hydroxyindoleacetic acid has been researched along with Colicky Pain in 5 studies
(5-hydroxyindol-3-yl)acetic acid : A member of the class of indole-3-acetic acids that is indole-3-acetic acid substituted by a hydroxy group at C-5.
Excerpt | Relevance | Reference |
---|---|---|
"To study differences in the visceral sensitivity of the colonic mucosa between patients with diarrhea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome (IBS-D) and those with ulcerative colitis (UC) in remission and to relate these differences with changes in the 5-hydroxytryptophan (5-HT) signaling pathway." | 7.83 | Comparison of 5-hydroxytryptophan signaling pathway characteristics in diarrhea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome and ulcerative colitis. ( Chi, HG; Huang, SG; Lv, RX; Ye, H; Yu, FY; Zhang, HY; Zheng, XB; Zou, Y, 2016) |
"There is growing evidence to suggest the use of urinary 5-hydroxyindoleacetic acid (5-HIAA) test to help with the diagnosis of appendicitis." | 7.83 | Spot urinary 5-hydroxyindoleacetic acid is not an ideal diagnostic test for acute appendicitis. ( Alijani, A; Kennedy, G; Mittapalli, D; Rao, A; Tait, I; Wilson, M, 2016) |
"To study differences in the visceral sensitivity of the colonic mucosa between patients with diarrhea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome (IBS-D) and those with ulcerative colitis (UC) in remission and to relate these differences with changes in the 5-hydroxytryptophan (5-HT) signaling pathway." | 3.83 | Comparison of 5-hydroxytryptophan signaling pathway characteristics in diarrhea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome and ulcerative colitis. ( Chi, HG; Huang, SG; Lv, RX; Ye, H; Yu, FY; Zhang, HY; Zheng, XB; Zou, Y, 2016) |
"There is growing evidence to suggest the use of urinary 5-hydroxyindoleacetic acid (5-HIAA) test to help with the diagnosis of appendicitis." | 3.83 | Spot urinary 5-hydroxyindoleacetic acid is not an ideal diagnostic test for acute appendicitis. ( Alijani, A; Kennedy, G; Mittapalli, D; Rao, A; Tait, I; Wilson, M, 2016) |
Timeframe | Studies, this research(%) | All Research% |
---|---|---|
pre-1990 | 0 (0.00) | 18.7374 |
1990's | 0 (0.00) | 18.2507 |
2000's | 1 (20.00) | 29.6817 |
2010's | 4 (80.00) | 24.3611 |
2020's | 0 (0.00) | 2.80 |
Authors | Studies |
---|---|
Pavel, M | 1 |
Hörsch, D | 1 |
Caplin, M | 1 |
Ramage, J | 1 |
Seufferlein, T | 1 |
Valle, J | 1 |
Banks, P | 1 |
Lapuerta, P | 1 |
Sands, A | 2 |
Zambrowicz, B | 2 |
Fleming, D | 1 |
Wiedenmann, B | 1 |
Yu, FY | 1 |
Huang, SG | 1 |
Zhang, HY | 1 |
Ye, H | 1 |
Chi, HG | 1 |
Zou, Y | 1 |
Lv, RX | 1 |
Zheng, XB | 1 |
Rao, A | 1 |
Wilson, M | 1 |
Kennedy, G | 1 |
Mittapalli, D | 1 |
Tait, I | 1 |
Alijani, A | 1 |
Brown, PM | 1 |
Drossman, DA | 1 |
Wood, AJ | 1 |
Cline, GA | 1 |
Frazier, KS | 1 |
Jackson, JI | 1 |
Bronner, J | 1 |
Freiman, J | 1 |
Gershon, MD | 1 |
Mihmanli, M | 1 |
Uysalol, M | 1 |
Coşkun, H | 1 |
Demir, U | 1 |
Dilege, E | 1 |
Eroğlu, T | 1 |
Trial | Phase | Enrollment | Study Type | Start Date | Status | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
A Phase 2, Open-Label, Multi-Center, Serial Ascending-Dose, Dose-Finding Study to Evaluate the Safety and Tolerability of LX1606 in Subjects With Symptomatic Carcinoid Syndrome[NCT01104415] | Phase 2 | 15 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2010-06-15 | Completed | ||
[information is prepared from clinicaltrials.gov, extracted Sep-2024] |
Participants recorded the number of daily cutaneous flushing episodes experienced in the daily diary. The change from baseline value was calculated as the difference between the mean numbers of cutaneous flushing episodes of the post-baseline interval (Weeks 9 to 12) and baseline. Baseline for the Extension Period was defined as non-missing assessment in Run-in period prior to the first dose of study drug. (NCT01104415)
Timeframe: Core Phase: Baseline to Weeks 9-12; Extension Period: Baseline to Week 24
Intervention | Daily number of flushing episodes (Mean) |
---|---|
Telotristat Etiprate- Core Phase | -0.88 |
Telotristat Etiprate- Extension Period | -1.55 |
The severity of abdominal pain was measured using a 100 mm VAS. Participants rated their perception of the sensation/severity of abdominal pain or experienced by marking a single vertical line on a VAS scale from 0 to 100 mm, where 0 = No vomiting and 100 = vomiting. The change from the baseline value was calculated as the difference between the mean score of the post-baseline interval (Weeks 9 to 12) and baseline. 0 indicate the best score, 100 indicates the worst score. Baseline for the Extension Period was defined as non-missing assessment in Run-in period prior to the first dose of study drug. (NCT01104415)
Timeframe: Core Phase: Baseline to Weeks 9-12; Extension Period: Baseline to Week 24
Intervention | score on a scale (Mean) |
---|---|
Telotristat Etiprate- Core Phase | -8.66 |
Telotristat Etiprate- Extension Period | -24.11 |
Participants recorded the number of bowel movements in a daily diary. The change from baseline value was calculated as the difference between mean numbers of BMs of the post-baseline interval (Weeks 9 to 12) and baseline. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement. Baseline for the Extension Period was defined as non-missing assessment in Run-in period prior to the first dose of study drug. (NCT01104415)
Timeframe: Core Phase: Baseline to Weeks 9-12; Extension Period: Baseline to Week 24
Intervention | number of bowel movements/day (Mean) |
---|---|
Telotristat Etiprate- Core Phase | -2.60 |
Telotristat Etiprate- Extension Period | -2.85 |
"Participants assessed the urgency to defecate using a daily diary response to the following question, Have you felt or experienced a sense of urgency to pass stool today?. The change from the baseline value was calculated as the difference between the mean score (percentage of days) of the post-baseline interval (Weeks 9 to 12) and baseline. Baseline for the Extension Period was defined as non-missing assessment in Run-in period prior to the first dose of study drug." (NCT01104415)
Timeframe: Core Phase: Baseline to Weeks 9-12; Extension Period: Baseline to Week 24
Intervention | percentage of days (Mean) |
---|---|
Telotristat Etiprate- Core Phase | -11.32 |
Telotristat Etiprate- Extension Period | -22.79 |
Sensation/severity of nausea was measured using a 100 mm VAS. Participants rated their perception of the sensation/severity of nausea experienced by marking a single vertical line on a VAS scale from 0 to 100 mm, where 0 = No vomiting and 100 = vomiting. The change from the baseline value was calculated as the difference between the mean score of the post-baseline interval (Weeks 9 to 12) and baseline. 0 indicates the best score, 100 indicates the worst score. Baseline for the Extension Period was defined as non-missing assessment in Run-in period prior to the first dose of study drug. (NCT01104415)
Timeframe: Core Phase: Baseline to Weeks 9-12; Extension Period: Baseline to Week 24
Intervention | score on a scale (Mean) |
---|---|
Telotristat Etiprate- Core Phase | -2.43 |
Telotristat Etiprate- Extension Period | -5.71 |
Participants assessed stool form/consistency in a daily diary using a 6-point scale (0-none, 1-hard, 2-firm, 3-soft, 4-loose, 5-watery). The change from the baseline value was calculated as the difference between a mean score of the post-baseline interval (Weeks 9 to 12) and baseline. 0 indicates the best score and 5 indicates the worst score. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement. Baseline for the Extension Period was defined as non-missing assessment in Run-in period prior to the first dose of study drug. (NCT01104415)
Timeframe: Core Phase: Baseline to Weeks 9-12; Extension Period: Baseline to Week 24
Intervention | score on a scale (Mean) |
---|---|
Telotristat Etiprate- Core Phase | -0.79 |
Telotristat Etiprate- Extension Period | -1.31 |
Urinary 5-HIAA (u5-HIAA) is a standard test used in clinical practice to assess the neuroendocrine tumor (NET) activity and is collected as a 24-hour urine specimen. The change from baseline value for the Extension Period was calculated as the difference between mean change in 5-HIAA of the post-baseline interval (Weeks 20 to 21) and baseline. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement. Baseline for the Extension Period was defined as non-missing assessment in Run-in period prior to the first dose of study drug. (NCT01104415)
Timeframe: Core Phase: Baseline to Week 12; Extension Period: Baseline to Weeks 20-21
Intervention | mg/24 hours (Mean) |
---|---|
Telotristat Etiprate- Core Phase | -97.26 |
Telotristat Etiprate- Extension Period | -65.02 |
Clinically meaningful symptom reduction was defined as either: a) an average of < 4 bowel movements per day over 15 consecutive days, b) a 50% reduction from baseline in the number of bowel movements, c) a positive response to the question regarding adequate relief, or d) a 50% reduction from baseline in the number of daily flushing episodes. (NCT01104415)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 12
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|---|
Telotristat Etiprate- Core Phase | 14 |
"Participants assessed their symptoms using a weekly subjective response to the following question, In the past 7 days, have you had adequate relief of your carcinoid syndrome bowel complaints such as diarrhea, urgent need to have a bowel movement, abdominal pain, or discomfort?. The values for improvement in global assessment of symptoms associated with carcinoid syndrome in the Core Phase were averaged from Weeks 9 to 12." (NCT01104415)
Timeframe: Core Phase: Weeks 9-12; Extension Period: Week 24
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|---|
Telotristat Etiprate- Core Phase | 10 |
Telotristat Etiprate- Extension Period | 4 |
An adverse event (AE) was defined as any untoward medical occurrence associated with the use of a drug in humans, whether or not considered drug-related. Treatment-emergent AEs were defined as any AEs reported after the first dose of treatment on Day 1. (NCT01104415)
Timeframe: Baseline up to Week 12 in the Core Phase
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) | |
---|---|---|
Any TEAE | Drug-Related TEAE | |
Telotristat Etiprate- Core Phase | 15 | 5 |
An adverse event (AE) was defined as any untoward medical occurrence associated with the use of a drug in humans, whether or not considered drug-related. Treatment-emergent AEs were defined as any AEs reported after the first dose of treatment on Day 1. (NCT01104415)
Timeframe: Up to 124 Weeks in the Extension Period
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) | |
---|---|---|
Any TEAE | Drug-Related TEAE | |
Telotristat Etiprate- Extension Period | 11 | 4 |
2 trials available for hydroxyindoleacetic acid and Colicky Pain
Article | Year |
---|---|
Telotristat etiprate for carcinoid syndrome: a single-arm, multicenter trial.
Topics: Abdominal Pain; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Female; Flushing; Gastrointestinal Transit; Humans; | 2015 |
The tryptophan hydroxylase inhibitor LX1031 shows clinical benefit in patients with nonconstipating irritable bowel syndrome.
Topics: Abdominal Pain; Adult; Biomarkers; Biphenyl Compounds; Constipation; Double-Blind Method; Feces; Fem | 2011 |
3 other studies available for hydroxyindoleacetic acid and Colicky Pain
Article | Year |
---|---|
Comparison of 5-hydroxytryptophan signaling pathway characteristics in diarrhea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome and ulcerative colitis.
Topics: 5-Hydroxytryptophan; Abdominal Pain; Adult; Colitis, Ulcerative; Colon; Defecation; Diarrhea; Female | 2016 |
Spot urinary 5-hydroxyindoleacetic acid is not an ideal diagnostic test for acute appendicitis.
Topics: Abdominal Pain; Adult; Appendicitis; Area Under Curve; Case-Control Studies; Constipation; Double-Bl | 2016 |
The value of 5-hydroxyindolacetic acid levels in spot urine in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis.
Topics: Abdominal Pain; Acute Disease; Adolescent; Adult; Appendectomy; Appendicitis; Diagnosis, Differentia | 2004 |