incretins and Pancreatic-Neoplasms

Some early reports in the medical literature have raised concern about a possible increased risk of pancreatic cancer associated with the use of two broad classes of incretin-based therapies, dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors, and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists. This possibility has been somewhat mitigated by the null findings meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials, but the usefulness of their findings was hampered by serious shortcomings of lack of power and representativeness. These shortcomings can typically be addressed by observational studies, but observational studies on the topic have yielded conflicting findings. A systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies was performed to qualitatively and quantitatively appraise the totality of evidence on the association between the use of incretin-based therapies and the risk of pancreatic cancer in routine clinical practice.. The PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Google Scholar databases were searched. The study quality was appraised using the ROBINS-I tool and based on the presence of pharmacoepidemiology biases. A random-effects model was used to estimate the summary relative risks with corresponding CIs.. A total of 14 studies were included. The qualitative assessment revealed that all studies had inadequate follow-up (≤5 years), 12 studies were suspected to suffer from time-lag bias (due to inappropriate choice of comparator group) to varying extent, five studies included prevalent users, five studies did not implement exposure lag period, five studies had a serious risk of bias due to confounding, and one study had a time-window bias. The quantitative assessment showed no indication of an increased risk when all studies were pooled together (RR 1.04, 95% CI 0.87, 1.24) and when the analysis was restricted to the studies with the least bias (RR 0.77, 95% CI 0.51, 1.17). However, the pooled RRs were more frequently higher in the studies with less rigorous design and analysis. Specifically, a tendency toward an increased risk was observed in the studies with (RR 1.34, 95% CI 1.04, 1.72) or possibly with (RR 1.10, 95% CI 0.89, 1.36) time-lag bias, in the studies that did not apply (RR 1.23, 95% CI 0.93, 1.63) or with potentially inadequate exposure lag period of 6 months (RR 1.13, 95% CI 0.66, 1.94), in the studies that inappropriate comparator group of a combination of unspecified (RR 1.49, 95% CI 1.25, 1.78) or non-insulin (RR 1.15, 95% CI 0.93, 1.42) antidiabetic drugs, and in the studies with serious risk of bias due to confounding (RR 1.18, 95% CI 0.56, 2.49).. In summary, the totality of evidence from observational studies does not support the claim that the use of incretin-based therapies is associated with an increased risk of pancreatic cancer in routine clinical practice. The increased risk of pancreatic cancer observed in observational studies reflects bias resulting from suboptimal methodological approaches, which need to be avoided by future studies.

Topics: Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Incretins; Pancreatic Neoplasms

Incretin-based therapies like glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists and dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors help maintain the glycaemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus with additional systemic benefits and little risk of hypoglycaemia. These medications are associated with low-grade chronic pancreatitis in animal models inconsistently. The incidence of acute pancreatitis was also reported in some human studies. This inflammation provides fertile ground for developing pancreatic carcinoma (PC). Although the data from clinical trials and population-based studies have established safety regarding PC, the pathophysiological possibility that low-grade chronic pancreatitis leads to PC remains. We review the existing literature and describe the relationship between incretin-based therapies and PC.

Topics: Acute Disease; Animals; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Incretins; Pancreatic Neoplasms; Pancreatitis, Chronic

An increasing number of studies have investigated associations of antidiabetes medications with cancer risk. Antidiabetes medications are classified by their mechanisms of action on tissues and organs. They potentially act as both causative and confounding factors in the temporal association of diabetes and cancer.. To present the current evidence regarding both the carcinogenic and anti-carcinogenic effects of antidiabetes medications on cancer in humans.. A review of the scientific literature.. The most conclusive evidence shown of an association of antidiabetes medication with a specific cancer was for that of the thiazolidinedione pioglitazone with bladder cancer. Currently, there is inconclusive evidence regarding a possible association of incretin therapies, drugs of the dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor class, with the risk of pancreatic cancer. Insulin, sulfonylureas, metformin and sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors appear not to be associated with increased risk of any cancer. Sparse evidence suggests possible protective effects against cancer incidence of metformin, sulfonylureas, thiazolidinediones, incretin-based drugs and sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors.. The conflicting evidence regarding associations of antidiabetes medications with cancer risk is apparently attributable to both methodological issues and to the complexity of the subject. More recent and better-designed studies have weakened the evidence for links between antidiabetes medications and cancer risk.

Topics: Diabetes Mellitus; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor; Glycoside Hydrolase Inhibitors; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Incretins; Insulin; Metformin; Neoplasms; Pancreatic Neoplasms; Protective Factors; Risk Factors; Sodium-Glucose Transporter 2 Inhibitors; Sulfonylurea Compounds; Thiazolidinediones; Urinary Bladder Neoplasms

The dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP-4is), which belong to the class of incretin-based medications, are recommended as second or third-line therapies in guidelines for the management of type 2 diabetes mellitus. They have a favorable drug tolerability and safety profile compared to other glucose-lowering agents.. This review discusses data concerning the use of DPP-4is and their cardiovascular profile, and gives an updated comparison with the other oral glucose-lowering medications with regards to safety and efficacy. Currently available original studies, abstracts, reviews articles, systematic reviews and meta-analyses were included in the review.. DPP4is are moderately efficient in decreasing the HbA1c by an average of 0.5% as monotherapy, and 1.0% in combination therapy with other drugs. They have a good tolerability and safety profile compared to other glucose-lowering drugs. However, there are possible risks pertaining to acute pancreatitis and pancreatic cancer.. Cardiovascular outcome trials thus far have proven the cardiovascular safety for ischemic events in patients treated with sitagliptin, saxagliptin, alogliptin, linagliptin and vildagliptin. Data showing increased rate of hospitalisation in the case of saxagliptin did not seem to be a class effect.

Topics: Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Incretins; Pancreatic Neoplasms; Pancreatitis; Treatment Outcome

To perform a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs), including 6 recently published large-scale cardiovascular outcome trials (CVOTs), to evaluate the risk of pancreatic cancer with incretin-based therapies in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2DM).. For the period January 1, 2007 to May 1, 2017, the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central Register and ClininalTrials.gov databases were searched for RCTs in people with T2DM that compared incretin drugs with placebo or other antidiabetic drugs, with treatment and follow-up durations of ≥52 weeks. Two reviewers screened the studies, extracted the data and assessed the risk of bias independently and in duplicate.. A total of 33 studies (n = 79 971), including the 6 CVOTs, with 87 pancreatic cancer events were identified. Overall, the pancreatic cancer risk was not increased in patients administered incretin drugs compared with controls (Peto odds ratio [OR] 0.67, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.44-1.02). In the 6 CVOTs, 79 pancreatic cancer events were identified in 55 248 participants. Pooled estimates of the 6 CVOTs showed an identical tendency (Peto OR 0.65, 95% CI 0.42-1.01). Notably, in the subgroup of participants who received treatment and follow-up for ≥104 weeks, 84 pancreatic cancer events were identified in 59 919 participants, and a lower risk of pancreatic cancer was associated with incretin-based therapies (Peto OR 0.62, 95% CI 0.41-0.95).. Treatment with incretin drugs was not associated with an increased risk of pancreatic cancer in people with T2DM. Instead, it might protect against pancreatic malignancy in patients treated for ≥104 weeks.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Databases, Factual; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Incretins; Male; Middle Aged; Pancreatic Neoplasms; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Risk Factors

Topics: Acute Disease; Clinical Trials as Topic; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Drug Therapy, Combination; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Incretins; Odds Ratio; Pancreatic Neoplasms; Pancreatitis; Risk; Risk Factors; Treatment Outcome

In the last couple of years incretin-based antidiabetic drugs became increasingly popular and widely used for treating patients with type 2 diabetes. Immediately after launching, case reports and small case series were published on the potential side effects of the new drugs, with special attention to pancreatic disorders such as acute pancreatitis or pancreatic cancer. As clinical observations accumulated, these side-effects were noted with nearly all drugs of this class. Although these side-effects proved to be rare, an intensive debate evolved in the literature. Opinion of diabetes specialists and representatives of pharmaceutical industry as well as position statements of different international scientific boards and health authorities were published. In addition, results of randomized clinical trials with incretin-based therapy and meta-analyses became available. Importantly, in everyday clinical practice, the label of the given drug should be followed. With regards to incretins, physicians should be cautious if pancreatitis in the patients' past medical history is documented. Early differential diagnosis of any abdominal pain during treatment of incretin-based therapy should be made and the drug should be discontinued if pancreatitis is verified. Continuous post-marketing surveillance and side-effect analysis are still justified with incretin-based antidiabetic treatment in patients with type 2 diabetes.

Topics: Abdominal Pain; Acute Disease; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Diagnosis, Differential; Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Incretins; Meta-Analysis as Topic; Pancreatic Neoplasms; Pancreatitis; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Risk Factors

Incretin-based therapies, including the use of incretin mimetics of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor (GLP-1R) agonists and incretin enhancers of dipeptidyl-peptidase 4 (DPP-4) inhibitors, are widely used by clinicians for glucose lowering in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. These agents have benefits of a lower risk of hypoglycemia, being neutral for body weight for DPP-4 inhibitors and having a potential for weight reduction with GLP-1R agonists. They may also have a neutral or beneficial cardiovascular effect. Despite these benefits, an increased risk of cancer (especially pancreatic cancer and thyroid cancer) associated with incretin-based therapies has been reported. In this article, we reviewed related literature of experimental animal and observational human studies, clinical trials, and meta-analyses published until December 15, 2014. Current studies suggested a probable role of GLP-1R activation on the development of pancreatic cancer and thyroid cancer in rodents, but such an effect in humans is not remarkable due to the lower or lack of expression of GLP-1R on human pancreatic ductal cells and thyroid tissues. Findings in human studies are controversial and inconclusive. In the analyses of the US Food and Drug Administration adverse events reporting system, a significantly higher risk of pancreatic cancer was observed for GLP-1R agonists and DPP-4 inhibitors, but a significantly higher risk of thyroid cancer was only observed for GLP-1R agonists. Such a higher risk of pancreatic cancer or thyroid cancer could not be similarly demonstrated in other human observational studies or analyses of data from clinical trials. With regards to cancers other than pancreatic cancer and thyroid cancer, available studies supported a neutral association in humans. Some preliminary studies even suggested a potentially beneficial effect on the development of other cancers with the use of incretins. Based on current evidence, continuous monitoring of the cancer issues related to incretin-based therapies is required, even though the benefits may outweigh the potential cancer risk in the general patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Topics: Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Incretins; Neoplasms; Pancreatic Neoplasms; Risk Factors; Thyroid Neoplasms

Signals from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (AERS) and pre-clinical and human pancreata obtained from organ donors have suggested that incretin-based therapies used to treat type 2 diabetes mellitus, such as glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists and dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors, may increase the risk of acute pancreatitis (AP) and pancreatic cancer (PC). However, data from observational studies and randomized trials have been conflicting. We conducted a literature review to identify and summarize all observational data published assessing the pancreatic safety of incretins.. Searches were conducted in MEDLINE via PubMed and Embase using the key terms for the time period of 1 January 2005, to 12 February 2014. A total of 180 articles were screened in abstract form and 49 were subsequently reviewed in full text for inclusion. Data from 12 articles are included in this report.. Data from the FDA AERS database suggest increased risk of AP and PC with GLP-1 receptor agonist and DPP-4 inhibitor use. These findings are not supported by population-based observational studies for either AP or PC; however, studies assessing the relationship between PC and incretin-based therapies are limited.. Current evidence is conflicting and inadequate to conclude whether use of incretin-based therapies increases the risk of AP and PC. Further studies, with the ability to provide long term follow-up, are needed.

Topics: Acute Disease; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Incidence; Incretins; Observational Studies as Topic; Pancreatic Neoplasms; Pancreatitis; Receptors, Glucagon

Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists are new options in the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus. However, due to accumulating reports on the occurrence of acute pancreatitis (AP), a suspicion of an association between incretin-based therapies and pancreatic disease has arisen.. A review of the literature on the safety of incretin-based therapies in regard to AP and pancreatic cancer was undertaken with discussion of potential mechanisms as well as limitations.. Until now, several preclinical and clinical studies have been published; however, they present conflicting results. Common risk factors, low incidence rates, long latency periods (in regard to pancreatic malignancy), lack of availability of human pancreatic tissues during lifetime among others hamper the confirmation or exclusion of a causal association. The results of the ongoing large randomized controlled trials will add further data. In line with current recommendations by European Medicines Agency and FDA, incretin-based therapies should be discontinued in patients with suspicion of AP, and incretin mimetics should not be administered to patients with a history of AP. However, based on current knowledge, there is no sound reason for depriving type 2 diabetic patients in general of a beneficial and effective therapy. However, this conclusion cannot be final and should be subject to constant reevaluation and, if necessary, change.

Topics: Animals; Blood Glucose; Cell Transformation, Neoplastic; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor; Humans; Incretins; Pancreatic Neoplasms; Pancreatitis; Receptors, Glucagon; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1ra) are a new group of drugs with a glucose-lowering action due to their incretin effect. The GLP-1 receptor is expressed in various human tissues, which could be related to the pleiotropic effects of human GLP-1, as well as to the adverse effects described in patients treated with GLP-1ra. The risk of hypoglycaemia is low, which is one of the main considerations in the safety of this family of compounds and is also important to patients with diabetes. The most frequent adverse effect is nausea, which usually occurs at the start of treatment and is transient in 20-60% of affected patients. This article also reviews the information available on antibody formation, the potential effect on the thyroid gland, and the controversial association between this group of drugs with pancreatitis and cancer.

Topics: Cardiovascular Diseases; Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Incretins; Nausea; Pancreatic Neoplasms; Pancreatitis; Thyroid Neoplasms

Recent suggestions that glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1)-based therapies could cause pancreatitis, and even pancreatic cancer, are based on:. The worrying histological changes are not reproduced in all studies and are unexpectedly variable with different GLP-1-based therapies.. Singh's findings that pancreatitis is doubled with GLP-1-based therapies could relate to their use in obese patients who are prone to pancreatitis risk factors--gallstones and hypertriglyceridaemia. The other observational studies do not find an association between GLP-1-based therapies and pancreatitis.. The increased reports of pancreatitis and pancreatic cancer are likely to be attributable to 'notoriety bias'.. Butler's findings for those on GLP-1-based therapies vs. those not, could have other explanations. Meanwhile: META ANALYSIS: Randomized control trials with GLP-1-based therapies do not find increased pancreatitis risk. Meta-analysis of 53 randomized controlled trials including 20 212 dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor-treated patients found a significantly reduced risk of major adverse cardiovascular events [odds ratio 0.689 (0.528-0.899), P = 0.006] for dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors compared with control subjects.. The evidence suggests that there is more than a possibility that some of the GLP-1 receptor agonists, and possibly also some dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors, may be associated with reduced cardiovascular events. Eight ongoing long-term cardiovascular randomized controlled trials will report from September 2013 onwards. These trials should resolve the issue of pancreatitis risk and substantiate the extent of benefit.. Whilst we should remain vigilant, currently the balance of evidence is strongly in support of GLP-1-based therapy, with benefits far outweighing potential risks.

Topics: Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting Systems; Cardiovascular Diseases; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Diabetic Angiopathies; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Exenatide; Female; Glucagon-Like Peptide 1; Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor; Humans; Incretins; Liraglutide; Male; Pancreatic Neoplasms; Pancreatitis; Patient Selection; Peptides; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Receptors, Glucagon; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Venoms

Pancreatic islets are heterogenous. To clarify the relationship between islet heterogeneity and incretin action in the islets, we studied gene expression and metabolic profiles of non-large and enlarged islets of the Zucker fatty diabetes mellitus rat, an obese diabetes model, as well as incretin-induced insulin secretion (IIIS) in these islets.. Pancreatic islets of control (fa/+) and fatty (fa/fa) rats at 8 and 12 weeks-of-age were isolated. The islets of fa/fa rats at 12 weeks-of-age were separated into non-large islets (≤200 μm in diameter) and enlarged islets (>300 μm in diameter). Morphological analyses, insulin secretion experiments, transcriptome analysis, metabolome analysis and oxygen consumption analysis were carried out on these islets.. The number of enlarged islets was increased with age in fatty rats, and IIIS was significantly reduced in the enlarged islets. Markers for β-cell differentiation were markedly decreased in the enlarged islets, but those for cell proliferation were increased. Glycolysis was enhanced in the enlarged islets, whereas the tricarboxylic acid cycle was suppressed. The oxygen consumption rate under glucose stimulation was reduced in the enlarged islets. Production of glutamate, a key signal for IIIS, was decreased in the enlarged islets.. The enlarged islets of Zucker fatty diabetes mellitus rats, which are defective for IIIS, show tumor cell-like metabolic features, including a dedifferentiated state, accelerated aerobic glycolysis and impaired mitochondrial function. The age-dependent increase in such islets could contribute to the pathophysiology of obese diabetes.

Topics: Animals; Gene Expression Profiling; Gene Expression Regulation; Incretins; Insulin Secretion; Islets of Langerhans; Male; Metabolome; Obesity; Pancreatic Neoplasms; Rats; Rats, Zucker

Dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitors (DPP-4i) are useful incretin-based antidiabetes drugs. However, there is a concern that DPP-4i may adversely impact the exocrine pancreas, owing to their pleiotropic effects. In this study, we investigated whether DPP-4i are associated with pancreatitis and pancreatic cancer using a nationwide population-based cohort study.. We included patients newly diagnosed with type 2 diabetes who were treated with antidiabetes drugs (. Out of 33,208 subjects, 10,218 were new users of DPP-4i and 22,990 were new users of other antidiabetes drugs. DPP-4i significantly increased the risks of pancreatitis (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 1.24, 95% CI 1.01-1.52;. DPP-4i use is associated with increased risks of pancreatitis and pancreatic cancer in patients with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes. However, the absence of increasing trend according to exposure duration suggests the chances of reverse causality, and long-term pancreatic safety of DPP-4i has to be further investigated.

Topics: Aged; Cohort Studies; Databases, Factual; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Female; Humans; Incretins; Male; Middle Aged; Pancreatic Neoplasms; Pancreatitis; Proportional Hazards Models; Risk Factors

In people with metformin-treated diabetes, to evaluate the risk of acute pancreatitis, pancreatic cancer and other diseases of the pancreas post second-line anti-hyperglycaemic agent initiation.. People with Type 2 diabetes diagnosed after 2004 who received metformin plus a dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor (DPP-4i, n = 50 095), glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist (GLP-1RA, n = 12 654), sulfonylurea (n = 110 747), thiazolidinedione (n = 17 597) or insulin (n = 34 805) for at least 3 months were identified in the US Centricity Electronic Medical Records. Time to developing acute pancreatitis, other diseases of the pancreas and pancreatic cancer was estimated, balancing and adjusting anti-hyperglycaemic drug groups for appropriate confounders.. In the DPP-4i group, the adjusted mean time to acute pancreatitis was 2.63 [95% confidence intervals (CI) 2.38, 2.88] years; time to pancreatic cancer was 2.70 (2.19, 3.21) years; and time to other diseases of the pancreas was 2.73 (2.33, 3.12) years. Compared with DPP-4i, the insulin group developed acute pancreatitis 0.48 years (P < 0.01) earlier and the GLP-1RA group developed pancreatic cancer 3 years later (P < 0.01). However, with the constraint of no event within 6 months of insulin initiation, the risk of acute pancreatitis in the insulin group was insignificant. No other significant differences were observed between groups.. No significant differences in the risk of developing pancreatic diseases in those treated with various anti-hyperglycaemic drug classes were found.

Topics: Acute Disease; Aged; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Incretins; Insulin; Male; Metformin; Middle Aged; Pancreatic Diseases; Pancreatic Neoplasms; Pancreatitis

A retrospective cohort study, supplemented with a nested case-control study, was performed using two administrative databases from commercial health plans in the United States to compare the incidence of pancreatic and thyroid cancer among users of exenatide versus other antidiabetic drugs (OADs). Patients with type 2 diabetes who initiated exenatide or OADs between 1 June 2005 and 30 June 2015 were included. Pancreatic and thyroid cancers were identified using chart-validated algorithms in the cohort study. Cases in the nested case-control study were chart-confirmed pancreatic or thyroid cancers, and controls were sampled using risk-set sampling. The time-fixed analyses comparing 33 629 exenatide initiators with 49 317 propensity-score-matched OAD initiators yielded hazard ratios of 0.76 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.47-1.21) for pancreatic cancer and 1.46 (95% CI 0.98-2.19) for thyroid cancer. Results in the time-dependent analyses by cumulative duration or dose were similar. Nested case-control analyses yielded rate ratios of 0.61 (95%CI, 0.37-1.00) for pancreatic cancer and 0.89 (95% CI, 0.64-1.24) for thyroid cancer. This observational study suggested exenatide use was not associated with an increased risk of pancreatic or thyroid cancer.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Cohort Studies; Databases, Factual; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Exenatide; Female; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Incidence; Incretins; Male; Middle Aged; Pancreatic Neoplasms; Propensity Score; Proportional Hazards Models; Retrospective Studies; Thyroid Neoplasms; United States

Incretin-based medications are a novel class of agents for the treatment of type-2 diabetes mellitus (DM2). The safety profile of these medications is not firmly established, and concerns have been raised about their potential carcinogenicity. The objective of our study was to produce new evidence on the effect of incretin-based medications on cancer risk in patients with DM2.. We conducted a "retrospective cohort" study with data from the Clinical Practice Research Datalink and the Hospital Episodes Statistics in the UK. New users of either an incretin-based medication (n = 18 885) or a sulfonylurea medication (n = 36 929) between 2007 and 2013 were identified and followed for up to 8 years. Cox proportional-hazards models were used to estimate the quasi-intention-to-treat and quasi-per-protocol hazard-ratios for the association between incretin-based medications with cancer while adjusting for potential confounders.. The adjusted hazard ratio (95% confidence interval) for use of incretin-based medications versus use of sulfonylurea medications for the overall-cancer outcome was 0.97 (0.90, 1.05) in the quasi-intention-to-treat analysis and 0.90 (0.81, 1.00) in the quasi-per-protocol analysis. In both analyses, the hazard-ratio functions over the 8-year follow-up seemed fairly constant, and the 8-year cumulative-risk functions in the two subcohorts were similar.. Our study suggests that the use of incretin-based medications in patients with DM2 does not increase the risk of cancer relative to the use of sulfonylurea medications, at least in the first several years of the use. Further research is needed to assess long-term effects of the use of incretin-based medications on cancer risk.

Topics: Aged; Carcinogenesis; Databases, Factual; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Incidence; Incretins; Male; Middle Aged; Pancreatic Neoplasms; Retrospective Studies; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Sulfonylurea Compounds; Time Factors; United Kingdom

Both acute pancreatitis (AP) and pancreatic cancer (PC) have been areas of focus for studies of incretin drugs. This 5-year prospective cohort study aimed to quantify possible associations between liraglutide and risk of AP and PC as compared to other antidiabetic drugs (ADs).. Patients initiating liraglutide or other ADs who were enrolled in a US health plan (2010-2014) were included. Comparisons of AP and PC incidence rates were made between matched cohorts of liraglutide initiators and initiators of other ADs. Adjudicated AP cases and algorithm-based PC cases were identified. Propensity score-matched intention-to-treat (ITT) and time-on-drug (TOD) analyses were completed using Poisson regression. A latency analysis was performed for PC.. Median follow-up was 405 days for AP cohorts (9995 liraglutide, 1:1 matched to all comparators) and 503 days for PC cohorts (35 163 liraglutide, 1:1 matched to all comparators). In the primary AP analysis, "current" use of liraglutide was not significantly associated with elevated risk across comparators (all comparators relative risk [RR] = 1.2; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.6-2.3). ITT results were similar where, in the primary analysis, no RRs were significantly associated with PC (all comparators RR = 0.7; 95% CI, 0.3-1.4); latency and TOD analyses did not alter findings. There was no evidence of a dose-response effect.. Liraglutide was not associated with an increased risk of AP or PC, although risk estimates were more variable for AP, and numbers of cases for both outcomes were limited because of the rarity of outcomes.

Topics: Acute Disease; Adult; Databases, Factual; Female; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Incretins; Insurance, Health; Liraglutide; Male; Middle Aged; Pancreatic Neoplasms; Pancreatitis; Prospective Studies; United States

Concerns have been raised about a possible increased risk of pancreatic cancer associated with incretin-based therapies. We examined the risk of pancreatic cancer among patients with diabetes prescribed incretin drugs.. With the use of public health insurance databases of Belgium and the Lombardy Region, Italy, we created two retrospective cohorts that included adult patients who were first prescribed an incretin drug or another noninsulin antidiabetic drug (NIAD) from 1 July 2008 to 31 December 2013 in Belgium and from 1 January 2008 to 31 December 2012 in the Lombardy Region. The risk of pancreatic cancer was evaluated by multivariate-adjusted Cox models that included time-dependent variables. Adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs) from Belgium and Italy were pooled by using fixed-effects meta-analyses.. The cohorts included 525,733 patients with diabetes treated with NIADs and 33,292 with incretin drugs. Results in both cohorts were similar. Eighty-five and 1,589 subjects who developed pancreatic cancer were registered among the incretin and NIAD new users, respectively, which represented an aHR of pancreatic cancer of 2.14 (95% CI 1.71-2.67) among those prescribed an incretin compared with an NIAD. The aHR with a drug use lag exposure of 6 months was 1.69 (1.24-2.32). The aHR decreased from 3.35 (2.32-4.84) in the first 3 months after the first incretin prescription to 2.12 (1.22-3.66) in months 3-5.9, 1.95 (1.20-3.16) in months 6-11.9, and 1.69 (1.12-2.55) after 12 months. Among those prescribed an NIAD, pancreatic cancer occurred mostly within the year after the first prescription. The risk of pancreatic cancer among patients subsequently prescribed insulin was 6.89 (6.05-7.85).. The recent prescription of incretin therapy is associated with an increased risk of pancreatic cancer. The reason for such an increase is likely the consequence of an occult pancreatic cancer that provokes or aggravates diabetes. Studies are warranted for assessing the risk of pancreatic cancer associated with long-term use of incretin drugs.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Belgium; Databases, Factual; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Female; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Incretins; Insulin; Italy; Male; Middle Aged; Pancreatic Neoplasms; Retrospective Studies; Risk Factors

Topics: Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Incretins; Pancreatic Neoplasms; Risk

To investigate the association between the use of incretin agents and the risk of pancreatic cancer.. A retrospective population-based cohort study, using data from the Clinical Practice Research Datalink, 2007-2012, was conducted. Patients (n = 182 428) with at least one non-insulin antidiabetic drug (NIAD) prescription and aged ≥18 years during data collection, were matched one-to-one to control patients without diabetes. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards models and a new user design were used to estimate the hazard ratio (HR) of pancreatic cancer in incretin users (n = 28 370) compared with control subjects without diabetes and other NIAD-treated patients. Time-dependent adjustments were made for age, sex, lifestyle, comorbidities and drug use.. The mean duration of follow-up was 4.1 years for incretin users. Current NIAD use was associated with a fourfold increased risk of pancreatic cancer [HR 4.28, 95% confidence interval (CI) 3.49-5.24]. This risk was almost doubled among current incretin users as compared with control subjects. Incretin use was not associated with pancreatic cancer when compared with control subjects with diabetes (HR 1.36, 95% CI 0.94-1.96); however, the 'new user' design did show an association between incretin use and pancreatic cancer when compared with control subjects with diabetes. In both cohorts with prevalent and incident users of antidiabetic drugs, the risk of pancreatic cancer almost doubled in those who had recently initiated incretin therapy (up to seven prescriptions), whereas this elevated risk dropped to baseline levels with prolonged use.. We found that incretin use was not associated with pancreatic cancer after adjustment for the severity of the underlying Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM). The elevated risk of pancreatic cancer in those recently initiating incretin agents is likely to be caused by protopathic bias or other types of unknown distortion. The presence of considerable confounding by disease severity and the lack of a duration-of-use relationship do not support a causal explanation for the association between incretin agents and pancreatic cancer.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Incretins; Male; Middle Aged; Pancreatic Neoplasms; Proportional Hazards Models; Retrospective Studies; Risk Factors; Time Factors; United Kingdom; Young Adult

Topics: Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Female; Heart Failure; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Incretins; Male; Pancreatic Neoplasms

To determine whether the use of incretin based drugs compared with sulfonylureas is associated with an increased risk of incident pancreatic cancer in people with type 2 diabetes.. Population based cohort.. Large, international, multicentre study combining the health records from six participating sites in Canada, the United States, and the United Kingdom.. A cohort of 972,384 patients initiating antidiabetic drugs between 1 January 2007 and 30 June 2013, with follow-up until 30 June 2014.. Within each cohort we conducted nested case-control analyses, where incident cases of pancreatic cancer were matched with up to 20 controls on sex, age, cohort entry date, duration of treated diabetes, and duration of follow-up. Hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals for incident pancreatic cancer were estimated, comparing use of incretin based drugs with use of sulfonylureas, with drug use lagged by one year for latency purposes. Secondary analyses assessed whether the risk varied by class (dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists) or by duration of use (cumulative duration of use and time since treatment initiation). Site specific hazard ratios were pooled using random effects models.. During 2,024,441 person years of follow-up (median follow-up ranging from 1.3 to 2.8 years; maximum 8 years), 1221 patients were newly diagnosed as having pancreatic cancer (incidence rate 0.60 per 1000 person years). Compared with sulfonylureas, incretin based drugs were not associated with an increased risk of pancreatic cancer (pooled adjusted hazard ratio 1.02, 95% confidence interval 0.84 to 1.23). Similarly, the risk did not vary by class and evidence of a duration-response relation was lacking.. In this large, population based study the use of incretin based drugs was not associated with an increased risk of pancreatic cancer compared with sulfonylureas. Although this potential adverse drug reaction will need to be monitored long term owing to the latency of the cancer, these findings provide some reassurance on the safety of incretin based drugs.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Canada; Case-Control Studies; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Female; Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Incretins; Male; Middle Aged; Pancreatic Neoplasms; Proportional Hazards Models; Retrospective Studies; Sulfonylurea Compounds; United Kingdom; United States; Young Adult

Incretin-based therapies have been associated with an increased risk of pancreatitis. Recently, various histological abnormalities have been reported in human pancreatic tissue from brain-dead organ donors who had been exposed to incretin-based drugs. In the present study we examined pancreatic tissue collected at surgery.. Human pancreatic tissue from 7 type 2-diabetic patients treated with incretin-based drugs (type 2-I), 6 diabetic patients without incretin treatment (type 2-NI), 11 patients without diabetes (no diabetes group) and 9 brain-dead organ donors (BDOD group) was examined.. Fractional beta-cell area was reduced in the type 2-NI group compared to the group without diabetes (P < .05), but there was no difference compared to the type 2-I patients. Alpha-cell area (P = .30), beta-cell replication (P = .17) and alpha-cell replication (P = .91) were not different. There were also no differences in acinar cell (P = .13) and duct cell replication (P = .099). Insulin-positive duct cells were more frequent in the type 2-I and the BDOD groups (P = .034). No co-expression of insulin and glucagon was detected. Pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PanIN) lesions were very rare, all low-grade (PanIN 1a and 1b) and tended to occur more frequently in the type 2-I group (P = .084).. The present results did not reveal marked histological abnormalities in the pancreas of incretin-treated patients with type 2 diabetes. Low numbers of specimens available and a large inter-individual variability of the findings warrant caution regarding the interpretation of histological data concerning drug effects on the human pancreas.

Topics: Acinar Cells; Adamantane; Adenocarcinoma; Adult; Aged; Carcinoma in Situ; Case-Control Studies; Cystadenoma; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Digestive System Surgical Procedures; Dipeptides; Exenatide; Female; Glucagon; Glucagon-Secreting Cells; Humans; Incretins; Insulin; Insulin-Secreting Cells; Islets of Langerhans; Male; Middle Aged; Neuroendocrine Tumors; Nitriles; Organ Size; Pancreas; Pancreas, Exocrine; Pancreatic Neoplasms; Pancreatitis, Chronic; Peptides; Pyrrolidines; Sitagliptin Phosphate; Tissue Donors; Venoms; Vildagliptin

Topics: Cardiovascular Diseases; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Female; Humans; Incretins; Male; Pancreatic Neoplasms; Pancreatitis; Receptors, Glucagon

Topics: Cardiovascular Diseases; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Female; Humans; Incretins; Male; Pancreatic Neoplasms; Pancreatitis; Receptors, Glucagon

Topics: Animals; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Approval; Drug Evaluation, Preclinical; European Union; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Incretins; Mice; Pancreatic Neoplasms; Pancreatitis; Rats; United States; United States Food and Drug Administration

Topics: Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Glucagon-Like Peptide 1; Humans; Hyperplasia; Incretins; Metaplasia; Pancreas; Pancreatic Neoplasms; Pancreatitis

Topics: Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Incretins; Pancreatic Neoplasms; Product Surveillance, Postmarketing; Risk Assessment

Topics: Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; England; Female; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Incretins; Male; Pancreatic Neoplasms; Pancreatitis; Product Surveillance, Postmarketing; Thyroid Neoplasms; United States; United States Food and Drug Administration