Page last updated: 2024-10-21

hydroxyindoleacetic acid and Colicky Pain

hydroxyindoleacetic acid has been researched along with Colicky Pain in 5 studies

(5-hydroxyindol-3-yl)acetic acid : A member of the class of indole-3-acetic acids that is indole-3-acetic acid substituted by a hydroxy group at C-5.

Research Excerpts

ExcerptRelevanceReference
"To study differences in the visceral sensitivity of the colonic mucosa between patients with diarrhea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome (IBS-D) and those with ulcerative colitis (UC) in remission and to relate these differences with changes in the 5-hydroxytryptophan (5-HT) signaling pathway."7.83Comparison of 5-hydroxytryptophan signaling pathway characteristics in diarrhea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome and ulcerative colitis. ( Chi, HG; Huang, SG; Lv, RX; Ye, H; Yu, FY; Zhang, HY; Zheng, XB; Zou, Y, 2016)
"There is growing evidence to suggest the use of urinary 5-hydroxyindoleacetic acid (5-HIAA) test to help with the diagnosis of appendicitis."7.83Spot urinary 5-hydroxyindoleacetic acid is not an ideal diagnostic test for acute appendicitis. ( Alijani, A; Kennedy, G; Mittapalli, D; Rao, A; Tait, I; Wilson, M, 2016)
"To study differences in the visceral sensitivity of the colonic mucosa between patients with diarrhea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome (IBS-D) and those with ulcerative colitis (UC) in remission and to relate these differences with changes in the 5-hydroxytryptophan (5-HT) signaling pathway."3.83Comparison of 5-hydroxytryptophan signaling pathway characteristics in diarrhea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome and ulcerative colitis. ( Chi, HG; Huang, SG; Lv, RX; Ye, H; Yu, FY; Zhang, HY; Zheng, XB; Zou, Y, 2016)
"There is growing evidence to suggest the use of urinary 5-hydroxyindoleacetic acid (5-HIAA) test to help with the diagnosis of appendicitis."3.83Spot urinary 5-hydroxyindoleacetic acid is not an ideal diagnostic test for acute appendicitis. ( Alijani, A; Kennedy, G; Mittapalli, D; Rao, A; Tait, I; Wilson, M, 2016)

Research

Studies (5)

TimeframeStudies, this research(%)All Research%
pre-19900 (0.00)18.7374
1990's0 (0.00)18.2507
2000's1 (20.00)29.6817
2010's4 (80.00)24.3611
2020's0 (0.00)2.80

Authors

AuthorsStudies
Pavel, M1
Hörsch, D1
Caplin, M1
Ramage, J1
Seufferlein, T1
Valle, J1
Banks, P1
Lapuerta, P1
Sands, A2
Zambrowicz, B2
Fleming, D1
Wiedenmann, B1
Yu, FY1
Huang, SG1
Zhang, HY1
Ye, H1
Chi, HG1
Zou, Y1
Lv, RX1
Zheng, XB1
Rao, A1
Wilson, M1
Kennedy, G1
Mittapalli, D1
Tait, I1
Alijani, A1
Brown, PM1
Drossman, DA1
Wood, AJ1
Cline, GA1
Frazier, KS1
Jackson, JI1
Bronner, J1
Freiman, J1
Gershon, MD1
Mihmanli, M1
Uysalol, M1
Coşkun, H1
Demir, U1
Dilege, E1
Eroğlu, T1

Clinical Trials (1)

Trial Overview

TrialPhaseEnrollmentStudy TypeStart DateStatus
A Phase 2, Open-Label, Multi-Center, Serial Ascending-Dose, Dose-Finding Study to Evaluate the Safety and Tolerability of LX1606 in Subjects With Symptomatic Carcinoid Syndrome[NCT01104415]Phase 215 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-06-15Completed
[information is prepared from clinicaltrials.gov, extracted Sep-2024]

Trial Outcomes

Change From Baseline in Daily Number of Cutaneous Flushing Episodes

Participants recorded the number of daily cutaneous flushing episodes experienced in the daily diary. The change from baseline value was calculated as the difference between the mean numbers of cutaneous flushing episodes of the post-baseline interval (Weeks 9 to 12) and baseline. Baseline for the Extension Period was defined as non-missing assessment in Run-in period prior to the first dose of study drug. (NCT01104415)
Timeframe: Core Phase: Baseline to Weeks 9-12; Extension Period: Baseline to Week 24

InterventionDaily number of flushing episodes (Mean)
Telotristat Etiprate- Core Phase-0.88
Telotristat Etiprate- Extension Period-1.55

Change From Baseline in Daily Severity of Abdominal Pain or Discomfort Using 100 mm Visual Analog Scale (VAS)

The severity of abdominal pain was measured using a 100 mm VAS. Participants rated their perception of the sensation/severity of abdominal pain or experienced by marking a single vertical line on a VAS scale from 0 to 100 mm, where 0 = No vomiting and 100 = vomiting. The change from the baseline value was calculated as the difference between the mean score of the post-baseline interval (Weeks 9 to 12) and baseline. 0 indicate the best score, 100 indicates the worst score. Baseline for the Extension Period was defined as non-missing assessment in Run-in period prior to the first dose of study drug. (NCT01104415)
Timeframe: Core Phase: Baseline to Weeks 9-12; Extension Period: Baseline to Week 24

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Telotristat Etiprate- Core Phase-8.66
Telotristat Etiprate- Extension Period-24.11

Change From Baseline in Number of Bowel Movements (BMs)

Participants recorded the number of bowel movements in a daily diary. The change from baseline value was calculated as the difference between mean numbers of BMs of the post-baseline interval (Weeks 9 to 12) and baseline. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement. Baseline for the Extension Period was defined as non-missing assessment in Run-in period prior to the first dose of study drug. (NCT01104415)
Timeframe: Core Phase: Baseline to Weeks 9-12; Extension Period: Baseline to Week 24

Interventionnumber of bowel movements/day (Mean)
Telotristat Etiprate- Core Phase-2.60
Telotristat Etiprate- Extension Period-2.85

Change From Baseline in Percentage of Days With Sensation of Urgency to Defecate

"Participants assessed the urgency to defecate using a daily diary response to the following question, Have you felt or experienced a sense of urgency to pass stool today?. The change from the baseline value was calculated as the difference between the mean score (percentage of days) of the post-baseline interval (Weeks 9 to 12) and baseline. Baseline for the Extension Period was defined as non-missing assessment in Run-in period prior to the first dose of study drug." (NCT01104415)
Timeframe: Core Phase: Baseline to Weeks 9-12; Extension Period: Baseline to Week 24

Interventionpercentage of days (Mean)
Telotristat Etiprate- Core Phase-11.32
Telotristat Etiprate- Extension Period-22.79

Change From Baseline in Sensation/Severity of Nausea Using 100 mm Visual Analog Scale (VAS)

Sensation/severity of nausea was measured using a 100 mm VAS. Participants rated their perception of the sensation/severity of nausea experienced by marking a single vertical line on a VAS scale from 0 to 100 mm, where 0 = No vomiting and 100 = vomiting. The change from the baseline value was calculated as the difference between the mean score of the post-baseline interval (Weeks 9 to 12) and baseline. 0 indicates the best score, 100 indicates the worst score. Baseline for the Extension Period was defined as non-missing assessment in Run-in period prior to the first dose of study drug. (NCT01104415)
Timeframe: Core Phase: Baseline to Weeks 9-12; Extension Period: Baseline to Week 24

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Telotristat Etiprate- Core Phase-2.43
Telotristat Etiprate- Extension Period-5.71

Change From Baseline in Stool Form/Consistency

Participants assessed stool form/consistency in a daily diary using a 6-point scale (0-none, 1-hard, 2-firm, 3-soft, 4-loose, 5-watery). The change from the baseline value was calculated as the difference between a mean score of the post-baseline interval (Weeks 9 to 12) and baseline. 0 indicates the best score and 5 indicates the worst score. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement. Baseline for the Extension Period was defined as non-missing assessment in Run-in period prior to the first dose of study drug. (NCT01104415)
Timeframe: Core Phase: Baseline to Weeks 9-12; Extension Period: Baseline to Week 24

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Telotristat Etiprate- Core Phase-0.79
Telotristat Etiprate- Extension Period-1.31

Change From Baseline in Urinary 5-Hydroxyindoleacetic Acid (HIAA) Levels

Urinary 5-HIAA (u5-HIAA) is a standard test used in clinical practice to assess the neuroendocrine tumor (NET) activity and is collected as a 24-hour urine specimen. The change from baseline value for the Extension Period was calculated as the difference between mean change in 5-HIAA of the post-baseline interval (Weeks 20 to 21) and baseline. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement. Baseline for the Extension Period was defined as non-missing assessment in Run-in period prior to the first dose of study drug. (NCT01104415)
Timeframe: Core Phase: Baseline to Week 12; Extension Period: Baseline to Weeks 20-21

Interventionmg/24 hours (Mean)
Telotristat Etiprate- Core Phase-97.26
Telotristat Etiprate- Extension Period-65.02

Number of Participants Achieving Clinically Meaningful Symptom Reduction in the Core Phase

Clinically meaningful symptom reduction was defined as either: a) an average of < 4 bowel movements per day over 15 consecutive days, b) a 50% reduction from baseline in the number of bowel movements, c) a positive response to the question regarding adequate relief, or d) a 50% reduction from baseline in the number of daily flushing episodes. (NCT01104415)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 12

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Telotristat Etiprate- Core Phase14

Number of Participants With an Improvement in Global Assessment of Symptoms Associated With Carcinoid Syndrome

"Participants assessed their symptoms using a weekly subjective response to the following question, In the past 7 days, have you had adequate relief of your carcinoid syndrome bowel complaints such as diarrhea, urgent need to have a bowel movement, abdominal pain, or discomfort?. The values for improvement in global assessment of symptoms associated with carcinoid syndrome in the Core Phase were averaged from Weeks 9 to 12." (NCT01104415)
Timeframe: Core Phase: Weeks 9-12; Extension Period: Week 24

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Telotristat Etiprate- Core Phase10
Telotristat Etiprate- Extension Period4

Number of Participants With Any Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Drug-Related TEAEs in the Core Phase

An adverse event (AE) was defined as any untoward medical occurrence associated with the use of a drug in humans, whether or not considered drug-related. Treatment-emergent AEs were defined as any AEs reported after the first dose of treatment on Day 1. (NCT01104415)
Timeframe: Baseline up to Week 12 in the Core Phase

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Any TEAEDrug-Related TEAE
Telotristat Etiprate- Core Phase155

Number of Participants With Any Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Drug-Related TEAEs in the Extension Period

An adverse event (AE) was defined as any untoward medical occurrence associated with the use of a drug in humans, whether or not considered drug-related. Treatment-emergent AEs were defined as any AEs reported after the first dose of treatment on Day 1. (NCT01104415)
Timeframe: Up to 124 Weeks in the Extension Period

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Any TEAEDrug-Related TEAE
Telotristat Etiprate- Extension Period114

Trials

2 trials available for hydroxyindoleacetic acid and Colicky Pain

ArticleYear
Telotristat etiprate for carcinoid syndrome: a single-arm, multicenter trial.
    The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism, 2015, Volume: 100, Issue:4

    Topics: Abdominal Pain; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Female; Flushing; Gastrointestinal Transit; Humans;

2015
The tryptophan hydroxylase inhibitor LX1031 shows clinical benefit in patients with nonconstipating irritable bowel syndrome.
    Gastroenterology, 2011, Volume: 141, Issue:2

    Topics: Abdominal Pain; Adult; Biomarkers; Biphenyl Compounds; Constipation; Double-Blind Method; Feces; Fem

2011

Other Studies

3 other studies available for hydroxyindoleacetic acid and Colicky Pain

ArticleYear
Comparison of 5-hydroxytryptophan signaling pathway characteristics in diarrhea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome and ulcerative colitis.
    World journal of gastroenterology, 2016, Mar-28, Volume: 22, Issue:12

    Topics: 5-Hydroxytryptophan; Abdominal Pain; Adult; Colitis, Ulcerative; Colon; Defecation; Diarrhea; Female

2016
Spot urinary 5-hydroxyindoleacetic acid is not an ideal diagnostic test for acute appendicitis.
    The American journal of emergency medicine, 2016, Volume: 34, Issue:9

    Topics: Abdominal Pain; Adult; Appendicitis; Area Under Curve; Case-Control Studies; Constipation; Double-Bl

2016
The value of 5-hydroxyindolacetic acid levels in spot urine in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis.
    Ulusal travma ve acil cerrahi dergisi = Turkish journal of trauma & emergency surgery : TJTES, 2004, Volume: 10, Issue:3

    Topics: Abdominal Pain; Acute Disease; Adolescent; Adult; Appendectomy; Appendicitis; Diagnosis, Differentia

2004