hydrocodone has been researched along with Postoperative-Complications* in 3 studies
1 trial(s) available for hydrocodone and Postoperative-Complications
Article | Year |
---|---|
Evaluation of a single-dose, extended-release epidural morphine formulation for pain control after lumbar spine surgery.
DepoDur, an extended-release epidural morphine, has been used effectively for postoperative pain control following many orthopaedic and general surgery procedures and has provided prolonged analgesia when compared with Duramorph. The goal of this article was to compare the safety and analgesic efficacy of DepoDur versus Duramorph after lumbar spine surgery. A prospective, randomized, double-blind clinical study was completed at a single extended-stay ambulatory surgery center. All patients over 18 undergoing posterior lumbar spine fusions were considered for the study. Sixty patients were randomly assigned to a control or treatment group. The control group received DepoDur before surgery, while the treatment group received Duramorph. Although results show no significant differences between the two groups in postoperative visual analog pain scale scores, use of pain medication, and adverse events, subjects receiving DepoDur were less likely to receive Naloxone and oxygen supplementation, experience nausea or fever, and were more likely to experience hypotension. DepoDur proved to be safe and effective, offering similar prolonged analgesic activity when compared with Duramorph. Topics: Analgesia, Epidural; Analgesics, Opioid; Double-Blind Method; Humans; Hydrocodone; Lumbar Vertebrae; Middle Aged; Morphine; Pain Measurement; Pain, Postoperative; Postoperative Complications; Prospective Studies; Spinal Fusion | 2014 |
2 other study(ies) available for hydrocodone and Postoperative-Complications
Article | Year |
---|---|
A retrospective study of multimodal analgesic treatment after laparoscopic appendectomy in children.
Laparoscopic appendectomy is a common emergency pediatric surgery procedure accompanied by substantial pain (pain scores >4 for >60% of the time) in 33% of these patients. We introduced a bundle of pain management interventions including local anesthetic infiltration at the incision site, intravenous (IV) opioids by patient-controlled analgesia (PCA), and scheduled doses of IV ketorolac and oral acetaminophen/hydrocodone.. To evaluate the effect of these pain management interventions on pain control after laparoscopic appendectomy.. We retrospectively studied pain in 206 children above 7 years of age undergoing laparoscopic appendectomy from December 2011 to February 2012 at our institution. We extracted data on patient demographics, duration of anesthesia and surgery, intraoperative opioids, local anesthetic infiltration, surgical procedure reports, along with pain scores, postoperative PCA use, and opioid-related complications and hospital stays. Patients were divided into two groups - simple appendicitis without peritonitis and appendicitis with generalized peritonitis.. The incidence of substantial pain when the multimodal regimen was used was 12%, which is significantly lower than earlier reports (Fisher's exact test P < 0.001). Patients with generalized peritonitis experienced more pain, consumed more opioids, had more unmet PCA demands, and a higher incidence of respiratory depression compared with those with simple appendicitis.. The multimodal regimen of local anesthetic infiltration, opioid by PCA, NSAIDs, and oral acetaminophen/hydrocodone reduced the incidence of substantial pain. Additional studies are required to identify subgroups of patients with minimal opioid requirements who can benefit from modifications of this regimen. Topics: Acetaminophen; Adolescent; Analgesia, Patient-Controlled; Analgesics, Non-Narcotic; Analgesics, Opioid; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Appendectomy; Appendicitis; Child; Female; Humans; Hydrocodone; Laparoscopy; Length of Stay; Male; Morphine; Pain Management; Pain Measurement; Pain, Postoperative; Peritonitis; Postoperative Complications; Retrospective Studies; Treatment Outcome | 2013 |
Open versus minimally invasive lumbar microdiscectomy: comparison of operative times, length of hospital stay, narcotic use and complications.
To determine if a minimally invasive approach to lumbar microdiscectomy reduces post-operative pain, length of hospital stay, or frequency of complications we retrospectively compared medical records of single level microdiscectomy patients by a single surgeon performed using a traditional open approach versus a minimally invasive approach. Thirty-five patients were in the open group: 63% male, average age 41.2 years, and 31 patients were in the minimally invasive group: 68% male, average age 42.1 years. There was no difference in surgical time or blood loss between the open and minimally invasive groups: 84.1 versus 76.8 minutes and 51.4 versus 69.7 mL, respectively. There were no significant complications intraoperatively or within the 30 day post-op period for either group. The average dose of intravenous morphine taken was 12.9 mg for the minimally invasive group and 15.7 mg for the open group (P=0.04). The average dose of hydrocodone was 13.4 mg for the minimally invasive group and 20.9 mg for the open group (P=0.03). The open group took an average of 11.7 mg oxycodone, the minimally invasive none. 45.2% of patients in the minimally invasive group were discharged on the same day as surgery compared to 5.75% in the open group (P=0.001). Microdiscectomy was performed safely and effectively through a minimally invasive expanding retractor system and operating microscope. Surgical times, blood loss, complications, and outcome were similar to a traditional open microdiscectomy while pain medication requirements and hospitalization were significantly less. Topics: Adult; Analgesics, Opioid; Diskectomy; Female; Humans; Hydrocodone; Intervertebral Disc; Intervertebral Disc Displacement; Length of Stay; Lumbar Vertebrae; Male; Microsurgery; Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures; Oxycodone; Pain, Postoperative; Postoperative Complications; Retrospective Studies; Surgical Instruments; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome | 2008 |