indinavir-sulfate and Chemical-and-Drug-Induced-Liver-Injury

Topics: Chemical and Drug Induced Liver Injury; Databases, Factual; Drug Labeling; Humans; Pharmaceutical Preparations; Risk

The inclusion of protease inhibitors in 3-drug highly active antiretroviral regimens for treating patients who are infected with human immunodeficiency virus-1 has had a significant impact in increasing survival and decreasing morbidity. However, the effectiveness of this class of drugs may be compromised by the occurrence of drug-related hepatotoxicity, which is problematic especially in individuals co-infected with hepatitis viruses. Based on its clinical and pharmacologic profile, especially its unique pattern of resistance, nelfinavir has been used frequently as a first-line protease-inhibitor therapy for human immunodeficiency virus-1-infected patients. The aim of this study was to identify the relative potential for developing hepatotoxicity for nelfinavir vs other protease inhibitors.. An exploratory meta-analysis of liver enzyme level increases was conducted in a combined total of 4268 patients derived from 3 large recently conducted prospective and retrospective clinical trials and a prospective cohort study.. The results indicate that among 4 commercially available protease inhibitors and a 2-protease inhibitor combination, nelfinavir and indinavir are associated with the lowest rates of occurrence of severe hepatotoxicity (ie, combined estimates of liver enzyme level increases of 2.9% and 3.1%, respectively). The low rate of occurrence of severe hepatotoxicity for nelfinavir was shown even among patients co-infected with hepatitis viruses.. In conclusion, these data provide support for the conclusion that differences in the potential for hepatotoxicity do exist among the commercially available protease inhibitors.

Topics: Chemical and Drug Induced Liver Injury; Drug Therapy, Combination; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Indinavir; Liver; Nelfinavir

Topics: AIDS-Related Opportunistic Infections; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; Chemical and Drug Induced Liver Injury; Helicobacter Infections; Helicobacter pylori; Hepatitis C; HIV; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Hyperbilirubinemia; Indinavir; Quality of Life; RNA, Viral; Viral Load

Elevations in serum bilirubin during drug treatment may indicate global liver dysfunction and a high risk of liver failure. However, drugs also can increase serum bilirubin in the absence of hepatic injury by inhibiting specific enzymes/transporters. We constructed a mechanistic model of bilirubin disposition based on known functional polymorphisms in bilirubin metabolism/transport. Using physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model-predicted drug exposure and enzyme/transporter inhibition constants determined in vitro, our model correctly predicted indinavir-mediated hyperbilirubinemia in humans and rats. Nelfinavir was predicted not to cause hyperbilirubinemia, consistent with clinical observations. We next examined a new drug candidate that caused both elevations in serum bilirubin and biochemical evidence of liver injury in rats. Simulations suggest that bilirubin elevation primarily resulted from inhibition of transporters rather than global liver dysfunction. We conclude that mechanistic modeling of bilirubin can help elucidate underlying mechanisms of drug-induced hyperbilirubinemia, and thereby distinguish benign from clinically important elevations in serum bilirubin.

Topics: Animals; Bilirubin; Carrier Proteins; Chemical and Drug Induced Liver Injury; Computer Simulation; Enzyme Inhibitors; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Hyperbilirubinemia; Indinavir; Liver; Mice; Mice, Knockout; Models, Biological; Nelfinavir; Pharmacokinetics; Rats; Rats, Gunn; Receptors, Chemokine; Systems Biology

Drug-induced liver injury (DILI) accounts for 20-40% of all instances of clinical hepatic failure and is a common reason for withdrawal of an approved drug or discontinuation of a potentially new drug from clinical/nonclinical development. Numerous individual risk factors contribute to the susceptibility to human DILI and its severity that are either compound- and/or patient-specific. Compound-specific primary mechanisms linked to DILI include: cytotoxicity, reactive metabolite formation, inhibition of bile salt export pump (BSEP), and mitochondrial dysfunction. Since BSEP is an energy-dependent protein responsible for the efflux of bile acids from hepatocytes, it was hypothesized that humans exposed to drugs that impair both mitochondrial energetics and BSEP functional activity are more sensitive to more severe manifestations of DILI than drugs that only have a single liability factor. As annotated in the United States National Center for Toxicological Research Liver Toxicity Knowledge Base (NCTR-LTKB), the inhibitory properties of 24 Most-DILI-, 28 Less-DILI-, and 20 No-DILI-concern drugs were investigated. Drug potency for inhibiting BSEP or mitochondrial activity was generally correlated across human DILI concern categories. However, drugs with dual potency as mitochondrial and BSEP inhibitors were highly associated with more severe human DILI, more restrictive product safety labeling related to liver injury, and appear more sensitive to the drug exposure (Cmax) where more restrictive labeling occurs.. These data affirm that severe manifestations of human DILI are multifactorial, highly associated with combinations of drug potency specifically related to known mechanisms of DILI (like mitochondrial and BSEP inhibition), and, along with patient-specific factors, lead to differences in the severity and exposure thresholds associated with clinical DILI.

Topics: Animals; ATP Binding Cassette Transporter, Subfamily B, Member 11; ATP-Binding Cassette Transporters; Chemical and Drug Induced Liver Injury; Humans; Male; Mitochondria, Liver; Rats; Rats, Sprague-Dawley; Severity of Illness Index

The bile salt export pump (BSEP) is expressed at the canalicular domain of hepatocytes, where it serves as the primary route of elimination for monovalent bile acids (BAs) into the bile canaliculi. The most compelling evidence linking dysfunction in BA transport with liver injury in humans is found with carriers of mutations that render BSEP nonfunctional. Based on mounting evidence, there appears to be a strong association between drug-induced BSEP interference and liver injury in humans; however, causality has not been established. For this reason, drug-induced BSEP interference is best considered a susceptibility factor for liver injury as other host- or drug-related properties may contribute to the development of hepatotoxicity. To better understand the association between BSEP interference and liver injury in humans, over 600 marketed or withdrawn drugs were evaluated in BSEP expressing membrane vesicles. The example of a compound that failed during phase 1 human trials is also described, AMG 009. AMG 009 showed evidence of liver injury in humans that was not predicted by preclinical safety studies, and BSEP inhibition was implicated. For 109 of the drugs with some effect on in vitro BSEP function, clinical use, associations with hepatotoxicity, pharmacokinetic data, and other information were annotated. A steady state concentration (C(ss)) for each of these annotated drugs was estimated, and a ratio between this value and measured IC₅₀ potency values were calculated in an attempt to relate exposure to in vitro potencies. When factoring for exposure, 95% of the annotated compounds with a C(ss)/BSEP IC₅₀ ratio ≥ 0.1 were associated with some form of liver injury. We then investigated the relationship between clinical evidence of liver injury and effects to multidrug resistance-associated proteins (MRPs) believed to play a role in BA homeostasis. The effect of 600+ drugs on MRP2, MRP3, and MRP4 function was also evaluated in membrane vesicle assays. Drugs with a C(ss)/BSEP IC₅₀ ratio ≥ 0.1 and a C(ss)/MRP IC₅₀ ratio ≥ 0.1 had almost a 100% correlation with some evidence of liver injury in humans. These data suggest that integration of exposure data, and knowledge of an effect to not only BSEP but also one or more of the MRPs, is a useful tool for informing the potential for liver injury due to altered BA transport.

Topics: Animals; ATP Binding Cassette Transporter, Subfamily B; ATP Binding Cassette Transporter, Subfamily B, Member 11; ATP-Binding Cassette Transporters; Biological Transport; Chemical and Drug Induced Liver Injury; Cluster Analysis; Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions; Humans; Liver; Male; Multidrug Resistance-Associated Proteins; Pharmacokinetics; Rats; Rats, Sprague-Dawley; Recombinant Proteins; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Toxicity Tests

Drug-induced liver injury is the most common cause of market withdrawal of pharmaceuticals, and thus, there is considerable need for better prediction models for DILI early in drug discovery. We present a study involving 223 marketed drugs (51% associated with clinical hepatotoxicity; 49% non-hepatotoxic) to assess the concordance of in vitro bioactivation data with clinical hepatotoxicity and have used these data to develop a decision tree to help reduce late-stage candidate attrition. Data to assess P450 metabolism-dependent inhibition (MDI) for all common drug-metabolizing P450 enzymes were generated for 179 of these compounds, GSH adduct data generated for 190 compounds, covalent binding data obtained for 53 compounds, and clinical dose data obtained for all compounds. Individual data for all 223 compounds are presented here and interrogated to determine what level of an alert to consider termination of a compound. The analysis showed that 76% of drugs with a daily dose of <100 mg were non-hepatotoxic (p < 0.0001). Drugs with a daily dose of ≥100 mg or with GSH adduct formation, marked P450 MDI, or covalent binding ≥200 pmol eq/mg protein tended to be hepatotoxic (∼ 65% in each case). Combining dose with each bioactivation assay increased this association significantly (80-100%, p < 0.0001). These analyses were then used to develop the decision tree and the tree tested using 196 of the compounds with sufficient data (49% hepatotoxic; 51% non-hepatotoxic). The results of these outcome analyses demonstrated the utility of the tree in selectively terminating hepatotoxic compounds early; 45% of the hepatotoxic compounds evaluated using the tree were recommended for termination before candidate selection, whereas only 10% of the non-hepatotoxic compounds were recommended for termination. An independent set of 10 GSK compounds with known clinical hepatotoxicity status were also assessed using the tree, with similar results.

Topics: Chemical and Drug Induced Liver Injury; Cytochrome P-450 Enzyme Inhibitors; Cytochrome P-450 Enzyme System; Decision Trees; Drug Evaluation, Preclinical; Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions; Glutathione; Humans; Liver; Pharmaceutical Preparations; Protein Binding

Drug-induced liver injury (DILI) is a leading cause of drugs failing during clinical trials and being withdrawn from the market. Comparative analysis of drugs based on their DILI potential is an effective approach to discover key DILI mechanisms and risk factors. However, assessing the DILI potential of a drug is a challenge with no existing consensus methods. We proposed a systematic classification scheme using FDA-approved drug labeling to assess the DILI potential of drugs, which yielded a benchmark dataset with 287 drugs representing a wide range of therapeutic categories and daily dosage amounts. The method is transparent and reproducible with a potential to serve as a common practice to study the DILI of marketed drugs for supporting drug discovery and biomarker development.

Topics: Animals; Benchmarking; Biomarkers, Pharmacological; Chemical and Drug Induced Liver Injury; Drug Design; Drug Labeling; Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions; Humans; Pharmaceutical Preparations; Reproducibility of Results; United States; United States Food and Drug Administration

Drug-induced liver injury (DILI) is a significant concern in drug development due to the poor concordance between preclinical and clinical findings of liver toxicity. We hypothesized that the DILI types (hepatotoxic side effects) seen in the clinic can be translated into the development of predictive in silico models for use in the drug discovery phase. We identified 13 hepatotoxic side effects with high accuracy for classifying marketed drugs for their DILI potential. We then developed in silico predictive models for each of these 13 side effects, which were further combined to construct a DILI prediction system (DILIps). The DILIps yielded 60-70% prediction accuracy for three independent validation sets. To enhance the confidence for identification of drugs that cause severe DILI in humans, the "Rule of Three" was developed in DILIps by using a consensus strategy based on 13 models. This gave high positive predictive value (91%) when applied to an external dataset containing 206 drugs from three independent literature datasets. Using the DILIps, we screened all the drugs in DrugBank and investigated their DILI potential in terms of protein targets and therapeutic categories through network modeling. We demonstrated that two therapeutic categories, anti-infectives for systemic use and musculoskeletal system drugs, were enriched for DILI, which is consistent with current knowledge. We also identified protein targets and pathways that are related to drugs that cause DILI by using pathway analysis and co-occurrence text mining. While marketed drugs were the focus of this study, the DILIps has a potential as an evaluation tool to screen and prioritize new drug candidates or chemicals, such as environmental chemicals, to avoid those that might cause liver toxicity. We expect that the methodology can be also applied to other drug safety endpoints, such as renal or cardiovascular toxicity.

Topics: Animals; Anti-Infective Agents; Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Chemical and Drug Induced Liver Injury; Databases, Factual; Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions; Humans; Liver; Models, Biological; Predictive Value of Tests

Drug-induced liver injury (DILI) is one of the most important reasons for drug development failure at both preapproval and postapproval stages. There has been increased interest in developing predictive in vivo, in vitro, and in silico models to identify compounds that cause idiosyncratic hepatotoxicity. In the current study, we applied machine learning, a Bayesian modeling method with extended connectivity fingerprints and other interpretable descriptors. The model that was developed and internally validated (using a training set of 295 compounds) was then applied to a large test set relative to the training set (237 compounds) for external validation. The resulting concordance of 60%, sensitivity of 56%, and specificity of 67% were comparable to results for internal validation. The Bayesian model with extended connectivity functional class fingerprints of maximum diameter 6 (ECFC_6) and interpretable descriptors suggested several substructures that are chemically reactive and may also be important for DILI-causing compounds, e.g., ketones, diols, and α-methyl styrene type structures. Using Smiles Arbitrary Target Specification (SMARTS) filters published by several pharmaceutical companies, we evaluated whether such reactive substructures could be readily detected by any of the published filters. It was apparent that the most stringent filters used in this study, such as the Abbott alerts, which captures thiol traps and other compounds, may be of use in identifying DILI-causing compounds (sensitivity 67%). A significant outcome of the present study is that we provide predictions for many compounds that cause DILI by using the knowledge we have available from previous studies. These computational models may represent cost-effective selection criteria before in vitro or in vivo experimental studies.

Topics: Bayes Theorem; Chemical and Drug Induced Liver Injury; Humans; Ligands

Drug-induced liver injury is one of the main causes of drug attrition. The ability to predict the liver effects of drug candidates from their chemical structures is critical to help guide experimental drug discovery projects toward safer medicines. In this study, we have compiled a data set of 951 compounds reported to produce a wide range of effects in the liver in different species, comprising humans, rodents, and nonrodents. The liver effects for this data set were obtained as assertional metadata, generated from MEDLINE abstracts using a unique combination of lexical and linguistic methods and ontological rules. We have analyzed this data set using conventional cheminformatics approaches and addressed several questions pertaining to cross-species concordance of liver effects, chemical determinants of liver effects in humans, and the prediction of whether a given compound is likely to cause a liver effect in humans. We found that the concordance of liver effects was relatively low (ca. 39-44%) between different species, raising the possibility that species specificity could depend on specific features of chemical structure. Compounds were clustered by their chemical similarity, and similar compounds were examined for the expected similarity of their species-dependent liver effect profiles. In most cases, similar profiles were observed for members of the same cluster, but some compounds appeared as outliers. The outliers were the subject of focused assertion regeneration from MEDLINE as well as other data sources. In some cases, additional biological assertions were identified, which were in line with expectations based on compounds' chemical similarities. The assertions were further converted to binary annotations of underlying chemicals (i.e., liver effect vs no liver effect), and binary quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) models were generated to predict whether a compound would be expected to produce liver effects in humans. Despite the apparent heterogeneity of data, models have shown good predictive power assessed by external 5-fold cross-validation procedures. The external predictive power of binary QSAR models was further confirmed by their application to compounds that were retrieved or studied after the model was developed. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study for chemical toxicity prediction that applied QSAR modeling and other cheminformatics techniques to observational data generated by the means of automate

Topics: Animals; Chemical and Drug Induced Liver Injury; Cluster Analysis; Databases, Factual; Humans; MEDLINE; Mice; Models, Chemical; Molecular Conformation; Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship

The bile salt export pump (BSEP) is an efflux transporter, driving the elimination of endobiotic and xenobiotic substrates from hepatocytes into the bile. More specifically, it is responsible for the elimination of monovalent, conjugated bile salts, with little or no assistance from other apical transporters. Disruption of BSEP activity through genetic disorders is known to manifest in clinical liver injury such as progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis type 2. Drug-induced disruption of BSEP is hypothesized to play a role in the development of liver injury for several marketed or withdrawn therapeutics. Unfortunately, preclinical animal models have been poor predictors of the liver injury associated with BSEP interference observed for humans, possibly because of interspecies differences in bile acid composition, differences in hepatobiliary transporter modulation or constitutive expression, as well as other mechanisms. Thus, a BSEP-mediated liver liability may go undetected until the later stages of drug development, such as during clinical trials or even postlicensing. In the absence of a relevant preclinical test system for BSEP-mediated liver injury, the toxicological relevance of available in vitro models to human health rely on the use of benchmark compounds with known clinical outcomes, such as marketed or withdrawn drugs. In this study, membrane vesicles harvested from BSEP-transfected insect cells were used to assess the activity of more than 200 benchmark compounds to thoroughly investigate the relationship between interference with BSEP function and liver injury. The data suggest a relatively strong association between the pharmacological interference with BSEP function and human hepatotoxicity. Although the most accurate translation of risk would incorporate pharmacological potency, pharmacokinetics, clearance mechanisms, tissue distribution, physicochemical properties, indication, and other drug attributes, the additional understanding of a compound's potency for BSEP interference should help to limit or avoid BSEP-related liver liabilities in humans that are not often detected by standard preclinical animal models.

Topics: Animals; ATP Binding Cassette Transporter, Subfamily B, Member 11; ATP-Binding Cassette Transporters; Biological Assay; Biological Transport; Cell Line; Cell Membrane; Chemical and Drug Induced Liver Injury; Cytoplasmic Vesicles; Drug Evaluation, Preclinical; Humans; Liver; Rats; Reproducibility of Results; Spodoptera; Transfection; Xenobiotics

Since their introduction, hepatotoxicity has been associated with the use of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-1 protease inhibitors (PIs). However, the complexity of the HIV-infected patient and the combinations of medications used to treat HIV complicate the understanding of the independent effects of PIs in the development of drug-induced liver injury (DILI). I discuss the current understanding of PI-associated hepatotoxicity. Of the PI regimens studied, the greatest risk of DILI has been observed among patients receiving full-dose ritonavir. Similarly, hepatitis B and/or C virus coinfection has been associated with a greater risk of DILI, compared with those with no hepatitis. Although the specific mechanism by which viral hepatitis increases this risk is not known, patients with cirrhosis may have decreased cytochrome P450 activity, leading to increased PI exposure. Clearly, further research is needed to define the interaction of PIs and chronic viral hepatitis in the development of DILI.

Topics: Anti-HIV Agents; Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active; Atazanavir Sulfate; Chemical and Drug Induced Liver Injury; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Hyperbilirubinemia; Indinavir; Oligopeptides; Pyridines

Topics: Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome; Acute Kidney Injury; Adult; Alcoholism; Chemical and Drug Induced Liver Injury; Hepatitis C, Chronic; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Indinavir; Male; Rhabdomyolysis; Ritonavir

Topics: Anti-HIV Agents; Chemical and Drug Induced Liver Injury; HIV Infections; Humans; Indinavir; Male; Middle Aged

Topics: Adult; Anti-HIV Agents; Chemical and Drug Induced Liver Injury; Drug Therapy, Combination; Hepatitis A; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Indinavir; Liver Failure; Male

Topics: Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome; Adult; CD4 Lymphocyte Count; Chemical and Drug Induced Liver Injury; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Indinavir; Male; Middle Aged

Topics: Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome; Adult; Anti-HIV Agents; Chemical and Drug Induced Liver Injury; Hemophilia B; Humans; Indinavir; Male