hirudin and Stroke

Unfractionated heparin (UFH) has been the primary anticoagulant of choice on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). However, it is debatable whether bivalirudin (BIV), a direct thrombin inhibitor, may be considered a better alternative anticoagulant option.. We searched Embase, Pubmed, Cochrane library, Clinicaltrials.gov, CNKI and Wanfang databases up to 15 June 2021. Randomized controlled trials and observational studies were considered eligible for inclusion. Random-effects meta-analyses, including subgroup analyses, were conducted.. A total of 9 studies containing 994 patients were enrolled. All articles were retrospective cohort studies. Compared with UFH, BIV was associated with lower risks of major bleeding (risk ratio [RR]: 0.32, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.22-0.49), ECMO in-circuit thrombosis (RR: 0.57, 95% CI 0.43-0.74), stroke (RR: 0.52, 95% CI 0.29-0.95) and in-hospital mortality (RR: 0.82, 95% CI 0.69-0.99), and higher rates of survival to ECMO decannulation (RR: 1.18, 95% CI 1.03-1.34). Pooled risk estimates did not show a significant association with clinical thrombotic events (RR: 0.69, 95% CI 0.45-1.07). Moreover, BIV was associated with a lower risk of ECMO in-circuit thrombosis and in-hospital mortality in the adult subgroup but not in the paediatric subgroup. However, leave-one-out sensitivity analyses indicated that the results of stroke, survival to ECMO decannulation and in-hospital mortality should be interpreted with caution.. BIV appears to be a potential alternative to UFH in paediatric and adult patients requiring ECMO.

Topics: Adult; Anticoagulants; Child; Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation; Heparin; Hirudins; Humans; Peptide Fragments; Recombinant Proteins; Retrospective Studies; Stroke; Thrombosis

The direct thrombin inhibitor bivalirudin (BIV) was shown to be superior to unfractionated heparin (UFH) in percutaneous coronary interventions for reducing procedural blood loss. The aim of this study was to compare outcome profiles of BIV and UFH in peripheral endovascular procedures (PEPs) by synthesizing the currently available data.. Following the PRISMA statement, we conducted a comprehensive literature search using Medline, Cochrane CENTRAL, PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL Google scholar, and clinicaltrials.gov. We recruited randomized, controlled trials and well-conducted observational studies that compared UFH and BIV in PEPs requiring anticoagulation, excluding endovascular cardiac procedures and coronary interventions. Random-effects meta-analyses were conducted to compare the outcome profiles of these two agents.. Thirteen articles containing 14 studies involving a total of 21,057 patients were enrolled. Of these, 2 were randomized controlled trials, 2 were prospective cohort studies, and 10 were retrospective studies. There were no significant differences between BIV and UFH in terms of procedural success rates, major and minor perioperative bleeding, transfusion, perioperative transient ischemic attack, or hemorrhagic strokes. However, compared with UFH, BIV had significantly lower odds ratios (OR) of perioperative mortality (OR, 0.58; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.40-0.86), major adverse cardiovascular events (OR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.51-0.83), net adverse clinical events (OR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.63-0.88), perioperative myocardial infarction (OR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.55-0.98), major vascular complications (OR, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.39-0.91), and minor vascular complications (OR, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.40-0.84).. Compared with UFH, PEPs using BIV had comparable procedural success rates and odds of perioperative transient ischemic attack and hemorrhagic stroke. However, procedures with BIV had a lower but nonsignificant odds of perioperative bleeding and transfusion. Depending on the procedures conducted, the patients who received BIV will have reduced or comparable odds of perioperative mortality, myocardial infarction, major adverse cardiovascular events, net adverse clinical events, and major and minor vascular complications. Therefore, BIV may be chosen solely as an alternative procedural anticoagulant to UFH for PEPs.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Antithrombins; Endovascular Procedures; Hemorrhage; Heparin; Hirudins; Humans; Ischemic Attack, Transient; Myocardial Infarction; Observational Studies as Topic; Patient Safety; Peptide Fragments; Peripheral Vascular Diseases; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Recombinant Proteins; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Stroke; Treatment Outcome

Decades of research have been devoted to developing effective, safe, and convenient anticoagulant agents. In recent years, much emphasis has been placed on the development of direct thrombin inhibitors (DTIs) that offer benefits over agents like heparin and warfarin including the inhibition of both circulating and clot-bound thrombin; a more predictable anticoagulant response, because they do not bind to plasma proteins and are not neutralized by platelet factor 4; lack of required cofactors, such as antithrombin or heparin cofactor II; inhibiting thrombin-induced platelet aggregation; and absence of induction of immune-mediated thrombocytopenia. Various injectable DTIs are currently available and used for many indications. In addition, research is now focusing on oral DTIs that seem promising and offer various advantages, such as oral administration, predictable pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, a broad therapeutic window, no routine monitoring, no significant drug interactions, and fixed-dose administration.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Arginine; Atrial Fibrillation; Benzimidazoles; Dabigatran; Fibrinolytic Agents; Half-Life; Hirudins; Humans; Peptide Fragments; Pipecolic Acids; Pyridines; Recombinant Proteins; Stroke; Sulfonamides; Thrombin

Elderly patients with acute myocardial infarction undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention are at increased risk of both ischemic and bleeding complications. The optimal anticoagulation strategy in these patients is uncertain. Therefore, we compared bivalirudin to heparin monotherapy in a contemporary cohort of such patients.. A prespecified subgroup analysis of elderly patients with myocardial infarction (≥75 years) from the VALIDATE-SWEDEHEART trial (Bivalirudin Versus Heparin in ST-Segment and Non-ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction in Patients on Modern Antiplatelet Therapy in the Swedish Web System for Enhancement and Development of Evidence-Based Care in Heart Disease Evaluated According to Recommended Therapies Registry Trial) was performed. In the trial, patients were randomized to either bivalirudin or heparin monotherapy during percutaneous coronary intervention, with mandatory potent P2Y12 inhibition, routine radial artery access, and only bail-out glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibition. Kaplan-Meier event rates were assessed for the primary end point, consisting of a composite of all-cause death, myocardial reinfarction, or major bleeding, within 180 days.. The elderly (n=1592) had more than twice the risk of all events compared with younger patients (n=4406). Baseline and periprocedural characteristics were equal between bivalirudin (n=799) and heparin (n=793) treated patients ≥75 years. No differences were found in the elderly between bivalirudin and heparin monotherapy regarding the primary end point (180-day all-cause death, myocardial reinfarction, or major bleeding), the individual components of the primary end point, definite stent thrombosis, or stroke.. In this prespecified subgroup analysis of the VALIDATE-SWEDEHEART trial, elderly patients with myocardial infarction had a highly increased risk of all events. However, no difference in outcomes could be observed with an anticoagulation strategy with either bivalirudin or heparin as monotherapy in this patient group.

Topics: Age Factors; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Antithrombins; Coronary Thrombosis; Female; Hemorrhage; Heparin; Hirudins; Humans; Male; Non-ST Elevated Myocardial Infarction; Peptide Fragments; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Recombinant Proteins; Recurrence; Registries; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction; Stroke; Sweden; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

Recent randomized controlled trials comparing femoral and radial access in primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) have shown conflicting results regarding the incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and major bleeding.. Using data from the HEAT-PPCI trial, we compared the primary efficacy (all-cause mortality, stroke, new myocardial infarction or unplanned repeat revascularization) and safety (major bleeding BARC 3-5) outcomes at 28 days, by final access site used (radial or femoral) and by default operator type. We then assessed outcomes in femoral cases performed by both operator types.. Radial access (RA) was associated with fewer MACE (91/1472 = 6.2% vs. 36/332 = 10.8% P = .003) and major bleeding events (38/1472 = 2.6% vs 22/332 = 6.6% P = .001) when compared to femoral access (FA). When analyzing outcomes by default operator type, there was a similar incidence of MACE (111/1575 = 7% vs 16/229 = 7% P = .97) and major bleeding events (49/1575 = 3.1% vs 11/229 = 4.8% P = .18). In cases where FA was performed by default radial operators, there was a higher rate of MACE (22/122 = 18% vs 14/210 = 6.7% P = .003) and major bleeding events (11/122 = 9% vs 11/210 = 5.2% P < .001), potentially explained by a higher risk profile in these cases.. Default femoral operators achieved comparable outcomes when compared to default radial operators. The less favorable outcomes observed in FA cases may result from its selective use by radial operators in high risk cases.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Antithrombins; Cause of Death; Femoral Artery; Heparin; Hirudins; Humans; Incidence; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Peptide Fragments; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Postoperative Complications; Postoperative Hemorrhage; Pressure; Radial Artery; Recombinant Proteins; Recurrence; Reoperation; ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction; Stroke; Surgeons; Treatment Outcome; Vascular Closure Devices

The Minimizing Adverse Haemorrhagic Events by Transradial Access Site and Systemic Implementation of Angiox (MATRIX) programme was designed to assess the comparative safety and effectiveness of radial versus femoral access and of bivalirudin versus unfractionated heparin with optional glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors in patients with the whole spectrum of acute coronary syndrome undergoing invasive management. Here we describe the prespecified final 1-year outcomes of the entire programme.. MATRIX was a programme of three nested, randomised, multicentre, open-label, superiority trials in patients with acute coronary syndrome in 78 hospitals in Italy, the Netherlands, Spain, and Sweden. Patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction were simultaneously randomly assigned (1:1) before coronary angiography to radial or femoral access and to bivalirudin, with or without post-percutaneous coronary intervention infusion or unfractionated heparin (one-step inclusion). Patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome were randomly assigned (1:1) before coronary angiography to radial or femoral access and, only if deemed eligible to percutaneous coronary intervention after angiography (two-step inclusion), entered the antithrombin type and treatment duration programmes. Randomisation sequences were computer generated, blocked, and stratified by intended new or current use of P2Y12 inhibitor (clopidogrel vs ticagrelor or prasugrel), and acute coronary syndrome type (ST-elevation myocardial infarction, troponin-positive, or troponin-negative non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome). Bivalirudin was given as a bolus of 0·75 mg/kg, followed immediately by an infusion of 1·75 mg/kg per h until completion of percutaneous coronary intervention. Heparin was given at 70-100 units per kg in patients not receiving glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors, and at 50-70 units per kg in patients receiving glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors. Clinical follow-up was done at 30 days and 1 year. Co-primary outcomes for MATRIX access and MATRIX antithrombin type were major adverse cardiovascular events, defined as the composite of all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, or stroke up to 30 days; and net adverse clinical events, defined as the composite of non-coronary artery bypass graft-related major bleeding, or major adverse cardiovascular events up to 30 days. The primary outcome for MATRIX treatment duration was the composite of urgent target vessel revascularisation, definite stent thrombosis, or net adverse clinical events up to 30 days. Analyses were done according to the intention-to-treat principle. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01433627.. Between Oct 11, 2011, and Nov 7, 2014, we randomly assigned 8404 patients to receive radial (4197 patients) or femoral (4207 patients) access. Of these 8404 patients, 7213 were included in the MATRIX antithrombin type study and were randomly assigned to bivalirudin (3610 patients) or heparin (3603 patients). Patients assigned to bivalirudin were included in the MATRIX treatment duration study, and were randomly assigned to post-procedure infusion (1799 patients) or no post-procedure infusion (1811 patients). At 1 year, major adverse cardiovascular events did not differ between patients assigned to radial access compared with those assigned to femoral access (14·2% vs 15·7%; rate ratio 0·89, 95% CI 0·80-1·00; p=0·0526), but net adverse clinical events were fewer with radial than with femoral access (15·2% vs 17·2%; 0·87, 0·78-0·97; p=0·0128). Compared with heparin, bivalirudin was not associated with fewer major adverse cardiovascular (15·8% vs 16·8%; 0·94, 0·83-1·05; p=0·28) or net adverse clinical events (17·0% vs 18·4%; 0·91, 0·81-1·02; p=0·10). The composite of urgent target vessel revascularisation, stent thrombosis, or net adverse clinical events did not differ with or without post-procedure bivalirudin infusion (17·4% vs 17·4%; 0·99, 0·84-1·16; p=0·90).. In patients with acute coronary syndrome, radial access was associated with lower rates of net adverse clinical events compared with femoral access, but not major adverse cardiovascular events at 1 year. Bivalirudin with or without post-procedure infusion was not associated with lower rates of major adverse cardiovascular events or net adverse clinical events. Radial access should become the default approach in acute coronary syndrome patients undergoing invasive management.. Italian Society of Invasive Cardiology, The Medicines Company, Terumo, amd Canada Research Chairs Programme.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Aged; Anticoagulants; Antithrombins; Coronary Angiography; Female; Femoral Artery; Hemorrhage; Heparin; Hirudins; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Mortality; Myocardial Infarction; Peptide Fragments; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Perioperative Care; Platelet Glycoprotein GPIIb-IIIa Complex; Prosthesis Failure; Radial Artery; Recombinant Proteins; Stents; Stroke

In the HORIZONS-AMI trial, bivalirudin compared to unfractionated heparin (UFH) plus a glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor (GPI) improved net clinical outcomes in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) at the cost of an increased rate of acute stent thrombosis. We sought to examine whether these effects are dependent on time to treatment.. The interaction between anticoagulation regimen and symptom onset to first balloon inflation time (SBT) on the 30-day and three-year rates of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) was examined in 3,199 randomised patients according to SBT ≤3 hours versus >3 hours. Among patients with an SBT ≤3 hours, bivalirudin resulted in higher 30-day rates of MACE compared to UFH plus a GPI. Non-significant differences were observed in patients with an SBT >3 hours. Similar results were found for MACE at three years and stent thrombosis and reinfarction at 30 days and three years. By multivariable analysis, bivalirudin was an independent predictor of MACE at 30 days and three years in patients with an SBT ≤3 hours, but not in patients with SBT >3 hours.. Bivalirudin compared to UFH plus a GPI is associated with an increased rate of stent thrombosis and MACE in patients with short SBTs, but not in those with longer SBTs.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Antithrombins; Cause of Death; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Graft Occlusion, Vascular; Heparin; Hirudins; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Mortality; Myocardial Infarction; Myocardial Revascularization; Peptide Fragments; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Glycoprotein GPIIb-IIIa Complex; Postoperative Complications; Recombinant Proteins; Recurrence; ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction; Stroke; Thrombosis; Time-to-Treatment; Treatment Outcome

Conflicting evidence exists on the efficacy and safety of bivalirudin administered as part of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with an acute coronary syndrome.. We randomly assigned 7213 patients with an acute coronary syndrome for whom PCI was anticipated to receive either bivalirudin or unfractionated heparin. Patients in the bivalirudin group were subsequently randomly assigned to receive or not to receive a post-PCI bivalirudin infusion. Primary outcomes for the comparison between bivalirudin and heparin were the occurrence of major adverse cardiovascular events (a composite of death, myocardial infarction, or stroke) and net adverse clinical events (a composite of major bleeding or a major adverse cardiovascular event). The primary outcome for the comparison of a post-PCI bivalirudin infusion with no post-PCI infusion was a composite of urgent target-vessel revascularization, definite stent thrombosis, or net adverse clinical events.. The rate of major adverse cardiovascular events was not significantly lower with bivalirudin than with heparin (10.3% and 10.9%, respectively; relative risk, 0.94; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.81 to 1.09; P=0.44), nor was the rate of net adverse clinical events (11.2% and 12.4%, respectively; relative risk, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.78 to 1.03; P=0.12). Post-PCI bivalirudin infusion, as compared with no infusion, did not significantly decrease the rate of urgent target-vessel revascularization, definite stent thrombosis, or net adverse clinical events (11.0% and 11.9%, respectively; relative risk, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.74 to 1.11; P=0.34).. In patients with an acute coronary syndrome, the rates of major adverse cardiovascular events and net adverse clinical events were not significantly lower with bivalirudin than with unfractionated heparin. The rate of the composite of urgent target-vessel revascularization, definite stent thrombosis, or net adverse clinical events was not significantly lower with a post-PCI bivalirudin infusion than with no post-PCI infusion. (Funded by the Medicines Company and Terumo Medical; MATRIX ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01433627.).

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Aged; Anticoagulants; Combined Modality Therapy; Coronary Thrombosis; Female; Heparin; Hirudins; Humans; Incidence; Infusions, Intravenous; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Peptide Fragments; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Recombinant Proteins; Stents; Stroke

Transradial intervention (TRI) and bivalirudin infusion compared with transfemoral coronary intervention or unfractionated heparin plus glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors decrease bleeding complications in patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS). Although bleeding is thought to be associated with worse outcomes, it remains unclear whether TRI and bivalirudin both independently lower ischemic or combined ischemic and bleeding complications in ACS patients undergoing contemporary invasive management.. The primary objectives of the MATRIX program are to assess whether TRI or bivalirudin as compared, respectively, with transfemoral coronary intervention (MATRIX access site) or unfractionated heparin plus provisional glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors, (MATRIX antithrombin) decrease the 30-day incidence of an ischemic (ie, death, myocardial infarction or stroke) or an ischemic and bleeding composite end point across the whole spectrum of ACS patients, including clarifying the optimal duration of bivalirudin infusion after percutaneous coronary intervention (MATRIX treatment duration).. The MATRIX (NCT01433627) study, which incorporates 3 randomized comparisons in a nonfactorial manner and primary end points at 30 days and clinical follow-up ≤ 1 year, is a large-scale, multicenter study with blind event adjudication conducted at approximately 100 European sites. With 8,200 patients in the randomized comparison of access sites and 6,800 individuals participating in the randomized comparison of antithrombin regimens, this study will have ≥ 85% power for the primary end points.. The MATRIX program aims at conclusively ascertaining the role of TRI and bivalirudin infusion in the whole spectrum of ACS patients undergoing contemporary invasive management.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Aged; Antithrombins; Europe; Female; Femoral Artery; Heparin; Hirudins; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Peptide Fragments; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Platelet Glycoprotein GPIIb-IIIa Complex; Postoperative Hemorrhage; Radial Artery; Recombinant Proteins; Stroke; Survival Analysis; Treatment Outcome

This study sought to investigate the impact of chronic kidney disease (CKD) in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) with different antithrombotic strategies.. CKD is associated with increased risk of adverse ischemic and hemorrhagic events after primary PCI for STEMI.. HORIZONS-AMI (Harmonizing Outcomes With Revascularization and Stents in Acute Myocardial Infarction) trial was a multicenter, international, randomized trial comparing bivalirudin monotherapy or heparin plus a glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor (GPI) during primary PCI in STEMI. CKD, defined as creatinine clearance <60 ml/min, was present at baseline in 554 of 3,397 patients (16.3%). Patients were followed for 3 years. Net adverse cardiac event (NACE) was defined as the composite of death, reinfarction, ischemia-driven target vessel revascularization (TVR), stroke or non-coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG)-related major bleeding.. Patients with CKD compared with patients without had higher rates of NACE (41.4% vs. 23.8%, p < 0.0001), death (18.7% vs. 4.4%, p < 0.0001), and major bleeding (19.3% vs. 6.7%, p < 0.0001). Multivariable analysis identified baseline creatinine as an independent predictor of death at 3 years (hazard ratio: 1.51, 95% confidence interval: 1.21 to 1.87, p < 0.001). Patients with CKD randomized to bivalirudin monotherapy versus heparin plus GPI had no significant difference in major bleeding (19.0% vs. 19.6%, p = 0.72) or death (19.0% vs. 18.4%, p = 0.88) at 3 years. In patients with CKD, there was no difference in the rates of TVR in bare-metal stents (BMS) versus drug-eluting stents (DES) at 3 years (14.1% vs. 15.1%, p = 0.8).. STEMI patients with CKD have significantly higher rates of death and major bleeding compared with those without CKD. In patients with CKD, there appears to be no benefit of bivalirudin compared with heparin + GPI, or DES versus BMS during primary PCI in improving clinical outcomes.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary; Anticoagulants; Chi-Square Distribution; Chronic Disease; Drug-Eluting Stents; Europe; Female; Fibrinolytic Agents; Hemorrhage; Heparin; Hirudins; Humans; Israel; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Kidney Diseases; Male; Metals; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Peptide Fragments; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Platelet Glycoprotein GPIIb-IIIa Complex; Proportional Hazards Models; Prospective Studies; Prosthesis Design; Recombinant Proteins; Recurrence; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Stents; Stroke; Thrombosis; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; United States

General recommendations indicate that, during a carotid artery stenting (CAS), sufficient unfractionated heparin (UFH) has to be given to maintain the activated clotting time between 250 to 300 seconds. Bivalirudin use is able to reduce postprocedural bleedings in percutaneous interventions when compared with UFH. The study purpose was to evaluate, in a randomized study, the safety and efficacy of bivalirudin versus heparin during CAS, using proximal endovascular occlusion (PEO) as a distal protection device.. From January 2006 to December 2009, 220 patients undergoing CAS using PEO have been randomly assigned to one of the study arms (control arm: 100 UI/kg UFH or bivalirudin arm: 0.75 mg/kg intravenous bolus and intraprocedural infusion at 1.75 mg/kg/h).. Procedural success was achieved in all the patients. No episodes of intraprocedural thrombosis occurred. One major stroke occurred in the bivalirudin arm, and two minor strokes occurred, one in each group. A significant difference in the incidence of postprocedural bleedings was observed between the study groups; bivalirudin use was associated with reduced number of bleedings according to Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction criteria.. The use of bivalirudin should be considered a safe and effective anticoagulation regimen during CAS, using PEO as a distal protection device. Bivalirudin use is associated with a reduced incidence of bleedings.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Balloon Occlusion; Blood Loss, Surgical; Carotid Artery, Internal; Carotid Stenosis; Endovascular Procedures; Female; Heparin; Hirudins; Humans; Male; Peptide Fragments; Recombinant Proteins; Stents; Stroke; Thrombosis; Whole Blood Coagulation Time

Treatment with the direct thrombin inhibitor bivalirudin, as compared with heparin plus glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors, results in similar suppression of ischemia while reducing hemorrhagic complications in patients with stable angina and non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes who are undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The safety and efficacy of bivalirudin in high-risk patients are unknown.. We randomly assigned 3602 patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction who presented within 12 hours after the onset of symptoms and who were undergoing primary PCI to treatment with heparin plus a glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor or to treatment with bivalirudin alone. The two primary end points of the study were major bleeding and combined adverse clinical events, defined as the combination of major bleeding or major adverse cardiovascular events, including death, reinfarction, target-vessel revascularization for ischemia, and stroke (hereinafter referred to as net adverse clinical events) within 30 days.. Anticoagulation with bivalirudin alone, as compared with heparin plus glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors, resulted in a reduced 30-day rate of net adverse clinical events (9.2% vs. 12.1%; relative risk, 0.76; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.63 to 0.92; P=0.005), owing to a lower rate of major bleeding (4.9% vs. 8.3%; relative risk, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.46 to 0.77; P<0.001). There was an increased risk of acute stent thrombosis within 24 hours in the bivalirudin group, but no significant increase was present by 30 days. Treatment with bivalirudin alone, as compared with heparin plus glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors, resulted in significantly lower 30-day rates of death from cardiac causes (1.8% vs. 2.9%; relative risk, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.40 to 0.95; P=0.03) and death from all causes (2.1% vs. 3.1%; relative risk, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.44 to 1.00; P=0.047).. In patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction who are undergoing primary PCI, anticoagulation with bivalirudin alone, as compared with heparin plus glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors, results in significantly reduced 30-day rates of major bleeding and net adverse clinical events. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00433966 [ClinicalTrials.gov].).

Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary; Anticoagulants; Antithrombins; Combined Modality Therapy; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Hemorrhage; Heparin; Hirudins; Humans; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Peptide Fragments; Platelet Glycoprotein GPIIb-IIIa Complex; Recombinant Proteins; Recurrence; Stents; Stroke; Thrombosis

To assess the effectiveness and safety of bivalirudin compared with heparin monotherapy in elderly patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).. Bivalirudin is recommended for periprocedural use in patients undergoing PCI who are of high bleeding risk. However, its safe and efficacious use in elderly patients, a typical high bleeding risk cohort, in real world practice is yet to be reported.. In this single center, real-world observational study, 4736 consecutive elderly patients who underwent PCI were enrolled. Of these, 1240 were treated with bivalirudin and 3496 with heparin according to the periprocedural anticoagulation strategies of PCI. The primary outcome was 12-month net adverse clinical events (NACE) defined as a composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction, stroke, revascularization, or any bleeding. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to balance baseline characteristics between groups.. After PSM, bivalirudin was found to be associated with lower rates of NACE (19.1% vs. 24.7%, p = 0.002), cardiac death (2.7% vs. 4.3%, p = 0.038), and any bleeding (10.0% vs. 12.9%, p = 0.023) compared to heparin monotherapy. No differences were found in the incidences of myocardial infarction, stroke, revascularization, stent thrombosis (0.1% vs. 0.1%, p = 1.000), and major bleedings (0.5% vs. 0.5%, p = 1.000) between the two patient groups.. In this real-world observational study, periprocedural use of bivalirudin in elderly patients who underwent PCI was associated with less cardiac death and any bleeding compared to heparin monotherapy, without increased risk of stent thrombosis.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Coronary Artery Disease; Death; Hemorrhage; Heparin; Hirudins; Humans; Myocardial Infarction; Peptide Fragments; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Recombinant Proteins; Stroke; Thrombosis; Treatment Outcome

Acute ischemic stroke is a severe condition that a vessel supplying blood to the brain is abruptly blocked mostly due to cerebral thrombosis and embolism. There is a dearth of the effective prevention and early intervention strategies. NOD-like receptor family pyrin domain containing 3 (NLRP3) inflammasome-mediated neuroinflammation plays a crucial role in the pathophysiology of ischemic stroke. Hirudin is a secretion from the salivary glands of the leech Hirudo medicinalis and has a role in regulating inflammation. In this study, hirudin with a dose of 10-40 mg/kg was given to middle cerebral artery occlusion/reperfusion mice. Hirudin markedly constrained cerebral infarct area in a dose-dependent manner, and significantly improved locomotor disability at 40 mg/kg dose. Similar to MCC950, a selective NLRP3 inflammasome inhibitor, hirudin inhibited M1 polarization and promoted M2 polarization. It also strikingly suppressed the ischemia-induced overexpression of NLRP3 and its downstream components, caspase-1, apoptosis-associated speck-like protein (ASC), and interleukin-1β (IL-1β). Hirudin and MCC950 equivalently protected viability and death of BV-2 microglia cells against oxygen-glucose deprivation/reperfusion (OGD/R), an in vitro cell model of brain ischemia. Both agents had similar effects in normalizing the OGD/R-evoked aberrant microglial profiles and NLRP3 pathway dysregulation as observed in the mice. These results demonstrated anti-ischemic effects of hirudin and its association with the inhibition of microglial NLRP3 inflammasome-mediated neuroinflammation. Hirudin is a promising agent for the early intervention of acute ischemic stroke.

Topics: Animals; Brain Ischemia; Hirudins; Inflammasomes; Ischemic Stroke; Mice; Microglia; Neuroinflammatory Diseases; NLR Family, Pyrin Domain-Containing 3 Protein; Stroke

There is a paucity of data regarding the use of direct thrombin inhibitors such as bivalirudin for children on extracorporeal life support (ECLS). We sought to compare the outcomes of children on ECLS anticoagulated with bivalirudin versus heparin. Patients transitioned from heparin to bivalirudin were treated as a separate group. A single-institution, retrospective review of all consecutive children (neonate to 18 years) placed on ECLS in the cardiac or pediatric intensive care units was performed (June 2018-December 2019). Data collected included demographics, anticoagulation strategy, number of circuit interventions, blood product use on ECLS, survival to decannulation, and survival to discharge. Fifty-four children were placed on ECLS for a total of 56 runs. Demographics and venovenous versus venoarterial ECLS were similar. The bivalirudin group had longer median duration of support compared to the heparin group--11.0 days [IQR 6.2, 23.1] versus 3.3 days [2.1, 6.2], P < .001. Patients switched from heparin to bivalirudin had a similar duration of support (10.3 days [8.3, 18.3]) as those on bilvalirudin alone. However, there was no difference in red blood cell, fresh frozen plasma, or platelet transfusions. There was no difference in the number of circuit interventions, survival to decannulation or discharge. The freedom to first circuit intervention was longer with bivalirudin compared to heparin. Our data suggest that even with longer pediatric ECLS runs on bivalirudin, there were no differences in the outcomes between the heparin and bivalirudin groups, with longer freedom from first circuit intervention with bivalirudin. While this is the largest reported series comparing children on ECLS anticoagulated with heparin versus bivalirudin, larger studies are needed to determine the optimal anticoagulation strategy for this diverse and complicated group of children.

Topics: Adolescent; Anticoagulants; Blood Coagulation; Child; Child, Preschool; Critical Illness; Drug Substitution; Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation; Female; Hemorrhage; Heparin; Hirudins; Hospitals, High-Volume; Humans; Infant; Intensive Care Units, Pediatric; Male; Peptide Fragments; Recombinant Proteins; Retrospective Studies; Stroke; Thrombosis

Thrombotic and bleeding complications have historically been major causes of morbidity and mortality in pediatric ventricular assist device (VAD) support. Standard anticoagulation with unfractionated heparin is fraught with problems related to its heterogeneous biochemical composition and unpredictable pharmacokinetics. We sought to describe the utilization and outcomes in children with paracorporeal VAD support who are treated with direct thrombin inhibitors (DTIs) antithrombosis therapy. Retrospective multicenter review of all pediatric patients (aged <19 years) treated with a DTI (bivalirudin or argatroban) on paracorporeal VAD support, examining bleeding and thrombotic adverse events. From May 2012 to 2018, 43 children (21 females) at 10 centers in North America, median age 9.5 months (0.1-215 months) weighing 8.6 kg (2.8-150 kg), were implanted with paracorporeal VADs and treated with a DTI. Diagnoses included cardiomyopathy 40% (n = 17), congenital heart disease 37% (n = 16; single ventricle n = 5), graft vasculopathy 9% (n = 4), and other 14% (n = 6). First device implanted included Berlin Heart EXCOR 49% (n = 21), paracorporeal continuous flow device 44% (n = 19), and combination of devices in 7% (n = 3). Adverse events on DTI therapy included; major bleeding in 16% (n = 7) (2.6 events per 1,000 patient days of support on DTI), and stroke 12% (n = 5) (1.7 events per 1,000 patient days of support on DTI). Overall survival to transplantation (n = 30) or explantation (n = 8) was 88%. This is the largest multicenter experience of DTI use for anticoagulation therapy in pediatric VAD support. Outcomes are encouraging with lower major bleeding and stroke event rate than that reported in literature using other anticoagulation agents in pediatric VAD support.

Topics: Adolescent; Antithrombins; Arginine; Child; Child, Preschool; Female; Heart-Assist Devices; Hemorrhage; Hirudins; Humans; Infant; Male; North America; Peptide Fragments; Pipecolic Acids; Recombinant Proteins; Retrospective Studies; Stroke; Sulfonamides; Thrombosis; Treatment Outcome

The aim of this study was to compare bivalirudin with heparin as anticoagulant agents in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction treated with radial primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).. Recent studies in which PCI was performed predominantly via radial access did not show bivalirudin to be superior to heparin.. Outcomes were compared in patients with STEMI included in the National Cardiovascular Data Registry CathPCI database from 2009 to 2015 who underwent primary PCI via radial access and who were anticoagulated with bivalirudin or heparin.. The sample included 67,368 patients, of whom 29,660 received bivalirudin and 37,708 received heparin. The 2 groups of patients did not differ significantly in their mean age or percentage of men. The unadjusted comparison showed no significant difference in the rate of the composite endpoint of death, myocardial infarction, or stroke (4.6% vs. 4.7%; p = 0.47) and a significantly higher rate of acute stent thrombosis (1.00% vs. 0.60%; p < 0.001) with bivalirudin compared with heparin. After adjusting for multiple variables, including a propensity score reflecting the probability of receiving bivalirudin, the odds ratio of the composite endpoint of death, myocardial infarction, or stroke for bivalirudin versus heparin was 0.95 (95% confidence interval: 0.87 to 1.05; p = 0.152), and the odds ratio for acute stent thrombosis was 2.11 (95% confidence interval: 1.73 to 2.57) for bivalirudin versus heparin. Major bleeding rates were not significantly different.. In patients undergoing primary PCI via transradial access anticoagulated with bivalirudin or heparin, there was no difference in the composite endpoint of death, myocardial infarction, or stroke.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Chi-Square Distribution; Coronary Thrombosis; Female; Hemorrhage; Heparin; Hirudins; Hospital Mortality; Humans; Logistic Models; Male; Middle Aged; Multivariate Analysis; Myocardial Infarction; Odds Ratio; Peptide Fragments; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Propensity Score; Radial Artery; Recombinant Proteins; Registries; Retrospective Studies; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction; Stroke; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; United States

Women comprise almost 50% of patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) and previous studies have indicated higher rates of procedural complications and bleeding in women compared to men. It is unknown whether men and women demonstrate a differential response to bivalirudin versus unfractionated heparin (UFH) in TAVR. We sought to evaluate outcomes by sex and type of anticoagulant from the Bivalirudin Versus Heparin Anticoagulation in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement (BRAVO-3) trial of transfemoral TAVR.. BRAVO-3 was a randomized multicenter trial comparing transfemoral TAVR with bivalirudin versus UFH (31 centers, n = 802). The primary endpoint was 48 h major bleeding defined as Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) type ≥3b. Major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) were a composite of 30-day death, myocardial infarction, or stroke. Net adverse cardiovascular events (NACE) were a composite of BARC ≥3b bleeding or 30-day MACE. We examined the outcomes in men and women.. The total cohort included 49% women (n = 391, 195 received bivalirudin and 196 UFH) and 51% men (n = 411, 209 received bivalirudin and 202 UFH). Women were older than men with fewer comorbidities including coronary artery disease, atrial fibrillation, diabetes but similar EuroSCORE I. Women received smaller sheath and device sizes compared with men without differences in the use of vascular closure devices. At 48-hr post-TAVR there was no difference in bleeding or vascular complications in women compared to men. The use of bivalirudin did not result in significantly lower bleeding at 48 hr or 30-days compared to UFH.. There was no difference in early outcomes with bivalirudin versus UFH in men or women undergoing contemporary TAVR. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Antithrombins; Aortic Valve; Aortic Valve Stenosis; Cardiac Catheterization; Europe; Female; Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation; Hemorrhage; Heparin; Hirudins; Humans; Male; Multicenter Studies as Topic; Myocardial Infarction; North America; Peptide Fragments; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Recombinant Proteins; Retrospective Studies; Risk Factors; Sex Factors; Stroke; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

To observe the efficacy and safety of bivalirudin use in Chinese patients with coronary heart disease (CHD) during the peri-percutaneous coronary intervention(PCI) period.. A total of 3 271 patients who underwent PCI and received periprocedural bivalirudin treatment between July 2013 and October 2015 from 88 centers of China were involved in this study. The primary outcome was 30-day net adverse clinical events (NACE a composite of major adverse cardiac or cerebral events (MACE, all-cause death, reinfarction, urgent target vessel revascularization, or stroke) or bleeding), the secondary outcome was stent thrombosis at 30 days.. The mean age of enrolled patients was (65.12±12.44) years old, 27.4%(889/3 244) of them were female. Percent of stable coronary disease (SCD), non-ST segment elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS) and ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) was 5.0%(162/3 248), 44.6%(1 450/3 248) and 50.4%(1 636/3 248) respectively. Radial access was performed in 89.5% (2 879/3 271) patients, and 9.7% (316/3 271) and 34.1% (1 115/3 271) patients also received ticagrelor and tirofiban medication. 69.3% (2 266/3 271) patients received post-procedural bivalirudin infusion, in which 46.3% (1 050/2 266) was treated at PCI-does, with a median duration of 2.5(1.0, 4.0) h. During the 30-day follow-up, NACE occurred in 3.45% (103/2 988) patients, the incidence of MACE, death was 2.17% (65/2 994) and 1.03% (31/3 017), respectively and bleeding events were recorded in 1.37% (41/2 996) patients. Four cases (0.13%) of stent thrombosis (3 acute stent thrombosis) were recorded.. Peri-PCI Bivalirudin use is safe and related with low bleeding risk in Chinese CHD patients.

Topics: Aged; China; Coronary Disease; Female; Hemorrhage; Heparin; Hirudins; Humans; Male; Peptide Fragments; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Recombinant Proteins; Retrospective Studies; Stroke; Tirofiban; Tyrosine

Topics: Anticoagulants; Antithrombins; Coronary Angiography; Drug Therapy, Combination; Hemorrhage; Heparin; Hirudins; Hospital Mortality; Humans; Myocardial Infarction; Peptide Fragments; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Recombinant Proteins; Recurrence; Stroke; Treatment Outcome

We sought to assess if bivalirudin use during balloon aortic valvuloplasty (BAV) would affect clinical outcomes compared with heparin.. We compared the outcomes of consecutive patients who underwent elective or urgent BAV with intraprocedural use of bivalirudin or heparin at two high-volume centres. All in-hospital events post BAV were adjudicated by an independent, blinded clinical events committee. Of 427 patients, 223 patients (52.2%) received bivalirudin and 204 (47.8%) received heparin. Compared with patients who received heparin, patients who received bivalirudin had significantly less major bleeding (4.9% vs. 13.2%, p=0.003). Net adverse clinical events (NACE, major bleeding or major adverse cardiovascular events [MACE]) were also reduced (11.2% vs. 20.1%, p=0.01). There was no significant difference in the rates of MACE (mortality, myocardial infarction or stroke, 6.7% vs. 11.3%, p=0.1), or vascular complications (major, 2.7% vs. 2.0%; minor, 4.5% vs. 4.9%; p=0.83). After multivariate analysis controlling for vascular preclosure, the use of bivalirudin remained independently associated with reduced major bleeding (OR 0.37; 95% CI: 0.16 to 0.84; p=0.02) while the association was attenuated in propensity-adjusted analysis (OR 0.44, 95% CI: 0.18 to 1.07, p=0.08).. In this registry of patients with severe aortic stenosis, bivalirudin as compared to heparin resulted in improved in-hospital outcomes post BAV in terms of reduced major bleeding, similar MACE and reduced NACE. If verified in a randomised study and extended to the transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) population, these results might indicate a potential benefit for patients undergoing such procedures.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Aortic Valve Stenosis; Balloon Valvuloplasty; Female; Florida; Hemorrhage; Heparin; Hirudins; Hospitals, High-Volume; Humans; Logistic Models; Male; Multivariate Analysis; Myocardial Infarction; New York City; Odds Ratio; Peptide Fragments; Propensity Score; Recombinant Proteins; Registries; Retrospective Studies; Risk Factors; Severity of Illness Index; Stroke; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

Little is known about the use of bivalirudin in "real life". In the context of contemporary antiplatelet treatment, we aimed to assess bivalirudin treatment patterns and short-term (one-month) outcome.. Greek Antiplatelet Registry (GRAPE) is a prospective, observational, multicenter cohort study of consecutive, moderate-to-high-risk acute coronary syndrome patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). We assessed bivalirudin treatment patterns and predictive factors for its use. Combined in-hospital and one-month major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE, including death, myocardial infarction, urgent revascularization, and stroke), and bleeding events according to Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) criteria were analyzed after propensity matching.. Of 2047 registered patients, 480 (23.4%) were treated with bivalirudin. Multivariate analysis (C statistic 0.77, 0.75-0.80 95% CIs, P < 0.001) revealed as factors favoring bivalirudin use primary PCI, radial arterial access, presentation with positive biomarkers and use of novel P2Y12 inhibitor, whereas IIb/IIIa inhibitor administration did not. Regional trends also affected bivalirudin's choice. In 370 propensity-matched pairs of patients who received or not bivalirudin, MACE, BARC type 1, 2 and 3 did not differ between groups: 4.1%, 21.9%, 3.2%, 3.5% and 5.1%, 18.9%, 2.7%, 4.3%, respectively, P = nonsignificant for all.. In a "real life", contemporary antiplatelet treatment registry, clinical, laboratory and logistic factors affect bivalirudin's choice, while there are no differences in one-month outcome between bivalirudin-treated and non-bivalirudin-treated patients.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Aged; Antithrombins; Female; Greece; Hemorrhage; Hirudins; Hospital Mortality; Humans; Logistic Models; Male; Middle Aged; Multivariate Analysis; Myocardial Infarction; Patient Selection; Peptide Fragments; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Propensity Score; Prospective Studies; Recombinant Proteins; Recurrence; Registries; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Stroke; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

The prospective EUROVISION Registry was designed to capture patterns of use and short term outcomes in consecutive patients undergoing PCI with bivalirudin (BIV) in European centres.. A total of 2018 consecutive BIV-treated patients were included from 58 sites in 5 countries (Germany, Italy, France, Austria, United Kingdom). In-hospital and 30-day outcomes were prospectively collected and included: death, myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, urgent revascularization (URV), major and minor bleeding, stent thrombosis (ST) and thrombocytopenia (TCP).. In this all-comer population, indication for PCI included STEMI (34%), NSTEMI (25%), unstable angina (16%) and stable angina (26%). Diabetes was present in 24% of patients and 30% of cases were performed via radial access. Preloading with a P2Y12 inhibitor was frequent (74%) while procedural glycoprotein inhibitor (GPI) use was low at 4.2%. Almost half (45%) of patients had received at least one additional anticoagulant prior to receiving BIV for PCI. The overall 30-day mortality was 1.0%, with low rates of MI (1.1%), URV (0.8%), ST (0.3%) and stroke (0.2%). The rate of ACUITY major bleeding was 1.6% and no TCP was reported. Dosing variations representing possible under- or over-dosing of BIV were frequent at 35%.. In this prospective registry of consecutive patients intended for PCI, use of BIV was associated with low rates of ischemic complications and excellent safety.

Topics: Aged; Angina, Stable; Angina, Unstable; Anticoagulants; Antithrombins; Coronary Thrombosis; Europe; Female; Hemorrhage; Hirudins; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Outcome Assessment, Health Care; Peptide Fragments; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Recombinant Proteins; Registries; Risk Factors; Stents; Stroke

The direct thrombin inhibitor, bivalirudin, is associated with similar efficacy and superior safety in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. However, the role of direct thrombin inhibitors in carotid artery stenting is not well defined. The objective of this study was to compare the safety and effectiveness of bivalirudin and unfractionated heparin (UFH) for carotid artery stenting. We hypothesized that bivalirudin would be associated with less in-hospital postprocedure bleeding than UFH but similar rates of in-hospital and 30-day ischemic outcomes.. We compared the incidence of in-hospital hemorrhagic and in-hospital/30-day ischemic outcomes among patients in the CARE Registry who underwent carotid artery stenting between May 2005 and March 2012 using bivalirudin or UFH. Propensity score matching was used to obtain a balanced cohort of 3555 patients in each treatment group. Patients treated with bivalirudin had a significantly lower incidence of bleeding or hematoma requiring red blood cell transfusions (0.9% versus 1.5%; odds ratio, 0.57 [0.36-0.89]; P=0.01) when compared with UFH-treated patients. The incidence of in-hospital and 30-day ischemic outcomes, including death, myocardial infarction, stroke, transient ischemic attack, and the composite outcome, death/myocardial infarction/stroke, did not differ significantly between groups.. Bivalirudin was associated with lower rates of hemorrhagic outcomes compared with UFH during the index hospitalization for carotid artery stenting. In-hospital and 30-day ischemic events were similar between the 2 groups. Randomized comparisons of these agents are needed to confirm these findings.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Angioplasty; Anticoagulants; Antithrombins; Brain Ischemia; Carotid Stenosis; Female; Hemorrhage; Heparin; Hirudins; Humans; Incidence; Male; Myocardial Infarction; Peptide Fragments; Recombinant Proteins; Registries; Risk Factors; Stents; Stroke

Data from randomized trials has demonstrated the superiority of bivalirudin to glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors plus heparin in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention. Real-world performance of bivalirudin in primary percutaneous coronary intervention and the benefit of bivalirudin over heparin remain unknown in an era of routine dual antiplatelet therapy.. From July 2004 to December 2010, 2317 consecutive patients were indexed in the University of Ottawa Heart Institute ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction registry. During this period 748 patients received bivalirudin, 699 patients received glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors, and 676 patients received unfractionated heparin alone. The primary outcome was the rate of noncoronary artery bypass graft related thrombolysis in myocardial infarction major bleeding. Bivalirudin significantly reduced the primary outcome compared with heparin plus glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors (2.7% versus 7.3%, adjusted OR 2.96, 95% CI: 1.61-5.45, P<0.001) and the composite end point of death, stroke, reinfarction and major bleed (OR 1.66, 95% CI: 1.12-2.45, P=0.01). Compared with heparin alone, a reduction in major bleeds (OR 1.21, 95% CI: 0.60-2.44, P=0.59) or the composite end point (1.05, 95% CI: 0.68-1.63, P=0.83) with bivalirudin could not be demonstrated. Notably, major bleeding was associated with a 5-fold increase in the risk of mortality both in-hospital (3.5% versus 20.6%) and out to 180 days (5.6% versus 25.8%).. Bivalirudin use compared with glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors plus heparin as an antithrombotic strategy in primary percutaneous coronary intervention results in less major bleeding in contemporary practice. A benefit of bivalirudin over heparin could not be established with this registry and requires additional investigations to either confirm or refute.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Antithrombins; Chi-Square Distribution; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Fibrinolytic Agents; Hemorrhage; Heparin; Hirudins; Hospital Mortality; Hospitals, University; Humans; Logistic Models; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Odds Ratio; Ontario; Peptide Fragments; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Platelet Glycoprotein GPIIb-IIIa Complex; Propensity Score; Recombinant Proteins; Recurrence; Registries; Risk Factors; Stroke; Thrombosis; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary; Anticoagulants; Coronary Artery Disease; Diabetes Complications; Hemorrhage; Heparin; Hirudins; Humans; Myocardial Infarction; Peptide Fragments; Platelet Glycoprotein GPIIb-IIIa Complex; Recombinant Proteins; Risk Factors; Stroke

This study sought to evaluate the short- and long-term efficacy and safety of bivalirudin in diabetic patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in contemporary clinical practice.. Early trials of platelet glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa inhibitors have suggested a survival benefit in diabetic patients undergoing PCI. More recently, randomized trials have demonstrated that diabetic patients have similar protection from acute ischemic events, while lowering the risk of bleeding complications, when treated with bivalirudin monotherapy versus heparin plus GP IIb/IIIa blockade. However, the impact of bivalirudin use on long-term outcomes in diabetic patients undergoing PCI remains unclear.. Using the Cornell Angioplasty Registry, we studied 786 consecutive diabetic patients undergoing urgent or elective PCI with a mean clinical follow up of 24.6 +/- 7.8 months. Of these, 428 patients (54.5%) received bivalirudin monotherapy and 358 patients (45.5%) received unfractionated heparin (UFH) plus GP IIb/IIIa inhibition. The incidence of in-hospital death (0% vs. 0.3%; p = 0.46), post-procedural myocardial infarction (MI) (4.7% vs. 7.0%; p = 0.169), and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) (death, MI, stroke or urgent revascularization) (4.9% vs. 7.3%; p = 0.176) was similar in the two groups, with less minor bleeding (9.6% vs. 14.5%; p = 0.035) in the bivalirudin vs. UFH plus GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor group, respectively. By the end of follow up, there were 38 (8.9%) deaths in the bivalirudin vs. 19 (5.3%) deaths in the GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor arm (hazard ratio [HR] 1.8, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.0-3.1; p = 0.04). However, after a propensity score-adjusted multivariate Cox regression analysis, there was no longer a significant difference in long-term mortality between the two groups (HR 1.63; chi(2) = 2.61; 95% CI 0.90-2.94; p = 0.106).. These findings indicate that in diabetic patients, bivalirudin monotherapy results in similar protection from acute ischemic events and long-term mortality, while lowering the risk of minor bleeding in comparison to UFH plus GP IIb/IIIa inhibition.

Topics: Aged; Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary; Anticoagulants; Coronary Artery Disease; Diabetes Complications; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Heparin; Hirudins; Humans; Infusions, Intravenous; Logistic Models; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Peptide Fragments; Platelet Glycoprotein GPIIb-IIIa Complex; Recombinant Proteins; Registries; Retrospective Studies; Stroke; Treatment Outcome

This study sought to investigate if the efficacy of bivalirudin monotherapy is similar to heparin plus GP IIb/IIIa inhibition in patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) treated with clopidogrel following diagnostic angiography.. Prior trials have demonstrated that peri-procedural bivalirudin therapy confers similar efficacy as heparin plus GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors, while lowering the risk of bleeding complications in ACS patients undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI). However, the incidence of adverse ischemic events post-PCI appeared to be higher in patients receiving bivalirudin without adequate pretreatment with clopidogrel.. Using the 2004/2005 Cornell Angioplasty Registry, we evaluated 980 consecutive patients undergoing urgent PCI for UA/NSTEMI who were treated with either bivalirudin or UFH plus GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor. We excluded patients who were on chronic clopidogrel therapy or received clopidogrel pretreatment prior to angiography. All patients received a clopidogrel load (≥300-mg dose) immediately before or after the PCI. Long-term all-cause mortality was obtained for 100% of patients, with a mean follow-up of 24.6 ± 7.7 months.. Of the 980 study patients, 461 (47.0%) were treated with bivalirudin and 519 (53.0%) patients received UFH plus GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor. DES were used in 88% of PCI; 45% of patients presented with NSTEMI. The incidence of in-hospital death (0.4% vs. 0.2%, P = 0.604), post-procedural MI (6.9% vs. 5.4%, P = 0.351), and MACE including death, stroke, emergent CABG/PCI, and MI (7.6% vs. 5.8%, P = 0.304) were similar in patients treated with bivalirudin versus UFH plus GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors, respectively. The incidence of in-hospital stent thrombosis was similar (0.7% vs. 0%, P = 0.104), while major (0.9% vs. 2.9%, P = 0.034) and minor bleeding (10.4% vs. 18.9%, P < 0.001) was reduced in the bivalirudin-treated group. By two-years of follow-up, after propensity-score adjusted multivariate Cox regression analysis, there was no significant difference in long-term mortality between the two groups (HR 1.18; 95%CI 0.64-2.19, P = 0.598).. In patients presenting with ACS and receiving clopidogrel treatment after angiography (before or within 30 min of PCI), peri-procedural bivalirudin monotherapy suppresses acute and long-term adverse events to a similar extent as does UFH plus GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors, while significantly lowering the risk of bleeding complications.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary; Antithrombins; Chi-Square Distribution; Clopidogrel; Coronary Angiography; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Heart Diseases; Hemorrhage; Heparin; Hirudins; Hospital Mortality; Humans; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Logistic Models; Male; Middle Aged; New York City; Odds Ratio; Peptide Fragments; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Platelet Glycoprotein GPIIb-IIIa Complex; Propensity Score; Proportional Hazards Models; Recombinant Proteins; Registries; Retrospective Studies; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Stroke; Ticlopidine; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary; Antithrombins; Clopidogrel; Coronary Angiography; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Therapy, Combination; Heart Diseases; Hemorrhage; Heparin; Hirudins; Hospital Mortality; Humans; Peptide Fragments; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Platelet Glycoprotein GPIIb-IIIa Complex; Recombinant Proteins; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Stroke; Ticlopidine; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

Heparin is commonly used in the intensive care unit for preventing and treating thromboembolic disease. One of its more significant complications is heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT), an immune-mediated disorder which can provoke an extreme prothrombotic state. We describe an unusual presentation of HIT, where thrombocytopenia was absent.

Topics: Adult; Anticoagulants; Calcitonin; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Heparin; Hirudins; Humans; Intensive Care Units; Partial Thromboplastin Time; Platelet Count; Protein Precursors; Recombinant Proteins; Stroke; Thrombocytopenia; Thrombosis; Time Factors; Tomography, X-Ray Computed

The role of different anticoagulants in reducing in-hospital complications in patients undergoing closure of interatrial septal defects (IASD) is unknown. In this study, we review our own experience with IASD closure data to determine if in-hospital complications and ambulation time are influenced by the use of various anticoagulants.. Fifty-five consecutive patients with a history of unexplainable stroke or transient ischemic attacks (TIA), with the exception of the presence of an IASD, were included in this study. Multiple variables were collected including age, gender, history of smoking, hypertension, diabetes, hypercholesterolemia, ejection fraction, anticoagulants used pre- and postprocedure, anticoagulants used during the closure procedure, shunt grade across the IASD pre- and postprocedure, defect size, and right-sided filling pressures. Descriptive analysis was performed on all variables including complications frequency and ambulation time, and compared between bivalirudin and indirect thrombin inhibitors.. Of 55 consecutive patients included in this study, 22 patients received bivalirudin and 33 patients received unfractionated heparin (UFH) (n = 26) or enoxaparin (n = 7). The bivalirudin patients were older (60.1 vs 50.8 years; p = 0.028), with a higher incidence of interatrial septal aneurysm (75% vs. 40.7%; p = 0.037). In-hospital complications included 1 (5%) patient with a minor bleed (groin hematoma) in the bivalirudin group, and 3 patients with minor bleed (1 GI bleed, 1 groin hematoma, and 1 transient ischemia on electrocardiogram) in the non-bivalirudin group (9.1%). No patient had a major bleed that required a transfusion or prolonged hospital stay. Ambulation time was not significantly different between the two groups (7.7 +/- 5.9 hours for bivalirudin and 6.9 +/- 5.1 hours for other anticoagulants; p = NS).. We conclude that bivalirudin is safe during IASD closure, with a statistically nonsignificant trend toward fewer minor complications than UFH and enoxaparin. No major bleeding occurred in either group. This could be due to the fact that IASD closure is performed via venous access that generally carries a low bleeding complication rate and allows safe early ambulation, irrespective of the anticoagulant utilized and despite the use of 10 and 11 Fr sheaths. Given that major differences do not appear to exist in this exploratory study between the anticoagulants studied, patent foramen ovale closure is currently being performed in our laboratory with UFH.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Antithrombins; Cardiac Surgical Procedures; Enoxaparin; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Heart Septal Defects, Atrial; Hirudins; Humans; Incidence; Intraoperative Complications; Male; Middle Aged; Peptide Fragments; Recombinant Proteins; Retrospective Studies; Stroke; Treatment Outcome

Intra-arterial thrombolysis has been demonstrated to improve recanalization and outcomes among patients with acute ischemic stroke. However, thrombolytic agents have limited effectiveness and are associated with a significant risk of bleeding. Bivalirudin is a direct thrombin inhibitor that has been demonstrated in the cardiology literature to have a more favorable efficacy and bleeding profile than other antithrombotic medications. We report the use of bivalirudin during endovascular treatment of acute stroke, when hemorrhagic complications are not uncommon.. A 71-year-old woman with atrial fibrillation presented with right hemiparesis and aphasia and was found to have a National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score of 10. Computed tomographic scans revealed no evidence of intracranial hemorrhage, aneurysm, or ischemic stroke. Cerebral angiography revealed thromboembolic occlusion of the superior division of the left middle cerebral artery.. For anticoagulation, a loading dose of bivalirudin was intravenously administered before the interventional procedure, followed by continuous infusion. Attempts to remove the clot with an endovascular snare failed to induce recanalization of the vessel. Bivalirudin was then administered intra-arterially. Immediate postprocedural angiography demonstrated restoration of flow in the left middle cerebral artery. Repeat computed tomographic scans demonstrated no intracranial hemorrhage. The patient's hemiparesis and aphasia were nearly resolved and her National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score was 2 at the time of her discharge 5 days later.. To our knowledge, this is the first report of the use of bivalirudin for treatment of acute ischemic stroke. Bivalirudin may be a useful agent for intravenous anticoagulation and intra-arterial thrombolysis in this setting.

Topics: Acute Disease; Aged; Angioplasty; Anticoagulants; Brain Ischemia; Female; Hirudins; Humans; Infusions, Intra-Arterial; Peptide Fragments; Recombinant Proteins; Stroke