iclaprim has been researched along with Acute Disease in 2 studies
Timeframe | Studies, this research(%) | All Research% |
---|---|---|
pre-1990 | 0 (0.00) | 18.7374 |
1990's | 0 (0.00) | 18.2507 |
2000's | 0 (0.00) | 29.6817 |
2010's | 2 (100.00) | 24.3611 |
2020's | 0 (0.00) | 2.80 |
Authors | Studies |
---|---|
Balser, B; Corey, GR; Desplats, E; Dryden, M; File, TM; Holland, TL; Huang, DB; Lodise, T; O'Riordan, W; Torres, A; Wilcox, MH | 1 |
Charrier, C; Hawser, S; Huang, DB; Le Bras, C; Noviello, S | 1 |
2 trial(s) available for iclaprim and Acute Disease
Article | Year |
---|---|
Pooled analysis of the phase 3 REVIVE trials: randomised, double-blind studies to evaluate the safety and efficacy of iclaprim versus vancomycin for treatment of acute bacterial skin and skin-structure infections.
Topics: Acute Disease; Adult; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Creatinine; Double-Blind Method; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Humans; Male; Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus; Microbial Sensitivity Tests; Middle Aged; Patient Safety; Pyrimidines; Skin Diseases, Bacterial; Staphylococcal Infections; Staphylococcus aureus; Streptococcal Infections; Streptococcus pyogenes; Treatment Outcome; Vancomycin | 2018 |
The incidence and patient outcomes of ABSSSI by iclaprim MIC values in the phase 3 REVIVE trials for treatment of acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections.
Topics: Acute Disease; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Double-Blind Method; Humans; Incidence; Methicillin; Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus; Microbial Sensitivity Tests; Pyrimidines; Skin; Staphylococcal Skin Infections; Staphylococcus aureus; Vancomycin | 2019 |