incretins and Heart-Failure

The impressive results of recent clinical trials with glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1Ra) and sodium glucose transporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT-2i) in terms of cardiovascular protection prompted a huge interest in these agents for heart failure (HF) prevention and treatment. While both classes show positive effects on composite cardiovascular endpoints (i.e. 3P MACE), their actions on the cardiac function and structure, as well as on volume regulation, and their impact on HF-related events have not been systematically evaluated and compared. In this narrative review, we summarize and critically interpret the available evidence emerging from clinical studies. While chronic exposure to GLP-1Ra appears to be essentially neutral on both systolic and diastolic function, irrespective of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), a beneficial impact of SGLT-2i is consistently detectable for both systolic and diastolic function parameters in subjects with diabetes with and without HF, with a gradient proportional to the severity of baseline dysfunction. SGLT-2i have a clinically significant impact in terms of HF hospitalization prevention in subjects at high and very high cardiovascular risk both with and without type 2 diabetes (T2D) or HF, while GLP-1Ra have been proven to be safe (and marginally beneficial) in subjects with T2D without HF. We suggest that the role of the kidney is crucial for the effect of SGLT-2i on the clinical outcomes not only because these drugs slow-down the time-dependent decline of kidney function and enhance the response to diuretics, but also because they attenuate the meal-related anti-natriuretic pressure (lowering postprandial hyperglycemia and hyperinsulinemia and preventing proximal sodium reabsorption), which would reduce the individual sensitivity to day-to-day variations in dietary sodium intake.

Topics: Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Evidence-Based Medicine; Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor; Heart Disease Risk Factors; Heart Failure; Humans; Incretins; Risk Assessment; Sodium-Glucose Transporter 2 Inhibitors; Stroke Volume; Treatment Outcome; Ventricular Function, Left; Ventricular Remodeling

The prevalence of cardiomyopathy is higher in diabetic patients than those without diabetes. Diabetic cardiomyopathy (DCM) is defined as a clinical condition of abnormal myocardial structure and performance in diabetic patients without other cardiac risk factors, such as coronary artery disease, hypertension, and significant valvular disease. Multiple molecular events contribute to the development of DCM, which include the alterations in energy metabolism (fatty acid, glucose, ketone and branched chain amino acids) and the abnormalities of subcellular components in the heart, such as impaired insulin signaling, increased oxidative stress, calcium mishandling and inflammation. There are no specific drugs in treating DCM despite of decades of basic and clinical investigations. This is, in part, due to the lack of our understanding as to how heart failure initiates and develops, especially in diabetic patients without an underlying ischemic cause. Some of the traditional anti-diabetic or lipid-lowering agents aimed at shifting the balance of cardiac metabolism from utilizing fat to glucose have been shown inadequately targeting multiple aspects of the conditions. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor α (PPARα), a transcription factor, plays an important role in mediating DCM-related molecular events. Pharmacological targeting of PPARα activation has been demonstrated to be one of the important strategies for patients with diabetes, metabolic syndrome, and atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseases. The aim of this review is to provide a contemporary view of PPARα in association with the underlying pathophysiological changes in DCM. We discuss the PPARα-related drugs in clinical applications and facts related to the drugs that may be considered as risky (such as fenofibrate, bezafibrate, clofibrate) or safe (pemafibrate, metformin and glucagon-like peptide 1-receptor agonists) or having the potential (sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitor) in treating DCM.

Topics: Animals; Diabetic Cardiomyopathies; Energy Metabolism; Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor; Heart Failure; Humans; Incretins; Myocytes, Cardiac; PPAR alpha; Signal Transduction; Sodium-Glucose Transporter 2 Inhibitors; Ventricular Dysfunction, Left; Ventricular Function, Left; Ventricular Remodeling

Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) portends high risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular (CV) events and of CV mortality; moreover, this group of patients has a very high probability of developing heart failure (HF). In this review, we discuss new advances in pharmacological treatment both in CV prevention and in HF management with a special focus on T2DM patients. A large number of randomized clinical trials and meta-analyses provided strong evidence about therapeutic strategies acting on glucose metabolism, such as GLP-1 RA and SGLT2i and about lipid-lowering treatment, such as PCSK9i and icosapent ethyl. Moreover, SGLT2i demonstrated strong evidence of benefit particularly in HF management both in diabetic and non-diabetic patients. The pathophysiological bases of multiple mechanisms of benefit of this class of drug explain the unexpected and remarkable results demonstrated both by prevention trials and by trials dedicated only to HF (like DAPA-HF). These, new drugs in the CV therapeutic armamentarium are establishing a new comprehensive approach from prevention to therapy of HF, giving more emphasis on HF classification in four stages (A→D). New therapies, which are on the horizon, promise to further reduce CV mortality and morbidity in HF patients irrespective of diabetic status.

Topics: Anticholesteremic Agents; Cardiology; Cardiovascular Diseases; Cooperative Behavior; Diabetes Mellitus; Endocrinology; Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor; Heart Disease Risk Factors; Heart Failure; Humans; Incretins; Interdisciplinary Communication; Patient Care Team; PCSK9 Inhibitors; Risk Assessment; Sodium-Glucose Transporter 2 Inhibitors; Treatment Outcome

Glucagon-like Peptide 1 Receptor Agonists (GLP1-RA) has been associated with a reduction of major cardiovascular events (MACE) and mortality on the basis of the results of cardiovascular outcome trials (CVOT). Several meta-analyses on this issue have been recently published; however, they were all restricted to CVOT, with the exclusion of all studies designed for other endpoints; moreover, other cardiovascular endpoints, such as atrial fibrillation and heart failure have not been fully explored.. A Medline search for GLP-1 receptor agonists (exenatide, liraglutide, lixisenatide, albiglutide, dulaglutide, or semaglutide) was performed, collecting all randomized clinical trials with a duration ≥52 weeks, enrolling patients with type 2 diabetes, and comparing a GLP-1 receptor agonist with placebo or any other non-GLP-1 receptor agonist drug. We included 43 trials, enrolling 63,134 patients. A significant reduction of MACE (MH-OR 0.87 [0.83, 0.92]), all-cause mortality (MH-OR 0.89 [0.83, 0.96]), and a nonstatistical trend toward reduction of heart failure (MH-OR 0.93 [0.85, 1.01]) was observed - GLP1-RA did not increase the risk of atrial fibrillation (MH-OR 0.94 [0.84, 1.04]).. The present meta-analysis confirms the favorable effects of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists on major cardiovascular events, cardiovascular and all-cause mortality, stroke, and possibly myocardial infarction. Conversely, the effects on heart failure remain uncertain. Available data on atrial fibrillation seems to exclude any major safety issues in this respect.. CRD42018115577.

Topics: Aged; Atrial Fibrillation; Cause of Death; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Female; Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor; Heart Failure; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Incidence; Incretins; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Protective Factors; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Treatment Outcome

The advent of Sodium Glucose Transporter 2-inhibitors (SGLT2-i) in recent years gave endocrinologists the opportunity to actively treat and prevent heart failure (HF) in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2DM). While the relationship between T2DM and HF has been extensively reviewed, previous works focused mostly on epidemiology, pathophysiology and treatment of HF in T2DM. The aim of our work was to aid health care professionals in identifying individuals at high risk for this dreadful complication. Recent guidelines recommend to use drugs with proven cardiovascular benefits (Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP1-RA) and SGLT2-i) in patients with previous cardiovascular disease (CVD) and to prefer SGLT2-i in patients with known HF. In everyday clinical practice, the choice between these two drug classes in patients without known HF or atherosclerotic CVD is mostly arbitrary and based on the side effect profile. Recently, risk stratification tools to estimate HF incidence have been developed in order to guide treatment with a view to bring precision medicine into diabetes care. With this purpose, we provide a review of the tools able to predict HF incidence for patients in primary CVD prevention as well as risk of future hospitalizations for patients with known HF.

Topics: Clinical Decision Rules; Clinical Decision-Making; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor; Heart Failure; Hospitalization; Humans; Incidence; Incretins; Primary Prevention; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Sodium-Glucose Transporter 2 Inhibitors; Treatment Outcome

Heart failure is one of the major cardiovascular complications in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and increases the risk of morbidity and mortality. Although active management for heart failure is needed in patients with T2DM, traditional treatment and some new class of antihyperglycemic drugs, such as glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists or dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors, could not reduce the risk of heart failure. Recent major trials demonstrated sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors improve prognosis of T2DM patients through prevention of heart failure. Both heart failure with reduced ejection fraction and that with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is observed in T2DM patients, and HFpEF is often overlooked and misdiagnosed in these population. Left ventricular hypertrophy, left atrial dilatation, diastolic dysfunction, and subclinical systolic dysfunction indicated as reduced global longitudinal strain are major abnormalities on echocardiography in patients with diabetic cardiomyopathy. These structural and functional changes are also prevalent in the general patients with T2DM, and those with these abnormalities have higher incidence of heart failure than those without them. Glycemic control might improve some of these abnormalities on echocardiography, but it is still unclear whether their improvement could be associated with risk reduction for heart failure. At now, there are only limited data on the effects of DPP-4 inhibitors or SGLT2 inhibitors on echocardiography in T2DM patients. Large-scale trials are needed to clarify how antihyperglycemic drugs affect echocardiographic parameters.

Topics: Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Diabetic Cardiomyopathies; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Echocardiography; Heart Failure; Humans; Hypertrophy, Left Ventricular; Hypoglycemic Agents; Incretins; Sodium-Glucose Transporter 2 Inhibitors; Stroke Volume

The most significant manifestation of heart failure is exercise intolerance. This systematic review and meta-analysis was performed to investigate whether dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors or glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs), widely used anti-diabetic drugs, could improve exercise tolerance in heart failure patients with or without type 2 diabetes mellitus.. An electronic search of PubMed, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library was carried out through March 8th, 2019, for eligible trials. Only randomized controlled studies were included. The primary outcome was exercise tolerance [6-min walk test (6MWT) and peak O. After the literature was screened by two reviewers independently, four trials (659 patients) conducted with heart failure patients with or without type 2 diabetes met the eligibility criteria. The results suggested that targeting the DPP-4-GLP-1 pathway can improve exercise tolerance in heart failure patients [MD 24.88 (95% CI 5.45, 44.31), P = 0.01] without decreasing QoL [SMD -0.51 (95% CI -1.13, 0.10), P = 0.10]; additionally, targeting the DPP-4-GLP-1 pathway did not show signs of increasing the incidence of serious AEs or mortality.. Our results suggest that DPP-4 inhibitors or GLP-1 RAs improve exercise tolerance in heart failure patients. Although the use of these drugs for heart failure has not been approved by any organization, they may be a better choice for type 2 diabetes mellitus patients with heart failure. Furthermore, as this pathway contributes to the improvement of exercise tolerance, it may be worth further investigation in exercise-intolerant patients with other diseases.

Topics: Aged; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptidyl Peptidase 4; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Exercise Tolerance; Female; Glucagon-Like Peptide 1; Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor; Heart Failure; Humans; Incretins; Male; Middle Aged; Quality of Life; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Recovery of Function; Signal Transduction; Treatment Outcome

The common ultimate pathological feature for all cardiovascular diseases, congestive heart failure (CHF), is now considered as one of the main public health burdens that is associated with grave implications. Neurohormonal systems play a critical role in cardiovascular homeostasis, pathophysiology, and cardiovascular diseases. Hormone treatments such as the newly invented dual-acting drug valsartan/sacubitril are promising candidates for CHF, in addition to the conventional medications encompassing beta receptor blockers, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin receptor blockers, and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists. Clinical trials also indicate that in CHF patients with low insulin-like growth factor-1 or low thyroid hormone levels, supplemental treatment with growth hormone or thyroid hormone seems to be cardioprotective; and in CHF patients with volume overload the vasopressin antagonists can relieve the symptoms superior to loop diuretics. Furthermore, a combination of selective glucocorticoid receptor agonist and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist may be used in patients with diuretic resistance. Finally, the potential cardiovascular efficacy and safety of incretin-based therapies, testosterone or estrogen supplementation needs to be prudently evaluated in large-scale clinical studies. In this review, we briefly discuss the therapeutic effects of several key hormones in CHF.

Topics: Antidiuretic Hormone Receptor Antagonists; Cardiovascular Agents; Estrogens; Ghrelin; Glucocorticoids; Growth Hormone; Heart Failure; Hormones; Humans; Incretins; Natriuretic Peptides; Neprilysin; Testosterone; Thyroid Hormones; Urocortins

Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) agonists and dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors produce some beneficial and deleterious effects in diabetic patients not mediated by their glycemic lowering effects, and there is a need for better understanding of the molecular basis of these effects. They possess antioxidant and anti-inflammatory effects with some direct vasodilatory action (animal and human trial data) that may indirectly influence heart failure (HF). Unlike GLP-1R agonists, signaling for HF adverse effects was observed with two DPP-4 inhibitors, saxagliptin and alogliptin. Accordingly, these drugs should be used with caution in heart failure patients.

Topics: Animals; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Global Health; Heart Failure; Humans; Incretins; Morbidity

Diabetes is a major risk factor for heart failure (HF). Patients with diabetes have a high incidence of both clinical HF and subclinical LV dysfunction. Although intensive glucose lowering does not appear to impact on HF outcomes, the choice of glucose-lowering agents plays an important role in the development of HF and related cardiovascular outcomes. Whilst metformin and insulin appear to have little impact on HF progression, the role of sulphonylurea agents in this patient population remains uncertain. Thiazolidinediones (TZDs) are associated with a significant risk of HF progression and are best avoided in patients at risk. The incretin-based therapies (GLP agonists and DPP-4 inhibitors) are generally not associated with any HF interaction. However, a small increase in HF admissions was observed with the DPP-4 inhibitor saxagliptin. The GLP-1 agonist liraglutide was recently shown to reduce cardiovascular and all-cause mortality, yet hospitalization for HF was not significantly reduced. The SGLT2 inhibitor empagliflozin was shown to reduce HF admissions and cardiovascular mortality in patients with prior cardiovascular disease including HF. These recent data showing improved outcomes with a glucose-lowering category provide a novel strategy to improve survival and reduce morbidity in diabetic patients at high cardiovascular disease risk.

Topics: Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Heart Failure; Hospitalization; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Incretins; Insulin; Mortality; Sodium-Glucose Transporter 2 Inhibitors; Sulfonylurea Compounds; Thiazolidinediones

The incretin-based therapies, dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP4) inhibitors and glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) analogs, are important new classes of therapy for type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). These agents prolong the action of the incretin hormones, GLP-1 and glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP), by inhibiting their breakdown. The incretin hormones improve glycemic control in T2DM by increasing insulin secretion and suppressing glucagon levels. The cardiovascular (CV) effects of the incretin-based therapies have been of substantial interest since 2008, when the US Food and Drug Administration began to require that all new therapies for diabetes undergo rigorous assessment of CV safety through large-scale CV outcome trials. This article reviews the most recent CV outcome trials of the DPP-4 inhibitors (SAVOR-TIMI 53, EXAMINE, and TECOS) as evidence that the incretin-based therapies have acceptable CV safety profiles for patients with T2DM. The studies differ with regard to patient population, trial duration, and heart failure outcomes but show similar findings for CV death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, and stroke, as well as hospitalization for unstable angina.

Topics: Adamantane; Cardiovascular Diseases; Cardiovascular System; Clinical Trials as Topic; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptides; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Glucagon-Like Peptide 1; Heart Failure; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Incretins; Piperidines; Sitagliptin Phosphate; Uracil

Several randomized, controlled clinical trials were initiated some years ago in order to evaluate the cardiovascular safety of the new antidiabetic drugs in patients with type 2 diabetes due to requirements from regulatory bodies. Four trials with incretin-based drugs (saxagliptin, alogliptin, sitagliptin and lixisenatide) have been completed so far. Based on the primary outcome endpoints of these trials no cardiovascular risks were found with incretins in patients with type 2 diabetes. As for saxagliptin, the hospitalization for heart failure was investigated as a secondary endpoint, and an increased risk was observed in the respective trial; however, this observation was widely debated later in the literature. Together with ongoing trials of other novel antihyperglycemic agents, these data will provide more robust evidence about the cardiovascular safety of incretin-based antidiabetic treatment in patients with type 2 diabetes.

Topics: Adamantane; Cardiovascular System; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptides; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Evidence-Based Medicine; Heart Failure; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Incretins; Peptides; Piperidines; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Sitagliptin Phosphate; Time Factors; Uracil

The new pharmacological classes of GLP-1 agonists and DPP-4 inhibitors are now widely used in diabetes and have been postulated as beneficial in heart failure. These proposed benefits arise from the inter-related pathophysiologies of diabetes and heart failure (diabetes increases the risk of heart failure, and heart failure can induce insulin resistance) and also in light of the dysfunctional myocardial energetics seen in heart failure. The normal heart utilizes predominantly fatty acids for energy production, but there is some evidence to suggest that increased myocardial glucose uptake may be beneficial for the failing heart. Thus, GLP-1 agonists, which stimulate glucose-dependent insulin release and enhance myocardial glucose uptake, have become a focus of investigation in both animal models and humans with heart failure. Limited pilot data for GLP-1 agonists shows potential improvements in systolic function, hemodynamics, and quality of life, forming the basis for current phase II trials.

Topics: Animals; Cardiovascular Agents; Clinical Trials as Topic; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Disease Models, Animal; Glucagon-Like Peptide 1; Heart Failure; Humans; Incretins

Since diabetes mellitus (DM) is the most common cause of heart failure (HF), it is critically important to clarify whether incretin hormones including glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1), which play an important role in blood glucose control, mediate cardioprotection. There are many lines of basic research evidence indicating that GLP-1 improves the pathophysiology of HF: In murine and canine HF models, either GLP-1 analogues or DPP-IV inhibitors improved cardiac functions. The first question that arises is how either GLP-1 analogues or DPP-IV inhibitors mediate cardioprotection. Cardiovascular diseases are tightly linked to impaired glucose tolerance (IGT): IGT is not only one of the causes of cardiovascular events but also the result of HF. Indeed, the treatment of IGT improved HF, showing that one of the mechanisms attributable to DPP-IV inhibitors is related to the improvement of IGT. Intriguingly, either DPP-IV inhibitors or GLP-1 analogues mediate cardioprotection even without IGT, suggesting two possible explanations: One is that GLP-1 analogues directly activate the prosurvival kinases, such as Akt and Erk1/2, and another is that DPP-IV inhibition increases cardioprotective peptides such as BNP and SDF-1α. The next question is whether cardioprotection is translated to clinical medicine. Small scale clinical trials proved their cardioprotective effects; however, several large scale clinical trials have not proved the beneficial effects of DPP-IV inhibitors. Taken together, GLP-1 analogues or DPP-IV inhibitors can mediate cardioprotection, however, what needs to be clarified is who mainly receives their benefits among the patients with cardiovascular diseases and/or DM.

Topics: Animals; Blood Glucose; Cardiotonic Agents; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Dogs; Glucagon-Like Peptide 1; Heart Failure; Humans; Incretins; Mice; Translational Research, Biomedical

Studies designed to evaluate the short-term effects of incretin-related drugs in subjects with cardiac disease are still preliminary. In patients with heart failure, two of five studies showed that glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) infusion was associated with an absolute increase in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) by 6-10 %, whereas no significant benefit was observed in the remaining three studies. In patients with coronary artery disease, single infusion of the GLP-1 receptor analog, exenatide, did not increase LVEF, but this drug may decrease infarct size in patients with myocardial infarction presenting with short duration of ischemic symptoms. Single dose of GLP-1 and the dipeptidyl-peptidase-IV (DPP-IV) inhibitor, sitagliptin, may improve left ventricular function, predominantly in ischemic segments, and attenuate post-ischemic stunning. Nausea, vomiting and hypoglycemia were the most common adverse effects associated with GLP-1 and exenatide administration. Increased heart rate was also observed with exenatide in patients with heart failure. Large randomized trials including diabetic patients with preexisting heart failure and myocardial infarction showed that chronic therapy with the DPP-IV inhibitors saxagliptin and alogliptin did not reduce cardiovascular events or mortality. Moreover, saxagliptin use was associated with significant increase in frequency of heart failure requiring hospitalization, hypoglycemia and angioedema. Overall, short-term preliminary data suggest potential cardioprotective effects of exenatide and sitagliptin in patients with heart failure and myocardial infarction. Meanwhile, long-term randomized trials suggest no benefit of alogliptin, and increased harm associated with the use of saxagliptin.

Topics: Animals; Cardiotonic Agents; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Diabetic Angiopathies; Exenatide; Glucagon-Like Peptide 1; Heart Failure; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Incretins; Myocardial Infarction; Peptides; Venoms

Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is widely prevalent and a critical risk factor for cardiovascular disease that increases both morbidity and mortality. Recently, new therapies based on the actions of the incretin hormones have become widely used, offering advantages over conventional treatments by limiting hypoglycemia and achieving glycemic control. Moreover, many experimental studies have suggested that GLP-1 and related drugs exert cardioprotective effects on atherosclerosis and cardiac dysfunction both in vitro and in vivo. However, there is thus far little clinical evidence supporting the efficacy of incretin therapy in patients with cardiovascular disease. This review focuses on the effects of GLP-1-related therapy on cardiac function from the bench to the bed, with a discussion of possible underlying mechanisms.  

Topics: Animals; Diabetes Complications; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Glucagon-Like Peptide 1; Heart Failure; Humans; Incretins

Heart failure (HF) and diabetes mellitus (DM) commonly co-exist, with a prevalence of DM of up to 40 % in HF patients. Treatment of DM in patients with HF is challenging since many of the contemporary therapies used for the treatment of DM are either contraindicated in HF or are limited in their use due to the high prevalence of co-morbidities such as significant renal dysfunction. This article presents an overview of the physiology of the incretin system and how it can be targeted therapeutically, highlighting implications for the management of patients with DM and HF. Receptors for the incretin glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) are expressed throughout the cardiovascular system and the myocardium and are up-regulated in HF. GLP-1 therapy improves cardiac function in animal models of HF through augmented glucose uptake in the myocardium mediated through a p38 MAP kinase pathway. Small clinical studies have shown that GLP-1 improves ejection fraction, reduces BNP levels and enhances functional capacity in patients with chronic HF. A number of randomized controlled trials are currently underway to define the utility of targeting the incretin system in HF patients with DM. Incretin-based therapy may represent a novel therapeutic strategy in the treatment of HF patients with diabetes, in particular for their cardioprotective effects independent of those attributable to tight glycemic control.

Topics: Comorbidity; Diabetes Mellitus; Glucagon-Like Peptide 1; Heart Failure; Humans; Incretins; Treatment Outcome

Type 2 diabetes mellitus is acknowledged as a major risk factor for the development of cardiovascular disease (CVD). Advancing treatment options for person with diabetes beyond glucose control to prevent microvascular and macrovascular complications and ultimately have an impact on CVD development holds great significance for the growing number of persons with diabetes. Glucagonlike peptide-1 (GLP-1) is an incretin secreted in response to nutrient ingestion that inhibits glucagon secretion and gastric emptying, resulting in reduced postprandial glycemia. GLP-1 has insulinomimetic, insulinotropic, and antiapoptotic properties. GLP-1 agonists (exenatide and liraglutide) are a class of drugs approved for the treatment of diabetes that have significant cardiovascular (CV) effects. These CV effects potentially provide an opportunity for clinicians to address the multifactorial issues involved in the increased CV morbidity and mortality associated with diabetes. This article presents an overview of the CV effects of GLP-1 agonists, highlighting implications for the management of patients with diabetes and heart disease.

Topics: Animals; Blood Pressure; Cardiovascular System; Exenatide; Gastric Emptying; Glucagon-Like Peptide 1; Heart Failure; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Incretins; Ischemic Preconditioning, Myocardial; Liraglutide; Peptides; Venoms; Ventricular Function, Left

A link between diabetes mellitus (DM) and heart failure (HF) has been well-recognized for more than a century. HF is also closely linked to abnormal glucose regulation (AGR) and insulin resistance (IR) in patients without DM and, similarly, these conditions commonly coexist. In epidemiological studies, each condition appears to predict the other. The prevalence of AGR/IR in HF patients without DM is significantly underrecognized and, as yet, the optimal method for screening for these abnormalities in the outpatient setting is unclear.. The purpose of this review is to overview the prevalence and prognostic impact of AGR and IR in HF patients without DM and discuss potential pathophysiological pathways that link these conditions with HF. The severity of glucose intolerance in patients with HF correlates with functional and clinical severity of HF and is an independent predictor of an adverse outcome. It is thought that changes in cardiac metabolism, including a switch from glucose metabolism toward fatty acid metabolism, may in part contribute to the pathophysiological processes associated with HF patients with AGR/IR.. We discuss how pharmacological targeting of metabolic pathways in the myocardium of these patients with HF may represent novel therapeutic strategies in these at-risk patients.

Topics: Blood Glucose; Fatty Acids; Glucose Intolerance; Heart Failure; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Incretins; Insulin Resistance; Metabolic Syndrome; Metformin; Myocardium; Prognosis; Risk Factors; Treatment Outcome

People with diabetes are at high risk for cardiovascular events including heart failure (HF). We examined the effect of the glucagon-like peptide 1 agonist dulaglutide on incident HF events and other cardiovascular outcomes in those with or without prior HF in the randomized placebo-controlled Researching Cardiovascular Events with a Weekly Incretin in Diabetes (REWIND) trial.. The REWIND major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE) outcome was the first occurrence of a composite endpoint of non-fatal myocardial infarction, non-fatal stroke, or death from cardiovascular causes (including unknown causes). In this post-hoc analysis, a HF event was defined as an adjudication-confirmed hospitalization or urgent evaluation for HF. Of the 9901 participants studied over a median follow-up of 5.4 years, 213/4949 (4.3%) randomly assigned to dulaglutide and 226/4952 (4.6%) participants assigned to placebo experienced a HF event (hazard ratio [HR] 0.93, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.77-1.12; p = 0.456). In the 853 (8.6%) participants with HF at baseline, there was no change in either MACE or HF events with dulaglutide as compared to participants without HF (p = 0.44 and 0.19 for interaction, respectively). Combined cardiovascular death and HF events were marginally reduced with dulaglutide compared to placebo (HR 0.88, 95% CI 0.78-1.00; p = 0.050) but unchanged in patients with and without HF at baseline (p = 0.31).. Dulaglutide was not associated with a reduction in HF events in patients with type 2 diabetes regardless of baseline HF status over 5.4 years of follow-up.

Topics: Cardiovascular Diseases; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Heart Failure; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Incretins; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Aged; Chronic Disease; Female; Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor; Heart Failure; Heart Rate; Humans; Incretins; Liraglutide; Male; Middle Aged; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

The FIGHT (Functional Impact of GLP-1 [glucagon-like peptide-1] for Heart Failure Treatment) trial randomized 300 patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and a recent hospitalization for heart failure to liraglutide versus placebo. While there was no difference in the primary outcome (rank score of time to death, time to rehospitalization for heart failure, and change in NT-proBNP [N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide]), there was a significant increase in cystatin C among patients randomized to liraglutide raising concern of adverse renal outcomes. We performed a post hoc analysis of FIGHT to investigate whether liraglutide was associated with worsening renal function (WRF).. The relationship between randomization to liraglutide and WRF was evaluated using logistic regression models. Two hundred seventy-four patients (91%) had complete data to assess for WRF defined as: increase in SCr ≥0.3 mg/dL, or ≥25% decrease in estimated glomerular filtration rate, or an increase in cystatin C ≥0.3 mg/L from baseline to 180-days.. Patients with WRF (n=113, 41%), compared with those without, were older, had more comorbidities, and lower utilization of guideline-directed medical treatment. Logistic regression models showed that age and baseline cystatin C levels were associated with WRF. In adjusted models, liraglutide was not associated with excess risk of WRF compared with placebo (odds ratio, 1.02 [95% CI, 0.62-1.67]). There was also no difference in the rank score when WRF was added as a fourth-tier outcome.. Liraglutide was not associated with WRF among patients with HFrEF and a recent hospitalization for heart failure. These data support the relative renal safety profile of liraglutide among patients with HFrEF. Registration: URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01800968.

Topics: Aged; Double-Blind Method; Female; Glomerular Filtration Rate; Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor; Heart Failure; Hospitalization; Humans; Incretins; Kidney; Liraglutide; Male; Middle Aged; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Stroke Volume; Treatment Outcome; Ventricular Function, Left

An elevated level of urinary albumin to creatinine ratio (UACR) is a marker of renal dysfunction and predictor of kidney failure/death in patients with type 2 diabetes. The prognostic use of UACR in established cardiac biomarkers is not well described.. To evaluate whether UACR offers incremental prognostic benefit beyond risk factors and established plasma cardiovascular biomarkers.. The Saxagliptin Assessment of Vascular Outcomes Recorded in Patients With Diabetes Mellitus-Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (SAVOR-TIMI) 53 study was performed from May 2010 to May 2013 and evaluated the safety of saxagliptin vs placebo in patients with type 2 diabetes with overt cardiovascular disease or multiple risk factors. Median follow-up was 2.1 years (interquartile range, 1.8-2.3 years).. Patients were randomized to saxagliptin vs placebo plus standard care.. Baseline UACR was measured in 15 760 patients (95.6% of the trial population) and categorized into thresholds.. Of 15 760 patients, 5205 were female (33.0%). The distribution of UARC categories were: 5805 patients (36.8%) less than 10 mg/g, 3891 patients (24.7%) at 10 to 30 mg/g, 4426 patients (28.1%) at 30 to 300 mg/g, and 1638 patients (10.4%) at more than 300 mg/g. When evaluated without cardiac biomarkers, there was a stepwise increase with each higher UACR category in the incidence of the primary composite end point (cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or ischemic stroke) (3.9%, 6.9%, 9.2%, and 14.3%); cardiovascular death (1.4%, 2.6%, 4.1%, and 6.9%); and hospitalization for heart failure (1.5%, 2.5%, 4.0%, and 8.3%) (adjusted P < .001 for trend). The net reclassification improvement at the event rate for each end point was 0.081 (95% CI, 0.025 to 0.161), 0.129 (95% CI, 0.029 to 0.202), and 0.056 (95% CI, -0.005 to 0.141), respectively. The stepwise increased cardiovascular risk associated with a UACR of more than 10 mg/g was also present within each chronic kidney disease category. The UACR was associated with outcomes after including cardiac biomarkers. However, the improvement in discrimination and reclassification was attenuated; net reclassification improvement at the event rate was 0.022 (95% CI, -0.022 to 0.067), -0.008 (-0.034 to 0.053), and 0.043 (-0.030 to 0.052) for the primary end point, cardiovascular death, and hospitalization for heart failure, respectively.. In patients with type 2 diabetes, UACR was independently associated with increased risk for a spectrum of adverse cardiovascular outcomes. However, the incremental cardiovascular prognostic value of UACR was minimal when evaluated together with contemporary cardiac biomarkers.. clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01107886.

Topics: Adamantane; Albuminuria; Biomarkers; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Diabetic Cardiomyopathies; Diabetic Nephropathies; Dipeptides; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Double-Blind Method; Female; Glomerular Filtration Rate; Heart Failure; Hospitalization; Humans; Incretins; Male; Renal Insufficiency, Chronic

Animal studies demonstrated that glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists reduce myocardial necrosis following regional ischaemia induction. This effect may improve cardiovascular outcomes after myocardial infarction. Risk of cardiovascular death or hospitalisation for heart failure after myocardial infarction was evaluated in patients with type 2 diabetes at high cardiovascular risk in the LEADER trial.. Data from patients randomised to liraglutide or placebo, in addition to standard of care, in Liraglutide Effect and Action in Diabetes: Evaluation of Cardiovascular Outcome Results (LEADER) (NCT01179048) were analysed post hoc. Cox regression, with myocardial infarction as a time-dependent covariate, was used to analyse time from randomisation to a composite of cardiovascular death or hospitalisation for heart failure.. Patients who experienced myocardial infarction had a sevenfold higher risk of the composite endpoint (with myocardial infarction: n = 148, 25.0%; without myocardial infarction: n = 716, 8.2%; hazard ratio: 7.0; 95% confidence interval: 5.8, 8.4). The risk of the composite endpoint after myocardial infarction was not significantly lower in the liraglutide group ( n = 63, 23.0%) compared with placebo ( n = 85, 26.7%; hazard ratio: 0.91; 95% confidence interval: 0.66, 1.26).. The data demonstrated that having myocardial infarction significantly increased the risk of subsequent cardiovascular death or hospitalisation for heart failure. However, we did not find evidence for a reduced risk in these cardiovascular outcomes following myocardial infarction in patients treated with liraglutide versus placebo.

Topics: Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Double-Blind Method; Heart Failure; Hospitalization; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Incretins; Liraglutide; Myocardial Infarction; Proportional Hazards Models; Risk Factors; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

To determine the effect of the glucagon-like peptide-1 analogue liraglutide on left ventricular function in chronic heart failure patients with and without type 2 diabetes.. LIVE was an investigator-initiated, randomised, double-blinded, placebo-controlled multicentre trial. Patients (n = 241) with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF ≤45%) were recruited (February 2012 to August 2015). Patients were clinically stable and on optimal heart failure treatment. Intervention was liraglutide 1.8 mg once daily or matching placebo for 24 weeks. The LVEF was similar at baseline in the liraglutide and the placebo group (33.7 ± 7.6% vs. 35.4 ± 9.4%). Change in LVEF did not differ between the liraglutide and the placebo group; mean difference (95% confidence interval) was -0.8% (-2.1, 0.5; P = 0.24). Heart rate increased with liraglutide [mean difference: 7 b.p.m. (5, 9), P < 0.0001]. Serious cardiac events were seen in 12 (10%) patients treated with liraglutide compared with 3 (3%) patients in the placebo group (P = 0.04).. Liraglutide did not affect left ventricular systolic function compared with placebo in stable chronic heart failure patients with and without diabetes. Treatment with liraglutide was associated with an increase in heart rate and more serious cardiac adverse events, and this raises some concern with respect to the use of liraglutide in patients with chronic heart failure and reduced left ventricular function. More data on the safety of liraglutide in different subgroups of heart failure patients are needed.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Aged; Atrial Fibrillation; Chronic Disease; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Disease Progression; Double-Blind Method; Echocardiography; Female; Heart Failure; Heart Rate; Humans; Incretins; Liraglutide; Male; Middle Aged; Natriuretic Peptide, Brain; Peptide Fragments; Stroke Volume; Tachycardia, Ventricular; Treatment Outcome; Ventricular Function, Left; Walk Test

The effect of saxagliptin on cardiovascular outcomes according to different hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) levels has not been described. Thus, we analyzed the SAVOR-TIMI 53 trial to compare the cardiovascular effects of saxagliptin vs placebo according to baseline HbA1c.. A total of 16,492 patients with type 2 diabetes (HbA1c 6.5%-12.0% in the 6 months before randomization) and either a history of established cardiovascular disease or multiple risk factors for atherosclerosis were randomized to saxagliptin or placebo in addition to usual care. Patients were followed for a median of 2.1 years. The primary endpoint was cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or ischemic stroke.. Patients were stratified by HbA1c at randomization into the following prespecified groups: <7%, 7%-<8%, 8%-<9%, and ≥9%. Baseline HbA1c ≥7% was associated with increased risk of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or ischemic stroke (adjusted hazard ratio [HR(adj)] 1.35; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.17-1.58) but not hospitalization for heart failure (HR(adj) 1.09; 95% CI, 0.88-1.36). Saxagliptin neither increased nor decreased the risk of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or ischemic stroke in patients with HbA1c <7% (HR 1.01; 95% CI, 0.78-1.31), 7%-<8% (HR 0.98; 95% CI, 0.80-1.20), 8%-<9% (HR 1.09; 95% CI, 0.85-1.39), ≥9% (HR 0.95; 95% CI, 0.77-1.18) (P-interaction = .89).. Baseline HbA1c is associated with increased risk of macrovascular events but not hospitalization for heart failure. There was no heterogeneity in the effect of saxagliptin on cardiovascular events by baseline HbA1c, with cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or ischemic stroke neither increased nor decreased across the spectrum of baseline HbA1c values.

Topics: Adamantane; Aged; Cardiovascular Diseases; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptides; Double-Blind Method; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Heart Failure; Hospitalization; Humans; Incretins; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Risk; Stroke

This study sought to determine if glucagon-like peptide (GLP)-1 ameliorates myocardial metabolic abnormalities in chronic heart failure.. Albiglutide (GSK716155) is a GLP-1 agonist indicated for type 2 diabetes.. We performed a randomized, placebo-controlled study evaluating 12 weeks of albiglutide in New York Heart Association II or III subjects with ejection fraction <40%. Subjects received weekly placebo (n = 30) or albiglutide 3.75 mg (n = 12), 15 mg (n = 13), or 30 mg (n = 27). The primary comparison was between albiglutide 30 mg and placebo. Assessments included echocardiography, 6-minute-walk test, and peak oxygen consumption. In a subgroup of patients, myocardial glucose and oxygen use were assessed. Endpoints are reported as change from baseline ± SE.. Albiglutide 30 mg compared with placebo did not improve change from baseline in left ventricular ejection fraction (2.4% [1.1%] vs. 4.4% [1.1%]; p = 0.22), 6-min walk test (18 [12] m vs. 9 [11] m; p = 0.58), myocardial glucose use (p = 0.59), or oxygen use (p = 0.25). In contrast, albiglutide 30 mg versus placebo improved change from baseline in peak oxygen consumption (0.9 [0.5] ml/kg/min vs. -0.6 [0.5] ml/kg/min; p = 0.02). Albiglutide was well tolerated.. Although there was no detectable effect of albiglutide on cardiac function or myocardial glucose use, there was a modest increase in peak oxygen consumption, which could have been mediated by noncardiac effects. (A Multi-center, Placebo-controlled Study to Evaluate the Safety of GSK716155 and Its Effects on Myocardial Metabolism, Myocardial Function, and Exercise Capacity in Patients With NYHA Class II/III Congestive Heart Failure; NCT01357850).

Topics: Adult; Aged; Carbon Radioisotopes; Chronic Disease; Echocardiography; Exercise Tolerance; Female; Fluorodeoxyglucose F18; Glucagon-Like Peptide 1; Glucose; Heart Failure; Humans; Incretins; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardium; Oxygen Consumption; Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography; Quality of Life; Radiopharmaceuticals; Stroke Volume; Walk Test

The US Sentinel System and the Canadian Network for Observational Drug Effect Studies (CNODES) are two medical product safety surveillance networks. Using Sentinel's preprogrammed, parameterizable analytic tools, we reproduced two protocol-based studies conducted by CNODES to assess the risks of acute pancreatitis and heart failure (HF) associated with the use of incretin-based drugs, compared with use of ≥ 2 oral hypoglycemic agents. Results from the replication new-user cohort analyses aligned with those from the CNODES nested case-control studies. The adjusted hazard ratios were 0.95 (0.81-1.12; vs. 1.03 (0.87-1.22) in CNODES) for acute pancreatitis and 0.91 (0.84-1.00; vs. 0.82 (0.67-1.00) in CNODES) for HF among patients without HF history. The CNODES's common protocol approach allows studies tailored to specific safety questions, whereas the Sentinel's common data model plus pretested program approach enables more rapid analysis. Despite these differences, it is possible to obtain comparable results using both approaches.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Canada; Cohort Studies; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Heart Failure; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Incretins; Male; Middle Aged; Pancreatitis; Product Surveillance, Postmarketing; Retrospective Studies; United States; Young Adult

In randomised clinical trials, glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) and sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT-2) inhibitors reduced cardiovascular events in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) at high cardiovascular risk, as compared to standard care. However, data comparing these agents in patients with T2D who are at moderate risk is sparse.. From Danish national registries, we included patients with T2D previously on metformin monotherapy, who started an additional glucose-lowering agent [GLP-1 RA, SGLT-2 inhibitor, dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitor, sulfonylurea (SU), or insulin] in the period 2010-2016. Patients with a history of cardiovascular events [heart failure (HF), myocardial infarction (MI) or stroke] were excluded. Patients were followed for up to 2 years. Cause-specific adjusted Cox regression models were used to compare the risk of hospitalisation for HF, a composite endpoint of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) (MI, stroke or cardiovascular death), and all-cause mortality for each add-on therapy. Patients who initiated DPP-4 inhibitors were used as reference.. The study included 46,986 T2D patients with a median age of 61 years and of which 59% were male. The median duration of metformin monotherapy prior to study inclusion was 5.3 years. Add-on therapy was distributed as follows: 13,148 (28%) GLP-1 RAs, 2343 (5%) SGLT-2 inhibitors, 15,426 (33%) DPP-4 inhibitors, 8917 (19%) SUs, and 7152 (15%) insulin. During follow-up, 623 (1.3%, range 0.8-2.1%) patients were hospitalised for HF-hazard ratios (HR) were 1.11 (95% CI 0.89-1.39) for GLP-1 RA, 0.84 (0.52-1.36) for SGLT-2 inhibitors, 0.98 (0.77-1.26) for SU and 1.54 (1.25-1.91) for insulin. The composite MACE endpoint occurred in 1196 (2.5%, range 1.5-3.6%) patients, yielding HRs of 0.82 (0.69-0.97) for GLP-1 RAs, 0.79 (0.56-1.12) for SGLT-2 inhibitors, 1.22 (1.03-1.49) for SU and 1.23 (1.07-1.47) for insulin. 1865 (3.9%, range 1.9-9.0%) died from any cause during follow-up. HRs for all-cause mortality were 0.91 (0.78-1.05) for GLP-1 RAs, 0.79 (0.58-1.07) for SGLT-2 inhibitors, 1.13 (0.99-1.31) for SU and 2.33 (2.08-2.61) for insulin.. In a nationwide cohort of metformin-treated T2D patients and no history of cardiovascular events, the addition of either GLP-1 RA or SGLT-2 inhibitor to metformin treatment was associated with a similar risk of hospitalisation for HF and death, and a lower risk of MACE for GLP-1 RA when compared with add-on DPP-4 inhibitors. By contrast, initiation of treatment with SU and insulin were associated with a higher risk of MACE. Additionally, insulin was associated with an increased risk of all-cause mortality and hospitalisation for HF.

Topics: Aged; Denmark; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor; Heart Failure; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Incretins; Insulin; Male; Metformin; Middle Aged; Patient Admission; Registries; Risk Factors; Sodium-Glucose Transporter 2 Inhibitors; Sulfonylurea Compounds; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

There are many glucose-lowering agents used in patients with heart failure, showing mixed results, this study was conducted to determine the effect of liraglutide, a glucagon-like peptide-1 analogue, on the treatment of patients with heart failure. Patients from the FIGHT and LIVE trials were included, all overlapped data were summarized and described. No significant changes from baseline in left ventricular ejection fraction, N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide, hemoglobin A1c, heart rate, left ventricular end-systolic volume index, left ventricular end-diastolic volume index, and 6 min walk test were observed in FIGHT. In LIVE, liraglutide significantly decreased hemoglobin A1c and inceased 6 min walk test and increased heart rate and serious cardiac adverse events, and there were no statistical differences in left ventricular ejection fraction, N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide, left ventricular end-systolic volume index, and left ventricular end-diastolic volume index. In this study, we found that there is not enough reason to support the use of liraglutide in patients with heart failure, and importantly, the safety of liraglutide in this particular population remains uncertain. Enhanced recognition the risks and benefits of liraglutide would help guide therapeutic decisions in patients with heart failure.

Topics: Aged; Evidence-Based Medicine; Female; Heart Failure; Humans; Incretins; Liraglutide; Male; Middle Aged; Patient Safety; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Recovery of Function; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Stroke Volume; Treatment Outcome; Ventricular Function, Left

Incretins represent a group of gut-derived peptide hormones that, at physiological concentrations, potentiate the release of insulin. Work leading to the discovery of incretins began as early as the late 1800s where scientists, including Claude Bernard who is widely considered the father of modern physiology (Rehfeld, J.F. The Origin and Understanding of the Incretin Concept. Front. Endocrinol. (Lausanne) (2018) 9, 387; Robin, E.D. Claude Bernard. Pioneer of regulatory biology. JAMA (1979) 242, 1283-1284), attempted to understand the pancreas as an important organ in the development of diabetes mellitus and blood glucose control. After the seminal work of Paulescu and Banting and Best in the early 1920s that led to the discovery of insulin (Murray I. Paulesco and the isolation of insulin. J. Hist. Med. Allied Sci. (1971) 26, 150-157; Raju T.N. The Nobel Chronicles. 1923: Frederick G. Banting (1891-1941), John J.R. Macleod (1876-1935). Lancet (1998) 352, 1482), attention was turned toward understanding gastrointestinal factors that might regulate insulin secretion. A series of experiments by Jean La Barre showed that a specific fraction of intestinal extract caused a reduction in blood glucose. La Barre posited that the fraction's glucose lowering actions occurred by increasing insulin release, after which he coined the term 'incretin'. In the 1970s, the first incretin was purified, glucose insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) (Gupta K. and Raja A. Physiology, Gastric Inhibitory Peptide StatPearls Treasure Island (FL); 2020), followed by the discovery of a second incretin in the 1980s, glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1). Interest and understanding of the incretins, has grown since that time.

Topics: Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Gastric Inhibitory Polypeptide; Glucagon-Like Peptide 1; Heart Failure; Humans; Incretins; Insulin; Male

Once-weekly exenatide (EQW) had a neutral effect on hospitalization for heart failure (HHF) in the EXSCEL study (Exenatide Study of Cardiovascular Event Lowering), with no differential treatment effect on major adverse cardiac events by baseline heart failure (HF) status. EQW's effects on secondary end points based on HHF status have not been reported. The objective was to explore the effects of EQW on secondary end points in patients with and without baseline HF and test the effects of EQW on recurrent HHF events.. The prespecified analysis of the randomized controlled EXSCEL trial, which enrolled patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus with and without additional cardiovascular disease, analyzed EQW effects on all-cause death, each major adverse cardiac event component, first HHF, and repeat HHF, by baseline HF status (regardless of ejection fraction). A subgroup analysis of the population stratified by preserved or reduced baseline ejection fraction was performed.. In EXSCEL, the use of EQW in patients with or without HF was well tolerated, but benefits of EQW on reduction in all-cause death and first hospitalization for HF were attenuated in patients with baseline HF.. https://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01144338.

Topics: Aged; Cause of Death; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Disease Progression; Drug Administration Schedule; Exenatide; Female; Heart Failure; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Incretins; Male; Middle Aged; Patient Admission; Risk Factors; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) reduces cardiovascular events in diabetic patients; however, its counter-protective effects have also been suggested in patients with heart failure and the clear explanation for its mechanisms have not yet been offered.. The effects of GLP-1 analog on cardiac function and energy metabolism, especially glycemic and lipid metabolisms were elucidated using non-diabetic J2N-k hamsters which showed spontaneous dilated cardiomyopathy. J2N-k hamsters were treated with PBS (HF group), low-dose (HF-L group) or high-dose liraglutide (HF-H group).. In failing heart, GLP-1 analog exerted further deteriorated cardiac function (e.g. positive and negative dP/dt; p = 0.01 and p = 0.002, respectively) with overt fibrosis and cardiac enlargement (heart/body weight, 5.7 ± 0.2 in HF group versus 7.6 ± 0.2 in HF-H group; p = 0.02). The protein expression of cardiac muscles indicated the energy starvation status. Indirect calorimetry showed that failing hearts consumed higher energy and carbohydrate than normal hearts; moreover, this tendency was augmented by GLP-1 analog administration. Upon 10% glucose solution loading with GLP-1 analog administration (HF-H-G group) as complementary experiments, the cardiac function and fibrosis significantly ameliorated, whereas carbohydrate utilization augmented further and lipid utilization reduced more. The prognosis of HF-H-G group also significantly improved (p = 0.025).. Glucagon-like peptide-1 analog caused the relative but desperate shortage of glycemic energy source for the failing cardiac muscles and it may restrict ATP synthesis, resulting in cardiac function deterioration. Therefore, appropriate energy supply and amount of carbohydrate intake should be carefully considered when administrating incretin-related drugs to patients with heart failure.

Topics: Adenosine Triphosphate; Animals; Cardiomyopathy, Dilated; Cricetinae; Disease Models, Animal; Energy Metabolism; Fibrosis; Heart Failure; Incretins; Liraglutide; Male; Myocytes, Cardiac; Risk Assessment; Stroke Volume; Ventricular Function, Left; Ventricular Pressure; Ventricular Remodeling

Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) is a neuroendocrine hormone secreted by the intestine. Its receptor (GLP-1R) is expressed in various organs, including the heart. However, the dynamics and function of the GLP-1 signal in heart failure remains unclear. We investigated the impact of the cardio-intestinal association on hypertensive heart failure using miglitol, an α-glucosidase inhibitor known to stimulate intestinal GLP-1 production.. Dahl salt-sensitive (DS) rats fed a high-salt diet were assigned to miglitol, exendin (9-39) (GLP-1R blocker) and untreated control groups and treated for 11 weeks. Control DS rats showed marked hypertension and cardiac dysfunction with left ventricular dilatation accompanied by elevated plasma GLP-1 levels and increased cardiac GLP-1R expression as compared with age-matched Dahl salt-resistant (DR) rats. Miglitol further increased plasma GLP-1 levels, suppressed adverse cardiac remodelling, and mitigated cardiac dysfunction. In cardiomyocytes from miglitol-treated DS hearts, mitochondrial size was significantly larger with denser cristae than in cardiomyocytes from control DS hearts. The change in mitochondrial morphology reflected enhanced mitochondrial fusion mediated by protein kinase A activation leading to phosphorylation of dynamin-related protein 1, expression of mitofusin-1 and OPA-1, and increased myocardial adenosine triphosphate (ATP) content. GLP-1R blockade with exendin (9-39) exacerbated cardiac dysfunction and led to fragmented mitochondria with disarrayed cristae in cardiomyocytes and reduction of myocardial ATP content. In cultured cardiomyocytes, GLP-1 increased expression of mitochondrial fusion-related proteins and ATP content. When GLP-1 and exendin (9-39) were administered together, their effects cancelled out.. Increased intestinal GLP-1 secretion is an adaptive response to heart failure that is enhanced by miglitol. This could be an effective strategy for treating heart failure through regulation of mitochondrial dynamics.

Topics: 1-Deoxynojirimycin; Animals; Cells, Cultured; Cyclic AMP-Dependent Protein Kinases; Disease Models, Animal; Dynamins; Enteroendocrine Cells; Glucagon-Like Peptide 1; Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor; Glycoside Hydrolase Inhibitors; GTP Phosphohydrolases; Heart Failure; Ileum; Incretins; Male; Membrane Proteins; Mitochondria, Heart; Mitochondrial Dynamics; Mitochondrial Proteins; Myocytes, Cardiac; Paracrine Communication; Peptide Fragments; Rats, Inbred Dahl; Rats, Sprague-Dawley; Signal Transduction; Sodium Chloride, Dietary; Ventricular Function, Left

Topics: Biomarkers; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Disease Progression; Evidence-Based Medicine; Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor; Heart Failure; Hospitalization; Humans; Incretins; Protective Factors; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Sodium-Glucose Transporter 2 Inhibitors; Treatment Outcome

Incretin-based therapies including dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors and glucagon like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists are novel medications for type 2 diabetes management. Several studies have found cardioprotective effects of incretin-based therapies; however, it remains unclear whether there is any difference in heart failure (HF) risk between the two incretin-based therapies (DPP-4 inhibitors and GLP-1 receptor agonists). We aimed to assess the risk of hospitalization due to HF with the use of DPP-4 inhibitors compared to GLP-1 receptor agonists.. Using Truven Health Marketscan data, we conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients with type 2 diabetes, who were newly initiated on DPP-4 inhibitors or GLP-1 agonists. Follow-up continued from drug initiation until the first occurrence of: HF hospitalization (primary outcome), discontinuation of therapy (i.e. no fill for 7 days), switch to the comparator, end of enrollment, or end of study (December 2013). Cox proportional hazards models with propensity-score-matching were used to compare the risk of HF hospitalization between DPP-4 inhibitors and GLP-1 agonists.. A total of 321,606 propensity score-matched patients were included in the analysis (n = 160,803 for DPP-4 inhibitors; n = 160,803 for GLP-1 agonists). After adjusting for baseline characteristics and disease risk factors, the use of DPP-4 inhibitors was associated with a 14% decreased risk of HF hospitalization compared to GLP-1 agonists use [hazard ratio (HR), 0.86; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.83, 0.90]. The results were consistent in patients without baseline HF (HR, 0.85; 95% CI 0.82, 0.89), but the association was not statistically significant for patients with baseline HF (HR, 0.90; 95% CI 0.74, 1.07).. In this retrospective matched cohort of patients with type 2 diabetes, the use of DPP-4 inhibitors was associated with a reduced risk of HF hospitalization compared to GLP-1 agonists. However, the association was not statistically significant in patients who had HF prior to the use of DPP-4 inhibitors.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptidyl Peptidase 4; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Female; Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor; Heart Failure; Humans; Incretins; Male; Middle Aged; Patient Admission; Retrospective Studies; Risk Factors; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

There are concerns that incretin-based antidiabetic drugs - including dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP-4) inhibitors and glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists - increase the risk of hospitalization for heart failure (HF). To further analyse this issue, we conducted a nested case-control study within a cohort of antidiabetic users in a real world setting.. Within a cohort of 133,639 subjects with a first prescription of an antidiabetic drug (new-users) between 2010 and 2016 in Lombardy, Italy, and were followed-up to 2016, we identified 4057 subjects with a first hospitalization for HF and 80,450 controls matched on sex, age, and date of cohort-entry. The multivariate odds ratios (ORs) of HF in relation to current use of incretin-based drugs as compared to current use of two or more oral antidiabetics was 1.06 (95% confidence interval, CI, 0.83-1.35), with no evidence of a trend in risk with increasing duration of use. The corresponding ORs were 1.10 (95% CI 0.85-1.41) for DPP-4 inhibitors and 0.84 (95% CI 0.48-1.47) for GLP-1 receptor agonists. Estimates were consistent in various sensitivity analyses.. This study indicates that incretin-based drugs are not associated with an increased risk of hospitalization for HF, thus providing further reassurance on the cardiovascular safety of these antidiabetic drugs in the clinical practice.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Case-Control Studies; Cohort Studies; Female; Heart Failure; Hospitalization; Humans; Incretins; Male; Middle Aged

To evaluate clinical outcomes in patients with diabetes, treated by cardiac resynchronization therapy with a defibrillator (CRT-d), and glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RA) in addition to conventional hypoglycemic therapy vs. CRTd patients under conventional hypoglycemic drugs.. Patients with diabetes treated by CRTd experienced an amelioration of functional New York Association Heart class, reduction of hospital admissions, and mortality, in a percentage about 60%. However, about 40% of CRTd patients with diabetes experience a worse prognosis.. We investigated the 12-months prognosis of CRTd patients with diabetes, previously treated with hypoglycemic drugs therapy (n 271) vs. a matched cohort of CRTd patients with diabetes treated with GLP-1 RA in addition to conventional hypoglycemic therapy (n 288).. At follow up CRTd patients with diabetes treated by GLP-1 RA therapy vs. CRTd patients with diabetes that did not receive GLP-1 RA therapy, experienced a significant reduction of NYHA class (p value < 0.05), associated to higher values of 6 min walking test (p value < 0.05), and higher rate of CRTd responders (p value < 0.05). GLP-1 RA patients vs. controls at follow up end experienced lower AF events (p value < 0.05), lower VT events (p value < 0.05), lower rate of hospitalization for heart failure worsening (p value < 0.05), and higher rate of CRTd responders (p value < 0.05). To date, GLP-1 RA therapy may predict a reduction of AF events (HR 0.603, CI [0.411-0.884]), VT events (HR 0.964, CI [0.963-0.992]), and hospitalization for heart failure worsening (HR 0.119, CI [0.028-0.508]), and a higher CRT responders rate (HR 3.707, CI [1.226-14.570]).. GLP-1 RA drugs in addition to conventional hypoglycemic therapy may significantly reduce systemic inflammation and circulating BNP levels in CRTd patients with diabetes, leading to a significant improvement of LVEF and of the 6 min walking test, and to a reduction of the arrhythmic burden. Consequently, GLP-1 RA drugs in addition to conventional hypoglycemic therapy may reduce hospital admissions for heart failure worsening, by increasing CRTd responders rate. Trial registration NCT03282136. Registered 9 December 2017 "retrospectively registered".

Topics: Aged; Arrhythmias, Cardiac; Biomarkers; Blood Glucose; Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy; Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Devices; Defibrillators, Implantable; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Disease Progression; Electric Countershock; Female; Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor; Heart Failure; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Incretins; Italy; Male; Middle Aged; Patient Readmission; Prospective Studies; Recovery of Function; Risk Factors; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Ventricular Function, Left

Topics: Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Guidelines as Topic; Heart Failure; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Incretins

Topics: Cyclic AMP; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor; Heart; Heart Failure; Heart Rate; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Incretins; Kidney; Myocardial Contraction; Natriuresis; Sodium-Glucose Transporter 2 Inhibitors; Ventricular Remodeling

Topics: Benzhydryl Compounds; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Diabetic Angiopathies; Glucosides; Heart Failure; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Incretins; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Sodium-Glucose Transporter 2; Sodium-Glucose Transporter 2 Inhibitors; Survival Analysis

Topics: Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Female; Heart Failure; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Incretins; Male; Pancreatic Neoplasms

There is concern that antidiabetic incretin-based drugs, including dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP-4) inhibitors and glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) analogues, can increase the risk of heart failure. Ongoing clinical trials may not have large enough samples to effectively address this issue.. We applied a common protocol in the analysis of multiple cohorts of patients with diabetes. We used health care data from four Canadian provinces, the United States, and the United Kingdom. With the use of a nested case-control analysis, we matched each patient who was hospitalized for heart failure with up to 20 controls from the same cohort; matching was based on sex, age, cohort-entry date, duration of treated diabetes, and follow-up time. Cohort-specific hazard ratios for hospitalization due to heart failure among patients receiving incretin-based drugs, as compared with those receiving oral antidiabetic-drug combinations, were estimated by means of conditional logistic regression and pooled across cohorts with the use of random-effects models.. The cohorts included a total of 1,499,650 patients, with 29,741 hospitalized for heart failure (incidence rate, 9.2 events per 1000 persons per year). The rate of hospitalization for heart failure did not increase with the use of incretin-based drugs as compared with oral antidiabetic-drug combinations among patients with a history of heart failure (hazard ratio, 0.86; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.62 to 1.19) or among those without a history of heart failure (hazard ratio, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.67 to 1.00). The results were similar for DPP-4 inhibitors and GLP-1 analogues.. In this analysis of data from large cohorts of patients with diabetes, incretin-based drugs were not associated with an increased risk of hospitalization for heart failure, as compared with commonly used combinations of oral antidiabetic drugs. (Funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02456428.).

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Case-Control Studies; Cohort Studies; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Combinations; Female; Heart Failure; Hospitalization; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Incretins; Logistic Models; Male; Middle Aged

Topics: Diabetes Mellitus; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Glucagon-Like Peptide 1; Heart Failure; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Incretins

Topics: Administration, Oral; Case-Control Studies; Cohort Studies; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Heart Failure; Hospitalization; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Incretins; Risk

To determine whether the use of incretin-based drugs, including GLP-1 analogs and dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors, is associated with an increased risk of congestive heart failure (CHF) among patients with type 2 diabetes.. The U.K. Clinical Practice Research Datalink, linked to the Hospital Episode Statistics database, was used to conduct a cohort study with a nested case-control analysis among patients newly prescribed antidiabetic drugs between 1 January 2007 and 31 March 2012 and no prior history of CHF. Case subjects were defined as patients hospitalized for a first CHF and matched with up to 20 control subjects on age, duration of treated diabetes, calendar year, and time since cohort entry. Conditional logistic regression was used to estimate odds ratios (ORs) with corresponding 95% CIs of incident CHF comparing current use of incretin-based drugs with current use of two or more oral antidiabetic drugs.. The cohort consisted of 57,737 patients followed for a mean 2.4 years, during which time 1,118 incident cases of hospitalized CHF were identified (incidence rate 8.1/1,000 person-years). Current use of incretin-based drugs was not associated with an increased risk of CHF (adjusted OR 0.85 [95% CI 0.62-1.16]). Secondary analyses revealed no duration-response relationship (P trend = 0.39).. In our population-based study, incretin-based drug use was not associated with an increased risk of CHF among patients with type 2 diabetes. These findings provide some reassurance, but will need to be replicated in other large-scale studies.

Topics: Aged; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Diabetic Cardiomyopathies; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Epidemiologic Methods; Female; Glucagon-Like Peptide 1; Heart Failure; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Incretins; Male; Middle Aged

Topics: Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Diabetic Cardiomyopathies; Female; Heart Failure; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Incretins; Male

Topics: Adamantane; Cardiovascular Diseases; Clinical Trials as Topic; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptides; Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions; Heart Failure; Heart Rate; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Incretins; Myocardial Infarction; Pioglitazone; Risk Assessment; Rosiglitazone; Safety-Based Drug Withdrawals; Stroke; Thiazolidinediones; United States; United States Food and Drug Administration

Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) treatment leads to short-term improvements in myocardial function in ischemic and nonischemic cardiomyopathy. It is unknown whether GLP-1 improves survival when administered over a longer time period. Spontaneously hypertensive, heart failure-prone (SHHF) rats progress to advanced heart failure and death over a 15-month period. The authors sought to determine whether a continuous infusion of GLP-1 would reduce mortality in this model.. At 9 months of age, 50 SHHF rats were randomized to receive a 3-month, continuous infusion of either GLP-1 or saline. Metabolic parameters were measured and cardiac ultrasounds performed at study initiation and completion of treatment. Surviving rats were euthanized at 12 months. Hearts were perfused in an isolated, isovolumic heart preparation, and Tunel staining of myocardial samples was performed. Baseline metabolic and cardiac functional parameters were comparable. GLP-1-treated SHHF rats had greater survival (72% versus 44%, P=0.008) at 12 months of age. In addition, GLP-1 treatment led to higher plasma insulin, lower plasma triglycerides, and preserved left ventricular (LV) function. GLP-1-treated rats demonstrated decreased myocyte apoptosis by Tunel staining as well as reduced caspase-3 activation. No increase in p-BAD expression was seen. In isolated hearts, the LV systolic pressure and LV-developed pressure were greater in the GLP-1 group. Myocardial glucose uptake was also increased in GLP-1-treated SHHF rats.. Chronic GLP-1 treatment prolongs survival in obese SHHF rats. This is associated with preserved LV function and LV mass index, increased myocardial glucose uptake, and reduced myocyte apoptosis.

Topics: Animals; Disease Models, Animal; Glucagon-Like Peptide 1; Heart Failure; Incretins; Infusions, Intravenous; Prone Position; Rats; Rats, Inbred SHR; Survival Rate; Systole; Treatment Outcome; Ventricular Function, Left