idoxifene and Neoplasm-Metastasis

During recent years the development of hormone therapy for the treatment breast neoplasms has seen, in addition to classic aspecific antiestrogens (AE) like tamoxifen (TAM) and to a lesser extent toremifen, a major development of new molecules divided into two groups: the first is the so-called selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs), the most important of which is Raloxifen, which mediate estrogen-agonist effects in some tissues and estrogen-antagonist effects in others; the second group includes the aromatase inhibitors (AI), important enzymes for peripheral estrogen conversion. Some studies compare or associate classic AE with the new SERMs and AI, both in adjuvant therapy and in treatment for advanced forms. Other trials assess the anti-osteoporotic activity of some SERMs which present concomitant inhibitory activity on the breast and endometrium.

Topics: Adult; Anastrozole; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal; Aromatase Inhibitors; Breast Neoplasms; Clinical Trials as Topic; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Enzyme Inhibitors; Estrogen Antagonists; Female; Forecasting; Humans; Indoles; Letrozole; Middle Aged; Neoplasm Metastasis; Nitriles; Osteoporosis; Postmenopause; Raloxifene Hydrochloride; Selective Estrogen Receptor Modulators; Tamoxifen; Toremifene; Triazoles

Idoxifene is a novel selective oestrogen receptor modulator (SERM) which had greater binding affinity for the oestrogen receptor (ER) and reduced agonist activity compared with tamoxifen in preclinical studies. In a randomized phase II trial in 56 postmenopausal patients with progressive locally advanced/metastatic breast cancer we assessed whether idoxifene showed evidence of activity compared with an increased 40 mg/day dose of tamoxifen in patients who had previously demonstrated resistance to the standard 20 mg/day dose of tamoxifen. Of 47 patients eligible for response (25 idoxifene, 22 tamoxifen), two partial responses and two disease stabilizations (SD) for >6 months were seen with idoxifene (overall clinical benefit rate 16%, 95% CI 4.5-36.1%). The median duration of clinical benefit was 9.8 months. In contrast, no objective responses were seen with the increased 40 mg/day dose of tamoxifen, although two patients had SD for 7 and 14 months (clinical benefit rate 9%, 95% CI 1.1-29.2%). Idoxifene was well tolerated and the reported possible drug-related toxicities were similar in frequency to those with tamoxifen (hot flushes 13% vs 15%, mild nausea 20% vs 15%). Endocrine and lipid analysis in both groups showed a similar significant fall in serum follicle-stimulating hormone and luteinizing hormone after 4 weeks, together with a significant rise in sex hormone binding globulin levels and 11% reduction in serum cholesterol levels. In conclusion, while idoxifene was associated with only modest evidence of clinical activity in patients with tamoxifen-resistant breast cancer, its toxicity profile and effects on endocrine/lipid parameters were similar to those of tamoxifen.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal; Biological Availability; Breast Neoplasms; Double-Blind Method; Drug Resistance, Neoplasm; Female; Humans; Middle Aged; Neoplasm Invasiveness; Neoplasm Metastasis; Receptors, Cell Surface; Receptors, Estrogen; Tamoxifen; Treatment Outcome; United Kingdom

More efficacious and safer hormonal agents are needed for breast cancer treatment and prevention. Idoxifene is a novel selective estrogen receptor modulator (SERM) that, in preclinical models, has greater antiestrogenic but lower estrogenic activity than tamoxifen.. Three hundred and twenty-one postmenopausal patients with hormone receptor-positive or -unknown metastatic breast cancer were randomized to receive either tamoxifen or idoxifene as initial endocrine therapy for advanced disease. Data were analyzed based on intention to treat and all the responses were subject to independent review.. At the time of a second planned interim analysis, the trial was stopped for economic considerations, not for reasons related to safety or efficacy. Complete data for the 219 patients included in the second interim analysis are fully available and reported here. Median age was 59.1 years for idoxifene patients and 59.9 years for tamoxifen patients. Complete response (CR) plus partial response (PR) rates were as follows: tamoxifen, 9%; idoxifene, 13% (P = 0.39). Clinical benefit rate [CR + PR + stable disease (SD) >or=6 months] was 34.3% for idoxifene and 38.7% for tamoxifen (P = 0.31). Median time to progression and duration of response were 140 days and 151.5 days, respectively, for tamoxifen compared with 166 days and 218 days for idoxifene. None of these endpoints was significantly different for the two drugs, nor was survival. Adverse events (lethal, serious but not lethal and important but not life threatening) were similar in the two arms.. Idoxifene was both active and well tolerated in postmenopausal women with metastatic breast cancer. Idoxifene had similar efficacy and toxicity to tamoxifen in this randomized comparison.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal; Breast Neoplasms; Disease Progression; Estrogen Antagonists; Female; Humans; Middle Aged; Neoplasm Metastasis; Postmenopause; Survival; Tamoxifen; Treatment Outcome

Idoxifene, a novel antiestrogen with reduced estrogenic activity when compared to tamoxifen, has been given to 20 women with metastatic breast cancer, 19 of whom had received tamoxifen previously, in doses between 10-60 mg. Idoxifene had an initial half-life of 15 h and a terminal half-life of 23.3 days. At a maintenance dose of 20 mg, a mean steady-state level of 173.5 ng/ml was achieved. Significant falls in luteinizing hormone and follicle-stimulating hormone were seen, but the falls were not dose related. Idoxifene was well tolerated, with 11 patients complaining of mild symptoms similar to those seen with tamoxifen. Fourteen patients continued idoxifene therapy for 1-56 weeks; 4 patients showed stabilization of disease for 6-56 weeks and 2 patients showed a partial response.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Breast Neoplasms; Endocrine Glands; Estrogen Antagonists; Female; Humans; Middle Aged; Neoplasm Metastasis; Postmenopause; Tamoxifen