hr-810 and Fever

Cefpirome is an injectable extended-spectrum or 'fourth generation' cephalosporin. Its antibacterial activity encompasses many of the pathogens involved in hospital-acquired infections such as Enterobacteriaceae, methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus, coagulase-negative staphylococci and viridans group streptococci. Cefpirome also has in vitro activity against Streptococcus pneumoniae regardless of penicillin susceptibility. It is stable against most plasmid- and chromosome-mediated beta-lactamases, with the exception of the extended-spectrum plasmid-mediated SHV enzymes. Intravenous cefpirome 2g twice daily has shown clinical efficacy comparable to that of ceftazidime 2g 3 times daily in the treatment of hospitalised patients with moderate to severe infections. Clinical response and bacteriological eradication rates were similar in patients with severe pneumonia or septicaemia treated with either cefpirome or ceftazidime. Cefpirome appeared more effective than ceftazidime in the eradication of bacteria in patients with febrile neutropenia in 1 study; however, clinical response rates were similar in the 2 treatment groups. The tolerability of cefpirome appears similar to that of ceftazidime and other third generation cephalosporins, diarrhoea being the most frequently observed event. Thus, cefpirome is likely to be a valuable extended-spectrum agent for the treatment of severe infections. Cefpirome offers improved coverage against some Gram-positive pathogens and Enterobacteriaceae producing class I beta-lactamases compared with the third generation cephalosporins, although this has yet to be demonstrated in clinical trials.

Topics: Animals; Bacterial Infections; Cefpirome; Cephalosporins; Fever; Humans; Neutropenia

The objective of this study was to document the clinical experience of cefpirome use in the treatment of febrile neutropenia in everyday medical practice.. This was an open, non-controlled multicenter study. Patients with fever and neutropenia were started on cefpirome empirically. Response to therapy was evaluated 72 to 96 h after the beginning of treatment. The primary endpoint, clinical response, was classified as: improvement (disappearance of fever and the other signs and symptoms of infection) or failure (the patient died during the therapy or had no response to the antibiotic regimen; i.e., fever persisted and the patient's clinical condition was not improving, requiring a change in antibiotic therapy). The secondary endpoints were time to the resolution of fever and improvement of neutropenia, and microbiological response evaluated on-treatment or post-treatment.. 140 patients were enrolled in this study; clinical response was analyzed on the clinically evaluated population after 72 to 96 h of treatment. Among the 69 evaluated patients, 58 patients (84.1%) were improved and 11 patients (15.9%) failed. Overall, among the enrolled 140 patients, 124 patients' clinical outcomes were improved after treatment and 16 patients failed. The mean time to fever resolution was 3.1 days. Mean temperature reduced from a baseline reading of 38.7 degrees C to 37.2 degrees C (p<0.0001). Moreover, the mean neutrophil count (342.7/mm(3) at baseline) increased significantly to 3664/mm(3) (p<0.0001) after 72 to 96 h of treatment. Twenty five pathogens were isolated from 20 patients (13 Gram-positive and 9 Gram-negative). The eradication rate was 72% on-treatment or post-treatment, and the mean time to eradication was 5 days.. Cefpirome improves clinical signs and symptoms of infection and offers improved coverage against some Gram-positive and Gram-negative pathogens in patients with febrile neutropenia. Thus, cefpirome is likely to be a valuable and cost-effective extended-spectrum agent for the empiric treatment of severe infections.

Topics: Anti-Bacterial Agents; Cefpirome; Cephalosporins; Endpoint Determination; Fever; Humans; Injections, Intravenous; Leukocyte Count; Male; Middle Aged; Neutropenia; Neutrophils; Taiwan; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

Cefpirome, a fourth generation cephalosporin, was administered during 154 episodes of febrile neutropenia in 106 patients. We assessed the clinical efficacy of cefpirome and its activity against isolated pathogens in neutropenic patients with hematologic malignancies. In addition, the pharmacokinetics and optimal dosing regimen of cefpirome during neutropenia were investigated.

Topics: Aged; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Cefpirome; Cephalosporins; Female; Fever; Hematologic Neoplasms; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Neutropenia

Fever is frequently the only clinical sign of infection in patients with chemo-induced neutropenia. In this setting, empirical administration of broad spectrum antibiotics must be rapid. The aim of this work was to compare, for the first time, cefpirome (CPO) and piperacillin-tazobactam (PT) in a large randomized trial. Two hundred-eight febrile neutropenic episodes (FNE) (> or = 38.5 degrees C and ANC < or = 0.5 giga/l) were treated by randomization, as first line therapy, using either CPO 2 g x 2/day (105 cases) or PT 4 g x 3/day (103 cases), alone (CPO: 15/PT: 15), or plus aminoglycoside (165 cases, CPO: 82/PT: 83) or quinolone (CPO: 2/PT: 2). There were 131 men and 77 women aged between 17 and 83 years (median: 49) who received chemotherapy (n = 160) or allogeneic (n = 10) or autologous (n = 38) stem cell transplantations. Underlying diseases were: acute leukemia (n = 131), lymphoma (n = 33), myeloma (n = 16), solid tumor (n = 8), myeloproliferative disorder (n = 9), chronic lymphoid leukemia (n = 5), aplastic anemia (n = 3), myelodysplasia (n = 3). Distribution of age, neutropenia duration (median: 17 days), underlying disease, and protocol therapy duration (median: 11 days) was comparable in both arms. A microbiologically documented infection (MDI) was evidenced in 57 cases (27%). Bacteria were isolated from blood cultures in 54 cases (Gram positive: 32 cases). Their in vitro susceptibility rates to CPO and PT were not different. Two days after antibiotics initiation, clinical (fever disappearance) and microbiological (culture negativation) success rates (SR) were 62% for CPO versus 61% for PT and 50% versus 55% respectively in case of MDI (p = 0.89). Two deaths and 77 failures were registered. At the end of protocol, SR (no antibiotic change/absence of superinfection) was 59% with CPO versus 50% with PT (p = 0.27) and 53% versus 40% respectively in the 151 cases with neutropenia > or = 10 days (p = 0.17). The occurrence of side effects was similar in both arms. In our hands, the efficacy of CPO and PT was comparable for treating FNE.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anemia, Aplastic; Cefpirome; Cephalosporins; Enzyme Inhibitors; Female; Fever; France; Hematologic Neoplasms; Humans; Male; Microbial Sensitivity Tests; Middle Aged; Myelodysplastic Syndromes; Neutropenia; Penicillanic Acid; Piperacillin; Tazobactam; Treatment Outcome