insulin-glargine and Cat-Diseases

No insulin formulation should be considered best by default for management of feline diabetes. Rather, the choice of insulin formulation should be tailored to the specific clinical situation. In most cats that have some residual beta cell function, administering only a basal insulin might lead to complete normalization of blood glucose concentrations. Basal insulin requirements are constant throughout the day. Therefore, for an insulin formulation to be effective and safe as a basal insulin, its action should be roughly the same every hour of the day. At present, only insulin glargine U300 approaches this definition in cats.

Topics: Animals; Blood Glucose; Cat Diseases; Cats; Diabetes Mellitus; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine

Understanding the pharmacology of insulin and how it relates to the pathophysiology of diabetes can lead to better clinical outcomes. No insulin formulation should be considered "best" by default. Insulin suspensions (NPH, NPH/regular mixes, lente, and PZI) as well as insulin glargine U100 and detemir are intermediate-acting formulations that are administered twice daily. For a formulation to be an effective and safe basal insulin, its action should be roughly the same every hour of the day. Currently, only insulin glargine U300 and insulin degludec meet this standard in dogs, whereas in cats, insulin glargine U300 is the closest option.

Topics: Animals; Cat Diseases; Cats; Diabetes Mellitus; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dog Diseases; Dogs; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine

Smarter understanding of diabetes pathophysiology and pharmacology of insulin therapy can lead to better clinical outcomes. Rather than looking for an insulin formulation that is considered "best" for a general population, it could be appropriate to seek the "smart" insulin choice, tailored to the specific clinical situation. Different treatment goals should be considered, with pros and cons to each. Ideally, insulin therapy in most diabetic dogs should mimic a "basal-bolus" pattern. The "intermediate"-acting insulin formulations might provide better "bolus" treatment in dogs than the rapid-acting formulations used in people. In patients with some residual beta cell function such as many diabetic cats, administering only a "basal" insulin might lead to complete normalisation of blood glucose concentrations. Insulin suspensions (neutral protamine Hagedorn, neutral protamine Hagedorn/regular mixes, lente and protamine zinc insulin) as well as insulin glargine U100 and detemir are "intermediate"-acting formulations that are administered twice daily. For a formulation to be an effective and safe "basal" insulin, its action should be roughly the same every hour of the day. Currently, only insulin glargine U300 and insulin degludec meet this standard in dogs, whereas in cats, insulin glargine U300 is the closest option.

Topics: Animals; Blood Glucose; Cat Diseases; Cats; Diabetes Mellitus; Dog Diseases; Dogs; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Protamines

Diabetes mellitus is a common endocrine disorder in feline practice, affecting approximately 1 in 200 cats. The majority of diabetic cats have type 2 diabetes mellitus, which results from a combination of peripheral insulin resistance and a progressive reduction in insulin production.. While usually easy to diagnose, management of diabetes mellitus presents a number of challenges for practitioners and clients alike. Practitioners must decide on diet, insulin type and dose, monitoring method and intensity, and concomitant therapy, which will vary based on individual patient and client needs, and geographic location. Practitioners may also encounter patients with diabetic ketoacidosis or other diabetic complications, and patients with multiple concurrent diseases. Clients may be challenged by the substantial time and financial commitment involved in owning a diabetic cat.. Understanding the pathophysiology, optimal treatment protocols and current goals of diabetes management will benefit practitioners managing diabetic cats. This article reviews the most current management plans for feline diabetics. It places particular emphasis on best practice for achieving diabetic remission, which is an attainable goal in the majority of newly diagnosed diabetic cats.. The information in this article is drawn from the recent human and veterinary literature, including prospective and retrospective studies. The body of prospective clinical data on the use of newer, long-acting insulins (glargine and especially detemir) in cats is limited, but growing.

Topics: Animals; Cat Diseases; Cats; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Diabetic Ketoacidosis; Drug Administration Schedule; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Detemir; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting

To determine whether basal-bolus administration of glargine insulin is a safe and effective alternative treatment compared to the standard continuous rate infusion (CRI) protocol.. Prospective randomized clinical trial.. University teaching hospital.. Twenty cats diagnosed with diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA).. The cats were block-randomized to either a CRI protocol using regular insulin (CRI-group; n = 10) or a basal-bolus SC and IM glargine protocol (glargine-group, n = 10). Baseline blood gases, electrolytes, glucose, and β-hydroxybutyrate (β-OHB) concentrations were measured at the time of admission and later at predefined intervals until reaching the primary endpoint of the study, defined as a β-hydroxybutyrate concentration < 2.55 mmol/L.. The main outcome measure was time (h) to resolution of ketonemia. Secondary outcome measures were time until first improvement of hyperglycemia and ketonemia, decrease of glucose to ≤13.9 mmol/L (250 mg/dL), resolution of acidosis, consumption of first meal, and discharge from hospital. Additionally, occurrence of treatment-associated adverse events and death were compared. Seventeen cats (85%) survived to discharge, with no difference in survival between groups (P = 1.0). Median times to β-OHB < 2.55 mmol/L were 42 (CRI-group) and 30 (glargine-group) hours, respectively (P = 0.114). Median times to first improvement of hyperglycemia (glargine-group: 2 h; CRI-group: 6 h; P = 0.018) and until discharge from hospital (glargine-group: 140 h; CRI-group: 174 h; P = 0.033) were significantly shorter in the glargine-group. No significant differences were observed in any other parameter under investigation (P > 0.05).. Basal-bolus administration of glargine insulin appears to be an effective and safe alternative to the current standard CRI-protocol for the management of DKA in cats. The positive outcomes and simplicity make it a viable option for the treatment of feline DKA.

Topics: Animals; Blood Glucose; Cat Diseases; Cats; Clinical Trials, Veterinary as Topic; Diabetic Ketoacidosis; Hyperglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Prospective Studies

A commonly used therapeutic strategy for type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) in humans involves the use of synthetic incretin hormone-based therapies including exenatide, a glucagon-like pepetide-1 hormone agonist. Glucagon-like pepetide-1 agonists can be used alone or as an ancillary therapy with other agents, including insulin and oral antihyperglycemics. Little is known about the role of these therapies for DM in cats. Therefore, the primary objective of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of short-acting exenatide combined with insulin, as compared to placebo and insulin for the treatment of DM in cats. Treatment with exenatide was well tolerated; only 2 cats developed side effects requiring dose reduction. Two cats (25%) went into diabetic remission while receiving exenatide and insulin, whereas remission was not reported during placebo treatment. The average change in the daily exogenous insulin dose was significant (β = -0.56 U/kg, 95% confidence interval, -0.96 to -0.15, P = 0.007), and the dose of insulin administered was lower during exenatide treatment. The average weight loss experienced on exenatide was significantly higher than on placebo (β = 0.65 kg, 95% confidence interval, 0.09-1.21, P = 0.02). There was no significant difference in any of the hormone concentrations evaluated for cats on exenatide vs placebo treatments. Overall, the treatment of diabetic cats with insulin and a fixed dose of exenatide was found to be safe. The weight loss and decreased exogenous insulin requirement experienced with exenatide treatment could be a significant benefit for overweight diabetic cats and warrants further evaluation.

Topics: Animals; Blood Glucose; Cat Diseases; Cats; Cross-Over Studies; Diabetes Mellitus; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Combination; Exenatide; Female; Glucagon-Like Peptide 1; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine; Male; Placebos; Random Allocation; Weight Loss

The aim of this study was to report outcomes using detemir and a protocol aimed at intensive blood glucose control with home monitoring in diabetic cats, and to compare the results with a previous study using the same protocol with glargine. Eighteen cats diagnosed with diabetes and previously treated with other insulins were included in the study. Data was provided by owners who joined the online German Diabetes-Katzen Forum. The overall remission rate was 67%. For cats that began the protocol before or after 6 months of diagnosis, remission rates were 81% and 42%, respectively (P = 0.14). No significant differences were identified between the outcomes for the glargine and detemir studies, with the exception of three possibly interrelated factors: a slightly older median age of the detemir cohort at diabetes diagnosis, a higher rate of chronic renal disease in the detemir cohort and lower maximal dose for insulin detemir.

Topics: Animals; Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring; Cat Diseases; Cats; Cohort Studies; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Female; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Detemir; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Treatment Outcome

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of dietary modification in addition to twice daily insulin glargine. Cats were treated with insulin glargine twice daily and randomized to receive either a low carbohydrate, high protein (LCHP) diet (n=6) or a control diet (n=6) for 10 weeks. Re-evaluations of clinical signs, blood glucose curves, and serum fructosamine concentrations were performed at weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, and 10. Two of 12 cats achieved complete remission by the end of the study but remission rate was not different between diet groups. Using twice daily insulin glargine and frequent monitoring, all cats in both diet groups achieved successful glycemic control. Frequent monitoring is key to achieving glycemic control in diabetic cats; potential benefits of dietary modification require further evaluation.

Topics: Animals; Blood Glucose; Cat Diseases; Cats; Diabetes Mellitus; Diet, Carbohydrate-Restricted; Diet, Diabetic; Dietary Carbohydrates; Dietary Proteins; Female; Fructosamine; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Treatment Outcome

Glycaemic control and remission probabilities were compared in 24 newly diagnosed diabetic cats treated twice daily with either glargine, protamine zinc (PZI) or lente insulin and fed a low carbohydrate diet. After day 17, the probability of remission was substantially higher for cats with lower mean 12h blood glucose concentrations on day 17, irrespective of insulin type. Glargine-treated cats had lower mean 12h blood glucose concentrations on day 17 than PZI- or lente-treated cats, and all eight glargine-treated cats achieved remission compared to three PZI- and two lente-treated cats. The probability of remission was greater for cats treated with glargine than cats treated with PZI or lente insulin. In newly diagnosed diabetic cats, twice daily treatment with glargine provides better glycaemic control and higher probability of remission compared to twice daily treatment with PZI or lente insulin. Good glycaemic control soon after diagnosis is associated with increased probability of remission and should be the goal of insulin therapy.

Topics: Analysis of Variance; Animals; Blood Glucose; Cat Diseases; Cats; Diabetes Mellitus; Dietary Carbohydrates; Female; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Protamines; Remission Induction; Treatment Outcome

Treatment of diabetes mellitus (DM) in cats typically requires insulin injections q12h-q24h, posing a major compliance barrier for caregivers. Novel treatments enabling decreased injection frequency while maintaining safety are highly desirable. Insulin fused with feline immunoglobulin fragment crystallizable (Fc) has an ultra-long plasma half-life because it recycles through cells where it is protected from proteolysis.. Glycemic control can be achieved in diabetic cats with a recombinant fusion protein of a synthetic insulin and feline Fc (AKS-267c) administered SC weekly.. Five cats with spontaneous DM.. Cats previously controlled using insulin glargine q12h were transitioned to once-weekly injection of AKS-267c. The dose of AKS-267c was titrated weekly for 7 weeks based on continuous glucose monitoring. Clinical signs, body weight, fructosamine concentrations, and mean interstitial glucose concentrations (IG) were compared between baseline (week 0, on insulin glargine) and the last week of treatment. Data were assessed for normality and compared using parametric or nonparametric paired tests (as appropriate).. After 7 weeks of once-weekly injections, compared to baseline, there were no significant changes in clinical signs, body weight (median [range] gain, 0.1 kg [-0.1 to +0.7]; P = .5), fructosamine (-60 mmol/L [-338 to +206]; P = .6), and mean IG concentrations (change = -153 mmol/L [-179 to +29]; P = .3), and no adverse reactions were reported.. Successful control of clinical signs and maintenance of glycemia was achieved with this once-weekly novel insulin treatment. The efficacy and safety of this novel formulation should be further assessed in a large clinical trial.

Topics: Animals; Blood Glucose; Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring; Cat Diseases; Cats; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine

Rebound hyperglycaemia (also termed Somogyi effect) is defined as hyperglycaemia caused by the release of counter-regulatory hormones in response to insulin-induced hypoglycaemia, and is widely believed to be common in diabetic cats. However, studies in human diabetic patients over the past quarter century have rejected the common occurrence of this phenomenon. Therefore, we evaluated the occurrence and prevalence of rebound hyperglycaemia in diabetic cats.. In a retrospective study, 10,767 blood glucose curves of 55 cats treated with glargine using an intensive blood glucose regulation protocol with a median of five blood glucose measurements per day were evaluated for evidence of rebound hyperglycaemic events, defined in two different ways (with and without an insulin resistance component).. While biochemical hypoglycaemia occurred frequently, blood glucose curves consistent with rebound hyperglycaemia with insulin resistance was confined to four single events in four different cats. In 14/55 cats (25%), a median of 1.5% (range 0.32-7.7%) of blood glucose curves were consistent with rebound hyperglycaemia without an insulin resistance component; this represented 0.42% of blood glucose curves in both affected and unaffected cats.. We conclude that despite the frequent occurrence of biochemical hypoglycaemia, rebound hyperglycaemia is rare in cats treated with glargine on a protocol aimed at tight glycaemic control. For glargine-treated cats, insulin dose should not be reduced when there is hyperglycaemia in the absence of biochemical or clinical evidence of hypoglycaemia.

Topics: Animals; Blood Glucose; Cat Diseases; Cats; Diabetes Mellitus; Hyperglycemia; Insulin Glargine; Retrospective Studies

Human diabetic patients routinely self-adjust their insulin dose using a protocol and home monitoring, and perform equally well or outperform physician directed adjustments. The objective of this study was to report the outcome of home monitoring of diabetic cats by owners using a protocol aimed at achieving euglycaemia, using ultra-low carbohydrate diets (< or =10% metabolisable energy) and the insulin analogue glargine for >10 weeks and/or until remission was achieved. Fifty-five cats diagnosed with diabetes mellitus, whose owners joined the online German Diabetes-Katzen Forum, were included. An overall remission rate of 64% was achieved in the cohort. Significantly higher remission rates were observed if good glycaemic control was achieved soon after diagnosis: 84% for cats started on the protocol within 6 months of diagnosis went into remission, and only 35% for cats that began more than 6 months after diagnosis (P<0.001). Only one mild clinical hypoglycaemic episode occurred observed despite tight blood glucose control. In conclusion, intensive blood glucose control is safe and effective in diabetic cats using home monitoring and treatment with glargine.

Topics: Animals; Blood Glucose; Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring; Cat Diseases; Cats; Comorbidity; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dietary Carbohydrates; Female; Germany; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Animals; Animals, Domestic; Cat Diseases; Cats; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Diet, Carbohydrate-Restricted; Diet, Diabetic; Fructosamine; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting