incretins and Non-ST-Elevated-Myocardial-Infarction

There are insufficient data on the prognosis and management of people with type 2 diabetes who experience a non-obstructive coronary artery stenosis (NOCS)-non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) event. We evaluated the 12-month prognosis of patients with diabetes and NOCS (20%-49% luminal stenosis) who experience a first NSTEMI as compared with patients without diabetes. In addition, we investigated the 12-month prognosis in patients with diabetes and NSTEMI-NOCS previously treated with incretin-based therapy compared with a matched cohort of patients with NSTEMI-NOCS never treated with such therapy. We categorized the patients with diabetes as current incretin users (6 months' treatment with glucagon-like peptide-1 agonists or dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors) and non-users of incretins. The endpoint was all-cause mortality, cardiac death, recurrent acute coronary syndrome (ACS), and heart failure. The unadjusted Kaplan-Meier analysis, and a risk-adjusted hazard analysis showed that, all-cause mortality, cardiac death, readmission for ACS and heart failure rates during the 12-month follow-up were higher in patients with diabetes and NOCS-NSTEMI than in those with NOCS-NSTEMI without diabetes. Among the patients with diabetes, the current incretin users had a significantly lower rate of all-cause mortality, cardiac death and readmission for ACS at 12 months. In patients with type 2 diabetes and NOCS-NSTEMI, we observed a higher incidence of 1-year mortality and adverse cardiovascular outcomes, as compared with patients without diabetes with NOCS-NSTEMI. In people with diabetes, non-users of incretins had a worse prognosis than current incretin users.

Topics: Aged; Coronary Stenosis; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Diabetic Angiopathies; Female; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Incretins; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Male; Middle Aged; Non-ST Elevated Myocardial Infarction; Prospective Studies; Treatment Outcome

Diabetes mellitus (DM) is a known risk factor for myocardial infarction (MI); however, data regarding MI subtypes in people with diabetes are limited. In the Liraglutide Effect and Action in Diabetes: Evaluation of Cardiovascular Outcome Results (LEADER) trial (n = 9,340), liraglutide significantly reduced the risk of major adverse cardiovascular (CV) events (composite of CV death, nonfatal MI, or nonfatal stroke) versus placebo in patients with type 2 DM and high CV risk. Liraglutide also reduced risk of first MI (292 events with liraglutide vs 339 with placebo). This post hoc analysis characterized MIs (first and recurrent) occurring in LEADER, by treatment arm and regarding incidence, outcome, subtype, and troponin levels. A total of 780 MIs (first and recurrent) were reported, with fewer in the liraglutide-treatment group than in the placebo-treatment group (359 vs 421, p = 0.022). Numerically fewer MIs were associated with CV death with liraglutide than with placebo (17 vs 28 fatal MIs, p = 0.28). Symptomatic MIs in both arms were mainly non-ST-segment elevation MI (555/641) and spontaneous MI (518/641). Numerically greater proportions of symptomatic MIs were associated with troponin levels ≤5× or ≤10× the upper reference limit with liraglutide versus placebo (p = 0.16 and p = 0.42, respectively). At baseline, more liraglutide-treated patients than placebo-treated patients with MI during the trial had a history of coronary artery bypass graft (p = 0.008), and fewer had peripheral arterial disease in the lower extremities (p = 0.005) and >50% stenosis of the coronary artery, the carotid artery, or other arteries (p = 0.044). In conclusion, this analysis showed that liraglutide reduces the incidence of MIs in patients with type 2 DM at high CV risk and may impact the clinical outcomes of MI.

Topics: Carotid Stenosis; Coronary Stenosis; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Double-Blind Method; Humans; Incidence; Incretins; Liraglutide; Myocardial Infarction; Non-ST Elevated Myocardial Infarction; Peripheral Arterial Disease; ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction; Troponin