insulin-detemir and Body-Weight

Insulin therapy is often associated with adverse weight gain. This is attributable, at least in part, to changes in energy balance and insulin's anabolic effects. Adverse weight gain increases the risk of poor macrovascular outcomes in people with diabetes and should therefore be mitigated if possible. Clinical studies have shown that insulin detemir, a basal insulin analogue, exerts a unique weight-sparing effect compared with other basal insulins. To understand this property, several hypotheses have been proposed. These explore the interplay of efferent and afferent signals between the muscles, brain, liver, renal and adipose tissues in response to insulin detemir and comparator basal insulins. The following models have been proposed: insulin detemir may reduce food intake through direct or indirect effects on the central nervous system (CNS); it may have favourable actions on hepatic glucose metabolism through a selective effect on the liver, or it may influence fluid homeostasis through renal effects. Studies have consistently shown that insulin detemir reduces energy intake, and moreover, it is clear that this shift in energy balance is not a consequence of reduced hypoglycaemia. CNS effects may be mediated by direct action, by indirect stimulation by peripheral mediators and/or via a more physiological counter-regulatory response to insulin through restoration of the hepatic-peripheral insulin gradient. Although the precise mechanism remains unclear, it is likely that the weight-sparing effect of insulin detemir can be explained by a combination of mechanisms. The evidence for each hypothesis is considered in this review.

Topics: Blood Glucose; Body Weight; Central Nervous System; Diabetes Mellitus; Energy Intake; Homeostasis; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Detemir; Kidney; Liver; Weight Gain

Insulin have been recommended to decrease glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) level in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients whose blood glucose control are unsatisfactory by using oral hypoglycemic drugs.. To systematically estimate the therapeutic effect and security of insulin glargine and insulin detemir for treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus.. We searched the Cochrane library, PubMed, EMBASE, etc databases. Quality evaluation of all randomized control tests (RCT) enrolled was conducted according to Cochrane manual, and meta-analysis was performed by using RevMan5.0 software.. Both insulin glargine and insulin detemir can effectively control T2DM patient's blood glucose.. Insulin detemir has evident superiority on reducing body weight than insulin glargine. As the doses are concerned, daily insulin dose of insulin detemir is higher than insulin glargine.

Topics: Blood Glucose; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Insulin Detemir; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting

Basal insulin analogs are used to minimize unpredictable processes of NPH insulin. Modification of the human insulin molecule results in a slower distribution to peripheral target tissues, a longer duration of action with stable concentrations and thus a lower rate of hypoglycemia. Insulin detemir is a basal insulin analog that provides effective therapeutic options for patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes. For glycemic control, no significant differences were found in HbA1c levels compared with NPH and insulin glargine. It is comparable with insulin glargine in significantly reducing rates of all types of hypoglycemia. Clinical studies have demonstrated that detemir is responsible for significantly lower within-subject variability and no or less weight gain than NPH insulin and glargine. Recent pharmacodynamic studies have shown that detemir can be used once daily in many patients with diabetes. Together with patient-friendly injection devices and dose adjustments, it provides a treatment option with the potential to lower the key barriers of adherence to insulin therapy in type 2 diabetes. Recent guidelines for treatment of type 2 diabetes suggest starting intensive therapy of hyperglycemia at an early stage of diabetes and recommend therapeutic options that provide the possibility of reaching HbA1c goals individually, with a low risk of hypoglycemia or other adverse effects of treatment. The properties of insulin detemir match these requirements.

Topics: Body Weight; Delayed-Action Preparations; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Injections; Insulin; Insulin Detemir; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Medication Adherence; Pregnancy; Treatment Outcome

A pooled analysis of randomized controlled trials of individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) was conducted to compare dosing and impact of two basal insulin analogs, insulin glargine (glargine) and insulin detemir (detemir), on weight and hemoglobin A1c (A1c).. Twenty-two studies of at least 20 weeks in duration in individuals with T2DM initiating glargine/detemir were included. Results were combined using a weighted-average method and a bivariate random effect model. Outcomes included changes in weight, A1c, and insulin dose from study start to end.. One study was head-to-head comparison of glargine and detemir. Detemir (four studies) was administered once or twice daily, with 50% starting on detemir once daily but needing therapy intensification. Glargine was used once daily in all 22 studies. The Egger test was borderline significant for change in weight over the course of the treatment for glargine (0.29; 90% confidence interval [CI] -0.01, 0.58), and heterogeneity was not observed for detemir (-0.18; 90% CI -0.59, 0.23). Heterogeneity was observed for change in A1c over the course of the treatment (glargine, -1.19, 90% CI -1.74, -0.63; detemir, -2.65, 90% CI -4.86, -0.45). Nonheterogeneity for change in A1c over the course of the treatment was achieved by excluding five studies for glargine and one study for detemir; however, all studies were included in subsequent analyses. In the unadjusted model, glargine and detemir showed similar results for mean A1c change (-1.4% vs. -1.4%), weight gain (2.5 vs. 1.7 kg), and weight/A1c (1.8 vs. 1.2 kg/%). A significantly higher detemir dose was needed to achieve the same A1c change (51.5 vs. 38.8 U/day).. Although absolute weight gain was higher with glargine versus detemir, weight gain per A1c change was similar. A higher detemir dose was required to achieve a similar A1c reduction.

Topics: Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Detemir; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic

The efficacy and tolerability of insulin detemir (detemir), a long-acting basal insulin analog, is already well documented for type 1 diabetes. This article reviews new evidence, in particular on the weight-sparing effect of detemir and its use in type 2 diabetes.. All clinical trials of detemir published since a 2006 drug evaluation and up to December 2007, including large real-life studies, are covered in this review. Earlier studies are cited when relevant.. In type 2 diabetes, detemir used once or twice daily achieves equivalent glycemic control to other basal insulins in treat-to-target trials but tends to improve control in patients switched from other basal insulins in basal-oral regimens. The risk of hypoglycemia (nocturnal, overall, or both) is substantially and significantly reduced with detemir compared with NPH insulin. Body weight increase is consistently significantly lower with detemir than with NPH in type 1 and type 2 diabetes. The results of both glucose clamp studies and clinical trials support initiation of detemir at a once-daily dosing regimen.

Topics: Blood Glucose; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Evaluation; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Injections, Subcutaneous; Insulin; Insulin Detemir; Insulin, Long-Acting

Weight gain can be a significant barrier to the treatment of diabetes. Insulin detemir is a basal insulin analog that can help patients move safely toward glycemic targets with less weight gain. This review discusses the potential adverse effects of, and hypothesis for, weight gain resulting from intensive insulin management of diabetes. In addition, an assessment of all weight change data from clinical trials and observational studies involving insulin detemir are presented. Finally, we discuss how the ability of insulin detemir to closely mimic endogenous insulin secretion leads to more predictable glycemic control with reduced weight gain and provides patients with a more acceptable method of achieving glycemic control.

Topics: Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Detemir; Insulin, Long-Acting

Insulin is an effective treatment for type 2 diabetes (T2D), a progressive condition in which insulin deficiency is one of the core defects. When patients with T2D are unable to achieve glycemic goals with diet and oral antihyperglycemic medications, a common starting insulin regimen consists of basal or premixed insulin added to oral antihyperglycemic medications. When glycemic goals are not achieved with the initial insulin regimen, a basal-bolus regimen is necessary.. This article reviews clinical-trial data on the efficacy and safety profile of prandial premixed insulin analogues (insulin aspart and insulin lispro) compared with basal insulin analogues (insulin glargine, insulin detemir, and insulin lispro protamine suspension), with or without a prandial insulin analogue, in the management of T2D.. A systematic search of Ovid, MEDLINE, and EMBASE (1995-2007) was performed to identify published randomized controlled trials comparing prandial premixed insulin analogues with basal insulin analogues, with or without prandial insulin, in patients with T2D. The search terms were premixed insulin analogues, premixed insulin, biphasic insulin aspart, insulin aspart 70/30, insulin aspart 50/50, premixed insulin lispro, insulin lispro 75/25, insulin lispro 50/50, glargine, and detemir. Abstracts presented at the 2005 and 2006 meetings of the American Diabetes Association and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes and bibliographies of the identified studies were also reviewed. Predetermined criteria for study inclusion were treatment duration of at least 12 weeks, T2D diagnosed using valid criteria, use of a basal insulin analogue (with or without rapid-acting insulin) as a study comparator, and use of well-accepted end points (eg, glycosylated hemoglobin [HbA(1c)], hypoglycemia, preprandial and postprandial blood glucose).. Of the identified randomized controlled trials, 3 studies compared premixed insulin analogues containing 70% or 75% basal and 30% or 25% rapid-acting insulin analogue with basal insulin analogues only, and 3 studies evaluated premixed insulin analogues containing 50% basal and 50% rapid-acting insulin analogue with basal insulin analogues only. Use of prandial premixed insulin analogues was associated with better overall and postprandial glycemic control. In the studies that compared twice-daily premixed insulin analogues with a basal insulin analogue, changes in HbA(1c) ranged from -1.00% to -2.79% and from -0.42% to -2.36%, respectively (P < 0.01). In the studies that compared thrice-daily premixed insulin analogues with a basal insulin analogue, changes in HbA(1c) ranged from -0.72% to -1.2% and from -0.3% to -0.75%, respectively (P < 0.01). These results were achieved with some increase in overall hypoglycemia, but not in nocturnal or severe hypoglycemia. Doses of the premixed insulin analogues were adjusted during the titration period to achieve glycemic goals.. The results of this systematic review suggest that regimens consisting of prandial premixed insulin analogues, which provide both basal and prandial insulin coverage, may be used as an initial insulin regimen in patients with T2D to enable better overall, preprandial, and postprandial glycemic control compared with a basal insulin analogue regimen alone. Premixed insulin analogues are an effective option for initiating and intensifying insulin therapy in patients with T2D.

Topics: Body Weight; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Administration Schedule; Evidence-Based Medicine; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Aspart; Insulin Detemir; Insulin Glargine; Insulin Lispro; Insulin, Long-Acting; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic

Basal insulin therapy is an integral part of the intensive management of type 1 diabetes and it is also often used in type 2 diabetes. An ideal insulin regimen in patients with diabetes would mirror the 24-h insulin profile of a non-diabetic person, thereby preventing hyperglycaemia without inducing hypoglycaemia. Until recently, available insulins have pharmacokinetic disadvantages, compared to physiological insulin secretion. Insulin detemir is a new basal insulin analogue recently available for commercial use in the UK. Clinical trials have demonstrated lower fasting plasma glucose levels, lower variability in plasma glucose, predictable action profile and a reduced risk of nocturnal hypoglycaemia and weight gain, compared to conventional basal insulins. This study reviews the properties and potential use of insulin detemir.

Topics: Blood Glucose; Body Weight; Clinical Trials as Topic; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Detemir; Insulin, Isophane; Insulin, Long-Acting; Treatment Outcome

Insulin detemir (Levemir, Novo Nordisk) is a novel, biologically engineered analogue of human insulin that has been successfully developed for clinical use in diabetes as a basal insulin. Its unique mechanism of prolongation of action, achieved through acylation to give reversible albumin binding and additional self-association, goes some way to addressing one of the fundamental limitations of previously available, subcutaneously administered basal insulins, a high level of within-person variability in time-action profile from one injection to another. The pharmacological profile of insulin detemir, characterised in a series of studies, suggested it had the potential to offer efficacy and tolerability advantages in the clinical setting. Such advantages, in comparison to NPH (neutral protamine Hagedorn) insulin, have subsequently been illustrated in trials. Despite glucose control targets that are identical to comparators, insulin detemir achieved levels of glycaemic control that, overall, were at least as good as NPH insulin in the Phase III development programme, with lower variability being a consistent finding. This was associated with consistent risk reductions in nocturnal hypoglycaemic events, which are closely linked with the basal component of insulin therapy. Another consistent finding has been a significantly reduced propensity for weight gain. An all-analogue regimen combining insulin detemir with the rapid-acting insulin aspart illustrated the potential benefits achievable when insulins that are designed to achieve defined pharmacokinetic profiles are employed clinically; blood glucose control, including hypoglycaemia, was significantly superior to a human insulin-based mealtime plus basal regimen. Insulin detemir is, therefore, a valuable addition to the range of exogenous insulins, as it should enable treatment regimens to be constructed that offer good outcomes of efficacy and tolerability.

Topics: Animals; Blood Glucose; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Design; Drug Evaluation, Preclinical; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Detemir; Insulin, Long-Acting; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Receptor, Insulin

To compare the efficacy and safety of a glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist (GLP1RA) plus basal insulin versus basal-bolus insulin treatment in patients with very uncontrolled type 2 diabetes.. The SIMPLE study was a 6-month pragmatic, randomized, open-label trial testing the effectiveness of two approaches to treat patients with type 2 diabetes and HbA1c ≥10%. We randomized patients to detemir plus liraglutide or detemir plus aspart (before each meal). The primary endpoint was change in HbA1c; changes in body weight, insulin dose, hypoglycaemia and diabetes-related quality-of-life were secondary outcomes.. In patients with HbA1c ≥10% treatment with GLP1RA plus basal insulin, compared with basal-bolus insulin, resulted in better glycaemic control and body weight, lower insulin dosage and hypoglycaemia, and improved quality of life. This treatment strategy is an effective and safe alternative to a basal-bolus insulin regimen.

Topics: Adult; Blood Glucose; Body Weight; Comparative Effectiveness Research; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Glucagon-Like Peptide 1; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Aspart; Insulin Detemir; Liraglutide; Male; Meals; Middle Aged; Treatment Outcome

The aim of the study was to compare body composition and epicardial fat thickness changes in insulin-naïve inadequately controlled patients with type 2 diabetes following basal insulin initiation with detemir vs. glargine. Six-month, open-label, interventional randomized pilot study was conducted. Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and echocardiography were used to estimate the body composition and epicardial fat thickness respectively. Thirty-six patients in the detemir group and 20 in the glargine group completed the study. Study groups baseline characteristics were comparable. At 6 months, for similar glycemic control, those on detemir significantly gained less total weight (0.6±2.5 vs. 4.2±4.1 kg, p=0.004), total fat mass (0.9±2.2 vs. 2.9±2.4 kg, p=0.02), and truncal fat mass (0.8±1.5 vs. 2.1±1.7 kg, p=0.02), with a loss in truncal lean mass (- 0.8±1.9 kg vs. 0.3±1.7 kg; p=0.02). EFT significantly decreased from baseline in both group (detemir - 1.7±0.52-mm, glargine - 1.1±1.6-mm; p<0.05, without significant difference inter-groups). Within the detemir group, epicardial fat thickness change correlated with truncal fat and total fat mass changes (r=0.65, p=0.06 and r=0.60, p=0.07). In conclusion, detemir resulted in less fat mass gain, a trend for a more pronounced epicardial fat thickness reduction when compared with glargine.

Topics: Adiposity; Blood Glucose; Body Composition; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Female; Humans; Insulin Detemir; Insulin Glargine; Male; Middle Aged; Pericardium

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of two insulin intensification strategies for patients with type 2 diabetes previously treated with basal insulin--insulin degludec (IDeg) and insulin aspart (IAsp)--administered as a co-formulation (IDegAsp) or as a basal-bolus regimen (IDeg and IAsp in separate injections).. This 26-week, open-label, treat-to-target, phase IIIb, non-inferiority trial randomized patients (1 : 1) to IDegAsp twice daily with main meals (n = 138; IDegAsp group) or IDeg once daily and IAsp 2-4 times daily (n = 136; IDeg+IAsp group).. After 26 weeks, the mean glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) level was 7.0% (53 mmol/mol) for the IDegAsp group and 6.8% (51 mmol/mol) for the IDeg+IAsp group (Δ%HbA1c from baseline -1.31 and -1.50%, respectively). The non-inferiority of IDegAsp versus IDeg+IAsp was not confirmed for mean change in HbA1c [estimated treatment difference (ETD) 0.18, 95% confidence interval (CI) -0.04, 0.41; p = non-significant]. No significant differences were observed in the proportion of patients achieving HbA1c <7.0% (56.5 and 59.6%, respectively). IDegAsp treatment resulted in a significantly lower total daily insulin dose, a smaller change in body weight, numerically lower rates of confirmed hypoglycaemia (self-reported plasma glucose <3.1 mmol/l; rate ratio 0.81; p = non-significant), and nocturnal confirmed hypoglycaemic episodes (rate ratio 0.80; p = non-significant) versus IDeg+IAsp. Patient-reported outcome scores for social functioning were significantly higher for IDegAsp versus IDeg+IAsp (ETD 2.2; 95% CI 0.3, 4.1; p < 0.05).. Both intensification strategies effectively improved glycaemic control. Although non-inferiority was not confirmed, there were no significant differences between the groups that could affect clinical utility.

Topics: Aged; Blood Glucose; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Combinations; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Aspart; Insulin Detemir; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Meals; Middle Aged

To assess the effect of 3 insulin analogue regimens on change in carotid intima-media thickness (IMT) in patients with type 2 diabetes.. Investigator-initiated, randomised, placebo-controlled trial with a 2 × 3 factorial design, conducted at 8 hospitals in Denmark.. Participants with type 2 diabetes (glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) ≥ 7.5% (≥ 58 mmol/mol), body mass index >25 kg/m(2)) were, in addition to metformin versus placebo, randomised to 18 months open-label biphasic insulin aspart 1-3 times daily (n=137) versus insulin aspart 3 times daily in combination with insulin detemir once daily (n=138) versus insulin detemir alone once daily (n=137), aiming at HbA1c ≤ 7.0% (≤ 53 mmol/mol).. Primary outcome was change in mean carotid IMT (a marker of subclinical cardiovascular disease). HbA1c, insulin dose, weight, and hypoglycaemic and serious adverse events were other prespecified outcomes.. Carotid IMT change did not differ between groups (biphasic -0.009 mm (95% CI -0.022 to 0.004), aspart+detemir 0.000 mm (95% CI -0.013 to 0.013), detemir -0.012 mm (95% CI -0.025 to 0.000)). HbA1c was more reduced with biphasic (-1.0% (95% CI -1.2 to -0.8)) compared with the aspart+detemir (-0.4% (95% CI -0.6 to -0.3)) and detemir (-0.3% (95% CI -0.4 to -0.1)) groups (p<0.001). Weight gain was higher in the biphasic (3.3 kg (95% CI 2.7 to 4.0) and aspart+detemir (3.2 kg (95% CI 2.6 to 3.9)) compared with the detemir group (1.9 kg (95% CI 1.3 to 2.6)). Insulin dose was higher with detemir (1.6 IU/kg/day (95% CI 1.4 to 1.8)) compared with biphasic (1.0 IU/kg/day (95% CI 0.9 to 1.1)) and aspart+detemir (1.1 IU/kg/day (95% CI 1.0 to 1.3)) (p<0.001). Number of participants with severe hypoglycaemia and serious adverse events did not differ.. Carotid IMT change did not differ between 3 insulin regimens despite differences in HbA1c, weight gain and insulin doses. The trial only reached 46% of planned sample size and lack of power may therefore have affected our results.. NCT00657943.

Topics: Blood Glucose; Body Weight; Carotid Intima-Media Thickness; Denmark; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Aspart; Insulin Detemir; Male; Metformin; Middle Aged; Treatment Outcome

This study aims to compare the effectiveness of insulin glargine 300 U/mL (Gla-300) with its accompanying patient support program with that of other basal insulin and available patient support programs in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) in a real-world setting in terms of achieving HEDIS (Healthcare Effectiveness Data and Information Set) individualized glycemic targets without documented symptomatic hypoglycemia.. Achieve Control is a US-based, multicenter, randomized, open-label, active-controlled, parallel group pragmatic Phase IV trial in insulin-naïve patients with T2D uncontrolled on ≥2 oral antidiabetes drugs (OAD) and/or glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor antagonists (GLP-1 RA). Inclusion criteria include a diagnosis of T2D, age ≥18 years, and glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) between 8.0% and 11.0%. Patients will be assigned to either the Gla-300 or other basal insulin group. The primary end point is the proportion of patients achieving HEDIS HbA1c targets (<8.0% [64 mmol/mol] in patients with comorbidities or aged ≥65 years; <7.0% [58 mmol/mol] in all other patients) without occurrence of symptomatic hypoglycemia (blood glucose ≤70 mg/dL) from baseline to 6 months. Secondary end points include rates of documented symptomatic nocturnal hypoglycemia and severe hypoglycemia; change from baseline in HbA1c, fasting glucose, and body weight; treatment persistence; patient-reported outcomes; and healthcare resource utilization. Planned enrollment is 3270 patients across approximately 400 clinical sites.. Pragmatic clinical trials offer the potential to assess comparative effectiveness in broadly based patient populations receiving care (with or without a corresponding educational support program) in real-world clinical settings. The results of Achieve Control should elucidate the benefits of management of T2D with Gla-300 versus other basal insulins in terms of patient outcomes, experiences, and perceptions, and its impact on healthcare resource utilization and cost.. www.clinicaltrials.gov identifier is NCT02451137.

Topics: Aged; Blood Glucose; Body Weight; Comorbidity; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor; Glycated Hemoglobin; Health Services; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Detemir; Insulin Glargine; Male; Patient Reported Outcome Measures; United States

Weight gain upon insulin initiation is opposite to clinical goals in diabetes management. This trial aimed to determine the impact of modest dietary intervention on weight change and examine weight change in baseline body mass index strata when initiating once-daily insulin detemir (IDet) in overweight or obese insulin-naïve individuals with type 2 diabetes (T2D).. DIET (Impact of Dietary Intervention on Weight Change in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes) was a 26-week, randomized, treat-to-target, stratified, controlled, open-label, multinational trial. Subjects were randomized 1 : 1 to either the IDet group, which received basic dietary and physical exercise advice at baseline, or the Diet+IDet group, which had additional dietary consultations with a certified dietician (three face-to-face meetings, three phone contacts).. Mean estimated change in body weight from baseline ± standard error (SE) was -1.05 ± 0.23 kg for Diet+IDet and -0.56 ± 0.23 kg for IDet alone. Estimated mean difference was 0.49 kg (95% confidence interval: -0.15; 1.13, p = 0.132). Glycaemic control, measured by haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) and fasting plasma glucose, improved similarly in both groups. Both groups reported variable reductions in caloric intake and overall physical activity levels. No difference in hypoglycaemia rates between groups was observed.. This study suggests that a modest dietary intervention plus basic lifestyle advice, compared with basic lifestyle advice alone, resulted in similar weight change, efficacy, safety and tolerability when initiating IDet once daily in overweight or obese insulin-naïve individuals with T2D.

Topics: Adult; Blood Glucose; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Directive Counseling; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Detemir; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Obesity; Risk Reduction Behavior; Treatment Outcome; Weight Loss

Studies in rodents have demonstrated that insulin in the central nervous system induces satiety. In humans, these effects are less well established. Insulin detemir is a basal insulin analog that causes less weight gain than other basal insulin formulations, including the current standard intermediate-long acting Neutral Protamine Hagedorn (NPH) insulin. Due to its structural modifications, which render the molecule more lipophilic, it was proposed that insulin detemir enters the brain more readily than other insulins. The aim of this study was to investigate whether insulin detemir treatment differentially modifies brain activation in response to food stimuli as compared to NPH insulin. In addition, cerebral spinal fluid (CSF) insulin levels were measured after both treatments. Brain responses to viewing food and non-food pictures were measured using functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging in 32 type 1 diabetic patients, after each of two 12-week treatment periods with insulin detemir and NPH insulin, respectively, both combined with prandial insulin aspart. CSF insulin levels were determined in a subgroup. Insulin detemir decreased body weight by 0.8 kg and NPH insulin increased weight by 0.5 kg (p = 0.02 for difference), while both treatments resulted in similar glycemic control. After treatment with insulin detemir, as compared to NPH insulin, brain activation was significantly lower in bilateral insula in response to visual food stimuli, compared to NPH (p = 0.02 for right and p = 0.05 for left insula). Also, CSF insulin levels were higher compared to those with NPH insulin treatment (p = 0.003). Our findings support the hypothesis that in type 1 diabetic patients, the weight sparing effect of insulin detemir may be mediated by its enhanced action on the central nervous system, resulting in blunted activation in bilateral insula, an appetite-regulating brain region, in response to food stimuli.. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00626080.

Topics: Appetite Regulation; Blood-Brain Barrier; Body Weight; Brain Mapping; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Detemir; Insulin, Isophane; Insulin, Long-Acting; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Photic Stimulation

Hemodialyzed patients with diabetes face an increased cardiovascular risk. Optimal glycemic control can reduce morbidity and mortality, but it is difficult to achieve because of the alternation between dialysis and non-dialysis periods. This study evaluated the contribution of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) to the management of insulin regimen.. In this pilot prospective multicenter study, we performed CGM (Navigator®, Abbott, Rungis, France) for a total of 54 hours at baseline and for a 3-month follow-up period in a group of 28 hemodialyzed patients with type 2 diabetes treated by a basal-bolus detemir plus aspart insulin regimen. Insulin therapy was adapted to the CGM values. HbA1c and CGM parameters collected over the 3-month treatment period were compared using MANOVA for repeated measures.. After 3 months, HbA1c significantly decreased from 8.4 ± 1.0% (65 ± 1 mmol/mol) to 7.6 ± 1.0% (60 ± 11 mmol/mol; p < 0.01). Similarly, mean CGM glucose values significantly decreased from 9.9 ± 1.9 to 8.9 ± 2.1 mmol/L (p = 0.05). The frequency of glucose values > 10 mmol/L significantly decreased from 41.3 ± 21.9% to 30.1 ± 22.4% (p < 0.05), without a significant increase in the frequency of glucose values < 3.3 mmol/L. Insulin requirements significantly increased from 70 ± 51 IU/d to 82 ± 77 IU/d (p < 0.001), without significant changes in body weight.. CGM-adapted insulin regimen improves glycemic control without increasing hypoglycemic events in hemodialyzed diabetic patients. CGM could be a useful tool for the management of insulin therapy in these patients. These results need to be confirmed by long-term studies with larger sample sizes.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Blood Glucose; Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Aspart; Insulin Detemir; Male; Middle Aged; Monitoring, Ambulatory; Pilot Projects; Prospective Studies; Renal Dialysis; Risk Factors; Young Adult

This study assessed the efficacy and safety of once-daily insulin initiation using insulin detemir (detemir) or insulin glargine (glargine) added to existing metformin in type 2 diabetes (T2D).. This 26-week, multinational, randomized, treat-to-target trial involved 457 insulin-naïve adults with T2D (HbA1c 7-9%). Detemir or glargine was added to current metformin therapy [any second oral antidiabetic drug (OAD) discontinued] and titrated to a target fasting plasma glucose (FPG) ≤90 mg/dl (≤5.0 mmol/l). Primary efficacy endpoint was change in HbA1c.. Mean (s.d.) HbA1c decreased with detemir and glargine by 0.48 and 0.74%-points, respectively, to 7.48% (0.91%) and 7.13% (0.72%) [estimated between-treatment difference, 0.30 (95% CI: 0.14-0.46)]. Non-inferiority for detemir at the a priori level of 0.4%-points was not established. The proportions of patients reaching HbA1c ≤ 7% at 26 weeks were 38% and 53% (p = 0.026) with detemir and glargine, respectively. FPG decreased ∼43.2 mg/dl (∼2.4 mmol/l) in both groups [non-significant (NS)]. Treatment satisfaction was good for both insulins. Hypoglycaemia, which occurred infrequently, was observed less with detemir than glargine [rate ratio 0.73 (95% CI 0.54-0.98)]. The proportions of patients reaching HbA1c ≤ 7% without hypoglycaemia in the detemir and glargine groups were 32% and 38% (NS), respectively. Weight decreased with detemir [-0.49 (3.3) kg] and increased with glargine [+1.0 (3.1) kg] (95% CI for difference: -2.17 to -0.89 kg).. While both detemir and glargine, when added to metformin therapy, improved glycaemic control, glargine resulted in greater reductions in HbA1c, while detemir demonstrated less weight gain and hypoglycaemia.

Topics: Argentina; Blood Glucose; Body Mass Index; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Therapy, Combination; Fasting; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Detemir; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Metformin; Middle Aged; Patient Satisfaction; Republic of Korea; Thailand; Treatment Outcome; United States

This 52-week, randomized, multinational, open-label, parallel-group, non-inferiority trial investigated the efficacy and safety of basal-bolus treatment with insulin detemir vs. NPH (neutral protamine Hagedorn) insulin, in combination with insulin aspart, in subjects aged 2-16 years with Type 1 diabetes mellitus.. Of the 347 randomized and exposed subjects, 177 received insulin detemir and 170 NPH insulin, both administered once or twice daily in combination with mealtime insulin aspart. Glycaemic measurements and weight were followed over 52 weeks.. After 52 weeks, insulin detemir was shown to be non-inferior to NPH insulin with regard to HbA(1c) [mean difference insulin detemir-NPH: 1.30 mmol/mol, 95% CI -1.32 to 3.92 (0.12%, 95% CI -0.12 to 0.36) in the full analysis set and 1.41 mmol/mol, 95% CI -1.26 to 4.08 (0.13%, 95% CI -0.12 to 0.37) in the per protocol analysis set]. Hypoglycaemic events per subject-year of exposure of 24-h and nocturnal hypoglycaemia were significantly lower with insulin detemir than with NPH insulin (rate ratio 0.76, 95% CI 0.60-0.97, P = 0.028 and 0.62, 95% CI 0.47-0.84, P = 0.002, respectively). Weight standard deviation (sd) scores (body weight standardized by age and gender) decreased with insulin detemir, but increased slightly with NPH insulin (change: -0.12 vs. 0.04, P < 0.001). At end of the trial, median insulin doses were similar in both treatment groups.. Insulin detemir was non-inferior to NPH insulin after 52 weeks' treatment of children and adolescents aged 2-16 years, and was associated with a significantly lower risk of hypoglycaemia, together with significantly lower weight sd score when compared with NPH insulin.

Topics: Adolescent; Blood Glucose; Body Mass Index; Body Weight; Child; Child, Preschool; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1; Drug Administration Schedule; Europe; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Aspart; Insulin Detemir; Insulin, Isophane; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Treatment Outcome

Hypoglycemic risk and improved glycemic control have to be weightened when a decision on intensification of treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus with basal insulin is made. Findings from randomized studies are available in this respect, and should be complemented by data from routine treatment.. The international, prospective, open-label, observational study SOLVE (Study of Once-Daily Levemir) investigated add-on treatment with basal insulin in type 2 diabetes mellitus using once daily insulin detemir in patients currently receiving oral antidiabetic drugs (OAD). Data were collected between initiation of insulin treatment and the final visit after approximately 24 weeks. The primary objective of the study was to evaluate the incidence of serious adverse drug reactions (SADR), including major hypoglycemic events.. In Germany, 2,090 patients were eligible for the full analysis set and 1,671 patients for the effectiveness analysis set. The mean age was 64.9 years, mean duration of diabetes 9.36 years, and mean duration of OAD treatment 7.29 years. Three patients (0.14%) experienced a SADR (1 fall resulting in death, 2 major hypoglycemic events). At the final visit, there was a significant reduction in major hypoglycemic events if compared with the period before starting insulin treatment (0.002 versus 0.120 events per patient year, p < 0.001), as were minor hypoglycemic events (0.880 versus 1.588 events per patient year, p = 0.006). The mean body weight and BMI decreased by -0.9 kg (p < 0.001) and-0.35 kg/m2 (p < 0.001) respectively and the mean HbA(1c) level improved from 8.45 +/- 1.19% to 7.30 +/- 0.92% (-1.15 +/- 1.08%; p < 0.001). The mean fasting plasma glucose level and plasma glucose variability were significantly reduced.. Baseline data of the study underline the need for earlier intensification of antidiabetic therapy in type 2 diabetes in Germany. Study results show that within the German diabetes care system, initiation of basal insulin therapy with insulin detemir is able to result in significant HbA(1c) improvements without increased risk of hypoglycemia and/or weight gain.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Blood Pressure; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Detemir; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Middle Aged; Prospective Studies

This randomised (1:1), multinational, open-labelled, parallel group trial compared insulin detemir (IDet) with neutral protamine Hagedorn (NPH) insulin, in combination with mealtime insulin aspart, over 1 yr in subjects aged 2-16 yr with type 1 diabetes mellitus. Of 348 randomised subjects, 82 (23.6%) were 2-5 yr (IDet: 42, NPH: 40). This article is a descriptive subgroup analysis of these young children. Baseline characteristics (IDet vs. NPH) were similar: mean age, 4.3 vs. 4.5 yr; diabetes duration, 2.2 vs. 2.1 yr; males, 42.9 vs. 52.5%. Mean haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) was similar between groups at baseline (8.2 vs. 8.1%), and changed little over 1 yr (8.1 vs. 8.3%). Fasting plasma glucose (FPG) was similar at baseline (8.44 vs. 8.56 mmol/L) and decreased during the study (-1.0 vs. -0.45 mmol/L). A lower rate of hypoglycaemia was observed with IDet compared with NPH (24-h; 50.6 vs. 78.3 episodes per patient-year; nocturnal hypoglycaemia, 8.0 vs. 17.4 episodes per patient-year). No severe hypoglycaemic episodes occurred with IDet, while 3 subjects reported 6 episodes with NPH. Change in weight standard deviation score standardised by age and gender was -0.17 with IDet and +0.03 with NPH. A slightly lower proportion of subjects in this age group reported adverse events with IDet than with NPH (69.0 vs. 77.5%). Serious adverse events were few (5 with IDet, 7 with NPH). In conclusion, long-term treatment with IDet in children aged 2-5 yr suggested similar glycaemic control, greater reduction in FPG, lower rates of hypoglycaemia, no inappropriate weight gain, and fewer adverse events compared with NPH.

Topics: Body Weight; Child, Preschool; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1; Europe; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Detemir; Insulin, Isophane; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male

PREDICTIVE (Predictable Results and Experience in Diabetes through Intensification and Control to Target: an International Variability Evaluation) is a large, multinational, open-label, prospective, observational study addressed to assess the efficacy and safety of insulin detemir in clinical practice. This paper reports 26 weeks of follow-up data, from 1298 type 2 diabetes patients from Italy.. In this observational study, the primary end point was the incidence of serious adverse drug reactions (SADRs), including major hypoglycemia. Secondary end points were: hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), mean self-monitored fasting glucose, within-patient fasting glucose variability and body weight change.. Insulin detemir significantly improved glycemic control, with a decrease in mean HbA1c, fasting glucose and within-patient fasting glucose variability. Interestingly, the improvements in glycemic control occurred in association with a small, but significant reduction in weight. The safety results of this study showed that 26 weeks of treatment with insulin detemir was associated with a very low rate of SADRs (only 14 events), which mainly consisted of hypoglycemia (78%, of which 42% were major hypoglycemia).. Insulin detemir improves glycemic control, with low risk of hypoglycemia, no weight gain and an excellent safety profile; these data support the overall findings of PREDICTIVE.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Detemir; Insulin, Long-Acting; Italy; Male; Middle Aged; Young Adult

The efficacy of two basal insulins, insulin lispro protamine suspension (ILPS) and insulin detemir, was compared in basal-bolus regimens in Type 1 diabetes.. In this 32-week, multinational, parallel-group, randomized, controlled trial, adult patients with Type 1 diabetes received ILPS or insulin detemir, injected twice daily (before breakfast and bedtime) and prandial insulin lispro three times daily. The primary outcome was change in glycated haemoglobin (HbA(1c)) from baseline to endpoint.. Least squares mean (+/-se) changes in HbA(1c) were similar between groups, meeting non-inferiority (margin, 0.4%): -0.69 +/- 0.07% for ILPS and -0.59 +/- 0.07% for insulin detemir [between-treatment difference -0.10%; 95% confidence interval (CI) -0.29, 0.10]. Standard deviation of fasting blood glucose was similar (non-inferiority margin 0.8 mmol/l): 2.74 +/- 0.14 mmol/l for ILPS and 2.38 +/- 0.14 mmol/l for insulin detemir (CI -0.03, 0.75). Patients on ILPS gained more weight (1.59 +/- 0.23 kg vs. 0.62 +/- 0.24 kg; CI 0.34, 1.60; margin 1.5 kg). Weight-adjusted daily total and prandial insulin doses were lower for ILPS (prandial insulin, 0.38 +/- 0.01 U/kg/day for ILPS, 0.44 +/- 0.01 U/kg/day for insulin detemir; P = 0.004); daily basal insulin dose was similar. All hypoglycaemia incidence and rate and nocturnal hypoglycaemia incidence were similar between groups; nocturnal hypoglycaemia rate was lower for insulin detemir (mean +/- sd 0.79 +/- 1.23 for ILPS, 0.49 +/- 0.85 for insulin detemir; P = 0.001). Severe hypoglycaemia rate was 0.03 +/- 0.11 for ILPS and 0.02 +/- 0.10 for insulin detemir (P = 0.37).. ILPS-treated patients with Type 1 diabetes achieved similar glycaemic control as insulin detemir-treated patients after 32 weeks. Glucose variability was similar. While weight gain and nocturnal hypoglycaemia rate were statistically higher with ILPS, the clinical relevance is unclear.

Topics: Adult; Analysis of Variance; Blood Glucose; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Fasting; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Injections, Subcutaneous; Insulin; Insulin Detemir; Insulin Lispro; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Middle Aged

Insulin lispro protamine suspension (ILPS) and insulin detemir were compared in insulin-naive patients with Type 2 diabetes poorly controlled by oral glucose-lowering agents (OGLAs) to demonstrate non-inferior overall glycaemic control.. This was a 24-week, multinational, open-label, parallel-group, treat-to-target trial. Adults taking two or more OGLAs were randomized to ILPS (n = 223) or detemir (n = 219) once daily at bedtime. Doses were titrated to target fasting blood glucose (FBG) 5.0-7.2 mmol/l. A pre-breakfast dose was added up to week 8 per prespecified criteria. The primary objective was comparison of glycated haemoglobin (HbA(1c)) change from baseline (non-inferiority margin 0.4%).. At end-point, HbA(1c) decreased from 8.8 +/- 0.7% in both groups to 7.3 +/- 0.9% (ILPS) and 7.5 +/- 1.1% (detemir). Least-squares mean difference (95% confidence interval) for HbA(1c) [-0.21% (-0.39, -0.03)] and glycaemic variability [0.10 mmol/l (-0.02, 0.23)] demonstrated non-inferiority. End-point mean FBG was 7.0 vs. 6.9 mmol/l (P = 0.85), and percentages of patients achieving H < 7.0% were 34.9% vs. 31.2% for ILPS vs. detemir. More ILPS patients used twice-daily dosing (59% vs. 49%). Mean daily insulin dose was 0.39 vs. 0.46 U/kg (P = 0.005) and weight gain was 1.88 vs. 0.36 kg (P < 0.001) for ILPS vs. detemir. Overall hypoglycaemia (episodes patient(-1) year(-1)) (24.2 +/- 33.0 vs. 16.2 +/- 26.1, P = 0.001) and nocturnal (6.3 +/- 12.1 vs. 3.8 +/- 13.2, P < 0.001) rates were higher for ILPS.. At end-point, ILPS was non-inferior to detemir in HbA(1c) change from baseline. Patients using ILPS achieved lower end-point HbA(1c) with lower insulin doses but greater hypoglycaemia and weight gain.

Topics: Aged; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Detemir; Insulin Lispro; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Middle Aged

The aim of this study was to compare a simplified patient-driven algorithm (303 Algorithm) to physician-driven adjustments in a subset of 193 patients with type 2 diabetes from the PREDICTIVE 303 study who were using basal-bolus insulin therapy.. PREDICTIVE 303 was a 26-week, randomized, phase 4 study, in which subjects were either instructed to adjust their insulin detemir dose every 3 days by +/-3 units if mean fasting plasma glucose (FPG) values were above 110 mg/dL or below 80 mg/dL (303 Algorithm), or had physicians adjust the insulin detemir dose according to usual practice (Standard-of-care).. Patients in both groups achieved similar reductions in glycated hemoglobin (-0.2% and -0.3% for 303 Algorithm and Standard-of care groups, respectively; between groups P=0.60). 303 Algorithm group patients achieved a greater reduction in FPG (-21.3 mg/dL vs. 0.2 mg/dL; between groups P=0.03). Both 303 Algorithm and Standard-of care groups experienced a similar rate of overall hypoglycemia, and similar weight reduction (-1.7 kg and -0.4 kg, respectively; between groups P=0.07). Over 82% of patients in both groups used insulin detemir once daily.. Adjustments of a once-daily detemir dose by patients using the 303 Algorithm in a basal-bolus setting is equally effective in improving glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes compared with physician-directed basal dose adjustments.

Topics: Aged; Algorithms; Blood Glucose; Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Monitoring; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Insulin; Insulin Detemir; Insulin, Long-Acting; Linear Models; Male; Middle Aged; Physician's Role; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Safety; Self Administration; Treatment Outcome; United States

The aim was to compare clinical outcomes by different dosing frequencies of insulin detemir (detemir) used over 52 weeks in various regimens.. This analysis involved French patients enrolled in PREDICTIVE (a large-scale, multinational, observational study of empirical use of detemir in everyday clinical practice) for whom data have been collected over 52 weeks. Three cohorts were considered: patients with type 1 diabetes; patients with type 2 diabetes using detemir in a basal insulin plus oral antidiabetic drug (OAD) regimen; patients with type 2 diabetes using detemir as part of basal-bolus insulin therapy. In each cohort, data were stratified according to detemir dosing frequency at the beginning and end of 52 weeks: once daily (o.d.) at the beginning and end; twice daily (b.i.d.) at the beginning and end; o.d. at the beginning, but b.i.d. at the end. Endpoints assessed included glycated hemoglobin, fasting plasma glucose, hypoglycemia, weight, and insulin dose.. There were improvements in glycemic control and tolerability in all subgroups. Patients completing on o.d. dosing tended to have better outcomes than those completing on b.i.d. dosing in all cohorts, and o.d. administration was associated with lower insulin dosing. There was little evidence that switching from o.d. to b.i.d. dosing influenced outcomes other than insulin dose. However, there were some baseline differences between subgroups selected for o.d. and b.i.d. dosing that might have influenced outcomes: many patients appeared to have been continued on previous basal dosing frequencies; for others, b.i.d. detemir dosing seemed to be used to intensify previous therapy.. With the caveat that empirical choices of dose frequency were made, this analysis shows that empirical use of o.d. detemir produces results at least as good as empirical use of b.i.d. detemir in basal-bolus-treated type 1 and type 2 diabetes, and in basal plus OAD-treated type 2 diabetes.

Topics: Blood Glucose; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Detemir; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Middle Aged; Prospective Studies; Treatment Outcome

The primary study objective was to determine whether insulin detemir (detemir) was noninferior to insulin glargine (glargine) as the basal insulin in a basal-bolus regimen, with insulin aspart as the mealtime insulin, in terms of glycemic control at the end of 52 weeks in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM).. This multinational, open-label, parallel-group, treat-to-target, noninferiority trial enrolled patients aged > or = 18 years who had had T1DM for at least 12 months, had been taking a basal-bolus insulin regimen for at least 3 months, and had a glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) value < or = 11.0% at screening. Patients were randomized in a 2:1 ratio to receive either detemir or glargine for 52 weeks. The basal insulin was initially administered once daily (in the evening) in both groups; if patients in the detemir group were achieving the plasma glucose (PG) target before breakfast but not before dinner, they were switched to twice-daily administration. Glargine was administered once daily throughout the trial, according to its approved labeling. Each patient attended 13 study visits and received 16 scheduled telephone calls from the trial site. The primary efficacy end point was glycemic control (HbA1c) after 52 weeks of treatment. Secondary end points included the number of patients achieving an HbA1c value < or = 7.0%, with or without a major hypoglycemic episode in the last month of treatment; fasting PG (FPG); within-patient variation in self-monitored plasma glucose (SMPG) before breakfast and dinner; and 10-point SMPG profiles. The noninferiority margin was 0.4%, consistent with US Food and Drug Administration guidelines.. Four hundred forty-three patients (mean [SD] age, 42 [12] years; body mass index, 26.5 [4.0] kg/m2; duration of diabetes, 17.2 [11.4] years; HbA1c, 8.1% [1.1%]) received study treatment. After 52 weeks, the estimated mean HbA1c did not differ significantly between the detemir and glargine groups (7.57% and 7.56%, respectively; mean difference, 0.01%; 95% CI, -0.13 to 0.16), consistent with the noninferiority of detemir to glargine. The corresponding estimated changes in HbA1c were -0.53% and -0.54%. In the 90 patients who completed the trial on once-daily detemir and the 173 patients who completed the trial on twice-daily detemir, the estimated changes in HbA1c were -0.49% and -0.58%, respectively. After 52 weeks, there were no significant differences in the proportions of those receiving detemir and glargine who achieved an HbA1c value < or = 7.0% without major hypoglycemia (31.9% and 28.9%, respectively). In addition, there were no significant differences in estimated mean FPG (8.58 and 8.81 mmol/L; mean difference, -0.23 mmol/L; 95% CI, -1.04 to 0.58) or in basal insulin doses. The basal insulin dose was numerically higher in patients receiving detemir twice rather than once daily (0.47 vs 0.33 U/kg, respectively). The relative risks for total and nocturnal hypoglycemia with detemir versus glargine were 0.94 and 1.12, respectively (both, P = NS). Six patients (2.0%) randomized to the detemir group and 4 (2.7%) randomized to the glargine group withdrew due to adverse events.. During 52 weeks of basal-bolus therapy in patients with T1DM, detemir was noninferior to glargine in terms of overall glycemic control (HbA1c). When used according to the approved labeling, detemir and glargine did not differ in tolerability or in terms of the occurrence of hypoglycemia.

Topics: Adult; Blood Glucose; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1; Double-Blind Method; Endpoint Determination; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Detemir; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Middle Aged; Sample Size; Treatment Outcome

PREDICTIVE 303 was a 26-week, prospective, randomized, open-label, multi-center study in patients with type 2 diabetes that investigated whether patient-driven adjustments of insulin detemir doses using the 303 Algorithm achieved similar glycemic control compared to standard-of-care, physician-driven adjustments in doses. This post hoc sub-analysis evaluates insulin naïve patients on oral anti-diabetic drugs (OADs) who were directed to start on once-daily insulin detemir as add-on therapy to any other glucose-lowering regimens.. Patients in the 303 Algorithm group were instructed to adjust their detemir dose every 3 days based on mean fasting plasma glucose (FPG) values using a simple algorithm: mean FPG < 80 mg/dL, reduce dose by 3 units; between 80-110mg/dL, no change; > 110mg/dL, increase by 3 units. Physicians adjusted the detemir dose for patients in the Standard-of-care group according to their usual practice. No control insulin was used for comparison to insulin detemir.. Reductions in glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA(1c)) from baseline were similar between those patients in the 303 Algorithm and Standard-of-care groups (-1.1 and -1.0%, respectively; between group p = 0.0933); patients in the 303 Algorithm group achieved a greater reduction in FPG. Patients in both groups experienced a similar, low rate of hypoglycemia. Over 95% and 92% of patients, respectively, used detemir once daily.. These data indicate that patients with type 2 diabetes naïve to insulin can effectively implement the 303 Algorithm to initiate and adjust a once-daily dose of insulin detemir to achieve improvements in glycemic control.

Topics: Aged; Algorithms; Blood Glucose; Body Weight; Circadian Rhythm; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Dosage Calculations; Fasting; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Detemir; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Middle Aged; United States

PREDICTIVE is a multi-national, prospective, observational study, assessing the safety and efficacy of insulin detemir in patients with diabetes.. The European cohort includes 20,531 patients with diabetes (7420 type 1) from 11 countries. A subgroup of 4782 type 1 patients were transferred from a basal-bolus regimen with NPH insulin (n = 3117) or insulin glargine (n = 1665) to insulin detemir basal-bolus therapy; or from a human insulin basal-bolus regimen (n = 570) to insulin detemir/insulin aspart (part of the pre-study NPH group). Mean follow-up was 14.4 weeks. The primary endpoint was serious adverse drug reactions (SADRs), including major hypoglycaemia. Secondary endpoints were: incidence of overall and nocturnal hypoglycaemia; haemoglobin A(1c) (HbA(1c)); fasting glucose; within-patient fasting glucose variability; and change in body weight.. SADRs were reported by 62 (2.0%) patients previously receiving NPH insulin, 45 (2.7%) patients previously receiving insulin glargine and seven (1.2%) patients previously receiving human basal-bolus insulins. Major hypoglycaemia was significantly reduced in NPH insulin (55%), insulin glargine (51%), and human basal-bolus insulin groups (54%; p < 0.0001 for all). Total and nocturnal hypoglycaemic episodes were also significantly reduced in all groups (p < 0.0001 for all). HbA(1c) was reduced in patients previously receiving NPH insulin (0.5%), insulin glargine (0.4%), and human basal-bolus insulins (0.6%; p < 0.0001 for all). Mean fasting glucose and within-patient fasting glucose variability significantly decreased in all patients (p < 0.0001 for all). Body weight remained stable.. In this open-label, prospective, observational study, insulin detemir basal-bolus therapy improved glycaemic control and reduced hypoglycaemia with weight neutrality in type 1 patients in actual clinical practice.

Topics: Adult; Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting Systems; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1; Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions; Europe; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Detemir; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Prospective Studies; Treatment Outcome

To assess efficacy and tolerability of insulin detemir or NPH insulin added to oral therapy for type 2 diabetes in a treat-to-target titration protocol.. Individuals (n = 476) with HbA(1c) (A1C) 7.5-10.0% were randomized to addition of twice-daily insulin detemir or NPH insulin in a parallel-group, multicenter trial. Over 24 weeks, insulin doses were titrated toward prebreakfast and predinner plasma glucose targets of < or =6.0 mmol/l (< or =108 mg/dl). Outcomes assessed included A1C, percentage achieving A1C < or =7.0%, risk of hypoglycemia, and body weight.. At 24 weeks, A1C had decreased by 1.8 and 1.9% (from 8.6 to 6.8 and from 8.5 to 6.6%) for detemir and NPH, respectively (NS). In both groups, 70% of participants achieved an A1C

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Blood Glucose; Body Mass Index; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Detemir; Insulin, Isophane; Insulin, Long-Acting; Weight Gain

The aim of this study was to compare the long-term safety and efficacy of twice-daily insulin detemir or NPH insulin as the basal component of basal-bolus therapy in people with type 1 diabetes.. A multicentre, open-label, parallel-group study was conducted over 12 months and completed by 308 people (from an original randomized cohort of 428). Patients were randomized in a 2:1 ratio to receive insulin detemir or NPH insulin before breakfast and dinner, with insulin aspart at mealtimes.. Glycaemic control improved in both groups with HbA(1c) decreasing by 0.64 and 0.56% point in the insulin detemir and NPH insulin groups, reaching baseline-adjusted final values of 7.53 +/- 0.10% and 7.59 +/- 0.13%, respectively. No significant difference was apparent between treatments in terms of HbA(1c), fasting plasma glucose or 9-point blood glucose profiles. Fewer hypoglycaemic events (major and minor) occurred in association with insulin detemir compared with NPH insulin, but the overall hypoglycaemic risk did not differ statistically significantly (RR for detemir, 0.78 [0.56-1.08]). However, the risk of nocturnal hypoglycaemia during the maintenance phase (month 2-12) was 32% lower in the detemir group (p = 0.02) and lower in every month. This risk reduction remained statistically significant after correction for HbA(1c). After 12 months, baseline-adjusted mean body weight was significantly lower in the insulin detemir group than in the NPH insulin group (p < 0.001).. In long-term basal-bolus therapy, insulin detemir with insulin aspart as mealtime insulin is well tolerated and reduces the risks of nocturnal hypoglycaemia and weight gain compared to NPH insulin.

Topics: Adult; Blood Glucose; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Insulin; Insulin Detemir; Insulin, Isophane; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male

Insulin detemir is a soluble long-acting basal insulin analog designed to overcome the limitations of conventional basal insulin formulations. Accordingly, insulin detemir has been compared with NPH insulin with respect to glycemic control (HbA1c, prebreakfast glucose levels and variability, and hypoglycemia) and timing of administration.. People with type 1 diabetes (n = 408) were randomized in an open-label, parallel-group trial of 16-week treatment duration using either insulin detemir or NPH insulin. Insulin detemir was administered twice daily using two different regimens, either before breakfast and at bedtime (IDet(morn+bed)) or at a 12-h interval (IDet(12h)). NPH insulin was administered before breakfast and at bedtime. Mealtime insulin was given as the rapid-acting insulin analog insulin aspart.. With both insulin detemir groups, clinic fasting plasma glucose was lower than with NPH insulin (IDet(12h) vs. NPH, -1.5 mmol/l [95% CI -2.51 to -0.48], P = 0.004; IDet(morn+bed) vs. NPH, -2.3 mmol/l (-3.32 to -1.29), P < 0.001), as was self-measured prebreakfast plasma glucose (P = 0.006 and P = 0.004, respectively). The risk of minor hypoglycemia was lower in both insulin detemir groups (25%, P = 0.046; 32%, P = 0.002; respectively) compared with NPH insulin in the last 12 weeks of treatment, this being mainly attributable to a 53% reduction in nocturnal hypoglycemia in the IDet(morn+bed) group (P < 0.001). Although HbA1c for each insulin detemir group was not different from the NPH group, HbA1c for the pooled insulin detemir groups was significantly lower than for the NPH group (mean difference -0.18% [-0.34 to -0.02], P = 0.027). Within-person between-day variation in self-measured prebreakfast plasma glucose was lower for both detemir groups (both P < 0.001). The NPH group gained weight during the study, but there was no change in weight in either of the insulin detemir groups (IDet(12h) vs. NPH, -0.8 kg [-1.44 to -0.24], P = 0.006; IDet(morn+bed) vs. NPH, -0.6 kg [-1.23 to -0.03], P = 0.040).. Overall glycemic control with insulin detemir was improved compared with NPH insulin. The data provide a basis for tailoring the timing of administration of insulin detemir to the individual person's needs.

Topics: Adult; Blood Glucose; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Detemir; Insulin, Isophane; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male

The aim of the trial was to compare the efficacy and tolerability of two types of basal-bolus therapy, using either the soluble long-acting basal insulin analogue, insulin detemir, in combination with the rapid-acting analogue, insulin aspart, or NPH insulin in combination with mealtime regular human insulin.. In this 18-week, 1:1 randomised, open-labelled, parallel trial, 595 patients with Type 1 diabetes mellitus received insulin detemir or NPH insulin in the morning and at bedtime in combination with mealtime insulin aspart or regular human insulin respectively.. Glycaemic control with insulin detemir/insulin aspart was improved in comparison with NPH insulin/regular human insulin (HbA1c: 7.88% vs 8.11%; mean difference: -0.22% point [95% CI: -0.34 to -0.10]; p<0.001). Self-measured 8-point plasma glucose profiles differed between the groups (p<0.001), with lower postprandial plasma glucose levels in the insulin detemir/insulin aspart group. Within-person day-to-day variation in plasma glucose was lower with insulin detemir/insulin aspart than with NPH insulin/regular human insulin (SD: 2.88 vs 3.12 mmol/l; p<0.001). Risk of overall and nocturnal hypoglycaemia (23.00-06.00 hours) was, respectively, 21% (p=0.036) and 55% (p<0.001) lower in the insulin detemir/insulin aspart group than in the NPH insulin/regular human insulin group. Body weight (adjusted for baseline and change in HbA1c) was 1 kg lower with insulin detemir/insulin aspart than with NPH insulin/regular human insulin (p<0.001).. Basal-bolus therapy using insulin detemir/insulin aspart offers a better balance of control and tolerability than with NPH insulin/regular human insulin. The low variability and more physiological action profiles generated with these insulin analogues resulted in improved glycaemic control with lower risk of hypoglycaemia and no concomitant body weight increase.

Topics: Adult; Blood Glucose; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1; Endpoint Determination; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Aspart; Insulin Detemir; Insulin, Isophane; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male

This trial compared the efficacy and safety of basal-bolus therapy using either the soluble basal insulin analogue insulin detemir (IDet) in combination with meal-time rapid-acting analogue insulin aspart (IAsp), or NPH insulin (NPH) in combination with meal-time regular human insulin (HSI). This was a 22-week, multinational, open-labelled, symmetrically randomised, parallel group trial including 395 people with type 2 diabetes (IDet + IAsp: 195, NPH + HSI: 200). At 22 weeks, HbA1c was comparable between treatments (IDet + IAsp: 7.46%, NPH + HSI: 7.52%, P = 0.515) with decreases from baseline of 0.65% and 0.58%, respectively. Treatment with IDet + IAsp was associated with a significantly lower within-person variation in self-measured fasting plasma glucose (FPG) (SD:1.20 versus 1.54 mmol/L, p < 0.001), as well as a lower body weight gain (0.51 versus 1.13 kg, p = 0.038) than with NPH + HSI. The risk of nocturnal hypoglycaemia was 38% lower with IDet + IAsp than with NPH + HSI, but statistical significance was not attained (P = 0.14). The overall safety profile was similar between the two treatments. Basal-bolus treatment with IDet + IAsp is an effective and well tolerated insulin regimen in people with type 2 diabetes, resulting in glycaemic control comparable to that of NPH + HSI, but with the advantages of less weight gain and a lower day-to-day within-person variation in FPG.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Blood Glucose; Body Weight; Circadian Rhythm; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Therapy, Combination; Fasting; Female; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Aspart; Insulin Detemir; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male

Insulin detemir is a soluble basal insulin analog with a unique mechanism of protracted action designed to reduce the variability associated with conventional basal insulins. This trial compared the glycemic control, risk of hypoglycemia, and effect on body weight of insulin detemir and NPH insulin in patients with type 1 diabetes treated with rapid-acting insulin aspart at meals.. This study was a 6-month multinational open parallel-group comparison conducted at 46 centers in five countries and included 448 patients with type 1 diabetes randomized 2:1 to insulin detemir or NPH insulin, respectively.. After 6 months, comparable HbA(1c) levels were found between the two treatment groups. Fasting plasma glucose tended to be lower in patients treated with insulin detemir, but this difference was not statistically significant (-0.76 mmol/l, P = 0.097). Within-subject variation in self-measured fasting blood glucose was lower with insulin detemir than with NPH insulin (SD 3.37 vs. 3.78 mmol/l, P < 0.001). Risk of hypoglycemia was 22% lower with insulin detemir than with NPH insulin (P < 0.05) and 34% lower for nocturnal (2300-0600) hypoglycemia (P < 0.005). Nightly plasma glucose profiles were smoother and more stable with insulin detemir (P = 0.05). Body weight was significantly lower with insulin detemir at the end of the trial (P < 0.001).. Treatment with insulin detemir resulted in more predictable glycemic control, with smoother plasma glucose profiles than NPH insulin and a significant reduction in the risk of hypoglycemia. The reduction in body weight with insulin detemir is a potential additional advantage. Regimens optimized for insulin detemir may be able to improve glycemic control beyond that possible with NPH insulin.

Topics: Adult; Blood Glucose; Body Weight; Carrier Proteins; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1; Eating; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Incidence; Insulin; Insulin Aspart; Insulin Detemir; Insulin, Isophane; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Middle Aged; Risk Factors

Insulin detemir (DET) is a basal insulin analog that, in contrast to other long-acting forms of insulin, has significant weight-gain-sparing effects in diabetic patients. We hypothesized that this effect of DET may be due to its enhanced catabolic action in the central nervous system. We investigated the long-term effects of single third ventricular (3V) microinjections of equimolar doses of DET and regular insulin in normal male rats on feeding, body weight, energy expenditure (EE), and respiratory quotient (RQ). Also, in acute testing, we assessed the ability of lower doses of DET to alter feeding, EE, and RQ when microinjected directly into the paraventricular nucleus (PVN). The anabolic peptide ghrelin served as a positive control in acute testing. 3V administration of both DET (0.5-2.0 mU) and regular insulin (2.0-8.0 mU) significantly reduced feeding and body weight over 48 and 120 h, respectively, with DET yielding greater inhibitory effects. DET also stimulated greater elevations of EE and reductions of RQ over 72 and 48 h postinjection, respectively. In acute (4 h) testing, microinjections of DET (0.5 mU) into the PVN reduced feeding, increased EE, and reduced RQ, while ghrelin (100 pmol) had the opposite effects. When administered sequentially into the PVN, DET (0.25 and 0.5 mU) reversed ghrelin-induced feeding, EE, and RQ effects. These data support the notion that the weight-sparing effect of DET is at least in part based on its central catabolic action and that enhanced EE and reduced RQ may participate in this effect.

Topics: Animals; Body Weight; Central Nervous System; Eating; Energy Metabolism; Ghrelin; Insulin Detemir; Male; Oxygen Consumption; Paraventricular Hypothalamic Nucleus; Rats; Rats, Sprague-Dawley; Weight Gain

The present subanalysis of the Study of Once Daily Levemir (SOLVE) study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of once-daily insulin detemir as add-on to oral antidiabetic drugs (OADs) in Chinese type 2 diabetes patients according to body mass index in a real-life setting.. In all, 3272 eligible patients who were treated with diet, exercise, and one or more OAD were prescribed once-daily insulin detemir by their physician according to routine clinical practice and were followed-up for 24 weeks. The incidence of serious adverse reactions (SADRs), including major hypoglycemia, was the primary endpoint. Subanalyses were performed on patients in the following BMI groups: normal weight (BMI < 25 kg/m2); overweight (25 ≤ BMI < 30 kg/m2); and obese (BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2).. No SADRs were reported during the study. Significant improvements in glycemic levels were observed in all subgroups. For normal weight, overweight, and obese patients, the mean change in HbA1c (%/[mmol/mol]) was -1.26/-14, -1.09/-12, and -1.06/-12, respectively. The mean change in fasting plasma glucose in normal weight, overweight, and obese patients was -2.77, -2.57, and -2.71 mmol/L, respectively. Slight weight gain (0.25 kg), slight weight loss (-0.36 kg), and weight loss (-1.32 kg) were observed in the normal weight, overweight, and obese patients, respectively (P < 0.001). Linear regression analysis revealed a negative relationship between weight change and baseline BMI (slope = -0.16; P < 0.001).. Once-daily insulin detemir as add-on to OADs in Chinese patients with type 2 diabetes showed effective glycemic control and a low risk of hypoglycemia. Weight-neutral effects were observed in different BMI subgroups.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Blood Glucose; Body Mass Index; Body Weight; China; Cohort Studies; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Detemir; Insulin, Long-Acting; International Agencies; Male; Middle Aged; Prognosis; Young Adult

To evaluate real-world clinical outcomes for switching basal insulin analogues [insulin glargine (GLA) and insulin detemir (DET)] among US patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).. Using the GE Centricity Electronic Medical Records database, this retrospective study examined two cohorts: cohort 1, comprising patients previously on GLA and then either switching to DET (DET-S) or continuing with GLA (GLA-C); and cohort 2, comprising patients previously on DET and then either switching to GLA (GLA-S) or continuing with DET (DET-C). Within each cohort, treatment groups were propensity-score-matched on baseline characteristics. At 1-year follow-up, insulin treatment patterns, glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) levels, hypoglycaemic events, weight and body mass index (BMI) were evaluated.. The analysis included 13 942 patients: cohort 1: n = 10 657 (DET-S, n = 1797 matched to GLA-C, n = 8860) and cohort 2: n = 3285 (GLA-S, n = 858 matched to DET-C, n = 2427). Baseline characteristics were similar between the treatment groups in each cohort. At 1-year follow-up, in cohort 1, patients in the DET-S subgroup were significantly less persistent with treatment, more likely to use a rapid-acting insulin analogue, had higher HbA1c values, lower HbA1c reductions and lower proportions of patients achieving HbA1c <7.0 or <8.0% compared with patients in the GLA-C subgroup, while hypoglycaemia rates and BMI/weight values and change from baseline were similar in the two subgroups. In cohort 2, overall, there were contrasting findings between patients in the GLA-S and those in the DET-C subgroup.. This study showed contrasting results when patients with T2DM switched between basal insulin analogues, although these preliminary results may be subject to limitations in the analysis. Nevertheless, this study calls into question the therapeutic interchangeability of GLA and DET, and this merits further investigation.

Topics: Aged; Body Mass Index; Body Weight; Databases, Factual; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Substitution; Electronic Health Records; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Detemir; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Insulin, Short-Acting; Male; Middle Aged; Retrospective Studies; Treatment Outcome; United States

Insulin detemir (DET) reduces glycemia comparably to other long-acting insulin formulations but causes less weight gain. Insulin signaling in the brain is catabolic, reducing food intake. We hypothesized that DET reduces weight gain, relative to other insulins, owing to increased transport into the central nervous system and/or increased catabolic action within the brain. Transport of DET and NPH insulin into the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) was compared over several hours and after the administration of different doses peripherally in rats. DET and NPH had comparable saturable, receptor-mediated transport into the CSF. CSF insulin remained elevated significantly longer after intraperitoneal DET than after NPH. When administered acutely into the 3rd cerebral ventricle, both DET and NPH insulin reduced food intake and body weight at 24 h, and both food intake and body weight remained lower after DET than after NPH after 48 h. In direct comparison with another long-acting insulin, insulin glargine (GLAR), DET led to more prolonged increases in CSF insulin despite a shorter plasma half-life in both rats and mice. Additionally, peripheral DET administration reduced weight gain and increased CSF insulin compared with saline or GLAR in mice. Overall, these data support the hypothesis that DET has distinct effects on energy balance through enhanced and prolonged centrally mediated reduction of food intake.

Topics: Animals; Appetite Depressants; Biological Transport; Body Composition; Body Weight; Brain; Eating; Hypoglycemic Agents; Injections, Intraperitoneal; Insulin; Insulin Detemir; Insulin, Isophane; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Mice; Mice, Inbred C57BL; Rats; Rats, Wistar

Several studies suggest benefits of insulin analogues detemir or glulisine in overweight and obese patients with type 2 diabetes. The present multicentre study therefore examines, whether these insulin analogues are used more frequently in patients with increased body mass index.. Data of 38 560 adult type 2 diabetic patients using insulin analogues, from 150 centres in Germany, registered in a standardized, prospective, computer-based documentation program (DPV), were included. Patients were classified into body mass index categories according to World Health Organization. Analysis was stratified by 3 time periods. To adjust for confounding effects, multivariable logistic regression models were created.. Detemir was preferentially used in overweight (OR 1.36, 95%-CI 1.20-1.53) and obese patients (OR 2.06, 95%-CI 1.84-2.31) compared to normal-weight patients. These effects remained significant after adjusting for sex, age, new/old federal state of Germany, size of centre, treatment in university clinic and clinic/specialized private practice. Models were additionally adjusted for time period and interaction of BMI category with age or sex. For glulisine, a minor effect was present when comparing obese to normal-weight patients (OR 1.26, 95%-CI 1.06-1.50). After adjustment, this finding was no longer significant. Stratified by obesity grade, class III obese patients more frequently used detemir or glulisine compared to class I obese patients. Comparing time periods, odds ratios did not differ, neither for detemir nor for glulisine..  Detemir is used more often in overweight and obese patients compared to normal-weight patients. For glulisine, the relationship is less pronounced.

Topics: Aged; Body Weight; Databases, Factual; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Prescriptions; Female; Germany; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Detemir; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Middle Aged; Obesity; Overweight; Practice Patterns, Physicians'; Registries

To determine the safety and effectiveness of insulin analogues in type 2 diabetes (T2D) patients in the Algerian cohort of the A₁chieve study and to examine the status of T2D management across different regions in Algeria.. Patients starting therapy with biphasic insulin aspart 30, insulin detemir, insulin aspart (IAsp) or IAsp + basal insulin at their physicians' decision were included. The primary outcome was the incidence of serious adverse drug reactions (SADRs), including major hypoglycaemia. Secondary outcomes included changes from baseline to Week 24 in hypoglycaemia, glycated haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), fasting plasma glucose (FPG), postprandial plasma glucose (PPPG), weight and quality of life (QoL, evaluated using the EQ-5D questionnaire).. Overall, 1494 patients (mean ± SD age: 60.1 ± 10.3 years; body mass index: 28.1 ± 4.9 kg/m(2); HbA1c: 9.2 ± 1.8%) were enrolled. Poor baseline glucose control was revealed across the different Algerian regions with mean HbA1c varying from 8.9% to 9.6%. Two SADRs were reported during the study. The proportion of patients reporting major hypoglycaemic events decreased from 1.1% at baseline to 0.2% at Week 24 (p = 0.0017). Significant improvements in mean HbA1c (-1.3 ± 2.0%), FPG (-38.8 ± 79.9 mg/dL) and post-breakfast PPPG (-51.4 ± 97.1 mg/dL) were observed in the entire cohort (all p < 0.001). The mean body weight increased by 0.9 ± 3.8 kg, while QoL increased by 9.2 ± 16.7 points after 24 weeks.. Insulin analogue therapy was well-tolerated and significantly improved blood glucose control over 24 weeks in the Algerian cohort.

Topics: Algeria; Biomarkers; Blood Glucose; Body Mass Index; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Aspart; Insulin Detemir; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Middle Aged; Postprandial Period; Prevalence; Prospective Studies; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Treatment Outcome

This study aimed to compare glycemic variations seen among Japanese patients with type 1 diabetes treated with insulin glargine versus insulin detemir using continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) in a crossover design.. Twenty-three patients with type 1 diabetes were enrolled in this study. The subjects were on either insulin glargine followed by insulin detemir twice daily, or vice versa, with no change in the timing of injections. The glycemic variations during 4-day hospitalizations were monitored by CGM while the patients were on either regimen, with a second hospitalization scheduled more than 1 month after the change of the long-acting insulin analogs. CGM data obtained on Day 3 of both hospitalizations were compared.. The subjects had a median age of 44.0 years, a median body mass index of 22.2 kg/m(2), and a median glycosylated hemoglobin of 7.3%. There was no significant difference between the two treatments with a mean glucose level of 156 mg/dL with the insulin glargine treatment versus 150 mg/dL with the insulin detemir treatment; their SD values were 60 versus 51 mg/dL, their mean amplitude of glycemic excursions values were 121 versus 105 mg/dL, and their mean of daily differences values were 45.7 versus 41.4 mg/dL, respectively. In addition, the insulin detemir treatment was associated with a narrower range of postprandial glucose increases after lunch (80 vs. 59 mg/dL; P=0.007).. A comparison of the long-acting insulin analogs administered twice daily in type 1 diabetes demonstrated that insulin detemir may potentially offer better glycemic control after lunch than insulin glargine.

Topics: Adult; Asian People; Blood Glucose; Body Weight; Cross-Over Studies; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Detemir; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Treatment Outcome

Insulin detemir is a novel human insulin analog that does not show the usual propensity for weight gain in diabetic patients. We speculated that this beneficial effect could be due to insulin detemir exerting stronger anorectic effects within the brain than other insulins. To study the central effects of regular human insulin and insulin detemir on food intake, the present study was undertaken. We used acute intracerebroventricular insulin injections to compare food intake and body weight in rats fed ad libitum. Contrary to previously published data, we found that neither regular human insulin (8 or 32 mU) nor insulin detemir (1,290 pmol) reduced food intake in this model. Melanotan-II was also injected intracerebroventricularly as a positive control, and significantly reduced food intake and body weight, suggesting that our intracerebroventricular model is able to show anorectic effects. A series of experiments was therefore conducted in which different set-ups were tested to investigate which factors would be required to produce the reported anorectic effect of intracerebroventricular insulin. Although we varied rat strain, stereotactic coordinates, formulations of insulin and vehicle, dose, volume, and time of injection, the anorectic effect of intracerebroventricular insulin could not be replicated. Therefore, we suggest that acute intracerebroventricularly injected insulin does not robustly inhibit food intake in rats. Based on our results, the acute intracerebroventricular injection procedure may not be a preferred method for studying the central anorectic effects of insulin in rats. Instead, administrations over time or locally in hypothalamic nuclei might be recommended.

Topics: Animals; Anorexia; Body Weight; Disease Models, Animal; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Eating; Hypoglycemic Agents; Injections, Intraventricular; Insulin; Insulin Detemir; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Rats; Rats, Long-Evans; Rats, Sprague-Dawley; Time Factors

The objective was to compare glycemic control, insulin utilization, and body weight in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) initiated on insulin detemir (IDet) or insulin glargine (IGlar) in a real-life setting in the Netherlands.. Insulin-naïve patients with T2D, starting treatment with IDet or IGlar between January 1, 2004 and June 30, 2008, were selected from the PHARMO data network. Glycemic control (hemoglobin A1c [HbA1c]), target rates (HbA1c <7%), daily insulin dose, and weight gain were analyzed comparing IDet and IGlar for patients with available HbA1c levels both at baseline and at 1-year follow-up. Analysis of all eligible patients (AEP) and a subgroup of patients without treatment changes (WOTC) in the follow-up period were adjusted for patient characteristics, propensity scores, and baseline HbA1c.. A total of 127 IDet users and 292 IGlar users were included in the WOTC analyses. The mean HbA1c dropped from 8.4%-8.6% at baseline to 7.4% after 1 year. Patients at HbA1c goal increased from 9% at baseline to 32% for IDet and 11% to 35% for IGlar, which was not significantly different (OR 0.75, 95% CI 0.46, 1.24). Weight gain (n=90) was less among IDet users (+0.4 kg) than among IGlar users (+1.1 kg), albeit not significant. The AEP analysis (252 IDet + 468 IGlar users) showed similar results with 33%-36% at goal (OR 0.81, 95% CI 0.57, 1.16), and median daily insulin doses of 25 IU/day (P=0.70).. There was no significant difference between users of IDet and IGlar with respect to glycemic control and insulin dose in a real-life setting. The low proportion of patients on target at baseline may indicate that insulin therapy is initiated too late. Moreover, the observation that one-third of the patients reached HbA1c target at follow-up may indicate that basal insulin analogs are not titrated intensively enough.

Topics: Aged; Body Weight; Cohort Studies; Delayed-Action Preparations; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Utilization; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Detemir; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Insurance Claim Review; Male; Middle Aged; Retrospective Studies

PREDICTIVE is a large, observational study of the empirical use of insulin detemir in patients with type 1 or type 2 diabetes (T1DM/T2DM). This post hoc analysis evaluates insulin-naïve patients with T2DM uncontrolled on oral antidiabetic drugs (OADs) who were initiated and remained on once-daily insulin detemir for 12 weeks.. This observational, multinational, multi-center, open-label prospective study evaluated the efficacy and safety of insulin detemir in 1653 insulin-naïve patients with T2DM (mean age 60.8 +/- 10.9 years, BMI 29.8 +/- 4.8 kg/m(2), and HbA(1C) 8.82 +/- 1.50%). Statistical comparisons were made between baseline and 12-week follow up data. Our study was subject to the usual limitations of observational studies.. Endpoints were: incidence of serious adverse drug reactions, including number of hypoglycemic events (total, major, and nocturnal), glycemic parameters, and weight change.. Following insulin initiation, no significant change occurred in the number of nocturnal hypoglycemic events or total hypoglycemic events (p = 0.4513), and no serious adverse drug reactions were observed during the 12 weeks of treatment. HbA(1C) decreased by a mean 1.25% (SD +/- 1.25%; p < 0.0001), with 30% of patients (n = 383) achieving HbA(1C) <7% at 12 weeks. Mean changes in fasting blood glucose and fasting blood glucose variability were -3.62 mmol/L (SD +/- 2.93; p < 0.0001) and -0.48 mmol/L (SD +/- 1.03; p < 0.0001), respectively. Body weight decreased by a mean 0.5 kg (SD +/- 3.3; p < 0.0001), with weight loss or no weight change occurring in a substantial percentage of patients in each BMI category (<25, 25-30, 30-35, and >35 kg/m(2)). Patients with higher baseline BMI lost the most weight, with the greatest weight loss (-1.20 kg) reported in those with BMI >35 kg/m(2).. Empirical use of insulin detemir as an insulin initiation strategy can improve glycemic control with good tolerability, including a low risk of hypoglycemia and a weight benefit, in a majority of insulin-naïve patients uncontrolled on OADs.

Topics: Aged; Blood Glucose; Body Mass Index; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Administration Schedule; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Detemir; Insulin, Long-Acting; Middle Aged; Safety

Between 5 and 10% of the European population suffers from diabetes, and its prevalence is constantly rising, in Austria like in other countries. The main goals in the treatment of diabetes mellitus are the prevention of complications and organ damage, the prevention of severe hypo- and hyperglycaemia and the preservation of quality of life. Many patients with type 2 diabetes become insulin-dependent in the course of their disease. The application of a long acting insulin or insulin analogue is the simplest way of initiating an insulin therapy and is in accordance with current guidelines. Current scientific evidence shows that the use of long acting insulin analogues for type 2 diabetes; which can no longer be sufficiently controlled with oral antidiabetic agents, is simple, safe and efficacious. Thus, this treatment option should be available without any restrictions to physicians and patients in order to facilitate the beginning of an insulin regime. This position paper summarises up the current evidence concerning this subject.

Topics: Austria; Body Weight; Cohort Studies; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Detemir; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Myocardial Infarction; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Quality of Life; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Retrospective Studies; Rosiglitazone; Thiazolidinediones

PREDICTIVE (an ongoing multinational observational study) provides an opportunity to explore the impact of insulin detemir use in routine clinical practice. Here, we report on long-term (52-week) data from a French cohort of patients (n=1772), comprising 643 with type 1 diabetes and 1129 with type 2 diabetes.. Patients were prescribed insulin detemir at their physician's discretion and assessed at various visits (baseline, 12 weeks, 26 weeks and 52 weeks). The primary endpoint was the frequency of serious adverse drug reactions, including major hypoglycaemia. Secondary endpoints included minor and nocturnal hypoglycaemia, glycaemic control (HbA(1c), fasting blood glucose and variability of fasting blood glucose) and weight change.. The incidence of serious adverse drug reactions was low throughout the study, seen in 10 patients with type 1 diabetes (14 events, 1.6%) and seven with type 2 diabetes (seven events, 0.6%). In both type 1 and type 2 diabetes cohorts, the overall minor and nocturnal hypoglycaemic events were reduced from baseline (P<0.001), with no clinically significant changes in weight from baseline to endpoint. After 52 weeks of treatment with insulin detemir, glycaemic control improved, with reductions in: HbA(1c), by -0.6% and -0.8% in type 1 and type 2 diabetes patients, respectively; fasting blood glucose, by -1.4mmol/L and -1.9mmol/L respectively; and FBG variability, by -0.8mmol/L and -0.3mmol/L, respectively (P<0.0001 for all).. Patients treated with insulin detemir in a clinical healthcare setting improved their glycaemic control with no increases in hypoglycaemia, adverse events or weight compared with baseline.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Blood Glucose; Body Mass Index; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Female; France; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Detemir; Insulin, Long-Acting; Longitudinal Studies; Male; Middle Aged; Treatment Outcome

To evaluate long-term effects of treatment with insulin analogue glargine in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus and to follow up their further course of life.. Retrospective evaluation of 114 patients who, from September 2004, had their basal insulin changed from NPH insulin to insulin glargine. Treatment was changed again in patients in whom a year-long treatment with insulin glargine did not bring improvement in diabetes control. The original sample was divided into 3 groups and the results compared. Compensation of diabetes (HbA1c) after 1, 2 and 3 years and changes to basal and bolus daily insulin dose and body weight were evaluated.. The results are presented as median and 25th and 75th percentile. Group A--75 patients (65%) treated for the entire evaluation period with insulin glargine. Initial HbA1c was 7.3 (6.4-8.2)%, 6.9 (6.0-8.4)% after 1 year, 7.1 (5.9-7.9)% after 2 years and 6.6 (5.5-7.7)% after 3 years (p < 0.001). We did not identify any statistically significant changes to total, basal or bolus daily dose of insulin or statistically significant body weight increase over the evaluation period. Group B--19 patients (17%). Switch from insulin glargine to detemir twice daily. Initial HbA1c was 7.3 (6.9-8.5)%, 7.4 (6.8-8.7)% after 1 year of treatment with insulin glargine, 7.7 (7.2-8.1)% before the treatment switch and 7.8 (6.7-8.5)% (NS) after 3 years of treatment. Daily dose of total, basal and bolus insulin did not change and, similarly, no statistically significant change to patients' bodyweight was identified. Group C--17 patients (15%). Switch from insulin glargine to an insulin pump. This group had better initial compensation with HbA1c 6.7(5.7-8.6)%, HbA1c after 1 year was 6.2 (5.6-8.1)%, 7.0 (6.0-7.4)% before the treatment switch and 6.3 (5.2-7.7)% after 3 years of treatment. Total daily insulin dose: 48 (34-60)-38 (25-49) IU/day (NS). Basal daily insulin dose: 17.5 (13-28) IU/day-23 (12-32) IU/day (NS). Bolus daily dose decreased significantly: from 25.5 (21-33) to 15.5 (12-22) IU/day (p < 0.01). Body weight: 76 (71-97) kg-73 (72-99) kg (NS). Only 3% of patients went back to NPH insulin.. Insulin glargine brings improved control of diabetes. The dose of insulin glargine did not differ from NPH insulin. No statistically significant body weight increase was observed during the evaluation period.

Topics: Adult; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Detemir; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Middle Aged

To evaluate the long-term cost-effectiveness of transferring type 2 diabetes patients to an insulin detemir regimen after failure to achieve adequate control with oral antidiabetic agents (OADs) alone, or in combination with neutral protamine hagedorn (NPH) insulin, or with insulin glargine in Germany.. A computer simulation model of diabetes was used to make long-term projections of future clinical outcomes and direct medical costs based on findings from a German subanalysis of the PREDICTIVE trial. The study analysed the impact of converting patients failing their current treatments to an insulin detemir regimen. Therapy conversion to insulin detemir +/- OADs was associated with a significant reduction in glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA(1)c) compared with OADs alone, NPH insulin +/- OADs, and insulin glargine +/- OADs. Across all three groups, hypoglycaemia rates decreased by 80% and patients lost an average of 0.9 kg of body weight during treatment with insulin detemir +/- OADs.. Therapy conversion to insulin detemir +/- OADs was projected to improve life expectancy by 0.28 years compared with OADs alone, and by 0.13 years compared with the NPH and glargine regimens. Transfer to insulin detemir was associated with improvements in quality-adjusted life expectancy of 0.21 quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) over OADs alone, 0.28 QALYs over NPH +/- OADs, and 0.29 QALYs over glargine +/- OADs. Insulin detemir was associated with savings over patient lifetimes due to reduced diabetes-related complications in all three comparisons.. Therapy conversion to insulin detemir +/- OADs in type 2 diabetes patients failing OADs alone, NPH or insulin glargine regimens was associated with improvements in life expectancy, quality-adjusted life expectancy and cost savings in all three scenarios evaluated.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Body Weight; Costs and Cost Analysis; Diabetes Complications; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Female; Germany; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Detemir; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Isophane; Insulin, Long-Acting; Life Expectancy; Male; Middle Aged; Quality-Adjusted Life Years

PREDICTIVE (Predictable Results and Experience in Diabetes through Intensification and Control to Target: An International Variability Evaluation) is a large, multi-national, open-label, prospective, observational study assessing the safety and efficacy of insulin detemir in clinical practice. A total of 20,531 patients with type 1 or 2 diabetes from 11 countries were prescribed insulin detemir and followed up after a mean of 14.4 weeks. The primary endpoint was incidence of serious adverse drug reactions (SADRs), including major hypoglycaemia. Secondary endpoints were: haemoglobin A(1c) (HbA(1c)), mean self-monitored fasting glucose, within-patient fasting glucose variability and body weight change. Two hundred and fourteen patients (1%) reported SADRs, including major hypoglycaemia. The incidence of major hypoglycaemic episodes was reduced from 3.0/patient-year at baseline to 0.7/patient-year at follow-up in type 1 patients (p < 0.0001), and from 0.8 to 0.1/patient-year in type 2 patients (p < 0.0001). Insulin detemir improved glycaemic control in type 1 and type 2 patients, with reductions in mean HbA(1c) (0.5% and 0.9%, respectively, p < 0.0001 for both), fasting glucose (1.7 and 2.6 mmol/l, p < 0.0001 for both) and within-patient fasting glucose variability (0.7 and 0.5 mmol/l, p < 0.0001 for both). There was a small decrease in mean body weight in both type 1 and 2 patients (-0.1 kg, p < 0.01 and -0.4 kg, p < 0.0001 respectively). Insulin detemir was used once- or twice-daily in 49% and 50% of type 1 patients, and 77% and 23% of type 2 diabetes patients, respectively. The 14-week observations from PREDICTIVE support clinical trial data showing that insulin detemir improves glycaemic control, with a lowered risk of hypoglycaemia and no weight gain.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Blood Glucose; Body Weight; Cohort Studies; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Detemir; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Middle Aged; Prospective Studies; Treatment Outcome

PREDICTIVEtrade mark (Predictable Results and Experience in Diabetes through Intensification and Control to Target: An International Variability Evaluation) is a large, multi-national, observational study assessing the safety and efficacy of insulin detemir. We report the study design, population characteristics and baseline observations, including cross-sectional analysis, from 19 911 patients with type 1 or 2 diabetes.. Patients with type 1 or 2 diabetes requiring basal insulin are prescribed insulin detemir and followed up for 12-52 weeks. Data on demographics, haemoglobin A(1c) (HbA(1c)), fasting glucose, within-subject fasting glucose variability and weight are collected from patient records (and/or recall for hypoglycaemia). A negative binomial distribution model is used to assess the influence of predictive/confounding variables on hypoglycaemic episodes in insulin-treated patients at baseline. Multi-factorial analysis of covariance is used to evaluate the association of the variables with current body weight and within-subject fasting glucose variability.. Total hypoglycaemic episodes in the 4 weeks prior to study start were 47.5 per patient-year in patients with type 1 and 9.2 per patient-year in patients with type 2 diabetes. The frequency of hypoglycaemia in insulin-treated patients showed a significant, positive association with duration of diabetes, number of insulin injections and fasting glucose variability but was inversely related to HbA(1c), fasting glucose and body mass index. Weight showed a significant positive association with gender (male > female) and insulin dosage. Weight was also positively associated with fasting glucose variability in patients with type 1 diabetes, and age and number of injections in patients with type 2 diabetes.. These baseline data showed that, in addition to the established relationship with intensive treatment and HbA(1c), frequency of hypoglycaemia was positively associated with fasting glucose variability. Follow-up data from PREDICTIVE will provide insights on insulin detemir in diabetes management.

Topics: Adult; Blood Glucose; Body Mass Index; Body Weight; Cross-Sectional Studies; Diabetes Mellitus; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Detemir; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Middle Aged; Prospective Studies; Sex Factors; Treatment Outcome