insulin-degludec and Diabetes-Mellitus

Insulin degludec/insulin aspart (IDegAsp) is a fixed-ratio co-formulation of insulin degludec (IDeg), which provides long-lasting basal insulin coverage, and insulin aspart (IAsp), which targets post-prandial glucose. This expert panel aimed to provide a practical and implementable guidance document to assist clinicians in prescribing IDegAsp in the diabetes management with respect to different patient populations including children and adults with type 1 diabetes (T1D) or type 2 diabetes (T2D) as well as pregnant, elderly and hospitalized patients and varying practice patterns (insulin-naive, insulin-treated, switching from basal, basal bolus and premix regimens). The experts recommended that IDegAsp can be used in insulin-naive T2D patients with poor glycemic control (HbA1c >8.5%) despite optimal oral antidiabetic drugs (OADs) as well as in insulin-treated T2D patients by switching from basal insulin, basal-bolus therapy or premixed insulins in relation to lower risk of nocturnal hypoglycemia, fewer injections and lower intraday glycemic variability, respectively. The experts considered the use of IDegAsp in children with T2D as a basal bolus alternative rather than as an alternative to basal insulin after metformin failure, use of IDegAsp in adult T1D patients as a simplified basal bolus regimen with lesser nocturnal hypoglycemia, fewer injections and better fasting plasma glucose control and in children with T1D as an alternative insulin regimen with fewer injection to increase treatment adherence. The proposed expert opinion provides practical information on use of IDegAsp in different patient populations and practice patterns to assist clinicians, which seems to compensate the need for easily implementable guidance on this novel insulin regimen.

Topics: Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus; Disease Management; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Aspart; Insulin, Long-Acting; Practice Patterns, Physicians'

Insulin remains a predominant life-saving medication for type 1 and type 2 Diabetes Mellites. Natural insulin secretion limits the fluctuation of the narrow and high surge of blood glucose levels. However, imitating the same by external insulin remains a challenge as a variety of insulin analogs (rapid acting, short acting, intermediate acting and long-acting) have different pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) properties. Inconsistent reduction in overall hyperglycemia level and nocturnal hypoglycemia due to variable absorption time and time action profile predominantly highlights the need of revisiting the PK/PD of insulin analogs as single analog is not yet sufficed to replace internal insulin exogenously. Combination therapy with basal and prandial insulins or intensification of hypoglycemic therapy with premixed insulins are of prime importance in managing diabetes effectively, imitating the natural insulin secretion. Therefore, the knowledge of PK/PD properties might help a practitioner to design, implement and manage insulin replacement therapy effectively and averting adverse events. Present study reports the comparative analysis of PK/PD profile of various insulin analogs based on the concurrent information about clinical aspects. Moreover, study interlinks the major concerns of therapeutic efficacy of insulin analogs with their respective onset of action and duration of effectiveness and reported adverse drug reaction which explore the scope of improvement.

Topics: Diabetes Mellitus; Forecasting; Humans; Insulin; Insulin Aspart; Insulin Detemir; Insulin Glargine; Insulin Lispro; Insulin, Long-Acting

Diabetes mellitus is a disease that affects millions of Americans, and its prevalence is only anticipated to increase in coming years. It is estimated that diabetes-related visits account for 1% of all emergency department (ED) encounters. In recent years, there have been several new categories of medications approved for the treatment of diabetes, including new insulins, glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists, dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors, an amylin analogue, and sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors.. This review presents recently approved agents to treat diabetes, with a focus on basic mechanism, place in therapy, and toxicities the ED provider may encounter.. Many of these new therapies have been incorporated as first- and second-line agents for the management of diabetes. Recently approved diabetes medications often have different mechanisms of action and adverse effect and overdose profiles compared to traditional agents, such as sulfonylureas and metformin.. Emergency providers will encounter patients taking these newly approved medications, as well as treat those presenting with adverse effects and overdoses from them. As such, emergency providers must have a basic understanding of these new therapies so that they can optimally care for diabetic patients.

Topics: Diabetes Mellitus; Dipeptidyl Peptidase 4; Drug Therapy; Emergency Medicine; Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor; Humans; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Islet Amyloid Polypeptide; Sodium-Glucose Transporter 2; Sodium-Glucose Transporter 2 Inhibitors

Diabetes, particularly type 2 diabetes (T2D), has become an epidemic in the United States, with a significant portion of patients unable to meet recommended glycemic targets. All individuals with type 1 diabetes (T1D) and a significant majority of those with T2D will ultimately require insulin therapy. However, there are several barriers to its use. The introduction of the new, ultra-long-acting basal insulins degludec and glargine U-300, and the single-injection combinations of insulin degludec/liraglutide and insulin glargine U-100/lixisenatide, offer options that may overcome several of those barriers, including the high risk of hypoglycemia, glycemic variability, and relatively short duration of action. This article spotlights the outcomes of the phase 3 clinical trials for these newer formulations, as well as more recent meta-analyses and real-world studies. It also highlights the implications for managed care plans as they move to add these insulins to their formularies.

Topics: Diabetes Mellitus; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Humans; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Managed Care Programs; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Treatment Outcome

In the past decade, there has been much advancement in oral antidiabetic agents, but few changes in insulin therapy. With the addition of the ultra-long-acting insulins, insulin glargine U300 (IGlar 300) and insulin degludec (IDeg 100 and IDeg 200), it is important to understand key aspects in the agents' clinical properties, efficacy, safety, dosing, packaging, and place in therapy.. A literature review was conducted using PubMed database and was limited to English, full-text articles published from January 2000 to January 2018. The following search terms were used: insulin glargine 300, insulin degludec, Toujeo, Tresiba, and ultra-long-acting insulin.. These agents are longer acting with sustained insulin coverage as compared with other basal insulins while having a low potential for hypoglycemia. Efficacy and safety profiles are quite good, and potential for weight gain was similar to IGlar 100.. Depending on the patient's needs, these newer agents may offer some advantages. Insulin glargine U300 and IDeg 200 are concentrated, allowing for administration of large doses by less volume, thereby theoretically improving absorption. For patients needing flexible dosing, IDeg may be beneficial. The ultra-long-acting agents may also be useful if it is suspected that the basal insulin is not lasting the entire day.

Topics: Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Detemir; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Patient Safety; Prevalence; Weight Gain

Manufacturers of insulin products for diabetes therapy have long sought ways to modify the absorption rate of exogenously administered insulins in an effort to better reproduce the naturally occurring pharmacokinetics of endogenous insulin secretion. Several mechanisms of protraction have been used in pursuit of a basal insulin, for which a low injection frequency would provide tolerable and reproducible glucose control; these mechanisms have met with varying degrees of success. Before the advent of recombinant DNA technology, development focused on modifications to the formulation that increased insulin self-association, such as supplementation with zinc or the development of preformed precipitates using protamine. Indeed, NPH insulin remains widely used today despite a frequent need for a twice-daily dosing and a relatively high incidence of hypoglycaemia. The early insulin analogues used post-injection precipitation (insulin glargine U100) or dimerization and albumin binding (insulin detemir) as methods of increasing therapeutic duration. These products approached a 24-hour glucose-lowering effect with decreased variability in insulin action. Newer basal insulin analogues have used up-concentration in addition to precipitation (insulin glargine U300), and multihexamer formation in addition to albumin binding (insulin degludec), to further increase duration of action and/or decrease the day-to-day variability of the glucose-lowering profile. Clinically, the major advantage of these recent analogues has been a reduction in hypoglycaemia with similar glycated haemoglobin control when compared with earlier products. Future therapies may bring clinical benefits through hepato-preferential insulin receptor binding or very long durations of action, perhaps enabling once-weekly administration and the potential for further clinical benefits.

Topics: Chemistry, Pharmaceutical; Diabetes Mellitus; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Detemir; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Isophane; Insulin, Lente; Insulin, Long-Acting; Recombinant Proteins

To systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of insulin degludec for diabetes mellitus (DM).. Databases including Cochrane Library, PubMed, Embase, Wanfang Data, China Biology Medicine disc (CBM) and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) were searched electronically for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) meeting including criteria and the methodological quality of studies was assessed. Then meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.0 software.. Twelve RCTs with 6 527 patients were included into our study: 4 358 patients in degludec group and 2 169 patients in control group. Compared with insulin glargine, insulin degludec was more effective in reducing fasting blood glucose (MD=-0.40, 95%CI: -0.65--0.16, P=0.001), but less effective in improving levels of glycated hemoglobin (MD=0.13, 95%CI: 0.08-0.17, P<0.001). There was no significant difference in the incidence rate of adverse events in two groups (OR=0.98, 95%CI: 0.87-1.10, P=0.700), but incidence rate of nocturnal hypoglycaemia was significantly lower in insulin degludec group (OR=0.82, 95%CI: 0.72-0.94, P=0.004).. Insulin degludec is non-inferior to other basal insulin in reducing levels of blood glucose, but insulin degludec can obviously reduce the incidence rate of nocturnal hypoglycaemia, so it is safer than other basal insulin. The long-term efficacy and safety should be further studied .

Topics: Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Safety

Meta-analysis to compare hypoglycemia rates of basal insulin degludec (IDeg) with insulin glargine (IGlar) in patients with diabetes achieving good glycemic control (hemoglobin A1c [HbA1c] <7% at end of trial).. In a preplanned meta-analysis, patient data from 7 randomized, treat-to-target, 26- or 52-week trials in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) or type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) who administered IDeg (n = 2,899) or IGlar (n = 1,431) once daily were analyzed. Using a negative binomial regression model, this meta-analysis compared hypoglycemia rates in patients achieving HbA1c <7% at end of trial with IDeg (n = 1,347) and IGlar (n = 697).. In all trials, IDeg was noninferior to IGlar in HbA1c reduction from baseline. At end of trial, 2,044 patients (T2DM, n = 1,661; T1DM, n = 383) achieved HbA1c <7%. The overall confirmed hypoglycemia rate, defined as plasma glucose <56 mg/dL or severe hypoglycemia if requiring assistance, was significantly lower with IDeg versus IGlar (estimated rate ratio [ERR] IDeg:IGlar, 0.86; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.76 to 0.98). The nocturnal confirmed hypoglycemia rate, defined as occurring between midnight and 6:00 am, was significantly lower with IDeg (ERR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.52 to 0.77). In the maintenance period (16 weeks onward when average insulin dose and glycemic levels stabilized), the overall confirmed hypoglycemia rate was significantly lower (ERR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.68 to 0.92) and the nocturnal confirmed hypoglycemia rate was significantly lower (ERR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.45 to 0.72) with IDeg versus IGlar.. Patients with T1DM and T2DM achieved HbA1c <7% with significantly lower rates of overall and nocturnal confirmed hypoglycemia with IDeg versus IGlar. The lower hypoglycemia rate with IDeg was more pronounced in the maintenance period.

Topics: Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Diabetes Mellitus; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting

Since 1921, the benefits achieved by insulin therapy research have been constant. However, the fear of a hypoglycemia incidence and rigid time schedules of insulin therapy still interfere with treatment adherence, which is essential to achieve optimal glycemic control and minimize complications in diabetic patients. The possibility of using an ultra long- acting insulin analogue (degludec), which has an extensive and predictable pharmacokinetic profile over 24 hours, is analyzed in this context. Clinical trials have shown that this ultra long-acting insulin analogue administered in a flexible dosage treatment, reached a good glycaemic control with no increase on hypoglycemia risk. Although to follow a predefined plan in clinical practice is recommended, the possibility of flexibility in day to day dosage timing of this specific insulin analogue on requirement, could improve adherence in patients with a non-predictable and active social life and workday.

Topics: Clinical Trials as Topic; Delayed-Action Preparations; Diabetes Mellitus; Drug Administration Schedule; Glycemic Index; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin, Long-Acting; Patient Compliance; Patient Education as Topic; Quality of Life

Insulin degludec is, like insulin detemir, a product of coupling of Des-B30 threonine insulin to fatty acid side chains. After injection, degludec self associates, precipitating in subcutaneous tissue. There is a continuous and highly predictable slow dissociation of insulin monomers from this depot; insulin levels rise immediately reaching tmax at 10-12 hours, followed by a slow decline with a t½ of 17-21 hours, roughly double the duration of action of insulin glargine. An important property of degludec not shared by glargine is miscibility with rapid-acting insulin. Although the effect of coadministered insulin aspart is somewhat blunted by coformulation with degludec, a preparation of 70% degludec and 30% aspart has predictable pharmacodynamics. Daily administration of degludec has glucose-lowering benefits not different from those of glargine, with purportedly less hypoglycemia. Although degludec is approved and marketed in Europe under the brand name Tresiba®, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, in a surprising development, challenged the assertion of lower tendency to hypoglycemia with degludec, and, more importantly, raised concerns that degludec may have a higher cardiovascular risk than glargine. Only a long-term study in a large patient population can resolve these questions. However, release of degludec for marketing to appropriate patients should proceed while awaiting the results of such a study.

Topics: Diabetes Mellitus; Drug Interactions; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin, Long-Acting

The central role of insulin in the management of patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) remains, nearly a century after its first use in humans. In patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), the role of insulin has evolved as other therapies have been introduced, with insulin now used across the spectrum of the disease. This article discusses the use of insulin in patients with T1DM or T2DM, including combined use with other agents in T2DM, with an emphasis on incretin-based therapies. In addition, new insulin products and concentrations are discussed along with their varied routes of administration.

Topics: Chemistry, Pharmaceutical; Diabetes Mellitus; Drug Combinations; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Incretins; Insulin Glargine; Insulin Lispro; Insulin, Long-Acting; Insulins; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Diabetes Mellitus; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Isophane; Insulin, Long-Acting

Topics: Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin, Long-Acting; Treatment Outcome

Insulin degludec (IDeg) is a new insulin formulation that facilitates long-term control of glucose level in humans. In this study, we investigated the effects of IDeg on glycemic control in dogs. Its time-action profiles were monitored in healthy dogs using an artificial pancreas apparatus under euglycemic conditions. At 9.0-13.5 hr post-IDeg injection, an indistinct peak of glucose level was detected. Moreover, the action of IDeg was persistent for >20 hr. Both IDeg and neutral protamine Hagedorn insulin (NPH) lowered blood glucose concentrations in diabetic dogs, but IDeg caused postprandial hyperglycemia and a somewhat lower preprandial glucose level than that caused by NPH. IDeg might be ineffective in concurrently preventing postprandial hyperglycemia and preprandial hypoglycemia in a single-agent administration.

Topics: Animals; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus; Dog Diseases; Dogs; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Insulin, Isophane; Insulin, Long-Acting

This post-authorization study was conducted to evaluate the safety of insulin degludec/insulin aspart (IDegAsp) in adult patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) during routine clinical care under a real-world setting in India. Eligible patients received IDegAsp for a minimum of 12 months during routine clinical management. Data were collected at 0, 3, 6, and 12 months. In total, 1029 adult patients with DM were included; 65.2% (n = 671) were men; mean age was 55.0 ± 12.2 years, and the mean duration of diabetes mellitus was 10.8 ± 7.4 years. Thirty adverse events were reported in 23 patients (2.2%) during the follow-up: two adverse events in two patients were serious with fatal outcomes, which were unrelated to IDegAsp use. At baseline, there were 176 confirmed hypoglycemic events in 67 (6.7%) patients while they were on their previous treatment options. At 12 months of treatment with IDegAsp, 11 confirmed hypoglycemic events were reported in 11 (1.1%) patients since the previous visit; there were no reported episodes of severe hypoglycemia. Mean glycosylated hemoglobin value reduced from 9.5% ± 1.8% at baseline to 7.7% ± 1.1% at 12 months. This study showed the safety of IDegAsp in patients with diabetes mellitus over a period of 1 year during routine clinical care.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus; Female; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; India; Insulin Aspart; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Middle Aged

Highly sensitive assays for anti-drug antibodies (ADAs) are both a regulatory requirement and requisite for proper evaluation of the effects of immunogenicity on clinical efficacy and safety. Determination of ADA assay sensitivity depends on positive control antibodies to represent naturally occurring or treatment-induced ADA responses. An accurate determination of the proportion of drug-specific antibodies in these polyclonal positive control batches is critical for correct evaluation of assay sensitivity. Target purification of positive control antibodies is commonly applied but infers the risk to lose a proportion of the antibodies. This may lead to an incorrect estimate of the ADA assay sensitivity, especially if high-affinity antibodies are lost that may be representative of natural ADAs with clinical implication. The Surface Plasmon Resonance platform on the Biacore™ systems offers methods for real-time analysis of biomolecular interactions without introducing any modifications to the analysed material. Calibration-free concentration analysis (CFCA) is such an application for determination of the proportion of drug-specific antibodies, which allows direct determination of active antibody concentrations, as defined by the ligand, in a flow-based system. Here, we present a novel CFCA method for ADA quantification developed and validated using polyclonal positive control antibodies against endogenous human insulin, insulin degludec (Tresiba®) and turoctocog alfa (NovoEight®). We find that CFCA precisely and accurately measures concentrations of drug-specific IgG antibodies with a precision of ±10% and 90%-112% recovery of expected values of monoclonal positive control antibodies. Additionally, we have achieved a more accurate measure of the sensitivity of a cell-based bioassay for in vitro neutralising ADAs using the specific concentration determined with CFCA. Moreover, we effectively quantified serum anti-insulin antibodies in high-titre clinical samples from individuals with diabetes mellitus. This application extends the relevance of the CFCA technology to analysis of immunogenicity for accurate quantification of ADAs in both the polyclonal positive control and in clinical samples.

Topics: Antibodies, Neutralizing; Autoantibodies; Biomarkers; Coagulants; Diabetes Mellitus; Factor VIII; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Immunoglobulin G; Immunologic Techniques; Insulin, Long-Acting; Predictive Value of Tests; Reproducibility of Results; Surface Plasmon Resonance

Day-to-day variability impacts safety of insulin therapy and the choice of monitoring strategies. Side-by-side comparisons of insulin formulations in diabetic dogs are scarce.. Insulin glargine 300 U/mL (IGla300) and insulin degludec (IDeg) are associated with less day-to-day glucose variability compared to porcine lente (PL) in diabetic dogs.. Seven intact male purpose-bred beagles with toxin-induced diabetes.. In this repeated measured study, PL, IGla300 and IDeg were compared in 2 phases: once-daily (q24h) and twice-daily (q12h) administration. Interstitial glucose concentrations (IG) were measured continuously throughout the study. For each formulation, maximal q24h dose was determined using the same algorithm (while avoiding hypoglycemia) and then maintained for 72 hours. In phase 2, 70% of the maximal q24h dose was administered q12h and maintained for 5 days regardless of hypoglycemia. Coefficient of variation (CV) and glycemic variability percentage (GVP) were calculated to determine day-to-day and intraday variability, respectively.. There was no difference in day-to-day variability between PL, IGla300, and IDeg in the q24h phase. In the q12h phase, day-to-day variability was higher (P = .01) for PL (CV = 42.6 ± 6.8%) compared to IGla300 and IDeg (CV = 30.1 ± 7.7%, 25.2 ± 7.0%, respectively). The GVP of PL was lower (P = .02) compared to IGla300. There was no difference between PL, IGla300 and IDeg in %time IG < 70 mg/dL.. Insulin degludec and IGla300 administered q12h were associated with lower day-to-day variability, which might be advantageous in minimizing monitoring requirements without increasing the risk of hypoglycemia.

Topics: Animals; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dog Diseases; Dogs; Glycated Hemoglobin; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Swine; Swine Diseases

Topics: Diabetes Mellitus; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Compounding; Excipients; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Injections, Subcutaneous; Insulin Glargine; Insulin Lispro; Insulin, Long-Acting; Insulin, Regular, Human; Osmolar Concentration; Recombinant Proteins

Topics: Blood Glucose; Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring; Diabetes Mellitus; Drug Combinations; Glucose; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin Infusion Systems; Insulin, Long-Acting; Inventions; Liraglutide; Mobile Applications; Peptides; Self Care; Self-Management; Sweetening Agents; Transdermal Patch

Health economic analysis from a healthcare and societal point of view was conducted to assess the cost-effectiveness of insulin degludec (IDeg) after switching from other basal insulins in people with type 1 diabetes.. This was a prospective, open-label, single arm, observational follow-up from August 2013 to October 2015 of 476 consecutive patients at Danderyd Hospital (Stockholm, Sweden) who switched to IDeg from other basal insulins (99% basal insulin analogs). The IMS CORE Diabetes Model (CDM) was used to predict the cost-effectiveness of life-long treatment with IDeg vs. other basal insulins, based on a Swedish setting.. Based on this prospective, real-world, follow-up and using the CDM, it was estimated that switching to IDeg from other basal insulins translated into QALY gains including improved life expectancy and health-related quality of life, as well as dominant ICER, meaning cost-savings for the healthcare system. However, the study is limited by its observational design. Extrapolation into the future is only estimated since the actual treatment effect cannot be projected with certainty.

Topics: Adult; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Diabetes Mellitus; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Middle Aged; Prospective Studies; Sweden

Topics: Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus; Drug Combinations; Humans; Injections, Subcutaneous; Insulin, Long-Acting; Liraglutide

Topics: Diabetes Mellitus; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Approval; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin, Long-Acting; Recombinant Proteins

Topics: Diabetes Mellitus; Female; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Injections, Subcutaneous; Insulin, Long-Acting; Japan; Male; Middle Aged; Patient Satisfaction

Ideally, the insulin therapy must aim at the creation of a near normal glycaemic profile without the barriers of unacceptable weight gain or hypoglycaemia. Provision of a flexible insulin regimen would further enhance adherence to the prescribed therapy and positively impact glycaemic control. Insulin degludec addresses many of the aspirations of ideal basal insulin. Long duration of action, flat pharmacodynamic profile, low day-to-day variability translate into benefits of predictable glucose excursions, lower risk of hypoglycaemia at same glycaemic level and effective glycaemic with one daily injection in individuals. In conclusion, insulin degludec represents an important advancement in the treatment of type 1 and 2 diabetes.

Topics: Diabetes Mellitus; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin, Long-Acting; Quality of Life

There is a need for ideal basal insulin which can overcome the unmet need of a truly once daily insulin, with a flat peakless profile. Useful for all types of patients Insulin degludec is next generation insulin with a unique mode of protraction of forming soluble multi-hexamers and slow continuous absorption giving it a flat profile compared to the existing basal insulin. In patients with type 1 diabetes or with type 2 diabetes, at steady-state, the mean terminal half-life of insulin degludec was 25 hours, i.e., approximately twice as long as for insulin glargine (half-life of 12.1 hours). In once-daily dosing regimen it reaches steady state after approximately 3 days. The duration of action of insulin degludec was estimated to be beyond 42 hours in euglycaemic clamp studies and this gives the unique opportunity of flexible time dosing which is not an available option with the existing basal insulin. The glucose-lowering effect is evenly distributed across a 24-hour dosing interval with insulin degludec having 4 times lower variability than insulin glargine. This is an important attribute given the narrow therapeutic window of insulin and the goal of achieving night time and inter-prandial glycaemic control without increasing the risk for hypoglycaemia, a goal that is challenging given the variability of absorption and lower PK half-lives of current basal insulin products. The combination of the ultra-long, flat and stable profile with an improved hour-to-hour and day-to-day variability could present an improved risk-benefit trade-off with the lower risk of hypoglycaemia, allowing for targeting improved levels of glycaemic control.

Topics: Diabetes Mellitus; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin, Long-Acting

Topics: Animals; Biosimilar Pharmaceuticals; Chemistry, Pharmaceutical; Delayed-Action Preparations; Diabetes Mellitus; Dogs; History, 20th Century; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Detemir; Insulin Glargine; Insulin Infusion Systems; Insulin, Isophane; Insulin, Long-Acting; Swine

The aim of the paper is to determine the dose accuracy and injection force of FlexTouch (FT) filled with insulin degludec 100 U/ml, insulin degludec 200 U/ml and insulin degludec/insulin aspart 100 U/ml, SoloStar (SS) filled with insulin glargine 100 U/ml and KwikPen (KP) filled with insulin lispro mix 75/25 100 U/ml.. Dose accuracy was measured at minimum, midpoint and maximum doses (FT 1, 2, 40, 80 and 160 U; SS 1, 40 and 80 U; KP 1, 30 and 60 U). Injection force was measured during the injection of the maximum dose.. All doses delivered from FT were within ISO limits (ISO 11608-1:2012) for degludec 100 U/ml, degludec 200 U/ml and degludec/aspart 100 U/ml, and the pens delivered insulin accurately and consistently at all doses tested. Similarly, all tested doses from KP filled with insulin lispro mix 75/25 100 U/ml were within ISO limits, while some doses from SS filled with insulin glargine 100 U/ml were outside ISO limits. FT had a significantly lower injection force than SS and KP (p < 0.05).. FT filled with insulin degludec and insulin degludec/insulin aspart, delivered insulin accurately and consistently within ISO limitations at all doses tested; similarly, KP delivered insulin within ISO limitations at all doses tested and SS delivered most doses within ISO limitations. The significantly lower injection force of FT compared to SS and KP is an important feature that has the potential to make the injection process easier for people with diabetes.

Topics: Diabetes Mellitus; Drug Combinations; Drug Delivery Systems; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Injections; Insulin Glargine; Insulin Lispro; Insulin, Long-Acting