incretins and Cardiovascular-Diseases

Glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) and now tirzepatide, a dual GLP-1 RA/glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide agonist, have numerous advantages in the treatment of type 2 diabetes and obesity, yet only 11% of patients with type 2 diabetes are prescribed a GLP-1 RA. This narrative review addresses the complexity and cost issues surrounding incretin mimetics to support clinicians.. This narrative review summarizes key trials on the differing effects of incretin mimetics on glycosylated hemoglobin and weight, provides a table with rationale for how to interchange among agents, and summarizes the key factors that guide drug selection beyond guidance from the American Diabetes Association. To support proposed dose interchanges, we preferentially selected high-quality, prospective randomized controlled trials with direct comparisons of agents and doses when available.. Tirzepatide produces the greatest reductions in glycosylated hemoglobin and weight, but its impact on cardiovascular events is still under investigation. Subcutaneous semaglutide and liraglutide are approved for weight loss specifically and are effective in the secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease. Although producing less weight loss, only dulaglutide has effectiveness in the primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease. Semaglutide is the only orally available incretin mimetic; however, the oral formulation produces less weight loss versus its subcutaneous alternative and did not have cardioprotection in its outcomes trial. Although effective in controlling type 2 diabetes, exenatide extended release has the least impact on glycosylated hemoglobin and weight among commonly used agents, while not having cardioprotection. However, exenatide extended release may be preferred on some restrictive insurance formularies.. Although trials have not explicitly studied how to interchange among agents, interchanges can be guided by comparisons between agents' impact on glycosylated hemoglobin and weight. Efficient changes among agents can help clinicians optimize patient-centered care, particularly in the face of changing patient needs and preferences, insurance formularies, and drug shortages.

Topics: Cardiovascular Diseases; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Exenatide; Glucagon-Like Peptide 1; Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Incretins; Prospective Studies; Weight Loss

Diabetic kidney disease (DKD) is the leading cause of kidney failure worldwide. Development of DKD increases risks for cardiovascular events and death. Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonist have demonstrated improved cardiovascular and kidney outcomes in large-scale clinical trials.. GLP-1 and dual GLP-1/glucose-depending insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) receptor agonists have robust glucose-lowering efficacy with low risk of hypoglycemia even in advanced stages of DKD. Initially approved as antihyperglycemic therapies, these agents also reduce blood pressure and body weight. Cardiovascular outcome and glycemic lowering trials have reported decreased risks of development and progression of DKD and atherosclerotic cardiovascular events for GLP-1 receptor agonists. Kidney and cardiovascular protection is mediated partly, but not entirely, by lowering of glycemia, body weight, and blood pressure. Experimental data have identified modulation of the innate immune response as a biologically plausible mechanism underpinning kidney and cardiovascular effects.. An influx of incretin-based therapies has changed the landscape of DKD treatment. GLP-1 receptor agonist use is endorsed by all major guideline forming organizations. Ongoing clinical trials and mechanistic studies with GLP-1 and dual GLP-1/GIP receptor agonists will further define the roles and pathways for these agents in the treatment of DKD.

Topics: Body Weight; Cardiovascular Diseases; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Glucagon-Like Peptide 1; Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor; Glucose; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Incretins; Renal Insufficiency, Chronic

Major cardiovascular outcome trials and real-life observations have proven that glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs), regardless of structural GLP-1 homology, exert clinically relevant cardiovascular protection. GLP-1RAs provide cardioprotective benefits through glycaemic and non-glycaemic effects, including improved insulin secretion and action, body-weight loss, blood-pressure lowering and improved lipid profile, as well as via direct effects on the heart and vasculature. These actions are likely combined with anti-inflammatory and antioxidant properties that translate into robust and consistent reductions in atherothrombotic events, particularly in people with type 2 diabetes and established atherosclerotic CVD. GLP-1RAs may also have an impact on obesity and chronic kidney disease, conditions for which cardiovascular risk-reducing options are limited. The available evidence has prompted professional and medical societies to recommend GLP-1RAs for mitigation of the cardiovascular risk in people with type 2 diabetes. This review summarises the clinical evidence for cardiovascular protection with use of GLP-1RAs and the main mechanisms underlying this effect. Moreover, it looks into how the availability of upcoming dual and triple incretin receptor agonists might expand the possibility for cardiovascular protection in people with type 2 diabetes.

Topics: Cardiovascular Diseases; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Glucagon-Like Peptide 1; Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Incretins

As the worldwide prevalence of diabetes and obesity continues to rise, so does the risk of debilitating cardiovascular complications. Given the significant association between diabetes and cardiovascular risk, the actions of glucose-lowering therapies within the cardiovascular system must be clearly defined. Incretin hormones, including GLP-1 (glucagon-like peptide 1) and GIP (glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide), are gut hormones secreted in response to nutrient intake that maintain glycemic control by regulating insulin and glucagon release. GLP-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1Ras) and dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitors (DPP-4is) represent two drug classes used for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) that improve glucose regulation through stimulating the actions of gut-derived incretin hormones or inhibiting their degradation, respectively. Despite both classes acting to potentiate the incretin response, the potential cardioprotective benefits afforded by GLP-1Ras have not been recapitulated in cardiovascular outcome trials (CVOTs) evaluating DPP-4is. This review provides insights through discussion of clinical and preclinical studies to illuminate the physiological mechanisms that may underlie and reconcile observations from GLP-1Ra and DPP-4i CVOTs. Furthermore, critical knowledge gaps and areas for further investigation will be emphasized to guide future studies and, ultimately, facilitate improved clinical management of cardiovascular disease in T2DM.

Topics: Animals; Cardiovascular Diseases; Cardiovascular System; Clinical Trials as Topic; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Diabetic Angiopathies; Drug Therapy, Combination; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Incretins; Treatment Outcome

The incretin hormone system is the target of multiple type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) treatments because defects in this system play major roles in the pathogenesis of diabetes. Currently, the glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) are recommended for patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular (CV) disease and those at high risk for atherosclerotic CV disease. In addition to the favorable CV effects, GLP-1 RAs also provide robust lowering of hemoglobin A1c and weight. Although these factors make GLP-1 RAs attractive options for T2DM, the currently available agents have no effect on glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP). Patients with T2DM are known to have GIP defect which is significant due to its profound insulinotropic effects. Tirzepatide is a novel incretin agent currently recently approved by the Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of T2DM. This first-in-class agent serves as a coagonist for both the GLP-1 and GIP receptors. In this review, we report on the pharmacologic mechanism of GLP-1, GIP, and coagonist effects on the cardiometabolic system. In addition, we review the glycemic lowering, weight loss effects, and other cardiometabolic outcomes of tirzepatide based on phase 2 and 3 data. The safety profile of tirzepatide is consistent across all phase 3 trials. The most common adverse effects are gastrointestinal symptoms, but they generally have a low risk for discontinuation. Overall, preliminary data suggest that tirzepatide is an efficacious and safe agent for the treatment of T2DM.

Topics: Cardiovascular Diseases; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Gastric Inhibitory Polypeptide; Glucagon-Like Peptide 1; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Incretins

Dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP4) inhibitors are a class of antidiabetic medications that cause glucose-dependent increase in incretins in diabetic patients. One of the two incretins, glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1), beside its insulinotropic activity, has been studied for extra pancreatic effects. Most of DPP4 inhibitors (DPP4i) have been investigated in in vivo and in vitro models of diabetic and nondiabetic cardiovascular diseases including heart failure, hypertension, myocardial ischemia or infarction, atherosclerosis, and stroke. Results of preclinical studies proved prominent therapeutic potential of DPP4i in cardiovascular diseases, regardless the presence of diabetes. This review aims to present an updated summary of the cardiovascular protective and therapeutic effects of DPP4 inhibitors through the past 5 years focusing on the molecular mechanisms beneath these effects. Additionally, based on the results summary presented here, future studies may be conducted to elucidate or illustrate some of these findings which can add clinical benefits towards management of diabetic cardiovascular complications.

Topics: Cardiovascular Diseases; Diabetes Complications; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptidyl Peptidase 4; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Glucagon-Like Peptide 1; Glucose; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Incretins

The increasing prevalence of obesity and type 2 diabetes (T2DM) is provoking an important socioeconomic burden mainly in the form of cardiovascular disease (CVD). One successful strategy is the so-called metabolic surgery whose beneficial effects are beyond dietary restrictions and weight loss. One key underlying mechanism behind this surgery is the cooperative improved action of the preproglucagon-derived hormones, glucagon, glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1), and glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) which exert their functions through G protein-coupled receptors (GPCR). Great success has been reached with therapies based on the GLP-1 receptor monoagonism; therefore, a logical and rational approach is the use of the dual and triagonism of GCPC to achieve complete metabolic homeostasis. The present review describes novel findings regarding the complex biology of the preproglucagon-derived hormones, their signaling, and the drug development of their analogues, especially those acting as dual and triagonists. Moreover, the main investigations into animal models and ongoing clinical trials using these unimolecular dual and triagonists are included which have demonstrated their safety, efficacy, and beneficial effects on the CV system. These therapeutic strategies could greatly impact the treatment of CVD with unprecedented benefits which will be revealed in the next years.

Topics: Animals; Cardiovascular Diseases; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Gastric Inhibitory Polypeptide; Glucagon; Glucagon-Like Peptide 1; Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor; Glucose; Incretins; Peptides; Proglucagon

Circadian rhythm, an innate 24-h biological clock, regulates several mammalian physiological activities anticipating daily environmental variations and optimizing available energetic resources. The circadian machinery is a complex neuronal and endocrinological network primarily organized into a central clock, suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN), and peripheral clocks. Several small molecules generate daily circadian fluctuations ensuring inter-organ communication and coordination between external stimuli, i.e., light, food, and exercise, and body metabolism. As an orchestra, this complex network can be out of tone. Circadian disruption is often associated with obesity development and, above all, with diabetes and cardiovascular disease onset. Moreover, accumulating data highlight a bidirectional relationship between circadian misalignment and cardiometabolic disease severity. Food intake abnormalities, especially timing and composition of meal, are crucial cause of circadian disruption, but evidence from preclinical and clinical studies has shown that food could represent a unique therapeutic approach to promote circadian resynchronization. In this review, we briefly summarize the structure of circadian system and discuss the role playing by different molecules [from leptin to ghrelin, incretins, fibroblast growth factor 21 (FGF-21), growth differentiation factor 15 (GDF15)] to guarantee circadian homeostasis. Based on the recent data, we discuss the innovative nutritional interventions aimed at circadian re-synchronization and, consequently, improvement of cardiometabolic health.

Topics: Animals; Cardiovascular Diseases; Circadian Rhythm; Ghrelin; Growth Differentiation Factor 15; Humans; Incretins; Leptin

A meta-analysis is presented of cardiovascular outcome trials (CVOTs) comparing glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RA) versus placebo on cardiorenal outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).. We did an electronic search up to June 30, 2021, for eligible trials. We did a meta-analysis of available trial data using a random-effects model to calculate overall hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% CI (confidence intervals). We included data from 8 CVOTs and 60,080 patients (72.4% with established cardiovascular disease).. GLP-1RA reduced major cardiovascular events (MACE) by 14% (HR = 0.86, 95% CI 0.79-0.94, P = 0.006) with a non-significant heterogeneity between subgroups of patients with and without cardiovascular disease (P = 0.127). GLP-1RA also reduced the risk of cardiovascular death by 13% (P = 0.016), nonfatal stroke by 16% (P = 0.007), hospitalization for heart failure by 10% (P = 0.023), all-cause mortality by 12% (P = 0.012), and the broad composite kidney outcome by 17% (P = 0.012), which was driven by a reduction in macroalbuminuria only (HR = 0.74, 0.67-0.82, P < 0.001).. GLP-1RA have moderate benefits on MACE, and also reduce hospitalization for heart failure and all-cause mortality; they also have robust benefits on reducing the incidence of macroalbuminuria.

Topics: Aged; Cardio-Renal Syndrome; Cardiovascular Diseases; Cause of Death; Clinical Trials as Topic; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Female; Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor; Hospitalization; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Incidence; Incretins; Kidney Diseases; Male; Middle Aged; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Treatment Outcome

Besides providing reassurance about cardiovascular (CV) safety of newer diabetes drugs, cardiovascular outcome trials (CVOTs) have also shown encouraging benefits on some CV endpoints. The contribution of the better glycemic control in the reduction of major cardiovascular events (MACE) remains an open question. The aim of this study is to evaluate the associations between the reduction of HbA1c and risk of MACE, MACE components, hospitalization for heart failure (HF) and all-cause death in CVOTs.. An electronic search up to July 2021 was conducted to determine eligible trials. Systematic review identified eighteen CVOTs reporting prespecified CV outcomes. Pooled summary estimates and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated according to the random effects model using the Paule-Mandel method; restricted maximum likelihood estimators were used to estimate model parameters in the metaregression.. The eighteen CVOTs evaluated 161,156 patients and included four trials with dipeptidyl-peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP-4i), eight trials with glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RA) and six trials with sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT-2i). Random-effects model meta-analysis showed an association between treatment and risk of MACE (hazard ratio [HR] 0.90; 95% CI 0.86, 0.94, P < 0.001), with significant heterogeneity between studies (I. The reduction of HbA1c in eighteen CVOTs was significantly associated with reduction of non-fatal stroke, explaining all (R

Topics: Aged; Biomarkers; Blood Glucose; Cardiovascular Diseases; Cause of Death; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Female; Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor; Glycated Hemoglobin; Glycemic Control; Hospitalization; Humans; Incretins; Male; Middle Aged; Protective Factors; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Sodium-Glucose Transporter 2 Inhibitors; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

Previous studies have demonstrated that individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) have a two- to fourfold propensity to develop cardiovascular disease (CVD) than nondiabetic population, making CVD a major cause of death and disability among people with T2DM. The present treatment options for management of diabetes propose the earlier and more frequent use of new antidiabetic drugs that could control hyperglycaemia and reduce the risk of cardiovascular events. Findings from basic and clinical studies pointed out DPP-4 inhibitors as potentially novel pharmacological tools for cardioprotection. There is a growing body of evidence suggesting that these drugs have ability to protect the heart against acute ischaemia-reperfusion injury as well as reduce the size of infarction. Consequently, the prevention of degradation of the incretin hormones by the use of DPP-4 inhibitors represents a new strategy in the treatment of patients with T2DM and reduction of CV events in these patients. Here, we discuss the cardioprotective effects of DPP-4 inhibitors as well as proposed pathways that these hypoglycaemic agents target in the cardiovascular system.

Topics: Cardiovascular Diseases; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Dipeptidyl-Peptidases and Tripeptidyl-Peptidases; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Incretins

The comparative efficacy of different glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists and sodium glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors for prevention of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in type 2 diabetes with or without cardiorenal disease is undefined. PubMed and Embase were searched for relevant randomized trials. We conducted network meta-analysis within the Bayesian framework. Effect sizes were measured using hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI). We calculated surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) values to rank drug interventions for different type 2 diabetic subgroups. Albiglutide (HR 0.76, 95% CI 0.63-0.93) and subcutaneous semaglutide (HR 0.71, 95% CI 0.52-0.95), with the maximum SUCRA values, significantly reduced MACE versus lixisenatide in people with diabetes with cardiovascular disease; albiglutide (HRs: 0.69 and 0.72), with the maximum SUCRA value, significantly reduced MACE versus dapagliflozin and exenatide in people with diabetes with heart failure; and canagliflozin (HRs: 0.72 and 0.72) and liraglutide (HRs: 0.68 and 0.68), with the maximum SUCRA values, significantly reduced MACE versus exenatide and lixisenatide in people with diabetes with chronic kidney disease. In preventing MACE in type 2 diabetes, subcutaneous semaglutide and albiglutide are most effective for diabetes with cardiovascular disease, albiglutide is most effective for diabetes with heart failure, and canagliflozin and liraglutide are most effective for diabetes with chronic kidney disease.

Topics: Cardiovascular Diseases; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor; Humans; Incretins; Network Meta-Analysis; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Sodium-Glucose Transporter 2 Inhibitors; Treatment Outcome

Emerging evidence suggests that sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT-2) inhibitors and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) are associated with decreased risk of cardiovascular and renal events in type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) patients. However, no study to date has compared the effect of SGLT-2 inhibitors with that of GLP-1 RAs in type 2 DM patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). We herein investigated the benefits of SGLT-2 inhibitors and GLP-1 RAs in CKD patients.. We performed a systematic literature search through November 2020. We selected randomized control trials that compared the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and a composite of renal outcomes. We performed a network meta-analysis to compare SGLT-2 inhibitors with GLP-1 RAs indirectly. Risk ratios (RRs) with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI) were synthesized.. Thirteen studies were selected with a total of 32,949 patients. SGLT-2 inhibitors led to a risk reduction in MACE and renal events (RR [95% CI]; 0.85 [0.75-0.96] and 0.68 [0.59-0.78], respectively). However, GLP-1 RAs did not reduce the risk of cardiovascular or renal adverse events (RR 0.91 [0.80-1.04] and 0.86 [0.72-1.03], respectively). Compared to GLP-1 RAs, SGLT-2 inhibitors did not demonstrate a significant difference in MACE (RR 0.94 [0.78-1.12]), while SGLT-2 inhibitors were associated with a lower risk of renal events compared to GLP-1 RAs (RR 0.79 [0.63-0.99]). A sensitivity analysis revealed that GLP-1 analogues significantly decreased MACE when compared to placebo treatment (RR 0.81 [0.69-0.95]), while exendin-4 analogues did not (RR 1.03 [0.88-1.20]).. In patients with type 2 DM and CKD, SGLT-2 inhibitors were associated with a decreased risk of cardiovascular and renal events, but GLP-1 RAs were not. SGLT-2 inhibitors significantly decreased the risk of renal events compared to GLP-1 RAs. Among GLP-1 RAs, GLP-1 analogues showed a positive impact on cardiovascular and renal outcomes, while exendin-4 analogues did not.

Topics: Aged; Cardiovascular Diseases; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Disease Progression; Female; Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor; Humans; Incretins; Male; Network Meta-Analysis; Renal Insufficiency, Chronic; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Sodium-Glucose Transporter 2 Inhibitors; Treatment Outcome

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of death worldwide and is the clinical manifestation of the atherosclerosis. Elevated LDL-cholesterol levels are the first line of therapy but the increasing prevalence in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) has positioned the cardiometabolic risk as the most relevant parameter for treatment. Therefore, the control of this risk, characterized by dyslipidemia, hypertension, obesity, and insulin resistance, has become a major goal in many experimental and clinical studies in the context of CVD. In the present review, we summarized experimental studies and clinical trials of recent anti-diabetic and lipid-lowering therapies targeted to reduce CVD. Specifically, incretin-based therapies, sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors, and proprotein convertase subtilisin kexin 9 inactivating therapies are described. Moreover, the novel molecular mechanisms explaining the CVD protection of the drugs reviewed here indicate major effects on vascular cells, inflammatory cells, and cardiomyocytes, beyond their expected anti-diabetic and lipid-lowering control. The revealed key mechanism is a prevention of acute cardiovascular events by restraining atherosclerosis at early stages, with decreased leukocyte adhesion, recruitment, and foam cell formation, and increased plaque stability and diminished necrotic core in advanced plaques. These emergent cardiometabolic therapies have a promising future to reduce CVD burden.

Topics: Animals; Biomarkers; Cardiovascular Diseases; Clinical Studies as Topic; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Disease Management; Disease Susceptibility; Drug Design; Drug Development; Drug Evaluation, Preclinical; Dyslipidemias; Humans; Incretins; Lipid Metabolism; Molecular Targeted Therapy; PCSK9 Inhibitors; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors

The prevalence of obesity continues to grow rapidly worldwide, posing many public health challenges of the 21st century. Obese subjects are at major risk for serious diet-related noncommunicable diseases, including type 2 diabetes mellitus, cardiovascular disease, and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Understanding the mechanisms underlying obesity pathogenesis is needed for the development of effective treatment strategies. Dysregulation of incretin secretion and actions has been observed in obesity and related metabolic disorders; therefore, incretin-based therapies have been developed to provide new therapeutic options. Incretin mimetics present glucose-lowering properties, together with a reduction of appetite and food intake, resulting in weight loss. In this review, we describe the physiology of two known incretins-glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) and glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1), and their role in obesity and related cardiometabolic disorders. We also focus on the available and incoming incretin-based medications that can be used in the treatment of the above-mentioned conditions.

Topics: Animals; Cardiovascular Diseases; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Humans; Incretins; Mice; Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease; Obesity

The incretin hormones glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) and glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) have their main physiological role in augmenting insulin secretion after their nutrient-induced secretion from the gut. A functioning entero-insular (gut-endocrine pancreas) axis is essential for the maintenance of a normal glucose tolerance. This is exemplified by the incretin effect (greater insulin secretory response to oral as compared to "isoglycaemic" intravenous glucose administration due to the secretion and action of incretin hormones). GIP and GLP-1 have additive effects on insulin secretion. Local production of GIP and/or GLP-1 in islet α-cells (instead of enteroendocrine K and L cells) has been observed, and its significance is still unclear. GLP-1 suppresses, and GIP increases glucagon secretion, both in a glucose-dependent manner. GIP plays a greater physiological role as an incretin. In type 2-diabetic patients, the incretin effect is reduced despite more or less normal secretion of GIP and GLP-1. While insulinotropic effects of GLP-1 are only slightly impaired in type 2 diabetes, GIP has lost much of its acute insulinotropic activity in type 2 diabetes, for largely unknown reasons. Besides their role in glucose homoeostasis, the incretin hormones GIP and GLP-1 have additional biological functions: GLP-1 at pharmacological concentrations reduces appetite, food intake, and-in the long run-body weight, and a similar role is evolving for GIP, at least in animal studies. Human studies, however, do not confirm these findings. GIP, but not GLP-1 increases triglyceride storage in white adipose tissue not only through stimulating insulin secretion, but also by interacting with regional blood vessels and GIP receptors. GIP, and to a lesser degree GLP-1, play a role in bone remodelling. GLP-1, but not GIP slows gastric emptying, which reduces post-meal glycaemic increments. For both GIP and GLP-1, beneficial effects on cardiovascular complications and neurodegenerative central nervous system (CNS) disorders have been observed, pointing to therapeutic potential over and above improving diabetes complications. The recent finding that GIP/GLP-1 receptor co-agonists like tirzepatide have superior efficacy compared to selective GLP-1 receptor agonists with respect to glycaemic control as well as body weight has renewed interest in GIP, which previously was thought to be without any therapeutic potential. One focus of this research is into the long-

Topics: Animals; Blood Glucose; Cardiovascular Diseases; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Gastric Inhibitory Polypeptide; Glucagon-Like Peptide 1; Humans; Incretins; Receptors, Gastrointestinal Hormone

In recent large-scale cardiovascular outcome trials, two new classes of glucose-lowering medications-sodium glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs)-demonstrated cardiovascular benefits in adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). These findings have prompted growing optimism among clinicians regarding the potential for these agents to reduce the burden of cardiovascular disease in people with T2DM. GLP-1RAs and SGLT2i are now advocated as second-line agents in European and US guidelines for management of both hyperglycaemia and for primary prevention of cardiovascular disease in people with T2DM. Given the high prevalence of T2DM in patients with cardiovascular disease, cardiologists will increasingly encounter these agents in routine clinical practice. In this review, we summarise evidence from cardiovascular outcome trials of GLP-1RAs and SGLT2i, give practical advice on prescribing and detail safety considerations associated with their use. We also highlight areas where further work is needed, giving details on active clinical trials. The review aims to familiarise cardiologists with these emerging treatments, which will be increasingly encountered in clinical practice, given the expanding representation of T2DM in patients with cardiovascular disease. Whether these drugs will be initiated by cardiologists remains to be determined.

Topics: Biomarkers; Blood Glucose; Cardiovascular Diseases; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Down-Regulation; Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor; Humans; Incretins; Patient Safety; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Sodium-Glucose Transporter 2 Inhibitors; Treatment Outcome

Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is currently one of the most prevalent diseases, with as many as 415 million patients worldwide. T2DM is characterized by elevated blood glucose levels and is often accompanied by several comorbidities, such as cardiovascular disease. Treatment of T2DM is focused on reducing glucose levels by either lifestyle changes or medical treatment. One treatment option for T2DM is based on the gut-derived hormone glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1). GLP-1 reduces blood glucose levels by stimulating insulin secretion, however, it is rapidly degraded, and thereby losing its glycaemic effect. GLP-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) are immune to degradation, prolonging the glycaemic effect. Lately, GLP-1RAs have spiked the interest of researchers and clinicians due to their beneficial effects on cardiovascular disease. Preclinical and clinical data have demonstrated that GLP-1 receptors are abundantly present in the heart and that stimulation of these receptors by GLP-1 has several effects. In this review, we will discuss the effects of GLP-1RA on heart rate, blood pressure, microvascular function, lipids, and inflammation, as measured in human mechanistic studies, and suggest how these effects may translate into the improved cardiovascular outcomes as demonstrated in several trials.

Topics: Animals; Biomarkers; Blood Glucose; Cardiovascular Diseases; Cardiovascular System; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Incretins; Risk Factors; Signal Transduction; Treatment Outcome

There is substantial interest in how GLP-1RA (glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists) and SGLT2 (sodium-glucose cotransporter 2) inhibitors reduce cardiovascular and renal events; yet, robust mechanistic data in humans remain sparse. We conducted a narrative review of published and ongoing mechanistic clinical trials investigating the actions of SGLT2 inhibitors and GLP-1RAs to help the community appreciate the extent of ongoing work and the variety and design of such trials. Approach and Results: To date, trials investigating the mechanisms of action of SGLT2 inhibitors have focused on pathways linked to glucose metabolism and toxicity, hemodynamic/volume, vascular and renal actions, and cardiac effects, including those on myocardial energetics. The participants studied have included those with established cardiovascular disease (including coronary artery disease and heart failure), liver disease, renal impairment, obesity, and hypertension; some of these trials have enrolled patients both with and without type 2 diabetes mellitus. GLP-1RA mechanistic trials have focused on glucose-lowering, insulin-sparing, weight reduction, and blood pressure-lowering effects, as well as possible direct vascular, cardiac, and renal effects of these agents. Very few mechanisms of action of SGLT2 inhibitors or GLP-1RAs have so far been convincingly demonstrated. One small trial (n=97) of SGLT2 inhibitors has investigated the cardiac effects of these drugs, where a small reduction in left ventricular mass was found. Data on vascular effects are limited to one trial in type 1 diabetes mellitus, which suggests some beneficial actions. SGLT2 inhibitors have been shown to reduce liver fat. We highlight the near absence of mechanistic data to explain the beneficial effects of SGLT2 inhibitors in patients without diabetes mellitus. GLP-1RAs have not been found to have major cardiovascular mechanisms of action in the limited, completed trials. Conflicting data around the impact on infarct size have been reported. No effect on left ventricular ejection fraction has been demonstrated.. We have tabulated the extensive ongoing mechanistic trials that will report over the coming years. We report 2 exemplar ongoing mechanistic trials in detail to give examples of the designs and techniques employed. The results of these many ongoing trials should help us understand how SGLT2 inhibitors and GLP-1RAs improve cardiovascular and renal outcomes and may also identify unexpected mechanisms suggesting novel therapeutic applications.

Topics: Biomarkers; Blood Glucose; Cardiovascular Diseases; Clinical Trials as Topic; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Evidence-Based Medicine; Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor; Humans; Incretins; Risk Factors; Sodium-Glucose Transporter 2 Inhibitors; Treatment Outcome

The link of acute pancreatitis (AP) with Incretin based therapies (IBTs) in type 2 diabetes has existed since United States Food and Drug Administration alert in 2010. This issue still remains unresolved due to conflicting results among studies.. We performed a systematic search of the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases until 31 July 2019, and retrieved all cardiovascular outcome trials (CVOTs) of IBTs conducted for ≥12 months that reported the pre-specified and or pre-adjudicated pancreatitis outcomes. Subsequently, we conducted a meta-analysis to study the risk of AP observed with IBT in CVOTs.. A meta-analysis of seven CVOTs of GLP-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) compared with placebo (N = 55,932) found no significant increase in AP (odds ratio [OR], 1.05; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.77-1.42; p = 0.77). In contrast, meta-analysis of five CVOTs comparing DPP-4 inhibitors with placebo (N = 47,714) and six CVOTs comparing DPP-4 inhibitors with placebo or active comparator (N = 53,747), found a significant increase (OR, 1.81; 95% CI, 1.21-2.70; p = 0.04 and OR, 1.54; 95% CI, 1.08-2.18; p = 0.02, respectively) in AP without any significant heterogeneity.. This meta-analysis revealed a significant association between pancreatitis and DPP-4 inhibitors; however, no such association was observed for GLP-1RAs.

Topics: Animals; Cardiovascular Diseases; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Incretins; Pancreatitis

Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) portends high risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular (CV) events and of CV mortality; moreover, this group of patients has a very high probability of developing heart failure (HF). In this review, we discuss new advances in pharmacological treatment both in CV prevention and in HF management with a special focus on T2DM patients. A large number of randomized clinical trials and meta-analyses provided strong evidence about therapeutic strategies acting on glucose metabolism, such as GLP-1 RA and SGLT2i and about lipid-lowering treatment, such as PCSK9i and icosapent ethyl. Moreover, SGLT2i demonstrated strong evidence of benefit particularly in HF management both in diabetic and non-diabetic patients. The pathophysiological bases of multiple mechanisms of benefit of this class of drug explain the unexpected and remarkable results demonstrated both by prevention trials and by trials dedicated only to HF (like DAPA-HF). These, new drugs in the CV therapeutic armamentarium are establishing a new comprehensive approach from prevention to therapy of HF, giving more emphasis on HF classification in four stages (A→D). New therapies, which are on the horizon, promise to further reduce CV mortality and morbidity in HF patients irrespective of diabetic status.

Topics: Anticholesteremic Agents; Cardiology; Cardiovascular Diseases; Cooperative Behavior; Diabetes Mellitus; Endocrinology; Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor; Heart Disease Risk Factors; Heart Failure; Humans; Incretins; Interdisciplinary Communication; Patient Care Team; PCSK9 Inhibitors; Risk Assessment; Sodium-Glucose Transporter 2 Inhibitors; Treatment Outcome

Incretin-based therapies include pharmacologic agents such as glucagon like peptide-1 receptor agonists and dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors which exert potent anti-hyperglycemic effects in the diabetic milieu. They are also shown to have extra-pancreatic effects. Renin-angiotensin system is part of the endocrine system which is widely distributed in the body and is closely involved in water and electrolyte homeostasis as well as renal and cardiovascular functions. Hence the renin-angiotensin system is the main target for treating patients with various renal and cardiovascular disorders. There is growing evidence that incretins have modulatory effects on renin-angiotensin system activity; thereby, can be promising therapeutic agents for the management of renal and cardiovascular disorders. But the exact molecular interactions between incretins and renin-angiotensin system are not clearly understood. In this current study, we have reviewed the possible molecular mechanisms by which incretins modulate renin-angiotensin system activity.

Topics: Blood Pressure; Cardiovascular Diseases; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Gene Expression Regulation; Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Incretins; Renal Insufficiency; Renin-Angiotensin System; Treatment Outcome

The cardiovascular outcome trials (CVOTs) have shown that glucagon like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP1RAs) have varying degrees of cardiovascular (CV) safety in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM.) The lack of any head-to-head comparative trials among GLP1RAs urged the need for an indirect comparison of these agents. Therefore, this study was conducted to indirectly compare the CV safety and mortality effects among different GLP1RAs in patients with T2DM using network meta-analysis (NMA).. Medline was searched to identify GLP1RA CVOTs to date. The outcomes of interest were CV death, myocardial infarction (IM), stroke, and death from any cause. An NMA with binomial likelihood logit link model was used for the binary outcomes. We conducted both fixed effects and random effects models for each outcome, and selected the best model based on the deviance information and the average posterior residual deviance. This NMA was reported in accordance with the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA-NMA).. A total of seven GLP1RA CVOTs were included having 56,004 patients. The NMA results showed that oral semaglutide was statistically better than exenatide (OR 0.47, 95% CI 0.21-0.99), dulaglutide (OR 0.46, 95% CI 0.20-0.97), albiglutide (OR 0.45, 95% CI 0.19-0.97), lixisenatide (OR 0.43, 95% CI 0.19-0.92) in reducing CV death events. No significant differences were detected between most of the treatments regarding reducing death from any cause, MI and stroke events. The ranking results showed that oral semaglutide had the highest probability to be ranked first (> 90%) in reducing CV death and death from any cause. Moreover, once weekly semaglutide had the highest probability to be ranked first in reducing MI and stroke events.. The GLP1RAs have shown significant benefits in terms of CV safety. The indirect comparison and ranking probability results have shown that one weekly semaglutide and oral semaglutide seems to be the preferred option in patients with T2DM and established or at high risk of CVD. This result can aid health care providers, pharmacy and therapeutics committees in hospitals, and insurance companies when deciding which GLP1RA to start or add to their formulary.

Topics: Aged; Biomarkers; Blood Glucose; Cardiovascular Diseases; Clinical Trials as Topic; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Female; Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Incretins; Male; Middle Aged; Network Meta-Analysis; Protective Factors; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

New era antidiabetic drugs are characterized by cardiovascular safety, including specific outcome benefits observed in randomized clinical trials (RCTs). It has been postulated that the favorable effects of new antidiabetic agents are related both to better control of blood pressure (BP) levels and to activation of multiple anti-atherosclerotic properties. In this review, we aimed to assess whether antidiabetic drugs have a pressor effect in glucose control and outcome-oriented RCTs, and to summarize the activated pathophysiological mechanisms relevant to BP control following the use of different antidiabetic drug classes. We also tried to determine which, if any, are the BP-lowering effects of more intense vs less intense glucose-lowering strategy irrespectively of trial antidiabetic regimen. To provide more robust results and evidence-based argumentation, a meta-analysis of placebo-controlled antidiabetic drug RCTs was undertaken to estimate the ongoing BP reduction for all considered and each separate drug class alone. This quantitative synthesis might be helpful for the clinician 1) to select or avoid the use of some classes of antidiabetic agents with a potential favorable or adverse pressor effect, respectively 2) to organize the overall drug regimen in patients with diabetes mellitus and minimize side effects because of concomitant use of drugs with established pressor effect (i.e. antihypertensive agents). This review was also organized to indicate whether BP change associated with different antidiabetic treatments may explain the specific macrovascular outcome benefits. Between all antidiabetic drugs including exogenous insulin, only sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors produce a clinically important BP-lowering effect, but this BP reduction alone cannot explain the observed cardiovascular benefit.

Topics: Biomarkers; Blood Glucose; Blood Pressure; Cardiovascular Diseases; Diabetes Mellitus; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Incretins; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Sodium-Glucose Transporter 2 Inhibitors; Treatment Outcome

Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) and dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors are so called "incretin-based therapies" (IBTs) that represent innovative therapeutic approaches and are commonly used in clinical practice for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). The cardiovascular outcome trials (CVOTs) have provided useful information that has helped to shape changes in clinical practice guidelines for the management of T2DM. At the same time, the mechanisms that may explain the nonglycemic and cardiovascular (CV) benefits of these medications are still being explored. A summary of the main findings from CVOTs performed to-date with particular emphasis on various outcomes and inconsistencies observed in the trials is provided. Overall, available data is favourable to the early deployment of GLP-1RAs in clinical practice, fully in line with recommendations from international scientific guidelines, and based on their effects on glucose metabolism parameters, body weight reduction and CV outcomes. Evidence further suggest that the CV benefits of GLP-1RAs may not be a class effect, with GLP-1 analogues having a greater benefit rather than exendin-based agents.

Topics: Animals; Cardiovascular Diseases; Cardiovascular System; Dipeptidyl Peptidase 4; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor; Humans; Incretins

The disclosure of proven cardiorenal benefits with certain antidiabetic agents was supposed to herald a new era in the management of type 2 diabetes (T2D), especially for the many patients with T2D who are at high risk for cardiovascular and renal events. However, as the evidence in favour of various sodium-glucose transporter-2 inhibitor (SGLT2i) and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RA) accumulates, prescriptions of these agents continue to stagnate, even among eligible, at-risk patients. By contrast, dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP-4i) DPP-4i remain more widely used than SGLT2i and GLP-1 RA in these patients, despite a similar cost to SGLT2i and a large body of evidence showing no clear benefit on cardiorenal outcomes. We are a group of diabetologists united by a shared concern that clinical inertia is preventing these patients from receiving life-saving treatments, as well as placing them at greater risk of hospitalisation for heart failure and progression of renal disease. We propose a manifesto for change, in order to increase uptake of SGLT2i and GLP-1 RA in appropriate patients as a matter of urgency, especially those who could be readily switched from an agent without proven cardiorenal benefit. Central to our manifesto is a shift from linear treatment algorithms based on HbA1c target setting to parallel, independent considerations of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, heart failure and renal risks, in accordance with newly updated guidelines. Finally, we call upon all colleagues to play their part in implementing our manifesto at a local level, ensuring that patients do not pay a heavy price for continued clinical inertia in T2D.

Topics: Biomarkers; Blood Glucose; Cardiovascular Diseases; Clinical Decision-Making; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Evidence-Based Medicine; Global Health; Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor; Glycemic Control; Humans; Incretins; Kidney Diseases; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Practice Patterns, Physicians'; Protective Factors; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Sodium-Glucose Transporter 2 Inhibitors; Treatment Outcome

Recent trials suggested that glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) and sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 (SGLT-2) inhibitors reduced cardiovascular events. Comparative effectiveness of these new antidiabetic drug classes remains unclear. We therefore performed a network meta-analysis to compare the effect on cardiovascular outcomes among GLP-1 RAs, SGLT-2 and dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors.. MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane database, ClinicalTrials.gov, and congress proceedings from recent cardiology conferences were searched up to April 20, 2019. Cardiovascular outcome trials and renal outcome trials reporting cardiovascular outcomes on GLP-1 RAs, SGLT-2 and DPP-4 inhibitors in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus were included. The primary outcome was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). Secondary outcomes were nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke, cardiovascular mortality, all-cause mortality, hospitalisation for heart failure (HF), and renal composite outcome. ORs and 95% CI were calculated using random-effects models.. Fourteen trials enrolling 121,047 patients were included. SGLT-2 inhibitors reduced cardiovascular deaths and all-cause deaths compared to placebo (OR 0.82, 95% CI 0.73-0.93 and OR 0.84, 95% CI 0.77-0.92) and DPP-4 inhibitors (OR 0.83, 95% CI 0.70-0.99 and OR 0.83, 95% CI 0.73-0.94), respectively. SGLT-2 inhibitors and GLP-1 RAs significantly reduced MACE (OR 0.88, 95% CI 0.82-0.95 and OR 0.87, 95% CI 0.82-0.93), hospitalisation for HF (OR 0.68, 95% CI 0.61-0.77 and OR 0.87, 95% CI 0.82-0.93), and renal composite outcome (OR 0.59, 95% CI 0.52-0.67 and OR 0.86, 95% CI 0.78-0.94) compared to placebo, but SGLT-2 inhibitors reduced hospitalisation for HF (OR 0.79, 95% CI 0.69-0.90) and renal composite outcome (OR 0.69, 95% CI 0.59-0.80) more than GLP-1 RAs. Only GLP-1 RAs reduced nonfatal stroke (OR 0.88, 95% CI 0.77-0.99). DPP-4 inhibitors did not lower the risk of these outcomes when compared to placebo and were associated with higher risks of MACE, hospitalisation for HF, and renal composite outcome when compared to the other two drug classes.. SGLT-2 inhibitors show clear superiority in reducing cardiovascular and all-cause deaths, hospitalisation for HF, and renal events among new antidiabetic drug classes. GLP-1 RAs also have cardiovascular and renal protective effects. DPP-4 inhibitors have no beneficial cardiovascular effects and are therefore inferior to the other two drug classes. SGLT-2 inhibitors should now be the preferred treatment for type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Topics: Cardiovascular Diseases; Cause of Death; Clinical Trials as Topic; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor; Hospitalization; Humans; Incretins; Network Meta-Analysis; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Sodium-Glucose Transporter 2 Inhibitors; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

Incretin contains two peptides named glucagon-like peptide-1(GLP-1) and glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP). Drug therapy using incretin has become a new strategy for diabetic treatments due to its significant effects on improving insulin receptors and promoting insulinotropic secretion. Considering the fact that diabetes millitus is a key risk factor for almost all age-related diseases, the extensive protective roles of incretin in chronic diseases have received great attention. Based on the evidence from animal experiments, where incretin can protect against the pathophysiological processes of neurodegenerative diseases, clinical trials for the treatments of Alzheimer's disease (AD) and Parkinson's disease (PD) patients are currently ongoing. Moreover, the protective effect of incretin on heart has been observed in cardiac myocytes, smooth muscle cells and endothelial cells of vessels. Meanwhile, incretin can also inhibit the proliferation of aortic vascular smooth muscle cells, which can induce atherosclerogenesis. Incretin is also beneficial for diabetic microvascular complications, including nephropathy, retinopathy and gastric ulcer, as well as the hepatic-related diseases such as NAFLD and NASH. Besides, the anti-tumor properties of incretin have been proven in diverse cancers including ovarian cancer, pancreas cancer, prostate cancer and breast cancer.

Topics: Aging; Animals; Cardiovascular Diseases; Diabetes Mellitus; Humans; Incretins; Liver Diseases; Neoplasms; Neurodegenerative Diseases; Stomach Ulcer

Liraglutide is a glucagon-like 1 (GLP-1) agonist approved for treatment of type 2 diabetes and obesity.. To review the cardiovascular effects of liraglutide including macrovascular and microvascular events, its use in heart failure, and its effects on heart rate and blood pressure.. The impact of liraglutide on cardiovascular outcomes was examined in a large welldesigned study published in 2016, the LEADER trial. This study included 9,340 patients with advanced type 2 diabetes and high baseline cardiovascular risk. The primary outcome was the first occurrence of death from cardiovascular causes, non-fatal myocardial infarction, or non-fatal stroke. After a median follow-up of 3.8 years, patients randomized to liraglutide had significant reduction in the composite primary outcome compared to patients randomized to placebo, hazard ratio (HR) 0.87; 95% CI 0.78-0.97. Death from cardiovascular causes was significantly reduced with liraglutide therapy (HR, 0.78; 95% CI 0.66-0.93), as well as death from any cause (HR, 0.85; 95% CI 0.74-0.97). In 2017, the LEADER investigators reported that nephropathy events were significantly lower after liraglutide therapy than placebo (HR 0.78; 95% CI 0.67-0.92), but there was no significant difference in retinopathy events. Meanwhile, other studies suggested that the use of liraglutide may be harmful in patients with severe heart failure, in part due to increase in heart rate.. Liraglutide is a useful therapy in patients with advanced type 2 diabetes complicated by cardiovascular disease, except patients with severe heart failure. Further studies are needed to evaluate the long-term effects of liraglutide, and to see whether its beneficial effects extend to patients with type 2 diabetes and low cardiac risk.

Topics: Cardiovascular Diseases; Cardiovascular System; Clinical Decision-Making; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Incretins; Liraglutide; Patient Selection; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Signal Transduction; Treatment Outcome

The prevalence of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is increasing worldwide. In some patients with NAFLD, isolated steatosis can progress to advanced stages with non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) and fibrosis, increasing the risk of cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. Furthermore, NAFLD is believed to be involved in the pathogenesis of common disorders such as type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease. In this Review, we highlight novel concepts related to diagnosis, risk prediction, and treatment of NAFLD. First, because NAFLD is a heterogeneous disease, the advanced stages of which seem to be strongly affected by comorbidities such as insulin resistance and type 2 diabetes, early use of reliable, non-invasive diagnostic tools is needed, particularly in patients with insulin resistance or diabetes, to allow the identification of patients at different disease stages. Second, although the strongest genetic risk alleles for NAFLD (ie, the 148Met allele in PNPLA3 and the 167Lys allele in TM6SF2) are associated with increased liver fat content and progression to NASH and cirrhosis, these alleles are also unexpectedly associated with an apparent protection from cardiovascular disease. If consistent across diverse populations, this discordance in NAFLD-related risk prediction between hepatic and extrahepatic disease might need to be accounted for in the management of NAFLD. Third, drug treatments assessed in NAFLD seem to differ with respect to cardiometabolic and antifibrotic efficacy, suggesting the need to better identify and tailor the most appropriate treatment approach, or to use a combination of approaches. These emerging concepts could contribute to the development of a multidisciplinary approach for endocrinologists and hepatologists working together in the management of NAFLD.

Topics: Antioxidants; Bariatric Surgery; Carcinoma, Hepatocellular; Cardiovascular Diseases; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Disease Progression; Dysbiosis; Gastrointestinal Microbiome; Genetic Predisposition to Disease; Humans; Incretins; Insulin Resistance; Lipase; Liver Cirrhosis; Liver Neoplasms; Membrane Proteins; Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease; Obesity, Abdominal; Risk Assessment; Risk Reduction Behavior; Sodium-Glucose Transporter 2 Inhibitors

The aim of this network meta-analysis (NMA) was to indirectly compare the cardiovascular (CV) safety of new antidiabetic medications in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). DATA SYNTHESIS: A search of the Embase and MEDLINE databases was conducted systematically to identify cardiovascular outcome trials (CVOTs) of new antidiabetic medications (DPP-4 inhibitors, GLP-1 agonists and SGLT-2 inhibitors) in patients with T2DM. The primary outcomes were the composite endpoint of CV death, nonfatal MI, and nonfatal stroke (MACE), death from CV causes, nonfatal MI, nonfatal stroke and death from any cause. Hospitalization for HF and unstable angina were evaluated as secondary endpoints. A total of 9 trials, including 87,162 patients, met the eligibility criteria and were retained for the analysis. The NMA results showed no significant differences among the DPP-4 inhibitors (sitagliptin, alogliptin, and saxagliptin) in any of the CV endpoints. Similarly, no significant changes were seen in the NMA among the GLP-1 receptor agonists nor the SGLT-2 inhibitors. The pairwise meta-analysis showed that DPP-4 inhibitors have a CV safety profiled comparable to placebo. GLP-1 agonists on the other hand, showed significant reduction in MACE (RR 0.92; 95% CI 0.87-0.97), death from CV causes (RR=0.88; 95% CI 0.80-0.97), and death from any cause (RR=0.89; 95% CI 0.82-0.96). SGLT-2 inhibitors showed significant reduction in hospitalization for heart failure events (RR 0.72; 95% CI 0.6-0.86) compared to placebo. CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis has shown that new antidiabetic medications do not impose any additional CV risk. The indirect comparison among the medications of each class resulted in no significant changes regarding CV endpoints and death from any cause.

Topics: Biomarkers; Blood Glucose; Cardiovascular Diseases; Cause of Death; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Disease Progression; Female; Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor; Hospitalization; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Incretins; Male; Middle Aged; Network Meta-Analysis; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Sodium-Glucose Transporter 2 Inhibitors; Treatment Outcome

The cardiovascular (CV) safety in terms of heart failure among different classes of treatment remains largely unknown. We sought to assess the comparative effect of these agents on heart failure outcomes.. This study was registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (CRD 42016042063). MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched. For the primary outcomes reported previously, studies between Jan 1, 1980 and June 30, 2016 were screened, and subsequently updated till Jan 24, 2019. We performed network meta-analysis to obtain estimates for the outcomes of heart failure, in particular by rankograms for ranking of heart failure risk as well as by pairwise comparisons among all classes of anti-diabetic medications.. A total of 91 trials were included, among which were 171,253 participants and 4163 reported cases of heart failure events. As for rankograms, the surface under the cumulative ranking curves (SUCRA) of sodium-glucose co-transporters 2 and thiazolidinediones were 93.4% and 4.3%, respectively, signifying the lowest and highest risk of heart failure, respectively. As for pairwise comparisons in the network, sodium-glucose co-transporters 2 were significantly superior to insulin (OR: 0.75, 95% CI 0.62-0.91), dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitors (OR: 0.68, 95% CI 0.59-0.78), glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (OR: 0.65, 95% CI 0.54-0.78), and thiazolidinediones (OR: 0.46, 95% CI 0.27-0.77) in terms of heart failure risk. Furthermore, in an exploratory analysis among subjects with underlying heart failure or at risk of heart failure, the superiority of sodium-glucose co-transporters 2 was still significant.. In terms of heart failure risk, sodium-glucose co-transporters 2 were the most favorable option among all classes of anti-diabetic medications.

Topics: Cardiovascular Diseases; Diabetes Mellitus; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Incretins; Protective Agents; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Sodium-Glucose Transporter 2 Inhibitors; Treatment Outcome

There is a growing body of evidence that diabetes represents a significant and largely modifiable risk factor for cardiovascular disease (CVD). It is known to markedly increase the risk of CVD-with CVD accounting for 2 of every 3 deaths in patients with diabetes. It is suggested that once patients with diabetes develop clinical coronary disease, they have a grim prognosis. In 2008, the Food and Drug Association mandated the evidence of CV safety in any new diabetic therapy, leading to a multitude of large CV outcome trials to assess CV risk from these medications. However, several of these outcome trials with novel antidiabetic therapies have demonstrated not only safety but a clear and definite CV advantage in patients with type 2 diabetes. In this review, we discuss 2 relatively newer classes of diabetic drugs, sodium glucose cotransport 2 inhibitors and glucagon-like peptide 1 agonists, evaluate their efficacy in improving CV outcomes, and discuss the future of CV prevention with these agents.

Topics: Biomarkers; Blood Glucose; Cardiovascular Diseases; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor; Humans; Incretins; Risk Factors; Sodium-Glucose Transporter 2 Inhibitors; Treatment Outcome

The authors of 2 large randomized trials have recently published their findings related to the effects of a glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonist (GLP-1RA) (the HARMONY trial) and a dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP-4) inhibitor (the CARMELINA trial) on cardiovascular (CV) outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. In light of these new data, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of GLP-1RAs and DPP-4 inhibitors in CV outcome trials to assess their CV safety in patients with type 2 diabetes.. We conducted a comprehensive literature search in the Embase and MEDLINE databases to identify trials involving GLP-1RAs and DPP-4 inhibitors with major CV-related outcomes reported, including major adverse CV events, CV death, myocardial infarction, stroke, death from any cause and hospitalization because of heart failure. A total of 9 CV outcome trials were included. Odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals were calculated based on the Mantel-Haenszel method.. Relative to placebo, GLP-1RAs were associated with a statistically significant reduction in the odds of major adverse CV events (13%), CV death (12%), death from any cause (11%) and stroke (13%). DPP-4 inhibitors were comparable to placebo for all outcomes. Moreover, DPP-4 inhibitors were associated with a nonsignificant 5% increase in the odds of hospitalization from heart failure compared to placebo.. This meta-analysis demonstrated that GLP-1RAs were associated with a significant reduction in major adverse CV events, CV death, stroke and death from any cause, while DPP-4 inhibitors were comparable to placebo for all CV outcomes, including hospitalizations for heart failure.

Topics: Adult; Cardiovascular Diseases; Clinical Trials as Topic; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Humans; Incretins; Patient Safety; Prognosis

Topics: Biomarkers; Blood Glucose; Cardiovascular Diseases; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor; Humans; Incretins; Patient Selection; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Sodium-Glucose Transporter 2 Inhibitors; Treatment Outcome

With cardiovascular disease accounting for approximately 50% of deaths in patients diagnosed with type 2 diabetes, it is pertinent to initiate anti-diabetic medications with cardiovascular benefits. This systematic clinical review critically examines the clinical therapeutic effect of lixisenatide.. Data were gathered from articles indexed in PubMed, Google Scholar and Medline from 2010 - 2017, with the following search terms, "lixisenatide" and "GLP-1 receptor agonist". Studies written in the English language were included.. Thirteen clinical studies which evaluated the efficacy of lixisenatide were analyzed. Results from these studies showed that lixisenatide is an effective monotherapy in the reduction of glycated hemoglobin (A1C), Postprandial Glucose (PPG) and Fasting Blood Glucose (FPG). As an add-on therapy to metformin or sulfonylureas and insulin, it was found to be clinically effective compared to placebo. In all reviewed trials, there were higher proportions of patients who achieved A1C < 7% or < 6.5% compared to placebo without a corresponding increase in weight. Finally, the use of lixisenatide was not associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular events. The most common adverse events in all lixisenatide groups were nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea.. Lixisenatide appears to be safe and effective therapy for the management of type 2 diabetes mellitus. It is not associated with either the risk of cardiovascular events or symptomatic hypoglycemia. Finally, lixisenatide may be best used as an adjunct therapy for patients who are inadequately controlled with other diabetic medications, or select group of patients at risk of insulin induced obesity, hypertension or heart failure.

Topics: Biomarkers; Blood Glucose; Cardiovascular Diseases; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Incretins; Peptides; Protective Factors; Risk Factors; Signal Transduction; Treatment Outcome

To evaluate the comparative cardiovascular safety of incretin-based therapies in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).. Medline, Embase, the Cochrane Library and www.clinicaltrials.gov were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with duration≥12 weeks. Network meta-analysis was performed, followed by subgroup analysis and meta-regression. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation system was used to assess the quality of evidence. The outcome of interest was a composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, stroke and heart failure. Odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) was calculated as the measure of effect size.. 281 RCTs (76.9% double-blinded) with 180,000 patients were included, comparing incretin-based therapies with other six classes of anti-diabetic drugs or placebo. A statistically significant reduction in the risk of cardiovascular events was found in favour of GLP-1RAs when compared with placebo (OR 0.89, 95%CI: 0.80-0.99) and sulfonylurea (OR 0.76, 95%CI: 0.59-0.99), whereas DPP-4 inhibitors showed a neutral effect compared with placebo (OR 0.92, 95%CI: 0.83-1.01).. Incretin-based therapies show similar cardiovascular risk in comparison with metformin, insulin, thiazolidinediones, alpha-glucosidase inhibitor and sodium-glucose co-transporter 2. GLP-1RA could decrease the risk compared with sulfonylurea or placebo, while DPP-4I appears to have neutral effect on cardiovascular risk.

Topics: Cardiovascular Diseases; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Incretins; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Risk

The aim of this study is to examine the cardioprotective properties of Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist, a class of antihyperglycemic therapy, via meta-analysis of four recently published cardiovascular outcomes trials.. Meta-analysis was performed pooling data from the ELIXA, LEADER, SUSTAIN-6 and EXSCEL trials. A random effects model was used to generate risk ratio with 95% confidence interval for cardiovascular and safety outcomes.. A total of 33,457 patients were included in the meta-analysis. Based on the study, GLP-1R agonists significantly reduced all-cause mortality (RR 0.89; 95% CI 0.82 to 0.96) and cardiovascular mortality (RR 0.88; 95% CI 0.80 to 0.97) when compared to placebo. When long-acting agents were analyzed alone, reduction in major adverse cardiac events (RR 0.88; 95% CI 0.81 to 0.97) and non-fatal strokes (RR 0.87; 95% CI 0.76 to 0.99) also showed significance.. Overall, GLP-1R agonists appear to have cardioprotective properties likely via modification of metabolic parameters such as glycemic control, weight loss, and improvement in blood pressure. Additional studies are warranted to compare cardiovascular outcomes among the different agents.

Topics: Cardiovascular Agents; Cardiovascular Diseases; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Incretins; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Risk Factors; Signal Transduction; Treatment Outcome

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is a major challenge in the management of type 2 diabetes mellitus. Glucose-lowering agents that reduce the risk of major cardiovascular events would be considered a major advance, as recently reported with liraglutide and semaglutide, 2 glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists, and with empagliflozin and canagliflozin, 2 SGLT-2 (sodium-glucose cotransporter type 2) inhibitors, but not with DPP-4 (dipeptidyl peptidase-4) inhibitors. The present review is devoted to CV effects of new oral glucose-lowering agents. DPP-4 inhibitors (gliptins) showed some positive cardiac and vascular effects in preliminary studies, and initial data from phase 2 to 3 clinical trials suggested a reduction in major cardiovascular events. However, subsequent CV outcome trials with alogliptin, saxagliptin, and sitagliptin showed noninferiority but failed to demonstrate any superiority compared with placebo in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and high CV risk. An unexpected higher risk of hospitalization for heart failure was reported with saxagliptin. SGLT-2 inhibitors (gliflozins) promote glucosuria, thus reducing glucose toxicity and body weight, and enhance natriuresis, thus lowering blood pressure. Two CV outcome trials in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients mainly in secondary prevention showed remarkable positive results. Empagliflozin in EMPA-REG-OUTCOME (EMPAgliflozin Cardiovascular OUTCOME Events in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Patients) reduced major cardiovascular events, CV mortality, all-cause mortality, and hospitalization for heart failure. In CANVAS (Canagliflozin Cardiovascular Assessment Study), the reduction in CV mortality with canagliflozin failed to reach statistical significance despite a similar reduction in major cardiovascular events. The underlying protective mechanisms of SGLT-2 inhibitors remain unknown and both hemodynamic and metabolic explanations have been proposed. CVD-REAL studies (Comparative Effectiveness of Cardiovascular Outcomes in New Users of Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter-2 Inhibitors; with the limitation of an observational approach) suggested that these favorable results may be considered as a class effect shared by all SGLT-2 inhibitors (including dapagliflozin) and be extrapolated to a larger population of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus in primary prevention. Ongoing CV outcome trials with other DPP-4 (linagliptin) and SGLT-2 (dapagliflozin, ertugliflozin) inhibitors should provide additional infor

Topics: Cardiovascular Diseases; Cardiovascular System; Clinical Trials as Topic; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Diabetic Cardiomyopathies; Diabetic Nephropathies; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor; Hospitalization; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Incretins; Meta-Analysis as Topic; Multicenter Studies as Topic; Observational Studies as Topic; Risk; Sodium-Glucose Transporter 2 Inhibitors; Treatment Outcome

Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is a metabolic condition with an elevated impact on cardiovascular (CV) risk. The innovative therapeutic approaches for T2DM - incretin-based therapies (IBTs), including glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists, have become popular and more widely used in recent years. The available scientific data from clinical studies and clinical practice highlights their beyond glucose-lowering effects, which is achieved without any increase in hypoglycaemia. The former effects include reduction in body weight, lipids, blood pressure, inflammatory markers, oxidative stress, endothelial dysfunction, and subclinical atherosclerosis, thus reducing and potentially preventing CV events. In fact, the introduction of IBTs is one of the key moments in the history of diabetes research and treatment. Such therapeutic strategies allow customization of antidiabetic treatment to each patient's need and therefore obtain better metabolic control with reduced CV risk. The aim of the present paper is to provide a comprehensive overview of the effects of GLP-1RA on various cardiometabolic markers and overall CV risk, with particular attention on recent CV outcome studies and potential mechanisms. In particular, the effects of liraglutide on formation and progression of atherosclerotic plaque and mechanisms explaining its cardioprotective effects are highlighted.

Topics: Blood Glucose; Cardiovascular Diseases; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor; Glucagon-Like Peptides; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Incretins; Liraglutide; Plaque, Atherosclerotic

Diabetes mellitus is a chronic disease prevalence of which is high and continually growing. Cardiovascular disease continues to be the leading cause of death in patients with T2DM. The prevention of cardiovascular complications and the cardiovascular safety of treatments should be a primary objective when selecting treatment. Among all the drugs available, the compounds known as glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) appear to be not just innocuous in terms of CVD but indeed to be beneficial. GLP-1 RA actions not only translate on an improvement of well-known cardiovascular risk factors such as glycaemic control, dyslipidaemia, weight, or arterial hypertension but also might show benefits on endothelial function, coronary ischaemia, and heart failure. On the other hand, recent clinical trials aimed at studying cardiovascular episodes have been conducted with GLP-1 RAs. Only liraglutide and semaglutide have shown superiority in cardiovascular benefit compared with placebo. Although many of the mechanisms by which liraglutide and semaglutide produce a cardiovascular benefit are still unknown it would be desirable for these benefits to be incorporated into the therapeutic algorithms routinely used in clinical practice. The purpose of this review is to explore GLP-1 RA actions not only in cardiovascular risk factors (glucose, weight, and hypertension) but also the possible effects on established cardiovascular disease.

Topics: Blood Glucose; Cardiovascular Diseases; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Incretins

Atherosclerosis is a major underlying cause of ischemic heart diseases, ischemic stroke, and peripheral artery disease. Atherosclerotic plaque progression is characterized by chronic progressive inflammation of the arterial wall, endothelial cell dysfunction, and subendothelial lipoprotein retention. Incretin drugs, glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor (GLP-1R) agonists, and dipeptidyl peptidase-IV (DPP-IV) inhibitors, are promising anti-hyperglycemic agents used for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). In addition to glucose-lowering effects, emerging data suggest that incretin drugs have anti-atherogenic effects with the potential to stabilize atherosclerotic plaques and treat arterial inflammation. Clinical and preclinical studies have reported a plethora of therapeutic benefits of incretin drugs, including modulation of inflammatory response, reduction of intima-media thickening, improvement in lipid profiles, endothelial and smooth muscle cell modulation. Despite extensive research and widespread clinical use of incretin-based therapies, the research on the incretin hormones continues to expand. This review outlines clinical studies, molecular aspects, and potential therapeutic implications of incretin drugs in attenuation of atherosclerosis.

Topics: Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Atherosclerosis; Blood Glucose; Blood Pressure; Cardiovascular Diseases; Carotid Intima-Media Thickness; Diabetes Complications; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Endothelium, Vascular; Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor; Homeostasis; Humans; Incretins; Inflammation; Lipids; Peptides

Patients with type 2 diabetes (T2DM) have a substantial risk of developing cardiovascular disease. The strong connection between the severity of hyperglycaemia, metabolic changes secondary to T2DM and vascular damage increases the risk of macrovascular complications. There is a challenging demand for the development of drugs that control hyperglycaemia and influence other metabolic risk factors to improve cardiovascular outcomes such as cardiovascular death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke, hospitalization for unstable angina and heart failure (major adverse cardiovascular events). In recent years, introduction of the new drug class of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) has changed the treatment landscape as GLP-1RAs have become well-established therapies in T2DM. The benefits of GLP-1RAs are derived from their pleiotropic effects, which include appetite control, glucose-dependent secretion of insulin and inhibition of glucagon secretion. Importantly, their beneficial effects extend to the cardiovascular system. Large clinical trials have evaluated the cardiovascular effects of GLP-1RAs in patients with T2DM and elevated risk of cardiovascular disease and the results are very promising. However, important aspects still require elucidation, such as the specific mechanisms involved in the cardioprotective effects of these drugs. Careful interpretation is necessary because of the heterogeneity across the trials concerning the definition of cardiovascular risk or cardiovascular disease, baseline characteristics, routine care and event rates. The aim of this review is to describe the main clinical aspects of the GLP-1RAs, compare them using data from both the mechanistic and randomized controlled trials and discuss potential reasons for improved cardiovascular outcomes observed in these trials. This review may help clinicians to decide which treatment is most appropriate in reducing cardiovascular risk in patients with T2DM.

Topics: Blood Glucose; Cardiovascular Diseases; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Evidence-Based Medicine; Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Incretins; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Signal Transduction; Treatment Outcome

Nowadays, obesity is seriously increasing in most of the populations all over the world, and is associated with the development and progression of high-mortality diseases such as type-2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and its subsequent cardiovascular pathologies. Recent data suggest that both body fat distribution and adipocyte phenotype, can be more determinant for fatal outcomes in obese patients than increased general adiposity. In particular, visceral adiposity is significantly linked to long term alterations on different cardiac structures, and in developed forms of myocardial diseases such as hypertensive and ischaemic heart diseases, and diabetic cardiomyopathy. Interestingly, this depot may be also related to epicardial fat accumulation through secretion of lipids, adipokines, and pro-inflammatory and oxidative factors from adipocytes. Thus, visceral adiposity and its white single-lipid-like adipocytes, are risk factors for different forms of heart disease and heart failure, mainly in higher degree obese subjects. However, under specific stimuli, some of these adipocytes can transdifferentiate to brown multi-mitochondrial-like adipocytes with anti-inflammatory and anti-apoptotic proprieties. Accordingly, in order to improve potential cardiovascular abnormalities in obese and T2DM patients, several therapeutic strategies have been addressed to modulate the visceral and epicardial fat volume and phenotypes. In addition to lifestyle modifications, specific genetic manipulations in adipose tissue and administration of PPARγ agonists or statins, have improved fat volume and phenotype, and cardiovascular failures. Furthermore, incretin stimulation reduced visceral and epicardial fat thickness whereas increased formation of brown adipocytes, alleviating insulin resistance and associated cardiovascular pathologies.

Topics: Adipose Tissue; Adipose Tissue, Brown; Cardiovascular Diseases; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Humans; Incretins; Intra-Abdominal Fat; Obesity; Pericardium

Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP-4is) and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) represent two distinct classes of incretin-based therapies used for the treatment of type 2 diabetes. Non-inferiority versus placebo was shown in large prospective cardiovascular outcome trials in patients with high cardiovascular risk: SAVOR-TIMI 53 (saxagliptin), EXAMINE (alogliptin), and TECOS (sitagliptin); ELIXA (lixisenatide), LEADER (liraglutide) and SUSTAIN 6 (semaglutide). The promises raised by meta-analyses of phase 2-3 trials with DPP-4is were non confirmed as no cardiovascular protection could be evidenced. However, LEADER showed a significant reduction in major cardiovascular events, myocardial infarction, cardiovascular and all-cause mortality in patients treated by liraglutide compared to placebo. These positive results contrasted with the non-inferiority results with lixisenatide in ELIXA. They were partially confirmed with semaglutide in SUSTAIN 6 despite the absence of reduction in cardiovascular mortality. Hospitalisation for heart failure was not increased except with saxagliptin in SAVOR-TIMI 53. The reasons for different outcomes between trials remain largely unknown as well as the precise underlying mechanisms explaining the cardiovascular protection by liraglutide. The clinical relevance of results with DPP-4is and GLP-1RAs is discussed. Ongoing trials with linagliptin and several once-weekly GLP-1RAs should provide new insights into remaining fundamental questions.

Topics: Cardiovascular Diseases; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Incretins; Outcome Assessment, Health Care; Prospective Studies; Risk Factors

Diabetes is a well-established pro-inflammatory state with an increased risk for cardiovascular (CV) diseases. In recent years, the number of different classes of agents for the treatment of type 2 diabetes has increased substantially, and while glycemic control is the major focus of these medications, CV safety has become of interest. Two incretin-based therapies are currently available: glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists (RAs) and dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors.. The literature was reviewed for information regarding the incretin-based therapies and their effects on the CV system.. Independent of their glucose-lowering action, incretin-based therapies may have incretin-dependent mechanisms that positively affect blood pressure, weight, and other markers of CV disease risk, and, in the case of DPP-4 inhibition, nonincretin-dependent actions such as improving endothelial function. Several CV outcomes trials (CVOTs) with incretin-based therapies have recently completed with no excess CV risk observed, and positive effects have been reported in at least 1 trial of GLP-1 RAs, with more studies ongoing. Results for the risk for heart failure with DPP-4 inhibitor use are mixed, but no increase has been demonstrated with GLP-1 RAs.. Future CVOTs will need to be redesigned to help address these questions in the context of the emerging scope of the underlying mechanisms of cardio-metabolic disease in populations with diabetes.. A1C = hemoglobin A1C ACS = acute coronary syndrome CHD = coronary heart disease CI = confidence interval CV = cardiovascular CVOT = Cardiovascular Outcome Trial DPP-4 = dipeptidyl peptidase 4 FDA = U.S. Food and Drug Administration GIP = glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide GLP-1 = glucagon-like protein 1 GLP-1 RA = glucagon-like protein 1 receptor agonist HF = heart failure HR = hazard ratio LVEF = left ventricular ejection fraction MACE = major adverse cardiovascular events MI = myocardial infarction T2D = type 2 diabetes.

Topics: Blood Pressure; Body Weight; Cardiovascular Diseases; Clinical Trials as Topic; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Endothelium, Vascular; Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor; Humans; Incretins; Treatment Outcome

Regulatory requirements mandate that new drugs for treatment of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), such as dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors and glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists, are evaluated to show that they do not increase cardiovascular (CV) risk.. A systematic review was undertaken to evaluate the association between DPP-4 inhibitor and GLP-1 receptor agonist use and major adverse cardiac events (MACE). The National Institutes of Health Medline database was searched for pooled analyses, meta-analyses, and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of DPP-4 inhibitors and GLP-1 receptor agonists that included CV endpoints.. Thirty-six articles met the inclusion criteria encompassing 11 pooled analyses, 17 meta-analyses, and eight RCTs (including secondary analyses). Over the short term (up to 4 years), patients with T2DM exposed to a DPP-4 inhibitor or GLP-1 receptor agonist were not at increased risk for MACE (or its component endpoints) compared with those who received comparator agents. Two meta-analyses showed a significant reduction in the incidence of MACE associated with DPP-4 inhibitor therapy as a drug class, but this beneficial effect was not observed in other meta-analyses that included large RCT CV outcome studies. In four RCTs that evaluated alogliptin, saxagliptin, sitagliptin, or lixisenatide, there was no overall increased risk for MACE relative to placebo in T2DM patients at high risk for CV events or with established CV disease, although there was an increased rate of hospitalization for heart failure associated with saxagliptin. A fifth RCT showed that liraglutide reduced MACE risk by 13% versus placebo.. Overall, incretin therapy does not appear to increase risk for MACE in the short term.

Topics: Adamantane; Cardiovascular Diseases; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptides; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Incretins; Meta-Analysis as Topic; Peptides; Piperidines; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Sitagliptin Phosphate; Uracil

The purpose of this study was to review the results of clinical trials assessing the cardiovascular effects of drugs for type 2 diabetes and the cardiovascular effects of newer available drugs.. We performed a detailed search of PubMed-listed publications, reports from international meetings, and ongoing studies from clinical trials.gov.. Currently available drugs have neutral or, in some cases, negative effects on cardiovascular outcomes. Modern sulfonylureas appear to be safe, although the biguanide metformin has a slightly better cardiovascular safety profile than the sulfonylureas and is the first choice for monotherapy. The cardiovascular tolerability of thiazolidinediones (glitazones) remains controversial, with particularly adverse effects in patients with cardiac failure. The cardiovascular effects of insulin in type 2 diabetes appear neutral. Newer incretin-based therapies have been closely examined in a large number of clinical trials, some of which are still ongoing. The dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor (gliptins) trials to date have all found a neutral effect. Of the glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) agonists, lixisenatide had a neutral effect, whereas liraglutide and semaglutide had a benefit on outcomes. The results of the sodium-glucose transporter-2 (SGLT-2) inhibitor empaglifozin attracted interest when it was the first to report a strong benefit on cardiovascular mortality. Liraglutide and semaglutide had a neutral effect on cardiac failure admissions, whereas empaglifozin had a benefit. In each of the trials, there was not a clear effect on myocardial infarction and stroke. The mechanism of the cardiovascular benefit is debated, and further studies with other GLP-1 agonists and SGLT-2 inhibitors are awaited.. After 2 decades of disappointment in attempting to control cardiovascular progression in type 2 diabetes with careful glycemic control, there is distinct hope that newer drugs, particularly the GLP-1 agonists and the SGLT-2 inhibitors, will have cardiovascular benefits independent of glycemic control.

Topics: Cardiovascular Diseases; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor; Glucose; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Incretins; Insulin; Metformin; Sodium-Glucose Transporter 2; Sodium-Glucose Transporter 2 Inhibitors; Sulfonylurea Compounds; Thiazolidinediones

Topics: Cardiovascular Diseases; Comorbidity; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Female; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Incretins; Male; Prognosis; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Risk Assessment; Survival Rate; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Cardiovascular Diseases; Cardiovascular System; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Global Health; Humans; Incidence; Incretins; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Survival Rate

Incretin-based agents, including dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP-4Is) and glucagon-like peptide-1 agonists (GLP-1As), work via GLP-1 receptor for hyperglycemic control directly or indirectly, but have different effect on cardiovascular (CV) outcomes. The present study is to evaluate and compare effects of incretin-based agents on CV and pancreatic outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and high CV risk.. Six prospective randomized controlled trials (EXMAINE, SAVOR-TIMI53, TECOS, ELIXA, LEADER and SUSTAIN-6), which included three trials for DPP-4Is and three trials for GLP-1As, with 55,248 participants were selected to assess the effect of different categories of incretin-based agents on death, CV outcomes (CV mortality, major adverse CV events, nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke, heart failure hospitalization), pancreatic events (acute pancreatitis and pancreatic cancer) as well as on hypoglycemia.. When we evaluated the combined effect of six trials, the results suggested that incretin-based treatment had no significant effect on overall risks of CV and pancreatic outcomes compared with placebo. However, GLP-1As reduced all-cause death (RR = 0.90, 95% CI 0.82-0.98) and CV mortality (RR = 0.84, 95% CI 0.73-0.97), whereas DPP-4Is had no significant effect on CV outcomes but elevated the risk for acute pancreatitis (OR = 1.76, 95% CI 1.14-2.72) and hypoglycemia (both any and severe hypoglycemia), while GLP-1As lowered the risk of severe hypoglycemia.. GLP-1As decreased risks of all-cause and CV mortality and severe hypoglycemia, whereas DPP-4Is had no effect on CV outcomes but increased risks in acute pancreatitis and hypoglycemia.

Topics: Cardiovascular Diseases; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Glucagon-Like Peptide 1; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Incretins; Pancreatitis; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Risk Factors; Treatment Outcome

Recently, cardiovascular outcome trials with glucose-lowering drugs used in type 2 diabetes mellitus, namely glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RA), liraglutide and semaglutide, showed a reduction in cardiovascular events, which had not been observed in trials with other incretin-based drugs, such as lixisenatide or with dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP4i). Mechanisms underlying the observed cardiovascular differences between DPP4i and GLP1-RA, and across individual GLP1-RA are poorly understood. This review is aimed at collecting and summarizing available evidence from experimental and mechanistic studies on the action of GLP1-RA and DPP4i on the cardiovascular system, both deriving from clinical and pre-clinical sources. The results of cardiovascular outcome trials are interpreted on the basis of the experimental preclinical data available, paying particular attention to the heart failure results, and suggesting some novel intriguing hypotheses to explain some of the unexpected findings of cardioprotection of incretin-based drugs. In particular, we discuss the possible contribution to the incretin cardiovascular effects of a direct cardiac action of GLP-1 metabolites through GLP-1 receptor-independent pathways, and of DPP4 substrates other than GLP-1.

Topics: Animals; Cardiotonic Agents; Cardiovascular Diseases; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor; Glucagon-Like Peptides; Humans; Incretins; Liraglutide; Treatment Outcome

In this paper, we review the results of large, double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized trials mandated by the US Food and Drug Administration to examine the cardiovascular safety of newly-approved antihyperglycemic agents in patients with type 2 diabetes. The cardiovascular effects of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors remain controversial: while these drugs did not reduce or increase the risk of primary, pre-specified composite cardiovascular outcomes, one DPP-4 inhibitor (saxagliptin) increased the risk of hospitalization for heart failure in the overall population; another (alogliptin) demonstrated inconsistent effects on heart failure hospitalization across subgroups of patients, and a third (sitagliptin) demonstrated no effect on heart failure. Evidence for cardiovascular benefits of glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) agonists has been similarly heterogeneous, with liraglutide and semaglutide reducing the risk of composite cardiovascular outcomes, but lixisenatide having no reduction or increase in cardiovascular risk. The effect of GLP-1 agonists on retinopathy remains a potential concern. In the only completed trial to date to assess a sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitor, empagliflozin reduced the risk of composite cardiovascular endpoints, predominantly through its impact on cardiovascular mortality and heart failure hospitalization.

Topics: Biomarkers; Blood Glucose; Cardiovascular Diseases; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptidyl Peptidase 4; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Glucagon-Like Peptide 1; Humans; Incretins; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Sodium-Glucose Transporter 2; Sodium-Glucose Transporter 2 Inhibitors; Treatment Outcome

With the recent introduction of the new European Pharmacovigilance legislation, all new drugs must be carefully monitored after admission on the European market, in order to assess the long safety profile. Currently, special attention is given to several hypoglycemic agents with recent market approval (agonists of glucagon-like peptide-1 [GLP-1] receptor and dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitors [DPP-4i]), which act through the potentiation of incretin hormone signaling. Their inclusion in European additional monitoring is also due to safety problems, which seem to characterize their pharmacological class. In fact, these drugs initially showed a good tolerability profile with mainly gastrointestinal adverse events, low risk of hypoglycemia and minor effects on body weight. But, new concerns such as infections, pancreatitis, pancreatic cancer and above all cardiovascular events (especially risk of heart failure requiring hospitalization) are now arising. In this review, we highlighted aspects of the new Pharmacovigilance European dispositions, and then we investigated the tolerability profile of incretin-based therapies, in particular DPP-4 inhibitors. Notably, we focused our attention on new safety concerns, which are emerging mostly in the post-marketing period, as the cardiovascular risk profile. Evidence in literature and opinions of regulatory agencies (e.g., European Medicines Agency and Food and Drug Administration) about risks of incretin-based therapies are yet controversial, and there are many open questions in particular on cancer and cardiovascular effects. Thus, it is important to continue to monitor closely the use of these drugs in clinical practice to improve the knowledge on their long-term safety and their place in diabetes therapy.

Topics: Cardiovascular Diseases; Dipeptidyl Peptidase 4; Humans; Incretins; Pharmacovigilance; Risk Factors

The incretin-based therapies, dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP4) inhibitors and glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) analogs, are important new classes of therapy for type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). These agents prolong the action of the incretin hormones, GLP-1 and glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP), by inhibiting their breakdown. The incretin hormones improve glycemic control in T2DM by increasing insulin secretion and suppressing glucagon levels. The cardiovascular (CV) effects of the incretin-based therapies have been of substantial interest since 2008, when the US Food and Drug Administration began to require that all new therapies for diabetes undergo rigorous assessment of CV safety through large-scale CV outcome trials. This article reviews the most recent CV outcome trials of the DPP-4 inhibitors (SAVOR-TIMI 53, EXAMINE, and TECOS) as evidence that the incretin-based therapies have acceptable CV safety profiles for patients with T2DM. The studies differ with regard to patient population, trial duration, and heart failure outcomes but show similar findings for CV death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, and stroke, as well as hospitalization for unstable angina.

Topics: Adamantane; Cardiovascular Diseases; Cardiovascular System; Clinical Trials as Topic; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptides; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Glucagon-Like Peptide 1; Heart Failure; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Incretins; Piperidines; Sitagliptin Phosphate; Uracil

Diabetic vascular complications are the most common cause of mortality and morbidity worldwide, with numbers of affected individuals steadily increasing. Diabetic vascular complications can be divided into two categories: macrovascular andmicrovascular complications. Macrovascular complications include coronary artery diseaseand cerebrovascular disease, while microvascular complications include retinopathy and chronic kidney disease. These complications result from metabolic abnormalities, including hyperglycemia, elevated levels of free fatty acids, and insulin resistance. Multiple mechanisms have been proposed to mediate the adverse effects of these metabolic disorders on vascular tissues, including stimulation of protein kinase C signaling and activation of the polyol pathway by oxidative stress and inflammation. Additionally, the loss of tissue-specific insulin signaling induced by hyperglycemia and toxic metabolites can induce cellular dysfunction and both macro- and microvascular complications characteristic of diabetes. Despite these insights, few therapeutic methods are available for the management of diabetic complications. Recently, incretin-based therapeutic agents, such as glucagon-like peptide-1 and dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors, have been reported to elicit vasotropic actions, suggesting a potential for effecting an actual reduction in diabetic vascular complications. The present review will summarize the relationship between multiple adverse biological mechanisms in diabetes and putative incretin-based therapeutic interventions intended to prevent diabetic vascular complications.

Topics: Animals; Cardiovascular Diseases; Cerebrovascular Circulation; Diabetic Angiopathies; Diabetic Nephropathies; Diabetic Neuropathies; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Incretins; Inflammation; Kidney; Oxidative Stress; Protein Kinase C

Incretin-based therapies are effective glucose-lowering drugs that have an increasing role in the treatment of type 2 diabetes because of their efficacy, safety, and ease of use. Both glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists and dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors are commonly used for glycemic control as adjuncts to metformin, other oral antiglycemic agents, or insulin. Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists may have additional effects, such as weight loss, that may be advantageous in obese patients. There is a large body of evidence from randomized controlled clinical trials supporting the cardiovascular safety of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors and some glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists, at least in the short term. However, concerns have been raised, particularly regarding their safety in patients with heart failure. In this review, the authors provide a brief but practical evidence-based analysis of the use of incretin-based agents in patients with diabetes, their efficacy, and cardiovascular safety.

Topics: Blood Glucose; Cardiovascular Diseases; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Humans; Incretins; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Treatment Outcome

Recent cardiovascular outcome trials of incretin-based therapies (IBT) in type 2 diabetes have not demonstrated either benefit or harm in terms of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). Earlier meta-analyses showed conflicting results but were limited in methodology. We aimed to perform an updated meta-analysis of all available incretin therapies on the incidence of MACE plus arrhythmia and heart failure.. We identified studies published through November 2014 by searching electronic databases and reference lists. We included RCTs in which the intervention group received incretin-based therapies and the control group received placebo or standard treatment; enrolled >100 participants in each group; interventions lasted >24 weeks; and reported data on one or more primary major adverse cardiovascular events endpoints plus terms for arrhythmia and heart failure. We used the Peto method for each CV event for individual IBT treatment.. In this meta-analysis of 100 RCTs involving 54,758 incretin-based therapies users and 48,175 controls, exenatide was associated with increased risk of arrhythmia (OR 2.83; 95% CI, 1.06-7.57); saxagliptin was associated with an increased risk of heart failure (OR 1.23; 95% CI, 1.03-1.46), and sitagliptin was associated with a significantly decreased risk of all cause death compared to active controls (OR 0.39, 95% CI 0.18-0.82).. In type 2 diabetes, exenatide may increase the risk of arrhythmia, and sitagliptin may reduce the risk of all cause death; however, the subgroup of patients most likely to experience harm or benefit is unclear. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Topics: Arrhythmias, Cardiac; Cardiovascular Diseases; Case-Control Studies; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Humans; Incretins; Prognosis; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic

To assess the cardiovascular (CV) risk associated with the use of incretin-based therapy in adult patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) primary prevention group with low CV risks.. The clinical studies on incretin-based therapy published in medical journals until August 2014 were comprehensively searched using MEDLINE, EMBASE and CENTRAL with no language restriction. The studies were systemically reviewed and evaluated for CV risks using a meta-analysis approach and where they meet the following criteria: clinical trial, incidence of predefined CV disease, T2DM with no comorbidities, age > 18 years old, duration of at least 12 weeks, incretin-based therapy compared with other antihyperglycaemic agents or placebo. Statistical analyses were performed using a Mantel-Haenszel (M-H) test. The odds ratios (OR) and their 95% confidence interval (CI) were estimated and displayed for comparison.. A total of 75 studies comprising 45,648 patients with T2DM were selected. The pooled estimate demonstrated no significance in decreased CV risk with incretin-based therapy versus control (M-H OR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.81-1.00).. This meta-analysis suggests that incretin-based therapy show no significant protective effect on CV events in T2DM primary prevention group with low CV risks. Prospective randomized controlled trials are required to confirm the results of this analysis.

Topics: Adult; Cardiovascular Diseases; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Incretins; Risk

Controversy exists regarding the selection of second-line therapy for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) who are unable to achieve glycemic control with metformin therapy alone. Newer pharmacologic treatments for T2DM include glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists and sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors. Both the classes of medication are efficacious, exhibit positive effects on weight, and are associated with minimal risk of hypoglycemia. The purpose of this review is to compare the clinical trial and real-world effectiveness data of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists versus sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors related to A1c reduction, weight loss, cost-effectiveness, cardiovascular outcomes, and safety in patients with T2DM. This review summarizes comparative evidence for providers who are determining which of the two classes may be the most appropriate for a specific patient.

Topics: Biomarkers; Blood Glucose; Cardiovascular Diseases; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Costs; Drug Therapy, Combination; Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Incretins; Kidney Tubules, Proximal; Patient Selection; Risk Factors; Sodium-Glucose Transporter 2; Sodium-Glucose Transporter 2 Inhibitors; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Weight Loss

Diabetes treatments aim at preventing undesirable metabolic effects of hyperglycemia and at preventing/reducing tissue damage, including cardiovascular (CV) events. For approval, novel diabetes drugs undergo early systematic investigation to assess CV safety. This review provides an updated analysis of the results of recent studies examining novel diabetes medications and CV outcomes.. The new regulatory guidelines enforce adjudication of all CV events when testing novel diabetes drugs. Endpoints of CV mortality, myocardial infarction (MI), stroke and hospitalization for heart failure (HF) were included in the most recent clinical studies on novel antihyperglycemics. These are: the incretin mimetics glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists (GLP1-RA), the incretin enhancers dipeptidylpeptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors (DPP4-I or gliptins), and the sodium-glucose cotransporter (SGLT2) inhibitors (SGLT2-I or gliflozins). The studies ELIXA and EXAMINE, testing lixisenatide and alogliptin, respectively, revealed non-inferiority versus placebo in terms of CV safety. The SAVOR-TIMI 53 results confirmed overall CV safety of saxagliptin, but raised a warning related to the increase in the risk of hospitalization for HF in the saxagliptin group. Recently, TECOS revealed a particularly favorable CV profile for sitagliptin while EMPA-REG showed a significant CV risk reduction in empagliflozin treated subjects. Ongoing studies will provide additional data on CV safety for other GLP1-RAs, DPP4-I and SGLT2-I.. Results of safety outcome studies focused on CV events, including HF and mortality for CV causes, are not homogeneous. A critical analysis of these studies may help cardiologists and diabetes specialists to adapt their therapeutic choices to individual patients.

Topics: Benzhydryl Compounds; Cardiovascular Diseases; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Glucosides; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Incretins; Patient Safety; Patient Selection; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Sitagliptin Phosphate; Treatment Outcome

The increased risk of cardiovascular disease in patients with type 2 diabetes has been known for many years. However, until recently the cardiovascular (CV) impact of glucose lowering strategies has been inadequately understood. Major clinical trials have now investigated the impact of intensification of glycemic control upon CV outcomes, as well as the CV effects of glucose management with newer antihyperglycemic agents.. Key findings from recently completed CV outcomes trials of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP4) inhibitors, GLP-1 receptor agonists, and sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors completed thus far are reviewed and summarized.. Multiple trials designed to meet regulatory requirements for CV safety of antihyperglycemic medications have been initiated. The results of several completed CV outcomes trials clarify the risks and benefits associated with newer medications used to manage hyperglycemia in patients with type 2 diabetes, particularly in individuals at high CV risk. Important differences have been noted with respect to heart failure outcomes within the DPP4 inhibitor class, and thus far one agent in the SGLT2 inhibitor class has been found to significantly reduce rates of important CV outcomes. Robust safety related information from trials designed to assess the CV effects of diabetes therapies will permit the incorporation of outcomes-based evidence into the formulation of diabetes care guidelines.

Topics: Cardiovascular Diseases; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Incretins; Patient Safety; Patient Selection; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Treatment Outcome

The effect of glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) treatment in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) remains controversial. The purpose of this study was to compare the effect of GLP-1 and placebo/conventional antidiabetic agents on cardiovascular risk in T2DM patients. PubMed, EmBase and the Cochrane Library were searched to identify its eligible studies as well as manual searches for the reliability of this study. All eligible trials were performed in T2DM patients who received GLP-1 therapy or placebo/conventional antidiabetic agents. The reported outcomes included major cardiovascular events (MACE), and total mortality. Of 490 identified studies, we included 13 trials reporting data on 11,943 T2DM patients. Overall, the pooled results suggested that GLP-1 therapy has no or little effect on MACE (RR: 0.99; 95% CI: 0.88-1.12; P=0.872) and total mortality (RR: 0.90; 95% CI: 0.70-1.15; P=0.399). Furthermore, sensitivity analysis indicated that GLP-1 was associated with lower incidence of total mortality (RR: 0.28; 95% CI: 0.08-0.93; P=0.037). We concluded that GLP-1 therapy was not associated with MACE and total mortality compared with placebo or antidiabetic agents.

Topics: Cardiovascular Diseases; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Global Health; Glucagon-Like Peptide 1; Humans; Incretins; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Reproducibility of Results; Survival Rate

Incretin-based therapies offer another treatment option for patients with type 2 diabetes. Agents that provide glycaemic control in addition to attenuating cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factors are important for diabetes management. This review will focus on the off-target effects of incretin-based therapies on CVD risk factors [body weight, blood pressure (BP), lipid profile and albuminuria], major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), heart failure (HF) and beta-cell preservation.. A literature search was conducted to identify English-language publications for incretin-based therapies evaluating the following off-target end-points: body weight, BP, lipid profile, albuminuria, MACE, HF and beta-cell function. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) were prioritised as the primary source of information.. Overall, incretin-based therapies have shown beneficial effects on CVD risk factors, and glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists appear to have a more pronounced effect compared with dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors. RCTs are being conducted to determine if these positive effects on CVD risk factors translate to a reduction in MACE. To date, these studies have not shown an increase in MACE. A signal of increased hospitalisations for HF was observed with saxagliptin, warranting continued evaluation and vigilance in high-risk patients. In addition, incretin-based therapies have shown positive effects on measures of beta-cell function supporting their durability in the management of diabetes.. Incretin-based therapies are an important treatment option for patients with type 2 diabetes, offering beneficial effects on CVD risk factors without increasing MACE.

Topics: Cardiovascular Diseases; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Incretins; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Treatment Outcome

Cardiovascular (CV) disease is the leading cause of mortality and morbidity in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). However, improving glycaemic control alone has not decreased CV events. Therapies that improve glycaemic control, CV disease risk factors and CV function are more likely to be successful. Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors prevent breakdown of incretin hormones glucagon-like peptide-1(GLP-1) and glucose-dependent insulinotropic peptide and improve glycaemic control in patients with T2DM. DPP-4 acts on other substrates, many associated with cardioprotection. Thus, inhibition of DPP-4 may lead to elevations in these potentially beneficial substrates. Data from animal studies and small observational studies in humans suggest that DPP-4 inhibitors may potentially reduce CV risk. However, recently completed CV outcome trials in patients with T2DM and CV disease or at high risk of adverse CV events have shown that the DPP-4 inhibitors saxagliptin and alogliptin neither increased nor decreased major adverse CV events.

Topics: Adamantane; Animals; Biomarkers; Blood Glucose; Cardiovascular Diseases; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptides; Dipeptidyl Peptidase 4; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Humans; Incretins; Piperidines; Protective Factors; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Treatment Outcome; Uracil

Cardiometabolic disorders including obesity, diabetes and cardiovascular disease are among the most severe health problems worldwide. DPP4 enzymatic inhibitors were first developed as anti-diabetic reagents which preserve incretin hormones and promote post-prandial insulin secretion. It's been shown in animal studies that incretin-based therapy has a beneficial effect on cardiovascular disease. Recent studies demonstrated novel non-catalytic functions of DPP4 that may play a role in cardiometabolic disease. Although the role of DPP4 inhibition-mediated incretin effects has been well-reviewed, little information of its incretin-independent actions was introduced in cardiometabolic disease. In the current review, we will summarize the catalytic dependent and independent effects of DPP4 inhibition on cardiometabolic disease.

Topics: Cardiovascular Diseases; Dipeptidyl Peptidase 4; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Humans; Incretins

Albiglutide is a glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist, a new class of drugs used to treat type 2 diabetes. We did a prospective meta-analysis of the cardiovascular safety of albiglutide as stipulated by the US Food and Drug Administration recommendations for the assessment of new treatments for diabetes.. We did a meta-analysis of eight phase 3 trials and one phase 2b trial in which patients were randomly assigned to albiglutide, placebo, or active comparators (glimepiride, insulin glargine, insulin lispro, liraglutide, pioglitazone, or sitagliptin). The safety population included 5107 patients, of whom 2524 took albiglutide (4870 person-years) and 2583 took comparators (5213 person-years). Possible major cardiovascular events were recorded prospectively and adjudicated by an independent endpoint committee masked to treatment allocation. The primary endpoint was a composite of first occurrence of major adverse cardiovascular events (ie, cardiovascular death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, or non-fatal stroke) or hospital admission for unstable angina. Secondary endpoints were major adverse cardiovascular events alone, all-cause mortality, silent myocardial infarction, hospital admission for heart failure, chest pain, other angina, and subdural or extradural haemorrhage. The occurrence of all other adverse events classified by the investigators as cardiovascular events were documented, but these were not adjudicated.. The primary endpoint was not significantly different between albiglutide and all comparators (58 events vs 58 events; hazard ratio [HR] 1·00, 95% CI 0·68-1·49, p=0·0019 for non-inferiority). Major adverse cardiovascular event alone was also not significantly different (52 events vs 53; HR, 0·99; 95% CI, 0·65-1·49). When albiglutide was compared separately with placebo or active comparators, we noted no significant differences. We detected no significant differences in the other secondary endpoints. More patients had atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter in the albiglutide group (35 [1·4%] of 2524 patients; 8·6 events per 1000 patient-years) than in the all-comparators group (16 [0·6%] of 2583 patients; 3·4 events per 1000 patient-years).. Cardiovascular events were not significantly more likely to occur with albiglutide than with all comparators. Because the upper bound of the 95% CI for major adverse cardiovascular event plus hospital admission for unstable angina was greater than 1·3, a dedicated study with a cardiovascular endpoint is underway to confirm the safety of albiglutide.. GlaxoSmithKline.

Topics: Aged; Cardiovascular Diseases; Cardiovascular System; Clinical Trials, Phase II as Topic; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Female; Glucagon-Like Peptide 1; Humans; Incretins; Male; Middle Aged; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic

The metabolic syndrome (MetS) is associated with a higher risk for both, type 2 diabetes mellitus and cardiovascular disease. The cornerstone of treatment is lifestyle modification, encompassing weight reduction and physical exercise. However, pharmacotherapy is usually also required to achieve the recommended target values for the various components of the MetS, such as hypertension, dysglycemia and dyslipidemia. Regarding lipid treatment, statins are the main therapeutic agents while in blood pressure control a significant amount of pathophysiological and clinical evidence would suggest the use, as first line agents, of ACE inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers. Metformin seems to be the drug of choice for dysglycemia, specially since recent evidence questions the safety of thiazolidinediones. New drugs, targeting multiple components of the MetS, are under development but no data are currently available regarding their long-term efficacy and safety profile. In general, a multifactorial approach is recommended to decrease cardiovascular risk in patients with the MetS.

Topics: Acarbose; Cardiovascular Diseases; Drug Combinations; Dyslipidemias; Humans; Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors; Hypoglycemic Agents; Hypolipidemic Agents; Incretins; Insulin; Metabolic Syndrome; Metformin; Risk Reduction Behavior; Thiazolidinediones

An impaired endothelial function has been recognized in the early stage of atherosclerosis, and is a major factor affecting the future development of cardiovascular events. Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is widely prevalent, and is one of the most important risk factors for cardiovascular disease. T2DM is associated with increases in both morbidity and mortality, particularly from cardiovascular disease.New therapies based on the incretin hormone and its actions are now becoming widely used, and appear to offer advantages over conventional therapies by keeping the body weight steady and limiting hypoglycemia, while also achieving attractive glycemic control. However, there is little data available about the effects of incretins on the cardiovascular system.This review will focus on the effects of incretin therapies, including glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) analogs and dipeptidyl peptidase (DPP)-4 inhibitors, on the endothelial function, and will discuss the potential mechanisms underlying these effects.

Topics: Animals; Cardiovascular Diseases; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Glucagon-Like Peptide 1; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Incretins; Risk Factors

Antidiabetic drugs for type 2 diabetes receive marketing authorization if they show efficacy in reducing levels of HbA(1c). However, efficacy on this biological criterion does not necessarily reflect clinical benefit to patients. Several randomized clinical trials have shown that antidiabetic drugs reduce HbA(1c) without a corresponding reduction in clinical events. This suggests a need to focus on the clinical effectiveness (morbimortality criteria) of our available antidiabetic drugs. In this non-extensive review of the literature, it was found that none of the current antidiabetic drugs have clearly proven their superiority over placebo in the gold standard double-blind randomized clinical trials. Thus, in 2013, the level of evidence for the clinical efficacy of antidiabetic drugs is disappointing and does not support the millions of prescriptions being written for them.

Topics: Blood Glucose; Cardiovascular Diseases; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Diabetic Angiopathies; Evidence-Based Medicine; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Incretins; Insulin; Metformin; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Sulfonylurea Compounds

Incretin-based therapy became recently available as antihyperglycemic treatment for patients with type 2 diabetes (T2DM). Incretin therapy comprises glucagon-like peptide receptor agonists (GLP-1RA) and dipeptidyl-peptidase 4 inhibitors (DPP4-I): these classes of drugs not only have the ability to reduce blood glucose, but also can exert several cardioprotective effects. They have been shown to positively influence some risk factors for cardiovascular disease (CVD), to improve endothelial function, and to directly affect cardiac function. For these reasons incretins are considered not only antidiabetic drugs, but also cardiovascular effective. The first clinical trials aimed to demonstrate the safety of DPP4 inhibitors have been recently published: their clinical significance will be discussed in light of the prior experimental findings.

Topics: Blood Glucose; Blood Pressure; Cardiovascular Diseases; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Endothelium, Vascular; Female; Glucagon-Like Peptide 1; Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Incretins; Inflammation; Lipid Metabolism; Male; Myocytes, Cardiac; Receptors, Glucagon

Topics: Blood Glucose; Cardiovascular Diseases; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Incretins; Receptors, Glucagon; Risk Factors

Cardiovascular (CV) disease remains the major cause of mortality and morbidity in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). The pathogenesis of CV disease in T2DM is complex and multifactorial, and includes abnormalities in endothelial cells, vascular smooth muscle cells, myocardium, platelets, and the coagulation cascade. Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors are a newer class of agents that act by potentiating the action of glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) and glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide. This review summarizes CV disease pathophysiology in T2DM and the potential effect of DPP-4 inhibitors on CV risk in patients with T2DM. Preclinical and small observational studies and post hoc analyses of clinical trial data suggest that DPP-4 inhibitors may have beneficial CV effects. Some effects of DPP-4 inhibitors are GLP-1 dependent, whereas others may be due to GLP-1-independent actions of DPP-4 inhibitors. Analyses of major adverse CV events occurring during clinical development of DPP-4 inhibitors found no increased risk of CV events or mortality and even a potential reduction in CV events. Two large CV outcome trials have been completed and report that saxagliptin and alogliptin did not increase or decrease adverse CV outcomes in patients with T2DM and CV disease or at high risk for adverse CV events. More patients in the saxagliptin group than in the placebo group were hospitalized for heart failure, and there was a similar numerically increased risk of hospitalization for heart failure with alogliptin; however, the risk was not significantly greater compared with placebo. Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors may affect some of the pathologic processes involved in the increased CV risk inherent in T2DM.

Topics: Animals; Blood Platelets; Cardiovascular Diseases; Clinical Trials as Topic; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Drug Evaluation, Preclinical; Endothelial Cells; Glucagon-Like Peptide 1; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Incretins; Lipoproteins; Muscle, Smooth, Vascular; Myocardium; Risk Factors

Dipeptidylpeptidase-4 (DPP-4) is a ubiquitously expressed transmembrane protein that removes NH2-terminal dipeptides from various substrate hormones, chemokines, neuropeptides, and growth factors. Two known substrates of DPP-4 include the incretin hormones glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) and gastric inhibitory peptide, which are secreted by enteroendocrine cells in response to postprandial hyperglycemia and account for 60–70% of postprandial insulin secretion. DPP-4 inhibitors (DPP-4i) block degradation of GLP-1 and gastric inhibitory peptide, extend their insulinotropic effect, and improve glycemia. Since 2006, several DPP-4i have become available for treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus. Clinical trials confirm that DPP-4i raises GLP-1 levels in plasma and improves glycemia with very low risk for hypoglycemia and other side effects. Recent studies also suggest that DPP-4i confers cardiovascular and kidney protection, beyond glycemic control, which may reduce the risk for further development of the multiple comorbidities associated with obesity/type 2 diabetes mellitus, including hypertension and cardiovascular disease (CVD) and kidney disease. The notion that DPP-4i may improve CVD outcomes by mechanisms beyond glycemic control is due to both GLP-1-dependent and GLP-1-independent effects. The CVD protective effects by DPP-4i result from multiple factors including insulin resistance, oxidative stress, dyslipidemia, adipose tissue dysfunction, dysfunctional immunity, and antiapoptotic properties of these agents in the heart and vasculature. This review focuses on cellular and molecular mechanisms mediating the CVD protective effects of DPP-4i beyond favorable effects on glycemic control.

Topics: Animals; Cardiovascular Diseases; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Endothelium, Vascular; Glucagon-Like Peptide 1; Humans; Incretins; Metabolic Diseases

As cardiovascular (CV) disease remains the major cause of mortality and morbidity in type 2 diabetes mellitus, reducing macrovascular complications has been a major target of antiglycemic therapies. Emerging evidence suggests that incretin-based therapies are safe and may provide CV and cerebrovascular (CBV) benefits beyond those attributable to glycemic control, making the class an attractive therapeutic option. However, the mechanisms whereby the various classes of incretin-based therapies exert CV and CBV benefits may be distinct and may not necessarily lead to similar outcomes. In this chapter, we will discuss the potential mechanisms and current understanding of CV and CBV benefits of native glucagon-like peptide (GLP)-1, GLP-1 receptor agonists and analogues, and of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor therapies as a means to better understand differences in safety and efficacy.

Topics: Blood Glucose; Blood Pressure; Cardiotonic Agents; Cardiovascular Diseases; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Glucagon-Like Peptide 1; Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor; Heart; Humans; Incretins; Peptide Fragments; Receptors, Glucagon

Type 2 diabetes increases the risk of developing cardiovascular (CV) complications such as myocardial infarction, heart failure, stroke, peripheral vascular disease, and CV-associated mortality. Strict glycemic control in diabetics has shown improvement in microvascular complications related to diabetes but has been unable to demonstrate major effects on macrovascular complications including myocardial infarction and stroke. Conventional therapies for diabetes that include insulin, metformin, sulfonylureas (SU), and alpha-glucosidase inhibitors have limited and/or controversial data on CV safety based on observational studies not designed or powered to assess CV safety of these medications. In 2008, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) revised regulations for the approval of medications for type 2 diabetes by requiring that enough CV events are accrued prior to approval to rule out an upper 95 % confidence interval (95 % CI) for HR of 1.8 for CV events, followed by ruling out an upper 95 % CI for HR of 1.3 in the post-approval period. To date, novel diabetes therapies including peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR) gamma agonists, dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP4) inhibitors, glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP 1) analogs, and sodium-glucose transporter-2 (SGL2) inhibitors have been evaluated in CV safety trials. Results from the first major CV outcome studies in type 2 diabetes, SAVOR-TIMI 53 and EXAMINE, have shown that neither saxagliptin nor alogliptin had increases in major CV events relative to placebo in high-risk patients. Ongoing and future trials will elucidate the CV safety for other DPP-4 inhibitors compared to SUs and the GLP-1 agonists versus placebo.

Topics: Cardiovascular Diseases; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Diabetic Angiopathies; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Drug Administration Schedule; Glycated Hemoglobin; Glycoside Hydrolase Inhibitors; Humans; Hyperglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Incretins; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Risk Assessment; Sulfonylurea Compounds; Thiazolidinediones; Treatment Outcome

The wide ubiquity of GLP-1 receptors in the body has stimulated the search for different extrapancreatic actions of GLP-1 and its receptor agonists. Thus, severe cardioprotective effects directed on myocardial ischaemia and dysfunction as well as diverse antiaterogenic actions have been reported. Also, native and GLP-1 receptor agonists have demonstrated significant beneficial effects on liver steatosis and fibrosis and on neuronal protection in experimental models of Alzheimer, and Parkinson's disease as well as on cerebral ischaemia. Recent evidences suggest that these drugs may also be useful for prevention and treatment of diabetic retinopathy, nephropathy and peripheral neuropathy. Good results have also been reported in psoriasis. Despite we still need confirmation that these promising effects can be applied to clinical practice, they offer new interesting perspectives for treatment of type 2 diabetes associated complications and give to GLP-1 receptor agonists an even more integral position in diabetes therapy.

Topics: Alzheimer Disease; Brain Ischemia; Cardiovascular Diseases; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Diabetic Nephropathies; Diabetic Neuropathies; Diabetic Retinopathy; Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Incretins; Liver Diseases; Parkinson Disease; Patient Care Planning

Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1ra) are a new group of drugs with a glucose-lowering action due to their incretin effect. The GLP-1 receptor is expressed in various human tissues, which could be related to the pleiotropic effects of human GLP-1, as well as to the adverse effects described in patients treated with GLP-1ra. The risk of hypoglycaemia is low, which is one of the main considerations in the safety of this family of compounds and is also important to patients with diabetes. The most frequent adverse effect is nausea, which usually occurs at the start of treatment and is transient in 20-60% of affected patients. This article also reviews the information available on antibody formation, the potential effect on the thyroid gland, and the controversial association between this group of drugs with pancreatitis and cancer.

Topics: Cardiovascular Diseases; Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Incretins; Nausea; Pancreatic Neoplasms; Pancreatitis; Thyroid Neoplasms

Comorbid obesity, dyslipidemia, and hypertension place patients with type 2 diabetes (T2DM) at greatly increased risk of cardiovascular (CV) disease-related morbidity and mortality. An urgent need exists for effective treatment for patients with T2DM that encompasses glycemic control, weight loss, and reduction in CV risk factors. The glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) liraglutide and exenatide are incretin-based antidiabetes agents. This review examines CV-associated effects of liraglutide and exenatide in animal models and clinical trials with patients with T2DM. Studies support the effectiveness of GLP-1 RAs in reducing hyperglycemia. Further, GLP-1 RAs represent a significant advance in T2DM treatment because they uniquely affect a broad array of CV risk factors through significant weight and systolic blood pressure reduction, improved lipid levels, and possibly, as shown in in vitro studies and animal models, through direct effects on cardiac myocytes and endothelium.

Topics: Animals; Cardiovascular Diseases; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Exenatide; Glucagon-Like Peptide 1; Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Incretins; Liraglutide; Peptides; Receptors, Glucagon; Risk Factors; Treatment Outcome; Venoms

In addition to its effects on reproductive health, it is now well recognized that polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is a metabolic disorder, characterized by decreased insulin sensitivity which leads to an excess lifetime risk of type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease. PCOS patients are often obese, hypertensive, dyslipidemic and insulin resistant; they have obstructive sleep apnea and have been reported to have higher aldosterone levels in comparison to normal healthy controls. These are all components of an adverse cardiovascular risk profile. Many studies exploring subclinical atherosclerosis using different methods (flow-mediated dilatation, intima media thickness, arterial stiffness, coronary artery calcification) as well as assessing circulating cardiovascular risk markers, point toward an increased cardiovascular risk and early atherogenesis in PCOS. The risk and early features of subclinical atherosclerosis can be reversed by non-medical (normalization of weight, healthy lifestyle) and medical (metformin, thiazolidinediones, spironolactone, and statins) interventions. However, the long-term risk for cardiovascular morbidity and mortality as well as the clinical significance of different interventions still need to be properly addressed in a large prospective study.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Androstenes; Atherosclerosis; Cardiovascular Diseases; Carotid Intima-Media Thickness; Coronary Artery Disease; Female; Humans; Hypertension; Incretins; Insulin Resistance; Life Style; Metformin; Middle Aged; Obesity; Polycystic Ovary Syndrome; Postmenopause; Renin-Angiotensin System; Risk Factors; Sleep Apnea, Obstructive; Thiazolidinediones; Vascular Stiffness; Weight Reduction Programs

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in people with diabetes and therefore managing cardiovascular (CV) risk is a critical component of diabetes care. As incretin-based therapies are effective recent additions to the glucose-lowering treatment armamentarium for type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2D), understanding their CV safety profiles is of great importance. Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists have been associated with beneficial effects on CV risk factors, including weight, blood pressure and lipid profiles. Encouragingly, mechanistic studies in preclinical models and in patients with acute coronary syndrome suggest a potential cardioprotective effect of native GLP-1 or GLP-1 receptor agonists following ischaemia. Moreover, meta-analyses of phase 3 development programme data indicate no increased risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) with incretin-based therapies. Large randomized controlled trials designed to evaluate long-term CV outcomes with incretin-based therapies in individuals with T2D are now in progress, with the first two reporting as this article went to press.

Topics: Animals; Cardiovascular Diseases; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Incretins; Risk Factors; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

Recent suggestions that glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1)-based therapies could cause pancreatitis, and even pancreatic cancer, are based on:. The worrying histological changes are not reproduced in all studies and are unexpectedly variable with different GLP-1-based therapies.. Singh's findings that pancreatitis is doubled with GLP-1-based therapies could relate to their use in obese patients who are prone to pancreatitis risk factors--gallstones and hypertriglyceridaemia. The other observational studies do not find an association between GLP-1-based therapies and pancreatitis.. The increased reports of pancreatitis and pancreatic cancer are likely to be attributable to 'notoriety bias'.. Butler's findings for those on GLP-1-based therapies vs. those not, could have other explanations. Meanwhile: META ANALYSIS: Randomized control trials with GLP-1-based therapies do not find increased pancreatitis risk. Meta-analysis of 53 randomized controlled trials including 20 212 dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor-treated patients found a significantly reduced risk of major adverse cardiovascular events [odds ratio 0.689 (0.528-0.899), P = 0.006] for dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors compared with control subjects.. The evidence suggests that there is more than a possibility that some of the GLP-1 receptor agonists, and possibly also some dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors, may be associated with reduced cardiovascular events. Eight ongoing long-term cardiovascular randomized controlled trials will report from September 2013 onwards. These trials should resolve the issue of pancreatitis risk and substantiate the extent of benefit.. Whilst we should remain vigilant, currently the balance of evidence is strongly in support of GLP-1-based therapy, with benefits far outweighing potential risks.

Topics: Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting Systems; Cardiovascular Diseases; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Diabetic Angiopathies; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Exenatide; Female; Glucagon-Like Peptide 1; Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor; Humans; Incretins; Liraglutide; Male; Pancreatic Neoplasms; Pancreatitis; Patient Selection; Peptides; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Receptors, Glucagon; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Venoms

Recent years have seen an enormous increase in the number of therapeutic agents available for lowering blood glucose levels in people with type 2 diabetes. Among these agents, the incretin mimetics glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor (GLP-1R) agonists and dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP4) inhibitors have received particular attention for the potential of these interventions to positively impact on cardiovascular outcomes. Although the results of large-scale cardiovascular outcome trials eagerly are anticipated, an increasing body of literature from preclinical and early phase clinical studies has indicated that both GLP-1R agonists and DPP4 inhibitors may exert glucose-independent cardiovascular effects. Despite its role in glucose homeostasis, the GLP-1R is surprisingly widely distributed throughout the body, including in the heart. GLP-1 may exert its effects through both receptor-dependent and receptor-independent mechanisms and through the actions of both the intact peptide and its metabolites. In addition, DPP4 inhibition not only augments the circulating levels of incretin hormones, but it also holds the capacity to augment the activity of other biologically important substrates, most notably the small protein stromal cell-derived factor 1 alpha. Whether these collective functions will act to reduce cardiovascular events in patients remains to be determined.

Topics: Cardiovascular Diseases; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Diabetic Angiopathies; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Endothelium, Vascular; Exenatide; Female; Glucagon-Like Peptide 1; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Incretins; Liraglutide; Male; Myocytes, Cardiac; Peptides; Treatment Outcome; Venoms

Although there have been major advances in the understanding of the molecular mechanisms that contribute to the development of diabetic nephropathy, current best practice still leaves a significant treatment gap. The incidence of diabetes and associated nephropathy is increasing, with the main cause of mortality being related to cardiovascular causes. Novel therapies which are both 'cardio-renal'-protective seem the logical way forward. In the present review, we discuss the GLP-1 (glucagon-like peptide-1) receptor agonists and DPP-4 (dipeptidyl peptidase-4) inhibitors (incretin-based therapies), which are novel antidiabetic agents used in clinical practice and their role in diabetic nephropathy with specific focus on renoprotection and surrogate markers of cardiovascular disease. We discuss the pleiotropic effects of the incretin-based therapies apart from glucose-lowering and highlight the non-GLP-1 effects of DPP (dipeptidyl peptidase) inhibition. Large-scale clinical studies with cardiovascular end points are underway; however, studies with renal end points are lacking but much needed.

Topics: Biomarkers; Cardiovascular Diseases; Diabetic Nephropathies; Dipeptidyl Peptidase 4; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Glucagon-Like Peptide 1; Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor; Humans; Incretins; Receptors, Glucagon

The introduction of dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP4) inhibitors for the treatment of Type 2 diabetes acknowledges the fundamental importance of incretin hormones in the regulation of glycemia. Small molecule inhibitors of DPP4 exert their effects via inhibition of enzymatic degradation of glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) and glucose-dependent insulinotropic peptide (GIP). The widespread expression of DPP4 in tissues such as the vasculature and immune cells suggests that this protein may play a role in cardiovascular function. DPP4 is known to exert its effects via both enzymatic and non-enzymatic mechanisms. A soluble form of DPP4 lacking the cytoplasmic and transmembrane domain has also been recently recognized. Besides enzymatic inactivation of incretins, DPP4 also mediates degradation of many chemokines and neuropeptides. The non-enzymatic function of DPP4 plays a critical role in providing co-stimulatory signals to T cells via adenosine deaminase (ADA). DPP4 may also regulate inflammatory responses in innate immune cells such as monocytes and dendritic cells. The multiplicity of functions and targets suggests that DPP4 may play a distinct role aside from its effects on the incretin axis. Indeed recent studies in experimental models of atherosclerosis provide evidence for a robust effect for these drugs in attenuating inflammation and plaque development. Several prospective randomized controlled clinical trials in humans with established atherosclerosis are testing the effects of DPP4 inhibition on hard cardiovascular events.

Topics: Animals; Blood Pressure; Cardiovascular Diseases; Cardiovascular System; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptidyl Peptidase 4; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Gastric Inhibitory Polypeptide; Glucagon-Like Peptide 1; Humans; Incretins; Inflammation; Mice

Development of cardiovascular disease is one of the major complications of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). The chronic hyperglycaemic state is often accompanied by dyslipidaemia, hypertension, low-grade systemic inflammation and oxidative stress which collectively result in a high risk of micro- and macrovascular complications. Current glucose-lowering agents do not sufficiently address fore-mentioned macrovascular-risk factors. Recently, new therapeutic agents were introduced, based on the incretin hormone glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1), that is, the GLP-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RA) and dipeptidyl-peptidase 4 (DPP-4) inhibitors. Beside its effect on pancreatic insulin secretion, GLP-1 exerts several extra-pancreatic effects such as slowing down gastric emptying, promoting satiety and reducing food intake and weight loss. Also, GLP-1 and GLP-1RA were shown to improve cardiovascular-risk profiles, by reducing body fat content, blood pressure, circulating lipids and inflammatory markers in patients with T2DM. This review summarizes the presently known evidence with regard to extra-pancreatic effects of the incretin-based agents, focusing on the actions that improve the cardiovascular-risk profile. We present available data from clinical trials of at least 24 week duration, but also findings from small-sized clinical 'proof of principle' studies. We conclude that GLP-1 RA and to a lesser extent DPP-4 inhibitors are promising agents with regard to their effects on body weight, blood pressure and lipids, which collectively ameliorate the cardiovascular-risk profile and as such may have added value in the treatment of T2DM. However, large-sized long-term outcome studies are warranted to show the true added value of these agents in the treatment of patients with T2DM.

Topics: Animals; Cardiovascular Diseases; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Diabetic Angiopathies; Diabetic Cardiomyopathies; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Endothelium, Vascular; Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor; Heart; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Incretins; Receptors, Glucagon; Risk Factors

It has been demonstrated that fatty acids (FAs) are physiological ligands of G-protein-coupled receptors (GPRs). Activation of the GPRs (40, 41, 43, 84, 119 and 120) by FAs or synthetic agonists modulates several responses. In this review, we discuss the current knowledge on the actions of FA-activated GPRs and their relevance in normal and pathological conditions.. Studies have shown that FA-activated GPRs modulate hormone secretion (incretin, insulin and glucagon), activation of leukocytes and several aspects of metabolism.. Understanding GPR actions and their involvement in the development of insulin-resistance, β-cell failure, dyslipidemia and inflammation associated with obesity, type 2 diabetes, metabolic syndrome and cardiovascular diseases is important for the comprehension of the mechanisms underlying these pathological conditions and for the establishment of new and effective interventions.

Topics: Animals; Cardiovascular Diseases; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dyslipidemias; Fatty Acids; Feeding Behavior; Gastrointestinal Tract; Humans; Incretins; Inflammation; Insulin; Insulin Resistance; Insulin Secretion; Insulin-Secreting Cells; Leukocytes; Ligands; Obesity; Receptors, G-Protein-Coupled

Energy homeostasis in mammalians is a teleological process regulated by the interplay between caloric intake and energy expenditure. Incretins are a significant component of the complex homeostatic network regulating the metabolic state in humans. This narrative review will focus on the basic concepts regarding incretins physiology and their regulatory feedback mechanisms affecting energy homeostasis. In this context, glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) promotes satiety and weight loss through centrally and peripherally mediated pathways. On the other hand, gastric inhibitory peptide (GIP) is implicated in energy storage by its actions on adipose tissue. Understanding this biological model requires a holistic approach, since it is dually manifested by promoting weight reduction, in the case of GLP-1, or favoring lipid accumulation, in the case of GIP. The complete spectrum of incretin actions related to energy homeostasis is yet to be fully elucidated. Currently, new drugs based on incretin physiology are available for treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus, whereas the implication of similar drugs in the treatment of obesity is under investigation. These agents exert several beneficial effects that minimize cardiovascular risk.

Topics: Animals; Anti-Obesity Agents; Cardiovascular Diseases; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Design; Energy Metabolism; Feedback, Physiological; Homeostasis; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Incretins; Obesity; Risk Factors; Signal Transduction; Treatment Outcome

Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) is an incretin hormone that enhances glucose-stimulated insulin secretion and exerts direct and indirect actions on the cardiovascular system. GLP-1 and its related incretin hormone, glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide, are rapidly inactivated by the enzyme dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP-4), a key determinant of incretin bioactivity. Two classes of medications that enhance incretin action, GLP-1 receptor (GLP-1R) agonists and DPP-4 inhibitors, are used for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus. We review herein the cardiovascular biology of GLP-1R agonists and DPP-4 inhibitors, including direct and indirect effects on cardiomyocytes, blood vessels, adipocytes, the control of blood pressure, and postprandial lipoprotein secretion. Both GLP-1R activation and DPP-4 inhibition exert multiple cardioprotective actions in preclinical models of cardiovascular dysfunction, and short-term studies in human subjects appear to demonstrate modest yet beneficial actions on cardiac function in subjects with ischemic heart disease. Incretin-based agents control body weight, improve glycemic control with a low risk of hypoglycemia, decrease blood pressure, inhibit the secretion of intestinal chylomicrons, and reduce inflammation in preclinical studies. Nevertheless, there is limited information on the cardiovascular actions of these agents in patients with diabetes and established cardiovascular disease. Hence, a more complete understanding of the cardiovascular risk to benefit ratio of incretin-based therapies will require completion of long-term cardiovascular outcome studies currently underway in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Topics: Animals; Cardiovascular Diseases; Dipeptidyl Peptidase 4; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Glucagon-Like Peptide 1; Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Incretins; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Receptors, Glucagon

Glucagon-like peptide (GLP)-1 agonists and dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors are two classes of drugs that have been approved for treatment of Type 2 diabetes mellitus, based upon the glucose-lowering actions of the gastrointestinal hormone GLP-1. However, GLP-1 receptors are also present in cardiovascular tissues. Data from animal and in vitro studies suggest that GLP-1 may have cardioprotective effects and improve myocardial and endothelial dysfunction. Clinical data demonstrating cardiovascular effects are more limited, and there is some evidence that incretin-based therapies may be associated with improvements in cardiovascular risk factors. Large prospective cardiovascular outcome trials are underway to examine the cardiovascular safety of incretin-based therapies, and may reveal whether these agents are associated with any reduction in cardiovascular adverse events in patients with Type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Topics: Animals; Cardiovascular Diseases; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Glucagon-Like Peptide 1; Humans; Incretins; Risk Factors

The two classes of incretin-related therapies, dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs), have become important treatment options for patients with type 2 diabetes. Sitagliptin, saxagliptin, vildagliptin and linagliptin, the available DPP-4 inhibitors, are oral medications, whereas the GLP-1 RAs-twice-daily exenatide, once-weekly exenatide and once-daily liraglutide-are administered subcutaneously. By influencing levels of GLP-1 receptor stimulation, these medications lower plasma glucose levels in a glucose-dependent manner with low risk of hypoglycaemia, affecting postprandial plasma glucose more than most other anti-hyperglycaemic medications. Use of GLP-1 RAs has been shown to result in greater glycaemic improvements than DPP-4 inhibitors, probably because of higher levels of GLP-1 receptor activation. GLP-1 RAs can also produce significant weight loss and may reduce blood pressure and have beneficial effects on other cardiovascular risk factors. Although both classes are well tolerated, DPP-4 inhibitors may be associated with infections and headaches, whereas GLP-1 RAs are often associated with gastrointestinal disorders, primarily nausea. Pancreatitis has been reported with both DPP-4 inhibitors and GLP-1 RAs, but a causal relationship between use of incretin-based therapies and pancreatitis has not been established. In clinical trials, liraglutide has shown efficacy and tolerability and resulted in certain significant benefits when compared with exenatide and sitagliptin.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Blood Glucose; Blood Pressure; Cardiovascular Diseases; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Administration Schedule; Exenatide; Female; Glucagon-Like Peptide 1; Humans; Hyperglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Incretins; Injections, Subcutaneous; Liraglutide; Male; Peptides; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Risk Factors; Venoms; Weight Loss

Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors are novel drugs for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus. They exert their action through inhibition of the catabolism of locally secreted incretins such as glucagon-like peptide-4 (GLP-4) and glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) by inhibiting enzyme DPP-4. GLP-1 and GIP are secreted from the gastrointestinal tract in response to food intake. GLP-1 is secreted from L cells present in the mucosa of the small intestine and colon, whereas GIP is secreted from K cells of the jejunum. These 2 incretins lower blood glucose levels and postprandial hyperglycemia by stimulating insulin release from b cells of the pancreas, thus increasing insulin sensitivity, delaying gastrointestinal emptying, decreasing food intake through early satiety, and causing weight loss in the long term. However, their action is short-lived (2 to 3 minutes) because of catabolism by the DPP-4 enzyme. The importance of DPP-4 inhibitors lies in their blockade of the DPP-4 enzyme leading to the prevention of their catabolism and thus increasing their blood levels, extending the duration of their action, and improving their blood glucose-lowering effect. In addition to their antidiabetic action, recent experimental and clinical studies have demonstrated a pleiotropic cardiovascular protective effect of these agents independent of their antidiabetic action. They prevent atherosclerosis, improve endothelial dysfunction, lower blood pressure, and prevent myocardial injury. All these actions are discussed in this concise review. In conclusion, DPP-4 inhibitors are novel antidiabetic agents with pleiotropic cardiovascular protective effects in addition to their antidiabetic action.

Topics: Animals; Cardiotonic Agents; Cardiovascular Diseases; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Endothelium, Vascular; Gastric Inhibitory Polypeptide; Glucagon-Like Peptide 1; Heart; Humans; Hypertension; Incretins; Receptors, Glucagon

Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists and dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP4) inhibitors are currently used as glucose-lowering agents in type 2 diabetes, due to their effects on insulin and glucagon secretion. These agents, which are effective in improving glucose control, could also have a beneficial effect on the incidence of cardiovascular events. The analysis of major cardiovascular events reported during trials with metabolic endpoints shows a significant reduction of risk with both classes of drugs. Longer-term trials specifically designed to assess the effects of GLP-1 receptor agonists and DPP4 inhibitors on major cardiovascular events are currently ongoing.. In order to elucidate potential mechanisms of cardiovascular protection with incretin-based therapies, a Medline search (any date up to December 15th, 2011) was performed using the terms 'cardiovascular' and ('DPP-4' or 'GLP-1' or any single name of incretin-based drugs); papers which were considered relevant for the aim of this review were selected by the authors, on the basis of their judgment.. Incretin-based drugs have beneficial effects on cardiovascular risk factors, such as blood pressure and, to a lesser extent, cholesterol and triglyceride. GLP-1 receptor agonists also reduce body weight. A number of experimental studies has suggested that GLP-1 has direct, beneficial effects on myocardial and endothelial cells, but some of these actions could be mediated via GLP-1 receptor-independent pathways. Available experimental evidence, together with a few pilot studies in humans, shows that GLP-1 receptor agonists and DPP4 inhibitors are capable of ameliorating myocardial function and protect myocardiocytes from ischemic damage, independent of their glucose-lowering effects. Furthermore, both classes of drugs enhance endothelial function. In addition, DPP4 inhibitors increase the availability of endothelial progenitor cells, via a GLP-1 receptor-independent pathway.. Taken together, available data suggest that incretin-based therapies could prevent cardiovascular disease via multiple mechanisms.

Topics: Animals; Blood Pressure; Cardiovascular Diseases; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Endothelial Cells; Endothelium, Vascular; Glucagon-Like Peptide 1; Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor; Humans; Incretins; Myocytes, Cardiac; Pilot Projects; Receptors, Glucagon

The management of type 2 diabetes continues to evolve as new data emerge. Although glycaemic control is still important, other risk factors--such as hypertension, dyslipidaemia and obesity--must also be addressed in order to reduce the long-term risks of cardiovascular complications and mortality. In this context, targeting the incretin system, and glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) in particular, has generated much interest. GLP-1 is released from the gut in response to food ingestion and plays a crucial role in glucose homeostasis. GLP-1 receptors are expressed in the heart and vasculature, prompting evaluation of their physiological role and pharmacological stimulation, both in healthy and disease states. These studies indicate that GLP-1 and GLP-1-based therapies appear to have direct, beneficial effects on the cardiovascular system, in addition to their glucose-lowering properties, such as modulation of blood pressure, endothelial function, and myocardial contractility. Intriguingly, some of these effects appear to be independent of GLP-1 receptor signalling. Data from clinical studies of the GLP-1 receptor agonists, exenatide and liraglutide on cardiovascular risk factors, in patients with type 2 diabetes are also promising and the results from prospective studies to assess cardiovascular outcomes are eagerly awaited.

Topics: Animals; Blood Glucose; Cardiovascular Diseases; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Diabetic Angiopathies; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Endothelial Cells; Endothelium, Vascular; Exenatide; Glucagon-Like Peptide 1; Humans; Incretins; Liraglutide; Mice; Peptides; Prospective Studies; Risk Factors; Treatment Outcome; Venoms

Dyslipidemia is a prominent feature of type 2 diabetes and insulin resistance that contributes to increased atherosclerosis and cardiovascular disease (CVD) risks under these conditions. Incretin-based therapies (GLP-1 receptor agonists and DPP-4 inhibitors) have recently been developed and are approved for clinical use for treatment of type 2 diabetes. Besides improved glycemic control, other benefits are being increasingly appreciated, one of which is improved plasma lipid profile. This review aims to summarize the evidence and potential mechanism of such agents in humans in modulating fasting and postprandial lipoprotein metabolism.

Topics: Animals; Cardiovascular Diseases; Clinical Trials as Topic; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Incretins; Insulin Resistance; Lipid Metabolism; Lipids; Postprandial Period; Receptors, Glucagon

Cardiovascular disease continues to be a major cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. Whilst a focus on improved glucose control and HbA1c has led to a reduction in the progression and development of microvascular complications, the potential for this strategy to reduce cardiovascular event rates is less clearly defined. Identification of the incretin axis has facilitated the development of several novel therapeutic agents which target glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) pathways. The effects on glucose homeostasis are now established, but there is also now an increasing body of evidence to support a number of pleiotropic effects on the heart that may have the potential to influence cardiovascular outcomes. In this article, we review myocardial energy metabolism with particular emphasis on the potential benefits associated with a shift towards increased glucose utilisation and present the pre-clinical and clinical evidence regarding incretin effects on the heart. In addition we discuss the potential mechanism of action and benefit of drugs that modulate GLP-1 in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and coronary artery disease.

Topics: Animals; Cardiotonic Agents; Cardiovascular Diseases; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Energy Metabolism; Glucagon-Like Peptide 1; Humans; Incretins; Myocardium

Given the demonstrated importance of the incretin effect on the prandial insulin response, augmentation of the incretin effect in people with type 2 diabetes is an important pharmacological approach to glycemic management. In recent years, the use of incretin-based therapies, such as GLP-1 receptor agonists and DPP-4 inhibitors, has increased dramatically due to their demonstrated efficacy, low risk of hypoglycemia when used as monotherapy, and reasonable tolerability. Given their effects on glycemic parameters and the likelihood of aiding in weight loss, GLP-1 receptor agonists provide a unique treatment option for people with type 2 diabetes. Increased clinical experience and study of incretin-based therapies will help answer questions about safety issues that have arisen from post-marketing reports. The potential benefit of incretin-based therapies in the treatment of people with type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease is currently an active area of inquiry. While the potential benefits of incretin-based therapies in the arena of cardiovascular risk reduction are promising, results from ongoing outcomes-based studies will help determine the role of these agents in this setting.

Topics: Cardiovascular Diseases; Clinical Trials as Topic; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Incretins; Receptors, Glucagon

Recently, the crucial role of GLP-1 in cardiovascular disease has been suggested by both preclinical and clinical studies. In vivo and in vitro studies have demonstrated cardio-protective effects of GLP-1 by activating cell survival signal pathways, which have greatly reduced ischemia/reperfusion injury and also cardiac dysfunction in various congestive heart failure animal models. Clinically, beneficial effects of GLP-1 have been shown in patients with myocardial infarction, hypertension, and heart failure, and 2 classes of incretin enhancers, GLP-1 receptor agonists and DPP-4 inhibitors, are currently available for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus. In this review, we will summarize the role of incretins in various cardiovascular events such as hypertension and heart failure and postprandial lipoprotein secretion, and discuss their molecular mechanisms and potentials as a new therapeutic as well as preventive drug type for reducing cardiovascular events in both diabetic and nondiabetic patients.

Topics: Animals; Cardiovascular Diseases; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptidyl Peptidase 4; Glucagon-Like Peptide 1; Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor; Humans; Incretins; Receptors, Glucagon

The dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors are a relatively new class of oral antidiabetic agents that improve glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. These agents differ in structure, but all act by inhibiting the DPP-4 enzyme. Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibition increases levels of the incretin hormones glucagon-like peptide-1 and glucose-dependent insulinotropic peptide, which in turn stimulate insulin secretion in a glucose-dependent fashion. Clinical trials have shown that DPP-4 inhibitors provide significant reductions in glycated hemoglobin levels, with a low risk of hypoglycemia. Animal model experiments and proof-of-concept studies suggest that the incretins favorably affect the cardiovascular system; it is possible that these same effects may be conveyed by DPP-4 inhibitor therapy. Pooled and meta-analyses of DPP-4 inhibitor clinical trial data have shown no increase in major adverse cardiovascular events, and, in fact, suggest a potential cardiovascular benefit to such therapy. Long-term cardiovascular safety trials are currently underway to more fully define and understand the cardiovascular impact of DPP-4 therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Topics: Blood Glucose; Cardiovascular Diseases; Cardiovascular System; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Humans; Incretins; Meta-Analysis as Topic

Macrovascular complications of type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) are primarily driven by the combination of underlying atherosclerosis and propensity for thrombosis. Prevention of macrovascular complications in DM relies on therapies directed at multiple coexisting intermediary pathophysiologies that contribute to cardiovascular events, including hyperglycemia, lipoprotein abnormalities, hypertension, inflammation, and propensity for thrombosis. Multiple noninsulin, glucose-lowering agents have been developed that effectively lower blood glucose levels. This review explores the literature on the cardiovascular benefits and harms associated with these therapies, with an emphasis on cardiovascular outcomes when available. The lack of long-term data on cardiovascular outcomes regarding safety and efficacy of available traditional glucose-lowering agents has led to recommendations for more thorough evaluations of new therapies before approval. Furthermore, recent data suggest harm from intensive hemoglobin A(1c) reductions. Accordingly, there are multiple, large, cardiovascular-event driven phase 3-4 trials of therapies from the incretin axis currently enrolling. Recommendations for a therapeutic approach with noninsulin, glucose-lowering agents for the prevention of cardiovascular events in patients with type 2 DM are provided based on current data. Ultimately, multifactorial risk interventions, including lifestyle modifications, antihyperglycemic agents, antihypertensives, statins, and aspirin remain the primary focus to prevent macrovascular complications in patients with type 2 DM.

Topics: Blood Glucose; Cardiovascular Diseases; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Incretins; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Treatment Outcome

Type 2 diabetes mellitus is a chronic dysmetabolic condition characterized by hyperglycemia and accompanied by dyslipidemia (low HDL, high triglycerides), and hypertension associated with insulin resistance in obesity. In addition to the glucose-reducing effects, incretin-based therapies have been found to have cardiovascular protective properties. This review summarizes the best available evidence favoring these positive pleiotropic effects of incretin mimetics as well as incretin enhancers.. Studies in animals and humans are accumulating showing the direct as well as indirect actions of the glucagon-like peptide 1 analogues and dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitors on the cardiovascular system. This class of agents appear to have effects on the cardiomyocytes, blood vessels, adipose tissue, regulation of blood pressure, and postprandial intestinal lipoprotein metabolism.. Long-term hard outcome trials are under way that investigate the effects of incretin-based treatments on elevated cardiovascular risks in patients with type 2 diabetes.

Topics: Animals; Cardiotonic Agents; Cardiovascular Diseases; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor; Humans; Incretins; Receptors, Glucagon

The health burden of type 2 diabetes mellitus continues to increase worldwide. A substantial portion of this burden is due to the development of cardiovascular disease in patients with diabetes. Recent failures of clinical trials of intensive glucose control to reduce macrovascular events, coupled with reports of potential harm of certain diabetic therapy, have led to increased scrutiny as new diabetic therapies are developed. Incretin peptides are a group of gastrointestinal proteins that regulate glucose metabolism through multiple mechanisms, and incretin-based therapies have been developed to treat type 2 diabetes. These agents include glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) and dipeptidyl peptidase-IV (DPP-IV) inhibitors. In addition to effects on glucose homeostasis, growing evidence suggest that these peptides may also affect the cardiovascular system. In this review, we discuss recent findings concerning the potential, yet untested, benefits of incretin-based pharmacotherapy in the treatment of cardiovascular disease.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Age Distribution; Aged; Cardiovascular Diseases; Causality; Comorbidity; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Humans; Incretins; Male; Middle Aged; Prevalence; Primary Prevention; Prognosis; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Risk Factors; Severity of Illness Index; Sex Distribution; Survival Rate

The global epidemic of diabetes mellitus (~95% type 2 diabetes) has been fueled by a parallel increase in obesity and overweight. Together, these metabolic disease epidemics have contributed to the increasing incidence and prevalence of cardiovascular disease. The accumulation of metabolic and cardiovascular risk factors in patients with type 2 diabetes--risk factors that may exacerbate one another--complicates treatment. Inadequate treatment, treatment that fails to achieve goals, increases the risk for cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. From a clinical perspective, type 2 diabetes is a cardiovascular disease, an observation that is supported by a range of epidemiologic, postmortem, and cardiovascular imaging studies. Vascular wall dysfunction, and particularly endothelial dysfunction, has been posited as a "common soil" linking dysglycemic and cardiovascular diseases. Vascular wall dysfunction promoted by environmental triggers (e.g., sedentary lifestyle) and metabolic triggers (chronic hyperglycemia, obesity) has been associated with the upregulation of reactive oxygen species and chronic inflammatory and hypercoagulable states, and as such with the pathogenesis of type 2 diabetes, atherosclerosis, and cardiovascular disease. Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP)-1, an incretin hormone, and synthetic GLP-1 receptor agonists represent promising new areas of research and therapeutics in the struggle not only against type 2 diabetes but also against the cardiovascular morbidity and mortality associated with type 2 diabetes. In a number of small trials in humans, as well as in preclinical and in vitro studies, both native GLP-1 and GLP-1 receptor agonists have demonstrated positive effects on a range of cardiovascular disease pathologies and clinical targets, including such markers of vascular inflammation as high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, plasminogen activator inhibitor-1, and brain natriuretic peptide. Reductions in markers of dyslipidemia such as elevated levels of triglycerides and free fatty acids have also been observed, as have cardioprotective functions. Larger trials of longer duration will be required to confirm preliminary findings. In large human trials, GLP-1 receptor agonists have been associated with significant reductions in both blood pressure and weight.

Topics: Biomarkers; Cardiovascular Diseases; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Glucagon-Like Peptide 1; Humans; Incretins; Treatment Outcome

Glucose homeostasis is regulated by a complex interaction of hormones, principally including insulin, glucagon, amylin, and the incretins. Glucagon, cortisol, catecholamines, and growth hormone serve as the classic glucose counterregulatory hormones. The incretins are hormones released by enteroendocrine cells in the intestine in response to a meal. Classically, type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) has been considered to be a triad of insulin resistance, increased hepatic gluconeogenesis, and progressive β-cell exhaustion/failure. However, disordered enteroendocrine physiology, specifically the reduced activity of glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1), is also a principal pathophysiologic abnormality of the disease. Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists that have been studied include exenatide and liraglutide, which have been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for use in patients with T2DM. Sitagliptin and saxagliptin, both approved for use in the United States, modulate incretin physiology by inhibiting degradation of GLP-1 by the enzyme dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4). Modulators of incretin physiology have been shown to improve glycemic control with a low risk for hypoglycemia and beneficially affect β-cell function. Unlike the DPP-4 inhibitors, GLP-1 receptor agonist therapy also produces weight loss, an important consideration given the close association among T2DM, overweight/obesity, and cardiovascular disease. The GLP-1 receptor agonists have also demonstrated beneficial effects on cardiovascular risk factors other than hyperglycemia and excess body weight, such as lipid concentrations and blood pressure. This article describes incretin physiology and studies of pharmacologic therapy designed to address the blunted incretin response in patients with T2DM. Information was obtained by a search of the PubMed and MEDLINE databases for articles published from January 1, 1995 to June 1, 2009.

Topics: Adamantane; Cardiovascular Diseases; Clinical Trials as Topic; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptides; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Exenatide; Glucagon-Like Peptide 1; Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Incretins; Liraglutide; Peptides; Pyrazines; Receptors, Glucagon; Sitagliptin Phosphate; Triazoles; Venoms

Increased morbidity and mortality risk due to diabetes-associated cardiovascular diseases is partly associated with hyperglycaemia as well as dyslipidaemia. Pharmacological treatment of diabetic hyperglycaemia involves the use of the older oral antidiabetic drugs [OADs: biguanides, sulphonylureas (SUs), α-glucosidase inhibitors and thiazolidinediones], insulin (human and analogues) and/or incretin-based therapies (glucagon-like peptide-1 analogues and dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitors). Many of these agents have also been suggested to improve lipid profiles in patients with diabetes. These effects may have benefits on cardiovascular risk beyond glucose-lowering actions. This review discusses the effects of OADs, insulins and incretin-based therapies on lipid variables along with the possible mechanisms and clinical implications of these findings. The effects of intensive versus conventional antihyperglycaemic therapy on cardiovascular outcomes and lipid profiles are also discussed. A major conclusion of this review is that agents within the same class of OADs can have different effects on lipid variables and that contrary to the findings in experimental models, insulin has been shown to have beneficial effects on lipid variables in clinical trials. Further studies are needed to understand the precise effect and the mechanisms of these effects of insulin on lipids.

Topics: Biguanides; Cardiovascular Diseases; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Diabetic Angiopathies; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Glucagon-Like Peptide 1; Glycoside Hydrolase Inhibitors; Humans; Hyperglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Incretins; Insulin; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Sulfonylurea Compounds; Thiazolidinediones

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk in type 2 diabetes (T2DM) is only partially reduced by intensive glycemic control. Diabetic dyslipidemia is suggested to be an additional important contributor to CVD risk in T2DM. Multiple lipid lowering medications effectively reduce fasting LDL cholesterol and triglycerides concentrations and several of them routinely reduce CVD risk. However, in contemporary Western societies the vasculature is commonly exposed to prolonged postprandial hyperlipidemia. Metabolism of these postprandial carbohydrates and lipids yields multiple proatherogenic products. Even a transient increase in these factors may worsen vascular function and induces impaired endothelial dependent vasodilatation, a predictor of atherosclerosis and future cardiovascular events. There is a recent increased appreciation for the role of gut-derived incretin hormones in controlling the postprandial metabolic milieu. Incretin-based medications have been developed and are now used to control postprandial hyperglycemia in T2DM. Recent data indicate that these medications may also have profound effects on postprandial lipid metabolism and may favorably influence several cardiovascular functions. This review discusses (1) the postprandial state with special emphasis on postprandial lipid metabolism and its role in endothelial dysfunction and cardiovascular risk, (2) the ability of incretins to modulate postprandial hyperlipidemia and (3) the potential of incretin-based therapeutic strategies to improve vascular function and reduce CVD risk.

Topics: Animals; Cardiovascular Diseases; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Endothelium, Vascular; Humans; Hyperlipidemias; Incretins; Lipid Metabolism; Postprandial Period; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Risk Factors

Diabetes accounts for millions of office visits each year to primary care offices in the United States. Successful care of the patient with type 2 diabetes requires not only focus on glucose management but also on comorbidities such as hypertension, dyslipidemia and obesity which are closely linked to microvascular and macrovascular complications. Primary care clinicians must stay abreast of frequently published diabetes literature and new treatments to care for these increasingly complex patients. Metformin and its effect on B12 absorption continues to be an issue encountered by clinicians in daily clinical practice. There has also been recent discussion regarding the increased risk of diabetes with statins; data to date on this issue have been conflicting. Rosiglitazone continues to face public scrutiny and there are now Food and Drug Administration regulations regarding its increased risk of cardiovascular disease. Liraglutide and saxagliptin represent new treatment options for type 2 diabetes, increasing the available options for treating this complex disease. A review of the primary literature involving these topics is provided.

Topics: Adamantane; Cardiovascular Diseases; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptides; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Glucagon-Like Peptide 1; Humans; Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors; Hypoglycemic Agents; Incretins; Liraglutide; Metformin; Primary Health Care; Rosiglitazone; Thiazolidinediones; Vitamin B 12 Deficiency

Incretins, which are insulinotropic gastrointestinal hormones, are produced mainly in K and L cells of the small intestine under the influence of nutritional stimuli. The best known incretins are glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) and glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP). These hormones perform several functions: they stimulate insulin secretion in the pancreatic beta cells; they inhibit glucagon release from the alpha cells of the pancreas (GIP not in humans); they slow down gastric emptying and may directly suppress appetite; and, moreover, they indirectly increase peripheral glucose tolerance/insulin sensitivity. The insulinotropic and glucagonostatic effects of GLP-1 are glucose dependent. The incretins also have numerous other properties which are still being discovered and introduced in different branches of medicine. The patents mentioned in this work concern the use of incretins in diabetology, cardiology, gastroenterology and nuclear medicine. The pleiotropic effects of incretins offer therapeutic possibilities in numerous fields of medicine.

Topics: Animals; Carbohydrate Metabolism; Cardiovascular Diseases; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Gastric Inhibitory Polypeptide; Gastrointestinal Diseases; Glucagon-Like Peptide 1; Humans; Incretins; Patents as Topic; Radionuclide Imaging

Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is a worldwide public health challenge. Despite the availability of many antidiabetes agents and pharmacotherapies targeting cardiovascular risk factors, the morbidity, mortality and economic consequences of T2DM are still a great burden to patients, society, health care systems and the economy. The need for new therapies for glycaemic control is compounded by the fact that existing treatments have limitations either because of their side effects (particularly weight gain and hypoglycaemia) or contraindications that limit their use. Furthermore, none of the current therapies have a significant impact on disease progression. Incretin-based therapies offer a new therapeutic approach to the management of T2DM, and there are also several even newer therapies in development. There are two groups of incretin-based therapies currently available; dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors and GLP-1 analogues/mimetics. The former are given orally while the latter subcutaneously. These drugs result in glucose-dependent insulin secretion and glucose-dependent glucagon suppression, with consequent low risk of hypoglycaemia when used as mono- or combination therapy (except when used with sulphonylureas). In addition, they are either weight neutral in the case of DPP-4 inhibitors or cause weight loss in the case of incretin mimetics/analogues. Furthermore, animal studies have shown that these agents prolong beta cell survival which offers the theoretical possibility of slowing the progression to T2DM. In this article we will review the currently available antidiabetes agents with particular emphasis on incretin-based and future therapies. In addition, we will review and discuss the evidence relating to glycaemic control and cardiovascular disease.

Topics: Animals; Cardiovascular Diseases; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Drug Administration Routes; Drug Interactions; Glucagon-Like Peptide 1; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Incretins

Rates of type 2 diabetes, obesity and their associated detrimental cardiovascular effects are rapidly increasing. Despite the availability of several treatment options for type 2 diabetes and the use of intensive regimens combining several antidiabetic drugs, less than one-half of all patients reach a target glycosylated hemoglobin level of less than 7%. Disease progression due to ongoing deterioration of pancreatic islet cell health and beta-cell function is likely responsible. Therefore, there is a need to identify new pharmacological compounds that may not only treat hyperglycemia, but may also correct impaired glucose homeostasis and preserve endogenous beta-cell function. Identification and characterization of the incretin system and its effect on glucose homeostasis have resulted in the development of new antidiabetic agents that target these concerns. The current review examines the incretin effect and the pharmacological agents that have been developed based on the understanding of this physiological system. The influence of incretins on the cardiovascular system beyond the proatherogenic effect of type 2 diabetes will also be discussed.

Topics: Biomarkers; Blood Glucose; Cardiovascular Diseases; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Humans; Incretins; Metabolic Syndrome

Type 2 diabetes (T2D) is associated with increased cardiovascular disease and mortality. Most diabetes treatments have not proven to reduce this risk and may be associated with worsening of specific cardiovascular risk factors. GLP-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1R agonists) are new incretin-based therapies for the treatment of T2D. They improve glucose control by stimulating insulin secretion and suppressing glucagon release, both in a glucose-dependent manner. There are two GLP-1R agonists approved for the treatment of T2D: once daily liraglutide and twice daily exenatide, both administered by sc injection. Based on recent clinical trials, GLP-1R agonists suggest having a protective role in cardiovascular risk factors besides improving glycemic control, compared to placebo and to standard diabetes therapies. Both liraglutide and exenatide have demonstrated to induce clinically significant weight loss and to reduce systolic blood pressure. Liraglutide also has a positive effect on the lipid profile and cardiovascular risk biomakers. Furthermore, recent data shows a direct effect of GLP-1 and its metabolites in the vascular endothelium and the myocardium, leading to vasodilator effects and improved cardiac function in humans with acute myocardial infarction or congestive heart failure. GLP-1R agonists have a positive impact on cardiovascular risk factors otherwise not addressed by most standard diabetes therapies. Whether these new compounds actually decrease cardiovascular disease and mortality remains to be demonstrated in outcome studies.

Topics: Amino Acid Sequence; Animals; Cardiovascular Diseases; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Glucagon-Like Peptide 1; Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Incretins; Models, Biological; Molecular Sequence Data; Receptors, Glucagon; Risk Factors

In addition to progressive pancreatic β-cell failure resulting in impaired insulin secretion, and increased insulin resistance in muscle and liver, incretin hormone-related abnormalities have been identified as key underlying defects in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Treatment goals for patients with type 2 diabetes should be aligned with the basic defects of the disease. Many of the available antidiabetes agents correct hyperglycemia but do not impact other cardiovascular risk factors, and may actually aggravate some. This paper reviews the role of defects in the incretin system in the pathophysiology of type 2 diabetes, and discusses recent advances in the use of incretinbased agents that target the fundamental disease mechanisms of type 2 diabetes. The incretinbased agents reduce hyperglycemia and provide beneficial effects on surrogate markers of cardiovascular risk, including weight gain, elevated blood pressure, and dyslipidemia.

Topics: Blood Glucose; Cardiovascular Diseases; Clinical Trials as Topic; Diabetes Complications; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Diabetic Cardiomyopathies; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Dyslipidemias; Humans; Hyperglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Incretins

Animal venoms contain a variety of highly selective and potent toxins, which have evolved over thousands/millions of years, which target vital physiological processes. As such, they have proven to be an excellent source of lead compounds for the development of therapeutic agents. In particular, a number of these venom components (e.g. bradykinin-potentiating peptides, sarafotoxins, natriuretic peptides) have profound effects on the cardiovascular system. This review article examines recent progress in the search for lead compounds or novel scaffolds for cardiovascular drug development from animal venoms.

Topics: Animals; Anti-Arrhythmia Agents; Cardiovascular Diseases; Drug Discovery; Humans; Incretins; Natriuretic Peptides; Oligopeptides; Toxins, Biological; Viper Venoms

Impaired insulin secretion plays a major role in the pathogenesis of type 2 diabetes mellitus, and progressive loss of beta-cell function is a pathophysiologic hallmark of type 2 diabetes. Recent science has elaborated on the role of the incretin hormones on beta-cell function and insulin secretion, as well as the role that incretin-based pharmacotherapies may have on glycemic control and beta-cell function, possibly altering the progressive loss of beta-cell function and possibly reversing/halting disease progression. However, incretin-based therapies may also have benefits extending beyond glycemic control and insulin secretion. In this review we examine some of those "beyond-glycemic" benefits, including presentation of data on weight reduction, blood pressure lowering, beneficial changes in the lipid profile, and improvements in myocardial and endothelial function. We investigate how those effects may help ameliorate the cardiovascular burden in patients with diabetes.

Topics: Blood Glucose; Cardiovascular Diseases; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Humans; Incretins; Insulin; Insulin Secretion; Insulin-Secreting Cells; Prognosis

Impaired insulin secretion plays a major role in the pathogenesis of type 2 diabetes mellitus, and progressive loss of beta-cell function is a pathophysiologic hallmark of type 2 diabetes. Recent science has elaborated on the role of the incretin hormones on beta-cell function and insulin secretion, as well as the role that incretin-based pharmacotherapies may have on glycemic control and beta-cell function, possibly altering the progressive loss of beta-cell function and possibly reversing/halting disease progression. However, incretin-based therapies may also have benefits extending beyond glycemic control and insulin secretion. In this review we examine some of those "beyond-glycemic" benefits, including presentation of data on weight reduction, blood pressure lowering, beneficial changes in the lipid profile, and improvements in myocardial and endothelial function. We investigate how those effects may help ameliorate the cardiovascular burden in patients with diabetes.

Topics: Animals; Blood Glucose; Cardiovascular Diseases; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Humans; Incretins; Insulin; Insulin Secretion; Insulin-Secreting Cells; Prognosis

Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) is an incretin hormone secreted by the small intestine in response to nutrient ingestion. It has wide-ranging effects on glucose metabolism, including stimulation of insulin release, inhibition of glucagon secretion, reduction of gastric emptying and augmentation of satiety. Importantly, the insulinotropic actions of GLP-1 are uniquely dependent on ambient glucose concentrations, and it is this particular characteristic which has led to its recent emergence as a treatment for type 2 diabetes. Although the major physiological function of GLP-1 appears to be in relation to glycaemic control, there is growing evidence to suggest that it may also play an important role in the cardiovascular system. GLP-1 receptors (GLP-1Rs) are expressed in the heart and vasculature of both rodents and humans, and recent studies have demonstrated that GLP-1R agonists have wide-ranging cardiovascular actions, such as modulation of heart rate, blood pressure, vascular tone and myocardial contractility. Importantly, it appears that these agents may also have beneficial effects in the setting of cardiovascular disease (CVD). For example, GLP-1 has been found to exert cardioprotective actions in experimental models of dilated cardiomyopathy, hypertensive heart failure and myocardial infarction (MI). Preliminary clinical studies also indicate that GLP-1 infusion may improve cardiac contractile function in chronic heart failure patients with and without diabetes, and in MI patients after successful angioplasty. This review will discuss the current understanding of GLP-1 biology, examine its emerging cardiovascular actions in both health and disease and explore the potential use of GLP-1 as a novel treatment for CVD.

Topics: Animals; Blood Glucose; Cardiovascular Agents; Cardiovascular Diseases; Cardiovascular System; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Glucagon-Like Peptide 1; Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Incretins; Insulin; Insulin Secretion; Receptors, Glucagon

Patients with type 2 diabetes, approximately 85% of whom are overweight or obese, often have an increased incidence of cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factors such as hypertension and dyslipidemia. Both type 2 diabetes and obesity are independent risk factors for CVD. Unfortunately, many therapies aimed at maintaining and improving glucose control are associated with weight gain. Among the older antidiabetes agents, most, including the insulin secretagogues and sensitizers, can lead to weight gain, except for metformin, which is weight-neutral. Among the newer agents, the dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors generally are weight-neutral in addition to lowering glucose, while the glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists lead to weight reduction. Patients with type 2 diabetes are at an increased risk for both diabetes- and CV-related outcomes, and weight reduction is an important component of diabetes management. Weight gain in patients with type 2 diabetes can contribute to patient frustration and may negatively impact their compliance to therapeutic regimens. The selection of antidiabetes agents that not only improve glucose control but reduce or have a neutral effect on weight with beneficial effects on lipids are ideal options for managing patients with type 2 diabetes.

Topics: Cardiovascular Diseases; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Diet, Carbohydrate-Restricted; Exenatide; Glucagon-Like Peptide 1; Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Incretins; Motivation; Obesity; Patient Compliance; Peptides; Risk Management; Self Care; Venoms; Weight Gain

Cardiovascular (CV) disease is the major cause of mortality and morbidity in individuals with diabetes. Individuals with diabetes often have a variety of factors such as hyperglycaemia, dyslipidaemia, hypertension, insulin resistance and obesity, which increase their risks of endothelial dysfunction and CV disease. The incretin hormones, such as glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1), induce the glucose-dependent secretion of insulin, improve beta-cell function and induce slowing of gastric emptying and feelings of satiety - which result in reduced food intake and weight loss. Therapeutic treatments targeting the incretin system, such as GLP-1 receptor agonists, offer the potential to address beta-cell dysfunction (one the underlying pathogenic mechanisms of type 2 diabetes), as well as the resulting hyperglycaemia. Initial evidence now suggests that incretins could have beneficial effects on endothelial function and the CV system through both indirect effects on the reduction of hyperglycaemia and direct effects mediated through GLP-1 receptor-dependent and -independent mechanisms. If these initial findings are confirmed in larger clinical trials, GLP-1 receptor antagonists could help to address the major CV risks faced by patients with diabetes.

Topics: Cardiovascular Diseases; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Diabetic Angiopathies; Endothelium, Vascular; Glucagon-Like Peptide 1; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Incretins; Weight Loss

Topics: Blood Glucose; Cardiovascular Diseases; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptidyl Peptidase 4; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Glucagon-Like Peptide 1; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Incretins; Insulin; Insulin Secretion; Insulin-Secreting Cells; Postprandial Period

Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1), a gastrointestinal hormone mainly produced in the post-prandial state, reduces blood glucose through the stimulation of insulin secretion and the inhibition of glucagon release. Long-acting GLP-1 receptor agonists, and dipeptidyl-peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors which increase GLP-1 levels, are used as hypoglycemic treatments in type 2 diabetes. This paper aims at reviewing the potential benefit of those treatments in the prevention of cardiovascular risk in type 2 diabetic patients.. Experimental studies have shown that GLP-1 has several potentially beneficial actions on cardiovascular risk. Some of those, such as protection from myocardial ischemic damage and improvement of cardiac function, have also been demonstrated in humans. However, the equivalence of GLP-1 agonists and DPP-4 inhibitors with GLP-1, with respect to cardiovascular risk profile, cannot be assumed or taken for granted. Drugs of those two classes have been shown to effectively reduce glycated hemoglobin and to have a specific effect on post-prandial glucose; furthermore, they seem to reduce blood pressure and to have some favorable effects on lipid profiles. Additionally, GLP-1 agonists induce weight loss in diabetic patients.. The profile of action of GLP-1 receptor agonists and DPP-4 inhibitors suggests the possibility of an actual reduction in cardiovascular risk, which needs to be confirmed by large long-term clinical trials.

Topics: Blood Pressure; Body Weight; Cardiovascular Diseases; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptidyl Peptidase 4; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Glucagon-Like Peptide 1; Heart Rate; Humans; Incretins; Insulin Resistance; Myocardial Contraction; Myocardial Ischemia; Risk Factors

Type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) is associated with significantly increased risk of microvascular and macrovascular disease. Although most studies have focused on the microvascular complications of diabetes (eg, nephropathy, neuropathy, retinopathy), most patients with type 2 DM die from causes that are related to macrovascular disease (eg, myocardial infarction). Poor glycemic control increases the risk of future cardiovascular events, and prospective studies of patients with type 1 and type 2 DM have demonstrated that the incidence of vascular complications is reduced by lifestyle modifications or medications that reduce blood glucose concentrations.

Topics: Blood Glucose; Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring; Cannabinoid Receptor Modulators; Cardiovascular Diseases; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Incretins; Insulin; Risk Reduction Behavior

Full-fat dairy milk may protect against cardiometabolic disorders, due to the milk fat globule membrane (MFGM), through anti-inflammatory and gut-health-promoting activities. We hypothesized that a MFGM-enriched milk beverage (MEB) would alleviate metabolic endotoxemia in metabolic syndrome (MetS) persons by improving gut barrier function and glucose tolerance. In a randomized crossover trial, MetS persons consumed for two-week period a controlled diet with MEB (2.3 g/d milk phospholipids) or a comparator beverage (COMP) formulated with soy phospholipid and palm/coconut oil. They then provided fasting blood and completed a high-fat/high-carbohydrate test meal challenge for evaluating postprandial metabolism and intestinal permeability. Participants had no adverse effects and achieved high compliance, and there were no between-trial differences in dietary intakes. Compared with COMP, fasting endotoxin, glucose, incretins, and triglyceride were unaffected by MEB. The meal challenge increased postprandial endotoxin, triglyceride, and incretins, but were unaffected by MEB. Insulin sensitivity; fecal calprotectin, myeloperoxidase, and short-chain fatty acids; and small intestinal and colonic permeability were also unaffected by MEB. This short-term study demonstrates that controlled administration of MEB in MetS persons does not affect gut barrier function, glucose tolerance, and other cardiometabolic health biomarkers, which contradicts observational evidence that full-fat milk heightens cardiometabolic risk. Registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03860584).

Topics: Adult; Animals; Biomarkers; Cardiovascular Diseases; Cross-Over Studies; Endotoxemia; Endotoxins; Glucose; Humans; Incretins; Lecithins; Metabolic Syndrome; Milk; Phospholipids; Triglycerides

Low cognitive scores are risk factors for cardiovascular outcomes. Whether this relationship is stronger using novel cognitive indices is unknown.. Participants in the Researching Cardiovascular Events with a Weekly Incretin in Diabetes (REWIND) trial who completed both the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) score and Digit Substitution Test (DSST) at baseline (N = 8772) were included. These scores were used to identify participants with baseline substantive cognitive impairment (SCI), defined as a baseline score on either the MoCA or DSST ≥ 1.5 SD below either score's country-specific mean, or SCI-GM, which was based on a composite index of both scores calculated as their geometric mean (GM), and defined as a score that was ≥ 1.5 SD below their country's average GM. Relationships between these measures and incident major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), and either stroke or death were analyzed.. Compared with 7867 (89.7%) unaffected participants, the 905 (10.3%) participants with baseline SCI had a higher incidence of MACE (unadjusted hazard ratio [HR] 1.34; 95% CI 1.11, 1.62; P = 0.003), and stroke or death (unadjusted HR 1.60; 95% CI 1.33, 1.91; P < 0.001). Stronger relationships were noted for SCI-GM and MACE (unadjusted HR 1.61; 95% CI 1.28, 2.01; P < 0.001), and stroke or death (unadjusted HR 1.85; 95% CI 1.50, 2.30; P < 0.001). For SCI-GM but not SCI, all these relationships remained significant in models that adjusted for up to 10 SCI risk factors.. Country-standardized SCI-GM was a strong independent predictor of cardiovascular events in people with type 2 diabetes in the REWIND trial.

Topics: Cardiovascular Diseases; Cognitive Dysfunction; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Incretins; Risk Factors; Stroke

People with diabetes are at high risk for cardiovascular events including heart failure (HF). We examined the effect of the glucagon-like peptide 1 agonist dulaglutide on incident HF events and other cardiovascular outcomes in those with or without prior HF in the randomized placebo-controlled Researching Cardiovascular Events with a Weekly Incretin in Diabetes (REWIND) trial.. The REWIND major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE) outcome was the first occurrence of a composite endpoint of non-fatal myocardial infarction, non-fatal stroke, or death from cardiovascular causes (including unknown causes). In this post-hoc analysis, a HF event was defined as an adjudication-confirmed hospitalization or urgent evaluation for HF. Of the 9901 participants studied over a median follow-up of 5.4 years, 213/4949 (4.3%) randomly assigned to dulaglutide and 226/4952 (4.6%) participants assigned to placebo experienced a HF event (hazard ratio [HR] 0.93, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.77-1.12; p = 0.456). In the 853 (8.6%) participants with HF at baseline, there was no change in either MACE or HF events with dulaglutide as compared to participants without HF (p = 0.44 and 0.19 for interaction, respectively). Combined cardiovascular death and HF events were marginally reduced with dulaglutide compared to placebo (HR 0.88, 95% CI 0.78-1.00; p = 0.050) but unchanged in patients with and without HF at baseline (p = 0.31).. Dulaglutide was not associated with a reduction in HF events in patients with type 2 diabetes regardless of baseline HF status over 5.4 years of follow-up.

Topics: Cardiovascular Diseases; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Heart Failure; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Incretins; Treatment Outcome

The Researching cardiovascular Events with a Weekly INcretin in Diabetes (REWIND) double blind randomized trial demonstrated that weekly subcutaneous dulaglutide 1.5 mg, a glucagon like peptide-1 receptor agonist, versus matched placebo reduced the first outcome of major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE), cardiovascular death, nonfatal myocardial infarction or nonfatal stroke (594 versus 663 events) in 9901 persons with type 2 diabetes and either chronic cardiovascular disease or risk factors, and followed during 5.4 years. These findings were based on a time-to-first-event analysis and preclude relevant information on the burden of total major events occurring during the trial. This analysis reports on the total cardiovascular or fatal events in the REWIND participants METHODS: We compared the total incidence of MACE or non-cardiovascular deaths, and the total incidence of expanded MACE (MACE, unstable angina, heart failure or revascularization) or non-cardiovascular deaths between participants randomized to dulaglutide and those randomized to placebo. Incidences were expressed as number per 1000 person-years. Hazard ratios (HR) were calculated using the conditional time gap and proportional means models.. Participants had a mean age of 66.2 years, 46.3% were women and 31% had previous cardiovascular disease. During the trial there were 1972 MACE or non-cardiovascular deaths and 3673 expanded MACE or non-cardiovascular deaths. The incidence of total MACE or non-cardiovascular deaths in the dulaglutide and placebo groups was 35.8 and 40.3 per 1000 person-years, respectively [absolute reduction = 4.5 per 1000 person-years; conditional time gap HR 0.90 (95% CI, 0.82-0.98) p = 0.020, and proportional means HR 0.89 (95% CI, 0.80-0.98) p = 0.022]. The incidence of total expanded MACE or non-cardiovascular deaths in the dulaglutide and placebo groups was 67.1 and 74.7 per 1000 person-years, respectively [absolute reduction = 7.6 per 1000 person-years; conditional time gap HR 0.93 (95% CI, 0.87-0.99) p = 0.023, and proportional means HR 0.90 (95% CI, 0.82-0.99) p = 0.028].. These findings suggest that weekly subcutaneous dulaglutide reduced total cardiovascular or fatal event burden in people with type 2 diabetes at moderate cardiovascular risk.. https://www.clinicaltrials.gouv . Unique Identifier NCT01394952).

Topics: Aged; Cardiovascular Diseases; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Double-Blind Method; Female; Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor; Glucagon-Like Peptides; Heart Disease Risk Factors; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Immunoglobulin Fc Fragments; Incretins; Male; Middle Aged; Recombinant Fusion Proteins; Risk Assessment; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

Type 2 diabetes is associated with cognitive dysfunction and an increased dementia risk, particularly in individuals with concomitant cardiovascular and/or kidney disease. Incretin therapies may modulate this risk via glycemic and nonglycemic pathways. We explored if the dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitor linagliptin could prevent cognitive decline in people with type 2 diabetes with cardiorenal disease.. The CArdiovascular and Renal Microvascular outcomE study with LINAgliptin (CARMELINA)-COG substudy was an integral part of CARMELINA (NCT01897532) that randomized participants with cardiorenal disease to linagliptin 5 mg or placebo once daily (1:1), in addition to standard of care. The primary cognitive outcome was the occurrence of accelerated cognitive decline at the end of treatment, defined as a regression-based index score ≤16th percentile on the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) or a composite measure of attention and executive functioning and analyzed in participants with a baseline MMSE ≥24. Effects across subgroups by baseline factors, as well as absolute cognitive changes, were also assessed.. In a large international cardiovascular outcome trial in people with type 2 diabetes and cardiorenal disease, linagliptin did not modulate cognitive decline over 2.5 years.

Topics: Aged; Blood Glucose; Cardiovascular Diseases; Cognition; Cognitive Dysfunction; Comorbidity; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Female; Glomerular Filtration Rate; Humans; Incretins; Kidney; Kidney Diseases; Linagliptin; Male; Middle Aged; Treatment Outcome

To simplify administration of aqueous exenatide once weekly, which requires reconstitution, the exenatide microspheres have been reformulated in a ready-to-use autoinjector with a Miglyol diluent (exenatide QWS-AI). This study compared the efficacy and safety of exenatide QWS-AI with the first-in-class glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist exenatide twice daily (BID).. This randomized, open-label, controlled study in patients with type 2 diabetes using diet and exercise or taking stable oral glucose-lowering medication randomized patients 3:2 to either exenatide QWS-AI (2 mg) or exenatide BID (10 μg) for 28 weeks. The primary outcome was the 28-week change in glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c). A subset of patients completed a standardized meal test for postprandial and pharmacokinetic assessments.. A total of 375 patients (mean HbA1c, 8.5% [69 mmol/mol]; body mass index, 33.2 kg/m. Exenatide QWS-AI was associated with a greater reduction in HbA1c, similar weight loss and a favorable gastrointestinal AE profile compared with exenatide BID.

Topics: Cardiovascular Diseases; Cohort Studies; Combined Modality Therapy; Delayed-Action Preparations; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Diabetic Angiopathies; Diabetic Cardiomyopathies; Drug Administration Schedule; Exenatide; Female; Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hyperglycemia; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Incretins; Injections, Jet; Intention to Treat Analysis; Male; Middle Aged; Patient Dropouts; Peptides; Risk Factors; Severity of Illness Index; Suspensions; United States; Venoms

Albiglutide is a long-acting glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist that improves glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Harmony Outcomes is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of the effect of albiglutide on major adverse cardiovascular (CV) events in patients with T2DM and established CV disease.. The trial was designed to recruit 9,400 patients aged ≥40 years with T2DM, prior atherosclerotic CV disease, and suboptimal glycemic control. Participants were assigned in a 1:1 ratio to albiglutide 30 mg (potentially increasing to 50 mg) or matching placebo administered once weekly by subcutaneous injection. The trial will continue until ≥611 confirmed primary outcome events (CV death, myocardial infarction, or stroke) occur over a median follow-up of at least 1.5 years.. A total of 9,463 patients were enrolled at 611 sites in 28 countries between July 2015 and December 2016. The mean age was 64.1 years; duration of T2DM, 13.8 years; and glycated hemoglobin, 8.7%. The percentage of patients with prior coronary artery disease was 70.5%; peripheral arterial disease, 25.0%; stroke, 17.7%; heart failure, 20.2%; and chronic kidney disease, 22.6%.. Harmony Outcomes will assess the CV safety of albiglutide in patients with T2DM and CV disease. Trials of other agents in the glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist class have shown CV benefit for only some of these medications, possibly due to differences in trial design or instead due to differences in drug structure or metabolism. Harmony Outcomes will provide information critical to our understanding of this heterogenous class of glucose-lowering agents.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Blood Glucose; Cardiovascular Diseases; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Double-Blind Method; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Glucagon-Like Peptide 1; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Incidence; Incretins; Italy; Male; Middle Aged; Ontario; Survival Rate; Treatment Outcome; United Kingdom; United States

Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists and dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors treat type 2 diabetes through incretin-signaling pathways. This study compared the efficacy and safety of the glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist exenatide once-weekly (Miglyol) suspension for autoinjection (QWS-AI) with the dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor sitagliptin or placebo.. In this open-label, multicentre study of patients with type 2 diabetes who had suboptimal glycaemic control on metformin monotherapy, 365 patients were randomized to receive exenatide 2.0 mg QWS-AI, sitagliptin 100 mg once daily or oral placebo (3:2:1 ratio). The primary endpoint was change in glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) from baseline to 28 weeks.. At 28 weeks, exenatide QWS-AI significantly reduced HbA1c from baseline compared to sitagliptin (-1.13% vs -0.75% [baseline values, 8.42% and 8.50%, respectively]; P  = .02) and placebo (-0.40% [baseline value, 8.50%]; P = .001). More exenatide QWS-AI-treated patients achieved HbA1c <7.0% than did sitagliptin- or placebo-treated patients (43.1% vs 32.0% and 24.6%; both P  < .05). Exenatide QWS-AI and sitagliptin reduced fasting plasma glucose from baseline to 28 weeks (-21.3 and -11.3 mg/dL) vs placebo (+9.6 mg/dL), with no significant difference between the 2 active treatments. Body weight decreased with both active treatments (-1.12 and -1.19 kg), but not with placebo (+0.15 kg). No improvement in blood pressure was observed in any group. The most common adverse events with exenatide QWS-AI were gastrointestinal events and injection-site reactions.. This study demonstrated that exenatide QWS-AI reduced HbA1c more than sitagliptin or placebo and was well tolerated.

Topics: Cardiovascular Diseases; Cohort Studies; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Diabetic Angiopathies; Diabetic Cardiomyopathies; Drug Therapy, Combination; Excipients; Exenatide; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hyperglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Incidence; Incretins; Injections, Jet; Male; Metformin; Middle Aged; Peptides; Sitagliptin Phosphate; Triglycerides; United States; Venoms

The effect of saxagliptin on cardiovascular outcomes according to different hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) levels has not been described. Thus, we analyzed the SAVOR-TIMI 53 trial to compare the cardiovascular effects of saxagliptin vs placebo according to baseline HbA1c.. A total of 16,492 patients with type 2 diabetes (HbA1c 6.5%-12.0% in the 6 months before randomization) and either a history of established cardiovascular disease or multiple risk factors for atherosclerosis were randomized to saxagliptin or placebo in addition to usual care. Patients were followed for a median of 2.1 years. The primary endpoint was cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or ischemic stroke.. Patients were stratified by HbA1c at randomization into the following prespecified groups: <7%, 7%-<8%, 8%-<9%, and ≥9%. Baseline HbA1c ≥7% was associated with increased risk of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or ischemic stroke (adjusted hazard ratio [HR(adj)] 1.35; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.17-1.58) but not hospitalization for heart failure (HR(adj) 1.09; 95% CI, 0.88-1.36). Saxagliptin neither increased nor decreased the risk of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or ischemic stroke in patients with HbA1c <7% (HR 1.01; 95% CI, 0.78-1.31), 7%-<8% (HR 0.98; 95% CI, 0.80-1.20), 8%-<9% (HR 1.09; 95% CI, 0.85-1.39), ≥9% (HR 0.95; 95% CI, 0.77-1.18) (P-interaction = .89).. Baseline HbA1c is associated with increased risk of macrovascular events but not hospitalization for heart failure. There was no heterogeneity in the effect of saxagliptin on cardiovascular events by baseline HbA1c, with cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or ischemic stroke neither increased nor decreased across the spectrum of baseline HbA1c values.

Topics: Adamantane; Aged; Cardiovascular Diseases; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptides; Double-Blind Method; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Heart Failure; Hospitalization; Humans; Incretins; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Risk; Stroke

CARdiovascular Outcome Trial of LINAgliptin Versus Glimepiride in Type 2 Diabetes (NCT01243424) is an ongoing, randomized trial in subjects with early type 2 diabetes and increased cardiovascular risk or established complications that will determine the long-term cardiovascular impact of linagliptin versus the sulphonylurea glimepiride. Eligible patients were sulphonylurea-naïve with HbA1c 6.5%-8.5% or previously exposed to sulphonylurea (in monotherapy or in a combination regimen <5 years) with HbA1c 6.5%-7.5%. Primary outcome is time to first occurrence of cardiovascular death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, non-fatal stroke or hospitalization for unstable angina. A total of 631 patients with primary outcome events will be required to provide 91% power to demonstrate non-inferiority in cardiovascular safety by comparing the upper limit of the two-sided 95% confidence interval as being below 1.3 for a given hazard ratio. Hierarchical testing for superiority will follow, and the trial has 80% power to demonstrate a 20% relative cardiovascular risk reduction. A total of 6041 patients were treated with median type 2 diabetes duration 6.2 years, 40.0% female, mean HbA1c 7.2%, 66% on 1 and 24% on 2 glucose-lowering agents and 34.5% had previous cardiovascular complications. The results of CARdiovascular Outcome Trial of LINAgliptin Versus Glimepiride in Type 2 Diabetes may influence the decision-making process for selecting a second glucose-lowering agent after metformin in type 2 diabetes.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Biomarkers; Blood Glucose; Cardiovascular Diseases; Clinical Protocols; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptidyl Peptidase 4; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Double-Blind Method; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Incretins; Linagliptin; Male; Middle Aged; Patient Selection; Research Design; Risk Factors; Sample Size; Sulfonylurea Compounds; Treatment Outcome

The risk of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality is significantly increased in patients with diabetes; thus, it is important to determine whether glucose-lowering therapy affects this risk over time. Changes in cardiovascular risk markers were examined in patients with type 2 diabetes treated with exenatide twice daily (a glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist) or glimepiride (a sulfonylurea) added to metformin in the EURopean EXenAtide (EUREXA) study.. Patients with type 2 diabetes failing metformin were randomized to add-on exenatide twice daily (n = 515) or glimepiride (n = 514) until treatment failure defined by hemoglobin A1C. Anthropomorphic measures, blood pressure (BP), heart rate, lipids, and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) over time were evaluated.. Over 36 months, twice-daily exenatide was associated with improved body weight (-3.9 kg), waist circumference (-3.6 cm), systolic/diastolic BP (-2.5/-2.6 mmHg), high-density lipoprotein (HDL)-cholesterol (0.05 mmol/L), triglycerides (-0.2 mmol/L), and hsCRP (-1.7 mg/L). Heart rate did not increase (-0.3 beats/minute), and low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (0.2 mmol/L) and total cholesterol (0.1 mmol/L) increased slightly. Between-group differences were significantly in favor of exenatide for body weight (P < 0.0001), waist circumference (P < 0.001), systolic BP (P < 0.001), diastolic BP (P = 0.023), HDL-cholesterol (P = 0.001), and hsCRP (P = 0.004). Fewer patients randomized to exenatide twice daily versus glimepiride required the addition of at least one antihypertensive (20.4 vs 26.4%; P = 0.026) or lipid-lowering medication (8.4 vs 12.8%; P = 0.025).. Add-on exenatide twice daily was associated with significant, sustained improvement in several cardiovascular risk markers in patients with type 2 diabetes versus glimepiride.. NCT00359762, http://www.ClinicalTrials.gov.

Topics: Aged; Biomarkers; Blood Glucose; Blood Pressure; C-Reactive Protein; Cardiovascular Diseases; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Therapy, Combination; Europe; Exenatide; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Heart Rate; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Incretins; Lipids; Male; Metformin; Middle Aged; Peptides; Risk Factors; Sulfonylurea Compounds; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Venoms

In this study, we examined whether inhibition of postprandial hyperglycemia by combination therapy with two drugs for reducing postprandial hyperglycemia, i.e., α-glucosidase inhibitor miglitol and dipeptidyl peptidase (DPP)-4 inhibitor sitagliptin, improves glycemic control and reduces the risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) development.. We enrolled 32 type 2 diabetic Japanese patients with hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) levels ranging from 6.9% to 10.5%, who had been treated for at least 2 months with 50mg miglitol (t.i.d.) or 50 mg sitagliptin (q.d.). Following a monotherapy period with either miglitol (Group-M) or sitagliptin (Group-S) for 1 month, the patients were subjected to combination therapy with sitagliptin and miglitol for 3 months. Meal tolerance tests were performed at the end of the monotherapy and combination therapy.. Combination therapy for 3 months after monotherapy reduced HbA1c (changes: Group-M: -1.3%±0.7%, P<0.001; Group-S: -0.6%±0.5%, P<0.001) and glycoalbumin levels and increased 1,5-anhydroglucitol concentrations in the blood. In the meal tolerance tests, circulating active glucagon-like peptide-1 levels were elevated in both groups, while active glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide levels were reduced by combination therapy in the group with add-on miglitol therapy. The plasma protein concentrations of interleukin (IL)-8 and adhesion molecules (sE-selectin and sVCAM-1) were reduced by switching to the combination therapy, in particular with the add-on miglitol therapy.. Our results suggest that combination therapy with miglitol and sitagliptin improves glycemic control and reduces the circulating protein concentrations of IL-8, sE-selectin, and sVCAM-1 in type 2 diabetic Japanese patients.

Topics: 1-Deoxynojirimycin; Adult; Aged; Asian People; Biomarkers; Blood Glucose; Cardiovascular Diseases; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Drug Therapy, Combination; E-Selectin; Female; Glycoside Hydrolase Inhibitors; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Incretins; Interleukin-8; Japan; Male; Middle Aged; Prospective Studies; Pyrazines; Risk Factors; Sitagliptin Phosphate; Triazoles; Vascular Cell Adhesion Molecule-1

Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) have been used to treat patients with type 2 diabetes since 2005 and have become popular because of the efficacy and durability in relation to glycaemic control in combination with weight loss in most patients. Today in 2022, seven GLP-1 RAs, including oral semaglutide are available for treatment of type 2 diabetes. Since the efficacy in relation to reduction of HbA1c and body weight as well as tolerability and dosing frequency vary between agents, the GLP-1 RAs cannot be considered equal. The short acting lixisenatide showed no cardiovascular benefits, while once daily liraglutide and the weekly agonists, subcutaneous semaglutide, dulaglutide, and efpeglenatide, all lowered the incidence of cardiovascular events. Liraglutide, oral semaglutide and exenatide once weekly also reduced mortality. GLP-1 RAs reduce the progression of diabetic kidney disease. In the 2019 consensus report from European Association for the Study of Diabetes/American Diabetes Association, GLP-1 RAs with demonstrated cardio-renal benefits (liraglutide, semaglutide and dulaglutide) are recommended after metformin to patients with established cardiovascular diseases or multiple cardiovascular risk factors. European Society of Cardiology suggests starting with a sodium-glucose cotransprter-2 inhibitor or a GLP-1 RA in drug naïve patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (CVD) or high CV Risk. However, the results from cardiovascular outcome trials (CVOT) are very heterogeneous suggesting that some GLP-1RAs are more suitable to prevent CVD than others. The CVOTs provide a basis upon which individual treatment decisions for patients with T2D and CVD can be made.

Topics: Cardiovascular Diseases; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Glucagon-Like Peptide 1; Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Incretins; Liraglutide

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) remains the leading cause of death in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D). Older age, prior heart failure (HF) and CV events, peripheral artery disease, and kidney complications can identify a subgroup of patients with T2D at high risk of mortality who are likely to achieve the greatest benefit from newer glucose-lowering agents. Both glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RA) and sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT-2) inhibitors can reduce CV risk in patients with T2D, and both are recommended by the American Diabetes Association to reduce the risk of major cardiovascular events (MACE). The magnitude of the benefits of GLP-1RA and SGLT-2 inhibitors on MACE are similar, ranging from 12 to 14% reduction of risk, but only GLP-1RA may reduce the risk of stroke. The most striking difference between the two classes of drugs relates to the amelioration on hospitalization for HF, as the benefit of SGLT-2 inhibitors surpass by threefold that obtained with GLP-1RA. Despite this, GLP-1RA also exert a significant benefit on HF which suggest their use when SGLT-2 inhibitors are contraindicated or not tolerated. The difference between the two classes is less impressive for the kidney outcome. Overall, the results of CVOTs published so far seems to suggest that the gap between the cardiorenal benefits of SGLT-2 and GLP-1RA is narrowing.

Topics: Cardiovascular Diseases; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor; Hospitalization; Humans; Incretins; Kidney Diseases; Protective Factors; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Sodium-Glucose Transporter 2 Inhibitors; Treatment Outcome

We aimed to compare cardiovascular outcomes of patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) who initiated GLP-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RA) or basal insulin (BI) under routine care.. We accessed the administrative claims database of the Veneto Region (Italy) to identify new users of GLP-1RA or BI in 2014-2018. Propensity score matching (PSM) was implemented to obtain two cohorts of patients with superimposable characteristics. The primary endpoint was the 3-point major adverse cardiovascular events (3P-MACE). Secondary endpoints included 3P-MACE components, hospitalization for heart failure, revascularizations, and adverse events.. From a background population of 5,242,201 citizens, 330,193 were identified as having diabetes. PSM produced two very well matched cohorts of 4063 patients each, who initiated GLP-1RA or BI after an average of 2.5 other diabetes drug classes. Patients were 63-year-old and only 15% had a baseline history of cardiovascular disease. During a median follow-up of 24 months in the intention-to-treat analysis, 3P-MACE occurred less frequently in the GLP-1RA cohort (HR versus BI 0.59; 95% CI 0.50-0.71; p < 0.001). All secondary cardiovascular endpoints were also significantly in favor of GLP-1RA. Results were confirmed in the as-treated approach and in several stratified analyses. According to the E-value, confounding by unmeasured variables were unlikely to entirely explain between-group differences in cardiovascular outcomes.. Patients with T2D who initiated a GLP-1RA experienced far better cardiovascular outcomes than did matched patients who initiated a BI in the same healthcare system. These finding supports prioritization of GLP-1RA as the first injectable regimen for the management of T2D.

Topics: Administrative Claims, Healthcare; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Cardiovascular Diseases; Comparative Effectiveness Research; Databases, Factual; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Female; Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Incretins; Insulin; Italy; Longitudinal Studies; Male; Middle Aged; Retrospective Studies; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

The European Society of Cardiology (ESC) recently defined cardiovascular risk classes for subjects with diabetes. Aim of this study was to explore the distribution of subjects with type 2 diabetes (T2D) by cardiovascular risk groups according to the ESC classification and to describe the quality indicators of care, with particular regard to cardiovascular risk factors.. The study is based on data extracted from electronic medical records of patients treated at the 258 Italian diabetes centers participating in the AMD Annals initiative. Patients with T2D were stratified by cardiovascular risk. General descriptive indicators, measures of intermediate outcomes, intensity/appropriateness of pharmacological treatment for diabetes and cardiovascular risk factors, presence of other complications and overall quality of care were evaluated.. Overall, 473,740 subjects with type 2 diabetes (78.5% at very high cardiovascular risk, 20.9% at high risk and 0.6% at moderate risk) were evaluated. Among people with T2D at very high risk: 26.4% had retinopathy, 39.5% had albuminuria, 18.7% had a previous major cardiovascular event, 39.0% had organ damage, 89.1% had three or more risk factors. The use of DPP4-i markedly increased as cardiovascular risk increased. The prescription of secretagogues also increased and that of GLP1-RAs tended to increase. The use of SGLT2-i was still limited, and only slightly higher in subjects with very high cardiovascular risk. The overall quality of care, as summarized by the Q score, tended to be lower as the level of cardiovascular risk increased.. A large proportion of subjects with T2D is at high or very high risk. Glucose-lowering drug therapies seem not to be adequately used with respect to their potential advantages in terms of cardiovascular risk reduction. Several actions are necessary to improve the quality of care.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Biomarkers; Blood Glucose; Cardiovascular Diseases; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Electronic Health Records; Female; Heart Disease Risk Factors; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Incretins; Italy; Male; Middle Aged; Quality Indicators, Health Care; Retrospective Studies; Risk Assessment; Sodium-Glucose Transporter 2 Inhibitors; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

Major prospective randomized clinical safety trials have demonstrated beneficial effects of treatment with glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RA) and sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT-2i) in people with type 2 diabetes and elevated cardiovascular risk, and recent clinical treatment guidelines therefore promote early use of these classes of pharmacological agents. In this Swedish nationwide observational study, we compared cardiorenal outcomes and safety of new treatment with GLP-1RA and SGLT-2i in people with type 2 diabetes.. We linked data from national Swedish databases to capture patient characteristics and outcomes and used propensity-score based matching to account for differences between the two groups. The treatments were compared using Cox regression models.. We identified 9648 participants starting GLP-1RA and 12,097 starting SGLT-2i with median follow-up times 1.7 and 1.1 years, respectively. The proportion of patients with a history of MACE were 15.8%, and 17.0% in patients treated with GLP-1RA and SGLT-2i, respectively. The mean age was 61 years with 7.6 years duration of diabetes. Mean HbA1c were 8.3% (67.6 mmol/mol) and 8.3% (67.2 mmol/mol), and mean BMI 33.3 and 32.5 kg/m. This observational study suggests that treatment with GLP-1RA and SGLT-2i result in very similar cardiorenal outcomes. In the short term, treatment with GLP-1RA seem to be associated with lower risks of stroke and peripheral artery disease, whereas SGLT-2i seem to be nominally associated with lower risk of heart failure and total mortality.

Topics: Aged; Biomarkers; Blood Glucose; Cardiovascular Diseases; Databases, Factual; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Female; Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Incretins; Kidney Diseases; Male; Middle Aged; Registries; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Sodium-Glucose Transporter 2 Inhibitors; Sweden; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

Background SGLT-2 (sodium glucose transporter-2) inhibitors and GLP-1RAs (glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists) effectively lowered cardiovascular risk in large clinical trials for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus at high risk for these complications, and have been recommended by guidelines. To evaluate the contemporary landscape in which these recommendations would be implemented, we examined the use of these medications according to clinical guideline practice. Methods and Results In the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey for 2017 to 2018, we defined compelling indications for SGLT-2 inhibitors by the presence of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, heart failure, or chronic kidney disease, and for GLP-1RAs by the presence of established or high-risk atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, based on large clinical trials that have been incorporated in guideline recommendations of the American College of Cardiology and American Diabetes Association. We then evaluated use of these medications among patients with physician-diagnosed type 2 diabetes mellitus. All analyses incorporated complex survey design to produce nationally representative estimates. A total 1104 of 9254 sampled individuals had type 2 diabetes mellitus, representing 10.6% (95% CI, 9.7%-11.6%) of the US population or 33.2 million adults nationally. Of these, 52.6% (95% CI, 47.7%-57.5%) had an indication for SGLT-2 inhibitors, 32.8% (95% CI, 28.8%-37.2%) for GLP-1RAs, and 26.6% (95% CI, 22.2%-31.7%) for both medications. During 2017 to 2018, 4.5% (95% CI, 2.4%-8.2%) were treated with SGLT-2 inhibitors and 1.5% (95% CI, 0.7%-3.2%) with GLP-1RAs. Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, heart failure, or chronic kidney disease were not independently associated with SGLT-2 inhibitor or GLP-1RA use in patients with diabetes mellitus. Conclusions Despite a large number of patients being eligible for guideline-recommended cardiorenal protective therapies, there are substantial gaps in the use of SGLT-2 inhibitors and GLP-1RAs, limiting their public health benefits.

Topics: Aged; Biomarkers; Blood Glucose; Cardiovascular Diseases; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Utilization; Eligibility Determination; Female; Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor; Guideline Adherence; Heart Disease Risk Factors; Humans; Incretins; Male; Middle Aged; Nutrition Surveys; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Practice Patterns, Physicians'; Risk Assessment; Sodium-Glucose Transporter 2 Inhibitors; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; United States

Background Randomized controlled trials showed that newer glucose-lowering agents are cardioprotective, but most participants were men. It is unknown whether benefits are similar in women. Methods and Results Among adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus not controlled with metformin with no prior use of insulin, we assessed for sex differences in the cardiovascular effectiveness and safety of sodium-glucose-like transport-2 inhibitors (SGLT-2i), glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RA), dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors, initiated as second-line agents relative to sulfonylureas (reference-group). We studied type 2 diabetes mellitus American adults with newly dispensed sulfonylureas, SGLT-2i, GLP-1RA, or dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (Marketscan-Database: 2011-2017). We used multivariable Cox proportional hazards models with time-varying exposure to compare time to first nonfatal cardiovascular event (myocardial infarction/unstable angina, stroke, and heart failure), and safety outcomes between drugs users, and tested for sex-drug interactions. Among 167 254 type 2 diabetes mellitus metformin users (46% women, median age 59 years, at low cardiovascular risk), during a median 4.5-year follow-up, cardiovascular events incidence was lower in women than men (14.7 versus 16.7 per 1000-person-year). Compared with sulfonylureas, hazard ratios (HRs) for cardiovascular events were lower with GLP-1RA (adjusted HR-women: 0.57, 95% CI: 0.48-0.68; aHR-men: 0.82, 0.71-0.95), dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (aHR-women: 0.83, 0.77-0.89; aHR-men: 0.85, 0.79-0.91) and SGLT-2i (aHR-women: 0.58, 0.46-0.74; aHR-men: 0.69, 0.57-0.83). A sex-by-drug interaction was statistically significant only for GLP-1RA (

Topics: Aged; Biomarkers; Blood Glucose; Cardiovascular Diseases; Databases, Factual; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Down-Regulation; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor; Heart Disease Risk Factors; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Incretins; Male; Metformin; Middle Aged; Retrospective Studies; Risk Assessment; Sex Factors; Sodium-Glucose Transporter 2 Inhibitors; Treatment Outcome

The 5th Cardiovascular Outcome Trial (CVOT) Summit was held in Munich on October 24th-25th, 2019. As in previous years, this summit served as a reference meeting for in-depth discussions on the topic of recently completed and presented CVOTs. This year, focus was placed on the CVOTs CAROLINA, CREDENCE, DAPA-HF, REWIND, and PIONEER-6. Trial implications for diabetes management and the impact on new treatment algorithms were highlighted for diabetologists, cardiologists, endocrinologists, nephrologists, and general practitioners. Discussions evolved from CVOTs to additional therapy options for heart failure (ARNI), knowledge gained for the treatment and prevention of heart failure and diabetic kidney disease in populations with and without diabetes, particularly using SGLT-2 inhibitors and GLP-1 receptor agonists. Furthermore, the ever increasing impact of CVOTs and substances tested for primary prevention and primary care was discussed. The 6th Cardiovascular Outcome Trial Summit will be held in Munich on October 29th-30th, 2020 (https://www.cvot.org).

Topics: Cardiovascular Diseases; Clinical Trials as Topic; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor; Humans; Incretins; Sodium-Glucose Transporter 2 Inhibitors; Treatment Outcome

The recent results of Cardiovascular Outcomes Trials (CVOTs) in type 2 diabetes have clearly established the cardiovascular (CV) safety or even the benefit of two therapeutic classes, Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RA) and Sodium-Glucose Co-Transporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT-2i). Publication of the latest CVOTs for these therapeutic classes also led to an update of ESC guidelines and ADA/EASD consensus report in 2019, which considers using GLP-1 RA or SGLT-2i with proven cardiovascular benefit early in the management of type 2 diabetic patient with established cardiovascular disease (CVD) or at high risk of atherosclerotic CVD. The main beneficial results of these time-to event studies are supported by conventional statistical measures attesting the effectiveness of GLP-1 RA or SGLT2i on cardiovascular events (absolute risk, absolute risk difference, relative risk, relative risk reduction, odds ratio, hazard ratio). In addition, another measure whose clinical meaning appears to be easier, the Number Needed to Treat (NNT), is often mentioned while discussing the results of CVOTs, in order to estimating the clinical utility of each drug or sometimes trying to establish a power ranking. While the value of the measure is admittedly of interest, the subtleties of its computation in time-to-event studies are little known. We provide in this article a clear and practical explanation on NNT computation methods that should be used in order to estimate its value, according to the type of study design and variables available to describe the event of interest, in any randomized controlled trial. More specifically, a focus is made on time-to-event studies of which CVOTs are part, first to describe in detail an appropriate and adjusted method of NNT computation and second to help properly interpreting NNTs with the example of CVOTs conducted with GLP-1 RA and SGLT-2i. We particularly discuss the risk of misunderstanding of NNT values in CVOTs when some specific parameters inherent in each study are not taken into account, and the following risk of erroneous comparison between NNTs across studies. The present paper highlights the importance of understanding rightfully NNTs from CVOTs and their clinical impact to get the full picture of a drug's effectiveness.

Topics: Cardiovascular Diseases; Clinical Trials as Topic; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Evidence-Based Medicine; Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor; Humans; Incretins; Numbers Needed To Treat; Patient Selection; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Sodium-Glucose Transporter 2 Inhibitors; Treatment Outcome

Cardiovascular outcome trials in high-risk patients showed that some GLP-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RA), but not dipeptidyl-peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP-4i), can prevent cardiovascular events in type 2 diabetes (T2D). Since no trial has directly compared these two classes of drugs, we performed a comparative outcome analysis using real-world data.. From a database of ~ 5 million people from North-East Italy, we retrospectively identified initiators of GLP-1RA or DPP-4i from 2011 to 2018. We obtained two balanced cohorts by 1:1 propensity score matching. The primary outcome was the 3-point major adverse cardiovascular events (3P-MACE; a composite of death, myocardial infarction, or stroke). 3P-MACE components and hospitalization for heart failure were secondary outcomes.. From 330,193 individuals with T2D, we extracted two matched cohorts of 2807 GLP-1RA and 2807 DPP-4i initiators, followed for a median of 18 months. On average, patients were 63 years old, 60% male; 15% had pre-existing cardiovascular disease. The rate of 3P-MACE was lower in patients treated with GLP-1RA compared to DPP4i (23.5 vs. 34.9 events per 1000 person-years; HR: 0.67; 95% C.I. 0.53-0.86; p = 0.002). Rates of myocardial infarction (HR 0.67; 95% C.I. 0.50-0.91; p = 0.011) and all-cause death (HR 0.58; 95% C.I. 0.35-0.96; p = 0.034) were lower among GLP-1RA initiators. The as-treated and intention-to-treat approaches yielded similar results.. Patients initiating a GLP-1RA in clinical practice had better cardiovascular outcomes than similar patients who initiated a DPP-4i. These data strongly confirm findings from cardiovascular outcome trials in a lower risk population.

Topics: Aged; Cardiovascular Diseases; Cause of Death; Databases, Factual; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Female; Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor; Humans; Incretins; Italy; Male; Middle Aged; Patient Admission; Protective Factors; Retrospective Studies; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

Current evidence about the cardiovascular safety of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist (GLP-1ra) possesses limited generalizability to real-world patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) in usual practice. This study aimed to investigate the comparative cardiovascular safety of GLP-1ra in comparisons with dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor (DPP-4i), sulfonylurea (SU), and insulin in a real-world population with T2D.. Adults with newly-diagnosed T2D were identified from Taiwan's National Health Insurance Research Database in 2003-2014. A prevalent new-user cohort design was adopted to include a broad representation of real-world T2D patients being treated with GLP-1ra. The between-group comparability of baseline patient characteristics was achieved by matching on (1) initiation time of study drugs, (2) prior exposure to glucose-lowering agents, and (3) diabetes severity and complications, comorbidities, and concomitant cardiovascular medications using propensity scores. The primary outcome was a composite of cardiovascular disease (CVD) events and assessed up to the end of 2015. Cox modeling was employed to assess the association between study drugs and outcomes.. A total of 3195 GLP-1ra stable users was identified in 2011-2014. 1893, 1829, and 1367 GLP-1ra stable users were 1:1 matched to DPP-4i, SU and insulin users, respectively. Compared to DPP-4i, SU and insulin, the use of GLP-1ra was associated with a lower risk of composite CVD events [hazard ratio (95% confidence interval) 0.73 (0.57-0.96), 0.76 (0.57-1.00), and 0.81 (0.62-1.07), respectively]. Subgroup analyses revealed that GLP-1ra versus DPP-4i yielded a greater cardiovascular benefit in those without established CVD versus those with established CVD.. This comparison study extends the supporting evidence for the cardiovascular safety of GLP-1ra to a broad spectrum of real-world T2D patients using GLP-1ra.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Biomarkers; Blood Glucose; Cardiovascular Diseases; Databases, Factual; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Female; Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor; Humans; Incretins; Insulin; Male; Middle Aged; Prevalence; Retrospective Studies; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Sulfonylurea Compounds; Taiwan; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

Sodium-glucose cotransport protein-2 inhibitors (SGLT2is) and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) have been shown to reduce cardiovascular events in high-risk patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). We examined real-world use of these agents at a US academic medical center in the state of Mississippi. Prescriptions, provider specialty, and insurance status of users of SGLT2is and GLP-1RAs in patients with T2DM, and T2DM and cardiovascular disease (CVD) seen from 1st January 2013 to 30th June 2019 were obtained by electronic health records review. We identified 21,173 patients with T2DM and CVD. Overall, 306 (1.4%) and 349 (1.6%) patients received a SGLT2i and GLP-1RA, respectively. After the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) expanded empagliflozin and liraglutide indications, a mean difference of 19.2 and 12.7 greater quarterly new prescriptions was noted, respectively, whereas no such rise in canagliflozin was observed. Primary care physicians accounted for 53.4% SGLT2i prescriptions, endocrinology for 30.3%, and cardiology for 6.0%. Primary care physicians accounted for 45.1% GLP-1RA prescriptions, endocrinology for 45.0%, and cardiology for 1.4%. Prescription patterns did not largely differ by patient insurance status. In conclusion, prescription of evidence-based therapies to improve CVD outcomes in high-risk patients with T2DM remains very low after several years of evidence generation. Low uptake was evident across insurance types. Modest increases in use were observed after regulatory expansions in labeling; however, cardiologists rarely engaged in prescription, underscoring the need for widespread implementation strategies across health care systems.

Topics: Academic Medical Centers; Adult; Aged; Cardiovascular Diseases; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Approval; Drug Utilization; Electronic Health Records; Female; Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor; Humans; Incretins; Male; Middle Aged; Practice Patterns, Physicians'; Retrospective Studies; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Sodium-Glucose Transporter 2 Inhibitors; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; United States; United States Food and Drug Administration

No abstract present.

Topics: Biomarkers; Blood Glucose; Cardiovascular Diseases; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Diabetic Nephropathies; Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor; Humans; Incretins; Protective Factors; Risk Factors; Sodium-Glucose Transporter 2 Inhibitors; Treatment Outcome

The SUSTAIN 6 trial demonstrated that once-weekly semaglutide (0.5 and 1.0 mg) significantly reduced major adverse cardiovascular (CV) events (MACE) vs placebo in subjects with type 2 diabetes (T2D) and high CV risk. The effects of gender, age and baseline CV risk on outcomes are important considerations for further study.. Subjects were grouped according to gender, age (50-65 years and > 65 years), and CV risk profile at baseline (prior myocardial infarction [MI] or stroke vs no prior MI or stroke, and established CV disease [CVD] vs CV risk factors alone, including subjects with chronic kidney disease). Time to MACE and its individual components (CV death, nonfatal MI, nonfatal stroke), hospitalization for unstable angina or heart failure, and revascularization (coronary and peripheral) were analyzed for all subgroups. Additional analyses were performed for gender and age to investigate change from baseline in HbA. A total of 3297 subjects were included. The majority of subjects (60.7%) were male; 43% were > 65 years of age; 41.5% had a history of MI or stroke; and 76.8% had established CVD. Compared with placebo, semaglutide reduced the risk of the first occurrence of MACE and each MACE component consistently across all subgroups (gender, age, and baseline CV risk profile). Revascularizations, HbA. In this post hoc analysis of SUSTAIN 6, once-weekly semaglutide vs placebo reduced the risk of MACE in all subjects included in the trial, regardless of gender, age, or baseline CV risk profile. Trial registry Clinicaltrials.gov, Identifying number: NCT01720446, Date of registration: October 29, 2012.

Topics: Age Factors; Aged; Cardiovascular Diseases; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Glucagon-Like Peptides; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Incretins; Male; Middle Aged; Protective Factors; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Sex Factors; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

The aim was to determine the effects of dulaglutide, a synthetic once-weekly, injectable human glucagon-like peptide 1 analogue that lowers blood glucose, body weight, appetite and blood pressure, on cardiovascular outcomes. People with type 2 diabetes, aged ≥50 years, with glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) ≤9.5%, and either a previous cardiovascular event, evidence of cardiovascular disease or ≥2 cardiovascular risk factors were randomly allocated to a weekly subcutaneous injection of either dulaglutide (1.5 mg) or placebo and followed within the ongoing Researching cardiovascular Events with a Weekly INcretin in Diabetes (REWIND) trial every 3 to 6 months. The primary cardiovascular outcome is the first occurrence of the composite of cardiovascular death or non-fatal myocardial infarction or non-fatal stroke. Secondary outcomes include each component of the primary composite cardiovascular outcome, a composite clinical microvascular outcome comprising retinal or renal disease, hospitalization for unstable angina, heart failure requiring hospitalization or an urgent heart failure visit, and all-cause mortality. Follow-up will continue until the accrual of 1200 confirmed primary outcomes. Recruitment of 9901 participants (mean age 66 years, 46% women) occurred in 370 sites located in 24 countries over a period of 2 years. The mean duration of diabetes was 10 years, mean baseline HbA1c was 7.3%, and 31% had prior cardiovascular disease. The REWIND trial's international scope, high proportion of women, high proportion of people without prior cardiovascular disease and inclusion of participants whose mean baseline HbA1c was 7.3% suggests that its cardiovascular and safety findings will be directly relevant to the typical middle-aged patient seen in general practice throughout the world.

Topics: Aged; Cardiovascular Diseases; Delayed-Action Preparations; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Diabetic Angiopathies; Diabetic Cardiomyopathies; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor; Glucagon-Like Peptides; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Immunoglobulin Fc Fragments; Incretins; Injections, Subcutaneous; Male; Middle Aged; Mortality; Multicenter Studies as Topic; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Recombinant Fusion Proteins; Research Design; Risk Factors

Metabolic syndrome increases the risk of cardiovascular disease. Recently glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) agonists proved to be effective in preventing cardiovascular disease (CVD) in patients with type 2 diabetes. We investigated the association of blood incretin levels with metabolic syndrome in patients with type 2 diabetes.. This is a cross-sectional study involving 334 people with type 2 diabetes. Intact GLP-1 (iGLP-1) and intact glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (iGIP) levels were measured in a fasted state and 30 min after ingestion of a standard mixed meal. Metabolic syndrome was diagnosed based on the criteria of the International Diabetes Federation.. Two hundred twenty-five (69%) of the subjects have metabolic syndrome. The fasting iGLP-1 level was no different between groups. Thirty-min postprandial iGLP-1 was non-significantly lower in the subjects who had metabolic syndrome. Incremental iGLP-1 (ΔiGLP-1, the difference between 30-min postmeal and fasting iGLP-1 levels) was significantly lower in those with metabolic syndrome. There were no significant differences in fasting iGIP, postprandial iGIP, and ΔiGIP between groups. The ΔiGLP-1, but not ΔiGIP levels decreased significantly as the number of metabolic syndrome components increased. In hierarchical logistic regression analysis, the ΔiGLP-1 level was found to be a significant contributor to metabolic syndrome even after adjusting for other covariates.. Taken together, the iGLP-1 increment in the 30 min after meal ingestion is inversely associated with metabolic syndrome in patients with type 2 diabetes. This suggests that postmeal iGLP-1 increment could be useful in assessing cardiovascular risk in type 2 diabetes.

Topics: Aged; Cardiovascular Diseases; Cross-Sectional Studies; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Female; Gastric Inhibitory Polypeptide; Glucagon-Like Peptide 1; Humans; Incretins; Male; Metabolic Syndrome; Middle Aged; Postprandial Period; Risk

Topics: Cardiology; Cardiovascular Diseases; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Europe; Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor; Glycated Hemoglobin; Glycoside Hydrolase Inhibitors; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Incretins; Metformin; Myocardial Infarction; Societies, Medical; Sodium-Glucose Transporter 2 Inhibitors; Stroke

Recent clinical trials investigating cardiovascular (CV) safety of newer antidiabetic agents have been rapidly and largely changing the landscape of diabetes care and providing highly important clinical information on decision-making regarding the choice of antidiabetic agents. Similar to the sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors, some glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) have also demonstrated a marked risk reduction in major adverse CV events (MACE) in patients with type 2 diabetes at high risk of CV events. However, the two classes of agents differ largely in their pharmacological modes of action on glucose-lowering and CV parameters. Furthermore, CV benefits on individual components of MACE and other outcomes, including heart failure (HF), appear to differ partly between the two classes. Specifically, improvement of overall CV outcomes was likely driven by reduction in HF-related events in trials investigating SGLT2 inhibitors, and by reduction in atherosclerotic events in those investigating GLP-1RAs. This difference in CV benefit observed in the trials has important clinical implications regarding how to use the two classes of agents and how to identify suitable patients to obtain the best benefit from each class during routine diabetes care, possibly leading to a treatment plan tailored to an individual patient's CV risk and clinical condition. At this stage, however, we cardiologists may overlook such differences and may be unfamiliar with GLP-1RAs specifically. Herein, we highlight the potential benefits of GLP-1RAs on CV parameters observed in recent CV outcomes trials and further discuss clinical application of GLP-1RAs in CV medicine.

Topics: Cardiovascular Diseases; Clinical Decision-Making; Clinical Trials as Topic; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Evidence-Based Medicine; Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Incretins; Patient Selection; Risk Factors; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Attitude of Health Personnel; Biomarkers; Blood Glucose; Cardiologists; Cardiovascular Diseases; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Evidence-Based Medicine; Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice; Humans; Incretins; Risk Factors; Sodium-Glucose Transporter 2 Inhibitors; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Blood Glucose; Cardiovascular Diseases; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Incretins; Metformin; Protective Factors; Risk Factors; Sodium-Glucose Transporter 2; Sodium-Glucose Transporter 2 Inhibitors; Treatment Outcome

To estimate the long-term cost-effectiveness of exenatide twice daily vs insulin glargine once daily as add-on therapy to oral antidiabetic agents (OADs) for Chinese patients with type 2 diabetes (T2DM).. The Cardiff Diabetes Model was used to simulate disease progression and estimate the long-term effects of exenatide twice daily vs insulin glargine once daily. Patient profiles and treatment effects required for the model were obtained from literature reviews (English and Chinese databases) and from a meta-analysis of 8 randomized controlled trials comparing exenatide twice daily with insulin glargine once daily add-on to OADs for T2DM in China. Medical expenditure data were collected from 639 patients with T2DM (aged ≥18 years) with and without complications incurred between January 1, 2014 and December 31, 2015 from claims databases in Shandong, China. Costs (2014 Chinese Yuan [¥]) and benefits were estimated, from the payers' perspective, over 40 years at a discount rate of 3%. A series of sensitivity analyses were performed.. Patients on exenatide twice daily + OAD had a lower predicted incidence of most cardiovascular and hypoglycaemic events and lower total costs compared with those on insulin glargine once daily + OAD. A greater number of quality-adjusted life years (QALYs; 1.94) at a cost saving of ¥117 706 gained was associated with exenatide twice daily vs insulin glargine once daily. (i.e. cost saving of ¥60 764/QALY) per patient.. In Chinese patients with T2DM inadequately controlled by OADs, exenatide twice daily is a cost-effective add-on therapy alternative to insulin glargine once daily, and may address the problem of an excess of medical needs resulting from weight gain and hypoglycaemia in T2DM treatment.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Cardiovascular Diseases; China; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Diabetic Angiopathies; Diabetic Cardiomyopathies; Direct Service Costs; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Therapy, Combination; Exenatide; Humans; Hyperglycemia; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Incidence; Incretins; Injections, Subcutaneous; Insulin Glargine; Middle Aged; Models, Economic; Peptides; Quality of Life; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Venoms

Incretin-based dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists are newer choices of antidiabetic medications that are now most widely used worldwide. Preclinical study results suggest that the two drugs potentially exert benefits to prevent onsets and/or progressions of diabetes-related complications, such as myocardial infarctions and strokes. Outcomes of five clinical trials to evaluate the cardiovascular (CV) safety of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist have been recently reported. The heart failure findings of the Saxagliptin Assessment of Vascular Outcomes Recorded in Patients with Diabetes Mellitus-Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction 53 (SAVOR-TIMI53) are unexpected and very concerning; results of the Examination of Cardiovascular Outcomes with Alogliptin vs Standard of Care (EXAMINE), the Trial Evaluating Cardiovascular Outcomes with Sitagliptin (TECOS) and the Evaluation of Lixisenatide in Acute Coronary Syndrome (ELIXA) encourage neutral CV safety profiles of incretin-based drugs in individuals with type 2 diabetes and established CV diseases or multiple CV risks. Furthermore, the Liraglutide Effect and Action in Diabetes: Evaluation of Cardiovascular Outcome Results (LEADER) results show the benefits of liraglutide in preventing CV events in a similar study population. Despite the many preclinical studies showing the beneficial effects of incretin-related drugs, most CV safety trials of incretin-based drugs, except for LEADER, did not show benefits for CV events. It is important to recognize that CV safety trials were carried out to meet the US Food and Drug Administration guidance to assess CV safety of all new antidiabetic drugs; they were not designed to assess their benefits for CV events. Therefore, the long-term potential benefit, as well as even the safety, of incretin-based drugs for certain CV outcomes has not been definitively established, and requires evaluation in more specific and more relevant trials. If the need for CV safety trials would be determined based on an individual drug's safety data during its earlier development as well as its mechanism of action, resources could be saved for carrying out such clinical trials.

Topics: Cardiovascular Diseases; Clinical Trials as Topic; Diabetes Complications; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Female; Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor; Humans; Incretins; Male; Middle Aged; Treatment Outcome

In four trials including a total of more than 3000 patients, dulaglutide reduced the HbA1c concentration as effectively as other GLP-1 analogues when added to other hypoglycaemic drugs. The long elimination half-life of dulaglutide can make management of adverse effects and drug interactions more difficult. More data are needed on possible cardiac adverse effects.

Topics: Biomarkers; Blood Glucose; Cardiovascular Diseases; Clinical Trials as Topic; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Administration Schedule; Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor; Glucagon-Like Peptides; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Immunoglobulin Fc Fragments; Incretins; Recombinant Fusion Proteins; Risk Assessment; Treatment Outcome

To evaluate the comparative cardiovascular disease (CVD) safety of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) in head-to-head comparisons with dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors, sulphonylureas or insulin, when added to metformin, as used in 'real-world' patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).. Within a large US commercial health plan database linked to laboratory test results, we identified three pairwise 1 : 1 propensity-score-matched cohorts of patients with T2DM aged ≥18 years treated with metformin who initiated a GLP-1 RA or a comparator, i.e. DPP-4 inhibitor (n = 35 534), second-generation sulphonylureas (n = 28 138) or insulin (n = 47 068), between 2005 and 2013. We examined the association between drug initiation and a composite CVD endpoint, comprising hospitalizations for acute myocardial infarction, unstable angina, stroke or coronary revascularization.. During the course of 1 year, there were 13.9 and 13.7 CVD events per 1000 person-years among propensity-score-matched initiators of GLP-1 RAs versus DPP-4 inhibitors [hazard ratio (HR) 1.02; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.84-1.24]; and 12.1 versus 14.0 events among initiators of GLP-1 RAs versus sulphonylureas (HR 0.86; 95% CI 0.69-1.08). The effect estimates for GLP-1 RAs versus insulin were sensitive to the adjustment for glycated haemoglobin, after which the HR was 1.01 (95% CI 0.73-1.41). Results were robust across several sensitivity analyses, including an as-treated analysis considering up to 8.7 years of follow-up.. This large study, performing head-to-head comparisons of GLP-1 RAs with other antidiabetic agents in real-world patients, provides estimates of relative safety precise enough to exclude large differences in CVD risk and adds further understanding to results from recent clinical trials.

Topics: Adult; Angina, Unstable; Cardiovascular Diseases; Cohort Studies; Databases, Factual; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor; Glycated Hemoglobin; Hospitalization; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Incretins; Insulin; Male; Metformin; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Myocardial Revascularization; Propensity Score; Proportional Hazards Models; Retrospective Studies; Stroke; Sulfonylurea Compounds

Atherogenic dyslipidemia, hypertension and obesity are frequently present in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and contribute to the overall increase in cardiovascular (CV) morbidity and mortality associated with this disease. It is therefore highly desirable that treatments aimed to improving glucose control in T2DM do not negatively impact such risk factors. It would be very helpful, instead, if treatments implemented to lower blood glucose could also be efficacious in mitigating hypertension, obesity and dyslipidemia, so to improve global CV risk profile in these patients. Glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RA) can efficiently ameliorate blood glucose profile in diabetic subjects with no or minimal risk of hypoglycemia: besides, the use of these agents is associated with weight loss, decreased blood pressure and a modestly but significantly improved lipid profile. Clinical trials and meta-analyses have also demonstrated that patients treated with exenatide and, to a larger extent, with liraglutide are significantly more likely to achieve the composite endpoint of glycated hemoglobin <7%, no hypoglycemia and no weight gain as compared to patients exposed to other diabetes treatment, including dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors and insulin glargine. Thus, even if randomized controlled outcome trials definitely demonstrating a reduction in CV events in GLP-1RA treated subjects are still lacking, it is nevertheless evident that treatment with GLP-1RA, by its action on CV risk factors, could contribute to mitigate the risk profile in T2DM.

Topics: Blood Glucose; Cardiovascular Diseases; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor; Humans; Incretins; Risk Factors

Incretin-based therapies are normally prescribed to individuals with type 2 diabetes but has recently come under scrutiny due to the possibility of associated pancreatitis. A 2014 systematic review published in the BMJ found no increase risk of acute pancreatitis in adults with type 2 diabetes, as partly evident from the meta-analysis of RCTs (OR=1.11, 95% CI 0.57-2.17). By contrast, a second meta-analysis added 3 large outcome trials in patients with previous cardiovascular disease to the previous 55 RCTs from Li et al. and showed an increased risk in acute pancreatitis. While the discrepancy in result may be due to better quality large trials, as the authors suggest, it is likely that since the large outcome trials investigated patients with cardiovascular disease, the increased risk is present only in this group.

Topics: Adult; Cardiovascular Diseases; Clinical Trials as Topic; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Incretins; Meta-Analysis as Topic; Pancreatitis; Risk Factors

There is limited comparative effectiveness evidence to guide approaches to managing diabetes in individuals failing metformin monotherapy. Our aim was to compare the incidence of all-cause mortality and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) among new metformin monotherapy users initiating a dipeptidyl-peptidase-4 inhibitor (DPP4i), glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist (GLP-1RA), sulfonylurea (SU), thiazolidinedione, or insulin.We conducted a cohort study using the UK-based Clinical Practice Research Datalink. Participants included a cohort of 38,233 new users of metformin monotherapy who initiated a 2nd antidiabetic agent between January 1, 2007 and December 31, 2012 with follow-up until death, disenrollment, therapy discontinuation, or study end-date. A subcohort of 21,848 patients with linked hospital episode statistics (HES) and Office of National Statistics (ONS) data were studied to include MACE and cardiovascular-related death. The primary exposure contrasts, defined a priori, were initiation of a DPP4i versus an SU and initiation of a GLP-1RA versus an SU following metformin monotherapy. Cox proportional hazards models were used to assess the relative differences in time to mortality and MACE between exposure contrasts, adjusting for important baseline patient factors and comedications used during follow-up.The main study cohort consisted of 6213 (16%) patients who initiated a DPP4i, 25,916 initiated an SU (68%), 4437 (12%) initiated a TZD, 487 (1%) initiated a GLP-1RA, 804 (2%) initiated insulin, and 376 (1%) initiated a miscellaneous agent as their 2nd antidiabetic agent. Mean age was 62 years, 59% were male, and mean glycated hemoglobin was 8.8% (92.6 mmol/mol). Median follow-up was 2.7 years (interquartile range 1.3-4.2). Mortality rates were 8.2 deaths/1000 person-years for DPP4i and 19.1 deaths/1000 person-years for SU initiators. Adjusted hazards ratio (aHR) for mortality in DPP4i versus SU initiators = 0.58, 95% CI 0.46 to 0.73, P < 0.001. MACE rates were 19.1/1000 person-years for DPP4i initiators, 15.9/1000 person-years for GLP1-RA initiators versus 33.1/1000 person-years for SU initiators (aHR: DPP4i vs SU initiators = 0.64, 95%CI 0.52-0.80; GLP1RA vs SU initiators = 0.73, 95% CI 0.34-1.55).In this cohort of metformin monotherapy users, 2nd-line DPP4i use was associated with a 42% relative reduction in all-cause mortality and 36% reduction in MACE versus SUs, the most common 2nd-line therapy in our study. GLP-1RAs were not asso

Topics: Cardiovascular Diseases; Cohort Studies; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Female; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Incretins; Male; Metformin; Middle Aged; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Benzhydryl Compounds; Cardiovascular Diseases; Clinical Trials as Topic; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Glucosides; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Incretins; Liraglutide; Protective Factors; Risk Factors; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Cardiovascular Diseases; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Female; Humans; Incretins; Male; Pancreatic Neoplasms; Pancreatitis; Receptors, Glucagon

Topics: Cardiovascular Diseases; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Female; Humans; Incretins; Male; Pancreatic Neoplasms; Pancreatitis; Receptors, Glucagon

Incretin-based therapies either increase endogenous levels of glucagon-like peptide-1 by prolonging its half-life (DPP-4 inhibitors) or directly stimulate its receptor (glucagon-like peptide-1 analogues; GLP-1 RA). They are currently widely used for the treatment of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus owing to good antidiabetic efficacy, low risk of hypoglycemia, and relatively few other side effects. They also offer potential additional benefits such as weight neutrality or weight loss, positive effects on blood pressure and lipid levels, and potential cardio- and neuroprotectivity. Some experimental and clinical studies have raised concerns with respect to potential cardiovascular and pancreatic side effects of these therapies such as increased risk of heart failure with DPP-4 inhibitors as well as acute pancreatitis and pancreatic cancer with both classes. The available data are at present not robust enough to enable firm conclusions regarding these potential associations. Nevertheless, some recent data suggest a possibility of slightly increased risk of acute pancreatitis with GLP-1 RAs while they do not indicate increased risk of pancreatic cancer. Ongoing cardiovascular outcome trials will shed more light on the possible cardioprotective effects of incretin-based therapies as well as on the possible interconnection of DPP-4 inhibitors and heart failure.

Topics: Cardiovascular Diseases; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Incretins; Pancreatic Diseases; Risk Assessment

Topics: Adamantane; Cardiovascular Diseases; Clinical Trials as Topic; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptides; Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions; Heart Failure; Heart Rate; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Incretins; Myocardial Infarction; Pioglitazone; Risk Assessment; Rosiglitazone; Safety-Based Drug Withdrawals; Stroke; Thiazolidinediones; United States; United States Food and Drug Administration

Glucagon-like peptide (GLP)-1 action involves both endocrine and neural pathways to control peripheral tissues. In diabetes the impairment of either pathway may define different subsets of patients: some may be better treated with GLP-1 receptor agonists that are more likely to directly stimulate beta-cells and extrapancreatic receptors, while others may benefit from dipeptidyl peptidase (DPP)-4 inhibitor treatments that are more likely to increase the neural gut-brain-pancreas axis. Elevated plasma concentrations of GLP-1 associated with agonist treatment or bariatric surgery also appear to exert neuroprotective effects, ameliorate postprandial and fasting lipids, improve heart physiology and protect against heart failure, thereby expanding the possible positioning of GLP-1-based therapies. However, the mechanisms behind GLP-1 secretion, the role played by proximal and distal intestinal GLP-1-producing cells as well as the molecular basis of GLP-1 resistance in diabetes are still to be ascertained. The pharmacological features distinguishing GLP-1 receptor agonists from DPP-4 inhibitors are discussed here to address their respective positions in type 2 diabetes.

Topics: Bariatric Surgery; Cardiovascular Diseases; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Diabetic Angiopathies; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Fasting; Female; Glucagon-Like Peptide 1; Humans; Incretins; Lipids; Male

Atherosclerosis and cardiovascular events are highly prevalent and represent the major cause of mortality in patients with type 2 diabetes. Therefore, there is significant interest in the non-glycemic properties of anti-diabetic agents, particularly on those that are effective on cardiovascular risk factors. Thiazolidinediones and incretin-based therapies (IBTs) represent some of the most recent treatment options approved for the management of type 2 diabetes; these agents have shown important glycemic effects, as well as a number of non-glycemic effects. The latter include those on body weight, inflammation, hypertension and dyslipidemia, thus impacting the different components of the metabolic syndrome. Pioglitazone has been shown to significantly reduce cardiovascular adverse outcomes, while preliminary data on IBTs are very encouraging as well. Although highlighting the non-glycemic effects of pioglitazone and incretin-based therapies is of potential significance, clinical practice and patient care must be based largely on evidence-based medicine. Therefore, definitive opinions will await additional data from ongoing studies evaluating the effects of both GLP-1 agonists and DPP-4 inhibitors on cardiovascular morbidity and mortality.

Topics: Body Weight; Cardiovascular Diseases; Dyslipidemias; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Incretins; Pioglitazone; Thiazolidinediones

Topics: Cardiovascular Diseases; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Incretins; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Cardiovascular Diseases; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Diabetic Angiopathies; Female; Humans; Incretins; Male; Pancreatitis; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors

Topics: Acute Disease; Blood Glucose; Cardiovascular Diseases; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Diabetic Angiopathies; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Incidence; Incretins; Nausea; Pancreatitis; Receptors, Glucagon; Treatment Outcome; United States; Vomiting

Topics: Cardiovascular Diseases; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Diabetic Angiopathies; Female; Humans; Incretins; Male; Pancreatitis

Topics: Biomarkers; Blood Glucose; Cardiovascular Diseases; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Incretins; Insulin Resistance; Risk Factors; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Cardiovascular Diseases; Diabetes Mellitus; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Incretins; Risk Factors

Topics: Cardiovascular Diseases; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Glucagon-Like Peptide 1; Humans; Incretins

The assessment of the effects on cardiovascular risk is necessary for all new drugs for diabetes, including glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists and dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors. While waiting for the results of ongoing clinical trials specifically designed for cardiovascular outcomes, some analyses were performed on major cardiovascular events reported as severe adverse events in short- and medium-term trials with metabolic endpoints. Several pooled analyses of trials with individual molecules, based on patient-level data, showed a trend toward a reduction in the incidence of major cardiovascular events, which reached statistical significance in some cases. Meta-analyses of the same trials, combining all molecules of each class, showed that DPP-4 inhibitors are associated with a significant reduction of major cardiovascular events and mortality; in trials with GLP-1 receptor agonists, which are fewer because of the smaller number of available molecules, a similar trend is observed, reaching statistical significance only for major cardiovascular events in placebo-controlled trials. In conclusion, currently available data suggest that incretin-based therapies are probably associated with a relevant reduction of cardiovascular risk. These promising results need to be confirmed by ongoing large-scale trials.

Topics: Cardiovascular Diseases; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Humans; Incretins; Meta-Analysis as Topic

We examined the impact of FDA's 2008 guidelines for addressing cardiovascular risks of new therapies for type 2 diabetes on clinical trials. We focused on the new class of incretin-modulating drugs, exenatide, sitagliptin, saxagliptin and liraglutide, which were approved in 2005-2010. We contrasted these findings with those from 2 different groups: 1. diabetes drugs approved in the same timeframe but with a non-incretin mechanism of action (colesevelam HCl and bromocriptine mesylate) and 2. diabetes drugs with NDAs delayed and not yet approved within the same time frame (vildagliptin, alogliptin, insulin inhalation powder, and exenatide long acting release). The new guidelines have had an important impact on clinical development. Review time has increased over 2-fold. The increase is seen even if a drug with the same mechanism of action has been already approved. Whereas exenatide (approved in 2005) required 10 months of regulatory review, the approval of liraglutide in 2010 required more than twice as long (21 months). In contrast, the marketing authorization of liraglutide in the EU required 14 months. Additionally, the manufacturer of vildagliptin announced in June 2008, 30 months after the NDA was filed, that a re-submission to meet FDA's demands was not planned. The drug however received marketing authorization in the EU in 2007. The number of randomized patients and patient-years in NDAs increased more than 2.5 and 4 fold, respectively since the guidelines. The significant cost increases and negative publicity because of rare adverse reactions will adversely affect future clinical research in type 2 diabetes and not address its burgeoning health care impact.

Topics: Adamantane; Allylamine; Cardiovascular Diseases; Colesevelam Hydrochloride; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptides; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Exenatide; Glucagon-Like Peptide 1; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Incretins; Insulin; Investigational New Drug Application; Liraglutide; Nitriles; Peptides; Piperidines; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Pyrazines; Pyrrolidines; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Sitagliptin Phosphate; Time Factors; Triazoles; United States; United States Food and Drug Administration; Uracil; Venoms; Vildagliptin

Topics: Body Weight; Cardiovascular Diseases; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Glucagon-Like Peptide 1; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Incretins

Management of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) can be challenging. Patients frequently present with poor glycemic control despite therapy. Other patients may be nonadherent or resistant to continuing their treatment when confronted with undesirable adverse effects, such as weight gain, that are associated with many conventional therapies. Incretin-based therapies developed to treat patients with T2DM, including oral dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor agents or glucagon-like peptide-1 agonists, offer the potential of sustained glycemic control for many patients without the adverse events associated with other classes of antihyperglycemic medications. Available safety data from clinical trials indicate that incretin-based therapies have weight-neutral or weight-reducing effects, with no apparent adverse impact on other important safety parameters, such as cardiovascular disease. The integration of these therapies into treatment algorithms, as highlighted in three case presentations, will increase treatment options for patients with T2DM.

Topics: Aged; Blood Glucose; Cardiovascular Diseases; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Exenatide; Female; Glucagon-Like Peptide 1; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Incretins; Life Style; Male; Metformin; Middle Aged; Peptides; Pyrazines; Risk Factors; Sitagliptin Phosphate; Triazoles; Venoms

The management of type 2 diabetes is designed to reduce disease-related complications and improve long-term outcomes. Achieving glycemic control is a critical component of this process. The selection of drug therapy for reducing blood glucose is made more challenging when patients already have complications or comorbid conditions (eg, high risk for hypoglycemia, obesity, renal impairment). Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors are a new class of antihyperglycemic drugs that block degradation of incretin hormones. By enhancing and prolonging incretin effects, DPP-4 inhibitors stimulate glucose-dependent insulin secretion and also reduce glucagon secretion. This results in improved glycemic control, as reflected by decreases in glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), fasting plasma glucose, and postprandial plasma glucose. Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors also have the potential to improve beta-cell function. In randomized clinical trials, the DPP-4 inhibitors saxagliptin and sitagliptin reduced HbA1c by 0.5% to 0.8%, compared with placebo, whether used as monotherapy or in combination with another agent. As initial combination therapy with metformin, saxagliptin and sitagliptin have demonstrated reductions in HbA1c of 2.5% and 1.9%, respectively. The efficacy of the DPP-4 inhibitors was maintained during treatment for up to 2 years, and did not differ in the elderly compared with younger adults. Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors offer efficacy similar to other drug classes, and are well tolerated with a lower risk of hypoglycemia, weight-neutral effects, and a low propensity for drug-drug interactions. On the basis of their clinical profiles, the DPP-4 inhibitors are emerging as an attractive option for improving glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes. Saxagliptin and sitagliptin are approved for use as initial therapy in combination with metformin, as monotherapy, as well as in combination with metformin, a sulfonylurea, or a thiazolidinedione in patients not adequately controlled by these agents alone.

Topics: Blood Glucose; Cardiovascular Diseases; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Drug Therapy, Combination; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Incretins

The incretin system has been shown to stimulate insulin secretion in a glucose dependent manner and currently fosters considerable hope for the treatment of diabetes. Recently, we have shown that the dipeptidylpeptidase-4 (DPP4) gene, which is responsible for incretin inactivation, was overexpressed in omental adipose tissue of obese men with the metabolic syndrome, compared to men not characterized by this condition. Since the cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk profile shows substantial inter-individual variability in obesity, this study aimed at verifying whether DPP4 polymorphisms contribute to explain such a difference. In the first step of this multi-stage study, seven tagging SNPs were genotyped in a sample of 576 obese (BMI>40 kg/m(2)) individuals and tested for their association with blood pressure and lipids, as well as diabetes-related phenotypes. Then, in an additional sample of 572 obese individuals (stage 2), SNPs showing trends (P<0.10) for an association in the first sample were genotyped and reanalyzed. Logistic regressions were used to compute odds ratio for obesity-related metabolic complications. In sample 1, homozygotes for rs17848915 and rs7608798 minor alleles were at lower risk of hyperglycemia/diabetes (P=0.002) and elevated plasma triglyceride levels (P=0.030) respectively, whereas rs1558957 heterozygotes were at higher risk to have high plasma triglyceride (P=0.040), HDL- (P=0.021), LDL- (P=0.001) and total-cholesterol (P=0.003) levels. However, none of these associations was consistently replicated in stage 2. This first comprehensive genetic analysis does not support the notion that DPP4 polymorphisms could modulate the CVD risk profile among obese patients.

Topics: Adipose Tissue; Cardiovascular Diseases; Diastole; Dipeptidyl Peptidase 4; Exons; Female; Humans; Incretins; Linkage Disequilibrium; Lipids; Lipoproteins; Male; Metabolic Syndrome; Obesity, Morbid; Polymorphism, Genetic; Quebec; Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction; Risk Factors

Type 2 diabetes (T2D) is associated with a greatly increased risk of cardiovascular disease. An increasing need for glucose-lowering treatments is emphasized by the almost inevitable failure of monotherapy and occurrence of weight gain. Recently, novel classes of drugs derived from the incretin system have been introduced into the management of T2D. Recent advances in the field of incretin-based therapies in the management of T2D were discussed at the 45th Annual Meeting of the European Association for the Study of Diabetes, held from September 29 until October 2, 2009, in Vienna, Austria.

Topics: Animals; Blood Glucose; Cardiovascular Diseases; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptidyl Peptidase 4; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Glucagon-Like Peptide 1; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Incretins; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Cardiovascular Diseases; Clinical Trials as Topic; Diabetic Angiopathies; Gliclazide; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemic Agents; Incretins; Insulin; Rosiglitazone; Thiazolidinediones