insulin-detemir and Hyperglycemia

The aim of this review is to summarize the clinical efficacy, tolerability and safety data of insulin detemir, and compare its use with that of neutral protamine Hagedorn (NPH) insulin in randomized controlled trials in people with type 1 or type 2 diabetes. A literature search was conducted with PubMed using predefined search terms. Studies were included if they met the following criteria: randomized, controlled trial, comparison of insulin detemir with NPH insulin, non-hospitalized adults aged ≥18 years with either type 1 or type 2 diabetes, and study duration of ≥12 weeks. The following types of studies were excluded: non-randomized controlled trials, studies of mixed cohorts of patients with type 1 or type 2 diabetes that did not report results separately, pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic studies, reviews, pooled or meta-analyses or health-economic analyses. Fourteen publications met the inclusion criteria. Nine studies in people with type 1 diabetes and three studies in people with type 2 diabetes, using insulin detemir in a basal-bolus regimen were included. Two studies were in people with type 2 diabetes using insulin detemir with oral antidiabetes medicines. In 14 studies of people with type 1 or type 2 diabetes, insulin detemir treatment provided similar or better glycaemic control, lower within-subject variability, similar or lower frequency of hypoglycaemia and less weight gain when compared with NPH insulin.

Topics: Adult; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Humans; Hyperglycemia; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Detemir; Insulin, Isophane; Insulin, Long-Acting; Insulin, Regular, Human; Isophane Insulin, Human; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Weight Gain

The treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) has been revolutionized by the introduction of novel therapeutic regimens following the clinical approval of the long-acting basal insulin glargine 10 years ago, followed by insulin detemir and, more recently, agents that target the glucagon-like peptide (GLP)-1 system with dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP-4)-resistant products, such as liraglutide and exenatide, and DPP-4 inhibitors, such as sitagliptin, saxagliptin, alogliptin, and vildagliptin. The position and clinical efficacy of the GLP-1 mimetics are less well understood, however, and how they should be best used in the context of the established clinical efficacy of long-acting insulin analogs is yet to be defined. The aim of this review is to provide a summary of the efficacy, safety, and weight changes associated with long-acting insulin analogs (insulin glargine and insulin detemir) and two GLP-1 mimetics (exenatide and liraglutide). MEDLINE, EMBASE, and BIOSIS databases were searched with a timeframe of January 1, 2003-January 12, 2009 using the following terms: "Insulin glargine," with the co-indexing terms "LANTUS" and "HOE901"; "Insulin detemir," with the co-indexing term "Levemir"; "Exenatide"; and "Liraglutide." This literature review demonstrates that GLP-1 and basal insulin therapies are effective treatment options for insulin-naïve patients with suboptimal glycemic control with oral hypoglycemic agents. There are potential advantages of basal insulin and GLP-1 therapies in particular populations of patients. Further comparative data are needed to fully investigate the relative positioning of these therapies within the T2DM treatment paradigm.

Topics: Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Glucagon-Like Peptide 1; Humans; Hyperglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Detemir; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Isophane; Insulin, Long-Acting

To compare the safety and efficacy of fast-acting insulin aspart (faster aspart) with conventional insulin aspart (IAsp) in adults with type 1 diabetes (T1D).. onset 1 was a randomized, multicentre, treat-to-target, phase III, 52-week (initial 26 weeks + additional 26 weeks) trial conducted at 165 sites across 9 countries. Adults with T1D were randomly allocated to double-blind mealtime faster aspart or IAsp, each with once- or twice-daily insulin detemir. The primary endpoint, change in glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) from baseline after the initial 26 weeks, has been reported previously. In the present paper, we report data from the full 52-week study period.. Between August 2013 and June 2015, 381 participants were assigned to double-blind faster aspart and 380 participants to IAsp. After 52 weeks, estimated mean changes from baseline in HbA1c levels were -0.08% (faster aspart) and +0.01% (IAsp); estimated treatment difference significantly favoured faster aspart (-0.10% [95% confidence interval {CI} -0.19;-0.00]; P = .0424). Changes from baseline in 1-hour postprandial plasma glucose (PPG) increment (meal test; faster aspart -1.05 mmol/L; IAsp -0.14 mmol/L) also significantly favoured faster aspart (estimated treatment difference -0.91 mmol/L [95% CI -1.40;-0.43]; -16.48 mg/dL [95% CI -25.17;-7.80]; P = .0002). There was no difference in overall severe or blood glucose-confirmed hypoglycaemic episodes or treatment-emergent adverse events between treatments.. At 52 weeks, overall glycaemic control had significantly improved with faster aspart vs IAsp, consistent with the 26-week study findings. Achieving an insulin profile closer to physiological insulin secretion with faster aspart translates into lower PPG and HbA1c levels compared with those achieved with IAsp in people with T1D.

Topics: Adult; Blood Glucose; Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Double-Blind Method; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Compounding; Drug Monitoring; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hyperglycemia; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Aspart; Insulin Detemir; Male; Meals; Middle Aged

To develop an algorithm that delivers an individualized dose of rapid-acting insulin after morning resistance exercise to counter post-exercise hyperglycaemia in individuals with Type 1 diabetes.. Eight people with Type 1 diabetes, aged 34 ± 7 years with HbA1c concentrations 72 ± 12 mmol/mol (8.7 ± 1.1%), attended our laboratory on two separate mornings after fasting, having taken their usual basal insulin the previous evening. These people performed a resistance exercise session comprising six exercises for two sets of 10 repetitions at 60% of the maximum amount of force that was generated in one maximal contraction (60% 1RM). In a randomized and counterbalanced order, the participants were administered an individualized dose of rapid-acting insulin (2 ± 1 units, range 0-4 units) immediately after resistance exercise (insulin session) by means of an algorithm or were not administered this (no-insulin session). Venous blood glucose concentrations were measured for 125 min after resistance exercise. Data (mean ± sem values) were analysed using anova (P ≤ 0.05).. Participants had immediate post-resistance exercise hyperglycaemia (insulin session 13.0 ± 1.6 vs. no-insulin session 12.7 ± 1.5 mmol/l; P = 0.834). The decline in blood glucose concentration between peak and 125 min after exercise was greater in the insulin exercise session than in the no-insulin session (3.3 ± 1.0 vs. 1.3 ± 0.4 mmol/l: P = 0.015). There were no episodes of hypoglycaemia (blood glucose <3.9 mmol/l).. Administration of rapid-acting insulin according to an individualized algorithm reduced the hyperglycaemia associated with morning resistance exercise without causing hypoglycaemia in the 2 h post-exercise period in people with Type 1 diabetes.

Topics: Adult; Blood Glucose; Combined Modality Therapy; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Dosage Calculations; Drug Monitoring; Drug Therapy, Combination; Humans; Hyperglycemia; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Aspart; Insulin Detemir; Insulin Glargine; Pilot Projects; Precision Medicine; Resistance Training; Risk; United Kingdom

To compare the efficacy and safety of insulin glargine 300 U/ml (Gla-300) with glargine 100 U/ml (Gla-100) in Japanese people with type 2 diabetes using basal insulin plus oral antihyperglycaemic drug(s) [OAD(s)].. The EDITION JP 2 study (NCT01689142) was a 6-month, multicentre, open-label, phase III study. Participants (n = 241, male 61%, mean diabetes duration 14 years, mean weight 67 kg, mean body mass index 25 kg/m(2), mean glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) 8.02 %, mean basal insulin dose 0.24 U/kg/day) were randomized to Gla-300 or Gla-100, while continuing OAD(s). Basal insulin was titrated to target fasting self-monitored plasma glucose 4.4-5.6 mmol/l. The primary efficacy endpoint was HbA1c change over 6 months. Safety endpoints included hypoglycaemia and weight change.. Gla-300 was non-inferior to Gla-100 for HbA1c reduction [least squares (LS) mean difference 0.10 (95% confidence interval [CI] -0.08, 0.27) %]. The mean HbA1c at month 6 was 7.56 and 7.52 % with Gla-300 and Gla-100, respectively. Nocturnal confirmed (≤3.9 mmol/l) or severe hypoglycaemia risk was 38% lower with Gla-300 versus Gla-100 [relative risk 0.62 (95% CI 0.44, 0.88)]; annualized rates were 55% lower at night [rate ratio 0.45 (95% CI 0.21, 0.96)] and 36% lower at any time [24 h; rate ratio 0.64 (95% CI 0.43, 0.96)]. Severe hypoglycaemia was infrequent. A significant between-treatment difference in weight change favoured Gla-300 [LS mean difference -1.0 (95% CI -1.5, -0.5) kg; p = 0.0003]. Adverse event rates were comparable between groups.. Japanese people with type 2 diabetes using basal insulin plus OAD(s) experienced less hypoglycaemia with Gla-300 than with Gla-100, while glycaemic control did not differ.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Delayed-Action Preparations; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Resistance, Multiple; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hyperglycemia; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Detemir; Insulin Glargine; Japan; Male; Middle Aged; Risk

To compare efficacy and safety of new insulin glargine 300 U/ml (Gla-300) with that of insulin glargine 100 U/ml (Gla-100) in Japanese adults with type 1 diabetes.. The EDITION JP 1 study (NCT01689129) was a 6-month, multicentre, open-label, phase III study. Participants (n = 243) were randomized to Gla-300 or Gla-100 while continuing mealtime insulin. Basal insulin was titrated with the aim of achieving a fasting self-monitored plasma glucose target of 4.4-7.2 mmol/l. The primary endpoint was change in glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) over 6 months. Safety measures included hypoglycaemia and change in body weight.. Gla-300 was non-inferior to Gla-100 for the primary endpoint of HbA1c change over the 6-month period {least squares [LS] mean difference 0.13 % [95 % confidence interval (CI) -0.03 to 0.29]}. The annualized rate of confirmed (≤3.9 mmol/l) or severe hypoglycaemic events was 34 % lower with Gla-300 than with Gla-100 at night [rate ratio 0.66 (95 % CI 0.48-0.92)] and 20 % lower at any time of day [24 h; rate ratio 0.80 (95 % CI 0.65-0.98)]; this difference was most pronounced during the first 8 weeks of treatment. Severe hypoglycaemia was infrequent. The basal insulin dose increased in both groups (month 6 dose: Gla-300 0.35 U/kg/day, Gla-100 0.29 U/kg/day). A between-treatment difference in body weight change over 6 months favouring Gla-300 was observed [LS mean difference -0.6 kg (95 % CI -1.1 to -0.0); p = 0.035]. Adverse event rates were comparable between the groups.. In Japanese adults with type 1 diabetes using basal plus mealtime insulin, less hypoglycaemia was observed with Gla-300 than with Gla-100, particularly during the night, while glycaemic control did not differ.

Topics: Adult; Delayed-Action Preparations; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Resistance, Multiple; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hyperglycemia; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Detemir; Insulin Glargine; Japan; Male; Middle Aged; Risk

Previous studies comparing insulin detemir versus insulin glargine showed conflicting results, and included only outpatients. This study compared the two insulin analogs once daily in hospitalized patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D).. A total of 55 patients aged 18-80 years with hyperglycemia admitted to the endocrinology wards were screened between June 2014 and February 2015. Forty-two enrolled patients were randomly assigned to receive either insulin detemir followed by insulin glargine once daily (n = 21), or vice versa (n = 21). The two insulin analogs were titrated 0.1 U/kg once daily based on fasting blood glucose (FBG). After achieving FBG <7.8 mmol/L (the first period), subjects were switched from one analog to the other (the second period) with no change in the dose. The second period lasted for 3 days. When hypoglycemia occurred in the second period, the observation was discontinued. Six-point blood glucose including FBG, 2 h after breakfast, lunch, dinner, bedtime, and at 3:00 am was tested every day. The glucose profiles of the final days in the two periods were compared.. At the end of the first period, days for achieving FBG target (4.0 ± 0.5 days vs. 3.3 ± 0.4 days, t = 1.079, P = 0.286) and total daily dose (30.1 ± 2.4 U vs. 30.1 ± 2.9 U, t = 0.002, P = 0.999) between insulin detemir and insulin glargine were similar. There was no significant difference in the 24-h glucose control between the two analogs. No hypoglycemia occurred with both analogs in the first period. However, in the second period, when insulin glargine was switched to insulin detemir, two, three and, one patients had hypoglycemia events on day 1, day 2 and day 3 of the second period, respectively. One patient had severe hypoglycemia on day 1.. When both basal insulin analogs were given once daily in T2D, insulin detemir achieved similar efficacy to insulin glargine. On the other hand, there may be differences in action of the compared basal insulins. Further studies with larger patient samples are necessary to support evidence and reveal possible mechanisms.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Blood Glucose; Cross-Over Studies; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Female; Hospitalization; Humans; Hyperglycemia; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Detemir; Insulin Glargine; Male; Middle Aged; Young Adult

To investigate, using a novel non-steady-state protocol, the differential effects of subcutaneous (s.c.) detemir and NPH insulin on glucose flux and lipid metabolism after insulin withdrawal.. After a period of insulin withdrawal resulting in whole-blood glucose concentration of 7 mmol/l, 11 participants (five men, mean age 41.0 years, mean body mass index 25 kg/m(2)) with type 1 diabetes (mean glycated haemoglobin concentration 57 mmol/mol, mean diabetes duration 14 years) received 0.5 units per kg body weight s.c. insulin detemir or NPH insulin in random order. Stable isotopes of glucose and glycerol were infused intravenously throughout the study protocol.. Glucose concentration decreased after insulin treatment as a result of suppression of endogenous glucose production, which occurred to a similar extent with both detemir and NPH insulin. The rate of glucose disappearance (Rd) was not increased significantly with either type of insulin. When the effect of detemir and NPH insulin on glucose flux at glucose concentrations between 9 and 6 mmol/l was examined, glucose rate of appearance (Ra) was similar with the two insulins; however, glucose Rd was greater with NPH insulin than with detemir at glucose concentrations of 8.0, 8.5, 7.0 and 6.0 mmol/l (p < 0.05) The percentage change in glycerol Ra, a measure of lipolysis, was greater in the NPH group than in the detemir group (p = 0.04).. The results of the study are consistent with the hypothesis that detemir has a lesser effect on the periphery, as evidenced by a lesser effect on peripheral glucose uptake at specific glucose concentrations.

Topics: Adult; Blood Glucose; Body Mass Index; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1; Glycated Hemoglobin; Glycerol; Humans; Hyperglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Injections, Subcutaneous; Insulin Detemir; Insulin, Isophane; Lipolysis; Male

To assess the efficacy and safety of insulin detemir administered once vs. twice daily in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes mellitus.. In this prospective, open-label, treat-to-target study, 37 patients [mean age 12.7 ± 3 yr; diabetes duration 4.2 ± 3 yr, hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) 8.8 ± 0.8%] were scheduled to receive insulin detemir once daily before breakfast, with pre-meal insulin aspart, for 16-20 wk. Detemir dose titration algorithm was based on age-related target fasting blood glucose levels during 4-8 wk. Patients achieving target range continued on once-daily detemir (Group A) if up-titration could not be done due to hypoglycemia patients were switched to twice-daily detemir (Group B).. Nineteen (51%) patients continued with once-daily detemir. HbA1c decreased significantly in both groups (A: -0.7%, p = 0.02; B: -0.8%, p = 0.004), without a significant difference between groups. The frequency of nocturnal hypoglycemic events/week decreased in both groups but a significant change was found only in Group A (10.9-2.7, p < 0.05 vs. 8.7-5.8, NS), with no change in frequency of severe hypoglycemic episodes in either group. No significant differences were found between and within groups for body mass index-standard deviation score, insulin requirement or treatment satisfaction. Group B patients were significantly younger than Group A patients (11.5 ± 2.3 vs.13.8 ± 3.2 yr, p = 0.01), with a higher percentage in active puberty (50 vs. 11%, p = 0.003).. Since twice-daily determir showed no clinical advantage over once-daily detemir, it appears reasonable to commence all children on once-daily detemir, taking into consideration that younger children and those in active puberty may require twice-daily therapy (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00542399).

Topics: Adolescent; Algorithms; Child; Cohort Studies; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Monitoring; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hyperglycemia; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Incidence; Insulin Aspart; Insulin Detemir; Insulin, Long-Acting; Israel; Male

Conventionally, biphasic human insulin (30/70, BHI) is used twice daily for the management of patients with diabetes. However, this regimen is suboptimal to control post-lunch and/or pre-dinner hyperglycaemia in some patients. This study was undertaken to compare the efficacy and safety of thrice-daily biphasic human insulin (30/70, BHI) versus basal detemir and bolus aspart (BB) in patients with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).. In this open labelled randomized pilot study, 50 patients with uncontrolled T2DM on twice-daily BHI and insulin sensitizers were randomized either to BHI thrice-daily or BB regimen. HbA1c, six point plasma glucose profile, increment in insulin dose, weight gain, hypoglycaemic episodes and cost were compared between the two treatment groups at the end of 12 wk.. Mean HbA l c (± SD) decreased from 9.0 ± 0.9 per cent at randomization to 7.9 ± 0.8 per cent in BHI (P<0.001) and from 9.4 ± 1.3 to 8.2 ± 1.0 per cent in BB regimen (P<0.001) after 12 wk of treatment. The mean (± SEM) weight gain in patients in the BHI regimen was 1.5 ± 0.33 kg compared to 1.4 ± 0.34 kg in the BB regimen. Insulin dose increment at 12 wk was significantly more in the BB regimen 0.46 ± 0.32 U/kg/day compared to 0.15 ± 0.21 U/kg/day in the BHI regimen (P<0.001). The incidence of major as well as minor hypoglycaemic episodes was not different in both the regimen. The BB regimen was more expensive than the BHI regimen (P<0.001).. The thrice daily biphasic human insulin regimen is non-inferior to the basal bolus insulin analogue regimen in terms efficacy and safety in patients with poorly controlled T2DM. However, these data require further substantiation in large long term prospective studies.

Topics: Adult; Biphasic Insulins; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hyperglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Aspart; Insulin Detemir; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Middle Aged; Pilot Projects; Treatment Outcome; Weight Gain

We examined the impact of an aspart insulin protocol for treatment of hyperglycemia in the emergency department (ED) coupled with rapid initiation of a detemir-aspart insulin protocol for patients admitted to the hospital.. ED patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and a blood glucose (BG) ≥ 200 mg/dL were randomized to intervention (INT) or usual care (UC). INT patients (n = 87) received aspart every 2 hours when BG > 200 mg/dL, and if admitted, began daily detemir in the ED. UC patients (n = 89) were treated per hospital physicians.. The initial ED BG was 304 ± 76 mg/dL. The final ED BG differed: 217 ± 71 mg/dL for INT patients versus 257 ± 89 mg/dL for UC patients (P < .01). No INT patients and 3 UC patients had a BG < 50 mg/dL (P = .5). ED length of stay (LOS) was similar: 5.4 ± 1.8 hours for INT patients versus 4.9 ± 1.9 hours for UC patients (P = .06). Sixty-nine percent from each group were admitted. Admission BG was 184 ± 74 mg/dL for INT patients versus 224 ± 93 mg/dL for UC patients (P < .01). Patient-day weighted mean glucose was 163 ± 39 mg/dL for INT patients versus 202 ± 39 mg/dL for UC patients (P < .01). One INT patient and 6 UC patients had a BG < 50 mg/dL (P = .11). Hospital LOS was similar: 2.7 ± 2.0 versus 3.1 ± 1.9 days, respectively (P = .58).. An aspart insulin protocol safely lowers BG levels in the ED without prolonging LOS. During hospitalization, a detemir-aspart protocol achieves significantly better glycemic control compared with guideline-driven use of NPH-aspart or glargine/detemir-aspart (usual care) without increasing hypoglycemia. Standardization of insulin protocols in the ED and hospital settings leads to improvement in overall glycemic control with greater safety and efficacy than usual care.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Emergency Medical Services; Emergency Service, Hospital; Female; Hospitalization; Humans; Hyperglycemia; Insulin Aspart; Insulin Detemir; Insulin, Long-Acting; Length of Stay; Male; Middle Aged; Treatment Outcome

To determine whether an insulin algorithm could be used in a similar manner in the setting of diabetes and stress hyperglycaemia following cessation of intravenous (IV) insulin after cardiac surgery.. Subjects who were clinically stable, requiring ≥ 1 unit/h of IV insulin 48 h after surgery, were randomized to once daily detemir at 50, 65 or 80% of IV insulin requirements and received aspart according to carbohydrate intake. Diabetes was defined as any history of diabetes or preoperative HbA1c 6.5%.. The morning glucose in patients with diabetes was 143 mg/dl (n = 61) vs. 124 mg/dl in those with stress hyperglycaemia (n = 21,p = 0.05) on day 1 and 127 vs. 110 mg/dl over 72 h (p = 0.01). This was unaffected by adjustment for initial dosing group. At 72 h, 56% of patients with stress hyperglycaemia reached AM (80-130 mg/dl) and 87% reached overall (80-180 mg/dl) glucose targets, compared to 90 and 100% of patients with stress hyperglycaemia, respectively. There was no difference in hypoglycaemia in patients with stress hyperglycaemia or diabetes. The percentage of patients with diabetes receiving insulin was 46% on admission and 77% at discharge, compared to 0 and 42% of patients with stress hyperglycaemia.. Following cardiac surgery, patients with stress hyperglycaemia may be converted from IV insulin to detemir with a 50% conversion factor, while patients with diabetes may require a higher conversion factor. Stress hyperglycaemia may be prolonged; the intensity and duration of insulin therapy required for optimal outcomes warrants further examination.

Topics: Algorithms; Body Mass Index; Cardiac Surgical Procedures; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hyperglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Infusions, Intravenous; Insulin Detemir; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Middle Aged; Postoperative Period; Stress, Physiological; Treatment Outcome

Type 2 diabetes (T2D) is rapidly increasing in incidence and has significant social and economic costs. Given the increasing cost of complications, even relatively short delays in the onset of T2D can significantly reduce long-term complications and costs. Equally, recent studies have shown the onset of T2D can be delayed by use of long-acting insulin, despite the risk and concomitant low adherence. Thus, there is a strong potential motivation to develop models of long-acting insulin analogues to enable safe, effective use in model-based dosing systems. In particular, there are no current models of long-acting insulin Detemir and its unique action for model-based control. The objective of this work is to develop a first model of insulin Detemir and its unique action, and validate it against existing data in the literature.. This study develops a detailed compartment model for insulin Detemir. Model specific parameters are identified using data from a range of published clinical studies on the pharmacokinetic of insulin Detemir. Model validity and robustness are assessed by identifying the model for each study and using average identified parameters over several dose sizes and study cohorts. Comparisons to peak concentration, time of peak concentration and overall error versus measured plasma concentrations are used to assess model accuracy and validity.. Almost all studies and cohorts fit literature data to within one standard deviation of error, even when using averaged identified model parameters. However, there appears to be a noticeable dose dependent dynamic not included in this first model, nor reported in the literature studies.. A first model of insulin Detemir including its unique albumin binding kinetics is derived and provisionally validated against clinical pharmacokinetic data. The pharmacokinetic curves are suitable for model-based control and general enough for use. While there are limitations in the studies used for validation that prevent a more complete understanding, the results provide an effective first model and justify the design and implementation of further, more precise human trials.

Topics: Adult; Algorithms; Computational Biology; Computer Simulation; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Female; Humans; Hyperglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Detemir; Male; Middle Aged; Patient Compliance; Young Adult

Historically, data on the rate of hyperglycemia and ketosis have not been collected in clinical trials. However, it is clinically important to assess the rate of these events in children with type 1 diabetes (T1D). This question was addressed in two pediatric trials using insulin degludec (degludec).. To assess the rate of hyperglycemia and ketosis in two-phase 3b trials investigating degludec (Study 1) and degludec with insulin aspart (IDegAsp [Study 2]) vs insulin detemir (IDet).. Patients (aged 1-17 years inclusive) with T1D treated with insulin for ≥3 months.. Study 1: patients were randomized to degludec once daily (OD) or IDet OD/twice daily (BID) for 26 weeks, followed by a 26-week extension phase. Study 2: patients were randomized to IDegAsp OD or IDet OD/BID for 16 weeks. Bolus mealtime IAsp was included in both studies. In Study 1, hyperglycemia was recorded if plasma glucose (PG) was >11.1 mmol/L, with ketone measurement required with significant hyperglycemia (>14.0 mmol/L). In Study 2, hyperglycemia was recorded with PG >14.0 mmol/L where the subject looked/felt ill, with ketone measurement also required in these hyperglycemic patients. In this post hoc analysis, the hyperglycemia threshold was 14.0 mmol/L for uniformity.. Despite similar rates of hyperglycemia with degludec/IDegAsp compared with IDet, the rates of ketosis were lower with degludec/IDegAsp.. These trials, the first to systematically collect data on ketosis in pediatric patients with T1D, demonstrate the potential of degludec/IDegAsp to reduce rates of metabolic decompensation, compared with IDet.

Topics: Adolescent; Blood Glucose; Child; Child, Preschool; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1; Diabetic Ketoacidosis; Drug Combinations; Female; Humans; Hyperglycemia; Hypoglycemia; Infant; Insulin Aspart; Insulin Detemir; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Retrospective Studies

This study examines the relationship between glycated haemoglobin (A1C) levels and treatment persistence with, or time to discontinuation of, basal insulin in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) newly initiating insulin. Claims data were extracted from the Optum Clinformatics database from January 2010 to June 2015. Adult patients with T2D initiating insulin glargine 100 U/mL (Gla-100) or insulin detemir (DET) with ≥1 A1C measurement during 12-month baseline and 18-month follow-up periods were included. Patients with a refill gap of >90 days were considered non-persistent; otherwise, patients were considered persistent with insulin. The main outcome was A1C, measured closest to the end of each quarter during the follow-up period. A total of 3993 of 109 934 patients met the inclusion criteria (43.0% persistent; 57.0% non-persistent). Persistent patients were older (54.7 vs 52.7 years; P < .001), were more likely to be male (59.4% vs 54.4%; P = .002), and had significantly lower mean unadjusted A1C values at 18 months (8.26% vs 8.60%; P < .001) and quarterly. Only 43.0% of adults initiating basal insulin persisted with treatment for 18 months, with earlier discontinuation associated with higher A1C.

Topics: Age Factors; Cohort Studies; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Monitoring; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hyperglycemia; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Incidence; Insulin Detemir; Insulin Glargine; Insurance, Health; Male; Medicare; Medication Adherence; Middle Aged; Retrospective Studies; Sex Characteristics; United States

Glargine and detemir insulin are the two most commonly prescribed basal insulin analogues for the ambulatory and inpatient management of diabetes. The efficacy and safety of basal insulin analogues in the hospital setting has not been established.. This observational study compared differences in glycemic control and outcomes in non-intensive care unit patients with blood glucose (BG) >140 mg/dL who were treated with glargine or detemir, between January 1, 2012, and September 30, 2015, in two academic centers.. Among 6,245 medical and surgical patients with hyperglycemia, 5,749 received one or more doses of glargine, and 496 patients received detemir during the hospital stay. There were no differences in the mean daily BG (glargine, 182 ± 46 mg/dL vs. detemir, 180 ± 44 mg/dL; P = .70). There were no differences in mortality, hospital complications, or re-admissions between groups (all, P>.05). After adjusting for potential confounders, there was no statistically significant difference in hypoglycemia rates between treatment groups. Patients treated with detemir required higher total daily basal insulin doses (0.27 ± 0.16 units/kg/day vs. 0.22 ± 0.15 units/kg/day; P<.001). Glargine-treated patients had statistically longer length of stay; however, this difference may not be clinically relevant (6.8 ± 7.4 days vs. 6.0 ± 6.3 days; P<.001).. Our study indicates that treatment with glargine and detemir results in similar inpatient glycemic control in general medicine and surgery patients. Detemir treatment was associated with higher daily basal insulin dose and number of injections. A prospective randomized study is needed to confirm these findings.. BG = blood glucose BMI = body mass index CI = confidence interval eGFR = estimated glomerular filtration rate HbA1c = glycated hemoglobin ICD-9 = International Classification of Diseases, ninth revision ICU = intensive care unit IQR = interquartile range LOS = length-of-stay OR = odd ratio.

Topics: Aged; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus; Female; Humans; Hyperglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Inpatients; Insulin Detemir; Insulin Glargine; Length of Stay; Male; Middle Aged

To determine if insulin detemir administration time affects the frequency of hypoglycemia (blood glucose level <70 mg/dl) in hospitalized patients.. Retrospective cohort study.. A total of 357 adults (aged 18-89 yrs) who received insulin detemir for at least 48 hours while hospitalized between January 1, 2014, and December 31, 2015, were included. Patients were categorized into one of three groups according to insulin detemir administration time: detemir given once/day between 7 a.m. and 10 a.m. (AM group [71 patients]), detemir given once/day between 6 p.m. and 10 p.m. (PM group [158 patients]), and detemir given twice/day (BID group [128 patients]).. Community hospital.. The primary outcome was the percentage of patient days with any occurrence of hypoglycemia. The key secondary outcomes included the percentages of patients who experienced any hypoglycemic event, severe hypoglycemia, hypoglycemia requiring treatment, and refractory hypoglycemia; time of hypoglycemia; and percentage of patients experiencing one or more episodes of hyperglycemia. The AM group had a lower proportion of days with hypoglycemia compared with the PM group (7.9% vs 11.9%, p=0.008). There was a nonsignificant trend toward a lower proportion of days with hypoglycemia in the BID group compared with the PM group (9.1% vs 11.9%, p=0.0302). No significant differences in percentage of patient days with hyperglycemia and rates of severe hypoglycemia, hypoglycemia requiring treatment, or refractory hypoglycemia were noted among the three groups.. Administration of detemir in the morning may reduce the occurrence of hypoglycemia in hospitalized patients. Institutions that include detemir on their formularies may consider evaluating the incidence of hypoglycemia and modifying administration schedules as part of their medication safety program.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Delayed-Action Preparations; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Hospitalization; Humans; Hyperglycemia; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Detemir; Male; Middle Aged; Nevada; Retrospective Studies; Young Adult

To compare glucose control and safety of different basal insulin therapies (BI, including Insulin NPH, glargine and detemir) in real-world clinical settings based on a large-scale registry study.. In this multi-center 6-month prospective observational study, patients with type 2 diabetes (HbA1c ≥ 7%) who were uncontrolled by oral anti-diabetic drugs (OADs) and were willing to initiate BI therapy were enrolled from 209 hospitals within 8 regions of China. Type and dose of BI were at the physician's discretion and the patients' willingness. Interviews were conducted at 0 months (visit 1), 3 months (visit 2) and 6 months (visit 3). Outcomes included change in HbA1c, hypoglycemia rate and body weight from baseline at 6 months.. A total of 16 341 and 9002 subjects were involved in Intention-To-Treat (ITT) and per-protocol (PP) analysis, respectively. After PS regression adjustment, ITT analysis showed that reduction in HbA1c in glargine (2.2% ± 2.1%) and detemir groups (2.2% ± 2.1%) was higher than that in the NPH group (2.0% ± 2.2%) (P < .01). The detemir group had the lowest weight gain (-0.1 ± 2.9 kg) compared with the glargine (+0.1 ± 3.0 kg) and NPH (+0.3 ± 3.1 kg) groups (P < .05). The glargine group had the lowest rate of minor hypoglycaemia, while there was no difference in severe hypoglycaemia among the 3 groups. The results observed in PP analyses were consistent with those in ITT analysis.. In a real-world clinical setting in China, treatment with long-acting insulin analogues was associated with better glycaemic control, as well as less hypoglycaemia and weight gain than treatment with NPH insulin in type 2 diabetes patients. However, the clinical relevance of these observations must be interpreted with caution.

Topics: China; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Monitoring; Drug Resistance; Drug Therapy, Combination; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hyperglycemia; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Detemir; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Isophane; Intention to Treat Analysis; Lost to Follow-Up; Prospective Studies; Registries; Severity of Illness Index; Weight Gain

To assess the effects of insulin on peripheral nerve under normoglycemic and hyperglycemic conditions in the presence and absence of anoxia.. This study uses the in-vitro sciatic nerve model to assess the effect of insulin on peripheral nerve with the nerve action potential (NAP) as an index of nerve function.. Under normoglycemic conditions, low concentrations of regular insulin (0.01nM) reduced the conduction velocity of oxygenated nerves. Hyperglycemia increased the duration of the NAP and this increase was nearly completely eliminated by insulin in the 0.1nM-100nM concentration range. Insulin (1nM) also had effects on normoglycemic nerves exposed to intermittent anoxia, producing a decrease in the paired-pulse response and NAP amplitude and an increase in peak duration. This was associated with a reduced time to anoxia-induced conduction block. Similar effects were seen when regular insulin was replaced by insulin detemir, but the latter required much higher concentrations.. Insulin has concentration dependent effects on the peripheral nerve that are dependent on glucose and anoxia. These effects may be important in modulating neuropathic consequences of diabetes.

Topics: Action Potentials; Animals; Cell Hypoxia; Diabetic Neuropathies; Hyperglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; In Vitro Techniques; Insulin; Insulin Detemir; Kinetics; Male; Neural Conduction; Neuroprotective Agents; Oxidation-Reduction; Perfusion; Peripheral Nerves; Rats, Sprague-Dawley; Sciatic Nerve

To evaluate the effectiveness and safety on once-daily (OD) insulin detemir (IDet) in Chinese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) who were treated with different types or combinations of oral anti-diabetic drugs (OADs).. The SOLVE™ study was a 24-week observational study on the initiation of IDet OD in T2DM patients with uncontrolled hyperglycemia on diet, exercise, and one or more OADs. Subjects were grouped based on the numbers of OADs taken before (>2-OAD, 2-OAD, and 1-OAD groups). Efficacy and safety endpoints were evaluated and compared in different groups.. This study includes 3 272 patients, among them 464 (14.2%) were treated with more than 2 OADs, 1511 (46.2%) with 2 OADs, and 1 218 (37.2%) with 1 OAD before the study. The mean glycosylated hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) was 8.4%, 8.3%, 8.4% at baseline, and 7.3%, 7.2%, 7.1% at the end of 24-week in each 3 groups (all P<0.001 vs. baseline values). The HbA1c reductions were not statistically significant different among groups. Body weight tended to decrease in patients from all groups, however, only that in the 2-OAD group reached statistically significance. No major hypoglycaemia events were reported. However, the overall minor hypoglycaemia rate in the 2-OAD group was higher at the end of the study than that at baseline (P<0.05). No differences in the rate of nocturnal minor hypoglycaemia were observed in all groups after IDet treatment.. Initiation of IDet OD was effective and well-tolerated in Chinese patients with T2DM whose glycemia was poorly controlled on OADs irrespective of the number of OADs taken before. (registration number NCT00825643).

Topics: Blood Glucose; China; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hyperglycemia; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Detemir; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Middle Aged; Treatment Outcome

Early morning hyperglycemia is frequent among children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes. Reasons are a dawn phenomenon, a Somogyi phenomenon or a lack of insulin in the morning hours. Only few studies are published regarding incidence and relation to different modes of basal insulin treatment in this population.We analyzed all cases recorded in the DPV register from 1995 to 2010. 5 839 patients from 128 centers with at least 3 blood glucose measurements during the last night of a hospital stay were included.24.2% of patients showed a morning hyperglycemia above 200 mg/dl. 8.6% showed a dawn phenomenon, 7.0 % a lack of insulin and 2.0% a Somogyi phenomenon. A dawn phenomenon was significantly less frequent in patients treated with an insulin pump (1.1%) compared to long acting insulin analogs Glargin and Levemir (5.4%) or NPH insulin (8.2%). Lack of insulin was again less frequent during insulin pump treatment compared to other treatments (1.9% vs. 4.9% vs. 5.3%). Median rise of blood glucose levels was 33.4 mg/dl between midnight and 6 a.m. Mode of basal insulin treatment is an important factor: while treatment with an insulin pump led to a blood glucose fall of 28.5 mg/dl between 3 and 6 a.m., treatment with insulin analog or NPH insulin resulted in a rise of 28.5 or 35.9 mg/dl, respectively.This study shows that insulin pump treatment reduces the frequency of morning hyperglycemia caused by the dawn phenomenon or a lack of insulin.

Topics: Blood Glucose; Child; Circadian Rhythm; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1; Humans; Hyperglycemia; Insulin; Insulin Detemir; Insulin Glargine; Insulin Infusion Systems; Insulin, Isophane; Insulin, Long-Acting; Quality Assurance, Health Care; Registries

Subjects with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) eventually develop insulin resistance and other features of T2DM such as cardiovascular disorders. The exact mechanism has been not been completely understood. In this study, we tested the hypothesis that excessive or inappropriate exposure to insulin is a primary mediator of insulin resistance in T1DM. We found that continuous exposure of mice with non-obese diabetes to insulin detemir, which is similar to some current conventional treatment of human T1DM, induced severe insulin resistance, whereas untreated hyperglycemia for the same amount of time (2 weeks) did not cause obvious insulin resistance. Insulin resistance was accompanied by decreased mitochondrial production as evaluated by mitochondrial DNA and levels of transcripts and proteins of mitochondrion-associated genes, increased ectopic fat accumulation in liver and skeletal muscle (gastrocnemius) evaluated by measurements of triglyceride content, and elevated oxidative stress detected by the GSH/GSSG ratio. Prolonged exposure of cultured hepatocytes to insulin induced significant insulin resistance, whereas the same length of exposure to a high level of glucose (33 mm) did not cause obvious insulin resistance. Furthermore, our results showed that prolonged exposure to insulin caused oxidative stress, and blockade of mitochondrion-derived oxidative stress by overexpression of manganese-superoxide dismutase prevented insulin resistance induced by the prolonged exposure to insulin. Together, our results show that excessive exposure to insulin is a primary inducer of insulin resistance in T1DM in mice.

Topics: Animals; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1; Glucose; Hepatocytes; Humans; Hyperglycemia; Insulin; Insulin Detemir; Insulin Resistance; Insulin, Long-Acting; Lipid Metabolism; Mice; Mitochondria; Oxidative Stress; Time Factors