insulin--isophane and Hyperglycemia

The Cystic Fibrosis Foundation recommends both short-term and long-acting insulin therapy when cystic fibrosis-related diabetes (CFRD) has been diagnosed. Diagnosis is based on: an elevated fasting blood glucose level greater than 6.94 mmol/L (125 mg/dL); or oral glucose tolerance tests greater than 11.11 mmol/L (200 mg/dL) at two hours; or symptomatic diabetes for random glucose levels greater than 11.11 mmol/L (200 mg/dL); or glycated hemoglobin levels of at least 6.5%. This is an update of a previously published review.. To establish the effectiveness of insulin and oral agents for managing diabetes in people with cystic fibrosis in relation to blood sugar levels, lung function and weight management.. We searched the Cochrane Cystic Fibrosis and Genetic Disorders Group's Trials Register comprising references identified from comprehensive electronic database searches and handsearches of relevant journals and abstract books of conference proceedings. We also handsearched abstracts from pulmonary symposia and the North American Cystic Fibrosis Conferences. Date of most recent register search: 10 September 2020. We searched online trials registries; date of most recent searches: 21 March 2020.. Randomized controlled trials comparing all methods of pharmacological diabetes therapy in people with diagnosed CFRD.. Two authors independently extracted data and assessed the risk of bias in the included studies. Authors also used GRADE to assess the quality of the evidence.. The searches identified 29 trials (45 references). Four included trials provide results: one short-term single-center cross-over trial (seven adults) comparing insulin with oral repaglinide and no medication in adults with CFRD and normal fasting glucose; one long-term multicenter trial (61 adults with CFRD) comparing insulin with oral repaglinide and placebo; one long-term multicenter trial (67 adults) comparing insulin with oral repaglinide; and one 12-week single-center cross-over trial (20 adults) comparing the long-acting insulin glargine to short-term neutral protamine Hagedorn insulin. Two ongoing trials of newly approved incretin mimics have been noted for possible future inclusion. Downgrading of the quality of the evidence was mainly due to risks of bias across all domains, but particularly due to concerns surrounding allocation concealment and selective reporting. There were also some concerns due to imprecision from small sample sizes and low event rates. Finally, there may be some bias due to the amounts of insulin and repaglinide given not being comparable. Data from one trial comparing insulin to placebo (39 participants) did not show any difference between groups for the primary outcomes of blood glucose levels (very low-quality evidence), lung function (low-quality evidence) or nutritional status (low-quality evidence). Similarly, no differences between groups were seen for the secondary outcomes of number of hypoglycemic episodes (low-quality evidence), secondary infection complications or quality of life (QoL). These results were mirrored in the narrative reports for the second trial in this comparison (seven participants). Data from the one-year trial comparing repaglinide to placebo (38 participants), showed no differences between groups for the primary outcomes of blood glucose levels (very low-quality evidence), lung function (low-quality evidence) and nutritional status (low-quality evidence). Also, no differences were seen between groups for the secondary outcomes of number of hypoglycemic episodes (low-quality evidence), secondary infection complications or QoL. These findings were mirrored in the narrative reports for the second trial (n = 7) in this comparison. Three trials compared insulin to repaglinide (119 participants). Data from one trial (n = 67) showed no difference in blood glucose levels at either 12 months (high-quality evidence) or 24 months; narrative reports from one trial (45 participants) reported no difference. This review has not found any conclusive evidence that any agent has a distinct advantage over another in controlling hyperglycemia or the clinical outcomes associated with CFRD. Given the treatment burden already experienced by people with cystic fibrosis, oral therapy may be a viable treatment option. While some cystic fibrosis centers use oral medications to help control diabetes, the Cystic Fibrosis Foundation (USA) clinical practice guidelines support the use of insulin therapy and this remains the most widely-used treatment method. Randomized controlled trials specifically related to controlling diabetes and its impact on the course of pulmonary disease process in cystic fibrosis continue to be a high priority. Specifically, investigators should evaluate adherence to different therapies and also whether there is benefit in using additional hypoglycemic agents as well as the newly approved incretin mimics. Agents that potentiate insulin action, especially agents with additional anti-inflammatory potential should also be further investigated as adjuvant therapy to insulin.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Bias; Blood Glucose; Carbamates; Cystic Fibrosis; Diabetes Mellitus; Fasting; Humans; Hyperglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Isophane; Piperidines; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic

Glucocorticoids are frequently prescribed to patients with a wide range of inflammatory and autoimmune diseases. The semi-synthetic glucocorticoid prednisolone is most commonly prescribed and in two main patterns. Prednisolone is prescribed short term at medium-high doses to treat an acute inflammatory illness or long term at lower doses to attenuate chronic inflammatory disease progression. In hospitalized patients with acute prednisolone-induced hyperglycaemia, there is a distinct circadian pattern of glucose elevation, which occurs predominantly in the afternoon and evening. As a morning dose of isophane insulin has a pharmacokinetic pattern that matches this pattern of glucose elevation, treatment comprising a basal dose of morning isophane insulin in combination with short-acting insulin boluses is generally recommended. However, evidence is lacking that isophane-based basal bolus insulin is more efficacious than other insulin regimens. In outpatients, low-dose prednisolone causes a small increase in post glucose-load glucose concentration but no change in overall glycaemic control as measured by glycosylated haemoglobin. If treatment is indicated, metformin has been shown to be effective and may attenuate other adverse effects of long-term prednisolone therapy. Further studies are necessary in order to identify factors underlying the variability in response to insulin therapy and clinical benefits of treatment in hospitalized patients with prednisolone-induced hyperglycaemia. In outpatients prescribed low-dose prednisolone, the cardiovascular risk associated with postprandial hyperglycaemia and efficacy of hypoglycaemic therapies should be evaluated in future randomized clinical trials.

Topics: Blood Glucose; Evidence-Based Medicine; Glucocorticoids; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hyperglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin, Isophane; Metformin; Prednisolone

The best insulin regimen to treat hyperglycemia in hospitalized patients on nutritional support (NS) is unclear.. We searched electronic databases to identify cohort studies or randomized clinical trials in order to evaluate the efficacy of different insulin regimens used to treat hyperglycemia in hospitalized patients on NS on diverse outcomes: mean blood glucose (MBG), hypoglycemia, length of stay in hospital, and mortality.. Seventeen studies from a total of 5,030 were included. Enteral Group included 8 studies; 1,203 patients using rapid, glargine, NPH, or Premix insulin; MBG 108-225 mg/dL; hypoglycemia 0-13%. In indirect meta-analyses, NPH insulin ranked best for glucose control (MD 95% CI -2.50 mg/dL [2.65 to -2.35]). Parenteral Group included 4 studies; 228 patients using regular and glargine or NPH insulin; MBG 137-202 mg/dL; hypoglycemia 0-40%. In meta-analyses comparing regular insulin added to parenteral nutrition bag with glargine, MBG (MD 95% CI -3.78 mg/dL [-11.93 to 4.37]; I2 = 0%) or hypoglycemia frequency (RR 95% CI 1.37 [0.43-4.32]; I2 = 70.7%) did not differ. The description related to hospital length of stay and mortality was inconsistent between groups.. The best insulin regimen to treat hyperglycemia in hospitalized patients on NS has not been established; best results using insulin regimens with NPH in enteral nutrition do not seem to be clinically relevant.

Topics: Blood Glucose; Hospital Mortality; Humans; Hyperglycemia; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Inpatients; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Isophane; Length of Stay; Nutritional Support; Parenteral Nutrition

The Cystic Fibrosis Foundation recommends both short-term and long-acting insulin therapy when cystic fibrosis-related diabetes has been diagnosed. Diagnosis is based on: an elevated fasting blood glucose level greater than 6.94 mmol/liter (125 mg/deciliter); or oral glucose tolerance tests greater than 11.11 mmol/liter (200 mg/deciliter) at two hours; or symptomatic diabetes for random glucose levels greater than 11.11 mmol/liter (200 mg/deciliter); or glycated hemoglobin levels of at least 6.5%.. To establish the effectiveness of insulin and oral agents for managing diabetes in people with cystic fibrosis in relation to blood sugar levels, lung function and weight management.. We searched the Cochrane Cystic Fibrosis and Genetic Disorders Group's Trials Register comprising references identified from comprehensive electronic database searches and handsearches of relevant journals and abstract books of conference proceedings. We also handsearched abstracts from pulmonary symposia and the North American Cystic Fibrosis Conferences.Date of the most recent search of the Group's Cystic Fibrosis Trials Register: 18 February 2016.. Randomized controlled trials comparing all methods of diabetes therapy in people with diagnosed cystic fibrosis-related diabetes.. Two authors independently extracted data and assessed the risk of bias in the included studies.. The searches identified 22 trials (34 references). Four trials (200 participants) are included: one short-term single-center trial (n = 7) comparing insulin with oral repaglinide and no medication in people with cystic fibrosis-related diabetes and normal fasting glucose; one long-term multicenter trial (n = 100, 74 of whom had cystic fibrosis-related diabetes) comparing insulin with oral repaglinide and placebo; one long-term multicenter trial (n = 73) comparing insulin with oral repaglinide; and one 12-week single-center trial (n = 20) comparing the long-acting insulin glargine to short-term neutral protamine Hagedorn insulin.Two trials with data for the comparison of insulin to placebo did not report any significant differences between groups for the primary outcomes of blood glucose levels, lung function and nutritional status. This was also true for the single trial with data for the comparison of repaglinide to placebo. Two trials (one lasting one year and one lasting two years) contributed data for the comparison of insulin versus repaglinide. There were no significant differences for the primary outcomes at any time point, except at one year (in the two-year trial) when the insulin group had significant improvement in z score for body mass index compared to the repaglinide group. The single trial comparing glargine to neutral protamine Hagedorn insulin also did not report any significant differences in the review's primary outcomes. A few cases of hypoglycemia were seen in three out of the four trials (none in the longest trial), but these events resolved without further treatment.There was an unclear risk of bias from randomization and allocation concealment in two of the four included trials as the authors did not report any details; in the remaining two studies details for randomization led to a low risk of bias, but only one had sufficient details on allocation concealment to allow a low risk judgement, the second was unclear. There was a high risk from blinding for all trials (except for the comparison of oral repaglinide versus placebo) due to the nature of the interventions. Complete data for all outcomes were not available from any trial leading to a high risk of reporting bias. The amounts of insulin and repaglinide administered were not comparable and this may lead to bias in the results. None of the included trials were powered to show a significant improvement in lung function.. This review has not found any significant conclusive evidence that long-acting insulins, short-acting insulins or oral hypoglycemic agents have a distinct advantage over one another in controlling hyperglycemia or clinical outcomes associated with cystic fibrosis-related diabetes. While some cystic fibrosis centers use oral medications to help control diabetes, the Cystic Fibrosis Foundation (USA) clinical practice guidelines support the use of insulin therapy and this remains the most widely-used treatment method. Randomized controlled trials specifically related to controlling diabetes with this impact on the course of pulmonary disease process in cystic fibrosis continue to be a high priority.There is no demonstrated advantage yet established for using oral hypoglycemic agents over insulin, and further trials need to be evaluated to establish whether there is clear benefit for using hypoglycemic agents. Agents that potentiate insulin action, especially agents with additional anti-inflammatory potential should be further investigated to see if there may be a clinical advantage to adding these medications to insulin as adjuvant therapy.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Carbamates; Cystic Fibrosis; Diabetes Mellitus; Humans; Hyperglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Isophane; Piperidines; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic

The aim of this review is to summarize the clinical efficacy, tolerability and safety data of insulin detemir, and compare its use with that of neutral protamine Hagedorn (NPH) insulin in randomized controlled trials in people with type 1 or type 2 diabetes. A literature search was conducted with PubMed using predefined search terms. Studies were included if they met the following criteria: randomized, controlled trial, comparison of insulin detemir with NPH insulin, non-hospitalized adults aged ≥18 years with either type 1 or type 2 diabetes, and study duration of ≥12 weeks. The following types of studies were excluded: non-randomized controlled trials, studies of mixed cohorts of patients with type 1 or type 2 diabetes that did not report results separately, pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic studies, reviews, pooled or meta-analyses or health-economic analyses. Fourteen publications met the inclusion criteria. Nine studies in people with type 1 diabetes and three studies in people with type 2 diabetes, using insulin detemir in a basal-bolus regimen were included. Two studies were in people with type 2 diabetes using insulin detemir with oral antidiabetes medicines. In 14 studies of people with type 1 or type 2 diabetes, insulin detemir treatment provided similar or better glycaemic control, lower within-subject variability, similar or lower frequency of hypoglycaemia and less weight gain when compared with NPH insulin.

Topics: Adult; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Humans; Hyperglycemia; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Detemir; Insulin, Isophane; Insulin, Long-Acting; Insulin, Regular, Human; Isophane Insulin, Human; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Weight Gain

Hospitalized patients frequently transition between various levels of care and changing clinical situations. Optimal management of hospitalized patients with hyperglycemia includes awareness of situations that may significantly affect glucose and/or insulin metabolism. A review of published clinical trials reveals practical approaches to the management of hyperglycemia in select patient populations that may prove useful for the hospital clinician. We outline approaches to the management of hyperglycemia in hospitalized patients receiving glucocorticoids, patients with severe or end-stage renal disease undergoing hemo- or peritoneal dialysis, and patients receiving total parenteral or enteral feeding, in addition to patients transitioning from intravenous insulin infusion to subcutaneously administered insulin. Key considerations underlying these management methods include a proactive approach, frequent blood glucose monitoring, daily review of blood glucose patterns, and daily reassessment of the insulin regimen and associated orders.

Topics: Diabetes Complications; Diabetes Mellitus; Enteral Nutrition; Glucocorticoids; Hospitals; Humans; Hyperglycemia; Insulin; Insulin, Isophane; Parenteral Nutrition; Renal Dialysis; Renal Insufficiency

The treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) has been revolutionized by the introduction of novel therapeutic regimens following the clinical approval of the long-acting basal insulin glargine 10 years ago, followed by insulin detemir and, more recently, agents that target the glucagon-like peptide (GLP)-1 system with dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP-4)-resistant products, such as liraglutide and exenatide, and DPP-4 inhibitors, such as sitagliptin, saxagliptin, alogliptin, and vildagliptin. The position and clinical efficacy of the GLP-1 mimetics are less well understood, however, and how they should be best used in the context of the established clinical efficacy of long-acting insulin analogs is yet to be defined. The aim of this review is to provide a summary of the efficacy, safety, and weight changes associated with long-acting insulin analogs (insulin glargine and insulin detemir) and two GLP-1 mimetics (exenatide and liraglutide). MEDLINE, EMBASE, and BIOSIS databases were searched with a timeframe of January 1, 2003-January 12, 2009 using the following terms: "Insulin glargine," with the co-indexing terms "LANTUS" and "HOE901"; "Insulin detemir," with the co-indexing term "Levemir"; "Exenatide"; and "Liraglutide." This literature review demonstrates that GLP-1 and basal insulin therapies are effective treatment options for insulin-naïve patients with suboptimal glycemic control with oral hypoglycemic agents. There are potential advantages of basal insulin and GLP-1 therapies in particular populations of patients. Further comparative data are needed to fully investigate the relative positioning of these therapies within the T2DM treatment paradigm.

Topics: Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Glucagon-Like Peptide 1; Humans; Hyperglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Detemir; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Isophane; Insulin, Long-Acting

Topics: Animals; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus; Dogs; Humans; Hyperglycemia; Hypoglycemia; Insulin; Insulin Aspart; Insulin Glargine; Insulin Lispro; Insulin, Isophane; Insulin, Long-Acting; Swine; Time Factors

Post-transplantation diabetes mellitus (PTDM) might be preventable.. This open-label, multicenter randomized trial compared 133 kidney transplant recipients given intermediate-acting insulin isophane for postoperative afternoon glucose ≥140 mg/dl with 130 patients given short-acting insulin for fasting glucose ≥200 mg/dl (control). The primary end point was PTDM (antidiabetic treatment or oral glucose tolerance test-derived 2 hour glucose ≥200 mg/dl) at month 12 post-transplant.. In the intention-to-treat population, PTDM rates at 12 months were 12.2% and 14.7% in treatment versus control groups, respectively (odds ratio [OR], 0.82; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 0.39 to 1.76) and 13.4% versus 17.4%, respectively, at 24 months (OR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.34 to 1.49). In the per-protocol population, treatment resulted in reduced odds for PTDM at 12 months (OR, 0.40; 95% CI, 0.16 to 1.01) and 24 months (OR, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.24 to 1.20). After adjustment for polycystic kidney disease, per-protocol ORs for PTDM (treatment versus controls) were 0.21 (95% CI, 0.07 to 0.62) at 12 months and 0.35 (95% CI, 0.14 to 0.87) at 24 months. Significantly more hypoglycemic events (mostly asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic) occurred in the treatment group versus the control group. Within the treatment group, nonadherence to the insulin initiation protocol was associated with significantly higher odds for PTDM at months 12 and 24.. At low overt PTDM incidence, the primary end point in the intention-to-treat population did not differ significantly between treatment and control groups. In the per-protocol analysis, early basal insulin therapy resulted in significantly higher hypoglycemia rates but reduced odds for overt PTDM-a significant reduction after adjustment for baseline differences-suggesting the intervention merits further study.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Guideline Adherence; Humans; Hyperglycemia; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Lispro; Insulin, Isophane; Intention to Treat Analysis; Kidney Transplantation; Male; Middle Aged; Postoperative Care; Postoperative Period; Risk Factors; Sex Factors; Standard of Care; Time Factors

In Japan, premixed insulins are commonly used as starter insulin for type 2 diabetes. This subpopulation analysis assessed the efficacy and safety of twice-daily LM25 (25% insulin lispro/75% insulin lispro protamine) and LM50 (50% insulin lispro/50% insulin lispro protamine) as starter insulin in Japanese subjects, and compared these results with the whole-trial populations of East Asian subjects. In this subpopulation analysis of an open-label, phase 4, randomized trial (CLASSIFY), Japanese subjects received LM25 (n = 88) or LM50 (n = 84) twice-daily for 26 weeks. The primary outcome was change from baseline at Week 26 in glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c). Results for Japanese subjects were generally similar to those for the whole-trial population. Similar changes from baseline in HbA1c were observed for LM25 and LM50 groups (least squares [LS] mean difference [95% confidence interval] of LM25 - LM50 = 0.13 [-0.16, 0.41]%, 1.42 [-1.75, 4.48] mmol/mol, p = 0.388). More LM50-treated subjects than LM25-treated subjects achieved HbA1c targets of <7.0% (59.5% versus 43.2%; p = 0.034) or ≤6.5% (45.2% versus 28.4%; p = 0.027). The reduction in postprandial blood glucose concentrations after morning and evening meals was statistically significantly greater for LM50 than for LM25. The incidence of both hypoglycemia and treatment-emergent adverse events were similar between treatment groups. Both LM25 and LM50 twice daily appear to be effective and well tolerated as starter insulin, although LM50 might be more effective for Japanese type 2 diabetes patients.

Topics: Aged; Asia, Eastern; Asian People; Biphasic Insulins; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hyperglycemia; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Incidence; Insulin Lispro; Insulin Resistance; Insulin, Isophane; Japan; Male; Middle Aged; Postprandial Period

Prednisolone causes hyperglycaemia predominantly between midday and midnight. Consequently, glargine-based basal-bolus insulin regimens may under treat daytime hyperglycaemia and cause nocturnal hypoglycaemia. We investigated whether an isophane-based insulin regimen is safer and more effective than a glargine-based regimen in hospitalized patients.. Fifty inpatients prescribed ≥20 mg/day prednisolone acutely with (1) finger prick blood glucose level (BGL) ≥15 mmol/L or (2) BGLs ≥10 mmol/L within the previous 24 hours were randomized to either insulin isophane or glargine before breakfast and insulin aspart before meals. The initial daily insulin dose was 0.5 U/kg bodyweight or 130% of the current daily insulin dose. Glycaemic control was assessed using a continuous glucose monitoring system.. On Day 1, there were no significant differences in percentage of time outside a target glucose range of 4 to 10 mmol/L (41.3% ± 5.5% vs 50.0% ± 5.7%, P  = .28), mean daily glucose (10.2 ± 0.7 vs 10.8 ± 0.8 mmol/L, P  = .57) or glucose <4 mmol/L (2.2% ± 1.1% vs 2.0% ± 1.3%, P  = .92) in patients randomized to isophane and glargine. In patients treated for 3 days, the prednisolone dose was reduced ( P  = .02) and the insulin dose was increased over time ( P  = .02), but the percentage of time outside the 4 to 10 mmol/L glucose range did not differ over time ( P  = .45) or between groups ( P  = .24).. There were no differences in the efficacy or safety of the isophane and glargine-based insulin regimens. We recommend an initial daily insulin dose of 0.5 units/kg bodyweight if not on insulin, a greater than 30% increase in pre-prednisolone insulin dose and larger insulin dose adjustments in patients with prednisolone-induced hyperglycaemia.

Topics: Aged; Blood Glucose; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Hospitalization; Humans; Hyperglycemia; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Inpatients; Insulin; Insulin Aspart; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Isophane; Male; Meals; Middle Aged; Prednisolone; Treatment Outcome

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of twice-daily insulin degludec/insulin aspart vs. twice-daily biphasic insulin aspart 30 in people with Type 2 diabetes mellitus who were naïve to insulin.. In this 26-week, multinational, open-label, controlled, two-arm, parallel-group, treat-to-target trial, participants [mean (± sd) age 58.9 (±8.9) years, duration of diabetes 9.5 (±5.9) years, HbA1c 68 (±8.7) mmol/mol or 8.4 (±0.8)% and BMI 31.2 (±4.2) kg/m(2) ) were randomized (1:1) to insulin degludec/insulin aspart (n = 197) or biphasic insulin aspart 30 (n = 197), administered with breakfast and the main evening meal, titrated to a self-monitored plasma glucose target > 3.9 and ≤ 5.0 mmol/l.. The mean HbA1c was reduced to 49 mmol/mol (6.6%) with insulin degludec/insulin aspart and 48 mmol/mol (6.5%) with biphasic insulin aspart 30. Insulin degludec/insulin aspart achieved the prespecified non-inferiority margin (estimated treatment difference 0.02%; 95% CI -0.12, 0.17). Insulin degludec/insulin aspart was superior in lowering fasting plasma glucose (estimated treatment difference -1.00 mmol/l; 95% CI -1.4, -0.6; P < 0.001) and reducing overall and nocturnal confirmed hypoglycaemia at a similar overall insulin dose compared with biphasic insulin aspart 30. Similar proportions of participants in each arm experienced severe hypoglycaemia. Adverse events were equally distributed.. Consistent with previous findings, insulin degludec/insulin aspart twice daily effectively improved long-term glycaemic control, with superior reductions in FPG, and significantly less overall and nocturnal confirmed hypoglycaemia compared with biphasic insulin aspart 30 in people with Type 2 diabetes who were insulin-naïve.

Topics: Aged; Biphasic Insulins; Blood Glucose; Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Combinations; Drug Monitoring; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hyperglycemia; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Aspart; Insulin, Isophane; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Meals; Middle Aged; Risk; Severity of Illness Index; Solubility

To examine whether insulin glargine can lead to better control of glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) than that achieved by neutral protamine Hagedorn (NPH) insulin, using a protocol designed to limit nocturnal hypoglycaemia.. The present study, the Least One Oral Antidiabetic Drug Treatment (LANCELOT) Study, was a 36-week, randomized, open-label, parallel-arm study conducted in Europe, Asia, the Middle East and South America. Participants were randomized (1:1) to begin glargine or NPH, on background of metformin with glimepiride. Weekly insulin titration aimed to achieve median prebreakfast and nocturnal plasma glucose levels ≤5.5 mmol/l, while limiting values ≤4.4 mmol/l.. The efficacy population (n = 701) had a mean age of 57 years, a mean body mass index of 29.8 kg/m², a mean duration of diabetes of 9.2 years and a mean HbA1c level of 8.2% (66 mmol/mol). At treatment end, HbA1c values and the proportion of participants with HbA1c <7.0 % (<53 mmol/mol) were not significantly different for glargine [7.1 % (54 mmol/mol) and 50.3%] versus NPH [7.2 % (55 mmol/mol) and 44.3%]. The rate of symptomatic nocturnal hypoglycaemia, confirmed by plasma glucose ≤3.9 or ≤3.1 mmol/l, was 29 and 48% less with glargine than with NPH insulin. Other outcomes were similar between the groups.. Insulin glargine was not superior to NPH insulin in improving glycaemic control. The insulin dosing algorithm was not sufficient to equalize nocturnal hypoglycaemia between the two insulins. This study confirms, in a globally heterogeneous population, the reduction achieved in nocturnal hypoglycaemia while attaining good glycaemic control with insulin glargine compared with NPH, even when titrating basal insulin to prevent nocturnal hypoglycaemia rather than treating according to normal fasting glucose levels.

Topics: Aged; Asia; Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring; Circadian Rhythm; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Dosage Calculations; Drug Resistance; Drug Therapy, Combination; Europe; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hyperglycemia; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Isophane; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Metformin; Middle Aged; Middle East; South Africa; Sulfonylurea Compounds

To investigate, using a novel non-steady-state protocol, the differential effects of subcutaneous (s.c.) detemir and NPH insulin on glucose flux and lipid metabolism after insulin withdrawal.. After a period of insulin withdrawal resulting in whole-blood glucose concentration of 7 mmol/l, 11 participants (five men, mean age 41.0 years, mean body mass index 25 kg/m(2)) with type 1 diabetes (mean glycated haemoglobin concentration 57 mmol/mol, mean diabetes duration 14 years) received 0.5 units per kg body weight s.c. insulin detemir or NPH insulin in random order. Stable isotopes of glucose and glycerol were infused intravenously throughout the study protocol.. Glucose concentration decreased after insulin treatment as a result of suppression of endogenous glucose production, which occurred to a similar extent with both detemir and NPH insulin. The rate of glucose disappearance (Rd) was not increased significantly with either type of insulin. When the effect of detemir and NPH insulin on glucose flux at glucose concentrations between 9 and 6 mmol/l was examined, glucose rate of appearance (Ra) was similar with the two insulins; however, glucose Rd was greater with NPH insulin than with detemir at glucose concentrations of 8.0, 8.5, 7.0 and 6.0 mmol/l (p < 0.05) The percentage change in glycerol Ra, a measure of lipolysis, was greater in the NPH group than in the detemir group (p = 0.04).. The results of the study are consistent with the hypothesis that detemir has a lesser effect on the periphery, as evidenced by a lesser effect on peripheral glucose uptake at specific glucose concentrations.

Topics: Adult; Blood Glucose; Body Mass Index; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1; Glycated Hemoglobin; Glycerol; Humans; Hyperglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Injections, Subcutaneous; Insulin Detemir; Insulin, Isophane; Lipolysis; Male

Clinical guidelines recommend point-of-care glucose testing and the use of supplemental doses of rapid-acting insulin before meals and at bedtime for correction of hyperglycemia. The efficacy and safety of this recommendation, however, have not been tested in the hospital setting.. In this open-label, randomized controlled trial, 206 general medicine and surgery patients with type 2 diabetes treated with a basal-bolus regimen were randomized to receive either supplemental insulin (n = 106) at bedtime for blood glucose (BG) >7.8 mmol/L or no supplemental insulin (n = 100) except for BG >19.4 mmol/L. Point-of-care testing was performed before meals, at bedtime, and at 3:00 a.m. The primary outcome was the difference in fasting BG. In addition to the intention-to-treat analysis, an as-treated analysis was performed where the primary outcome was analyzed for only the bedtime BG levels between 7.8 and 19.4 mmol/L.. There were no differences in mean fasting BG for the intention-to-treat (8.8 ± 2.4 vs. 8.6 ± 2.2 mmol/L, P = 0.76) and as-treated (8.9 ± 2.4 vs. 8.8 ± 2.4 mmol/L, P = 0.92) analyses. Only 66% of patients in the supplement and 8% in the no supplement groups received bedtime supplemental insulin. Hypoglycemia (BG <3.9 mmol/L) did not differ between groups for either the intention-to-treat (30% vs. 26%, P = 0.50) or the as-treated (4% vs. 8%, P = 0.37) analysis.. The use of insulin supplements for correction of bedtime hyperglycemia was not associated with an improvement in glycemic control. We conclude that routine use of bedtime insulin supplementation is not indicated for management of inpatients with type 2 diabetes.

Topics: Aged; Blood Glucose; Circadian Rhythm; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Hospitalization; Humans; Hyperglycemia; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Lispro; Insulin, Isophane; Insulin, Long-Acting; Insulin, Short-Acting; Male; Meals; Middle Aged; Sleep

To test the hypothesis that a 'basal plus' regimen--adding once-daily main-meal fast-acting insulin to basal insulin once daily--would be non-inferior to biphasic insulin twice daily as assessed by glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) concentration (predefined as ≤0.4%), but would provide superior treatment satisfaction.. This open-label trial enrolled adults to an 8- or 12-week run-in period, during which oral therapies except metformin were stopped and insulin glargine dose was titrated. Those with fasting glucose <7 mmol/l but HbA1c >7% (53 mmol/mol) were randomized to insulin glargine/glulisine once daily (n = 170) or insulin aspart/aspart protamine 30/70 twice daily (n = 165) for 24 weeks, with dose titration to glucose targets using standardized algorithms.. For HbA1c, the basal plus regimen was non-inferior to biphasic insulin (least squares mean difference, 0.21%, upper 97.5% confidence limit 0.38%) meeting the predefined non-inferiority margin of 0.4%. Treatment satisfaction (Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire change version and Insulin Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire total scores) significantly favoured basal plus. No difference was observed between the basal plus and the biphasic insulin groups in responders (HbA1c <7%, 20.6 vs 27.9%; p = 0.12), weight gain (2.06 vs 2.50 kg; p = 0.2), diabetes-specific quality of life (Audit of Diabetes-Dependent Quality of Life average weighted impact (AWI) score) and generic health status (five-dimension European Quality of Life questionnaire). Overall hypoglycaemia rates were similar between groups (15.3 vs 18.2 events/patient-year; p = 0.22); nocturnal hypoglycaemia was higher with the basal plus regimen (5.7 vs 3.6 events/patient-year; p = 0.02).. In long-standing type 2 diabetes with suboptimal glycaemia despite oral therapies and basal insulin, the basal plus regimen was non-inferior to biphasic insulin for biomedical outcomes, with a similar overall hypoglycaemia rate but more nocturnal events.

Topics: Aged; Australia; Biphasic Insulins; Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Combinations; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hyperglycemia; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Incidence; Insulin; Insulin Aspart; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Isophane; Intention to Treat Analysis; Male; Middle Aged; Patient Dropouts; Quality of Life; United Kingdom

To investigate the clinical efficacy and safety of insulin glargine compared with NPH insulin as basal insulin for the management of corticosteroid-induced hyperglycemia in hospitalized people with type 2 diabetes (T2DM) and respiratory disease.. Randomized, two-arm parallel group, clinical trial undertaken from February 2011 to November 2012 on the pneumology ward of the Hospital Regional Universitario de Málaga (Spain), involving 53 participants with T2DM treated with medium/high doses of intermediate-acting corticosteroids. Participants were randomly assigned to receive one single dose of insulin glargine or NPH insulin in three equally divided doses before each meal as basal insulin within a basal-bolus insulin protocol. The intervention lasted six days or until discharge if earlier.. No significant differences were seen between groups during the study in mean blood glucose (11.43±3.44 mmol/l in glargine vs. 11.88±2.94 mmol/l in NPH, p=0.624), and measures of glucose variability (standard deviation 3.27±1.16 mmol/l vs. 3.61±0.99 mmol/l, p=0.273; coefficient of variation 1.55±0.33 mmol/l vs. 1.72±0.39 mmol/l, p=0.200). Results from CGM were concordant with those obtained with capillary blood glucose reading. The length of hospital stay was also similar between groups (8.2±2.8 days vs. 9.8±3.4 days, p=0.166) There was a non significant trend for lower episodes of mild (4 vs. 8, p=0.351) and severe hypoglycemia (0 vs. 3, p=0.13) in the glargine group.. The results of this study showed that insulin glargine and NPH insulin are equally effective in a basal-bolus insulin protocol to treat glucocorticoid-induced hyperglycemia in people with T2DM on a pneumology ward.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Glucocorticoids; Humans; Hyperglycemia; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Isophane; Male; Middle Aged; Respiratory Tract Diseases; Safety; Young Adult

Our aim was to compare the effects of an intermediate acting human insulin (NPH) and a long-acting insulin analog, insulin glargine, in insulin naïve type 2 diabetes patients, stratified by the type of hyperglycemia (fasting or postprandial type). Based on different action profiles, we hypothesized that patients having different hyperglycemia types would react differently when treated with these insulins. This is a post hoc analysis of the Lanmet study data. The Lanmet study was a randomized, 36-week controlled insulin initiation study in type 2 diabetes patients. 109 subjects with baseline HbA1c >8.0% (64 mmol/mol) completed the study. The patients were divided into two groups according to fasting glucose (mmol/l)/HbA1c (%) ratio. Patients with a ratio ≥1.3 were defined as having fasting type and those with a ratio <1.3 as having postprandial type hyperglycemia. The main outcome measures were change in HbA1c and body weight, and final insulin dose. Independently of insulin type, compared to patients with postprandial type hyperglycemia, those with fasting type hyperglycemia had 2.1 kg/m(2) greater initial BMI (p = 0.044), gained 2.0 kg more weight (p = 0.020, adjusted for baseline BMI p = 0.035), and had 36% greater final insulin dose/kg (p = 0.001). With respect to hyperglycemia type, there was no difference between NPH and glargine in their effects on HbA1c. When starting bedtime insulin in type 2 diabetes patients, those with fasting type hyperglycemia are prone to greater weight gain. Hyperglycemia type does not help in identifying patients who would benefit specially from either NPH insulin or insulin glargine.

Topics: Blood Glucose; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Fasting; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hyperglycemia; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Isophane; Male; Middle Aged; Postprandial Period; Statistics, Nonparametric

Hyperglycaemia and diabetes mellitus are common in patients hospitalized in the orthopaedic surgery ward. However, glycaemic control obtained during hospitalization is often suboptimal. No method for achieving adequate glycaemic control in this population has been validated in an in-hospital setting.. An intervention including an intensive subcutaneous insulin protocol in the orthopaedic department.. All diabetic patients admitted to the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery were prospectively randomized during a 6-month period. One group (n = 30) received standard care with sliding scale insulin and the other group (n = 35) received the intervention protocol. During the intervention period, the staff was briefed on the importance of glucose monitoring and control. An intensive multiple-injection protocol consisting of four daily regular/neutral protamine hagedorn (NPH) insulin injections was initiated in diabetic patients. The programme was followed up by a consulting diabetologist.. Mean blood glucose levels throughout the hospitalization were 161.48 ± 3.8 mg/dL in the intervention group versus 175.29 ± 2.3 mg/dL in the control group (p < 0.0005). Hospitalization was shorter by 2 days in the intervention group (p < 0.05). The number of severe hyperglycaemic events (blood glucose level above 400 mg%) was significantly lower (p < 0.05) in the intervention group. There was no significant difference in the number of hypoglycaemic events.. The suggested four-step intervention regimen improved glycaemic control of hospitalized patients in the orthopaedic department and simplified the 'in-house' treatment of the diabetic patient. Hospital stays were reduced on average by two days (p < 0.05).

Topics: Aged; Blood Glucose; Clinical Protocols; Diabetes Mellitus; Female; Health Personnel; Humans; Hyperglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Inpatients; Insulin; Insulin, Isophane; Male; Orthopedic Procedures; Patient Education as Topic; Prospective Studies

A randomized, open-label, parallel study was conducted to assess the efficacy and safety of premixed insulin aspart 30 (biphasic insulin aspart [BIAsp] 30) in managing gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). A total of 323 women with GDM registered at a single center in India were randomly assigned to receive 6 U of either BIAsp 30 (Group A) or premixed human insulin (biphasic human insulin [BHI] 30; Group B) in a 1:1 ratio. Subjects performed home glucose monitoring and visited their care provider twice a month. The primary outcome was the degree of neonatal macrosomia (neonatal birth weight >90th percentile). Groups A and B were demographically comparable at study entry. Before labor onset, Groups A and B achieved similar degrees of fasting plasma glucose and postprandial plasma glucose control (92.97 ± 14.44 vs. 95.43 ± 18.96 and 127.59 ± 28.99 vs. 126.98 ± 29.89, respectively; both p = NS). Neonatal macrosomia frequency was 6.3% in Group A and 6.9% in Group B; however, this difference was not statistically significant. By last visit, the required insulin dose was significantly lower for Group A than Group B (19.83 ± 15.75 IU vs. 26.34 ± 23.15 IU, respectively; p = 0.006). BIAsp 30 was noninferior to BHI 30, producing comparable fetal outcomes when administered during pregnancy. Based on final doses, BIAsp 30 may offer greater treat-to-target potential for pregnant women.

Topics: Biphasic Insulins; Birth Weight; Blood Glucose; Cohort Studies; Diabetes, Gestational; Drug Combinations; Female; Fetal Macrosomia; Humans; Hyperglycemia; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Incidence; India; Infant, Newborn; Insulin Aspart; Insulin, Isophane; Intention to Treat Analysis; Male; Pregnancy

To evaluate the effect of metformin and insulin in glycemic control and compare pregnancy outcome in women with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM).. This randomized controlled trial was conducted in GDM women with singleton pregnancy and gestational age between 20 and 34 weeks who did not achieve glycemic control on diet were assigned randomly to receive either metformin (n=80) or insulin (n=80). The primary outcomes were maternal glycemic control and birth weight. The secondary outcomes were neonatal and obstetric complications.. Two groups were comparable regarding the maternal characteristics. Two groups were similar in mean FBS (P=0.68) and postprandial measurements (P=0.87) throughout GDM treatment. The neonates of metformin group had less rate of birth weight centile >90 than insulin group (RR: 0.5, 95% CI: 0.3-0.9, P=0.012). Maternal weight gain was reduced in the metformin group (P<0.001). Two groups were comparable according to neonatal and obstetric complications (P>0.05). In metformin group 14% of women needed to supplemental insulin to achieve euglycemia.. Metformin is an effective and safe alternative treatment to insulin for women with GDM. This study does not show significant risk of maternal or neonatal adverse outcome with the use of metformin.

Topics: Adult; Birth Weight; Blood Glucose; Diabetes, Gestational; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Fetal Macrosomia; Humans; Hyperglycemia; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin, Isophane; Lost to Follow-Up; Metformin; Pregnancy; Pregnancy Outcome; Pregnancy Trimester, Second; Pregnancy Trimester, Third; Single-Blind Method; Weight Gain

This A1chieve® study subgroup analysis examined clinical safety and effectiveness of biphasic insulin aspart 30 (BIAsp30) ±OGLDs in 6323 individuals with T2D, switching from biphasic human insulin 30 (BHI30) ±OGLDs.. A1chieve was a 24-week, international, prospective, observational, multi-centre, open-label study in individuals with T2D starting treatment with BIAsp30, insulin detemir or insulin aspart as part of routine clinical care.. Mean baseline (SD) dose BHI was 0.56 (0.25) IU/kg. BIAsp30 was initiated at 0.57 (0.25) U/kg; the daily dose was 0.62 (0.28)U/kg by Week 24. Switching from BHI30 to BIAsp30 was associated with significant mean reduction in HbA1c of 1.7% [-18 mmol/mol] (1.6) from a baseline of 9.1% [76 mmol/mol] (p<0.001); FPG and PPG were also significantly reduced (p<0.001). Major hypoglycaemic episodes decreased from 0.69 events/patient/year at baseline to 0.03 events/patient/year at Week 24. Minor hypoglycaemia decreased from 5.31 to 2.04 events/patient/year from baseline to study-end. Five serious adverse drug reactions (hypoglycaemia) were reported by five individuals (0.1%). Mean bodyweight increased by 0.1 (3.3)kg from baseline to 24 weeks. Improved self-reported quality of life was observed.. Switching from BHI30 to BIAsp30 in individuals with T2D is associated with improvement in glycaemic control and reduced rates of hypoglycaemia, without tolerability or safety issues.

Topics: Adult; Africa, Northern; Aged; Asia; Biphasic Insulins; Cohort Studies; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Combinations; Drug Monitoring; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hyperglycemia; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Aspart; Insulin, Isophane; Male; Middle Aged; Middle East; Prospective Studies; Quality of Life

The aim of this study was to compare coefficient of variation of fasting capillary blood glucose (FBG) between insulin glargine and NPH in T2DM with poorly controlled by oral antidiabetic drugs. The results demonstrated that insulin glargine was more potent in improving glycemic control than NPH with stable FBG.

Topics: Adult; Blood Glucose; Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Homeostasis; Humans; Hyperglycemia; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin Resistance; Insulin-Secreting Cells; Insulin, Isophane; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Middle Aged

To compare two subcutaneous insulin strategies for glycemic management of hyperglycemia in non-critically ill hospitalized patients with diabetes during enteral nutrition therapy (ENT).. Fifty inpatients were prospectively randomized to receive sliding-scale regular insulin (SSRI) alone (n = 25) or in combination with insulin glargine (n = 25). NPH insulin was added for persistent hyperglycemia in the SSRI group (glucose >10 mmol/l).. Glycemic control was similar in the SSRI and glargine groups (mean +/- SD study glucose 8.9 +/- 1.6 vs. 9.2 +/- 1.6 mmol/l, respectively; P = 0.71). NPH insulin was added in 48% of the SSRI group subjects. There were no group differences in frequency of hypoglycemia (1.3 +/- 4.1 vs. 1.1 +/- 1.8%; P = 0.35), total adverse events, or length of stay.. Both insulin strategies (SSRI with the addition of NPH for persistent hyperglycemia and glargine) demonstrated similar efficacy and safety in non-critically ill hospitalized patients with type 2 diabetes during ENT.

Topics: Aged; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Complications; Diabetes Mellitus; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Humans; Hyperglycemia; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Inpatients; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Isophane; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Middle Aged; Neoplasms; Severity of Illness Index

The efficacy of various regimens of initial insulin treatment in poorly controlled type 2 diabetes was compared with regard to diurnal glucose variation.. Randomized controlled trial. Setting. Insulin therapy initiated on hospital wards, follow-up as outpatients for 12 months.. Fifty-two type 2 diabetic patients (HbA1c >7.5%, mean 9.8%) on maximal oral therapy. Interventions. Insulin only (IO), bedtime insulin with sulphonylurea (glipizide) (IS), or bedtime insulin with metformin (IM).. HbA1c and body weight.. HbA1c decreased on average by 1.8, 1.0 and 1.5 percentage points in the IO, IS, and IM groups, respectively (p always <0.025). Body weight increased, most in the IO patients (+6.2 kg), least in the IM patients (+3.4 kg). Analysing all treatment groups combined, a similar HbA1c reduction was observed in patients with overall hyperglycaemia (low fasting plasma glucose/HbA1c ratio) and in patients with fasting hyperglycaemia (high fasting plasma glucose/HbA1c ratio). Within the overall hyperglycaemia group, the IS and IM patients had smaller decreases in HbA1c (-1.5 and -1.3 percentage points, respectively) than the IO patients (-2.7 percentage points). On the other hand, within the fasting hyperglycaemia group HbA1c reductions were -1.2, -0.8 and -1.5 percentage points, in the IO, IS, and IM groups, respectively.. Not all poorly controlled type 2 diabetic patients should automatically be treated with an oral agent and bedtime insulin. Two daily insulin injections is a valid choice, particularly if the patient has overall hyperglycaemia.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Blood Glucose; Circadian Rhythm; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Fasting; Follow-Up Studies; Glipizide; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hyperglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin, Isophane; Insulin, Long-Acting; Metformin; Middle Aged

Traditionally hyperglycemia in surgical inpatients has been managed with six-hourly sliding-scale regular insulin. However, this approach is usually ineffective in preventing hyperglycemia since no basal insulin is provided. We compared glycemic control using NPH and regular insulin versus glargine insulin alone in patients after cardiovascular surgery on a general surgical ward.. Ninety-four hyperglycemic patients were randomized to subcutaneous insulin using twice-daily NPH/regular or once-daily glargine if they required at least 1 unit/h of intravenous insulin at the time of transfer from the ICU. NPH/regular was adjusted twice daily; glargine was adjusted once daily. Blood glucose was measured four times daily and targeted to 80-140 mg/dL.. The mean blood glucose after NPH/regular (124 mg/dL) and glargine (131 mg/dL) was similar (P = 0.065). In the subgroup of patients with a history of diabetes, mean blood glucose was significantly lower after NPH/regular (133 mg/dL) versus glargine (154 mg/dL) (P = 0.016). Blood glucose less than 60 mg/dL was significantly less common after glargine (0.5%) as compared with NPH/regular (2%) (P = 0.036).. Once-daily glargine insulin provides good glycemic control in hyperglycemic patients after cardiovascular surgery. Although twice-daily NPH/regular insulin provided better control than glargine insulin monotherapy, the simplicity and safety of glargine insulin make it an attractive option for the management of postoperative hyperglycemia. Patients with established diabetes will achieve better glucose control with NPH/regular insulin as compared with glargine but have a higher incidence of hypoglycemia.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Blood Glucose; Cardiovascular Surgical Procedures; Female; Humans; Hyperglycemia; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Isophane; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Middle Aged; Postoperative Complications

The objective of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of insulin glargine, a long-acting insulin analog, with NPH insulin in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM). In a multicenter, open-label, randomized, 6-month study, 349 patients with TIDM, aged 5-16 years, received insulin glargine once daily or NPH insulin either once or twice daily, based on their prior treatment regimen. Although there was no significant difference between the NPH insulin and insulin glargine treatment groups with respect to baseline to endpoint change in HbA1c levels, fasting blood glucose (FBG) levels decreased significantly more in the insulin glargine group (-1.29 mmol/l) than in the NPH insulin group (-0.68 mmol/L, p = 0.02). The percentage of symptomatic hypoglycemic events was similar between groups; however, fewer patients in the insulin glargine group reported severe hypoglycemia (23% vs 29%) and severe nocturnal hypoglycemia (13% vs 18%), although these differences were not statistically significant (p = 0.22 and p = 0.19, respectively). Fewer serious adverse events occurred in the insulin glargine group than in the NPH insulin group (p < 0.02). A once-daily subcutaneous dose of insulin glargine provides effective glycemic control and is well tolerated in children and adolescents with T1DM.

Topics: Adolescent; Age of Onset; Blood Glucose; Child; Child, Preschool; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1; Double-Blind Method; Drug Hypersensitivity; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hyperglycemia; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Isophane; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Multicenter Studies as Topic; Puberty

Nasal insulin administration is a potential route for intensive insulin management, less invasive and more rapid than subcutaneous injections. Previous studies have shown poor bioavailability (less than 15%) with nasal insulin administration with various absorption enhancers. The aim of the study was to evaluate in type 1 diabetic patients, the metabolic efficacy and local tolerance of a new gelified sprayed nasal insulin containing glychocolate and methylcellulose as absorption promoters.. The study was conducted in 16 type 1 diabetic patients (HbA1c 8.6+/-0.2%) in a cross-over trial including 2 six month randomized periods: a) NPH twice daily + 3 pre-prandial nasal insulin doses + nasal supplementation in case of unexpected hyperglycaemia; b) NPH twice daily + 3 pre-prandial regular insulin injections. End points were HbA1c levels, hypoglycaemic episodes and tolerance evaluated at month 0, 2, 6 and 8 on clinical symptoms and objective nasal assessments.. Four patients were withdrawn because of nasal burning (3 cases) and persistent sinusitis (1 case), and one patient had purulent sinusitis at the month 6 examination. At month 6, HbA1c levels were comparable (8.3 +/- 0.1 vs 8.6 +/- 0.1%, m +/- SEM, NS) for nasal and subcutaneous period respectively. The number of hypoglycaemic events was identical during the 2 periods (88 episodes). Nasal tolerance with the gelified form was better than with the already reported lyophilized form but, when present, symptoms were more marked, suggesting a potentiating additional role of methylcellulose excipient on nasal intolerance.. 1) Gelified nasal insulin is as efficient as subcutaneous regular insulin in type 1 diabetic patients. 2) Other galenic forms should be investigated to improve nasal tolerance and bioavailability.

Topics: Administration, Intranasal; Adult; Cross-Over Studies; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1; Drug Administration Schedule; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hyperglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Inflammation; Injections, Subcutaneous; Insulin, Isophane; Nasal Mucosa; Sinusitis

We have evaluated the local tolerance and the metabolic efficacy of a lyophilized nasal insulin preparation in 10 severely hyperglycaemic Type 2 diabetic patients.. The study included two 4-month randomized periods: (A) three preprandial doses of nasal insulin secondarily combined with one evening subcutaneous NPH if the desired glycaemic control was not achieved; (B) two NPH injections daily. We assessed: (i) diabetes control on monthly HbA1c levels and occurrence of hypoglycaemic events; (ii) local tolerance on clinical symptoms, rhinoscopy, nasal muco-ciliary clearance and nasal biopsies; (iii) insulin absorption at months 0 and 4.. One patient was withdrawn because of cough and dizziness after each nasal application. HbA1c was not significantly different at month 4 (9.4 +/- 0.5% vs. 8.8 +/- 0.2%, A vs. B). Blood glucose control remained only fair in the majority of our patients. Nasal insulin was able to replace the daytime fraction of the subcutaneous insulin with a 18% efficacy. Side-effects included transient nasal hyperactivity (pruritus, sneezing and rhinorrhoea) and chronic persistence of nasal crusts. Plasma insulin profiles were not significantly different between months 0 and 4.. The utilization of nasal insulin (with or without NPH) was associated with similar diabetes control compared with NPH twice daily. Nasal insulin alone was able to achieve an adequate glycaemic control in three of the 10 patients.

Topics: Administration, Intranasal; Adult; Aged; Cross-Over Studies; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hyperglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin, Isophane; Middle Aged; Patient Selection; Treatment Failure

To assess satisfaction with treatment and psychological well-being associated with insulin glargine and Neutral Protamine Hagedorn (NPH). Insulin glargine, a new long-acting insulin analogue, provides constant, peakless insulin release following once-daily administration and is associated with fewer hypoglycaemic episodes, despite metabolic control equivalent to that achieved with NPH human basal insulin.. The Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (DTSQ) and Well-being Questionnaire (W-BQ) were completed at baseline and at weeks 8, 20 or 28 by 517 patients with Type 1 diabetes participating in a randomized, controlled European trial comparing insulin glargine and NPH. Analysis of covariance was performed on change from baseline scores (main effects: treatment and pooled site; covariate: baseline scores).. Treatment satisfaction improved with insulin glargine at all time points, including endpoint, but deteriorated slightly with NPH. These differences were significant throughout the study (change from baseline to endpoint: +1.27 vs. -0.56; P = 0.0001). Outcomes were better with insulin glargine for the DTSQ items, Perceived Frequency of Hyperglycaemia and Hypoglycaemia, with statistically significant differences at week 28 and endpoint for hyperglycaemia (P = 0.0373 and 0.0379) and at week 20 for hypoglycaemia (P = 0.0024). There was no difference in psychological well-being between the treatment groups, with mean scores increasing in both.. Study participants had treatment-independent improvements in General Well-being. Advantages for insulin glargine were seen in significantly improved Treatment Satisfaction throughout the study, together with lower Perceived Frequency of Hyperglycaemia than for patients on NPH, without a significant increase in Perceived Frequency of Hypoglycaemia.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Attitude to Health; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1; Female; Humans; Hyperglycemia; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Isophane; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Middle Aged; Patient Satisfaction; Surveys and Questionnaires; Treatment Outcome

In patients with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM) good glycaemic control confers an enhanced risk of hypoglycaemia. Nocturnal hypoglycaemia occurs frequently and contributes to the syndrome of hypoglycaemia unawareness. In order to avoid nocturnal hypoglycaemia we substituted night-time continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) therapy in 14 patients with well-controlled IDDM using a multiple injection regimen for the more variable bedtime NPH insulin. During a stepwise hypoglycaemic clamp we studied the effect of this regimen on counterregulatory hormonal responses, warning symptoms and cognitive function. In addition, we investigated the incidence of daytime hypoglycaemia and the acceptability of night-time CSII treatment. CSII was associated with a lower frequency of hypoglycaemia (mean+/-SEM): 16.1+/-3.1 vs 23.6+/-3.3) episodes during the last 6 weeks of treatment, p=0.03 (CSII vs NPH)) with maintenance of good glycaemic control (HbA1c 7.2+/-0.2 vs 7.1+/-0.2 %, p=0.2). Hypoglycaemic thresholds for the growth hormone response and for autonomic symptoms were lower for CSII treatment than for NPH treatment. Of 14 patients 6 decided to continue with the nocturnal CSII treatment. In conclusion, nocturnal CSII improves warning symptoms and counterregulatory hormonal responses to hypoglycaemia and is an acceptable treatment strategy for patients suffering from hypoglycaemia unawareness, as demonstrated in this acute feasibility study.

Topics: Adult; Blood Glucose; Circadian Rhythm; Cognition Disorders; Cross-Over Studies; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Glucose; Glucose Clamp Technique; Hormones; Humans; Hyperglycemia; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Infusion Pumps; Injections, Subcutaneous; Insulin; Insulin Infusion Systems; Insulin, Isophane; Male; Middle Aged; Nervous System Diseases; Patient Acceptance of Health Care; Perception

To test whether a suppertime injection of human ultralente insulin in patients with type I diabetes would result in a larger inhibition of basal hepatic glucose production (HGP) and improvement in fasting and mean daily plasma glucose levels.. We studied 16 type I diabetic patients (41 +/- 4 years of age; body mass index [BMI] = 23.3 +/- 0.3 kg/m2; diabetes duration > 3 years) with a crossover protocol of therapy with an intermediate and ultralente insulin. All patients were already treated with three injections per day of regular insulin in addition to intermediate-acting (NPH) insulin at suppertime. After a 14-day run-in period, patients were randomly assigned to treatment with equivalent doses (10.8 +/- 0.8 U, at 1900) of intermediate (Humulin I) or ultralente (Humulin U) insulin. After 1 month of treatment, patients were crossed over. No change of the insulin dosage was performed during the study period. Basal HGP was measured by D-(6,6-2H2)-glucose infusion. Plasma glucose concentration was measured in the fasting state and monitored during the day.. Before starting the study period, fasting plasma glucose was 13.4 +/- 1.1 mM and plasma free-insulin was 48.0 +/- 4.8 pM. Daily plasma glucose concentration averaged 10.3 +/- 0.3 mM and the area under the curve (AUC) was 1.41 +/- 0.05 mol/14 h. NPH insulin, given at suppertime for a month, did not induce significant changes in fasting plasma insulin (40.2 +/- 4.8 pM), glucose concentration (14.0 +/- 0.9 mM) or HGP (20.2 +/- 2.2 mumol.kg-1.min-1). Accordingly, no change occurred in the average daily plasma glucose (10.3 +/- 0.3 mM) or AUC (1.41 +/- 0.9 mol/14 h). Glycated hemoglobin also was not affected (8.2 +/- 0.4 vs. 8.2 +/- 0.3%). On the contrary, a 4-week treatment with ultralente insulin, also given at suppertime, was associated with a decline in the basal HGP (16.0 +/- 1.3 mumol.kg-1.min-1), fasting (11.3 +/- 0.9 mM) and average daily (9.4 +/- 0.3 mM) plasma glucose concentrations, and AUC (1.29 +/- 0.07 mol/14 h) of plasma glucose level (all P < 0.05). Glycated hemoglobin was reduced (7.9 +/- 0.4%). In each condition, fasting plasma glucose concentration was correlated with the average daily plasma glucose level (basal = 0.78; intermediate = 0.89; ultralente = 0.62; all P < 0.05), which suggests that ultralente insulin likely induces the improvements of metabolic control through reducing fasting plasma glucose.. Our results suggest that treating type I diabetic patients with ultralente insulin at suppertime provides a better modulation of basal HGP so that lower fasting plasma glucose levels are ensured. The reduction of fasting hyperglycemia is likely to affect positively daily plasma glucose control.

Topics: Adult; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Therapy, Combination; Fasting; Female; Glucose; Humans; Hyperglycemia; Insulin; Insulin, Isophane; Insulin, Long-Acting; Liver; Male; Recombinant Proteins

Morning versus bedtime administration of NPH insulin was compared in 12 subjects with Type 2 diabetes and overt fasting hyperglycaemia. Subjects were studied at baseline (diet alone) and after 2 months on each of the two insulin programmes in a random crossover design, in which dosage was increased until at least one daily preprandial blood glucose was consistently in the range of 3.9 to 6.0 mmol l-1. Mean (+/- SEM) daily total insulin dosage was equivalent for the morning (0.36 +/- 0.03 units kg-1) and for the bedtime (0.37 +/- 0.03 units kg-1) insulin administration schedules. Glycaemic control was improved on both insulin regimens, but was better on bedtime than morning insulin. Fasting plasma glucose (mmol l-1) was 12.0 +/- 0.7 (baseline), 8.6 +/- 0.7 (morning), and 4.6 +/- 0.3 (bedtime), respectively. Mean 24 h plasma glucose (mmol l-1) was 13.3 +/- 1.3, 9.0 +/- 0.7, and 7.8 +/- 0.7. Glycated haemoglobin (%) was 7.65 +/- 0.35, 6.23 +/- 0.26, and 5.81 +/- 0.32. The improvement of basal glycaemia is a consequence of increased basal metabolic clearance of glucose (baseline, 47.6 +/- 3.1 ml m-2 min-1; morning 63.5 +/- 5.4, bedtime 103.5 +/- 7.1). There was no change in hepatic glucose output. It is concluded that bedtime administration of intermediate acting insulin results in increased basal insulinaemia, leading to improved basal glycaemia and consequent improved overall metabolic control, compared to morning insulin administration. Therefore, bedtime may be the preferable timing of insulin therapy for patients with Type 2 diabetes and overt fasting hyperglycaemia.

Topics: Circadian Rhythm; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Administration Schedule; Fasting; Female; Humans; Hyperglycemia; Insulin, Isophane; Male; Middle Aged; Time Factors

To evaluate whether an insulin regimen with a long-acting zinc insulin (Ultratard HM) could help control fasting hyperglycemia in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM) patients.. A randomized sequential crossover trial with 6-wk treatment periods was used. Ten IDDM patients from the diabetes clinic at the Medical School who had persistent fasting hyperglycemia (greater than 10 mmol/L) were studied. Patients with nocturnal hypoglycemia were excluded. All patients completed the study. Insulin regimens consisted of three daily injections of a short-acting insulin (Actrapid HM) before meals and either a long-acting zinc insulin (Ultratard HM) or an intermediate isophane insulin (Protaphane HM) before the evening meal. Each regimen was followed for 6 wk.. Fasting blood glucose levels (at 06:00 and 08:00) were significantly lower after the long-acting insulin regimen (6.26 +/- 0.88 vs. 10.82 +/- 4.27 mM, P less than 0.05 and 9.26 +/- 1.02 vs. 14.03 +/- 1.08 mM, P less than 0.05, respectively). Plasma-free insulin levels mirrored blood glucose concentrations because they were significantly higher at 06:00 and 08:00 after the long-acting insulin regimen (49.5 +/- 10.1 vs. 20.1 +/- 4.3 pM, P less than 0.05 and 31.6 +/- 5.0 vs. 16.5 +/- 3.4 pM, P less than 0.05, respectively). At any other time of the day, blood glucose and plasma insulin levels were not significantly different with either one of the two insulin regimens.. A long-acting zinc human insulin injected before the evening meal can help to control persistent fasting hyperglycemia in IDDM patients.

Topics: Blood Glucose; Circadian Rhythm; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Therapy, Combination; Humans; Hyperglycemia; Insulin; Insulin, Isophane; Insulin, Long-Acting; Insulin, Regular, Pork

Three 'pen'-administered multiple injection regimens have been compared with twice daily insulin injection regimens by means of 24-h profiles of plasma glucose and free insulin concentrations. Ten Type 1 diabetic patients received their usual twice daily insulin regimen and were then randomized to receive the same total daily insulin dose in four divided doses using (1) 50:50 premixed soluble and isophane, (2) 30:70 premixed soluble and isophane, and (3) preprandial soluble and evening crystalline-zinc insulins. Profiles were performed after 1 week on each regimen. Plasma glucose concentrations were similar during the twice daily regimen and the two premixed regimens, rising during the early hours of the morning to a peak between 0900 and 0930 h of 13.8 +/- 2.8 (+/- SD) mmol l-1 on the twice daily regimen, 13.6 +/- 5.3 mmol l-1 on the premixed 50:50 regimen, and 13.5 +/- 4.2 mmol-1 on the premixed 30:70 regimen. With the basal and prandial regimen, overnight plasma glucose concentrations were higher than with the other regimens between 2400 and 0300 h (p less than 0.05). Concentrations then fell until breakfast, and rose after this meal to a peak of 9.5 +/- 4.3 mmol l-1 (p less than 0.01). Mean plasma glucose concentrations were significantly lower than on the other three regimens between 0830 and 1100 h (p less than 0.05). Less variability was observed in 24-h mean plasma glucose concentrations during the basal and prandial regimen than during the other three regimens.

Topics: Adult; Blood Glucose; Circadian Rhythm; Delayed-Action Preparations; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1; Drug Administration Schedule; Humans; Hyperglycemia; Insulin; Insulin, Isophane; Insulin, Long-Acting; Insulin, Regular, Pork; Male; Recombinant Proteins

Though many trials had examined the effectiveness of taking insulin with or without oral agents, there are limited real-world data, particularly among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) in the resource limited settings. This study aimed to examine level of glycemic control among patients with T2DM after initiation of insulin and factors associated with poor glycemic control.. An analysis of retrospective medical records of patients with T2DM who initiated insulin due to uncontrolled hyperglycemia by oral agents was conducted from 2015-2020 in the University of Gondar Comprehensive Specialized Hospital. Difference in median fasting plasma glucose (FPG) before and after insulin initiations was examined by a Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Kruskal Wallis test was performed to explore difference in the median level of FPG among treatment groups. A logistic regression model was also used to identify associated factors of poor glycemic control after insulin initiation. Statistical significance was declared at p < 0.05.. Of 424 enrolled patients with T2DM, 54.7% were males and the mean age was 59.3±9.3 years. A Wilcoxon signed-rank test showed that there was significant deference in FPG before and after insulin initiation (P < 0.001). A declining trend of blood glucose was observed during the 1-year follow-up period of post-initiation. However, majority of the participants did not achieve target glucose levels. Participants who had higher FPG and systolic blood pressure (SBP) before insulin initiation were found more likely to have poor glycemic control after insulin initiation. Similarly, patients who received atorvastatin compared with simvastatin were found to have poor glycemic control in the post-period of initiation (P = 0.04). Premixed insulin was associated with a lower likelihood of poor glycemic control than neutral protamine Hagedorn (NPH) insulin (P < 0.001).. Following insulin initiation, a significant change in glycemic level and declining trend of FPG was observed during a 1-year follow-up period. However, the majority of patients still had a poorly controlled glycemic level. Appropriate management focusing on predictors of glycemic control would be of a great benefit to achieve glycemic control.

Topics: Aged; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Ethiopia; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Glycated Hemoglobin; Glycemic Control; Hospitals, University; Humans; Hyperglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin, Isophane; Insulin, Regular, Human; Male; Middle Aged; Retrospective Studies

This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of insulin neutral protamine Hagedorn (NPH) for steroid-induced hyperglycemia and identify factors associated with achievement of euglycemia.. Retrospective, single center, cohort analysis.. Quaternary care academic medical center.. Adult patients with steroid-induced hyperglycemia on combination therapy of an intermediate-acting steroid and once daily NPH.. The primary outcome was the percentage of patients who achieved euglycemia on day 3 of combination therapy. Patients were divided into euglycemic and dysglycemic cohorts based on the primary outcome. Univariate analysis on baseline characteristics, NPH dose, and steroid dose based on prednisone equivalent dose (PED) was conducted to identify differences between the cohorts. Safety analysis was conducted to detect differences between the two cohorts.. Of 142 patients included in the primary analysis, 50 (35.2%) achieved euglycemia on day 3 of combination therapy. In univariate analysis, patients who achieved euglycemia had significantly higher median NPH dose standardized to steroid dose on day 1 (0.5 units/mg PED [25%-75% interquartile range (IQR) 0.4-0.8] vs 0.4 units/mg PED [0.2-0.8]; p = 0.046), lower median blood glucose prior to combination therapy on day 3 (111 mg/dl [96-160] vs 136 mg/dl [113-198]; p = 0.008), and lower median blood glucose 4 hours after administration of combination therapy on day 3 (147 mg/dl [116-197] vs 190 mg/dl [153-245]; p = 0.003) compared to patients who did not achieve euglycemia, respectively. Hypoglycemia and life-threatening hypoglycemia occurred at similar rates between the two cohorts.. Neutral protamine Hagedorn is a safe and efficacious option for acute care hospitalized patients experiencing steroid-induced hyperglycemia. More aggressive dosing initiation of NPH based on steroid dose may allow for earlier achievement of euglycemia without a difference in hypoglycemia.

Topics: Adult; Humans; Hyperglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin, Isophane; Prednisone; Retrospective Studies; Treatment Outcome

To assess effects of basal-bolus insulin treatment (BBIT) with lispro and neutral protamine Hagedorn (NPH) insulins, compared with NPH insulin alone, on serum fructosamine concentration (SFC) and postprandial blood glucose concentration (BGC) in dogs with clinically well-controlled diabetes mellitus and postprandial hyperglycemia fed a high insoluble fiber-content diet.. 6 client-owned dogs with diabetes mellitus.. Blood samples were collected for BGC and SFC measurement in hospitalized dogs just before feeding and routine SC NPH insulin administration (time 0); samples were collected for BGC measurement every 30 minutes for 2 hours, then every 2 hours for up to 10 additional hours. Postprandial hyperglycemia was identified when BGC 30 minutes after insulin administration exceeded BGC at time 0 or the 1-hour time point. For BBIT, owners were instructed to continue NPH insulin administration at the usual dosage at home (q 12 h, with feeding) and to administer lispro insulin (0.1 U/Kg, SC) separately at the time of NPH injections. Two weeks later, SFC and BGC measurements were repeated; results at the start and end of the study were compared statistically.. Median SFC was significantly higher at the start (400 μmol/L) than at the end (390 μmol/L) of the study. Median 1-hour (313 mg/dL) and 1.5-hour (239 mg/dL) BGC measurements at the start of the study were significantly higher than those at the end of the study (117 and 94 mg/dL, respectively).. In this sample of dogs with well-controlled diabetes mellitus, addition of lispro insulin to an existing treatment regimen of NPH insulin and dietary management significantly decreased postprandial BGCs. Further study of BBIT for dogs with diabetes mellitus is warranted.

Topics: Animals; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus; Dog Diseases; Dogs; Fructosamine; Hyperglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Lispro; Insulin, Isophane; Protamines

Investigate contributors to treatment satisfaction in type 1 diabetes (T1D).. Post-hoc analysis using the Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire status version (DTSQs) in 771 T1D patients from two 28-week trials comparing once-daily insulin glargine 100U/mL (Gla-100) with once- or twice-daily NPH neutral protamine Hagedorn (NPH) insulin.. Gla-100 was associated with a significant improvement in treatment satisfaction versus NPH (overall population adjusted mean [standard error] DTSQs change from baseline: +1.13 [0.30] versus -0.04 [0.31]; p=0.006). In the overall population, treatment satisfaction improvement with all insulin regimens was related to less frequent severe hypoglycemia (coefficient-0.077; p=0.040) and HbA1c reduction (-0.066; p=0.082). By treatment regimen, relationships between treatment satisfaction and these outcomes approached or attained statistical significance for NPH insulin, but not Gla-100. In the overall population, predictors of treatment satisfaction improvement included: Gla-100 treatment (estimate 1.17, p=0.006), lower baseline DTSQs (-0.57, p<0.001), study (-1.01, p=0.019), lower severe hypoglycemia rate (0.17, p=0.012), and higher baseline HbA1c (0.44, p=0.014). By treatment regimen, these predictors remained significant for NPH insulin.. Gla-100 resulted in a significant improvement in treatment satisfaction versus NPH insulin, independent of baseline disease characteristics and clinical outcomes.

Topics: Adult; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Monitoring; Drug Resistance; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hyperglycemia; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Isophane; Male; Middle Aged; Patient Satisfaction; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Retrospective Studies; Severity of Illness Index

To compare glucose control and safety of different basal insulin therapies (BI, including Insulin NPH, glargine and detemir) in real-world clinical settings based on a large-scale registry study.. In this multi-center 6-month prospective observational study, patients with type 2 diabetes (HbA1c ≥ 7%) who were uncontrolled by oral anti-diabetic drugs (OADs) and were willing to initiate BI therapy were enrolled from 209 hospitals within 8 regions of China. Type and dose of BI were at the physician's discretion and the patients' willingness. Interviews were conducted at 0 months (visit 1), 3 months (visit 2) and 6 months (visit 3). Outcomes included change in HbA1c, hypoglycemia rate and body weight from baseline at 6 months.. A total of 16 341 and 9002 subjects were involved in Intention-To-Treat (ITT) and per-protocol (PP) analysis, respectively. After PS regression adjustment, ITT analysis showed that reduction in HbA1c in glargine (2.2% ± 2.1%) and detemir groups (2.2% ± 2.1%) was higher than that in the NPH group (2.0% ± 2.2%) (P < .01). The detemir group had the lowest weight gain (-0.1 ± 2.9 kg) compared with the glargine (+0.1 ± 3.0 kg) and NPH (+0.3 ± 3.1 kg) groups (P < .05). The glargine group had the lowest rate of minor hypoglycaemia, while there was no difference in severe hypoglycaemia among the 3 groups. The results observed in PP analyses were consistent with those in ITT analysis.. In a real-world clinical setting in China, treatment with long-acting insulin analogues was associated with better glycaemic control, as well as less hypoglycaemia and weight gain than treatment with NPH insulin in type 2 diabetes patients. However, the clinical relevance of these observations must be interpreted with caution.

Topics: China; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Monitoring; Drug Resistance; Drug Therapy, Combination; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hyperglycemia; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin Detemir; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Isophane; Intention to Treat Analysis; Lost to Follow-Up; Prospective Studies; Registries; Severity of Illness Index; Weight Gain

The Somogyi effect postulates that nocturnal hypoglycaemia causes fasting hyperglycaemia attributable to counter-regulatory hormone release. Although most published evidence has failed to support this hypothesis, this concept remains firmly embedded in clinical practice and often prevents patients and professionals from optimizing overnight insulin. Previous observational data found lower fasting glucose was associated with nocturnal hypoglycaemia, but did not assess the probability of infrequent individual episodes of rebound hypoglycaemia. We analysed continuous glucose monitoring data to explore its prevalence.. We analysed data from 89 patients with Type 1 diabetes who participated in the UK Hypoglycaemia study. We compared fasting capillary glucose following nights with and without nocturnal hypoglycaemia (sensor glucose < 3.5 mmol/l).. Fasting capillary blood glucose was lower after nights with hypoglycaemia than without [5.5 (3.0) vs. 14.5 (4.5) mmol/l, P < 0.0001], and was lower on nights with more severe nocturnal hypoglycaemia [5.5 (3.0) vs. 8.2 (2.3) mmol/l; P = 0.018 on nights with nadir sensor glucose of < 2.2 mmol/l vs. 3.5 mmol/l]. There were only two instances of fasting capillary blood glucose > 10 mmol/l after nocturnal hypoglycaemia, both after likely treatment of the episode. When fasting capillary blood glucose is < 5 mmol/l, there was evidence of nocturnal hypoglycaemia on 94% of nights.. Our data indicate that, in clinical practice, the Somogyi effect is rare. Fasting capillary blood glucose ≤ 5 mmol/l appears an important indicator of preceding silent nocturnal hypoglycaemia.

Topics: Adult; Biphasic Insulins; Blood Glucose; Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring; Circadian Rhythm; Cohort Studies; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1; Drug Monitoring; Humans; Hyperglycemia; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Isophane; Insulin, Long-Acting; Middle Aged; Monitoring, Ambulatory; Prevalence; Severity of Illness Index; United Kingdom

The intent of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of transitioning from a continuous intravenous (IV) regular human insulin (RHI) or intermittent IV RHI therapy to subcutaneous neutral protamine Hagedorn (NPH) insulin with intermittent corrective IV RHI for critically ill patients receiving continuous enteral nutrition (EN).. Data were obtained from critically ill trauma patients receiving continuous EN during transitional NPH insulin therapy. Target blood glucose concentration (BG) range was 70-149 mg/dL. BG was determined every 1-4 hours.. Thirty-two patients were transitioned from a continuous IV RHI infusion (CIT) to NPH with intermittent corrective IV RHI therapy. Thirty-four patients had NPH added to their preexisting supplemental intermittent IV RHI therapy (SIT). BG concentrations were maintained in the target range for 18 ± 3 and 15 ± 4 h/d for the CIT and SIT groups, respectively (P < .05). Thirty-eight percent of patients experienced a BG <60 mg/dL, and 9% had a BG <40 mg/dL. Hypoglycemia was more prevalent for those who were older (P < .01) or exhibited greater daily BG variability (P < .01) or worse HgbA1C (p < 0.05).. Transitional NPH therapy with intermittent corrective IV RHI was effective for achieving BG concentrations within 70-149 mg/dL for the majority of the day. NPH therapy should be implemented with caution for those who are older, have erratic daily BG control, or have poor preadmission glycemic control.

Topics: Administration, Intravenous; Adult; Aged; Blood Glucose; Critical Illness; Drug Administration Schedule; Enteral Nutrition; Female; Humans; Hyperglycemia; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin, Isophane; Male; Middle Aged; Treatment Outcome

Neonatal diabetes mellitus (DM) is a rare condition that can be either transient or permanent. In this case report, we describe a novel mutation (p.L30Q) in the INS gene resulting in permanent DM in a four-month-old female who presented with polyphagia, polyuria, irritability, and hyperglycemia with glucosuria and ketonuria without acidosis.

Topics: Diabetes Mellitus; Female; Humans; Hyperglycemia; Hyperphagia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Infant; Insulin; Insulin, Isophane; Insulin, Regular, Human; Isophane Insulin, Human; Mosaicism; Mothers; Mutation, Missense; Polyuria; Treatment Outcome

There are an estimated 1000 children with diabetes in Tanzania. Recently, the first two pediatric endocrinologists, trained in the European Society for Paediatric Endocrinology (ESPE)/International Society for Paediatric and Adolescent Diabetes (ISPAD) program in Nairobi, Kenya, entered practice. The purpose of this study was to prospectively assess the impact of a 6-month diabetes management and education program on glycemic control and acute complications in children and adolescents in Tanzania.. Eighty-one patients aged 3-19 yr were enrolled. All were on split-dose Insulatard (Neutral Protamine Hagedorn) and Actrapid (soluble, regular) insulin, and were given three glucose test strips per week. Children were seen in clinic an average of six times over 6 months and received 3 h of diabetes education. A structured questionnaire evaluated social demographic data and acute complications.. Despite regular clinic attendance, diabetes education, and provision of insulin, hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) levels did not improve. Four children (5%) had HbA1c 7.5%, 22 (28%) HbA1c 7.5-10%, 9 (24%) HbA1c 11-12.5%, and 36 (44%) HbA1c >12.5%. There was a substantial reduction in severe hypoglycemia, with 17% of subjects experiencing this acute complication compared to 52% in the 6 months prior to study enrolment. Six children were admitted in diabetic ketoacidosis during the study compared to three during the previous 6 months. Twenty-six children (36%) reported missing >6 doses of insulin (but only two lacked insulin).. Diabetes education significantly reduced the risk of severe hypoglycemia, but better glycemic control of diabetes was not attained. Further study is needed to explore factors to improve glycemic control including increased testing, or perhaps different insulin regimens.

Topics: Adolescent; Child; Child, Preschool; Cohort Studies; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1; Diabetic Ketoacidosis; Drug Therapy, Combination; Family; Female; Humans; Hyperglycemia; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Incidence; Insulin, Isophane; Insulin, Regular, Human; Insulin, Regular, Pork; Isophane Insulin, Human; Male; Medication Adherence; Outpatient Clinics, Hospital; Patient Education as Topic; Prospective Studies; Tanzania

Early morning hyperglycemia is frequent among children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes. Reasons are a dawn phenomenon, a Somogyi phenomenon or a lack of insulin in the morning hours. Only few studies are published regarding incidence and relation to different modes of basal insulin treatment in this population.We analyzed all cases recorded in the DPV register from 1995 to 2010. 5 839 patients from 128 centers with at least 3 blood glucose measurements during the last night of a hospital stay were included.24.2% of patients showed a morning hyperglycemia above 200 mg/dl. 8.6% showed a dawn phenomenon, 7.0 % a lack of insulin and 2.0% a Somogyi phenomenon. A dawn phenomenon was significantly less frequent in patients treated with an insulin pump (1.1%) compared to long acting insulin analogs Glargin and Levemir (5.4%) or NPH insulin (8.2%). Lack of insulin was again less frequent during insulin pump treatment compared to other treatments (1.9% vs. 4.9% vs. 5.3%). Median rise of blood glucose levels was 33.4 mg/dl between midnight and 6 a.m. Mode of basal insulin treatment is an important factor: while treatment with an insulin pump led to a blood glucose fall of 28.5 mg/dl between 3 and 6 a.m., treatment with insulin analog or NPH insulin resulted in a rise of 28.5 or 35.9 mg/dl, respectively.This study shows that insulin pump treatment reduces the frequency of morning hyperglycemia caused by the dawn phenomenon or a lack of insulin.

Topics: Blood Glucose; Child; Circadian Rhythm; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1; Humans; Hyperglycemia; Insulin; Insulin Detemir; Insulin Glargine; Insulin Infusion Systems; Insulin, Isophane; Insulin, Long-Acting; Quality Assurance, Health Care; Registries

Postprandial hyperglycemia is known to be associated with increasing cardiovascular mortality in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients. Cardio-ankle vascular index (CAVI) reflects arterial stiffness and is more useful for predicting coronary atherosclerosis than intima-media thickness. Premixed human insulin 30/70 (BHI30) containing rapid-acting insulin has been used conventionally as a biphasic insulin. Recently, a biphasic insulin analogue preparation, biphasic insulin aspart 30/70 (BIAsp30), containing ultrarapid-acting insulin has been approved and expected to improve postprandial hyperglycemia. The aim of this study was to clarify the effects of switching the biphasic insulin from BHI30 to BIAsp30 on arterial stiffness in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients. Twenty-six type 2 diabetes mellitus patients (glycosylated hemoglobin >6.5%) who were already receiving biphasic insulin therapy with BHI30 twice daily were observed for 3 months. Afterward, BHI30 was switched to BIAsp30. At 3 months after switching, relative mobility of the peak of LDL fraction decreased significantly (from 0.3462 ± 0.041 to 0.3356 ± 0.035, P < .01); and CAVI also decreased significantly (from 9.77 ± 1.11 to 9.35 ± 1.17 m/s, P < .005). A significant negative correlation was observed between the change in CAVI and change in 1,5-anhydroglucitol (1,5-AG) (r = -0.3929, P < .05). A stronger correlation between change in CAVI and change in 1,5-AG was observed in the subgroup of patients whose 1,5-AG levels were elevated after switching (r = -0.6261, P < .05) compared with all subjects. These results suggest that switching biphasic insulin from BHI30 to BIAsp30 improves arterial stiffness, and the improvement of arterial stiffness may be associated with improvement of postprandial hyperglycemia.

Topics: Aged; Arteries; Biphasic Insulins; Deoxyglucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Female; Humans; Hyperglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Aspart; Insulin, Isophane; Male; Middle Aged

To determine the relative contributions of basal hyperglycemia (BHG) versus postprandial hyperglycemia (PPHG) before and after treatment intensification in patients with glycated hemoglobin A(1c) (A1C) >7.0% while on prior oral therapy.. Self-measured, plasma-referenced glucose profiles and A1C values were evaluated from participants in six studies comparing systematically titrated insulin glargine with an alternative regimen (adding basal, premixed, or prandial insulin, or increasing oral agents). Hyperglycemic exposure (>100 mg/dL [5.6 mmol/L]) as a result of BHG versus PPHG was calculated.. On prior oral therapy, 1,699 participants (mean age 59 years, diabetes duration 9 years) had mean fasting plasma glucose (FPG) of 194 mg/dL (10.8 mmol/L), and mean A1C was 8.7%. BHG contributed an average of 76-80% to hyperglycemia over the observed range of baseline A1C levels. Adding basal insulin for 24 or 28 weeks lowered mean FPG to 117 mg/dL (6.5 mmol/L), A1C to 7.0%, and BHG contribution to 32-41%. Alternative regimens reduced FPG to 146 mg/dL (8.1 mmol/L), A1C to 7.1%, and the contribution of BHG to 64-71%. BHG contributions for patients with A1C averaging 7.6-7.7% were 76% at baseline and 34 and 68% after adding basal insulin or other therapies, respectively.. When A1C is >7.0% despite oral therapy, BHG routinely dominates exposure. Intensified therapy reduces A1C and changes this relationship, but BHG amenable to further intervention still accounts for one-third of total hyperglycemia after basal insulin treatment and two-thirds after alternative methods.

Topics: Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hyperglycemia; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Isophane; Insulin, Long-Acting; Insulin, Regular, Human; Isophane Insulin, Human; Male; Middle Aged; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Treatment Outcome

The IMPROVE study evaluated the safety and effectiveness of biphasic insulin aspart 30/70 (BIAsp 30) in type 2 diabetes patients in the routine practice. Here we present the results for patients from Italy.. Adverse events, hypoglycaemia, glycaemic control, patient treatment satisfaction and physician resource utilisation were assessed at baseline and 26 weeks.. Out of the 1371 patients enrolled, 84.1% (n=1153) were receiving BIAsp 30 at baseline (in accordance with local regulations), and were included in the study. Mean HlbA, reduction was--0.63% after 26 weeks (p < 0.001); 26.5% and 13.5% of patients reached the HbA(1c) targets of < 7% and < 6.5%, respectively. Fasting and postprandial blood glucose significantly decreased; 65% of patients were using BIAsp 30 once daily and 32% twice daily at final visit. Rates of major and minor hypoglycaemic events also significantly decreased. Small weight increase was observed, and total insulin daily dose increased from 0.29 IU/kg pre-study to 0.32 IU/kg at final visit.. In Italy, BIAsp 30 in the routine care improved glycaemic control and reduced hypoglycaemia; however, there was little intensification and titration. This may partly explain the relatively small improvement in glycaemic control in Italy compared with other countries in the IMPROVE study.

Topics: Aged; Biphasic Insulins; Cohort Studies; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hyperglycemia; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Aspart; Insulin, Isophane; International Cooperation; Italy; Male; Middle Aged; Patient Satisfaction

Skeletal muscle mitochondrial content is reduced in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Whether hyperglycemia inhibits mitochondrial biogenesis and/or function is unknown. This study examined the effect of different levels of glycemia on skeletal muscle mitochondrial function in patients with T2DM.. Eleven patients with T2DM [9 males, 2 females; age, 52.8 +/- 2.5 yr (mean +/- se); body mass index, 30.2 +/- 1.1 kg/m(2)] in poor glycemic control were treated with insulin aspart and NPH insulin for a median period of 46 d (range, 31-59). Mitochondrial respiration and citrate synthase activity (a marker of mitochondrial content) were measured before and after treatment. Eleven healthy subjects (age, 53.3 +/- 2.7 yr; body mass index, 30.6 +/- 1.1 kg/m(2)) were included as controls.. Hemoglobin A1c (9.1 +/- 0.5 to 7.5 +/- 0.3%; P < 0.001) and fasting plasma glucose (12.7 +/- 1.1 to 6.5 +/- 0.3 mmol/liter; P < 0.001) were reduced after treatment. Mitochondrial respiration per milligram muscle was lower in T2DM compared to controls [substrates for complex I, 24% lower (P < 0.05); substrates for complex I+II, 17% lower (P < 0.05)]. Mitochondrial respiration and citrate synthase activity did not differ before and after improvements in glycemic control, but mitochondrial respiration correlated with fasting plasma glucose before (r(2) = 0.53; P < 0.05) but not after treatment [r(2) = 0.0024; not significant (NS)]. Mitochondrial respiration normalized to mitochondrial content did not differ between control subjects and patients with T2DM.. Mitochondrial respiration and content was not improved after significant improvements in glycemic control. However, severe hyperglycemia inhibited respiration reversibly, but moderate hyperglycemia and mitochondrial function were not correlated.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Blood Glucose; Body Mass Index; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Female; Fructosamine; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hyperglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Aspart; Insulin, Isophane; Male; Middle Aged; Mitochondria, Muscle; Muscle, Skeletal; Oxygen Consumption

Hyperglycemia is often a problem in patients who receive continuous enteral nutrition. The purpose of this study was to determine if the use of sliding-scale neutral protamine Hagedorn (NPH) insulin was more effective than sliding-scale insulin aspart in controlling blood glucose in continuously tube-fed patients.. A retrospective, records-based review comparing sliding-scale NPH insulin given every 4 or 6 hours with sliding-scale insulin aspart was performed in patients admitted to 2 community hospitals between April 1, 2006, and September 30, 2007.. Mean blood glucose was found to be lower in patients receiving NPH every 4 hours and NPH every 6 hours than in patients receiving insulin aspart (P < .001). No statistically significant differences in mean blood glucose values (P = .41) were observed between patients receiving the NPH regimen given every 4 or 6 hours. More patients in the NPH groups had blood glucose values in the target and acceptable ranges than those in the insulin aspart group (P < .001), but no statistical significance was observed between the groups receiving NPH every 4 hours and NPH every 6 hours (P = .41).. In this study, sliding-scale NPH insulin was demonstrated to be a safe and effective management strategy for blood glucose control in continuously tube-fed patients; NPH insulin resulted in better blood glucose control compared with insulin aspart.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Blood Glucose; Drug Administration Schedule; Enteral Nutrition; Female; Humans; Hyperglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Aspart; Insulin, Isophane; Male; Middle Aged; Retrospective Studies; Treatment Outcome

Intensive insulin therapy improves glycosylated haemoglobin (Hb(A1C)) levels and delays the onset of long-term diabetes-related complications. Current treatment guidelines recommend maintaining a glycosylated haemoglobin (Hb(A1C)) of < or = 7% in patients with type 1 and 2 diabetes mellitus. However, the risk of hypoglycaemia increases with lower Hb(A1C) levels. As such, patients often choose to settle for suboptimal glucose control in order to prevent hypoglycaemic events. At a given Hb(A1C) level, treatment with insulin glargine results in a lower risk of hypoglycaemia in type 1 and 2 diabetes compared with NPH insulin. It has been proposed that the lower hypoglycaemic risk will allow more patients to achieve target Hb(A1C) levels with insulin glargine compared with NPH insulin. The objective of this study was to assess the cost effectiveness of insulin glargine compared with NPH insulin in patients with type 1 or 2 diabetes who had inadequate glycaemic control.. A long-term, state-transition model was developed to simulate the natural history of type 1 and 2 diabetes. Risks of diabetes-related macro- and microvascular complications and mortality by Hb(A1C) levels were estimated based on the UKPDS (United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study). Outcome measures included complication rates and associated costs, insulin costs, life years (LYs) and QALYs. The baseline analysis was conducted for patients with type 1 and 2 diabetes (aged 27 and 53 years, respectively) with Hb(A1C) levels >7%, using a 36-year time horizon and a Canadian public payer perspective. Costs and effects were discounted at 5% per annum. Univariate sensitivity analyses were performed on key model inputs. All costs were reported in $Can (2005 values).. The NPH insulin group had lower total costs than the insulin glargine group for patients with inadequately controlled diabetes (Hb(A1C) >7%; lifetime difference 1398 Can dollars and 1992 Can dollars, respectively, in type 1 and 2 diabetes). However, patients treated with insulin glargine had greater total and quality-adjusted life expectancy than those who received NPH insulin (incremental LY = 0.08 and QALYs = 0.07 in type 1 diabetes and incremental LY = 0.25 and QALYs = 0.23 in type 2 diabetes). The weighted incremental cost per LY gained and QALY gained were 18,661 Can dollars and 20,799 Can dollars, respectively, in type 1 diabetes and 8041 Can dollars and 8618 Can dollars, respectively, in type 2 diabetes (discounted results).. The cost-effectiveness ratios for insulin glargine use for type 1 and 2 diabetes provide evidence for its adoption from a Canadian healthcare payer perspective.

Topics: Analysis of Variance; Canada; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hyperglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Isophane; Insulin, Long-Acting; Treatment Outcome

Treatment of hematological malignancies with L-asparaginase has been associated with diabetes mellitus in about 1-2% of patients. The concomitant use of steroids has an additional deleterious effect. In this article, we report the occurrence of diabetes in a 13 year-old girl treated with L-asparaginase and dexamethasone for acute lymphoblastic leukemia. The diabetes developed 120 days after the drug was started, requiring insulin therapy for 12 months. Anti-islet autoantibody was negative, and there were no laboratory findings suggestive of pancreatitis. The DM related do L-asparaginase therapy is insulinopenic and transient, resolving with suspension of the drug. The diagnosis of this type of diabetes is based on its temporal relationship with the L-asparaginase and in the exclusion of other known causes. There is no laboratory test capable of elucidating the diagnosis. Therefore, investigation to rule out type 1A DM, type 1B DM, insulin-resistant DM induced by corticotherapy and DM secondary to toxic pancreatitis is of utmost importance. The insulin therapy must be followed closely, since this is a transient form of diabetes.

Topics: Adolescent; Antineoplastic Agents; Asparaginase; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1; Female; Humans; Hyperglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin, Isophane; Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute

The Physician's Routine Evaluation of Safety and Efficacy of NovoMix* 30 Therapy (PRESENT) aims to assess the safety and efficacy of biphasic insulin aspart (BIAsp30) used in routine clinical practice.. This was a large, multi-national, multi-centre, prospective, 6-month study in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients who were prescribed BIAsp30. Efficacy endpoints included changes in HbA(1c), fasting plasma glucose (FPG), postprandial plasma glucose (PPPG), and proportion who achieved target HbA(1c) < 7%. Changes from baseline were analysed using paired t-test. Safety endpoints were incidence and rate of hypoglycaemic episodes. A subgroup of patients previously uncontrolled (HbA(1c) > or = 7.0%) on biphasic human insulin (BHI) were analysed.. Glycaemia improved significantly (mean +/- SD): HbA(1c) by 1.58 +/- 1.69% points (from 9.32 +/- 1.64% to 7.70 +/- 1.29%), FPG by 2.92 +/- 3.71 mmol/L and PPPG by 4.75 +/- 4.87 mmol/L. The incidence of hypoglycaemic episodes decreased over time, from 38.7% (baseline) to 20.8% (6 months). Episodes were mostly minor (reduced from 37.7 to 20.6% at 6 months), occurring during the day (reduced from 31.5 to 17.1% at 6 months). Major episodes were less frequently reported (reduced from 5.0 to 0.4% at 6 months). The rate of hypoglycaemia (episodes/patient year) from baseline to end of study decreased over time for overall (8.9-2.2), major (0.7-0.1), minor (8.2-2.2) and nocturnal (2.9-0.5) episodes.. In this observational study, in the type 2 diabetes mellitus patients who were poorly controlled on BHI, glycaemia improved when transferred to BIAsp30, and a lower incidence or rate of hypoglycaemia was observed in these patients.

Topics: Aged; Biphasic Insulins; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Female; Humans; Hyperglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Aspart; Insulin, Isophane; Male; Middle Aged; Treatment Outcome

Combination therapy consisting of biphasic insulin aspart 30 bid with metformin provide better glycaemic control in obese patients with diabetes mellitus type 2. In our study, patients who were treated with 2550 mg of metformin, administered in three daily doses had poor glycaemic control. Three months after switching from metformin therapy to treatment with biphasic insulin aspart 30 + metformin twice a day, glycaemic control improved with significant reduction in hemoglobin HbA1c, fasting blood glucose and postprandial blood glucose levels. Biphasic insulin aspart 30 in combination with metformin administered twice a day may be recommended as a starting insulin treatment in obese diabetic persons whose glycaemic control remained poor while on oral metformin therapy alone.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Biphasic Insulins; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Female; Humans; Hyperglycemia; Insulin; Insulin Aspart; Insulin, Isophane; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Metformin; Middle Aged; Obesity; Treatment Outcome

We studied a systematic program to reeducate our medical house officers on how to manage inpatient hyperglycemia without the use of sliding-scale insulin (SSI).. Patients admitted to the general medical service with diabetes or a blood glucose >140 mg/dl were included. HbA(1c) was measured in all patients, and therapy was modified if the HbA(1c) was >7.0%. For each 24 h on call, two house officers were responsible for all glucose management for their team's patients and rounded with a teaching endocrinologist twice daily for 2 weeks. Oral agent or insulin therapy was modified using blood glucoses and HbA(1c). All patients who required insulin therapy were treated with basal and bolus insulin, usually NPH and regular, adjusted twice daily.. During 8 weeks, 88 patients were identified and 16 house officers were instructed. The mean duration of diabetes was 10.4 years. Mean HbA(1c) level was 8.7%, and 48% of patients had HbA(1c) >8%. All patients with HbA(1c) >7% had diabetes therapy intensified. Overall 80% had their diabetes therapy changed by discharge. Compared with 98 historical control subjects, significantly fewer study patients had episodes of hyperglycemia, and a subgroup followed for 12 months showed a decrease in HbA(1c) from 10.1 to 8%.. Medical history, blood glucose, and HbA(1c) testing can effectively identify patients with inpatient hyperglycemia. Using direct ward-based teaching and a widely disseminated pocket set of guidelines, house officers can be taught to effectively and safely manage inpatient hyperglycemia without the use of SSI.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Education, Medical, Graduate; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hyperglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Inpatients; Insulin; Insulin, Isophane; Male; Medical Staff, Hospital; Middle Aged; Staff Development

The purpose of this study was to compare the effect of insulin glargine (glargine) and NPH insulin (NPH) on long-term outcomes in type 2 diabetes patients using the Diabetes Mellitus Model (DMM).. The DMM predicts short- and long-term complications over ten years using data in studies published previously. The main effect on outcome is the influence of the treatment on the HbA1c level which is simulated over time. The simulation was based on a cohort size of 10,000 type 2 diabetes patients taking either glargine or NPH. The best scenario, baseline scenario and worst case scenario were simulated based on differences of 0.13%, 0.44% and 0.85%, respectively, in HbA1c values and corresponding to potentially attainable improvements with comparable or lower hypoglycemia rates in glargine-treated patients and NPH-treated patients. Assumptions for scenarios 1, 2 and 3 were based on a regression analysis of clinical trial data (pooled data clinical trials comparing glargine and NPH) in which the effect of glargine on the HbA1c/hypoglycemia incidence ratio was superior to that of NPH.. The relative risks (RR, glargine/NPH) obtained for scenarios 1, 2 and 3 were 0.97, 0.89 and 0.81, respectively, for long-term microvascular complications and 0.99, 0.95 and 0.91, respectively, for long-term macrovascular complications. RR reductions ranged from 1% in the less optimistic scenario to > 20% in the "best case" scenario. Sensitivity analyses showed that variations in the mean baseline HbA1c values and duration of the diabetes were without effect on these outcomes.. Although there is a need to corroborate the results of these simulations with real, long-term clinical data, they have demonstrated that, assuming comparable or lower rates of hypoglycemia, a better glycemic control (HbA1c reduction) can be expected with glargine when compared to NPH together with a reduction in long-term complications, mortality and associated costs.

Topics: Computer Simulation; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Epidemiologic Methods; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hyperglycemia; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Glargine; Insulin, Isophane; Insulin, Long-Acting; Male; Middle Aged; Sensitivity and Specificity

Mechanism of protection against cisplatin nephrotoxicity in streptozotocin-diabetic rats is unclear but is associated with decreased renal platinum accumulation. This study was designed to determine whether normalization of hyperglycaemia by insulin treatment to six week streptozotocin-diabetic rats reversed protection against cisplatin nephrotoxicity. Male Sprague-Dawley rats divided into 3 groups (n=10/group) (1) non-diabetic (2) untreated streptozotocin-diabetic and (3) insulin-treated streptozotocin-diabetic groups were rendered diabetic using streptozotocin (65 mg/kg body weight, intravenous). At the end of 6 weeks, Group 3 animals were treated with insulin (subcutaneously) for 21 days to normalize glucose. After 21 days of insulin treatment, the mean +/- S.D. plasma glucose (mg%) in Group 3 animals at 144.8 +/- 22.03, was significantly lower than Group 2 animals (412 +/- 24.69) and comparable to age-matched non-diabetic (Group 1) animals. Blood urea nitrogen at 24 hr after intraperitoneal administration of cisplatin (5 mg/kg body weight) increased by a factor 2.5 in Group 3 compared to 1.1 and 1.3 in Group 1 and Group 2 animals respectively. In the same animals, at 96 hr the blood area nitrogen increased by a factor of 3.2 and 2.9 in Group 1 and Group 3 respectively compared to 1.14 for Group 2 animals. Renal platinum levels in Group 1, Group 2 and Group 3 after 96 hr after cisplatin administration were 6.92 +/- 0.83, 3.46 +/- 0.77 & 6.20 +/- 0.64 (microg/g wet weight of tissue) respectively. Results indicate that 21 day insulin treatment to streptozotocin-diabetic animal reverses protection against cisplatin toxicity. Moreover, insulin treatment increased the susceptibility of streptozotocin-diabetic rats to cisplatin-induced renal toxicity.

Topics: Animals; Blood Glucose; Blood Urea Nitrogen; Body Weight; Cisplatin; Diabetes Mellitus, Experimental; Drug Administration Schedule; Glycated Hemoglobin; Hyperglycemia; Injections, Intraperitoneal; Injections, Subcutaneous; Insulin, Isophane; Kidney; Kidney Diseases; Male; Platinum; Rats; Rats, Sprague-Dawley; Streptozocin; Time Factors

Patients with diabetes mellitus type I usually are treated with a multiple injection regimen comprising rapid-acting insulin before meals and intermediate-acting insulin at bedtime. Recently, the rapid-acting insulin analogue insulin LISPRO was introduced on the Dutch market. This form of insulin is very rapidly taken up into the bloodstream from the subcutaneous tissue. The advantages of the use of insulin LISPRO are the comfort of injecting the insulin just before a meal, the more rapid correction of incidental hyperglycaemia and the slightly lower incidence of (nocturnal) hypoglycaemia in comparison with conventional rapid-acting insulin. There is no argument in favour of switching diabetics to insulin LISPRO if they are well-controlled with normal rapid-acting insulin and have few episodes of hypoglycaemia. In some persons the duration of action of insulin LISPRO may be too short, leading to preprandial hyperglycaemia. This can be avoided by using a second injection of intermediate-acting insulin, either before breakfast or before lunch.

Topics: Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1; Humans; Hyperglycemia; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Insulin Lispro; Insulin, Isophane

Topics: Diabetic Coma; Granulomatosis with Polyangiitis; Humans; Hyperglycemia; Insulin, Isophane; Male; Middle Aged; Osmolar Concentration; Prednisone

Topics: Acidosis; Adolescent; Diabetes Mellitus; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1; Diabetic Ketoacidosis; Humans; Hyperglycemia; Insulin; Insulin, Isophane; Vomiting

Topics: Diabetes Mellitus; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1; Humans; Hyperglycemia; Hypoglycemia; Insulin; Insulin, Isophane; Insulin, Long-Acting