idrabiotaparinux and Venous-Thromboembolism

In recent years, the significant limitations associated with the use of vitamin K antagonists (VKA) have encouraged the development of new agents. Based upon the central roles played by the serine proteases thrombin and Factor Xa in the blood coagulation cascade, direct thrombin inhibitors and direct Factor Xa inhibitors have been developed. These agents, which include the direct thrombin inhibitor dabigatran etexilate and the Factor Xa inhibitors rivaroxaban and idrabiotaparinux are free from many of the limitations of VKAs. According to the results of available phase III randomized clinical trials, both dabigatran and rivaroxaban are effective and safe enough to qualify as ideal oral anticoagulants for the initial and long-term treatment of patients with acute venous thromboembolism (VTE). Rivaroxaban does not require an initial parenteral treatment and can be given in once daily administrations after the first three weeks. Both of them have limitations for the treatment of patients with severe renal failure, and require further investigations in cancer patients and in pregnant patients with VTE. Both of them lack an antidote.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Antithrombins; Benzimidazoles; Biotin; Dabigatran; Humans; Oligosaccharides; Pyrazoles; Pyridines; Pyridones; Thiazoles; Venous Thromboembolism; Vitamin K

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a prevalent disease with potential serious consequences. Idraparinux and idrabiotaparinux are two kinds of long-acting pentasaccharides. Evidence has shown that idraparinux and idrabiotaparinux are effective anticoagulants. However, up to now, there is no consensus on whether they are better than other anticoagulation methods for long-term VTE treatment.. To evaluate the effect of idraparinux or idrabiotaparinux versus other anticoagulation methods for long-term VTE treatment.. We searched Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, PubMed, Embase, Web of science, clinical trial registry web sites (clinical trials,WHO clinical trial registry), Googlescholar, PubMed related articles and companies' web sites electronically up to Dec 30(th), 2012 and manually searched the reference lists and conference proceedings. Only randomized controlled trial (RCT) involving adult patients comparing idraparinux and/or idrabiotaparinux versus other anticoagulation methods for long-term VTE treatment was included. Two reviewers evaluated the studies and extracted data independently. Pooled risk ratios (RRs) were calculated as outcome measures and Revman 5.2 software was used to analyze data. Our primary efficacy and safety outcomes were the recurrent VTE and major bleeding rates.. We included four RCTs and involved 8584 participants on idraparinux or idrabiotaparinux versus standard warfarin for VTE treatment from 9364 references. We did not perform meta-analysis on the VTE rate because of the significant heterogeneity. We used the fixed effect model to analyze the safety outcomes and demonstrated that idraparinux or idrabiotaparinux decreased major bleeding rate significantly (RR 0.73, 95% CI 0.54 to 0.98, P = 0.04) but had a trend to increase the all cause mortality (RR 1.26, 95% CI 1.00 to 1.57, P = 0.05) compared with warfarin.. Until now there is not sufficient evidence to clarify whether idraparinux or idrabiotaparinux is as effective and safe as the standard warfarin treatment for VTE treatment.

Topics: Biotin; Humans; Oligosaccharides; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Venous Thromboembolism