identify the predictors of change.. Complete glycaemic variability data were available for 78 participants. Of these participants, 41% were women, their mean (sd) age was 59.2 (10.4) years, the median (interquartile range) diabetes duration was 10.4 (6.5, 13.3) years and the median (interquartile range) baseline HbA1c was 82.5 (71.6, 96.7) mmol/mol [9.7 (8.7, 11.0)%]. At baseline, BMI correlated negatively with standard deviation (r = -0.30) and mean amplitude of glycaemic excursion (r = -0.26), but not with J-index; HbA1c correlated with J-index (r = 0.61) but not with mean amplitude of glycaemic excursion and standard deviation. After insulin initiation the mean (sd) glucose level decreased [from 12.0 (3.0) to 8.5 (1.6) mmol/l; P < 0.001], as did the median (interquartile range) J-index [from 66.9 (47.7, 95.1) to 36.9 (27.6, 49.8) mmol/l; P < 0.001]. Baseline HbA1c correlated with a greater J-index reduction (r = -0.45; P < 0.001). The mean amplitude of glycaemic excursion and standard deviation values were unchanged. The baseline temporal profile, showing elevated postprandial morning glucose levels, was unchanged after insulin initiation, despite an overall reduction in glycaemia.. Insulin initiation reduced hyperglycaemia but did not alter glycaemic variability in adults with Type 2 diabetes receiving maximum oral hypoglycaemic agents. The most significant postprandial excursions were seen in the morning, which identifies prebreakfast as the most effective target for short-acting insulin therapy.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Blood Glucose; Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring; Cohort Studies; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hyperglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Male; Middle Aged; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of basal insulin peglispro (BIL) versus insulin glargine in patients with type 2 diabetes (hemoglobin A1c [HbA1c] ≤9% [75 mmol/mol]) treated with basal insulin alone or with three or fewer oral antihyperglycemic medications.. This 52-week, open-label, treat-to-target study randomized patients (mean HbA1c 7.42% [57.6 mmol/mol]) to BIL (n = 307) or glargine (n = 159). The primary end point was change from baseline HbA1c to 26 weeks (0.4% [4.4 mmol/mol] noninferiority margin).. At 26 weeks, reduction in HbA1c was superior with BIL versus glargine (-0.82% [-8.9 mmol/mol] vs. -0.29% [-3.2 mmol/mol]; least squares mean difference -0.52%, 95% CI -0.67 to -0.38 [-5.7 mmol/mol, 95% CI -7.3 to -4.2; P < 0.001); greater reduction in HbA1c with BIL was maintained at 52 weeks. More BIL patients achieved HbA1c <7% (53 mmol/mol) at weeks 26 and 52 (P < 0.001). With BIL versus glargine, nocturnal hypoglycemia rate was 60% lower, more patients achieved HbA1c <7% (53 mmol/mol) without nocturnal hypoglycemia at 26 and 52 weeks (P < 0.001), and total hypoglycemia rates were lower at 52 weeks (P = 0.03). At weeks 26 and 52, glucose variability was lower (P < 0.01), basal insulin dose was higher (P < 0.001), and triglycerides and aminotransferases were higher with BIL versus glargine (P < 0.05). Liver fat content (LFC), assessed in a subset of patients (n = 162), increased from baseline with BIL versus glargine (P < 0.001), with stable levels between 26 and 52 weeks.. BIL provided superior glycemic control versus glargine, with reduced nocturnal and total hypoglycemia, lower glucose variability, and increased triglycerides, aminotransferases, and LFC.

Topics: Aged; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine; Insulin Lispro; Male; Middle Aged

To compare the efficacy and safety of insulin glargine 300 U/ml (Gla-300) with glargine 100 U/ml (Gla-100) in Japanese people with type 2 diabetes using basal insulin plus oral antihyperglycaemic drug(s) [OAD(s)].. The EDITION JP 2 study (NCT01689142) was a 6-month, multicentre, open-label, phase III study. Participants (n = 241, male 61%, mean diabetes duration 14 years, mean weight 67 kg, mean body mass index 25 kg/m(2), mean glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) 8.02 %, mean basal insulin dose 0.24 U/kg/day) were randomized to Gla-300 or Gla-100, while continuing OAD(s). Basal insulin was titrated to target fasting self-monitored plasma glucose 4.4-5.6 mmol/l. The primary efficacy endpoint was HbA1c change over 6 months. Safety endpoints included hypoglycaemia and weight change.. Gla-300 was non-inferior to Gla-100 for HbA1c reduction [least squares (LS) mean difference 0.10 (95% confidence interval [CI] -0.08, 0.27) %]. The mean HbA1c at month 6 was 7.56 and 7.52 % with Gla-300 and Gla-100, respectively. Nocturnal confirmed (≤3.9 mmol/l) or severe hypoglycaemia risk was 38% lower with Gla-300 versus Gla-100 [relative risk 0.62 (95% CI 0.44, 0.88)]; annualized rates were 55% lower at night [rate ratio 0.45 (95% CI 0.21, 0.96)] and 36% lower at any time [24 h; rate ratio 0.64 (95% CI 0.43, 0.96)]. Severe hypoglycaemia was infrequent. A significant between-treatment difference in weight change favoured Gla-300 [LS mean difference -1.0 (95% CI -1.5, -0.5) kg; p = 0.0003]. Adverse event rates were comparable between groups.. Japanese people with type 2 diabetes using basal insulin plus OAD(s) experienced less hypoglycaemia with Gla-300 than with Gla-100, while glycaemic control did not differ.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Delayed-Action Preparations; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Resistance, Multiple; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hyperglycemia; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Detemir; Insulin Glargine; Japan; Male; Middle Aged; Risk

The Outcome Reduction With Initial Glargine Intervention (ORIGIN) trial reported neutral effects of insulin glargine on cardiovascular outcomes and cancers and reduced incident diabetes in high-cardiovascular risk adults with dysglycemia after 6.2 years of active treatment. Omega-3 fatty acids had neutral effects on cardiovascular outcomes. The ORIGIN and Legacy Effects (ORIGINALE) study measured posttrial effects of these interventions during an additional 2.7 years.. Surviving ORIGIN participants attended up to two additional visits. The hazard of clinical outcomes during the entire follow-up period from randomization was calculated.. Of 12,537 participants randomized, posttrial data were analyzed for 4,718 originally allocated to insulin glargine (2,351) versus standard care (2,367), and 4,771 originally allocated to omega-3 fatty acid supplements (2,368) versus placebo (2,403). Posttrial, small differences in median HbA1c persisted (glargine 6.6% [49 mmol/mol], standard care 6.7% [50 mmol/mol], P = 0.025). From randomization to the end of posttrial follow-up, no differences were found between the glargine and standard care groups in myocardial infarction, stroke, or cardiovascular death (1,185 vs. 1,165 events; hazard ratio 1.01 [95% CI 0.94-1.10]; P = 0.72); myocardial infarction, stroke, cardiovascular death, revascularization, or hospitalization for heart failure (1,958 vs. 1,910 events; 1.03 [0.97-1.10]; P = 0.38); or any cancer (524 vs. 529 events; 0.99 [0.88-1.12]; P = 0.91) or between omega-3 and placebo groups in cardiovascular death (688 vs. 700; 0.98 [0.88-1.09]; P = 0.68) or other outcomes.. During >6 years of treatment followed by >2.5 years of observation, insulin glargine had neutral effects on health outcomes and salutary effects on metabolic control, whereas omega-3 fatty acid supplementation had no effect.

Topics: Aged; Cardiovascular Diseases; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dietary Supplements; Fatty Acids, Omega-3; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine; Male; Metformin; Middle Aged; Proportional Hazards Models; Risk Factors; Sulfonylurea Compounds; Treatment Outcome

The safety and efficacy of LY2963016 insulin glargine (LY IGlar) and Lantus insulin glargine (IGlar), products with identical primary amino acid sequences, were assessed in subgroups of patients with type 1 (T1D, n = 452) or type 2 diabetes (T2D, n = 299) reporting prestudy IGlar treatment in 52-week open-label (ELEMENT-1) and 24-week double-blind (ELEMENT-2) studies. At randomization, patients transitioned from their prestudy IGlar to equivalent doses of LY IGlar or IGlar. Primary efficacy (change in glycated haemoglobin from baseline to 24 weeks), other efficacy and select safety outcomes of LY IGlar were compared with those of IGlar. Continuous data were analysed using analysis of covariance, categorical data by Fisher's exact test, and treatment comparisons for hypoglycaemia by Wilcoxon test. No statistically significant treatment differences were identified for efficacy and safety outcomes except for weight change (T1D), overall incidence of detectable insulin antibodies (T2D), and serious adverse events (T2D). These differences were neither consistently observed across both studies nor observed in the total study populations, and their magnitude suggests they were not clinically meaningful. LY IGlar and IGlar show similar efficacy and safety profiles in patients reporting prestudy IGlar treatment.

Topics: Biosimilar Pharmaceuticals; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Double-Blind Method; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hyperglycemia; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine

Diabetes mellitus type 2 (DMT2) and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) are both characterized by decreased circulating adiponectin. Recently, glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists have been shown to induce adiponectin's expression. However, their interaction on clinical grounds needs to be further elucidated.. DMT2 patients with abnormal aminotransferases were screened for NAFLD and subjected to liver biopsy (group A, n=17). A subgroup of patients (n=110), after assessed for eligibility criteria, was blindly randomized to receive either 6-month exenatide supplementation on glargine insulin (group B) or intense, self-regulated, insulin therapy alone (group C).. Baseline patient characteristics: 49(38.6%) males, aged 63.1 ± 7.5 years-old, BMI 32.9 ± 4.9 kg/m(2), HbA1c 8.1 ± 1.2% (65 ± 14 mmol/mol), median ALT 23 U/L (range 5-126), AST 20 U/L (7-72). Group A had biopsy-proven NAFLD with a median Activity Score of 5 and fibrosis stage 3. Presence of NAFLD was accompanied by a significant decline in adiponectin (p<0.001), which was negatively correlated with the degree of ALT in all groups (Spearman's correlation, rs=-0.644, p<0.001). In the subgroup intervention trial, adiponectin was significantly raised in both groups B and C (t-Student for paired samples, p=0.001) by Δ=+24.2% (interquartile range 14.8-53.2%). This elevation was not associated with the type of intervention but with weight loss, glycemic control and reduction of C-reactive protein (one-way ANCOVA).. Supplementation of exenatide to glargine insulin compared to standard insulin was: (i) effective in inducing weight loss, (ii) non-inferior in lowering HbA1c and (iii) non-inferior in increasing circulating adiponectin. Higher adiponectin was associated with lower ALT, suggesting a hepato-protective role for this cytokine.

Topics: Adiponectin; Aged; Blood Glucose; C-Reactive Protein; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Exenatide; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Middle Aged; Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease; Peptides; Prospective Studies; Venoms

Previous studies comparing insulin detemir versus insulin glargine showed conflicting results, and included only outpatients. This study compared the two insulin analogs once daily in hospitalized patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D).. A total of 55 patients aged 18-80 years with hyperglycemia admitted to the endocrinology wards were screened between June 2014 and February 2015. Forty-two enrolled patients were randomly assigned to receive either insulin detemir followed by insulin glargine once daily (n = 21), or vice versa (n = 21). The two insulin analogs were titrated 0.1 U/kg once daily based on fasting blood glucose (FBG). After achieving FBG <7.8 mmol/L (the first period), subjects were switched from one analog to the other (the second period) with no change in the dose. The second period lasted for 3 days. When hypoglycemia occurred in the second period, the observation was discontinued. Six-point blood glucose including FBG, 2 h after breakfast, lunch, dinner, bedtime, and at 3:00 am was tested every day. The glucose profiles of the final days in the two periods were compared.. At the end of the first period, days for achieving FBG target (4.0 ± 0.5 days vs. 3.3 ± 0.4 days, t = 1.079, P = 0.286) and total daily dose (30.1 ± 2.4 U vs. 30.1 ± 2.9 U, t = 0.002, P = 0.999) between insulin detemir and insulin glargine were similar. There was no significant difference in the 24-h glucose control between the two analogs. No hypoglycemia occurred with both analogs in the first period. However, in the second period, when insulin glargine was switched to insulin detemir, two, three and, one patients had hypoglycemia events on day 1, day 2 and day 3 of the second period, respectively. One patient had severe hypoglycemia on day 1.. When both basal insulin analogs were given once daily in T2D, insulin detemir achieved similar efficacy to insulin glargine. On the other hand, there may be differences in action of the compared basal insulins. Further studies with larger patient samples are necessary to support evidence and reveal possible mechanisms.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Blood Glucose; Cross-Over Studies; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Female; Hospitalization; Humans; Hyperglycemia; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Detemir; Insulin Glargine; Male; Middle Aged; Young Adult

To compare blood glucose fluctuations in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients were treated using three procedures: insulin intensive therapy which is continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII), MDI3 (three injections daily), and MDI4 (four injections daily). T2DM patients were hospitalized and were randomly assigned to CSII, aspart 30-based MDI3, and glargine based MDI4. Treatments were maintained for 2-3 weeks after the glycaemic target was reached. After completing the baseline assessment, 6-day continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) was performed before and after completion of insulin treatment. Treatment with CSII provided a greater improvement of blood glucose fluctuations than MDI (MDI3 or MDI4) therapy either in newly diagnosed or in long-standing T2DM patients. In long-standing diabetes patients, the MDI4 treatment group had significantly greater improvement of mean amplitude glycemic excursion (MAGE) than the MDI3 treatment group. However, in patients with newly diagnosed diabetes, there were no significant differences in the improvement of MAGE between MDI3 and MDI4 groups. Glargine based MDI4 therapy provided better glucose fluctuations than aspart 30-based MDI3 therapy, especially in long-standing T2DM patients, if CSII therapy was not available.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Biomarkers; Biphasic Insulins; Blood Glucose; China; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Hospitalization; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Infusions, Subcutaneous; Injections, Subcutaneous; Insulin Aspart; Insulin Glargine; Insulin Infusion Systems; Insulin, Isophane; Male; Middle Aged; Pilot Projects; Prospective Studies; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

Insulin glargine 300 U/mL (Gla-300) has a more constant and prolonged action profile than insulin glargine 100 U/mL and in clinical studies is associated with similar glycemic control but less hypoglycemia. Whether its effects are altered by variability of injection time was examined in two 3-month substudies.. Eligible participants completing 6 months of optimized treatment with Gla-300 in EDITION 1 (n = 109) and EDITION 2 (n = 89), having a mean hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) level of 7.3 % (SD 1.0 %), were randomized (1:1) to groups advised to increase variability of between-injection intervals to 24 ± up to 3 h or to maintain fixed 24-h intervals for 3 months. Changes of HbA1c level and other efficacy and safety measures were assessed.. In the fixed-dosing group, 64% of participants reported all intervals within the 23-25-h range, compared with 15% of those advised flexible dosing. In the fixed- and flexible-dosing groups, 12% and 41%, respectively, of between-injection intervals were outside the 23-25-h range, and 2% and 16%, respectively, were outside the 21-27-h range. Least squares mean between-group difference in HbA1c change from baseline was 0.05 % (95% confidence interval [CI], -0.13 to 0.23); for fasting plasma glucose, 2.7 mg/dL (95% CI, -9.0 to 14.4); and for daily basal insulin dose, 0.00 U/kg (95% CI, -0.02 to 0.03). Frequencies of hypoglycemia and adverse events did not differ between groups.. The efficacy and safety of Gla-300 demonstrated in EDITION 1 and EDITION 2 are maintained in substudies when the insulin was injected up to 3 h before or after the usual time of administration.

Topics: Activities of Daily Living; Administration, Oral; Chemistry, Pharmaceutical; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hyperglycemia; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine; Intention to Treat Analysis; Male; Meals; Medication Adherence

To describe the efficacy and safety of premixed insulin lispro protamine suspension 75%/insulin lispro solution 25% (LM25) twice daily (bid) versus basal insulin glargine plus prandial insulin lispro (IGL), both once daily, according to main meal timing.. Data were obtained post hoc from a 24 week, randomized, open-label study comparing LM25 and IGL as insulin intensification in patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled with once daily basal insulin glargine plus metformin and/or pioglitazone (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01175824). Patients administered LM25 bid before breakfast and the evening meal, insulin glargine at bedtime and insulin lispro before the day's main meal (meal with the highest 2 hour postprandial glucose level during screening). Patients were grouped by main meal. Changes in glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) and bodyweight were summarized using likelihood-based mixed models; hypoglycemia incidence was compared between treatments using Fisher's exact test.. Overall, 476 patients (LM25, n = 236; IGL, n = 240) were randomized. In all main meal groups, with both insulin regimens, mean HbA1c significantly decreased from baseline to 24 weeks (p < 0.0001). Patients whose main meal was in the evening had a greater bodyweight increase with LM25 than with IGL (p = 0.015), and a smaller proportion of these patients experienced total (p = 0.027) and nocturnal (p = 0.006) hypoglycemia with LM25 compared with IGL. Patients whose main meal was lunch experienced more nocturnal hypoglycemia with LM25 than with IGL (p = 0.030). Study limitations include that this was a post hoc analysis and no assessments ensured that: SMBG results determined timing of the main meal, each patient's main meal remained unchanged throughout the study, or patients administered insulin lispro with that meal.. Glycemic control improved in patients receiving either LM25 or IGL, irrespective of main meal timing. Both regimens can be used in patients with inadequate glycemic control who are in need of insulin intensification.

Topics: Aged; Blood Glucose; Clinical Protocols; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Incidence; Insulin Glargine; Insulin Lispro; Likelihood Functions; Male; Meals; Middle Aged; Postprandial Period; Weight Gain

Achieving glycemic control remains a challenge for patients with type 2 diabetes, even with insulin therapy.. To assess whether a fixed ratio of insulin degludec/liraglutide was noninferior to continued titration of insulin glargine in patients with uncontrolled type 2 diabetes treated with insulin glargine and metformin.. Phase 3, multinational, multicenter, 26-week, randomized, open-label, 2-group, treat-to-target trial conducted at 75 centers in 10 countries from September 2013 to November 2014 among 557 patients with uncontrolled diabetes treated with glargine (20-50 U) and metformin (≥1500 mg/d) with glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) levels of 7% to 10% and a body mass index of 40 or lower.. 1:1 randomization to degludec/liraglutide (n = 278; maximum dose, 50 U of degludec/1.8 mg of liraglutide) or glargine (n = 279; no maximum dose), with twice-weekly titration to a glucose target of 72 to 90 mg/dL.. Primary outcome measure was change in HbA1c level after 26 weeks, with a noninferiority margin of 0.3% (upper bound of 95% CI, <0.3%). If noninferiority of degludec/liraglutide was achieved, secondary end points were tested for statistical superiority and included change in HbA1c level, change in body weight, and rate of confirmed hypoglycemic episodes.. Among 557 randomized patients (mean: age, 58.8 years; women, 49.7%), 92.5% of patients completed the trial and provided data at 26 weeks. Baseline HbA1c level was 8.4% for the degludec/liraglutide group and 8.2% for the glargine group. HbA1c level reduction was greater with degludec/liraglutide vs glargine (-1.81% for the degludec/liraglutide group vs -1.13% for the glargine group; estimated treatment difference [ETD], -0.59% [95% CI, -0.74% to -0.45%]), meeting criteria for noninferiority (P < .001), and also meeting criteria for statistical superiority (P < .001). Treatment with degludec/liraglutide was also associated with weight loss compared with weight gain with glargine (-1.4 kg for degludec/liraglutide vs 1.8 kg for glargine; ETD, -3.20 kg [95% CI, -3.77 to -2.64],P < .001) and fewer confirmed hypoglycemic episodes (episodes/patient-year exposure, 2.23 for degludec/liraglutide vs 5.05 for glargine; estimated rate ratio, 0.43 [95% CI, 0.30 to 0.61],P < .001). Overall and serious adverse event rates were similar in the 2 groups, except for more nonserious gastrointestinal adverse events reported with degludec/liraglutide (adverse events, 79 for degludec/liraglutide vs 18 for glargine).. Among patients with uncontrolled type 2 diabetes taking glargine and metformin, treatment with degludec/liraglutide compared with up-titration of glargine resulted in noninferior HbA1c levels, with secondary analyses indicating greater HbA1c level reduction after 26 weeks of treatment. Further studies are needed to assess longer-term efficacy and safety.. clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01952145.

Topics: Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Metformin; Middle Aged; Weight Gain; Weight Loss

To compare the therapeutic effects of different regimens in Chinese obese type 2 diabetic mellitus (T2DM) patients. From October 2013 to July 2014, a total of 166 T2DM outpatients who attended the Shanghai Changhai Hospital and the Yijishan Hospital of Wannan Medical College were randomly assigned into an experimental sitagliptin/metformin combined with low caloric diet group (n = 115) and an insulin glargine combined with metformin control group (n = 51). Inclusion criteria were body mass index (BMI) ≥ 25 kg/m and diagnosed with T2DM with glycosylated hemoglobin (glycated hemoglobin A1C [HbA1c]) >9%. Main outcome parameters were fasting plasma glucose, postprandial plasma glucose, BMI, HbA1c, fasting C-peptide, 2-h postprandial C-peptide, triglyceride (TG), total cholesterol (TC), high-density cholesterol (HDL-C), and low-density cholesterol (LDL-C), which were determined by the 75 g steamed-bun meal tolerance test before and 4, 8, 12, and 24 weeks after the treatment started. Treatment costs and life quality were also assessed. BMI, HbA1C, TG, TC, and LDL were significantly more reduced (P < 0.000) and HbA1c significantly better improved in the experimental group than in the control group (<6.5% in 24 [20.87%] vs 2 [3.92%], P < 0.001; <7% in 65 [56.52%] vs 12 [23.53%], P < 0.001). Quality of life scores in the experimental group increased more than in the control group (P < 0.001). The costs for the experimental group medication were less than for other regimens. For obese T2DM patients diagnosed with a glycosylated hemoglobin level >9%, oral sitagliptin/metformin combined with a low caloric diet effectively and economically maintained glycemic control and significantly improved life quality.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Body Mass Index; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Monitoring; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine; Male; Metformin; Middle Aged; Obesity; Sitagliptin Phosphate; Treatment Outcome

To lower the barrier for initiating insulin treatment and obtain adequate glycemic control in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), new basal insulin preparations with improved pharmacological properties and consequently a lower risk of hypoglycemia are needed. The objective of this trial was to confirm the efficacy and compare the safety of insulin degludec (IDeg) with insulin glargine (IGlar) in a multinational setting with two thirds of subjects enrolled in China.. This was a 26-week, randomized, open-label, parallel-group, treat-to-target, non-inferiority trial in 833 subjects with T2DM (48 % were female, mean age 56 years, diabetes duration 8 years), inadequately controlled on oral antidiabetic drugs (OADs). Subjects were randomized 2:1 to once-daily IDeg (555 subjects) or IGlar (278 subjects), both with metformin. The primary endpoint was the change from baseline in glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) after 26 weeks.. The completion rate was high (IDeg 94.2 %; IGlar 91.4 %). Mean HbA1c decreased from 8.3 to 7.0 % in both groups. Estimated treatment difference (ETD) [95 % confidence interval (CI)] IDeg-IGlar in change from baseline was -0.05 % points [-0.18 to 0.08], confirming the non-inferiority of IDeg to IGlar. The proportion of subjects achieving HbA1c <7.0 % was 54.2 and 51.4 % with IDeg and IGlar, respectively (estimated odds ratio [95 % CI] IDeg/IGlar: 1.14 [0.84 to 1.54]). The mean decrease in fasting plasma glucose, self-measured plasma glucose profiles, and insulin dose were similar between groups. Numerically lower rates of overall (estimated rate ratio [95 % CI] IDeg/IGlar: 0.80 [0.59 to 1.10]) and nocturnal (0.77 [0.43 to 1.37]) confirmed hypoglycemia were observed with IDeg compared with IGlar. No treatment differences in other safety parameters were found. Subjects were more satisfied with the IDeg device compared with the IGlar device as reflected by the total Treatment Related Impact Measures-Diabetes Device score (ETD [95 % CI] IDeg-IGlar: 2.2 [0.2 to 4.3]).. IDeg provided adequate glycemic control non-inferior to IGlar and a tendency for a lower hypoglycemia rate. IDeg is considered suitable for initiating insulin therapy in T2DM patients on OADs requiring intensified treatment.. Clinicaltrials.gov NCT01849289.

Topics: Blood Glucose; China; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Metformin; Middle Aged; Treatment Outcome

To compare the effects of the basal insulin analogues glargine and detemir on endothelial function and adipocytokine levels in people with Type 2 diabetes.. We studied 32 people with Type 2 diabetes whose blood glucose control was unsatisfactory while receiving only oral hypoglycaemic drugs. Participants were randomized to either insulin glargine or detemir for 24 weeks and then crossed over to the other treatment without a washout period. Flow-mediated vasodilatation, adipocytokine levels (plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 and leptin/adiponectin ratio), and fasting ghrelin levels were monitored.. These results suggest that the effect on endothelial function and adipocytokine profiles may differ between glargine and detemir in people with diabetes (Trial registration ID: UMIN000004973).

Topics: Adipokines; Adiponectin; Adult; Aged; Ankle Brachial Index; C-Reactive Protein; Cross-Over Studies; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Endothelium, Vascular; Female; Ghrelin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Detemir; Insulin Glargine; Leptin; Male; Middle Aged; Obesity; Plasminogen Activator Inhibitor 1; Vasodilation; Young Adult

To provide evidence-based options on how to intensify basal insulin, we explored head-to-head prandial interventions in overweight patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled on basal insulin glargine with or without 1-3 oral antidiabetic agents (OADs).. Patients were randomized to lixisenatide once daily or insulin glulisine given once or thrice daily, added to glargine, with or without metformin, if HbA1c remained ≥7 to ≤9% (≥53 to ≤75 mmol/mol) after 12 weeks of glargine optimization with OADs other than metformin stopped at the start of optimization. Coprimary end points at 26 weeks were 1) noninferiority (95% CI upper bound <0.4% [<4.4 mmol/mol]) in HbA1c reduction with lixisenatide versus glulisine once daily, and either 2a) noninferiority in HbA1c reduction for lixisenatide versus glulisine thrice daily or 2b) superiority in body weight change for lixisenatide versus glulisine thrice daily. Fasting and postprandial plasma glucose, composite efficacy/safety end points, and adverse events were also assessed.. Baseline characteristics were similar between arms (n = 298, diabetes and basal insulin duration of 12.2 and 3.2 years, respectively; BMI 32.2 kg/m(2)). HbA1c improved from 8.5% to 7.9% (69 to 63 mmol/mol) with glargine optimization and further to 7.2%, 7.2%, and 7.0% (55, 55, and 53 mmol/mol) with lixisenatide and glulisine once daily and thrice daily, respectively; all coprimary end points were met. Symptomatic hypoglycemia and body weight were lower in lixisenatide versus glulisine patients. More gastrointestinal events occurred with lixisenatide.. Short-acting glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists as add-on to basal insulin may become a preferred treatment intensification option, attaining meaningful glycemic targets with fewer hypoglycemic events without weight gain versus basal-plus or basal-bolus in uncontrolled basal insulin-treated type 2 diabetes.

Topics: Aged; Blood Glucose; Body Mass Index; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Endpoint Determination; Female; Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine; Male; Meals; Metformin; Middle Aged; Overweight; Peptides; Postprandial Period

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of basal insulin peglispro (BIL) with those of insulin glargine, both in combination with prandial insulin lispro, in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D).. In this phase III, multicentre, double-blind, 26-week study, we randomized patients with T2D [glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) ≥7 and <12%, on ≥1 insulin injections daily) to BIL (n = 691) or glargine (n = 678), in combination with lispro.. At week 26, the primary objective of non-inferiority of BIL versus glargine for HbA1c reduction was achieved (least squares mean difference -0.21%; 95% confidence interval -0.31 to -0.11%), with statistical superiority of BIL with multiplicity adjustment (p < 0.001). HbA1c at baseline was 8.4% versus 8.5% for BIL versus glargine and at 26 weeks it was 6.8% versus 7.0%. At 26 weeks, more patients reached HbA1c <7% with BIL than with glargine (63.3% vs 53.3%; p < 0.001), the nocturnal hypoglycaemia rate (≤3.9 mmol/l) was lower with BIL (0.51 vs 0.92 events/30 days; p < 0.001), but the daytime hypoglycaemia rate was higher with BIL (5.47 vs 4.53 events/30 days; p < 0.001). The total hypoglycaemia relative rate was 1.10 (p = 0.053). At 26 weeks, patients in the BIL group had lower fasting serum glucose levels, higher basal insulin dosing, with no statistically significant difference in prandial or total insulin dosing, reduced glucose variability and less weight gain (1.3 kg vs 2.2 kg) compared with the glargine group. The BIL group had higher mean triglyceride and aminotransferase levels.. In patients with T2D, BIL with insulin lispro provided greater improvement in glycaemic control with less nocturnal hypoglycaemia, lower glucose variability and less weight gain compared with glargine. The daytime hypoglycaemia rate and mean triglyceride and aminotransferase levels were higher with BIL.

Topics: Aged; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Double-Blind Method; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Insulin Glargine; Insulin Lispro; Male; Meals; Middle Aged; Polyethylene Glycols

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Treatment Outcome

To conduct a substudy, using 24-hour continuous glucose monitoring (CGM), of the AWARD-4 trial, which was designed to compare insulin + glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist treatment with an insulin-only regimen.. The AWARD-4 trial randomized 884 conventional insulin regimen-treated patients to dulaglutide 1.5 mg, dulaglutide 0.75 mg and glargine, all in combination with prandial insulin lispro. The CGM substudy included 144 patients inserted with a Medtronic CGMS iPro CGM device to enable 3-day glucose monitoring. CGM sessions were completed at weeks 0, 13, 26 and 52. CGM measures included mean 24-hour glucose, percentage time in target glucose ranges, hyper- and hypoglycaemia and glucose variability. The primary objective was treatment comparison for percentage time spent with CGM glucose values in the 3.9-7.8 mmol/L range after 26 weeks.. At week 26, mean CGM values decreased in all treatment groups (change from baseline -2.8 ± 0.3, -2.4 ± 0.3 and -2.5 ± 0.3 mmol/L for dulaglutide 1.5 mg, dulaglutide 0.75 mg and glargine, respectively); between-group differences were not statistically significant. Treatment groups were similar for percentage time in the 3.9-7.8 mmol/L range. Percentage time in the 3.9-10.0 mmol/L range was greater for dulaglutide 1.5 mg than for glargine (p < 0.05). Dulaglutide and glargine were associated with decreased glucose variability for all CGM variability indices. The overall within-patient standard deviation (s.d.) was significantly reduced with dulaglutide 1.5 mg versus glargine (p < 0.05). At week 52, there were no significant differences among the groups with regard to measures of normoglycaemia or near-normoglycaemia and for the overall within-patient s.d. Treatment with glargine was associated with greater increases in percentage time spent with glucose values ≤3.9 mmol/L, with statistically significant differences between the groups at 52 weeks (p < 0.05).. In combination with prandial lispro, treatment with dulaglutide and glargine resulted in similar proportions of glucose values in the normoglycaemic range, but dulaglutide provided an improved balance between the proportion of values within the near-normoglycaemia range and values within the hypoglycaemic range.

Topics: Aged; Blood Glucose; Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor; Glucagon-Like Peptides; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Immunoglobulin Fc Fragments; Insulin Glargine; Insulin Lispro; Male; Meals; Middle Aged; Recombinant Fusion Proteins

This study assessed the efficacy and safety of LixiLan, a fixed-ratio, titratable, combination of 2 units insulin glargine (Gla-100) and 1 μg lixisenatide administered once daily via a single pen, versus Gla-100 in insulin-naïve type 2 diabetes on metformin.. Participants were randomized to once-daily LixiLan (n = 161) or Gla-100 (n = 162) for 24 weeks, while continuing metformin. LixiLan and Gla-100 were started at 10 units/5 μg and 10 units, respectively, and titrated based on the Gla-100 requirement according to fasting plasma glucose levels. The primary objective was to test noninferiority (upper bound of the 95% CI ≤0.4%) of LixiLan in reducing HbA1c; if met, statistical superiority was tested. Secondary objectives included body weight changes, hypoglycemia, and safety.. Baseline characteristics (mean age 57 years, diabetes duration 6-7 years, BMI 32 kg/m(2)) were similar between groups. At week 24, mean HbA1c was reduced from 8.0% (64 mmol/mol) at baseline to 6.3% (45 mmol/mol) and 6.5% (48 mmol/mol) with LixiLan and Gla-100, respectively, establishing statistical noninferiority and superiority of LixiLan (least-squared mean [95% CI] difference: -0.17% [-0.31, -0.04] {-1.9 mmol/mol [-3.4, -0.4]}; P = 0.01). HbA1c <7.0% (<53 mmol/mol) was achieved in 84% and 78% of participants (nonsignificant), respectively. LixiLan improved 2-h postmeal plasma glucose versus Gla-100 (least-squared mean difference: -3.17 mmol/L [-57 mg/dL]; P < 0.0001). Body weight was reduced with LixiLan (-1 kg) and increased with Gla-100 (+0.5 kg; P < 0.0001), with no increase in hypoglycemic events (∼25% in each group). The incidence of nausea (7.5%) and vomiting (2.5%) was low with LixiLan.. LixiLan achieved statistically significant reductions to near-normal HbA1c levels with weight loss and no increased hypoglycemic risk, compared with insulin glargine alone, and a low incidence of gastrointestinal adverse events in type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled on metformin.

Topics: Aged; Blood Glucose; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Combinations; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine; Male; Metformin; Middle Aged; Peptides; Postprandial Period; Risk; Safety

The primary objective of this study was to collect data regarding the effectiveness of different dose titration algorithms (TAs) for optimization or initiation of basal insulin supported oral therapy (BOT) in patients with type 2 diabetes. A total of 50 patients were enrolled in this trial (17 women, 33 men, age 63 ± 8 years, HbA1c 7.9 ± 0.8%). The investigator decided on an individual basis to apply any of 4 standard TAs: standard (S: fasting glucose target 90-130 mg/dL, n = 39), standard-fast titration (S-FT: 90-130 mg/dL, larger dose increments at FBG < 180 mg/dl, n = 1), less tight (LT: 110-150 mg/dL, n = 5), and tight (T: 70-100 mg/dL, n = 5). During the next 30 days daily contacts were used to adapt the insulin dose. The majority of all patients (70%) achieved a stable insulin glargine dose within 5 ± 6 days after initiation of the dose titration. HbA1c improved from 7.9 ± 0.8% to 7.5 ± 0.7% (P < .001). In total, 1300 dose decisions were made (1192 according to the TA and 108 by the physicians independently from the TA in 29 patients [58% of study population]). Reasons for TA-overruling dosing decisions were hypoglycemic events (14 mild/4 moderate) in 9 patients. In the majority of these cases (89.8%), the physician recommended continuation of the previous dose or a higher dose. The majority of FBG values were within the respective target range after 4 weeks. In conclusion, the insulin glargine TAs delivered safe dose recommendations with a low risk of hypoglycemia, which successfully led to a stable dose in the vast majority of patients.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Algorithms; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Female; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine; Male; Middle Aged

To compare, in a double-blind, randomized, multi-national study, 52- or 78-week treatment with basal insulin peglispro or insulin glargine, added to pre-study oral antihyperglycaemic medications, in insulin-naïve adults with type 2 diabetes.. The primary outcome was non-inferiority of peglispro to glargine with regard to glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) reduction (margin = 0.4%). Six gated secondary objectives with statistical multiplicity adjustments focused on other measures of glycaemic control and safety. Liver fat content was measured using MRI, in a subset of patients.. Peglispro was non-inferior to glargine in HbA1c reduction [least-squares (LS) mean difference: -0.29%, 95% confidence interval (CI) -0.40, -0.19], and had a lower nocturnal hypoglycaemia rate [relative rate 0.74 (95% CI 0.60, 0.91); p = .005), more patients achieving HbA1c <7.0% without nocturnal hypoglycaemia [odds ratio (OR) 2.15 (95% CI 1.60, 2.89); p < .001], greater HbA1c reduction (p < .001), and more patients achieving HbA1c<7.0% [OR 1.97 (95% CI 1.57, 2.47); p < .001]. Total hypoglycaemia rate and fasting serum glucose did not achieve statistical superiority. At 52 weeks, peglispro-treated patients had higher triglyceride (1.9 vs 1.7 mmol/L). alanine transaminase (34 vs 27 IU/L), and aspartate transaminase levels (27 vs 24 IU/L). LS mean liver fat content was unchanged with peglispro at 52 weeks but decreased 3.1% with glargine [difference: 2.6% (0.9, 4.2); p = .002]. More peglispro-treated patients experienced adverse injection site reactions (3.5% vs 0.6%, p < .001).. Compared with glargine at 52 weeks, peglispro resulted in a statistically superior reduction in HbA1c, more patients achieving HbA1c targets, less nocturnal hypoglycaemia, no improvement in total hypoglycaemia, higher triglyceride levels, higher aminotransferase levels, and more injection site reactions.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Blood Glucose; Circadian Rhythm; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Combination; Fasting; Female; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine; Insulin Lispro; Male; Middle Aged; Polyethylene Glycols

Basal insulin peglispro (BIL) is a novel basal insulin with hepato-preferential action, resulting from reduced peripheral effects. This report summarizes hypoglycaemia data from five BIL phase III studies with insulin glargine as the comparator, including three double-blind trials. Prespecified pooled analyses (n = 4927) included: patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) receiving basal insulin only, those with T2D on basal-bolus therapy, and those with type 1 diabetes (T1D). BIL treatment resulted in a 36-45% lower nocturnal hypoglycaemia rate compared with glargine, despite greater reduction in glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) and higher basal insulin dosing. The total hypoglycaemia rate was similar in patients with T2D on basal treatment only, trended towards being higher (10%) in patients with T2D on basal-bolus treatment (p = .053), and was 15% higher (p < .001) with BIL versus glargine in patients with T1D, with more daytime hypoglycaemia in the T1D and T2D groups who were receiving basal-bolus therapy. In T1D, during the maintenance treatment period (26-52 weeks), the total hypoglycaemia rate was not significantly different. There were no differences in severe hypoglycaemia in the T1D or T2D pooled analyses. BIL versus glargine treatment resulted in greater HbA1c reduction with less nocturnal hypoglycaemia in all patient populations, higher daytime hypoglycaemia with basal-bolus therapy in the T1D and T2D groups, and an associated increase in total hypoglycaemia in the patients with T1D.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Blood Glucose; Circadian Rhythm; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Double-Blind Method; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Insulin Glargine; Insulin Lispro; Male; Middle Aged; Polyethylene Glycols; Retrospective Studies

Basal insulin peglispro (BIL) is a novel basal insulin with hepato-preferential action resulting from reduced peripheral effects. This report provides an integrated summary of lipid changes at 26 weeks with BIL and comparator insulins (glargine, NPH) from phase III studies in type 1 diabetes (T1D), insulin-naïve patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D), patients with T2D on basal insulin only and patients with T2D on basal-bolus therapy. BIL treatment had little effect on HDL cholesterol and LDL cholesterol in all patients. The effect of both BIL and glargine treatment on triglycerides (TG) depended on whether patients had been previously treated with insulin. When BIL replaced conventional insulin glargine or NPH treatments, increases in TG levels were observed. When BIL or comparator insulins were given for 26 weeks to insulin-naïve patients with T2D, TG levels were unchanged from baseline with BIL but decreased with either glargine or NPH. The decreased peripheral action of BIL may reduce suppression of lipolysis in peripheral adipose tissue resulting in increased free fatty acid delivery to the liver and, hence, increased hepatic TG synthesis and secretion.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine; Insulin Lispro; Insulin, Isophane; Lipid Metabolism; Lipids; Male; Middle Aged; Polyethylene Glycols; Retrospective Studies; Triglycerides

The efficacy and safety of once-weekly dulaglutide 0.75 mg (dulaglutide) in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) were evaluated according to subgroups defined by concomitant oral hypoglycaemic agents. This exploratory analysis included data from a randomized, open-label, phase III study that compared dulaglutide with insulin glargine (glargine) (n = 361). The three subgroups were dulaglutide or glargine in combination with sulphonylurea (SU) alone, biguanide (BG) alone or SU and BG combined. There were no clinically relevant differences in glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) changes among the three subgroups in the dulaglutide group; in the glargine group, a numerically greater reduction was observed in combination with BG alone compared to the other two groups (SU alone and SU + BG). Weight loss was observed with dulaglutide in combination with BG alone or with SU + BG. The incidence of adverse events among subgroups was significantly different in the glargine group but not in the dulaglutide group. Incidence of hypoglycaemia was highest in combination with SU for both treatments. For patients with T2D, dulaglutide added to concomitant BG may be more likely to result in weight loss than dulaglutide added to concomitant SU.

Topics: Asian People; Biguanides; Blood Glucose; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Glucagon-Like Peptides; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Immunoglobulin Fc Fragments; Insulin Glargine; Japan; Male; Middle Aged; Recombinant Fusion Proteins; Sulfonylurea Compounds; Weight Loss

DEVOTE was designed to evaluate the cardiovascular safety of insulin degludec (IDeg) vs insulin glargine U100 (IGlar) in patients with T2D at high risk of cardiovascular events. DEVOTE is a phase 3b, multicenter, international, randomized, double-blind, active comparator-controlled trial, designed as an event-driven trial that would continue until 633 positively adjudicated primary events were accrued. The primary end point was the time from randomization to a composite outcome consisting of the first occurrence of cardiovascular death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or nonfatal stroke. Patients with T2D at high risk of cardiovascular complications were randomized 1:1 to receive either IDeg or IGlar, each added to background therapies. This trial was designed to demonstrate statistical noninferiority of IDeg vs IGlar for the primary end point. DEVOTE enrolled 7,637 patients between October 2013 and November 2014 at 436 sites in 20 countries. Of these, 6,506 patients had prior cardiovascular disease or chronic kidney disease, and the remainder had multiple cardiovascular risk factors. DEVOTE was designed to provide conclusive evidence regarding the cardiovascular safety of IDeg relative to IGlar in a high-risk population of patients with T2D.

Topics: Aged; Angina, Unstable; Cardiovascular Diseases; Comorbidity; Coronary Disease; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Double-Blind Method; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Heart Failure; Hospitalization; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Proportional Hazards Models; Renal Insufficiency, Chronic; Risk Factors; Stroke

Basal insulin titration in the real world is often unsuccessful. LTHome, a web tool, applies a rules engine-based algorithm providing insulin titration advice directly to the patient.. This pilot, randomized trial evaluates basal insulin glargine titration by LTHome compared to enhanced usual therapy ([EUT]-diabetes education program) over 12 weeks. Important inclusion criteria: 18-75 years, type 2 diabetes, computer literacy, and HbA1c >7.0%. Trial protocol was approved by ethics board.. We randomized 139 subjects. The achievement of primary composite outcome (four out of seven fasting plasma glucose [FPG] within 5-7.2 mmol/L + mean for three consecutive FPG within 5-7.2 mmol/L + no severe hypoglycemia) was 15% in LTHome versus 41% in EUT (noninferiority not met, P-value = 0.92). Other outcomes were similar between the LTHome and EUT arms: alternate composite outcome achievement (last five FPG mean within the range of 5-7.2 mmol/L + no hypoglycemia, 47% and 51%, P = 0.73); A1c reduction (-1.0% and -1.1%, P = 0.66); proportion achieving A1c ≤7% (14% and 20%, P = 0.36); and hypoglycemia incidence (31% and 37%, P = 0.4), respectively. Patient satisfaction score improvements were greater in LTHome versus EUT (change in fear of hypoglycemia score P = 0.04 and change in diabetes distress score P = 0.04). The mean number of additional healthcare provider visits was 0.13 for LTHome and 1.22 for EUT (P < 0.01).. INNOVATE trial suggests clinical utility of LTHome compared to EUT in real-life settings. Further research is needed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of automated insulin titration algorithms.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Algorithms; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine; Internet; Male; Middle Aged; Pilot Projects; Self Care; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult

This study aims to compare the effectiveness of insulin glargine 300 U/mL (Gla-300) with its accompanying patient support program with that of other basal insulin and available patient support programs in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) in a real-world setting in terms of achieving HEDIS (Healthcare Effectiveness Data and Information Set) individualized glycemic targets without documented symptomatic hypoglycemia.. Achieve Control is a US-based, multicenter, randomized, open-label, active-controlled, parallel group pragmatic Phase IV trial in insulin-naïve patients with T2D uncontrolled on ≥2 oral antidiabetes drugs (OAD) and/or glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor antagonists (GLP-1 RA). Inclusion criteria include a diagnosis of T2D, age ≥18 years, and glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) between 8.0% and 11.0%. Patients will be assigned to either the Gla-300 or other basal insulin group. The primary end point is the proportion of patients achieving HEDIS HbA1c targets (<8.0% [64 mmol/mol] in patients with comorbidities or aged ≥65 years; <7.0% [58 mmol/mol] in all other patients) without occurrence of symptomatic hypoglycemia (blood glucose ≤70 mg/dL) from baseline to 6 months. Secondary end points include rates of documented symptomatic nocturnal hypoglycemia and severe hypoglycemia; change from baseline in HbA1c, fasting glucose, and body weight; treatment persistence; patient-reported outcomes; and healthcare resource utilization. Planned enrollment is 3270 patients across approximately 400 clinical sites.. Pragmatic clinical trials offer the potential to assess comparative effectiveness in broadly based patient populations receiving care (with or without a corresponding educational support program) in real-world clinical settings. The results of Achieve Control should elucidate the benefits of management of T2D with Gla-300 versus other basal insulins in terms of patient outcomes, experiences, and perceptions, and its impact on healthcare resource utilization and cost.. www.clinicaltrials.gov identifier is NCT02451137.

Topics: Aged; Blood Glucose; Body Weight; Comorbidity; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor; Glycated Hemoglobin; Health Services; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Detemir; Insulin Glargine; Male; Patient Reported Outcome Measures; United States

The efficacy and safety of insulin degludec/insulin aspart (IDegAsp) once daily (OD) compared with insulin glargine U100 (IGlar) OD over 52 weeks in insulin-naïve adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) was investigated.. In this open-label, parallel-group treat-to-target trial, participants were randomized (1:1) to receive IDegAsp OD (breakfast, n = 266) or IGlar OD (as per label, n = 264). Participants then entered a 26-week extension phase (IDegAsp OD, n = 192; IGlar OD, n = 221). The primary endpoint was change from baseline to Week 26 in HbA1c.. After 26 and 52 weeks, mean HbA1c decreased to similar levels in both groups. After 52 weeks, the mean estimated treatment difference was -0.08% (-0.26, 0.09 95%CI), confirming the non-inferiority of IDegAsp OD versus IGlar OD evaluated at Week 26. After 52 weeks, there was a similar reduction in mean fasting plasma glucose in both treatment groups. The rate of confirmed hypoglycemic episodes was 86% higher (p < 0.0001) whereas the rate of nocturnal hypoglycemia was 75% lower (p < 0.0001) for IDegAsp versus IGlar.. Nocturnal-confirmed hypoglycemia was higher with IGlar whereas overall and diurnal hypoglycemia were higher with IDegAsp dosed at breakfast. These results highlight the importance of administration of IDegAsp with the main meal of the day, tailored to the individual patient's needs.. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01045707 [core]) and NCT01169766 [ext].

Topics: Blood Glucose; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Combinations; Female; Humans; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Middle Aged; Safety

Socioeconomic changes in Latin American countries have led to an increased prevalence of type 2 diabetes (T2D). We examined the effects of exenatide twice daily (BID) or insulin lispro, each added to insulin glargine, in Latin American patients with T2D.. This was a subgroup analysis of patients from Argentina and Mexico in the 4B study (N=114). Patients with glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) of 7.0-10.0% (53-86mmol/mol) after 12weeks of intensive basal insulin optimization were randomized to exenatide BID or thrice-daily insulin lispro added to insulin glargine and metformin.. After 30weeks, addition of exenatide BID or insulin lispro resulted in significant (P<0.0001) reductions in HbA1c (exenatide BID: -0.9% [-10mmol/mol]; insulin lispro: -1.2% [-13mmol/mol]). Weight was stable in the exenatide BID group (-0.1kg) and increased significantly (+3.4kg; P<0.0001) with insulin lispro. Major and minor hypoglycemia occurred less frequently (40 vs. 253 events) with exenatide BID compared with insulin lispro. Gastrointestinal adverse events of nausea, diarrhea, and vomiting occurred more frequently with exenatide BID than with insulin lispro.. Both exenatide BID and prandial insulin lispro, each added to basal insulin glargine, were effective at reducing HbA1c in Latin American patients. Treatment with exenatide BID resulted in stable weight but more gastrointestinal adverse events. Treatment with insulin lispro resulted in weight gain and an increased risk of hypoglycemia. These findings support the addition of exenatide BID to insulin glargine as an option for Latin American patients unable to achieve glycemic control on basal insulin alone.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Argentina; Blood Glucose; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Administration Schedule; Exenatide; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine; Insulin Lispro; Male; Metformin; Mexico; Middle Aged; Peptides; Retrospective Studies; Treatment Outcome; United States; Venoms

No previous studies have investigated the use of a premixed insulin analogue in a hospital setting.. To compare the efficacy and safety of treatment with premixed insulin analogue (insulin lispro mix 75/25, LM75/25) with the basal-plus regimen with insulin glargine in hospitalized patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D).. A randomized clinical trial in hospitalized patients with T2D and glucose >140 mg/dL on admission was performed. A total of 54 patients were randomized to receive insulin LM75/25 or glargine. In both groups, a correction dose of lispro was administered before meals. Insulin dose was adjusted to obtain a mean blood glucose (BG) between 100 and 140 mg/dL.. Improvement in the mean BG after the first day of treatment was similar in both groups (P = 0.470). Glycemic control at the end of follow-up was similar between the group with insulin LM75/25 (131.3 ± 28.4 mg/dL) and insulin glargine (143.8 ± 32.5 mg/dL, P = 0.153). The aim of a BG concentration of <140 mg/dL was obtained in 72% of the patients in the premixed insulin analogue group and 56% of patients in the basal-plus group (P = 0.239). There was no difference in the frequency of hypoglycemia between groups (7 vs. 10, P = 0.529).. Results of this trial indicate that the use of a premixed insulin analogue is as effective and safe as the basal-plus regimen to achieve glycemic control.

Topics: Aged; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Male; Middle Aged; Treatment Outcome

Insulin therapy should be strongly considered in newly diagnosed type 2 diabetic (T2D) patients with severe hyperglycemia. However, whether insulin be continued or patients switched to an oral antidiabetic drug (OAD) after short-term intensive insulin therapy (ITT) is not clear.. After ITT for 10-14 days, 47 patients were randomized into either a glargine (n = 21) or metformin-based OAD (n = 26) group for a 6-month intervention. After these 6 months, patients in the glargine group were switched to metformin-based OAD therapy, whereas treatment in the OAD group was unchanged. Patients were followed-up for another 6 months.. At the end of the 6-month intervention, HbA1c was similarly reduced in both the glargine (from 11.81 ± 1.70% to 6.48 ± 0.79%; P < 0.001) and OAD (from 11.71 ± 1.89% to 6.16 ± 0.52%; P < 0.001) groups. At the end of 12 months, HbA1c was at comparable and near optimal levels in both groups. Similar increases were seen in homeostatic model assessment of β-cell function in the two groups after 6 months. There were no significant differences between the two groups in insulin sensitivity improvement, hypoglycemic episodes, weight change, treatment satisfaction and quality of life after the 6-month intervention.. The effects of metformin-based OAD therapy on glycemic control and improvements in β-cell function are not inferior to glargine in newly diagnosed T2D patients with severe hyperglycemia after short-term ITT. Considering the superiority of metformin in terms of safety, cost, and convenience, metformin-based OAD therapy is strongly recommended for these patients.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Aged; Blood Glucose; China; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin-Secreting Cells; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Metformin; Middle Aged; Prognosis; Quality of Life; Risk Factors

To examine whether insulin glargine can lead to better control of glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) than that achieved by neutral protamine Hagedorn (NPH) insulin, using a protocol designed to limit nocturnal hypoglycaemia.. The present study, the Least One Oral Antidiabetic Drug Treatment (LANCELOT) Study, was a 36-week, randomized, open-label, parallel-arm study conducted in Europe, Asia, the Middle East and South America. Participants were randomized (1:1) to begin glargine or NPH, on background of metformin with glimepiride. Weekly insulin titration aimed to achieve median prebreakfast and nocturnal plasma glucose levels ≤5.5 mmol/l, while limiting values ≤4.4 mmol/l.. The efficacy population (n = 701) had a mean age of 57 years, a mean body mass index of 29.8 kg/m², a mean duration of diabetes of 9.2 years and a mean HbA1c level of 8.2% (66 mmol/mol). At treatment end, HbA1c values and the proportion of participants with HbA1c <7.0 % (<53 mmol/mol) were not significantly different for glargine [7.1 % (54 mmol/mol) and 50.3%] versus NPH [7.2 % (55 mmol/mol) and 44.3%]. The rate of symptomatic nocturnal hypoglycaemia, confirmed by plasma glucose ≤3.9 or ≤3.1 mmol/l, was 29 and 48% less with glargine than with NPH insulin. Other outcomes were similar between the groups.. Insulin glargine was not superior to NPH insulin in improving glycaemic control. The insulin dosing algorithm was not sufficient to equalize nocturnal hypoglycaemia between the two insulins. This study confirms, in a globally heterogeneous population, the reduction achieved in nocturnal hypoglycaemia while attaining good glycaemic control with insulin glargine compared with NPH, even when titrating basal insulin to prevent nocturnal hypoglycaemia rather than treating according to normal fasting glucose levels.

Topics: Aged; Asia; Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring; Circadian Rhythm; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Dosage Calculations; Drug Resistance; Drug Therapy, Combination; Europe; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hyperglycemia; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Isophane; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Metformin; Middle Aged; Middle East; South Africa; Sulfonylurea Compounds

Self-adjustment of insulin dose is commonly practiced in Western patients with type 2 diabetes but is usually not performed in Asian patients. This multinational, 24-week, randomized study compared patient-led with physician-led titration of once-daily insulin glargine in Asian patients with uncontrolled type 2 diabetes who were on 2 oral glucose-lowering agents.. Patient-led (n = 275) or physician-led (n = 277) subjects followed the same dose-titration algorithm guided by self-monitored fasting blood glucose (FBG; target, 110 mg/dL [6.1 mmol/L]). The primary endpoint was change in mean glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) at week 24 in the patient-led versus physician-led titration groups.. Patient-led titration resulted in a significantly higher drop in HbA1c value at 24 weeks when compared with physician-led titration (-1.40% vs. -1.25%; mean difference, -0.15; 95% confidence interval, -0.29 to 0.00; P = .043). Mean decrease in FBG was greatest in the patient-led group (-2.85 mmol/L vs. -2.48 mmol/L; P = .001). The improvements in HbA1c and FBG were consistent across countries, with similar improvements in treatment satisfaction in both groups. Mean daily insulin dose was higher in the patient-led group (28.9 units vs. 22.2 units; P<.001). Target HbA1c of <7.0% without severe hypoglycemia was achieved in 40.0% and 32.9% in the patient-led and physician-led groups, respectively (P = .086). Severe hypoglycemia was not different in the 2 groups (0.7%), with an increase in nocturnal and symptomatic hypoglycemia in the patient-led arm.. Patient-led insulin glargine titration achieved near-target blood glucose levels in Asian patients with uncontrolled type 2 diabetes who were on 2 oral glucose-lowering drugs, demonstrating that Asian patients can self-uptitrate insulin dose effectively when guided.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine; Male; Middle Aged; Patient Satisfaction

Hypoglycemia is a leading risk of glucose-lowering therapy. Treatment with insulin glargine compared with standard care early in the course of dysglycemia in the Outcome Reduction with an Initial Glargine Intervention (ORIGIN) trial provides information on the frequency and predictors of hypoglycemia in this setting.. A total of 12,537 people with high cardiovascular risk and dysglycemia treated with one or no oral glucose-lowering agents were randomized to add glargine titrated to a fasting glucose level of ≤5.3 mmol/L (≤95 mg/dL) or to use standard therapies. Independent associations of both nonsevere hypoglycemia (symptomatic and confirmed with a glucose level of ≤3 mmol/L [≤54 mg/dL]) and severe hypoglycemia with characteristics at baseline, treatment allocation, and average HbA1c were assessed by Cox proportional hazards models.. During a median follow-up period of 6.2 years, 28% of participants reported nonsevere hypoglycemia, and 3.8% reported severe hypoglycemia. Prior use of a sulfonylurea and allocation to glargine independently predicted a higher risk for both categories of participants. Nonsevere events were independently associated with younger age, lower BMI, the presence of diabetes, and higher baseline HbA1c level. Severe events were associated with older age, hypertension, higher serum creatinine level, and lower cognitive function, but not baseline glycemic status. Progressively higher on-treatment HbA1c level was associated with a lower risk of nonsevere events in both treatment groups; a lower risk of severe events in the glargine group, and a higher risk of severe events with standard care.. Hypoglycemia was relatively uncommon in the ORIGIN trial, but was more frequent with sulfonylurea use at baseline and allocation to glargine. Nonsevere and severe events were associated with different clinical characteristics, awareness of which may guide individualized therapy.

Topics: Aged; Blood Glucose; Body Mass Index; Cardiovascular Diseases; Creatinine; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Proportional Hazards Models; Risk Factors; Sulfonylurea Compounds

To compare safety and efficacy of insulin glargine and liraglutide in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2DM).. This randomized, multinational, open-label trial included subjects treated for T2DM with metformin ± sulphonylurea, who had glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) levels of 7.5-12%. Subjects were assigned to 24 weeks of insulin glargine, titrated to target fasting plasma glucose of 4.0-5.5 mmol/L or liraglutide, escalated to the highest approved clinical dose of 1.8 mg daily. The trial was powered to detect superiority of glargine over liraglutide in percentage of people reaching HbA1c <7%.. The mean [standard deviation (s.d.)] age of the participants was 57 (9) years, the duration of diabetes was 9 (6) years, body mass index was 31.9 (4.2) kg/m(2) and HbA1c level was 9.0 (1.1)%. Equal numbers (n = 489) were allocated to glargine and liraglutide. Similar numbers of subjects in both groups attained an HbA1c level of <7% (48.4 vs. 45.9%); therefore, superiority of glargine over liraglutide was not observed (p = 0.44). Subjects treated with glargine had greater reductions of HbA1c [-1.94% (0.05) and -1.79% (0.05); p = 0.019] and fasting plasma glucose [6.2 (1.6) and 7.9 (2.2) mmol/L; p < 0.001] than those receiving liraglutide. The liraglutide group reported a greater number of gastrointestinal treatment-emergent adverse events (p < 0.001). The mean (s.d.) weight change was +2.0 (4.0) kg for glargine and -3.0 (3.6) kg for liraglutide (p < 0.001). Symptomatic hypoglycaemia was more common with glargine (p < 0.001). A greater number of subjects in the liraglutide arm withdrew as a result of adverse events (p < 0.001).. Adding either insulin glargine or liraglutide to subjects with poorly controlled T2DM reduces HbA1c substantially, with nearly half of subjects reaching target levels of 7%.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Blood Glucose; Body Mass Index; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Glucagon-Like Peptide 1; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; International Cooperation; Liraglutide; Male; Metformin; Middle Aged; Treatment Outcome

The aim of this analysis was to assess the cost-effectiveness of switching from biphasic human insulin 30 (BHI), insulin glargine (IGlar), or neutral protamine Hagedorn (NPH) insulin (all ± oral glucose-lowering drugs [OGLDs]) to biphasic insulin aspart 30 (BIAsp 30) in people with type 2 diabetes in India, Indonesia, and Saudi Arabia.. The IMS CORE Diabetes Model was used to determine the clinical outcome, costs, and cost-effectiveness of switching from treatment with BHI, IGlar, or NPH to BIAsp 30 over a 30-year time horizon. A 1-year analysis was also performed based on quality-of-life data and treatment costs. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were expressed as a fraction of gross domestic product (GDP) per capita, and cost-effectiveness was defined as ICER <3-times GDP per capita.. Switching treatment from BHI, IGlar, or NPH to BIAsp 30 was associated with an increase in life expectancy of >0.7 years, reduction in all diabetes-related complications, and was considered as cost-effective or highly cost-effective in India, Indonesia, and Saudi Arabia (BHI to BIAsp 30, 0.26 in India, 1.25 in Indonesia, 0.01 in Saudi Arabia; IGlar to BIAsp 30, -0.68 in India, -0.21 in Saudi Arabia; NPH to BIAsp 30, 0.15 in India, -0.07 in Saudi Arabia; GDP per head per annum/quality-adjusted life-year). Cost-effectiveness was maintained in the 1-year analyses.. Switching from treatment with BHI, IGlar, or NPH to BIAsp 30 (all ± OGLDs) was found to be cost-effective in India, Indonesia, and Saudi Arabia, both in the long and short term.

Topics: Aged; Biphasic Insulins; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Diabetes Complications; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Combinations; Female; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Incidence; India; Indonesia; Insulin Aspart; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Isophane; Insulins; Life Expectancy; Male; Middle Aged; Quality of Life; Saudi Arabia

To compare pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) of insulin glargine in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) after evening versus morning administration.. Ten T2DM insulin-treated persons were studied during 24-h euglycemic glucose clamp, after glargine injection (0.4 units/kg s.c.), either in the evening (2200 h) or the morning (1000 h).. The 24-h glucose infusion rate area under the curve (AUC0-24h) was similar in the evening and morning studies (1,058 ± 571 and 995 ± 691 mg/kg × 24 h, P = 0.503), but the first 12 h (AUC0-12h) was lower with evening versus morning glargine (357 ± 244 vs. 593 ± 374 mg/kg × 12 h, P = 0.004), whereas the opposite occurred for the second 12 h (AUC12-24h 700 ± 396 vs. 403 ± 343 mg/kg × 24 h, P = 0.002). The glucose infusion rate differences were totally accounted for by different rates of endogenous glucose production, not utilization. Plasma insulin and C-peptide levels did not differ in evening versus morning studies. Plasma glucagon levels (AUC0-24h 1,533 ± 656 vs. 1,120 ± 344 ng/L/h, P = 0.027) and lipolysis (free fatty acid AUC0-24h 7.5 ± 1.6 vs. 8.9 ± 1.9 mmol/L/h, P = 0.005; β-OH-butyrate AUC0-24h 6.8 ± 4.7 vs. 17.0 ± 11.9 mmol/L/h, P = 0.005; glycerol, P < 0.020) were overall more suppressed after evening versus morning glargine administration.. The PD of insulin glargine differs depending on time of administration. With morning administration insulin activity is greater in the first 0-12 h, while with evening administration the activity is greater in the 12-24 h period following dosing. However, glargine PK and plasma C-peptide levels were similar, as well as glargine PD when analyzed by 24-h clock time independent of the time of administration. Thus, the results reflect the impact of circadian changes in insulin sensitivity in T2DM (lower in the night-early morning vs. afternoon hours) rather than glargine per se.

Topics: Aged; Blood Glucose; C-Peptide; Circadian Rhythm; Cross-Over Studies; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Administration Schedule; Fatty Acids, Nonesterified; Female; Glucose; Glucose Clamp Technique; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Injections; Insulin Glargine; Insulin Resistance; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Middle Aged

To compare the efficacy and safety of new insulin glargine 300 U/ml (Gla-300) with that of glargine 100 U/ml (Gla-100) in insulin-naïve people with type 2 diabetes using oral glucose-lowering drugs.. The EDITION 3 study was a multicentre, open-label, parallel-group study. Participants were randomized to Gla-300 or Gla-100 once daily for 6 months, discontinuing sulphonylureas and glinides, with a dose titration aimed at achieving pre-breakfast plasma glucose concentrations of 4.4-5.6 mmol/l (80-100 mg/dl). The primary endpoint was change in glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) from baseline to month 6. The main secondary endpoint was percentage of participants with ≥1 nocturnal confirmed [≤3.9 mmol/l (≤70 mg/dl)] or severe hypoglycaemia from week 9 to month 6. Other measures of glycaemia and hypoglycaemia, weight change and insulin dose were assessed.. Randomized participants (n = 878) had a mean (standard deviation) age of 57.7 (10.1) years, diabetes duration 9.8 (6.4) years, body mass index 33.0 (6.7) kg/m(2) and HbA1c 8.54 (1.06) % [69.8 (11.6) mmol/mol]. HbA1c levels decreased by equivalent amounts with the two treatments; the least squares mean difference in change from baseline was 0.04 [95% confidence interval (CI) -0.09 to 0.17] % or 0.4 (-1.0 to 1.9) mmol/mol. Numerically fewer participants reported ≥1 nocturnal confirmed (≤3.9 mmol/l) or severe hypoglycaemia from week 9 to month 6 [relative risk (RR) 0.89 (95% CI 0.66 to 1.20)] with Gla-300 versus Gla-100; a significantly lower risk of hypoglycaemia with this definition was found over the 6-month treatment period [RR 0.76 (95% CI 0.59 to 0.99)]. No between-treatment differences in adverse events were identified.. Gla-300 is as effective as Gla-100 in reducing HbA1c in insulin-naïve people with type 2 diabetes, with lower hypoglycaemia risk.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Blood Glucose; Delayed-Action Preparations; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Monitoring; Drug Resistance; Europe; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hyperglycemia; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Injections, Subcutaneous; Insulin Glargine; Japan; Male; Middle Aged; North America; Risk; Weight Gain

Hypoglycemia is a barrier to the achievement of glycemic targets and limits the beneficial effects of improved glucose control on cardiovascular outcomes in type 2 diabetes (T2D). Circulating endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs) participate in cardiovascular homeostasis and predict future cardiovascular events. Therefore, we herein analyzed the association between occurrence of hypoglycemia and EPC changes in T2D patients after optimization of glucose control with basal insulin therapy.. In the NCT00699686 trial, 42 T2D insulin-naïve patients received a 3 + 3-month cross-over therapy with glargine and detemir. There were 43 minor and 2 severe hypoglycemic episodes in 19 patients (45.2 %, 0.54 episodes/patient/year). Changes in EPCs were analyzed in relation to the occurrence of hypoglycemia during the trial.. Patients with hypoglycemia had a higher final HbA1c at 6 months than patients without, although absolute HbA1c changes were not significantly different. Though PCs increased at study end, in patients experiencing at least 1 hypoglycemic episode, the changes in CD34(+), CD133(+) progenitor cells and CD34(+)KDR(+) EPCs were significantly lower than the respective changes in patients without incident hypoglycemia, even after correcting for confounders. During treatment with detemir, which induced >twofold less hypoglycemia than glargine, CD34(+)KDR(+) EPCs increased significantly more than during treatment with glargine.. In naïve T2D patients initiating basal insulin, hypoglycemia prevents the increase in vasculoprotective PCs. Clinically, these data strengthen the importance of avoiding hypoglycemia to improve cardiovascular outcomes during the treatment of T2D.

Topics: Aged; Cross-Over Studies; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Diabetic Angiopathies; Endothelial Progenitor Cells; Female; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Detemir; Insulin Glargine; Male; Middle Aged

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of insulin injections in patients using 8 mm 31 gauge vs. 5 mm 31 gauge pen needles, as determined by A1C results and to measure individual patient satisfaction and compare overall satisfaction regarding the use of the 2 needles.. The study was completed as a substudy of a single-site, open-label, randomized, 6-month comparative study consisting of 66 obese patients. Prior to the study, all individuals had treated their diabetes with either long-acting insulin glargine or insulin detemir. At the onset of the study, patients were randomized 1:1 to either insulin glargine or neutral protamine Hagedorn insulin. All patients used an 8 mm pen needle for the first 3 months and a 5 mm pen needle for the remaining 3 months. At the conclusion of the trial, patients completed a questionnaire regarding pen needle satisfaction.. The 5 mm needle was preferred by 41.8% of study subjects, while the 8 mm needle was preferred by 27.9% of subjects. For other attributes (i.e. overall injection comfort, pain when inserting the needle into the skin and length of needle), the 5 mm needle scored higher than the 8 mm needle and higher also than the percentage of individuals who indicated no preference.. In patients with insulin-treated type 2 diabetes with a mean single-injection volume dose of basal insulin of 50.2 units, the 5 mm needle was generally preferred over the 8 mm needle. The shorter needle was more comfortable and easier to use while being equally effective in delivering insulin.

Topics: Canada; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Injections, Subcutaneous; Insulin; Insulin Detemir; Insulin Glargine; Needles; Patient Preference; Patient Safety; Patient Satisfaction; Surveys and Questionnaires; Treatment Outcome

Unlike in western countries, premixed insulin is widely used as the starter insulin in Asian patients instead of basal insulin. The use of basal-bolus therapy as an intensification regimen is not common in Asia despite poor glycaemic control after starting insulin therapy. An alternative insulin intensification regimen with a similar efficacy and safety profile to basal-bolus therapy, but of higher convenience, is urgently needed. The efficacy and safety of insulin lispro mix thrice-daily was compared with basal-bolus therapy in Asian patients with type 2 diabetes who were insufficiently controlled on twice-daily premixed insulin.. This open-label, randomised, active comparator-controlled, parallel-group trial was done at 24 centres in China, Taiwan, and South Korea. Patients with type 2 diabetes who were inadequately controlled on twice-daily premixed insulin were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive either insulin lispro mix (mix 50 before breakfast and lunch plus mix 25 before dinner) or basal-bolus therapy (insulin glargine at bedtime plus prandial insulin lispro thrice-daily) for 24 weeks. Randomisation was done by a computer-generated random sequence and was stratified by country or region and baseline HbA1c. Treatment assignments were masked from the study team assessing outcomes but not from investigators and patients. The primary outcome was change from baseline in HbA1c at week 24 in all randomly assigned patients who received at least one dose of study drug. Analysis was by modified intention to treat, with the per-protocol population used as a supportive analysis. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01175811.. Between Feb 7, 2011, and Nov 7, 2012, 402 patients were enrolled (199 in the premix group, 203 in the basal-bolus group) and 399 were included in the primary analysis (197 in the premix group, 202 in the basal-bolus group). HbA1c change at week 24 was -1.1% for both treatment groups. The least squares mean difference between groups in HbA1c change from baseline was 0% (95% CI -0.1 to 0.2). Insulin lispro mix was non-inferior to basal-bolus therapy based on the prespecified margin of 0.4%. The frequency of adverse events, and the incidences and 30-day rates of nocturnal and overall hypoglycaemia were comparable between groups. No severe hypoglycaemia was reported.. A premixed insulin lispro regimen thrice-daily was non-inferior to basal-bolus therapy in terms of overall glycaemic control and thus could be an option for intensified insulin regimen in Asian patients with type 2 diabetes who are inadequately controlled with twice-daily premixed insulin.

Topics: Acarbose; Aged; China; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Inositol; Insulin Glargine; Insulin Lispro; Male; Metformin; Middle Aged; Republic of Korea; Taiwan; Treatment Outcome

The combination of a dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitor and a long-acting insulin analogue is widely used in clinical practice. However, some patients fail to achieve lower postprandial hyperglycemia. Mitiglinide, a short-acting insulinotropic sulfonylurea receptor ligand, is effective for postprandial hyperglycemia. Recently, it has been reported that the combination therapy of mitiglinide with a DPP-4 inhibitor could improve glycemic control. However, the efficacy of those under long-acting insulin analogue therapy remains to be investigated. Thus, we conducted a prospective single-center study of eight Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus receiving mitiglinide added to the combination therapy of sitagliptin and insulin glargine, and evaluated its efficacy and safety by continuous glucose monitoring (CGM). Participants' (four men and four women) mean age was 70.3 ± 10.6 years. Their mean body mass index, HbA1c level, and urinary C-peptide level were 22.0 ± 2.8 kg/m(2), 9.2 ± 1.2%, and 50.0 ± 31.4 μg/day, respectively. CGM showed that as compared with the combination of only sitagliptin and insulin glargine, mitiglinide in combination with sitagliptin and insulin glargine significantly reduced glycemic fluctuation indices, total area for the range of 24-h glycemic fluctuations (p = 0.04), mean amplitude of glycemic excursions (p = 0.03), and the proportion of time in hyperglycemia (p = 0.02) without significant difference in the proportion of time in hypoglycemia (p = 0.18). Hence, we have demonstrated the efficacy and safety of the add-on treatment with mitiglinide in type 2 diabetic patients, receiving the combination therapy of sitagliptin and insulin glargine.

Topics: Aged; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Fasting; Female; Humans; Hyperglycemia; Insulin Glargine; Isoindoles; Male; Monitoring, Physiologic; Sitagliptin Phosphate

This study determined the effects of insulin versus liraglutide therapy on liver fat in patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled with oral agents therapy, including metformin.. Thirty-five patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled on metformin monotherapy or in combination with other oral antidiabetic medications were randomized to receive insulin glargine or liraglutide therapy for 12 weeks. The liver proton density fat fraction (PDFF) was measured by MRS. The mean liver PDFF, the total liver volume, and the total liver fat index were measured by MRI. The Student t test, the Fisher exact test, and repeated-measures ANOVA were used for statistical analysis.. Insulin treatment was associated with a significant improvement in glycated hemoglobin (7.9% to 7.2% [62.5 to 55.2 mmol/mol], P = 0.005), a trend toward a decrease in MRS-PDFF (12.6% to 9.9%, P = 0.06), and a significant decrease in liver mean MRI-PDFF (13.8% to 10.6%, P = 0.005), liver volume (2,010.6 to 1,858.7 mL, P = 0.01), and the total liver fat index (304.4 vs. 209.3 % ⋅ mL, P = 0.01). Liraglutide treatment was also associated with a significant improvement in glycated hemoglobin (7.6% to 6.7% [59.8 to 50.2 mmol/mol], P < 0.001) but did not change MRS-PDFF (P = 0.80), liver mean MRI-PDFF (P = 0.15), liver volume (P = 0.30), or the total liver fat index (P = 0.39).. The administration of insulin glargine therapy reduced the liver fat burden in patients with type 2 diabetes. However, the improvements in the liver fat fraction and glycemia control were not significantly different from those in the liraglutide group.

Topics: Adipose Tissue; Aged; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Fatty Liver; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Liraglutide; Liver; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Male; Metformin; Middle Aged

To evaluate the maintenance of efficacy and safety of insulin glargine 300 U/ml (Gla-300) versus glargine 100 U/ml (Gla-100) in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) using basal plus meal-time insulin for 12 months in the EDITION 1 trial.. EDITION 1 was a multicentre, randomized, open-label, two-arm, phase IIIa study. Participants completing the initial 6-month treatment period continued to receive Gla-300 or Gla-100, as previously randomized, once daily for a further 6-month open-label extension phase. Changes in glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) and fasting plasma glucose concentrations, insulin dose, hypoglycaemic events and body weight were assessed.. Of 807 participants enrolled in the initial phase, 89% (359/404) assigned to Gla-300 and 88% (355/403) assigned to Gla-100 completed 12 months. Glycaemic control was sustained in both groups (mean HbA1c: Gla-300, 7.24%; Gla-100, 7.42%), with more sustained HbA1c reduction for Gla-300 at 12 months: least squares mean difference Gla-300 vs Gla-100: HbA1c -0.17 [95% confidence interval (CI) -0.30 to -0.05]%. The mean daily basal insulin dose at 12 months was 1.03 U/kg for Gla-300 and 0.90 U/kg for Gla-100. Lower percentages of participants had ≥1 confirmed [≤3.9 mmol/l (≤70 mg/dl)] or severe hypoglycaemic event with Gla-300 than Gla-100 at any time of day [24 h; 86 vs 92%; relative risk 0.94 (95% CI 0.89-0.99)] and during the night [54 vs 65%; relative risk 0.84 (95% CI 0.75-0.94)], while the annualized rates of such hypoglycaemic events were similar. No between-treatment differences in adverse events were apparent.. During 12 months of treatment of T2DM requiring basal and meal-time insulin, glycaemic control was better sustained and fewer individuals reported hypoglycaemia with Gla-300 than with Gla-100. The mean basal insulin dose was higher with Gla-300 compared with Gla-100, but total numbers of hypoglycaemic events and overall tolerability did not differ between treatments.

Topics: Aged; Blood Glucose; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Therapy, Combination; Fasting; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Male; Meals; Middle Aged; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

This mechanistic trial compared the pharmacodynamics and safety of lixisenatide and liraglutide in combination with optimized insulin glargine with/without metformin in type 2 diabetes (T2D).. This was a multicenter, randomized, open-label, three-arm trial comparing lixisenatide 20 µg and liraglutide 1.2 and 1.8 mg once daily for 8 weeks in combination with insulin glargine after optimized titration. The primary end point was change from baseline to week 8 in incremental area under the postprandial plasma glucose curve for 4 h after a standardized solid breakfast (AUC PPG0030-0430 h). Changes from baseline in gastric emptying, 24-h plasma glucose profile, HbA1c, fasting plasma glucose (FPG), 24-h ambulatory heart rate and blood pressure, amylase and lipase levels, and adverse events (AEs) were also assessed.. In total, 142 patients were randomized and treated. Lixisenatide 20 µg achieved greater reductions of AUC PPG0030-0430 h compared with liraglutide (marginal mean [95% one-sided CI] treatment difference, -6.0 [-7.8] h ⋅ mmol/L [-108.3 (-140.0) h ⋅ mg/dL] vs. liraglutide 1.2 mg and -4.6 [-6.3] h ⋅ mmol/L [-83.0 (-114.2) h ⋅ mg/dL] vs. liraglutide 1.8 mg; P < 0.001 for both), and gastric emptying was delayed to a greater extent than with liraglutide 1.2 and 1.8 mg (P < 0.001 for treatment comparisons). FPG was unchanged in all treatment arms. At week 8, mean ± SD HbA1c was 6.2 ± 0.4% (44 ± 5 mmol/mol), 6.1 ± 0.3% (44 ± 4 mmol/mol), and 6.1 ± 0.3% (44 ± 4 mmol/mol) for lixisenatide 20 µg and liraglutide 1.2 and 1.8 mg, respectively. At week 8, both liraglutide doses increased marginal mean ± SE 24-h heart rate from baseline by 9 ± 1 bpm vs. 3 ± 1 bpm with lixisenatide (P < 0.001). Occurrence of symptomatic hypoglycemia was higher with lixisenatide; gastrointestinal AEs were more common with liraglutide. Lipase levels were significantly increased from baseline with liraglutide 1.2 and 1.8 mg (marginal mean ± SE increase 21 ± 7 IU/L for both; P < 0.05).. Lixisenatide and liraglutide improved glycemic control in optimized insulin glargine-treated T2D albeit with contrasting mechanisms of action and differing safety profiles.

Topics: Adult; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Gastric Emptying; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine; Liraglutide; Male; Metformin; Middle Aged; Peptides; Postprandial Period; Treatment Outcome

To compare the efficacy and safety of LY2963016 insulin glargine (LY IGlar) and the reference product (Lantus(®)) insulin glargine (IGlar) in combination with oral antihyperglycaemic medications in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D).. This phase III, randomized, double-blind, 24-week study enrolled patients with T2D who were insulin-naïve [glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) ≥7 and ≤11.0%] or previously on IGlar (HbA1c ≤11%) and treated with ≥2 oral antihyperglycaemic medications. Patients were randomized to receive once-daily LY IGlar (n = 376) or IGlar (n = 380) for 24 weeks. The primary efficacy outcome was to test the non-inferiority (0.4% and then 0.3% margin) of LY IGlar to IGlar, as measured by change in HbA1c from baseline to 24 weeks.. Both treatment groups had similar and significant (p < 0.001) within-group decreases in mean HbA1c values from baseline. LY IGlar met non-inferiority criteria compared with IGlar for change in HbA1c from baseline [-1.29 vs -1.34%; respectively, least-squares mean difference 0.052% (95% confidence interval -0.070 to 0.175); p > 0.05]. There were no treatment differences (p > 0.05) in fasting plasma glucose, proportion of patients reaching HbA1c <7% or insulin dose at 24 weeks. Adverse events, allergic reactions, weight change, hypoglycaemia and insulin antibodies were similar between treatment groups. Similar findings were observed in patients who were insulin-naïve or previously treated with IGlar at baseline.. Both LY IGlar and IGlar, when used in combination with oral antihyperglycaemic medications, provided effective and similar glucose control with similar safety profiles in patients with T2D.

Topics: Aged; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Combination; Fasting; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Antibodies; Insulin Glargine; Male; Middle Aged

The aim of this study is to compare the efficacy and safety of once-daily insulin glargine plus gliclazide modified release combination therapy versus twice-daily premixed insulin monotherapy in Chinese type 2 diabetic patients insufficiently controlled by oral antidiabetic agents.. In a 12-week, multicenter, randomized, parallel-group clinical trial, patients with poor glycaemic control (fasting plasma glucose ≥ 7.0 mmol/L and 7.5% < haemoglobin A1c  ≤ 10%) on oral antidiabetic drugs were randomized to the treatment groups for combination therapy (n = 52) or monotherapy (n = 53). Continuous glucose monitoring was carried out over two 72-h periods, at the beginning and the end of the study, and the data were used to calculate the 24-h mean blood glucose, mean amplitude of glycaemic excursions, standard deviation of blood glucose, and the mean of daily differences.. The mean haemoglobin A1c decrease from baseline to study end was significant for both treatment groups (combination therapy: -1.23 ± 0.92%; insulin monotherapy: -1.02 ± 1.04%); moreover, the combination therapy group showed a significantly more robust haemoglobin A1c decrease (p = 0.0308). Both therapies significantly reduced the 24-h mean blood glucose (both, p < 0.001), but neither produced a significant effect on glycaemic variability, calculated as mean amplitude of glycaemic excursions, standard deviation of blood glucose, and mean of daily differences. In addition, the effects on rates of hypoglycaemic episodes were similar between the two therapies.. Chinese patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled with oral antidiabetic agents attained greater benefit from once-daily insulin glargine plus gliclazide modified release regimen than from a twice-daily premixed insulin regimen.

Topics: Blood Glucose; Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring; China; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Gliclazide; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine; Male; Middle Aged; Monitoring, Ambulatory; Treatment Outcome

Demonstrate superiority of insulin glargine (±glulisine) strategy versus premixed insulin strategy for percentage of patients reaching HbA1c <7% (<53 mmol/mol) at study end without any documented symptomatic hypoglycemia (bloof glucose [BG] ≤3.1 mmol/L) in type 2 diabetes (T2DM) patients failing oral agents.. This 24-week, open-label, multinational trial randomized patients to glargine OD or premix OD or BID, continuing metformin ± insulin secretagogue (IS). Second premix injection could be added any time; glulisine could be added with main meal in glargine OD patients with HbA1c ≥7% and fasting blood glucose (FBG) <7 mmol/L at week 12. IS was stopped with any second injection. Insulin titration targeted FBG ≤5.6 mmol/L.. Modified intent-to-treat population comprised 923 patients (glargine, 462; premix, 461). Baseline characteristics were similar (mean T2DM duration: 9 years; HbA1c: 8.7% (72 mmol/mol); FBG: 10.4 mmol/L). Primary endpoint was achieved by 33.2% of glargine (±glulisine) and 31.4% of premix patients. Superiority was not demonstrated, but non-inferiority was (pre-specified margin: 25% of premix rate). More patients using premix achieved target (52.6% vs. 43.2%, p=0.005); symptomatic hypoglycemia was less with glargine (1.17 vs. 2.93 events/patient-year).. Glargine (±glulisine) and premix strategies resulted in similar percentages of well-controlled patients without hypoglycemia, with more patients achieving target HbA1c with premix whereas overall symptomatic hypoglycemia was less with glargine.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Injections; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Male; Middle Aged

For patients with type 2 diabetes who do not achieve target glycaemic control with conventional insulin treatment, advancing to a basal-bolus insulin regimen is often recommended. We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of long-acting glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist dulaglutide with that of insulin glargine, both combined with prandial insulin lispro, in patients with type 2 diabetes.. We did this 52 week, randomised, open-label, phase 3, non-inferiority trial at 105 study sites in 15 countries. Patients (aged ≥18 years) with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled with conventional insulin treatment were randomly assigned (1:1:1), via a computer-generated randomisation sequence with an interactive voice-response system, to receive once-weekly dulaglutide 1·5 mg, dulaglutide 0·75 mg, or daily bedtime glargine. Randomisation was stratified by country and metformin use. Participants and study investigators were not masked to treatment allocation, but were unaware of dulaglutide dose assignment. The primary outcome was a change in glycated haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) from baseline to week 26, with a 0·4% non-inferiority margin. Analysis was by intention to treat. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01191268.. Between Dec 9, 2010, and Sept 21, 2012, we randomly assigned 884 patients to receive dulaglutide 1·5 mg (n=295), dulaglutide 0·75 mg (n=293), or glargine (n=296). At 26 weeks, the adjusted mean change in HbA1c was greater in patients receiving dulaglutide 1·5 mg (-1·64% [95% CI -1·78 to -1·50], -17·93 mmol/mol [-19·44 to -16·42]) and dulaglutide 0·75 mg (-1·59% [-1·73 to -1·45], -17·38 mmol/mol [-18·89 to -15·87]) than in those receiving glargine (-1·41% [-1·55 to -1·27], -15·41 mmol/mol [-16·92 to -13·90]). The adjusted mean difference versus glargine was -0·22% (95% CI -0·38 to -0·07, -2·40 mmol/mol [-4·15 to -0·77]; p=0·005) for dulaglutide 1·5 mg and -0·17% (-0·33 to -0·02, -1·86 mmol/mol [-3·61 to -0·22]; p=0·015) for dulaglutide 0·75 mg. Five (<1%) patients died after randomisation because of septicaemia (n=1 in the dulaglutide 1·5 mg group); pneumonia (n=1 in the dulaglutide 0·75 mg group); cardiogenic shock; ventricular fibrillation; and an unknown cause (n=3 in the glargine group). We recorded serious adverse events in 27 (9%) patients in the dulaglutide 1·5 mg group, 44 (15%) patients in the dulaglutide 0·75 mg group, and 54 (18%) patients in the glargine group. The most frequent adverse events, arising more often with dulaglutide than glargine, were nausea, diarrhoea, and vomiting.. Dulaglutide in combination with lispro resulted in a significantly greater improvement in glycaemic control than did glargine and represents a new treatment option for patients unable to achieve glycaemic targets with conventional insulin treatment.. Eli Lilly and Company.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Glucagon-Like Peptides; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Immunoglobulin Fc Fragments; Insulin Glargine; Insulin Lispro; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Middle Aged; Postprandial Period; Recombinant Fusion Proteins; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult

Glycemic variability may contribute to adverse medical outcomes of type 2 diabetes, but prior therapies have had limited success in controlling glycemic fluctuations, and the hypothesis has not been adequately tested.. People with insulin-requiring type 2 diabetes and high cardiovascular risk were enrolled during a run-in period on basal-bolus insulin (BBI), and 102 were randomized to continued BBI or to basal insulin with a prandial GLP-1 receptor agonist (GLIPULIN) group, each seeking to maintain HbA(1c) levels between 6.7% and 7.3% (50-56 mmol/mol) for 6 months. The primary outcome measure was glycemic variability assessed by continuous glucose monitoring; other measures were HbA(1c), weight, circulating markers of inflammation and cardiovascular risk, albuminuria, and electrocardiographic patterns assessed by Holter monitoring.. At randomization, the mean age of the population was 62 years, median duration of diabetes 15 years, mean BMI 34 kg/m(2), and mean HbA(1c) 7.9% (63 mmol/mol). Thirty-three percent had a prior cardiovascular event, 18% had microalbuminuria, and 3% had macroalbuminuria. At baseline, the continuous glucose monitoring coefficient of variation for glucose levels was similar in both groups.. FLAT-SUGAR is a proof-of-concept study testing whether, in a population of individuals with type 2 diabetes and high cardiovascular risk, the GLIPULIN regimen can limit glycemic variability more effectively than BBI, reduce levels of cardiovascular risk markers, and favorably alter albuminuria and electrocardiographic patterns. We successfully randomized a population that has sufficient power to answer the primary question, address several secondary ones, and complete the protocol as designed.

Topics: Albuminuria; Biomarkers; Blood Glucose; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Diabetic Angiopathies; Exenatide; Female; Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Metformin; Middle Aged; Peptides; Postprandial Period; Risk Factors; Time Factors; Venoms

To test the hypothesis that a 'basal plus' regimen--adding once-daily main-meal fast-acting insulin to basal insulin once daily--would be non-inferior to biphasic insulin twice daily as assessed by glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) concentration (predefined as ≤0.4%), but would provide superior treatment satisfaction.. This open-label trial enrolled adults to an 8- or 12-week run-in period, during which oral therapies except metformin were stopped and insulin glargine dose was titrated. Those with fasting glucose <7 mmol/l but HbA1c >7% (53 mmol/mol) were randomized to insulin glargine/glulisine once daily (n = 170) or insulin aspart/aspart protamine 30/70 twice daily (n = 165) for 24 weeks, with dose titration to glucose targets using standardized algorithms.. For HbA1c, the basal plus regimen was non-inferior to biphasic insulin (least squares mean difference, 0.21%, upper 97.5% confidence limit 0.38%) meeting the predefined non-inferiority margin of 0.4%. Treatment satisfaction (Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire change version and Insulin Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire total scores) significantly favoured basal plus. No difference was observed between the basal plus and the biphasic insulin groups in responders (HbA1c <7%, 20.6 vs 27.9%; p = 0.12), weight gain (2.06 vs 2.50 kg; p = 0.2), diabetes-specific quality of life (Audit of Diabetes-Dependent Quality of Life average weighted impact (AWI) score) and generic health status (five-dimension European Quality of Life questionnaire). Overall hypoglycaemia rates were similar between groups (15.3 vs 18.2 events/patient-year; p = 0.22); nocturnal hypoglycaemia was higher with the basal plus regimen (5.7 vs 3.6 events/patient-year; p = 0.02).. In long-standing type 2 diabetes with suboptimal glycaemia despite oral therapies and basal insulin, the basal plus regimen was non-inferior to biphasic insulin for biomedical outcomes, with a similar overall hypoglycaemia rate but more nocturnal events.

Topics: Aged; Australia; Biphasic Insulins; Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Combinations; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hyperglycemia; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Incidence; Insulin; Insulin Aspart; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Isophane; Intention to Treat Analysis; Male; Middle Aged; Patient Dropouts; Quality of Life; United Kingdom

This study compared the efficacy and safety of once-weekly dulaglutide, a glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist, with daily insulin glargine, both combined with maximally tolerated doses of metformin and glimepiride in patients with type 2 diabetes. The primary objective was noninferiority of dulaglutide 1.5 mg to glargine in the HbA1c change from baseline at 52 weeks.. In this 78-week, open-label study, 810 patients were randomized to dulaglutide 1.5 mg, dulaglutide 0.75 mg, or glargine.. The baseline mean ± SD HbA1c was 8.1 ± 1.0% (65.5 ± 10.8 mmol/mol). The least squares mean ± SE HbA1c change from baseline to the primary end point was -1.08 ± 0.06% (-11.8 ± 0.7 mmol/mol) for dulaglutide 1.5 mg, -0.76 ± 0.06% (-8.3 ± 0.7 mmol/mol) for dulaglutide 0.75 mg, and -0.63 ± 0.06% (-6.9 ± 0.7 mmol/mol) for glargine, with an end point mean ± SD dose of 29 ± 26 units (0.33 ± 0.24 units/kg), and a fasting plasma glucose (mean ± SD) of 118 ± 23 mg/dL from self-monitored plasma glucose. Statistical criteria for superiority were met with dulaglutide 1.5 mg and for noninferiority with dulaglutide 0.75 mg. More patients on dulaglutide 1.5 mg achieved HbA1c targets <7.0% (53 mmol/mol) versus glargine (P < 0.001). Body weight decreased with dulaglutide and increased with glargine. Total hypoglycemia rates were lower with dulaglutide; severe hypoglycemia was minimal. Increases in pancreatic enzymes were observed for dulaglutide. Incidence of nausea (15.4, 7.7, and 1.5%) and diarrhea (10.6, 9.2, and 5.7%) were more common with dulaglutide 1.5 mg and 0.75 mg than with glargine.. Once-weekly dulaglutide 1.5 mg, compared with daily insulin glargine without forced titration, demonstrated greater HbA1c reduction and weight loss, with a higher incidence of gastrointestinal adverse events and a lower risk of hypoglycemia.

Topics: Aged; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Double-Blind Method; Female; Gastrointestinal Diseases; Glucagon-Like Peptides; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Immunoglobulin Fc Fragments; Insulin Glargine; Male; Metformin; Middle Aged; Recombinant Fusion Proteins; Sulfonylurea Compounds; Treatment Outcome; Weight Loss

Few randomized studies have focused on the optimal management of non-intensive care unit patients with type 2 diabetes in Latin America. We compared the safety and efficacy of a basal-bolus regimen with analogues and human insulins in general medicine patients admitted to a University Hospital in Asunción, Paraguay.. In a prospective, open-label trial, we randomized 134 nonsurgical patients with blood glucose (BG) between 140 and 400 mg/dL to a basal-bolus regimen with glargine once daily and glulisine before meals (n = 66) or Neutral Protamine Hagedorn (NPH) twice daily and regular insulin before meals (n = 68). Major outcomes included differences in daily BG levels and frequency of hypoglycemic events between treatment groups.. There were no differences in the mean daily BG (157 ± 37 mg/dL versus 158 ± 44 mg/dL; P = .90) or in the number of BG readings within target <140 mg/dL before meals (76% versus 74%) between the glargine/glulisine and NPH/regular regimens. The mean insulin dose in the glargine/glulisine group was 0.76 ± 0.3 units/kg/day (glargine, 22 ± 9 units/day; glulisine, 31 ± 12 units/day) and was not different compared with NPH/regular group (0.75 ± 0.3 units/kg/day [NPH, 28 ± 12 units/day; regular, 23 ± 9 units/day]). The overall prevalence of hypoglycemia (<70 mg/dL) was similar between patients treated with NPH/regular and glargine/glulisine (38% versus 35%; P = .68), but more patients treated with human insulin had severe (<40 mg/dL) hypoglycemia (7.6% versus 25%; P = .08). There were no differences in length of hospital stay or mortality between groups.. The basal-bolus regimen with insulin analogues resulted in equivalent glycemic control and frequency of hypoglycemia compared to treatment with human insulin in hospitalized patients with diabetes.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Female; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Regular, Human; Male; Middle Aged; Outcome Assessment, Health Care; Paraguay

Gain in VO2 peak after cardiac rehabilitation (CR) following an acute coronary syndrome (ACS), is associated with reduced mortality and morbidity. We have previously shown in CR, that gain in VO2 peak is reduced in Type 2 diabetic patients and that response to CR is impaired by hyperglycemia.. We set up a prospective multicenter study (DARE) whose primary objective was to determine whether good glycemic control during CR may improve the gain in VO2 peak. Sixty four type 2 diabetic patients, referred to CR after a recent ACS, were randomized to insulin intensive therapy or a control group with continuation of the pre-CR antidiabetic treatment. The primary objective was to study the effect of glycemic control during CR on the improvement of peak VO2 by comparing first the 2 treatment groups (insulin intensive vs. control) and second, 2 pre-specified glycemic control groups according to the final fructosamine level (below and above the median).. At the end of the CR program, the gain in VO2 peak and the final fructosamine level (assessing glycemic level during CR) were not different between the 2 treatment groups. However, patients who had final fructosamine level below the median value, assessing good glycemic control during CR, showed significantly higher gain in VO2 peak (3.5 ± 2.4 vs. 1.7 ± 2.4 ml/kg/min,p = 0.014) and ventilatory threshold (2.7 ± 2.5 vs. 1.2 ± 1.9 ml/kg/min,p = 0.04) and a higher proportion of good CR-responders (relative gain in VO2 peak ≥ 16 %): 66 % vs. 36 %, p = 0.011. In multivariate analysis, gain in VO2 peak was associated with final fructosamine level (p = 0.010) but not with age, gender, duration of diabetes, type of ACS, insulin treatment or basal fructosamine.. The DARE study shows that, in type 2 diabetes, good glycemic control during CR is an independent factor associated with gain in VO2 peak. This emphasizes the need for good glycemic control in CR for type 2 diabetic patients.. Trial registered as NCT00354237 (19 July 2006).

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Aged; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Exercise Therapy; Female; Fructosamine; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Aspart; Insulin Glargine; Male; Metformin; Middle Aged; Oxygen Consumption; Pulmonary Gas Exchange; Pulmonary Ventilation; Treatment Outcome

To compare the efficacy and safety of new insulin glargine 300 U/ml (Gla-300) with insulin glargine 100 U/ml (Gla-100) over 12 months of treatment in people with type 2 diabetes using basal insulin and oral antihyperglycaemic drugs (OADs).. EDITION 2 (NCT01499095) was a randomized, 6-month, multicentre, open-label, two-arm, phase IIIa study investigating once-daily Gla-300 versus Gla-100, plus OADs (excluding sulphonylureas), with a 6-month safety extension.. Similar numbers of participants in each group completed 12 months of treatment [Gla-300, 315 participants (78%); Gla-100, 314 participants (77%)]. The reduction in glycated haemoglobin was maintained for 12 months with both treatments: least squares (LS) mean (standard error) change from baseline -0.55 (0.06)% for Gla-300 and -0.50 (0.06)% for Gla-100; LS mean difference -0.06 [95% confidence interval (CI) -0.22 to 0.10)%]. A significant relative reduction of 37% in the annualized rate of nocturnal confirmed [≤3.9 mmol/l (≤70 mg/dl)] or severe hypoglycaemia was observed with Gla-300 compared with Gla-100: rate ratio 0.63 [(95% CI 0.42-0.96); p = 0.031], and fewer participants experienced ≥1 event [relative risk 0.84 (95% CI 0.71-0.99)]. Severe hypoglycaemia was infrequent. Weight gain was significantly lower with Gla-300 than Gla-100 [LS mean difference -0.7 (95% CI -1.3 to -0.2) kg; p = 0.009]. Both treatments were well tolerated with a similar pattern of adverse events (incidence of 69 and 60% in the Gla-300 and Gla-100 groups).. In people with type 2 diabetes treated with Gla-300 or Gla-100, and non-sulphonylurea OADs, glycaemic control was sustained over 12 months, with less nocturnal hypoglycaemia in the Gla-300 group.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Compounding; Drug Therapy, Combination; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hyperglycemia; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Incidence; Injections, Subcutaneous; Insulin Glargine; Intention to Treat Analysis; Isophane Insulin, Human; Middle Aged; Patient Dropouts; Patient Satisfaction; Risk; Weight Gain

To evaluate 0.75 mg of dulaglutide, a once-weekly glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist, compared with once-daily insulin glargine for glycaemic control in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D).. In this phase III, randomized, open-label, parallel-group, 26-week study, 361 patients with inadequately controlled T2D receiving sulphonylureas and/or biguanides, aged ≥20 years, with glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) levels 7.0-10.0% (53-86 mmol/mol), inclusive, were randomized (1 : 1) to receive dulaglutide or glargine. Participants and investigators were not masked to treatment allocation. The primary measure was change from baseline in HbA1c at 26 weeks, analysed using a mixed-effects model for repeated measures, with a predefined non-inferiority margin of 0.4%.. At week 26, least-squares (LS) mean (standard error) reductions in HbA1c were -1.44 (0.05)% [-15.74 (0.55) mmol/mol] in the dulaglutide group and -0.90 (0.05)% [-9.84 (0.55) mmol/mol] in the glargine group. The mean between-group treatment difference in HbA1c was -0.54% (95% CI -0.67, -0.41) [-5.90 mmol/mol (95% CI -7.32, -4.48)]; p < 0.001. Dulaglutide significantly reduced body weight compared with glargine at week 26 (LS mean difference -1.42 kg, 95% CI -1.89, -0.94; p < 0.001). The most frequent adverse events with dulaglutide treatment were nasopharyngitis and gastrointestinal symptoms. The incidence of hypoglycaemia was significantly lower with dulaglutide [47/181 (26%)] compared with glargine [86/180 (48%)], p < 0.001.. In Japanese patients with T2D uncontrolled on sulphonylureas and/or biguanides, once-weekly dulaglutide was superior to once-daily glargine for reduction in HbA1c at 26 weeks. Although dulaglutide increased gastrointestinal symptoms, it was well tolerated, with an acceptable safety profile.

Topics: Aged; Biguanides; Blood Glucose; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Gastrointestinal Diseases; Glucagon-Like Peptides; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Immunoglobulin Fc Fragments; Insulin Glargine; Japan; Male; Middle Aged; Nasopharyngitis; Recombinant Fusion Proteins; Sulfonylurea Compounds

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of human glucagon-like peptide-1 analogue liraglutide in newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) with glycosylated hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) > 9%.. This was an open-labelled, randomized, parallel-group, treat-to-target trial. Newly diagnosed T2DM patients with HbA1c > 9% were enrolled. These patients were treated with metformin with repaglinide and randomized to receive once-daily liraglutide (LIRA, n=25) or the insulin glargine (IGla, n=24) at bedtime. Efficacy and safety were assessed and compared after 18-month treatment.. (1) Compared with the baseline, patients with LIRA had significantly reduced mean body weight,BMI and waist circumference (P < 0.01), whereas, the above indexes were increased (P < 0.01) in patients treated with IGla. (2) After 18 months of treatment, fasting plasma glucose (FPG), 2-hour plasma glucose after a 75g oral glucose load (2hPG) and HbA1c were significantly improved in all patients (P < 0.01), with 2hPG, mean blood glucose (MBG), the largest amplitude of glycemic excursions (LAGE), mean amplitude of glycemic excursions (MAGE) were significantly lower in LIRA group than in IGla group (all P < 0.05). (3) HOMA-IR decreased in both groups (P < 0.05). However, ΔI30/ΔG30, AUCCP180 and Matsuda index were only significantly increased in patients treated with LIRA (respectively, 4.88 ± 1.55 vs 7.60±1.91, 9.23 ± 2.66 vs 13.18 ± 2.72, 39.28 ± 20.35 vs 54.64 ± 23.34, all P < 0.01), while HOMA-IR reduced (4.41 ± 1.58 vs 3.52 ± 1.44, P < 0.05). But in IGla group only HOMA-IR was reduced (4.92 ± 1.84 vs 4.57 ± 1.80, P < 0.05). The index of ΔI30/ΔG30, AUCCP180 and Matsuda index in LIRA group are higher than those of indexes in IGla group(respectively, 7.60 ± 1.91 vs 4.18 ± 1.00, 13.18 ± 2.72 vs 10.53 ± 2.68,54.64 ± 23.34 vs 41.65 ± 17.84, all P < 0.05), while HOMA-IR is lower (3.52 ± 1.44 vs 4.57 ± 1.80, P< 0.05). (4) The rate of HbA1c ≤ 6.5% and the dosages of oral anti-diabetic drugs in LIRA group were significantly better than that in IGla group. (5) No significant differences were observed in hypoglycemic episodes and adverse events between two groups.. It seems that liraglutide is superior to insulin glargine in newly diagnosed T2DM patients with HbA1c > 9% in improving beta-cell function, insulin sensitivity and glucose homeostasis.

Topics: Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Glucagon-Like Peptide 1; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Liraglutide; Metformin; Treatment Outcome

GLP-1 improves hyperglycemia, and it has been reported to have favorable effects on atherosclerosis. However, it has not been fully elucidated whether GLP-1 is able to improve endothelial function in patients with type 2 diabetes. Therefore, we investigated the efficacy of the GLP-1 analogue, liraglutide on endothelial function and glycemic metabolism compared with insulin glargine therapy.. In this multicenter, prospective randomized parallel-group comparison study, 31 diabetic outpatients (aged 60.3 ± 10.3 years with HbA1c levels of 8.6 ± 0.8%) with current metformin and/or sulfonylurea treatment were enrolled and randomly assigned to receive liraglutide or glargine therapy once daily for 14 weeks. Flow mediated dilation (FMD), a comprehensive panel of hemodynamic parameters (Task Force Monitor), and serum metabolic markers were assessed before and after the treatment period.. A greater reduction (worsening) in %FMD was observed in the glargine group, although this change was not statistically different from the liraglutide group (liraglutide; 5.7 to 5.4%, glargine 6.7 to 5.7%). The augmentation index, C-peptide index, derivatives of reactive oxygen metabolites and BMI were significantly improved in the liraglutide group. Central systolic blood pressure and NT-proBNP also tended to be improved in the liraglutide-treated group, while improvements in HbA1c levels were similar between groups. Cardiac index, blood pressure and most other metabolic parameters were not different.. Regardless of glycemic improvement, early liraglutide therapy did not affect endothelial function but may provide favorable effects on beta-cell function and cardioprotection in type 2 diabetics without advanced atherosclerosis.. UMIN Clinical Trials Registry System as trial ID UMIN000005331.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Atherosclerosis; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Endothelium; Female; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine; Liraglutide; Male; Middle Aged; Young Adult

To evaluate the impact of different subcutaneous basal insulin regimens on glycemic variability (GV) and hospital complications in non-intensive care unit (ICU) patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D).. This study is a post hoc analysis of 279 general medicine and surgery patients treated with either a "Basal Bolus" insulin regimen using glargine once daily and glulisine before meals or a "Basal Plus" regimen using glargine once daily plus correction doses of glulisine before meals for glucose >140 mg/dL. GV was calculated as mean delta (Δ) daily glucose, mean SD, and mean amplitude of glycemic excursions (MAGE).. Treatment with Basal Bolus and Basal Plus regimens resulted in similar mean daily glucose, hypoglycemia, length of stay (LOS), and hospital complications (all P>.05). There were no differences in GV between treatment groups by Δ change (72.5 ± 36 vs. 69.3 ± 34 mg/dL), SD (38.5 ± 18 vs. 37.1 ± 16 mg/dL) and MAGE (67.5 ± 34 vs. 66.1 ± 39 mg/dL) (all P>.05). Surgery patients treated with Basal Bolus had higher GV compared to those treated with Basal Plus (Δ daily glucose and SD: P = .02, MAGE: P = .009), but no difference in GV was found between treatment groups for the general medicine patients (P>.05). Patients with hypoglycemia events had higher GV compared to subjects without hypoglycemia (P<.05), but no association was found between GV and hospital complications (P>.05).. Treating hospitalized, non-ICU, diabetic patients with Basal Plus insulin regimen resulted in similar glucose control and GV compared to the standard Basal Bolus insulin regimen. Higher GV was not associated with hospital complications.

Topics: Aged; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Hospitalization; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Male; Meals; Middle Aged; Retrospective Studies; Treatment Outcome

This trial was conducted to compare the efficacy and safety of combination therapy with basal insulin glargine plus mitiglinide to that of basal insulin glargine plus voglibosein patients with type 2 diabetes. This was a 20-week, randomized, multicenter non-inferiority trial. Patients with HbA1c levels over 7.0% were randomly assigned to receive either mitiglinide (10 mg tid) or voglibose (0.2 mg tid) concurrent with insulin glargine for 16 weeks after a 4-week of basal insulin glargine monotherapy. The intention-to-treat population included 156 patients; 79 were placed in the mitiglinide group, and 77 were placed in the voglibose group. At 20 weeks, there was no significant difference between the mitiglinide group and the voglibose group in terms of the mean HbA1c level or the mean decrease of the HbAlc level from baseline (-0.9% [-7.5 mmol/mol] and -0.7%, [-5.3 mmol/mol] respectively). The mean fasting plasma glucose level and data of self-monitoring blood glucosewere significantly decreased from baseline to week 20 in both groups, but there was no significant difference between the two groups. The changes in the basal insulin requirements of each group were not significant. The prevalence of adverse events and the risk of hypoglycemia were similar for both groups. Combination therapy with mitiglinide plus basal insulin glargine was non-inferior to voglibose plus basal insulin glargine in terms of the effect on overall glycemic control.

Topics: Adult; Blood Glucose; Body Mass Index; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Fasting; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Inositol; Insulin Glargine; Isoindoles; Male; Middle Aged; Prospective Studies

Premixed insulin is a commonly prescribed formulation for the outpatient management of patients with type 2 diabetes. The safety and efficacy of premixed insulin formulations in the hospital setting is not known.. In a prospective, open-label trial, we randomized general medicine and surgery patients to receive a basal-bolus regimen with glargine once daily and glulisine before meals (n = 33) or premixed human insulin (30% regular insulin and 70% NPH insulin) twice daily (n = 39). Major outcomes included differences in daily blood glucose (BG) levels and frequency of hypoglycemic events (<70 mg/dL) between treatment groups.. At the first prespecified interim analysis, the study was stopped early because of an increased frequency of hypoglycemia >50% in patients treated with premixed human insulin. A total of 64% of patients treated with premixed insulin experienced one or more episodes of hypoglycemia compared with 24% in the basal-bolus group (P < 0.001). There were no differences in mean daily BG level after the first day of insulin treatment (175 ± 32 vs. 179 ± 43 mg/dL, P = 0.64) between groups. A BG target between 80 and 180 mg/dL before meals was achieved in 55.9% of BG readings in the basal-bolus group and 54.3% of BG readings in the premixed insulin group (P = 0.23). There was no difference in the length of hospital stay or mortality between treatment groups.. Inpatient treatment with premixed human insulin resulted in similar glycemic control but in significantly higher frequency of hypoglycemia compared with treatment with basal-bolus insulin regimen in hospitalized patients with diabetes.

Topics: Aged; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Combinations; Female; Hospitalization; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Isophane; Insulin, Regular, Human; Male; Middle Aged; Prospective Studies

To investigate the clinical efficacy and safety of insulin glargine compared with NPH insulin as basal insulin for the management of corticosteroid-induced hyperglycemia in hospitalized people with type 2 diabetes (T2DM) and respiratory disease.. Randomized, two-arm parallel group, clinical trial undertaken from February 2011 to November 2012 on the pneumology ward of the Hospital Regional Universitario de Málaga (Spain), involving 53 participants with T2DM treated with medium/high doses of intermediate-acting corticosteroids. Participants were randomly assigned to receive one single dose of insulin glargine or NPH insulin in three equally divided doses before each meal as basal insulin within a basal-bolus insulin protocol. The intervention lasted six days or until discharge if earlier.. No significant differences were seen between groups during the study in mean blood glucose (11.43±3.44 mmol/l in glargine vs. 11.88±2.94 mmol/l in NPH, p=0.624), and measures of glucose variability (standard deviation 3.27±1.16 mmol/l vs. 3.61±0.99 mmol/l, p=0.273; coefficient of variation 1.55±0.33 mmol/l vs. 1.72±0.39 mmol/l, p=0.200). Results from CGM were concordant with those obtained with capillary blood glucose reading. The length of hospital stay was also similar between groups (8.2±2.8 days vs. 9.8±3.4 days, p=0.166) There was a non significant trend for lower episodes of mild (4 vs. 8, p=0.351) and severe hypoglycemia (0 vs. 3, p=0.13) in the glargine group.. The results of this study showed that insulin glargine and NPH insulin are equally effective in a basal-bolus insulin protocol to treat glucocorticoid-induced hyperglycemia in people with T2DM on a pneumology ward.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Glucocorticoids; Humans; Hyperglycemia; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Isophane; Male; Middle Aged; Respiratory Tract Diseases; Safety; Young Adult

Our aim was to compare the effects of an intermediate acting human insulin (NPH) and a long-acting insulin analog, insulin glargine, in insulin naïve type 2 diabetes patients, stratified by the type of hyperglycemia (fasting or postprandial type). Based on different action profiles, we hypothesized that patients having different hyperglycemia types would react differently when treated with these insulins. This is a post hoc analysis of the Lanmet study data. The Lanmet study was a randomized, 36-week controlled insulin initiation study in type 2 diabetes patients. 109 subjects with baseline HbA1c >8.0% (64 mmol/mol) completed the study. The patients were divided into two groups according to fasting glucose (mmol/l)/HbA1c (%) ratio. Patients with a ratio ≥1.3 were defined as having fasting type and those with a ratio <1.3 as having postprandial type hyperglycemia. The main outcome measures were change in HbA1c and body weight, and final insulin dose. Independently of insulin type, compared to patients with postprandial type hyperglycemia, those with fasting type hyperglycemia had 2.1 kg/m(2) greater initial BMI (p = 0.044), gained 2.0 kg more weight (p = 0.020, adjusted for baseline BMI p = 0.035), and had 36% greater final insulin dose/kg (p = 0.001). With respect to hyperglycemia type, there was no difference between NPH and glargine in their effects on HbA1c. When starting bedtime insulin in type 2 diabetes patients, those with fasting type hyperglycemia are prone to greater weight gain. Hyperglycemia type does not help in identifying patients who would benefit specially from either NPH insulin or insulin glargine.

Topics: Blood Glucose; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Fasting; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hyperglycemia; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Isophane; Male; Middle Aged; Postprandial Period; Statistics, Nonparametric

Few studies have evaluated long-term durability of glycemic control in older patients. The aim of this study was to compare durability of glycemic control of twice-daily insulin lispro mix 75/25 (LM75/25; 75 % insulin lispro protamine suspension, 25 % insulin lispro) and once-daily insulin glargine (GL) added to oral antihyperglycemic medications in older patients (≥65 years of age).. Patients were participants in the maintenance phase of the DURABLE trial. During the initiation phase, patients with type 2 diabetes were randomized to LM75/25 or GL. After 6 months, patients with hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) ≤7.0 % advanced to the 24-month maintenance phase. The primary objective was between-group comparison of duration of maintaining the HbA1c goal in older patients (≥65 years of age). A similar analysis was conducted for older patients achieving HbA1c ≤6.5 % in the initiation phase.. Median time of maintaining HbA1c goal was longer in LM75/25 versus GL (19.6 versus 15.4 months, p = 0.007) and more LM75/25 patients maintained goal versus GL (49.2 versus 30.4 %; p = 0.003). HbA1c reduction from baseline was greater in LM75/25 versus GL (-1.56 ± 0.10 versus -1.24 ± 0.11 %; p = 0.003). Post-meal glucose was significantly lower in LM75/25 versus GL (158.86 ± 3.42 versus 171.67 ± 4.51 mg/dL; p = 0.017). No differences were observed in overall and severe hypoglycemia. LM75/25 patients had higher daily insulin doses (0.41 ± 0.02 versus 0.32 ± 0.02 units/kg/day; p < 0.001) and more weight gain (5.47 ± 0.49 versus 3.10 ± 0.53 kg; p = 0.001). Similar results were generally obtained in older patients with HbA1c ≤6.5 %.. In our evaluation of older patients from a larger trial, LM75/25 appeared to provide longer durability of glycemic control, as well as a greater number of patients maintaining HbA1c goal versus GL.

Topics: Aged; Aging; Biphasic Insulins; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine; Insulin Lispro; Insulin, Isophane; Insulin, Long-Acting; Maintenance Chemotherapy; Male

OBJECTIVE Diabetes self-management is universally regarded as a foundation of diabetes care. We determined whether comparable glycemic control could be achieved by self-titration versus physician titration of a once-daily bolus insulin dose in patients with type 2 diabetes who are unable to achieve optimal glycemia control with a basal insulin. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS Patients with type 2 diabetes, an HbA1c level >7% (53 mmol/mol), and either nocturnal hypoglycemia episodes or an insufficient basal insulin glargine level (with or without oral agents) to achieve a fasting plasma glucose level ≤6 mmol/L (108 mg/dL) were studied. Participants all had bolus insulin glulisine added at breakfast and were allocated to either algorithm-guided patient self-titration or physician titration. The primary outcome was an HbA1c level ≤7% (53 mmol/mol) without severe hypoglycemia. RESULTS After a mean (SD) follow-up of 159.4 days (36.2 days), 28.4% of participants in the self-titration arm vs. 21.2% in the physician titration arm achieved an HbA1c level of ≤7% (53 mmol/mol) without severe hypoglycemia (between-group absolute difference 7.2%; 95% CI -3.2 to 17.7). The lower end of this 95% confidence interval was within the predetermined noninferiority boundary of -5% (P noninferiority = 0.011). CONCLUSIONS In stable patients with type 2 diabetes who are receiving doses of basal insulin glargine who require bolus insulin, a simple bolus insulin patient-managed titration algorithm is as effective as a physician-managed algorithm.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Algorithms; Blood Glucose; Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Middle Aged; Self Administration; Treatment Outcome

We compared two strategies initiating and intensifying insulin treatment and tested for noninferiority of premixed insulin to basal ± mealtime insulin analog in patients eating light breakfasts.. This randomized, open-label, 48-week study compared two algorithms. Up to three injections of insulin lispro mix 25 and/or insulin lispro mix 50 (premix; premixed insulin lispro) or basal insulin glargine plus up to three injections of insulin lispro (basal+; glargine + insulin lispro) were used in type 2 diabetic patients uncontrolled with oral antihyperglycemic medication and consuming <15% daily calories at breakfast. The hypothesis was to test noninferiority of premix to basal+ for glycemic control measured by HbA1c after 48 weeks, assessed using ANCOVA with a 0.4% margin.. Patients (n = 344; 176 [51%] females; mean [SD] age 54.3 [8.8] years; BMI 29.4 [4.6] kg/m(2); baseline HbA1c 9.02 [0.97]%) were randomized to premix (n = 171) or basal+ (n = 173). In the per-protocol analysis (n = 230), least squares means (95% CI) end point HbA1c were 7.40% (7.15-7.65) and 7.55% (7.27-7.82) in respective arms. Between-treatment difference was -0.14% (-0.42 to 0.13), with noninferiority met. Significantly more patients in premix achieved HbA1c targets of <7.0% compared with basal+ (48.2 vs. 36.2%; P = 0.024). Self-monitored blood glucose profiles, body weight changes, total insulin doses, and overall hypoglycemia (65 vs. 60%) were similar in premix and basal+ (P = 0.494), except nocturnal episodes (34.3 vs. 23.7%; P = 0.018) were more common in premix.. Both intensive insulin strategies improved glycemic control; however, final HbA1c levels were seen above those achieved in previous treat-to-target trials, likely due to the inadequate insulin titrations and probably due to the complexity of tested insulin regimens. A higher percentage of patients achieved target HbA1c <7% with multiple premixed insulins, but this treatment resulted in more nocturnal hypoglycemia than a basal-bolus regimen.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Blood Glucose; Breakfast; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Injections; Insulin Glargine; Insulin Lispro; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Middle Aged

To use continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) to evaluate the impact of the novel, long-acting basal insulin analog LY2605541 on hypoglycemia and glycemic variability in patients with type 2 diabetes.. Hypoglycemia and glucose variability were assessed with CGM of interstitial glucose (IG) in a subset of patients with type 2 diabetes from a phase II, randomized, open-label, parallel study of LY2605541 (n = 51) or insulin glargine (GL) (n = 25). CGM was conducted on 3 consecutive days (72-84 h) during the week before week 0, 6, and 12 study visits.. Measured by CGM for 3 days prior to the 12-week visit, fewer LY2605541-treated patients experienced hypoglycemic events overall (50.0 vs. 78.3%, P = 0.036) and nocturnally (20.5 vs. 47.8%, P = 0.027) and spent less time with IG ≤70 mg/dL than GL-treated patients during the 24-h (25 ± 6 vs. 83 ± 16 min, P = 0.012) and nocturnal periods (11 ± 5 vs. 38 ± 13 min, P = 0.024). These observations were detected without associated differences in the average duration of individual hypoglycemic episodes (LY2605541 compared with GL 57.2 ± 5.4 vs. 69.9 ± 10.2 min per episode, P = NS). Additionally, LY2605541-treated patients had lower within-day glucose SD for both 24-h and nocturnal periods.. By CGM, LY2605541 treatment compared with GL resulted in fewer patients with hypoglycemic events and less time in the hypoglycemic range and was not associated with protracted hypoglycemia.

Topics: Blood Glucose; Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring; Delayed-Action Preparations; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine; Insulin Lispro; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Middle Aged; Polyethylene Glycols; Treatment Outcome

To compare efficacy and safety of two, once-daily basal insulin formulations [insulin lispro protamine suspension (ILPS) vs. insulin glargine (glargine)] added to oral antihyperglycaemic medications (OAMs) and exenatide BID in suboptimally controlled type 2 diabetes (T2D) patients.. This 24-week, open-label, multicentre trial randomized patients to bedtime ILPS (n = 171) or glargine (n = 168). Non-inferiority of ILPS versus glargine was assessed by comparing the upper limit of 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for change in haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) from baseline to week 24 (adjusted for baseline HbA1c) with non-inferiority margin 0.4%.. Non-inferiority of ILPS versus glargine was demonstrated: least-squares mean between-treatment difference (ILPS minus glargine) (95% CI) was 0.22% (0.06, 0.38). Mean HbA1c reduction was less for ILPS- versus glargine-treated patients (-1.16 ± 0.84 vs. -1.40 ± 0.97%, p = 0.008). Endpoint HbA1c < 7.0% was achieved by 53.7% (ILPS) and 61.7% (glargine) (p = NS). Overall hypoglycaemia rates (p = NS) and severe hypoglycaemia incidence (p = NS) were similar. Nocturnal hypoglycaemia rate was higher in patients treated with ILPS versus glargine (p = 0.004). Weight gain was similar between groups (ILPS: 0.27 ± 3.38 kg; glargine: 0.66 ± 3.93 kg, p = NS). Endpoint total insulin doses were lower in patients treated with ILPS versus glargine (0.30 ± 0.17 vs. 0.37 ± 0.17 IU/kg/day, p < 0.001).. ILPS was non-inferior to glargine for HbA1c change over 24 weeks, but was associated with less HbA1c reduction and more nocturnal hypoglycaemia. Treat-to-target basal insulin therapy improves glycaemic control and is associated with minimal weight gain when added to OAMs and exenatide BID for suboptimally controlled T2D.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hyperglycemia; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine; Insulin Lispro; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Middle Aged; Protamines; Treatment Outcome; Weight Gain; Young Adult

To evaluate the effects of two different glargine insulin delivery methods (pen device vs. vial/syringe) on glycemic control and patient preferences in a randomized, open-label, crossover, comparative effectiveness study.. Thirty-one patients discharged from the hospital were recruited for this study. In the hospital, all patients were treated with a basal-bolus insulin regimen. Upon discharge, 21 patients received glargine by pen device for 3 months and were then switched to vial/syringe for the next 3 months (group 1). Group 2 consisted of 10 patients discharged on vial/syringe and converted to pen device after 3 months. Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) was measured at enrollment and at 3 and 6 months. A questionnaire assessing patient preference was administered at 3 and 6 months.. Groups 1 and 2 had similar baseline HbA1c (10.7 ± 2.2% and 11.2 ± 2.5%, respectively) and similar reduction in HbA1c at 3 months (7.8 ± 1.7% and 7.3 ± 1.4%, respectively; P<.001 vs. baseline). However, after crossover, the changes in HbA1c from 3 to 6 months were significantly different between groups. HbA1c increased to 8.5 ± 2.0% at 6 months in group 1 after switching to the vial/syringe but remained unchanged (7.1 ± 1.6%) in group 2 after switching to a pen device (P<.01, group 1 vs. group 2). Patient questionnaires after each phase of the trial revealed that patients found the pen device more convenient and were more likely to recommend this insulin delivery method to someone else.. Patients switching to a glargine pen device achieved lower HbA1c at the 6-month follow-up. Patients in both groups overwhelmingly preferred glargine pens over vials/syringes.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine; Male; Middle Aged; Patient Preference

The primary objective of this prospective controlled study was to investigate the impact of standardized injection-site warming on prandial rapid acting insulin dose and glycemic control when studied under real-world conditions.. All 145 participating patients (51 female, 94 male, 13 type 1 and 132 type 2 patients, age: 61.6 ± 8.4 yrs, HbA1c: 7.19 ± 0.50%) were treated with intensive insulin glargine and short-acting insulin analog therapy. After a 4 week treatment optimization run-in period, patients were randomized to continue therapy for three months without (control) or with a local injection-site warming device (InsuPad * ). Observation parameters included HbA1c, insulin dose, frequency of hypoglycemia, body weight and adverse events.. HbA1c improved in both arms until study end (control group: 6.3 ± 0.5%; injection-site warming device: 6.3 ± 0.5%; both p < 0.001 vs. baseline). To achieve this good control, patients in the control group needed to increase the daily prandial insulin dose by 8.1% (from 66 ± 31 U to 71 ± 38 U, p < 0.05) with stable basal insulin requirements. Patients who used the injection-site warming device required less prandial insulin (70 ± 43 U to 55 ± 34 U; -19%, p < 0.001) and slightly more basal insulin (+3.9%). Total daily insulin dose increased in the control group (+3.7%) and decreased with warming device use (-8.6%, p < 0.001). The number of hypoglycemic events (<63 mg/dL) during the observation period was higher in the control group (6.2 ± 9.9/patient vs. injection-site warming device: 3.3 ± 4.8/patient, p < 0.05). Main study limitations can be seen in the open label design reliability of the collected dose information and the very obese patient cohort.. When treating obese patients to target with insulin therapy, use of an injection-site warming device for 3 months resulted in a lower frequency of hypoglycemic events and a reduction in prandial insulin analog requirements. If these results are confirmed in other patient populations, an injection-site warming device may be useful in achieving treatment targets with a safer and more efficient basal bolus therapy in insulin-treated patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes.

Topics: Absorption; Animals; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Female; Humans; Hyperthermia, Induced; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Middle Aged; Obesity; Postprandial Period; Prospective Studies

The aim of present study is to assess whether if basal insulin, glargine, could improve insulin secretory function of β-cells compared with glimepiride when metformin alone was failed. This was an open-label and multi-center study for 52 weeks in Korean patients with uncontrolled type 2 diabetes by metformin monotherapy. Subjects were randomized to glargine or glimepiride groups (n = 38 vs. 36, respectively). The primary endpoint was to compare changes in c-peptide via glucagon test after 48 weeks. Glycemic efficacy and safety endpoints (glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), HOMA-B, fasting plasma glucose (FPG), lipid profiles, and hypoglycemic events) were also checked. The mean disease duration of all subjects was 88.2 months. Changes in C-peptide was no significant different between groups (P = 0.73), even though insulin secretion was not worsened in both groups at the endpoint. Glargine was not superior to glimepiride in other β-cell function indexes such as HOMA-B (P = 0.28). HbA1c and FPG reduced significantly in each groups but not different between two groups. Although, severe hypoglycemia did not occur, symptomatic hypoglycemia was more frequent in glimepiride group (P = 0.01). Insulin glargine was as effective as glimepiride in controlling hyperglycemia and maintaining β-cell function in Korean patients with type 2 diabetes during 48 weeks study period, after failure of metformin monotherapy. Hypoglycemic profile was favorable in the insulin glargine group and less weight gain was observed in the glimepiride group. Our results suggest that glargine and glimepiride can be considered after failure of metformin monotherapy.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Blood Glucose; C-Peptide; Chi-Square Distribution; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin Secretion; Insulin-Secreting Cells; Male; Middle Aged; Republic of Korea; Sulfonylurea Compounds; Young Adult

Insulin degludec (IDeg) is a new basal insulin with an ultra-long and stable glucose-lowering effect. We compared once-daily IDeg and insulin glargine (IGlar), both in combination with metformin ± dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors, in a 52-week, open-label, treat-to-target trial in patients with type 2 diabetes followed by a 52-week extension trial in which subjects [n = 725/1030 (70.4%)] maintained their initial randomised treatment. Health status was assessed at baseline and 105 weeks using the Short Form-36 (SF-36 v2) questionnaire. SF-36 scores were analysed (ITT population) using anova, with adjustments for covariates. At 105 weeks, the overall physical component score was significantly better with IDeg versus IGlar [treatment contrast (TC): 1.1 (0.1; 2.1)95% CI , p < 0.05]. This was largely because of significantly better physical functioning [TC: 1.1 (0.0; 2.3)95% CI , p < 0.05] and bodily pain sub-domain scores [TC: 1.5 (0.2; 2.9)95% CI , p < 0.05]. Improvements in health status with IDeg compared to IGlar were maintained after 2 years.

Topics: Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Therapy, Combination; Health Status; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Metformin; Treatment Outcome

Glucose variability combined with glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) assessments more reliably represents the level of glycemic control. The study was aimed to compare blood glucose variability with insulin glargine vs. neutral protamine Hagedorn (NPH) in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus using a continuous glucose-monitoring system (CGMS), in patients treated with basal insulin using stable dose of oral antidiabetic agents and HbA1c in the range of 4.5-8.0 % International Federation of Clinical Chemistry (IFCC) units. [6.2-9.4 % Diabetes Control and Complications Trial (DCCT) units].. This was a multicenter, prospective, open-label, single-arm study in patients (N = 116) treated for ≥ 2 months with NPH and metformin combined with sulfonylurea or glinide. Glucose variability was measured after a 4-week NPH treatment phase and after a subsequent 12-week glargine treatment phase using CGMS. Based on 72-hour CGMS, glucose variability was assessed by area under the curve [AUC (mmol/L · h)]. Differences (glargine-NPH) in AUC within 24 h in the glucose ranges of ≤ 3.3, ≤ 3.9, 7.5-3.9 (margins excluding), ≥ 7.5, ≥ 10, and ≥ 15 mmol/L were evaluated. Circadian fluctuation of glucose was assessed by M-value (log-transformation of the deviation from an arbitrary standard).. AUCs of glucose in the lowest ranges (≤ 3.3 and ≤ 3.9 mmol/L) did not change significantly after treatment with glargine. Those in the higher ranges (≥ 7.5, ≥ 10, and ≥ 15 mmol/L) were significantly lower (p < 0.001 for all ranges), whereas AUC of glucose in the normal range (3.9-7.5 mmol/L) was significantly higher (p < 0.001) at the end of glargine treatment phase. Circadian fluctuation of glucose assessed by M-value showed a significant decrease after glargine treatment (p < 0.003). No significant differences in hypoglycemia confirmed by glucose value ≤ 3.3 mmol/L were found between treatment phases. This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT00659477.. As monitored by CGMS, switching from NPH to glargine with active titration shifted glucose from abnormally high to normal levels with reduced fluctuation and without increased risk of hypoglycemia.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Blood Glucose; Czech Republic; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Monitoring; Drug Substitution; Female; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Isophane; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Middle Aged; Reproducibility of Results; Sensitivity and Specificity; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult

OBJECTIVE Epidemiologic studies linking insulin glargine and glucose-lowering therapies to cancers and n-3 fatty acids to cancer prevention have not been confirmed. We aimed to assess the effect of insulin glargine and n-3 fatty acids on incident cancers within the context of the ORIGIN (Outcome Reduction with Initial Glargine Intervention) trial. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS The ORIGIN trial is an international, long-term, randomized two-by-two factorial study comparing insulin glargine with standard care and n-3 fatty acids with placebo (double blind) in people with dysglycemia at high risk for cardiovascular events. The primary outcome measure (cancer substudy) was the occurrence of any new or recurrent adjudicated cancer. Cancer mortality and cancer subtypes were also analyzed. RESULTS Among 12,537 people (mean age 63.5 years, SD 7.8; 4,388 females), 953 developed a cancer event during the median follow-up of 6.2 years. In the glargine and standard care groups, the incidence of cancers was 1.32 and 1.32 per 100 person-years, respectively (P = 0.97), and in the n-3 fatty acid and placebo groups, it was 1.28 and 1.36 per 100 person-years, respectively (P = 0.39). No difference in the effect of either intervention was noted within predefined subgroups (P for all interactions ≥0.17). Cancer-related mortality and cancer-specific outcomes also did not differ between groups. Postrandomization HbA1c levels, glucose-lowering therapies (including metformin), and BMI did not affect cancer outcomes. CONCLUSIONS Insulin glargine and n-3 fatty acids have a neutral association with overall and cancer-specific outcomes, including cancer-specific mortality. Exposure to glucose-lowering therapies, including metformin, and HbA1c level during the study did not alter cancer risk.

Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Double-Blind Method; Fatty Acids, Omega-3; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Metformin; Middle Aged; Neoplasms

To compare the commonly prescribed oral anti-diabetic drug (OAD) combinations to use as an add-on therapy with insulin glargine in patients with uncontrolled type 2 diabetes despite submaximal doses of OADs.. People with inadequately controlled type 2 diabetes (n = 99) were randomly assigned on a 1∶1∶1 basis to receive insulin glargin, with fixed doses of glimepiride, metformin, and glimepiride plus metformin. Outcomes assessed included HbA1c, the changes in fasting glucose levels, body weight, serum lipids values, insulin dose and symptomatic hypoglycemia.. After 24 weeks, HbA1C levels improved from (mean ± SD) 8.5±0.9% to 7.7±0.8% (69.0±10.0 mmol/mol to 60.8±8.6 mmol/mol) with insulin glargine plus metformin, from 8.4±1.0% to 7.7±1.3% (68.8±10.6 mmol/mol to 61.1±14.4 mmol/mol) with insulin glargine plus glimepiride and from 8.7±0.9% to 7.3±0.6% (71.7±9.8 mmol/mol to 56.2±6.7 mmol/mol) with insulin glargine plus glimepirde plus metformin. The decrease in HbA1c was more pronounced with insulin glargine plus glimepiride plus metformin than with insulin glargine plus metformin (0.49% [CI, 0.16% to 0.82%]; P = 0.005) (5.10 mmol/mol [CI, 1.64 to 8.61]; P = 0.005) and insulin glargine plus glimepiride (0.59% [CI, 0.13% to 1.05%]; P = 0.012) (5.87 mmol/mol [CI, 1.10 to 10.64]; P = 0.012) (overall P = 0.02). Weight gain and the risk of hypoglycemia of any type did not significantly differ among the treatment groups.. The combination therapy of metformin and glimepiride plus glargine insulin resulted in a significant improvement in overall glycemic control as compared with the other combinations.. ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT00708578. The approval number of Kangbuk Samsung hospital's institutional review board (IRB): C0825.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Therapy, Combination; Fasting; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Insulin Glargine; Male; Metformin; Middle Aged; Sulfonylurea Compounds; Young Adult

In a 30 week, double-blind, randomized, controlled Phase 3 study in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus, the addition of fixed-dose exenatide twice daily (BID) to titrated insulin glargine resulted in significant glycated hemoglobin (HbA(1c)) lowering and weight loss without increased hypoglycemia risk versus titrated insulin glargine alone. Because individualized insulin titration contributed to these results, this post-hoc analysis examined the results in the context of the degree of insulin titration that occurred.. Subjects on pre-existing insulin glargine (with or without oral antidiabetes agents) were randomized to placebo (n = 123) or exenatide BID (n = 138; 5 µg for 4 weeks, then 10 µg ongoing). Insulin glargine was titrated in both arms per the Treat-to-Target algorithm. Tertiles (T1, T2, T3) were based on change in insulin dose from baseline to endpoint. Change in HbA(1c), hypoglycemia risk, and weight gain were assessed per insulin dose tertile.. The population comprised adult patients (mean age = 59 y) with type 2 diabetes and an HbA(1c) level between 7.0% and 10.5% (mean HbA(1c) = 8.4%). Insulin titration ranged from modest reductions in T1 to substantial increases in T3. Greater improvements in HbA1c were demonstrated with exenatide BID versus placebo in all tertiles (statistically significant in T2 and T3). With exenatide BID, more subjects achieved HbA(1c) <7.0% vs. placebo: T1, 44% vs. 29% (P = not significant); T2, 65% vs. 26%; T3, 54% vs. 29% (P < 0.05 for T2 and T3). Incidence of hypoglycemia was numerically lower with exenatide BID in all tertiles. Adjunctive exenatide BID was associated with statistically significantly greater weight loss (T1, T2) or mitigation of weight gain (T3) compared with placebo. Rates of nausea (42% vs. 8%), diarrhea (18% vs. 7%), and vomiting (18% vs. 4%) were higher with exenatide BID than with placebo and did not vary by tertile.. Addition of fixed-dose exenatide BID to optimized insulin glargine, regardless of the extent of insulin titration, significantly improved glycemia without increasing hypoglycemia risk, while mitigating insulin-induced weight gain in this post-hoc analysis.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Biomarkers; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Double-Blind Method; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Therapy, Combination; Exenatide; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Middle Aged; Peptides; Titrimetry; Treatment Outcome; Venoms; Weight Loss; Young Adult

Basal and bolus insulin therapy is required for strict blood control in diabetic patients, which could lead to prevention of vascular complications in diabetes. However, the optimal combination regimen is not well established.. Fifty-nine diabetic patients (49 type 1 and 10 type 2; 52.9 ± 13.3 years old) whose blood glucose levels were uncontrolled (HbA1c  > 6.2%) by combination treatment of basal insulin glargine with multiple daily pre-meal injections of bolus short-acting insulin [aspart (n = 19), lispro (n = 37) and regular human insulin (n = 3)] for at least 8 weeks were enrolled in this study. We examined whether glycaemic control and vascular injury were improved by replacement of short-acting insulin with glulisine. Patient satisfaction was assessed with Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire.. Although bolus and basal insulin doses were almost unchanged before and after replacement therapy, switching to glulisine insulin for 24 weeks significantly decreased level of HbA1c , advanced glycation end products (AGEs), soluble receptor for AGEs (sRAGE), monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1) and urinary albumin excretion. In multiple stepwise regression analysis, change in MCP-1 values from baseline (ΔMCP-1) was a sole determinant of log urinary albumin excretion. ΔAGEs and ΔsRAGE were independently correlated with each other. The relationship between ΔMCP-1 and ΔsRAGE was marginally significant (p = 0.05). Replacement of short-acting insulin by glulisine significantly increased Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire scores.. Our present study suggests that combination therapy of glargine with multiple daily pre-meal injections of glulisine might show superior efficacy in controlling blood glucose, preventing vascular damage and improving treatment satisfaction in diabetic patients.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Biomarkers; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Diabetic Angiopathies; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Resistance; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Humans; Hyperglycemia; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Injections, Subcutaneous; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Japan; Male; Middle Aged; Patient Satisfaction

After subcutaneous injection insulin glargine is rapidly metabolized to M1 and M2. In vitro, both M1 and M2 have metabolic effects and bind to IGF-1R similarly to human insulin, whereas glargine exhibits a higher affinity for the IGF-1R and greater mitogenetic effects. The present study was specifically designed to establish the dose-response metabolism of glargine over 24 h following s.c. injection in T2DM subjects on long-term use of glargine.. Ten subjects with T2DM were studied during 24 h after s.c. injection of 0.4 (therapeutic) and 0.8 (high dose) U/kg of glargine on two separate occasions during euglycaemic clamps (cross-over design). Glargine, M1 and M2 over 24 h period were determined in appropriately processed plasma samples by a specific liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry assay. Plasma M1 concentration (AUC0-24 h) was detected in all subjects and increased by increasing the glargine dose from therapeutic to high dose (p = 0.008). Glargine was detectable in 6 (therapeutic dose) and 9 (high dose) out of the 10 subjects and also increased by increasing the dose (p = 0.031). However, glargine concentration (AUC0-24 h--high dose) represented at most only 9.7% (4.6-15%) of the total amount of insulin measured in the blood. M2 was not detected at all.. In T2DM people on long-term use of insulin glargine, even with higher doses (0.8 U/kg), glargine is nearly totally metabolized to the active metabolite M1. Glargine is often detectable in plasma, but its concentration remains well below that needed in vitro to potentiate IGF-1R binding and mitogenesis.

Topics: Aged; Blood Glucose; Chromatography, Liquid; Cross-Over Studies; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Double-Blind Method; Endpoint Determination; Glucagon; Glucose Clamp Technique; Glycemic Index; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Injections, Subcutaneous; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Middle Aged; Tandem Mass Spectrometry

The basal insulin analogue LY2605541, a PEGylated insulin lispro with prolonged duration of action, was previously shown to be associated with modest weight loss in Phase 2, randomized, open-label trials in type 2 (N=288) and type 1 (N=137) diabetes mellitus (T2DM and T1DM), compared with modest weight gain with insulin glargine. Exploratory analyses were conducted to further characterize these findings.. Pearson correlations between change in body weight and other variables were calculated. Continuous variables were analysed using a mixed linear model with repeated measurements. Proportions of subjects with weight loss were analysed using Fisher's exact test for T2DM and Nagelkerke's method for T1DM.. Weight loss was more common in LY2605541-treated patients than in patients treated with insulin glargine (T2DM: 56.9 vs. 40.2%, p=0.011; T1DM: 66.1 vs. 40.3%, p<0.001). More LY2605541-treated patients experienced ≥5% weight loss compared to patients treated with glargine (T2DM: 4.8 vs. 0%, p=0.033; T1DM: 11.9 vs. 0.8%, p<0.001). In both the T1DM and T2DM studies, weight change did not correlate with baseline body mass index (BMI), or change in HDL-cholesterol in either treatment group. No consistent correlations were found across both studies between weight change and any of the variables assessed; however, weight change was significantly correlated with hypoglycaemia rate in glargine-treated T2DM patients.. In two Phase 2 trials, improved glycaemic control with long-acting basal insulin analogue LY2605541 is associated with weight loss in previously insulin-treated patients. This weight change is independent of baseline BMI or hypoglycaemia.

Topics: Adult; Blood Glucose; Body Mass Index; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine; Insulin Lispro; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Middle Aged; Polyethylene Glycols; Treatment Outcome; Weight Gain; Weight Loss

To compare the efficacy and safety of two insulin intensification strategies in patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled on basal insulin glargine with metformin and/or pioglitazone.. A multinational, randomized, open-label trial that compared insulin lispro low mixture (LM25; n = 236) twice daily with a basal-prandial regimen of insulin glargine once daily and insulin lispro once daily (IGL; n = 240) over 24 weeks in patients with HbA1c 7.5-10.5% and fasting plasma glucose ≤ 6.7 mmol/l. The primary objective was to assess non-inferiority [per-protocol (PP) population], and then superiority [intention-to-treat (ITT) population], of LM25 versus IGL according to change in HbA1c after 24 weeks (non-inferiority margin 0.4%, two-sided significance level 0.05).. Estimated change [least squares (LS) mean (95% CI)] in HbA1c after 24 weeks: -1.30 (-1.44, -1.16)% with LM25 and -1.08 (-1.22, -0.94)% with IGL. Non-inferiority was shown [LS mean (95% CI) HbA1c treatment difference -0.21 (-0.38, -0.04) (PP population)]; gated superiority assessment showed a statistically significant advantage for LM25 (p = 0.010; ITT population). Mean blood glucose, glycaemic variability, overall tolerability and hypoglycaemic episodes per patient-year did not show significant differences between treatments during the study.. In patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled on once-daily basal insulin glargine and metformin and/or pioglitazone, intensification with LM25 was superior to a basal-prandial approach in terms of reduction in HbA1c after 24 weeks and did not increase hypoglycaemia episodes.

Topics: Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine; Insulin Lispro; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Meals; Metformin; Middle Aged; Pioglitazone; Thiazolidinediones; Treatment Outcome

When patients with type 2 diabetes start their first injectable therapy, clinicians can choose between glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists and basal insulins. In DURATION-3, exenatide once weekly was compared with insulin glargine (henceforth, glargine) as first injectable therapy. Here, we report the results of the final 3-year follow-up.. DURATION-3 was an open-label randomised trial done between May 13, 2008, and Jan 30, 2012. Patients with type 2 diabetes aged 18 years or older were enrolled at 72 sites worldwide. They were eligible when they had suboptimum glycaemic control (HbA1c 7.1-11.0% [54-97 mmol/mol]) despite maximum tolerated doses of metformin alone or with a sulfonylurea for at least 3 months, a stable bodyweight for at least 3 months, and a BMI of 25-45 kg/m(2) (23-45 kg/m(2) in South Korea and Taiwan). Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) by computer-generated random sequence with an interactive voice-response system (block size four, stratified by country and concomitant therapy) to once-weekly exenatide (2 mg subcutaneous injection) or once-daily glargine (titrated to target) to be given in addition to their existing oral glucose-lowering regimens. The primary efficacy measure at 3 years was change in HbA1c from baseline in patients given at least one dose of the assigned drug (ie, analyses by modified intention to treat). Patients, investigators, and data analysts were not masked to treatment assignment. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00641056.. 456 patients underwent randomisation and received at least one dose of the assigned drug (233 given exenatide, 223 glargine). At 3 years, least-squares mean HbA1c change was -1.01% (SE 0.07) in the exenatide group versus -0.81% (0.07) in the glargine group (least-squares mean difference -0.20%, SE 0.10, 95% CI -0.39 to -0.02; p=0.03). Transient gastrointestinal adverse events characteristic of GLP-1 receptor agonists were more frequent with exenatide than glargine (nausea: 36 [15%] of 233 patients vs five [2%] of 223; vomiting: 15 [6%] vs six [3%]; diarrhoea: 32 [14%] vs 15 [7%]), although frequency of these events did decrease after week 26 in the exenatide group. The proportion of patients who reported serious adverse events in the exenatide group (36 patients [15%]) was the same as that in the glargine group (33 [15%]). The exposure-adjusted rate of overall hypoglycaemia was three times higher in patients given glargine (0.9 events per patient per year) than in those given exenatide (0.3 events per patient per year).. Efficacy of once-weekly exenatide is sustained for 3 years. GLP-1 receptor agonists could be a viable long-term injectable treatment option in patients with type 2 diabetes who have not yet started taking insulin.. Amylin Pharmaceuticals and Eli Lilly.

Topics: Blood Glucose; Body Mass Index; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Administration Schedule; Exenatide; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Glucagon-Like Peptide 1; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Injections, Subcutaneous; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Middle Aged; Peptides; Republic of Korea; Taiwan; Treatment Outcome; Venoms

To compare two self-titration algorithms for initiating and escalating prandial insulin lispro in patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled on basal insulin.. The trial was designed as two independent, multinational, parallel, open-label studies (A and B), identical in design, to provide substantial evidence of efficacy and safety in endocrine and generalist settings. Subjects were 18-85 years old (study A: N = 528; study B: N = 578), on basal insulin plus oral antidiabetic drugs for ≥3 months, and had an HbA1c 7.0% to ≤12.0% (>53.0 to ≤107.7 mmol/mol). Once optimized on insulin glargine, subjects were randomized to one of two self-titration algorithm groups adjusting lispro either every day (Q1D) or every 3 days (Q3D) for 24 weeks. The primary outcome was the change in HbA1c from baseline. The primary and secondary objectives were evaluated for the overall population and subjects ≥65 years old.. Baseline HbA1c was similar (study A: Q1D 8.3% [67.2 mmol/mol] vs. Q3D 8.4% [68.3 mmol/mol], P = 0.453; study B: Q1D 8.3% [67.2 mmol/mol] vs. Q3D 8.4% [68.3 mmol/mol], P = 0.162). Both algorithms had significant and equivalent reductions in HbA1c from baseline (study A: Q3D -0.96% [-10.49 mmol/mol], Q1D -1.00% [-10.93 mmol/mol], Q3D-Q1D 0.04% [0.44 mmol/mol] [95% CI -0.15 to 0.22 (-1.64 to 2.40)]; study B: Q3D -0.92% [-10.06 mmol/mol], Q1D -0.98% [-10.71 mmol/mol], Q3D-Q1D 0.06% [0.66 mmol/mol] [95% CI -0.12 to 0.24 (-1.31 to 2.62)]). The incidence and rate of hypoglycemia were similar for Q3D and Q1D in both studies. In general, no clinically relevant differences were found between the two algorithms in subjects ≥65 years old in either study.. Prandial insulin lispro can effectively and safely be initiated, by either of two self-titrated algorithms, in a variety of practice settings.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Blood Glucose; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine; Insulin Lispro; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Middle Aged; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult

As glycaemia and the incidence of microvascular diabetes complications follow a log-linear relationship, it becomes increasingly difficult to demonstrate a microvascular benefit of glucose-lowering when the HbA1c level is close to normal.. The Outcome Reduction with an Initial Glargine Intervention (ORIGIN) trial randomised 12,537 people with diabetes, impaired glucose tolerance or impaired fasting glucose to receive standard glycaemic care or standard care with the addition of basal insulin glargine (A21Gly,B31Arg,B32Arg human insulin), targeting a fasting plasma glucose level ≤5.3 mmol/l. Microvascular outcomes during a median follow-up of 6.2 years were examined in participants whose baseline HbA1c was above or below the median of 6.4% (46.4 mmol/mol).. Allocation to the insulin glargine group reduced the incidence of the primary microvascular composite outcome of kidney and eye disease in participants whose baseline HbA1c level was ≥6.4% (46.4 mmol/mol; HR 0.90 [95% CI 0.81, 0.99]) but not in participants with a lower baseline HbA1c (HR 1.07 [95% CI 0.95, 1.20]; p value for interaction 0.031). In people whose baseline HbA1c level was ≥6.4% (46.4 mmol/mol), the median post-randomisation change in HbA1c was -0.65% (interquartile range -0.16, -0.91%) after allocation to insulin glargine and -0.33% (-0.83, 0.13%) after allocation to standard care (median HbA1c difference 0.33%; p < 0.0001). A smaller median difference of 0.22% was noted in people whose baseline HbA1c was <6.4% (p < 0.0001).. In patients with dysglycaemia, intervention targeting normal fasting glucose levels reduced HbA1c and attenuated the risk of microvascular outcomes in participants with a baseline HbA1c level ≥6.4% (46.4 mmol/mol). A neutral effect was seen in those with a lower baseline HbA1c level.. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00069784.

Topics: Aged; Albuminuria; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Female; Glucose Intolerance; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Middle Aged; Treatment Outcome

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the advantages of exenatide treatment on obesity and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) with elevated liver enzymes in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D).. A total of 60 newly diagnosed patients with obesity, NAFLD with elevated liver enzymes and T2D were included in the study. The patients were randomly divided into two groups. The exenatide treatment group (n = 30) were treated with exenatide and insulin glargine, and the intensive insulin therapy group (n = 30) were treated with insulin aspart and insulin glargine for 12 weeks. Selected clinical characteristics were determined, and ultrasonography was performed at both baseline and 12 weeks following treatment.. At baseline, the clinical characteristics were matched between the two groups. After 12 weeks, fasting blood glucose (FBG), postprandial blood glucose (PBG), glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA1c), total cholesterol (TC), triglyceride (TG) and total bilirubin levels were significantly decreased in the two groups (p < 0.001). Body weight and waist circumference were significantly decreased in the exenatide group but increased in the intensive insulin group (p < 0.001). The levels of alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and γ-glutamyl transpeptidase (γGGT) in the exenatide group were significantly lower than in the intensive insulin group (p < 0.001). The mean body weight change correlated with the levels of ALT, AST and γGGT change (ALT, r = 0.761; AST, r = 0.733; γGGT, r = 0.752; p < 0.001). Moreover, the reversal rate of fatty liver was significantly higher in the exenatide group (93.3%) than the intensive insulin group (66.7%) (p < 0.01).. Exenatide has a better hepatic-protective effect than intensive insulin therapy and perhaps represents a unique option for adjunctive therapy for patients with obesity, non-alcoholic fatty liver disease with elevated liver enzymes and T2D.

Topics: Adult; Biomarkers; Body Mass Index; Combined Modality Therapy; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Diet, Diabetic; Drug Therapy, Combination; Exenatide; Exercise; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Hepatic Insufficiency; Humans; Hyperglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Liver; Male; Middle Aged; Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease; Obesity; Peptides; Ultrasonography; Venoms; Waist Circumference; Weight Loss

Because insulin dosing requires optimization of glycemic control, it is important to use a single metric of benefit and risk to determine best insulin dosing practices. We retrospectively applied a multiplicative clinical utility index (CUI) to a study of LY2605541 (Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN), a novel, long-acting basal insulin.. A CUI was developed to transform the multidimensional problem of assessing benefit/risk of multiple dosing algorithms into a single decision-making metric to evaluate two LY2605541 dosing algorithms relative to the insulin glargine (GL) dosing algorithm. The CUI was applied to data in a 12-week, open-label, Phase 2 trial in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus who were randomized to one of two dosing algorithms for LY2605541 (LY1 or LY2) or GL (algorithm similar to LY1). The CUI was created (via expert input) by weighing the relative benefit/risk of four components (glycosylated hemoglobin [HbA1c], percentage of patients with HbA1c ≤ 7%, hypoglycemia rate, and time to steady-state dose); individual utility values were multiplied to compute CUI values for LY1 and LY2 relative to GL, and bootstrap samples were used to determine variability.. The mean CUI was 0.82 for LY1 and 1.35 for LY2. Based on 3,000 bootstrap samples, there was a 48% probability of LY2 performing better than LY1 and a 28% probability of LY1 performing better than LY2.. CUI methodology, and in particular this CUI, is a useful tool for comparing dosing algorithms. Based on this CUI, LY2 is likely to be a better dosing algorithm than LY1.

Topics: Algorithms; Blood Glucose; Clinical Trials, Phase II as Topic; Decision Making; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine; Insulin Lispro; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Middle Aged; Polyethylene Glycols; Retrospective Studies; Risk Assessment; Treatment Outcome

The authors present and analyze the outcome of DIABOBHU observational study. The work was carried out in Hungarian type 2 diabetic patients whose treatment was insufficient with oral antidiabetic agents.. The safety and efficacy of glargine insulin added to oral antidiabetic therapy treatment was evaluated.. Between 2008 and 2011 3955 patients were enrolled. After proper education, patients titrated the insulin dosage under self-monitoring with the help of their attending physicians. During the 26-week study period 3 visits were included. The primary endpoint was the change of HbA1c. The secondary endpoints were fasting glucose levels, dose of insulin, body weight and body mass index, satisfaction of the patients with the treatment and the incidence of hypoglycemic events.. During the study mean HbA1c decreased from 8.94% to 7.31%. Most patients achieved the glycemic goals with very low frequency of hypoglycemia. The patients did not gain weight and were satisfied with their treatment.. The authors emphasize that this treatment based on an analogue basal insulin should be considered as an effective and safe therapy.. Bevezetés: A szerzők ismertetik és elemzik a 2-es típusú, orális antidiabetikumokkal sikertelenül kezelt betegekkel lefolytatott DIABOBHU hazai obszervációs vizsgálat eredményeit. Célkitűzés: A vizsgálat során a diabetológiai gyakorlatban elindított glargin bázisinzulinnal kombinált orális kezelés eredményességét és biztonságosságát értékelték. Módszer: 2008–2011 között összesen 3955 beteg került bevonásra. Oktatást követően a betegek vércukor-önellenőrzés mellett titrálták fel inzulindózisukat a kezelőorvosuk segítségével. A 26 hetes vizsgálati periódusban 3 vizitre került sor. Elsődleges végpontként a HbA1c-szint változása szerepelt négy korcsoportban. Másodlagos végpontként az éhgyomri vércukorértékek, az inzulin dózisa, a testsúly, testtömegindex változása, a kezeléssel kapcsolatos megelégedettség, a hypoglykaemiák incidenciája szerepelt. Eredmények: A kiindulási átlagos 8,94%-os HbA1c 7,31%-ra csökkent. A betegek többsége elérte a glykaemiás célokat igen alacsony hypoglykaemiaráta mellett. A vizsgálat eredményei közül kiemelendő, hogy a betegek testsúlya nem nőtt és kezelésükkel elégedettek voltak. Következtetések: A szerzők hangsúlyozzák, hogy az analóg bázisinzulinnal kombinált orális kezelés ma is hatékony és biztonságos terápiának számít. Orv. Hetil., 2014, 155(23), 903–910.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Aged; Biomarkers; Blood Glucose; Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hungary; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Middle Aged; Treatment Outcome

GLP-1 receptor agonists may provide an alternative to prandial insulin for advancing basal insulin therapy. Harmony 6 was a randomized, open-label, active-controlled trial testing once-weekly albiglutide vs. thrice-daily prandial insulin lispro as an add-on to titrated once-daily insulin glargine.. Patients taking basal insulin (with or without oral agents) with HbA1c 7-10.5% (53-91 mmol/mol) entered a glargine standardization period, followed by randomization to albiglutide, 30 mg weekly (n = 282), subsequently uptitrated to 50 mg, if necessary, or thrice-daily prandial lispro (n = 281) while continuing metformin and/or pioglitazone. Glargine was titrated to fasting plasma glucose of <5.6 mmol/L, and lispro was adjusted based on glucose monitoring. The primary end point was the difference in the HbA1c change from baseline at week 26.. At week 26, HbA1c decreased from baseline by -0.82 ± SE 0.06% (9.0 mmol/mol) with albiglutide and -0.66 ± 0.06% (7.2 mmol/mol) with lispro; treatment difference, -0.16% (95% CI -0.32 to 0.00; 1.8 mmol/mol; P < 0.0001), meeting the noninferiority end point (margin, 0.4%). Weight decreased with albiglutide but increased with lispro (-0.73 ± 0.19 kg vs. +0.81 ± 0.19 kg). The mean glargine dose increased from 47 to 53 IU (albiglutide) and from 44 to 51 IU (lispro). Adverse events for albiglutide versus lispro included severe hypoglycemia (0 vs. 2 events), documented symptomatic hypoglycemia (15.8% vs. 29.9%), nausea (11.2% vs. 1.4%), vomiting (6.7% vs. 1.4%), and injection site reactions (9.5% vs. 5.3%).. Weekly albiglutide is a simpler therapeutic option than thrice-daily lispro for advancing basal insulin glargine therapy, resulting in comparable HbA1c reduction with weight loss and lower hypoglycemia risk.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Aged; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Substitution; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Glucagon-Like Peptide 1; Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin Lispro; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Meals; Metformin; Middle Aged; Pioglitazone; Receptors, Glucagon; Thiazolidinediones; Treatment Outcome

Diabetes and non-diabetic dysglycaemia are risk factors for accelerated cognitive decline. In this planned substudy of the Outcome Reduction with Initial Glargine Intervention (ORIGIN) trial, we assessed whether normalising glucose with insulin glargine or administering omega-3 fatty acids in this population may slow this process or affect the development of cognitive impairment.. The ORIGIN trial recruited participants older than 50 years with dysglycaemia who were taking either no or one oral glucose-lowering drug, who had additional risk factors for cardiovascular events, whose HbA1c was less than 9%, and who were not taking insulin. Participants were recruited from 573 sites in 40 countries. Participants were randomly assigned to either titrated basal insulin glargine targeting a fasting plasma glucose concentration of 5.3 mmol/L or lower or standard care and to either omega-3 fatty acid (1 g) or placebo by a factorial design. Outcome adjudicators and data analysts were masked to treatment allocation. Cognitive function was assessed by the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMS) and Digit Symbol Substitution (DSS). The effect of insulin glargine or omega-3 fatty * acid on cognitive function over time, the annualised change in test scores, and the development of probable cognitive impairment were measured. All analyses were restricted to those participants who had a cognitive measurement at both baseline and at least one follow-up visit. The ORIGIN trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT00069784.. Participants were randomly assigned between Sept 1, 2003, and Dec 15, 2005. MMSE and DSS were assessed in 11,685 and 3392 ORIGIN participants (mean age 63.4 years [SD 7.7]), who were followed up for a median of 6.2 years (IQR 5.8-6.7). There was no difference in the rate of change of cognitive test scores between the insulin glargine and standard care groups (for the MMSE 0.0046, 95% CI -0.0132 to 0.0224, p=0.39; and for the DSS -0.0362, -0.2180 to 0.1455, p=0.34) or between the omega-3 fatty acid and placebo groups (for the MMSE 0.0013, 95% CI -0.0165 to 0.0191, p=0.21; and for the DSS -0.0605, -0.2422 to 0.1212, p=0.72). Similarly, the incidence of probable cognitive impairment did not differ between the insulin glargine and standard care groups (p=0.065) or the omega-3 fatty acid and placebo groups (p=0.070). In a subgroup analysis, allocation to insulin glargine versus standard care seemed to reduce the decline in the MMSE (but not the DSS) in participants with dysglycaemia but without evidence of diabetes (pinteraction=0.024).. In this relatively young cohort of people with dysglycaemia, insulin mediated normoglycaemia and omega-3 fatty acid for over 6 years had a neutral effect on the rate of cognitive decline and on incident cognitive impairment. Future studies should assess the effect of these interventions in an older cohort or the effect of other glucometabolic interventions on cognitive decline.. Sanofi.

Topics: Aged; Blood Glucose; Cognition Disorders; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Fatty Acids, Omega-3; Female; Glucose Metabolism Disorders; Humans; Hyperglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Middle Aged; Neuropsychological Tests; Risk Factors

To assess the effect of initiating insulin treatment on quality of life of patients with type 2 diabetes (T2DM) in the 60-week All-to-Target trial (NCT00384085).. Patient-reported outcomes from a phase IV, multicentre, randomised, open-label, parallel-group study were analysed. Participants were randomised to: insulin glargine with up to one insulin glulisine injection (G + 1); insulin glargine with stepwise addition of up to three insulin glulisine injections (G + 3); or twice-daily premixed 70/30 insulin protamine-aspart/aspart (PM-2). Patient-reported outcome questionnaires were administered at weeks 0, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48 and 60.. There were no between-group differences in the Psychosocial Adjustment to Illness State-Self Report (PAIS-SR) or in the EuroQoL Group Five-Dimension Self-Report Index Questionnaire (EQ-5D) from baseline to week 60; however, PAIS-SR scores improved significantly over this period in the G + 3 group (p = 0.0016) and EQ-5D scores worsened significantly in the PM-2 group (p = 0.02). Hypoglycemia Fear Survey Behaviour and Worry subscales worsened significantly for all groups, with greater deterioration being observed in the PM-2 group than in the G + 1 group (Behaviour, p = 0.0050; Worry, p = 0.0017) and G + 3 groups (Behaviour, p = 0.0105; Worry, p = 0.0016). Total scores on the Diabetes Quality of Life (DQoL) questionnaire improved more in the G + 3 group than in the PM-2 group over the study period (p = 0.0284), with all groups showing a significant improvement in DQoL score over time.. Insulin glargine-based regimens showed advantages over premixed insulin in a number of patient-reported outcome measures. The potential impact on fear of hypoglycaemia may be of particular relevance when addressing the major barriers to early insulin treatment.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anxiety; Blood Glucose; Body Mass Index; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Middle Aged; Patient Outcome Assessment; Quality of Life; Surveys and Questionnaires; United States

To compare the treatment effects of Novolin® 30R(a), versus Lantus(®a) combined with acarbose (Glucobay®), in elderly patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.. Patients (aged > 60 years) with type 2 diabetes mellitus were randomized to receive either Novolin® 30R(a) (initial dose 0.5 IU/kg) or Lantus(®a) (initial dose 0.2 IU/kg) combined with 50 mg acarbose. After a 32-week treatment period, the following parameters were measured: blood glucose control; blood lipid levels; body mass index; proportion of patients achieving a glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA1c) level <7.5%; rate of hypoglycaemic events; change in fasting blood glucose levels from baseline in patients stratified according to their baseline HbA1c level.. A total of 188 patients were enrolled in the study. After 32 weeks' treatment, compared with baseline levels, there were significant reductions in FBG, 2 h-postprandial blood glucose during an oral glucose tolerance test, HbA1c, total cholesterol, triglycerides and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol values in both groups. Although there were fewer hypoglycaemic events in the Lantus® combined with Glucobay® group compared with the Novolin® 30R group, the difference was not significant.. Novolin® 30R and Lantus® combined with acarbose both had beneficial effects on blood glucose control and blood lipid levels in elderly patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Topics: Acarbose; Aged; Blood Glucose; Body Mass Index; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Lipids; Male; Prospective Studies

Glucose fluctuation often remains to be corrected under basal-supported oral therapy. We investigated the efficacy of adding once-daily rapid-acting insulin in Japanese diabetes patients treated with basal-supported oral therapy.. In this 8-week, parallel-group, randomized, open-label trial, 62 Japanese adults with type 2 diabetes treated with insulin glargine and 50 mg of sitagliptin were randomized into the following two arms: the single-bolus group, in which once-daily insulin glulisine was initiated at a main meal at a fifth (i.e., 20%) the dose of insulin glargine, and the control group, in which the dose of sitagliptin was maximized to 100 mg. The primary end point was the change of glycemic fluctuation assessed with the M-value.. Baseline hemoglobin A1c levels, mean blood glucose profiles, and M-value were 7.2 ± 0.6%, 9.3 ± 1.7 mmol/L, and 21 ± 13 units, respectively. At the end of the study, the single-bolus group had a greater reduction of M-value than the control group (P=0.02); the difference was 6.5 units (95% confidence interval, 1.1-11.9 units). The single-bolus group also had a greater reduction of mean blood glucose levels (P=0.01). There were no significant differences in the incidence of hypoglycemia or the weight change between the two groups (P>0.05).. Adding once-daily insulin glulisine was more effective in controlling the glycemic fluctuation in Japanese type 2 diabetes patients treated with insulin glargine together with sitagliptin.

Topics: Adult; Asian People; Blood Glucose; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Japan; Male; Middle Aged; Pyrazines; Sitagliptin Phosphate; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Triazoles

Mealtime insulin is commonly added to manage hyperglycemia in type 2 diabetes when basal insulin is insufficient. However, this complex regimen is associated with weight gain and hypoglycemia. This study compared the efficacy and safety of exenatide twice daily or mealtime insulin lispro in patients inadequately controlled by insulin glargine and metformin despite up-titration.. In this 30-week, open-label, multicenter, randomized, noninferiority trial with 12 weeks prior insulin optimization, 627 patients with insufficient postoptimization glycated hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) were randomized to exenatide (10-20 µg/day) or thrice-daily mealtime lispro titrated to premeal glucose of 5.6-6.0 mmol/L, both added to insulin glargine (mean 61 units/day at randomization) and metformin (mean 2,000 mg/day).. Randomization HbA1c and fasting glucose (FG) were 8.3% (67 mmol/mol) and 7.1 mmol/L for exenatide and 8.2% (66 mmol/mol) and 7.1 mmol/L for lispro. At 30 weeks postrandomization, mean HbA1c changes were noninferior for exenatide compared with lispro (-1.13 and -1.10%, respectively); treatment differences were -0.04 (95% CI -0.18, 0.11) in per-protocol (n = 510) and -0.03 (95% CI -0.16, 0.11) in intent-to-treat (n = 627) populations. FG was lower with exenatide than lispro (6.5 vs. 7.2 mmol/L; P = 0.002). Weight decreased with exenatide and increased with lispro (-2.5 vs. +2.1 kg; P < 0.001). More patients reported treatment satisfaction and better quality of life with exenatide than lispro, although a larger proportion of patients with exenatide experienced treatment-emergent adverse events. Exenatide resulted in fewer nonnocturnal hypoglycemic episodes but more gastrointestinal adverse events than lispro.. Adding exenatide to titrated glargine with metformin resulted in similar glycemic control as adding lispro and was well tolerated. These findings support exenatide as a noninsulin addition for patients failing basal insulin.

Topics: Aged; Blood Glucose; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Administration Schedule; Exenatide; Female; Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hyperglycemia; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin Lispro; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Meals; Metformin; Middle Aged; Peptides; Quality of Life; Receptors, Glucagon; Treatment Outcome; Venoms

Insulin glargine is widely used as basal insulin. However, published dose titration regimens for insulin glargine are complex. This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety profile of a user-friendly, weight-based insulin glargine dose titration regimen with 2 published regimens.. A total of 160 hospitalized patients with hyperglycemia in 3 medical centers were screened. Our inclusion criteria included age 18 to 80 years and being conscious. Exclusion criteria included pregnancy or breast-feeding and hepatic or renal dysfunction. A total of 149 patients were randomly assigned to receive weight-based, glucose level-based, or dose-based insulin glargine dose titration regimen between January 2011 and February 2013. The initial dose of insulin glargine was 0.2 U/kg. In the weight-based regimen (n = 49), the dose was titrated by increments of 0.1 U/kg daily. In the glucose level-based regimen (n = 51), the dose was titrated by 2, 4, 6, or 8 U daily when fasting blood glucose (FBG) was, respectively, between 7.0 and 7.9, 8.0 and 8.9, 9.0 and 9.9, or ≥10 mmol/L. In the current dose-based regimen (n = 49), titration was by daily increments of 20% of the current dose. The target FBG in all groups was ≤7.0 mmol/L. The incidence of hypoglycemia was recorded. One-way ANOVA and χ(2) test were used to compare data between the 3 groups.. All but 1 patient who required additional oral antidiabetic medication completed the study. The mean (SD) time to achieve target FBG was 3.2 (1.2) days with the weight-based regimen and 3.7 (1.5) days with the glucose level-based regimen (P = 0.266). These times were both shorter than that achieved with the current dose-based regimen (4.8 [2.8] days; P = 0.0001 and P = 0.005, respectively). The daily doses of insulin glargine at the study end point were 0.43 (0.13) U/kg with the weight-based regimen, 0.50 (0.20) U/kg with the glucose level-based regimen, and 0.47 (0.23) U/kg with the current dose-based regimen (P = 0.184). The incidence of hypoglycemia was 4.1%, 2.0%, and 6.3%, respectively (P = 0.557).. The currently proposed weight-based insulin glargine dose titration regimen is effective, tolerable, and user-friendly at achieving FBG target levels in hospitalized patients with hyperglycemia.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Blood Glucose; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Fasting; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Hospitalization; Humans; Hyperglycemia; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine; Middle Aged; Research Design

To compare the efficacy and safety of new insulin glargine 300 units/mL (Gla-300) with glargine 100 units/mL (Gla-100) in people with type 2 diabetes on basal insulin (≥42 units/day) plus mealtime insulin.. EDITION 1 (NCT01499082) was a 6-month, multinational, open-label, parallel-group study. Adults with glycated hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) 7.0-10.0% (53-86 mmol/mol) were randomized to Gla-300 or Gla-100 once daily with dose titration seeking fasting plasma glucose 4.4-5.6 mmol/L. Primary end point was HbA1c change from baseline; main secondary end point was percentage of participants with one or more confirmed (≤3.9 mmol/L) or severe nocturnal hypoglycemia from week 9 to month 6.. Participants (n = 807) had mean age 60 years, diabetes duration 16 years, BMI 36.6 kg/m(2), and HbA1c 8.15% (65.6 mmol/mol). HbA1c reduction was equivalent between regimens; least squares mean difference -0.00% (95% CI -0.11 to 0.11) (-0.00 mmol/mol [-1.2 to 1.2]). Fewer participants reported one or more confirmed (≤3.9 mmol/L) or severe nocturnal hypoglycemic events between week 9 and month 6 with Gla-300 (36 vs. 46% with Gla-100; relative risk 0.79 [95% CI 0.67-0.93]; P < 0.005); nocturnal hypoglycemia incidence and event rates were also lower with Gla-300 in the first 8 weeks of treatment. No between-treatment differences in tolerability or safety were identified.. Gla-300 controls HbA1c as well as Gla-100 for people with type 2 diabetes treated with basal and mealtime insulin but with consistently less risk of nocturnal hypoglycemia.

Topics: Aged; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Meals; Middle Aged

Effective treatment algorithms are needed to guide diabetes care at hospital discharge in general medicine and surgery patients with type 2 diabetes.. This was a prospective, multicenter open-label study aimed to determine the safety and efficacy of a hospital discharge algorithm based on admission HbA1c. Patients with HbA1c <7% (53.0 mmol/mol) were discharged on their preadmission diabetes therapy, HbA1c between 7 and 9% (53.0-74.9 mmol/mol) were discharged on a preadmission regimen plus glargine at 50% of hospital daily dose, and HbA1c >9% were discharged on oral antidiabetes agents (OADs) plus glargine or basal bolus regimen at 80% of inpatient dose. The primary outcome was HbA1c concentration at 12 weeks after hospital discharge.. A total of 224 patients were discharged on OAD (36%), combination of OAD and glargine (27%), basal bolus (24%), glargine alone (9%), and diet (4%). The admission HbA1c was 8.7 ± 2.5% (71.6 mmol/mol) and decreased to 7.3 ± 1.5% (56 mmol/mol) at 12 weeks of follow-up (P < 0.001). The change of HbA1c from baseline at 12 weeks after discharge was -0.1 ± 0.6, -0.8 ± 1.0, and -3.2 ± 2.4 in patients with HbA1c <7%, 7-9%, and >9%, respectively (P < 0.001). Hypoglycemia (<70 mg/dL) was reported in 22% of patients discharged on OAD only, 30% on OAD plus glargine, 44% on basal bolus, and 25% on glargine alone and was similar in patients with admission HbA1c ≤7% (26%) compared with those with HbA1c >7% (31%, P = 0.54).. Measurement of HbA1c on admission is beneficial in tailoring treatment regimens at discharge in general medicine and surgery patients with type 2 diabetes.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Algorithms; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Glycated Hemoglobin; Hospitalization; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Middle Aged; Patient Discharge; Prospective Studies; Treatment Outcome

To compare the efficacy and safety of new insulin glargine 300 units/mL (Gla-300) with glargine 100 units/mL (Gla-100) in people with type 2 diabetes using basal insulin (≥42 units/day) plus oral antihyperglycemic drugs (OADs).. EDITION 2 was a multicenter, open-label, two-arm study. Adults receiving basal insulin plus OADs were randomized to Gla-300 or Gla-100 once daily for 6 months. The primary end point was change in HbA1c. The main secondary end point was percentage of participants with one or more nocturnal confirmed (≤3.9 mmol/L [≤70 mg/dL]) or severe hypoglycemic events from week 9 to month 6.. Randomized participants (n = 811) had a mean (SD) HbA₁c of 8.24% (0.82) and BMI of 34.8 kg/m(2) (6.4). Glycemic control improved similarly with both basal insulins; least squares mean (SD) reduction from baseline was -0.57% (0.09) for Gla-300 and -0.56% (0.09) for Gla-100 (mean difference -0.01% [95% CI -0.14 to 0.12]), with 10% higher dose of Gla-300. Less nocturnal confirmed (≤3.9 mmol/L [≤70 mg/dL]) or severe hypoglycemia was observed with Gla-300 from week 9 to month 6 (relative risk 0.77 [95% CI 0.61-0.99]; P = 0.038) and during the first 8 weeks. Fewer nocturnal and any time (24 h) hypoglycemic events were reported during the entire 6-month period. Weight gain was lower with Gla-300 than with Gla-100 (P = 0.015). No between-treatment differences in safety parameters were identified.. Gla-300 was as effective as Gla-100 and associated with a lower risk of hypoglycemia during the night and at any time of the day.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Aged; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Detemir; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Middle Aged

The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of once-weekly albiglutide with once-daily insulin glargine (A21Gly,B31Arg,B32Arg human insulin) in patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled on metformin with or without sulfonylurea.. This was a randomised, open-label, multicentre (n = 222), parallel-group, non-inferiority out-patient clinical trial, with 779 patients enrolled in the study. The study was conducted in 222 centres located in four countries. Patients aged ≥18 years with type 2 diabetes treated with metformin (±sulfonylurea) for at least 3 months with a baseline HbA1c 7.0-10.0% (53.0-85.8 mmol/mol) were randomly assigned (2:1) via a computer-generated randomisation sequence with a voice response system to receive albiglutide (30 mg once a week, n = 504) or insulin glargine (10 U once a day, n = 241) added to current therapy. Participants and investigators were not masked to treatment assignment. Doses of each medication were adjusted on the basis of the glycaemic response. The primary endpoint was change from baseline in HbA1c at week 52.. In the albiglutide group, HbA1c declined from 8.28 ± 0.90% (67.0 ± 9.8 mmol/mol) (mean ± SD) at baseline to 7.62 ± 1.12% (59.8 ± 12.2 mmol/mol) at week 52. A similar reduction occurred in the insulin glargine group (8.36 ± 0.95% to 7.55 ± 1.04% [67.9 ± 10.4 to 59.0 ± 11.4 mmol/mol]). The model-adjusted treatment difference of 0.11% (95% CI -0.04%, 0.27%) (1.2 mmol/mol [95% CI -0.4, 3.0 mmol/mol]) indicated non-inferiority of albiglutide to insulin glargine based on the pre-specified non-inferiority margin of 0.3% (3.3 mmol/mol, p = 0.0086). Body weight increased in the insulin glargine group and decreased in the albiglutide group, with a mean treatment difference of -2.61 kg (95% CI -3.20, -2.02; p < 0.0001). Documented symptomatic hypoglycaemia occurred in a higher proportion of patients in the insulin glargine group than in the albiglutide group (27.4% vs 17.5%, p = 0.0377).. Albiglutide was non-inferior to insulin glargine at reducing HbA1c at week 52, with modest weight loss and less hypoglycaemia. Both drugs were well tolerated. Albiglutide may be considered an alternative to insulin glargine in this patient population.. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00838916 (completed). This study was planned and conducted by GlaxoSmithKline.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Glucagon-Like Peptide 1; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Metformin; Middle Aged; Retreatment; Sulfonylurea Compounds; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult

To evaluate basal and prandial insulin initiation and titration in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) in primary care and to explore the feasibility of retrospective-continuous glucose monitoring (r-CGM) in guiding insulin dosing. The new model of care features General Practitioners (GPs) and Practice Nurses (PNs) working in an expanded role, with Credentialed Diabetes Educator - Registered Nurse (CDE-RN) support.. Insulin-naïve T2DM patients (HbA1c >7.5% [>58 mmol/mol] despite maximal oral therapy) from 22 general practices in Victoria, Australia commenced insulin glargine, with glulisine added as required. Each was randomised to receive r-CGM or self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG). Glycaemic control (HbA1c) was benchmarked against specialist ambulatory patients referred for insulin initiation.. Ninety-two patients mean age (range) 59 (28-77) years; 40% female; mean (SD) diabetes duration 10.5 (6.1) years participated. HbA1c decreased from (median (IQR)) 9.9 (8.8, 11.2)%; 85 (73, 99) mmol/mol to 7.3 (6.9, 7.8)%; 56 (52, 62) mmol/mol at 24 weeks (p < 0.0001). Comparing r-CGM (n = 46) with SMBG (n = 42), there were no differences in major hypoglycaemia (p=0.17) or ΔHbA1c (p = 0.31). More r-CGM than SMBG participants commenced glulisine (26/48 vs. 7/44; p < 0.001). Results were comparable to 82 benchmark patients, with similar low rates of major hypoglycaemia (2/89 vs. 0/82; p = 0.17) and less loss to follow up in the INITIATION group (3/92 vs. 14/82; p = 0.002).. Insulin initiation and titration for T2DM patients in primary care was safe and improved HbA1c with low rates of major hypoglycaemia. CDE-RNs were effective in a new consultant role. r-CGM use in primary care was feasible and enhanced post-prandial hyperglycaemia recognition. Trial registration ACTRN12610000797077.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Australia; Blood Glucose; Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Administration Schedule; Feasibility Studies; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hyperglycemia; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Middle Aged; Patient Acceptance of Health Care; Postprandial Period; Primary Health Care; Retrospective Studies

Endothelial progenitor cells (EPC) are bone marrow-derived cells which can undergo differentiation into endothelial cells and participate in endothelial repair and angiogenesis. Insulin facilitates this in vitro mediated by the IGF-1 receptor. Clinical trials showed that the number of circulating EPCs is influenced by glucose control and EPC are a predictor of cardiovascular death. To study direct effects of insulin treatment on EPCs in type 2 diabetes patients, add-on basal insulin treatment was compared to an escalation of oral medication aiming at similar glucose control between the groups.. 55 patients with type 2 diabetes (61.6±5.9 years) on oral diabetes medication were randomized in a 2:2:1 ratio in 3 groups. Patients were treated additionally with insulin glargine (n=20), NPH insulin (n=22) or escalated with oral medication (n=13). Number of circulating EPC, EPC-outgrowth, intima media thickness, skin microvascular function and HbA1c were documented at baseline and/or after 4 weeks and 4 months.. HbA1c at baseline was, 7.3+/-0.7% in the oral group, 7.3+/-0.9% and 7.5+/-0.7% in the glargine and NPH insulin respectively (p=0.713). HbA1c after 4 months decreased to 6.8+/-0.8%, 6.6+/-0.7% and 6.7+/-0.6%, in the oral, glargine and NPH insulin group respectively (p=0.61). FACS analysis showed no difference in number of circulating EPC between the groups after 4 weeks and 4 months. However, the outgrowth of EPCs as detected by colony forming assay was increased in the NPH insulin and glargine groups (29.2+/-6.4 and 29.4+/- 6.7 units respectively) compared to the group on oral medication (23.2+/-6.3, p=0.013) after 4 months of treatment. A significant decrease of IMT from 0.80mm (+/-0.14) at baseline to 0.76mm (+/-0.12) after 4 months could be observed in all patients only (p=0.03) with a trend towards a reduction of IMT after 4 months when all patients on insulin treatment were compared to the oral treatment group (p=0.06). Skin microvascular function revealed no differences between the groups (p=0.74).. The study shows that a 4-month treatment with add-on insulin significantly increases the outgrowth of EPC in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.. (Clinical Trials Identifier: NCT00523393).

Topics: Adult; Aged; Cell Count; Cell Enlargement; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Combination; Endothelial Progenitor Cells; Female; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Middle Aged; Prospective Studies

To demonstrate the efficacy of exenatide versus insulin glargine on endothelial functions and cardiovascular risk markers.. Thirty-four insulin and incretin-naive patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (body mass index 25-45 kg/m(2)) who received metformin for at least two months were randomized to exenatide or insulin glargine treatment arms and followed-up for 26 weeks. Measurements of endothelial functions were done by ultrasonography, cardiovascular risk markers by serum enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, and total body fat mass by bioimpedance.. Levels of high sensitivity-C-reactive protein and endothelin-1 decreased (27.5% and 18.75%, respectively) in the exenatide arm. However, in the insulin glargine arm, fibrinogen, monocyte chemoattractant protein-1, leptin and endothelin-1 levels (13.4, 30.2, 47.5, and 80%, respectively) increased. Post-treatment flow mediated dilatation and endothelium independent vascular responses were significantly higher in both arms (p=0.0001, p=0.0001). Positive correlation was observed between the changes in body weight and endothelium-independent vasodilatation, leptin, plasminogen activator inhibitor type 1 and endothelin-1 in both arms (r=0.376, r=0.507, r=0.490, r=0.362, respectively).. Insulin glargine improved endothelial functions, without leading to positive changes in cardiovascular risk markers. Exenatide treatment of 26 weeks resulted in reduced body weight and improvement in certain cardiovascular risk markers and endothelial functions.

Topics: Biomarkers; Blood Glucose; Brachial Artery; Cardiovascular Diseases; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Endothelin-1; Endothelium, Vascular; Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay; Exenatide; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Glucagon-Like Peptide 1; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Middle Aged; Peptides; Prognosis; Risk Factors; Ultrasonography; Vasodilation; Venoms

Insulin degludec (IDeg) is a basal insulin with a stable, flat action profile and an even distribution of the blood glucose lowering effect over 24 hou rs. The terminal half-life of IDeg is about 25 hours, which reflects a mean prolongation by factor 2 compared to Insulin glargin (lGlar).This may enable for a more flexible daytime dosing versus up to now available basal insulins.. Two open, randomized, treat-to-target studies enrolled patients with type 1 diabetes (n =493) or type 2 diabetes (n = 687). Both phase 3 studies compared a daytime flexible dosing of IDeg (IDeg-flex) with IDeg at the evening meal (IDeg-evening) and IDler at a fixed daytime. In the IDeg-flex-group dosing intervals were predefined with variations between 8 and 40 hours.. In patients with type 1 diabetes IDeg-flex proved to be non-inferior with respect to reduction of HbA1C (-0.40%) versus IDeg-evening (-0.41%) and IGlar (-0.58%) after 26 weeks. In addition, nocturnal hypoglycemic events were reduced by 40% (p < 0.01) with IDeg-flex versus IGlar. In patients with type 2 diabetes reduction of HbA1C with ID)eg-flex (-1.28%) was non-inferior to IDeg-evening (-1.07%) and IGlar (-1.26%), respectively, whereas rates for hypoglycemia were comparable.. Patients with diabetes mellitus are enabled to dose a basal insulin flexibly when needed (minimum interval of 8 hours afterthe last injection is necessary). Impacts of this treatment option on quality of life and adherence and outcomes should be examined in observational trials.

Topics: Adult; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Half-Life; Humans; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Middle Aged

This study assessed the efficacy and safety of once-daily insulin initiation using insulin detemir (detemir) or insulin glargine (glargine) added to existing metformin in type 2 diabetes (T2D).. This 26-week, multinational, randomized, treat-to-target trial involved 457 insulin-naïve adults with T2D (HbA1c 7-9%). Detemir or glargine was added to current metformin therapy [any second oral antidiabetic drug (OAD) discontinued] and titrated to a target fasting plasma glucose (FPG) ≤90 mg/dl (≤5.0 mmol/l). Primary efficacy endpoint was change in HbA1c.. Mean (s.d.) HbA1c decreased with detemir and glargine by 0.48 and 0.74%-points, respectively, to 7.48% (0.91%) and 7.13% (0.72%) [estimated between-treatment difference, 0.30 (95% CI: 0.14-0.46)]. Non-inferiority for detemir at the a priori level of 0.4%-points was not established. The proportions of patients reaching HbA1c ≤ 7% at 26 weeks were 38% and 53% (p = 0.026) with detemir and glargine, respectively. FPG decreased ∼43.2 mg/dl (∼2.4 mmol/l) in both groups [non-significant (NS)]. Treatment satisfaction was good for both insulins. Hypoglycaemia, which occurred infrequently, was observed less with detemir than glargine [rate ratio 0.73 (95% CI 0.54-0.98)]. The proportions of patients reaching HbA1c ≤ 7% without hypoglycaemia in the detemir and glargine groups were 32% and 38% (NS), respectively. Weight decreased with detemir [-0.49 (3.3) kg] and increased with glargine [+1.0 (3.1) kg] (95% CI for difference: -2.17 to -0.89 kg).. While both detemir and glargine, when added to metformin therapy, improved glycaemic control, glargine resulted in greater reductions in HbA1c, while detemir demonstrated less weight gain and hypoglycaemia.

Topics: Argentina; Blood Glucose; Body Mass Index; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Therapy, Combination; Fasting; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Detemir; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Metformin; Middle Aged; Patient Satisfaction; Republic of Korea; Thailand; Treatment Outcome; United States

We investigated whether basal insulin as first-line treatment in recently diagnosed type 2 diabetes (T2D) can improve glucose control, microvascular function and preserve insulin secretion in comparison with metformin (MET). In this open-label, randomized, prospective 36-week study, 75 patients (44 m, 31 f, mean age 60.7 ± 9.2 year) were allocated to treatment with either MET 1,000 mg b.i.d. (n = 36) or insulin glargine (GLA) at bedtime (n = 39). At baseline and study end, we performed a continuous glucose monitoring for assessment of interstitial glucose (IG) and measured microvascular function using Laser-Doppler fluxmetry. GLA versus MET treatment resulted in a more pronounced reduction in FPG (Δ: 3.1 ± 2.5 vs. 1.4 ± 1.5 mmol/l; p < 0.001) and overall IG (Δ AUC. 671 ± 507 vs. 416 ± 537 mmol/l min; p = 0.04). Postprandial PG and IG differences after a standardized test meal did not reach significance. Proinsulin/C-peptide and HOMA B as marker of endogenous insulin secretion were significantly more improved by GLA. Microvascular blood flow improved only in MET-treated patients. Early basal insulin treatment with GLA in T2D patients provided a better control of FPG, overall IG load and biomarker of beta-cell function compared to the standard treatment with MET. MET treatment resulted in an improvement of microvascular function. Studies of longer duration are needed to evaluate the durability of glucose control and β cell protection with early GLA treatment.

Topics: Aged; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin Secretion; Insulin-Secreting Cells; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Metformin; Microvessels; Middle Aged; Prospective Studies

Effective and easily implemented insulin regimens are needed to facilitate hospital glycemic control in general medical and surgical patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D).. This multicenter trial randomized 375 patients with T2D treated with diet, oral antidiabetic agents, or low-dose insulin (≤ 0.4 units/kg/day) to receive a basal-bolus regimen with glargine once daily and glulisine before meals, a basal plus regimen with glargine once daily and supplemental doses of glulisine, and sliding scale regular insulin (SSI).. Improvement in mean daily blood glucose (BG) after the first day of therapy was similar between basal-bolus and basal plus groups (P = 0.16), and both regimens resulted in a lower mean daily BG than did SSI (P = 0.04). In addition, treatment with basal-bolus and basal plus regimens resulted in less treatment failure (defined as >2 consecutive BG >240 mg/dL or a mean daily BG >240 mg/dL) than did treatment with SSI (0 vs. 2 vs. 19%, respectively; P < 0.001). A BG <70 mg/dL occurred in 16% of patients in the basal-bolus group, 13% in the basal plus group, and 3% in the SSI group (P = 0.02). There was no difference among the groups in the frequency of severe hypoglycemia (<40 mg/dL; P = 0.76).. The use of a basal plus regimen with glargine once daily plus corrective doses with glulisine insulin before meals resulted in glycemic control similar to a standard basal-bolus regimen. The basal plus approach is an effective alternative to the use of a basal-bolus regimen in general medical and surgical patients with T2D.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Female; Hospitalization; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Meals; Middle Aged; Surgical Procedures, Operative; Treatment Outcome

Diabetes is associated with a higher risk for adverse cardiovascular outcomes. To improve the health outcomes of patients with type 2 diabetes (T2DM), the American Diabetes Association (ADA) recommended target goals for the improvement of glycemic control and the reduction of cardiovascular risk factors associated with the disease. This retrospective analysis calculated the absolute benefit increase (ABI) of using exenatide once weekly (QW), a glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonist, vs an oral glucose-lowering medication or insulin glargine to achieve ADA-recommended goals. The number needed to treat (NNT) to achieve these goals was also calculated and provides a useful clinical metric for comparing potential therapies from different drug classes.. Patient data from three double-blind or open label, 26-week, randomized, controlled trials were retrospectively analyzed separately. ABI and NNT were calculated by comparing the percentage of patients treated with exenatide QW (N = 641) vs metformin (N = 246), sitagliptin (N = 329), pioglitazone (N = 328), or insulin glargine (N = 223), who achieved a single glycemic, weight, blood pressure, or lipid goal or a composite of these recommended goals, during the DURATION-2, -3, and -4 clinical trials.. Significant ABIs favoring exenatide QW over all four glucose-lowering medications were observed for at least one HbA1c glycemic goal. NNTs of 4 and 5 were calculated when exenatide QW was compared to sitagliptin for attaining HbA1c goals of <7.0% and ≤6.5%, respectively. Additionally, significantly more patients using exenatide QW compared to sitagliptin, pioglitazone, or insulin glargine attained the composite goal of HbA1c <7% or ≤6.5%, without weight gain or hypoglycemia. Exenatide QW was also favored over sitagliptin and insulin glargine for the achievement of the composite goals of HbA1c <7% (or ≤6.5%), systolic blood pressure <130 mm Hg, and low-density lipoprotein <2.59 mmol/L. For most goals, exenatide QW and metformin had similar effects in treatment naïve patients.. This analysis assessed the between-therapy differences in achieving therapeutic goals with therapies commonly used for glycemic control in patients with T2DM. In clinical trials, exenatide QW assisted more patients in reaching the majority of ADA-recommended therapeutic goals than treatment with sitagliptin, pioglitazone, or insulin glargine.. NCT00637273, NCT00641056, NCT00676338.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Aged; Blood Glucose; Cardiovascular Diseases; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Double-Blind Method; Drug Administration Schedule; Exenatide; Female; Glycemic Index; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Middle Aged; Patient Care Planning; Peptides; Retrospective Studies; Treatment Outcome; Venoms

This phase 3, 26-week, open-label, treat-to-target trial investigated the efficacy and safety of insulin degludec/insulin aspart (IDegAsp) in insulin-naïve Japanese adults with type 2 diabetes.. Subjects were randomized to once-daily injections of IDegAsp (n = 147) or insulin glargine (IGlar) (n = 149), both ±≤2 oral antidiabetic treatments. IDegAsp was given before the largest meal at the discretion of each subject (and maintained throughout the trial); IGlar was dosed according to label. Both insulins were titrated to a target prebreakfast self-measured plasma glucose of 3.9 to <5.0 mmol/l.. After 26 weeks, mean HbA1c was 7% with IDegAsp and 7.3% with IGlar; superiority of IDegAsp to IGlar was shown (estimated treatment difference, ETD; IDegAsp-IGlar: -0.28% points [-0.46; -0.10](95% CI), p < 0.01). At end-of-trial, mean fasting plasma glucose (FPG) was similar for IDegAsp and IGlar (5.7 vs. 5.6 mmol/l; ETD IDegAsp-IGlar: 0.15 mmol/l [-0.29; 0.60](95% CI), p = NS). IDegAsp was associated with numerically lower rates of overall confirmed (27%) and nocturnal confirmed hypoglycaemia (25%) versus IGlar (estimated rate ratio IDegAsp/IGlar: 0.73 [0.50; 1.08](95% CI), p = NS, and 0.75 [0.34; 1.64](95% CI), p = NS, respectively). Mean daily insulin doses were similar between groups at end-of-trial (both: 0.41 U/kg) as were the increases in body weight from baseline (both: 0.7 kg). Adverse event profiles were similar between groups.. IDegAsp provided superior long-term glycaemic control compared to IGlar, with similar FPG and doses and numerically lower rates of overall and nocturnal hypoglycaemia (p = NS).

Topics: Adult; Asian People; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Combinations; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Injections, Subcutaneous; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Middle Aged; Treatment Outcome

When oral therapy for type 2 diabetes is ineffective, adding basal insulin improves glycemic control. However, when glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) remains elevated because of postprandial hyperglycemia, the next therapeutic step is controversial. We examined the efficacy and safety of lixisenatide in patients with HbA1c still elevated after initiation of insulin glargine.. This double-blind, parallel-group trial enrolled patients with HbA1c 7-10% despite oral therapy. Insulin glargine was added and systematically titrated during a 12-week run-in, after which candidates with fasting glucose ≤ 7.8 mmol/L and HbA1c 7-9% were randomized to lixisenatide 20 µg or placebo for 24 weeks while insulin titration continued. The primary end point was HbA1c change after randomization.. The randomized population (n = 446) had mean diabetes duration of 9.2 years, BMI 31.8 kg/m(2), and daily glargine dosage of 44 units. HbA1c had decreased during run-in from 8.6 to 7.6%; adding lixisenatide further reduced HbA1c by 0.71 vs. 0.40% with placebo (least squares mean difference, -0.32%; 95% CI, -0.46 to -0.17; P < 0.0001). More participants attained HbA1c <7% with lixisenatide (56 vs. 39%; P < 0.0001). Lixisenatide reduced plasma glucose 2 h after a standardized breakfast (difference vs. placebo -3.2 mmol/L; P < 0.0001) and had a favorable effect on body weight (difference vs. placebo -0.89 kg; P = 0.0012). Nausea, vomiting, and symptomatic hypoglycemia <3.3 mmol/L were more common with lixisenatide.. Adding lixisenatide to insulin glargine improved overall and postprandial hyperglycemia and deserves consideration as an alternative to prandial insulin for patients not reaching HbA1c goals with recently initiated basal insulin.

Topics: Aged; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Double-Blind Method; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Middle Aged; Peptides; Treatment Outcome

Treatment response in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) varies because of different genotypic and phenotypic characteristics. Results of clinical trials are based largely on aggregated estimates of treatment effect rather than individualized outcomes. This research assessed heterogeneity and differential treatment response using the subgroup identification based on differential effect search (SIDES) algorithm with data from a large multinational study.. This was a retrospective analysis of the DURABLE trial, a randomized, open-label, two-arm, parallel study. The trial enrolled 2091 insulin-naïve T2DM patients aged 30 to 80 years. Patients received twice-daily insulin lispro mix 75/25 (LM75/25) or once-daily insulin glargine (insulin glargine). The SIDES methodology was used to find subgroups where the treatment effect was substantially different from what was observed in the full population of the clinical trial. A subgroup identification tool implementing the SIDES algorithm was used to examine data for 1092 patients (584 LM75/25 and 508 insulin glargine), achieving at-goal 12- or 24-week glycated hemoglobin A1c (A1C) (≤7.0%).. The overall at-goal population treatment difference (A1C reduction) was not clinically meaningful, but a clinically meaningful difference was observed (A1C reduction 2.31% ± 0.06% LM75/25 versus 2.01% ± 0.07% insulin glargine; p = .001) in patients with a baseline fasting insulin level >11.4 μIU/ml and age ≤56 years.. The observation that younger patients with higher levels of fasting insulin may benefit from a regimen that includes short-acting insulin targeting postprandial glycemia helps explain the heterogeneity in response and warrants further investigation.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Algorithms; Analysis of Variance; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine; Insulin Lispro; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Middle Aged; Retrospective Studies; Treatment Outcome

We investigated 1) the ability of purified glargine (GLA), metabolites 1 (M1) and 2 (M2), IGF-I, and NPH insulin to activate the insulin receptor (IR)-A and IR-B and IGF-I receptor (IGF-IR) in vitro; 2) plasma concentrations of GLA, M1, and M2 during long-term insulin therapy in type 2 diabetic patients; and 3) IR-A and IR-B activation in vitro induced by serum from patients treated with GLA or NPH insulin. A total of 104 patients (age 56.3 ± 0.8 years, BMI 31.4 ± 0.5 kg/m(2), and A1C 9.1 ± 0.1% [mean ± SE]) were randomized to GLA or NPH insulin therapy for 36 weeks. Plasma concentrations of GLA, M1, and M2 were determined by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry assay. IR-A, IR-B, and IGF-IR autophosphorylation was induced by purified hormones or serum by kinase receptor activation assays. In vitro, M1 induced comparable IR-A, IR-B, and IGF-IR autophosphorylation (activation) as NPH insulin. After 36 weeks, M1 increased from undetectable (<0.2 ng/mL) to 1.5 ng/mL (0.9-2.1), while GLA and M2 remained undetectable. GLA dose correlated with M1 (r = 0.84; P < 0.001). Serum from patients treated with GLA or NPH insulin induced similar IR-A and IR-B activation. These data suggest that M1 rather than GLA mediates GLA effects and that compared with NPH insulin, GLA does not increase IGF-IR signaling during long-term insulin therapy in type 2 diabetes.

Topics: Chromatography, Liquid; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Female; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine; Insulin-Like Growth Factor I; Insulin, Isophane; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Middle Aged; Receptor, IGF Type 1; Receptor, Insulin; Signal Transduction; Tandem Mass Spectrometry

Comparative efficacy of exenatide versus insulin glargine primarily on glucemic control, and secondarily on body mass index (BMI), lipid profile and blood pressure, in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients suboptimally treated with metformin monotherapy.. Forty-seven inadequately treated T2DM patients on metformin assigned to exenatide (n=18) or insulin glargine (n=29) for 26 weeks. Glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c), serum lipids, BMI, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, and adverse events, including episodes of hypoglycemia and gastrointestinal symptoms, were recorded.. Either treatment had a similar favorable mean reduction in HbA1c. However, more patients in exenatide group achieved HbA1c ≤ 7% at the 26th week compared with insulin glargine group (p=0.036). Insulin glargine group had significantly more episodes of hypoglycemia compared with exenatide group (p=0.039). Gastrointestinal adverse events were non-significantly higher in the exenatide group. A significantly greater BMI reduction was observed in exenatide group, whereas ΒΜΙ was not altered in insulin glargine group. Total and LDL cholesterol (p=0.012), and triglycerides (p=0.016) significantly decreased, whereas HDL cholesterol increased (p=0.021) in the exenatide group, whereas only total cholesterol decreased in insulin glargine group. Changes in systolic and diastolic blood pressure were insignificant in both groups.. Exenatide provided similar reduction in HbA1c, but fewer episodes of hypoglycemia, compared with insulin glargine. Exenatide had also a favorable effect on weight loss, although more gastrointestinal adverse events. Exenatide may provide a justified alternative in second line treatment of T2DM, but more trials are required to elucidate its long-term safety and cost-effectiveness.

Topics: Anthropometry; Blood Glucose; Blood Pressure; Body Mass Index; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Exenatide; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Lipids; Male; Metformin; Middle Aged; Multivariate Analysis; Peptides; Prospective Studies; Treatment Outcome; Venoms

To assess the success and baseline predictors of maintaining glycemic control for up to 5 years of therapy using basal insulin glargine or standard glycemic care in people with dysglycemia treated with zero or one oral glucose-lowering agents.. Data from 12,537 participants in the Outcome Reduction with Initial Glargine Intervention (ORIGIN) trial were examined by baseline glycemic status (with or without type 2 diabetes) and by therapeutic approach (titrated insulin glargine or standard therapy) using an intention-to-treat analysis. Median values for fasting plasma glucose (FPG) and A1C and percentages with A1C<6.5% (48 mmol/mol) during randomized treatment were calculated. Factors independently associated with maintaining updated mean A1C<6.5% were analyzed with linear regression models.. Median A1C in the whole population was 6.4% at baseline; at 5 years, it was 6.2% with glargine treatment and 6.5% with standard care. Of those with diabetes at baseline, 60% using glargine and 45% using standard care had A1C<6.5% at 5 years. Lack of diabetes and lower baseline A1C were independently associated with 5-year mean A1C<6.5%. Maintaining mean A1C<6.5% was more likely with glargine (odds ratio [OR] 2.98 [95% CI 2.67-3.32], P<0.001) than standard care after adjustment for other independent predictors.. Systematic intervention with basal insulin glargine or standard care early in the natural history of dysglycemia can maintain glycemic control near baseline levels for at least 5 years, whether diabetes is present at baseline or not. Keeping mean A1C<6.5% is more likely in people with lower baseline A1C and with the glargine-based regimen.

Topics: Aged; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Middle Aged; Treatment Outcome

The epidemic of type 2 diabetes (T2DM) threatens to become the major public health problem of this century. However, a comprehensive comparison of the long-term effects of medications to treat T2DM has not been conducted. GRADE, a pragmatic, unmasked clinical trial, aims to compare commonly used diabetes medications, when combined with metformin, on glycemia-lowering effectiveness and patient-centered outcomes.. GRADE was designed with support from a U34 planning grant from the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK). The consensus protocol was approved by NIDDK and the GRADE Research Group. Eligibility criteria for the 5,000 metformin-treated subjects include <5 years' diabetes duration, ≥ 30 years of age at time of diagnosis, and baseline hemoglobin A1c (A1C) of 6.8-8.5% (51-69 mmol/mol). Medications representing four classes (sulfonylureas, dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitors, glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists, and insulin) will be randomly assigned and added to metformin (minimum-maximum 1,000-2,000 mg/day). The primary metabolic outcome is the time to primary failure defined as an A1C ≥ 7% (53 mmol/mol), subsequently confirmed, over an anticipated mean observation period of 4.8 years (range 4-7 years). Other long-term metabolic outcomes include the need for the addition of basal insulin after a confirmed A1C >7.5% (58 mmol/mol) and, ultimately, the need to implement an intensive basal/bolus insulin regimen. The four drugs will also be compared with respect to selected microvascular complications, cardiovascular disease risk factors, adverse effects, tolerability, quality of life, and cost-effectiveness.. GRADE will compare the long-term effectiveness of major glycemia-lowering medications and provide guidance to clinicians about the most appropriate medications to treat T2DM. GRADE begins recruitment at 37 centers in the U.S. in 2013.

Topics: Adult; Blood Glucose; Comparative Effectiveness Research; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Female; Glucagon-Like Peptide 1; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Liraglutide; Male; Metformin; Middle Aged; Outcome Assessment, Health Care; Pyrazines; Sitagliptin Phosphate; Sulfonylurea Compounds; Triazoles

This study investigated the safety and efficacy of sitagliptin (Januvia) for the inpatient management of type 2 diabetes (T2D) in general medicine and surgery patients.. In this pilot, multicenter, open-label, randomized study, patients (n = 90) with a known history of T2D treated with diet, oral antidiabetic agents, or low total daily dose of insulin (≤0.4 units/kg/day) were randomized to receive sitagliptin alone or in combination with glargine insulin (glargine) or to a basal bolus insulin regimen (glargine and lispro) plus supplemental (correction) doses of lispro. Major study outcomes included differences in daily blood glucose (BG), frequency of treatment failures (defined as three or more consecutive BG >240 mg/dL or a mean daily BG >240 mg/dL), and hypoglycemia between groups.. Glycemic control improved similarly in all treatment groups. There were no differences in the mean daily BG after the 1st day of treatment (P = 0.23), number of readings within a BG target of 70 and 140 mg/dL (P = 0.53), number of BG readings >200 mg/dL (P = 0.23), and number of treatment failures (P > 0.99). The total daily insulin dose and number of insulin injections were significantly less in the sitagliptin groups compared with the basal bolus group (both P < 0.001). There were no differences in length of hospital stay (P = 0.78) or in the number of hypoglycemic events between groups (P = 0.86).. Results of this pilot indicate that treatment with sitagliptin alone or in combination with basal insulin is safe and effective for the management of hyperglycemia in general medicine and surgery patients with T2D.

Topics: Aged; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Female; Humans; Hyperglycemia; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Inpatients; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin Lispro; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Middle Aged; Pyrazines; Sitagliptin Phosphate; Triazoles

The aim of this study was to compare long-term safety and efficacy of the basal insulin analogue degludec with glargine in insulin-naive subjects with Type 2 diabetes.. This open-label trial included a 52-week core period followed by a 52-week extension. Participants were randomized 3:1 to once-daily degludec or glargine, administered with metformin ± dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors. Basal insulin was titrated to target pre-breakfast plasma glucose 3.9-4.9 mmol/l.. At end of treatment (104 weeks), mean HbA1c reductions were similar for degludec and glargine; estimated treatment difference between degludec and glargine was 1 mmol/mol (95% CI -1 to 3) [0.07% (95% CI -0.07 to 0.22)], P = 0.339 in the extension trial set (degludec 551, glargine 174), comprising subjects who completed core trial and continued into the extension trial. Overall confirmed hypoglycaemia rates (1.72 vs. 2.05 episodes/patient-year), rates of adverse events possibly or probably related to trial product (0.19 events/patient-year), weight gain (2.7 vs. 2.4 kg) and mean daily insulin doses (0.63 U/kg) were similar between treatments in the safety analysis set (degludec 766, glargine 257) comprising all treated subjects. Rates of nocturnal confirmed hypoglycaemia (0.27 vs. 0.46 episodes/patient-year; P = 0.002) and severe hypoglycaemia (0.006 vs. 0.021 episodes/patient-year, P = 0.023) were significantly lower with degludec for the safety analysis set (analysis based on intention-to-treat full analysis set comprising all randomized subjects).. In Type 2 diabetes, insulin degludec in combination with oral anti-diabetic drugs, safely and effectively improves long-term glycaemic control, with a significantly lower risk of nocturnal hypoglycaemia as compared with glargine.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Analysis of Variance; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Administration Schedule; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Treatment Outcome

To investigate whether once daily biphasic insulin aspart 30 (BIAsp 30) is noninferior to once daily insulin glargine (IGlar) among Chinese and Japanese insulin-naïve subjects with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).. This was a 24 week treat-to-target trial (NCT01123980) that included patients with T2DM who were poorly controlled on a combination of metformin and insulin secretagogue (or with a maximum of one more OAD) for 6 months. Patients were randomized to once daily BIAsp 30 or once daily IGlar and their secretagogue standardized to glimepiride 4 mg/day, metformin to 1500 or 2500 mg/day before randomization.. At Week 24, mean change from baseline in HbA1c was -0.78 ± 0.88% (mean ± SD) and -0.65 ± 0.92% (-8.49 ± 9.65 and -7.08 ± 10.1 mmol/mol) for the BIAsp 30 (n = 261) and IGlar (n = 260) groups, respectively. The estimated between-group difference (BIAsp 30 vs IGlar) in HbA1c change was -0.12% (95% CI: -0.25, 0.02) (-1.28 mmol/mol [95% CI: -2.75, 0.19]), thus treatment with BIAsp 30 was noninferior to IGlar with respect to HbA1c (non-inferiority margin 0.4%). Although reduction in mean 9-point self-measured plasma glucose (SMPG) profile was comparable between the two groups, BIAsp 30 showed significantly lower PG levels at three time points post-dinner and a higher PG level before dinner compared to the IGlar group (all p < 0.05). Comparable number of subjects reported hypoglycemic events (155 [59.4%] for BIAsp 30, 148 [56.9%] for IGlar).. BIAsp 30 once daily showed similar HbA1c reduction and a similar safety profile to IGlar when used in insulin-naïve Chinese and Japanese patients on metformin and a sulfonylurea. Moreover, it provided a better coverage of post-dinner glycemic control needs than those who received IGlar. The open-label design and insufficient insulin dose titration were the main limitations of the study.

Topics: Aged; Asian People; China; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Aspart; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Japan; Male; Middle Aged; Time Factors

Hypoglycaemia caused by glucose-lowering therapy has been linked to cardiovascular (CV) events. The ORIGIN trial provides an opportunity to further assess this relationship.. A total of 12 537 participants with dysglycaemia and high CV-risk were randomized to basal insulin glargine titrated to a fasting glucose of ≤ 5.3 mmol/L (95 mg/dL) or standard glycaemic care. Non-severe hypoglycaemia was defined as symptoms confirmed by glucose ≤ 54 mg/dL and severe hypoglycaemia as a requirement for assistance or glucose ≤ 36 mg/dL. Outcomes were: (i) the composite of CV death, non-fatal myocardial infarction or stroke; (ii) mortality; (iii) CV mortality; and (iv) arrhythmic death. Hazards were estimated before and after adjustment for a hypoglycaemia propensity score. During a median of 6.2 years (IQR: 5.8-6.7), non-severe hypoglycaemic episodes occurred in 41.7 and 14.4% glargine and standard group participants, respectively, while severe episodes occurred in 5.7 and 1.8%, respectively. Non-severe hypoglycaemia was not associated with any outcome following adjustment. Conversely, severe hypoglycaemia was associated with a greater risk for the primary outcome (HR: 1.58; 95% CI: 1.24-2.02, P < 0.001), mortality (HR: 1.74; 95% CI: 1.39-2.19, P < 0.001), CV death (HR: 1.71; 95% CI: 1.27-2.30, P < 0.001) and arrhythmic death (HR: 1.77; 95% CI: 1.17-2.67, P = 0.007). Similar findings were noted for severe nocturnal hypoglycaemia for the primary outcome and mortality. The severe hypoglycaemia hazard for all four outcomes was higher with standard care than with insulin glargine.. Severe hypoglycaemia is associated with an increased risk for CV outcomes in people at high CV risk and dysglycaemia. Although allocation to insulin glargine vs. standard care was associated with an increased risk of severe and non-severe hypoglycaemia, the relative risk of CV outcomes with hypoglycaemia was lower with insulin glargine-based glucose-lowering therapy than with the standard glycaemic control. Trial Registration (ORIGIN ClinicalTrials.gov number NCT00069784).

Topics: Arrhythmias, Cardiac; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Diabetic Angiopathies; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Prognosis; Risk Factors; Stroke

The pharmacodynamic properties of a single dose of 0.5 U/kg insulin detemir and insulin glargine were compared during two 24-h isoglycaemic clamps, one week apart.. The order of treatments was randomised. At approximately 0830 h, persons with T2DM received subcutaneous administration of a 0.5 U/kg dose of either insulin detemir or insulin glargine into the anterior abdominal wall. Plasma glucose was measured at 10-min intervals throughout the 24-h clamp period and isoglycaemia was maintained by variable infusion of 20% glucose. Glucose infusion rates (GIR) and plasma C-peptide were determined throughout each 24-h period.. Eleven persons with type 2 diabetes (8 male) with mean (SD) age 58.5 years (8.5), BMI 30.8 kg/m² (2.8) and HbA1c 7.5% (0.6) were studied. Plasma glucose remained constant during the clamp (CV: insulin detemir 3.7%; insulin glargine 3.8%). Following injection of insulin detemir, GIR increased, reaching a mean peak of 2.29 mg/kg/min (95% CI 1.64, 2.94) at 11.6h (range 8.9 to 14.3) compared to 1.71 mg/kg/min (95% CI 1.4, 2.0) at 10.2 h (8.1 to 12.3) for insulin glargine (P=0.025 for GIR(max)). Plasma C-peptide decreased during the study period, remaining significantly lower than the fasting level at the study end after both analogues, insulin detemir (P=0.01) and insulin glargine (P=0.02).. In persons with T2DM, no difference in duration of action following a single subcutaneous dose of insulin detemir and insulin glargine could be observed. Insulin detemir showed greater between subject variability and achieved a significantly higher maximum GIR than insulin glargine.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Area Under Curve; Blood Glucose; C-Peptide; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Female; Glucose Clamp Technique; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Detemir; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Middle Aged; Young Adult

We explored the safety and efficacy of exenatide BID v. insulin glargine in a subgroup of Polish patients with type 2 diabetes sub-optimally controlled with metformin plus a sulfonylurea, participating in a 26-week randomised, controlled open-label trial.. In Poland, 80 patients (HbA1c 7-10%, BMI 25-45 kg/m(2)) were randomised to exenatide 10 μg BID (n = 40) or insulin glargine once daily (n = 40). We present exploratory analyses on HbA1c, glucose profiles, body weight, hypoglycaemia and adverse events (AEs).. Mean (SD) baseline HbA1c was 7.9% (0.86) for exenatide and 7.8% (1.02) for insulin glargine. At Week 26, LS mean (SEM) HbA1c decreased in both groups (exenatide -0.72% [0.12]; glargine -0.64% [0.12]), as did fasting glucose. Postprandial glucose excursions after breakfast and dinner were smaller in patients treated with exenatide. LS mean (SEM) body weight decreased by -1.9 (0.48) kg with exenatide and increased by 1.6 (0.48) kg with glargine (group difference [95%CI]: -3.5 kg [-4.9 to -2.2]). Hypoglycaemia was low in both groups; nocturnal hypoglycaemia was reported for three v. seven patients (three v. 24 episodes) in the exenatide and glargine groups, respectively. Adverse events were more common with exenatide (nausea n = 22 v. n = 1, vomiting n = 5 v. n = 0, headache n = 8 v. n = 2).. This exploratory analysis confirms that findings from the global study apply to patients treated with exenatide BID and glargine in Poland, showing that exenatide BID was as effective as insulin glargine. Data suggested that changes in HbA1c were similar, with fasting glucose changes greater in the glargine group and postprandial changes greater in the exenatide BID group. Exenatide BID was associated with weight reduction, less nocturnal hypoglycaemia, but more gastrointestinal events compared to glargine.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Aged; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Administration Schedule; Exenatide; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Headache; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Metformin; Middle Aged; Nausea; Peptides; Sulfonylurea Compounds; Venoms; Vomiting

Results of an exploratory phase 2 study showed that insulin degludec, a basal insulin with an action profile of longer than 42 h, provided similar glycaemic control when injected three times a week (IDeg 3TW) to once-daily insulin glargine (IGlar OD). To provide further evidence, we did two phase 3 trials to compare the efficacy and safety of IDeg 3TW with IGlar OD in insulin-naive patients with type 2 diabetes.. In two 26 week, randomised, open-label, parallel group, non-inferiority trials IDeg was injected Monday, Wednesday, and Friday before breakfast (IDeg 3TW(AM)) in the AM trial (94 sites in seven countries) or with the evening meal (IDeg 3TW(PM)) in the PM trial (89 sites in seven countries), and compared with IGlar OD. Adults with type 2 diabetes (HbA(1c) 7.0-10.0%; body-mass index ≤45 kg/m(2)) were randomly allocated (1:1) without stratification by a central interactive response system to IDeg 3TW or IGlar OD. Both groups continued taking metformin with or without dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors. Insulin was titrated to achieve a prebreakfast self-monitored blood glucose (SMBG) concentration of between 3.9 and less than 5.0 mmol/L. The primary outcome was non-inferiority of IDeg 3TW compared with IGlar OD, as assessed by change in HbA(1c) from baseline to 26 weeks (non-inferiority limit of 0.4%) by ANOVA in an intent-to-treat analysis (full analysis set). These trials are registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, numbers NCT01068678 and NCT01076647.. We recruited 460 patients for the AM trial (IDeg 3TW(AM), n=230; IGlar OD, n=230) and 467 patients for the PM trial (IDeg 3TW(PM), n=233; IGlar OD, n=234). After 26 weeks, mean HbA decreased by 0.9% (IDeg 3TW(AM)) and 1.3% (IGlar OD) in the AM trial, and by 1.1% (IDeg 3TW(PM)) and 1.4% (IGlar OD) in the PM trial. Non-inferiority was not confirmed in either trial (estimated treatment difference [IDeg 3TW(AM)-IGlar OD] 0.34%, 95% CI 0.18-0.51; [IDeg 3TW(PM)-IGlar OD] 0.26%, 0.11-0.41). Across the two trials, rates of confirmed hypoglycaemia (SMBG <3.1 mmol/L or severe [needing assistance]) ranged from 1.0 to 1.6 episodes per patient-year and were similar for IDeg 3TW(AM) and IGlar OD (estimated rate ratio [ERR] 1.04, 95% CI 0.69-1.55), but higher for IDeg 3TW(PM) than for IGlar OD (ERR 1.58, 1.03-2.43). The rate of nocturnal confirmed hypoglycaemia was higher for IDeg 3TW(AM) than for IGlar OD (ERR 2.12, 1.08-4.16); we noted no significant difference between IDeg 3TW(PM) and IGlar OD (ERR 0.60, 0.21-1.69).. The inferior glycaemic control and increased risk of hypoglycaemia with IDeg 3TW compared with IGlar OD do not support a three-times-weekly dosing regimen.. Novo Nordisk.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Middle Aged; Treatment Outcome

Optimal dosing of basal insulin is needed to achieve target fasting blood glucose and to avoid hypoglycaemia on the other hand in patients of type 2 diabetes on bedtime basal insulin and daytime sulfonylureas. This is an open label, randomised prospective study done in 40 type 2 diabetics having uncontrolled diabetes. Statistical analysis was performed by the SPSS programme for windows, version 17.0. Continuous variables are presented as mean +/- SD, and categorical variables are presented as absolute numbers and percentage. Data were checked for normality before statistical analysis. Normally distributed continuous variables were compared from baseline to 12th week using paired t-test. The average dose requirement of insulin glargine was 33.55 +/- 11.94 units (mean +/- SD). The average insulin glargine dose requirement per kg body weight was 0.48 +/- 0.17 units/kg body weight. The range of insulin dose was 0.23 to 0.96 units/kg body weight. Dose titration is patient specific and should be done in order to achieve target fasting blood glucose.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Fasting; Female; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; India; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Metformin; Middle Aged; Pioglitazone; Prospective Studies; Sulfonylurea Compounds; Thiazolidinediones

We investigated the relationship between weight change and related factors in subjects with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) treated with liraglutide versus comparator diabetes therapies.. Twenty-six-week data from seven phase 3, randomized trials in the liraglutide T2DM development programme were analysed by trial and treatment group: liraglutide (1.2 and 1.8 mg), active comparator and placebo. Outcome measures included proportions of subjects in various weight change categories and their percentage weight change from baseline; impact of body mass index (BMI) and gastrointestinal (GI) adverse events (AEs) on weight change and correlation of weight change with change in glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA1c).. A number of subjects experienced >5% weight loss during the trials (24.4% liraglutide 1.8 mg and 17.7% liraglutide 1.2 mg; 17.7% exenatide, 10.0% sitagliptin, 3.6-7.0% sulphonylurea, 2.6% thiazolidinedione and 2.6% glargine; 9.9% placebo). More weight loss was seen with liraglutide 1.2 and 1.8 mg than with active comparators except exenatide. Across trials, higher initial BMI was associated with slightly greater weight loss with liraglutide. Mean weight loss increased slightly the longer GI AEs persisted. Although HbA1c reduction was slightly larger in higher weight loss categories across treatments (including placebo), sample sizes were small and no clear correlation could be determined. Liraglutide-treated subjects experienced additional HbA1c reduction beyond that which appeared weight induced; thus, not all HbA1c-lowering effect appears weight mediated.. The majority of liraglutide-treated T2DM subjects experienced weight loss in this analysis. Weight loss was greater and occurred more in glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist-treated subjects than in active comparator-treated subjects.

Topics: Blood Glucose; Body Mass Index; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Exenatide; Female; Glucagon-Like Peptide 1; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Liraglutide; Male; Middle Aged; Peptides; Pyrazines; Sitagliptin Phosphate; Sulfonylurea Compounds; Thiazolidinediones; Triazoles; Venoms; Weight Loss

To compare the efficacy and safety of once-weekly taspoglutide with insulin glargine in patients with advanced Type 2 diabetes failing metformin and sulphonylurea combination therapy.. This open-label, parallel-group, multi-centre trial randomized 1049 patients continuing metformin 1:1:1 to taspoglutide 10 mg once weekly, taspoglutide 20 mg once weekly or insulin glargine once daily with forced titration to fasting plasma glucose ≤ 6.1 mmol/l. Sulphonylureas were discontinued before randomization. The primary endpoint was change in HbA(1c) after 24 weeks.. After 24 weeks, least-square mean changes from baseline in HbA(1c) in patients receiving taspoglutide 10 mg [-8 mmol/mol (se 1)] [-0.77% (se 0.05)] or taspoglutide 20 mg [-11 mmol/mol (se 1)] [-0.98% (se 0.05)] were non-inferior to insulin glargine [-9 mmol/mol (se 1)] [-0.84% (se 0.05)]; treatment difference of 0.07% (95% CI -0.06 to 0.21) and -0.14% (95% CI -0.28 to -0.01), for taspoglutide 10 and 20 mg, respectively, vs. insulin glargine. Taspoglutide was associated with more adverse events (mainly gastrointestinal) and significantly less hypoglycaemia than insulin glargine.. Compared with insulin glargine, taspoglutide provided non-inferior HbA(1c) reductions associated with less hypoglycaemia, but more gastrointestinal adverse events.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Glucagon-Like Peptide 1; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Metformin; Middle Aged; Peptides; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult

Insulin glulisine (Glu) is a rapidly-acting insulin analog with a faster onset of action than the other insulin analogs of its class, which are insulin aspart (Asp) and insulin lispro (Lisp). While insulin Glu is usually injected just before meals, postprandial injection may help to avoid unexpected postprandial hypoglycemia or hyperglycemia by adjusting the insulin dosage according to food intake. However, the effect of postprandial insulin Glu on the glucose profile has not been evaluated. The aim of this study was to compare daily glucose excursion by continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) between multiple daily doses of preprandial insulin Asp or postprandial insulin Glu. In a randomized cross-over trial, we performed CGM to evaluate the 48-hour glucose profile during treatment with the same dosage of insulin Asp just before each meal in 12 hospitalized patients with type 2 diabetes. Patients also received the same dosage of long-acting insulin glargine at bedtime. The average glucose level, standard deviation of the glucose level, mean amplitude of glucose excursion, and daily glucose profile did not differ between preprandial Asp and postprandial Glu. The incidence of hypoglycemic episodes (glucose level<70 mg/dL with or without symptoms) and the area under the curve of glucose<70 mg/dL also did not differ between the two insulin regimens. Multiple daily injections of preprandial Asp and postprandial Glu achieved the same daily glucose excursion profile. Postprandial injection of Glu may provide greater flexibility for patients who require insulin therapy.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Blood Glucose; Cross-Over Studies; Diabetes Complications; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hyperglycemia; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Aspart; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Middle Aged; Monitoring, Ambulatory

The requirement to inject current basal insulin analogs at a fixed time each day may complicate adherence and compromise glycemic control. This trial evaluated the efficacy and safety of varying the daily injection time of insulin degludec (IDeg), an ultra-long-acting basal insulin.. This 26-week, open-label, treat-to-target trial enrolled adults (≥18 years) with type 2 diabetes who were either insulin naïve and receiving oral antidiabetic drugs (OADs) (HbA(1c) = 7-11%) or previously on basal insulin ± OAD(s) (HbA(1c) = 7-10%). Participants were randomized to 1) once-daily (OD) IDeg in a prespecified dosing schedule, creating 8-40-h intervals between injections (IDeg OD Flex; n = 229); 2) once-daily IDeg at the main evening meal (IDeg OD; n = 228); or 3) once-daily insulin glargine at the same time each day (IGlar OD; n = 230). The primary outcome was noninferiority of IDeg OD Flex to IGlar OD in HbA(1c) reduction after 26 weeks.. After 26 weeks, IDeg OD Flex, IDeg OD, and IGlar OD improved HbA(1c) by 1.28, 1.07, and 1.26% points, respectively (estimated treatment difference [IDeg OD Flex - IGlar OD]: 0.04% points [-0.12 to 0.20], confirming noninferiority). No statistically significant differences in overall or nocturnal hypoglycemia were found between IDeg OD Flex and IGlar OD. Comparable glycemic control and rates of hypoglycemia were seen with IDeg OD Flex and IDeg OD. Adverse event profiles were similar across groups.. The use of extreme dosing intervals of 8-40 h demonstrates that the daily injection time of IDeg can be varied without compromising glycemic control or safety.

Topics: Aged; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Middle Aged

Addition and titration of basal insulin is usually effective in improving glycaemic control in type 2 diabetes, but fear of hypoglycaemia remains a barrier. Ability to predict which patients might be at greatest risk of hypoglycaemia might facilitate individualization of treatment and improve safety. The aim of this study was to obtain information about clinical characteristics which might predict risk of hypoglycaemia during initiation of basal insulin.. Patient-level data from 2251 participants in 11 studies in which insulin glargine was started and titrated using similar treat-to-target methods was pooled and analysed with logistic regression models.. Participants had mean age 58 years, diabetes duration 8.9 years, body mass index 31.0 and baseline A1c 8.8%. They attained mean A1c 7.1% during 6 months of treatment with final mean glargine dosage 0.44 units/kg. Symptomatic hypoglycaemia occurred in 52%, glucose-confirmed hypoglycaemia (blood glucose <50 mg/dl) in 17%, repeated glucose-confirmed events in 7% and severe hypoglycaemia in 1.5%. Independent predictors of glucose-confirmed hypoglycaemia were younger age, lower body mass index, use of a sulphonylurea in addition to metformin, lower attained A1c and lower dosage of glargine.. These findings confirm low rates of clinically important hypoglycaemia using this method, and suggest that higher risk of hypoglycaemia may be suspected when patients needing insulin are younger, less obese and taking metformin and a sulphonylurea, and especially when A1c levels ≤7.0% are attained with glargine dosage ≤0.4 units/kg.

Topics: Age Factors; Aged; Body Mass Index; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Monitoring; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hyperglycemia; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Incidence; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Logistic Models; Male; Middle Aged; Overweight; Risk; Sulfonylurea Compounds

The prevalence of dyslipidaemia and the risk of cardiovascular disease are elevated in patients with type 2 diabetes. This analysis compared the effects of insulin glargine versus thiazolidinediones (TZDs) on lipid profiles.. Patient-level data were pooled from two randomized clinical studies. The population included 552 men and women aged >18 years, diagnosed with type 2 diabetes for at least 6 months, on metformin and/or sulphonylurea, and with A(1C) ≥7.5% and <12.0% at screening. Lipid outcome measures included change from baseline in lipid levels [low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (non-HDL-C), total cholesterol, triglycerides, and free fatty acids] and attainment of lipid goals for LDL-C, non-HDL-C, and triglycerides.. Both insulin glargine and TZDs improved lipid profiles from baseline values. Compared with TZDs, treatment with insulin glargine led to 7.9% greater reduction in LDL-C (p < 0.0003), 7.5% greater reduction in non-HDL-C (p < 0.0001), and 7.8% greater reduction in total cholesterol (p < 0.0001), whereas the HDL-C increase with TZD was 7.6% greater than that with insulin glargine (p < 0.0001). The percentage of patients attaining the lipid goals was comparable between insulin glargine and pioglitazone, but lower for rosiglitazone. Insulin glargine improved glycaemic control more than TZDs; however, insulin glargine caused more hypoglycaemia. Treatment with TZDs caused more weight gain and peripheral oedema.. These findings suggest that the favourable effects of insulin glargine on plasma lipid profiles should be considered among the advantages of treatment with insulin glargine as they are for TZDs.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Anticholesteremic Agents; Blood Glucose; Cholesterol, LDL; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Female; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Lipids; Lipoproteins, HDL; Lipoproteins, LDL; Male; Metformin; Middle Aged; Pioglitazone; Rosiglitazone; Sulfonylurea Compounds; Thiazolidinediones

This pilot study aimed to verify if glycemic control can be achieved in type 2 diabetes patients after acute myocardial infarction (AMI), using insulin glargine (iGlar) associated with regular insulin (iReg), compared with the standard intensive care unit protocol, which uses continuous insulin intravenous delivery followed by NPH insulin and iReg (St. Care).. Patients (n=20) within 24 h of AMI were randomized to iGlar or St. Care. Therapy was guided exclusively by capillary blood glucose (CBG), but glucometric parameters were also analyzed by blinded continuous glucose monitoring system (CGMS).. Mean glycemia was 141±39 mg/dL for St. Care and 132±42 mg/dL for iGlar by CBG or 138±35 mg/dL for St. Care and 129±34 mg/dL for iGlar by CGMS. Percentage of time in range (80-180 mg/dL) by CGMS was 73±18% for iGlar and 77±11% for St. Care. No severe hypoglycemia (≤40 mg/dL) was detected by CBG, but CGMS indicated 11 (St. Care) and seven (iGlar) excursions in four subjects from each group, mostly in sulfonylurea users (six of eight patients).. This pilot study suggests that equivalent glycemic control without increase in severe hyperglycemia may be achieved using iGlar with background iReg. Data outputs were controlled by both CBG and CGMS measurements in a real-life setting to ensure reliability. Based on CGMS measurements, there were significant numbers of glycemic excursions outside of the target range. However, this was not detected by CBG. In addition, the data indicate that previous use of sulfonylurea may be a potential major risk factor for severe hypoglycemia irrespective of the type of insulin treatment.

Topics: Aged; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Female; Humans; Hyperglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Monitoring, Ambulatory; Myocardial Infarction; Pilot Projects; Standard of Care; Time Factors; United States

To investigate the real-world use of combination insulin glargine/exenatide therapy for type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and associated treatment persistence and glycemic control.. In this retrospective study, data were extracted from a national US insurance claims database for patients with T2DM for whom insulin glargine and exenatide were co-prescribed in differing order: insulin glargine added after exenatide (EXE+); exenatide added after insulin glargine (GLA+); glargine and exenatide initiated together (GLA + EXE). Patients had continuous health plan coverage for 6 months pre- (baseline) and 1-year post-index (follow-up).. A total of 453 patients were eligible for analysis: 141 patients were included in the EXE+ cohort, 281 in the GLA+ cohort, and 31 in the GLA + EXE cohort. There were significant differences between the groups at baseline, including a significantly lower A1C in the GLA+ versus the EXE+ cohort (p = 0.0023). Around one third of patients stayed on both drugs up until the end of the follow-up period (GLA+: 30.2%; EXE+: 29.0%; GLA + EXE: 29.0%). However, more patients stayed on insulin glargine than on exenatide in each cohort. Significant A1C reductions were observed in each of the cohorts at follow-up: GLA+: -0.4%; EXE+: -0.9%; GLA + EXE: -1.2%; p < 0.01, and were significantly higher in the GLA + EXE and EXE+ cohorts than in the GLA+ cohort (p = 0.03 and p = 0.002, respectively). The mean number of hypoglycemic events increased slightly from baseline but remained low in each of the cohorts (GLA+: 0.12 to 1.42; EXE+: 0.09 to 1.04; GLA + EXE: 0.23 to 1.87 per patient, all p > 0.1).. Combined therapy with insulin glargine and exenatide resulted in A1C reductions in T2DM patients with poor glycemic control without a significantly increased risk of hypoglycemia irrespective of treatment order. Limitations of this study are the between-cohort differences at baseline, lack of a comparator group, and small n number, particularly in the GLA + EXE cohort.

Topics: Cohort Studies; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Exenatide; Female; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Middle Aged; Peptides; Retrospective Studies; Treatment Outcome; Venoms

The aim of this study was to compare IGF-I bioactivity 36 weeks after the addition of insulin glargine (A21Gly,B31Arg,B32Arg human insulin) or NPH insulin to metformin therapy in type 2 diabetic patients who had poor glucose control under metformin monotherapy.. In the Lantus plus Metformin (LANMET) study, 110 poorly controlled insulin-naive type 2 diabetic patients were randomised to receive metformin with either insulin glargine (G+MET) or NPH insulin (NPH+MET). In the present study, IGF-I bioactivity was measured, retrospectively, in 104 out of the 110 initially included LANMET participants before and after 36 weeks of insulin therapy. IGF-I bioactivity was measured using an IGF-I kinase receptor activation assay.. After 36 weeks of insulin therapy, insulin doses were comparable between the G+MET (68 ± 5.7 U/day) and NPH+MET (71 ± 6.2 U/day) groups (p = 0.68). Before insulin therapy, circulating IGF-I bioactivity was similar between the G+MET (134 ± 9 pmol/l) and NPH+MET (135 ± 10 pmol/l) groups (p = 0.83). After 36 weeks, IGF-I bioactivity had decreased significantly (p = 0.001) and did not differ between the G+MET (116 ± 9 pmol/l) and NPH+MET (117 ± 10 pmol/l) groups (p = 0.91). At baseline and after insulin therapy, total IGF-I concentrations were comparable in both groups (baseline: G+MET 13.3 ± 1.0 vs NPH+MET 13.3 ± 1.0 nmol/l, p = 0.97; and 36 weeks: 13.4 ± 1.0 vs 13.1 ± 0.9 nmol/l, p = 0.71). Total IGF-I concentration did not change during insulin therapy (13.3 ± 0.7 vs 13.3 ± 0.7 nmol/l, baseline vs 36 weeks, p = 0.86).. Addition of insulin glargine or NPH insulin to metformin monotherapy in poorly controlled type 2 diabetic patients decreases serum IGF-I bioactivity in a similar manner.

Topics: Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine; Insulin-Like Growth Factor I; Insulin, Isophane; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Metformin; Middle Aged

To compare the safety and efficacy of adding insulin glargine or neutral protamine Hagedorn (NPH) insulin to existing oral antidiabetic drug (OAD) regimens in adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus.. Pooled analysis of data from five randomized controlled trials with similar designs.. Three hundred forty-two centers in more than 30 countries worldwide.. Randomly selected individuals aged ≤ 80 with a body mass index ≤ 40 kg/m(2) and a glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) level of 7.5% to 12.0%.. Fixed- and random-effects models were used to compare outcomes after 24 or 28 weeks of treatment (insulin glargine, n = 1,441; NPH insulin, n = 1,254) according to age (≥65, n = 604 vs < 65, n = 2,091) and age based on treatment (e.g., ≥65 receiving insulin glargine vs NPH insulin). Outcomes included change in HbA1c, fasting blood glucose (FBG), insulin dose, and hypoglycemia incidence and event rates.. At end point, participants aged 65 and older receiving insulin glargine had greater reductions in HbA1c and FBG than those receiving similar doses of NPH insulin. In contrast, for participants younger than 65, there were no statistically significant differences in reductions in HbA1c or FBG between insulin glargine and NPH insulin. Daytime hypoglycemia rates were similar in all groups, although the rates of nocturnal symptomatic and severe hypoglycemia were lower with insulin glargine than NPH insulin.. Addition of insulin glargine to oral antidiabetic drugs in older adults with poor glycemic control may have modestly better glycemic benefits than adding NPH insulin, with low risk of hypoglycemia.

Topics: Adult; Age Distribution; Age Factors; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Blood Glucose; Body Mass Index; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Global Health; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Incidence; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Isophane; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Middle Aged; Prospective Studies; Treatment Outcome

We recently reported that after 26 weeks, exenatide once weekly (EQW) resulted in superior A1C reduction, reduced hypoglycemia, and progressive weight loss compared with daily insulin glargine (IG) in patients with type 2 diabetes who were taking metformin alone or with sulfonylurea. This 84-week extension study assessed the long-term safety and efficacy of EQW versus IG.. This multicenter, open-label, randomized, two-arm, parallel trial assessed change in A1C, proportions of patients achieving A1C <7.0 and ≤6.5%, body weight, incidence of hypoglycemia, and overall safety.. Of 415 patients who completed 26 weeks, 390 (194 EQW and 196 IG patients) entered the extension study. At 84 weeks, A1C decreased from baseline (8.3%) by -1.2% for EQW vs. -1.0% for IG (P = 0.029). The proportions of patients who achieved end point A1C targets <7.0 and ≤6.5% were 44.6% for EQW patients vs. 36.8% for IG patients (P = 0.084) and 31.3% for EQW patients vs. 20.2% for IG patients (P = 0.009), respectively. Patients taking EQW lost 2.1 kg of body weight, whereas those taking IG gained 2.4 kg (P < 0.001). Among patients taking metformin plus sulfonylurea, the incidence of minor hypoglycemia was 24% for EQW patients vs. 54% for IG patients (P < 0.001); among patients taking metformin alone, it was 8% for EQW patients vs. 32% for IG patients (P < 0.001). Among adverse events occurring in ≥5% of patients, diarrhea and nausea occurred more frequently (P < 0.05) in the EQW group than in the IG group (12 vs. 6% and 15 vs. 1%, respectively).. After 84 weeks, patients treated with EQW continued to experience better glycemic control with sustained overall weight loss and a lower risk of hypoglycemia than patients treated with IG.

Topics: Algorithms; Blood Glucose; Cardiovascular Physiological Phenomena; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Dosage Calculations; Exenatide; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Peptides; Time Factors; Titrimetry; Treatment Outcome; Venoms

Microcirculatory and endothelial dysfunction are signs of cardiovascular engagement in patients with type 2 diabetes. This study tested whether glucose normalisation may reverse this.. Thirty-nine T2DM patients (age 61±7 years, 58% females) with signs of mild diastolic dysfunction were randomised to strict glucose control based on insulin (I-group; n=21) or oral agents (O-group; n=18) for four months. Skin microcirculation was studied with laser Doppler fluxmetry and endothelial function with brachial artery flow-mediated dilatation.. Glucose control improved (reduction of HbA(1c) I-group = -0.5%; O-group -0.7%; p=0.69). Microcirculation improved in the entire group (n=39) determined by foot laser Doppler fluxmetry (32.2±13.6 vs. 35.3±13.1 perfusion units; p<0.001) and laser Doppler fluxmetry following heating (68.8±34.0 vs. 69.3±25.1 PU; p=0.007). Improvement was more consistent with oral agents than insulin. Endothelial function expressed as flow-mediated dilatation decreased in the I-group (6.0±2.2 to 4.7±3.0%; p=0.037) but remained unchanged in the O-group (4.8±2.3 to 5.0±3.7%; n.s.).. Glycaemic normalisation improved skin microcirculation but not endothelial function in patients with type 2 diabetes with mild cardiovascular engagement.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Biomarkers; Blood Glucose; Brachial Artery; Carbamates; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Diabetic Angiopathies; Diastole; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Aspart; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Laser-Doppler Flowmetry; Male; Metformin; Microcirculation; Middle Aged; Piperidines; Prospective Studies; Regional Blood Flow; Skin; Sweden; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Vasodilation; Ventricular Dysfunction; Ventricular Function

To evaluate whether fasting plasma glucose values measured early during insulin therapy can identify patients with Type 2 diabetes who may not achieve adequate glycaemic control after 6 months and will require additional treatment.. Patient-level data from seven prospective, randomized, controlled studies using treat-to-target methods were pooled to evaluate the efficacy of insulin glargine. Fasting plasma glucose was measured at baseline, week 6 or 8 (6/8) and week 12. HbA(1c) was measured at week 24 to assess glycaemic control.. One thousand and thirty-six patients (56% male, 81% white) were included in the analysis (mean age 56.3 years; duration of diabetes 8.4 years). Baseline mean fasting plasma glucose was 11.2 mmol/l and mean HbA(1c) was 73 mmol/mol (8.8%). After 24 weeks of treatment, mean HbA(1c) decreased to 53 mmol/mol (7.0%); 56% of patients reached a target HbA(1c) ≤ 53 mmol/mol (7.0%). Significant correlations with week 24 HbA(1c) were obtained for fasting plasma glucose measured at week 6/8 and week 12 (r = 0.32; P < 0.0001 for both). Patients with fasting plasma glucose > 10 mmol/l at week 6/8 or week 12 were significantly less likely to achieve the HbA(1c) target at the end of treatment than patients with fasting plasma glucose < 8.9 mmol/l (P < 0.0001 for both). If fasting plasma glucose was > 10 mmol/l at week 6/8 or week 12, patients had only a 27% chance of reaching the HbA(1c) goal.. Fasting plasma glucose remaining > 10 mmol/l after 6-12 weeks of glargine therapy indicates that reaching target HbA(1c) ≤ 53 mmol/mol (7.0%) is unlikely and calls for individualized attention to consider further therapeutic options.

Topics: Blood Glucose; Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Fasting; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Metformin; Middle Aged; Prognosis; Prospective Studies; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

To determine variables associated with glycemic and body weight responses when adding exenatide to basal insulin-treated type 2 diabetes.. Exploratory subgroup analyses based on baseline A1C, disease duration, and BMI of a 30-week study comparing exenatide twice daily to placebo, added to optimized insulin glargine (intent-to-treat analysis: 137 exenatide; 122 placebo).. Exenatide participants had greater A1C reductions compared with optimized insulin glargine alone, irrespective of baseline A1C (P < 0.001). Exenatide participants with longer diabetes duration and those with lower BMI had greater A1C reductions (P < 0.01). Exenatide participants lost more weight, regardless of baseline A1C or BMI (P < 0.05). Exenatide participants with longer diabetes duration lost the most weight (P < 0.001).. Exenatide added to optimized basal insulin was associated with improved glycemic control and weight loss, irrespective of baseline A1C, diabetes duration, and BMI. Changes were evident in modestly obese patients and in those with longer diabetes duration.

Topics: Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Exenatide; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Peptides; Venoms; Weight Loss

To evaluate the efficacy, safety and treatment satisfaction of insulin glargine plus oral antidiabetic drugs (OADs) in Chinese individuals with Type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled with premixed insulin plus OADs.. In this open-label, single-arm, 16-week, phase IV study, 313 subjects with Type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled with premixed insulin plus OADs were switched to insulin glargine plus OADs. Changes in glycaemic control, incidence of hypoglycaemia and treatment satisfaction using the Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (DTSQ) were evaluated.. Switching to insulin glargine was associated with significant reductions in levels of glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA(1c); 8.4 ± 0.6 to 7.9 ± 1.0%; p < 0.001) and fasting plasma glucose (FPG; 9.50 ± 2.10 to 6.58 ± 2.07 mmol/L; p < 0.001). A total of 32.9% of subjects experienced hypoglycaemia, including two cases of severe hypoglycaemia. Treatment satisfaction was improved with insulin glargine (DTSQ 8-item scores, all p < 0.001). Logistic regression analysis showed a significant association between baseline HbA(1c), disease duration, endpoint FPG and HbA(1c) < 7%.. This single-arm study suggested that switching to insulin glargine plus OADs significantly improved glycaemic control, with a low incidence of hypoglycaemia, in patients with Type 2 diabetes uncontrolled on premixed insulin plus OADs. Switching to insulin glargine was also associated with better patient treatment satisfaction compared with previous treatment. The main limitations to this study are the open-label design and the lack of a control arm.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Asian People; Blood Glucose; China; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Substitution; Fasting; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Middle Aged; Prospective Studies

Chronic diabetic complications result from an imbalance between vascular damage and regeneration. Several circulating lineage-committed progenitor cells have been implicated, but no data are available on pericyte progenitor cells (PPCs). Based on the evidence that PPCs increase in cancer patients after chemotherapy, we explored whether circulating PPC levels are affected by glucose control in type 2 diabetic patients, in relation to the presence of chronic complications. We enumerated peripheral blood PPCs as Syto16+CD45-CD31-CD140b+ events by flow cytometry at baseline and after 3 and 6 months of glucose control by means of add-on basal insulin therapy on top of oral agents in 38 poorly controlled type 2 diabetic patients. We found that, in patients with microangiopathy (n = 23), the level of circulating PPCs increased about 2 fold after 3 months and then returned to baseline at 6 months. In patients without microangiopathy (control group, n = 15), PPCs remained fairly stable during the whole study period. No relationship was found between change in PPCs and macroangiopathy (either peripheral, coronary, or cerebrovascular). We conclude that glucose control transiently mobilizes PPCs diabetic patients with microangiopathy. Increase in PPCs may represent a vasoregenerative event or may be a consequence of ameliorated glucose control on microvascular lesions.

Topics: Aged; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Diabetic Angiopathies; Flow Cytometry; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Detemir; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Middle Aged; Pericytes; Stem Cells; Treatment Outcome

Basal insulin therapy does not stop loss of β-cell function, which is the hallmark of type 2 diabetes mellitus, and thus diabetes control inevitably deteriorates. Insulin degludec is a new, ultra-longacting basal insulin. We aimed to assess efficacy and safety of insulin degludec compared with insulin glargine in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.. In this 52 week, phase 3, open-label, treat-to-target, non-inferiority trial, undertaken at 123 sites in 12 countries, we enrolled adults (aged ≥18 years) with type 2 diabetes mellitus and a glycated haemoglobin (HbA(1c)) of 7·0-10·0% after 3 months or more of any insulin regimen (with or without oral antidiabetic drugs). We randomly allocated eligible participants in a 3:1 ratio to receive once-daily subcutaneous insulin degludec or glargine, stratified by previous insulin regimen, via a central interactive response system. Basal insulin was titrated to a target plasma glucose concentration of 3·9-<5·0 mmol/L self-measured before breakfast. The primary outcome was non-inferiority of degludec to glargine measured by change in HbA(1c) from baseline to week 52 (non-inferiority limit of 0·4%) by ANOVA in the full analysis set. We assessed rates of hypoglycaemia in all treated patients. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00972283.. 744 (99%) of 755 participants randomly allocated degludec and 248 (99%) of 251 allocated glargine were included in the full analysis set (mean age 58·9 years [SD 9·3], diabetes duration 13·5 years [7·3], HbA(1c) 8·3% [0·8], and fasting plasma glucose 9·2 mmol/L [3·1]); 618 (82%) and 211 (84%) participants completed the trial. After 1 year, HbA(1c) decreased by 1·1% in the degludec group and 1·2% in the glargine group (estimated treatment difference [degludec-glargine] 0·08%, 95% CI -0·05 to 0·21), confirming non-inferiority. Rates of overall confirmed hypoglycaemia (plasma glucose <3·1 mmol/L or severe episodes requiring assistance) were lower with degludec than glargine (11·1 vs 13·6 episodes per patient-year of exposure; estimated rate ratio 0·82, 95% CI 0·69 to 0·99; p=0·0359), as were rates of nocturnal confirmed hypoglycaemia (1·4 vs 1·8 episodes per patient-year of exposure; 0·75, 0·58 to 0·99; p=0·0399). Rates of severe hypoglycaemia seemed similar (0·06 vs 0·05 episodes per patient-year of exposure for degludec and glargine) but were too low for assessment of differences. Rates of other adverse events did not differ between groups.. A policy of suboptimum diabetes control to reduce the risk of hypoglycaemia and its consequences in advanced type 2 diabetes mellitus might be unwarranted with newer basal insulins such as degludec, which are associated with lower risks of hypoglycaemia than insulin glargine.. Novo Nordisk.

Topics: Aged; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Insulin Aspart; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Middle Aged

The aim of this study was to report outcomes using detemir and a protocol aimed at intensive blood glucose control with home monitoring in diabetic cats, and to compare the results with a previous study using the same protocol with glargine. Eighteen cats diagnosed with diabetes and previously treated with other insulins were included in the study. Data was provided by owners who joined the online German Diabetes-Katzen Forum. The overall remission rate was 67%. For cats that began the protocol before or after 6 months of diagnosis, remission rates were 81% and 42%, respectively (P = 0.14). No significant differences were identified between the outcomes for the glargine and detemir studies, with the exception of three possibly interrelated factors: a slightly older median age of the detemir cohort at diabetes diagnosis, a higher rate of chronic renal disease in the detemir cohort and lower maximal dose for insulin detemir.

Topics: Animals; Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring; Cat Diseases; Cats; Cohort Studies; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Female; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Detemir; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Treatment Outcome

To test the hypothesis that initiation and intensification with 25% insulin lispro, 75% insulin lispro protamine suspension (LM25), is non-inferior to initiation and intensification with glargine + insulin lispro therapy on change from baseline in HbA(1c).. In this randomized, non-inferiority (margin of 0.4%), parallel, prospective, multi-country, 48-week, open-label study, patients (n = 426) with Type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled with oral anti-hyperglycaemic medications were assigned to either initiating therapy with one daily LM25 injection, progressing up to three daily injections (full analysis set n = 211; per protocol set n = 177) or initiating therapy with one daily glargine injection and progressing up to three daily insulin lispro injections (full analysis set n = 212; per protocol set n = 184).. LM25 therapy was found to be non-inferior to glargine + insulin lispro therapy by study end (upper limit of 95% CI < 0.4), with a least-squares mean difference (95% CI) in HbA(1c) (LM25 minus glargine + insulin lispro) of -0.4 mmol/mol (95% CI -2.7 to 1.9); -0.04% (95% CI -0.25 to 0.17). No statistically significant differences between treatment groups were found in the percentage of patients achieving HbA(1c) targets or postprandial blood glucose levels. The increase in insulin dose, number of injections and weight change during the course of the study were similar in both groups. Patients in both groups experienced similar hypoglycaemia rates and safety profile.. For patients with Type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled with oral anti-hyperglycaemic medications, glycaemic control when initiating and intensifying with LM25 therapy was found to be non-inferior to treatment with glargine + insulin lispro therapy.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Injections, Subcutaneous; Insulin Glargine; Insulin Lispro; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Middle Aged; Outcome Assessment, Health Care; Prospective Studies; Quality of Life; Treatment Outcome

In people with type 2 diabetes, a dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitor is one choice as second-line treatment after metformin, with basal insulin recommended as an alternative. We aimed to compare the efficacy, tolerability, and safety of insulin glargine and sitagliptin, a DPP-4 inhibitor, in patients whose disease was uncontrolled with metformin.. In this comparative, parallel, randomised, open-label trial, metformin-treated people aged 35-70 years with glycated haemoglobin A(1c) (HbA(1c)) of 7-11%, diagnosis of type 2 diabetes for at least 6 months, and body-mass index of 25-45 kg/m(2) were recruited from 17 countries. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to 24-week treatment with insulin glargine (titrated from an initial subcutaneous dose of 0·2 units per kg bodyweight to attain fasting plasma glucose of 4·0-5·5 mmol/L) or sitagliptin (oral dose of 100 mg daily). Randomisation (via a central interactive voice response system) was by random sequence generation and was stratified by centre. Patients and investigators were not masked to treatment assignment. The primary outcome was change in HbA(1c) from baseline to study end. Efficacy analysis included all randomly assigned participants who had received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one on-treatment assessment of any primary or secondary efficacy variable. This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT00751114.. 732 people were screened and 515 were randomly assigned to insulin glargine (n=250) or sitagliptin (n=265). At study end, adjusted mean reduction in HbA(1c) was greater for patients on insulin glargine (n=227; -1·72%, SE 0·06) than for those on sitagliptin (n=253; -1·13%, SE 0·06) with a mean difference of -0·59% (95% CI -0·77 to -0·42, p<0·0001). The estimated rate of all symptomatic hypoglycaemic episodes was greater with insulin glargine than with sitagliptin (4·21 [SE 0·54] vs 0·50 [SE 0·09] events per patient-year; p<0·0001). Severe hypoglycaemia occurred in only three (1%) patients on insulin glargine and one (<1%) on sitagliptin. 15 (6%) of patients on insulin glargine versus eight (3%) on sitagliptin had at least one serious treatment-emergent adverse event.. Our results support the option of addition of basal insulin in patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled by metformin. Long-term benefits might be expected from the achievement of optimum glycaemic control early in the course of the disease.. Sanofi.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Metformin; Middle Aged; Pyrazines; Sitagliptin Phosphate; Treatment Outcome; Triazoles

Transition of diabetic patients from iv insulin infusion to s.c. insulin frequently results in rebound hyperglycemia.. We hypothesized that initiation of a long-acting insulin therapy concurrently with i.v. insulin infusion would decrease the rate of rebound hyperglycemia after discontinuation of the insulin infusion.. Sixty-one diabetic patients receiving i.v. insulin therapy participated in this prospective randomized study. Subjects in the intervention group received daily injections of glargine s.c. (0.25 U/kg body weight) starting within 12 h of initiation of i.v. insulin infusion. Capillary blood glucose measurements were obtained up to 12 h after discontinuation of insulin infusion. Rebound hyperglycemia was defined as a blood glucose level greater than 180 mg/dl.. The study was conducted at the University of Colorado Hospital.. Sixty-one hospitalized patients with known type 1 or type 2 diabetes receiving i.v. insulin infusion participated in the study.. The primary outcome of this study was to compare the rates of rebound hyperglycemia between the control and the intervention groups after i.v. insulin infusion is discontinued.. Overall, 29 subjects in the control group (93.5%) had at least one glucose value above 180 mg/dl during the 12-h follow-up period. This was significantly greater than the rate of rebound hyperglycemia in the intervention group (10 subjects or 33.3%, P < 0.001). The effect of the intervention was apparent in subjects who presented with diabetic ketoacidosis, after solid organ transplantation, and in patients with other surgical and medical diagnoses. There were three hypoglycemic measurements in two control subjects (68, 62, and 58 mg/dl) and none in the intervention group.. Once-daily s.c. insulin glargine administered during i.v. insulin infusion is a safe method for preventing future rebound hyperglycemia, without increased risk of hypoglycemia.

Topics: Adult; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Female; Humans; Hyperglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Injections, Subcutaneous; Insulin Glargine; Insulin Infusion Systems; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Middle Aged; Prospective Studies; Treatment Outcome

The use of n-3 fatty acids may prevent cardiovascular events in patients with recent myocardial infarction or heart failure. Their effects in patients with (or at risk for) type 2 diabetes mellitus are unknown.. In this double-blind study with a 2-by-2 factorial design, we randomly assigned 12,536 patients who were at high risk for cardiovascular events and had impaired fasting glucose, impaired glucose tolerance, or diabetes to receive a 1-g capsule containing at least 900 mg (90% or more) of ethyl esters of n-3 fatty acids or placebo daily and to receive either insulin glargine or standard care. The primary outcome was death from cardiovascular causes. The results of the comparison between n-3 fatty acids and placebo are reported here.. During a median follow up of 6.2 years, the incidence of the primary outcome was not significantly decreased among patients receiving n-3 fatty acids, as compared with those receiving placebo (574 patients [9.1%] vs. 581 patients [9.3%]; hazard ratio, 0.98; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.87 to 1.10; P=0.72). The use of n-3 fatty acids also had no significant effect on the rates of major vascular events (1034 patients [16.5%] vs. 1017 patients [16.3%]; hazard ratio, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.93 to 1.10; P=0.81), death from any cause (951 [15.1%] vs. 964 [15.4%]; hazard ratio, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.89 to 1.07; P=0.63), or death from arrhythmia (288 [4.6%] vs. 259 [4.1%]; hazard ratio, 1.10; 95% CI, 0.93 to 1.30; P=0.26). Triglyceride levels were reduced by 14.5 mg per deciliter (0.16 mmol per liter) more among patients receiving n-3 fatty acids than among those receiving placebo (P<0.001), without a significant effect on other lipids. Adverse effects were similar in the two groups.. Daily supplementation with 1 g of n-3 fatty acids did not reduce the rate of cardiovascular events in patients at high risk for cardiovascular events. (Funded by Sanofi; ORIGIN ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00069784.).

Topics: Aged; Cardiovascular Diseases; Cholesterol; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Combination; Fatty Acids, Omega-3; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Glucose Intolerance; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Incidence; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Intention to Treat Analysis; Male; Middle Aged; Proportional Hazards Models; Treatment Failure; Triglycerides

The provision of sufficient basal insulin to normalize fasting plasma glucose levels may reduce cardiovascular events, but such a possibility has not been formally tested.. We randomly assigned 12,537 people (mean age, 63.5 years) with cardiovascular risk factors plus impaired fasting glucose, impaired glucose tolerance, or type 2 diabetes to receive insulin glargine (with a target fasting blood glucose level of ≤95 mg per deciliter [5.3 mmol per liter]) or standard care and to receive n-3 fatty acids or placebo with the use of a 2-by-2 factorial design. The results of the comparison between insulin glargine and standard care are reported here. The coprimary outcomes were nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke, or death from cardiovascular causes and these events plus revascularization or hospitalization for heart failure. Microvascular outcomes, incident diabetes, hypoglycemia, weight, and cancers were also compared between groups.. The median follow-up was 6.2 years (interquartile range, 5.8 to 6.7). Rates of incident cardiovascular outcomes were similar in the insulin-glargine and standard-care groups: 2.94 and 2.85 per 100 person-years, respectively, for the first coprimary outcome (hazard ratio, 1.02; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.94 to 1.11; P=0.63) and 5.52 and 5.28 per 100 person-years, respectively, for the second coprimary outcome (hazard ratio, 1.04; 95% CI, 0.97 to 1.11; P=0.27). New diabetes was diagnosed approximately 3 months after therapy was stopped among 30% versus 35% of 1456 participants without baseline diabetes (odds ratio, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.64 to 1.00; P=0.05). Rates of severe hypoglycemia were 1.00 versus 0.31 per 100 person-years. Median weight increased by 1.6 kg in the insulin-glargine group and fell by 0.5 kg in the standard-care group. There was no significant difference in cancers (hazard ratio, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.88 to 1.13; P=0.97).. When used to target normal fasting plasma glucose levels for more than 6 years, insulin glargine had a neutral effect on cardiovascular outcomes and cancers. Although it reduced new-onset diabetes, insulin glargine also increased hypoglycemia and modestly increased weight. (Funded by Sanofi; ORIGIN ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00069784.).

Topics: Aged; Blood Glucose; Cardiovascular Diseases; Cholesterol; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Combination; Fasting; Fatty Acids, Omega-3; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Glucose Intolerance; Hospitalization; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Incidence; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Intention to Treat Analysis; Male; Middle Aged; Proportional Hazards Models; Triglycerides

Renal insufficiency may increase the risk of hypoglycemia in hospitalized patients with diabetes who are treated with insulin. We randomized inpatients with type 2 diabetes and chronic renal failure to treatment with two different dose levels of insulin glargine and glulisine and studied control of hyperglycemia and the frequency of hypoglycemia.. We conducted a multicenter, prospective, randomized trial to compare the efficacy of once-daily glargine and three-times daily glulisine at 0.5 vs. 0.25 units/kg/day. A total of 107 subjects had type 2 diabetes for >1 year, had a glomerular filtration rate <45 mL/min but did not require dialysis, and had an initial blood glucose (BG) >180 mg/dL. Doses were adjusted based on four-times daily BG measurements for 6 days.. Mean BG on the first day was 196 ± 71 mg/dL in the group receiving 0.5 units/kg (0.5 group) and 197 ± 55 mg/dL in the group receiving 0.25 units/kg (0.25 group; P = 0.94). On days 2 to 6, mean BG was 174 ± 52 mg/dL in the 0.5 group and 174 ± 46 mg/dL in the 0.25 group (P = 0.96). There were no significant differences between groups in the percentage of BG values within the target range of 100 to 180 mg/dL on any of the 6 study days. In the 0.5 group, 30% experienced hypoglycemia (BG <70 mg/dL) compared with 15.8% of the 0.25 group (P = 0.08).. Reduction of initial glargine/glulisine insulin weight-based dosing in hospitalized patients with diabetes and renal insufficiency reduced the frequency of hypoglycemia by 50% without compromising the control of hyperglycemia.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Female; Hospitalization; Humans; Hyperglycemia; Hypoglycemia; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Middle Aged; Renal Insufficiency; Treatment Outcome

Information on starting insulin regimens in specific populations with type 2 diabetes (T2D) is limited. This analysis compared efficacy and safety of two starter insulin regimens: insulin lispro mix 25 (LM25) and basal insulin glargine (GL) in patients from Argentina. This post-hoc analysis evaluated 193 insulin-naïve patients who participated in the DURABLE trial 24-week initiation phase. Patients 30-79 years with T2D inadequately controlled (HbA1c > 7.0%) with = 2 oral antihyperglycemic medications (OAMs), were randomized to add LM25 (25% insulin lispro, 75% insulin lispro protamine suspension) twice daily or GL (basal insulin glargine) once daily to pre-study OAMs. Primary efficacy was measured by HbA1c at 24-week endpoint. Secondary measures included: proportion of patients achieving HbA1c = 6.5% and = 7.0%, body weight change, self-monitored blood glucose (BG) values, and hypoglycemia rates. LM25 demonstrated greater HbA1c reduction (- 2.4% ± 0.16 vs. -2.0% ± 0.16, P = 0.002), a higher proportion of patients achieving HbA1c = 7.0% (P = 0.012), and lower BG levels after the morning (P = 0.028) and evening (P = 0.011) meals, and at 3:00AM (P = 0.005) compared with GL. Fasting BG and proportion of patients achieving HbA1c = 6.5% were similar between groups. Both groups increased body weight, although the gain was higher at endpoint with LM25 (6.35 kg vs. 4.23 kg, P < 0.001). No differences in hypoglycemia rates were observed between groups, and no serious adverse events were reported for either group. In this subgroup from Argentina, LM25 demonstrated greater improvement in glucose control with similar risk of hypoglycemia and more weight gain than GL.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Argentina; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine; Insulin Lispro; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Middle Aged; Postprandial Period; Weight Gain

To evaluate whether LY2605541 results in lower fasting blood glucose (FBG) versus insulin glargine (GL).. This 12-week, randomized, open-label, Phase 2 study enrolled patients with type 2 diabetes (hemoglobin A(1c) [A1C] ≤ 10.5%), taking metformin and/or sulfonylurea with GL or NPH insulin once daily. Patients converted to morning insulin administration during lead-in were randomized 2:1 from GL (n = 248) or NPH insulin (n = 39) to LY2605541 (n = 195) or GL (n = 95) once daily in the morning.. At 12 weeks, FBG (mean ± SE) was similar with LY2605541 and GL (118.2 ± 2.0 mg/dL [6.6 ± 0.1 mmol/L] vs. 116.9 ± 2.7 mg/dL [6.5 ± 0.2 mmol/L], P = 0.433) as was A1C (7.0 ± 0.1 vs. 7.2 ± 0.1%, P = 0.279). Intraday blood glucose variability was reduced with LY2605541 (34.4 vs. 39.1 mg/dL [1.9 vs. 2.2 mmol/L], P = 0.031). LY2605541 patients had weight loss (-0.6 ± 0.2 kg, P = 0.007), whereas GL patients gained weight (0.3 ± 0.2 kg, P = 0.662; treatment difference: -0.8 kg, P = 0.001). The incidence and rate of both total hypoglycemia and nocturnal hypoglycemia were comparable between LY2605541 and GL, although, LY2605541 had a 48% reduction in nocturnal hypoglycemia after adjusting for baseline hypoglycemia (P = 0.021). Adverse events were similar across treatments. Alanine aminotransferase and aspartate aminotransferase remained within normal range but were significantly higher with LY2605541 (P ≤ 0.001).. In patients with type 2 diabetes, LY2605541 and GL had comparable glucose control and total hypoglycemia rates, but LY2605541 showed reduced intraday variability, lower nocturnal hypoglycemia, and weight loss relative to GL.

Topics: Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin Lispro; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Polyethylene Glycols

In patients with diabetes, intraday glucose variability might predict health outcomes independently from glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c).. Our objective was to evaluate patient satisfaction (PS), quality of life (QoL), glycemic control, and variability during insulin intensification to HbA1c below 7.0%.. Eighty-two type 1 and 306 insulin-treated type 2 diabetes patients (47% male; age 54±11 yr; HbA1c=7.8±0.7%) participated in this multicenter, randomized, crossover trial at 52 U.S. centers.. Interventions included insulin glargine plus premeal glulisine (n=192) vs. twice-daily premix 75/25 or 70/30 analog insulin (n=196) for 12 wk and crossed to the alternate arm for 12 wk.. Main outcome measures included PS and QoL questionnaires, 3-d continuous glucose monitoring (CGM), and HbA1c every 4-8 wk.. Mean±se HbA1c change was -0.39±0.09% for glargine-glulisine and -0.05±0.09% for premix (P<0.0001). The PS net benefit scale (0-100) improved from 51.1 to 60.5±1.2 for glargine-glulisine and worsened to 45.4±1.2 for premix (P<0.0001). The PS regimen acceptance scale was comparable (P=0.33). Overall QoL favored glargine-glulisine (P<0.001), as did perceived health (P<0.0001), symptom distress (P<0.0001), general health perceptions (P<0.01), and psychosocial (P<0.02). CGM daily glucose mean, daily glucose sd (glycemic variability), and percent time over 140 mg/dl were lower for glargine-glulisine by 13.1±2.7 mg/dl, 5.9±1.4 mg/dl, and 7.3±1.6%, respectively (all P<0.0001), with no difference in CGM percent time below 70 mg/dl (P=0.09). Symptomatic hypoglycemia rates were comparable. HbA1c, mean CGM daily glucose, and glycemic variability were independent predictors of PS net benefit.. Patient satisfaction was impacted more positively by improved QoL, reduced glucose variability, and better glycemic control with a basal-bolus regimen than negatively by the burden of additional injections, thereby facilitating insulin intensification and the ability to achieve HbA1c below 7.0%.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Blood Glucose; Body Weight; Cross-Over Studies; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Middle Aged; Patient Satisfaction; Quality of Life; Surveys and Questionnaires

Pragmatic methods for dose optimization are required for the successful basal management in daily clinical practice. To derive a useful formula for calculating recommended glargine doses, we analyzed data from the Add-on Lantus® to Oral Hypoglycemic Agents (ALOHA) study, a 24-week observation of Japanese type 2 diabetes patients.. The patients who initiated insulin glargine in basal-supported oral therapy (BOT) regimen (n = 3506) were analyzed. The correlations between average changes in glargine dose and HbA1c were calculated, and its regression formula was estimated from grouped data categorized by baseline HbA1c levels. Starting doses of the background-subgroup achieving the HbA1c target with a last-observed dose above the average were compared to an assumed optimal starting dose of 0.15 U/kg/day. The difference in regression lines between background-subgroups was examined. A formula for determining the optimal starting and titration doses was thereby derived. The correlation coefficient between changes in dose and HbA1c was -0.9043. The estimated regression line formula was -0.964 × change in HbA1c+2.000. A starting dose of 0.15 U/kg/day was applicable to all background-subgroups except for patients with retinopathy (0.120 U/kg/day) and/or with eGFR<60 mL/min/1.73 m(2) (0.114 U/kg/day). Additionally, women (0.135 U/kg/day) and patients with sulfonylureas (0.132 U/kg/day) received a slightly decreased starting dose.. We suggest a simplified and pragmatic dose calculation formula for type 2 diabetes patients starting glargine BOT optimal daily dose at 24 weeks  =  starting dose (0.15×weight) + incremental dose (baseline HbA1c - target HbA1c+2). This formula should be further validated using other samples in a prospective follow-up, especially since several patient groups required lower starting doses.

Topics: Aged; Asian People; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Japan; Male; Middle Aged; Product Surveillance, Postmarketing

Exenatide once weekly (QW) is an extended-release formulation of exenatide, a glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist that reportedly improves glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes.. The goal of this study was to test the hypothesis that exenatide QW is noninferior to insulin glargine, as measured by change in glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA(1c)) from baseline to end point (week 26 [primary end point]) in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes who have inadequate glycemic control with oral antidiabetes drugs.. In this open-label, parallel-group, multicenter, noninferiority registration study, patients were randomized (1:1) to add exenatide QW (2 mg) or once-daily insulin glargine (starting dose, 4 U) to their current oral antidiabetes drug treatment. The primary analysis was change in HbA(1c) from baseline to end point, evaluated by using a last-observation-carried-forward ANCOVA model, with a predefined noninferiority margin of 0.4%. Secondary analyses (a priori) included analysis of superiority for between-group comparisons of change in weight and the proportion of patients reaching HbA(1c) target levels of ≤7.0% or ≤6.5%.. The baseline characteristics of the exenatide QW (215 patients) and insulin glargine (212 patients) treatment groups were similar: mean (SD) age, 57 (10) years and 56 (11) years, respectively; 66.0% and 69.8% male; mean HbA(1c), 8.5% (0.82%) and 8.5% (0.79%); and mean weight, 69.9 (13.2) kg and 71.0 (13.9) kg. Exenatide QW was statistically noninferior to insulin glargine for the change in HbA(1c) from baseline to end point (least squares mean difference, -0.43% [95% CI, -0.59 to -0.26]; P < 0.001), with the 95% CI upper limit less than the predefined noninferiority margin (0.4%). A significantly greater proportion of patients receiving exenatide QW compared with insulin glargine achieved HbA(1c) target levels of ≤7.0% (89 of 211 [42.2%] vs 44 of 210 [21.0%]) or ≤6.5% (44 of 214 [20.6%] vs 9 of 212 [4.2%]) at end point (P < 0.001 for both). Patient weight was reduced with exenatide QW compared with insulin glargine at end point (least squares mean difference, -2.01 kg [95% CI, -2.46 to -1.56]; P < 0.001). Exenatide QW was well tolerated, with a lower risk of hypoglycemia compared with insulin glargine but a higher incidence of injection-site induration.. Exenatide QW was statistically noninferior to insulin glargine for the change in HbA(1c) from baseline to end point; these results suggest that exenatide QW may provide an effective alternative treatment for Japanese patients who require additional therapy to control their diabetes. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00935532.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Blood Glucose; Body Weight; Delayed-Action Preparations; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Exenatide; Female; Glucagon-Like Peptide 1; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Japan; Least-Squares Analysis; Male; Middle Aged; Peptides; Venoms

To compare ultra-long-acting insulin degludec with glargine for efficacy and safety in insulin-naive patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled with oral antidiabetic drugs (OADs).. In this 1-year, parallel-group, randomized, open-label, treat-to-target trial, adults with type 2 diabetes with A1C of 7-10% taking OADs were randomized 3:1 to receive once daily degludec or glargine, both with metformin. Insulin was titrated to achieve prebreakfast plasma glucose (PG) of 3.9-4.9 mmol/L. The primary end point was confirmation of noninferiority of degludec to glargine in A1C reduction after 52 weeks in an intent-to-treat analysis.. In all, 1,030 participants (mean age 59 years; baseline A1C 8.2%) were randomized (degludec 773, glargine 257). Reduction in A1C with degludec was similar (noninferior) to that with glargine (1.06 vs. 1.19%), with an estimated treatment difference of degludec to glargine of 0.09% (95% CI -0.04 to 0.22). Overall rates of confirmed hypoglycemia (PG <3.1 mmol/L or severe episodes requiring assistance) were similar, with degludec and glargine at 1.52 versus 1.85 episodes/patient-year of exposure (PYE). There were few episodes of nocturnal confirmed hypoglycemia in the overall population, and these occurred at a lower rate with degludec versus glargine (0.25 vs. 0.39 episodes/PYE; P = 0.038). Similar percentages of patients in both groups achieved A1C levels <7% without hypoglycemia. End-of-trial mean daily insulin doses were 0.59 and 0.60 units/kg for degludec and glargine, respectively. Adverse event rates were similar.. Insulins degludec and glargine administered once daily in combination with OADs provided similar long-term glycemic control in insulin-naive patients with type 2 diabetes, with lower rates of nocturnal hypoglycemia with degludec.

Topics: Aged; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Middle Aged; Treatment Outcome

The metabolic efficacy of adding prandial insulin in a stepwise manner to a straightforward basal-bolus regimen was compared in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), suboptimally controlled by oral antidiabetic drugs (OADs) and once-daily basal insulin.. In this international randomized, parallel-group, non-inferiority study, 811 patients with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes using basal insulin were switched to insulin glargine (GLAR) for 6 months while continuing OADs. Patients with HbA(1c) > 7% and FPG < 120 mg/dL (n=476) were then randomized to either group 1, GLAR+metformin (MET)+3×insulin glulisine (GLU), group 2, GLAR+MET+1-3×GLU, or group 3, GLAR+MET+insulin secretagogue (IS)+1-3×GLU, for 12 months. Objectives were to show the non-inferiority of efficacy of group 2 vs group 1 and vs group 3. Non-inferiority of group 2 vs group 1 was concluded if the upper limit of the 95% confidence interval (CI) for the HbA(1c) difference was ≤ to 0.4%.. The adjusted HbA(1c) difference of group 2 vs 1 for the per-protocol population crossed the non-inferiority margin (0.228, 95% CI: -0.018-0.473). There was significantly less weight gain in group 2 compared with group 1, but adverse events were otherwise similar between the two groups. In patients with HbA(1c) < 8% at baseline, non-inferiority was achieved in group 2 vs group 1.. Although non-inferiority was not achieved, stepwise intensification of GLU added to GLAR showed efficacy close to that of the basal-bolus approach and with significantly less weight gain.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Analysis of Variance; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Female; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Middle Aged

To evaluate three evening insulin glargine dosing strategies for achievement of target (100-179 mg/dL; 5.5 - 9.8 mmol/L) and widened (80-249 mg/dL; 4.4 - 13.7 mmol/L) preoperative fasting blood glucose (FBG) ranges on the day of surgery.. Prospective, randomized, open trial.. Preoperative units at two sites of a suburban hospital system.. 401 adult, ASA physical status 3 and 4 patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes, undergoing elective noncardiac surgery.. Patients were divided into two groups according to absence of daily rapid-acting/short-acting insulin (insulin glargine-only group) or presence of daily rapid-acting/short-acting insulin (insulin glargine plus bolus group). Subjects were then randomized to three evening insulin glargine dosing strategies: (a) take 80% of usual dose, (b) call physician for dose, or (c) refer to dosing table, based on self-reported usual FBG and insulin regimen. In the prehospital setting, patients administered the instructed insulin glargine dose on the evening before surgery.. Venous blood glucose values were recorded in the preoperative holding area on the day of surgery.. No significant differences in target preoperative FBG achievement were detected among strategies in the insulin glargine-only group (n = 174) or the insulin glargine plus bolus group (n = 227). In widened preoperative FBG achievement, no significant difference was noted among strategies in the insulin glargine-only group. In the insulin glargine plus bolus group, fewer subjects following the dosing table had FBG > 249 mg/dL (> 13.7 mmol/L; P = 0.031).. Target preoperative FBG achievement was similar among strategies in both insulin glargine groups. An insulin glargine adjustment strategy based on usual glycemic control may better prevent severe preoperative hyperglycemia in patients receiving basal/bolus regimens.

Topics: Aged; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Elective Surgical Procedures; Female; Humans; Hyperglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Middle Aged; Preoperative Care; Prospective Studies

The aim of this study was to compare coefficient of variation of fasting capillary blood glucose (FBG) between insulin glargine and NPH in T2DM with poorly controlled by oral antidiabetic drugs. The results demonstrated that insulin glargine was more potent in improving glycemic control than NPH with stable FBG.

Topics: Adult; Blood Glucose; Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Homeostasis; Humans; Hyperglycemia; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin Resistance; Insulin-Secreting Cells; Insulin, Isophane; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Middle Aged

Insulin replacement in diabetes often requires prandial intervention to reach hemoglobin A₁(c) (HbA₁(c)) targets.. To test whether twice-daily exenatide injections reduce HbA₁(c) levels more than placebo in people receiving insulin glargine.. Parallel, randomized, placebo-controlled trial, blocked and stratified by HbA₁(c) level at site, performed from October 2008 to January 2010. Participants, investigators, and personnel conducting the study were masked to treatment assignments. (ClinicalTrials.gov registration number: NCT00765817). 59 centers in 5 countries.. Adults with type 2 diabetes and an HbA₁(c) level of 7.1% to 10.5% who were receiving insulin glargine alone or in combination with metformin or pioglitazone (or both agents).. Assignment by a centralized, computer-generated, random-sequence interactive voice-response system to exenatide, 10 µg twice daily, or placebo for 30 weeks.. The primary outcome was change in HbA₁(c) level. Secondary outcomes included the percentage of participants with HbA₁(c) values of 7.0% or less and 6.5% or less, 7-point self-monitored glucose profiles, body weight, waist circumference, insulin dose, hypoglycemia, and adverse events.. 112 of 138 exenatide recipients and 101 of 123 placebo recipients completed the study. The HbA₁(c) level decreased by 1.74% with exenatide and 1.04% with placebo (between-group difference, -0.69% [95% CI, -0.93% to -0.46%]; P < 0.001). Weight decreased by 1.8 kg with exenatide and increased by 1.0 kg with placebo (between-group difference, -2.7 kg [CI, -3.7 to -1.7]). Average increases in insulin dosage with exenatide and placebo were 13 U/d and 20 U/d. The estimated rate of minor hypoglycemia was similar between groups. Thirteen exenatide recipients and 1 placebo recipient discontinued the study because of adverse events (P < 0.010); rates of nausea (41% vs. 8%), diarrhea (18% vs. 8%), vomiting (18% vs. 4%), headache (14% vs. 4%), and constipation (10% vs. 2%) were higher with exenatide than with placebo.. The study was of short duration. There were slight imbalances between groups at baseline in terms of sex, use of concomitant glucose-lowering medications, and HbA₁(c) levels, and more exenatide recipients than placebo recipients withdrew because of adverse events.. Adding twice-daily exenatide injections improved glycemic control without increased hypoglycemia or weight gain in participants with uncontrolled type 2 diabetes who were receiving insulin glargine treatment. Adverse events of exenatide included nausea, diarrhea, vomiting, headache, and constipation.. Alliance of Eli Lilly and Company and Amylin Pharmaceuticals.

Topics: Aged; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Double-Blind Method; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Therapy, Combination; Exenatide; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Injections, Subcutaneous; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Metformin; Middle Aged; Peptides; Pioglitazone; Sensitivity and Specificity; Thiazolidinediones; Venoms

We compared basal regimens of glargine or NPH among insulin-naïve, U.S. inner city, ethnic minority type 2 diabetic patients who were sub-optimally controlled on maximally tolerated doses of combination oral agents.. Eighty-five subjects were randomized to 26 weeks of open-label, add-on therapy using single doses of bedtime NPH, bedtime glargine, or morning glargine; initially through an 8-week dose titration phase, followed by a 16-week maintenance phase during which insulin doses were adjusted only to avoid symptomatic hypoglycemia.. All three groups were comparable at baseline (mean HbA(1c) 9.3 ± 1.4%), and improved their HbA(1c) (to 7.8 ± 1.3%), fasting, and pre-supper glucose readings, with no significant between-group differences. Weight gain was greater with either glargine regimen (+3.1 ± 4.1 kg and +1.7 ± 4.2 kg) compared to NPH (-0.2 ± 3.9 kg), despite comparable total insulin doses. Pre-supper hypoglycemia occurred more frequently with morning glargine, but nocturnal hypoglycemia and improvements in treatment satisfaction did not differ among groups.. Among inner city ethnic minority type 2 diabetic patients in the U.S., we found no differences in basal glycemic control or nocturnal hypoglycemia between glargine and NPH, although glargine precipitated greater weight gain.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Blood Glucose; Circadian Rhythm; Cities; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Ethnicity; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Isophane; Insulin, Long-Acting; Maximum Tolerated Dose; Middle Aged; Minority Groups; Treatment Outcome; Weight Gain; Young Adult

the AT-LANTUS Study demonstrated that a simple subject-administered titration algorithm significantly improved glycemic control with a low incidence of severe hypoglycemia compared with a physician-managed titration. However, in the AT-LANTUS Study Asian patients were under-represented, and more than 70% of the patients were already treated with insulin. The Asian Treat to Target Lantus Study (ATLAS) will compare the effectiveness of a patient- versus physician-led initiation of insulin glargine-based basal management in the specific setting of Asia and Russia (as is routinely used in Western countries). This report presents the study design of ATLAS.. subjects are 40-75 years old (body mass index ≥ 20 and ≤ 40 kg/m(2)) with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) of >2 years in duration, suboptimally controlled (hemoglobin A1c [HbA1c] ≥ 7.0% and ≤ 11%) with stable doses of two oral antidiabetes drugs (OADs) (sulfonylureas, biguanides, α-glucosidase inhibitors, dipeptidyl peptidase-IV inhibitors, and glinides) for more than 3 months, and not using insulin. The subjects will be randomized to either the patient-led or the physician-led titration arm, where the insulin dose will be adjusted to achieve a target fasting plasma glucose (FPG) value of 110 mg/dL (6.1 mmol/L).. the primary outcome will be change in mean HbA1c at 6 months from baseline. The analysis plan prespecifies a hierarchical testing procedure for the primary outcome. If noninferiority is achieved using a 0.3% HbA1c boundary, we will go on to undertake a test for superiority. Secondary outcomes will also include number of patients reaching American Diabetes Association target HbA1c with or without hypoglycemia and analysis of FPG profiles in the two groups.. ATLAS will provide information on the relative safety and efficacy of a patient- versus physician-led titration strategy for insulin glargine-based basal insulin initiation in patients who are not controlled with two OADs in Asia and Russia. The results of the study may guide policymakers to translate data into clinical practice.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Algorithms; Asia; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Middle Aged; Patient Satisfaction; Physicians; Prospective Studies; Quality of Life; Russia; Surveys and Questionnaires

The optimal treatment of hyperglycemia in general surgical patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus is not known.. This randomized multicenter trial compared the safety and efficacy of a basal-bolus insulin regimen with glargine once daily and glulisine before meals (n = 104) to sliding scale regular insulin (SSI) four times daily (n = 107) in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus undergoing general surgery. Outcomes included differences in daily blood glucose (BG) and a composite of postoperative complications including wound infection, pneumonia, bacteremia, and respiratory and acute renal failure.. The mean daily glucose concentration after the 1st day of basal-bolus insulin and SSI was 145 ± 32 mg/dL and 172 ± 47 mg/dL, respectively (P < 0.01). Glucose readings <140 mg/dL were recorded in 55% of patients in basal-bolus and 31% in the SSI group (P < 0.001). There were reductions with basal-bolus as compared with SSI in the composite outcome [24.3 and 8.6%; odds ratio 3.39 (95% CI 1.50-7.65); P = 0.003]. Glucose <70 mg/dL was reported in 23.1% of patients in the basal-bolus group and 4.7% in the SSI group (P < 0.001), but there were no significant differences in the frequency of BG <40 mg/dL between groups (P = 0.057).. Basal-bolus treatment with glargine once daily plus glulisine before meals improved glycemic control and reduced hospital complications compared with SSI in general surgery patients. Our study indicates that a basal-bolus insulin regimen is preferred over SSI in the hospital management of general surgery patients with type 2 diabetes.

Topics: Aged; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Female; General Surgery; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Inpatients; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Middle Aged; Perioperative Care; Postoperative Complications; Prospective Studies

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of two insulin treatment protocols using a continuous glucose monitoring system.. Type 2 diabetic patients mellitus with unsatisfactory control of fasting blood glucose by oral antidiabetic drugs were included in the study. The patients were randomized into two groups to receive bedtime injection of glargine and oral antidiabetic drugs (group A) or injection of Novolin 30 R twice a day (group B) for 12 weeks. The insuline dose was adjusted according to fasting blood glucose till discharge. Continuous glucose monitoring system was used to record the average blood glucose, fasting blood glucose, 2 h postprandial blood glucose, AUCPG ≥ 10.0 mmol/L%, HbA1c and C peptide, bedtime blood glucose, 3:00 AM blood glucose, the incidence of hypoglycemia and body mass index.. The average blood glucose, fasting blood glucose, 2 h postprandial blood glucose, AUCPG ≥ 10.0 mmol/L% and HbA1c was significantly decreased and C peptide significantly increased in the two groups after the treatments. The patients in glargine group showed better improvement with a significantly lower incidence of hypoglycemia than those in Novolin 30 R group. BMI underwent no significant changes in the two groups after the treatments.. Glargine therapy better mimics the physiological insulin secretion patterns, and when combined with oral antidiabetic drugs, can be more effective and safer than premixed insulin.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Blood Glucose; Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring; Computer Systems; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Middle Aged; Monitoring, Ambulatory

This study compared the durability of glycemic control of twice-daily insulin lispro mix 75/25 (LM75/25: 75% insulin lispro protamine suspension/25% lispro) and once-daily insulin glargine, added to oral antihyperglycemic drugs in type 2 diabetes patients.. During the initiation phase, patients were randomized to LM75/25 or glargine. After 6 months, patients with A1C ≤ 7.0% advanced to the maintenance phase for ≤ 24 months. The primary objective was the between-group comparison of duration of maintaining the A1C goal.. Of 900 patients receiving LM75/25 and 918 patients receiving glargine who completed initiation, 473 and 419, respectively, had A1C ≤ 7.0% and continued into maintenance. Baseline characteristics except age were similar in this group. Median time of maintaining the A1C goal was 16.8 months for LM75/25 (95% CI 14.0-19.7) and 14.4 months for glargine (95% CI 13.4-16.8; P = 0.040). A1C goal was maintained in 202 LM75/25-treated patients (43%) and in 147 glargine-treated patients (35%; P = 0.006). No differences were observed in overall, nocturnal, or severe hypoglycemia. LM75/25 patients had higher total daily insulin dose (0.45 ± 0.21 vs. 0.37 ± 0.21 units/kg/day) and more weight gain (5.4 ± 5.8 vs. 3.7 ± 5.6 kg) from baseline. Patients taking LM75/25 and glargine with lower baseline A1C levels were more likely to maintain the A1C goal (P = 0.043 and P < 0.001, respectively).. A modestly longer durability of glycemic control was achieved with LM75/25 compared with glargine. Patients with lower baseline A1C levels were more likely to maintain the goal, supporting the concept of earlier insulin initiation.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Glycemic Index; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin Lispro; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Middle Aged; Treatment Outcome; Weight Gain

No study of transition from intravenous to subcutaneous insulin after cardiac surgery with dose based on percentage of intravenous total daily insulin (TDI) has reported a clearly superior regimen for achieving target blood glucose. We compared three first-dose transition strategies for insulin glargine: two based on TDI alone and one that also took body weight into account.. Mostly obese, type 1 and type 2 diabetes patients (n = 223) undergoing cardiac surgery were randomized to receive insulin glargine subcutaneously at 60% or 80% of TDI or in a dose based on TDI and body weight.. Transition to subcutaneous insulin occurred 27.4 ± 6.6 h after surgery. Over the study period, mean proportion of blood glucose values within target range (80-140 mg/dL) were 0.34 ± 0.24, 0.35 ± 0.24, and 0.36 ± 0.22 in the 60% TDI, 80% TDI, and weight-based groups, respectively. This difference was not significant. Significantly more insulin corrections were needed in the 60% TDI group than in the weight-based group. There was only one incidence of hypoglycemia (blood glucose < 40 mg/dL).. No subcutaneous insulin regimen implemented approximately 1 day after cardiac surgery showed significantly better control of blood glucose over the 3-day study period. Further studies are needed to determine optimal formulae for effecting an early transition to subcutaneous insulin after cardiac surgery or whether it is preferable and/or necessary to continue intravenous insulin therapy for an additional period of time.

Topics: Aged; Blood Glucose; Body Mass Index; Cardiovascular Diseases; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Dosage Calculations; Drug Monitoring; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Injections, Subcutaneous; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Middle Aged; Obesity; Postoperative Care

Insulin degludec/insulin aspart (IDegAsp) is a soluble coformulation of the novel basal analog insulin degludec (IDeg: 70%) and insulin aspart (IAsp: 30%). We compared the safety and efficacy of IDegAsp, an alternative formulation (AF) (55% IDeg and 45% IAsp), and insulin glargine (IGlar) in insulin-naïve subjects with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled with oral antidiabetic drugs.. In this 16-week, open-label trial, subjects (mean age 59.1 years, A1C 8.5%, BMI 30.3 kg/m(2)) were randomized to once-daily IDegAsp (n = 59), AF (n = 59), or IGlar (n = 60), all in combination with metformin. Insulin was administered before the evening meal and dose-titrated to a fasting plasma glucose (FPG) target of 4.0-6.0 mmol/L.. After 16 weeks, mean A1C decreased in all groups to comparable levels (IDegAsp: 7.0%; AF: 7.2%; IGlar: 7.1%). A similar proportion of subjects achieved A1C <7.0% without confirmed hypoglycemia in the last 4 weeks of treatment (IDegAsp: 51%; AF: 47%; IGlar: 50%). Mean 2-h postdinner plasma glucose increase was lower for IDegAsp (0.13 mmol/L) and AF (0.24 mmol/L) than IGlar (1.63 mmol/L), whereas mean FPG was similar (IDegAsp: 6.8 mmol/L; AF: 7.4 mmol/L; IGlar: 7.0 mmol/L). Hypoglycemia rates were lower for IDegAsp and IGlar than AF (1.2, 0.7, and 2.4 events/patient year). Nocturnal hypoglycemic events occurred rarely for IDegAsp (1 event) and IGlar (3 events) compared with AF (27 events).. In this proof-of-concept trial, once-daily IDegAsp was safe, well tolerated, and provided comparable overall glycemic control to IGlar at similar low rates of hypoglycemia, but better postdinner plasma glucose control.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Female; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Middle Aged; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult

To test potential differences between the actions of anti-diabetic medications, we examined the effects of oral hypoglycaemic agents versus glargine-apidra insulin therapy in T2DM.. T2DM subjects were randomized to either oral hypoglycaemic agents (pioglitazone, metformin and glipizide, n = 9) or insulin therapy (n = 12) for 6 months. Carotid intimal media thickness, vascular reactivity (flow-mediated vasodilatation; percent change in brachial artery basal diameter post-ischaemia) and sublingual nitrate were measured with ultrasonography. Euglycemic hyperinsulinemic (80 mU/m(2) ) clamp with [3]-3H-glucose and muscle biopsies were performed.. Fasting plasma glucose (~257 to ~124 mg/dL, oral hypoglycaemic agents and ~256 to ~142 mg/dL, IT) and HbA(1c) (~10.3 to ~6.4%, OHA and ~10.7 to ~7.1%, IT) improved comparably. Endogenous glucose production (~2.1 to ~1.7 mg/kg/min, oral hypoglycaemic agents and ~2.3 to ~2.0 mg/kg/min, insulin therapy) and endogenous glucose production suppression by insulin (~0.4 to ~0.3 mg/kg min, oral hypoglycaemic agents and ~0.5 to ~0.7 mg/kg min, insulin therapy) were different. Total glucose disposal × 100 increased in the oral hypoglycaemic agents group (~5.2 to ~8.1; p = 0.03), but not in insulin therapy (~6.0 to ~5.4 mg/kg/min/µU/mL × 100). OHA reduced CIMT (~0.080 to ~0.068 cm; p < 0.05), whereas insulin therapy did not (~0.075 to ~0.072 cm). After sublingual nitrate, brachial artery basal diameter increased in the OHA group (~8.7 to ~18.2%), but not in insulin therapy (~11.2 to ~15.0%; p < 0.02). Except for plasma adiponectin (~7 to ~15, oral hypoglycaemic agents versus ~6 to ~10, IT), changes in inflammatory markers in the circulation and in muscle (IκBα, super-oxidase dismutase 2, monocyte-chemo-attractant protein 1, p-ERK and JNK) were equivalent.. Oral hypoglycaemic agents and insulin therapy treated patients achieved adequate glycemic control and the effects on circulating and muscle inflammatory biomarkers were similar, but only oral hypoglycaemic agents improved insulin sensitivity, vascular function and carotid intimal media thickness. These findings in a small sample suggest that the use of oral hypoglycaemic agents provides additional benefits to patients with T2DM.

Topics: Adult; Body Mass Index; Carotid Arteries; Carotid Artery Diseases; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Diabetic Angiopathies; Drug Combinations; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Inflammation Mediators; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin Resistance; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Metformin; Mexican Americans; Middle Aged; Muscle, Skeletal; Myositis; Pioglitazone; Sulfonylurea Compounds; Thiazolidinediones; Tunica Intima

Basal insulin treatment is frequently used in type 2 diabetes, but the successful control of postprandial glucose is challenging. We compared the effect of preferential postprandial glucose targeting drugs for postprandial glucose control after optimizing fasting glucose with basal insulin.. This study was performed in 58, insulin naïve type 2 diabetes. After fasting glucose was optimized by insulin glargine, nateglinide or acarbose was initiated and then crossed over after second wash out period. 75 g oral glucose tolerance test and 7 point self monitoring blood glucose for 3 days at the end of each period was performed.. Both drugs effectively reduced postprandial glucose levels compared with the insulin glargine monotherapy. No significant differences were found between nateglinide and acarbose in terms of mean glucose level, standard deviation of glucose levels, mean average glucose excursion and average daily risk range. Homeostasis model analysis (HOMA)% β, corrected insulin response and insulin-to-glucose ratio were significantly higher in the responder group compared with the non-responder. There was no episode of severe hypoglycemia.. Nateglinide and acarbose are equally effective in type 2 diabetes for postprandial glucose excursions during basal insulin treatment. The markers of beta cell function might be used for predicting response. (Clinical trial reg. no. NCT 00437918, clinicaltrial.gov.).

Topics: Acarbose; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Blood Glucose; Cyclohexanes; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Fasting; Female; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Middle Aged; Nateglinide; Phenylalanine; Postprandial Period; Treatment Outcome

Insulin degludec is a new basal insulin that forms soluble multihexamer assemblies after subcutaneous injection, resulting in an ultra-long action profile. This study aimed to assess efficacy and safety of insulin degludec injected once a day or three times a week compared with insulin glargine once a day in insulin-naive people with type 2 diabetes, who were inadequately controlled with oral antidiabetic drugs.. In this 16-week, randomised, open-label, parallel-group phase 2 trial, participants aged 18–75 years with type 2 diabetes and glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA(1C)) of 7·0–11·0% were enrolled and treated at 28 clinical sites in Canada, India, South Africa, and the USA. Participants were randomly allocated in a 1:1:1:1 ratio by computer-generated block randomisation to receive insulin degludec either once a day or three times a week or insulin glargine once a day, all in combination with metformin. Investigators were masked to data until database release. The primary outcome was HbA(1C) after 16 weeks of treatment. Analyses were done by intention to treat. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00611884.. Of 367 patients screened, 245 were eligible for inclusion. 62 participants were randomly allocated to receive insulin degludec three times a week (starting dose 20 U per injection [1 U=9 nmol]), 60 to receive insulin degludec once a day (starting dose 10 U [1 U=6 nmol]; group A), 61 to receive insulin degludec once a day (starting dose 10 U [1 U=9 nmol]; group B), and 62 to receive insulin glargine (starting dose 10 U [1 U=6 nmol]) once a day. At study end, mean HbA(1C) levels were much the same across treatment groups, at 7·3% (SD 1·1), 7·4% (1·0), 7·5% (1·1), and 7·2% (0·9), respectively. Estimated mean HbA(1C) treatment differences from insulin degludec by comparison with insulin glargine were 0·08% (95% CI –0·23 to 0·40) for the three dose per week schedule, 0·17% (–0·15 to 0·48) for group A, and 0·28% (–0·04 to 0·59) for group B. Few participants had hypoglycaemia and the number of adverse events was much the same across groups, with no apparent treatment-specific pattern.. Insulin degludec provides comparable glycaemic control to insulin glargine without additional adverse events and might reduce dosing frequency due to its ultra-long action profile.. Novo Nordisk.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Injections, Subcutaneous; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Middle Aged; Young Adult

In diabetes, endothelial damage promotes macroangiopathy and endothelial regeneration is impaired, owing to reduced endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs). Given that insulin influences endothelial biology, we compared the effects of add-on basal insulin analogues on endothelial damage and regeneration in type 2 diabetes (T2D).. This was a 6-month randomized crossover trial comparing add-on insulin detemir versus glargine in poorly controlled T2D with macroangiopathy. At baseline, crossover (3 months) and study end (6 months), we measured HbA1c, EPCs, circulating endothelial cells (CECs), VCAM-1, ICAM-1 and E-selectin. Body weight and hypoglycaemic episodes were also recorded.. Forty-two patients completed the study, randomly assigned to the glargine-detemir (n = 21) or the detemir-glargine (n = 21) schedule. At crossover, EPC levels did not change compared with baseline, but significantly increased at study end. CECs decreased over time and were significantly reduced at study end. ICAM-1, VCAM-1 and E-selectin were significantly reduced at crossover and further decreased at study end. No differences were seen in these effects between detemir and glargine. HbA1c showed a carryover effect and its reduction was similar with detemir and glargine in the first arm. Incidence of hypoglycaemia and weight gain was lower with detemir than with glargine in both arms.. Optimized glycaemic control by add-on basal insulin improved indexes of endothelial damage and regeneration. Compared to glargine, detemir achieved similar endothelial protection with lower weight gain and less hypoglycaemia. These results might have implications for therapy of aging T2D patients with cardiovascular disease.

Topics: Aged; Cross-Over Studies; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Diabetic Angiopathies; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Administration Schedule; Endothelial Cells; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Detemir; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Treatment Outcome

To compare the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of NPH, glargine, and detemir insulins in type 2 diabetic subjects.. This study used a single-blind, three-way, cross-over design. A total of 18 type 2 diabetic subjects underwent a euglycemic clamp for 32 h after a subcutaneous injection of 0.4 units/kg at 2200 h of either NPH, glargine, or detemir after 1 week of bedtime treatment with each insulin.. The glucose infusion rate area under the curve(0-32 h) was greater for glargine than for detemir and NPH (1,538 ± 688; 1,081 ± 785; and 1,170 ± 703 mg/kg, respectively; P < 0.05). Glargine suppressed endogenous glucose production more than detemir (P < 0.05) and similarly to NPH (P = 0.16). Glucagon, C-peptide, free fatty acids, and β-hydroxy-butyrate were more suppressed with glargine than detemir. All 18 subjects completed the glargine study, but two subjects on NPH and three on detemir interrupted the study because of plasma glucose >150 mg/dL.. Compared with NPH and detemir, glargine provided greater metabolic activity and superior glucose control for up to 32 h.

Topics: Blood Glucose; Circadian Rhythm; Cross-Over Studies; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Administration Schedule; Insulin; Insulin Detemir; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Isophane; Insulin, Long-Acting

Stepwise intensification of insulin treatment to match the progressive decline of endogenous insulin secretion has been shown to be an effective management strategy in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). The efficacy of initiating and titrating a single bolus dose of insulin glulisine to baseline insulin glargine plus oral hypoglycaemic agents (OHAs) was investigated.. This was a 6-month, parallel-group, randomized, open-label, Phase IV study conducted in the US, UK and Russia. People with T2DM (HbA(1c) 7.5-9.5%) using any basal insulin underwent a 3-month run-in period on insulin glargine titrated to optimize fasting blood glucose (BG) control. Those with HbA(1c) >7.0% were randomized to either continue prior therapy (n = 57) or to add a single dose of insulin glulisine (n = 49) immediately prior to the main meal for a further 3 months. Two different titration algorithms were employed for the bolus dose, targeting 2-h postprandial BG ≤135 mg/dL (≤7.5 mmol/l; Russia and UK) or pre-meal/bedtime BG 100-120 mg/dl (5.5-6.7 mmol/l; US).. HbA(1c) and fasting plasma glucose levels decreased during the run-in period. In the 3 months after randomization, more participants in the basal-plus-bolus group reached HbA(1c) <7.0% than the basal-only control group (22.4 vs. 8.8%; p < 0.05), with significantly greater reduction of HbA(1c) (-0.37 vs. -0.11%; p = 0.0290). Rates of hypoglycaemia and mean weight change were comparable between the treatment groups.. In people with T2DM inadequately controlled on basal insulin plus OHAs, adding a single injection of insulin glulisine prior to the main meal significantly improves glucose control without undesired side effects.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Algorithms; Biomarkers; Blood Glucose; Body Mass Index; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Administration Schedule; Fasting; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Middle Aged; Postprandial Period; Russia; Treatment Outcome; United Kingdom; United States; Young Adult

Cost can be an important consideration, along with safety and efficacy, in deciding the most appropriate treatment for patients with type 2 diabetes. Both basal-bolus and premixed insulin analogue regimens are widely used in clinical practice; however, limited information is available regarding cost-effectiveness.. The goal of this study was to compare glycemic control, cost-effectiveness, and quality of life effects of insulin glargine plus insulin glulisine (glargine/glulisine) versus premixed insulin analogues in real-world clinical practice.. Adults with type 2 diabetes (glycosylated hemoglobin [HbA(1c)] ≥7.0%) at 3 US endocrinology centers were randomly assigned to receive either glargine/glulisine or premixed insulin analogues and continued treatment following the centers' usual practice. HbA(1c), weight, insulin dose, concomitant oral antidiabetic drug (OAD) usage, and hypoglycemia were evaluated at baseline and 3, 6, and 9 months. Medication costs, including costs for all insulin or OAD regimens, were estimated using published wholesale acquisition costs.. A total of 197 patients were randomized to receive glargine/glulisine therapy (n = 106) or premixed analogue therapy (n = 91). Overall, the mean age was 56 years, the mean duration of diabetes was 13 years, with a mean HbA(1c) of 9.25% and mean BMI of 35.8 kg/m(2) at baseline. Patients randomized to receive glargine/glulisine had a greater mean HbA(1c) reduction from baseline (-2.3%) than patients receiving a premixed analogue regimen (-1.7%). Adjusted mean follow-up HbA(1c) was 6.9% versus 7.5%, respectively (difference, -0.59%; P < 0.01). The glargine/glulisine group also used a lower mean number of OADs (0.86 vs 1.14; difference, -0.28; P = 0.04) but had a higher weight (240 vs 235 lb; difference, 4.55 lb; P = 0.03) than the premixed analogue group at follow-up. There were no significant differences in daily insulin dose and rates of hypoglycemia. Overall medication costs per 1.0% reduction in HbA(1c) were $841 with glargine/glulisine and $1308 with premixed analogues.. Overall, treatment with glargine/glulisine provided greater improvement in glycemic control and may represent a more cost-effective treatment option than premixed regimens for patients with type 2 diabetes in real-world clinical practice. However, due to the pragmatic trial design, the study concluded before follow-up assessments were available for all randomized patients.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Blood Glucose; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Costs; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Middle Aged; Prospective Studies; Quality of Life

Insulin secretion is often diminished in hyperglycemic patients with type 2 diabetes. We examined whether chronic basal insulin treatment with insulin glargine improves glucose-induced insulin secretion.. Fourteen patients with type 2 diabetes on metformin monotherapy received an add-on therapy with insulin glargine over 8 weeks. Intravenous glucose tolerance tests (IVGTTs) were performed before and after the intervention, with and without previous adjustment of fasting glucose levels using a 3-h intravenous insulin infusion.. Fasting glycemia was lowered from 179.6 ± 7.5 to 117.6 ± 6.5 mg/dL (P < 0.001), and HbA(1c) levels declined from 8.4 ± 0.5 to 7.1 ± 0.2% (P = 0.0046). The final insulin dose was 59.3 ± 10.2 IU. Acute normalization of fasting glycemia by intravenous insulin reduced C-peptide levels during the IVGTT (P < 0.0001). In contrast, insulin and C-peptide responses to intravenous glucose administration were significantly greater after the glargine treatment period (P < 0.0001, respectively). Both first- and second-phase insulin secretion increased significantly after the glargine treatment period (P < 0.05, respectively). These improvements in insulin secretion were observed during both the experiments with and without acute adjustment of fasting glycemia.. Chronic supplementation of long-acting basal insulin improves glucose-induced insulin secretion in hyperglycemic patients with type 2 diabetes, whereas acute exogenous insulin administration reduces the β-cell response to glucose administration. These data provide a rationale for basal insulin treatment regiments to improve postprandial endogenous insulin secretion in hyperglycemic patients with type 2 diabetes.

Topics: Aged; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Fasting; Female; Humans; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin Secretion; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Middle Aged

To compare the efficacy and safety of insulin lispro protamine suspension (ILPS) versus insulin glargine once daily in a basal-bolus regimen in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients.. Three hundred eighty-three insulin-treated patients were randomized to either ILPS plus lispro or glargine plus lispro in this open-label 24-week European study. Insulin doses were titrated to predefined blood glucose (BG) targets. Non-inferiority of ILPS versus glargine was assessed by comparing the upper limit of the 95% confidence interval (CI) for the change of HbA1c from baseline to week 24 (adjusted for country and baseline HbA1c) with the non-inferiority margin of 0.4%. Secondary endpoints included HbA1c categories, BG profiles, insulin doses, hypoglycaemic episodes, adverse events and vital signs.. Non-inferiority of ILPS versus glargine in the change of HbA1c from baseline was shown: least-square mean between-treatment difference (95% CI) was 0.1% (-0.11; 0.31). Mean changes at week 24 were -1.05% (ILPS) and -1.20% (glargine). HbA1c <7.0% was achieved by 21.7 versus 29.4% of patients. Mean basal/mealtime insulin doses at week 24 were 29.6/36.2 IU/day (ILPS) versus 32.8/42.2 IU/day (glargine); the difference was not statistically significant for total dose (p = 0.7). In both groups, 56.1/25.7% versus 63.6/19.3% of patients experienced any/nocturnal hypoglycaemia (p = 0.2 for both). No relevant differences were noted in any other variables.. A basal-bolus regimen with ILPS once daily resulted in non-inferior glycaemic control compared to a similar regimen with glargine, without statistically significant or clinically relevant differences in hypoglycaemia. ILPS-based regimens can be considered an alternative to basal-bolus regimens with glargine for T2DM patients.

Topics: Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine; Insulin Lispro; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Middle Aged; Prospective Studies; Treatment Outcome

We previously showed that exenatide (EXE) enhanced insulin secretion after 1 year of treatment, relative to insulin glargine (GLAR), with a similar glucose-lowering action. These effects were not sustained after a 4-week off-drug period. This article reports the results after additional 2 years of exposure.. Sixty-nine metformin-treated patients with type 2 diabetes were randomized to EXE or GLAR. Forty-six patients entered the 2-year extension study in which they continued their allocated therapy. Thirty-six completed (EXE: n = 16; GLAR: n = 20) the 3-year exposure period. Insulin sensitivity (M value) and β-cell function were measured by euglycemic hyperinsulinemic clamp followed by hyperglycemic clamp with arginine stimulation at pretreatment (week 52) and 4 weeks after discontinuation of study medication (week 56 and week 172). First-phase glucose stimulated C-peptide secretion was adjusted for M value and calculated as the disposition index (DI).. At 3 years, EXE and GLAR resulted in similar levels of glycemic control: 6.6 ± 0.2% and 6.9 ± 0.2%, respectively (P = 0.186). EXE compared with GLAR significantly reduced body weight (-7.9 ± 1.8 kg; P < 0.001). After the 4-week off-drug period, EXE increased the M value by 39% (P = 0.006) while GLAR had no effect (P = 0.647). Following the 4-week off-drug period, the DI, compared with pretreatment, increased with EXE, but decreased with GLAR (1.43 ± 0.78 and -0.99 ± 0.65, respectively; P = 0.028).. EXE and GLAR sustained HbA(1c) over the 3-year treatment period, while EXE reduced body weight and GLAR increased body weight. Following the 3-year treatment with EXE, the DI was sustained after a 4-week off-drug period. These findings suggest a beneficial effect on β-cell health.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Blood Glucose; Body Weight; C-Peptide; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Exenatide; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine; Insulin-Secreting Cells; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Metformin; Middle Aged; Peptides; Venoms

To determine the functional health status and treatment satisfaction in patients with type 2 diabetes from the Evaluation of Lantus Effect ON Optimization of use of single dose Rapid insulin (ELEONOR) study that investigated whether a telecare program helps optimization of basal insulin glargine with one bolus injection of insulin glulisine.. Functional health status and treatment satisfaction were investigated using the 36-Item Short-Form (SF-36) Health Survey, the World Health Organization Well-Being Questionnaire (WBQ), and the Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire.. Of 291 randomized patients, 238 completed the study (telecare: 114; self-monitoring blood glucose: 124). Significant improvements were detected in most SF-36 domains, in WBQ depression and anxiety scores, and in treatment satisfaction, without differences between study groups.. An insulin regimen that substantially improves metabolic control, while minimizing the risk of hypoglycemia, can positively affect physical and psychologic well-being and treatment satisfaction irrespective of the educational support system used.

Topics: Blood Glucose; Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Patient Satisfaction; Quality of Life; Telecommunications; Treatment Outcome

To assess the efficacy and safety of MK-0941, a glucokinase activator (GKA), when added to stable-dose insulin glargine in patients with type 2 diabetes.. In this double-blind study, 587 patients taking stable-dose insulin glargine (±metformin ≥1,500 mg/day) were randomized (1:1:1:1:1) to MK-0941 10, 20, 30, or 40 mg or matching placebo t.i.d. before meals (a.c.). This study included an initial 14-week, dose-ranging phase followed by a 40-week treatment phase during which patients were to be uptitrated as tolerated to 40 mg (or placebo) t.i.d. a.c. The primary efficacy end point was change from baseline in A1C at Week 14.. At Week 14, A1C and 2-h postmeal glucose (PMG) improved significantly versus placebo with all MK-0941 doses. Maximal placebo-adjusted least squares mean changes from baseline in A1C (baseline A1C 9.0%) and 2-h PMG were -0.8% and -37 mg/dL (-2 mmol/L), respectively. No significant effects on fasting plasma glucose were observed at any dose versus placebo. By 30 weeks, the initial glycemic responses noted at 14 weeks were not sustained. MK-0941 at one or more doses was associated with significant increases in the incidence of hypoglycemia, triglycerides, systolic blood pressure, and proportion of patients meeting criteria for predefined limits of change for increased diastolic blood pressure.. In patients receiving stable-dose insulin glargine, the GKA MK-0941 led to improvements in glycemic control that were not sustained. MK-0941 was associated with an increased incidence of hypoglycemia and elevations in triglycerides and blood pressure.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Benzamides; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Double-Blind Method; Enzyme Activators; Glucokinase; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Middle Aged; Sulfones

To compare the efficacy and safety of an intensified insulin regimen, using insulin glargine (glargine) once daily and pre-meal insulin glulisine (glulisine) (basal-bolus), with a conventional therapy, using premixed insulin (premix) twice daily.. This 52-week, open-label, randomized, multinational, multicentre trial included 310 subjects with type 2 diabetes (T2D) on premix, with or without metformin, who were randomized to a basal-bolus regimen with glargine and glulisine (n = 153; mean +/- s.d. age 60.2 +/- 7.5 years; HbA1c 8.6 +/- 0.8%; weight 87.0 +/- 15.1 kg; T2D duration 12.8 +/- 5.8 years) or twice-daily premix (n = 157; age 60.9 +/- 7.8 years; HbA1c 8.5 +/- 0.9%; weight 84.3 +/- 15.0 kg; T2D duration 12.5 +/- 6.8 years). The primary endpoint was change in HbA1c from baseline to endpoint.. Mean decrease in baseline-to-endpoint HbA1c for basal-bolus vs. premix was -1.31 vs. -0.80% (difference: -0.476%; 95% Cl: -0.714, -0.238; p = 0.0001, ancova). More subjects reached HbA1c < or = 7.0% in the basal-bolus group than in the premix group [68 (46.6%) vs. 43 (27.9%); p = 0.0004], while they also experienced significantly lower mean +/- s.d. daytime (-2.7 +/- 2.3 vs. -2.3 +/- 2.5 mmol/l; p = 0.0033) and postprandial (-3.1 +/- 2.6 vs. -2.5 +/- 2.8 mmol/l; p < 0.0001) blood glucose. Endpoint daily insulin doses were 98.0 +/- 48.7 vs. 91.3 +/- 44.3 IU (p = 0.2104); mean weight gain was +3.6 +/- 4.0 vs. +2.2 +/- 4.5 kg (p = 0.0073). Mean number of overall hypoglycaemic events with basal-bolus and premix was 13.99 and 18.54 events/patient year, respectively (difference: -3.90; 95% CI: -10.40, 2.60; p = 0.2385).. An intensified basal-bolus regimen using glargine/glulisine results in a significantly superior glycaemic control vs. premix therapy in a population with long-standing insulin-treated T2D, with no increase in the rates of hypoglycaemia.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Analysis of Variance; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hyperglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Middle Aged; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult

This study was designed to compare glycemic control (glycated hemoglobin [A1C] level) with either once-daily basal insulin (BI) (insulin glargine) or preprandial insulin (PPI) (Exubera) [insulin human (recombinant DNA origin)] inhalation powder, Pfizer Inc., New York, NY) in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) poorly controlled on at least two oral antidiabetes agents (OADs).. This was a 26-week, open-label, parallel-group, randomized study where 257 patients (mean A1C 8.6%) on OAD treatment for > or = 3 months were treated with either BI (n = 122) or PPI (n = 135). Based on self-monitored blood glucose levels, PPI dose was adjusted before each major meal, whereas BI dose was titrated in the morning or before bedtime. Prestudy OADs were continued, but doses could be modified.. At 26 weeks, change from baseline in A1C was greater with PPI (-1.7 vs. -1.4%, P = 0.0389). Numerically, more patients achieved A1C <6.5% (28% vs. 19%) and A1C <7.0% (63% vs. 55%) with PPI compared with BI. PPI had lower postmeal glucose increments, but higher prebreakfast glucose and weight gain (1.1kg), than BI. Mild or moderate hypoglycemic events were more frequent with PPI (6.2 vs. 2.9 events/months), but nocturnal hypoglycemic events were less frequent (22% vs. 30%).. PPI improved postprandial glucose and A1C levels significantly more than BI. More patients achieved A1C targets with PPI, at the expense of more hypoglycemia and body weight gain. These results illustrate the potential benefits and detriments of prandial insulin supplementation in patients with T2DM poorly controlled on OADs alone.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Middle Aged; Postprandial Period

The efficacy of either detemir or glargine is comparable in subjects with type 2 diabetes when combined with insulin aspart in a basal-bolus regimen. Subjects randomized to detemir used slightly higher daily insulin doses, but gained less weight on average than glargine-treated subjects.

Topics: Adult; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Detemir; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting

In a previous publication we reported no difference in the 24-hour glucose response between two basal analog insulins, detemir and glargine, when taken once a day in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). We now report the dose comparison observed within this randomized, double-blind, crossover study.. Of 36 patients on basal insulin and other noninsulin treatments, 29 completed the study. Both insulins were given once a day at 8 pm and no food was taken between 6 pm and the following morning. The dose was titrated daily by continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) until the basal glucose (between 12 and 6 am) was <120 mg/dl but not >5% of CGM readings <70 mg/dl. Subjects were then crossed over to the other insulin and titrated similarly.. Glucose goals were achieved in all subjects. The mean dosage was 0.26 U/kg with very few subjects requiring >0.4 U/kg. Only 2 required an absolute dose less than 10 U/day and all others required more, some considerably higher. Of the 29 subjects, 7 required a greater, 6 a smaller, and 16 the same dose of detemir compared to glargine.. When given once daily in T2DM and titrated using CGM to the same fasting glucose, there was no difference in the glucose response between basal insulins during the basal titration period (4-10 hours after injection) nor during the entire 24-hour period following the injection. Further, the mean dosage to achieve this glucose goal was the same with both insulins.

Topics: Aged; Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring; Cross-Over Studies; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Double-Blind Method; Drug Administration Schedule; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Detemir; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Middle Aged; Monitoring, Ambulatory

To determine whether glargine is noninferior to detemir regarding the percentage of patients reaching A1C <7% without symptomatic hypoglycemia

Topics: Administration, Oral; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Administration Schedule; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Detemir; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Treatment Outcome; Weight Gain

To determine the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic dose-response effects of insulin glargine administered subcutaneously in individuals with type 2 diabetes.. Twenty obese type 2 diabetic individuals (10 male and 10 female, aged 50 +/- 3 years, with BMI 36 +/- 2 kg/m(2) and A1C 8.3 +/- 0.6%) were studied in this single-center, placebo-controlled, randomized, double-blind study. Five subcutaneous doses of insulin glargine (0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, and 2.0 units/kg) were investigated on separate occasions using the 24-h euglycemic clamp technique. RESULTS Glargine duration of action to reduce glucose, nonessential fatty acid (NEFA), and beta-hydroxybutyrate levels was close to or >24 h for all four doses. Increases in glucose flux revealed no discernible peak and were modest with maximal glucose infusion rates of 9.4, 6.6, 5.5, and 2.8 mumol/kg/min for the 2.0, 1.5, 1.0, and 0.5 units/kg doses, respectively. Glargine exhibited a relatively hepatospecific action with greater suppression (P < 0.05) of endogenous glucose production (EGP) compared with little or no increases in glucose disposal.. A single subcutaneous injection of glargine at a dose of >or=0.5 units/kg can acutely reduce glucose, NEFA, and ketone body levels for 24 h in obese insulin-resistant type 2 diabetic individuals. Glargine lowers blood glucose by mainly inhibiting EGP with limited effects on stimulating glucose disposal. Large doses of glargine have minimal effects on glucose flux and retain a relatively hepatospecific action in type 2 diabetes.

Topics: Blood Glucose; C-Peptide; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Fatty Acids, Nonesterified; Female; Glucagon; Glucose Clamp Technique; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Injections, Subcutaneous; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Middle Aged

To assess the effect of a 4-week adjunctive therapy of exenatide (EXE) (5-10 microg b.i.d.) or sitagliptin (SITA) (100 mg once daily) in response to a standardized breakfast meal challenge in 48 men or women with type 2 diabetes receiving insulin glargine (GLAR) + metformin (MET).. This was a single-center, randomized, open-label, active comparator-controlled study with a three-arm parallel group design, consisting of: screening, 4- to 8-week run-in period, 4-week treatment period, and follow-up. In all three groups, the GLAR dose was titrated according to an algorithm (fasting blood glucose

Topics: Adult; Aged; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Exenatide; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Hyperglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Metformin; Middle Aged; Peptides; Treatment Outcome; Venoms

We compare the efficacy and safety of once-daily biphasic insulin aspart 70/30 (BIAsp 30) and insulin glargine in Asian subjects with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled with oral anti-diabetic drugs (OADs). In a 26-week, open-labelled, randomised, parallel-group, multinational, multicentre, treat-to-target trial, 155 insulin-naïve Asian subjects were treated with either BIAsp 30 or insulin glargine, both in combination with metformin and glimepiride. Change in HbA(1c) at end of treatment with BIAsp 30 was superior to insulin glargine (BIAsp 30-glargine=-0.36%, 95% CI [-0.64; -0.07], p=0.015). Mean self-measured plasma glucose (SMPG) at bedtime was significantly lower with BIAsp 30 than insulin glargine (7.98+/-0.34 mmol/L vs. 9.16+/-0.33 mmol/L, p=0.0078). Incidences of minor and daytime hypoglycaemia were higher with BIAsp 30 than those with glargine, but the difference did not reach the statistical significance. No difference was seen in nocturnal hypoglycaemia. The incidence of adverse events was comparable between treatments, with low incidence of serious adverse events and major hypoglycaemia. Mean body weight increased slightly in both groups. In insulin-naïve Asian subjects with type 2 diabetes who are inadequately controlled with OADs, once-daily BIAsp 30 is superior to insulin glargine.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adolescent; Adult; Asian People; Biphasic Insulins; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dosage Forms; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Aspart; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Isophane; Insulin, Long-Acting; International Agencies; Male; Middle Aged; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult

Postprandial release of intact proinsulin (IP) is an independent marker for beta-cell dysfunction in patients with type 2 diabetes. This open-label, parallel-group, two-arm, pilot study compared the beta-cell protective effect of adding insulin glargine (GLA) vs. NPH insulin to ongoing metformin.. Overall, 28 insulin-naive type 2 diabetes subjects (mean +/- SD age, 61.5 +/- 6.7 years; diabetes duration, 9.8 +/- 6.5 years; HbA1c, 7.1 +/- 0.5%; BMI, 30.7 +/- 4.3 kg/m(2)) treated with metformin and sulfonylurea were randomized to add once-daily GLA or NPH at bedtime. At baseline and after 3 months, subjects received a standardized breakfast, lunch and dinner, with pre- and postprandial blood sampling to measure plasma IP, total insulin and blood glucose (BG).. Insulin dose after 3 months was comparable in both groups (GLA vs. NPH: 23.6 +/- 13.4 vs. 23.3 +/- 12.7; p = NS ). Both treatments significantly reduced fasting BG levels (GLA: 158 +/- 19 to 121 +/- 23 mg/dl; NPH: 156 +/- 34 to 119 +/- 29 mg/dl; both p < 0.01 vs. baseline). Fasting and postprandial BG levels did not differ between groups. IP levels decreased in both groups (p < 0.05 at all timepoints). Although IP release after breakfast did not differ between treatments, GLA induced a greater reduction in IP release after lunch (p = 0.08) and dinner (p = 0.04). Total plasma insulin levels did not differ between groups.. Adding basal insulin to metformin reduces postprandial beta-cell load. While GLA and NPH had comparable effects at breakfast, GLA reduces beta-cell stress more effectively at dinner, and with a trend at lunch, most probably because of its longer lasting pharmacodynamic profile.

Topics: Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Therapy, Combination; Fasting; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin-Secreting Cells; Insulin, Isophane; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Metformin; Middle Aged; Pilot Projects; Postprandial Period

The objective of the present study was to investigate the effects of one-year treatment with exenatide or Insulin Glargine, followed by a 5-week off-drug period, on postprandial lipidaemia, glycaemia and measures of oxidative stress.. Sixty-nine metformin-treated patients with type 2 diabetes were randomised (using apermuted block randomisation scheme stratified by site and baseline HbA(1c) stratum (< or = 8.5% or >8.5%) of which 60 completed (exenatide n=30; Insulin Glargine n=30) the pre-treatment and on-drug meal test. Postprandial glucose, lipids and lipoproteins, and oxidative stress markers were studied at week -1, 51, and after a 5-week off-drug period following a breakfast and lunch mixed-meal containing 50 g fat, 75 g carbohydrates, and 35 g protein.. 51-Week exenatide treatment resulted in a significant reduction of prandial glucose, triglycerides, apo-B48, calculated VLDL-C, FFA and MDA excursions whereas Insulin Glargine predominantly reduced fasting glucose, FFA and MDA. Changes in markers of oxidative stress were related to changes in postprandial glucose and triglyceride excursions, independent of treatment arm. All postprandial measures returned to pre-treatment values in both groups after 5-week cessation of study treatment.. Exenatide showed beneficial effects on postprandial glycaemia and lipidaemia, and these effects were related to changes in the oxidative stress markers MDA and oxLDL during one year of treatment as compared to Insulin Glargine. Following cessation of both exenatide and Insulin Glargine measures returned to pre-treatment values, suggesting that ongoing treatment is necessary to maintain the beneficial effects of either therapy.

Topics: Apolipoprotein B-48; Biomarkers; Blood Glucose; Cholesterol, VLDL; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Administration Schedule; Europe; Exenatide; Fatty Acids, Nonesterified; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hyperlipidemias; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Lipids; Lipoproteins, LDL; Male; Malondialdehyde; Middle Aged; Oxidative Stress; Peptides; Postprandial Period; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Triglycerides; Venoms

Self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) is an important self-management tool for insulin-treated patients with Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Its value in estimating glycaemic control in insulin-treated T2DM patients remains unclear. The relationship between glycated haemoglobin (HbA(1c)) and SMBG measures in T2DM patients treated with premixed insulin lispro mixtures or basal insulin glargine was examined.. HbA(1c) and plasma equivalent glucose (PGe) data derived from SMBG profiles were pooled from five randomized clinical trials of patients with T2DM on one or more oral glucose-lowering medication +/- 0-2 insulin injections per day switching to insulin lispro mixtures (N = 317) or glargine (N = 306). Patients generated seven-point SMBG profiles three times in a 2-week period prior to each HbA(1c) measurement. Pearson's correlation coefficients (r) were calculated for PGe values and HbA(1c). Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curves determined the ability of sets of PGe to estimate HbA(1c) (< or > 7.0%).. Mean +/- standard deviation age was 57.5 +/- 9.5 years, body mass index 31.3 +/- 5.6 kg/m(2), 52.5% were male and HbA(1c) overall was 7.4 +/- 1.0% at end-point. Among individual SMBG measures, r for HbA(1c) ranged from 0.34 to 0.49. For means of two or more PGe measures, r for HbA(1c) ranged from 0.51 to 0.59. Correlations were similar for either regimen. ROC curves were consistent with the correlation data.. These data provide patients and clinicians information on the relationship between HbA(1c) and SMBG measurements in patients with T2DM, and support the value of frequent blood glucose measurements for assessing overall glycaemic control.

Topics: Aged; Blood Glucose; Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin Lispro; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Middle Aged

To examine changes in patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2DM) on oral agents who initiated insulin (insulin lispro mix 25/75 [LM25] or insulin glargine) in the DURABLE trial (n=580).. Subjects completed generic and diabetes-specific health-related quality-of-life measures (RAND-36 and Diabetes-39) and a symptom assessment measure (DSC-Revised) at baseline and 6 months post insulin initiation. Mean score change was evaluated. Effect size (ES; Cohen's d) and analysis of covariance were used to examine extent and significance of change both within and between treatment groups.. Subject characteristics were mean age 57 years, males 59%, duration of diabetes 9.6 years, and baseline HbA1c 8.9%. In the total sample, significant (P<0.01) improvements (with small ES) were observed in four of eight RAND-36 subscales (ES range: 0.13-0.24), three of five Diabetes-39 subscales (ES range: 0.09-0.34), and five of eight DSC-Revised subscales (ES range: 0.15-0.38). While significance of within-group changes varied by treatment, only one subscale (physical functioning for LM25) showed deterioration. The changes were not significantly different (P>0.01) between regimens for any subscales.. Our findings suggest that insulin initiation improves selective PRO in patients with poorly controlled T2DM.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Middle Aged; Treatment Outcome

The purpose of this sub-study of the Outcome Reduction with Initial Glargine Intervention (ORIGIN) trial was to determine efficacy and safety of targeting normal fasting plasma glucose (FPG) levels in patients with early Type 2 diabetes treated with insulin glargine in comparison with standard care.. Participants were randomly allocated to insulin or standard care. Insulin was titrated to reach FPG

Topics: Adult; Aged; Area Under Curve; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Fasting; Glucose Tolerance Test; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Middle Aged; Postprandial Period

Several treatment options are available for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus who are making the transition from oral antidiabetes drugs (OADs) to insulin. Two options currently recommended by the Canadian Diabetes Association for initiating insulin therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes who are no longer responsive to OADs alone are insulin glargine plus OADs, and premixed insulin therapy only. Because of differences in efficacy, adverse events (such as hypoglycaemia) and acquisition costs, these two treatment options may lead to different long-term clinical and economic outcomes.. To determine the cost effectiveness of insulin glargine plus OADs compared with premixed insulin without OADs in insulin-naive patients with type 2 diabetes in Canada.. Using treatment effects taken from a published clinical trial, the validated IMS-CORE Diabetes Model was used to simulate the long-term cost effectiveness of insulin glargine with OADs, versus premixed insulin. Input treatment effects for the two therapeutic approaches were based on changes in glycosylated haemoglobin A(1c) (HbA(1c)) at clinical trial endpoint, and hypoglycaemia rates. The analysis was conducted from the perspective of the Canadian Provincial payer. Direct treatment and complication costs were obtained from published sources (primarily from Ontario) and reported in $Can, year 2008 values. All base-case costs and outcomes were discounted at 5% per year. Sensitivity analyses were conducted around key parameters and assumptions used in the study. Outcomes included direct medical costs associated with both treatment and diabetes-related complications. Cost-effectiveness outcomes included total average lifetime (35 years) costs, life expectancy (LE), QALYs and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs).. Base-case analyses showed that, compared with premixed insulin only, insulin glargine in combination with OADs was associated with a 0.051-year increase in LE and a 0.043 increase in QALYs. Insulin glargine plus OADs showed a very slight increase in total direct costs ($Can 343 +/- 2572), resulting in ICERs of $Can 6750 per life-year gained (LYG) and $Can 7923 per QALY gained. However, considerable uncertainty around the ICERs was demonstrated by insulin glargine having a 50% probability of being cost effective at a willingness-to-pay threshold of $Can 10,000 per QALY, and a 54% probability at a $Can 20,000 threshold. Base-case results were most sensitive to assumed disutilities for hypoglycaemic events, to the assumed effect of insulin glargine plus OADs on HbA(1c), and to its assumed acquisition costs.. These findings should be interpreted within the context of a large degree of uncertainty and of several study limitations that include a single clinical trial as the source for primary treatment assumptions and a single province as the source for most cost inputs. Under current study assumptions and limitations, insulin glargine plus OADs was projected to be a cost-effective option, compared with premixed insulin only, for the treatment of insulin-naive patients with type 2 diabetes unresponsive to OADs. Additional work is needed to examine the generalizability of the findings to individual jurisdictions of the Canadian healthcare system.

Topics: Canada; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Metformin; Middle Aged; Quality-Adjusted Life Years; Sulfonylurea Compounds

To explore glucose lowering response to insulin initiation or switch to insulin glargine in obese and non-obese individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and to examine weight gain and hypoglycaemic episodes in this group.. Post hoc subgroup analysis using data of obese and non-obese participants from a large multi-centre (4555 participants with T2DM), multi-national 24-week randomized controlled trial of investigator titrated insulin glargine versus patient self-managed titrated insulin glargine. This analysis was carried out to compare two subgroups: obese (> or =30 kg/m2) and non-obese (<30 kg/m2) participants.. The mean body mass index (BMI) values were 33.7 kg/m2(n = 1833) and 25.9 kg/m(2)(n = 2755) in obese and non-obese subjects, respectively. There was a significant reduction in glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) from baseline in both subgroups but no significant difference between subgroups (1.15 vs. 1.15%, p = 0.50). Overall, there was a 1.21 kg (s.d. 3.3) increase in weight in individuals who were non-obese and a 1.08 kg (s.d. 3.9) increase in obese individuals (p = 0.67). There was no significant difference in the proportion of participants achieving an HbA1c of <7.0% at 6 months in both the subgroups (28.8 vs. 27.1%, p = 0.20). In multiple logistic regression, BMI was not a prognostic factor in achieving a target of HbA1c < or = 7.0%. There was no significant difference in severe hypoglycaemic episodes between obese and non-obese subgroups (1.3 vs. 1.0%); however, significantly more non-obese individuals experienced nocturnal hypoglycaemic episodes(4.5 vs. 2.4%, p < 0.05).. In this study, treatment with insulin glargine in people with T2DM was associated with a significant reduction in HbA1c without differential increase in weight gain in obese and non-obese subgroups. Rates of severe hypoglycaemia were not different between obese and non-obese subgroups.

Topics: Blood Glucose; Body Mass Index; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Middle Aged; Obesity; Treatment Outcome

Diabetes treatments are needed that are convenient, provide effective glycaemic control, and do not cause weight gain. We aimed to test the hypothesis that improvement in haemoglobin A(1c) (HbA(1c)) achieved with once weekly exenatide was superior to that achieved with insulin glargine titrated to glucose targets.. In this 26-week, open-label, randomised, parallel study, we compared exenatide with insulin glargine in adults with type 2 diabetes who had suboptimum glycaemic control despite use of maximum tolerated doses of blood-glucose-lowering drugs for 3 months or longer. Patients were randomly assigned to add exenatide (2 mg, once-a-week injection) or insulin glargine (once-daily injection, starting dose 10 IU, target glucose range 4.0-5.5 mmol/L) to their blood-glucose-lowering regimens. Randomisation was with a one-to-one allocation and block size four, stratified according to country and concomitant treatment (70% metformin only; 30% metformin plus sulphonylurea). Participants and clinical investigators were not masked to assignment, but investigators analysing data were. The primary endpoint was change in HbA(1c) from baseline, and analysis of this outcome was by modified intention to treat for all patients who received at least one dose of study drug. This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00641056.. 456 patients were randomly allocated to treatment and were included in the modified intention-to-treat analysis (233 exenatide, 223 insulin glargine). Participants who received at least one dose of study drug and for whom baseline and at least one postbaseline measurement of HbA(1c) were available were included in the primary efficacy analysis. Change in HbA(1c) at 26 weeks was greater in patients taking exenatide (n=228; -1.5%, SE 0.05) than in those taking insulin glargine (n=220; -1.3%, 0.06; treatment difference -0.16%, 0.07, 95% CI -0.29 to -0.03). 12 (5%) of 233 patients allocated to exenatide and two (1%) of 223 taking insulin glargine discontinued participation because of adverse events (p=0.012). A planned extension period (up to 2.5 years' duration) is in progress.. Once weekly exenatide is an important therapeutic option for patients for whom risk of hypoglycaemia, weight loss, and convenience are particular concerns.. Amylin Pharmaceuticals; Eli Lilly and Company.

Topics: Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Administration Schedule; Exenatide; Female; Glucagon-Like Peptide 1; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Injections, Subcutaneous; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Middle Aged; Peptides; Venoms

Insulin therapy is often a delayed strategy in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus because it is associated with weight gain, hypoglycaemia, and the need for subcutaneous injections. We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of prandial Technosphere inhaled insulin compared with twice daily biaspart insulin.. In this randomised, open-label, parallel-group study, adult patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and poor glycaemic control despite insulin therapy, with or without oral antidiabetes drugs, were enrolled from ten countries between Feb 23, 2006, and Aug 8, 2007. Patients were randomly allocated in a 1:1 ratio to receive 52 weeks' treatment with: prandial Technosphere inhaled insulin powder plus bedtime insulin glargine; or twice daily premixed biaspart insulin (70% insulin aspart protamine suspension and 30% insulin aspart of rDNA origin). The primary endpoint was a comparison of change in glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA(1c)) from baseline to week 52 between treatment groups; the non-inferiority margin was 0.4%. Analysis was by per protocol for non-inferiority testing of the primary endpoint. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00309244.. 334 patients were allocated to inhaled insulin plus insulin glargine, and 343 to biaspart insulin; 107 patients on inhaled insulin plus insulin glargine and 85 on biaspart insulin discontinued the trial. 211 patients on inhaled insulin plus insulin glargine and 237 on biaspart insulin were included in per-protocol analyses. Change in HbA(1c) with inhaled insulin plus insulin glargine (-0.68%, SE 0.077, 95% CI -0.83 to -0.53) was similar and non-inferior to that with biaspart insulin (-0.76%, 0.071, -0.90 to -0.62). The between-group difference was 0.07% (SE 0.102, 95% CI -0.13 to 0.27). Patients had significantly lower weight gain and had fewer mild-to-moderate and severe hypoglycaemic events on inhaled insulin plus insulin glargine than on biaspart insulin. The safety and tolerability profile was similar for both treatments, apart from increased occurrence of cough and change in pulmonary function in the group receiving inhaled insulin plus insulin glargine.. This study is part of a large clinical development programme addressing the efficacy and tolerability of use of Technosphere inhaled insulin in a wide variety of patients.. MannKind.

Topics: Administration, Inhalation; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Therapy, Combination; Eating; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Injections, Subcutaneous; Insulin; Insulin Aspart; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Middle Aged; Powders

We designed a system for diabetes patients treated with glargine, a long-acting insulin, to make an automatic adjustment of insulin dose based on glucose level data and to provide the patients with the needed insulin dose by using a short message service (SMS). We also compared diabetes patients who used our system with patients who received the conventional titration scheme.. Included were 100 type 2 diabetes patients whose blood glucose was suboptimally controlled on their previous antidiabetes treatment. Each participant was assigned to either the intervention or control group, each with 50 patients, using adaptive randomization. We applied our system to the intervention group for 12 weeks, whereas the control group received a conventional titration scheme, seeking a target fasting blood glucose of <120 mg/dL.. The fasting and postprandial glucose levels of the intervention group declined earlier than those of the control group. Lastly, a greater (P = 0.023) reduction in hemoglobin A(1C) from baseline to the end point was observed in the intervention group (from 9.8 +/- 1.3% to 7.4 +/- 0.7%) than in the control group (from 9.8 +/- 1.2% to 7.8 +/- 0.8%). The incidence of symptomatic, asymptomatic, and nocturnal hypoglycemia was similar in both groups. There was a small increase in body weight from baseline to the end point with both the intervention (2.4 +/- 3.0 kg) and control (2.2 +/- 2.8 kg) groups.. This study demonstrated that SMS based on our specialized Internet-supported system is an effective and safe approach to long-acting insulin dose adjustments in patients with type 2 diabetes.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Female; Humans; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Middle Aged; Postprandial Period; Telemedicine; Treatment Outcome

This is a work aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of the combination of metformin with glargine or with neutral protamine Hagedorn in treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus. Sixty such patients with poor glycemic control by oral antidiabetic drugs were included and divided into group A and group B. Thirty patients in group A were treated with glargine and metformin, and the other 30 patients in group B were treated with neutral protamine Hagedorn and metformin for 12 weeks. Fasting plasma glucose (FPG), postprandial glucose(PPG) and HbA1c were measured before and after the treatment. Hypoglycemia was also noted. At the end of the study, the levels of FPG, PPG and HbAlc were significantly lower than the baseline levels in the two groups (P < 0.05). At the 12th week, the percentage of HbAlc < 7% in group A was 53.3% and that in group B was 40.0%; statistically, there was no significant difference (P > 0.05). After the end of the treatment, there was no significant difference in that the percentage of HbA1c < 7% was 70.6% in group A and 62.5% in group B; the two groups' HbA1c levels were > or = 7%-9% at the baseline (P > 0.05). No sigificant difference in respect to the incidence rate of hypoglycemia in the two groups was noted (P > 0.05). In the cases of type 2 diabetes mellitus with poor glycaemic control by oral antidiabetic drug, glucose and HbA1c can be lowered further by the combination of metformin with glargine or with neutral protamine Hagedorn, the incidence rate of hypoglycemia is low. Metformin plus glargine or plus neutral protamine Hagedorn is a safe and effective therapeutic choice for type 2 diabetes mellitus cases with poor glycaemic control; moreover, metformin plus neutral protamine is a cheaper and effective choice.

Topics: Aged; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Isophane; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Metformin; Middle Aged

The aim of study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of insulin detemir as a basal insulin switching from neutral protamine Hagedorn insulin (NPH) and insulin glargine in patients with diabetes on an intensive insulin therapy regimen.. This 6-month multicentre, prospective, treat-to-target [glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA(1c) ) less than 6.5%] trial included 92 people with diabetes (61 type 1, 29 type 2 and two unknown diabetes types). Detemir was administered first with fixed dose and injection times and then adapted to optimal dose after 3 months.. Mean HbA(1c) (%) of all the subjects at months 4 to 6 of the study was improved compared with month 0 (7.34 ± 0.87, 7.28 ± 0.88, 7.25 ± 0.93 vs. 7.55 ± 1.18; p < 0.05 paired t-test). However, significant improvement was seen only among the patients who had previously used NPH as a basal insulin. Twice-daily injection of basal insulin increased among people in the type 1 previously injected insulin glargine. Total insulin dose increased in the type 1 glargine group. The mean body weight change in the highest quartile body mass index (BMI) group was from 70.7 to 69.3 kg over the 6 months. Quality of life (QoL) relating to the patients' glycaemic control tended to improve without a change in frequency of hypoglycaemia.. The results suggest that insulin detemir has a greater effect on glycaemic control in subjects with poor glycaemic control using NPH; can reduce or maintain body weight in obese patients; and obtains perceptive stability for patients with unstable glycaemic control.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Anti-Obesity Agents; Blood Glucose; Body Mass Index; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Detemir; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Isophane; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Middle Aged; Obesity; Prospective Studies; Treatment Outcome; Weight Loss

Insulin glargine and lispro mix 75/25 (75% insulin lispro protamine suspension and 25% insulin lispro injection [LM75/25]) represent 2 common starter insulin regimen classes: basal and premixed. After initiation of starter insulin therapy, if patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) are unable to achieve a glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) level <7.0%, insulin intensification may be indicated. The DURABLE (Assessing Durability of Basal Versus Lispro Mix 75/25 Insulin Efficacy) trial was designed to compare initiating insulin therapy with analogue basal insulin versus premixed analogue insulin in patients unable to achieve good glycemic control while taking multiple oral antihyperglycemic drugs (OADs).. To provide objective information about insulin intensification, the DURABLE trial also included a substudy evaluating a systematic approach to advancing insulin therapy in those patients who did not achieve glycemic control with their initial insulin regimen. This substudy, the results of which are reported here, tested the hypothesis that advancing insulin therapy with premixed insulin is noninferior to basal-bolus therapy (BBT) in patients with type 2 DM unable to achieve an HbA1c level < or = 7.0% after 6 months of starter insulin therapy.. In the main DURABLE study, 2091 patients (age range, 30-80 years) with type 2 DM and HbA1c values >7.0% receiving > or = 2 OADs were randomized to receive insulin glargine (n = 1046) or LM75/25 (n = 1045), both in combination with prestudy OADs. After 6 months, patients with HbA1c levels >7.0% could enter this intensification substudy; OADs except sulfonylureas were continued. Patients originally receiving insulin glargine were enrolled in intensification arm A and were randomized to receive BBT (insulin glargine once daily plus mealtime insulin lispro TID) or LM75/25 BID. Patients originally receiving LM75/25 were enrolled in intensification arm B and randomized to receive BBT or mealtime 50% insulin lispro protamine suspension and 50% insulin lispro injection (LM50/50) TID. Insulin doses were adjusted based on preprandial plasma glucose levels. The primary end point was noninferiority of premixed therapy versus BBT with respect to end-point HbA1c. Secondary end points included change in HbA1c and weight, percentage of patients reaching HbA1c target levels, total daily insulin dose, and rates of hypoglycemia. The safety profile was also assessed.. Of the 475 patients in the insulin glargine + OAD arm of the main study who had HbA1c levels >7.0% at 6 months, 399 (84%) entered intensification arm A. The mean age was 57 years, 53% of the patients were male, and mean (SD) HbA1c was 8.0% (1.0%) at baseline. Of those patients, 199 were randomly assigned to receive BBT and 200 were assigned to receive LM75/25. Of the 411 patients in the LM75/25 + OAD arm of the main study who had an HbA1c level >7.0% at 6 months, 345 (84%) entered intensification arm B. The mean age was 55 years, 51% of the patients were male, and mean (SD) HbA1c was 8.0% (0.9%) at baseline. Of those patients, 171 were randomly assigned to receive BBT and 174 were assigned to receive LM50/50. At end point, noninferiority of LM75/25 or LM50/50 to BBT was supported, with a 95% CI of -0.10 to 0.37 and -0.25 to 0.25, respectively. At 6 months, HbA1c did not differ significantly from baseline in any group. Regardless of treatment group, <20% of patients achieved an HbA1c level <7.0%. There were no significant differences between groups in total daily insulin dose, weight gain, incidence or rate of hypoglycemia, or incidence of serious adverse events.. No group had significant improvement from baseline in HbA1c. Our study results suggest that premixed therapy, dosed 2 times per day (LM75/25) or 3 times per day (LM50/50), was noninferior to BBT (4 injections/d) in this population of adult patients with type 2 DM previously uncontrolled with OADs plus basal insulin or twice-daily premixed insulin. Clinical-Trials.gov identifier: NCT00279201.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin Lispro; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Middle Aged

To compare the efficacy and safety of the rapid-acting insulin analog glulisine and regular insulin in hyperglycemic hospitalized patients.. A total of 180 hospitalized patients with type 2 diabetes received either glulisine (n = 88) or regular insulin (n = 92) before each meal in combination with insulin glargine at bedtime in a randomized double-blind fashion. All previous diabetes medications were discontinued if applicable. Doses of insulin were adjusted to obtain target blood glucose concentrations of <130 mg/dl before meals and at bedtime while avoiding hypoglycemia.. Overall mean blood glucose concentrations were ∼ 8 mg/dl lower in the glulisine group than in the regular insulin group (152.6 ± 66.6 vs. 160.4 ± 70.8 mg/dl; P < 0.0002). This improvement was wholly due to ∼ 22 mg/dl lower levels after 4 days of therapy (140 ± 55 vs. 162 ± 71 mg/dl; P < 0.0007); after day 4, this difference progressively increased such that mean blood glucose concentrations from day 7 onward were ∼ 31 mg/dl lower in the glulisine group. The mean daily incidence of hypoglycemia was slightly but not significantly lower in the glulisine than the regular insulin group (0.10 ± 0.02 vs. 0.14 ± 0.03 episode/day; P > 0.35).. In hospitalized type 2 diabetic patients, glulisine may provide better glycemic control than regular insulin, especially in those who have a prolonged length of stay.

Topics: Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Middle Aged; Treatment Outcome

The addition of basal insulin to existing oral therapy can help patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) achieve glycaemic targets. This study compares the efficacy and safety of insulin lispro protamine suspension (ILPS) and insulin glargine in insulin-naive patients with T2D and inadequate control on oral antihyperglycaemic medication (OAM).. An open-label, randomized, multicentre, multinational 24-week study of 471 patients receiving ≥2 OAMs for ≥3 months with a body mass index between 25 and 45 kg/m(2) and HbA1c 7.5-10.0% was conducted. ILPS was injected once or twice daily vs. glargine injected once daily plus prestudy OAMs. Primary objective compared the HbA1c change from baseline.. HbA1c change from baseline to endpoint was similar in both groups [-1.46% (ILPS) and -1.41% (glargine)]. Least-squares mean difference (95% CI) for HbA1c (-0.05 [-0.21, 0.11]%), glycaemic variability (0.06 [-0.06, 0.19] mmol/l) and weight change (-0.01 [-0.61, 0.59] kg) showed non-inferiority (margins of 0.4%, 0.8 mmol/l and 1.5 kg, respectively). Percentages of patients achieving HbA1c <7.0% were 43.8% ILPS and 41.2% glargine. Mean daily insulin dose was 0.39 vs. 0.35 U/kg (p = 0.02) and weight gain was 1.04 vs. 1.07 kg for ILPS vs. glargine (p = 0.98). Overall hypoglycaemia (episodes/patient/year) was similar for ILPS and glargine (24.2 ± 28.8 vs. 23.0 ± 30.9); nocturnal (6.1 ± 10.6 vs. 4.1 ± 9.4, p < 0.001) rates were higher for ILPS. Severe hypoglycaemia was higher for ILPS vs. glargine (n = 9 vs. n = 2; p = 0.04).. At endpoint, ILPS was non-inferior to glargine in HbA1c change from baseline, but associated with increased risk of hypoglycaemia.

Topics: Body Mass Index; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin Lispro; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Middle Aged; Treatment Outcome

Costs for diabetes treatment burden statutory health care systems. Aim of the LIVE-COM study (Long Acting Insulin Glargine versus Insulin Detemir Cost Evaluation Comparison) was to assess resource utilization and costs of diabetes care as well as patient reported outcomes in a random sample of type 2 diabetes patients treated with either insulin glargine (GLA) or detemir (DET) as part of a basal-bolus regimen in a primary care setting.. LIVE-COM is a non-interventional, cross-sectional study performed between April and September 2008 in 138 randomly selected centers of primary care physicians in Germany. From 1731 type 2 diabetes patients (GLA: n = 1150; DET: n = 581) with statutory health insurance status and pretreatment with either GLA or DET for at least 6 months as part of a basal-bolus therapy, total direct costs of diabetes care (for insulins, oral antidiabetic drugs, test strips, needles, lancets, Hypokits®) were calculated from total recorded expenditures, for a period of six months, from the perspective of statutory health insurance. Patient-reported outcomes were assessed using validated questionnaires (SF-12, DTSQs, ITEQ).. Mean total costs per patient over six months were lower with GLA based therapy compared with DET based therapy (972 euro ± 374 euro vs. 1135 euro ± 477 euro, p < 0.001). Adjusted by ANCOVA: 932 euro (95% CI: 905, 957 euro) vs. 1.061 euro (95% CI: 1025, 1099 euro, p < 0.001). The adjusted mean single costs for basal insulin (223 euro vs. 246 euro), bolus insulin (241 euro vs. 289 euro), test strips (347 euro vs. 393 euro) and needles (67 euro vs. 80 euro) were significantly lower in the GLA group (p < 0.001, each), whereas costs of OAD (36 euro vs. 35 euro), lancets (14 euro vs. 15 euro) and Hypokits® (1.9 euro vs. 1.0 euro) did not differ significantly. Glycemic parameters (HbA1c, fasting blood glucose) were better on GLA based therapy (p < 0.01) and associated with lower daily total insulin doses (68 U vs. 79 U). Furthermore, slightly better results in patient-reported outcomes were found in GLA patients.. In a head-to-head comparison over six months a glargine vs. detemir based basal-bolus therapy in type 2 diabetes patients was associated with lower total costs of diabetes care Δ: -128 euro/patient) mainly caused by savings of consumables. Further health services research with larger sample sizes should be conducted to obtain a more comprehensive analysis of economic aspects of insulin analogs or other innovative drugs in routine practice.

Topics: Aged; Ambulatory Care; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Cross-Sectional Studies; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Female; Germany; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Detemir; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Middle Aged; National Health Programs; Patient Satisfaction; Primary Health Care

Evaluation of a new disposable insulin pen and injection habits of diabetes patients in everyday clinical practice. Injection devices (pens) for insulin application play a major role in treatment acceptance and adherence in insulin-treated diabetes patients. The mechanical disposable pen SoloStar containing the insulin analogs glargine or glulisine (each 100 IE/ml) provides modern design with user-friendly handling features.. In two independent, non-interventional, observational studies conducted nation-wide between April and December 2007 in outpatient practices, patients with diabetes newly instructed on how to use the pen were interviewed by their trainers (physicians, diabetes consultants) after approx. 6-8 weeks of pen use to give feedback on technical deficiencies, handling problems with the pen, injection habits, as well as on pen properties. Trainers were also asked to assess pen properties and particularly to document the time required for pen training. The evaluation applied a grading system similar to that used in German schools (1: very good; 6: very insufficient/failed). Furthermore, trainers were asked to retrospectively record any adverse events occurring during the observational period.. A total of 2,412 trainers from 1,626 centres and 8,428 patients (80% type 2) participated in the studies. In each study 0.5% of patients reported 41 and 19 technical problems with the pen, respectively. Similarly 3% of patients from each study reported handling problems. Recommended changes of needles and safety checks of the pen before each injection were performed by 40% and max. 25% of the patients, respectively. The features of the new disposable pen were all rated "very good" to "good" by the majority of patients and trainers. The best rated features were usability, dose adjustment and the low effort for the dose release. Pen training of patients were rated as "very simple" or "simple" by the training staff and average instruction time was reported not to exceed more than 10 minutes for the majority of patients. In 19 patients (0.2%) a total of 34 adverse events were documented.. The results of these two observational studies showed no relevant technical deficiencies and handling problems associated with the new disposable pen in everyday clinical practice. Ease of use and little time required for pen training may contribute to a high acceptance and satisfaction by the patients and training staff. Injection habits, however, indicated that patients did not well comply with recommendations given for needle changes and safety tests.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Attitude of Health Personnel; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Disposable Equipment; Equipment Failure; Female; General Practice; Germany; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Injections, Subcutaneous; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Middle Aged; Patient Education as Topic; Patient Satisfaction; Surveys and Questionnaires

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Aged; Cost Savings; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Costs; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Germany; Health Care Costs; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Injections, Subcutaneous; Insulin; Insulin Detemir; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Middle Aged; National Health Programs

This randomised, open-label, two-way cross-over study compared the coefficient of variance (CV) of fasting and postprandial blood glucose (FBG and PPBG) with insulin glargine (glargine) versus neutral protamine Hagedorn (NPH) insulin treatment in patients with Type 2 diabetes (T2DM). Patients (N=20) on oral antidiabetic drugs (OADs) were treated with NPH (at bedtime) or glargine (at dinnertime) for 12 weeks of each cross-over treatment period; OADs were continued. The FBG CV was calculated from self-monitored BG values and PPBG using venous blood samples, or continuous glucose monitoring system (CGMS). Both insulins provided similar improvements in glycaemic control; however, PPBG was significantly lower after a standard meal test (performed at 13:00 h the day after insulin injection) with glargine versus NPH (p=0.02). Thirteen versus 15 patients experienced >or=1 episode of hypoglycaemia with glargine versus NPH. The results suggest that glargine plus OADs is more effective in reducing PPBG fluctuations during the day than NPH plus OADs.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Blood Glucose; Cross-Over Studies; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Female; Glyburide; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Isophane; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Metformin; Middle Aged; Monitoring, Ambulatory; Pilot Projects

To determine whether earlier administration of insulin glargine (glargine) vs. the intensification of lifestyle management (LM) improves glycaemic control in type 2 diabetes patients with A1c 7-8% treated with oral therapy.. TULIP [Testing the Usefulness of gLargine when Initiated Promptly in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM)] was a 9-month, 12-visit, open-label, multinational, multicentre, randomized study to evaluate starting glargine or intensifying LM in T2DM patients aged 40-75 years, body mass index (BMI) 24-35 kg/m2 and A1c 7-8%, treated with maximum doses of metformin and sulphonylurea for > or = 2 years. Glargine was injected once daily (evening) and titrated to fasting blood glucose 0.7-1.0 g/l. In the LM arm, dietary and physical activity counselling recommended stable weight for people with BMI < 27 kg/m2 or weight loss of 3 kg for patients with BMI > or = 27 kg/m2. A total of 215 patients were randomized to glargine (n = 106) or LM (n = 109). The primary objective was patients achieving A1c < 7% at endpoint. Secondary endpoints included changes in A1c, in fasting plasma glucose (FPG), body weight and hypoglycaemia incidence.. Two hundred and eleven (52.6% male) patients were randomized and treated; mean (+/- s.d.) age 60.7 +/- 7.9 years, weight 84.5 +/- 13.1 kg, BMI 29.9 +/- 3.5 kg/m2 and A1c 7.6 +/- 0.4%. More patients reached A1c < 7% (66 vs. 38%; p < 0.0001) or < 6.5% (34 vs. 11%; p = 0.0001) with glargine vs. LM. The change in FPG from baseline to study endpoint was significantly greater in the glargine vs. the LM arm (-0.50 +/- 0.47 vs. -0.05 +/- 0.39 g/l respectively; p < 0.0001). Compared with the glargine group, the LM group showed a decrease in weight (+0.9 +/- 2.9 vs. -2.5 +/- 3.2 kg; p < 0.0001), as well as the expected lower symptomatic hypoglycaemia (55.3 vs. 25.0%; p < 0.0001) and nocturnal hypoglycaemia (20.4 vs. 5.6%; p = 0.0016). No significant changes were observed from baseline to study endpoint in any of the lipid parameters tested.. In patients with T2DM with A1c 7-8%, who were previously treated by conventional LM and OAD therapy, adding glargine resulted in greater improvements in glycaemic control vs. intensifying LM.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Blood Glucose; Combined Modality Therapy; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Therapy, Combination; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Life Style; Middle Aged; Treatment Outcome

Once-daily dosing with insulin detemir and insulin glargine were compared in a double-blind, randomised, crossover study in type 2 diabetes subjects previously treated with other antihyperglycaemic medications. Blood glucose was measured through continuous glucose monitoring (CGM). Insulin dose was adjusted daily during the titration phase to achieve target blood glucose values of (70-120 mg/dL) during the basal period, defined as 2400-0600 hours. The last meal of the day started at 1800 h and basal insulin was injected at 2000 h. The CGM data for a 24-h period on the second consecutive day after achieving target blood glucose levels were compared between treatments. Twenty-nine subjects completed the study. Over a 24-h measurement period, once-daily dosing with insulin detemir provided glycaemic control very similar to that of once-daily insulin glargine in patients with type 2 diabetes after both had been titrated to the same glucose target. Insulin detemir- and insulin glargine-treated subjects had similar mean 24-h glucose values (133 +/- 21 mg/dL compared with 126+/-20 mg/dL respectively, p = 0.385) and similar glucose values during the basal period (105 +/- 23 mg/dL compared with 98 +/- 19 mg/dL, respectively p = 0.204).Target basal glycaemic control was achieved in all subjects in a mean of 3.8 days for detemir and 3.5 days for glargine (p = 0.360). The mean dose of detemir was similar to that of glargine (26.3 and 26.6 units/day, respectively, p = 0.837). In this study, once-daily dosing of insulin detemir provided 24-h glycaemic control similar to that of insulin glargine in patients with type 2 diabetes.

Topics: Adult; Blood Glucose; Cross-Over Studies; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Double-Blind Method; Drug Administration Schedule; Glucose Clamp Technique; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Detemir; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Middle Aged; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult

To examine the relationship between glycaemic control and hypoglycaemia in patients with type 2 diabetes treated with metformin (Met) and either insulin lispro mixtures, given twice or thrice daily (LM + Met), or insulin glargine, given once daily (G + Met).. Data from three randomized clinical trials were pooled to compare effects of LM + Met with G + Met.. The LM + Met group achieved lower mean HbA(1c) (mean+/-SE, 7.2+/-0.1 vs. 7.7+/-0.1%, p<0.0001) and all meals combined post-prandial blood glucose (BG) (8.9+/-0.1 vs. 10.2+/-0.1 mmol/L, p<0.0001) compared with the G + Met group, but had higher fasting blood glucose (8.1+/-0.1 vs. 6.8+/-0.1 mmol/L, p<0.0001) and insulin requirement (0.7+/-0.01 vs. 0.6+/-0.01 U/kg, p<0.0001). Over the entire study period, daytime hypoglycaemia was higher for the LM + Met group (10.3 vs. 3.5 episodes/patient/year, p<0.0001) than for the G + Met group; however, nocturnal hypoglycaemia was lower (3.4 vs. 6.6 episodes/patient/year, p=0.003). At endpoint, daytime hypoglycaemia was higher for the LM + Met group (6.2 vs. 1.4 episodes/patient/year, p<0.0001); however, nocturnal hypoglycaemia was similar in both groups (1.9 vs. 3.0 episodes/patient/year). An inverse relationship was observed between all confirmed hypoglycaemia and HbA(1c) at endpoint; for every 1% reduction in HbA(1c), the increase (in slope) was 1.4 episodes/patient/year (p=0.04). Patients with confirmed hypoglycaemia had lower HbA(1c) than patients without hypoglycaemia (7.39 vs. 7.64%, respectively; decrement=0.26%, p=0.026).. These studies demonstrated an inverse relationship between HbA(1c) and 24-h and daytime hypoglycaemia. Lispro insulin mixtures provided lower HbA(1c) and post-prandial blood glucose values than glargine, but caused more daytime hypoglycaemia. Frequency of nocturnal hypoglycaemia was similar and severe hypoglycaemia was rare with both insulin regimens.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Fasting; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin Lispro; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Metformin; Middle Aged

Traditional blood glucose-lowering agents do not sustain adequate glycemic control in most type 2 diabetic patients. Preclinical studies with exenatide have suggested sustained improvements in beta-cell function. We investigated the effects of 52 weeks of treatment with exenatide or insulin glargine followed by an off-drug period on hyperglycemic clamp-derived measures of beta-cell function, glycemic control, and body weight.. Sixty-nine metformin-treated patients with type 2 diabetes were randomly assigned to exenatide (n = 36) or insulin glargine (n = 33). beta-Cell function was measured during an arginine-stimulated hyperglycemic clamp at week 0, at week 52, and after a 4-week off-drug period. Additional end points included effects on glycemic control, body weight, and safety.. Treatment-induced change in combined glucose- and arginine-stimulated C-peptide secretion was 2.46-fold (95% CI 2.09-2.90, P < 0.0001) greater after a 52-week exenatide treatment compared with insulin glargine treatment. Both exenatide and insulin glargine reduced A1C similarly: -0.8 +/- 0.1 and -0.7 +/- 0.2%, respectively (P = 0.55). Exenatide reduced body weight compared with insulin glargine (difference -4.6 kg, P < 0.0001). beta-Cell function measures returned to pretreatment values in both groups after a 4-week off-drug period. A1C and body weight rose to pretreatment values 12 weeks after discontinuation of either exenatide or insulin glargine therapy.. Exenatide significantly improves beta-cell function during 1 year of treatment compared with titrated insulin glargine. After cessation of both exenatide and insulin glargine therapy, beta-cell function and glycemic control returned to pretreatment values, suggesting that ongoing treatment is necessary to maintain the beneficial effects of either therapy.

Topics: Arginine; Blood Glucose; Body Mass Index; C-Peptide; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Exenatide; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin Secretion; Insulin-Secreting Cells; Insulin, Long-Acting; Kinetics; Male; Metformin; Middle Aged; Peptides; Venoms

Hyperglycemia and Its Effect After Acute Myocardial Infarction on Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (HEART2D) is a multinational, randomized, controlled trial designed to compare the effects of prandial versus fasting glycemic control on risk for cardiovascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes after acute myocardial infarction (AMI).. Patients (type 2 diabetes, aged 30-75 years) were randomly assigned within 21 days after AMI to the 1) prandial strategy (PRANDIAL) (three premeal doses of insulin lispro targeting 2-h postprandial blood glucose <7.5 mmol/l) or the 2) basal strategy (BASAL) (NPH twice daily or insulin glargine once daily targeting fasting/premeal blood glucose <6.7 mmol/l).. A total of 1,115 patients were randomly assigned (PRANDIAL n = 557; BASAL n = 558), and the mean patient participation after randomization was 963 days (range 1-1,687 days). The trial was stopped for lack of efficacy. Risks of first combined adjudicated primary cardiovascular events in the PRANDIAL (n = 174, 31.2%) and BASAL (n = 181, 32.4%) groups were similar (hazard ratio 0.98 [95% CI 0.8-1.21]). Mean A1C did not differ between the PRANDIAL and BASAL groups (7.7 +/- 0.1 vs. 7.8 +/- 0.1%; P = 0.4) during the study. The PRANDIAL group showed a lower daily mean postprandial blood glucose (7.8 vs. 8.6 mmol/l; P < 0.01) and 2-h postprandial blood glucose excursion (0.1 vs. 1.3 mmol/l; P < 0.001) versus the BASAL group. The BASAL group showed lower mean fasting blood glucose (7.0 vs. 8.1 mmol/l; P < 0.001) and similar daily fasting/premeal blood glucose (7.7 vs. 7.3 mmol/l; P = 0.233) versus the PRANDIAL group.. Treating diabetic survivors of AMI with prandial versus basal strategies achieved differences in fasting blood glucose, less-than-expected differences in postprandial blood glucose, similar levels of A1C, and no difference in risk for future cardiovascular event rates.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Body Weight; Cardiovascular System; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Administration Schedule; Fasting; Female; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin Lispro; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Middle Aged; Postprandial Period; Risk Factors; Treatment Outcome

Both insulin and thiazolidinediones (TZDs) are effective in the treatment of hyperglycaemia and amelioration of insulin resistance in type 2 diabetes but have side effects including weight gain and fluid retention. The use of TZDs has been further hampered by the risk of adverse cardiovascular events including heart failure. The present study evaluated the effect of pioglitazone or insulin glargine on cardiac function and size as well as on surrogate markers of fluid retention such as weight, haemoglobin and natriuretic peptides.. Thirty patients with inadequate glycaemic control on metformin and sulfonylurea were randomised to receive add-on therapy with insulin glargine or pioglitazone for 26 weeks. Echocardiographic data and blood samples were collected from the two groups before the start of the treatment and after 26 weeks. Left ventricular end-diastolic and left atrial end-systolic volumes were quantified, weight measured and blood samples analyzed.. After 26 weeks of treatment, the changes in HbA1c, weight and haemoglobin were similar between the two groups. HDL increased significantly in the pioglitazone group. While there was an increase in natriuretic peptides in the pioglitazone group (NT-proBNP 11.4 +/- 19.6 to 22.8 +/- 44.0, p = 0.046), the difference between the treatment groups was not significant. Left ventricular end-diastolic volume increased by 11% and left atrial end-systolic volume by 17% in the pioglitazone group (Both, p < 0.05, between treatment groups). There was a borderline significant increase in ejection fraction in the pioglitazone group.. This randomised pilot-study showed that six-month treatment with pioglitazone induced significant increases in natriuretic peptides and alterations of cardiac size. These changes were not observed with insulin glargine, which also is known to induce fluid retention. Larger randomised trials are warranted to confirm these findings.

Topics: Aged; Atrial Function, Left; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Edema; Electrocardiography; Female; Humans; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardium; Organ Size; Pilot Projects; Pioglitazone; Thiazolidinediones; Ventricular Function, Left

To assess the effect of three times daily mealtime inhaled insulin therapy compared with once daily basal insulin glargine therapy on 72-h glucose profiles, glucose variability and oxidative stress in type 2 diabetes patients.. In an inpatient crossover study, 40 subjects with type 2 diabetes were randomized to receive 9 days of inhaled insulin three times daily before meals or 9 days of glargine administered in the morning before breakfast in a randomized order. During the last 72 h in each phase, glucose was measured with continuous glucose monitoring. Activation of oxidative stress was measured by determining the 15(S)-8-iso-PGF(2alpha)-secretion in 24-h urine samples.. Inhaled insulin improved overall and postprandial glucose control significantly better than insulin glargine (p < 0.0001). There was a trend towards a greater reduction in glucose variability (8-9%) in the inhaled group [p = 0.1430 and p = 0.3298 for mean amplitude of glycaemic excursions (MAGEs) and mean of daily differences respectively]. Oxidative stress, estimated by determining the urinary isoprostane excretion (15(S)-8-iso-PGF(2alpha)), was equally reduced from baseline by both treatments. No correlation was found between glucose variability and oxidative stress in both groups.. This study showed a mealtime insulin approach to improve glycaemic control more than a basal insulin approach. These findings indicate also that lowering glucose using insulin treatment lowers oxidative stress over time, at least for the study period of 9 days, in type 2 diabetes patients. Contrary to earlier data, we found no correlation between glucose variability (MAGE) and oxidative stress (15(S)-8-iso-PGF(2alpha)) in this study.

Topics: Administration, Inhalation; Aged; Blood Glucose; Cross-Over Studies; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Middle Aged; Oxidative Stress; Prospective Studies; Treatment Outcome

To compare the ability of two starter insulin regimens to achieve glycemic control in a large, ethnically diverse population with type 2 diabetes.. During the initiation phase of the DURABLE trial, patients were randomized to a twice-daily lispro mix 75/25 (LM75/25; 75% lispro protamine suspension, 25% lispro) (n = 1,045) or daily glargine (GL) (n = 1,046) with continuation of prestudy oral antihyperglycemic drugs.. Baseline A1C was similar (LM75/25: 9.1 +/- 1.3%; GL: 9.0 +/- 1.2%; P = 0.414). At 24 weeks, LM75/25 patients had lower A1C than GL patients (7.2 +/- 1.1 vs. 7.3 +/- 1.1%, P = 0.005), greater A1C reduction (-1.8 +/- 1.3 vs. -1.7 +/- 1.3%, P = 0.005), and higher percentage reaching A1C target <7.0% (47.5 vs. 40.3%, P < 0.001). LM75/25 was associated with higher insulin dose (0.47 +/- 0.23 vs. 0.40 +/- 0.23 units x kg(-1) x day(-1), P < 0.001) and more weight gain (3.6 +/- 4.0 vs. 2.5 +/- 4.0 kg, P < 0.0001). LM75/25 patients had a higher overall hypoglycemia rate than GL patients (28.0 +/- 41.6 vs. 23.1 +/- 40.7 episodes x pt(-1) x year(-1), P = 0.007) but lower nocturnal hypoglycemia rate (8.9 +/- 19.3 vs. 11.4 +/- 25.3 episodes x pt(-1) x year(-1), P = 0.009). Severe hypoglycemia rates were low in both groups (LM75/25: 0.10 +/- 1.6 vs. GL: 0.03 +/- 0.3 episodes x pt(-1) x year(-1), P = 0.167).. Compared with GL, LM75/25 resulted in slightly lower A1C at 24 weeks and a moderately higher percentage reaching A1C target <7.0%. Patients receiving LM75/25 experienced more weight gain and higher rates of overall hypoglycemia but lower rates of nocturnal hypoglycemia. Durability of regimens will be evaluated in the following 2-year maintenance phase.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Blood Glucose; Body Mass Index; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Eating; Ethnicity; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin Lispro; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Middle Aged; Postprandial Period

Combinations of insulin and oral antidiabetic drugs (OAD) are often prescribed instead of insulin alone. In this study, the effects of insulin glargine (IG) in combination with repaglinide or acarbose on glycemic parameters were investigated. Obese Type 2 diabetic patients with fasting blood glucose (FBG) levels >or= 7.7 mmol/l [corrected] and hemoglobin glycated (A1C) >or=9% under maximal OAD combination therapy were enrolled. Previous therapies were discontinued, and patients were randomized into 2 groups. The combinations of IG and repaglinide were administered to group 1, and of IG and acarbose to group 2 for 13 weeks. Twenty patients in group 1 and 18 patients in group 2 completed the study. A1C levels were significantly decreased from 10.9+/-1.4% to 7.7+/-1.1% in group 1 and 11.0+/-1.4% to 8.1+/-1.4% in group 2. FBG levels were significantly decreased from 11.9+/-2.7 to 7.1+/-2.3 mmol/l in group 1 and 11.1+/-2.5 to 6.8+/-1.4 mmol/l in group 2. Post-prandial glucose levels were significantly decreased from 15.3+/-3.8 to 10.3+/-3.0 mmol/l in group 1 and 14.0+/-3.1 to 8.9+/-2.2 mmol/l in group 2. Intergroup comparisons indicated no significant differences. More weight gain was detected in group 1, compared to the baseline. Symptomatic hypoglycemia incidence was similar in both groups. Severe hypoglycemic attacks were seen in two patients in group 1. Flatulence incidence was higher in acarbose group. Conclusively, repaglinide and acarbose were equally effective when combined with IG for obese Type 2 diabetic patients controlled inadequately with OAD alone. Furthermore, acarbose seems to have advantages over repaglinide concerning weight gain and severe hypoglycemic attacks.

Topics: Acarbose; Blood Glucose; Carbamates; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Middle Aged; Obesity; Piperidines; Weight Gain

Insulin glargine as a basal insulin exhibits constant absorption with no pronounced peaks in blood insulin levels and 24-h duration of action. We checked the effect of insulin glargine through the comparison of insulin glargine with glucose-insulin-potassium (GIK) on perioperative glucose control in insulin-treated type 2 diabetic patients.. Thirty insulin-treated type 2 diabetic patients, 40-80 years of age, were subjected to femoral artery bypass or knee amputation under general anaesthesia. The insulin glargine group (n = 15) was treated with insulin glargine (two-thirds of the total daily insulin dose required) subcutaneous administration with 5% dextrose solution infusion. The GIK group (n = 15) was treated with GIK infusion (125 ml h). Blood glucose levels were checked every 30 min during anaesthesia and 1 h after extubation. Potassium was checked every 1 h during anaesthesia and 2-4 h after extubation. Statistical analysis was performed with unpaired t test.. There were no significant differences in the time course of blood glucose levels during operation and postoperative period between the two groups (P < 0.05). There was no hypoglycaemic episode in the perioperative period and no significant differences in potassium levels between the two groups.. Insulin glargine was as effective as GIK regimen for perioperative glycaemic control during major surgery in insulin-dependent type 2 diabetic patients.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Amputation, Surgical; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Female; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Infusions, Intravenous; Injections, Subcutaneous; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Knee; Male; Middle Aged; Perioperative Care; Vascular Surgical Procedures

Many patients with type 2 diabetes (T2DM) are not able to reach the glycaemic target level of HbA1c < 7.0%, and therefore are at increased risk of developing severe complications. Transition to insulin therapy is one of the obstacles in diabetes management, because of barriers of both patient and health care providers. Patient empowerment, a patient-centred approach, is vital for improving diabetes management. We developed a web-based self-management programme for insulin titration in T2DM patients. The aim of our study is to investigate if this internet programme helps to improve glycaemic control more effectively than usual care.. T2DM patients (n = 248), aged 35-75 years, with an HbA1c > or = 7.0%, eligible for treatment with insulin and able to use the internet will be selected from general practices in two different regions in the Netherlands. Cluster randomisation will be performed at the level of general practices. Patients in the intervention group will use a self-developed internet programme to assist them in self-titrating insulin. The control group will receive usual care.Primary outcome is the difference in change in HbA1c between intervention and control group. Secondary outcome measures are quality of life, treatment satisfaction, diabetes self-efficacy and frequency of hypoglycaemic episodes. Results will be analysed according to the intention-to-treat principle.. An internet intervention supporting self-titration of insulin therapy in T2DM patients is an innovative patient-centred intervention. The programme provides guided self-monitoring and evaluation of health and self-care behaviours through tailored feedback on input of glucose values. This is expected to result in a better performance of self-titration of insulin and consequently in the improvement of glycaemic control. The patient will be enabled to 'discover and use his or her own ability to gain mastery over his/her diabetes' and therefore patient empowerment will increase. Based on the self-regulation theory of Leventhal, we hypothesize that additional benefits will be achieved in terms of increases in treatment satisfaction, quality of life and self-efficacy.. Dutch Trial Register TC1316.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Injections, Subcutaneous; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Internet; Middle Aged; Patient Education as Topic; Patient Satisfaction; Patient-Centered Care; Self Care; Self Efficacy

This long-term study was designed to further characterise the retinal safety profile of insulin glargine and human neutral protamine Hagedorn (NPH) insulin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.. An open-label, 5 year, randomised (1:1), multicentre, stratified, parallel-group study conducted in the USA and Canada enrolled individuals with type 2 diabetes and either no or non-proliferative retinopathy (less than severe; Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study [ETDRS] level less than 53 in both eyes) who were treated with oral hypoglycaemic agents (OHAs) alone, insulin alone or OHAs with insulin for >/=3 months prior to study entry and a baseline HbA(1c) level of 6.0-12.0%. Patients were randomised by the investigator according to the centralised interactive voice response system to receive twice-daily NPH insulin (n = 509) or once-daily basal insulin glargine (n = 515). The investigator was not blinded to the treatment group to which each participant had been assigned. The main objective of this study was to compare the progression of diabetic retinopathy between treatment groups by analysing the percentage of patients with three or more step progression in the ETDRS retinopathy patient-level severity scale after treatment with either basal insulin. Masked, centralised grading of seven-field stereoscopic fundus photographs was used.. Similarly sustained glycaemic control was observed in both the insulin glargine and NPH insulin treatment groups. Despite a slightly greater severity of diabetic retinopathy for the insulin glargine group at baseline, three or more step progression in ETDRS score from baseline to end-of-study was similar between treatment groups (14.2% [53/374] of insulin glargine-treated patients vs 15.7% [57/363] of NPH-treated patients); the difference in the incidence of progression was -1.98% (95% CI -7.02, 3.06%). Other measures of retinopathy-the development of proliferative diabetic retinopathy and progression to clinically significant macular oedema-occurred to a similar degree in both treatment groups. No other safety issues, such as unexpected adverse events for either insulin emerged during the 5 year study. However, NPH insulin treatment was associated with a higher incidence of severe hypoglycaemia compared with insulin glargine.. This study shows no evidence of a greater risk of the development or progression of diabetic retinopathy with insulin glargine vs NPH insulin treatment in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00174824. This study was sponsored by sanofi-aventis.

Topics: Aged; Blood Glucose; Canada; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Diabetic Retinopathy; Disease Progression; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Isophane; Insulin, Long-Acting; Internationality; Male; Middle Aged; Patient Selection; United States

The objective was to compare the effects on glycemia of adding either inhaled human insulin (Exubera [EXU] [insulin human (recombinant DNA origin) inhalational powder]) or subcutaneous insulin glargine (GLA) to the treatment regimens of patients with type 2 diabetes uncontrolled with oral antidiabetic drugs.. Forty patients were randomized to receive either EXU three times daily prior to meals or subcutaneous GLA once daily in a crossover design. Interstitial glucose concentrations were monitored using a continuous glucose monitoring system (CGMS) for the final 72-h period of 8 treatment days.. Total insulin dosage on the last treatment day was approximately 40.1+/-18.1 units/day EXU compared with 16.4+/-4.8 units/day GLA. Serum insulin levels over the 72-h CGMS period were higher for EXU than for GLA (1,091+/-589 pmol/mL/h vs. 737+/-386 pmol/mL/h; ratio, 148; 95% confidence interval [CI], 130-169). The glucose exposure over this period was lower with EXU than with GLA (380+/-45 mmol/Lh vs. 426+/-89 mmol/Lh; ratio, 88.57; 95% CI, 84-93). The overall hypoglycemic event rate was 8.7 events per subject-month for EXU and 2.4 for GLA.. Prandial insulin therapy with EXU, using a higher daily insulin dose, reduces total daily glucose exposure--in particular postmeal glycemia--more effectively than a basal insulin analog.

Topics: Administration, Inhalation; Blood Glucose; Cross-Over Studies; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Humans; Injections, Subcutaneous; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Monitoring, Ambulatory

This treat-to-target study compared the efficacy and safety of insulin detemir (IDet) and insulin glargine (IGla) in a basal-bolus (insulin aspart) regimen in type 2 diabetes.. 385 patients were randomized 2 : 1 (IDet : IGla). Non-inferiority of IDet to IGla was determined by HbA(1c) 95% CI upper limit <0.4.. IDet and IGla showed similar efficacy in HbA(1c) reduction at 26 weeks, as the non-inferiority criterion was met at 26 weeks (LS mean [Det-Gla]: 0.207; 95% CI: 0.0149,0.3995). It appeared that IGla in some cases did better than IDet in terms of HbA(1c), but the difference (0.207%) was not clinically meaningful. Based on the CONSORT guideline, non-inferiority analysis using the LOCF approach was inconclusive regarding possible inferiority of delta 0.4 (LS mean of [Det-Gla]: 0.307; 95% CI: 0.1023, 0.5109). HbA(1c) decreased significantly from baseline in IDet (-1.1% [26 weeks], -0.9% [LOCF], p < 0.001) and in IGla (-1.3% [26 weeks, LOCF], p < 0.001). Final HbA(1c) were 7.1% (26 weeks) and 7.3% (LOCF) in IDet, and 6.9% (26 weeks) and 7.0% (LOCF) in IGla. Final FPG were 130 mg/dL (26 weeks) and 135 mg/dL (LOCF) in IDet, and 134 mg/dL (26 weeks) and 137 mg/dL (LOCF) in IGla. There was significantly less weight gain in IDet-treated patients (1.2 +/- 3.96 kg versus 2.7 +/- 3.94 kg, p = 0.001). Hypoglycemia risk was comparable between groups. The majority of IDet-treated patients (87.4%) remained on a once-daily basal insulin regimen throughout the study.. IDet and IGla were both effective and safe treatments for glycemic control in a basal-bolus regimen for type 2 diabetes. Clinically significant reductions in HbA(1c) were achieved in both groups, but with significantly less weight gain in the IDet group at comparable basal insulin dosage.

Topics: Adult; Blood Glucose; Body Mass Index; Confidence Intervals; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Edema; Fasting; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Aspart; Insulin Detemir; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Middle Aged; Poisson Distribution; Respiratory Tract Infections; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Weight Gain

Topics: Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Diabetic Retinopathy; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Isophane; Insulin, Long-Acting; Neoplasms; Risk Factors

To investigate the long-term clinical and economic outcomes associated with exenatide versus insulin glargine as "add-on" treatments to oral therapy in individuals with Type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled with combination oral agents in the Swiss setting.. A computer simulation model of diabetes was used to project complications, life expectancy, quality-adjusted life expectancy and direct medical costs over a 35-year time horizon. Cohort characteristics and treatment effect data were derived from a 26-week randomized clinical trial comparing exenatide and insulin glargine. Modeled treatment effects included reductions in glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) by -0.99% and -1.07% and in body mass index (BMI) by -0.80 and +0.55 kg/m2 with exenatide and insulin glargine respectively. Changes in systolic blood pressure and serum lipid levels were also captured. Simulations incorporated published quality of life utilities and Swiss costs from 2006. Extensive sensitivity analyses were conducted to assess the robustness of projected outcomes. Future clinical and economic outcomes were discounted at 2.5% per annum.. In the base-case analysis exenatide was associated with comparable life expectancy (11,549 years versus 11,468 years) and an improvement in quality-adjusted life expectancy of 0.43 quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) versus insulin glargine over a 35-year time horizon. Exenatide was associated with a reduced cumulative incidence of most diabetes-related complications including an absolute reduction in myocardial infarction by 0.28%. Assuming an annual treatment cost of CHF 2,797.74 for exenatide, direct costs increased by CHF 8,378 per patient over the 35-year time horizon compared to insulin glargine. The resultant incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was CHF 19,450 per QALY gained for exenatide versus insulin glargine.. Exenatide was associated with comparable life expectancy and an improvement in quality-adjusted life expectancy versus insulin glargine over a 35-year time horizon. Based on current standards exenatide would be a cost-effective treatment alternative to insulin glargine in Switzerland for Type 2 diabetes patients inadequately controlled on oral therapy.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Blood Glucose; Blood Pressure; Body Mass Index; Computer Simulation; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Exenatide; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Health Care Costs; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Lipids; Male; Peptides; Quality of Life; Quality-Adjusted Life Years; Switzerland; Venoms

The aim of the study was to compare the efficacy and safety of liraglutide in type 2 diabetes mellitus vs placebo and insulin glargine (A21Gly,B31Arg,B32Arg human insulin), all in combination with metformin and glimepiride.. This randomised (using a telephone or web-based randomisation system), parallel-group, controlled 26 week trial of 581 patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus on prior monotherapy (HbA(1c) 7.5-10%) and combination therapy (7.0-10%) was conducted in 107 centres in 17 countries. The primary endpoint was HbA(1c). Patients were randomised (2:1:2) to liraglutide 1.8 mg once daily (n = 232), liraglutide placebo (n = 115) and open-label insulin glargine (n = 234), all in combination with metformin (1 g twice daily) and glimepiride (4 mg once daily). Investigators, participants and study monitors were blinded to the treatment status of the liraglutide and placebo groups at all times.. The number of patients analysed as intention to treat were: liraglutide n = 230, placebo n = 114, insulin glargine n = 232. Liraglutide reduced HbA(1c) significantly vs glargine (1.33% vs 1.09%; -0.24% difference, 95% CI 0.08, 0.39; p = 0.0015) and placebo (-1.09% difference, 95% CI 0.90, 1.28; p < 0.0001). There was greater weight loss with liraglutide vs placebo (treatment difference -1.39 kg, 95% CI 2.10, 0.69; p = 0.0001), and vs glargine (treatment difference -3.43 kg, 95% CI 4.00, 2.86; p < 0.0001). Liraglutide reduced systolic BP (-4.0 mmHg) vs glargine (+0.5 mmHg; -4.5 mmHg difference, 95% CI 6.8, -2.2; p = 0.0001) but not vs placebo (p = 0.0791). Rates of hypoglycaemic episodes (major, minor and symptoms only, respectively) were 0.06, 1.2 and 1.0 events/patient/year, respectively, in the liraglutide group (vs 0, 1.3, 1.8 and 0, 1.0, 0.5 with glargine and placebo, respectively). A slightly higher number of adverse events (including nausea at 14%) were reported with liraglutide, but only 9.8% of participants in the group receiving liraglutide developed anti-liraglutide antibodies.. Liraglutide added to metformin and sulfonylurea produced significant improvement in glycaemic control and bodyweight compared with placebo and insulin glargine. The difference vs insulin glargine in HbA(1c) was within the predefined non-inferiority margin.. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00331851.. The study was funded by Novo Nordisk A/S.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Blood Glucose; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Glucagon-Like Peptide 1; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Liraglutide; Male; Metformin; Middle Aged; Placebos; Sulfonylurea Compounds; Young Adult

As diabetes is in part an inflammatory condition, the initiation of insulin and/or metformin may beneficially reduce levels of inflammatory biomarkers such as high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP).. To determine whether insulin alone or combined with metformin lowers levels of hsCRP, IL-6, and soluble tumor necrosis factor receptor 2 (sTNFr2) in patients with recent-onset type 2 diabetes mellitus.. Randomized 2 x 2 factorial trial of open-label insulin glargine and placebo-controlled metformin in 500 adults with type 2 diabetes (median time from diagnosis, 2.0 years), suboptimal glycemic control, and elevated hsCRP levels. Patients were recruited from US office-based practices between October 2006 and December 2008.. Random allocation to 1 of 4 treatments (placebo metformin only, placebo metformin and insulin glargine, active metformin only, or active metformin and insulin glargine) with dose titration targeting fasting blood glucose less than 110 mg/dL.. Change in hsCRP level (primary end point) and change in IL-6 and sTNFr2 levels (secondary end points) from baseline to 14 weeks.. Levels of glucose and glycated hemoglobin (HbA(1c)) were significantly reduced with active treatment vs placebo (all P values <.001). Levels of hsCRP were reduced in all 4 groups. There was no significant difference in hsCRP reduction among those allocated to insulin (-11.8%; 95% CI, -18.7% to -4.4%) or to no insulin (-17.5%; 95% CI, -23.9% to -10.5%) (P for difference = .25), or among those allocated to active metformin (-18.1%; 95% CI, -24.4% to -11.1%) or placebo metformin (-11.2%; 95% CI, -18.1% to -3.7%) (P for difference = .17). In the individual treatment groups, despite a differential impact on glucose control, reductions in hsCRP in the metformin (-16.1%; 95% CI, -25.1% to -6.1%) and metformin plus insulin (-20.1%; 95% CI, -28.8% to -10.4%) groups were no different than reductions with placebo alone (-19.0%; 95% CI, -27.8% to -9.1%; P = .67 and .87 vs placebo, respectively). By contrast, hsCRP reduction was attenuated with insulin alone (-2.9%, 95% CI, -13.2% to 8.6%; P = .03 vs placebo). Similar findings were noted for levels of IL-6 and sTNFr2.. In patients with recent-onset type 2 diabetes, treatment with insulin or metformin compared with placebo did not reduce inflammatory biomarker levels despite improving glucose control.. clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00366301.

Topics: Biomarkers; Blood Glucose; C-Reactive Protein; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Interleukin-6; Male; Metformin; Middle Aged; Receptors, Tumor Necrosis Factor, Type II

The primary aim was to evaluate duration of action of a single 0.8 U/kg dose of insulin lispro protamine suspension (ILPS) in type 2 diabetes (T2DM) patients; secondarily to compare onset and duration of action of ILPS, glargine (G), and detemir (D) (0.8 U/kg) and evaluate pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) dose responses of ILPS.. In a single-center, double-blind, five-arm crossover study, 34 patients were randomized to a treatment sequence which included a single subcutaneous 0.8 U/kg dose of G and D and three doses of ILPS (0.4 U/kg, 0.8 U/kg, and 1.2 U/kg) and were studied using 24-hour euglycemic glucose clamps.. Duration of action was determined as the time to the last measurable glucose infusion rate (tR(last)) during glucose clamps.. The duration of insulin action (tR(last)) for ILPS at 0.8 U/kg was >23 hours and was similar to G (p = 0.114) and D (p = 0.570). Post-hoc analysis demonstrated the probability of achieving 24 hours of glucose-lowering activity after a 0.8 U/kg dose: 48% (ILPS), 43% (G), and 26% (D). G(tot) and R(max) were significantly greater for ILPS versus G or D. The median ILPS time-dependent values demonstrated a significantly earlier maximum PD response (tR(max) and early 50% tR(max)) versus either G or D. ILPS demonstrated dose-dependent increases in PK and PD measures across the dose range.. Following a single 0.8 U/kg dose in T2DM patients, ILPS, G, and D demonstrated similar durations of glucose-lowering activity and ILPS demonstrated significantly greater glucose-lowering activity (R(max) and G(tot)) and earlier maximum PD response. These results potentially support once-daily dosing of ILPS in T2DM.. The observed number of 24-hour censored observations was higher than expected and the wash-out period for basal insulin treated patients may have been too short to definitively rule out a carry-over effect; however, such an effect, if present, would potentially only affect onset of action and not the primary outcome measure.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Cross-Over Studies; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Double-Blind Method; Female; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Detemir; Insulin Glargine; Insulin Lispro; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Middle Aged; Protamines; Suspensions

Patients with type 2 diabetes often initiate insulin with once-daily basal insulin. Over time, many patients intensify their insulin regimens in an attempt to attain and sustain glycemic targets. This study compares three intensification approaches: changing insulin glargine to preprandial AIR inhaled insulin (developed by Alkermes, Inc. [Cambridge, MA] and Eli Lilly and Company [Indianapolis, IN]; AIR is a registered trademark of Alkermes, Inc.), intensifying glargine via validated titration algorithms (IG), or adding AIR insulin while intensifying glargine (AIR + IG).. Five hundred sixty patients with hemoglobin A(1c) (A1C) of 7.5-10.5%, on one or more antihyperglycemic medications, and on once-daily insulin glargine for > or =4 months were randomly allocated to one of the three treatments lasting 52 weeks. The primary objective assessed between-group differences in A1C mean change from baseline to 24 weeks using last-observation-carried-forward (LOCF) in the intent-to-treat population.. At 24 weeks, A1C was reduced from a mean baseline of 8.5% to 7.7%, 7.9%, and 7.5% for the AIR, IG, and AIR + IG groups, respectively. AIR produced 0.20% greater A1C decrease than IG (least-squares mean difference = -0.20%; 95% confidence interval [CI], -0.39, -0.02). AIR + IG had a 0.35% greater A1C decrease versus IG (95% CI, -0.57, -0.13). The -0.15% difference between AIR + IG versus AIR was not significant (P < 0.198). More hypoglycemia categorized as severe occurred with AIR alone versus IG alone at LOCF end points. More nocturnal hypoglycemia occurred with IG alone versus AIR alone and AIR + IG.. Preprandial inhaled insulin provides an alternative for patients not optimized on insulin glargine alone. Glycemic control, hypoglycemic risk, delivery preference, and regimen complexity must be considered when selecting insulin initiation and optimization regimens.

Topics: Administration, Inhalation; Adult; Aged; Blood Glucose; Body Mass Index; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Least-Squares Analysis; Male; Middle Aged

To assess the efficacy and safety of biphasic insulin aspart 70/30 (BIAsp 30) and insulin glargine, administered once daily in subjects with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled with oral anti-diabetic drugs.. In this 26-week, open-labeled, randomized, parallel-group, multinational, treat-to-target trial, 480 insulin-naïve subjects were randomized to receive either BIAsp 30 before dinner or insulin glargine at bedtime, both in combination with metformin and glimepiride.. NCT00469092, ClinicalTrials.gov.. A total of 433 subjects completed the trial. Estimated mean reduction in HbA(1c) from baseline to end of treatment was -1.41% with BIAsp 30 and -1.25% with insulin glargine (BIAsp 30 - insulin glargine = -0.16%, 95% CI [-0.30; -0.02], p = 0.029). At the end of treatment, mean HbA(1c) was 7.1% and 7.3% for BIAsp 30 and insulin glargine, respectively. Significantly lower plasma glucose levels were observed with BIAsp 30 post-dinner (BIAsp 30 - insulin glargine = -0.52 mmol/L, 95% CI [-1.02; -0.03], p = 0.04) and at bedtime (BIAsp 30 - insulin glargine = -0.78 mmol/L, 95% CI [-1.25; -0.31], p < 0.01). The relative risk (RR) of experiencing a nocturnal hypoglycemic episode (00:00-06.00 a.m.) was significantly higher with BIAsp 30 than with insulin glargine (1.1 versus 0.5 episodes/year, RR = 2.41, 95% CI [1.34; 4.34], p = 0.003), but overall hypoglycemia rates were low. There were three major hypoglycemic episodes in each group.. With respect to HbA(1c), BIAsp 30 fulfilled the statistical criteria for non-inferiority and superiority to insulin glargine and, according to pre-defined criteria, the improvements in HbA(1c) are considered clinically equivalent. Subjects had an increased risk of minor nocturnal hypoglycemia with BIAsp 30. There were no differences in treatment satisfaction between the two groups.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Biphasic Insulins; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dosage Forms; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Aspart; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Isophane; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Middle Aged; Treatment Failure

To compare starter insulins in the elderly subgroup of the DURABLE trial 24-week initiation phase.. In a post-hoc analysis of the > or = 65 years subgroup enrolled in the DURABLE trial, we compared the safety and efficacy of lispro mix 25 (LM25: lispro 25%/insulin lispro protamine suspension 75%), n = 258, vs. glargine, n = 222, added to oral glucose-lowering agents.. Baseline glycated hemoglobin (HbA(1c)) was similar (LM25 8.7 +/- 1.2, glargine 8.8 +/- 1.1%, P = 0.612). At 24-weeks, LM25 patients had lower HbA(1c) (7.0 +/- 0.9 vs. 7.3 +/- 0.9%, P < 0.001), greater HbA(1c) reduction (-1.7 +/- 1.2 vs. -1.5 +/- 1.1%, P < 0.001), and more patients reaching HbA(1c) < 7.0% (55.6 vs. 41.0%, P = 0.005). LM25 patients were on more insulin (0.40 +/- 0.19 vs. 0.33 +/- 0.19 u/kg/day, P < 0.001) and experienced more weight gain (3.6 +/- 3.6 vs. 1.8 +/- 3.2 kg, P < 0.001). Additionally, LM25-treated patients reported a higher mean overall hypoglycaemia rate than glargine patients (40.8 +/- 47.6 vs. 31.1 +/- 48.5 episodes/patient/year, P = 0.037), while nocturnal hypoglycaemia rates were similar. Over 24 weeks, incidence of severe hypoglycaemia was higher for LM25 (4.3% vs. 0.9%, P = 0.018); however, by 24-week endpoint incidence was similar (0.8% vs. 0.0%P = 0.125).. In this elderly subgroup post-hoc analysis, LM25 demonstrated a lower endpoint HbA(1c) and a higher % of patients reaching HbA(1c) target of < 7.0%, but with more weight gain and higher rates of hypoglycaemia compared to glargine.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin Lispro; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Treatment Outcome; Weight Gain

The intuitiveness, instruction time, and handling of the Levemir (insulin detemir) FlexPen and the Lantus OptiClik pen (with insulin glargine) were investigated.. This randomized open-label crossover study involved two groups of insulin-device-naive Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes [mean (SD) age 61.9 +/- 12.3 years, 57% male]. Patients were evaluated on the ease-of-use of each insulin pen without instruction [intuitiveness group (n = 32)], or with instruction [instruction time group (n = 29)]. Patient preferences for the respective devices were assessed by questionnaire.. FlexPen required significantly less instruction time (p < .001) and was objectively more intuitive to use (p < .001) than OptiClik. Nevertheless, few patients in the intuitiveness group felt confident injecting either pen prior to instruction (FlexPen, 31%; OptiClik, 16%). No patients in the instruction time group found FlexPen difficult to learn, whereas 45% of patients found OptiClik difficult or very difficult to learn. FlexPen was rated simpler to use (77% versus 12%; p < .001), easier to inject (67% versus 13%; p < .001), and more convenient (71% versus 12%; p < .001) compared with OptiClik. More patients would trust FlexPen to deliver insulin injections (p < .01) and would prefer to use FlexPen compared with OptiClik (82% versus 13%; p < .001).. FlexPen was faster to teach, simpler to use, and more trusted by patients compared with OptiClik. Mean injection time was significantly shorter for FlexPen than OptiClik, with or without instruction. This study highlights not only how easy it is for patients to learn to use FlexPen, but also how easily health care providers can teach patients to use it.

Topics: Aged; Asian People; Cross-Over Studies; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Female; Humans; Injections, Subcutaneous; Insulin; Insulin Detemir; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Middle Aged; Patient Education as Topic; Patient Preference

Insulin glargine is a long-acting human insulin analog often administered at bedtime to patients with type 2 diabetes. It reduces fasting blood glucose levels more efficiently and with less nocturnal hypoglycemic events compared with human neutral protamine Hagedorn (NPH) insulin. Therefore, bedtime injections of insulin glargine and NPH insulin were compared overnight and in the morning.. In 10 type 2 diabetic patients, euglycemic clamps were performed, including [6,6'](2)H(2) glucose, to study the rate of disappearance (Rd) and endogenous production (EGP) of glucose during the night. On separate days at bedtime (2200 h), patients received a sc injection of insulin glargine, NPH insulin, or saline in a randomized, double-blind fashion.. Similar doses of both insulins had different metabolic profiles. NPH insulin had a greater effect on both Rd and EGP in the night compared with insulin glargine. By contrast, in the morning, insulin glargine was more effective, increasing Rd by 5.8 micromol/kg(-1).min(-1) (95% confidence interval 4.7-6.9) and reducing EGP -5.7 (-5.0 to -6.4) compared with NPH insulin. Nearly 80% of the glucose lowering effect in the morning was due to insulin glargine's reduction of EGP. Its injection was associated with one-third lower morning glucagon levels compared with NPH insulin (P = 0.021).. Nocturnal variations of EGP and Rd explain the reduced incidence of hypoglycemia and lower fasting glucose levels reported for insulin glargine compared with human NPH insulin.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Blood Glucose; Circadian Rhythm; Cross-Over Studies; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Double-Blind Method; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Injections, Subcutaneous; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Isophane; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Middle Aged; Placebos

This study was designed to validate the use of SoloSTAR (sanofi-aventis Deutschland GmbH, Frankfurt, Germany), a new disposable pen developed for use with insulin glargine by patients with type 1 or type 2 diabetes.. This single-center, open-label, single-arm, sequential trial enrolled subjects with type 1 or type 2 diabetes, 21-78 years old. After face-to-face training (Part 1) or self-training (Part 2), subjects performed three dose-delivery repetitions into an injection pad using separate pens; pens were weighed before and after each dose delivery. The primary outcome was the proportion of subjects delivering successful doses (target dose, 40 units) with all three repetitions. Secondary outcomes included pen accuracy and precision.. Validation population included 50 (Part 1) and 54 (Part 2) subjects. In Part 1, 100% of the subjects delivered a successful dose on all three repetitions. In Part 2, 98% of subjects delivered a successful dose on all three repetitions, with five cases of dose-delivery failures reported in the study population. The mean dose delivered was 40.2 units (95% confidence interval [CI], 40.1-40.3 units) in Part 1 and 38.0 units (95% CI, 36.7-39.3 units) in Part 2; 99% and 88% of dose repetitions in Parts 1 and 2, respectively, were within 38-42 units. The safety test was successfully performed by 80% (95% CI, 70.2-88.0%) of subjects in Part 1 and 68% (95% CI, 58.1-77.6%) in Part 2.. This study successfully validated the SoloSTAR pen for use by subjects with or without face-to-face training. SoloSTAR was shown to be easy to use, accurate, and precise.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Disposable Equipment; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Injections, Subcutaneous; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Middle Aged; Outcome Assessment, Health Care; Syringes

While metformin is the first line treatment in type 2 diabetes, the best way to escalate therapy is not always clear, particularly whether to add one or two oral agents or to introduce insulin.. Thirty-six patients inadequately controlled on metformin and sulfonylurea/meglitinide were randomized to receive add-on therapy with insulin glargine or pioglitazone for 26 weeks. Insulin was up-titrated to achieve fasting plasma glucose <6 mmol/l. Pioglitazone was increased to 45 mg/day after 16 weeks if HbA1c>6.2%. beta-Cell function and insulin sensitivity were assessed by measuring insulin, proinsulin and adiponectin, and in a subgroup using a combined glucagon-stimulated C-peptide test and insulin tolerance test (GITT). Lipids and natriuretic peptides were measured at start and end of study.. The reduction in HbA1c was slightly greater in the insulin glargine group and used as co-variate when analysing other variables. The effect on beta-cell function was more favourable with insulin glargine measured by proinsulin (42+/-48 to 19+/-16, p=0.01 vs. 36+/-26 to 27+/-16 p=0.04) while the improvement in insulin sensitivity measured by adiponectin (7.5+/-3.7 to 15+/-10, p<0.01 vs. 8.7+/-4 to 7.6+/-3, p=0.04) and HDL cholesterol (1.10+/-0.24 to 1.24+/-0.3, p<0.01 vs. 1.08+/-0.35 to 1.04+/-0.33, ns) (all p between groups <0.01) was more favourable in pioglitazone group. Pioglitazone caused significant increase in natriuretic peptides (BNP pmol/l 6.6+/-5.2 to 13.7+/-16.1, p=0.04 vs. 8.8+/-11.6 to 8.6+/-10.6, ns, p between groups 0.028).. The results demonstrate characteristic differences in the effects of insulin glargine vs. pioglitazone on measures of beta-cell function and insulin sensitivity as well as cardiac load.

Topics: Adiponectin; Adult; Aged; Benzamides; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Glycated Hemoglobin; Heart Function Tests; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin Resistance; Insulin, Long-Acting; Metformin; Middle Aged; Pioglitazone; Proinsulin; Sulfonylurea Compounds; Thiazolidinediones; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult

Injection of long-acting insulin at bedtime is a common therapeutic approach for patients with type 2 diabetes that is poorly controlled with oral regimens. Neutral protamine lispro (NPL) insulin has demonstrated better glycemic control and similar incidence of hypoglycemic events than that of neutral protamine Hagedorn insulin.. To compare the clinical efficacy and safety of bedtime NPL insulin or insulin glargine in patients with type 2 diabetes who had suboptimal glycemic control while receiving stable doses of metformin and sulfonylurea.. Open-label, randomized trial.. Teaching hospital (Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria, Second University of Naples), Naples, Italy.. 116 adults receiving stable doses of metformin plus sulfonylurea for longer than 90 days with hemoglobin A(1c) (HbA(1c)) levels of 7.5% to 10% and fasting plasma glucose levels of 6.7 mmol/L or greater (> or =120 mg/dL).. 10 IU of NPL insulin or insulin glargine injected subcutaneously at bedtime with weekly dose titrations to target fasting glucose levels less than 5.6 mmol/L (<100 mg/dL) in addition to stable oral regimens. Patients receiving nighttime sulfonylurea before the study were switched to metformin.. The primary outcome was change in HbA(1c) levels from baseline to week 36. Secondary outcomes were HbA(1c) levels less than 7%, self-reported hypoglycemic episodes, insulin dose, self-monitored glucose level, and body weight. Twenty patients in each group had continuous glucose monitoring for 3 consecutive days before adding insulin and at week 36.. Improvement in HbA(1c) levels was similar in both groups (1.83% and 1.89% for NPL and glargine, respectively). The difference between the groups was 0.06 percentage point (95% CI, -0.1 to 0.15 percentage points). Secondary outcomes did not differ between groups. Hemoglobin A(1c) levels less than 7% occurred in 62% of patients receiving NPL and 64% of patients receiving glargine (difference, 2.0 percentage points [CI, -1.1 to 5.0 percentage points]). Fasting plasma glucose levels less than 5.6 mmol/L (<100 mg/dL) occurred in 40% of patients receiving NPL and 41% of patients receiving glargine (difference, 1.0 percentage point [CI, -0.9 to 3.0 percentage points]). Any hypoglycemic event occurred in 74% of patients receiving NPL and 67% of patients receiving glargine (difference, 7 percentage points [CI, -5 to 13 percentage points]). Continuous glucose level monitoring in the patients who had this measurement did not differ statistically.. The study was not blinded, had limited power to detect differences in hypoglycemic events, and did not obtain continuous glucose level monitoring for all patients.. Similar glycemic control occurred with the addition of NPL or glargine insulin to oral regimens in patients with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes. Hypoglycemia was similar in the 2 groups, but sample size limited the ability to make a definite safety assessment.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Aged; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Injections, Subcutaneous; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Metformin; Middle Aged; Protamines; Sulfonylurea Compounds; Weight Gain

To investigate whether the addition of a single bolus of insulin glulisine (glulisine), administered at either breakfast or main mealtime, in combination with basal insulin glargine (glargine) and oral antidiabetic drugs (OADs), provides equivalent glycaemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes, irrespective of the time of glulisine injection.. A national, multicentre, randomized, open-label, parallel-group study of 393 patients with type 2 diabetes who were suboptimally controlled [haemoglobin A(1c) (HbA(1c)) > 6.5-9.0% and fasting blood glucose (BG) 7.0% at baseline and who reached HbA(1c)

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Middle Aged; Postprandial Period; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Weight Gain; Young Adult

This trial compared the efficacy and safety profiles of the insulin analogues detemir and glargine as the basal insulin component of a basal-bolus regimen in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) who were being treated with oral antidiabetic drugs (OADs) or insulin with or without OADs.. This was a multinational, 52-week, openlabel, parallel-group, noninferiority, treat-to-target trial. Patients with a diagnosis of T2DM for > or = 12 months who had been receiving an OAD or insulin, with or without OADs, for > 4 months were randomized in a 2:1 ratio to receive detemir or glargine. According to the approved labeling, detemir could be administered once or twice daily, and glargine was administered once daily. Insulin aspart was given at mealtimes. Insulin secretagogues and a-glucosidase inhibitors were discontinued at study entry, and existing OADs were continued. Doses of detemir and glargine were titrated to achieve a prebreakfast (and predinner for detemir administered twice daily) plasma glucose target of < or = 6.0 mmol/L. Patients monitored their plasma glucose levels before breakfast and dinner on the 3 days before each of 13 scheduled visits, recorded their insulin doses on 1 of these 3 days, and recorded their 10-point self-monitored plasma glucose (SMPG) at baseline and after 24 and 52 weeks. The primary efficacy end point was glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA(1c)) at 52 weeks; secondary efficacy end points included changes in fasting plasma glucose (FPG), postprandial plasma glucose, insulin doses, and weight change at 52 weeks. Safety end points included the frequency of hypoglycemia and adverse events (AEs).. The intention-to-treat population included 319 patients (58.0% male, 42.0% female; 78.4% white; mean age, 58 years; mean weight, 92.8 kg; mean duration of diabetes, 13.6 years). At study entry, 46.1% of patients were receiving insulin and > or = 1 OAD, 35.4 were receiving insulin only, and 18.5% were receiving > or = 1 OAD only. At 52 weeks, there was no significant difference between detemir and glargine in terms of mean HbA(1c) (7.19% and 7.03%, respectively; mean difference, 0.17% [95% CI, -0.07 to 0.40]) or the mean decrease in HbAlc from baseline (-1.52% and -1.68%). The reduction in HbA(1c) was not significantly affected by whether detemir was administered once or twice daily. There were no significant differences between groups in terms of mean FPG (7.05 and 6.68 mmol/L) or the mean change in FPG from baseline (-2.56 and -2.92 mmol/L; mean difference, 0.36; 95% CI, -0.26 to 0.99). The overall shape of the 10-point SMPG profiles was not significantly different between groups. Mean weight gain at 52 weeks was significantly lower with detemir than with glargine (2.8 vs 3.8 kg; mean difference, -1.04; 95% CI, -2.08 to -0.01; P < 0.05). Doses of basal and prandial insulins at the end of the study were not significantly different between groups. Major hypoglycemic episodes were reported by 4.7% and 5.7% of patients in the respective treatment groups. There was no significant difference in the risk of hypoglycemia between groups. The proportion of patients with AEs and the number of AEs per patient were comparable between groups (185/214 patients [86.4%] reporting 743 AEs and 88/105 patients [83.8%] reporting 377 AEs).. when used as indicated as part of a basal-bolus regimen in patients with T2DM who had previously received other insulin and/or OAD regimens, detemir was noninferior to glargine in its effects on overall glycemic control. Both basal insulins were associated with clinically relevant reductions in hyperglycemia. Both were well tolerated, with no significant difference in the frequency of hypoglycemia or AEs.

Topics: Aged; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Detemir; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; International Cooperation; Male; Middle Aged; Patients; Postprandial Period; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of glimepiride plus insulin glargine in ethnic Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).. This 24-week, open-label, single-arm study was conducted in eight centers in Brazil. One hundred ethnic Japanese T2DM patients with inadequate glycemic control [HbA(1c): 8.0-11.0% and fasting plasma glucose (FPG)>or=140 mg/dL] on oral antidiabetic drugs (OADs) were enrolled. Patients were treated once daily with glimepiride 3mg (morning) and glargine (bedtime) with dose titration to achieve FPG 72-100mg/dL.. At Week 24, the mean dose of glargine was 37.6 IU/day. There were significant decreases (p<0.0001) compared with baseline, for mean HbA(1c) (1.5%), mean FPG (88.3mg/dL) (p<0.0001), mean PPG (112.0mg/dL), and mean fasting C-peptide (1.14 ng/mL). Peptide index (peak-basal/basal) in carbohydrate challenge test increased by 2.24 units. No severe adverse events, including severe hypoglycemia were reported.. Our study suggests that combined therapy of insulin glargine and glimepiride should be considered for T2DM patients who have unsatisfactory response to previous OAD treatment.

Topics: Blood Glucose; C-Peptide; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Humans; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Japan; Male; Middle Aged; Sulfonylurea Compounds

Addition of the long-acting basal human insulin analogue insulin glargine (LANTUS) to the treatment regimen of patients with inadequate glycaemic control on oral antidiabetic drugs (OADs) alone has previously been evaluated as effective, safe and convenient. This pilot study aimed to establish whether insulin glargine plus OADs is effective in Type 2 diabetes patients previously poorly controlled on premixed insulin therapy.. In an open, controlled, randomized, parallel-group, single-centre, 16-week pilot study, 52 patients (age 65.6+/-9.2 years; diabetes duration 15.3+/-7.6 years; insulin therapy duration 4.2+/-1.7 years, body mass index 31.4+/-2.9 kg/m(2)) with Type 2 diabetes (HbA (1c)> or =8.0%) on premixed human insulin (75/25 or 70/30) were randomized to once-daily morning insulin glargine plus glimepiride (Group A; n=17), insulin glargine plus glimepiride and metformin (Group B; n=18) or premixed insulin (Group C; n=17). Glycaemic control and incidence of hypoglycaemia were evaluated.. HbA (1c) decreased significantly from baseline in Groups A and B, but not in Group C; (Group A: 7.87+/-0.66%, -0.35%, p=0.013; Group B: 7.44+/-0.92%, -0.69%, p=0.0057; Group C: 7.83+/-1.13%, -0.25%, p=0.32). There were no between-treatment differences at endpoint in HbA (1c), fasting blood glucose, mean daily blood glucose or symptomatic hypoglycaemia (mean events/patient: Group A, 2.2; Group B, 2.3; Group C, 2.0). At endpoint, 88% of patients in Group A, 81% in Group B and 94% in Group C opted to continue with their assigned regimen.. This pilot study is the first prospective study to show that switching from premixed insulin to insulin glargine plus OAD treatment resulted in similar glycaemic control and treatment satisfaction. The results support the need for prospective examination in a larger-scale clinical study in patients with long-standing Type 2 diabetes and sub-optimal glycaemic control previously using a conventional premixed insulin regimen.

Topics: Aged; Body Mass Index; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Metformin; Middle Aged; Patient Satisfaction; Pilot Projects; Sulfonylurea Compounds; Treatment Outcome

The AT.LANTUS trial recently demonstrated the efficacy and safety of insulin glargine initiation and maintenance using two different treatment algorithms in poorly controlled type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). This sub-analysis investigated glycemic control and safety in 686 patients switching from premixed insulin (premix) with or without (+/-OADs) to once-daily glargine (+/-OADs/prandial insulin). A 24-week, multinational (n=59), multicenter (n=611), randomized study comparing two algorithms (Algorithm 1: clinic-driven titration; Algorithm 2: patient-driven titration) in four glargine+/-OADs treatment groups: alone, once- (OD), twice- (BD) or >twice- (>BD) daily prandial insulin. After switching to the glargine regimen, HbA(1c) levels significantly improved in the overall group (9.0+/-1.3 to 8.0+/-1.2%; p<0.001) and in all subgroups; fasting blood glucose levels also improved in all subgroups (overall: 167.1+/-50.0 to 106.9+/-27.2 mg/dL [9.3+/-2.8 to 5.9+/-1.5 mmol/L]; p<0.001). The incidence of severe hypoglycemia was also low in all four subgroups (< or =1.7%). Patients with T2DM switching from premix+/-OADs to glargine+/-OADs had significant reductions in glycemic control with a low incidence of severe hypoglycemia. The addition of prandial (OD, BD or >BD) insulin was associated with further improvements in glycemic control. These data provide support for the stepwise introduction of prandial insulin to a more physiologic basal-bolus regimen, which is under investigation.

Topics: Aged; Algorithms; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Middle Aged

Intensification of insulin therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes, while improving glycemic control, often leads to an increase in body weight and other markers of cardiovascular risk. The effects of pramlintide as an adjunct to basal insulin titration (without mealtime insulin) on glycemia and cardiovascular risk markers were examined.. This was a post hoc analysis of a 16-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled study in patients with type 2 diabetes (N = 211) using insulin glargine (without mealtime insulin) +/- oral agents. Patients were randomized to treatment with placebo or pramlintide (60 or 120 mug with major meals), and insulin glargine was titrated to target a fasting plasma glucose concentration of > or = 70 to < 100 mg/dL.. Endpoints included the change from baseline to Week 16 in body weight, high sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP), triglycerides, HDL, LDL, and blood pressure.. Pramlintide-treated patients lost weight and placebo-treated patients gained weight during 16 weeks of treatment (-1.6 +/- 0.3 kg vs. +0.7 +/- 0.3 kg, p < 0.001; mean +/- SE). hsCRP was reduced in pramlintide-treated versus placebo-treated patients (-0.8 +/- 0.2 mg/L vs. 0.1 +/- 0.2 mg/L, p < 0.01; mean +/- SE). Patients with baseline hsCRP > 3 mg/L (high cardiovascular risk) demonstrated greater hsCRP reductions with pramlintide versus placebo treatment at Week 16 (p < 0.05). Patients with baseline triglycerides > or = 150 mg/dL or > or = 200 mg/dL (high cardiovascular risk) showed significant reductions from baseline in triglyceride concentrations with pramlintide (-43 +/- 14 mg/dL or -59 +/- 19 mg/dL; p < 0.05; mean +/- SE) but not with placebo (1 +/- 29 mg/dL or -3 +/- 54 mg/dL; mean +/- SE). No significant differences between pramlintide and placebo were observed for changes in HDL, LDL, or blood pressure. Pramlintide treatment was generally well tolerated. The most frequent adverse event related to pramlintide was mild-to-moderate nausea (31% pramlintide vs. 10% placebo). Pramlintide added to basal insulin did not increase the incidence of hypoglycemia. A limitation of the study was its relatively short duration.. Pramlintide, as an adjunct to basal insulin, was associated with improvements in several cardiovascular risk markers, warranting long-term clinical studies to determine its potential effects on cardiovascular risk.

Topics: Aged; Amyloid; Biomarkers; Blood Glucose; Body Weight; C-Reactive Protein; Cardiovascular Diseases; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Islet Amyloid Polypeptide; Male; Middle Aged; Placebos; Risk Factors; Triglycerides

Impaired fasting glucose (IFG), impaired glucose tolerance (IGT), and diabetes arise due to insufficient insulin secretion and are risk factors for cardiovascular (CV) events. Thus, targeting normal fasting glucose levels with insulin may reduce CV events. Previous studies suggest that omega-3 fatty acid supplements may reduce CV death; however, their effect in high-risk dysglycemic individuals is not known.. People aged > or = 50 years with evidence of CV disease and with IFG, IGT, newly detected or established diabetes (on 0 or 1 oral agent), and a local glycated hemoglobin < 150% of the upper limit of normal for that assay were recruited and allocated to (a) either 1 daily injection of insulin glargine with the dose titrated to achieve a fasting plasma glucose < or = 5.3 mmol/L (95 mg/dL), or standard glycemic care; and (b) either omega-3-acid ethyl esters 90 (1 g consisting of EPA 465 mg and DHA 375 mg) or identical placebo, according to a 2 x 2 factorial design. The 2 different primary outcomes for the insulin and omega-3 fatty acid arms are CV events and CV death, respectively.. A total of 12,612 (mean age 64, 35% women) people in 40 countries were randomized during a 2-year period ending December 2005. Eighty-two percent had established diabetes, 6% had new diabetes, and 12% had IGT or IFG; the mean fasting plasma glucose was 7.3 mmol/L (131 mg/dL).. The ORIGIN trial will determine whether or not either or both of these interventions can reduce CV events.

Topics: Aged; Blood Glucose; Cardiovascular Diseases; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Glucose Tolerance Test; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; International Cooperation; Male; Middle Aged; Patient Selection; Probability; Proportional Hazards Models; Reference Values; Research Design; Severity of Illness Index; Survival Analysis; Treatment Outcome

This 52-week multinational, randomised, open-label, parallel-group, non-inferiority trial compared clinical outcomes following supplementation of oral glucose-lowering drugs with basal insulin analogues detemir and glargine in type 2 diabetic patients.. Insulin-naive adults (n=582, HbA(1c) 7.5-10.0%, BMI 7.0 mmol/l after achieving FPG <7.0 mmol/l. Due to labelling restrictions, no second glargine dose was allowed.. Baseline HbA(1c) decreased from 8.6 to 7.2 and 7.1% (NS) with detemir and glargine, respectively. FPG improved from 10.8 to 7.1 and 7.0 mmol/l (NS), respectively. With detemir, 45% of participants completed the study on once daily dosing and 55% on twice daily dosing, with no difference in HbA(1c). Overall, 52% of participants achieved HbA(1c)

Topics: Aged; Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring; Body Mass Index; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Detemir; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Middle Aged

To investigate the relationship between changes in glycated haemoglobin (HbA(1c)) and postprandial glucose excursions on 1,5-anhydroglucitol (1,5-AG) in patients with Type 2 diabetes, utilizing the differential effects between biphasic insulin aspart 30 (BIAsp 30) or insulin glargine (IGlar) on postprandial glucose (PPG) levels.. 1,5-AG was measured using the GlycoMark assay at baseline and after 12 and 28 weeks in the INITiation of Insulin to reach HbA(1c) Target (INITIATE) study of 233 patients randomized to either BIAsp 30 or IGlar.. Baseline 1,5-AG was low and not significantly different (4.9 +/- 3.5 and 4.3 +/- 2.6 microg/ml in the BIAsp 30 and IGlar groups, respectively). After 28 weeks, the levels of 1,5-AG were higher in the BIAsp 30 than in the IGlar group (13.4 vs. 11.1 microg/ml, P = 0.008) and change from baseline was 25% greater with BIAsp 30 than IGlar (8.4 vs. 6.7 microg/ml, P = 0.011). 1,5-AG levels increased as a function of decreasing HbA(1c) or the average change in postprandial plasma glucose (PPG(ave)) with significant relationships for 1,5-AG/ HbA(1c) vs. HbA(1c) or 1,5-AG/PPG(ave )vs. PPG(ave) (both P < 0.0001), respectively.. As reported in previous publications, 1,5-AG reflects ambient glycaemic control and increases with reductions in HbA(1c) and postprandial glucose. The greater reductions in postprandial excursion achieved with BiAsp 30 compared with glargine were associated with greater increases in 1,5-AG. Even moderate elevations in HbA(1c) substantially lower 1,5-AG, suggesting that it can be most discriminating in identifying patients with excessive postprandial glucose excursions at HbA(1c) levels that approach the upper end of the normal range.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Biphasic Insulins; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Epidemiologic Studies; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Aspart; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Isophane; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Middle Aged; Postprandial Period

For many patients with type 2 diabetes, oral antidiabetic agents (OADs) do not provide optimal glycaemic control, necessitating insulin therapy. Fear of hypoglycaemia is a major barrier to initiating insulin therapy. The AT.LANTUS study investigated optimal methods to initiate and maintain insulin glargine (LANTUS, glargine, Sanofi-aventis, Paris, France) therapy using two treatment algorithms. This subgroup analysis investigated the initiation of once-daily glargine therapy in patients suboptimally controlled on multiple OADs.. This study was a 24-week, multinational (59 countries), multicenter (611), randomized study. Algorithm 1 was a clinic-driven titration and algorithm 2 was a patient-driven titration. Titration was based on target fasting blood glucose < or =100 mg/dl (< or =5.5 mmol/l). Algorithms were compared for incidence of severe hypoglycaemia [requiring assistance and blood glucose <50 mg/dl (<2.8 mmol/l)] and baseline to end-point change in haemoglobin A(1c) (HbA(1c)).. Of the 4961 patients enrolled in the study, 865 were included in this subgroup analysis: 340 received glargine plus 1 OAD and 525 received glargine plus >1 OAD. Incidence of severe hypoglycaemia was <1%. HbA(1c) decreased significantly between baseline and end-point for patients receiving glargine plus 1 OAD (-1.4%, p < 0.001; algorithm 1 -1.3% vs. algorithm 2 -1.5%; p = 0.03) and glargine plus >1 OAD (-1.7%, p < 0.001; algorithm 1 -1.5% vs. algorithm 2 -1.8%; p = 0.001).. This study shows that initiation of once-daily glargine with OADs results in significant reduction of HbA(1c) with a low risk of hypoglycaemia. The greater reduction in HbA(1c) was seen in patients randomized to the patient-driven algorithm (algorithm 2) on 1 or >1 OAD.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Aged; Algorithms; Blood Glucose; Body Weight; Circadian Rhythm; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Middle Aged; Prospective Studies

Carbohydrate counting is an effective approach to mealtime insulin adjustment in type 1 diabetes but has not been rigorously assessed in type 2 diabetes. We sought to compare an insulin-to-carbohydrate ratio with a simple algorithm for adjusting the dose of prandial insulin glusiline.. This 24-week, multicenter, randomized, controlled study compared two algorithms for adjusting mealtime (glulisine) insulin along with a standard algorithm for adjusting background (glargine) insulin in 273 intent-to-treat patients with type 2 diabetes. Glulisine and glargine were adjusted weekly in both groups based on self-monitored blood glucose (SMBG) results from the previous week. The simple algorithm group was provided set doses of glulisine to take before each meal. The carbohydrate counting (carb count) group was provided an insulin-to-carbohydrate ratio to use for each meal and adjusted their glulisine dose based on the amount of carbohydrate consumed.. A1C levels at week 24 were 6.70% (simple algorithm) and 6.54% (carb count). The respective mean A1C changes from baseline to 24 weeks were -1.46 and -1.59% (P = 0.24). A1C <7.0% was achieved by 73.2% (simple algorithm) and 69.2% (carb count) (P = 0.70) of subjects; respective values for A1C <6.5% were 44.3 and 49.5% (P = 0.28). The total daily dose of insulin was lower, and there was a trend toward less weight gain in carb count group patients. Severe hypoglycemia rates were low and equal in the two groups.. Weekly basal-bolus insulin adjustments based on premeal and bedtime glucose patterns resulted in significant reductions in A1C. Having two effective approaches to delivering and adjusting rapid-acting mealtime insulin may increase physicians' and patients' willingness to advance therapy to a basal-bolus insulin regimen.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Algorithms; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dietary Carbohydrates; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Administration Schedule; Eating; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Metformin; Middle Aged; Racial Groups; United States

As type 2 diabetes mellitus progresses, oral hypoglycaemic agents often fail to maintain blood glucose control and insulin is needed. We investigated whether the addition of once-daily insulin glargine is non-inferior to three-times daily prandial insulin lispro in overall glycaemic control in adults with inadequately controlled type 2 diabetes mellitus taking oral hypoglycaemic agents.. In the 44-week, parallel, open study that was undertaken in 69 study sites across Europe and Australia, 418 patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus that was inadequately controlled by oral hypoglycaemic agents were randomly assigned to either insulin glargine taken once daily at the same time every day or to insulin lispro administered three times per day. The primary objective was to compare the change in haemoglobin A(1c) from baseline to endpoint (week 44) between the two regimens. Randomisation was done with a central randomisation service. Analysis was per protocol. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00311818.. 205 patients were randomly assigned to insulin glargine and 210 to insulin lispro. Mean haemoglobin A(1c) decrease in the insulin glargine group was -1.7% (from 8.7% [SD 1.0] to 7.0% [0.7]) and -1.9% in the insulin lispro group (from 8.7% [1.0] to 6.8% [0.9]), which was within the predefined limit of 0.4% for non-inferiority (difference=0.157; 95% Cl -0.008 to 0.322). 106 (57%) patients reached haemoglobin A(1c) of 7% or less in the glargine group and 131 (69%) in the lispro group. In the glargine group, the fall in mean fasting blood glucose (-4.3 [SD 2.3] mmol/L vs -1.8 [2.3] mmol/L; p<0.0001) and nocturnal blood glucose (-3.3 [2.8] mmol/L vs -2.6 [2.9] mmol/L; p=0.0041) was better than it was in the insulin lispro group, whereas insulin lispro better controlled postprandial blood glucose throughout the day (p<0.0001). The incidence of hypoglycaemic events was less with insulin glargine than with lispro (5.2 [95% CI 1.9-8.9] vs 24.0 [21-28] events per patient per year; p<0.0001). Respective mean weight gains were 3.01 (SD 4.33) kg and 3.54 (4.48) kg. The improvement of treatment satisfaction was greater for insulin glargine than for insulin lispro (mean difference 3.13; 95% CI 2.04-4.22).. A therapeutic regimen involving the addition of either basal or prandial insulin analogue is equally effective in lowering haemoglobin A(1c). We conclude that insulin glargine provides a simple and effective option that is more satisfactory to patients than is lispro for early initiation of insulin therapy, since it was associated with a lower risk of hypoglycaemia, fewer injections, less blood glucose self monitoring, and greater patient satisfaction than was insulin lispro.. Sanofi-Aventis.

Topics: Australia; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Administration Schedule; Europe; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin Lispro; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Middle Aged; Postprandial Period; Treatment Outcome

In this report, we quantify the effects of exenatide and glargine on the relative contributions of fasting and postprandial glucose (PPG) excursion to overall hyperglycemia based on self-monitored blood glucose. After 26 weeks of treatment, insulin glargine reduced fasting glucose to a greater extent than exenatide without significant effect on PPG excursion. The principal effect of exenatide on hyperglycemia was mitigating the rise in PPG with moderate improvement on fasting glucose. These findings may be limited by the fact that glucose measurements were collected through self-monitoring with six time points measured during the daytime, the meals were not standardized and the exact time for glucose measurements was unknown.

Topics: Aged; Area Under Curve; Blood Glucose; Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Administration Schedule; Exenatide; Female; Humans; Hyperglycemia; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Middle Aged; Peptides; Postprandial Period; Risk Assessment; Single-Blind Method; Treatment Outcome; Venoms

To determine whether FPs could help patients implement bedtime basal insulin therapy as successfully as diabetes experts could.. National, multicentre, randomized, open-label trial designed to assess use of bedtime basal insulin therapy compared with use of standard oral-agent therapy for patients with type 2 diabetes being treated by diabetes experts or FPs.. Nineteen endocrinologist or expert sites and 34 family practices.. A total of 405 adult patients with hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) values of 7.5% to 11.0% who were taking 0 to 2 oral agents.. Participants were randomized to receive either basal insulin therapy using glargine self-titrated according to a patient algorithm or conventional therapy with physician-adjusted doses of oral agents for a period of 24 weeks.. The primary outcome was time to achieve 2 consecutive HbA1c values < or = 6.5%. Secondary outcomes were the proportion of subjects who achieved these HbA1c values, a fasting plasma glucose level < or = 5.5 mmol/L, and 2 consecutive HbA1c values < or = 7.0%; incidence, rate, and severity of hypoglycemia; daily variations in blood-glucose levels; and participants' lipid profiles. Post-hoc analysis sought to determine whether patients' outcomes differed in terms of the above measures depending on whether they had been treated by diabetes experts or FPs.. A total of 206 patients were randomized to the glargine group, and 199 to the oral agents group. In total, 145 patients were followed by experts and 260 by FPs. Mean reductions in HbA1c and fasting plasma glucose levels and rates of hypoglycemia were comparable in the 2 groups. Patients of both types of physicians achieved significantly greater reductions in fasting plasma glucose with glargine than with oral agents (FPs: -4.14 vs -2.45 mmol/L, P = .0001; experts: -3.47 vs -2.19 mmol/L, P = .0013). Patients of FPs achieved significantly greater reductions in HbA1c levels with glargine than with oral agents (FPs: -1.64 vs -1.26%, P = .0058; experts: -1.41 vs-1.24%, P = .3331). Final mean insulin doses were higheramong FPs' patients than among experts' patients (41.74vs 31.66 units, P = .015). Family physicians were more aggressive in their use of insulin, while experts used more oral agents. There were no significant differences inefficacy of treatment.. In most settings, FPs could easily implement the patient-driven bedtime basal insulin protocol used in this study.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Aged; Canada; Chronotherapy; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Endocrinology; Family Practice; Female; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Injections; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Middle Aged; Patient Compliance; Practice Patterns, Physicians'; Treatment Outcome

To compare insulin and glucose profiles during basal continuous subcutaneous infusion of a rapid-acting insulin analogue and once daily subcutaneous injection of a long-acting insulin analogue in Type 2 diabetes.. Twenty-one patients with Type 2 diabetes treated with oral glucose-lowering agents were randomized in this two-period crossover study to an equivalent 24-h dose of continuous subcutaneous infusion of insulin aspart and subsequently once-daily bedtime subcutaneous injection of insulin glargine, or vice versa, for eight consecutive days. Plasma profiles of insulin and glucose were recorded.. On the last day of each treatment period, the area under the curve (AUC) for glucose was 10% lower on the continuous subcutaneous infusion regimen compared with the insulin injection regimen (P = 0.002). This was accomplished by a flat exogenous insulin infusion profile compared with a peaking profile with injected insulin (AUC was 74% higher after injection compared with pre-injection levels (P = 0.001)). During the last 6 days in each treatment period, the intra-subject variability of exogenous fasting insulin levels in the mornings was 41% lower during insulin infusion compared with insulin injection (P = 0.012). The corresponding intra-subject variability for fasting glucose only showed a tendency to be lower during infusion as compared to the injection regimen (28%; P = 0.104). Thirteen symptomatic-only or minor hypoglycaemic episodes were recorded during the entire infusion period compared with three episodes during the injection period.. Basal continuous subcutaneous infusion of a rapid-acting insulin analogue improved plasma insulin (more flat insulin profile with a lower variability) and glucose (lower AUC) profiles compared with once-daily subcutaneous injection of a long-acting insulin analogue in Type 2 diabetes.

Topics: Area Under Curve; Blood Glucose; Body Mass Index; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Injections, Subcutaneous; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin Infusion Systems; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Middle Aged; Treatment Outcome

To evaluate the long-term clinical and economic outcomes of biphasic insulin aspart 70/30 (BIAsp 70/30) treatment vs. insulin glargine in insulin naïve, type 2 diabetes patients failing oral antidiabetic drugs in a Swedish setting.. A published and validated computer simulation model (the CORE Diabetes Model) was used to project life expectancy, quality-adjusted life expectancy (QALE) and costs over patient lifetimes. Cohort characteristics [54.5% male, mean age 52.4 years, 9 years mean diabetes duration, mean glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA1c) 9.77%] and treatment effects were based on results from the Initiate Insulin by Aggressive Titration and Education (INITIATE) clinical trial. Direct medical costs were accounted in 2006 Swedish Kronor (SEK) and economic and clinical benefits were discounted at 3% per annum.. Biphasic insulin aspart 70/30 treatment when compared with insulin glargine treatment was associated with improvements in discounted life expectancy of 0.21 years (13.10 vs. 12.89 years) and QALE of 0.21 quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) (9.16 vs. 8.96 QALYs). Reductions in the incidence of diabetes-related complications in the BIAsp 70/30 treatment arm led to reduced total costs of SEK 10,367 when compared with insulin glargine (SEK 396,475 vs. SEK 406,842) over patient lifetimes. BIAsp 70/30 treatment was projected to be dominant (cost and lifesaving) when compared with insulin glargine in the base case analysis.. Biphasic insulin aspart 70/30 treatment was associated with improved clinical outcomes and reduced costs compared with insulin glargine treatment over patient lifetimes. These results were driven by improved HbA1c levels associated with BIAsp 70/30 compared with insulin glargine and the accompanying reduction in diabetes-related complications despite increases in body mass index.

Topics: Costs and Cost Analysis; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Diabetic Angiopathies; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Aspart; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Middle Aged; Quality-Adjusted Life Years; Sweden; Treatment Outcome

People with early type 2 diabetes and pre-diabetes (impaired glucose tolerance [IGT] and/or impaired fasting glucose [IFG]) are at risk of hyperglycaemia-related complications, including cardiovascular disease. Insulin, traditionally reserved as late treatment in type 2 diabetes, may also be a useful therapy in this population. We examined the short-term efficacy and tolerability of insulin glargine (glargine) in individuals with early or pre-type 2 diabetes.. In this multicentre, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized, parallel group, 12-day study, subjects with IGT/IFG (n=9), newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes (n=9) or normal glucose tolerance (n=3) (confined to a clinical research unit taking a prescribed diet) were randomized to once-daily glargine (n=16) or placebo (saline; n=5) at bedtime. Dose was titrated to achieve target fasting blood glucose (FBG) 80-95 mg/dL.. Over the treatment period, mean FBG decreased in glargine-treated subjects (from 100.0+/-18.8 to 85.6+/-18.4 mg/dL), but was unchanged in placebo-treated subjects (from 112.5+/-10.6 to 111.3+/-17.5 mg/dL). Mean eight-point blood glucose value decreased by 9.7 mg/dL in the glargine group, but increased by 8.1 mg/dL in the placebo group. Mean post-exercise blood glucose was similar before and after glargine treatment, but increased after placebo treatment. Five subjects receiving glargine experienced 16 mild symptomatic hypoglycaemia episodes; however, no hypoglycaemia occurred during exercise. Mean body weight decreased in both the glargine (-0.44 kg) and placebo (-0.25 kg) groups, in line with dietary restrictions.. The results of this pilot study suggest that glargine can be used by people with IFG, IGT or new-onset type 2 diabetes for management of hyperglycaemia with low risk of hypoglycaemia. However titration of insulin in people on dietary restrictions should be more cautious as they may be more prone to hypoglycaemia. Further studies are warranted to determine the clinical benefits of this approach.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Double-Blind Method; Fasting; Feasibility Studies; Glucose Intolerance; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Middle Aged; Pilot Projects; Placebos; Prediabetic State; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

Intensive insulin therapy composed of bolus and basal insulin has been believed as the most powerful recipe for glycemic control of both type 1 and type 2 diabetes. In this study, we investigated the effects of changes in basal/total daily insulin ratio (B/TD ratio) in type 2 diabetes patients on intensive insulin therapy including insulin glargine. The B/TD ratio used in our Japanese patients was about 0.35, and the ratio was increased up to about 0.46+/-0.12 without change of total insulin daily dose. After 24-week-treatment, mean glycated albumin of the patients whose B/TD ratio was increased was significantly lower than those of the patients whose B/TD ratio was not changed. Our results suggest that adequate supplementation of basal insulin may be important for maximum effect of bolus insulin even in Japanese who have serious defect in postprandial rapid insulin secretion.

Topics: Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Glycated Serum Albumin; Glycation End Products, Advanced; Glycosylation; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Isophane; Insulin, Long-Acting; Serum Albumin

To evaluate the superiority of insulin glargine as basal insulin replacement by continuous glucose monitoring system (CGMS). Twenty-four patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) whose blood glucose was not well controlled with sulphanylureas were enrolled. At first, they were treated with extended-release glipizide (glucotrol XL) 5mg/d before breakfast for 2 weeks, then randomized to combination treatment with glargine (16 patients) or NPH (8 patients) and treated for 12 weeks. CGMS were carried in the second week after treatment with glucotrol XL, and in the 12th week after combination treatment. The data of CGMS showed: (1) When FPG were well controlled in both groups (glargine group versus NPH group: 6.0+/-1.0 mmol/L versus 5.8+/-1.3 mmol/L), the blood glucose level at 3:00 a.m. (5.1+/-0.9 mmol/L versus 4.2+/-0.8 mmol/L) were higher (P<0.05), TPG< or =3.0 mmol/L at night were lower (2.56+/-1.79 versus 5.88+/-1.96), and the rate of nocturnal hypoglycemia (1/16 versus 4/8) were less (P=0.028) in glargine group than those in NPH group. (2) CGMS showed that the daily blood glucose profile excursion were more smoother in glargine group than those in NPH group. In conclusion, it was confirmed with CGMS that compared with traditionally basal insulin replacement with NPH, the combination treatment with glargine injection at bedtime may be predominant for stabilizing the daily blood glucose profile excursion and decreasing the nocturnal hypoglycemia events incidence. So glargine may be a more ideal basal insulin replacement than NPH.

Topics: Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Evaluation Studies as Topic; Fasting; Female; Glipizide; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Isophane; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Middle Aged; Monitoring, Physiologic; Treatment Outcome

This study investigated the effect of insulin glargine (LANTUS) versus NPH insulin on metabolic control and safety in Asian patients with Type 2 diabetes, inadequately controlled on oral hypoglycemic agents (OHAs).. In this open-label, randomized, parallel, multinational, 24-week, non-inferiority study, 443 patients received either once-daily insulin glargine (n=220) or NPH insulin (n=223) at bedtime, plus glimepiride (Amaryl).. Baseline characteristics were similar between the two groups. HbA(1c) levels decreased in the insulin glargine and NPH groups over the study period in the per-protocol (PP; -1.10% versus 0.92%) and full-analysis (FA; -0.99% versus -0.77%) populations. In the PP population, the difference between adjusted means (predefined equivalence region >-0.4%) was 0.19% (90% confidence interval [CI]: 0.02, 0.36), demonstrating non-inferiority between the two treatments. In a superiority analysis (FA population), the difference between adjusted mean changes in the two groups was 0.22% (95% CI: 0.02, 0.42), demonstrating the superiority of insulin glargine (p=0.0319). Moreover, the number of hypoglycemic episodes was significantly lower with insulin glargine versus NPH insulin (p<0.004), particularly severe (p<0.03) and nocturnal (p<0.001). Daily insulin dose increased from 9.6+/-1.5 to 32.1+/-17.6 U in the insulin glargine group and from 9.8+/-1.9 to 32.8+/-18.9 U in the NPH insulin group.. These results confirm earlier reports that insulin glargine provides superior glycemic control with less hypoglycemia and demonstrates that these benefits are consistent between different ethnicities.

Topics: Asian People; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Isophane; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Middle Aged; Sulfonylurea Compounds; Treatment Outcome

We have previously reported the therapeutic efficacy of mitiglinide combined with once daily insulin glargine (mitiglinide regimen) after switching from multiple daily insulin regimen of aspart insulin and glargine (intensive insulin regimen) in inpatients with type 2 diabetes mellitus in two consecutive days. In the present study, we followed up 9 of the 15 responsive patients with these novel regimens for 6 months after discharge. The data collected from these patients were compared to those of 15 randomly chosen patients who had well matched background and received intensive insulin regimen during hospitalization which was continued after discharge. The average HbA1c level of these 9 patients with mitiglinide regimen at 6 months was 6.7 +/- 0.8% and was comparable to that of the patients with intensive insulin regimen (HbA1c = 7.0 +/- 1.0%). In conclusion, mitiglinide and insulin glargine combination therapy maintained fair glycemic control for as long as 6 months in subpopulation of Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes.

Topics: Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Indoles; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Isoindoles; Male; Middle Aged; Research Design; Time; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

This observational study aimed to investigate the long-term efficacy and safety of adding insulin glargine (LANTUS((R))) to support oral antidiabetic (OAD) treatment in patients with type 2 diabetes in everyday practice.. A 9-month, open-label, multicentre, observational study, with an optional 20-month extension phase, in which add-on insulin glargine therapy was initiated in 12,216 patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled on OADs. The insulin glargine dose was adjusted at the physician's discretion, reflecting everyday practice. The main outcome measures were changes in HbA(1c), fasting blood glucose (FBG), insulin dose and body mass index (BMI).. At baseline, mean (+/- s.d.) age was 63.9 +/- 11.3 years; disease duration was >5 years in 47% of patients, 1-5 years in 39% of patients and <1 year in 10% of patients, while 4% of patients were newly diagnosed. Addition of insulin glargine to OAD therapy led to reductions in mean HbA(1c) (-1.5% from 8.7%) and FBG (-69 mg/dl from 202 mg/dl) levels after 3 months, which were maintained after 9 months [HbA(1c): -1.7%; FBG: -71 mg/dl (-3.9 mmol/l)] without an increase in BMI. Similar glycaemic control was observed after 20 months in the 2721 patients in the extension study. Adverse drug reactions were documented in 26 patients (0.2%). Of 47 adverse events documented, 19 were due to hypoglycaemia.. In everyday practice, patients with type 2 diabetes who are inadequately controlled on OADs benefit from add-on basal insulin treatment with insulin glargine as they demonstrate improved glycaemic control without weight gain.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Blood Glucose; Body Mass Index; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Middle Aged; Treatment Outcome

To project the long-term clinical and economic outcomes of treatment with biphasic insulin aspart 30 (BIAsp 70/30, 30% soluble and 70% protaminated insulin aspart) vs. insulin glargine in insulin-naïve type 2 diabetes patients failing to achieve glycemic control with oral antidiabetic agents alone (OADs).. Baseline patient characteristics and treatment effect data from the recent 'INITIATE' clinical trial served as input to a peer-reviewed, validated Markov/Monte-Carlo simulation model. INITIATE demonstrated improvements in HbA1c favouring BIAsp 70/30 vs. glargine (-0.43%; p < 0.005) and greater efficacy in reaching glycaemic targets among patients poorly controlled on OAD therapy. Effects on life expectancy (LE), quality-adjusted life expectancy (QALE), cumulative incidence of diabetes-related complications and direct medical costs (2004 USD) were projected over 35 years. Clinical outcomes and costs were discounted at a rate of 3.0% per annum. Sensitivity analyses were performed.. Improvements in glycaemic control were projected to lead to gains in LE (0.19 +/- 0.24 years) and QALE (0.19 +/- 0.17 years) favouring BIAsp 70/30 vs. glargine. Treatment with BIAsp 70/30 was also associated with reductions in the cumulative incidences of diabetes-related complications, notably in renal and retinal conditions. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was $46 533 per quality-adjusted life year gained with BIAsp 70/30 vs. glargine (for patients with baseline HbA1c >/= 8.5%, it was $34 916). Total lifetime costs were compared to efficacy rates in both arms as a ratio, which revealed that the lifetime cost per patient treated successfully to target HbA1c levels of <7.0% and

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Aged; Biphasic Insulins; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Diabetes Complications; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Epidemiologic Methods; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Health Care Costs; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Aspart; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Isophane; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Middle Aged; Treatment Failure; Treatment Outcome

Type 2 diabetes remains a difficult clinical challenge characterized by progressive insulin deficiency and frequent cardiovascular events requiring multiple therapeutic decisions. In this randomized clinical trial, we assessed the comparative effects of rosiglitazone (RSG) and insulin glargine (IG) on inflammatory biomarkers, glycemic control, and lipids. Forty subjects with type 2 diabetes and inadequate glycemic control on sulfonylurea and metformin therapy received 24 weeks of add-on therapy with either RSG 4mg daily or IG 10 units daily. Subjects on RSG with fasting glucose values >120mg/dl at 12 weeks were increased from 4 to 8mg. Subjects on IG increased insulin doses until fasting glucose was <120mg/dl. Markers of glycemic control and inflammation including HbA1c, hsCRP, PAI-1, plasma F2-isoprostanes, and lipids were measured at baseline, 12, 18, and 24 weeks. RSG and IG demonstrated similar efficacy in reducing HbA1c levels by 1.5 and 1.4%, respectively, with greater weight gain with RSG. Hypoglycemic events occurred with equal frequency. IG did not reduce hsCRP, but RSG reduced hsCRP levels 45% from baseline. Both IG and RSG reduced F2-isoprostanes similarly. IG did not affect PAI-1 levels, but did reduce total, LDL, and non-HDL cholesterol levels. Despite similar HbA1c reductions with RSG and IG, differential effects were found on inflammatory biomarkers and lipids that deserve consideration in the clinical decision process of selecting a therapeutic agent.

Topics: Biomarkers; Blood Glucose; C-Reactive Protein; Cholesterol; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Inflammation; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Lipids; Plasminogen Activator Inhibitor 1; Rosiglitazone; Thiazolidinediones; Triglycerides

We sought to assess health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in patients with type 2 diabetes treated with insulin glargine or rosiglitazone as add-on therapy to sulfonylurea plus metformin.. HRQOL was evaluated in 217 subjects uncontrolled with sulfonylurea plus metformin, enrolled in a 24-week, multicenter, randomized, open-label, parallel-group trial of add-on insulin glargine versus rosiglitazone. A 40-item, self-administered questionnaire at baseline and at weeks 2, 6, 12, 18, and 24 was given, including the 34-item Diabetes Symptom Checklist-Revised (DSC-R), a 5-item mental health scale from the 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36), and a single-item health rating from the SF-36. These assessments do not specify route of therapy.. Both treatment groups showed similar improvements in glycemic control from baseline to week 24 (change in A1C: -1.66% in the insulin glargine group, -1.51% in the rosiglitazone group, P = 0.1446). Both groups also showed improvement in HRQOL, although subjects treated with insulin glargine experienced significantly greater improvements compared with rosiglitazone in the DSC-R total symptom score (P = 0.005), total symptom distress score (P = 0.03), individual domain scores for mood symptoms (P = 0.007), ophthalmologic symptoms (P = 0.007), ophthalmologic distress (P = 0.013), fatigue distress (P = 0.033), and SF-36 perception of general health (P = 0.047).. Although addition of insulin glargine and rosiglitazone achieved comparable improvements in glycemic control, insulin glargine was associated with greater improvements in HRQOL, indicating that other factors (e.g., safety profile and nonglycemic actions) may further enhance HRQOL in patients with type 2 diabetes.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Body Mass Index; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Female; Health Status; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Middle Aged; Psychometrics; Quality of Life; Rosiglitazone; Surveys and Questionnaires; Thiazolidinediones

Successfully managing diabetes is a complex process that includes addressing issues of drug efficacy, safety and treatment satisfaction. Additionally, the combined impact of patient/disease characteristics and treatment outcomes on treatment satisfaction is not well understood. The purpose of this study was to examine the impact of age, weight, gender, co-morbid conditions, diabetes history, treatment burden, efficacy (HbA1c) and side effects (weight gain, hypoglycemic events) on patients' appraisal of treatment satisfaction using linear regression models.. Data from a multi-center, randomized clinical trial comparing the efficacy/safety of biphasic insulin aspart 70/30 (BIAsp 70/30) vs. glargine (Glar) among insulin naïve type 2 patients were analyzed. Subjects were between ages 18-75, with baseline HbA1c > 8% and BMI < or = 40 kg/m2 (N = 233). Treatment satisfaction was assessed by the Insulin Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (ITSQ).. When factors were examined independently, multiple significant relationships (age, co-morbidity, hypoglycemic events, and weight gain) with overall and/or domains of treatment satisfaction were found. However, when all significant relationships were examined together, only neuropathy, treatment efficacy, and number of hypoglycemic events maintained their previous significance.. By examining predictors independently, significant relationships were identified. However, not all findings remained significant when examined in combination with each other. Thus, to more accurately characterize the impact of factors on treatment satisfaction, a more comprehensive approach may be necessary. By improving patient treatment satisfaction, the efficacy of treatments, as well as critical treatment outcomes such as compliance and cost of care should be improved.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Age Factors; Aged; Body Mass Index; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Injections; Insulin; Insulin Aspart; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Middle Aged; Patient Satisfaction; Treatment Outcome; Weight Gain

To determine the effect of adding nateglinide to therapy with insulin glargine in adults with Type 2 diabetes previously treated with insulin and with poor blood glucose control.. In this 16-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, people with Type 2 diabetes [n = 55, HbA(1c) 8.2 +/- 1.0 (+/- sd)%, duration of diabetes 12.8 +/- 6.0 years, duration of insulin treatment 6.0 +/- 4.0 years] were transferred to single bedtime injection of insulin glargine for a titration period of 4 weeks, and then randomized to nateglinide or matching placebo before meals in addition to insulin glargine. Metformin was continued if taken. Doses of insulin and oral medication were titrated to protocol for the treatment period of 12 weeks.. Baseline-adjusted self-monitored capillary blood glucose concentration at 12 weeks was significantly lower with nateglinide + insulin glargine compared with placebo + insulin glargine after breakfast [difference -2.3 (95% confidence interval -4.4, -0.2) mmol/l, P = 0.030], before lunch [-2.5 (-4.6, -0.3) mmol/l, P = 0.029], and after lunch [-2.3 (-4.3, -0.4) mmol/l, P = 0.021], but not at other times. Baseline-adjusted HbA(1c) was not lower with nateglinide + insulin glargine as compared with placebo + insulin glargine [7.8 +/- 1.4 vs. 8.3 +/- 1.0%, difference -0.43 (-0.98, 0.12)%].. Addition of nateglinide before meals to once-daily insulin glargine in people with long-standing diabetes already requiring insulin therapy improves blood glucose control in the early part of the day after breakfast and lunch, but does not provide good control of blood glucose levels overall.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Analysis of Variance; Blood Glucose; Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring; Cyclohexanes; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Metformin; Middle Aged; Nateglinide; Phenylalanine; Time Factors

To compare initiation of insulin therapy by adding once-daily insulin glargine to oral antidiabetic agents (OADs) with switching patients to premixed 30% regular, 70% human neutral protamine hagedorn insulin (70/30) without OADs.. A 24-week, multicenter, open, randomized (1:1), parallel study.. Three hundred sixty-four poorly controlled patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus were treated with once-daily morning insulin glargine with continued OADs (glimepiride+metformin) (glargine+OAD) or twice-daily 70/30 alone. Insulin dosage in each group was titrated to target fasting blood glucose (FBG) of 100 mg/dL or less (or=6.7 mmol/L) and hemoglobin (Hb)A(1c) levels between 7.5% and 10.5% on OADs (glargine+OAD, n=67; 70/30, n=63).. HbA(1c), FBG, hypoglycemia, insulin dose, and adverse events were recorded.. HbA(1c) decreased from baseline to endpoint for both glargine+OAD (from 8.8% to 7.0%) and 70/30 (from 8.9% to 7.4%); adjusted mean HbA(1c) decrease for glargine+OAD and 70/30 was -1.9% and -1.4%, respectively (P=.003). More patients reached HbA(1c) of 7.0% or less without confirmed nocturnal hypoglycemia with glargine+OAD (n=37, 55.2%) than with 70/30 (n=19, 30.2%) (P=.006). FBG decreased significantly more with glargine+OAD (-57 mg/dL (-3.2 mmol/L)) than with 70/30 (-40 mg/dL (-2.2 mmol/L)) (P=.002). Patients treated with glargine+OAD experienced fewer episodes of any hypoglycemia (3.68/patient-year) than did those treated with 70/30 (9.09/patient-year) (P=.008).. In elderly patients, addition of once-daily morning glargine+OAD is a simple regimen to initiate insulin therapy, restoring glycemic control more effectively and with less hypoglycemia than twice-daily 70/30 alone.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Metformin; Sulfonylurea Compounds; Weight Gain

The aim of this study was to evaluate the long-term clinical and economic outcomes associated with exenatide or insulin glargine, added to oral therapy in individuals with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled with combination oral agents in the UK setting.. A published and validated computer simulation model of diabetes was used to project long-term complications, life expectancy, quality-adjusted life expectancy and direct medical costs. Probabilities of diabetes-related complications were derived from published sources. Treatment effects and patient characteristics were extracted from a recent randomised controlled trial comparing exenatide with insulin glargine. Simulations incorporated published quality of life utilities and UK-specific costs from 2004. Pharmacy costs for exenatide were based on 20, 40, 60, 80 and 100% of the US value (as no price for the UK was available at the time of analysis). Future costs and clinical benefits were discounted at 3.5% annually. Sensitivity analyses were performed.. In the base-case analysis exenatide was associated with improvements in life expectancy of 0.057 years and in quality-adjusted life expectancy of 0.442 quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) versus insulin glargine. Long-term projections demonstrated that exenatide was associated with a lower cumulative incidence of most cardiovascular disease (CVD) complications and CVD-related death than insulin glargine. Using the range of cost values, evaluation results showed that exenatide is likely to fall in a range between dominant (cost and life saving) at 20% of the US price and cost-effective (with an ICER of 22,420 pounds per QALY gained) at 100% of the US price, versus insulin glargine.. Based on the findings of a recent clinical trial, long-term projections indicated that exenatide is likely to be associated with improvement in life expectancy and quality-adjusted life expectancy compared to insulin glargine. The results from this modelling analysis suggest that that exenatide is likely to represent good value for money by generally accepted standards in the UK setting in individuals with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled on oral therapy.

Topics: Adult; Blood Glucose; Cost of Illness; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Diabetes Complications; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Administration Schedule; Evaluation Studies as Topic; Exenatide; Female; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Markov Chains; Middle Aged; Models, Economic; Peptides; Prognosis; Quality-Adjusted Life Years; Risk Assessment; Sensitivity and Specificity; Severity of Illness Index; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; United Kingdom; Venoms

This study compared the time-action profiles of the novel albumin-bound basal insulin analogue NN344 with those of insulin detemir and insulin glargine in individuals with type 2 diabetes.. Twenty-seven insulin-treated men with type 2 diabetes [body mass index 30.8 +/- 2.6 kg/m(2) (mean +/- s.d.), haemoglobin A(1c) 7.6 +/- 1.1%] were enrolled in this randomized, double-blind trial and participated in six euglycaemic glucose clamp experiments [target blood glucose (BG) 5 mmol/l] each. Participants received NN344 in three experiments at a dose of 0.8, 1.6 and 2.8 dosing units (DU) (1 DU corresponds to 6 nmol NN344) per kilogram of body weight. In the other three experiments, the participants received 0.4, 0.8 and 1.4 U/kg of either insulin detemir or insulin glargine. The insulin preparations were characterized with regards to their effects on glucose infusion rates (GIRs) (in particular duration of action and within-subject and between-subject variabilities), BG, C-peptide, free fatty acids (FFA), endogenous glucose production (EGP) and peripheral glucose uptake (PGU) over 24 h post-dose.. The mean GIR profiles for all three preparations were similar in shape/flatness and showed increasing effect (area under the curve for GIR: AUC-GIR(total)) with increasing dose [low dose: 647 +/- 580, 882 +/- 634, 571 +/- 647 mg/kg (insulin detemir vs. NN344 vs. insulin glargine]; medium dose: 1203 +/- 816, 1720 +/- 1109, 1393 +/- 1203 mg/kg and high dose: 2171 +/- 1344, 3119 +/- 1549, 2952 +/- 2028 mg/kg; p = 0.48]. The duration of action increased with rising doses of all insulin preparations, without major differences between treatments. BG remained below 7 mmol/l in nearly all the experiments. Within-subject variability was lower for the albumin-bound insulin analogues, insulin detemir and NN344, than for insulin glargine (p < 0.0001). Between-subject variability did not differ between treatments, nor did the effects on BG, C-peptide, FFA, EGP or PGU.. In individuals with type 2 diabetes, the time-action profiles and the duration of action of the albumin-bound insulin analogues, insulin detemir and NN344, were comparable with those of insulin glargine, whereas within-subject variability in the metabolic effect was significantly lower. Therefore, insulin detemir and NN344 seem to be as well suited as insulin glargine for once-daily administration in type 2 diabetes. The better predictability may be an important characteristic of the albumin-bound analogues as insulin detemir has already been shown to improve hypoglycaemia.

Topics: Blood Glucose; C-Peptide; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Double-Blind Method; Drug Administration Schedule; Fatty Acids, Nonesterified; Glucose; Glucose Clamp Technique; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Detemir; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Middle Aged

Topics: Affect; Anxiety; Blood Glucose; Cognition; Cross-Over Studies; Depression; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Humans; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin Lispro; Insulin, Long-Acting; Perception; Pilot Projects; Postprandial Period

Early worsening of diabetic retinopathy, characterized by cotton wool spots, intraretinal microvascular abnormalities and/or macular edema, can occur following improvement of glycemic control. In four randomized 28- to 52-week clinical trials comparing insulin glargine and NPH insulin in regard to glycemic control and frequency of hypoglycemia, ophthalmologic examinations and fundus photographs were included to assess frequency of early worsening of retinopathy or other early adverse ocular effects. Retinopathy progression rates at 28 weeks were 7-12% by clinical examination and 3-8% by photographic grading; corresponding rates of clinically significant macular edema (CSME) were 1-8% and 1-4%, respectively. Optic disc swelling was not observed clinically or in photographs. Two of the 24 possible comparisons (four trials, three outcomes, two assessment methods), both of which were photographic assessments in type 2 diabetes, were in/near the nominally significant range and favored NPH insulin: 28-week rates of >or=3-step retinopathy progression (insulin glargine: 16/213, 7.5%; NPH insulin: 6/220, 2.7%; p=0.028) and 52-week CSME rates (26/233, 11.2% and 14/214, 6.5%, respectively; p=0.098). Because the between-treatment differences were small and inconsistent across trials and assessment methods, and because overall rates were consistent with the natural course of diabetic retinopathy, we conclude that it is unlikely that insulin glargine carries a higher risk of early worsening or other early adverse effect than NPH insulin. These trials tended to exclude a large early adverse effect, such as optic disc swelling, but cannot assess longer-term effects; a 5-year randomized trial of insulin glargine versus NPH insulin has been initiated. Data from this manuscript have been presented as posters and published in abstract form at the European Association for the Study of Diabetes 2001 ( DIABETOLOGIA 44(Suppl 1):I-IV(A287), 2001) and the Latin American Diabetes Association 2001 (11-15 November 2001, Punta del Este, Uruguay; Poster 180) congresses.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Diabetic Retinopathy; Female; Fluorescein Angiography; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Isophane; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Middle Aged

The objective was to compare the impact on treatment satisfaction (TS) and quality of life (QoL) of early insulinization with glargine versus adjusting oral antidiabetic drug (OAD) therapy in people with Type 2 diabetes with uncontrolled glycemia. TS and QoL were assessed at baseline, weeks 12 and 24 within the Canadian INSIGHT, a randomized 24-week trial of Type 2 patients. A total of 366 patients randomized to either the insulin glargine arm (n=182) or the adjusted OAD therapy arm (n=184) completed both questionnaires. At baseline, TS and QoL were similar in both groups. A1c reduction was greater in the insulin glargine arm. TS improved from baseline in both treatment arms; however, there was greater increase with insulin glargine+OAD. Perceived frequency of hypoglycemia and hypoglycemia were lower at week 24, with no differences between the two groups. Perceived frequency of hyperglycemia improved with glargine at week 12, and no difference was found at 24 weeks. Finally, QoL improved in both groups, but significantly more with glargine at both weeks 12 and 24. Improving glucose control by adding insulin glargine to OAD therapy had a positive impact on TS and general QoL without complaints related to hypoglycemia.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hyperglycemia; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Middle Aged; Patient Satisfaction; Quality of Life

We sought to study the optimal management of hyperglycemia in non-intensive care unit patients with type 2 diabetes, as few studies thus far have focused on the subject.. We conducted a prospective, multicenter, randomized trial to compare the efficacy and safety of a basal-bolus insulin regimen with that of sliding-scale regular insulin (SSI) in patients with type 2 diabetes. A total of 130 insulin-naive patients were randomized to receive glargine and glulisine (n = 65) or a standard SSI protocol (n = 65). Glargine was given once daily and glulisine before meals at a starting dose of 0.4 units x kg(-1) x day(-1) for blood glucose 140-200 mg/dl or 0.5 units x kg(-1) x day(-1) for blood glucose 201-400 mg/dl. SSI was given four times per day for blood glucose >140 mg/dl.. The mean admission blood glucose was 229 +/- 6 mg/dl and A1C 8.8 +/- 2%. A blood glucose target of <140 mg/dl was achieved in 66% of patients in the glargine and glulisine group and in 38% of those in the SSI group. The mean daily blood glucose between groups ranged from 23 to 58 mg/dl, with an overall blood glucose difference of 27 mg/dl (P < 0.01). Despite increasing insulin doses, 14% of patients treated with SSI remained with blood glucose >240 mg/dl. There were no differences in the rate of hypoglycemia or length of hospital stay.. Treatment with insulin glargine and glulisine resulted in significant improvement in glycemic control compared with that achieved with the use of SSI alone. Our study indicates that a basal-bolus insulin regimen is preferred over SSI in the management of non-critically ill, hospitalized patients with type 2 diabetes.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Female; Hospitalization; Humans; Hyperglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Middle Aged; Prospective Studies; Treatment Outcome

This study examined the impact of insulin glargine introduction in basal-bolus therapy in type 1 and type 2 diabetic patients with inadequate metabolic control (A1c > 6.9%) using previous NPH insulin regime. In this uncontrolled, retrospective study, 49 patients (28F/21M), average age 24.7 +/- 16.5, mean duration of DM 13.2 +/- 10.1 yrs., 93.1% DM1 patients, received insulin glargine plus mealtime rapid-acting insulin (lispro or aspart) followed by 90-day treatment. We analyzed mean total insulin dose, incidence of hypoglycemic events, convulsive crisis, hyperglycemic complications and A1c levels before and after three months of introduction of glargine therapy. A1c values were determined using the HPLC instrument, with a normal range of 4.3% to 6.9%. After switching to insulin glargine therapy, mean A1c dropped from 10.2 +/- 2.0 to 9.1 +/- 1.8%, with significant impact (p= 0.019). We observed a significant reduction of 0.11 U/kg/day in total insulin dose, dropped from 0.75 U/kg of NPH to 0.64 U/kg of glargine, with significant correlation (p< 0.05). The introduction of glargine therapy was coincident with a decrease of hypoglycemic crisis (p= 0.02), convulsive events due to hypoglycemia (severe hypoglycemic crisis) (p= 0.023) and ketosis (p= 0.001) switching MDI-treated patients with improvement of metabolic control (reduction of A1c levels). This therapy improved quality of life in these patients due to a significant reduction of hypoglycemic (including severe) events, ketosis episodes and total daily insulin dose, with important impact on health public services.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Child; Child, Preschool; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Female; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Isophane; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Middle Aged; Retrospective Studies; Treatment Outcome

Type 2 diabetes patients insufficiently controlled with sulfonylurea (SU) are commonly treated by switching to twice-daily premix insulin replacing SU. The efficacy of glargine (GL) added on to SU compared with the premix therapy has not been analyzed in Japan.. The open-label two-arm study was conducted in 30 type 2 diabetes patients poorly controlled [hemoglobin A(1c) (HbA(1c)) >7.5%] with SU with or without other oral hypoglycemic agents (OHAs). The GL group injected once-daily GL in addition to the OHAs. The aspart 70/30 (70/30) group discontinued SU among the OHAs and injected twice-daily 70/30. Patients were recommended either method in a block random method, and if twice-daily 70/30 was rejected, once-daily GL was selected only at the first time. The insulin dose was titrated to achieve a target fasting plasma glucose of <120 mg/dL and/or HbA(1c) of <7%.. Nineteen of 20 patients treated with GL and 11 of 14 patients treated with 70/30 completed the 6-month study. Mean HbA(1c) improved from 8.45% to 7.5% in the GL group and from 9.13% to 7.93% in the 70/30 group. The mean HbA(1c) decrease during 6 months was -0.95% in the GL group and -1.20% in the 70/30 group (P = 0.49). Mean insulin doses at 6 months were 12.0 units/day for the GL group and 26.7 units/day for the 70/30 group. Both therapies were well tolerated without severe hypoglycemia.. Once-daily GL injection added on to OHAs was equally safe and effective compared with twice-daily injection of aspart 70/30 premix replacing SU in type 2 patients insufficiently controlled with OHAs.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Aspart; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Japan; Male; Middle Aged; Sulfonylurea Compounds

The AT.LANTUS study compared insulin glargine initiation and titration using one of two algorithms in suboptimally controlled subjects with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) based on a primary outcome of severe hypoglycaemia. Secondary outcomes included other categories of hypoglycaemia, glycaemic control, weight changes and insulin dose. Here, we report the results of a subanalysis of the trial, which investigated whether insulin glargine can be initiated and titrated as effectively in primary [general practitioner (GP)] as secondary (hospital) care in patients with T2DM in the UK.. The main study was a multicentre (n = 611), multinational (n = 59), open-label, 24-week randomized trial in 4,588 suboptimally controlled subjects with T2DM. Insulin glargine was titrated to target fasting blood glucose (FBG) levels of

Topics: Algorithms; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Female; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Middle Aged; Primary Health Care; Titrimetry; Treatment Outcome; United Kingdom

To assess the efficacy and safety of pramlintide in patients with type 2 diabetes suboptimally controlled with basal insulin.. In a 16-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, 212 patients using insulin glargine with or without oral antidiabetes agents (OAs) were randomized to addition of pramlintide (60 or 120 microg b.i.d./t.i.d.) or placebo. Insulin glargine was adjusted to target a fasting plasma glucose concentration of 70-100 mg/dl. One coprimary end point was the change in A1C at week 16. The other coprimary end point was a composite measure of overall diabetes control comprising A1C < or = 7.0% or reduction > or = 0.5%, mean daily postprandial glucose (PPG) increments < or = 40 mg/dl, no increase in body weight, and no severe hypoglycemia. Patients meeting all four conditions at week 16 achieved this end point.. More pramlintide- than placebo-treated patients achieved the composite end point (25 vs. 7%; P < 0.001). Reductions (means +/- SE) in A1C (-0.70 +/- 0.11% vs. -0.36 +/- 0.08%; P < 0.05) and PPG increments (-24.4 +/- 3.6 mg/dl vs. -0.4 +/- 3.0 mg/dl; P < 0.0001) were greater in pramlintide- versus placebo-treated patients, respectively. Glycemic improvements were accompanied by progressive weight loss with pramlintide and weight gain with placebo (-1.6 +/- 0.3 kg vs. +0.7 +/- 0.3 kg; P < 0.0001). No treatment-related severe hypoglycemia occurred.. Pramlintide improved multiple glycemic parameters and reduced weight with no increase in hypoglycemia in patients with type 2 diabetes who were not achieving glycemic targets with basal insulin with or without OAs.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Aged; Amyloid; Blood Glucose; Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Islet Amyloid Polypeptide; Middle Aged; Placebos; Treatment Outcome; Weight Loss

To assess the effects of a structured in-patient diabetes training programme in people with Type 2 diabetes mellitus on a basal-bolus regimen using insulin glargine or NPH insulin and rapid-acting insulin analogues with respect to glycaemic control, weight development and incidence of hypoglycaemia in an outpatient-clinic setting.. This was a prospective, non-randomized, single centre, comparative observational study including 119 subjects. Pre-study treatment was a basal-bolus regimen with NPH insulin and a rapid-acting insulin analogue. Subjects either continued with NPH insulin (n=56) or were switched over to insulin glargine (n=63) at the discretion of the investigator (aiming at equal numbers in each group). Patients then attended routine out-patient follow up visits for 18 months.. HbA1c in the insulin glargine group improved statistically significant by -0.49%; [95%CI, -0.26, -0.71; p<0.001; HbA1c at endpoint 6.95+/-0.71%], whereas in the NPH group the reduction by -0.12% [95%CI, -0.31, 0.06; p=0.189; HbA1c at endpoint 7.22+/-0.74%] was statistically not significant. After 18 months of treatment the difference between treatment groups was 0.37% (p<0.015). Mean weight gain was significantly higher in the NPH group than in the glargine group (2.1 vs. 0.25 kg; p=0.025). A lower risk of hypoglycaemia in the glargine group (0.50 vs. 0.71 episodes/patient/month) did not reach statistical significance (p=0.081).. Following a structured in-patient diabetes training programme glycaemic control in people with Type 2 diabetes mellitus on a basal-bolus regimen improved significantly only with insulin glargine suggesting that training alone may not be sufficient to further improve metabolic control in relatively well controlled patients on NPH insulin. Therefore, in addition to a structured training programme also the insulin regimen should be optimized, e.g. by introduction of an insulin analogue.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Ambulatory Care Facilities; Body Weight; Diabetes Complications; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Isophane; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Middle Aged; Patient Education as Topic; Prospective Studies

The results of using status measures to identify any changes in treatment satisfaction strongly suggest a need for specific change instruments designed to overcome the ceiling effects frequently observed at baseline. Status measures may leave little room to show improvement in situations where baseline ceiling effects are observed. A change version of the DTSQ (DTSQc) is compared here with the original status (now called DTSQs) version to test the instruments' comparative ability to demonstrate change.. Two multinational, openlabel, randomised-controlled trials (one for patients with type 1 diabetes, the other for type 2) compared new, longer-acting insulin glargine with standard NPH basal insulin. The DTSQs was completed at baseline and the DTSQs and DTSQc at final visit by 351 English- and German-speaking patients. DTSQc scores were compared with change from baseline for the DTSQs, using 3-way analysis of variance, to examine Questionnaire, Treatment and Ceiling effects (i.e. baseline scores at/near ceiling).. Significant Questionnaire effects and a Questionnaire x Ceiling interaction (p < 0.001) in both trial datasets showed that the DTSQc detected more improvement in Treatment Satisfaction than the DTSQs, especially when patients had DTSQs scores at/near ceiling at baseline. Additionally, significant Treatment effects favouring insulin glargine (p < 0.001) and a Treatment x Questionnaire interaction (p < 0.019), with the DTSQc showing more benefits, were found in the type 1 trial. Results for Perceived Hyper- and Hypoglycaemia also demonstrated important differences between the questionnaires in the detection of treatment effects. Tests of effect sizes showed these differences in response to change to be significantly in favour of the DTSQc.. The DTSQc, used in conjunction with the DTSQs, overcomes the problem of ceiling effects encountered when only the status measure is used and provides a means for new treatments to show greater value than is possible with the DTSQs alone.

Topics: Adult; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Endpoint Determination; Female; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Isophane; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Middle Aged; Outcome Assessment, Health Care; Patient Satisfaction; Psychometrics; Surveys and Questionnaires; Time Factors

The primary objective of this study was to investigate the difference in the proportion of patients with conventionally detected hypoglycemia compared with continuous glucose monitoring system (CGMS, Medtronic MiniMed, Sylmar, CA)-detected glucose values < or = 60 mg/dL (< or = 3.3 mmol/L), during the 72-h CGMS measurement period after 8 weeks' treatment with insulin glargine.. This was a multicenter (n = 125), open-label, single-arm study in patients with Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) on multiple daily injections. Patients received NPH insulin (2-week run-in) followed by glargine (8-week treatment phase). Glucose levels were measured by CGMS and self-monitored blood glucose (SMBG) profiles over the 72-h pre- and post-treatment phase.. The full analysis set contained 367 patients [male 59%; mean age 59.2 years; mean body mass index 31.7 kg/m(2); mean hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) 6.9%]. At end point, 209 patients (56.9%) experienced hypoglycemia according to CGMS; 97 (26.4%) recorded hypoglycemia by conventional methods. CGMS- and SMBG-determined mean daytime glucose levels were similar at baseline and end point; however, nocturnal glucose levels were significantly lower with CGMS versus SMBG at baseline [130.2 vs. 145.0 mg/dL (7.2 vs. 8.1 mmol/L)] and at end point [123.3 vs. 137.3 mg/dL (6.8 vs. 7.6 mmol/L)]. Glucose levels measured by CGMS and SMBG decreased, and HbA1c levels decreased from 6.90% at screening to 6.67% at end point (P < 0.001).. This study demonstrates that CGMS can be successfully employed in large clinical trial settings in patients with T2DM. This easy-to-implement method may provide additional insights into glucose levels and valuable information regarding the time patients spend within the preferred glucose range.

Topics: Aged; Blood Glucose; Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Fasting; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Injections; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Isophane; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Middle Aged; Time Factors

Addition of the long-acting basal human insulin analogue insulin glargine (LANTUS) to the treatment regimen of patients with inadequate glycaemic control on oral antidiabetic drugs (OADs) alone has previously been evaluated as effective, safe and convenient. This pilot study aimed to establish whether insulin glargine plus OADs is effective in Type 2 diabetes patients previously poorly controlled on premixed insulin therapy.. In an open, controlled, randomized, parallel-group, single-centre, 16-week pilot study, 52 patients (age 65.6+/-9.2 years; diabetes duration 15.3+/-7.6 years; insulin therapy duration 4.2+/-1.7 years, body mass index 31.4+/-2.9 kg/m2) with Type 2 diabetes (HbA1c>or=8.0%) on premixed human insulin (75/25 or 70/30) were randomized to once-daily morning insulin glargine plus glimepiride (Group A; n=17), insulin glargine plus glimepiride and metformin (Group B; n=18) or premixed insulin (Group C; n=17). Glycaemic control and incidence of hypoglycaemia were evaluated.. HbA1c decreased significantly from baseline in Groups A and B, but not in Group C; (Group A: 7.87+/-0.66%, -0.35%, p=0.013; Group B: 7.44+/-0.92%, -0.69%, p=0.0057; Group C: 7.83+/-1.13%, -0.25%, p=0.32). There were no between-treatment differences at endpoint in HbA1c, fasting blood glucose, mean daily blood glucose or symptomatic hypoglycaemia (mean events/patient: Group A, 2.2; Group B, 2.3; Group C, 2.0). At endpoint, 88% of patients in Group A, 81% in Group B and 94% in Group C opted to continue with their assigned regimen.. This pilot study is the first prospective study to show that switching from premixed insulin to insulin glargine plus OAD treatment resulted in similar glycaemic control and treatment satisfaction. The results support the need for prospective examination in a larger-scale clinical study in patients with long-standing Type 2 diabetes and sub-optimal glycaemic control previously using a conventional premixed insulin regimen.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Blood Glucose; Body Mass Index; Case-Control Studies; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Fasting; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Metformin; Middle Aged; Pilot Projects; Prospective Studies; Sulfonylurea Compounds; Time Factors

This study was conducted to compare the efficacy and safety profiles of exenatide and insulin glargine therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes who had not achieved glucose control with metformin or sulfonylurea monotherapy.. This multinational, randomized, open-label, crossover noninferiority study compared the efficacy of exenatide 10 pg BID and insulin glargine QD (titrated targeting a fasting serum glucose (FSG) level < or =5.6 mmol/L) in patients with type 2 diabetes treated with a single oral antidiabetic agent. The study included two 16-week treatment periods. The primary a priori outcome variable was the change in glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA(lc)). Secondary outcomes included the proportion of patients achieving the American Diabetes Association (ADA) target HbA(lc) of < or =7% and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes target of < or =6.5%, the change in FSG, end-point values and change in the 7-point self-monitored glucose profile, and change in body weight. Adverse events were assessed based on standard laboratory tests and patient reports.. One hundred thirty-eight patients were randomized to study treatment (52.9% female, 47.1% male; 79.7% white; mean [SEM] age, 54.9 [0.8] years; duration of diabetes, 7.4 [0.4] years; body mass index, 31.1 [0.4] kg/m(2); weight, 84.8 [1.4] kg) while continuing to receive metformin (55.1%) or a sulfonylurea (44.9%). The population had a baseline least squares (LS) mean (SEM) HbA(lc) of 8.95% (0.09%) and an LS mean FSG concentration of 12.0 (0.3) mmol/L. Both exenatide and titrated insulin glargine therapy were associated with similar significant changes from baseline in HbA(1c) (both, -1.36% [0.09%]; P < 0.001); the difference between groups was not statistically significant. The LS mean HbA(1c) at end point was above the ADA target with both treatments (exenatide, 7.57% [0.09%]; insulin glargine, 7.58% [0.09%]). Similar proportions of patients achieved an HbA(1c) < or =7% (37.5% and 39.8%, respectively; P = NS) or < or =6.5% (21.5% and 13.6%). Patients lost weight during exenatide treatment, whereas they gained weight during insulin glargine treatment; the between-group difference in weight change was statistically significant (LS mean difference, -2.2 [0.3] kg; 95% CI, -2.8 to-1.7; P < 0.001). Both exenatide and insulin glargine were associated with significant reductions from baseline in FSG (-2.9 [0.2] and -4.1 [0.2] mmol/L, respectively; both, P < 0.001), although the reduction was significantly greater with insulin glargine compared with exenatide (LS mean difference, 1.2 [0.3] mmol/L; 95% CI, 0.7 to 1.7; P < 0.001). Compared with insulin glargine, exenatide was associated with significantly lower 2-hour postprandial glucose (PPG) excursions (P < 0.016) and total daily mean glucose excursion (P < 0.001). The proportions of patients reporting nausea during exenatide and insulin glargine treatment were 42.6% and 3.1%, respectively; the proportions reporting vomiting were 9.6% and 3.1%. The incidence of hypoglycemia in the 2 groups was 14.7% and 25.2% (P = NS).. In this open-label, crossover study, treatment with exenatide or insulin glargine for 16 weeks was associated with similar significant improvements from baseline in HbA(1c), independent of treatment order. The improvements in HbA(1c) from baseline did not differ significantly between treatment groups. Exenatide therapy was associated with significant reductions in body weight and PPG excursions compared with insulin glargine, whereas insulin glargine was associated with a significantly greater reduction in FSG compared with exenatide. These findings provide additional information to guide treatment decisions in patients with type 2 diabetes who are potential candidates for either therapy.

Topics: Adult; Blood Glucose; Body Weight; Cross-Over Studies; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Double-Blind Method; Drug Resistance; Exenatide; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Metformin; Peptides; Sulfonylurea Compounds; Venoms

The purpose of this study was to compare the effect of two insulin therapies with respect to long-term complications in type 2 diabetes patients using the Diabetes Mellitus Model (DMM). The therapies under investigation were insulin glargine combined with the oral antidiabetic agents, glimepiride and metformin, (BOT = basal supported oral treatment) and premixed insulin (CT = conventional therapy).. The DMM predicts complications over a 10-year period using data from published studies. Particular interest is placed on the influence of HbA1c levels related to time. The simulations are based on 10,000 virtual patients taking BOT and CT and the clinical data are based on the results of the LAPTOP study (Lantus + Amaryl + metformin versus premixed insulin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus after failing oral treatment pathways) comparing BOT and CT for 24 weeks. The simulations were performed in patients aged 60 A+/- 9 years with type 2 diabetes in which the duration of disease had a baseline of 9 A+/- 7 years. Sensitivity analyses were carried out by changing the response rate of those on BOT, the age of patients and duration of diabetes.. The overall relative risk reductions obtained with BOT versus CT for the base case are, 11% for the nervous and vascular systems, 7% for the renal system, 5% for ophthalmic disorders, 3% for the cardiovascular system and mortality and 6% for any kind of event after 10 years. The advantages of BOT were robust to all the changes in the sensitivity analyses. When compared with the base case, the best therapeutic effects were obtained in younger patients who had been diabetic for a shorter period.. Using the DMM data from the LAPTOP study, simulations based on both therapies showed that the BOT regimen provides better glycemic control and reduction in HbA1c thereby leading to a reduction in the long-term complications of diabetes and mortality.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Computer Simulation; Diabetes Complications; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Metformin; Middle Aged; Models, Biological; Sulfonylurea Compounds

This study examined the long-term glycaemic control and safety of insulin glargine (LANTUS) in patients with Type 2 diabetes.. This

Topics: Aged; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Ethnicity; Female; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Middle Aged; Patient Selection

In type 2 diabetic patients we compared 9 months of combination therapy with insulin glargine and metformin with 9 months of NPH insulin combined with metformin. The primary focus was changes in HbA(1c); secondary focus was diurnal glucose profiles and symptomatic hypoglycaemia.. In this investigator-initiated open, parallel-group clinical trial involving seven centres, 110 insulin-naive type 2 diabetic patients with poor glycaemic control (HbA(1c) >or=8.0%) on oral hypoglycaemic agents (90% using sulfonylurea plus metformin) were randomised to receive bedtime insulin glargine with metformin (G+MET) or bedtime NPH with metformin (NPH+MET) for 36 weeks. The patients were taught how to self-adjust their insulin dose and use a modem to send the results of home glucose monitoring to treatment centres. The goal was to achieve a fasting plasma glucose (FPG) of 4.0 to 5.5 mmol/l in both groups.. During the last 12 weeks, FPGs averaged 5.75+/-0.02 and 5.96+/-0.03 mmol/l (p<0.001) and insulin doses were 68+/-5 and 70+/-6 IU/day (0.69+/-0.05 and 0.66+/-0.04 IU kg(-1) day(-1), NS) in the G+MET and NPH+MET groups, respectively. At 36 weeks, mean HbA(1c) was 7.14+/-0.12 and 7.16+/-0.14%, respectively (NS). Symptomatic, but not confirmed symptomatic, hypoglycaemia was significantly lower during the first 12 weeks in the G+MET group (4.1+/-0.8 episodes/patient-year) than in the NPH+MET group (9.0+/-2.3 episodes/patient-year, p<0.05), but not significantly different thereafter. Glucose levels before dinner were higher in the NPH+MET group (10.1+/-0.3 mmol/l) than in the G+MET group (8.6+/-0.3 mmol/l, p=0.002) throughout the 36-week study. With regard to baseline characteristics such as initial glycaemia or C-peptide, there was no difference between patients who achieved good glycaemic control (HbA(1c) <7.0%) and those who did not. Differences were seen in the following: between study centres, weight gain during the run-in period and insulin therapy, and FPG during the last 12 weeks (5.7+/-0.2 vs 6.7+/-0.3 mmol/l for patients reaching vs those not reaching target, p<0.01).. Good glycaemic control can be achieved with both G+MET and NPH+MET. Use of G+MET reduces symptomatic hypoglycaemia during the first 12 weeks and dinner time hyperglycaemia compared with NPH+MET.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Blood Glucose; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Fasting; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Isophane; Insulin, Long-Acting; Lipid Metabolism; Liver; Male; Metformin; Middle Aged

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of add-on insulin glargine versus rosiglitazone in insulin-naïve patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled on dual oral therapy with sulfonylurea plus metformin.. In this 24-week multicenter, randomized, open-label, parallel trial, 217 patients (HbA(1c) [A1C] 7.5-11%, BMI >25 kg/m(2)) on > or =50% of maximal-dose sulfonylurea and metformin received add-on insulin glargine 10 units/day or rosiglitazone 4 mg/day. Insulin glargine was forced-titrated to target fasting plasma glucose (FPG) < or =5.5-6.7 mmol/l (< or =100-120 mg/dl), and rosiglitazone was increased to 8 mg/day any time after 6 weeks if FPG was >5.5 mmol/l.. A1C improvements from baseline were similar in both groups (-1.7 vs. -1.5% for insulin glargine vs. rosiglitazone, respectively); however, when baseline A1C was >9.5%, the reduction of A1C with insulin glargine was greater than with rosiglitazone (P < 0.05). Insulin glargine yielded better FPG values than rosiglitazone (-3.6 +/- 0.23 vs. -2.6 +/- 0.22 mmol/l; P = 0.001). Insulin glargine final dose per day was 38 +/- 26 IU vs. 7.1 +/- 2 mg for rosiglitazone. Confirmed hypoglycemic events at plasma glucose <3.9 mmol/l (<70 mg/dl) were slightly greater for the insulin glargine group (n = 57) than for the rosiglitazone group (n = 47) (P = 0.0528). The calculated average rate per patient-year of a confirmed hypoglycemic event (<70 mg/dl), after adjusting for BMI, was 7.7 (95% CI 5.4-10.8) and 3.4 (2.3-5.0) for the insulin glargine and rosiglitazone groups, respectively (P = 0.0073). More patients in the insulin glargine group had confirmed nocturnal hypoglycemia of <3.9 mmol/l (P = 0.02) and <2.8 mmol/l (P < 0.05) than in the rosiglitazone group. Effects on total cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, and triglyceride levels from baseline to end point with insulin glargine (-4.4, -1.4, and -19.0%, respectively) contrasted with those of rosiglitazone (+10.1, +13.1, and +4.6%, respectively; P < 0.002). HDL cholesterol was unchanged with insulin glargine but increased with rosiglitazone by 4.4% (P < 0.05). Insulin glargine had less weight gain than rosiglitazone (1.6 +/- 0.4 vs. 3.0 +/- 0.4 kg; P = 0.02), fewer adverse events (7 vs. 29%; P = 0.0001), and no peripheral edema (0 vs. 12.5%). Insulin glargine saved $235/patient over 24 weeks compared with rosiglitazone.. Low-dose insulin glargine combined with a sulfonylurea and metformin resulted in similar A1C improvements except for greater reductions in A1C when baseline was > or =9.5% compared with add-on maximum-dose rosiglitazone. Further, insulin glargine was associated with more hypoglycemia but less weight gain, no edema, and salutary lipid changes at a lower cost of therapy.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Lipids; Male; Metformin; Middle Aged; Rosiglitazone; Sulfonylurea Compounds; Thiazolidinediones

In normal subjects, approximately half of the daily insulin requirement constitutes basal insulin. We investigated whether increasing the dose of insulin glargine up to half of the total insulin requirement could lead to better glycemic control in type 2 diabetic patients who were treated on basal-prandial insulin therapy. A total of 62 patients with type 2 diabetes on mealtime rapid-acting insulin analogue and bedtime NPH were randomized to either continuation of bedtime NPH (n=31) or morning glargine (n=31) for 6 months while continuing the aspart/lispro at each meal. The two groups were matched for age, sex, diabetes duration, BMI, HbA(1C), endogenous insulin secretion, and proportion of numbers using aspart/lispro and using oral hypoglycemic agents. The dose of insulin glargine was increased by 2-4 units to meet the target fasting blood glucose, whereas the dose of NPH was principally unchanged as a control group. Mean HbA(1C) at baseline was similar between patients with glargine and NPH (7.2% versus 6.9%). The percentage of glargine dose increased significantly (31% at baseline to 48% at 6 months) without any significant changes in total insulin dose. Mean HbA(1C) at 3 months was 6.6% with glargine and 7.0% with NPH (P<0.0001, adjusted mean change between-treatment difference 0.6% [95% CI 0.3-0.9]), and the values at 6 months were 6.6% and 6.9%, respectively (P=0.007). Frequency of hypoglycemia did not differ between the groups. Increasing the dose of glargine without changing the total daily insulin dose resulted in significantly better glycemic control in type 2 diabetic patients on basal-prandial insulin therapy. Conversion from bedtime NPH to morning glargine appears efficacious with no increase in frequency of hypoglycemia.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Blood Glucose; Circadian Rhythm; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Administration Schedule; Eating; Female; Humans; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Isophane; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Middle Aged

Mitiglinide is novel class of rapid-acting insulin secretagogues, which have been widely used alone or in combination with other oral hypoglycemic drugs to improve postprandial hyperglycemia in early type 2 diabetes. While mitiglinide enhances postprandial requirement of insulin, the efficacy of mitiglinide combined with insulin has yet to be established. We investigated the efficacy of mitiglinide combined with insulin glargine, the first soluble insulin analog that has a flat and prolonged effect. After control with the intensive regimen (daily aspart insulin and glargine), 30 inpatients with type 2 diabetes were switched to premeal mitiglinide combined with once daily insulin glargine (mitiglinide regimen), and daily profiles of blood glucose level were compared under each regimen. Fifteen patients showed similar control of hyperglycemia with mitiglinide regimen and intensive insulin regimen, assessed by M value (<32), while the remaining 15 showed worsening under the mitiglinide regimen. The patients who were well controlled with mitiglinide regimen were significantly younger (51.9 +/- 16.0 years, p<0.005) and heavier (body mass index: 25.7 +/- 3.3 kg/m(2), p<0.05) than those who were not (67.9 +/- 8.7 and 23.0 +/- 3.1, respectively). Moreover, insulin doses of aspart per body weight were significantly fewer in effective group than in ineffective group. Duration of diabetes was shorter in the effective group, albeit insignificantly. Previous treatment before starting intensive insulin regimen, such as insulin and sulfonylurea, was not different between the two groups. Our results suggest that mitiglinide plus insulin glargine combination therapy is useful for lowering both fasting and postprandial hyperglycemia in a subpopulation of type 2 diabetes. The long-term effects of such treatment need to be established in future studies.

Topics: Adult; Age Factors; Aged; Blood Glucose; Body Mass Index; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Humans; Hyperglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Indoles; Insulin; Insulin Aspart; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Isoindoles; Male; Middle Aged; Postprandial Period; Time Factors

The pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of biphasic insulin aspart (BIAsp 30) (30% soluble, 70% protaminated insulin aspart [IAsp]) and insulin glargine (IGlarg) were compared.. Twelve people with type 2 diabetes took part in two 24-h isoglycaemic clamp studies, 1 week apart. Patients were randomised to treatment with 0.5 U/kg of BIAsp 30 (0.25 U/kg at 08.30 h and 0.25 U/kg at 20.30 h) or 0.50 U/kg IGlarg at 08.30 h. Both insulins were given by subcutaneous injection into the anterior abdominal wall. The plasma glucose, glucose infusion rates, plasma insulin and C-peptide concentrations were measured.. All 12 patients were men; mean (+/-SD) age was 58.8 (8.9) years, BMI 31.0 (3.0) kg/m2 and HbA(1c) 7.1 (0.6)%. Plasma glucose was constant throughout the 24-h clamp period. After each injection of BIAsp 30, glucose infusion rates increased, reaching a distinct peak approximately 3-5 h after injection. A much flatter postinjection profile was observed following IGlarg administration. Plasma insulin concentrations rose rapidly after each injection of BIAsp 30, reaching a distinct peak after approximately 2-3 h. A flatter plasma insulin profile reached a plateau approximately 6-16 h after IGlarg administration. Plasma C-peptide fell below baseline after both injections of BIAsp 30 but remained unaltered after IGlarg injection.. The pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic profiles were 34 and 28%, respectively, higher following equivalent doses (0.5 U/kg) of BIAsp 30 given as two split doses than following IGlarg given as a single daily dose.

Topics: Aged; Area Under Curve; Biphasic Insulins; Blood Glucose; C-Peptide; Cross-Over Studies; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Glucose Clamp Technique; Humans; Insulin; Insulin Aspart; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Isophane; Insulin, Long-Acting; Kinetics; Male; Middle Aged

To compare the incidence of nocturnal hypoglycemia and glycemic control following bedtime or morning insulin glargine (LANTUS; glargine) plus glimepiride.. In this 24-week, multinational, open, randomized study, 624 patients with type 2 diabetes poorly controlled on oral therapy received morning or bedtime glargine plus morning glimepiride (2, 3 or 4 mg) titrated to a target fasting blood glucose level < or = 5.5 mmol/l.. The incidence of nocturnal hypoglycemia was equivalent between the two groups, with morning glargine non-inferior to bedtime (13.0 VS. 14.9 % of patients; between-treatment difference -1.9 %; one-sided 95 % confidence interval -100 %; 2.84 %). At endpoint, similar improvements in glycemic control were observed with morning compared to bedtime glargine: HbA1c: -1.65 +/- 1.21 VS. -1.57 +/- 1.16 %; p = 0.42; fasting blood glucose: -4.25 +/- 2.82 VS. -4.48 +/- 2.75 mmol/l; p = 0.08. The endpoint mean daily glargine dose was comparable (34.7 +/- 17.4 VS. 32.4 +/- 17.0 IU; p = 0.15), and there was no significant between-treatment difference in the change in body weight (2.1 VS. 1.8 kg; p = 0.39).. Once-daily glargine can be administered in a flexible morning or bedtime regimen (plus morning glimepiride) to achieve good glycemic control without any difference in hypoglycemia.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Blood Glucose; Body Mass Index; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Middle Aged; Sulfonylurea Compounds; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

Type 2 diabetes (T2DM) patients often fail to achieve adequate glycemic control with oral antidiabetic drugs (OADs). Insulin has been shown to improve glycemic control in these patients but with increased risk of hypoglycemia. This study compared the efficacy and safety of insulin glargine and NPH insulin, both in combination with a once-daily fixed dose of glimepiride, in terms of glycemic control and incidence of hypoglycemia.. In this open-label, 24-week randomized trial in ten Latin American countries, T2DM patients poorly controlled on OADs (HbA1c > or = 7.5 and < or = 10.5%) received glimepiride plus insulin glargine (n = 231) or NPH insulin (n = 250) using a forced titration algorithm. The primary endpoint was the equivalence of 24-week mean changes in HbA1c.. Insulin glargine and NPH insulin achieved similar HbA1c reductions (adjusted mean difference -0.047; 90% CI -0.232, 0.138; per-protocol analysis). Confirmed nocturnal hypoglycemia was significantly lower with insulin glargine vs. NPH insulin (16.9 vs. 30.0%; p <0.01; safety analysis). Patients receiving insulin glargine were significantly more likely to achieve HbA1c levels < 7.0% without hypoglycemia (27 vs. 17%; p = 0.014; per-protocol analysis). There was a more pronounced treatment satisfaction improvement with insulin glargine vs. NPH insulin (p <0.02; full analysis). The proportion of patients who lost time from work or normal activities due to diabetes was lower with insulin glargine vs. NPH (1.8 vs. 3.3%; full analysis).. In patients with T2DM, inadequately controlled on OADs, once-daily insulin glargine plus glimepiride is effective in improving metabolic control with a reduced incidence of nocturnal hypoglycemia compared with NPH insulin.

Topics: Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Isophane; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Middle Aged; Sulfonylurea Compounds

In patients with type 2 diabetes, insulin therapy is commonly initiated with either a single dose of basal insulin or twice-daily premixed (basal plus prandial) insulin despite no widely accepted recommendation. We compared the glycaemic control, as measured by a change in HbA1c, of intensive mixture therapy (IMT), a basal plus prandial regimen using insulin lispro mixture 50/50 (50% lispro and 50% NPL) before breakfast and lunch and insulin lispro mixture 25/75 (25% lispro and 75% NPL) before dinner, vs. once-daily insulin glargine therapy, while continuing patients on oral antidiabetes medications.. Following inadequate glycaemic control (HbA1c 1.2-2.0 times the upper limit of normal) and at least 2 months of two or more oral antidiabetes agent therapy, 60 insulin-naïve patients with type 2 diabetes were randomized to one of the insulin regimens for 4 months with crossover to the alternative regimen for an additional 4 months. Glycaemic goals were preprandial blood glucose <120 mg/dl (6.7 mmol/l) and 2-h postprandial blood glucose <180 mg/dl (10.0 mmol/l). The insulin dose was optimized by investigators without forced titration.. Mean prestudy (baseline) HbA1c for all patients was 9.21 +/- 1.33% (+/-s.d.). IMT compared to glargine resulted in both a lower endpoint in HbA1c (7.08 +/- 0.11% vs. 7.34 +/- 0.11%; p = 0.003) and a greater change in HbA1c from pretherapy (-1.01 +/- 0.10% vs. -0.75 +/- 0.10%; p = 0.0068). Forty-four per cent of patients receiving IMT and 31% of patients receiving insulin glargine achieved HbA1c < or = 7%. Two-hour postprandial glucose values (for all three meals) and predinner glucose values were significantly less with IMT than with insulin glargine (p = 0.0034, 0.0001, 0.0066 and 0.0205). Overall hypoglycaemia throughout the complete treatment period was infrequent (IMT vs. Glargine: 3.98 +/- 4.74 vs. 2.57 +/- 3.22 episodes/patient/30 days, p = 0.0013), and no severe hypoglycaemia was observed during the study with either therapy. There was no difference in nocturnal hypoglycaemia between the two therapies. The mean insulin dose at the end of therapy was greater for IMT than for once-daily insulin glargine (0.353 +/- 0.256 vs. 0.276 +/- 0.207 IU/kg, p = 0.0107).. In combination with oral antidiabetes agents, multiple daily injections of a basal plus prandial insulin IMT regimen (using premixed insulin lispro formulations) resulted in greater improvements and a lower endpoint in HbA1c compared with a basal-only insulin regimen. IMT also resulted in improved postprandial blood glucose control at each meal and enabled administration of a greater daily dose of insulin, which most likely contributed to these lower HbA1c measures. This greater reduction in HbA1c with IMT is accompanied by a small increased occurrence of mild hypoglycaemia but without any severe hypoglycaemia. Greater consideration should be given to initiating insulin as a basal plus prandial regimen rather than a basal-only regimen.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Blood Glucose; Body Weight; Cross-Over Studies; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Middle Aged

Insulin is generally withheld until people with Type 2 diabetes are unresponsive to other therapies. However, its potential advantages suggest that it could be added earlier to achieve glycaemic goals; this possibility was tested in a clinical trial.. Consenting adults aged 18-80 years with Type 2 diabetes for at least 6 months, HbA1c of 7.5-11%, and on 0, 1 or 2 oral agents, were randomized to one of two therapeutic approaches for 24 weeks: evening insulin glargine plus self-titration by 1 unit/day if the fasting plasma glucose (FPG) was > 5.5 mmol/l; or conventional therapy with physician adjustment of oral glucose-lowering agents if capillary FPG levels were > 5.5 mmol/l. The primary outcome was the first achievement of two consecutive HbA1c levels

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Blood Glucose; Canada; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Metformin; Middle Aged; Sulfonylurea Compounds; Treatment Outcome

To compare insulin lispro mixture (25% insulin lispro and 75% NPL; Mix 25/75) twice-daily plus oral glucose-lowering medications (metformin and/or sulphonylurea) with once-daily insulin glargine plus oral agents with respect to postprandial glycaemic control and other glucose and lipid parameters in patients with Type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled with insulin and/or oral glucose-lowering agents.. This was a randomized, open-label, crossover study. Prestudy oral agents were continued and patients not already on oral agents were treated with metformin. Mix 25/75 and insulin glargine were adjusted over 3 months to attain premeal plasma glucose (PG) < 6.0 mmol/l and were then given during a 24-h in-patient test meal period with frequent PG, serum triglyceride (TG) and free fatty acid (FFA) measurements.. Twenty patients (10 F/10 M; mean +/-sd age 54.0 +/- 10.7 years, body mass index 37.0 +/- 8.6 kg/m2, HbA1c 8.4 +/- 1.01%) participated. Mean doses were 23 U before the morning and 37 U before the evening meal for Mix 25/75 and 44 U for insulin glargine. The combined 2-h morning and evening meal postprandial plasma glucose (PPG) was not different between groups (9.2 +/- 2.04 vs. 9.9 +/- 1.66 mmol/l, P = 0.161). Mix 25/75 was associated with a lower mean 2-h PPG for all meals combined (9.0 +/- 1.88 vs. 9.9 +/- 1.80 mmol/l, P < 0.05) and lower mean 24-h PG (6.7 +/- 1.00 vs. 7.5 +/- 1.32 mmol/l, P < 0.01). Eight patients experienced mild hypoglycaemia (PG < 3.5 mmol/l) with Mix 25/75 and 3 with insulin glargine. The endpoint HbA1c was lower with Mix 25/75 (6.9 +/- 0.52% vs. 7.3 +/- 0.81%, P < 0.05).. In a 24-h test-meal setting in 20 patients, Mix 25/75 insulin plus oral glucose-lowering agents was associated with lower mean PPG and 24-h PG, more mild hypoglycaemia and similar TG, FFA and fasting PG concentrations. HbA1c was lower with Mix 75/25 plus oral agents, although it may not have reached steady state due to ongoing dose adjustment.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Blood Glucose; Cross-Over Studies; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Eating; Fatty Acids, Nonesterified; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin Lispro; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Metformin; Middle Aged; Sulfonylurea Compounds; Treatment Outcome; Triglycerides

This controlled proof-of-concept study investigated inhaled insulin (INH) as adjunctive therapy to existing oral antidiabetic agents in subjects with type 2 diabetes.. Twenty-four subjects with type 2 diabetes [19 men and 5 women, 56.1 +/- 6.6 years, body mass index 32.7 +/- 4.2 kg/m(2), glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA1c) 8.4 +/- 0.8% (mean +/- s.d.)] inadequately controlled by metformin and/or sulfonylureas were randomized to receive additional therapy with either INH administered preprandially using a metered-dose inhaler (MDI), or insulin glargine (GLA) injected subcutaneously at bedtime for 4 weeks. Both inhaled and injected insulin doses were titrated to predefined blood glucose (BG) targets.. INH and GLA improved metabolic control to a similar extent. Mean daily BG decreased by 2.8 mmol/l in the INH group (p < 0.001) and by 2.4 mmol/l in the GLA group (p < 0.001). Accordingly, fasting BG (-2.7 vs. -3.6 mmol/l for INH vs. GLA), preprandial- and 2-h postprandial BG, HbA1c (-1.23 vs. -1.05%), body weight (-1.9 vs. -2.3 kg) and serum fructosamine were similarly and significantly reduced in both groups (p < 0.05). Triglycerides decreased significantly with INH (-1.15 micromol/l; p < 0.001) but not with GLA [-0.52 micromol/l; not significant (NS)]. Incidence rates of adverse events did not differ significantly, and there were no indications of respiratory tract irritation.. In subjects with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled by oral agents, preprandial administration of INH delivered by a MDI provided a comparable metabolic control to bedtime GLA and did not show any safety concerns during a 4-week treatment. These results warrant a more extensive investigation of preprandial treatment with INH in longer term studies.

Topics: Administration, Inhalation; Administration, Oral; Adolescent; Adult; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Injections, Subcutaneous; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Metformin; Middle Aged; Pilot Projects; Sulfonylurea Compounds; Treatment Failure

Topics: Adult; Algorithms; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Fasting; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Incidence; Injections, Subcutaneous; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Self Administration; Self Care

Patient-reported measures can be used to examine whether drug differences other than clinical efficacy have an impact on outcomes that may be important to patients. Although exenatide and insulin glargine appear to have similar efficacy for treatment of type 2 diabetes, there are several differences between the two treatments that could influence outcomes from the patient's perspective. The purpose of the current study was to examine whether the two drugs were comparable as assessed by patient-reported outcomes using data from a clinical trial in which these injectable medications were added to pre-existing oral treatment regimens.. Patients were randomized to either twice daily exenatide or once daily insulin glargine during a 26-week international trial. At baseline and endpoint, five patient-reported outcome measures were administered: the Vitality Scale of the SF-36, The Diabetes Symptom Checklist - Revised (DSC-R), the EuroQol EQ-5D, the Treatment Flexibility Scale (TFS), and the Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (DTSQ). Change from baseline to endpoint was analyzed within each treatment group. Group differences were examined with General linear models (GLMs), controlling for country and baseline scores.. A total of 549 patients with type 2 diabetes were enrolled in the trial, and current analyses were conducted with data from the 455 per protocol patients (228 exenatide and 227 insulin glargine). The sample was primarily Caucasian (79.6%), with slightly more men (55.2%) than women, and with a mean age of 58.5 years. Paired t-tests found that both treatment groups demonstrated statistically significant baseline to endpoint change on several of the health outcomes instruments including the DSC-R, DTSQ, and the SF-36 Vitality subscale. GLMs found no statistically significant differences between groups in change on the health outcomes instruments.. This analysis found that both exenatide and insulin glargine were associated with significant improvements in patient-reported outcomes when added to oral medications among patients with type 2 diabetes. Despite an additional daily injection and a higher rate of gastrointestinal adverse events, treatment satisfaction in the exenatide group was comparable to that of the glargine group, possibly because of weight reduction observed in patients treated with exenatide.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Exenatide; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Middle Aged; Outcome Assessment, Health Care; Patient Satisfaction; Peptides; Psychometrics; Surveys and Questionnaires; Treatment Outcome; Venoms

We sought to examine the mechanisms by which the addition of glargine insulin or rosiglitazone improves glycemic control in type 2 diabetic subjects poorly controlled on maximally effective doses of metformin plus sulfonylurea.. Subjects (aged 47 +/- 11 years, BMI 31 +/- 5 kg/m(2), HbA(1c) [A1C] 9.4 +/- 1.3%) received bedtime glargine insulin (titrated based on the fasting plasma glucose [FPG], n = 10) or rosiglitazone (4 mg twice daily, n = 10). At baseline and after 4 months, A1C was measured and an oral glucose tolerance test and a 3-h euglycemic insulin (80 mU/m(2) per min) clamp with [3-(3)H]glucose were performed.. A1C and FPG decreased similarly in the glargine insulin (9.1 +/- 0.4 to 7.6 +/- 0.3% and 212 +/- 14 to 139 +/- 5 mg/dl, respectively, both P < 0.0001) and rosiglitazone (9.4 +/- 0.3 to 7.6 +/- 0.4% and 223 +/- 14 to 160 +/- 19 mg/dl, respectively, both P < 0.005) groups. After 4 months, endogenous glucose production (EGP) declined similarly with glargine insulin (2.27 +/- 0.10 to 1.73 +/- 0.12 mg . kg(-1) . min(-1), P < 0.0001) and rosiglitazone (2.21 +/- 0.12 to 1.88 +/- 0.12 mg . kg(-1) . min(-1), P = 0.01). The hepatic insulin resistance index declined in the rosiglitazone group (32 +/- 3 to 21 +/- 1 mg . kg(-1) . min(-1) x microU/ml, P = 0.03 vs. baseline and P < 0.05 vs. glargine insulin) and did not change in the glargine group (22 +/- 5 to 20 +/- 3 mg . kg(-1) . min(-1) x microU/ml, P = NS). At 4 months, glargine insulin (3.6 +/- 0.5 to 4.2 +/- 0.4 mg . kg(-1) . min(-1), P < 0.01) and rosiglitazone (2.7 +/- 0.3 to 3.8 +/- 0.3 mg . kg(-1) . min(-1), P < 0.0005) increased R(d), but the increment was greater in the rosiglitazone group (P < 0.05). Diastolic blood pressure was reduced only by rosiglitazone (P < 0.01).. Triple therapy with glargine insulin or rosiglitazone similarly reduced A1C, primarily by suppressing basal EGP (hepatic). Glargine insulin reduced basal EGP by increasing plasma insulin levels, while rosiglitazone decreased basal hepatic glucose production by improving hepatic insulin sensitivity.

Topics: Adult; Blood Glucose; Blood Pressure; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Glucose Clamp Technique; Glucose Tolerance Test; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Liver; Male; Metformin; Middle Aged; Rosiglitazone; Sulfonylurea Compounds; Thiazolidinediones

To compare the efficacy and safety of two analog insulins as starting regimens in insulin-naïve Type 2 diabetes patients.. In this randomized, open-label parallel study, twice-daily biphasic insulin aspart 30 (30% soluble and 70% protaminated insulin aspart; BIAsp 30) plus metformin (met) was compared with once-daily insulin glargine (glarg) plus glimepiride (glim) in 255 insulin-naïve patients (131 male; mean+/-SD age, 61.2+/-9.1 years). Mean baseline HbA (1c) (+/-SD) was 9.2+/-1.4% and 8.9+/-1.3% for BIAsp 30 plus met ( N=128) and glarg plus glim ( N=127), respectively ( P=0.0747). Primary endpoint was the difference in absolute change in HbA (1c) between groups after 26 weeks of treatment.. HbA (1c) change was significantly greater in the BIAsp 30 plus met group than the glarg plus glim group (between-group difference: -0.5% (95% CI: -0.8; -0.2); P=0.0002). Mean prandial plasma glucose increment was significantly lower for BIAsp 30 plus met compared with glarg plus glim: 1.4+/-1.4 mmol/l vs. 2.2+/-1.8 mmol/l; P=0.0002. During the maintenance phase (weeks 6-26), one major hypoglycemic episode occurred in each group; 20.3% and 9% of patients experienced minor hypoglycemic episodes in the BIAsp 30 plus met and glarg plus glim groups, respectively ( P=0.0124). At end-of-trial, mean daily insulin doses were 0.40 U/kg BIAsp 30 and 0.39 U/kg glarg. Glarg plus glim-treated patients experienced significant weight gain of 1.5 kg (95% CI: 0.84; 2.19; P<0.0001). Weight change with BIAsp 30 plus met of +0.7 kg was not statistically significant (95% CI: -0.07; 1.42; P=0.0762).. Starting insulin in Type 2 diabetes patients with twice-daily BIAsp 30 plus met can reduce HbA (1c) and mean prandial plasma glucose increment to a greater extent than once-daily glarg plus glim.

Topics: Aged; Biphasic Insulins; Blood Glucose; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Aspart; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Isophane; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Metformin; Middle Aged; Sulfonylurea Compounds; Treatment Outcome

To compare the efficacy and safety of adding once-daily basal insulin versus switching to twice-daily premixed insulin in type 2 diabetic patients insufficiently controlled by oral antidiabetic agents (OADs).. In a 24-week, multinational, multicenter, open, parallel group clinical trial, 371 insulin-naive patients with poor glycemic control (fasting blood glucose [FBG] >/=120 mg/dl, HbA(1c) 7.5-10.5%) on OADs (sulfonylurea plus metformin) were randomized to once-daily morning insulin glargine plus glimepiride and metformin (glargine plus OAD) or to 30% regular/70% human NPH insulin (70/30) twice daily without OADs. Insulin dosage was titrated to target FBG

Topics: Adult; Aged; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Metformin; Middle Aged; Sulfonylurea Compounds; Weight Gain

Safety and efficacy of biphasic insulin aspart 70/30 (BIAsp 70/30, prebreakfast and presupper) were compared with once-daily insulin glargine in type 2 diabetic subjects inadequately controlled on oral antidiabetic drugs (OADs).. This 28-week parallel-group study randomized 233 insulin-naive patients with HbA(1c) values >/=8.0% on >1,000 mg/day metformin alone or in combination with other OADs. Metformin was adjusted up to 2,550 mg/day before insulin therapy was initiated with 5-6 units BIAsp 70/30 twice daily or 10-12 units glargine at bedtime and titrated to target blood glucose (80-110 mg/dl) by algorithm-directed titration.. A total of 209 subjects completed the study. At study end, the mean HbA(1c) value was lower in the BIAsp 70/30 group than in the glargine group (6.91 +/- 1.17 vs. 7.41 +/- 1.24%, P < 0.01). The HbA(1c) reduction was greater in the BIAsp 70/30 group than in the glargine group (-2.79 +/- 0.11 vs. -2.36 +/- 0.11%, respectively; P < 0.01), especially for subjects with baseline HbA(1c) >8.5% (-3.13 +/- 1.63 vs. -2.60 +/- 1.50%, respectively; P < 0.05). More BIAsp 70/30-treated subjects reached target HbA(1c) values than glargine-treated subjects (HbA(1c) 8.5%.

Topics: Adult; Blood Glucose; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Aspart; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Metformin; Middle Aged; Treatment Outcome

To compare the glycaemic control of an insulin lispro mixture (25% insulin lispro and 75% NPL) twice daily in combination with metformin to that of once-daily insulin glargine plus metformin in patients with Type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled with intermediate insulin, or insulin plus oral agent(s) combination therapy.. Ninety-seven patients were randomized in a multicentre, open-label, 32-week crossover study. Primary variables evaluated: haemoglobin A1c (A1c), 2-h post-prandial blood glucose (BG), hypoglycaemia rate (episodes/patient/30 days), incidence (% patients experiencing > or = 1 episode) of overall and nocturnal hypoglycaemia.. At endpoint, A1c was lower with the insulin lispro mixture plus metformin compared with glargine plus metformin (7.54% +/- 0.87% vs. 8.14% +/- 1.03%, P < 0.001). Change in A1c from baseline to endpoint was greater with the insulin lispro mixture plus metformin (-1.00% vs. -0.42%; P < 0.001). Two-hour post-prandial BG was lower after morning, midday, and evening meals (P < 0.001) during treatment with the insulin lispro mixture plus metformin. The fasting BG values were lower with glargine plus metformin (P = 0.007). Despite lower BG at 03.00 hours (P < 0.01), patients treated with the insulin lispro mixture plus metformin had a lower rate of nocturnal hypoglycaemia (0.14 +/- 0.49 vs. 0.34 +/- 0.85 episodes/patient/30 days; P = 0.002), although the overall hypoglycaemia rate was not different between treatments (0.61 +/- 1.41 vs. 0.44 +/- 1.07 episodes/patient/30 days; P = 0.477).. In patients with Type 2 diabetes and inadequate glucose control while on insulin or insulin and oral agent(s) combination therapy, treatment with a twice-daily insulin lispro mixture plus metformin, which targets both post-prandial and pre-meal BG, provided clinically significant improvements in A1c, significantly reduced post-prandial BG after each meal, and reduced nocturnal hypoglycaemia as compared with once-daily glargine plus metformin, a treatment that targets fasting BG.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Blood Glucose; Circadian Rhythm; Cross-Over Studies; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Delivery Systems; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin Lispro; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Metformin; Middle Aged; Weight Gain

Intensified insulin therapy using rapid acting insulin analogues is advocated in younger type 2 diabetic patients at risk of developing diabetic complications. Most patients prefer postprandial insulin injections. So far, however, there were no data on glycemic control by postprandial aspart insulin in patients with type 2 diabetes.. To compare blood glucose responsiveness to preprandial vs. postprandial aspart injections, a randomised open intraindividual cross-over trial was carried out. Blood glucose was measured before and one hour after the three main meals and at bedtime. 18 insulin-naive patients with type 2 diabetes (age, 60 +/- 3 years (mean +/- SEM), known duration of the disease, 7 +/- 2 years) participated at this study.. Both with preprandial and postprandial injections of aspart insulin, the averages of the 7-point blood glucose profiles (8.27 +/- 0.50 vs. 8.5 +/- 0.61 mmol/l) were similar. With postprandial aspart insulin, however, 84 % of the blood glucose levels measured one hour after breakfast exceeded > 10 mmol/l in comparison to 38 % with preprandial aspart insulin (p < 0.05). Patients injected similar amounts of basal and aspart insulin on both experimental days (insulin glargin, 11 +/- 3 U, aspart insulin, 23 +/- 2 vs. 25 +/- 2 U/day, p = 0.4843).. Both preprandial and postprandial insulin aspart can be allowed to well-controlled type 2 diabetic patients. However, patients will benefit from the recommendation to inject insulin aspart immediately before meal if food with a high glycemic index such as the continental breakfast is to be consumed.

Topics: Blood Glucose; Body Mass Index; Cross-Over Studies; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Eating; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Aspart; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Middle Aged; Patient Education as Topic; Postprandial Period; Time Factors

Large prospective studies have demonstrated that optimum glycemic control is not routinely achieved in clinical practice. Barriers to optimal insulin therapy include hypoglycemia, weight gain, and suboptimal initiation and dose titration. This study compared two treatment algorithms for insulin glargine initiation and titration: algorithm 1 (investigator led) versus algorithm 2 (performed by study subjects).. A prospective, multicenter (n = 611), multinational (n = 59), open-label, 24-week randomized trial in 4,961 (algorithm 1, n = 2,493; algorithm 2, n = 2,468) suboptimally controlled type 2 diabetic subjects.. At baseline, mean diabetes duration was 12.3 +/- 7.2 years, and 72% of subjects were pretreated with insulin. At end point, there was no significant difference in the incidence of severe hypoglycemia between algorithms 1 and 2 (0.9 vs. 1.1%). There was a significant reduction in HbA(1c) from 8.9 +/- 1.3 to 7.8 +/- 1.2%, with a greater decrease (P < 0.001) with algorithm 2 (-1.22%) versus algorithm 1 (-1.08%). Fasting blood glucose decreased from 170 to 110 mg/dl, with a greater decrease (P < 0.001) with algorithm 2 (-62 mg/dl) versus algorithm 1 (-57 mg/dl). Mean basal insulin dose increased from 22.9 +/- 15.5 to 43.0 +/- 25.5 IU, with a significant difference (P < 0.003) between algorithm 2 (21.6 IU) and algorithm 1 (18.7 IU).. Glargine is safe and effective in improving glycemic control in a large, diverse population with longstanding type 2 diabetes. A simple subject-administered titration algorithm conferred significantly improved glycemic control with a low incidence of severe hypoglycemia compared with physician-managed titration.

Topics: Algorithms; Blood Glucose; Body Mass Index; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Female; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Middle Aged; Patient Selection; Safety; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Administration, Oral; Circadian Rhythm; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Administration Schedule; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting

Topics: Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Administration Schedule; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting

Physicians may use either insulin or exenatide injections for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus who have poor glycemic control despite taking oral blood glucose-lowering drugs.. To compare effects of exenatide and insulin glargine on glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus that is suboptimally controlled with metformin and a sulfonylurea.. 26-week multicenter, open-label, randomized, controlled trial.. 82 outpatient study centers in 13 countries.. 551 patients with type 2 diabetes and inadequate glycemic control (defined as hemoglobin A1c level ranging from 7.0% to 10.0%) despite combination metformin and sulfonylurea therapy.. Exenatide, 10 microg twice daily, or insulin glargine, 1 daily dose titrated to maintain fasting blood glucose levels of less than 5.6 mmol/L (<100 mg/dL).. Hemoglobin A1c level, fasting plasma glucose level, body weight, 7-point self-monitored blood glucose, standardized test-meal challenge, safety, and tolerability.. Baseline mean hemoglobin A1c level was 8.2% for patients receiving exenatide and 8.3% for those receiving insulin glargine. At week 26, both exenatide and insulin glargine reduced hemoglobin A1c levels by 1.11% (difference, 0.017 percentage point [95% CI, -0.123 to 0.157 percentage point]). Exenatide reduced postprandial glucose excursions more than insulin glargine, while insulin glargine reduced fasting glucose concentrations more than exenatide. Body weight decreased 2.3 kg with exenatide and increased 1.8 kg with insulin glargine (difference, -4.1 kg [CI, -4.6 to -3.5 kg]). Rates of symptomatic hypoglycemia were similar, but nocturnal hypoglycemia occurred less frequently with exenatide (0.9 event/patient-year versus 2.4 events/patient-year; difference, -1.6 events/patient-year [CI, -2.3 to -0.9 event/patient year]). Gastrointestinal symptoms were more common in the exenatide group than in the insulin glargine group, including nausea (57.1% vs. 8.6%), vomiting (17.4% vs. 3.7%) and diarrhea (8.5% vs. 3.0%).. The trial was open-label and did not assess clinical complications related to diabetes. Of the 551 participants, 19.4% of those receiving exenatide and 9.7% of those receiving insulin glargine withdrew from the study. Only 21.6% of the insulin glargine group and 8.6% of the exenatide group achieved the target level for fasting plasma glucose of less than 5.6 mmol/L (<100 mg/dL).. Exenatide and insulin glargine achieved similar improvements in overall glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes that was suboptimally controlled with oral combination therapy. Exenatide was associated with weight reduction and had a higher incidence of gastrointestinal adverse effects than insulin glargine.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Blood Glucose; Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Exenatide; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Middle Aged; Nausea; Peptides; Venoms; Vomiting

Recent data suggest that insulin glargine might be a cost-effective alternative to conventional insulin therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). The aim of this observational study was to evaluate the treatment costs of insulin glargine in combination with oral antidiabetic drugs (OADs) compared with conventional insulin therapy in T2DM in everyday clinical practice.. Data were obtained from a cohort of 678 patients with T2DM not adequately controlled by OADs alone (HbA1c mean 9.1 +/- 1.7%). Patients received either insulin glargine in addition to oral therapy or were switched to conventional insulin therapy. Treatment and dosing decisions were made at the physician's discretion, reflecting everyday practice. Patients were followed for 2-4 months. Primary outcome parameters were total treatment costs and clinical efficacy.. The two therapeutic regimens were equally effective in decreasing HbA1c to 7.8% (p < 10(-9)). Patients in the insulin glargine plus OAD group controlled their blood glucose level at endpoint with a median of 60 test strips per month and those in the conventional insulin therapy group with a median of 80 strips per month (p = 0.000000739). Total daily costs of insulin, needles, glycemic control and OAD treatment per patient were similar in the two treatment groups (insulin glargine group 1.91 Euro vs conventional group 1.99 Euro).. The two treatment regimens were equally effective in improving glycemic control. These results were achieved with significantly lower insulin doses and fewer blood glucose test strips in the insulin glargine group, which therefore led to cost equivalence when compared with conventional insulin therapy.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Austria; Cohort Studies; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Combinations; Female; Health Care Costs; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Incidence; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Middle Aged; Therapeutic Equivalency; Treatment Outcome

To determine long-term effects of insulin glargine on vascular function in patients with type 2 diabetes.. A total of 49 in vivo endothelial function tests, intrabrachial artery infusions of endothelium-dependent (acetylcholine [ACh]) and endothelium-independent (sodium nitroprusside [SNP]) vasoactive agents, were performed in 11 patients with type 2 diabetes (age: 59+/-2 years; BMI: 29.7+/-0.9 kg/m2; fasting plasma glucose: 226+/-14 mg/dL) and 16 matched normal subjects. The tests in the type 2 diabetic patients were performed before and after 6 months and 3.5 years of combination therapy with insulin glargine and metformin. A control group of type 2 diabetic patients not treated with insulin was studied twice at 6-month intervals. Before treatment, blood flow during infusions of low and high doses of ACh were significantly lower in the type 2 diabetic patients than in the normal subjects (P=0.021 for ANOVA). In the patients with type 2 diabetes, blood flow during infusion of the low dose of ACh averaged 7.1+/-0.8 mL/dL per minute at baseline, 8.8+/-1.0 mL/dL per minute at 6 months (NS), and then increased compared with baseline by 87+/-29% to 11.6+/-1.4 mL/dL per minute at 3.5 years (P<0.02 versus baseline). Blood flow during infusion of the high dose of ACh increased from 8.8+/-0.9 at baseline to 13.0+/-1.9 mL/dL per minute at 6 months (P<0.05) and by 86+/-25% to 14.7+/-1.6 mL/dL per minute at 3.5 years (P<0.01 versus baseline), which was not different from normal subjects. Blood flow during infusion of low (blood flow at 0 months: 7.7+/-0.5; at 6 months: 9.9+/-0.6; P<0.01 for 6 versus 0 months; and 3.5 years: 11.6+/-1.1 mL/dL per minute; P<0.02 for 3.5 years versus 0 months) and high (blood flow at 0 months: 10.7+/-0.9; 6 months: 13.4+/-1.0; P<0.05 for 6 versus 0 months; and 3.5 years: 16.6+/-1.5 mL/dL per minute; P<0.05 for 3.5 years versus 0 months) doses of SNP also increased significantly during insulin therapy.. We conclude that insulin glargine therapy improves endothelium-dependent and endothelium-independent vasodilatation. These data support the idea that long-term insulin therapy has beneficial rather than harmful effects on vascular function in type 2 diabetes.

Topics: Acetylcholine; Adult; Aged; Blood Flow Velocity; Blood Glucose; Body Composition; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Therapy, Combination; Endothelium, Vascular; Female; Humans; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Lipids; Male; Matched-Pair Analysis; Metformin; Middle Aged; Nitroprusside; Reproducibility of Results; Time; Vasodilation

This study aimed to assess glycemic response to a mixture of 75% insulin lispro protamine suspension and 25% insulin lispro (Mix 75/25) BID plus metformin versus insulin glargine QD plus metformin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM).. Adults new to insulin therapy were enrolled in a multicenter, randomized, prospective, open-label, crossover study with 16 weeks on each treatment. Variables included glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA(1c)), hypoglycemia rate, fasting blood glucose (FBG), 2-hour postprandial blood glucose (ppBG), and rise in blood glucose after meals.. One hundred five patients (mean age, 55 years) were randomized. There was no difference in baseline mean values for either treatment sequence group for body mass index, duration of DM, or HbA(1c). Ninety-five patients completed the study and 67 were included in the efficacy analysis. Mix 75/25 was associated with lower mean (SD) HbA(1c) at end point (7.4% [1.1%] vs 7.8% [1.1%]; P = 0.002). More patients using Mix 75/25 achieved target HbA(1c) < or =7.0% (42% [30/71] vs 18% [13/71]; P < 0.001). With Mix 75/25, the mean (SD) 2-hour ppBG was similar after lunch but lower after breakfast (156.4 [43.6] vs 171.1 [44.9] mg/dL; P = 0.012) and dinner (164.8 [42.5] mg/dL vs 193.8 [51.0] mg/dL; P < 0.001), although FBG was higher (139.3 [36.6] mg/dL vs 123.9 [34.9] mg/dL; P < 0.001). Rise in ppBG was lower with Mix 75/25 after breakfast (16.9 [47.0] mg/dL vs 47.4 [34.8] mg/dL; P < 0.001) and dinner (14.2 [44.1] mg/dL vs 45.9 [41.3] mg/dL; P < 0.001). Gain in mean (SD) body weight was greater with Mix 75/25 than insulin glargine (2.3 [4.0] kg vs 1.6 [4.0] kg; P = 0.006). For all randomized patients, mean (SD) hypoglycemia rates were lower with insulin glargine (0.68 [1.38] vs 0.39 [1.24] episodes/patient per 30 days; P = 0.041), although nocturnal hypoglycemia was similar.. In this study population, Mix 75/25 plus metformin was associated with lower HbA(1c) than insulin glargine plus metformin, smaller rise in ppBG after breakfast and dinner, and higher proportion of patients achieving HbA(1c) < or =7.0%, with a slight increase in overall (but not nocturnal) hypoglycemia.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Blood Glucose; Cross-Over Studies; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Therapy, Combination; Fasting; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin Lispro; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Metformin; Middle Aged

The aim of the trial was to compare the efficacy and safety of the new, long-acting basal insulin, insulin glargine (LANTUS(R)), with NPH human insulin, each administered in a combination regimen with oral antidiabetic drugs in patients with Type 2 diabetes.. In a multicentre, open, randomised study, 570 patients with Type 2 diabetes, aged 34 - 80 years, were treated for 52 weeks with insulin glargine or NPH insulin given once daily at bedtime. Previous oral antidiabetic therapy was continued throughout the study.. There was a clinically relevant decrease in glycosylated haemoglobin (GHb) values from baseline to endpoint with both drugs (insulin glargine: - 0.46 %; NPH insulin: - 0.38 %; p = 0.415); also, this difference was statistically significant in the subgroup of overweight patients with BMI > 28 kg/m 2 (insulin glargine: - 0.42 %, NPH insulin: - 0.11 %; p = 0.0237). Over the entire treatment period, NPH insulin-treated patients (41 %) and insulin glargine-treated patients (35 %) experienced a similar level of symptomatic hypoglycaemia. A statistically significant difference was observed in the number of patients treated with NPH insulin who reported at least one episode of nocturnal hypoglycaemia compared with those treated with insulin glargine in the overall population and in the overweight subgroup (overall: 24 % vs. 12 %, p = 0.002; overweight: 22.2 % vs. 9.5 %, p = 0.0006), using the Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test. These differences were most pronounced in insulin-naïve and overweight (BMI > 28 kg/m 2) sub-groups. The incidence of adverse events was similar for the two treatments.. This study demonstrated that insulin glargine is as effective as NPH insulin in achieving glycaemic control in patients with Type 2 diabetes, and is associated with fewer episodes of symptomatic hypoglycaemia, particularly nocturnal episodes.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Body Mass Index; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Isophane; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Middle Aged

Patients with type 2 diabetes are often treated with oral antidiabetic agents plus a basal insulin.. To investigate the efficacy and safety of glimepiride combined with either morning or bedtime insulin glargine or bedtime neutral protamine Hagedorn (NPH) insulin in patients with type 2 diabetes.. Open-label, randomized, controlled trial.. 111 centers in 13 European countries.. 695 patients with type 2 diabetes who were previously treated with oral antidiabetic agents.. Randomization to treatment with morning insulin glargine, bedtime NPH insulin, or bedtime insulin glargine for 24 weeks in addition to 3 mg of glimepiride. The insulin dose was titrated by using a predefined regimen to achieve fasting blood glucose levels of 5.56 mmol/L or lower (< or =100 mg/dL).. Hemoglobin A(1c) values, blood glucose levels, insulin dose, and body weight.. Hemoglobin A(1c) levels improved by -1.24% (two-sided 90% CI, -1.10% to -1.38%) with morning insulin glargine, by -0.96% (CI, -0.81% to -1.10%) with bedtime insulin glargine, and by -0.84% (CI, -0.69% to -0.98%) with bedtime NPH insulin. Hemoglobin A(1c) improvement was more pronounced with morning insulin glargine than with NPH insulin (0.40% [CI, 0.23% to 0.58%]; P = 0.001) or bedtime insulin glargine (0.28% [CI, 0.11% to 0.46%]; P = 0.008). Baseline to end-point fasting blood glucose levels improved similarly in all three groups. Nocturnal hypoglycemia was less frequent with morning (39 of 236 patients [17%]) and bedtime insulin glargine (52 of 227 patients [23%]) than with bedtime NPH insulin (89 of 232 patients [38%]) (P < 0.001).. The risk for nocturnal hypoglycemia was lower with glimepiride in combination with morning and bedtime insulin glargine than with glimepiride in combination with bedtime NPH insulin in patients with type 2 diabetes. Morning insulin glargine provided better glycemic control than did bedtime insulin glargine or bedtime NPH insulin.

Topics: Aged; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Isophane; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Middle Aged; Risk Factors; Sulfonylurea Compounds; Weight Gain

The aim of this study was to compare the subcutaneous absorption characteristics of insulin glargine with NPH insulin in patients with Type 2 diabetes. In this single-dose, double-blind, randomized, two-way crossover study, 14 patients with Type 2 diabetes (aged 40-70 years) previously untreated with insulin were randomized to receive in a fasting state either a single subcutaneous injection of 0.3 U/kg 125I-insulin glargine or 0.3 U/kg 125I-NPH insulin. The disappearance of radioactivity was monitored for forty-eight hours. The median time for 25%, 50% and 75% of the radioactivity to disappear from the injection site was significantly longer for insulin glargine compared with NPH insulin (T75% 15.0 and 6.5 h, p=0.009; T50% 26.3 and 13.4 h, p=0.009; T25% 42.4 and 26.6 h, p=0.019, respectively). The mean residual radioactivity remaining at 24, 36 and 48 h after injection remained significantly higher than NPH insulin (54.4 and 27.9%, p=0.0001; 35.0 and 17.0%, p=0.003; 19.2 and 9.2%, p=0.01, respectively). Mean plasma glucose levels reached a minimum after 14.6 and 9 h in response to insulin glargine and NPH insulin, respectively. The subcutaneous absorption of insulin glargine in fasting Type 2 diabetes patients was significantly (2-3 times) slower compared with NPH insulin in patients with Type 2 diabetes. The slower absorption of insulin glargine correlated with the fall in plasma glucose levels over a 24 h period compared with the faster insulin absorption and more rapid decrease in plasma glucose levels observed in response to NPH insulin. Both insulin glargine and NPH insulin were well tolerated.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Blood Glucose; C-Reactive Protein; Cross-Over Studies; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Double-Blind Method; Half-Life; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Injections, Subcutaneous; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Isophane; Insulin, Long-Acting; Iodine Radioisotopes; Middle Aged; Scintillation Counting; Skin Absorption

To compare the abilities and associated hypoglycemia risks of insulin glargine and human NPH insulin added to oral therapy of type 2 diabetes to achieve 7% HbA(1c).. In a randomized, open-label, parallel, 24-week multicenter trial, 756 overweight men and women with inadequate glycemic control (HbA(1c) >7.5%) on one or two oral agents continued prestudy oral agents and received bedtime glargine or NPH once daily, titrated using a simple algorithm seeking a target fasting plasma glucose (FPG)

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Aged; Algorithms; Blood Glucose; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Isophane; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Middle Aged; Treatment Outcome

To determine the safety and efficacy of the long-acting analog insulin glargine compared with NPH insulin in patients with type 2 diabetes who were previously treated with insulin alone.. A total of 518 subjects with type 2 diabetes who were receiving NPH insulin with or without regular insulin for postprandial control were randomized to receive insulin glargine (HOE 901) once daily (n = 259) or NPH insulin once or twice daily in = 259) for 28 weeks in an open-label, multicenter trial. Doses were adjusted to obtain target fasting glucose <6.7 mmol/l. At study end point, the median total daily insulin dose in both treatment groups was 0.75 IU/kg.. The treatment groups showed similar improvements in HbA1c from baseline to end point on intent-to-treat analysis. The mean change (means +/- SD) in HbA1c from baseline to end point was similar in the insulin glargine group (-0.41 +/- 0.1%) and the NPH group (-0.59 +/- 0.1%) after patients began with an average baseline HbA1c of approximately 8.5%. The treatments were associated with similar reductions in fasting glucose levels. Overall, mild symptomatic hypoglycemia was similar in insulin glargine subjects (61.4%) and NPH insulin subjects (66.%) However, nocturnal hypoglycemia in the insulin glargine group was reduced by 25% during the treatment period after the dose-titration phase(26.5 vs. 35.5%, P = 0.0136). Subjects in the insulin glargine group experienced less weight gain than those in the NPH group (0.4 vs. 1.4 kg, P < 0.0007).. In patients with type 2 diabetes, once-daily bedtime insulin glargine is as effective as once- or twice-daily NPH in improving and maintaining glycemic control. In addition, insulin glargine deonstrates a lower risk of nocturnal hypoglycemia and less weight gain compared with NPH insulin.

Topics: Blood Glucose; Body Mass Index; Circadian Rhythm; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Fasting; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Isophane; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Middle Aged; Postprandial Period; Risk Factors; Time Factors

Available basal insulin formulations do not provide a constant and reliable 24-h insulin supply. We compared the efficacy and safety of glargine (a long-acting insulin analog) and NPH insulins in insulin-naive type 2 diabetic patients treated with oral antidiabetic agents.. There were 426 type 2 diabetic patients (age 59 +/- 9 years, BMI 28.9 +/- 4.3 kg/m2, mean +/- SD) with poor glycemic control on oral antidiabetic agents randomized to treatment for 1 year with bedtime insulin glargine or bedtime NPH insulin. Oral agents were continued unchanged. The fasting blood glucose (FBG) target was 6.7 mmol/l (120 mg/dl).. Average glycemic control improved similarly with both insulins (HbA(1c), [reference range <6.5%] 8.3 +/- 0.1 vs. 8.2 +/- 0.1% at 1 year, glargine vs. NPH, mean +/- SEM, P < 0.001 vs. baseline for both). However, there was less nocturnal hypoglycemia (9.9 vs. 24.0% of all patients, glargine vs. NPH, P < 0.001) and lower post-dinner glucose concentrations (9.9 +/- 0.2 vs. 10.7 +/- 0.3 mmol/l, P < 0.02) with insulin glargine than with NPH. Insulin doses and weight gain were comparable. In patients reaching target FBG, HbA(1c) averaged 7.7 and 7.6% in the glargine and NPH groups at 1 year.. Use of insulin glargine compared with NPH is associated with less nocturnal hypoglycemia and lower post-dinner glucose levels. These data are consistent with peakless and longer duration of action of insulin glargine compared with NPH. Achievement of acceptable average glucose control requires titration of the insulin dose to an FBG target < or =6.7 mmol/l. These data support use of insulin glargine instead of NPH in insulin combination regimens in type 2 diabetes.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Blood Glucose; Blood Pressure; C-Peptide; Cholesterol; Cholesterol, HDL; Circadian Rhythm; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Antibodies; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Isophane; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Middle Aged; Postprandial Period; Triglycerides

INSULIA is an insulin-titration app developed for patients with type 2 diabetes treated with basal insulin as part of a basal insulin-supported oral therapy (BOT). The app uses patient-logged fasting blood glucose (FBG) values and a titration plan defined by the treating physician to provide basal insulin dosing recommendations. Physicians use the web portal to monitor their patients' therapy progress and, if necessary, adjust therapy. The aim of this study was to assess the app, specifically its features, handling and impact on diabetes treatment and self-management in Germany.. This German retrospective pilot study included physicians (diabetologists, general practitioners, and internists) and patients with type 2 diabetes who either receive or start BOT using the app. Both groups completed group-specific questionnaires between December 2018 and June 2019.. Overall, 10 physicians and 34 patients with type 2 diabetes completed their respective questionnaires. Physicians perceived their app-using patients to be more involved and more confident in managing their insulin therapy than patients not using the app. The majority of patients considered the app as a tool that assists with safer insulin treatment. The physicians perceived that due to the app use, FBG and HbA. The titration app seems to have a positive impact on BOT patients' FBG and HbA

Topics: Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Regular, Human; Mobile Applications; Pilot Projects; Retrospective Studies; Smartphone

Insulin remains a mainstay of treating hyperglycemia in an acute setting. Insulin glargine 300 units/mL (Toujeo, iGlar300) has a different pharmacokinetic profile than 100 units/mL basal insulins, such as insulin detemir (iDet100) and iGlar100. While conversion from iGlar300 to iGlar100 requires a 20% dose decrease, there is currently no recommended interchange from iGlar300 to iDet100.. Compare the incidence of hypoglycemia in patients who received a 1:1 unit interchange from home iGlar300 or iGlar100 to iDet100 while admitted.. A retrospective study was conducted to evaluate adults within a multi-site network admitted between May and December 2019. Patients were included if they received at least one dose of iDet100 following interchange from home iGlar300 or iGlar100. The primary endpoint was the incidence of hypoglycemic events following a 1:1 interchange of iGlar300 vs. iGlar100 to inpatient iDet100. Secondary outcomes include overall hypoglycemic events, time to hypoglycemia, and doses given before hypoglycemia.. Of 615 patients, 394 received a 1:1 unit interchange to iDet100 (52 from iGlar300 and 342 from iGlar100). Incidence of hypoglycemic events was significantly higher in those with a 1:1 interchange from iGlar300 versus iGlar100 (36.5% vs. 18.7%, p = 0.007). Significant differences were observed in overall hypoglycemic events, time to hypoglycemia, and number of doses given before hypoglycemic event.. A 1:1 unit interchange from iGlar300 to iDet100 led to a higher incidence of hypoglycemic events compared to those interchanged from iGlar100. Dose reduction should be considered when transitioning from home iGlar300 to iDet100 in the inpatient setting.

Topics: Adult; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Inpatients; Insulin; Insulin Detemir; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Retrospective Studies

To evaluate the real-world effectiveness and safety of insulin glargine 300 U/ml (Gla-300) in achieving glycaemic goals in insulin-naïve people with type 2 diabetes (T2D) in Mexico, Colombia and Peru (Latin America region) in the A Toujeo Observational Study (ATOS).. ATOS was a multicentre, prospective, 12-month observational study, which included 4422 insulin-naïve adults (age ≥ 18 years) with T2D uncontrolled (HbA1c > 7% and ≤11%) on at least one oral antidiabetic drug (OAD) who initiated Gla-300 treatment as per routine practice. The primary endpoint was the percentage of participants achieving their predefined individualized HbA1c goal at month 6. Key secondary endpoints included change from baseline in HbA1c, fasting plasma glucose (FPG), fasting self-monitored blood glucose (SMBG), body weight and incidence of hypoglycaemia.. In this subgroup analysis, a total of 314 participants with T2D received Gla-300. At baseline, mean ± SD age was 56.0 ± 11.6 years, duration of diabetes was 9.7 ± 6.6 years and 65.9% of participants were on at least two OADs. The individualized HbA1c target was achieved by 25.8% of participants (95% confidence interval [CI]: 20.3-31.9) at month 6 and by 35.3% (95% CI: 28.5-42.5) at month 12. Gla-300 treatment improved glycaemic control with meaningful reductions in mean HbA1c, FPG and fasting SMBG. The incidence of hypoglycaemia reported was low and body weight remained stable.. In a real-world setting in the Latin America region, the initiation of Gla-300 in people with T2D uncontrolled on OADs resulted in improved glycaemic control with a low incidence of hypoglycaemia and no change in body weight.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Humans; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Middle Aged; Prospective Studies

To report prespecified and post hoc analyses of the SoliMix dataset exploring the impact of baseline participant characteristics on the original SoliMix study outcomes, to enable informed treatment choices for people with different biomedical characteristics.. SoliMix (EudraCT 2017-003370-13) compared once-daily iGlarLixi (a fixed-ratio combination of insulin glargine 100 U/mL and the glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist lixisenatide) with twice-daily BIAsp 30 (30% insulin aspart and 70% insulin aspart protamine). In this analysis, the original primary outcomes of noninferiority of iGlarLixi versus BIAsp 30 in terms of glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) change and superiority in terms of body weight change, together with change in basal insulin dose and hypoglycaemia outcomes, were investigated by baseline age, duration of diabetes, insulin dose, HbA1c level, body mass index (BMI), and renal function.. No evidence of difference in comparative treatment effect was detected across baseline age, duration of diabetes, insulin dose, HbA1c level, BMI and renal function subgroups for any endpoint (all heterogeneity P > 0.05), except American Diabetes Association Level 2 hypoglycaemia event rate when stratified by insulin dose (P = 0.011), which may be a chance difference given multiple testing and the small numbers of Level 2 events.. Treatment effects of iGlarLixi were consistent irrespective of baseline HbA1c, insulin dose, BMI, age, duration of diabetes and renal function, supporting the use of iGlarLixi as an efficacious and well-tolerated treatment option in people with type 2 diabetes with a wide range of biomedical characteristics.

Topics: Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Combinations; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Aspart; Insulin Glargine

For patients using basal-bolus insulin therapy, it is widespread clinical practice to aim for a 50-50 ratio between basal and total daily bolus. However, this practice was based on a small study of individuals without diabetes. To assess the rule in real-world practice, we retrospectively analyzed patients on basal-bolus therapy that was adjusted at least weekly by an artificial intelligence-driven titration within the d-Nav® Insulin Management Technology.. We obtained de-identified data from the Diabetes Centre of Ulster Hospital for patients with four inclusion criteria: type 2 Diabetes (T2D), on d-Nav >6 months, on basal-bolus insulin therapy >80% of the time (based on insulin analogs), and no gap in data >3 months.. We assembled a cohort of 306 patients, followed by the d-Nav service for 3.4 ± 1.8 years (mean ± SD), corresponding to about 180 autonomous insulin dose titrations and about 5000 autonomous individual dose recommendations per patient. After an initial run-in period, mean glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) values in the cohort were maintained close to 7%. Surprisingly, in just over three-quarters of the cohort, the average basal insulin fraction was <50%; in half of the cohort average basal insulin fraction <41.2%; and in one-quarter the basal insulin fraction was <33.6%. Further, the basal insulin fraction did not remain static over time. In half of the patients, the basal insulin fraction varied by ≥1.9×; and, in 25% of the patients, ≥2.5×.. Our data show that a 50-50 ratio of basal-to-bolus insulin does not generally apply to patients with T2D who successfully maintain stable glycemia. Therefore, the 50-50 ratio should not serve as an ongoing treatment guide. Moreover, our results emphasize the importance of at least weekly insulin titrations.

Topics: Artificial Intelligence; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Glycemic Control; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Retrospective Studies; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Prospective Studies

Topics: Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Drug Therapy, Combination; Glucagon-Like Peptide 1; Glycemic Control; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Liraglutide; Metformin; Sitagliptin Phosphate; Treatment Outcome

To assess the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) of basal insulin Fc (BIF; LY3209590), a fusion protein combining a novel single-chain insulin variant together with human IgG2 Fc domain, following single and multiple once-weekly BIF administration.. The single ascending dose, 15-day study assessed four BIF doses (5-35 mg) in healthy participants and people with type 2 diabetes (T2D). In the 6-week multiple ascending dose study, people with T2D, previously treated with basal insulin, received insulin glargine daily or a one-time loading dose of BIF followed by 5 weeks of once-weekly dosing (1-10 mg). Safety, tolerability and PK and glucose PD were examined.. Mean ages of people with T2D (N = 57) and healthy participants (N = 16) in the single-dose study were 58.4 and 35.8 years, respectively; mean body mass index values were 29.5 and 26.1 kg/m. BIF was well tolerated and the PK/PD profile enabled once-weekly dosing with minimal variation in exposure in a treatment interval of 1 week. The findings suggest BIF is suitable for further development as a weekly basal insulin in people with diabetes.

Topics: Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Double-Blind Method; Glucose; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Regular, Human

GRADE Study Research Group; Nathan DM, Lachin JM, Balasubramanyam A, et al.

Topics: Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine; Liraglutide; Metformin; Sitagliptin Phosphate; Treatment Outcome

GRADE Study Research Group; Nathan DM, Lachin JM, Buse JB, et al.

Topics: Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine; Liraglutide; Sitagliptin Phosphate; Treatment Outcome

To present the results of an exploratory analysis of the BEYOND V study in which Chinese individuals with uncontrolled type 2 diabetes (T2D) received short-term intensive insulin therapy (SIIT) during study run-in (prior to randomization) using a basal-first insulin titration method.. This was exclusively an exploratory analysis of the 7- to 10-day run-in period of BEYOND V. Participants were hospitalized and had oral therapies withdrawn (except metformin). They received SIIT with once-daily insulin glargine and three-times-daily premeal insulin glulisine, titrated daily from a total starting dose of 0.4 to 0.5 units/kg/d, first adjusting insulin glargine to achieve fasting blood glucose (FBG) of 4.4 to 6.1 mmol/L (79 to 119 mg/dL), then insulin glulisine to achieve pre-meal blood glucose of 4.4 to 6.1 mmol/L. Key outcomes were the proportions of participants achieving FBG and 2-hour postprandial blood glucose (PBG) targets.. Overall, 397 entered the run-in (mean 54.2 years, 235 males [59.2%]). At the end of SIIT, 374/396 participants (94.4%) had both FBG <7.0 mmol/L (<126 mg/dL) and 2-hour PBG <10 mmol/L (<180 mg/dL) and 282/396 (71.2%) had both FBG <6.1 mmol/L (<100 mg/dL) and 2-hour PBG <10 mmol/L. The mean first time taken to achieve FBG <7 mmol/L, 2-hour PBG <10 mmol/L, and both, was 4.35, 3.88, and 5.04 days, respectively. Hypoglycaemia occurred in 99 participants (24.9%). There was no severe hypoglycaemia.. Titrating basal insulin first is an effective and safe method of SIIT in individuals with T2D, rapidly achieving target glucose levels with a relatively low rate of hypoglycaemia.

Topics: Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Regular, Human; Male

To compare outcomes in adults with type 2 diabetes (T2D) suboptimally controlled with basal insulin who initiated treatment with iGlarLixi or premixed insulin.. This retrospective real-world analysis was conducted using data from adults (age ≥ 18 years) with T2D in the US Optum Clinformatics database who had previously received basal insulin and newly initiated iGlarLixi or premixed insulin. Cohorts were propensity-score matched on baseline characteristics using a greedy nearest neighbour-matching algorithm, and outcomes were assessed at 12 months. Subgroup analyses were performed for those aged 65 years or older and those with a baseline HbA1c of 9% or higher. The primary endpoint was treatment persistence in the overall population. Secondary endpoints were treatment adherence, healthcare resource utilization (HRU), costs, hypoglycaemia events and change in HbA1c from baseline.. Each cohort comprised 834 participants. In the overall population, treatment persistence at 12 months was statistically significantly higher for iGlarLixi versus premixed insulin: 42.5% versus 39.1%; hazard ratio 0.88; 95% confidence interval 0.778-0.998; P = .0465. Adherence and HbA1c reduction were similar between groups, whereas hypoglycaemia events, HRU and costs were numerically lower for iGlarLixi. Outcomes in both the age 65 years or older subgroup and in those with an HbA1c of 9% or higher were consistent with those for the overall population.. In this observational study in people with T2D suboptimally controlled on basal insulin, once-daily iGlarLixi was an effective treatment alternative to premixed insulin with significantly higher treatment persistence, similar adherence and HbA1c reduction, and numerically lower hypoglycaemia events, HRU and costs, regardless of age or baseline HbA1c.

Topics: Adult; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Regular, Human; Retrospective Studies

Two types of fixed-ratio combinations of basal insulin and a glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist (GLP-1RA) have been approved for use in type 2 diabetes. One is insulin degludec/liraglutide (iDergLira), and the other is insulin glargine/lixisenatide (iGlarLixi). Direct comparisons between these two combination is not available.. The retrospective study included 186 patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) with inadequate glycemic control on metformin and basal insulin (degludec, glargine 100, glargine 300) who were switched to fixed-ratio combination GLP-1 RA and basal insulin. Patients were divided into two groups based on the basal insulin before study: group I (n = 86) treated with degludec were switched to iDegLira and patients group II (n = 99), treated with glargine were switched to iGlarLixi. The aim of this study was to directly compare the effects between two fixed - ratio combination on glycemic parameters and non glycemic parameters. Follow up was 6 months.. Mean HbA1c decreased similarly (- 1.2% vs.-1.1%). Higher percentage patients in iDegLira group had reached the HbA1c < 7% after 6 months (22% vs. 18.2%, p < 0.05). The mean change in fasting plasma glucose (FPG) was comparable for the two groups, while mean decrease postprandial plasma glucose (PPG) level were lower in iGlarLixi group (2 vs 1.8 mmol/l, p > 0.05). Change in body weight was significant in iDegLira group (1.8 kg vs. 0.7 kg, p < 0.001). At the end of the study patients showed decrease in total cholesterol (TC) and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) for 0.2 mmol/L in iDegLira, 0.1 mmol/l in iGlarLixi, triglycerides decreased 0.3 mmol/l in both groups, high-density lipoprotein(HDL) increased 0.1 mm/l in iGlarLixi.. Our results showed that more patients with iDegLira had HbA1c less than 7% and these combination had better effect on weight loss. There was no difference observed in FPG and PPG, lipid profile and rate of hypoglycemia.

Topics: Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Substitution; Glucagon-Like Peptide Receptors; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine; Liraglutide; Peptides; Retrospective Studies

In the AWARD-7 study in patients with type 2 diabetes and moderate-to-severe chronic kidney disease, once-weekly dulaglutide slowed the decline in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and decreased the urine albumin/creatinine ratio compared to insulin glargine at the end of 52 weeks of treatment. In this exploratory post hoc analysis, changes in two fibrosis biomarkers, serum PRO-C6 (type VI collagen formation) and urine C3M (type III collagen degradation), were evaluated.. In the groups treated with dulaglutide 1.5 mg or insulin glargine (N = 330), serum PRO-C6 and urine C3M were measured using competitive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays. Biomarker changes were assessed by a mixed-effects model for repeated measures. Pearson correlation analyses were conducted to determine associations between changes in kidney fibrosis biomarkers and eGFR measures at 52 weeks.. At weeks 26 and 52 of treatment in the overall population, serum PRO-C6 levels were significantly lower in the dulaglutide group versus insulin glargine group with percent change from baseline of (least squares mean ± standard error) -4.6% ± 1.9 and -0.2% ± 2.2 versus 5.7% ± 2.0 and 8.0% ± 2.3 (p < 0.01), respectively, and urine C3M levels were significantly higher in the dulaglutide group versus insulin glargine group with percent change from baseline of 10.9% ± 8.2 and 20.7% ± 8.8 versus -10.0% ± 6.5 and -16.9% ± 6.4 (p < 0.05), respectively. These findings appeared greater in the subgroup with macroalbuminuria. Serum PRO-C6 negatively correlated with eGFR, while urine C3M positively correlated with eGFR.. Dulaglutide treatment was associated with biomarker changes that indicated lower type VI collagen formation and higher type III collagen degradation compared to treatment with insulin glargine, suggesting a potential drug effect to reduce kidney fibrosis.

Topics: Biomarkers; Collagen Type III; Collagen Type VI; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine; Kidney; Recombinant Fusion Proteins; Renal Insufficiency, Chronic

To evaluate the effectiveness and safety in routine clinical practice of insulin glargine/lixisenatide (iGlarLixi) in people with type 2 diabetes (T2D) according to age.. Patient-level data were pooled from 1316 adults with T2D inadequately controlled on oral antidiabetic drugs with or without basal insulin who initiated iGlarLixi for 24 weeks. Participants were classified into age subgroups of younger than 65 years (N = 806) and 65 years or older (N = 510).. iGlarLixi is effective and well tolerated in both younger and older people with uncontrolled T2D.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Combinations; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine; Prospective Studies

Individuals with diabetes can be clustered into five subtypes using up to six routinely measured clinical variables. We hypothesised that circulating protein levels might be used to distinguish between these subtypes. We recently used five of these six variables to categorise 7017 participants from the Outcome Reduction with an Initial Glargine Intervention (ORIGIN) trial into these subtypes: severe autoimmune diabetes (SAID, n=241), severe insulin-deficient diabetes (SIDD, n=1594), severe insulin-resistant diabetes (SIRD, n=914), mild obesity-related diabetes (MOD, n=1595) and mild age-related diabetes (MARD, n=2673).. Forward-selection logistic regression models were used to identify a subset of 233 cardiometabolic protein biomarkers that were independent determinants of one subtype vs the others. We then assessed the performance of adding identified biomarkers (one after one, from the most discriminant to the least) to predict each subtype vs the others using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC ROC). Models were adjusted for age, sex, ethnicity, C-peptide level, diabetes duration and glucose-lowering medication usage at blood collection.. A total of 25 biomarkers were independent determinants of subtypes, including 13 for SIDD, 2 for SIRD, 7 for MOD and 11 for MARD (all p<4.3 × 10. We identified 25 serum biomarkers, as independent determinants of type 2 diabetes subtypes, that could be combined into a diagnostic test for subtyping.. ORIGIN trial, ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00069784.

Topics: Biomarkers; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Humans; Insulin; Insulin Glargine

Steroid-induced hyperglycemia was diagnosed in an older hospitalized patient after he was treated with the intermediate-acting glucocorticoid methylprednisolone. Before hospital admission, the patient did not have a diagnosis of diabetes. His elevated admission glucose level of 167 mg/dL along with his significant hyperglycemia after glucocorticoid initiation prompted the medical team to obtain a hemoglobin A1c result, 8.4%, which confirmed the diagnosis of type 2 diabetes. The capillary blood glucose level was elevated into the 200 to 399 mg/dL range for most of the patient's hospital stay while he was receiving subcutaneous insulin therapy of glargine and aspart correction and prandial bolus dosing. When the patient's subcutaneous insulin therapy was changed from glargine to neutral protamine Hagedorn insulin, the target glucose level range of 140 to 180 mg/dL was attained. From this case report, we determined that it is important to consider modifying subcutaneous insulin therapy by using another type of insulin when target glucose values are not achieved during the treatment of steroid-induced hyperglycemia.

Topics: Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Glucocorticoids; Glucose; Humans; Hyperglycemia; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Male; Steroids

The efficacy and safety of iGlarLixi, a fixed-ratio combination (FRC) of basal insulin glargine plus lixisenatide, have been demonstrated in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients. However, no relevant economic analysis of iGlarLixi has been done in China. Thus, the primary objective of this study is to evaluate the cost effectiveness of iGlarLixi versus IDegAsp in Chinese T2DM patients, and then back-calculate the appropriate drug price of iGlarLixi to support its pricing after listing in China.. The United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study Outcome Model 2 (UKPDS OM2) was applied to estimate lifetime health and economic outcomes from the Chinese health-care system perspective. As no head-to-head comparison data are currently available, the baseline cohort characteristics and the initial clinical data for iGlarLixi were derived from the randomized LixiLan-L-China trial. The relative treatment effects for IDegAsp were based on an indirect treatment comparison. Due to the unavailability of iGlarLixi pricing data, the annual medication cost of iGlarLixi was assumed to be equal to that of IDegAsp at the beginning of the study. Afterwards, a break-even analysis using comparator drug price and the willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold was performed to back-calculate the appropriate drug price of iGlarLixi. One-way sensitivity analysis, scenario analysis and probabilistic sensitivity analysis (PSA) were conducted to assess the robustness of the model.. Based on the initial assumption of equal annual medication cost of iGlarLixi and IDegAsp, iGlarLixi was cost effective compared to IDegAsp with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) far below the WTP threshold in Chinese T2DM patients. From the back calculation for the price of iGlarLixi, the annual medication cost of iGlarLixi was $656.96 and $1075.96 to obtain an ICER of iGlarLixi versus IDegAsp close to 1 × GDP and 3 × GDP, respectively. When the discount rate was changed from the base value to 8% (the most sensitive parameter to the model results in one-way sensitivity analysis), the ICER was nearly equal to 1 × GDP and 3 × GDP with the annual medication cost of iGlarLixi decreasing to $590.41 and $865.03, respectively. Thus, iGlarLixi was dominant over IDegAsp with an annual medication cost of $590.41 to $865.03. The findings were robust to one-way sensitivity analysis, PSA and scenario analysis.. This long-term cost-effectiveness analysis in Chinese T2DM patients indicates that iGlarLixi, assuming equal price to IDegAsp, is cost-effective versus IDegAsp with an ICER far below the WTP threshold. With 1 × GDP and 3 × GDP threshold set we back-calculate the appropriate annual medication cost of iGlarLixi to be $590.41 to $865.03, respectively.

Topics: Blood Glucose; China; Cost-Effectiveness Analysis; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Combinations; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine; Peptides; Pilot Projects; Prospective Studies

To determine the potential impact of the cross-reactivity of insulin glargine U-100 and its metabolites on insulin sensitivity and β-cell measures in people with type 2 diabetes.. Using liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS), we measured concentrations of endogenous insulin, glargine and its two metabolites (M1 and M2) in fasting and oral glucose tolerance test-stimulated plasma from 19 participants and fasting specimens from another 97 participants 12 months after randomization to receive the insulin glargine. The last dose of glargine was administered before 10:00 PM the night before testing. Insulin was also measured on these specimens using an immunoassay. We used fasting specimens to calculate insulin sensitivity (Homeostatic Model Assessment 2 [HOMA2]-S%; QUICKI index; PREDIM index) and β-cell function (HOMA2-B%). Using specimens following glucose ingestion, we calculated insulin sensitivity (Matsuda ISI[comp] index) and β-cell response (insulinogenic index [IGI], and total incremental insulin response [iAUC] insulin/glucose).. In plasma, glargine was metabolized to form the M1 and M2 metabolites that were quantifiable by LC-MS; however, the analogue and its metabolites cross-reacted by less than 100% in the insulin immunoassay. This incomplete cross-reactivity resulted in a systematic bias of fasting-based measures. By contrast, because M1 and M2 did not change following glucose ingestion, a bias was not observed for IGI and iAUC insulin/glucose.. Despite glargine metabolites being detected in the insulin immunoassay, dynamic insulin responses can be used to assess β-cell responsiveness. However, given the cross-reactivity of the glargine metabolites in the insulin immunoassay, fasting-based measures of insulin sensitivity and β-cell function are biased.

Topics: Blood Glucose; Chromatography, Liquid; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Glucose; Humans; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin Resistance; Insulin, Regular, Human; Mass Spectrometry

Topics: Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine

To prevent hypoglycemic episodes, the management of insulin therapy against post-transplant diabetes mellitus (PTDM) is important. We compared glargine (long-acting insulin) versus NPH isophane (intermediate-acting insulin) as an armamentarium against PTDM. Indeed, the study evaluated PTDM patients with hypoglycemic episodes treated with isophane or glargine.. We evaluated a total number of 231 living-donor renal transplant recipients with PTDM of age ≥ 18 years admitted to the hospital between January 2017 and September 2021. However, patients taking hypoglycemic agents before transplantation were excluded from this study. Out of 231 patients, 52 (22.15%) suffered from PTDM out of whom 26 were treated with glargine or isophane.. After applying exclusion criteria, out of 52 PTDM patients 23 were included in the study: 13 PTDM patients were treated with glargine, whereas 10 PTDM patients with isophane. Our analysis revealed 12 episodes of hypoglycemia in glargine-treated PTDM patients compared to 3 in isophane-treated PTDM patients (p = 0.056). Clinically, 9 out of 15 hypoglycemic episodes were nocturnal (60%). Furthermore, no other risk factors were observed in our study population. Detailed analysis showed that both groups had equivalent doses of immunosuppressants and oral hypoglycemic agents. The odds ratio for hypoglycemia in the group treated with isophane compared to that treated with glargine was 0.224 (95% CI, 0.032-1.559). Glargine users recorded significantly lower blood sugar levels before lunch, dinner and at bedtime with p-values of 0.001, 0.009 and 0.001 respectively. A better hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) level was seen in the glargine vs. isophane group (6.98 ± 0.52 vs. 7.45 ± 0.49, p-value 0.03).. The study shows better blood sugar control with long-acting insulin analog, glargine, than with intermediate-actin analog, isophane. Overall, a higher number of hypoglycemic episodes was nocturnal. Long term safety of long-acting insulin analogs needs to be further studied.

Topics: Adolescent; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Isophane; Insulin, Long-Acting

To determine whether the use of long-acting insulin analogues is associated with an increased risk of incident diabetic retinopathy (DR) among patients with type 2 diabetes.. Using data from the Clinical Practice Research Datalink Aurum, this retrospective, population-based cohort study included patients with type 2 diabetes who initiated a long-acting insulin analogue (glargine, detemir, degludec) or Neutral Protamine Hagedorn (NPH) insulin. The primary outcome was incident DR. We used Cox proportional hazards models with inverse probability of treatment weighting to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for incident DR with insulin analogues versus NPH insulin.. There were 66 280 new users of long-acting insulin analogues and 66 173 new users of NPH insulin. The incidence rate of DR was 101.7 per 1000 person-years (95% CI, 98.7-104.8) for insulin analogues and 93.2 (95% CI, 90.0-96.5) per 1000 person-years for NPH insulin. Compared with the current use of NPH insulin, insulin analogues were not associated with the risk of incident DR (HR 1.04, 95% CI, 0.99-1.09). The adjusted HRs were 0.84 (95% CI, 0.66-1.07) for proliferative DR and 1.02 (95% CI, 0.97-1.08) for non-proliferative DR.. Compared with NPH insulin, long-acting insulin analogues were not associated with the risk of incident DR among patients with type 2 diabetes. This finding provides important reassurance regarding the safety of long-acting insulin analogues with respect to incident DR.

Topics: Cohort Studies; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Diabetic Retinopathy; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Isophane; Insulin, Long-Acting; Retrospective Studies

Tirzepatide reduces HbA1c and body weight, and creatinine-based estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) decline. Unlike creatine-derived eGFR (eGFR-creatinine), cystatin C-derived eGFR (eGFR-cystatin C) is unaffected by muscle mass changes. We assessed effects of tirzepatide on eGFR-creatinine and eGFR-cystatin C.. Our primary outcome was eGFR change from baseline at 52 weeks with pooled tirzepatide (5, 10, and 15 mg) and titrated insulin glargine in adults with type 2 diabetes and high cardiovascular risk (SURPASS-4).. Least squares mean (SE) eGFR-creatinine (mL/min/1.73 m2) changes from baseline with tirzepatide and insulin glargine were -2.5 (0.38) and -3.9 (0.38) (between-group difference, 1.4 [95% CI 0.3-2.4]) and -3.5 (0.37) and -5.3 (0.37) (between-group difference, 1.8 [95% CI 0.8-2.8]) for eGFR-cystatin C. Baseline, 1-year, and 1-year change from baseline values significantly correlated between eGFR-cystatin C and eGFR-creatinine. Measures of eGFR changes did not correlate with body weight changes.. Tirzepatide slows the eGFR decline rate, supporting a kidney-protective effect.

Topics: Adult; Body Weight; Creatinine; Cystatin C; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Glomerular Filtration Rate; Humans; Insulin Glargine; Kidney

Topics: Adult; Biosimilar Pharmaceuticals; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Pharmaceutical Preparations; United States

To evaluate the effectiveness and safety profile of switching to insulin glargine 300 U/mL (Gla-U300) in patients with uncontrolled type 2 diabetes (T2D) on basal insulin in Saudi Arabia.. We conducted a multicentre retrospective study that retrieved the medical records of adult T2D patients switched to Gla-U300 because of poor glycaemic control on their basal insulin. Data covering 6 months ± 30 days before and after the switch were retrieved.. Data from 718 patients were analysed. The mean HbA1c decreased significantly 6 months after switching to Gla-U300, with a mean reduction of 0.7% (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.6%-0.9%; P < .001). The percentage of patients with HbA1c levels of less than 7% increased from 6.4% before switching to 10.3% after switching to Gla-U300. The percentage of patients achieving the predefined individualized HbA1c goal increased from 8.6% before switching to 17.3% after switching to Gla-U300. The mean daily insulin dose decreased from a baseline level of 32.2 (± 14.7) to 31.0 (± 15) U (P = .09). About 36.1 of the patients required adjustment to the initial dose. Gla-300 was well tolerated; 4.5% of the patients experienced overall confirmed or symptomatic hypoglycaemia, compared with 15.3% before switching to Gla-U300. The incidence of severe hypoglycaemia after switching was 0.6% (n = 4 patients), compared with 1% before switching.. Real-world evidence supports the effectiveness of switching to Gla-U300 from first-generation basal insulin in T2D in Saudi Arabia.

Topics: Adult; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine; Retrospective Studies; Saudi Arabia; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting

Topics: Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting

Topics: Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting

Topics: Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine

This study examined the impact of insulin products donated by a pharmaceutical manufacturer and dispensed by Dispensary of Hope-partnered pharmacies on medication access and treatment outcomes among uninsured patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D).. This was a pilot, single-center, retrospective observational study.. Uninsured patients with diabetes who were newly established with Ascension Medical Group clinics for the treatment of T2D were included in this study. Participants were prescribed insulin glargine, insulin isophane, or insulin isophane/insulin regular insulin therapy between March 2020 and August 2021. A retrospective chart review was conducted. Information collected included participants' hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) level at baseline, 3 months, and 6 months; change in HbA1c level; insulin prescribed; fill history; whether they had been referred to a patient assistance program; and whether they were seen by a pharmacist under a collaborative practice agreement.. Thirty-eight participants were assessed, and 22 met criteria for the primary outcome. The mean HbA1c level decreased from 11.2% at baseline to 8.9% at 3 months and 8.8% at 6 months, resulting in a mean change in HbA1c of -2.4 percentage points (P = .033). Eleven participants (50%) had an HbA1c level of less than 9% at 6 months. The mean proportion of days covered was 76%. The mean monthly savings for insulin ranged from $183.74 (insulin isophane) to $253.84 (insulin glargine) per participant.. Our results showed a significant improvement in glycemic control among participants, demonstrating the substantial impact that pharmacies partnered with charitable medication distributors such as the Dispensary of Hope can have on individuals with insulin-treated T2D.

Topics: Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Isophane; Insulin, Regular, Human; Medically Uninsured; Retrospective Studies

A 58-year-old Japanese man was brought to the emergency room due to disturbance of consciousness. He regained consciousness on the day of admission and started taking hospital meals, but he needed intravenous glucose administration for eight days. The total amount of glucose administration was 4,464 g. It took over three weeks for exogenous insulin to be almost undetectable. While degludec binds to albumin and exerts glucose-lowering effects for a long time, the above-mentioned period of three weeks was consistent with the half-life of albumin. Hypoglycemia induced by massive dose of insulin degludec is persistent and prominent.

Topics: Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Middle Aged

This study evaluated the effectiveness and safety of switching the basal insulin (BI) in a BI-supported oral therapy (BOT) to insulin glargine 300 U/ml (Gla-300) in adults with inadequately controlled type 2 diabetes (T2D).. This was a non-interventional, multicentre, prospective 12-month study, conducted in Germany, Austria and Switzerland. The study documented people with T2D with glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) between 7.5% and 10.0%, currently treated by a non-Gla-300 BOT regimen, after the physician had decided to switch the BI to Gla-300. Primary endpoint was the proportion of patients achieving the fasting plasma glucose (FPG; ≤110 mg/dl) target.. In total, 1194 participants comprised the full analysis set, of which 793 completed documentation of 12 months Gla-300 treatment (FAS-M12). The main previous BI was insulin glargine 100 U/ml (Gla-100; 47.2%). Twelve months after switching to Gla-300, 27.0% of FAS-M12 participants achieved the FPG target and 44.8% their individualized HbA1c target. The greatest FPG target achievements were seen in previous Gla-100 (29.3%), and greatest HbA1c target achievements in previous insulin detemir users (57.7%). The mean FPG decreased by -36.3 ± 51.2 mg/dl to 135.5 ± 36.9 mg/dl and mean HbA1c by -0.79 ± 1.01% to 7.45 ± 0.94%. Symptomatic and nocturnal hypoglycaemia incidence significantly decreased over 12 months of Gla-300 treatment. Body weight remained unchanged.. Switching the BI to Gla-300 in a BOT regimen improved metabolic control and treatment satisfaction in a substantial proportion of patients with T2D and inadequate target achievement within 12 months in clinical practice with a decreased risk of symptomatic and nocturnal hypoglycaemia and without weight gain.

Topics: Adult; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine; Prospective Studies

Topics: Blood Glucose; Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine

Topics: Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Kidney

Recent development of novel antidiabetic drugs with proven cardiovascular (CV) and renal benefit and positive effect on body weight enable to take a more complex approach toward the management of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Fixed-ratio combinations of insulin-GLP-1 receptor agonist (FRC) utilize complementary mechanisms of action of their individual components and address multiple pathologies linked with T2DM at the same time.. There are currently three FRCs on the market: iGlarLixi (glargine and lixisenatide in 2 different formulations) and IDegLira (degludec and liraglutide). We provide an up-to-date review on the rationale for the use of FRCs and their current position in the management of T2DM. We discuss the available evidence from randomized controlled trials, post hoc analyses, indirect comparative studies and real-world data on their effect on glycemic control, risk of hypoglycemia, body weight, CV safety, and their safety profile.. FRCs represent an efficacious option for treatment intensification from basal insulin or even the first insulin-based therapy in T2DM. Their excellent glucose-lowering efficacy is complemented with lower risk of hypoglycemia in comparison to basal insulin, neutral effect on body weight and the lower risk of gastrointestinal adverse effects in comparison to GLP-1 receptor agonists.

Topics: Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Combinations; Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine

Topics: Blood Glucose; Cohort Studies; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Combinations; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Liraglutide

To compare 12-month clinical effectiveness of insulin glargine 300 units/mL (Gla-300) versus first-generation basal insulin analogues (BIAs) (insulin glargine 100 units/mL [Gla-100] or insulin detemir [IDet]) in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) who were at high risk of hypoglycaemia and switched from one BIA to a different one (Gla-300 or Gla-100/IDet) in a real-world setting.. DELIVER High Risk was a retrospective observational cohort study of 2550 patients with T2D who switched BIA to Gla-300 (Gla-300 switchers) and were propensity score-matched (1:1) to patients who switched to Gla-100 or IDet (Gla-100/IDet switchers). Outcomes were change in glycated haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), attainment of HbA1c goals (<7% and <8%), and incidence and event rates of hypoglycaemia (all-hypoglycaemia and hypoglycaemia associated with an inpatient/emergency department [ED] contact).. HbA1c reductions were similar following switching to Gla-300 or Gla-100/IDet (-0.51% vs. -0.53%; p = .67), and patients showed similar attainment of HbA1c goals. Patients in both cohorts had comparable all-hypoglycaemia incidence and event rates. However, the Gla-300 switcher cohort had a significantly lower risk of inpatient/ED-associated hypoglycaemia (adjusted odds ratio: 0.73, 95% confidence interval: 0.60-0.89; p = .002) and experienced significantly fewer inpatient/ED-associated hypoglycaemic events (0.21 vs. 0.33 events per patient per year; p < .001).. In patients with T2D at high risk of hypoglycaemia, switching to Gla-300 or Gla-100/IDet achieved similar HbA1c reductions and glycaemic goal attainment, but Gla-300 switchers had a significantly lower risk of hypoglycaemia associated with an inpatient/ED contact during 12 months after switching.

Topics: Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Retrospective Studies; United States

To investigate the association between treatment with dulaglutide and glycaemic variability (GV) in adult patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2D).. Post hoc analyses of six randomized, phase 3 studies were conducted to investigate the association between treatment with dulaglutide 1.5 mg once weekly and GV in adult patients with T2D. Using data from seven- and eight-point self-monitored plasma glucose (SMPG) profiles over up to 28 weeks of treatment, GV in within- and between-day SMPG, and between-day fasting glucose from SMPG (FSMPG) was assessed according to standard deviation and coefficient of variation.. Pooled data from five studies with dulaglutide as monotherapy or added to oral glucose-lowering medication, without concomitant insulin treatment, revealed clinically meaningful reductions in within- and between-day SMPG, and between-day FSMPG variability from baseline in the dulaglutide group. Comparisons between treatment groups in two studies demonstrated that reductions from baseline in within-day and between-day SMPG, and between-day FSMPG variability were greater for treatment with dulaglutide compared with insulin glargine, as well as for treatment with dulaglutide when added to insulin glargine compared with insulin glargine alone.. In patients with T2D, treatment with dulaglutide as monotherapy or added to oral glucose-lowering medication, without concomitant insulin treatment, was potentially associated with a reduction in GV. Treatment with dulaglutide was associated with a reduction in GV to a greater degree than insulin glargine. When added to insulin glargine, treatment with dulaglutide was associated with greater decreases in GV compared with insulin glargine alone. As reduced GV may be associated with better outcomes, these findings may have clinical relevance.

Topics: Adult; Blood Glucose; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Glucagon-Like Peptides; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Immunoglobulin Fc Fragments; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Recombinant Fusion Proteins

To examine trends in basal insulin prescribing in older adults with chronic kidney disease (CKD).. We conducted a population-based study of adults aged 66 years or older with treated diabetes from 1 January 2010 to 30 September 2020 in Ontario, Canada. We examined prevalent and incident prescriptions for human NPH, Levemir, glargine-100, Basaglar, glargine-300, and degludec insulin over 43 study intervals. We present trends in those with CKD, and in a subgroup, by estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). To provide context for prescribing, we provide demographics, co-morbidities, and the healthcare utilization of included patients.. In CKD, use of basal insulin was about 2-fold higher than in the general treated diabetes cohort. Prescriptions for NPH declined over time, while prescriptions for Levemir and glargine-100 increased until 2018 then decreased. Following drug formulary approval (September 2018), prescriptions for glargine-300 and degludec increased substantially. Incident prescriptions for basal insulin in CKD declined over time; however, in those with an eGFR of less than 30 ml/min/1.73m. In an era of new oral and injectable diabetes medications, the use of basal insulin has declined in older adults with CKD. However, in those with more advanced CKD, basal insulin, particularly newer analogues, remain a mainstay treatment.

Topics: Aged; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Ontario; Renal Insufficiency, Chronic

This study aimed to retrospectively compare the clinical efficacy of different types of long-acting insulin therapies-glargine U100, glargine U300, degludec, and insulin degludec/insulin aspart-among Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes after insulin use was initiated in an outpatient setting. The study consisted of 822 insulin-naïve patients in Japan who started using long-acting insulin for treatment of type 2 diabetes and continued for over 12 months. In addition, the impact of insulin type on insulin withdrawal was investigated by dividing the participants into two groups: those who achieved insulin withdrawal and those who did not, during the 12-month observation period based on a Cox proportional hazards model. As a result, HbA1c was decreased, and BMI was increased in all participants regardless of the insulin type used. A total of 185 participants succeeded in insulin withdrawal. After adjustment was made for several confounders, the positive determinant factors for withdrawal were short duration of diabetes and the choice of IDegAsp when compared with Gla100; the negative determinant factor was use of insulin secretagogues at the start of the study. In conclusion, all long-acting insulins were a powerful tool for treatment of type 2 diabetes, and patients with short duration of diabetes and/or no usage of insulin secretagogues resulted in favorable outcomes in terms of insulin withdrawal within a year in an outpatient setting. In addition, insulin degludec/insulin aspart was found to possibly be a better choice for treatment when it was compared with glargine U100 among the four types of insulin.

Topics: Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Aspart; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Japan; Retrospective Studies; Secretagogues

This study simulated the 5-year risk of diabetes complications associated with the use of iGlarLixi, a fixed-ratio combination of insulin glargine 100 U/ml and lixisenatide, in type 2 diabetes (T2D) using the BRAVO diabetes model.. The six-month efficacy data of iGlarLixi and Standard of Care (SOC) were extracted from the LixiLan-O (NCT02058147) and ORIGIN (NCT00069784) trials, respectively. The trial participants' baseline characteristics were standardized to the ACCORD trial through a matching method. The BRAVO diabetes simulation model was used to project the 5-year complications based on T2D people baseline characteristics and treatment efficacy. An optimistic scenario where the six-month relative efficacy of iGlarLixi (i.e., iGlarlixi-SOC) lasted for 5 years, and a conservative scenario where the relative effect of iGlarLixi waned to none within 5 years were simulated.. iGlarLixi compared with SOC was found to reduce HbA1c (-1.4%), SBP (-3.4 mm Hg), and BMI (-0.6 kg/m. The long-term use of iGlarLixi may lead to a substantial reduction in diabetes-related complications among people with T2D at elevated risk for CVD. The use of a simulation model to evaluate outcomes of treatment in a well-characterized patient cohort is novel. Such an approach may serve as a template for future evaluation of medications and combinations when the effect of a treatment is known, but a long-term outcome trial is not feasible.

Topics: Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Combinations; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine

Del Prato S, Kahn SE, Pavo I, et al.

Topics: Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Gastric Inhibitory Polypeptide; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine

The effects of switching Canadians from other basal insulins to degludec (IDeg) in an outpatient setting are unknown. Our aim in this study was to evaluate the clinical effectiveness and safety of switching insulin-treated adults with either type 1 (T1DM) or type 2 (T2DM) diabetes mellitus to IDeg.. This was a retrospective observational cohort study of Albertans who were switched to IDeg between December 1, 2018, and December 1, 2019, and followed until March 1, 2020. We used administrative databases (provincial cohort) and electronic medical records (clinic cohort) to gather data and interrupted time series for the primary outcome analysis.. We analyzed a provincial cohort of 5,294 patients, 287 of whom were also included in the clinic cohort (T1DM, n=80; T2DM, n=207). After switching to IDeg, glycated hemoglobin (A1C) decreased by -0.3 (95% confidence interval [CI], -0.4% to -0.2%) and the reduction in A1C was maintained throughout the follow-up period. Rates of all-cause hospitalizations/emergency department visits per patient were not affected (hospitalizations pre-switch 0.07 [95% CI, 0.07 to 0.08], post-switch 0.08 [95% CI, 0.06 to 0.09], p=0.45; ED visits pre-switch 0.25 [95% CI, 0.23 to 0.27], post-switch 0.26 [95% CI, 0.23 to 0.29], p=0.27). In the clinic cohort, at switch, there was an average basal insulin dose reduction of 11.2% (T1DM), 12.3% (T2DM) and 16.3% (patients with insulin resistance).. Patients with inadequate glycemic control or who find their basal insulin dosing inconvenient may benefit from switching to Ideg, with the potential for small improvementa in A1C at lower basal insulin doses.

Topics: Adult; Blood Glucose; Canada; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Substitution; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Retrospective Studies

To provide real-world data on the addition of basal insulin (BI) in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus (PWD2) suboptimally controlled with glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist (GLP-1RA) therapy. However, real-world data on the addition of BI to GLP-1RA therapy are limited.. We used a US electronic medical record data source (IBM® Explorys®) that includes approximately 4 million PWD2 to assess the real-world impact of adding the second-generation BI analogue insulin glargine 300 U/mL (Gla-300) to GLP-1RA therapy. Insulin-naïve PWD2 receiving GLP-1RAs who also received Gla-300 between March 1, 2015 and September 30, 2019 were identified; participants were required to have data for ≥12 months before, and ≥6 months after, addition of Gla-300.. The mean (standard deviation [SD]) age of participants (N = 271) was 57.9 (10.8) years. Baseline glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) was 9.16% and was significantly reduced (-0.97 [SD 1.60]%; P < 0.0001) after addition of Gla-300; a significant increase in the proportion of PWD2 achieving HbA1c control was observed after addition of Gla-300 (HbA1c <7.0%: 4.80% vs. 22.14%, P < 0.0001; HbA1c <8.0%: 19.56% vs. 51.29%, P < 0.0001). The incidence of overall (8.49% vs. 9.59%; P = 0.513) and inpatient/emergency department (ED)-associated hypoglycaemia (0.37% vs. 0.74%; P = 1.000), as well as overall (0.33 vs. 0.46 per person per year [PPPY]; P = 0.170) and inpatient/ED-associated hypoglycaemia events (0.01 vs. 0.04 PPPY; P = 0.466) were similar before and after addition of Gla-300.. In US real-world clinical practice, adding Gla-300 to GLP-1RA significantly improved glycaemic control without significantly increasing hypoglycaemia in PWD2. Further research into the effect of adding Gla-300 to GLP-1RA therapy is warranted.

Topics: Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Glucagon-Like Peptide 1; Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Middle Aged

To evaluate the efficacy and safety profile of fixed ratio combinations (FRC) in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (DMT2) poorly controlled on different insulin regimens.. This multicentric observational study included 376 patients (157 males, 219 female), with longstanding DMT2 inadequately controlled (HbA1c >7%) on different insulin regimens; premix insulin analogs (MIX) (23.2%), basal-bolus regimen (BB) (30.9%) or basal oral therapy (BOT) (37.1%) to whom FRC was introduced at least 6 months prior to data collection.. Median age of patients was 67 years, with the duration of diabetes for 14 years, median HbA1c of 8.4% and BMI of 34.35 kg/m2. The proportion of patients treated with IDegLira and IGlarLixi was similar (48.4% vs. 51.6%). There was a borderline difference regarding regimen groups (p = 0.059) implying the greatest improvement of HbA1c in the MIX group. The significant interaction between BOT and BB/MIX regimens (p = 0.011) was noted indicating the largest reduction of BMI in BB and MIX groups. After the FRC administration, there was no significant difference in gastrointestinal (GIT) side-effects. The number of patients with hypoglycemic episodes decreased from 24% to 7% after FRC initiation (p < .001). The group using IGlarLixi required a significantly higher average dose steps compared to IDegLira (p < .001 for all) to achieve glycemic goals, while a larger proportion of patients using IDegLira lost more than 5 kg, compared to IGlarLixi (p < .001). Significant improvement was observed in all glycemic parameters in all insulin treated patients after replacement of insulin therapy with FRC (p < .001 for all). Composite outcome defined as any weight loss and HbA1c below 7% was accomplished in 20.3% of patients.. In real life setting switching to both FRC options in people with longstanding inadequately controlled DMT2 treated with different insulin regimens could offer an effective therapeutic choice for achieving glycemic goals, with an improved safety profile.

Topics: Aged; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Combinations; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Male; Peptides

To assess the effectiveness and safety of insulin glargine and lixisenatide (iGlarLixi) fixed-ratio combination on a cohort of Romanian adults with type 2 diabetes (T2D).. Open-label, 24-week, prospective cohort study.. 65 secondary care diabetes centres in Romania.. The study included 901 adults with T2D suboptimally controlled with previous oral antidiabetic drugs (OADs)±basal insulin (BI) who initiated treatment with iGlarLixi upon the decision of the investigator. Major exclusion criteria were iGlarLixi contraindications and refusal to participate. 876 subjects received at least one dose of iGlarLixi (intention-to-treat/safety population).. The primary endpoint was change in glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) from baseline to week 24 in the modified intention-to-treat population (study participants with HbA1c available at baseline and week 24). Secondary efficacy outcomes were percentage of participants reaching HbA1c targets and change in fasting plasma glucose (FPG).. Mean baseline HbA1c was 9.2% (SD 1.4) and FPG was 10.8 mmol/L (2.9). Mean HbA1c change was -1.3% (95% CI: -1.4% to -1.2%, p<0.0001) at week 24. HbA1c levels ≤6.5%, <7% and<7.5% at week 24 were achieved by 72 (8.9%), 183 (22.6%) and 342 (42.3%) participants, respectively. Mean FPG change was -3.1 mmol/L (95% CI: -3.3 to -2.8, p<0.001) at week 24. Mean body weight change was -1.6 kg (95% CI: -1.9 to -1.3, p<0.001) at 24 weeks. Mean iGlarLixi dose increased from 19.5 U (SD 7.7) and 30.1 U (10.0) to 30.2 U (8.9) (ratio 2/1 pen) and 45.0 U (11.6) (ratio 3/1 pen). Adverse events (AEs) were reported by 43 (4.9%) participants (18 (2.1%) gastrointestinal) with 4 (0.5%) reporting serious AEs. 13 (1.5%) participants reported at least one event of symptomatic hypoglycaemia, with one episode of severe hypoglycaemia reported.. In a real-world setting, 24-week treatment with iGlarLixi provided a significant reduction of HbA1c with body weight loss and low hypoglycaemia risk in T2D suboptimally controlled with OADs±BI treatment.

Topics: Adult; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Combinations; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine; Peptides; Prospective Studies; Romania

Diabetes imposes a large burden on countries' healthcare expenditures. In Kuwait, diabetes prevalence in adults is estimated at 22.0%%-double the worldwide prevalence (9.3%). There is little current data on pharmaceutical costs in Kuwait of managing diabetes and diabetes-related complications and comorbidities.. Estimate the utilization and cost of drugs for diabetes and diabetes-related complications and comorbidities in Kuwait for year 2018, as well determinants of costs.. This cross-sectional study used a multi-stage stratified sampling method. Patients were Kuwaiti citizens with diabetes, aged 18-80, recruited from all six governorates. Physicians collected demographic data, clinical data, and current drug prescription for each patient which was extrapolated for the full year of 2018. A prevalence-based approach and bottom-up costing were used. Data were described according to facility type (primary care vs. hospital). A generalized linear model with log function and normal distribution compared drug costs for patients with and without comorbidities/complications after adjustments for demographic and health confounders (gender, age group, disease duration, and obesity).. Of 1182 diabetes patients, 64.0% had dyslipidemia and 57.7% had hypertension. Additionally, 40.7% had diabetes-related complications, most commonly neuropathy (19.7%). Of all diabetes patients, 85.9% used oral antidiabetics (alone or in combinations), 49.5% used insulin alone or in combinations, and 29.3% used both oral antidiabetics and insulin. The most frequently used oral drug was metformin (75.7%), followed by DPP4 inhibitors (40.2%) and SGLT2 inhibitors (23.8%). The most frequently used injectables were insulin glargine (36.6%), followed by GLP-1 receptor agonists (15.4%). Total annual drug cost for Kuwait's diabetic population for year 2018 was US$201 million (US$1,236.30 per patient for antidiabetics plus drugs for comorbidities/complications).. Drug costs for treating diabetes and comorbidities/complications accounted for an estimated 22.8% of Kuwait's 2018 drug expenditures. Comorbidities and complications add 44.7% to the average drug cost per diabetes patient.

Topics: Adult; Cross-Sectional Studies; Diabetes Complications; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Costs; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine; Kuwait

To assess the change in HbA1c after initiation of biosimilar follow-on insulin (Basaglar) or reference insulin (Lantus) among patients with type 2 diabetes. We also compared treatment adherence, safety events and costs at 1 year after initiation of insulin.. Using claims data from a large US health plan during 2016-2020, we identified adults with type 2 diabetes who initiated either Basaglar or Lantus. Generalized linear regression modelling assessed the differences in outcomes between the two groups. A 0.4% margin was used to determine non-inferiority for HbA1c.. The study included 1136 Basaglar users and 6304 Lantus users. Both Lantus and Basaglar groups showed more than 1% reduction in HbA1c over 6 months and over 12 months. Reduction in HbA1c with Basaglar was similar (non-inferior) to that with Lantus, with an adjusted difference of Basaglar to Lantus of 0.14% (95% CI -0.02 to 0.30) over 6 months and 0.17% (95% CI 0.02 to 0.32) over 12 months. Rates of adverse events were similar for both hypoglycaemia and vascular events. The Basaglar group showed higher adherence in terms of proportion of days covered (adjusted difference 0.06, 95% CI 0.04 to 0.08). Medical costs were similar, but the cost of Basaglar was lower (adjusted mean cost difference -$462, 95% CI -$556 to -$363) after adjustment.. In patients with type 2 diabetes, Basaglar provided similar glycaemic control compared with Lantus, had a similar safety profile and lower drug costs, and showed more favourable adherence.

Topics: Adult; Biosimilar Pharmaceuticals; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Regular, Human; Treatment Adherence and Compliance

To compare the risk of cardiovascular outcomes associated with long-acting insulin analogues versus neutral protamine Hagedorn (NPH) insulin among patients with type 2 diabetes.. We conducted a population-based retrospective cohort study using the UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink Aurum, linked with hospitalization and vital statistics data. Patients with type 2 diabetes who initiated basal insulin treatment between 2002 and 2018 were included in the study. Exposure was defined as current use of long-acting insulin analogues or NPH insulin, defined using a time-varying approach. The primary outcome was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE; a composite endpoint of myocardial infarction, ischaemic stroke and cardiovascular death). We used a marginal structural Cox proportional hazards model to estimate the hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) for MACE with current use of long-acting insulin analogues versus NPH insulin, and in secondary analyses, by long-acting insulin molecule.. Our cohort included 57 334 patients. A total of 3494 MACE occurred over a mean follow-up of 1.6 years (incidence rate 37.4, 95% CI 36.2 to 38.7 per 1000 person-years). Long-acting insulin analogues were associated with a decreased risk of MACE compared to NPH insulin (HR 0.89, 95% CI 0.83 to 0.96).. Current use of long-acting insulin analogues is associated with a modestly reduced risk of MACE compared to current use of NPH insulin among patients with type 2 diabetes. This study could have important implications for drug plan managers and guideline-writing committees for recommendations of insulin treatment for type 2 diabetes.

Topics: Brain Ischemia; Cohort Studies; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Isophane; Insulin, Long-Acting; Protamines; Retrospective Studies; Stroke

Alzheimer's disease is the most common cause of dementia in the elderly population. It is characterized by the accumulation of amyloid β and intraneuronal neurofibrillary tangles in the brain. Increasing evidence shows that the disturbance of insulin signalling in the brain may contribute to the pathophysiology of Alzheimer's disease. In type 1 diabetes, these disruptions are caused by hypoinsulinemia, but in type 2 diabetes, they are caused by insulin resistance and decreased insulin secretion. Multiple studies have shown that diabetes is connected with an increased risk of acquiring Alzheimer's disease. The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of anti-diabetic agents on Alzheimer's disease progression and the levels of Alzheimer's biomarkers in a hyperglycaemic rat model, which was induced by intraperitoneal injection of streptozocin to produce insulin-deficient diabetes.. Thirty-six male Wistar albino rats were allocated into six groups of six rats each. Group I was the negative control group. Intraperitoneal injections of streptozocin (42mg/kg) were used once for the five experimental groups. Group II served as the positive control group. The rats in Groups III, IV, V, and VI received metformin (300mg/kg), donepezil (10mg/kg), insulin glargine (3 unit/animal), and glibenclamide (10mg/kg), respectively, for 21 days.. Inducing hyperglycaemia in rats significantly increased the levels of serum glucose, haemoglobin A1c, total cholesterol, triglycerides, high-density lipoprotein, interleukin 6, tumour necrosis factor alpha, amyloid β 42, total plasma tau, and neurofilament light. A significant increase was also found in brain amyloid β 42, nitric oxide, acetylcholinesterase, malondialdehyde, β secretase, and phosphorylated microtubule-associated protein tau. The greatest statistically significant reductions in serum glucose, haemoglobin A1c, triglycerides, amyloid β 42, total plasma tau, brain amyloid β 42, acetylcholinesterase, and malondialdehyde were observed in rats treated with metformin. In contrast, rats treated with donepezil demonstrated the greatest statistically significant reduction in serum tumour necrosis factor alpha, brain nitric oxide, and β secretase. The levels of neurofilament light and phosphorylated microtubule-associated protein tau in the brains of rats treated with insulin glargine were significantly lower than the other treatment groups. The total cholesterol and low-density lipoprotein levels in rats treated with glibenclamide exhibited the most statistically significant reductions of all the treatment groups.. Metformin and donepezil, when administered at appropriate doses, were shown to successfully lower most plasma and brain biomarkers, including glucose, triglycerides, tumour necrosis factor alpha, amyloid β 42, nitric oxide, acetylcholinesterase, malondialdehyde, and β secretase in rats suffering from Diabetes Mellitus. As a result of this research, we suggest that metformin, either alone or in conjunction with donepezil, might be an excellent drug of choice for neuro-regeneration and risk reduction in Alzheimer's like disease.

Topics: Acetylcholinesterase; Alzheimer Disease; Amyloid beta-Peptides; Amyloid Precursor Protein Secretases; Animals; Biomarkers; Cholesterol; Diabetes Mellitus, Experimental; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Donepezil; Glucose; Glyburide; Glycated Hemoglobin; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine; Male; Malondialdehyde; Metformin; Microtubule-Associated Proteins; Nitric Oxide; Rats; Rats, Wistar; Streptozocin; Triglycerides; Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha

Topics: Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Gastric Inhibitory Polypeptide; Glucagon-Like Peptides; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine

This study assessed comparative effectiveness of glargine 300 U/mL (Gla-300) versus degludec 100 U/mL (Deg-100) in insulin-naïve patients with T2D.. This is a retrospective, multicenter, non-inferiority study based on electronic medical records. All patients initiating Gla-300 or Deg-100 were 1:1 propensity score-matched (PSM). Linear mixed models were used to assess the changes in continuous endpoints. Incidence rates (IR) of hypoglycemia were compared using Poisson's regression models.. Nineteen centers provided data on 357 patients in each PSM cohort. HbA1c after 6 months (primary endpoint) decreased by - 1.70% (95%CI - 1.90; - 1.50) in Gla-300 group and - 169% (95%CI - 1.89; - 1.49) in Deg-100 group, confirming non-inferiority of Gla-300 versus Deg-100. Fasting blood glucose (BG) decreased by ~60 mg/dl in both groups; body weight remained unchanged. In both groups, the mean starting dose was 12U (0.15U/kg) and it was slightly titrated to 16U (0.20U/kg). IR (episodes per patient-months) of BG ≤70 mg/dl was 0.13 in Gla-300 group and 0.14 in Deg-100 group (p=0.87). IR of BG <54 mg/dL was 0.02 in both groups (p=0.49). No severe hypoglycemia occurred.. Initiating Gla-300 or Deg-100 was associated with similar improvements in glycemic control, no weight gain and low hypoglycemia rates, without severe episodes during 6 months of treatment.

Topics: Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Retrospective Studies

Data on second generation basal insulin (2BI) in people with type 2 diabetes (T2D) generated by clinical trials still need confirmation in real-world clinical settings. This study aimed at assessing the comparative effectiveness of 2BI [Glargine 300 U/mL (Gla-300) vs. Degludec 100 U/mL (Deg-100)] in T2D Italian patients switching from first generation basal insulins (1BI).. This was a retrospective, non-inferiority, multicenter study. Patients switching to Gla-300 or Deg-100 from 1BI were 1:1 propensity score matched (PSM). Changes during 6 months in continuous endpoints were assessed through linear mixed models. Incidence rates (IR) of hypoglycemia (episodes per patient-months) were compared using Poisson regression. Each PSM cohort included 593 patients. HbA1c decreased from baseline (8.7%) to 6 months by -0.58% (95%CI -0.69;-0.47) in Gla-300 group and -0.50% (95%CI -0.61;-0.39) in Deg-100 group, confirming the non-inferiority of Gla-300 vs. Deg-100. No between-group differences emerged: FBG was reduced by about 20 mg/dl with both 2BI, mean dose of 2BI (24.5 U, 0.3 U/Kg at the first prescription) was suboptimally titrated during 6 months (+1.34 U in Gla-300 and + 1.76 U in Deg-100), body weight showed minor changes. IR of hypoglycemia <54 mg/dl was 0.32 (95%CI 0.21; 0.49) in Gla-300 group and 0.19 (95%CI 0.11; 0.33) in Deg-100 group (p = 0.14).. In subjects with T2D, switching to 2BI from 1BI was associated with similar improvements in glycemic control, low hypoglycemia rates and no weight gain in real-life setting. Clinical inertia, represented by late treatment intensification and suboptimal titration, represents a major issue in Italy.

Topics: Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Retrospective Studies

To assess patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in the SoliMix trial, which compared the efficacy and safety of iGlarLixi versus BIAsp 30 in people with type 2 diabetes (T2D).. SoliMix (EudraCT: 2017-003370-13), a 26-week, open-label study, randomized (1:1) 887 adults with T2D and HbA1c ≥7.5%-≤10.0% (≥58-≤86 mmol/mol) on basal insulin plus oral antihyperglycaemic drugs (OADs) to once-daily iGlarLixi or twice-daily premix insulin, BIAsp 30. PROs were assessed using the Treatment-Related Impact Measure Diabetes (TRIM-D) and Global Treatment Effectiveness Evaluation (GTEE) questionnaires.. Over 26 weeks, iGlarLixi showed greater improvement from baseline versus BIAsp 30 in total TRIM-D score (least squares mean difference [95% confidence interval]: 5.08 [3.69, 6.47]; effect size: 0.32) and in each TRIM-D domain, with the greatest differences seen in diabetes management (8.47 [6.11, 10.84]) and treatment burden (6.95 [4.83, 9.07]). GTEE scores showed a greater proportion of participants and physicians rated a complete or marked improvement of diabetes control with iGlarLixi (80.5%, 82.8%) versus BIAsp 30 (63.3%, 65.1%) at week 26. Post hoc analyses showed that after adjusting for HbA1c, body weight and hypoglycaemia outcomes, iGlarLixi continued to show greater improvements in TRIM-D total scores versus BIAsp 30.. In addition to better glycaemic control, weight benefit and less hypoglycaemia, once-daily iGlarLixi provided improved diabetes management, treatment burden and perceived effectiveness versus twice-daily premix BIAsp 30, further supporting iGlarLixi as an advanced treatment option in people with suboptimally controlled T2D on basal insulin plus OADs.

Topics: Adult; Biphasic Insulins; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Aspart; Insulin Glargine; Patient Reported Outcome Measures; Treatment Outcome

To emulate the GRADE (Glycemia Reduction Approaches in Diabetes: A Comparative Effectiveness Study) trial using real world data before its publication. GRADE directly compared second line glucose lowering drugs for their ability to lower glycated hemoglobin A. Observational study.. OptumLabs® Data Warehouse (OLDW), a nationwide claims database in the US, 25 January 2010 to 30 June 2019.. Adults with type 2 diabetes and HbA. The primary outcome was time to HbA. 8252 people were identified (19.7% of adults starting the study drugs in OLDW) who met eligibility criteria for the GRADE trial (glimepiride arm=4318, liraglutide arm=690, sitagliptin arm=2993, glargine arm=251). The glargine arm was excluded from analyses owing to small sample size. Median times to HbA. In this emulation of the GRADE trial, liraglutide was statistically significantly more effective at maintaining glycemic control than glimepiride or sitagliptin when added to metformin monotherapy. Generating timely evidence on medical treatments using real world data as a complement to prospective trials is of value.

Topics: Adult; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine; Liraglutide; Metformin; Prospective Studies; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Retrospective Studies; Sitagliptin Phosphate; Sulfonylurea Compounds; Treatment Outcome

The Scottish Diabetes Research Network (SDRN)-diabetes research platform was established to combine disparate electronic health record data into research-ready linked datasets for diabetes research in Scotland. The resultant cohort, 'The SDRN-National Diabetes Dataset (SDRN-NDS)', has many uses, for example, understanding healthcare burden and socioeconomic trends in disease incidence and prevalence, observational pharmacoepidemiology studies and building prediction tools to support clinical decision making.. We estimate that >99% of those diagnosed with diabetes nationwide are captured into the research platform. Between 2006 and mid-2020, the cohort comprised 472 648 people alive with diabetes at any point in whom there were 4 million person-years of follow-up. Of the cohort, 88.1% had type 2 diabetes, 8.8% type 1 diabetes and 3.1% had other types (eg, secondary diabetes). Data are captured from all key clinical encounters for diabetes-related care, including diabetes clinic, primary care and podiatry and comprise clinical history and measurements with linkage to blood results, microbiology, prescribed and dispensed drug and devices, retinopathy screening, outpatient, day case and inpatient episodes, birth outcomes, cancer registry, renal registry and causes of death.. There have been >50 publications using the SDRN-NDS. Examples of recent key findings include analysis of the incidence and relative risks for COVID-19 infection, drug safety of insulin glargine and SGLT2 inhibitors, life expectancy estimates, evaluation of the impact of flash monitors on glycaemic control and diabetic ketoacidosis and time trend analysis showing that diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) remains a major cause of death under age 50 years. The findings have been used to guide national diabetes strategy and influence national and international guidelines.. The comprehensive SDRN-NDS will continue to be used in future studies of diabetes epidemiology in the Scottish population. It will continue to be updated at least annually, with new data sources linked as they become available.

Topics: COVID-19; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Diabetic Ketoacidosis; Humans; Insulin Glargine; Middle Aged; Scotland; Sodium-Glucose Transporter 2 Inhibitors

As type 2 diabetes (T2D) progresses, intensification to combination therapies, such as iGlarLixi (a fixed-ratio GLP-1 RA and basal insulin combination), may be required. Here a simulation study was used to assess the effect of iGlarLixi administration timing (am vs pm) on blood sugar profiles.. Models of lixisenatide were built with a selection procedure, optimizing measurement fits and model complexity, and were included in a pre-existing T2D simulation platform containing glargine models. With the resulting tool, a simulated trial was conducted with 100 in-silico participants with T2D. Individuals were given iGLarLixi either before breakfast or before an evening meal for 2 weeks and daily glycemic profiles were analyzed. In the model, breakfast was considered the largest meal of the day.. A similar percentage of time within 24 hours was spent with blood sugar levels between 70 to 180 mg/dL when iGlarLixi was administered pre-breakfast or pre-evening meal (73% vs 71%, respectively). Overall percent of time with blood glucose levels above 180 mg/dL within a 24-hour period was similar when iGlarLixi was administered pre-breakfast or pre-evening meal (26% vs 28%, respectively). Rates of hypoglycemia were low in both regimens, with a blood glucose concentration of below 70 mg/dL only observed for 1% of the 24-hour time period for either timing of administration.. Good efficacy was observed when iGlarlixi was administered pre-breakfast; however, administration of iGlarlixi pre-evening meal was also deemed to be effective, even though in the model the size of the evening meal was smaller than that of the breakfast.

Topics: Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Combinations; Gastric Emptying; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine; Peptides

For patients with type 2 diabetes in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs), access to newer antidiabetic drugs (eg, sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 [SGLT2] inhibitors, glucagon-like peptide-1 [GLP-1] receptor agonists, and insulin analogues) could reduce the incidence of diabetes-related complications. We aimed to estimate price targets to pursue in negotiations for inclusion in national formularies given the addition of these novel agents to WHO's Essential Medicines List.. We incorporated individual-level, nationally representative survey data (2006-18) from 23 678 people with diabetes in 67 LMICs into a microsimulation of cardiovascular events, heart failure, end-stage renal disease, vision loss, pressure sensation loss, hypoglycaemia requiring medical attention, and drug-specific side-effects. We estimated price targets for incremental costs of switching to newer treatments to achieve cost-effectiveness (ie, <3-times gross domestic product per disability-adjusted life-year averted) or to achieve net cost-savings when including costs of averted complications. We compared switching to SGLT2 inhibitors or GLP-1 receptor agonists in place of sulfonylureas, or insulin analogues in place of human insulin, and also compared a glycaemia-agnostic pathways of adding SGLT2 inhibitors or GLP-1 receptor agonists to existing therapies for people with heart disease, heart failure, or kidney disease.. To achieve cost-effectiveness, SGLT2 inhibitors would need to have a median price of $224 per person per year (a 17·4% cost reduction; IQR $138-359, population-weighted across countries; mean price $257); GLP-1 receptor agonists $208 per person per year (98·3% reduction; $129-488; $240); and glargine insulin $20 per vial (31·0% reduction; $16-42; $28). To achieve net cost-savings, price targets would need to reduce by a further $9-10 to a median cost for SGLT2 inhibitors of $214 (21·4% reduction; $148-316; $245) and for GLP-1 receptor agonists to $199 per person per year (98·4% reduction; $138-294; $228); but insulin glargine remained around $20 per vial (32·4% reduction; $15-37; $26). Using SGLT2 inhibitors or GLP-1 receptor agonists in a glycaemia-agnostic pathway produced a 92% reduction (SGLT2 inhibitors) and 72% reduction (GLP-1 receptor agonists) in incremental cost-effectiveness ratios.. Among novel agents, SGLT2 inhibitors hold particular promise for reducing complications of diabetes and meeting common price targets, particularly when used among people with established cardiovascular or kidney disease. These findings are consistent with the choice to include SGLT2 inhibitors in the WHO Essential Medicines List.. Clinton Health Access Initiative.

Topics: Blood Glucose; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Developing Countries; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor; Heart Failure; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Sodium-Glucose Transporter 2 Inhibitors

Topics: Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Female; Gastric Inhibitory Polypeptide; Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Injections; Insulin Glargine; Male; Middle Aged

Topics: Adrenergic beta-Antagonists; Aminobutyrates; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Animals; Biphenyl Compounds; Blood Pressure; Calcium Channel Blockers; Cats; COVID-19; COVID-19 Serotherapy; Diabetes Mellitus; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dogs; Drug Combinations; Gastric Inhibitory Polypeptide; Heart Sounds; History, 20th Century; Humans; Hypertension; Immunization, Passive; Incretins; Insulin Glargine; Meta-Analysis as Topic; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; SARS-CoV-2; Thiazides; Valsartan

Fixed-dose combinations of insulin glargine/lixisenatide (IGlarLixi) or insulin degludec/insulin aspart (IDegAsp) constitute treatment intensification in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2D).. Compare efficacy and safety of IGlarLixi and IDegAsp (as intensification from basal insulin), by indirect comparison of phase III trials, in the absence of head-to-head trials.. Studies comparing treatment intensification by once-daily IDegAsp or IGlarLixi to basal insulin. Data were extracted from two trials (BOOST: Intensify-Basal and LixiLan-L) retained for analysis.. Treatments were compared in terms of estimated treatment difference (ETD) in glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c), fasting and postprandial plasma glucose (FPG and PPG) change from baseline; in addition to hypoglycaemia incidence and weight changes.. In a fixed-effect model examining HbA1c control, IGlarLixi was more effective than IDegAsp in reducing HbA1c (ETD 0.53%, P<0.0001]), PPG (ETD 2.65%, P<0.0001), and body weight (ETD 1.73kg, P<0.0001). Patients on IGlarLixi were more likely to achieve HbA1c<7% than patients on IDegAsp (odds ratio [OR]=0.40, P<0.0001), with lower incidence of hypoglycaemia (OR=1.33, P<0.001).. Limited number of studies; different baseline HbA1c and FPG.. Once-daily IGlarLixi is more efficient than once-daily IDegAsp in controlling HbA1c and PPG and associates with greater weight loss and lower hypoglycaemia incidence.

Topics: Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Combinations; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Aspart; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Peptides

Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) are the recommended first injectable therapy in type 2 diabetes. However, long-term persistence is suboptimal and partly attributable to gastrointestinal tolerability, particularly during initiation/escalation. Gradual titration of fixed-ratio combination GLP-1 RA/insulin therapies may improve GLP-1 RA gastrointestinal tolerability. We compared gastrointestinal adverse event (AE) rates for iGlarLixi versus GLP-1 RAs during the first 12 weeks of therapy, including a sensitivity analysis with IDegLira.. The PICO framework was used to identify studies from MEDLINE, EMBASE and CENTRAL searches using a proprietary, web-based, standardized tool with single data extraction. Gastrointestinal AEs were modelled using a Bayesian network meta-analysis (NMA), using fixed and random effects for each recommended dose (treatment-specific NMA) and class (drug-class NMA).. Treatment-specific NMA included 17 trials (n = 9030; 3665 event-weeks). Nausea rates were significantly lower with iGlarLixi versus exenatide 10 μg twice daily (rate ratio: 0.32; 95% credible interval: 0.15, 0.66), once-daily lixisenatide 20 μg (0.35; 0.24, 0.50) and liraglutide 1.8 mg once daily (0.48; 0.23, 0.98). Rates were numerically, but not statistically, lower versus once-weekly semaglutide 1 mg (0.60; 0.30, 1.23) and dulaglutide 1.5 mg (0.60; 0.29, 1.26), and numerically, but not statistically, higher versus once-weekly exenatide (1.91; 0.91, 4.03). Sensitivity analysis results were similar. In a naïve, pooled analysis, vomiting was lower with iGlarLixi versus other GLP-1 RAs.. During the first 12 weeks of treatment, iGlarLixi was generally associated with less nausea and vomiting than single-agent GLP-1 RAs. Enhanced gastrointestinal tolerability with fixed-ratio combinations may favour treatment persistence.

Topics: Bayes Theorem; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine; Network Meta-Analysis; Peptides

Insulin glargine 300 U/mL (Gla-300) contains the same units versus glargine 100 U/mL (Gla-100) in three-fold lower volume, and higher subcutaneous (SC) doses are required in people with diabetes. To investigate blood glucose (BG) lowering potency, Gla-300 and Gla-100 were compared after intravenous (IV, for 4 h) and SC (for 24 h) injection in healthy Beagle dogs.. The dose of 0.15 U/kg Gla-300 and Gla-100 was injected IV in 12 dogs. BG, C-peptide, glucagon and the active metabolite 21A-Gly-human insulin (M1; liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method) were measured. Twelve other dogs were studied after SC injection of 0.3 U/kg Gla-300 and Gla-100.. After IV injection, Gla-300 and Gla-100 were equally potent [BG_AUC. IV Gla-300 and Gla-100 have the equivalent of BG-lowering potency and M1 metabolism. SC Gla-300 has lower M1 bioavailability with a reduced BG-lowering effect and need for greater doses versus Gla-100.

Topics: Animals; Biological Availability; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dogs; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting

This study aimed to compare the rate of hypoglycemic events from all spontaneously reported adverse events (AEs) between insulin detemir and insulin degludec using the Korea Adverse Event Reporting System (KAERS) database.. We analyzed data on the reported hypoglycemia events retrieved from adverse drug reactions (ADR) on the use of different insulin types from 2016 to 2017 in the Korea Institute of Drug Safety & Risk Management-Korea Adverse Event Reporting System Database (KIDS-KD). After defining hypoglycemic events as the AE of interest, we performed a disproportionality analysis by calculating the reporting odds ratio (ROR) to identify the disproportionality of AEs following treatment with insulin degludec (IDeg) and insulin detemir (IDet). Because spontaneously reported hypoglycemic events were not distinguished between insulin glargine 100 U/mL (Gla-100) and insulin glargine 300 U/mL (Gla-300) due to same ATC code by KIDS-KD, direct comparisons of Gla-100 and Gla-300 or comparisons of each analog of insulin glargine vs. IDet or IDeg, respectively, could not be achieved.. Of the 3,220 AEs caused by the use of long-acting basal insulin, 739 and 296 were caused by IDeg and IDet, respectively. Among these, 172 (23.3%) of the 739 and 83 (28.0%) of the 296 AEs were reported to be hypoglycemic events caused by IDeg and IDet, respectively. The rate of reported hypoglycemic events caused by IDeg was lower than that of IDet (ROR (95% CI): 0.78 (0.71 - 0.86)). Further, IDeg consistently caused lower hypoglycemia events than IDet in the sensitivity analysis (ROR (95% CI): 0.41 (0.37 - 0.46)).. When we compared the proportionality of hypoglycemic events among the total number of reported AEs for each of the two basal insulins through disproportionality analysis using the spontaneous ADR reporting system, IDeg showed a relatively lower rate of reported hypoglycemic events than IDet.

Topics: Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Detemir; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Republic of Korea

Randomized controlled trial (RCT) populations often do not reflect those typically seen in clinical practice. This retrospective, observational cohort study analysed the real-world data of people with type 2 diabetes (T2DM) prescribed basal insulin analogues from electronic medical records (EMRs) in the Explorys database, which includes data from 39 integrated healthcare systems in the United States, to determine how representative selected RCTs investigating insulin glargine 300 U/mL (Gla-300) are of T2DM populations in a real-world setting. Applying eligibility criteria derived from the EDITION 1, 2 and 3 (Gla-300 vs. insulin glargine 100 U/mL [Gla-100]) and BRIGHT (Gla-300 vs. insulin degludec) RCTs, we observed that only 17% (33 345/191 218) of people captured in the real-world database would have been eligible for such trials. Those who were ineligible tended to be older, had more comorbidities and a higher baseline hypoglycaemia rate than the eligible group. Using another large US EMR database (Optum Humedica) as corroboration, we found that 15% (36 285/235 697) would have been eligible to participate in the EDITION/BRIGHT RCTs. Furthermore, only 7% (1734/24 547) would have been eligible for the CONCLUDE (insulin degludec vs. Gla-300) RCT. Our findings remind us of the value of real-world data studies, complementing the results of RCTs, and providing additional insights into groups who would typically be excluded from RCTs.

Topics: Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic

In comparative randomized studies, use of insulin detemir has been consistently demonstrated to be associated with less weight gain than the industry standard, insulin glargine. However, the magnitude of the relative reduction in weight gain with use of insulin determir vs insulin glargine in regulatory studies (reported values ranged from 0.77 kg to 3.6 kg) may not be generalizable to patients in real-world practice conditions. A study was conducted to substantiate detemir's purported weight-sparing advantage over insulin glargine in newly treated patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus under the conditions found in a clinical practice setting.. A retrospective longitudinal cohort study design was applied in reviewing electronic medical records to identify insulin-naive, overweight patients with type 2 diabetes who received insulin detemir or insulin glargine therapy continued for up to 1 year. Patient weights at baseline and at each subsequent clinic visit after treatment initiation were identified. The primary outcome was the maximum weight increase from baseline after exposure to insulin detemir or glargine. The difference-in-differences (DiD) mean total body weight change was tested by analysis of covariance (ANCOVA).. One hundred nine patient records (56 of patients who received insulin glargine and 53 of patients who received insulin detemir) met study criteria and underwent full abstraction. The covariate-adjusted estimated mean change in body weight associated with use of insulin detemir vs insulin glargine was -1.5 kg (95% CI, -2.89 to -0.12 kg; P = 0.04).. The mean weight gain associated with detemir use was significantly less than the mean weight change observed with glargine use. The magnitude of weight change was consistent with that demonstrated in randomized controlled trials. These results further substantiate detemir's purported comparative weight-sparing properties under conditions found in a real-world practice setting.

Topics: Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Detemir; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Longitudinal Studies; Retrospective Studies; Weight Gain

This study investigated the hypoglycemia risk in people with type 2 diabetes (T2D) who initiated or switched to insulin glargine 300 U/mL (Gla-300) by stratifying them by age and renal function.. We examined data from 4621 people with T2D (1227 insulin-naïve and 3394 insulin-experienced) of the X-STAR study, a prospective, observational, 12-month study conducted from December 2015 to August 2018 in Japan. Participants were stratified by age (<65, 65 to <75, and ≥75 years) and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) (≥90, 60 to <90, 30 to <60, and <30 mL/min/1.73 m. No apparent increase in the proportion of people who experienced hypoglycemia was found in all subgroups. The proportions were 2.9-3.5% and 2.7-5.2% of insulin-naïve and insulin-experienced people, respectively, for age subgroups, and 2.4-4.7% and 4.6-4.8%, respectively, for eGFR subgroups. The result was similar for HbA1c levels below and at or above 7.0% in all age subgroups.. Our study found no apparent increase in the hypoglycemia risk in people with older age and renal impairment who were administered Gla-300. These results would provide reassuring information on Gla-300 use.

Topics: Aged; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Female; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine; Japan; Male; Middle Aged; Prospective Studies

In people with type 2 diabetes (T2D) requiring intensification beyond glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) and oral antihyperglycaemic drugs (OADs), switching to iGlarLixi was shown to be efficacious and well-tolerated in the LixiLan-G trial. This exploratory analysis of LixiLan-G assessed the efficacy and safety of switching to iGlarLixi versus continuing GLP-1 RA therapy, stratified by screening HbA1c level (≥7.0 to ≤7.5 %; >7.5 to ≤8.0 %; >8.0 to ≤9.0 % [≥53 to ≤58 mmol/mol; >58 to ≤64 mmol/mol; >64 to ≤75 mmol/mol]) and previous GLP-1 RA regimen at screening (once/twice daily or once weekly).. Endpoints for all subgroups included: change in HbA1c, achievement of HbA1c <7 % and hypoglycaemia events. Adverse events and changes in fasting plasma glucose (FPG), 2-hour postprandial plasma glucose (PPG), 2-hour PPG excursion and weight were analysed according to previous GLP-1 RA regimen.. Switching to iGlarLixi in all subgroups resulted in significantly greater reductions in HbA1c and proportions of participants reaching HbA1c <7 % (including with no documented hypoglycaemia) at Week 26 compared with continued GLP-1 RA treatment. Switching to iGlarLixi also led to significantly greater reductions in FPG, 2-hour PPG, and 2-hour PPG excursion, irrespective of previous GLP-1 RA regimen. Rates of hypoglycaemia were low, but slightly higher in those who switched to iGlarLixi for all subgroups. Modest weight gain was seen with iGlarLixi, irrespective of previous GLP-1 RA regimen.. Switching to iGlarLixi improved glycaemic control, regardless of screening HbA1c or previous GLP-1 RA type, offering a simple, efficacious and well-tolerated treatment intensification option for people with T2D inadequately controlled by GLP-1 RAs and OADs.

Topics: Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Combinations; Glucagon-Like Peptide 1; Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine; Peptides

Topics: Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine

Topics: Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine

Topics: Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine

Rosenstock J, Bajaj HS, Janež A, et al.

Topics: Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of insulin glargine 300 U/mL (Gla-300) versus insulin degludec 100 U/mL (IDeg-100) in predefined (

Topics: Adult; Aged; Blood Glucose; Child, Preschool; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Glycated Hemoglobin; Glycemic Control; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Infant; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting

Topics: Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine

In the DEVOTE and SWITCH 2 trials, insulin degludec 100 units/mL (degludec) was superior to insulin glargine 100 units/mL (glargine U100) with respect to the rates of severe (DEVOTE; across trial) and overall symptomatic (SWITCH 2; during the maintenance period of the trial) hypoglycaemia in individuals with type 2 diabetes. In this post hoc analysis, data from 7635 individuals from DEVOTE and 720 individuals from SWITCH 2 were analysed by subgroups of diabetes duration at baseline (<10, ≥10-<15, ≥15-<20 and ≥20 years) using prespecified models from both trials. There was a trend towards lower rates of hypoglycaemia with degludec versus glargine U100 across all diabetes duration subgroups in both trials, with the difference being statistically significant in some subgroups in DEVOTE and SWITCH 2. Overall, however, no significant interaction was observed between diabetes duration and treatment (DEVOTE interaction, P = .496; SWITCH 2 interaction, P = .144). Therefore, in this post hoc analysis of DEVOTE and SWITCH 2, diabetes duration did not appear to affect the reduction in rates of hypoglycaemia observed with degludec compared with glargine U100.

Topics: Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting

To determine whether the use of an inhaled insulin would improve HbA1c.. This study was performed in 20 type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) participants with HbA1c values ≥7.5 (58) to ≤11.5% (102 mmol/mol) on a variety of glucose-lowering regimens. Prandial Technosphere insulin (TI) was rapidly titrated based on a treatment algorithm using postprandial blood glucose to calculate premeal doses. A 2-week baseline period was followed by 12 weeks of active treatment with TI. The primary outcome was change in HbA1c. Secondary outcomes included glucose time in range (time in range: 70-180 mg/dL) obtained by a blinded continuous glucose monitoring during the baseline period and at the end of 12 weeks. Goals were to assess how to rapidly and safely initiate TI intensification, determine dosing requirements, and establish an effective dose range in uncontrolled T2DM.. Mean HbA1c decreased by -1.6% (-17 mmol/mol) from 9.0% (75 mmol/mol) at baseline to 7.4% (57 mmol/mol) at 12 weeks (P < .0001). Mean time in range increased from 42.2% to 65.7% (P < .0002). Mean prandial doses of TI were 18 or 19 units for all meals. Time below range was 1.1% baseline and 2.6% post treatment (P = .01).. Treatment with inhaled TI dosed using a simple algorithm improved glycemic control measured by both HbA1c and time in range, with low rates of hypoglycemia. These data add significantly to understanding TI in the management of T2DM patients for whom prandial insulin is a consideration.

Topics: Blood Glucose; Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Treatment Outcome

To evaluate and compare the efficacy of insulin degludec (IDeg) and insulin glargine 300 U/mL (Gla300) 6 months after switching from other basal insulins by assessing the changes in glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), body mass index (BMI), and insulin doses in patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes in a real-world clinical setting.. A total of 307 patients with type 1 diabetes and 294 patients with type 2 diabetes with HbA1c >7.0% were studied. Adjusted mean changes in HbA1c, BMI, and insulin doses were compared between IDeg (IDeg group) and Gla300 (Gla300 group) switchers. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were carried out to examine whether the IDeg or Gla300 group was associated with HbA1c or insulin dose reduction and BMI gain.. HbA1c was significantly decreased in both the IDeg and Gla300 groups. Adjusted mean changes in HbA1c (approximately -0.3% and -0.5% in type 1 diabetes and type 2 diabetes patients, respectively) and BMI were similar between both groups. The mean change in insulin dose was slightly larger for dose reduction in the IDeg group than in the Gla300 group. Multivariable logistic regression models showed that the IDeg group was significantly associated with insulin dose reduction after adjusting for basal insulin type, insulin dose, and number of basal insulin injections at baseline and other confounding factors.. The current study suggested that IDeg and Gla300 have similar effects in reducing HbA1c and gaining BMI after switching from other basal insulins in Japanese patients with type 1 diabetes and type 2 diabetes. IDeg selection was associated with insulin dose reduction.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Body Mass Index; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Substitution; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Insulins; Japan; Logistic Models; Male; Middle Aged; Retrospective Studies; Treatment Outcome

Insulin degludec/aspart (IDegAsp) and insulin glargine U300 (IGlarU300) have recently emerged as popular new-generation insulin analogues. The aim of this real-life study was to investigate the patient profiles in which IGlarU300 and IDegAsp were preferred and the insulin combinations after which each of them were mostly used and also to analyse the effect of these two insulin analogues on blood glucose regulation and hypoglycaemia.. The retrospective study included 174 patients that were switched from basal insulin, basal-bolus insulin, or premixed insulin to IGlarU300 or IDegAsp due to uncontrolled blood glucose levels or history of hypoglycaemia. Hypoglycaemia, body weight, body mass index (BMI), fasting plasma glucose (FPG) and HbA1c levels over 3-month periods were evaluated for each patient.. There were 84 and 90 patients in the IGlarU300 and IDegAsp groups, respectively. Body weight was similar in both groups. Baseline FPG and HbA1c levels in the IGlarU300 and IDegAsp groups were 9.0%, 175.5 mg/dL and 9.4%, 193.5 mg/dL, respectively. A significant decrease was found in FPG and HbA1c levels in both groups (138.5, 7.8 vs 141.5, 8.2; P < .001 for all). Moreover, a significant weight gain was observed in both groups (P < .05 for both). The prevalence of hypoglycaemia in both groups decreased significantly and consistently between months 1 and 9 (P < .001). At month 12, although this decrease continued in the IGlarU300 group (P = .013), no significant decrease was observed in the IDegAsp group (P = .057).. Both twice-daily IDegAsp ± bolus insulin and IGlarU300 basal bolus insulin therapies are effective and safe treatment modalities.

Topics: Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Aspart; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Retrospective Studies

Topics: Animals; Blood Glucose; Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Macaca mulatta

In the EDITION clinical trial programme, patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) receiving insulin glargine (IGlar) U300 required 10-15% more insulin than those receiving IGlar U100. This study sought to determine whether this difference was apparent in real-world practice.. In this observational, retrospective cohort study, electronic medical records in the Big-Pac® database (Real Life Data) relating to adult insulin-naïve patients with T2DM who initiated IGlar U100 or U300 treatment in Spain in 2016-2017 and remained on treatment for 18 months were selected. IGlar U100- and U300-treated patients were matched 1:1 (propensity score matching). The primary analysis compared changes from baseline in mean daily IGlar dose (U and U/kg) at 6 (± 2), 12 (± 2) and 18 (± 2) months between cohorts (paired t tests). Changes in glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) and weight were analysed descriptively.. The IGlar U100 and U300 cohorts included 556 matched pairs (46.9% female) with the following mean (standard deviation) values at baseline, respectively: age 63.6 (12.8) versus 63.7 (11.9) years; years since diagnosis 9.5 (1.4) versus 9.5 (1.3); HbA1c 8.8 (1.3) versus 8.7 (1.5) %; weight 84.6 (16.9) versus 84.7 (17.1) kg. Mean IGlar dose at baseline was 0.19 U/kg/day (both cohorts). Patients receiving IGlar U300 showed a greater increase from baseline in IGlar dose at 6, 12 and 18 months [mean dose (U/kg/day) 5.1%, 10.3% and 12.8% greater, respectively, in IGlar U300-treated patients]. Mean HbA1c was 8.1% in both cohorts at 18 months. Mean (SD) weight at 18 months with IGlar U100 and IGlar300 was 86.8 (17.0) kg and 85.0 (17.1) kg, respectively.. In real-world practice, insulin dose was significantly higher in IGlar U300-treated than U100-treated patients at 6, 12 and 18 months, with similar reductions in HbA1c. At equal IGlar price/unit in Spain, the increased dose requirements of IGlar U300 would result in higher costs.

Topics: Adult; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Male; Middle Aged; Retrospective Studies; Spain

The aims of this study were to characterize insulin-treated individuals aged ≥75 years with type 2 diabetes using basal insulin analogs (BIA) or regular insulins (human insulin (HI)/neutral protamine Hagedorn (NPH)) and to compare the benefits and risks.. The analysis was based on data from the DPV (Diabetes-Patienten-Verlaufsdokumentation) and DIVE (DIabetes Versorgungs-Evaluation) registries. To balance for confounders, propensity score matching for age, sex, diabetes duration, body mass index and hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) as covariates was performed.. Among 167 300 patients aged ≥75 years with type 2 diabetes (mean age, 80.3 years), 9601 subjects used insulin regimens with basal insulin (HI/NPH or BIA). Of these 8022 propensity score-matched subjects were identified. The mean diabetes duration was ~12 years and half of the patients were male. At the time of switch, patients provided with BIA experienced more dyslipidemia (89.3% vs 85.9%; p=0.002) and took a greater number of medications (4.3 vs 3.7; p<0.001) and depression was more prevalent (8.4% vs 6.5%; p=0.01). Aggregated to the most actual treatment year, BIA was associated with a higher percentage of patients using basal-supported oral therapy (42.6% vs 14.4%) and intensified conventional insulin therapy (44.3% vs 29.4%) and lower total daily insulin doses (0.24 IU/kg/day vs 0.30 IU/kg/day; p<0.001). The study did not reveal significant differences in efficacy (HbA1c 7.4% vs 7.3%; p=0.06), hospitalizations (0.7 vs 0.8 per patient-year (PY); p=0.15), length of stay (16.3 vs 16.1 days per PY; p=0.53), or rates of severe hypoglycemia (4.07 vs 4.40 per 100 PY; p=0.88), hypoglycemia with coma (3.64 vs 3.26 per 100 PY; p=0.88) and diabetic ketoacidosis (0.01 vs 0.03 per 100 PY; p=0.36).. BIA were used in more individually and patient-centered therapy regimens compared with HI/NPH in patients with a mean age of 80 years. Both groups were slightly overtreated with mean HbA1c <7.5%. The risk of severe hypoglycemia was low and independent of insulin type. Further analyses of elderly patients with type 2 diabetes are needed to provide evidence for best practice approaches in this age group.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Female; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine; Male; Registries; Risk Assessment

Treatment of diabetes mellitus (DM) in cats typically requires insulin injections q12h-q24h, posing a major compliance barrier for caregivers. Novel treatments enabling decreased injection frequency while maintaining safety are highly desirable. Insulin fused with feline immunoglobulin fragment crystallizable (Fc) has an ultra-long plasma half-life because it recycles through cells where it is protected from proteolysis.. Glycemic control can be achieved in diabetic cats with a recombinant fusion protein of a synthetic insulin and feline Fc (AKS-267c) administered SC weekly.. Five cats with spontaneous DM.. Cats previously controlled using insulin glargine q12h were transitioned to once-weekly injection of AKS-267c. The dose of AKS-267c was titrated weekly for 7 weeks based on continuous glucose monitoring. Clinical signs, body weight, fructosamine concentrations, and mean interstitial glucose concentrations (IG) were compared between baseline (week 0, on insulin glargine) and the last week of treatment. Data were assessed for normality and compared using parametric or nonparametric paired tests (as appropriate).. After 7 weeks of once-weekly injections, compared to baseline, there were no significant changes in clinical signs, body weight (median [range] gain, 0.1 kg [-0.1 to +0.7]; P = .5), fructosamine (-60 mmol/L [-338 to +206]; P = .6), and mean IG concentrations (change = -153 mmol/L [-179 to +29]; P = .3), and no adverse reactions were reported.. Successful control of clinical signs and maintenance of glycemia was achieved with this once-weekly novel insulin treatment. The efficacy and safety of this novel formulation should be further assessed in a large clinical trial.

Topics: Animals; Blood Glucose; Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring; Cat Diseases; Cats; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine

Topics: Algorithms; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin Infusion Systems; Insulin, Regular, Human

Day-to-day variability impacts safety of insulin therapy and the choice of monitoring strategies. Side-by-side comparisons of insulin formulations in diabetic dogs are scarce.. Insulin glargine 300 U/mL (IGla300) and insulin degludec (IDeg) are associated with less day-to-day glucose variability compared to porcine lente (PL) in diabetic dogs.. Seven intact male purpose-bred beagles with toxin-induced diabetes.. In this repeated measured study, PL, IGla300 and IDeg were compared in 2 phases: once-daily (q24h) and twice-daily (q12h) administration. Interstitial glucose concentrations (IG) were measured continuously throughout the study. For each formulation, maximal q24h dose was determined using the same algorithm (while avoiding hypoglycemia) and then maintained for 72 hours. In phase 2, 70% of the maximal q24h dose was administered q12h and maintained for 5 days regardless of hypoglycemia. Coefficient of variation (CV) and glycemic variability percentage (GVP) were calculated to determine day-to-day and intraday variability, respectively.. There was no difference in day-to-day variability between PL, IGla300, and IDeg in the q24h phase. In the q12h phase, day-to-day variability was higher (P = .01) for PL (CV = 42.6 ± 6.8%) compared to IGla300 and IDeg (CV = 30.1 ± 7.7%, 25.2 ± 7.0%, respectively). The GVP of PL was lower (P = .02) compared to IGla300. There was no difference between PL, IGla300 and IDeg in %time IG < 70 mg/dL.. Insulin degludec and IGla300 administered q12h were associated with lower day-to-day variability, which might be advantageous in minimizing monitoring requirements without increasing the risk of hypoglycemia.

Topics: Animals; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dog Diseases; Dogs; Glycated Hemoglobin; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Swine; Swine Diseases

Several basal insulins have recently come to market including follow-on insulin glargine (Basaglar®). Currently, there is no real-world data published on the implications of conversion to Basaglar on dosing or glycemic control.. To identify differences in basal insulin dosing requirements, hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), and incidence of hypoglycemia or weight gain when converting a patient to Basaglar from another basal insulin.. Single-center, retrospective chart review at an academic medical center. All patients prescribed Basaglar between December 15, 2016, and August 31, 2017 were included for review if converted from another basal insulin.. Difference in basal insulin requirements in both units/d and units/kilogram (kg)/d after conversion to Basaglar.. Change in HbA1c and weight.. Mean basal insulin dose was 38.4 ± 26.3 units/d pre-conversion and 40.5 ± 29.8 units/d post-conversion (P = .031). Results were significant for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM; pre-conversion basal dose 34.6 ± 24.3 units/d; post-conversion basal dose 37.6± 29.0 units/d; P = .009). Weight-based dosing changed from 0.37 ± 0.25 units/kg/d pre-conversion to 0.39 ± 0.29 units/kg/d post-conversion (P = .056) and was significant for patients with T2DM (P = .040). A nonsignificant decrease in HbA1c was seen (-0.14% ± 1.24%; P = .142). There was no difference seen in weight (111.6 ± 46.3 kg vs 111.7 ± 46.9 kg; P = .662).. Patients with diabetes require similar basal insulin doses upon conversion to Basaglar. Clinicians should monitor blood glucose closely during basal insulin transition.

Topics: Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Retrospective Studies; Treatment Outcome

To determine whether basal insulin analogs reduce the rate of composite neonatal morbidity compared with neutral protamine Hagedorn (NPH) in women with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).. This was a retrospective cohort study of women with T2DM and singleton pregnancy at a single tertiary center. Primary outcome was a composite neonatal morbidity of any of the following: shoulder dystocia, large for gestational age, neonatal intensive care unit admission, neonatal hypoglycemia, or respiratory distress syndrome. Secondary outcomes were rates of maternal hypoglycemic events, hypertensive disorders, preterm birth, and primary cesarean delivery. Adjusted relative risk (aRR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated.. Of 233 women with T2DM that met the inclusion criteria, 114 (49%) were treated with basal insulin analogs and 119 (51%) with NPH. The rate of composite neonatal morbidity was similar between groups (73 vs. 60%; aRR: 1.18; 95% CI: 0.92-1.51). There were no differences in the rates of maternal adverse outcomes between the groups. Basal insulin analog was associated with a lower rate of primary cesarean delivery as compared with NPH (21 vs. 36%; aRR: 0.44; 95% CI: 0.25-0.78).. Among pregnant women with T2DM managed with either basal or NPH insulin regimen, the rates of composite neonatal morbidity and maternal complications were similar.

Topics: Adult; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Female; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Infant, Newborn; Infant, Newborn, Diseases; Insulin Detemir; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Isophane; Logistic Models; Pregnancy; Pregnancy in Diabetics; Pregnancy Outcome; Premature Birth; Retrospective Studies; Young Adult

Topics: Aged; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Health Care Costs; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Male; Middle Aged; Peptides; Weight Gain

To examine the relationship between baseline fasting C-peptide (FCP) and outcomes in insulin-naïve people with type 2 diabetes initiating basal insulin glargine 100 U/mL (Gla-100).. Post hoc pooled analysis of nine randomized, treat-to-target trials in patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled on oral antihyperglycaemic drugs initiating once-daily Gla-100. Participants (n = 2165) were stratified at baseline according to FCP (≤0.40, >0.40-1.20, >1.20-2.00, >2.00 nmol/L). Glycaemic control, body weight, insulin dose and hypoglycaemia were determined at 24 weeks.. At baseline low FCP levels were associated with longer known diabetes duration, lower body mass index and higher fasting plasma glucose (FPG). Following Gla-100 introduction, the mean HbA1c reduction at week 24 was similar in all four FCP groups, albeit fewer people in the lowest FCP group achieved HbA1c <7.0% versus FCP groups >0.40 nmol/L. By contrast, FPG reduction and proportion reaching FPG ≤5.6 mmol/L were greatest in the lowest FCP group, diminishing at higher FCP levels. Gla-100 dose at week 24 was lowest in the ≤0.40 nmol/L FCP group and highest in the >1.20 nmol/L FCP group. Incidence and event rate of overall, nocturnal and severe hypoglycaemia were higher at week 24 in groups with lower FCP levels. In multivariable regression analysis baseline FCP, concomitant sulphonylurea use and endpoint HbA1c were strong predictors of hypoglycaemia.. FCP levels identified patients with type 2 diabetes experiencing different responses to basal insulin Gla-100. A low FCP identifies a markedly insulin-deficient, insulin-sensitive subgroup/phenotype with an enhanced risk of hypoglycaemia, which requires a low initial basal insulin dose, cautious titration and earlier addition of prandial glucose-lowering therapy.

Topics: Biomarkers; C-Peptide; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Therapy, Combination; Fasting; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine

Topics: Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine; Lipids; Liraglutide; Metformin; Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease; Sitagliptin Phosphate

Topics: Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Humans; Insulin Glargine; Lipids; Liraglutide; Metformin; Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease; Sitagliptin Phosphate

Real-world evidence of the safety of insulin degludec compared with insulin glargine U100 is sparse. This study sought to investigate the risk of major cardiovascular events, severe hypoglycaemia, and all-cause mortality after initiation of degludec or glargine U100 in the population of Denmark.. All Danish people with diabetes initiating treatment on degludec (n=5159) or glargine (n=4041) in 2016 to 2017 were included in the study. The effect of insulin treatment on the endpoints of major cardiovascular events, severe hypoglycaemia, and all-cause mortality was analysed with Cox proportional hazard models. The models were adjusted for age, sex, diabetes duration, diabetes type, highest completed education, and annual income. The model of severe hypoglycaemia was also adjusted for severe hypoglycaemia prior to baseline. The model of mortality was also adjusted for history of alcohol abuse, use of antidepressants, use of opioids, and use of anxiolytics. Lastly, the models of major cardiovascular events and mortality were also adjusted for Charlson comorbidity index.. Use of degludec resulted in an almost twofold decrease in risk of death (hazard rate [HR]: 0.54, 95% CI: 0.44-0.65) compared with use of glargine. No statistically significant risk changes were found for major cardiovascular events (HR: 0.86, 95% CI: 0.62-1.19) and severe hypoglycaemia (HR: 1.13, 95% CI: 0.66-1.93). The proportion of cause of death due to malignant neoplasm of pancreas was almost doubled for glargine compared with degludec.. These results indicate that insulin degludec has a safer profile with respect to all-cause mortality as compared with insulin glargine U100.

Topics: Aged; Biomarkers; Blood Glucose; Cardiovascular Diseases; Cohort Studies; Denmark; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Incidence; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Prognosis; Risk Factors; Survival Rate

To assess whether people with type 2 diabetes transferring from higher basal insulin doses (> 20 units) to a starting dose of 16 units of insulin degludec/liraglutide (IDegLira) benefit from IDegLira with/without transient loss of glycaemic control.. Regardless of pre-trial insulin dose, IDegLira resulted in improved clinical outcomes, even in participants transferring from 40-50 units of basal insulin, despite a transient (< 4 weeks), clinically non-relevant, elevation in pre-breakfast SMBG. (Clinical Trial Registry Number NCT01952145 and NCT02420262).

Topics: Aged; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Combinations; Drug Substitution; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Glycemic Control; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Liraglutide; Male; Middle Aged; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Treatment Outcome

This study assessed the cost-effectiveness of long-acting insulin analogues (LAIAs) vs intermediate/long-acting human insulin (ILAHI) for patients with type 1 diabetes (T1D) in real-world clinical practice.. Individual-level analyses were conducted within a longitudinal population-based cohort of 540 propensity score-matched T1D patients (LAIAs, n = 270; ILAHI, n = 270) with over 10 years of follow-up using Taiwan's National Health Insurance Research Database, 2004-2013, from third-party payer and healthcare sector perspectives. The study outcomes included the number needed to treat (NNT) to prevent one case of clinical events (eg, hypoglycaemia, diabetes-related complications), medical costs, and cost per case of events prevented. Cost estimates are presented in 2013 British pounds (GBP, £).. The NNTs using LAIAs vs ILAHI to avoid one case of hypoglycaemia requiring medical assistance, outpatient hypoglycaemia and any diabetes-related complications were 12, 9 and 10 for mean follow-up periods of 5.84, 6.02 and 3.62 years, respectively. From third-party payer and healthcare sector perspectives, using LAIAs instead of ILAHI saved GBP6924-GBP7116 per case of hypoglycaemia requiring medical assistance prevented, GBP5346-GBP5508 per case of outpatient hypoglycaemia prevented, and GBP3570-GBP3680 per case of any diabetes-related complications prevented. Sensitivity analyses considering sampling uncertainty showed that using LAIAs over ILAHI yields at least a 76% probability of cost-saving for avoiding one case of hypoglycaemia requiring medical assistance, outpatient hypoglycaemia or any diabetes-related complications.. This real-world evidence reveals that compared with ILAHI, the greater pharmaceutical costs associated with LAIAs for patients with T1D could be substantially offset by savings from averted hypoglycaemia or diabetes-related complications.

Topics: Cost-Benefit Analysis; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting

Topics: Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Exenatide; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine; Life Style; Metformin; Venoms

To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of initiating basal insulin-supported oral therapy (BOT) with insulin glargine 300 U/mL (Gla-300) in patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled on oral antidiabetic drugs (OADs).. This non-interventional, multi-centre, prospective 52-week study, conducted in Germany and Switzerland, documented patients with type 2 diabetes with an HbA1c of between 7.5% and 10.0%, currently treated with OADs, after the physician had decided to start a BOT regimen with Gla-300. The primary endpoint was the rate of achievement of the individualized predefined HbA1c target.. Of 1748 patients included, 1153 comprised the full analysis set, of whom 721 completed documentation of 12 months of Gla-300 treatment. Twelve months after starting Gla-300, 49.9% achieved their individualized HbA1c target, and 61.1% achieved either their HbA1c target or a fasting plasma glucose (FPG) of ≤110 mg/dL. Mean HbA1c decreased by -1.22% ± 1.05% to 7.28% ± 0.92% and mean FPG by -51.5 (±48.63) mg/dl to 132.9 ± 33.0 mg/dL. Median duration of HbA1c target achievement was 341 days and probability to remain on target after 6 months was 81%. Hypoglycaemia incidence and rates remained low after 12 months of Gla-300 treatment; no severe or severe nocturnal hypoglycaemia was observed. Body weight remained unchanged.. Starting a BOT regimen with Gla-300 allowed about 60% of 721 German and Swiss patients with inadequately controlled type 2 diabetes to achieve glycaemic control within 12 months in daily clinical practice. Glycaemic control was achieved without weight gain or increased risk of nocturnal or severe hypoglycaemia.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Germany; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Prospective Studies

Treat-to-target, randomized controlled trials have confirmed lower rates of hypoglycaemia at equivalent glycaemic control with insulin degludec (degludec) versus insulin glargine 100 units/mL (glargine U100) in patients with type 1 (T1D) or type 2 diabetes (T2D). Treat-to-target trials are designed to enable comparisons of safety and tolerability at a similar HbA1c level. In this post hoc analysis of the SWITCH 1 and 2 trials, we utilised a patient-level modelling approach to compare how glycaemic control might differ between basal insulins at a similar rate of hypoglycaemia.. Data for HbA1c and symptomatic hypoglycaemia from the SWITCH 1 and SWITCH 2 trials were analyzed separately for patients with type 1 diabetes and type 2 diabetes, respectively. The association between the individual patient-level risk of hypoglycaemia and HbA1c was investigated using a Poisson regression model and used to estimate potential differences in glycaemic control with degludec versus glargine U100, at the same rate of hypoglycaemia.. Our findings suggest that patients in clinical practice may be able to achieve lower glycaemia targets with degludec versus glargine U100, before incurring an equivalent risk of hypoglycaemia.

Topics: Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting

Topics: Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Female; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Reproducibility of Results

To assess whether initiation of insulin glargine (glargine), compared with initiation of NPH or insulin detemir (detemir), was associated with an increased risk of breast cancer in women with diabetes.. This was a retrospective new-user cohort study of female Medicare beneficiaries aged ≥65 years initiating glargine (203,159), detemir (67,012), or NPH (47,388) from September 2006 to September 2015, with follow-up through May 2017. Weighted Cox proportional hazards regression was used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% CIs for incidence of breast cancer according to ever use, cumulative duration of use, cumulative dose of insulin, length of follow-up time, and a combination of dose and length of follow-up time.. Ever use of glargine was not associated with an increased risk of breast cancer compared with NPH (HR 0.97; 95% CI 0.88-1.06) or detemir (HR 0.98; 95% CI 0.92-1.05). No increased risk was seen with glargine use compared with either NPH or detemir by duration of insulin use, length of follow-up, or cumulative dose of insulin. No increased risk of breast cancer was observed in medium- or high-dose glargine users compared with low-dose users.. Overall, glargine use was not associated with an increased risk of breast cancer compared with NPH or detemir in female Medicare beneficiaries.

Topics: Age Factors; Age of Onset; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Breast Neoplasms; Cohort Studies; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Female; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Incidence; Insulin Detemir; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Isophane; Medicare; Retrospective Studies; United States

To undertake a post-hoc analysis, utilizing a hypoglycaemia risk score based on DEVOTE trial data, to investigate if a high risk of severe hypoglycaemia was associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular events, and whether reduced rates of severe hypoglycaemia in patients identified as having the highest risk affected the risk of cardiovascular outcomes.. The DEVOTE population was divided into quartiles according to patients' individual hypoglycaemia risk scores. For each quartile, the observed incidence and rate of severe hypoglycaemia, major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE) and all-cause mortality were determined to investigate whether those with the highest risk of hypoglycaemia were also at the greatest risk of MACE and all-cause mortality. In addition, treatment differences within each risk quartile [insulin degludec (degludec) vs. insulin glargine 100 units/mL (glargine U100)] in terms of severe hypoglycaemia, MACE and all-cause mortality were investigated.. Patients with the highest risk scores had the highest rates of severe hypoglycaemia, MACE and all-cause mortality. Treatment ratios between degludec and glargine U100 in the highest risk quartile were 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.56 (0.39; 0.80) (severe hypoglycaemia), 95% CI 0.76 (0.58; 0.99) (MACE) and 95% CI 0.77 (0.55; 1.07) (all-cause mortality).. The risk score demonstrated that a high risk of severe hypoglycaemia was associated with a high incidence of MACE and all-cause mortality and that, in this high-risk group, those treated with degludec had a lower incidence of MACE. These observations support the hypothesis that hypoglycaemia is a risk factor for cardiovascular events.

Topics: Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting

The relationship between baseline fasting C-peptide (FCP) and glucose control was examined in insulin-naïve people with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled with oral antihyperglycaemic drugs commencing basal insulin glargine 300 U/mL (Gla-300) or 100 U/mL (Gla-100) in the absence of sulfonylurea/glinides. Participants with FCP measurement from the EDITION 3 trial (n = 867) were stratified according to baseline FCP (≤0.40, >0.40-1.20, >1.20 nmol/L); 11.0%, 70.9% and 18.1% contributed to each group. Glycaemic control, body weight, insulin dose and hypoglycaemia were determined at 26 weeks. Glycaemic control (HbA1c, FPG) at 26 weeks was similar in each FCP group between insulins. However, end-of-study insulin dose was greater with higher FCP for both insulins. More people with lower baseline FCP experienced hypoglycaemia with both insulins, but with numerically lower incidence for Gla-300 versus Gla-100 across all FCP groups for all definitions (time periods and levels) of hypoglycaemia. This suggests that Gla-300 might be particularly advantageous for people who are at higher risk of hypoglycaemia.

Topics: Blood Glucose; C-Peptide; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Therapy, Combination; Fasting; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine

Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is a common and heterogeneous disease. Using advanced analytic approaches to explore real-world data may identify different disease characteristics, responses to treatment and progression patterns. Insulin glargine 300 units/mL (Gla-300) is a second-generation basal insulin analogue with preserved glucose-lowering efficacy but reduced risk of hypoglycaemia. The purpose of the REALI pooled analysis described in this paper is to advance the understanding of the effectiveness and real-world safety of Gla-300 based on a large European patient database of postmarketing interventional and observational studies.. In the current round of pooling, REALI will include data from up to 10 000 subjects with diabetes mellitus (mostly T2DM) from 20 European countries. Outcomes of interest include change from baseline to week 24 in haemoglobin A. The proposed study does not involve collection of primary data. Moreover, all individual study protocols were approved by independent local ethics committees, and all study participants provided written informed consent. Furthermore, patient data is deidentified before inclusion in the REALI database. Hence, there is no requirement for ethical approval. Results will be disseminated via peer-reviewed publications and presentations at international congresses as data are analysed.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Blood Glucose; Data Analysis; Databases, Factual; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Disease Progression; Europe; Fasting; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine; Middle Aged; Multivariate Analysis; Observational Studies as Topic; Treatment Outcome

ORION evaluated the safety and effectiveness of Gla-300 in insulin-treated people with T2DM before, during and after Ramadan, in a real-world setting.. This prospective, observational study across 11 countries included participants with T2DM treated with Gla-300 in pre-Ramadan, Ramadan and post-Ramadan periods. The primary endpoint was the percentage of participants experiencing ≥1 event of severe and/or symptomatic documented hypoglycaemia with self-monitored plasma glucose (SMPG) ≤70 mg/dL during Ramadan. Secondary endpoints included change in HbA. In ORION, people with T2DM treated with Gla-300 who fasted during Ramadan had a low risk of severe/symptomatic hypoglycaemia and improved glycaemic control.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Fasting; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Incidence; Insulin Glargine; Islam; Male; Middle Aged; Religion and Medicine; Treatment Outcome

To present the results of metabolic control in patients with type 2 Diabetes Mellitus from a private clinic in Northern Mexico.. This cross-sectional study used retrospective data obtained from electronic records from a private outpatient clinic at the end of 2018. Inclusion criteria were a diagnosis of T2DM and age ≥ 18 years. Baseline characteristics (age, gender, drug use) were reported. The achievement of glycated hemoglobin goals was established as <7%.. A total of 3820 patients were evaluated. Their mean age was 59.86 years (+/-15.01). Of the population, 46.72% were men, and 53.28% were women. Glycated hemoglobin goals were adequate in 1872 (54%) patients. There were 3247 patients (85%) treated with oral medications, of which 1948 (60%) reported glycated hemoglobin less than 7%. Insulin use was reported in 573 (15%) patients, with 115 (20%) reporting glycated hemoglobin less than 7%. The most frequently used basal insulin was glargine in 401 (70%) patients.. Our findings are clearly higher than the control rate reported by our national health surveys of 25% with glycated hemoglobin < 7%, but similar to that reported in other countries. The most commonly used therapeutic scheme was the combination of oral hypoglycemic agents. The percentage of cases that include insulin in their treatment was lower. Clinical inertia to insulin initiation and intensification has been defined as an important cause of this problem.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Cross-Sectional Studies; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Male; Mexico; Middle Aged; Retrospective Studies

To explore the glucagon-like peptide-1 analogue liraglutide in the hospital setting in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and acute coronary syndrome and to evaluate the safety and efficacy and its impact on hospitalization and short-term glycemic variability (GV).. A 12-week, open-label, prospective, randomized pilot clinical study with parallel groups that compared liraglutide (group 1) with glargine (group 2) and its impact on glycemic control and GV.. Thirteen patients were included. During hospitalization, mean glucose was 164.75 mg/dL (standard deviation [SD] 19.94) in group 1 and 166.69 mg/dL (38.22) in group 2. GV determined by CV and SD was 20.98 (7.68) vs. 25.48 (7.19) and 34.37 (13.05) vs. 43.56 (19.53) in groups 1 and 2, respectively. Group 1 prandial insulin requirements during hospitalization were lower compared with group 2. Follow-up A1c in group 1 was 6.9% (-1.51%) and 6.5% in group 2 (-1.27). GV after discharge and hypoglycemia were lower in group 1 compared with group 2.. Liraglutide seems to reduce GV in the acute phase of acute coronary syndrome, and patients achieved optimal control with a low incidence of hypoglycemia. These results support the need to explore liraglutide in a larger multicenter trial.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adult; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Glycemic Index; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Liraglutide; Male; Metformin; Middle Aged; Pilot Projects; Random Allocation; Spain

Topics: Benzhydryl Compounds; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Glucosides; Humans; Insulin Glargine; Metformin

Randomized controlled trials and real-world data from the USA have shown similar glycemic control with insulin glargine 300 U/ml (Gla-300) and insulin glargine 100 U/ml (Gla-100) and reduced hypoglycemia risk with Gla-300. This real-world study describes the efficacy and safety of Gla-300 and Gla-100 in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) in France, Spain, and Germany.. This retrospective chart review analysis used anonymized data for adults with T2D switching basal insulin analog (BIA) therapy to Gla-300 or Gla-100, or insulin-naïve patients initiating Gla-300 or Gla-100. Outcomes included change from baseline to 6-month follow-up in glycated hemoglobin A1c (A1C), total and severe hypoglycemia incidences and events, insulin dose, and reasons for BIA choice.. Six hundred sixty-five physicians (33.8% Spain, 31.7% France, 34.4% Germany) provided chart data for patients switching to Gla-300 (n = 679) or Gla-100 (n = 429) or initiating Gla-300 (n = 719) or Gla-100 (n = 711). After adjustment for baseline characteristics, A1C reductions from baseline were similar for patients switching to Gla-300 or Gla-100 (- 0.87% vs. - 0.93%; p = 0.326) while those switched to Gla-300 vs. Gla-100 had a significantly greater mean reduction in hypoglycemic events (- 1.29 vs. - 0.81 events during 6 months; p = 0.012). Mean insulin doses after titration were 0.43 ± 0.36 and 0.40 ± 0.28 U/kg in Gla-300 and Gla-100 switchers, respectively. Factors that significantly influenced BIA choice included a lower risk of hypoglycemia (for Gla-300) and physician familiarity (for Gla-100). Outcomes for insulin-naïve patients were broadly similar to those of switchers.. In this real-world European study, patients with T2D who switched therapy to Gla-300 or Gla-100 had improved glycemic control and reduced hypoglycemia at 6 months, with significant hypoglycemia advantages with Gla-300.

Topics: Aged; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Female; France; Germany; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Incidence; Insulin Glargine; Male; Middle Aged; Retrospective Studies; Spain; Treatment Outcome

With limited real-world insulin glargine 300 unit/mL (Gla-300) data available, we assessed the effectiveness and safety of Gla-300 in the Japanese type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) population.. X-STAR was a prospective, observational, 12-month post-marketing study of Gla-300 from 2015 to 2018. T2DM patients received Gla-300 as the first insulin (insulin-naïve) or after treatment with another type of insulin (insulin-experienced).. We identified 1,227 insulin-naïve and 3,394 insulin-experienced patients. Insulin-naïve group increased the Gla-300 starting dose by 2.80 U/day during 12 months (7.49 to 10.29 U/day). Mean HbA1c reduced by 1.99% (9.82 to 7.83%), and 28.4% showed HbA1c < 7.0%. Insulin-experienced group had a baseline insulin dose of 14.86 U/day, which increased by 0.73 U/day. Mean HbA1c reduced by 0.18% (7.99 to 7.81%), and 24.6% showed HbA1c < 7.0%. Adverse drug reactions occurred in 3.42% (insulin-naïve) and 4.45% (insulin-experienced); symptomatic hypoglycemia (2.93% and 3.86%, respectively) was the most common in both groups.. Gla-300, in clinical practice, provides an effective and safe therapy as HbA1c was reduced/maintained in insulin-naïve/experienced Japanese T2DM patients without new safety signal. This study provides insights into the current Japanese clinical practices where insulin use is delayed and conservative despite relatively low HbA1c achievement.

Topics: Aged; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Japan; Male; Middle Aged; Product Surveillance, Postmarketing; Prospective Studies; Treatment Outcome

To evaluate the economic impact of using 2nd generation basal insulin analogs, Glargine 300 Units/ml (Gla-300) vs Degludec 100 Units/ml (IDeg-100), in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D).. An economic analysis was conducted using findings from the BRIGHT study (the first controlled, head-to-head study comparing Gla-300 vs IDeg-100), and costs for the Italian National Healthcare Service (NHS). A cost-minimization analysis (CMA) and a budget impact analysis (BIA) were conducted. Only pharmacological costs were included in the analysis. The CMA estimated patient treatment costs at 24 weeks and 1 year; the BIA assessed the economic impact of treating the overall Italian population of T2D insulin-naïve patients, who initiated insulin treatment during the period September 2017-August 2018 (N = 55 318). In the BIA, four different scenarios were compared: i) all patients receive IDeg-100 (Scenario A); ii) 61% of patients receive Gla-300, 39% IDeg-100 (Scenario B); iii) 80% of patients receive Gla-300, 20% IDeg-100 (Scenario C); iv) all patients treated with Gla-300 (Scenario D). The average treatment costs per patient were lower with Gla-300 vs IDeg-100 (at 24 weeks: €129 vs €161; at 1 year: €324 vs €409, respectively). Results of the BIA showed that comparing Scenario D vs Scenario A, total savings would amount to €1.76 million at 24 weeks, €4.73 million at 1 year, €5.53 million at 2 years.. A larger use of Gla-300 vs IDeg-100 for the treatment of T2D patients would lead to a relevant reduction of therapy costs in Italy.

Topics: Biomarkers; Blood Glucose; Budgets; Cost Savings; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Costs; Glycemic Control; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Italy; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Treatment Outcome

The ability to differentiate patient populations with type 2 diabetes at high risk of severe hypoglycaemia could impact clinical decision making. The aim of this study was to develop a risk score, using patient characteristics, that could differentiate between populations with higher and lower 2-year risk of severe hypoglycaemia among individuals at increased risk of cardiovascular disease.. Two models were developed for the risk score based on data from the DEVOTE cardiovascular outcomes trials. The first, a data-driven machine-learning model, used stepwise regression with bidirectional elimination to identify risk factors for severe hypoglycaemia. The second, a risk score based on known clinical risk factors accessible in clinical practice identified from the data-driven model, included: insulin treatment regimen; diabetes duration; sex; age; and glycated haemoglobin, all at baseline. Both the data-driven model and simple risk score were evaluated for discrimination, calibration and generalizability using data from DEVOTE, and were validated against the external LEADER cardiovascular outcomes trial dataset.. Both the data-driven model and the simple risk score discriminated between patients at higher and lower hypoglycaemia risk, and performed similarly well based on the time-dependent area under the curve index (0.63 and 0.66, respectively) over a 2-year time horizon.. Both the data-driven model and the simple hypoglycaemia risk score were able to discriminate between patients at higher and lower risk of severe hypoglycaemia, the latter doing so using easily accessible clinical data. The implementation of such a tool (http://www.hyporiskscore.com/) may facilitate improved recognition of, and education about, severe hypoglycaemia risk, potentially improving patient care.

Topics: Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine; Risk Factors

To evaluate insulin treatment satisfaction, safety, and effectiveness of biosimilar insulin glargine (GLY) in real-world clinical practice for Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) who switched from originator insulin glargine (100 U/mL) or insulin degludec treatment to GLY treatment.. The Insulin Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (ITSQ) was used to assess treatment satisfaction in a subgroup analysis of a post-marketing safety study. Hypoglycemia incidence rates and blood glucose control are also reported during the 12-month observation period for GLY-switched patients.. Of 1104 patients with T2DM enrolled to participate, 565 patients switched from either insulin glargine U100/mL (. Treatment satisfaction does not change significantly in Japanese patients with T2DM who switch to GLY from the reference product or from insulin degludec. Safety and effectiveness over a 12-month period were similar in GLY-treated patients who switched from either insulin glargine or insulin degludec.. Not applicable.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Biosimilar Pharmaceuticals; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Incidence; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Middle Aged; Patient Satisfaction; Product Surveillance, Postmarketing; Prospective Studies; Surveys and Questionnaires

The progressive nature of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) renders the shifting of patients from oral drugs to insulin therapy an inevitability in most patients especially in those with long duration of diabetes. At the turn of the last millennium, neutral protamine Hagedorn (NPH) insulin was still the only long-acting insulin available for people with diabetes. The advent of the first truly long-acting basal insulin, i.e. insulin glargine 100 U/mL (Gla-100) brought to the table a remarkably long duration of action and a very minimal risk of hypoglycemia by due to less pronounced peaks in their action profile. Further, in trying to achieve fasting normoglycemia, Gla-100 has demonstrated remarkably more holistic glucose-lowering efficacy in several pivotal trials compared to other insulin formulations, such as premixed insulin and coformulations-apart from NPH insulin. This article delineates clinical data on the effectiveness of Gla-100 vs. other insulin formulations in the context of T2DM.

Topics: Blood Glucose; Clinical Trials as Topic; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting

Early insulin initiation benefits people with diabetes by inducing a rapid and sustained glycemic control along with preventing the onset of adverse legacy effects early in the disease course. This has an over-arching effect as it could possibly modify the disease course and prevent the development of vascular complications, as has been attested to in landmark studies like the UKPDS and GRACE. Insulin glargine 100 U/mL (Gla-100) has been extensively studied under various scenarios as the initial insulin administered early in T2DM disease course, registering significant glycemic and vascular benefits over the standard of care. By virtue of its ease of use and better safety profile, basal insulin like Gla-100 has been recommended by various international and Indian guidelines as the go-to initial insulin in people with diabetes. Further, the ability to personalize the initiating dose basis one's HbA1c and weight is an additional feature that contributes to the scientific merit of initiating with basal insulin like Gla-100. However, early insulin initiation is mostly delayed owing to 'clinical inertia,' thereby causing an evitable glycemic burden. Therefore, physicians managing diabetes must aim to increase acceptance, persistence, and adherence to insulin therapy by focusing on the safety, simplicity, and convenience of therapies.

Topics: Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine

Owing to the progressive nature of the disease, patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) eventually require adjustment or titration of insulin doses to achieve the desired glycemic control. Titration inertia, or the inability to dose-titrate, is one of the key barriers to optimized insulin therapy and is common in Asian countries such as India. Simple and effective titration algorithms involving the use of basal insulin, which has the lowest hypoglycemia risk, that can be individualized by physicians and easily followed by patients aid in tackling titration inertia. In this context, insulin glargine 100 U/mL (Gla-100) appears to be the ideal insulin to overcome titration inertia, owing to its low risk of hypoglycemia and effective glycemic control. Different guidelines recommend the use of basal insulin, such as Gla-100, and encourage a patient-centric approach for dose titration. Although the effective implementation of the patient-centric approach in India is challenging, it is nevertheless achievable.

Topics: Asia; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; India; Insulin Glargine

The inadequate control of postprandial glucose (PPG) excursions, are linked in some studies with cardiovascular disease. Even though basal insulins, such as insulin glargine 100 U/mL (Gla-100), maintain overall glycemic control, effective PPG control eventually requires intensification of therapy by adding prandial insulins. Compared to conventional basal-bolus or premixed approaches, a stepwise basal-plus or basal-prandial intensification regimen involving the addition of one, two, or three prandial insulins to basal therapy such as Gla-100, has received much attention in recent times. This intensification approach is comparable to other conventional approaches in terms of glycemic control, and offers the additional advantages of fewer hypoglycemic events, personalization of therapy, and a simple self-management algorithm for titration. Owing to such benefits, recent guidelines recommend its use over other approaches for initiating intensification. It is preferred by both physicians and patients and is a better alternative to immediately embarking on a full basal-bolus regimen or introducing premixed insulin preparations for intensification of therapy.

Topics: Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulins

Both hyperglycemia and hypoglycemia in hospitalized patients represent a major concern as they are associated with adverse outcomes-including increased rates of infection, longer hospital stay, and even death. Insulin therapy is the mainstay in the management of inpatient hyperglycemia. The traditional approach of sliding scale insulin (SSI) therapy for the temporary management of blood glucose levels in hospitalized patients, has now given way to basal-bolus insulin (BBI) therapy. This is owing to the BBI affording a better glycemic control in non-critical hospital settings as observed in multiple clinical studies using insulin glargine 100 U/mL (Gla-100) as the basal component. Furthermore, a string of clinical studies has also attested to Gla-100 being used effectively even in patients on corticosteroids, enteral or parenteral nutrition, and in perioperative settings. Hence, overall, the existing evidence would point to the growing role of BBI regimens centering around basal insulin like Gla-100 as an effective option with low safety concerns for insulin therapy in both hospitalized and out-patient settings in the treatment of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).

Topics: Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Humans; Hyperglycemia; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine

DPP-4 inhibitors (DPP-4i) have been shown to be effective for the management of inpatient diabetes. We report pooled data from 3 prospective studies using DPP-4i in general medicine and surgery patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D).. We combined data from 3 randomized studies comparing DPP-4i alone or in combination with basal insulin or a basal-bolus insulin regimen. Medicine (n = 266) and surgery (n = 319) patients admitted with a blood glucose (BG) between 140 and 400 mg/dL, treated with diet, oral agents, or low-dose insulin therapy were included. Patients received DPP-4i alone (n = 144), DPP-4i plus basal insulin (n = 158) or basal-bolus regimen (n = 283). All groups received correctional doses with rapid-acting insulin for BG >140 mg/dL. The primary endpoint was differences in mean daily BG between groups. Secondary endpoints included differences in hypoglycemia and hospital complications.. There were no differences in mean hospital daily BG among patients treated with DPP-4i alone (170 ± 37 mg/dL), DPP-4i plus basal (172 ± 42 mg/dL), or basalbolus (172 ± 43 mg/dL), P = .94; or in the percentage of BG readings within target of 70 to 180 mg/dL (63 ± 32%, 60 ± 31%, and 64 ± 28%, respectively; P = .42). There were no differences in length of stay or complications, but hypoglycemia was less common with DPP-4i alone (2%) compared to DPP-4i plus basal (9%) and basal-bolus (10%); P = .004.. Treatment with DPP-4i alone or in combination with basal insulin is effective and results in a lower incidence of hypoglycemia compared to a basal-bolus insulin regimen in general medicine and surgery patients with T2D.. BG = blood glucose; BMI = body mass index; CI = confidence interval; DPP-4i = dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors; HbA1c = hemoglobin A1c; OR = odds ratio; T2D = type 2 diabetes.

Topics: Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Medicine; Prospective Studies

The cardiovascular outcomes of insulin detemir in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) after acute coronary syndrome (ACS) or acute ischemic stroke (AIS) are unclear. The aim of our real-life cohort study was to evaluate the cardiovascular outcomes of insulin detemir (IDet) versus insulin glargine (IGlar) in T2DM patients after ACS or AIS.. A retrospective cohort study was conducted between June 1, 2005, and December 31, 2013, utilizing the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database. A total of 3,129 ACS or AIS patients were eligible for the analysis. Clinical outcomes were evaluated by comparing 1,043 subjects receiving IDet with 2,086 propensity score-matched subjects who received IGlar. The primary composite outcome included cardiovascular (CV) death, nonfatal myocardial infarction (MI) and nonfatal stroke.. The primary composite outcome occurred in 322 patients (30.9%) in the IDet group and 604 patients (29.0%) in the IGlar group (hazard ratio [HR], 1.12; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.95 to 1.32) with a mean follow-up of 2.4 years. No significant differences were observed for CV death (HR, 1.09; 95% CI, 0.86 to 1.38), nonfatal MI (HR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.66 to 1.19), and nonfatal stroke (HR, 1.15; 95% CI, 0.97 to 1.35). There were similar risks of all-cause mortality, hospitalization for heart failure and revascularization between the IDet group and the IGlar group (P = .647, .115, and .390 respectively).. Compared with IGlar, in T2DM patients after ACS or AIS, IDet was not associated with increased risks of CV death, nonfatal MI, or nonfatal stroke.. ACS = acute coronary syndrome; AIS = acute ischemic stroke; ASCVD = atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease; CI = confidence interval; CV = cardiovascular; DKA = diabetic ketoacidosis; HHF = hospitalization for heart failure; HHS = hyperosmolar hyperglycemic state; HR = hazard ratio; IDet = insulin detemir; IGlar = insulin glargine; MI = myocardial infarction; NHIRD = National Health Insurance Research Database; PCI = percutaneous coronary intervention; PSM = propensity score matching; T2DM = type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Topics: Brain Ischemia; Cardiovascular Diseases; Cohort Studies; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Humans; Insulin Detemir; Insulin Glargine; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Retrospective Studies; Stroke; Taiwan; Treatment Outcome

Despite the benefits and clinical necessity of insulin treatment in type 2 diabetes (T2D), healthcare providers are reluctant to initiate insulin, and patients are reluctant to start it for several reasons, one of these being the complexity of insulin treatment. Patients and their healthcare providers can benefit from titration algorithms (TAs) or rules that assist with the initiation and titration of insulin, performing the calculations that are needed to safely initiate and conservatively adjust.. The primary objective for this in silico study was to examine the effectiveness of 3 dose TAs (1-3) for optimization of basal insulin glargine (Gla-100 and Gla-300). In the simulations, 100 virtual subjects with T2D were included (50% men, age 62 ± 3 years, HbA1c 8.1% ± 2.9%, body weight 94 ± 16 kg). Subjects were studied under each TA (TA1 and TA2 fasting blood glucose [FBG] targets 90-130 mg/dL, TA3 FBG target 110-150 mg/dL). Initial dose of both insulins was based on 0.2 U/kg body weight. During 3 months, subjects reported their FBG to the LTHome web-based dose guidance system with a rules engine to safely guide long-acting insulin titration and maintenance. Subjects followed dose recommendations to reach designated FBG target ranges.. All subjects reached stable doses under all TAs with both Gla-100 and Gla-300 insulin, and 93 or more of the 100 subjects, depending on the assigned TA, achieved the target FBG range within the 3-month simulation for all TAs. Mean FBG was lowered (Gla-100: 155 ± 40 to 118 ± 11 mg/dL with TA1 and TA2 and 132 ± 12 mg/dL for TA3; Gla-300: 125 ± 14 with TA1 and TA2 and 134 ± 15 mg/dL with TA3). Calculated HbA1c improved from 8.1% ± 2.9% to 7.1% ± 2.5% for TA1 and TA2 and 7.5% ± 2.5% for TA3, a reduction of 0.9% and 0.6% over 3 months for both insulins. Three subjects on Gla-100 and one subject on Gla-300 experienced mild hypoglycemia.. All TAs delivered safe dose recommendations with minimal hypoglycemia, leading to a stable glucose control in the majority of subjects.

Topics: Aged; Algorithms; Biomarkers; Blood Glucose; Computer Simulation; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Dosage Calculations; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine; Male; Middle Aged; Models, Biological; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

Adequate insulin titration is crucial for optimal glycaemic control in type 2 diabetes (T2D). We aimed to explore the factors and outcomes associated with titration of glargine 100 U/mL (Gla-100) in patients uncontrolled on oral antidiabetic drugs (OAD) and initiating insulin therapy.. Patients from the Titration and Optimization (TOP)-1 registry were stratified by the magnitude of Gla-100 up-titration during the first month (no [< 1 Units (U)/day (d)], minimal [≥ 1 and < 5 U/d], moderate [≥ 5 and ≤ 8 U/d] and strong [> 8 U/d]). The primary endpoint was a fasting blood glucose (FBG) ≤ 110 mg/dL on ≥ 2 occasions and/or individual HbA1c target by 12 months.. Of 2308 patients, 905, 715, 409 and 279 underwent no, minimal, moderate and strong titration, respectively. Age decreased across increasing titration groups (p = 0.02) while body mass index (BMI) (p < 0.0001), FBG (p < 0.0001), and HbA1c (p < 0.0001) increased. At 12 months, the proportions of patients achieving the primary endpoint were comparable across groups (66.1% overall), though a smaller proportion of no titration patients met both their individual HbA1c target and FBG ≤ 110 mg/dL compared to moderate and strong titration patients (20.1% vs. 27.2% and 26.2%, p = 0.033 and 0.023, respectively). HbA1c was also comparable, though FBG was higher in the no titration group (126.2 vs. 122.6, 121.5 and 120.9 mg/dL, p < 0.02). A similar, small reduction in body weight occurred in all groups; hypoglycaemia rates were comparable across groups.. In real-world, titration of Gla-100 during the first month appears to coincide with a number of baseline factors. Insulin dose to meet HbA1c and FBG targets remains suboptimal in the majority of T2D patients.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine; Male; Middle Aged; Registries; Young Adult

In this post hoc analysis, data from participants with Type 2 diabetes in the phase 3 LixiLan-O (NCT02058147) and LixiLan-L (NCT02058160) trials were evaluated to compare the relationship between achievement of society-recommended FPG and/or PPG targets and efficacy (HbA. Insulin glargine and lixisenatide as a fixed-ratio combination resulted in more participants reaching both FPG and PPG targets, leading to better HbA

Topics: Aged; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Combinations; Fasting; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Glycemic Control; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine; Male; Middle Aged; Peptides; Postprandial Period; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Treatment Outcome

To identify real-world, age-related trends in the use of insulin glargine 100 U/mL (Gla-100) as part of basal-supported oral therapy (BOT).. The prospective, observational Titration and Optimization registry enrolled patients with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes mellitus initiated on Gla-100 BOT. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients with capillary fasting blood glucose (FBG) ≤110 mg/dL on ≥2 occasions and/or who met their individual HbA1c target within 12 months.. 2462 patients were analyzed (<65 years: n=1122; 65-74 years: n=771; ≥75 years: n=569). Diabetes duration (6.8, 8.9, and 11.2 years, p<0.0001) and proportion of women (40.7%, 47.9%, and 55.7%, p<0.0001) increased with age. Baseline HbA1c was highest in <65-year-olds (8.6% vs 8.4% and 8.5%, p<0.0001). Gla-100 up-titration until 12 months was highest in <65-year-olds (+11.6 U/day), compared with 65-74 (+10.2 U/day) and ≥75 years (+8.8; p<0.0001) but similar by units per kilogram, as was the decrease in FBG (<65: -64.1 mg/dL; 65-74: -56.1 mg/dL; ≥75: -53.4 mg/dL) and HbA1c (<65: -1.47%; 65-74: -1.31%; ≥75: -1.22%, p<0.0001). At 12 months, 65.9% of participants met the primary endpoint, with no significant difference between age groups. The proportion achieving their individual HbA1c target was lower for <65-year-olds (46.0% vs 54.3% and 54.7%; p<0.02). Symptomatic hypoglycemia incidence was more common in the ≥75-year-old group (3.4% vs 1.4% and 1.4%; p=0.0126).. BOT with Gla-100 results in similar improvements of glycemic values with low risk of hypoglycemia across age groups. Given the link between HbA1c and long-term cardiovascular risk, ensuring appropriately stringent target-setting, intensification of basal insulin and making sure hypoglycemia is avoided is of paramount importance.. Database: https://awbdb.bfarm.de; Identifier: 1641; Date of registration: September 23, 2013.

Topics: Aged; Biomarkers; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine; Male; Prognosis; Prospective Studies

To minimize the influence of possible confounding factors, the study was carried out in a cross-over manner. Using flash glucose monitoring, insulin glargine 300 U/mL showed less nocturnal hypoglycemia than insulin degludec 100 U/mL . Examination of insulin degludec 100 U/mL nocturnal hypoglycemia by combined oral medications suggested that metformin combination might be the cause of nocturnal hypoglycemia.

Topics: Blood Glucose; Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Insulins

Choosing therapies for type 2 diabetes that are both effective and cost-effective is vital as healthcare systems worldwide aim to maximize health of the population. The present analysis assessed the cost-effectiveness of once-weekly semaglutide (a novel glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonist) versus insulin glargine U100 (the most commonly used basal insulin) and versus dulaglutide (an alternative once-weekly GLP-1 receptor agonist), from a societal perspective in the Netherlands.. The IQVIA CORE Diabetes Model was used to project outcomes for once-weekly semaglutide 0.5 mg and 1 mg versus insulin glargine U100, once-weekly semaglutide 0.5 mg versus dulaglutide 0.75 mg, and once-weekly semaglutide 1 mg versus dulaglutide 1.5 mg. Clinical data were taken from the SUSTAIN 4 and SUSTAIN 7 clinical trials. The analysis captured direct and indirect costs, mortality, and the impact of diabetes-related complications on quality of life.. Projections of outcomes suggested that once-weekly semaglutide 0.5 mg was associated with improved quality-adjusted life expectancy by 0.19 quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) versus insulin glargine U100 and 0.07 QALYs versus dulaglutide 0.75 mg. Once-weekly semaglutide 1 mg was associated with mean increases in quality-adjusted life expectancy of 0.27 QALYs versus insulin glargine U100 and 0.13 QALYs versus dulaglutide 1.5 mg. Improvements came at an increased cost versus insulin glargine U100, with incremental cost-effectiveness ratios from a societal perspective of €4988 and €495 per QALY gained for once-weekly semaglutide 0.5 mg and 1 mg, respectively, falling below Netherlands-specific willingness-to-pay thresholds. Improvements versus dulaglutide came at a reduced cost from a societal perspective for both doses of once-weekly semaglutide.. Once-weekly semaglutide is cost-effective versus insulin glargine U100, and dominant versus dulaglutide 0.75 and 1.5 mg for the treatment of type 2 diabetes, and represents a good use of healthcare resources in the Netherlands.

Topics: Biomarkers; Blood Glucose; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Glucagon-Like Peptides; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine; Life Expectancy; Male; Middle Aged; Netherlands; Prognosis; Quality of Life

To evaluate the effectiveness of the different insulin therapies on obstetrics-fetal outcomes in women with pregestational diabetes mellitus. We enrolled 147 pregnant women with pre-existing type 1 or 2 diabetes mellitus. Clinical and biochemical parameters were analysed in relation to obstetric and fetal outcomes. 14.2% received treatment with Neutral Protamine Hagedorn insulin and short-acting insulin analogues; 19% with premixed human insulin; 40.1% with insulin glargine and lispro, 6.2% with detemir and aspart and 20% with continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion. All 5 types of treatment achieved a reduction of the mean HbA1c during pregnancy (p = 0.01). Pre-pregnancy care was carried out for 48% of patients. We found no statistically significant differences between the different insulin therapies and the obstetric-fetal outcomes. In conclusión, the different insulin therapies used in patients with pregestational diabetes mellitus does not seem to affect obstetric-fetal outcomes.

Topics: Adult; Diabetes Mellitus; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Diabetes, Gestational; Drug Combinations; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Insulin; Insulin Detemir; Insulin Glargine; Insulin Lispro; Insulin, Long-Acting; Pregnancy; Pregnancy Outcome

This study is aimed at estimating the proportion of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients treated with basal insulin (insulin glargine U100) and at evaluating daily insulin dose, treatment pattern, and adherence to treatment of these patients.. Data from administrative and laboratory databases of 3 Italian Local Health Units were retrospectively collected and analyzed. All patients with a diagnosis of T2DM between 01/01/2012 and 31/12/2012 were considered, and those with at least a prescription of insulin glargine between 01/01/2013 and 31/12/2014 were included and followed up for one year. For each patient, we evaluated HbA1c levels both at baseline and during the follow-up period and the daily average dose of insulin. Medication adherence was defined by using medication possession ratio (MPR) and reported as proportion of patients with MPR ≥ 80%.. 7,422 T2DM patients were available for the study. According to the antidiabetic medication prescribed, patients were categorized into four groups: insulin glargine only, insulin glargine plus oral glucose-lowering drugs, insulin glargine plus rapid-acting insulin, and insulin glargine plus DPP-4 inhibitors. Median daily dose of insulin among insulin glargine only patients was higher than in other groups (35 IU vs. 20 IU,. A large proportion of T2DM patients treated with insulin fail in achieving the glycemic target of HbA1c level < 7%, irrespective of treatment regimen; however, basal insulin only is associated with lower therapeutic unsuccess. Adherence to antidiabetes medications is also suboptimal in these patients and should be addressed to improve long-term outcomes of reducing and preventing microvascular and macrovascular complications.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine; Male; Medication Adherence; Middle Aged; Retrospective Studies

The purpose of this article is to review the efficacy, safety, and place in therapy of insulin degludec/liraglutide (IDegLira) and insulin glargine/lixisenatide (IGlarLixi) in the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus.. Type 2 diabetes is a condition affecting nearly 30 million American adults. Management of type 2 diabetes is complex and multifactorial. Using medications targeted at a variety of the physiologic defects known to contribute to the development of type 2 diabetes allows for a patient-specific approach to care. Utilizing combination products is a way to target several areas of the disease while decreasing the complexity and burden to the patient. Basal insulin/glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) agonist combination products have the benefit of being highly efficacious while having favorable effects on weight, reduced gastrointestinal adverse effects, and low hypoglycemic risks compared to the individual agents used alone.. This article will review 2 basal insulin/GLP-1 agonist combination products, IDegLira and IGlarLixi, which were approved in November 2016.

Topics: Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Combinations; Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Liraglutide; Peptides; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Aged; Blood Glucose; Body Mass Index; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine; Male; Middle Aged; Nurses; Patient Compliance; Prospective Studies; Telephone

This open-label, prospective study evaluated the effectiveness and safety of empagliflozin as add-on therapy in inadequately controlled type 2 diabetes (T2D) patients (glycated haemoglobin [HbA1c], 7.5-12%) who were already using three other types of orally active antidiabetic agents. A total of 268 T2D patients were enrolled and divided into two groups, empagliflozin (EMPA 25 mg/d, n = 142) or insulin glargine (INS, n = 126), respectively. After the treatment period of 24 weeks, HbA1c and fasting plasma glucose (FPG) were significantly reduced (HbA1c, P = 0.004; FPG, P = 0.008, respectively) in the EMPA group compared to the INS group. Also, EMPA treatment evoked a significant reduction in body weight (P < 0.001) and systolic blood pressure (P = 0.017) compared to the INS group. Hypoglycaemic adverse events were significantly higher in the INS group compared to the EMPA group (P = 0.001). In conclusion, this study demonstrated that a regimen comprising four different orally active antidiabetic agents, including EMPA, was effective and safe as a therapeutic strategy for treating T2D patients for glycaemic control and improvement of other cardiovascular and metabolic indices.

Topics: Aged; Benzhydryl Compounds; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Glucosides; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine; Middle Aged; Prospective Studies; Treatment Outcome

We compared cardiovascular and other outcomes in patients with dysglycaemia with or without anti-glutamic acid dehydrogenase (GAD) antibodies participating in the Outcome Reduction with Initial Glargine Intervention (ORIGIN) trial. Of the 12 537 participants, 8162 had anti-GAD measured at baseline and 267 were anti-GAD positive. The effects of insulin glargine versus standard care and of n-3 fatty acids supplements versus placebo were compared by testing the interaction of the treatment effects and anti-GAD status. The effect of glargine on development of new diabetes was assessed in participants without previous diabetes at baseline. The overall incidence of outcomes did not differ between anti-GAD positive and anti-GAD negative subjects. The incidence of the composite of cardiovascular death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, or non-fatal stroke did not differ between anti-GAD positive participants randomized to insulin glargine or to standard care, with a hazard ratio (HR) (95% confidence interval [CI]) of 0.80 (0.44-1.44) or in anti-GAD negative participants with a HR of 1.07 (0.96-1.20) (P for interaction = 0.20).

Topics: Aged; Autoantibodies; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Female; Glutamate Decarboxylase; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Male; Middle Aged; Prognosis; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Retrospective Studies; Standard of Care; Treatment Outcome

For patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and inadequate glycaemic control, addition of basal insulin is recommended, but titration and optimization of basal insulin therapy in primary care is not well understood. We conducted an observational trial in 2470 patients with T2DM who initiated insulin glargine 100 U/L (Gla-100) on top of oral antidiabetic drugs. Physicians were free to choose either a "Davies," "Fritsche" or "individual" titration algorithm. We found that fasting blood glucose (FBG) and glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) levels were effectively reduced by Gla-100; 65.9% of patients achieved the primary endpoint (FBG ≤6.1 mmol/L (110 mg/dL) or an individual HbA1c target). There were no significant differences in efficacy and safety between the algorithms used. The mean FBG decreased by 3.2 mmol/L (59 mg/dL) over 12 months, while the mean HbA1c decreased by 15.3 mmol/mol (1.4%)%. From a starting dose of 11.7 U/d, the Gla-100 dosage was 22.8 U/d at 12 months, with similar values in each group. Rates of hypoglycaemia were low and did not differ by titration algorithm. We conclude that Gla-100 was effective at reducing FBG and HbA1c, independent of the titration algorithm, but observed that algorithms were inconsistently applied in clinical practice.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Algorithms; Blood Glucose; Calibration; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Dosage Calculations; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine; Male; Middle Aged; Treatment Failure

To investigate the association between day-to-day fasting self-monitored blood glucose (SMBG) variability and risk of hypoglycaemia in type 1 (T1D) and type 2 diabetes (T2D), and to compare day-to-day fasting SMBG variability between treatments with insulin degludec (degludec) and insulin glargine 100 units/mL (glargine U100).. Data were retrieved from two double-blind, randomized, treat-to-target, two-period (32 weeks each) crossover trials of degludec vs glargine U100 in T1D (SWITCH 1, n = 501) and T2D (SWITCH 2, n = 720). Available fasting SMBGs were used to determine the standard deviation (SD) of day-to-day fasting SMBG variability for each patient and the treatment combination. The association between day-to-day fasting SMBG variability and overall symptomatic, nocturnal symptomatic and severe hypoglycaemia was analysed for the pooled population using linear regression, with fasting SMBG variability included as a three-level factor defined by population tertiles. Finally, day-to-day fasting SMBG variability was compared between treatments.. Linear regression showed that day-to-day fasting SMBG variability was significantly associated with overall symptomatic, nocturnal symptomatic and severe hypoglycaemia risk in T1D and T2D (P < 0.05). Day-to-day fasting SMBG variability was significantly associated (P < 0.01) with all categories of hypoglycaemia risk, with the exception of severe hypoglycaemia in T2D when analysed within tertiles. Degludec was associated with 4% lower day-to-day fasting SMBG variability than glargine U100 in T1D (P = 0.0082) and with 10% lower day-to-day fasting SMBG variability in T2D (P < 0.0001).. Higher day-to-day fasting SMBG variability is associated with an increased risk of overall symptomatic, nocturnal symptomatic and severe hypoglycaemia. Degludec has significantly lower day-to-day fasting SMBG variability vs glargine U100.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Blood Glucose; Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring; Circadian Rhythm; Cross-Over Studies; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Double-Blind Method; Fasting; Female; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Middle Aged; Multicenter Studies as Topic; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Retrospective Studies; Risk Factors; Young Adult

The LixiLan clinical trials of insulin glargine (iGlar)/lixisenatide fixed-ratio combination (iGlarLixi) investigated the safety and efficacy of iGlarLixi versus iGlar: LixiLan-O (NCT02058147) in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) inadequately controlled on oral antidiabetes drugs (OADs) and LixiLan-L (NCT02058160) in patients with T2D inadequately controlled on basal insulin ± OADs. In these two trials, both iGlar and iGlarLixi were titrated to a maximum (capped) dose of 60 units. We evaluated whether this may have affected the reported glycemic efficacy of iGlar, and the glycemic differences observed between treatment with iGlarLixi and iGlar.. The efficacy of iGlar under uncapped conditions was simulated in a two-step approach. First, a model characterizing the relationship between iGlar dose and fasting self-measured plasma glucose (f-SMPG) was developed. Then, the relationship between glycated hemoglobin A1. Most patients achieved stable f-SMPG at ∼60 units/day, with no further reduction with increasing insulin dose. In comparisons of observed/capped and simulated/uncapped changes in mean A1C from baseline to Week 30, iGlarLixi consistently demonstrated treatment benefit compared with iGlar. Uncapping resulted in a slightly higher mean iGlar dose in both LixiLan-O (+0.72 units) and LixiLan-L (+2.1 units), without marked impact on f-SMPG or A1C change from baseline.. Uncapping the iGlar dose in LixiLan-O and LixiLan-L would not have led to significant improvements in mean A1C reduction in the iGlar arm, supporting the conclusion that iGlarLixi provides additional, clinically relevant glycemic control versus iGlar alone.

Topics: Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Combinations; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine; Peptides

To compare the real-world effectiveness of insulin degludec (degludec) and glargine 300 units/mL (glargine U300) in insulin-naïve adult patients with type 2 diabetes in routine US clinical practice.. CONFIRM is a non-interventional comparative effectiveness study following US patients across the continuum of care, through electronic medical records from multiple health systems and integrated delivery networks. Propensity-score matching controlled for confounding. The primary endpoint, change in HbA1c from baseline to 180 days of follow-up, was estimated using a repeated-measure of covariance analysis with subject as random effect. Change in the rate of hypoglycaemic episodes (defined using International Classification of Diseases codes 9/10) and change in proportion of patients with hypoglycaemia were estimated using negative binomial and logistic regression, respectively. Time-to-discontinuation of the initial basal insulin/initiation with another prescribed basal insulin was analysed using a Cox Proportional Hazard model.. Data concerning 4056 patients were analysed. After matching, baseline characteristics were comparable (n = 2028 in each group). After 180 days of follow-up, degludec was associated with a larger reduction in HbA1c (estimated treatment difference, -0.27%; P = 0.03), greater reductions in change in rate (rate ratio, 0.70; P < 0.05) and greater reductions in change in the likelihood of hypoglycaemia (odds ratio, 0.64; P < 0.01]) compared with glargine U300. In addition, patients treated with degludec were 27% less likely to discontinue treatment at follow-up compared with those treated with glargine U300 (hazard ratio, 0.73; P < 0.001).. Significantly improved HbA1c, larger reductions in rates and likelihood of hypoglycaemia and lower risk of treatment discontinuation were demonstrated with degludec vs glargine U300.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Blood Glucose; Comparative Effectiveness Research; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Medication Adherence; Middle Aged; Treatment Outcome

To compare the effectiveness of different titration algorithms for insulin glargine U100 used in everyday practice to achieve glycaemic targets in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).. A total of 526 patients (278 in Slovenia, 248 in Croatia) with T2DM (aged ≥ 18 years) and treated with insulin glargine prior to inclusion were enrolled. Patients self-titrated insulin glargine according to physicians' guidance.. Among the 524 patients included in the final analysis, the titration algorithm from the LANMET study was used most commonly (n = 368, 70.5% patients), followed by the Treat-To-Target (TTT) algorithm (n = 117, 22.4%). At the end of the study (6 months), 179 (34.3%) patients reached HbA1c ≤ 7%. There was no significant difference in the proportion of patients who reached their target HbA1c between the different algorithms at 6 months (35.6% using LANMET, 30.7% with TTT, and 32.4% with other algorithms; p = 0.611). HbA1c levels were more significantly reduced in patients using the TTT algorithm compared to LANMET (-2.31%, vs. -1.57%; p < 0.05). The proportion of patients with reported symptomatic hypoglycaemia did not differ significantly between the algorithms.. Continuous titration of insulin glargine U100 is a safe and efficient option for T2DM management, regardless of the titration algorithm applied.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Algorithms; Blood Glucose; Croatia; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Diagnostic Tests, Routine; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine; Male; Middle Aged; Practice Patterns, Physicians'; Prospective Studies; Slovenia; Young Adult

The prevalence of Type 2 diabetes in Canada is estimated to be 7.6% and rising. Given the substantial economic burden associated with Type 2 diabetes treatment, optimizing healthcare expenditure is extremely important. In the present analysis, we evaluated the cost-effectiveness of dulaglutide 1.5 mg, a once-weekly glucagon-like peptide 1 agonist as third-line therapy relative to insulin glargine from the perspective of a Canadian healthcare payer.. A patient-level cost-utility model of Type 2 diabetes was developed to capture seven microvascular and macrovascular complications and severe and nonsevere hypoglycemia. Cohort characteristics and the relative efficacy of dulaglutide 1.5 mg and insulin glargine were derived from the AWARD-2 head-to-head trial, which was identified by systematic literature review. Cost data were derived from Canadian sources and expressed in 2016 Canadian dollars (CAD), and future cost and quality-adjusted life expectancy (QALE) estimates were discounted at 1.5% per annum. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were conducted.. Based on the AWARD-2 trial, relative to insulin glargine, dulaglutide 1.5 mg was projected to increase QALE by 0.38 quality-adjusted life years and increase costs by CAD 19,773, resulting in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of CAD 52,580 per quality-adjusted life year gained.. A computer simulation analysis showed that dulaglutide 1.5 mg would likely be cost-effective relative to insulin glargine in patients with Type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled on metformin and sulfonylurea in Canada.

Topics: Canada; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Female; Glucagon-Like Peptides; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Immunoglobulin Fc Fragments; Insulin Glargine; Male; Middle Aged; Quality-Adjusted Life Years; Recombinant Fusion Proteins

Topics: Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Double-Blind Method; Humans; Insulin; Insulin Glargine

Hyperglycemia in the hospital setting is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. In an attempt to cut costs, some hospitals implement policies to substitute all glargine orders with detemir.. To examine how the substitution of glargine with detemir affects inpatient blood glucose control.. Medical records were retrospectively analyzed to investigate the effect of a hospital formulary change at a semi-urban underserved hospital that substituted detemir for glargine on a 1:1 dosing basis. The study evaluated blood glucose control from September 6, 2015, to September 5, 2016, before substitution and from September 6, 2016, to September 5, 2017, after the substitution began. Patients were included in the study if they were older than 18 years, received glargine before admission, and had type 1 or 2 diabetes mellitus. Patients were excluded if they were pregnant, did not receive long-acting insulin, or lacked regular blood glucose testing. The medical records were analyzed for mean glucose levels, hypoglycemic events, and short-acting insulin administration amounts.. A total of 318 patients met criteria and were included in the retrospective analysis-134 patients received detemir and 184 patients received glargine. The mean glucose levels in the morning were 133.8 mg/dL for patients receiving detemir and 145.8 mg/dL for patients receiving glargine (95% CI, 126.972-140.753; P=.013). The mean blood glucose levels in the afternoon were 171.6 mg/dL for patients receiving detemir and 172.1 mg/dL for patients receiving glargine (95% CI, 162.955-180.344; P=.938). The mean blood glucose levels in the evening were 162.5 mg/dL for patients receiving detemir and 163.3 mg/dL for patients receiving glargine (95% CI, 153.654-171.315; P=.897). The mean blood glucose levels at night were 176.1 mg/dL for patients receiving detemir and 174.7 mg/dL for patients receiving glargine (95% CI, 167.797-184.474; P=.788). No significant difference in sliding scale insulin was required between the patient groups (0.16 U/kg insulin aspart in detemir group vs 0.18 U/kg aspart in glargine; 95% CI, 0.154-0.189; P=.297). There was no significant difference between the patient groups in regard to hypoglycemic events (45% glargine vs 49% detemir; P=.59).. Substituting detemir for glargine did not adversely affect inpatients' blood glucose control.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Female; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Inpatients; Insulin Detemir; Insulin Glargine; Male; Middle Aged; Retrospective Studies

Although hypersensitivity reaction to insulin was supposed to be less-frequent with current insulin analogue, case reports with different types of allergic reactions to insulin analogue were still reported. The most common form is type I hypersensitivity reaction with IgE-mediated. Besides, type III (IgG and IgM-mediated) and type IV (T-cell mediated delayed reaction) hypersensitivity reactions were also reported. Here we presented a long-standing type 2 diabetes with insulin requirements with hypersensitivity reactions to insulin actrapid, insulin aspart, insulin glargine, insulin detemir, and biphasic insulin aspart 30. Insulin desensitization was performed as initial management but failed as skin biopsy with immunohistochemical staining proved type IV hypersensitivity reaction. We continued with the next treatment approach using subcutaneous injection with the mixture of biphasic insulin aspart 30 and dexamethasone to alleviate allergy, and the result was successful with steroid-free biphasic insulin aspart 30 injection eight months later. Besides, the treatment effect had lasted after ten years even with switched type of insulin analogue from biphasic insulin aspart 30 to insulin glargine and insulin aspart. The case report demonstrated a good example of how clinicians deal with the rare but important questions of hypersensitivity reactions to insulin analogue.

Topics: Biphasic Insulins; Dexamethasone; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Combinations; Female; Humans; Hypersensitivity, Delayed; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Aspart; Insulin Detemir; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Isophane; Insulin, Long-Acting; Middle Aged

A post-hoc analysis to assess the impact in people with type 2 diabetes, of increasing doses of basal insulin on glycaemic measures, body weight and hypoglycaemia.. We included data from prospective, randomized controlled treat-to-target trials of ≥24 weeks' duration in people with type 2 diabetes, uncontrolled on metformin and sulphonylureas, and treated with insulin glargine 100 units/mL (U100), who had at least six fasting plasma glucose (FPG) measurements. The impact of insulin dose on glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) values, FPG, hypoglycaemia incidence (<3.9 mmol/L [70 mg/dL]), and body weight was analysed. A total of 458 participants from three eligible trials were included.. The observed relationship between higher basal insulin doses and glycaemic control was non-linear, with increasing insulin dose leading to smaller reductions in FPG and HbA1c for doses >0.3 IU/kg/d, with a plateauing effect at 0.5 IU/kg/d. Total daily dose of insulin >0.5 IU/kg/d resulted in greater weight gain, but without higher rates of hypoglycaemia, compared with insulin doses ≤0.5 IU/kg/d.. This analysis indicates that basal insulin doses >0.5 IU/kg/d have diminishing additional impact on improving glycaemic measures, with the disadvantage of additional weight gain. Clinicians should consider anti-hyperglycaemic treatment intensification at doses approaching 0.5 IU/kg/d.

Topics: Aged; Blood Glucose; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Fasting; Female; Humans; Insulin Glargine; Male; Middle Aged; Postprandial Period; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic

We sincerely thank Dr. Sikarin Upala for his interest in our article and for sharing his experience in the treatment of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). NAFLD is prevalent in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), yet only preliminary evidence are available on the effect of anti-diabetic agents to NAFLD in T2DM patients. According to clinical practice guidelines for NAFLD management

Topics: Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Humans; Insulin Glargine; Lipids; Liraglutide; Metformin; Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease; Sitagliptin Phosphate

We read with interest a recent article written by Yan et al.

Topics: Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine; Lipids; Liraglutide; Metformin; Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease; Sitagliptin Phosphate

Topics: Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Double-Blind Method; Humans; Insulin; Insulin Glargine