hydrocodone and Periodontal-Diseases

The aim of this study was to compare ketoprofen to acetaminophen with hydrocodone (A/H) in a postoperative periodontal pain model. A double-blind protocol was used. Thirty minutes prior to each procedure, subjects were given orally either 100 mg ketoprofen or a placebo tablet. Four hours later, the subjects took either 50 mg ketoprofen (ketoprofen group) or 1000 mg acetaminophen with 10 mg hydrocodone (placebo group). Subjects reported levels of overall discomfort and pain using visual analog scales at eight hourly intervals following the first dose of ketoprofen or placebo. Information about adverse side effects was requested from the patients in the form of a checklist. The results revealed only small differences between the two drug regimens with respect to levels of pain or overall discomfort. A/H provided significantly better pain relief at Hours 5 and 6, while overall discomfort levels were significantly higher with ketoprofen than with placebo at Hours 3 and 4. Pain levels were low for both groups. It is recommended that additional analgesics for mild to moderate pain should be tested.

Topics: Acetaminophen; Analgesics, Non-Narcotic; Analgesics, Opioid; Anesthesia, Dental; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Double-Blind Method; Humans; Hydrocodone; Ketoprofen; Pain, Postoperative; Palliative Care; Periodontal Diseases; Pilot Projects

A single blind study of 24 patients compared the postoperative periodontal pain relief and adverse effects associated with a pretreatment regimen with etodolac, a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID), to a typical pro re nada (prn) regimen with a combination of acetaminophen with hydrocodone. Patients selected required one or more periodontal osseous surgeries that were judged to involve relatively similar degrees of surgical manipulation. Patients in the etodolac group received two 300 mg capsules 30 minutes prior to surgery and then redosed themselves prn. Patients who received the combination drug were not premedicated and followed a prn regimen. The subjects used a verbal analogue scale to report levels of pain hourly for the first 8 hours (starting 30 minutes prior to surgery) and also indicated any side effects experienced during the first week after surgery. Specific parameters monitored were the mean sum of hourly pain scores, mean hourly pain scores, time to first medication, number of postoperative doses, and adverse effects. Of the parameters studied, the only one that showed a statistically significant difference was the time to first medication. The time span from 30 minutes prior to the beginning of surgery to the first postsurgical dose was greater for etodolac than for the combination drug. However, the total number of medications taken under both regimens was similar. The side effects were minimal for both of the drugs studied. It was concluded that the analgesic regimens tested under clinical practice conditions were comparable in providing analgesia with minimum side effects in uncomplicated periodontal osseous surgery. Studies with larger numbers of patients are needed to definitively address whether these regimens are truly equivalent.

Topics: Acetaminophen; Administration, Oral; Adult; Alveolectomy; Analgesics, Non-Narcotic; Analgesics, Opioid; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Capsules; Drug Combinations; Etodolac; Female; Humans; Hydrocodone; Male; Pain Measurement; Pain, Postoperative; Periodontal Diseases; Premedication; Time Factors